ymoslem/acl-abstracts huggingface dataset:
Fine-Tuned LLMs are \textquotedblleftTime Capsules\textquotedblright for Tracking Societal Bias Through Books (2025)

Books, while often rich in cultural insights, can also mirror societal biases of their eras{---}biases that Large Language Models (LLMs) may learn and perpetuate during training. We introduce a novel method to trace and quantify these biases using fine-tuned LLMs. We develop BookPAGE, a corpus comprising 593 fictional books across seven decades (1950-2019), to track bias evolution. By fine-tuning LLMs on books from each decade and using targeted prompts, we examine shifts in biases related to gender, sexual orientation, race, and religion. Our findings indicate that LLMs trained on decade-specific books manifest biases reflective of their times, with both gradual trends and notable shifts. For example, model responses showed a progressive increase in the portrayal of women in leadership roles (from 8{\%} to 22{\%}) from the 1950s to 2010s, with a significant uptick in the 1990s (from 4{\%} to 12{\%}), possibly aligning with third-wave feminism. Same-sex relationship references increased markedly from the 1980s to 2000s (from 0{\%} to 10{\%}), mirroring growing LGBTQ+ visibility. Concerningly, negative portrayals of Islam rose sharply in the 2000s (26{\%} to 38{\%}), likely reflecting post-9/11 sentiments. Importantly, we demonstrate that these biases stem mainly from the books' content and not the models' architecture or initial training. Our study offers a new perspective on societal bias trends by bridging AI, literary studies, and social science research.
Exploring the Cost-Effectiveness of Perspective Taking in Crowdsourcing Subjective Assessment: A Case Study of Toxicity Detection (2025)

Crowdsourcing has been increasingly utilized to gather subjective assessment, such as evaluating the toxicity of texts. Since there doesnot exist a single {\textquotedblleft}ground truth{\textquotedblright} answer for subjective annotations, obtaining annotations to accurately reflect the opinions of differentsubgroups becomes a key objective for these subjective assessment tasks. Traditionally, this objective is accomplished by directly soliciting a large number of annotations from each subgroup, which can be costly especially when annotators of certain subgroups are hard to access. In this paper, using toxicity evaluation as an example, we explore the feasibility of using perspective taking{---}that is, asking annotators to take the point of views of a certain subgroup and estimate opinions within that subgroup{---}as a way to achieve this objective cost-efficiently. Our results show that compared to the baseline approach of directly soliciting annotations from the target subgroup, perspective taking could lead to better estimates of the subgroup-level opinion when annotations from the target subgroup is costly while the budget is limited. Moreover, prompting annotators to take the perspectives of contrasting subgroups simultaneously can further improve the quality of the estimates. Finally, we find that aggregating multiple perspective-taking annotations while soliciting a small number of annotations directly from the target subgroup for calibration leads to the highest-quality estimates under limited budget.
NormAd: A Framework for Measuring the Cultural Adaptability of Large Language Models (2025)

To be effectively and safely deployed to global user populations, large language models (LLMs) may need to adapt outputs to user values and cultures, not just know about them. We introduce NormAd, an evaluation framework to assess LLMs' cultural adaptability, specifically measuring their ability to judge social acceptability across varying levels of cultural norm specificity, from abstract values to explicit social norms. As an instantiation of our framework, we create NormAd-Eti, a benchmark of 2.6k situational descriptions representing social-etiquette related cultural norms from 75 countries. Through comprehensive experiments on NormAd-Eti, we find that LLMs struggle to accurately judge social acceptability across these varying degrees of cultural contexts and show stronger adaptability to English-centric cultures over those from the Global South. Even in the simplest setting where the relevant social norms are provided, the best LLMs' performance ($\textless$ 82{\%}) lags behind humans ($\textgreater$ 95{\%}). In settings with abstract values and country information, model performance drops substantially ($\textless$ 60{\%}), while human accuracy remains high ($\textgreater$90{\%}). Furthermore, we find that models are better at recognizing socially acceptable versus unacceptable situations. Our findings showcase the current pitfalls in socio-cultural reasoning of LLMs which hinder their adaptability for global audiences.
LiPO: Listwise Preference Optimization through Learning-to-Rank (2025)

