ymoslem/acl-abstracts huggingface dataset:
Tooling or Not Tooling? The Impact of Tools on Language Agents for Chemistry Problem Solving (2025)

To enhance large language models (LLMs) for chemistry problem solving, several LLM-based agents augmented with tools have been proposed, such as ChemCrow and Coscientist. However, their evaluations are narrow in scope, leaving a large gap in understanding the benefits of tools across diverse chemistry tasks. To bridge this gap, we develop ChemAgent, an enhanced chemistry agent over ChemCrow, and conduct a comprehensive evaluation of its performance on both specialized chemistry tasks and general chemistry questions. Surprisingly, ChemAgent does not consistently outperform its base LLMs without tools. Our error analysis with a chemistry expert suggests that: For specialized chemistry tasks, such as synthesis prediction, we should augment agents with specialized tools; however, for general chemistry questions like those in exams, agents' ability to reason correctly with chemistry knowledge matters more, and tool augmentation does not always help.
RusCode: Russian Cultural Code Benchmark for Text-to-Image Generation (2025)

Text-to-image generation models have gained popularity among users around the world. However, many of these models exhibit a strong bias toward English-speaking cultures, ignoring or misrepresenting the unique characteristics of other language groups, countries, and nationalities. The lack of cultural awareness can reduce the generation quality and lead to undesirable consequences such as unintentional insult, and the spread of prejudice. In contrast to the field of natural language processing, cultural awareness in computer vision has not been explored as extensively. In this paper, we strive to reduce this gap. We propose a RusCode benchmark for evaluating the quality of text-to-image generation containing elements of the Russian cultural code. To do this, we form a list of 19 categories that best represent the features of Russian visual culture. Our final dataset consists of 1250 text prompts in Russian and their translations into English. The prompts cover a wide range of topics, including complex concepts from art, popular culture, folk traditions, famous people`s names, natural objects, scientific achievements, etc. We present the results of a human evaluation of the side-by-side comparison of Russian visual concepts representations using popular generative models.
Evaluation of LLMs-based Hidden States as Author Representations for Psychological Human-Centered NLP Tasks (2025)

Like most of NLP, models for human-centered NLP tasks{---}tasks attempting to assess author-level information{---}predominantly use rep-resentations derived from hidden states of Transformer-based LLMs. However, what component of the LM is used for the representation varies widely. Moreover, there is a need for Human Language Models (HuLMs) that implicitly model the author and provide a user-level hidden state. Here, we systematically evaluate different ways of representing documents and users using different LM and HuLM architectures to predict task outcomes as both dynamically changing states and averaged trait-like user-level attributes of valence, arousal, empathy, and distress. We find that representing documents as an average of the token hidden states performs the best generally. Further, while a user-level hidden state itself is rarely the best representation, we find its inclusion in the model strengthens token or document embeddings used to derive document- and user-level representations resulting in best performances.
Large Language Models and Causal Inference in Collaboration: A Comprehensive Survey (2025)

Causal inference has demonstrated significant potential to enhance Natural Language Processing (NLP) models in areas such as predictive accuracy, fairness, robustness, and explainability by capturing causal relationships among variables. The rise of generative Large Language Models (LLMs) has greatly impacted various language processing tasks. This survey focuses on research that evaluates or improves LLMs from a causal view in the following areas: reasoning capacity, fairness and safety issues, explainability, and handling multimodality. Meanwhile, LLMs can assist in causal inference tasks, such as causal relationship discovery and causal effect estimation, by leveraging their generation ability and knowledge learned during pre-training. This review explores the interplay between causal inference frameworks and LLMs from both perspectives, emphasizing their collective potential to further the development of more advanced and robust artificial intelligence systems.
ThoughtSculpt: Reasoning with Intermediate Revision and Search (2025)

We present THOUGHTSCULPT, a general reasoning and search method for tasks with outputs that can be decomposed into components. THOUGHTSCULPT explores a search tree of potential solutions using Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS), building solutions one action at a time and evaluating according to any domain-specific heuristic, which in practice is often simply an LLM evaluator. Critically, our action space includes revision actions: THOUGHTSCULPT may choose to revise part of its previous output rather than continuing to build the rest of its output. Empirically, THOUGHTSCULPT outperforms state-of-the-art reasoning methods across three challenging tasks: Story Outline Improvement (up to +30{\%} interestingness), Mini-Crosswords Solving (up to +16{\%} word success rate), and Constrained Generation (up to +10{\%} concept coverage).
Optimizing Hidden Markov Language Models: An Empirical Study of Reparameterization and Initialization Techniques (2025)

Hidden Markov models (HMMs) are valuable for their ability to provide exact and tractable inference. However, learning an HMM in an unsupervised manner involves a non-convex optimization problem that is plagued by poor local optima. Recent work on scaling-up HMMs to perform competitively as language models has indicated that this challenge only increases with larger hidden state sizes. Several techniques to address this problem have been proposed, but have not be evaluated comprehensively. This study provides a comprehensive empirical analysis of two recent strategies that use neural networks to enhance HMM optimization: neural reparameterization and neural initialization. We find that (1) these techniques work effectively for scaled HMM language modeling, (2) linear reparameterizations can be as effective as non-linear ones, and (3) the strategies are complementary.
Using Linguistic Entrainment to Evaluate Large Language Models for Use in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (2025)

Entrainment, the responsive communication between interacting individuals, is a crucial process in building a strong relationship between a mental health therapist and their client, leading to positive therapeutic outcomes. However, so far entrainment has not been investigated as a measure of efficacy of large language models (LLMs) delivering mental health therapy. In this work, we evaluate the linguistic entrainment of an LLM (ChatGPT 3.5-turbo) in a mental health dialog setting. We first validate computational measures of linguistic entrainment with two measures of the quality of client self-disclosures: intimacy and engagement ($p < 0.05$). We then compare the linguistic entrainment of the LLM to trained therapists and non-expert online peer supporters in a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) setting. We show that the LLM is outperformed by humans with respect to linguistic entrainment ($p < 0.001$). These results support the need to be cautious in using LLMs out-of-the-box for mental health applications.
Analysis of LLM as a grammatical feature tagger for African American English (2025)

African American English (AAE) presents unique challenges in natural language processing (NLP) This research systematically compares the performance of available NLP models{---}rule-based, transformer-based, and large language models (LLMs){---}capable of identifying key grammatical features of AAE, namely Habitual Be and Multiple Negation. These features were selected for their distinct grammatical complexity and frequency of occurrence. The evaluation involved sentence-level binary classification tasks, using both zero-shot and few-shot strategies. The analysis reveals that while LLMs show promise compared to the baseline, they are influenced by biases such as recency and unrelated features in the text such as formality. This study highlights the necessity for improved model training and architectural adjustments to better accommodate AAE`s unique linguistic characteristics. Data and code are available.
LLM-Microscope: Uncovering the Hidden Role of Punctuation in Context Memory of Transformers (2025)

We introduce methods to quantify how Large Language Models (LLMs) encode and store contextual information, revealing that tokens often seen as minor (e.g., determiners, punctuation) carry surprisingly high context. Notably, removing these tokens {---} especially stopwords, articles, and commas {---} consistently degrades performance on MMLU and BABILong-4k, even if removing only irrelevant tokens. Our analysis also shows a strong correlation between contextualization and linearity, where linearity measures how closely the transformation from one layer`s embeddings to the next can be approximated by a single linear mapping. These findings underscore the hidden importance of {\textquotedblleft}filler{\textquotedblright} tokens in maintaining context. For further exploration, we present LLM-Microscope, an open-source toolkit that assesses token-level nonlinearity, evaluates contextual memory, visualizes intermediate layer contributions (via an adapted Logit Lens), and measures the intrinsic dimensionality of representations. This toolkit illuminates how seemingly trivial tokens can be critical for long-range understanding.
On A Scale From 1 to 5: Quantifying Hallucination in Faithfulness Evaluation (2025)

Hallucination has been a popular topic in natural language generation (NLG). In real-world applications, unfaithful content can result in poor data quality or loss of trust from end users. Thus, it is crucial to fact-check before adopting NLG for production usage, which can be expensive if done manually. In this paper, we investigate automated faithfulness evaluation in guided NLG. We developed a rubric template and used large language models (LLMs) to score the generation on quantifiable scales. We compared popular LLMs as well as widely adopted natural language inference (NLI) models in scoring quality and sensitivity. In addition, we developed methods for the generation of synthetic unfaithful data, as well as heuristics to quantify the percentage of hallucination. Our results on 4 travel-domain industry dataset show that GPT-4 can provide accurate judgement and explanation of whether a source and a generation are factually consistent. Furthermore, we found that tuning NLI models on synthetic data can improve performance. Lastly, we present insights on the latency and cost of deploying such a system.
LITERA: An LLM Based Approach to Latin-to-English Translation (2025)

