Case: Matthews v. Spalding, Director, Idaho Department of Corrections; Zhang v. Arizona State University et al.; Christen v. Alabama; Thomas Shakir v. Schlein et al.; Germano et ux. v. First National Bank of Bethany et al.; Matima v. Ayerst Laboratories, Inc.; Dryden v. Immigration and Naturalization Service; Doe v. Noe et al. (two judgments); Olufemi v. DeKalb County Department of Family and Children Services; Jones v. Merit Systems Protection Board (two judgments); Shea v. Board of Trustees, Teachers' Pension and Annuity Fund; Ridley v. United States
Abbreviation: Matthews v. Spalding
Decision Date: 2001-10-01
Docket Number: No. 00-9939; No. 00-10003; No. 00-10139; No. 00-10391; No. 00-10445; No. 00-10458; No. 00-10710; No. 01-5359; No. 01-5413; No. 01-5533; No. 01-5756; No. 01-5999
Citation: 534 U.S. 809
Volume: 534
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Matthews v. Spalding, Director, Idaho Department of Corrections. Zhang v. Arizona State University et al. Christen v. Alabama. Thomas Shakir v. Schlein et al. Germano et ux. v. First National Bank of Bethany et al. Matima v. Ayerst Laboratories, Inc. Dryden v. Immigration and Naturalization Service. Doe v. Noe et al. (two judgments). Olufemi v. DeKalb County Department of Family and Children Services. Jones v. Merit Systems Protection Board (two judgments). Shea v. Board of Trustees, Teachers’ Pension and Annuity Fund. Ridley v. United States.
Judges: 
Pages: 809–810

Head Matter:
No. 00-9939.
No. 00-10003.
Matthews v. Spalding, Director, Idaho Department of Corrections. Zhang v. Arizona State University et al. Christen v. Alabama. Thomas Shakir v. Schlein et al. Germano et ux. v. First National Bank of Bethany et al. Matima v. Ayerst Laboratories, Inc. Dryden v. Immigration and Naturalization Service. Doe v. Noe et al. (two judgments). Olufemi v. DeKalb County Department of Family and Children Services. Jones v. Merit Systems Protection Board (two judgments). Shea v. Board of Trustees, Teachers’ Pension and Annuity Fund. Ridley v. United States.

Opinion:
C. A. 9th Cir.;
C. A. 9th Cir.;
No. 00-10139.
No. 00-10391.
No. 00-10445.
No. 00-10458.
No. 00-10710.
No. 01-5359.
No. 01-5413.
No. 01-5533.
No. 01-5756.
No. 01-5999.
Ct. Civ. App. Ala.;
Ct. App. D. G;
C. A. 5th Cir.;
C. A. 2d Cir.;
C. A. 6th Cir.;
App. Ct. Ill., 4th Dist.;
C. A. 11th Cir.;
C. A. Fed. Cir.;
Super. Ct. N. J., App. Div.; and
C. A. 11th Cir. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioners are allowed until October 22, 2001, wilhin which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.