Case: Bridge Novelty Co., Inc. v. United States; Metasco, Inc. v. United States; Gimbel Bros., Inc. v. United States
Abbreviation: Bridge Novelty Co. v. United States
Decision Date: 1966-03-31
Docket Number: No. P66/7; protest 64/24094 (New York); No. P66/8; protest 64/24695 (New York); No. P66/9; protests 65/1614 and 65/2347 (New York)
Citation: 56 Cust. Ct. 894
Volume: 56
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Bridge Novelty Co., Inc. v. United States, Metasco, Inc. v. United States, Gimbel Bros., Inc. v. United States,
Judges: 
Pages: 894–894

Head Matter:
No. P66/7.
protest 64/24094 (New York).
No. P66/8.
protest 64/24695 (New York).
No. P66/9.
protests 65/1614 and 65/2347 (New York).
Bridge Novelty Co., Inc. v. United States, Metasco, Inc. v. United States, Gimbel Bros., Inc. v. United States,

Opinion:
Oliver, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of plastic paperweights similar in all material respects to those the subject of Ace Importing Co., Inc. v. United States (50 Cust. Ct. 226, Abstract 67488), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.