Case: Bobby John FLUELLEN, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee
Abbreviation: Fluellen v. Nicholson
Decision Date: 2005-12-01
Docket Number: No. 06-7011
Citation: 159 F. App'x 1002
Volume: 19
Reporter: West's Veterans Appeals Reporter
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Bobby John FLUELLEN, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before MAYER, LOURIE, and LINN, Circuit Judges.
Pages: 1002–1003

Head Matter:
Bobby John FLUELLEN, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 06-7011.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Dec. 1, 2005.
Bobby John Fluellen, pro se.
Before MAYER, LOURIE, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Upon review of this recently docketed appeal, the court considers whether it should be dismissed as untimely.
On August 28, 2008, the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims dismissed Bobby John Fluellen's appeal, case no. OS-1161, because he had not received a decision from the Board of Veterans' Appeals. The court entered judgment on September 24, 2003. On October 11, 2005, the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims received a document from Fluellen that it treated as a notice of appeal.
Any appeal of the judgment was due within 60 days, or by November 24, 2003. 38 U.S.C. § 7292(a); 28 U.S.C. § 2107(b); Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1). Because Fluellen's notice of appeal was untimely filed, we have no jurisdiction and this appeal must be dismissed. See Sofarelli Assoc., Inc. v. United States, 716 F.2d 1395 (Fed.Cir.1983).
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) This appeal is dismissed as untimely.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.