Case: Long Beach Federal Savings & Loan Association et al. v. Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco et al.
Abbreviation: Long Beach Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank
Decision Date: 1956-04-30
Docket Number: No. 731
Citation: 351 U.S. 916
Volume: 351
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Long Beach Federal Savings & Loan Association et al. v. Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 916–917

Head Matter:
No. 731.
Long Beach Federal Savings & Loan Association et al. v. Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco et al.
Charles K. Chapman for the Long Beach Federal Savings & Loan Assn, et al., and F. Henry NeCasek for the Home Investment Co., appellants. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Burger, Samuel D. Slade and Donald B. Mac-Guineas for McAllister et al., and Sylvester Hoffmann for the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, appellees. Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General of California, and Everett W. Mattoon, Assistant Attorney General, filed a brief on behalf of the citizens of California, as amici curiae, in support of appellants.

Opinion:
Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.[ ]
[As amended, post, p. 922.]