沃倫時期美國最高法院案例列表

這是一個美國最高法院首席大法官厄爾·沃倫 (1953年10月5日 - 1969年6月23日)任職期間依時間順序排列的案例列表。這一時期的美國最高法院因沃倫法院而出名。

案件名｜引用｜簡介

Toolson v. New York Yankees｜346｜baseball antitrust exemption upheld

Miller Brothers Co. v. Maryland｜347｜use tax imposed by one state against merchant in another state violated Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment

布朗訴托皮卡教育局案｜347｜segregation, "separate ... inherently unequal"

埃爾南德斯訴德克薩斯州案｜347｜application of the Fourteenth Amendment to Mexican Americans

Bolling v. Sharpe｜347｜segregation in the District of Columbia

美國訴哈里斯｜347｜constitutionality of The Federal Regulation of Lobbying Act of 1946

Berman v. Parker｜348｜eminent domain, takings

美國訴紐約國際拳擊俱樂部｜348｜拳擊不可從反托拉斯法案獲得豁免

Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States｜348｜Federal government did not owe Indian tribe compensation for timber taken from tribal-occupied lands in Alaska under the 5th Amendment

Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.｜348｜definition of taxable income

Williamson v. Lee Optical Co.｜348｜Due Process Clause, economic liberties

格里芬訴伊利諾州案｜351｜access to court transcript for indigent appeals

Radovich v. National Football League｜352｜professional football covered by antitrust laws

Reid v. Covert｜354｜協議的權利

沃特金斯訴合眾國案｜354｜rights of a witness in refusing to answer questions before the House Un-American Activities Committee

耶茨訴合眾國案｜354｜演講自由，distinction between expression of opinion and advocacy of action

羅斯訴合眾國｜354｜淫穢

康利訴吉布森案｜355｜liberal pleading standards under Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

McGee v. International Life Insurance Co.｜355｜California did not violate the Due Process Clause when entering a binding judgment on a Texas corporation with "substantial connections" to California

蘭伯特訴加利福尼亞案｜355｜mens rea and ignorance of the law

One, Inc. v. Olesen｜355｜pro-homosexual writings and the Comstock laws

佩雷斯訴布勞內爾案｜356｜revocation of citizenship for voting in a foreign election

Trop v. Dulles｜356｜Eighth Amendment, loss of citizenship

謝爾曼訴合眾國案｜356｜Entrapment provisions apply to actions of government informers as well as agents

Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.｜356｜application of the Erie doctrine

Kent v. Dulles｜357｜right to travel, power of Secretary of State

Societe Internationale v. Rogers｜357｜appropriateness of involuntary dismissal of a case in which petitioner failed to produce records of a Swiss bank account

全國有色人種協進會訴阿拉巴馬州案｜357｜結社自由，成員列表的隱私權

Speiser v. Randall｜357｜忠誠宣誓

Cooper v. Aaron｜358｜enforcement of desegregation, "massive resistance"

卡馬拉諾訴合眾國案｜358｜business expenses incurred for the "promotion or defeat of legislation" are not tax deductible

Bartkus v. Illinois｜359｜"separate sovereigns" exception to double jeopardy; federal and state officials may cooperate in criminal investigations

弗蘭克訴馬里蘭州｜359｜warrantless administrative searches are permissible under the Fourth Amendment

Beacon Theatres v. Westover｜359｜right to civil jury trial under the Seventh Amendment, determination of legal & equitable issues

路易斯安那電力和照明公司訴蒂博市案｜360｜棄權規定

Barenblatt v. United States｜360｜upholding conviction for refusing to answer questions before the House Un-American Activities Committee against First Amendment challenge

史密斯訴加利福尼亞州案｜361｜sale of obscene books

貝茨訴小石城案｜361｜第一憲法修正案，compelled disclosure of membership lists

美國訴雷恩斯案｜362｜第五憲法修正案，民權法案

Federal Power Commission v. Tuscarora Indian Nation｜362｜eminent domain over Indian lands

