ymoslem/acl-abstracts huggingface dataset:
Quantification of Biodiversity from Historical Survey Text with LLM-based Best-Worst-Scaling (2025)

In this study, we evaluate methods to determine the frequency of species via quantity estimation from historical survey text. To that end, we formulate classification tasks and finally show that this problem can be adequately framed as a regression task using Best-Worst Scaling (BWS) with Large Language Models (LLMs). We test Ministral-8B, DeepSeek-V3, and GPT-4, finding that the latter two have reasonable agreement with humans and each other. We conclude that this approach is more cost-effective and similarly robust compared to a fine-grained multi-class approach, allowing automated quantity estimation across species.
Analyzing the Online Communication of Environmental Movement Organizations: NLP Approaches to Topics, Sentiment, and Emotions (2025)

This project employs state-of-the-art Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques to analyze the online communication of international Environmental Movement Organizations (EMOs). First, we introduce our overall EMO dataset and describe it through topic modeling. Second, we evaluate current sentiment and emotion classification models for our specific dataset. Third, as we are currently in our annotation process, we evaluate our current progress and issues to determine the most effective approach for creating a high-quality annotated dataset that captures the nuances of EMO communication. Finally, we emphasize the need for domain-specific datasets and tailored NLP tools and suggest refinements for our annotation process moving forward.
No AI on a Dead Planet: Sentiment and Emotion Analysis Across Reddit Communities on AI and the Environment (2025)

This paper investigates how different online communities perceive and discuss the environmental impact of AI through sentiment analysis and emotion detection. We analyze Reddit discussion from r/artificial and r/climatechange, using pre-trained models fine-tuned on social media data. Our analysis reveals distinct patterns in how these communities engage with AI`s environmental implications: the AI community demonstrates a shift from predominantly neutral and positive sentiment in posts to more balanced perspectives in comments, while the climate community maintains a more critical stance throughout discussions. The findings contribute to our understanding of how different communities conceptualize and respond to the environmental challenges of AI development.
Towards Addressing Anthropocentric Bias in Large Language Models (2025)

The widespread use of Large Language Models (LLMs), particularly among non-expert users, has raised ethical concerns about the propagation of harmful biases. While much research has addressed social biases, few works, if any, have examined anthropocentric bias in Natural Language Processing (NLP) technology. Anthropocentric language prioritizes human value, framing non-human animals, living entities, and natural elements solely by their utility to humans; a perspective that contributes to the ecological crisis. In this paper, we evaluate anthropocentric bias in OpenAI`s GPT-4o across various target entities, including sentient beings, non-sentient entities, and natural elements. Using prompts eliciting neutral, anthropocentric, and ecocentric perspectives, we analyze the model`s outputs and introduce a manually curated glossary of 424 anthropocentric terms as a resource for future ecocritical research. Our findings reveal a strong anthropocentric bias in the model`s responses, underscoring the need to address human-centered language use in AI-generated text to promote ecological well-being.
Efficient Scientific Full Text Classification: The Case of EICAT Impact Assessments (2025)

This study explores strategies for efficiently classifying scientific full texts using both small, BERT-based models and local large language models like Llama-3.1 8B. We focus on developing methods for selecting subsets of input sentences to reduce input size while simultaneously enhancing classification performance. To this end, we compile a novel dataset consisting of full-text scientific papers from the field of invasion biology, specifically addressing the impacts of invasive species. These papers are aligned with publicly available impact assessments created by researchers for the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). Through extensive experimentation, we demonstrate that various sources like human evidence annotations, LLM-generated annotations or explainability scores can be used to train sentence selection models that improve the performance of both encoder- and decoder-based language models while optimizing efficiency through the reduction in input length, leading to improved results even if compared to models like ModernBERT that are able to handle the complete text as input. Additionally, we find that repeated sampling of shorter inputs proves to be a very effective strategy that, at a slightly increased cost, can further improve classification performance.
The Accuracy, Robustness, and Readability of LLM-Generated Sustainability-Related Word Definitions (2025)

A common language with shared standard definitions is essential for effective climate conversations. However, there is concern that LLMs may misrepresent and/or diversify climate-related terms. We compare 305 official IPCC glossary definitions with those generated by OpenAI`s GPT-4o-mini and investigate their adherence, robustness, and readability using a combination of SBERT sentence embeddings and statistical measures. The LLM definitions received average adherence and robustness scores of $0.58 \pm 0.15$ and $0.96 \pm 0.02$, respectively. Both sustainability-related terminologies remain challenging to read, with model-generated definitions varying mainly among words with multiple or ambiguous definitions. Thus, the results highlight the potential of LLMs to support environmental discourse while emphasizing the need to align model outputs with established terminology for clarity and consistency.
A Comparative Analysis of Word Segmentation, Part-of-Speech Tagging, and Named Entity Recognition for Historical Chinese Sources, 1900-1950 (2025)

