Case: CARLOS v. NEW YORK
Abbreviation: Carlos v. New York
Decision Date: 1969-12-08
Docket Number: No. 524
Citation: 396 U.S. 119
Volume: 396
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: CARLOS v. NEW YORK
Judges: The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Harlan are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied. However, the case having been taken for review, they would affirm the judgment of the state court upon the premises stated in Mr. Justice Harlan’s separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496 (1957), and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 455 (1966).
Pages: 119–119

Head Matter:
CARLOS v. NEW YORK
No. 524.
Decided December 8, 1969
Herald Price Fahringer and Eugene Gressman for petitioner.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed, Redrup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767.
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Harlan are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied. However, the case having been taken for review, they would affirm the judgment of the state court upon the premises stated in Mr. Justice Harlan's separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496 (1957), and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 455 (1966).