弗洛拉訴合眾國案｜362｜Pay Income Tax Then Litigate, Internal Revenue Act

Dusky v. United States｜362｜standard for adjudicative competence

Commissioner v. Duberstein｜363｜definition of a 'gift' for taxation purposes

弗萊明訴內斯特案｜363｜no property right in Social Security benefits

博因頓訴維吉尼亞州案｜364｜種族隔離

門羅訴帕普案｜365｜municipalities cannot be held liable under the Civil Rights Act of 1871

Aro Mfg. Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.｜365｜doctrine of repair and reconstruction in United States patent law

Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority｜365｜state action

Gomillion v. Lightfoot｜364｜race-based electoral districting

詹姆斯訴合眾國案｜366｜assessment of income tax on embezzled funds

麥高恩訴馬里蘭州案｜366｜constitutionality of laws with religious origins but secular purposes

Braunfeld v. Brown｜366｜constitutionality of Sabbath laws requiring Sunday closure of stores

Gallagher v. Crown Kosher Super Market of Massachusetts, Inc.｜366｜Massachusetts blue laws upheld against challenge by Kosher grocery store

Jarecki v. G.D. Searle & Co.｜367｜using noscitur a sociis to interpret the Excess Profits Tax Act of 1950

Torcaso v. Watkins｜367｜oaths, religious test, First Amendment

Poe v. Ullman｜367｜ripeness to challenge statute banning contraceptives

馬普訴俄亥俄州案｜367｜search and seizure, exclusionary rule

Marcus v. Search Warrant｜367｜Procedural burden on state in seizure of obscene material

漢密爾頓訴阿拉巴馬州案｜368｜Absence of defendant's counsel at the time of his arraignment violated his rights under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

霍伊特訴佛羅里達州案｜368｜all-male jury in a woman's murder trial did not violate Fourteenth Amendment

Oyler v. Boles｜368｜habitual criminal sentencing and due process

Fong Foo v. United States｜369｜double jeopardy against federal courts

貝克訴卡爾案｜369｜重現分配

戈德布拉特訴斯特德案｜369｜due process, takings clause, safety regulations

Engel v. Vitale｜370｜school prayer

Manual Enterprises v. Day｜370｜magazine containing nude photographs of men not considered obscene

瓊斯訴坎寧翰案｜371｜state prison inmates have the right to petition for habeas corpus

Wong Sun v. United States｜371｜fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine in a narcotics case

Schlude v. Commissioner｜372｜what income must be included for income tax purposes when accrual method of accounting is used

愛德華茲訴南卡羅來納州案｜372｜First Amendment, protest marches at state capital

吉迪恩訴溫賴特案｜372｜right to counsel

道格拉斯訴加利福尼亞州案｜372｜F第十四憲法修正案; right of poor defendants to criminal court appeals

Gray v. Sanders｜372｜「one man, one vote」

Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Committee｜372｜requiring person divulge information contained in an organization's membership lists violates freedom of association under First Amendment

弗格森訴斯庫珀案｜372｜substantive due process, economic liberties

布雷迪訴馬里蘭州案｜373｜exculpatory evidence and due process

Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. Paul｜373｜Preemption, Dormant Commerce Clause

Silver v. New York Stock Exchange｜373｜duty of self-regulation imposed upon the New York Stock Exchange by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 did not exempt it from the antitrust laws

Ker v. California｜374｜incorporation of the Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable search & seizure against the states

Abington School District v. Schempp｜374｜constitutionality of mandatory bible reading in public schools

Sherbert v. Verner｜374｜strict scrutiny for religiously-based discrimination in unemployment compensation

England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners｜375｜refining procedures for Pullman abstention from deciding issues of state law

Wesberry v. Sanders｜376｜「one man, one vote」

Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.｜376｜preemption of state unfair competition laws which restrict sale of unpatented items

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.｜376｜preemption of state unfair competition laws which restrict sale of unpatented items, decided same day as Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.

