youngmon/atlassian-qna huggingface dataset:
Does the eclipse Connector support Crucible?
Asked by L. Schimmel:

I already installed the atlassian connector plugin in my IDE. Is there a way to connect Crucible to start and perform reviews?


Answers:
author: Felipe Kraemer
body: Hi Leonard,

As can be seen in the [Atlassian Connector Plugin for Eclipse](https://marketplace.atlassian.com/plugins/com.atlassian.ide.plugins.eclipse.jira) page, currently it can only be integrated with JIRA and Bamboo.

In that plugin's [version history](https://marketplace.atlassian.com/plugins/com.atlassian.ide.plugins.eclipse.jira/versions) you can see that it was possible to integrate with Crucible in the past, but this was discontinued. It's not possible to integrate that plugin with Crucible since the plugin version 3.0.

If you really want to use this plugin in Crucible, you would need to use the plugin version 2.3.0, and the Crucible version should be between 2.0.0 and 2.3.7, which are no longer supported by Atlassian because they have reached the [Atlassian Support End of Life Policy](https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/Support/Atlassian+Support+End+of+Life+Policy).

If this answer was helpful, please allow me to ask you to mark my answer as accepted in order to have it in the top of the thread, also helping other customers.

Thanks in advance!

Kind regards,  
Felipe Kraemer
Can I link an on premise Crucible/Fisheye to Jira OnDemand ?
Asked by Jonathann Zenou:

I am having issue with this. I succeeded to create the link from Crucible/Fisheye on premise to JIRA OnDemand, but I could not create the one from JIRA OnDemand to Crucible/Fisheye on premise, even if a check though a third party service (<http://ping.eu/port-chk/>) that the port 8060 was open to the internet on my Crucible/Fisheye installation. Of course I made the operation on both installations (Crucible/Fisheye and Jira) as admin.


Answers:
author: user1648639125013
body: Hi Jonathaan,

To integrate with Cloud instances FishEye must be accessible through port 80/443, you can do this either by;

* Integrating with Apache and then port forwarding to 8060 through the configuration
* Directly set up FishEye to bing on port 80, however the user running FishEye needs to be root in order to do this so the Apache solution is preferred.

Cheers,

Chris


author: Jonathann Zenou
body: Hi Christopher,

I don't have anything listening to port 80/443 . The package I installed includes fisheye and crucible (fecru-3.8.0). The only port the application is listening to is 8060 and I opened it.


author: user1648639125013
body: Hi Jonathann,

When setting up an Application link between FishEye and a JIRA Cloud (previously called OnDemand) please ensure that;

* Your FishEye application must be accessible through port 80 (or port 443 with a valid (CA) SSL certificate).
* You must initiate the application link creation from JIRA Cloud.

For more information please see;

<https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/JIRACLOUD/Integrating+JIRA+Cloud+with+FishEye>

Cheers,

Chris


Tags: fisheye-crucible-administration

jira
How do I post a code review for a draft commit in Mercurial?
Asked by RobertGlickman:

Hi,

Our developer setup is such that we have a central Mercurial repository on one of our servers and each developer has a clone of this repository. When a developer makes a change, we commit locally (via hg commit) and for the code review, we use hg serve to provide a web interface within the browser to the local clone of the repository and to the draft commit. Then, once we have achieved signoff, we use hg push to push the change to the central repository. This seems like it would be a very common flow.

However, I have been unable to find any information on how to easily post a review from a draft commit (i.e, one made via hg commit, but not pushed yet) on one of these peripheral clones. Our central repository is added and indexed, but we obviously don't want to index each individual's clone, as well. What is the best workflow to achieve what we need?

Thanks,

Robert


Answers:
author: gustavo_refosco
body: Hi Robert,

I think this could be achieved by using [Patch files for a pre-commit review](https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/CRUCIBLE/Adding+content+to+the+review#Addingcontenttothereview-precommit). For this you would basically create a patch (a diff with the latest change) and upload it to the review. I'm not sure if Crucible is able to anchor a patch generated as per this Mercurial workflow you described, but I think it's worth to try.

Furthermore, if we are talking about new files, as they can't be anchored, I think you could upload new files as [Attachments](https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/CRUCIBLE/Adding+content+to+the+review#Addingcontenttothereview-Attachments).

