ymoslem/acl-abstracts huggingface dataset:
UCL-Bench: A Chinese User-Centric Legal Benchmark for Large Language Models (2025)

Existing legal benchmarks focusing on knowledge and logic effectively evaluate LLMs on various tasks in legal domain. However, few have explored the practical application of LLMs by actual users. To further assess whether LLMs meet the specific needs of legal practitioners in real-world scenarios, we introduce UCL-Bench, a Chinese User-Centric Legal Benchmark, comprising 22 tasks across 5 distinct legal scenarios.To build the UCL-Bench, we conduct a user survey targeting legal professionals to understand their needs and challenges. Based on the survey results, we craft tasks, verified by legal professionals, and categorized them according to Bloom`s taxonomy. Each task in UCL-Bench mirrors real-world legal scenarios, and instead of relying on pre-defined answers, legal experts provide detailed answer guidance for each task, incorporating both {\textquotedblleft}information{\textquotedblright} and {\textquotedblleft}needs{\textquotedblright} elements to mimic the complexities of legal practice. With the guidance, we use GPT-4 as the user simulator and evaluator, enabling multi-turn dialogues as a answer guidance based evaluation framework. Our findings reveal that many recent open-source general models achieve the highest performance, suggesting that they are well-suited to address the needs of legal practitioners. However, these legal LLMs do not outperform ChatGPT, indicating a need for training strategies aligned with users' needs. Furthermore, we find that the most effective models are able to address legal issues within fewer dialogue turns, highlighting the importance of concise and accurate responses in achieving high performance. The code and dataset are available at https://github.com/wittenberg11/UCL-bench.
MIDAS: Multi-level Intent, Domain, And Slot Knowledge Distillation for Multi-turn NLU (2025)

Although Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate coherent text, they often struggle to recognise user intent behind queries. In contrast, Natural Language Understanding (NLU) models interpret the purpose and key information of user input for responsive interactions. Existing NLU models typically map utterances to a dual-level semantic frame, involving sentence-level intent (SI) and word-level slot (WS) labels. However, real-life conversations primarily consist of multi-turn dialogues, requiring the interpretation of complex and extended exchanges. Researchers encounter challenges in addressing all facets of multi-turn dialogue using a unified NLU model. This paper introduces MIDAS, a novel approach leveraging multi-level intent, domain, and slot knowledge distillation for multi-turn NLU. We construct distinct teachers for SI detection, WS filling, and conversation-level domain (CD) classification, each fine-tuned for specific knowledge. A multi-teacher loss is proposed to facilitate the integration of these teachers, guiding a student model in multi-turn dialogue tasks. Results demonstrate the efficacy of our model in improving multi-turn conversation understanding, showcasing the potential for advancements in NLU through multi-level dialogue knowledge distillation. Our implementation is open-sourced on GitHub (https://github.com/adlnlp/Midas).
A Practical Analysis of Human Alignment with *PO (2025)

At the forefront of state-of-the-art human alignment methods are preference optimization methods (*PO). Prior research has often concentrated on identifying the best-performing method, typically involving a grid search over hyperparameters, which can be impractical for general practitioners. In this paper, we examine the robustness of existing state-of-the-art methods to varying hyperparameters in a realistic out-of-distribution (OOD) scenario that mirrors real-world applications of human alignment. Our goal is to empirically find the method that increases the likelihood of achieving better results through the lens of various metrics, such as KL divergence and response length. We also introduce LN-DPO, a simple length-normalized version of DPO that is more stable across hyperparameters, effectively reduces the average response length, and improves performance. Our analysis of state-of-the-art reference-free (i.e., SimPO) and reference-dependent (i.e., DPO and LN-DPO) methods reveals that they perform similarly at their peak (i.e., best possible scenario). However, we uncover that the pattern of change in performance greatly varies as we move away from the best possible scenario.
Understanding Reference Policies in Direct Preference Optimization (2025)

Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has become a widely used training method for the instruction fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs). In this work, we explore an under-investigated aspect of DPO {--} its dependency on the reference model or policy. Such reference policies, typically instantiated as the model to be further fine-tuned, are important since they can impose an upper limit on DPO`s effectiveness. Therefore, we address three related research questions in this work. First, we explore the optimal strength of the KL divergence constraint in DPO, which penalizes deviations from the reference policy, and find that DPO is sensitive to this strength. Next, we examine the necessity of the KL-constraint from the reference policies in DPO by providing both theoretical and empirical comparisons between DPO and related learning objectives, demonstrating DPO`s superiority in this controlled setting. Additionally, we investigate whether DPO benefits from stronger reference policies, finding that a stronger reference policy can lead to improved performance, but only when it is similar to the model being fine-tuned. Our findings highlight the confounding role of reference policies in DPO and offer insights for best practices, while also identifying open research questions for future studies.
LLM-Coordination: Evaluating and Analyzing Multi-agent Coordination Abilities in Large Language Models (2025)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated emergent common-sense reasoning and Theory of Mind (ToM) capabilities, making them promising candidates for developing coordination agents. This study introduces the LLM-Coordination Benchmark, a novel benchmark for analyzing LLMs in the context of Pure Coordination Settings, where agents must cooperate to maximize gains. Our benchmark evaluates LLMs through two distinct tasks. The first is Agentic Coordination, where LLMs act as proactive participants in four pure coordination games. The second is Coordination Question Answering (CoordQA), which tests LLMs on 198 multiple-choice questions across these games to evaluate three key abilities: Environment Comprehension, ToM Reasoning, and Joint Planning. Results from Agentic Coordination experiments reveal that LLM-Agents excel in multi-agent coordination settings where decision-making primarily relies on environmental variables but face challenges in scenarios requiring active consideration of partners' beliefs and intentions. The CoordQA experiments further highlight significant room for improvement in LLMs' Theory of Mind reasoning and joint planning capabilities. Zero-Shot Coordination (ZSC) experiments in the Agentic Coordination setting demonstrate that LLM agents, unlike RL methods, exhibit robustness to unseen partners. These findings indicate the potential of LLMs as Agents in pure coordination setups and underscore areas for improvement.
AssertionBench: A Benchmark to Evaluate Large-Language Models for Assertion Generation (2025)

Assertions have been the de facto collateral for hardware for over a decade. The verification quality, i.e., detection and diagnosis of corner-case design bugs, is critically dependent on the assertion quality. There has been a considerable amount of research to generate high-quality assertions from hardware design source code and design execution trace data. With recent advent of generative AI techniques such as Large-Language Models (LLMs), there has been a renewed interest in deploying LLMs for assertion generation. However, there is little effort to quantitatively establish the effectiveness and suitability of various LLMs for assertion generation. In this paper, we present AssertionBench, a novel benchmark to evaluate LLMs' effectiveness for assertion generation quantitatively. AssertionBench contains 100 curated Verilog hardware designs from OpenCores and formally verified assertions for each design, generated from GoldMine and HARM. We use AssertionBench to compare state-of-the-art LLMs, e.g., GPT-3.5, GPT-4o, CodeLLaMa-2, and LLaMa3-70B, to assess their effectiveness in inferring functionally correct assertions for hardware designs. Our experiments comprehensively demonstrate how LLMs perform relative to each other, the benefits of using more in-context exemplars in generating a higher fraction of functionally correct assertions, and the significant room for improvement for LLM-based assertion generators.
On Reference (In-)Determinacy in Natural Language Inference (2025)

