Case: Raley et al. v. Ohio
Abbreviation: Raley v. Ohio
Decision Date: 1957-06-24
Docket Number: No. 306
Citation: 354 U.S. 929
Volume: 354
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Raley et al. v. Ohio.
Judges: Mr. Justice Burton would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for argument. Mr. Justice Clark dissents from this disposition of the case for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinions in Sweezy v. New Hampshire and Watkins v. United States, supra.
Pages: 929–929

Head Matter:
June 24, 1957.
No. 306.
Raley et al. v. Ohio.
Louis C. Capelle and Morse Johnson for appellants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
The judgment of the Supreme Court of Ohio is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in the light of Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U. S. 234, and Watkins v. United States, 354 U. S. 178.
Mr. Justice Burton would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for argument. Mr. Justice Clark dissents from this disposition of the case for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinions in Sweezy v. New Hampshire and Watkins v. United States, supra.