Case: Hudson Shipping Co., Inc. Fritzsche Brothers, Inc., et al. v. United States
Abbreviation: Hudson Shipping Co. v. United States
Decision Date: 1969-02-17
Docket Number: C.D. 3709
Citation: 62 Cust. Ct. 159
Volume: 62
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Hudson Shipping Co., Inc. Fritzsche Brothers, Inc., et al. v. United States
Judges: Before Richardson, Landis, and Rosenstein, Judges
Pages: 159–159

Head Matter:
(C.D. 3709)
Hudson Shipping Co., Inc. Fritzsche Brothers, Inc., et al. v. United States
United States Customs Court, Third Division
(Decided February 17, 1969)
Plaintiff not represented by counsel.
William, D. RueJcelshms, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
Before Richardson, Landis, and Rosenstein, Judges

Opinion:
Rosenstein, Judge:
When these eases were called for trial, there was no appearance by or on behalf of plaintiffs and defendant moved to dismiss said actions for failure to prosecute. As examination of the court files discloses that the protests were not filed within the 60-day period provided by section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, they are dismissed as untimely.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that said protests be dismissed.