紐約時報訴沙利文案｜376｜freedom of speech, libel

Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino｜376｜jurisdiction of federal courts over acts of foreign countries; act of state doctrine

Schneider v. Rusk｜377｜Naturalized U.S. citizens have the right to return to and reside in their native countries, and retain their U.S. citizenship, even if they never return to the United States

Massiah v. United States｜377｜Sixth Amendment prohibition on police speaking to suspect represented by counsel

Griffin v. County School Board of Prince Edward County｜377｜closing the local school and giving white students vouchers to attend schools outside of the county was unconstitutional under the equal protection clause

Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. Kuther｜377｜extension of doctrine of repair and reconstruction to enhancement of device's function

雷諾訴西姆斯案｜377｜「one man, one vote」 (state senates)

Malloy v. Hogan｜378｜Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination was applicable within state courts as well as federal courts

格里芬訴馬里蘭州案｜378｜segregation protests

Barr v. City of Columbia｜378｜due process and ex post facto law

羅賓遜訴佛羅里達州案｜378｜抗議隔離

Jacobellis v. Ohio｜378｜"I know obscenity when I see it." – Justice Potter Stewart

Quantity of Books v. Kansas｜378｜Seizure of allegedly obscene materials requires prior adversary hearing

Bell v. Maryland｜378｜抗議隔離

Bouie v. City of Columbia｜378｜due process and ex post facto law

United States v. Continental Can Co.｜378｜antitrust

Escobedo v. Illinois｜378｜right to remain silent

庫珀訴佩特｜378｜The court ruled for the first time that state prison inmates have the standing to sue in federal court to address their grievances under the Civil Rights Act of 1871.

Beck v. Ohio｜379｜probable cause and searches incident to a lawful arrest

McLaughlin v. Florida｜379｜striking down an anti-miscegenation law aimed at prevent cohabitation of interracial couples

Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States｜379｜interstate commerce, civil rights, public accommodations

Katzenbach v. McClung｜379｜civil rights and interstate commerce, decided same day as Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States

Stanford v. Texas｜379｜Fourth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment, Unconstitutionality of State issued general warrants

Cox v. Louisiana｜379｜First Amendment, "breach of the peace" statutes

Freedman v. Maryland｜380｜First Amendment, motion picture censorship

美國訴西格案｜380｜definition of religion for a military draft exemption

史懷恩訴阿拉巴馬州案｜380｜use of struck jury

漢納訴普盧默案｜380｜interpretation of the Erie doctrine, Civil Procedure

Dombrowski v. Pfister｜380｜federal injunction against state criminal trial for subversion

Harman v. Forssenius｜380｜Virginia's partial repeal of the poll tax violated 24th Amendment

格里芬訴加利福尼亞州案｜380｜prosecutor commenting on a defendant's refusal to testify violates the defendant's Fifth Amendment rights

One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. Pennsylvania｜380｜evidence that is obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment may not be relied on to sustain a civil forfeiture

格里斯沃爾德訴康乃狄克州案｜381｜privacy, birth control

Estes v. Texas｜381｜overturning Billy Sol Estes conviction on 14th Amendment due process grounds due to pretrial publicity

Lamont v. Postmaster General｜381｜Declared unconstitutional a Federal statute requiring that addressees of "Communist political propaganda" affirmatively indicate their request to receive such mailings

Albertson v. Subversive Activities Control Board｜382｜Communist Party of the United States of America members could not be required to register with the government under the Fifth Amendment

Graham v. John Deere Co.｜383｜nonobviousness as a condition of patentability

Baxstrom v. Herold｜383｜Prisoners committed to civil mental institutions have a right to a hearing to determine whether or not they are in fact mentally disordered.

Brown v. Louisiana｜383｜first amendment, right to protest

South Carolina v. Katzenbach｜383｜Voting Rights Act, Fifteenth Amendment

Memoirs v. Massachusetts｜383｜obscenity

Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections｜383｜poll taxes are unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause

United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs｜383｜federal court jurisdiction over pendent claims

United States v. Price｜383｜the Mississippi civil rights workers murders

Sheppard v. Maxwell｜384｜the Sam Sheppard case, defendant's right to a fair trial vs. freedom of the press

Miranda v. Arizona｜384｜self-incrimination (「right to remain silent」)

Federal Trade Commission v. Dean Foods Co.｜384｜federal agencies can use the All Writs Act to seek an injunction against a threatened action that will substantially interfere with the agency’s performance of its statutory duty

Katzenbach v. Morgan｜384｜voting rights, Section 5 power

Schmerber v. California｜384｜state can take blood sample from a suspect without his consent, without violating his Fourth Amendment rights

