Case: Swope v. Leffingwell
Abbreviation: Swope v. Leffingwell
Decision Date: 1881-10
Docket Number: 
Citation: 105 U.S. 3
Volume: 105
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Swope v. Leffingwell.
Judges: 
Pages: 3–4

Head Matter:
Swope v. Leffingwell.
This court has jurisdiction to re-examine the judgment of a State court inyolv* ing the right of a national; bank to purchase a promissory note secured by a deed of trust upon real estate. A motion to affirm will, however, be granted ' where that is the only Federal question in the case and the decision below is in recognition of the right. - . .
Error to the Supreme Court of the State of . Missouri.
This was a-suit brought in the'Circuit Court,of St. Louis County, Missouri, against Leffingwell arid the other defendants, to restrain and enjoin the sale of certain real estate in the city of St. Louis, under a deed of trust executed to secure the pay-. ment of a promissory note whereof the- Atlas National Bank of Boston became the purchaser. The case was ultimately .determined by the Supreme Court of the State reversing the decrees of the subordinate courts, and directing that the bill be dismissed. Swope sued out this writ of error.
A motion was made to dismiss- the -writ for want of jurisdiction, upon the ground that there was no Federal question involved; to which was united a motion to affirm!
Mr. Philip Phillips in support of the motions.
Mr. F. B. Sherzer, contra.

Opinion:
Mr. Chief Justice Waite
delivered the, opinion of the court.
We have jurisdiction of this case. The motion to dismiss , is, therefore, denied; but as the only Federal question presented on the merits was decided by the court below in accordance with our rulings in National Bank v. Matthews (98 U. S. 621) and National Bank v. Whitney (108 id. 99), the motion to affirm is
Granted.