Regards,

Gustavo Refosco

comments: author: RobertGlickman
body: Thanks, I just came across the line in <https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/CRUCIBLE/Creating+reviews+from+the+command+line> which indicates that this is a limitation in the CLI. Is there a place to upvote a feature request for this?


author: gustavo_refosco
body: Hi Robert,The only improvement requests I could find about the CLI tool are listed at the following URL: [https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/CRUC-6840?jql=project%20%3D%20CRUC%20AND%20issuetype%20in%20%28Improvement%2C%20%22New%20Feature%22%29%20AND%20text%20\~%20%22CLI%20tool%22](https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/CRUC-6840?jql=project%20%3D%20CRUC%20AND%20issuetype%20in%20%28Improvement%2C%20%22New%20Feature%22%29%20AND%20text%20~%20%22CLI%20tool%22)It seems there is none for the known limitations listed in that page, but please feel free to create one describing your suggestions at <https://jira.atlassian.com>You may also check on Atlassian's Feature Requests Policy at <http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/DEV/Implementation+of+New+Features+Policy>Regards,Gustavo Refosco
Crucible Description - Commit Message
Asked by Darly Senecal-Baptiste:

Hi all,

While creating a crucible code review, I realize that by default that my commit message appears. However, is there a setting where the commit message doesn't appear while creating the code review ticket?

Thanks


Answers:
author: gustavo_refosco
body: Hi Darly,

Could you please confirm if this is when using Branch Reviews or creating reviews using Smart Commits?

A few days ago I created the suggestion of allowing the user to choose what reviews objectives to be used. Please find this suggestion at <https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/CRUC-7231>, and feel free to comment and vote for it, as well as adding yourself as a watcher to track its progress.

As explained in it, when using Branch Reviews you can apply the workaround of setting an empty default reviews objectives for the project, so the commit messages from the branch are not added as a review objective. In the other hand, when using Smart Commits, the default reviews objectives are ignored, so I couldn't find a workaround for this.

Regards,

Gustavo Refosco

comments: author: Darly Senecal-Baptiste
body: Hi Gustavo, I don't use any of them. It's just a simple commit message (with any smart command in the message). Thanks for opening a ticket for the issue, which I will follow up.


author: gustavo_refosco
body: Hi Darly,I may have missed your point then. Were you talking about the Objectives field? Where is this commit message showing up that you didn't want to have it?Regards,Gustavo Refosco


author: Darly Senecal-Baptiste
body: Hi Gustavo,Yes, I was talking about the Objectives field. And the commit message is showing up in the Objectives field


Tags: fisheye-crucible-administration
SQLServer 2014 compatibility
Asked by Nick Nick:

<https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/FISHEYE/Supported+platforms> does not indicate compatibility with SQLServer 2014. Is this an oversight? Is it compatible? When will this be tested/certified if not?


Answers:
author: gustavo_refosco
body: Hi Nick,

SQLServer 2014 is still not officially supported. There's a feature request created for this which you can check at <https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/FE-5540>. Please feel free to add comments and vote for it, as well as adding yourself as a watcher to track its progress.

Even not being included into the Supported Platforms doesn't mean that it won't work with our product at all. It just means that we haven't tested our products compatibility with that version yet. You may still use it, but that would be at your own risk, as we won't be able to officially help you with any compatibility issue, since it's not officially supported just yet.

Regards,

Gustavo Refosco


Tags: fisheye-crucible-administration
Crucible: Export to reivew history to CSV file
Asked by Gagan Mahan:

How can I add file names / line numbers and SVN revision for comments into the csv (review history file)? I don't see any user input to do this. I need to store the review history in a central repository for record keeping.


Answers:
author: Felipe Kraemer
body: Hi Gagan,

You can give this a try. Please refer to the plugin development guide available here:

<https://developer.atlassian.com/display/FECRUDEV/FishEye+and+Crucible+Plugin+Guide>

If this answer was helpful, please allow me to ask you to mark my answer as accepted in order to have it in the top of the thread, also helping other customers.

Thanks in advance!

Kind regards,  
Felipe Kraemer


author: Gagan Mahan
body: Thanks, I was able to get the information on the review using the [REST API](https://docs.atlassian.com/fisheye-crucible/latest/wadl/crucible.html) for crucible. You can mark the answer as accepted.

comments: author: Steven
body: Is there any sample you can share on how to get the files using REST API? Did you create a plugin or just using CLI to get the information?


author: Gagan Mahan
body: Is is possible to create a plugin to perform this action ? Could you point me to a source where I can start from?


author: Felipe Kraemer
body: Hi Gagan,

At this time, the functionality you're requesting is not yet possible in Crucible. I have created a new request for this in our development issue tracker, and you can track it here:

<https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/CRUC-7243>

Feel free to [vote](https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/JIRA/Watching+and+Voting+on+an+Issue) for the issue, add it to your watch list in order to be notified on its progress, and leave a comment there describing your use-case the more detailed the possible. This will help our development team to build a solution that meets better your needs.

If you want to know more about how we prioritise feature requests, take a look at our [policy](https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/DEV/Implementation+of+New+Features+Policy).

If this answer was helpful, please allow me to ask you to mark my answer as accepted in order to have it in the top of the thread, also helping other customers.

Thanks in advance!

Kind regards,  
Felipe Kraemer
Can't view added file
Asked by Jim Schmidt:

My team recently started using Crucible for CRs, and we're perplexed as to why we can't view an added file. In Crucible we see the added file in the changelist summary, but no option to examine the added file, or a download option to open it locally. So we are only able to see diffs of edits to existing files.

What are we missing?

SCM is Perforce, in case that matters.


Answers:
author: Jim Schmidt
body: <br />

This is an example. There is a folder with one added header file, and the header file isn't zero-length. The edited files in the change show a diff as expected.

We've now noticed some other changelists are showing the whole added file. So the problem is not consistent across all reviews. And in the change I attached png of, there is one added file showing a diff because the author uploaded a second revision (it shows 1...3 and the diff between 2 and 3).

Update: Figured it out - slide the red bubble. Issue resolved.  
[](https://community.atlassian.com/t5/Fisheye-Crucible-questions/Can-t-view-added-file/qaq-p/450649?attachment-id=7827){#link_115b0363e19166}  
[](/tnckb94959/attachments/tnckb94959/fisheye-crucible-questions/6016/1/crucible.png){#display_115b0363e19166_0}


author: gustavo_refosco
body: Hi Jim,In order to further understand this, I'd like to ask:1. When you mention you see the file in the changelist summary, could you please take a screenshot of it to show what you are seeing and what happens if you click on the file?2. When creating a review and browsing for changesets aren't you able to see the changelist containing this file? I suppose if it shows up in Crucible in the changelist summary as you mentioned, it should be available to be added to the review.Regards,Gustavo Refosco
User is not receiving review invitations
Asked by Gary Schlachter:

I have a user that does not receive Review invitations. He receives email but the review is not listed in the Crucible Inbox. When he looks at the review, it has his id as a Reviewer. However, since he does not have Reviews listed in his Inbox, he is not able to follow the Review process. I have many other users which work correctly. The only difference is that his id is "built-in" and other use LDAP for authentication.


Answers:
author: Felipe Kraemer
body: Hi Gary,

Can you please check if this user is marked as [Active Crucible user](https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/FISHEYE/Deleting+or+deactivating+a+user)?

Kind regards,  
Felipe Kraemer
is there any chance to fisheye users to add branches to fisheye repositories
Asked by l:


Answers:
author: Maciej Swinarski
body: Could you explain the problem?

FishEye should automatically detect and index branches. For GIT and Mercurial this will be done automatically. For SVN repositories this may require extra configuration ([SVN Symbolic Rules](https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/FISHEYE/SVN+tag+and+branch+structure)) depending on your SVN repository structure.

mac

comments: author: l
body: User has raised the below concern:There is no way to add branch by ourself. Every time trunk branches out we have to create ticket. We should let users add new branches in the future.


author: Maciej Swinarski
body: I am not really sure if I understand the problem.\* does the user want to create new branches in the repository via FishEye? this is not possible - FishEye is only reading from the repository and not doing any write operations \* or the problem is with FishEye detecting new branches created by the user? if thats the case, like I have explained above - FishEye should automatically detect new branches.What repository type is it?Maybe if you could explain what operations are you doing to solve the ticket raised by the user? mac
Fisheye/Crucible Wiki Icons Not Visible
Asked by Cynthia Fehr:

Hi,

In our instance of Fisheye/Crucible the wiki icons can not be seen.