Aligning language models (LMs) with curated human feedback is critical to control their behaviors in real-world applications. Several recent policy optimization methods, such as DPO and SLiC, serve as promising alternatives to the traditional Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) approach.In practice, human feedback often comes in a format of a ranked list over multiple responses to amortize the cost of reading prompt. Multiple responses can also be ranked by reward models or AI feedback. There lacks such a thorough study on directly fitting upon a list of responses. In this work, we formulate the LM alignment as a listwise ranking problem and describe the LiPO framework, where the policy can potentially learn more effectively from a ranked list of plausible responses given the prompt. This view draws an explicit connection to Learning-to-Rank (LTR), where most existing preference optimization work can be mapped to existing ranking objectives. Following this connection, we provide an examination of ranking objectives that are not well studied for LM alignment, with DPO and SLiC as special cases when list size is two. In particular, we highlight a specific method, LiPO-$\lambda$, which leverages a state-of-the-art listwise ranking objective and weights each preference pair in a more advanced manner. We show that LiPO-$\lambda$ can outperform DPO variants and SLiC by a clear margin on several preference alignment tasks with both curated and real rankwise preference data.
Adaptive Prompting: Ad-hoc Prompt Composition for Social Bias Detection (2025)

Recent advances on instruction fine-tuning have led to the development of various prompting techniques for large language models, such as explicit reasoning steps. However, the success of techniques depends on various parameters, such as the task, language model, and context provided. Finding an effective prompt is, therefore, often a trial-and-error process. Most existing approaches to automatic prompting aim to optimize individual techniques instead of compositions of techniques and their dependence on the input. To fill this gap, we propose an adaptive prompting approach that predicts the optimal prompt composition ad-hoc for a given input. We apply our approach to social bias detection, a highly context-dependent task that requires semantic understanding. We evaluate it with three large language models on three datasets, comparing compositions to individual techniques and other baselines. The results underline the importance of finding an effective prompt composition. Our approach robustly ensures high detection performance, and is best in several settings. Moreover, first experiments on other tasks support its generalizability.
Enhancing Discriminative Representation in Similar Relation Clusters for Few-Shot Continual Relation Extraction (2025)

Few-shot Continual Relation Extraction (FCRE) has emerged as a significant challenge in information extraction, necessitating that relation extraction (RE) systems can sequentially identify new relations with limited labeled samples. While existing studies have demonstrated promising results in FCRE, they often overlook the issue of similar relations, which is a critical factor contributing to catastrophic forgetting. In this work, we propose Sirus{--}a novel method that utilizes relation descriptions and dynamic clustering on these descriptions to identify similar relations. Leveraging this information, we introduce innovative loss functions specifically designed to enhance the distinction between relations, with a focus on learning to differentiate similar ones. Experimental results show that our approach can effectively mitigate the problem of catastrophic forgetting and outperforms state-of-the-art methods by a large margin. Additionally, we explore the potential of Large Language Model Embeddings (LLMEs) with representation learning and embedding capabilities, demonstrating their promise for advancing FCRE systems.
SymBa: Symbolic Backward Chaining for Structured Natural Language Reasoning (2025)

To improve the performance and explainability of LLM-based natural language reasoning, structured reasoning can be applied to generate explicitly structured proofs. Among different methods for structured reasoning, we specifically focus on backward chaining, where the proof goal is recursively decomposed to subgoals by searching and applying rules. We argue that current LLM-based backward chaining systems (e.g. Least-to-most prompting and LAMBADA) are incomplete, as they omit crucial algorithmic components identified from the classic backward chaining algorithm in computational logic (SLD Resolution). To this end, we propose a novel backward chaining system, SymBa (Symbolic Backward Chaining), which integrates a symbolic solver and an LLM. In SymBa, the solver controls the proof process, and the LLM is only called when the solver requires new information to complete the proof. Empowered by completeness, SymBa achieves a significant improvement in seven deductive, relational, and arithmetic reasoning benchmarks compared to the baselines.
MEDA: Dynamic KV Cache Allocation for Efficient Multimodal Long-Context Inference (2025)

Long-context Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) that incorporate long text-image and text-video modalities, demand substantial computational resources as their multimodal Key-Value (KV) cache grows with increasing input lengths, challenging memory and time efficiency. For multimodal scenarios, the cross-modal interactions inevitablely increase complexity, and prior methods for KV cache compression, in both text-only and multimodal LLMs, have neglected attention density variations across layers, often adopting uniform or progressive reduction strategis for layer-wise cache allocation. This results in precision loss and suboptimal performance. We propose \textbf{MEDA}, a novel approach specifically designed for the complexities of multimodal settings, dynamically allocating KV cache sizes based on attention entropy to better adapt to multimodal interactions.Through a dynamic multimodal KV cache allocation strategy, MEDA compresses the KV cache, adaptively retains sufficient multimodal information at each layer. Meanwhile, to mitigate the degradation of contextual information due to cache compression, we also integrate KV pairs merging techniques to maintain coherence. MEDA achieves up to \textbf{72{\%}} KV cache memory reduction and \textbf{2.82} faster decoding speeds in some cases, while maintaining or enhancing performance on various multimodal tasks in a long context, including multi-image and long video scenarios.
Language Models Largely Exhibit Human-like Constituent Ordering Preferences (2025)

