ymoslem/acl-abstracts huggingface dataset:
To Burst or Not to Burst: Generating and Quantifying Improbable Text (2023)

While large language models (LLMs) are extremely capable at text generation, their outputs are still distinguishable from human-authored text. We explore this separation across many metrics over text, many sampling techniques, many types of text data, and across two popular LLMs, LLaMA and Vicuna. Along the way, we introduce a new metric, recoverability, to highlight differences between human and machine text; and we propose a new sampling technique, burst sampling, designed to close this gap. We find that LLaMA and Vicuna have distinct distributions under many of the metrics, and that this influences our results: Recoverability separates real from fake text better than any other metric when using LLaMA. When using Vicuna, burst sampling produces text which is distributionally closer to real text compared to other sampling techniques.
Are Large Language Models Reliable Judges? A Study on the Factuality Evaluation Capabilities of LLMs (2023)

In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have drawn significant attention due to their impressive emergent capabilities that were not observed in earlier language models. One emerging area where LLMs have been widely used in recent times is the utilization of LLMs as the evaluator of the texts generated by various generative models. In this paper, we also explore the possibility of whether LLMs are reliable in assessing the factual consistency of summaries generated by text generation models. We first propose a new approach to evaluate the factuality score using LLMs by utilizing the same LLM to perform all steps in the question-answering-based factuality scoring pipeline. Subsequently, we study the performance of various LLMs to directly score the factuality. Our evaluation is conducted in traditional benchmarks by comparing their correlation with human annotations. Contrary to expectations, our findings revealed that none of the factuality metrics showed any significant correlations (e.g., coefficient scores greater than 0.3) to human evaluations of factuality for GPT-4, PaLM-2, and Claude-2, with the only exception being GPT-3.5 in two subcategories of factuality. Nonetheless, our findings are consistent across almost all factual error types, suggesting a fundamental limitation in the ability of current LLMs to assess factuality.
RankAug: Augmented data ranking for text classification (2023)

Research on data generation and augmentation has been focused majorly around enhancing generation models, leaving a notable gap in the exploration and refinement of methods for evaluating synthetic data. There are several text similarity metrics within the context of generated data filtering which can impact the performance of specific Natural Language Understanding (NLU) tasks, specifically focusing on intent and sentiment classification. In this study, we propose RankAug, a text-ranking approach that detects and filters out the top augmented texts in terms of being most similar in meaning with lexical and syntactical diversity. Through experiments conducted on multiple datasets, we demonstrate that the judicious selection of filtering techniques can yield a substantial improvement of up to 35{\%} in classification accuracy for under-represented classes.
Separating the Wheat from the Chaff with BREAD: An open-source benchmark and metrics to detect redundancy in text (2023)

Data quality is a problem that perpetually resurfaces throughout the field of NLP, regardless of task, domain, or architecture, and remains especially severe for lower-resource languages. A typical and insidious issue, affecting both training data and model output, is data that is repetitive and dominated by linguistically uninteresting boilerplate, such as price catalogs or computer-generated log files. Though this problem permeates many web-scraped corpora, there has yet to be a benchmark to test against, or a systematic study to find simple metrics that generalize across languages and agree with human judgements of data quality. In the present work, we create and release BREAD, a human-labeled benchmark on repetitive boilerplate vs. plausible linguistic content, spanning 360 languages. We release several baseline CRED (Character REDundancy) scores along with it, and evaluate their effectiveness on BREAD. We hope that the community will use this resource to develop better filtering methods, and that our reference implementations of CRED scores can become standard corpus evaluation tools, driving the development of cleaner language modeling corpora, especially in low-resource languages.
Elo Uncovered: Robustness and Best Practices in Language Model Evaluation (2023)

In Natural Language Processing (NLP), the Elo rating system, well-established for ranking dynamic competitors in games like chess, has seen increasing adoption for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) through {\textquotedblleft}A vs B{\textquotedblright} paired comparisons. However, while popular, the system`s suitability for assessing entities with constant skill levels, such as LLMs, remains relatively unexplored. Our study investigates the sensitivity and reproducibility of Elo scores for LLMs, integrating both synthetic and human feedback. We show that Elo ratings for LLMs stabilize with 100 or more comparison permutations. A lower K-factor is preferable for closely matched models, whereas a higher K-factor better distinguishes models with clear performance differences. We also report that transitivity (A B and B C implies A C) does not consistently hold, particularly when models demonstrate similar performance. Our empirical findings provide guidelines for more reliable LLM evaluation.
PersonalityChat: Conversation Distillation for Personalized Dialog Modeling with Facts and Traits (2023)

