Case: Key et al. v. Doyle et al.; Super Tire Engineering Co. et al. v. McCorkle, Commissioner, Department of Institutions and Agencies of New Jersey, et al.; Downing v. District Attorney of Northampton County; Rosario v. LaVallee, Correctional Superintendent; DeVaughn v. United States; Kenny et al. v. City of Philadelphia; and MacDonald et al. v. City of Philadelphia; Sloan v. Bonime et al.; Davis v. Davis; Salyers v. Board of Governors of State Colleges and Universities of Illinois et al.; Martinez et al. v. United States
Abbreviation: Key v. Doyle
Decision Date: 1978-01-09
Docket Number: No. 76-1057; No. 76-1684; No. 76-6839; No. 76-6909; No. 76-6974; No. 77-370; No. 77-374; No. 77-385; No. 77-415; No. 77-437
Citation: 434 U.S. 1025
Volume: 434
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Key et al. v. Doyle et al., Super Tire Engineering Co. et al. v. McCorkle, Commissioner, Department of Institutions and Agencies of New Jersey, et al., Downing v. District Attorney of Northampton County, Rosario v. LaVallee, Correctional Superintendent, DeVaughn v. United States, Kenny et al. v. City of Philadelphia; and MacDonald et al. v. City of Philadelphia, Sloan v. Bonime et al., Davis v. Davis, Salyers v. Board of Governors of State Colleges and Universities of Illinois et al., Martinez et al. v. United States,
Judges: 
Pages: 1025–1025

Head Matter:
No. 76-1057.
No. 76-1684.
No. 76-6839.
No. 76-6909.
No. 76-6974.
No. 77-370.
No. 77-374.
No. 77-385.
No. 77-415.
No. 77-437.
Key et al. v. Doyle et al., Super Tire Engineering Co. et al. v. McCorkle, Commissioner, Department of Institutions and Agencies of New Jersey, et al., Downing v. District Attorney of Northampton County, Rosario v. LaVallee, Correctional Superintendent, DeVaughn v. United States, Kenny et al. v. City of Philadelphia; and MacDonald et al. v. City of Philadelphia, Sloan v. Bonime et al., Davis v. Davis, Salyers v. Board of Governors of State Colleges and Universities of Illinois et al., Martinez et al. v. United States,

Opinion:
ante, p. 59;
ante, p. 827;
ante, p. 846 ;
ante, p. 849;
ante, p. 954;
ante, p. 923;
ante, p. 924;
ante, p. 939;
ante, p. 924; and
ante, p. 924. Petitions for rehearing denied.