We revisit the reference determinacy (RD) assumption in the task of natural language inference (NLI), i.e., the premise and hypothesis are assumed to refer to the same context when human raters annotate a label. While RD is a practical assumption for constructing a new NLI dataset, we observe that current NLI models{---}which are typically trained solely on hypothesis-premise pairs created with the RD assumption{---}fail in downstream applications such as fact verification, where the input premise and hypothesis may refer to different contexts. To highlight the impact of this phenomenon in real-world use cases, we introduce RefNLI, a diagnostic benchmark for identifying reference ambiguity in NLI examples. In RefNLI, the premise is retrieved from a knowledge source (i.e. Wikipedia) and does not necessarily refer to the same context as the hypothesis. With RefNLI, we demonstrate that finetuned NLI models and few-shot prompted LLMs both fail to recognize context mismatch, leading to {\ensuremath{>}}80{\%} false contradiction and {\ensuremath{>}}50{\%} entailment predictions. We discover that the existence of reference ambiguity in NLI examples can in part explain the inherent human disagreements in NLI, and provide insight into how the RD assumption impacts NLI dataset creation process.
DHP Benchmark: Are LLMs Good NLG Evaluators? (2025)

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly serving as evaluators in Natural Language Generation (NLG) tasks; this is often referred to as {\textquotedblleft}LLM-as-a-judge{\textquotedblright} paradigm. However, the capabilities of LLMs in evaluating NLG quality remain underexplored. Current studies depend on human assessments and simple metrics that fail to capture the discernment of LLMs across diverse NLG tasks. To address this gap, we propose the Discernment of Hierarchical Perturbation (DHP) benchmarking framework, which provides quantitative discernment scores for LLMs. This framework leverages hierarchically perturbed text data and statistical tests to systematically measure the NLG evaluation capabilities of LLMs. We re-established six evaluation datasets for this benchmark, covering four NLG tasks: Summarization, Story Completion, Question Answering, and Translation. Our comprehensive benchmarking of five major LLM families provides critical insight into their strengths and limitations as NLG evaluators. Our dataset is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/YCWANGVINCE/DHP{\_}Benchmark.
GraphEval36K: Benchmarking Coding and Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models on Graph Datasets (2025)

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in natural language processing (NLP), demonstrating significant capabilities in processing and understanding text data. However, recent studies have identified limitations in LLMs' ability to manipulate, program, and reason about structured data, especially graphs. We introduce GraphEval36K, the first comprehensive graph dataset, comprising 40 graph coding problems and 36,900 test cases to evaluate the ability of LLMs on graph problem-solving. Our dataset is categorized into eight primary and four sub-categories to ensure a thorough evaluation across different types of graphs. We benchmark eight LLMs, finding that private models outperform open-source ones, though the gap is narrowing. We also analyze the performance of LLMs across directed vs undirected graphs, different kinds of graph concepts, and network models. Furthermore, to improve the usability of our evaluation framework, we propose Structured Symbolic Decomposition (SSD), an instruction-based method designed to enhance LLM performance on complex graph tasks. Results show that SSD improves the average passing rate of GPT-4, GPT-4o, Gemini-Pro and Claude-3-Sonnet by 8.38{\%}, 6.78{\%}, 29.28{\%} and 25.28{\%}, respectively.
SimulBench: Evaluating Language Models with Creative Simulation Tasks (2025)

We introduce SimulBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate large language models (LLMs) across a diverse collection of creative simulation tasks, such as acting as a Linux terminal or playing text games with users. While these simulation tasks serve as effective measures of an LLM`s general intelligence, they are seldom incorporated into existing benchmarks. A major challenge is to develop an evaluation framework for testing different LLMs fairly while preserving the multi-round interactive nature of simulation tasks between users and AI. To tackle this issue, we suggest using a fixed LLM as a user agent to engage with an LLM to collect dialogues first under different tasks. Then, challenging dialogue scripts are extracted for evaluating different target LLMs. To facilitate automatic assessment on SimulBench, GPT-4 is employed as the evaluator, tasked with reviewing the quality of the final response generated by the target LLMs given multi-turn dialogue scripts. Our comprehensive experiments indicate that these creative simulation tasks continue to pose a significant challenge with their unique natures and show the gap between proprietary models and the most advanced open LLMs. For example, GPT-4-turbo outperforms LLaMA-3-70b-Chat on 18.55{\%} more cases.
ReasoningRec: Bridging Personalized Recommendations and Human-Interpretable Explanations through LLM Reasoning (2025)