This paper introduces an LLM-based Latin-to-English translation platform designed to address the challenges of translating Latin texts. We named the model LITERA, which stands for Latin Interpretation and Translations into English for Research Assistance. Through a multi-layered translation process utilizing a fine-tuned version of GPT-4o-mini and GPT-4o, LITERA offers an unprecedented level of accuracy, showcased by greatly improved BLEU scores, particularly in classical Latin, along with improved BLEURT scores. The development of LITERA involved close collaboration with Duke University`s Classical Studies Department, which was instrumental in creating a small, high-quality parallel Latin-English dataset. This paper details the architecture, fine-tuning methodology, and prompting strategies used in LITERA, emphasizing its ability to produce literal translations.
Investigating the Shortcomings of LLMs in Step-by-Step Legal Reasoning (2025)

Reasoning abilities of LLMs have been a key focus in recent years. One challenging reasoning domain with interesting nuances is legal reasoning, which requires careful application of rules, and precedents while balancing deductive and analogical reasoning, and conflicts between rules. Although there have been a few works on using LLMs for legal reasoning, their focus has been on overall accuracy. In this paper, we dig deeper to do a step-by-step analysis and figure out where they commit errors. We use the college-level Multiple Choice Question-Answering (MCQA) task from the \textit{Civil Procedure} dataset and propose a new error taxonomy derived from initial manual analysis of reasoning chains with respect to several LLMs, including two objective measures: soundness and correctness scores. We then develop an LLM-based automated evaluation framework to identify reasoning errors and evaluate the performance of LLMs. The computation of soundness and correctness on the dataset using the auto-evaluator framework reveals several interesting insights. Furthermore, we show that incorporating the error taxonomy as feedback in popular prompting techniques marginally increases LLM performance. Our work will also serve as an evaluation framework that can be used in detailed error analysis of reasoning chains for logic-intensive complex tasks.
Towards Long Context Hallucination Detection (2025)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across various tasks. However, they are prone to contextual hallucination, generating information that is either unsubstantiated or contradictory to the given context. Although many studies have investigated contextual hallucinations in LLMs, addressing them in long-context inputs remains an open problem. In this work, we take an initial step toward solving this problem by constructing a dataset specifically designed for long-context hallucination detection. Furthermore, we propose a novel architecture that enables pre-trained encoder models, such as BERT, to process long contexts and effectively detect contextual hallucinations through a decomposition and aggregation mechanism. Our experimental results show that the proposed architecture significantly outperforms previous models of similar size as well as LLM-based models across various metrics, while providing substantially faster inference. We publicly release our dataset and code to promote research along the same line.
How to Talk to Language Models: Serialization Strategies for Structured Entity Matching (2025)

Entity matching (EM), which identifies whether two data records refer to the same real-world entity, is crucial for knowledge base construction and enhancing data-driven AI systems. Recent advances in language models (LMs) have shown great potential in resolving entities with rich textual attributes. However, their performance heavily depends on how structured entities are {\textquotedblleft}talked{\textquotedblright} through serialized text. The impact of this serialization process remains underexplored, particularly for entities with complex relations in knowledge graphs (KGs). In this work, we systematically study entity serialization by benchmarking the effect of common schemes with LMs of different sizes on diverse tabular matching datasets. We apply our findings to propose a novel serialization scheme for KG entities based on random walks and utilize LLMs to encode sampled semantic walks for matching. Using this lightweight approach with open-source LLMs, we achieve a leading performance on EM in canonical and highly heterogeneous KGs, demonstrating significant throughput increases and superior robustness compared to GPT-4-based methods. Our study on serialization provides valuable insights for the deployment of LMs in real-world EM tasks.
Accounting for Sycophancy in Language Model Uncertainty Estimation (2025)

Effective human-machine collaboration requires machine learning models to externalize uncertainty, so users can reflect and intervene when necessary. For language models, these representations of uncertainty may be impacted by sycophancy bias: proclivity to agree with users, even if they are wrong. For instance, models may be over-confident in (incorrect) problem solutions suggested by a user. We study the relationship between sycophancy and uncertainty estimation for the first time. We propose a generalization of the definition of sycophancy bias to measure downstream impacts on uncertainty estimation, and also propose a new algorithm (SyRoUP) to account for sycophancy in the uncertainty estimation process. Unlike previous works, we study a broad array of user behaviors, varying both correctness and confidence of user suggestions to see how model answers (and their certainty) change. Our experiments across conversation forecasting and question-answering tasks show that user confidence plays a critical role in modulating the effects of sycophancy, and that SyRoUP can better predict these effects. From these results, we argue that externalizing both model \textit{and} user uncertainty can help to mitigate the impacts of sycophancy bias.
Zero-Shot Keyphrase Generation: Investigating Specialized Instructions and Multi-sample Aggregation on Large Language Models (2025)

