Case: Cathleen E. GOLDEN, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee
Abbreviation: Golden v. Nicholson
Decision Date: 2007-04-20
Docket Number: No. 05-7189
Citation: 222 F. App'x 998
Volume: 21
Reporter: West's Veterans Appeals Reporter
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Cathleen E. GOLDEN, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before NEWMAN, MAYER, and LINN, Circuit Judges.
Pages: 998–999

Head Matter:
Cathleen E. GOLDEN, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 05-7189.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
April 20, 2007.
John F. Cameron, of Montgomery, Alabama, argued for claimant-appellant.
Michael S. Dufault, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. With him on the brief were Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, David M. Cohen, Director, and Donald E. Kinner, Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief were David R. McLe-nachen, Deputy Assistant General Counsel, and Y. Ken Lee, Attorney, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, of Washington, DC.
Before NEWMAN, MAYER, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Cathleen E. Golden appeals the final judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, which dismissed her appeal from the Board of Vet erans' Appeals for lack of jurisdiction based on the failure to timely file a notice of appeal. Golden v. Nicholson, No. 04-1385, 2005 WL 668715 (Vet.App. Mar. 16, 2005). In so doing, the court rejected her equitable tolling argument. We vacate the court's judgment and remand the case for reconsideration in light of Barrett v. Nicholson, 466 F.3d 1038 (Fed.Cir.2006).