Case: Frank P. Dow Co., Inc. (Montgomery Ward & Co.) v. United States
Abbreviation: Frank P. Dow Co. v. United States
Decision Date: 1943-01-09
Docket Number: No. 5785; Entry No. 5272
Citation: 10 Cust. Ct. 496
Volume: 10
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Frank P. Dow Co., Inc. (Montgomery Ward & Co.) v. United States
Judges: 
Pages: 496–497

Head Matter:
Frank P. Dow Co., Inc. (Montgomery Ward & Co.) v. United States
No. 5785.
Invoice dated Lauscha, Germany, September 17, 1937.
Certified September 27, 1937.
Entered at San Francisco, Calif., November 4, 1937.
Entry No. 5272.
(Decided January 9, 1943)
Wallace & Schwartz (Barnes, Richardson & Colburn by Joseph Schwartz of counsel) for the plaintiff.
Paul P. Rao, Assistant Attorney General (Daniel I. Auster, special attorney), for the defendant.

Opinion:
Oliver, Presiding Judge:
This appeal to reappraisement involves the proper dutiable value of certain Christmas-tree ornáments exported from Germany and imported at the port of San Francisco, Calif.
The case has been submitted for decision on a stipulation entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties, wherein it is agreed, in substance, as follows:
(1) That the Christmas-tree ornaments in question were exported from Germany during the month of September 1937.
(2) That the instant merchandise is similar in all material respects to that which was the subject of the decision in the case of F. W. Woolworth Co. et al. v. United States (Reap. Doc. 5094).
(3) That the market conditions existing during the period of exportation of the articles in question were similar, if not identical, to the conditions found to bo prevailing in the foreign market as described in the Woolworth Co. case, supra.
(4) That the extra charge of 2% per centum appearing on the invoice herein is the usual 2% per centum inside packing charge applying to this line of merchandise.
(5) That the record in the Woolworth Co. case, supra, may be incorporated in and made a part of the record in the present cases.
On the agreed facts, as hereinabove set forth, I find that on the dates of exportation of the instant merchandise Christmas-tree ornaments, such as and similar to those involved herein, were freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country of exportation, to wit, the Sonneberg-Lauscha district of Germany, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for- consumption m Germany and for exportation to the United States and other countries.
Accordingly, I hold as matter of law that the proper dutiable foreign and export values of the Christmas-tree ornaments exported pripr to January 1, 1938, are the per se unit invoice prices, plus 2% per centum inside packing, plus, when not included in such per se unit invoice prices, all other costs of cases and packing and the cost of all other containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, as invoiced, whenever reported as dutiable by the appraiser.
The appeal having been abandoned insofar as it relates to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeal is hereby dismissed.
Judgment will be rendered accordingly.