富勒時期美國最高法院案例列表

這是一個美國最高法院首席大法官梅爾維爾·富勒 (1888年10月8日 - 1910年7月4日)任職期間依時間順序排列的案例列表。

案件名｜引用｜簡介

基德訴皮爾遜案｜128｜Scope of the Commerce Clause

登特訴西維吉尼亞州案｜129｜醫生的州執照

Botiller v. Dominguez｜130｜validity of Spanish and Mexican land grants within the Mexican Cession

戴維斯訴比森案｜133｜United States federal courts have jurisdiction to hear charges related to polygamy even though it be part of a religious belief

漢斯訴路易斯安那州案｜134｜sovereign immunity of states, interpreting the Eleventh Amendment

芝加哥，密爾沃基和聖保羅鐵路訴明尼蘇達州案｜134｜州和鐵路費用

In re Neagle｜135｜authority of the U.S. Attorney General to appoint U.S. Marshals as bodyguards to Supreme Court Justices

LDS Church v. United States｜136｜upheld revocation of LDS Church charter and confiscation of church property

In re Ross｜140｜application of U.S. law to foreign sailors on U.S. flagged ships while in another country

Holy Trinity Church v. United States｜143｜與外國公民的合約

伊利諾伊中央鐵路訴伊利諾州案｜146｜鐵路用地之爭

尼克斯訴赫登案｜149｜在1883年關稅法案中番茄是蔬菜還是水果

士林格訴合眾國案｜155｜sovereign immunity forbids suit against the Federal government for patent infringement

United States v. E. C. Knight Co.｜156｜反托拉斯行動；糖業托拉斯案

斯帕夫訴美國案｜156｜jury instructions

科芬訴合眾國案｜156｜無罪推定

In re Debs｜158｜strikes and interstate commerce

波洛克訴農民貸款和信託公司案｜158｜income tax and tariffs

希爾頓訴蓋奧特案｜159｜doctrine of comity

羅森訴合眾國案｜161｜defendant's ability to inspect evidence at obscenity trial overcame objection that indictment was too vague

格爾訴康乃狄克州案｜161｜各州對其所擁有的野生動物具有管理其繁殖的權利

Talton v. Mayes｜163｜美國憲法規定的人權不適用於部落政府

普萊西訴弗格森案｜163｜隔離但平等

United States v. Ball｜163｜雙重處罰

United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association｜166｜鐵路

Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati, New Orleans and Texas Pacific Railway Co.｜167｜行政機構的權利

巴雷特訴合眾國案｜169｜South Carolina had not been subdivided into separate federal judicial districts

霍頓訴哈迪案｜169｜礦工工作時間

美國訴黃金德案｜169｜公民權和種族

霍克訴紐約州案｜170｜character and doctor’s licenses

威廉士訴密西西比州案｜170｜文化水平測試

布朗訴新澤西州案｜175｜use of a struck jury

Malony v. Adsit｜175｜trial judge must authenticate bill of exceptions

Cumming v. Richmond County Board of Education｜175｜公立學校中的隔離

The Paquete Habana｜175｜prize in admiralty law and customary international law

Marks v. Shoup｜181｜債券

海島案

DeLima v. Bidwell｜182｜波多黎各和菲律賓的地位

Goetze v. United States｜182

阿姆斯特朗訴合眾國案｜182

唐斯訴比德韋爾案｜182

Huus v. New York & Porto Rico S.S. Co.｜182

杜利訴合眾國案｜183

Fourteen Diamond Rings v. United States｜183

Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock｜187｜power of Congress to abrogate treaties with Native American tribes

Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Company｜188｜copyright protection of illustrations made for advertisements

Champion v. Ames｜188｜Congressional Commerce Clause regulation of lottery tickets

賈爾斯訴哈里斯案｜189｜選舉權，第十一憲法修正案

Hawaii v. Manikichi｜190｜海島案的一部分

德克薩斯州密蘇里，堪薩斯和德克薩斯鐵路公司訴克萊·梅案｜194｜14th Amendment permits law which penalizes railroads for allowing weeds to grow

Kepner v. United States｜195｜sometimes considered one of the Insular Cases

Dorr v. United States｜195｜sometimes considered one of the Insular Cases

Gonzales v. Williams｜192｜Puerto Ricans and illegal aliens

北方證券公司訴美國案｜193｜Antitrust, application of the Sherman Antitrust Act

拉斯穆森訴合眾國案｜197｜sometimes considered one of the Insular Cases

洛克納訴紐約州案｜198｜freedom of contract, substantive due process

哈里斯訴巴爾克案｜198｜quasi in rem jurisdiction

Chicago Board of Trade v. Christie Grain｜198｜upholding power of Chicago Board of Trade to regulate futures contracts

Hale v. Henkel｜201｜witness testimony in antitrust cases

西北國家人壽保險公司訴里格斯案｜203｜upheld power of states to regulate insurance contracts against Fourteenth Amendment challenge

United States v. Shipp｜203｜Only criminal trial in the court's history. Lynching.

Adair v. United States｜208｜"Yellow Dog contract"

Loewe v. Lawlor｜208｜謝爾曼反托拉斯法案應用於反對工會罷工

穆勒訴俄勒岡州案｜208｜保護性的勞工法案；對婦女的保護

White-Smith Music Publishing Company v. Apollo Company｜209｜manufacturers of player pianos need not pay royalties to copyright holders of music

Ex parte Young｜209｜exception to sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment

Ware & Leland v. Mobile County｜209｜contracts for the sales of cotton for future delivery that do not oblige interstate shipments are not subjects of interstate commerce, and are taxable by states

Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus｜210｜First-sale doctrine, copyright holder cannot control resale prices by use of licenses

Londoner v. City and County of Denver｜210｜role of due process in administrative rulemaking

Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.｜210｜專利和反托拉斯

Berea College v. Kentucky｜211｜state laws and segregation of educational facilities

唐寧訴新澤西州案｜211｜Fifth Amendment does not apply to state trials

Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. Mottley｜211｜federal question jurisdiction, the "well-pleaded complaint rule"

貝利訴阿拉巴馬州案｜211｜peonage laws and the Thirteenth Amendment

莫耶訴皮博迪案｜212｜暴亂時公民權

Welch v. Swasey｜214｜Massachusetts' statute restricting building heights is constitutional