Case: Lehmann, Officer in Charge, Immigration and Naturalization Service, v. United States ex rel. Carson or Carasaniti; Rabang v. Boyd, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service; Jackson v. Taylor, Acting Warden; Fowler v. Wilkinson, Warden; Smith v. United States; Lelles v. United States; Markham et al. v. Burchfield et al.; Lebron v. United States; Cepero v. Pan American World Airways et al.; Luciano v. Wilkinson, Warden
Abbreviation: Lehmann v. United States ex rel. Carson
Decision Date: 1957-07-08
Docket Number: No. 72; No. 403; No. 619; No. 620; No. 820; No. 922; No. 939; No. 677; No. 775; No. 795
Citation: 354 U.S. 944
Volume: 354
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Lehmann, Officer in Charge, Immigration and Naturalization Service, v. United States ex rel. Carson or Carasaniti, Rabang v. Boyd, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Jackson v. Taylor, Acting Warden, Fowler v. Wilkinson, Warden, Smith v. United States, Lelles v. United States, Markham et al. v. Burchfield et al., Lebron v. United States, Cepero v. Pan American World Airways et al., Luciano v. Wilkinson, Warden,
Judges: Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Pages: 944–944

Head Matter:
July 8, 1957.
No. 72.
No. 403.
No. 619.
No. 620.
No. 820.
No. 922.
No. 939.
No. 677,
No. 775,
No. 795,
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Lehmann, Officer in Charge, Immigration and Naturalization Service, v. United States ex rel. Carson or Carasaniti, Rabang v. Boyd, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Jackson v. Taylor, Acting Warden, Fowler v. Wilkinson, Warden, Smith v. United States, Lelles v. United States, Markham et al. v. Burchfield et al., Lebron v. United States, Cepero v. Pan American World Airways et al., Luciano v. Wilkinson, Warden,

Opinion:
353 U. S. 685;
353 U. S. 427;
353 U. S.569;
353 U. S. 583;
353 U. S. 983;
353 U. S. 974;
353 U. S. 988;
ante, p. 911;
ante, p. 927; and
ante, p. 924. Petitions for rehearing denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.