Case: Patricia KIDD, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Appellees
Abbreviation: Kidd v. District of Columbia
Decision Date: 2000-06-02
Docket Number: Nos. 98-7075 & 98-7100
Citation: 341 U.S. App. D.C. 419
Volume: 341
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Parties: Patricia KIDD, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Appellees.
Judges: BEFORE: EDWARDS, Chief Judge; SILBERMAN, WILLIAMS, GINSBURG, SENTELLE, HENDERSON, RANDOLPH, ROGERS, TATEL and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.
Pages: 419–419

Head Matter:
214 F.3d 179
Patricia KIDD, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Appellees.
Nos. 98-7075 & 98-7100.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Filed On: June 2, 2000.
BEFORE: EDWARDS, Chief Judge; SILBERMAN, WILLIAMS, GINSBURG, SENTELLE, HENDERSON, RANDOLPH, ROGERS, TATEL and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Chief Judge EDWARDS and Circuit Judges SENTELLE, TATEL and GARLAND would grant the petition.
A statement of Circuit Judge TATEL, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, joined by Chief Judge EDWARDS and Circuit Judges SENTELLE and GARLAND, is attached.
Circuit Judge ROGERS did not participate in this matter.
ORDER
Per Curiam
The petition for rehearing en banc of amicus curiae and the response thereto have been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that the petition be denied.