Case: Carter et al. v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; Reynolds v. United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit; Robinson v. Byrne, U. S. District Judge; Morris v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Co.; Mount v. Haight, U. S. District Judge, et al.; Mount v. Sifton, U. S. District Judge; Brown v. United States; and Clark v. United States District Court for the District of Kansas
Abbreviation: Carter v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Decision Date: 1978-10-02
Docket Number: No. 77-6458; No. 77-6663; No. 77-6810; No. 77-6841; No. 77-6894; No. 77-6918; No. 77-6965; No. 78-5196
Citation: 439 U.S. 814
Volume: 439
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Carter et al. v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; Reynolds v. United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit; Robinson v. Byrne, U. S. District Judge; Morris v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Co.; Mount v. Haight, U. S. District Judge, et al.; Mount v. Sifton, U. S. District Judge; Brown v. United States; and Clark v. United States District Court for the District of Kansas.
Judges: 
Pages: 814–814

Head Matter:
No. 77-6458.
No. 77-6663.
No. 77-6810.
No. 77-6841.
No. 77-6894.
No. 77-6918.
No. 77-6965.
No. 78-5196.
Carter et al. v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; Reynolds v. United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit; Robinson v. Byrne, U. S. District Judge; Morris v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Co.; Mount v. Haight, U. S. District Judge, et al.; Mount v. Sifton, U. S. District Judge; Brown v. United States; and Clark v. United States District Court for the District of Kansas.

Opinion:
Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of mandamus denied.