Case: FAG Kugelfischer Georg Schafer AG, FAG Italia S.p.A, Barden Corp. (U.K.) Ltd., FAG Bearings Corp., and Barden Corp., plaintiffs v. United States, defendant, and Torrington Co., defendant-intervenor
Abbreviation: FAG Kugelfischer Georg Schafer AG v. United States
Decision Date: 2001-11-15
Docket Number: Court No. 99-08-00465
Citation: 25 Ct. Int'l Trade 1238
Volume: 25
Reporter: United States Court of International Trade Reports
Court: United States Court of International Trade
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: FAG Kugelfischer Georg Schafer AG, FAG Italia S.p.A, Barden Corp. (U.K.) Ltd., FAG Bearings Corp., and Barden Corp., plaintiffs v. United States, defendant, and Torrington Co., defendant-intervenor
Judges: 
Pages: 1238–1238

Head Matter:
FAG Kugelfischer Georg Schafer AG, FAG Italia S.p.A, Barden Corp. (U.K.) Ltd., FAG Bearings Corp., and Barden Corp., plaintiffs v. United States, defendant, and Torrington Co., defendant-intervenor
Court No. 99-08-00465
(Dated November 15, 2001)

Opinion:
ORDER
Tsoucalas, Senior Judge:
This matter comes before the Court pursuant to the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ("CAFC") in FAG Kugelfischer Georg Schafer AG v. United States, 263 F.3d 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2001) and CAFC's mandate of October 15, 2001, vacating and remanding the judgment of the Court in FAG Kugelfischer Georg Schafer AG v. United States, 2000 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 78, Slip Op. 00-80 (CIT July 7, 2000).
Pursuant to said decision by CAFC, this Court hereby
Remands this case to the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration ("Commerce") to: (1) provide a reasonable explanation of why Commerce uses different definitions of "foreign like product" for price purposes and when calculating constructed value; (2) explain the factual setting for the calculations at issue; (3) explain the actual methodology of the calculations made; and (4) explain why Commerce's methodology for the calculations of constructed value profit comports with the statute, the definition of "foreign like product" contained in 19 U.S.C. § 1677(16), and particularly the definition in subsection (C); and it is hereby
Ordered that the remand results are due within ninety (90) days of the date that this order is entered. Any responses or comments are due within thirty (30) days thereafter. Any rebuttal comments are due within fifteen (15) days after the date the responses or comments are due.