This paper compares large language models (LLMs) and traditional natural language processing (NLP) tools for performing word segmentation, part-of-speech (POS) tagging, and named entity recognition (NER) on Chinese texts from 1900 to 1950. Historical Chinese documents pose challenges for text analysis due to their logographic script, the absence of natural word boundaries, and significant linguistic changes. Using a sample dataset from the Shanghai Library Republican Journal corpus, traditional tools such as Jieba and spaCy are compared to LLMs, including GPT-4o, Claude 3.5, and the GLM series. The results show that LLMs outperform traditional methods in all metrics, albeit at considerably higher computational costs, highlighting a trade-off between accuracy and efficiency. Additionally, LLMs better handle genre-specific challenges such as poetry and temporal variations (i.e., pre-1920 versus post-1920 texts), demonstrating that their contextual learning capabilities can advance NLP approaches to historical texts by reducing the need for domain-specific training data.
Analyzing register variation in web texts through automatic segmentation (2025)

This study introduces a novel method for analyzing register variation in web texts through classification-based register segmentation. While traditional text-linguistic register analysis treats web documents as single units, we present a recursive binary segmentation approach that automatically identifies register shifts within web documents without labeled segment data, using a ModernBERT classifier fine-tuned on full web documents. Manual evaluation shows our approach to be reliable, and our experimental results reveal that register segmentation leads to more accurate register classification, helps models learn more distinct register categories, and produces text units with more consistent linguistic characteristics. The approach offers new insights into documentinternal register variation in online discourse.
Analyzing Large Language Models' pastiche ability: a case study on a 20th century Romanian author (2025)

This study evaluated the ability of several Large Language Models (LLMs) to pastiche the literary style of the Romanian 20th century author Mateiu Caragiale, by continuing one of his novels left unfinished upon his death. We assembled a database of novels consisting of six texts by Mateiu Caragiale, including his unfinished one, six texts by Radu Albala, including a continuation of Mateiu`s novel, and six LLM generated novels that try to pastiche it. We compared the LLM generated texts with the continuation by Radu Albala, using various methods. We automatically evaluated the pastiches by standard metrics such as ROUGE, BLEU, and METEOR. We performed stylometric analysis, clustering, and authorship attribution, and a manual analysis. Both computational and manual analysis of the pastiches indicated that LLMs are able to produce fairly qualitative pastiches, without matching the professional writer performance. The study also showed that ML techniques outperformed the more recent DL ones in both clusterization and authorship attribution tasks, probably because the dataset consists of only a few literary archaic texts in Romanian. In addition, linguistically informed features were shown to be competitive compared to automatically extracted features.
RAG-Enhanced Neural Machine Translation of Ancient Egyptian Text: A Case Study of THOTH AI (2025)

This paper demonstrates how Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) significantly improves translation accuracy for Middle Egyptian, a historically rich but low-resource language. We integrate a vectorized Coptic-Egyptian lexicon and morphological database into a specialized tool called THOTH AI. By supplying domain-specific linguistic knowledge to Large Language Models (LLMs) like Claude 3.5 Sonnet, our system yields translations that are more contextually grounded and semantically precise. We compare THOTH AI against various mainstream models, including Gemini 2.0, DeepSeek R1, and GPT variants, evaluating performance with BLEU, SacreBLEU, METEOR, ROUGE, and chrF. Experimental results on the coronation decree of Thutmose I (18th Dynasty) show that THOTH AI`s RAG approach provides the most accurate translations, highlighting the critical value of domain knowledge in natural language processing for ancient, specialized corpora. Furthermore, we discuss how our method benefits e-learning, digital humanities, and language revitalization efforts, bridging the gap between purely data-driven approaches and expert-driven resources in historical linguistics.
Restructuring and visualising dialect dictionary data: Report on Erzya and Moksha materials (2025)

There are a number of Uralic dialect dictionaries based on fieldwork documentation of individual minority languages from the Pre-Soviet Era. The first of these published by the Finno-Ugrian Society features the Mordvin languages, Erzya and Moksha.In this article, we describe the possibility of reusing XML dialect dictionary collection point and phonetic variant data for visualizing informative linguistic isoglosses with R programming language`s Shiny web application frame-work.We provide a description of the {\textquoteleft}H. Paasonen Mordvin Dictionary', which will possibly provide the reader with a better perspective of what data and challenges might present themselves in minority language dialect dictionaries.We provide a description of how we processed our data, and then we provide conclusions followed by a more extensive section on limitations. The conclusions state that only some of the data should be rendered with R Shiny web application, whereas some data might be better rendered by other applications.Our limitations section description calls for the extension the dialect dictionary database for a more concise description of the languageforms.
Podcast Outcasts: Understanding Rumble`s Podcast Dynamics (2025)