The new wave of Large Language Models (LLM) has offered an efficient tool to curate sizeable conversational datasets. So far studies have mainly focused on task-oriented or generic open-domain dialogs, and have not fully explored the ability of LLMs in following complicated prompts. In this work, we focus on personalization, and employ LLMs to curate a dataset which is difficult and costly to crowd-source: PersonalityChat is a synthetic conversational dataset based upon the popular PersonaChat dataset, but conditioned on both personas and (Big-5) personality traits. Evaluating models fine-tuned on this dataset, we show that the personality trait labels can be used for trait-based personalization of generative dialogue models. We also perform a head-to-head comparison between PersonalityChat and PersonaChat, and show that training on the distilled dataset results in more fluent and coherent dialog agents in the small-model regime.
How well ChatGPT understand Malaysian English? An Evaluation on Named Entity Recognition and Relation Extraction (2023)

Recently, ChatGPT has attracted a lot of interest from both researchers and the general public. While the performance of ChatGPT in Named Entity Recognition and Relation Extraction from Standard English texts is satisfactory, it remains to be seen if it can perform similarly for Malaysian English. Malaysian English is unique as it exhibits morphosyntactic and semantical adaptation from local contexts. In this study, we assess ChatGPT`s capability in extracting entities and relations from the Malaysian English News (MEN) dataset. We propose a three-step methodology referred to as \textbf{educate-predict-evaluate}. The performance of ChatGPT is assessed using F1-Score across 18 unique prompt settings, which were carefully engineered for a comprehensive review. From our evaluation, we found that ChatGPT does not perform well in extracting entities from Malaysian English news articles, with the highest F1-Score of 0.497. Further analysis shows that the morphosyntactic adaptation in Malaysian English caused the limitation. However, interestingly, this morphosyntactic adaptation does not impact the performance of ChatGPT for relation extraction.
Post Turing: Mapping the landscape of LLM Evaluation (2023)

In the rapidly evolving landscape of Large Language Models (LLMs), introduction of well-defined and standardized evaluation methodologies remains a crucial challenge. This paper traces the historical trajectory of LLM evaluations, from the foundational questions posed by Alan Turing to the modern era of AI research. We categorize the evolution of LLMs into distinct periods, each characterized by its unique benchmarks and evaluation criteria. As LLMs increasingly mimic human-like behaviors, traditional evaluation proxies, such as the Turing test, have become less reliable. We emphasize the pressing need for a unified evaluation system, given the broader societal implications of these models. Through an analysis of common evaluation methodologies, we advocate for a qualitative shift in assessment approaches, underscoring the importance of standardization and objective criteria. This work serves as a call for the AI community to collaboratively address the challenges of LLM evaluation, ensuring their reliability, fairness, and societal benefit.
A Simple yet Efficient Ensemble Approach for AI-generated Text Detection (2023)

Recent Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in generating text that closely resembles human writing across wide range of styles and genres. However, such capabilities are prone to potential abuse, such as fake news generation, spam email creation, and misuse in academic assignments. Hence, it is essential to build automated approaches capable of distinguishing between artificially generated text and human-authored text. In this paper, we propose a simple yet efficient solution to this problem by ensembling predictions from multiple constituent LLMs. Compared to previous state-of-the-art approaches, which are perplexity-based or uses ensembles with a large number of LLMs, our condensed ensembling approach uses only two constituent LLMs to achieve comparable performance. Experiments conducted on four benchmark datasets for generative text classification show performance improvements in the range of 0.5 to 100{\%} compared to previous state-of-the-art approaches. We also study that the influence the training data from individual LLMs have on model performance. We found that substituting commercially-restrictive Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) data with data generated from other open language models such as Falcon, Large Language Model Meta AI (LLaMA2), and Mosaic Pretrained Transformers (MPT) is a feasible alternative when developing generative text detectors. Furthermore, to demonstrate zero-shot generalization, we experimented with an English essays dataset, and results suggest that our ensembling approach can handle new data effectively.
Large Language Model Adaptation for Financial Sentiment Analysis (2023)

