Case: The Blythe Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Bankers' Investment Company et al.
Abbreviation: Blythe Co. v. Bankers' Investment Co.
Decision Date: 1907-10-28
Docket Number: No. 358
Citation: 207 U.S. 580
Volume: 207
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: The Blythe Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Bankers’ Investment Company et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 580–580

Head Matter:
No. 358.
The Blythe Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Bankers’ Investment Company et al.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of California.
Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted October 21, 1907.
Decided October 28, 1907.
Mr. George W. Towle for plaintiff in error. Mr. Frederic D. McKenney, Mr. E. S. Heller and Mr. Thomas 7. Bergin for defendants in error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Blythe v. Hinckley, 84 Fed. Rep. 228; Blythe Company v. Blythe, 172 U. S. 644; Blythe Company v. Hinckley, 111 Fed. Rep. 827; Blythe Company v. Hinckley, 184 U. S. 701; Blythe v. Hinckley, 180 U. S. 333; Dupaneur v. Rochereau, 21 Wall. 130; Metcalf v. Watertown, 153 U. S. 671; Blythe Company v. Bankers' Investment Company, 147 California, 82; Missouri Pacific Railway v. Fitzgerald, 160 U. S. 558, 582; Temple v. Hagar, 4 Wall. 432, 434.