Case: Hotel Employees Union, Local No. 255, et al. v. Sax Enterprises, Inc., et al.; and Hotel Employees Union, Local No. 255, et al. v. Levy et al., doing business as Sherry Frontenac Hotel, et al.
Abbreviation: Hotel Employees Union, Local No. 255 v. Sax Enterprises, Inc.
Decision Date: 1958-10-20
Docket Number: No. 5; No. 6
Citation: 358 U.S. 860
Volume: 358
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Hotel Employees Union, Local No. 255, et al. v. Sax Enterprises, Inc., et al.; and Hotel Employees Union, Local No. 255, et al. v. Levy et al., doing business as Sherry Frontenac Hotel, et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 860–861

Head Matter:
October 20, 1958.
No. 5.
No. 6.
Hotel Employees Union, Local No. 255, et al. v. Sax Enterprises, Inc., et al.; and Hotel Employees Union, Local No. 255, et al. v. Levy et al., doing business as Sherry Frontenac Hotel, et al.
Thomas H. Anderson and Thomas H. Bark-dull, Jr. were on the suggestion of omission for respondents. David E. Feller was on a response for petitioners.

Opinion:
Certiorari, 355 U. S. 902, to the Supreme Court of Florida. Upon consideration of the suggestion of omission of parts of the record from the printed record, the Clerk is directed to print such parts as a supplemental record subject to further order of the Court as to the payment of costs incident thereto. The brief of the respondents is to be filed on or before November 1, and the cases are set for oral argument on November 10, next.
Reported below: 93 So. 2d 591, 598.