Natural language processing (NLP) has recently gained relevance within financial institutions by providing highly valuable insights into companies and markets' financial documents. However, the landscape of the financial domain presents extra challenges for NLP, due to the complexity of the texts and the use of specific terminology. Generalist language models tend to fall short in tasks specifically tailored for finance, even when using large language models (LLMs) with great natural language understanding and generative capabilities. This paper presents a study on LLM adaptation methods targeted at the financial domain and with high emphasis on financial sentiment analysis. To this purpose, two foundation models with less than 1.5B parameters have been adapted using a wide range of strategies. We show that through careful fine-tuning on both financial documents and instructions, these foundation models can be adapted to the target domain. Moreover, we observe that small LLMs have comparable performance to larger scale models, while being more efficient in terms of parameters and data. In addition to the models, we show how to generate artificial instructions through LLMs to augment the number of samples of the instruction dataset.
From Numbers to Words: Multi-Modal Bankruptcy Prediction Using the ECL Dataset (2023)

In this paper, we present ECL, a novel multimodal dataset containing the textual and numerical data from corporate 10K filings and associated binary bankruptcy labels. Furthermore, we develop and critically evaluate several classical and neural bankruptcy prediction models using this dataset. Our findings suggest that the information contained in each data modality is complementary for bankruptcy prediction. We also see that the binary bankruptcy prediction target does not enable our models to distinguish next year bankruptcy from an unhealthy financial situation resulting in bankruptcy in later years. Finally, we explore the use of LLMs in the context of our task. We show how GPT-based models can be used to extract meaningful summaries from the textual data but zero-shot bankruptcy prediction results are poor. All resources required to access and update the dataset or replicate our experiments are available on github.com/henriarnoUG/ECL.
Headline Generation for Stock Price Fluctuation Articles (2023)

The purpose of this paper is to construct a model for the generation of sophisticated headlines pertaining to stock price fluctuation articles, derived from the articles' content. With respect to this headline generation objective, this paper solves three distinct tasks: in addition to the task of generating article headlines, two other tasks of extracting security names, and ascertaining the trajectory of stock prices, whether they are rising or declining. Regarding the headline generation task, we also revise the task as the model utilizes the outcomes of the security name extraction and rise/decline determination tasks, thereby for the purpose of preventing the inclusion of erroneous security names. We employed state-of-the-art pre-trained models from the field of natural language processing, fine-tuning these models for each task to enhance their precision. The dataset utilized for fine-tuning comprises a collection of articles delineating the rise and decline of stock prices. Consequently, we achieved remarkably high accuracy in the dual tasks of security name extraction and stock price rise or decline determination. For the headline generation task, a significant portion of the test data yielded fitting headlines.
Audit Report Coverage Assessment using Sentence Classification (2023)

Audit reports are a window to the financial health of a company and hence gauging coverage of various audit aspects in them is important. In this paper, we aim at determining an audit report`s coverage through classification of its sentences into multiple domain specific classes. In a weakly supervised setting, we employ a rule-based approach to automatically create training data for a BERT-based multi-label classifier. We then devise an ensemble to combine both the rule based and classifier approaches. Further, we employ two novel ways to improve the ensemble`s generalization: (i) through an active learning based approach and, (ii) through a LLM based review. We demonstrate that our proposed approaches outperform several baselines. We show utility of the proposed approaches to measure audit coverage on a large dataset of 2.8K audit reports.
GPT-FinRE: In-context Learning for Financial Relation Extraction using Large Language Models (2023)

Relation extraction (RE) is a crucial task in natural language processing (NLP) that aims to identify and classify relationships between entities mentioned in text. In the financial domain, relation extraction plays a vital role in extracting valuable information from financial documents, such as news articles, earnings reports, and company filings. This paper describes our solution to relation extraction on one such dataset REFinD. The dataset was released along with shared task as a part of the Fourth Workshop on Knowledge Discovery from Unstructured Data in Financial Services, co-located with SIGIR 2023. In this paper, we employed OpenAI models under the framework of in-context learning (ICL). We utilized two retrieval strategies to find top K relevant in-context learning demonstrations / examples from training data for a given test example. The first retrieval mechanism, we employed, is a learning-free dense retriever and the other system is a learning-based retriever. We were able to achieve 3rd rank overall. Our best F1-score is 0.718.
Multi-Lingual ESG Impact Type Identification (2023)

Assessing a company`s sustainable development goes beyond just financial metrics; the inclusion of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors is becoming increasingly vital. The ML-ESG shared task series seeks to pioneer discussions on news-driven ESG ratings, drawing inspiration from the MSCI ESG rating guidelines. In its second edition, ML-ESG-2 emphasizes impact type identification, offering datasets in four languages: Chinese, English, French, and Japanese. Of the 28 teams registered, 8 participated in the official evaluation. This paper presents a comprehensive overview of ML-ESG-2, detailing the dataset specifics and summarizing the performance outcomes of the participating teams.
Identifying ESG Impact with Key Information (2023)