The rising popularity of podcasts as an emerging medium opens new avenues for digital humanities research, particularly when examining video-based media on alternative platforms. We present a novel data analysis pipeline for analyzing over 13K podcast videos (526 days of video content) from Rumble and YouTube that integrates advanced speech-to-text transcription, transformer-based topic modeling, and contrastive visual learning. We uncover the interplay between spoken rhetoric and visual elements in shaping political bias. Our findings reveal a distinct right-wing orientation in Rumble`s podcasts, contrasting with YouTube`s more diverse and apolitical content. By merging computational techniques with comparative analysis, our study advances digital humanities by demonstrating how large-scale multimodal analysis can decode ideological narratives in emerging media format.
I only read it for the plot! Maturity Ratings Affect Fanfiction Style and Community Engagement (2025)

We consider the textual profiles of different fanfiction maturity ratings, how they vary across fan groups, and how this relates to reader engagement metrics. Previous studies have shown that fanfiction writing is motivated by a combination of admiration for and frustration with the fan object. These findings emerge when looking at fanfiction as a whole, as well as when it is divided into subgroups, also called fandoms. However, maturity ratings are used to indicate the intended audience of the fanfiction, as well as whether the story includes mature themes and explicit scenes. Since these ratings can be used to filter readers and writers, they can also be seen as a proxy for different reader/writer motivations and desires. We find that explicit fanfiction in particular has a distinct textual profile when compared to other maturity ratings. These findings thus nuance our understanding of reader/writer motivations in fanfiction communities, and also highlights the influence of the community norms and fan behavior more generally on these cultural products.
The AI Co-Ethnographer: How Far Can Automation Take Qualitative Research? (2025)

Qualitative research often involves labor-intensive processes that are difficult to scale while preserving analytical depth. This paper introduces The AI Co-Ethnographer (AICoE), a novel end-to-end pipeline developed for qualitative research and designed to move beyond the limitations of simply automating code assignments, offering a more integrated approach. AICoE organizes the entire process, encompassing open coding, code consolidation, code application, and even pattern discovery, leading to a comprehensive analysis of qualitative data.
Irony Detection in Hebrew Documents: A Novel Dataset and an Evaluation of Neural Classification Methods (2025)

This paper focuses on the use of single words in quotation marks in Hebrew, which may or may not be an indication of irony. Because no annotated dataset yet exists for such cases, we annotate a new dataset consisting of over 4000 cases of words within quotation marks from Hebrew newspapers. On the basis of this dataset, we train and evaluate a series of seven BERT-based classifiers for irony detection, identifying the features and configurations that most effectively contribute the irony detection task. We release this novel dataset to the NLP community to promote future research and benchmarking regarding irony detection in Hebrew.
Masks and Mimicry: Strategic Obfuscation and Impersonation Attacks on Authorship Verification (2025)

The increasing use of Artificial Intelligence(AI) technologies, such as Large LanguageModels (LLMs) has led to nontrivial improvementsin various tasks, including accurate authorshipidentification of documents. However,while LLMs improve such defense techniques,they also simultaneously provide a vehicle formalicious actors to launch new attack vectors.To combat this security risk, we evaluate theadversarial robustness of authorship models(specifically an authorship verification model)to potent LLM-based attacks. These attacksinclude untargeted methods - authorship obfuscationand targeted methods - authorshipimpersonation. For both attacks, the objectiveis to mask or mimic the writing style of an authorwhile preserving the original texts' semantics,respectively. Thus, we perturb an accurateauthorship verification model, and achievemaximum attack success rates of 92{\%} and 78{\%}for both obfuscation and impersonation attacks,respectively.
Song Lyrics Adaptations: Computational Interpretation of the Pentathlon Principle (2025)

Songs are an integral part of human culture, and they often resonate the most when we can sing them in our native language. However, translating song lyrics presents a unique challenge: maintaining singability, naturalness, and semantic fidelity. In this work, we computationally interpret Low`s Pentathlon Principle of singable translations to be able to properly measure the quality of adapted lyrics, breaking it down into five measurable metrics that reflect the key aspects of singable translations. Building on this foundation, we introduce a text-to-text song lyrics translation system based on generative large language models, designed to meet the Pentathlon Principle`s criteria, without relying on melodies or bilingual training data.We experiment on the English-Czech language pair: we collect a dataset of English-to-Czech bilingual song lyrics and identify the desirable values of the five Pentathlon Principle metrics based on the values achieved by human translators. Through detailed human assessment of automatically generated lyric translations, we confirm the appropriateness of the proposed metrics as well as the general validity of the Pentathlon Principle, with some insights into the variation in people`s individual preferences. All code and data are available at https://github.com/stepankovab/Computational-Interpretation-of-the-Pentathlon-Principle.
MITRA-zh-eval: Using a Buddhist Chinese Language Evaluation Dataset to Assess Machine Translation and Evaluation Metrics (2025)

