Case: John L. Westland & Son, Inc. v. United States
Abbreviation: John L. Westland & Son, Inc. v. United States
Decision Date: 1957-07-25
Docket Number: Reap. Dec. 8950; Entry No. 10622
Citation: 39 Cust. Ct. 615
Volume: 39
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: John L. Westland & Son, Inc. v. United States
Judges: 
Pages: 615–616

Head Matter:
(Reap. Dec. 8950)
Entry No. 10622.
John L. Westland & Son, Inc. v. United States
(Decided July 25, 1957)
Lawrence & Tuttle (Ban Erik Hedin of counsel) for the plaintiff.
George Cochran Doub, Assistant Attorney General {Mollie Strum, trial attorney), for the defendant.
Lawrence & Tuttle (Dan Erik Hedin of counsel) for the plaintiff.
George Cochran Doub, Assistant Attorney General (Mollie Strum, trial attorney), for the defendant.

Opinion:
Wilson, Judge:
This appeal for reappraisement involves the proper value of a certain HyDRAulic Pbess and parts, exported from Sweden and entered at the port of Los Angeles.
At the trial, the case was submitted on an oral stipulation, wherein the parties agreed that cost of production, section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise in question, and that such value is $32,015, including packing.
On the agreed facts, I find cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the involved merchandise, and that such value is $32,015, including packing.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.