Case: UNITED STATES, Appellee v. LEON BRUNDIDGE, Private, U. S. Army, Appellant; UNITED STATES, Appellee v. WILLIAM A. MARSHALL, Private, U. S. Army, Appellant; UNITED STATES, Appellee v. JULIUS L. OLIVER, Specialist Four, U. S. Army, Appellant
Abbreviation: United States v. Brundidge
Decision Date: 1975-08-22
Docket Number: No. 30,233; No. 30,236; No. 30,310
Citation: 23 C.M.A. 531
Volume: 23
Reporter: Decisions of the United States Court of Military Appeals
Court: United States Court of Military Appeals
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: UNITED STATES, Appellee v LEON BRUNDIDGE, Private, U. S. Army, Appellant UNITED STATES, Appellee v WILLIAM A. MARSHALL, Private, U. S. Army, Appellant UNITED STATES, Appellee v JULIUS L. OLIVER, Specialist Four, U. S. Army, Appellant
Judges: 
Pages: 531–531

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES, Appellee v LEON BRUNDIDGE, Private, U. S. Army, Appellant UNITED STATES, Appellee v WILLIAM A. MARSHALL, Private, U. S. Army, Appellant UNITED STATES, Appellee v JULIUS L. OLIVER, Specialist Four, U. S. Army, Appellant
No. 30,233
No. 30,236
No. 30,310
August 22, 1975
Lieutenant Colonel James Kueera, Captain Robert D. Jones, Captain Jay Sacks Cohen, Captain Theodore H. Watts, Captain R. Stuart Broom, Captain Ronald Lewis Gallant, and Captain Ralph E. Sharpe were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.
Lieutenant Colonel Donald W. Hansen, Major Steven M. Werner, Captain John R. Erck, and Captain Nancy M. Giorno were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Per Curiam:
In each of these cases, a pretrial agreement between the accused and the convening authority included a condition limiting the accused's presentation at trial of motions on matters "other than jurisdiction" before entry of a plea of guilty. We condemned such a limitation in United States v Holland, 23 USCMA 442, 50 CMR 461 (June 27, 1975). Accordingly, as in Holland, we reverse the decision of the Court of Military Review and set aside the findings of guilty and the sentence in each case. The record of trial of each accused is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for submission to the original or other competent convening authority. A rehearing in each instance may be ordered.