Everything in here can be seen in fecru:

/fecru-3.7.1/content/static/nmfvqz/images

but not anything in the wiki directory:

/fecru-3.7.1/content/static/nmfvqz/images/2static/images/wiki/icons/emoticons/smile.gif

Does anyone know where or how to change this?

Thanks,

Cynthia


Answers:
author: Cynthia Fehr
body: I will give it to Felipe Kraemer. It turned out to be a pattern matching issue on the F5 that serves the pages.


author: clem
body: Thanks for your response but I can't disable the proxy. I also do not have a desktop installed on my server that I can log onto locally.


author: Felipe Kraemer
body: Hi Cynthia,

I am wondering if this could be related to a proxy configuration.

Can you please temporarily remove the proxy configuration from your instance, then open the same page where you see the error in the FishEye server web browser using <http://localhost:8060>... in order to bypass the proxy settings?

If this answer was helpful, please allow me to ask you to mark my answer as accepted in order to have it in the top of the thread, also helping other customers.

Thanks in advance!

Kind regards,  
Felipe Kraemer


author: Cynthia Fehr
body: Anybody?


Tags: fisheye-crucible-administration
Crucible RSS Feed configuration
Asked by Viktor:

Is it possible to configure RSS feed in Crucible to add data like:

Age details

No. of files

No. of comments

?


Answers:
author: Felipe Kraemer
body: Hello,

At this time, the functionality you're requesting is not yet possible in Crucible:

<https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/CRUCIBLE/Using+RSS+feeds+in+Crucible>

I have created a new request for this in our development issue tracker, and you can track it here:

<https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/CRUC-7242>

Feel free to [vote](https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/JIRA/Watching+and+Voting+on+an+Issue) for the issue, add it to your watch list in order to be notified on its progress, and leave a comment there describing your use-case the more detailed the possible. This will help our development team to build a solution that meets better your needs.

If you want to know more about how we prioritise feature requests, take a look at our [policy](https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/DEV/Implementation+of+New+Features+Policy).

If this answer was helpful, please allow me to ask you to mark my answer as accepted in order to have it in the top of the thread, also helping other customers.

Thanks in advance!

Kind regards,  
Felipe Kraemer


Tags: rss
Is there a way to extract list of fisheye users?
Asked by Debraj Neogi:

Is there a way to extract list of fisheye active users?


Answers:
author: gustavo_refosco
body: Hi Debraj,

You can get a list of your FishEye users by using the following REST API command: <https://docs.atlassian.com/fisheye-crucible/latest/wadl/fecru.html#rest-service-fecru:admin:users>

Regards,

Gustavo Refosco


Tags: fisheye-crucible-administration
crucible indexing
Asked by Cynthia Fehr:

Hello,

I accidentally started a re index of a very large mercurial repo.

Can I stop it somehow?

How can I tell how far it has gotten or even tell what it is doing?

Thanks


Answers:
author: gustavo_refosco
body: Hi Cynthia,

At the moment a re-index is triggered the indexes are removed, so the repository can start to be indexed again. That being said, you wouldn't be able to stop it and go back to the state it was before.

I'm thinking however in a way to try to reduce the time it will take to be fully indexed by restoring a backup of the indexed of this repository. Would you have a backup by any chance? The indexed are stored at `$FISHEYE_INST/var/cache/<repository_name>` so I think a recent backup would help to have most of the repository already indexed, so FishEye could start from this.

Regards,

Gustavo Refosco
Logged Time in Review is Converted Wrong in JIRA
Asked by John D Giotta:

We're experiencing an issue with logged work time from a Review to the related JIRA ticket.

For example, I'll complete the review, the modal will appear and I'll be given a Log Work button with 2 mins. I click it then close the modal and if I go to the JIRA ticket it'll say 2 hours logged.

It's as if it is not posting 2m but 2h instead.


Answers:
author: gustavo_refosco
body: Hi John,

I found this is a bug reported at <https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/CRUC-6890>, already fixed in Crucible 3.5.4.