The paper presents a concise summary of our work for the ML-ESG-2 shared task, exclusively on the Chinese and English datasets. ML-ESG-2 aims to ascertain the influence of news articles on corporations, specifically from an ESG perspective. To this end, we generally explored the capability of key information for impact identification and experimented with various techniques at different levels. For instance, we attempted to incorporate important information at the word level with TF-IDF, at the sentence level with TextRank, and at the document level with summarization. The final results reveal that the one with GPT-4 for summarisation yields the best predictions.
A low resource framework for Multi-lingual ESG Impact Type Identification (2023)

With the growing interest in Green Investing, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors related to Institutions and financial entities has become extremely important for investors. While the classification of potential ESG factors is an important issue, identifying whether the factors positively or negatively impact the Institution is also a key aspect to consider while making evaluations for ESG scores. This paper presents our solution to identify ESG impact types in four languages (English, Chinese, Japanese, French) released as shared tasks during the FinNLP workshop at the IJCNLP-AACL-2023 conference. We use a combination of translation, masked language modeling, paraphrasing, and classification to solve this problem and use a generalized pipeline that performs well across all four languages. Our team ranked 1st in the Chinese and Japanese sub-tasks.
GPT-based Solution for ESG Impact Type Identification (2023)

In this paper, we present our solutions to the ML-ESG-2 shared task which is co-located with the FinNLP workshop at IJCNLP-AACL-2023. The task proposes an objective of binary classification of ESG-related news based on what type of impact they can have on a company - Risk or Opportunity. We report the results of three systems, which ranked 2nd, 9th, and 10th in the final leaderboard for the English language, with the best solution achieving over 0.97 in F1 score.
The Risk and Opportunity of Data Augmentation and Translation for ESG News Impact Identification with Language Models (2023)

This paper presents our findings in the ML-ESG-2 task, which focused on classifying a news snippet of various languages as {\textquotedblleft}Risk{\textquotedblright} or {\textquotedblleft}Opportunity{\textquotedblright} in the ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) context. We experimented with data augmentation and translation facilitated by Large Language Models (LLM). We found that augmenting the English dataset did not help to improve the performance. By fine-tuning RoBERTa models with the original data, we achieved the top position for the English and second place for the French task. In contrast, we could achieve comparable results on the French dataset by solely using the English translation, securing the third position for the French task with only marginal F1 differences to the second-place model.
ESG Impact Type Classification: Leveraging Strategic Prompt Engineering and LLM Fine-Tuning (2023)

In this paper, we describe our approach to the ML-ESG-2 shared task, co-located with the FinNLP workshop at IJCNLP-AACL-2023. The task aims at classifying news articles into categories reflecting either {\textquotedblleft}Opportunity{\textquotedblright} or {\textquotedblleft}Risk{\textquotedblright} from an ESG standpoint for companies. Our innovative methodology leverages two distinct systems for optimal text classification. In the initial phase, we engage in prompt engineering, working in conjunction with semantic similarity and using the Claude 2 LLM. Subsequently, we apply fine-tuning techniques to the Llama 2 and Dolly LLMs to enhance their performance. We report the results of five different approaches in this paper, with our top models ranking first in the French category and sixth in the English category.
Exploring Knowledge Composition for ESG Impact Type Determination (2023)

In this paper, we discuss our (Team HHU`s) submission to the Multi-Lingual ESG Impact Type Identification task (ML-ESG-2). The goal of this task is to determine if an ESG-related news article represents an opportunity or a risk. We use an adapter-based framework in order to train multiple adapter modules which capture different parts of the knowledge present in the training data. Experimenting with various Adapter Fusion setups, we focus both on combining the ESG-aspect-specific knowledge, and on combining the language-specific-knowledge. Our results show that in both cases, it is possible to effectively compose the knowledge in order to improve the impact type determination.
Enhancing ESG Impact Type Identification through Early Fusion and Multilingual Models (2023)

In the evolving landscape of Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance (ESG) impact assessment, the ML-ESG-2 shared task proposes identifying ESG impact types. To address this challenge, we present a comprehensive system leveraging ensemble learning techniques, capitalizing on early and late fusion approaches. Our approach employs four distinct models: mBERT, FlauBERT-base, ALBERT-base-v2, and a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) incorporating Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) and Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) features. Through extensive experimentation, we find that our early fusion ensemble approach, featuring the integration of LSA, TF-IDF, mBERT, FlauBERT-base, and ALBERT-base-v2, delivers the best performance. Our system offers a comprehensive ESG impact type identification solution, contributing to the responsible and sustainable decision-making processes vital in today`s financial and corporate governance landscape.