With the advent of large language models, machine translation (MT) has become a widely used, but little understood, tool for accessing historical and multilingual texts. While models like GPT, Claude, and Deepseek increasingly enable translation of low-resource and ancient languages, critical questions remain about their evaluation, optimal model selection, and the value of domain-specific training and retrieval-augmented generation setups.While AI models like GPT, Claude, and Deepseek are improving translation capabilities for low-resource and ancient languages, researchers still face important questions about how to evaluate their performance, which models work best, and whether specialized training approaches provide meaningful improvements in translation quality.This study introduces a comprehensive evaluation dataset for Buddhist Chinese to English translation, comprising 2,662 bilingual data points from 32 texts that have been selected to represent the full breadth of the Chinese Buddhist canon.We evaluate various computational metrics of translation quality (BLEU, chrF, BLEURT, GEMBA) against expert annotations from five domain specialists who rated 182 machine-generated translations. Our analysis reveals that LLM-based GEMBA scoring shows the strongest correlation with human judgment, significantly outperforming traditional metrics. We then benchmark commercial models (GPT-4 Turbo, Claude 3.5, Gemini), open-source models (Gemma 2, Deepseek-r1), and a domain-specialized model (Gemma 2 Mitra) using GEMBA. Our results demonstrate that domain-specific training enables open-weights models to achieve competitive performance with commercial systems, while also showing that retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) significantly improves translation quality for the best performing commercial models.
Effects of Publicity and Complexity in Reader Polarization (2025)

We investigate how Goodreads rating distributions reflect variations in audience reception across literary works. By examining a large-scale dataset of novels, we analyze whether metrics such as the entropy or standard deviation of rating distributions correlate with textual features {--} including perplexity, nominal ratio, and syntactic complexity. These metrics reveal a disagreement continuum: more complex texts {--} i.e., more cognitively demanding books, with a more canon-like textual profile {--} generate polarized reader responses, while mainstream works produce more uniform reactions. We compare evaluation patterns across canonical and non-canonical works, bestsellers, and prize-winners, finding that textual complexity drives rating polarization even when controlling for publicity effects. Our findings demonstrate that linguistically unpredictable texts, particularly those with higher nominal density and dependency distance, generate divergent reader evaluations. This challenges conventional literary success metrics and suggests that the shape of rating distributions offers valuable insights beyond average scores. We hope our approach establishes a productive framework for understanding how literary features influence reception and how disagreement metrics can enhance our understanding of public literary judgment.
PsyTEx: A Knowledge-Guided Approach to Refining Text for Psychological Analysis (2025)

LLMs are increasingly applied for tasks requiring deep interpretive abilities and psychological insights, such as identity profiling, mental health diagnostics, personalized content curation, and human resource management. However, their performance in these tasks remains inconsistent, as these characteristics are not explicitly perceptible in the text. To address this challenge, this paper introduces a novel protocol called the {\textquotedblleft}Psychological Text Extraction and Refinement Framework (PsyTEx){\textquotedblright} that leverages LLMs to isolate and amplify psychologically informative segments and evaluate LLM proficiency in interpreting complex psychological constructs from text. Using personality recognition as a case study, our extensive evaluation of five SOTA LLMs across two personality models (Big Five and Dark Triad) and two assessment levels (detection and prediction) highlights significant limitations in LLM`s ability to accurately interpret psychological traits. However, our findings show that LLMs, when used within the PsyTEx protocol, can effectively extract relevant information that closely aligns with psychological expectations, offering a structured approach to support future advancements in modeling, taxonomy construction, and text-based psychological evaluations.
Advances and Challenges in the Automatic Identification of Indirect Quotations in Scholarly Texts and Literary Works (2025)

Literary scholars commonly refer to the interpreted literary work using various types of quotations. Two main categories are direct and indirect quotations. In this work we focus on the automatic identification of two subtypes of indirect quotations: paraphrases and summaries. Our contributions are twofold. First, we present a dataset of scholarly works with annotations of text spans which summarize or paraphrase the interpreted drama and the source of the quotation. Second, we present a two-step approach to solve the task at hand. We found the process of annotating large training corpora very time consuming and therefore leverage GPT-generated summaries to generate training data for our approach.