Case: American Commercial Lines, Inc., et al. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. et al.; American Trucking Associations, Inc., et al. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. et al.; American Waterways Operators, Inc. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. et al.; and Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. et al.
Abbreviation: American Commercial Lines, Inc. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
Decision Date: 1968-01-15
Docket Number: No. 797; No. 804; No. 808; No. 809
Citation: 389 U.S. 1032
Volume: 389
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: American Commercial Lines, Inc., et al. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. et al.; American Trucking Associations, Inc., et al. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. et al.; American Waterways Operators, Inc. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. et al.; and Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 1032–1032

Head Matter:
No. 797.
No. 804.
No. 808.
No. 809.
American Commercial Lines, Inc., et al. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. et al.; American Trucking Associations, Inc., et al. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. et al.; American Waterways Operators, Inc. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. et al.; and Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. et al.
T. Randolph Buck, Robert E. Webb, J. Raymond Clark and Harry C. Ames, Jr., for appellants in No. 797; Peter T. Beardsley, Bryce Rea, Jr., and Thomas M. Knebel for appellants in No. 804; A. Alvis Layne and Robert L. Wright for appellant in No. 808; and Robert W. Ginnane, Fritz R. Kahn and Leonard S. Goodman for appellant in No. 809.
Stanfield Johnson, Elbert R. Leigh, James H. Mc-Glothlin, James A. Bistline, Thormund A. Miller, William M. Maloney, Harry J. Breithaupt, Donal L. Turkal, Carl Helmetag, Jr., Joseph E. Stopher and R. Lee Blackwell for appellee railroads.
Solicitor General Griswold filed a memorandum for the United States in all four cases.

Opinion:
Appeal from D. C. W. D. Ky. Probable jurisdiction noted. Cases are consolidated and two hours allotted for oral argument.
Reported below: 268 F. Supp. 71.