This paper presents ReasoningRec, a reasoning-based recommendation framework that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to bridge the gap between recommendations and human-interpretable explanations. In contrast to conventional recommendation systems that rely on implicit user-item interactions, ReasoningRec employs LLMs to model users and items, focusing on preferences, aversions, and explanatory reasoning. The framework utilizes a larger LLM to generate synthetic explanations for user preferences, subsequently used to fine-tune a smaller LLM for enhanced recommendation accuracy and human-interpretable explanation. Our experimental study investigates the impact of reasoning and contextual information on personalized recommendations, revealing that the quality of contextual and personalized data significantly influences the LLM`s capacity to generate plausible explanations. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that ReasoningRec surpasses state-of-the-art methods by up to 12.5{\%} in recommendation prediction while concurrently providing human-intelligible explanations.
2D-DPO: Scaling Direct Preference Optimization with 2-Dimensional Supervision (2025)

Recent advancements in Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) have significantly enhanced the alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences, owing to its simplicity and effectiveness. However, existing methods typically optimize a scalar score or ranking reward, thereby overlooking the multi-dimensional nature of human preferences. In this work, we propose to extend the preference of DPO to two dimensions: segments and aspects. We first introduce a 2D supervision dataset called HelpSteer-2D. For the segment dimension, we divide the response into sentences and assign scores to each segment. For the aspect dimension, we meticulously design several criteria covering the response quality rubrics. With the 2-dimensional signals as feedback, we develop a 2D-DPO framework, decomposing the overall objective into multi-segment and multi-aspect objectives. Extensive experiments on popular benchmarks demonstrate that 2D-DPO performs better than methods that optimize for scalar or 1-dimensional preferences.
Demystifying the Power of Large Language Models in Graph Generation (2025)

Despite the unprecedented success of applying Large Language Models (LLMs) to graph discriminative tasks such as node classification and link prediction, its potential for graph structure generation remains largely unexplored. To fill this crucial gap, this paper presents a systematic investigation into the capability of LLMs for graph structure generation. Specifically, we design prompts triggering LLMs to generate codes that optimize network properties by injecting domain expertise from network science. Since graphs in different domains exhibit unique structural properties captured by various metrics (e.g., clustering coefficient capturing triangles in social networks while squares reflecting road segments in transportation networks), we first evaluate the capability of LLMs to generate graphs satisfying each structural property in different domains. After that, we select the optimal property configurations and benchmark the graph structure generation performance of LLMs against established graph generative models across multiple domains. Our findings shed light on generating graph structures from an LLM perspective. Our code is publically available https://github.com/yuwvandy/LLM-GraphGen.
COIG-CQIA: Quality is All You Need for Chinese Instruction Fine-tuning (2025)

Remarkable progress on large language models (LLMs), particularly in English, has facilitated impressive capabilities in following human instructions. However, there remains a noticeable gap in instruction fine-tuning for Chinese, where the complex linguistic features pose significant challenges. Existing datasets, generally distilled from English-centric LLMs, are not well-aligned with Chinese users' interaction patterns. To bridge this gap, we introduce COIG-CQIA, a new Chinese instruction tuning dataset derived from various real-world data resources and undergoing comprehensive human verification. We conduct extensive experiments on COIG-CQIA, and compare them with strong baseline models and datasets. The experimental results show that models trained on COIG-CQIA achieve highly competitive performance in diverse benchmarks. Additionally, our findings offer several insights for designing effective Chinese instruction-tuning datasets and data mixing strategies. Our dataset are available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/m-a-p/COIG-CQIA.
Gradient-guided Attention Map Editing: Towards Efficient Contextual Hallucination Mitigation (2025)