Though English sentences are typically inflexible vis-{\`a}-vis word order, constituents often show far more variability in ordering. One prominent theory presents the notion that constituent ordering is directly correlated with constituent weight: a measure of the constituent`s length or complexity. Such theories are interesting in the context of natural language processing (NLP), because while recent advances in NLP have led to significant gains in the performance of large language models (LLMs), much remains unclear about how these models process language, and how this compares to human language processing. In particular, the question remains whether LLMs display the same patterns with constituent movement, and may provide insights into existing theories on when and how the shift occurs in human language. We compare a variety of LLMs with diverse properties to evaluate broad LLM performance on four types of constituent movement: heavy NP shift, particle movement, dative alternation, and multiple PPs. Despite performing unexpectedly around particle movement, LLMs generally align with human preferences around constituent ordering.
SafeQuant: LLM Safety Analysis via Quantized Gradient Inspection (2025)

Contemporary jailbreak attacks on Large Language Models (LLMs) employ sophisticated techniques with obfuscated content to bypass safety guardrails. Existing defenses either use computationally intensive LLM verification or require adversarial fine-tuning, leaving models vulnerable to advanced attacks. We introduce SafeQuant, a novel defense framework that leverages quantized gradient patterns to identify harmful prompts efficiently. Our key insight is that when generating identical responses like {\textquotedblleft}Sure{\textquotedblright}, LLMs exhibit distinctly different internal gradient patterns for safe versus harmful prompts, reflecting conflicts with safety training. By capturing these patterns through selective gradient masking and quantization, SafeQuant significantly outperforms existing defenses across multiple benchmarks while maintaining model utility. The method demonstrates particular effectiveness against sophisticated attacks like WordGame prompts and persuasive adversarial attacks, achieving an F1-score of 0.80 on WordGame dataset and outperforming state-of-the-art (SoTA) methods like GradSafe by an absolute margin of 57{\%}.
Exploring Large Language Models for Effective Rumor Detection on Social Media (2025)

In this paper, we explore using Large Language Models (LLMs) for rumor detection on social media. It involves assessing the veracity of claims on social media based on social context (e.g., comments, propagation patterns). LLMs, despite their impressive capabilities in text-based reasoning tasks, struggle to achieve promising rumor detection performance when facing long structured social contexts. Our preliminary analysis shows that large-scale contexts hinder LLMs' reasoning abilities, while moderate contexts perform better for LLMs, highlighting the need for refined contexts. Accordingly, we propose a semantic-propagation collaboration-base framework that integrates small language models (e.g., graph attention network) with LLMs for effective rumor detection. It models contexts by enabling text semantic and propagation patterns to collaborate through graph attention mechanisms, and reconstruct the context by aggregating attention values during inference. Also, a cluster-based unsupervised method to refine context is proposed for generalization. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of proposed methods in rumor detection. This work bridges the gap for LLMs in facing long, structured data and offers a novel solution for rumor detection on social media.
No Simple Answer to Data Complexity: An Examination of Instance-Level Complexity Metrics for Classification Tasks (2025)

Natural Language Processing research has become increasingly concerned with understanding data quality and complexity at the instance level. Instance-level complexity scores can be used for tasks such as filtering out noisy observations and subsampling informative examples. However, there exists a diverse taxonomy of complexity metrics that can be used for a classification task, making metric selection itself a difficult task. We empirically examine the relationship between these metrics and find that simply storing training loss provides similar complexity rankings as other more computationally intensive techniques. Metric similarity allows us to subsample data with higher aggregate complexity along several metrics using a single a priori available meta-feature. Further, this choice of complexity metric does not impact demographic fairness, even in downstream predictions. Researchers should consider metric availability and similarity, as using the wrong metric or sampling strategy may hurt performance.
NLI under the Microscope: What Atomic Hypothesis Decomposition Reveals (2025)

Decomposition of text into atomic propositions is a flexible framework allowing for the closer inspection of input and output text. We use atomic decomposition of hypotheses in two natural language reasoning tasks, traditional NLI and defeasible NLI, to form atomic sub-problems, or granular inferences that models must weigh when solving the overall problem. These atomic sub-problems serve as a tool to further understand the structure of both NLI and defeasible reasoning, probe a model`s consistency and understanding of different inferences, and measure the diversity of examples in benchmark datasets. Our results indicate that LLMs still struggle with logical consistency on atomic NLI and defeasible NLI sub-problems. Lastly, we identify critical atomic sub-problems of defeasible NLI examples, or those that most contribute to the overall label, and propose a method to measure the inferential consistency of a model, a metric designed to capture the degree to which a model makes consistently correct or incorrect predictions about the same fact under different contexts.
HISTOIRESMORALES: A French Dataset for Assessing Moral Alignment (2025)

