Case: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Opio MOORE, Appellant
Abbreviation: United States v. Moore
Decision Date: 1997-04-15
Docket Number: Nos. 93-3158, 96-3046
Citation: 324 U.S. App. D.C. 53
Volume: 324
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Opio MOORE, Appellant.
Judges: Before: EDWARDS, Chief Judge, WALD, SILBERMAN, WILLIAMS, GINSBURG, SENTELLE, HENDERSON, RANDOLPH, ROGERS, TATEL and GARLAND , Circuit Judges.
Pages: 53–56

Head Matter:
110 F.3d 99
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Opio MOORE, Appellant.
Nos. 93-3158, 96-3046.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
April 15, 1997.
Before: EDWARDS, Chief Judge, WALD, SILBERMAN, WILLIAMS, GINSBURG, SENTELLE, HENDERSON, RANDOLPH, ROGERS, TATEL and GARLAND , Circuit Judges.
Circuit Judge GARLAND did not participate in this matter.

Opinion:
ORDER
On Appellee's Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc
PER CURIAM.
Appellee's Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc has been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service did not vote in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED, by the Court, that the suggestion be denied.
Circuit Judges SILBERMAN, WILLIAMS, and RANDOLPH would grant the suggestion.
Separate statement filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE, concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc.
Separate statement filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc.