Case: D.W.S. WASHINGTON HOLDINGS, INC. v. Timothy E. JACKSON, et al., Appellants
Abbreviation: D.W.S. Washington Holdings, Inc. v. Jackson
Decision Date: 1991-05-17
Docket Number: No. 90-7161
Citation: 289 U.S. App. D.C. 368
Volume: 289
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Parties: D.W.S. WASHINGTON HOLDINGS, INC. v. Timothy E. JACKSON, et al., Appellants.
Judges: Before RUTH BADER GINSBURG, WILLIAMS, and D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judges.
Pages: 368–369

Head Matter:
932 F.2d 984
D.W.S. WASHINGTON HOLDINGS, INC. v. Timothy E. JACKSON, et al., Appellants.
No. 90-7161.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued May 7, 1991.
Decided May 17, 1991.
John T. Donelan, Alexandria, Va., of the bar of the U.S. Supreme Court, pro hac vice, by special leave of the Court, with whom Joseph C. Paradiso, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellants.
Robert E. Greenberg, with whom James P. Holloway, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellee.
Before RUTH BADER GINSBURG, WILLIAMS, and D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.
PER CURIAM:
Defendants appeal the decision of the district court, D.W.S. Washington Holdings, Inc. v. Jackson, 739 F.Supp. 19 (D.D. C.1990), on one point only, that of the plaintiff landlord's efforts to mitigate damages. On appeal, the parties agree that on the facts of the case the landlord's duty to mitigate damages began in early April 1988, so the case raises no issue on that score. Compare id. at 22. As the defendants point to no specific factual assertions in the record indicating that the landlord's conduct after that date was commercially unreasonable, the grant of summary judgment is affirmed.
So ordered.