Garrity v. New Jersey｜385｜rights of police officers against self-incrimination

Whitus v. Georgia｜385｜racial discrimination in jury selection

Redrup v. New York｜386｜striking down state power to censor written works of fiction

In Re Gault｜387｜due process, juveniles

Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner｜387｜reviewability of administrative decisions

Toilet Goods Association, Inc. v. Gardner｜387｜ripeness in the context of judicial review of administrative decisions

Afroyim v. Rusk｜387｜federal government cannot strip a person of his citizenship

Reitman v. Mulkey｜387｜states may repeal laws providing protection against racial discrimination by Amending their state Constitution of referendum if their immediate objective is neutral and not to facilitate private racism

Loving v. Virginia｜388｜state laws banning interracial marriage (anti-miscegenation laws)

Berger v. New York｜388｜Telephone tapping in a bribery case, Fourth Amendment

Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts｜388｜libel; effect of Sullivan on private figures

United States v. Wade｜388｜no police lineup without counsel

Gilbert v. California｜388｜handwriting

United States v. Robel｜389｜First Amendment, right of association

Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.｜388｜Separability principle: challenges to enforceability of contracts with arbitration clauses must be decided by arbitrator unless clause itself is challenged

Katz v. United States｜389｜wiretapping as search and seizure

Zschernig v. Miller｜389｜foreign relations and state property law preventing inheritance by nonresident aliens

Mora v. McNamara｜389｜denial of certiorari in a case questioning the legality of the Vietnam War

Haynes v. United States｜390｜Compulsory firearm registration as self-incrimination

Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. Patterson｜390｜indispensable parties under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Albrecht v. Herald Co.｜390｜minimum price agreements between wholesalers and franchisees unlawful under the Sherman Act

Avery v. Midland County｜390｜local government districts must conform to "one man, one vote"

Ginsberg v. New York｜390｜States can prohibit sale of obscene material to minors

Levy v. Louisiana｜391｜An illegitimate child may still sue on behalf of a deceased parent; to deny them this right violates the Fourteenth Amendment

鄧肯訴路易斯安那州案｜391｜selective incorporation, trial by jury

United States v. O'Brien｜391｜free speech, burning draft cards

Menominee Tribe v. United States｜391｜Tribal hunting and fishing rights, treaty interpretation

Green v. County School Board of New Kent County｜391｜"freedom-of-choice" desegregation plan held unconstitutional

Witherspoon v. Illinois｜391｜constitutional status of a death-qualified jury

Pickering v. Board of Education｜391｜public employees' free speech rights

Terry v. Ohio｜392｜search and seizure, power of police to stop and frisk suspicious persons

弗拉斯特訴科恩案｜392｜taxpayer standing

United States v. Southwestern Cable Co.｜392｜Administrative law

King v. Smith｜392｜Aid to Families with Dependent Children cannot be denied to families of qualifying children based on a substitute father

Mancusi v. DeForte｜392｜Fourth Amendment allows reasonable expectation of privacy to exist at workplace

Jones v. Mayer｜392｜housing discrimination

埃珀森訴阿肯色州案｜393｜religiously motivated state law prohibiting the teaching of evolution in publicly funded schools

Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District｜393｜freedom of speech in public schools

舒特爾斯沃訴伯明罕案｜394｜overbreadth of local ordinance used by city officials to ban civil rights march

Stanley v. Georgia｜394｜private possession of obscene material protected under First Amendment

Street v. New York｜394｜free speech and flag burning

夏皮羅訴湯普森案｜394｜旅遊權

利里訴合眾國案｜395｜Marihuana Tax Act of 1937 ruled unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment

紅獅廣播公司訴聯邦電信交通委員會案｜395｜Fairness Doctrine，廣播權，演講自由

布蘭登堡訴俄亥俄州案｜395｜freedom of speech, incitement to riot

鮑威爾訴麥科馬克案｜395｜political question doctrine, justiciability

Kramer v. Union School District｜395｜right to vote in a special election district

Lear, Inc. v. Adkins｜395｜overturning the doctrine of licensee estoppel in U.S. patent law

Chimel v. California｜395｜search and seizure incident to arrest

伯頓訴馬里蘭州案｜395｜double jeopardy