In tasks such as summarization and open-book question answering (QA), Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently experience {\textquotedblleft}contextual hallucination{\textquotedblright}, where they generate irrelevant or incorrect responses despite having access to accurate information in the input. This issue often stems from the models' propensity to prioritize self-generated content over input context, leading to a disregard for pertinent details. To address this challenge, we introduce, Guided Attention Map Editing (GAME), an innovative approach that dynamically adjusts attention maps to enhance contextual relevance. During inference, GAME employs a trained classifier to identify attention maps likely to induce hallucinations and implements targeted interventions. These interventions, guided by gradient-informed {\textquotedblleft}edit directions{\textquotedblright}, strategically redistribute attention weights across various heads to efficiently mitigate hallucination. Extensive evaluations on challenging summarization and open-book QA tasks demonstrate that GAME consistently and significantly reduces hallucinations across diverse open-source models, thereby improving the reliability and applicability of LLMs.
Alleviating Hallucinations of Large Language Models through Induced Hallucinations (2025)

Despite their impressive capabilities, large language models (LLMs) have been observed to generate responses that include inaccurate or fabricated information, a phenomenon commonly known as hallucination. In this work, we propose a simple Induce-then-Contrast Decoding (ICD) strategy to alleviate hallucinations. We first construct a factually weak LLM by inducing hallucinations from the original LLMs. Then, we penalize these induced hallucinations during decoding to enhance the factuality of the generated content. Concretely, we determine the final next-token predictions by amplifying the predictions from the original model and downplaying the induced untruthful predictions via contrastive decoding. Experimental results on both discrimination-based and generation-based hallucination evaluation benchmarks, such as TruthfulQA and FActScore, demonstrate that our proposed ICD methods can effectively enhance the factuality of LLMs across various task formats, model sizes, and model families. For example, when equipped with ICD, Llama2-7B-Chat and Mistral-7B-Instruct achieve performance comparable to ChatGPT and GPT4 on TruthfulQA, respectively, without compromising their generalization capabilities on other tasks.
MoDE: Effective Multi-task Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning with a Mixture of Dyadic Experts (2025)

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning techniques like Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) have revolutionized the adaptation of large language models (LLMs) to diverse tasks. Recent efforts have explored mixtures of LoRA modules for multi-task settings. However, our analysis reveals redundancy in the down-projection matrices of these architectures. This observation motivates our proposed method, Mixture of Dyadic Experts (MoDE), which introduces a novel design for efficient multi-task adaptation. This is done by sharing the down-projection matrix across tasks and employing atomic rank-one adapters, coupled with routers that allow more sophisticated task-level specialization. Our design allows for more fine-grained mixing, thereby increasing the model`s ability to jointly handle multiple tasks. We evaluate MoDE on the Supernatural Instructions (SNI) benchmark consisting of a diverse set of 700+ tasks and demonstrate that it outperforms state-of-the-art multi-task parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods, without introducing additional parameters. Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of parameter efficiency in multi-task LLM adaptation and provide a practical solution for deploying high-performing, lightweight models.
Unsupervised Sentence Representation Learning with Syntactically Aligned Negative Samples (2025)

Sentence representation learning benefits from data augmentation strategies to improve model performance and generalization, yet existing approaches often encounter issues such as semantic inconsistencies and feature suppression. To address these limitations, we propose a method for generating Syntactically Aligned Negative (SAN) samples through a semantic importance-aware Masked Language Model (MLM) approach. Our method quantifies semantic contributions of individual words to produce negative samples that have substantial textual overlap with the original sentences while conveying different meanings. We further introduce Hierarchical-InfoNCE (HiNCE), a novel contrastive learning objective employing differential temperature weighting to optimize the utilization of both in-batch and syntactically aligned negative samples. Extensive evaluations across seven semantic textual similarity benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements over state-of-the-art models.