Keyphrases are the essential topical phrases that summarize a document. Keyphrase generation is a long-standing NLP task for automatically generating keyphrases for a given document. While the task has been comprehensively explored in the past via various models, only a few works perform some preliminary analysis of Large Language Models (LLMs) for the task. Given the impact of LLMs in the field of NLP, it is important to conduct a more thorough examination of their potential for keyphrase generation. In this paper, we attempt to meet this demand with our research agenda. Specifically, we focus on the zero-shot capabilities of open-source instruction-tuned LLMs (Phi-3, Llama-3) and the closed-source GPT-4o for this task. We systematically investigate the effect of providing task-relevant specialized instructions in the prompt. Moreover, we design task-specific counterparts to self-consistency-style strategies for LLMs and show significant benefits from our proposals over the baselines.
Meta-Reasoning Improves Tool Use in Large Language Models (2025)

External tools help large language models succeed at tasks where they would otherwise typically fail. In existing frameworks, choosing tools at test time relies on naive greedy decoding, regardless of whether the model has been fine-tuned on tool-annotated data or prompted with in-context examples. In contrast, we find that gathering and choosing among a suitable set of candidate tools has greater potential to lead to an optimal selection. We present Tool selECTion via meta-reasONing (TECTON), a two-phase system that first *reasons* over a task and outputs candidate tools using a custom fine-tuned language modelling head. Then, with the custom head disabled, it *meta-reasons* (i.e., it reasons over the previous reasoning process) to make a final choice. We show that TECTON results in substantial gains{---}both in-distribution and out-of-distribution{---}on a range of math reasoning datasets.
CLERC: A Dataset for U. S. Legal Case Retrieval and Retrieval-Augmented Analysis Generation (2025)

Legal professionals need to write analyses that rely on citations to relevant precedents, i.e., previous case decisions. Intelligence systems assisting legal professionals in writing such documents provide great benefits but are challenging to design. Such systems need to help locate, summarize, and reason over salient precedents in order to be useful. To enable systems for such tasks, we work with legal professionals to create a colossal dataset. supporting two important backbone tasks: information retrieval (IR) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). This dataset **CLERC** (Case Law Evaluation and Retrieval Corpus), is constructed for training and evaluating models on their ability to (1) find corresponding citations for a given piece of legal analysis and to (2) compile the text of these citations (as well as previous context) into a cogent analysis that supports a reasoning goal. We benchmark state-of-the-art models on CLERC, showing that current approaches still struggle: GPT-4o generates analyses with the highest ROUGE F-scores but hallucinates the most, while zero-shot IR models only achieve 48.3{\%} recall@1000.
GAIfE: Using GenAI to Improve Literacy in Low-resourced Settings (2025)

Illiteracy is a predictor of many negative social and personal outcomes. Illiteracy rates are particularly high in countries with underresourced languages, where few books exist that are suitable for children to learn to read from. We present GAIfE (Generative AI for Education), a toolchain and workflow developed through empirical methods, that demonstrates how existing tools can be adapted to address low literacy for an underresourced language. We used GAIfE (a play on the Bambara word for {\textquotedblleft}book{\textquotedblright}) to construct materials for developing children`s reading competence in Bambara, the vehicular language of Mali. Our approach to the generation and post-generation editing of content skewed by the Global-North-centric bias of available LLMs, enabled us to rapidly multiply the content in Bambara available online by 10 times while maintaining high standards of attractiveness of the material to maintain high engagement, accurate representation of the Malian culture and physical and social environment and language quality. Using our materials, pilot reading programs achieved a 67{\%} reduction in the number of children unable to read Bambara. Our approach demonstrated the power of bias-aware application of generative AI to the problem domain as well as the potential impact the application of this technology could have on reducing illiteracy and improving learning outcomes through native language education.
Hard Emotion Test Evaluation Sets for Language Models (2025)

Language models perform well on emotion datasets but it remains unclear whether these models indeed understand emotions expressed in text or simply exploit supperficial lexical cues (e.g., emotion words). In this paper, we present two novel test evaluation sets sourced from two existing datasets that allow us to evaluate whether language models make real inferential decisions for emotion detection or not. Our human-annotated test sets are created by iteratively rephrasing input texts to gradually remove explicit emotion cues (while preserving the semantic similarity and the emotions) until a strong baseline BERT model yields incorrect predictions. Using our new test sets, we carry out a comprehensive analysis into the capabilities of small and large language models to predict emotions. Our analysis reveals that all models struggle to correctly predict emotions when emotion lexical cues become scarcer and scarcer, but large language models perform better than small pre-trained language models and push the performance by 14{\%} over the 5{\%} BERT baseline. We make our evaluation test sets and code publicly available.