Case: Brett C. KIMBERLIN and Darrell Rice, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and Bureau of Prisons, Appellees
Abbreviation: Kimberlin v. United States Department of Justice
Decision Date: 2003-10-28
Docket Number: No. 01-5387
Citation: 359 U.S. App. D.C. 21
Volume: 359
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Parties: Brett C. KIMBERLIN and Darrell Rice, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and Bureau of Prisons, Appellees.
Judges: Before: SENTELLE, HENDERSON, and TATEL, Circuit Judges.
Pages: 21–22

Head Matter:
351 F.3d 1165
Brett C. KIMBERLIN and Darrell Rice, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and Bureau of Prisons, Appellees.
No. 01-5387.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Filed Oct. 28, 2003.
Judge Tatel would grant the petition for panel rehearing.

Opinion:
On Appellants' Petition for Rehearing
Before: SENTELLE, HENDERSON, and TATEL, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Upon consideration of the appellants' petition for panel rehearing, filed on March 28, 2003, and the appellees' response thereto, it is
ORDERED that the petition be denied. Our panel disposition of this case remains unchanged after the United States Supreme Court's opinion in Overton v. Bazzetta, 539 U.S. 126, 123 S.Ct. 2162, 156 L.Ed.2d 162 (2003). To the extent that Overton may affect our determination that we "need not invoke the four factor analysis the United States Supreme Court established in Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 89, 107 S.Ct. 2254, 2261-62, 96 L.Ed.2d 64 (1987)," Kimberlin v. United States Dep't of Justice, 318 F.3d 228, 232 (D.C.Cir. 2003), our alternative disposition, that the prison regulations banning electric and electronic musical instruments satisfy Safley's test, remains intact, see id. at 233-34.