If you are using a version previous to this one then an [upgrade](https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/FISHEYE/FishEye+upgrade+guide) should help you having this fixed. If you are not able to upgrade you may give a try to the workaround proposed in the bug report.

Regards,

Gustavo Refosco
Crucible tried to anchor your patch, but did not find any matching paths --- mercurial
Asked by Mohammed Mohammed:

I am using mercurial to create a patch and upload it to crucible, however it cannot anchor no matter what I try. I've tried creating the patch exactly how the atlassian website says by using

```
hg diff &gt; patch
```

However, when I upload the result, it does not anchor, even if I pick the repository manually from the drop down.

I have the repo cloned with the new files added, but not committed. The diff looks correct, but there must be something wrong to throw off the anchoring. I just want to be able to see iterative changes to the patches.

Any help is appreciated. Thanks


Answers:
author: gustavo_refosco
body: Hi Mohammed,

In this case the only workaround I can think of is to review each file separately, uploading the first revision of this file (when it's created) to the review and, upon any changes, upload it again, with the same filename, so the diff will be done. This could be done, for each file, as follows (this is just an example of workflow):

1. Create a new file (e.g. **test.txt**).
2. Create a review, adding this **test.txt** as an attachment.
3. After the file is reviewed, apply the necessary modifications to the file in the repository, then upload it as an attachment with the same filename.
4. Refresh the page. You'll see this addition revision will be shown in the review, to be diff against the previous one.

I'm aware this may not be the most ideal solution. In case you have any thoughts on your mind and would like to share a suggestion please feel free to raise a feature request at <https://jira.atlassian.com>.

Regards,

Gustavo Refosco


author: gustavo_refosco
body: Hi Mohammed,

As you mentioned you are creating a patch for new files, not yet commited (i.e. not still indexed), it's expected Crucible won't be able to anchor this patch to the repository. In this case, the patches would be uploaded separately, as stated by the document with "If Crucible is unable to anchor the patch to a repository, you will only be able to upload the patches as separate files".

It's still possible, though, to perform iterative patch reviews even not being able to attach these patches to the repository. You can do this adding the patches as attachments, as follows:

1. Create a review and, when adding content, select **Attachments**.
2. In the next screen, click in **Upload another file as the base of a diff** , then for \***Base of Diff File** select the file correspondent to the first revision.
3. For **File** select the file correspondent to the next revision, which will be compared to the previous one.
4. Click in **Upload**. This will upload the two files, diffing them.

Regards,

Gustavo Refosco

comments: author: Mohammed Mohammed
body: This results in a diff file being uploaded as an attachment without creating the directory tree with each separate file. Any ideas?


author: Mohammed Mohammed
body: My patch consists of multiple files.


Tags: fisheye-crucible-administration
Not able to commit
Asked by Varsha Damodaran:

Push to origin is showing the below error message.

git --no-optional-locks -c color.branch=false -c color.diff=false -c color.status=false -c diff.mnemonicprefix=false -c core.quotepath=false -c credential.helper=sourcetree push -v --tags origin refs/heads/master:refs/heads/master

Pushing to <https://bitbucket.org/cute66varsha/machinelearning.git>

remote: Too many invalid password attempts. Log in at <https://id.atlassian.com/> to restore access.

fatal: unable to access '<https://bitbucket.org/cute66varsha/machinelearning.git/>': The requested URL returned error: 403

Completed with errors, see above

Its not allowing me to enter the password again. Keep on getting the same error message above. Not prompting for re-entering the password. please advise.


Answers:
author: Twesigye Anthony
body: I found this to help me [solution on stackoverflow](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68191968/source-tree-fix-for-git-password-authentication-is-temporarily-disabled-as-part "solution on stackoverflow")

After creating the the Personal Access Token from github,

I just added the token to the remote settings in my repo inside sourcetree and after that I was able to push and pull again

`https://`**{personal-access-token}** [@Github](/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/3064969)`.com/`**{my-repo}**
fatal: unable to get credential storage lock in 1000 ms: No such file or directory
Asked by HARSHINI SG:

Hi I am facing this issue could you please help me resolve this issue


Answers:
author: Anurag Bhandari
body: [@HARSHINI SG](/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4511300) did you find a solution? I'm also having the same problem!