Aligning language models with human values is crucial, especially as they become more integrated into everyday life. While models are often adapted to user preferences, it is equally important to ensure they align with moral norms and behaviours in real-world social situations. Despite significant progress in languages like English and Chinese, French has seen little attention in this area, leaving a gap in understanding how LLMs handle moral reasoning in this language. To address this gap, we introduce HistoiresMorales, a French dataset derived from MoralStories, created through translation and subsequently refined with the assistance of native speakers to guarantee grammatical accuracy and adaptation to the French cultural context. We also rely on annotations of the moral values within the dataset to ensure their alignment with French norms. HistoiresMorales covers a wide range of social situations, including differences in tipping practices, expressions of honesty in relationships, and responsibilities toward animals. To foster future research, we also conduct preliminary experiments on the alignment of multilingual models on French and English data and the robustness of the alignment. We find that while LLMs are generally aligned with human moral norms by default, they can be easily influenced with user-preference optimization for both moral and immoral data.
Leveraging Allophony in Self-Supervised Speech Models for Atypical Pronunciation Assessment (2025)

Allophony refers to the variation in the phonetic realization of a phoneme based on its phonetic environment. Modeling allophones is crucial for atypical pronunciation assessment, which involves distinguishing atypical from typical pronunciations. However, recent phoneme classifier-based approaches often simplify this by treating various realizations as a single phoneme, bypassing the complexity of modeling allophonic variation. Motivated by the acoustic modeling capabilities of frozen self-supervised speech model (S3M) features, we propose MixGoP, a novel approach that leverages Gaussian mixture models to model phoneme distributions with multiple subclusters. Our experiments show that MixGoP achieves state-of-the-art performance across four out of five datasets, including dysarthric and non-native speech. Our analysis further suggests that S3M features capture allophonic variation more effectively than MFCCs and Mel spectrograms, highlighting the benefits of integrating MixGoP with S3M features.
SAPIENT: Mastering Multi-turn Conversational Recommendation with Strategic Planning and Monte Carlo Tree Search (2025)

Conversational Recommender Systems (CRS) proactively engage users in interactive dialogues to elicit user preferences and provide personalized recommendations. Existing methods train Reinforcement Learning (RL)-based agent with greedy action selection or sampling strategy, and may suffer from suboptimal conversational planning. To address this, we present a novel Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS)-based CRS framework SAPIENT. SAPIENT consists of a conversational agent (S-agent) and a conversational planner (S-planner). S-planner builds a conversational search tree with MCTS based on the initial actions proposed by S-agent to find conversation plans. The best conversation plans from S-planner are used to guide the training of S-agent, creating a self-training loop where S-agent can iteratively improve its capability for conversational planning. Furthermore, we propose an efficient variant SAPIENT for trade-off between training efficiency and performance. Extensive experiments on four benchmark datasets validate the effectiveness of our approach, showing that SAPIENT outperforms the state-of-the-art baselines. Our code and data are accessible through https://github.com/ninglab/SAPIENT.
Reliability of Topic Modeling (2025)

Topic models allow researchers to extract latent factors from text data and use those variables in downstream statistical analyses. However, these methodologies can vary significantly due to initialization differences, randomness in sampling procedures, or noisy data. Reliability of these methods is of particular concern as many researchers treat learned topic models as ground truth for subsequent analyses. In this work, we show that the standard practice for quantifying topic model reliability fails to capture essential aspects of the variation in two widely-used topic models. Drawing from a extensive literature on measurement theory, we provide empirical and theoretical analyses of three other metrics for evaluating the reliability of topic models. On synthetic and real-world data, we show that McDonald`s $\omega$ provides the best encapsulation of reliability. This metric provides an essential tool for validation of topic model methodologies that should be a standard component of any topic model-based research.
Style Transfer with Multi-iteration Preference Optimization (2025)

Numerous recent techniques for text style transfer characterize their approaches as variants of reinforcement learning and preference optimization. In this work, we consider the relationship between these approaches and a class of optimization approaches developed primarily for (non-neural) statistical machine translation, formerly known as {\textquoteleft}tuning'. Inspired by these techniques from the past, we improve upon established preference optimization approaches, incorporating multiple iterations of exploration and optimization, and choosing contrastive examples by following a {\textquoteleft}hope' vs {\textquoteleft}fear' sampling strategy. Cognizant of the difference between machine translation and style transfer, however, we further tailor our framework with a new pseudo-parallel data generation method and a dynamic weighted reward aggregation method to tackle the lack of parallel data and the need for a multi-objective reward. We evaluate our model on two commonly used text style transfer datasets. Through automatic and human evaluation results we show the effectiveness and the superiority of our model compared to state-of-the-art baselines.