Case: Miller et al. v. United States; Kaplan v. United States; Ewing, dba Action Publishing Co. v. United States; Miller v. United States; Cangiano et al. v. United States
Abbreviation: Miller v. United States
Decision Date: 1973-06-25
Docket Number: No. 70-43; No. 71-40; No. 71-182; No. 71-1517; No. 72-154
Citation: 413 U.S. 913
Volume: 413
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Miller et al. v. United States. Kaplan v. United States. Ewing, dba Action Publishing Co. v. United States. Miller v. United States. Cangiano et al. v. United States.
Judges: Me. Justice Douglas would grant cer-tiorari and reverse the judgments. See Miller v. California, ante, p. 37.
Pages: 913–914

Head Matter:
No. 70-43.
No. 71-40.
No. 71-182.
No. 71-1517.
No. 72-154.
Miller et al. v. United States. Kaplan v. United States. Ewing, dba Action Publishing Co. v. United States. Miller v. United States. Cangiano et al. v. United States.

Opinion:
C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 431 F. 2d 655;
Ct. App. D. C. Reported below: 277 A. 2d 477;
C. A. 10th Cir. Reported below: 445 F. 2d 945;
C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 455 F. 2d 899; and
C. A. 2d Cir. Reported below: 475 F. 2d 1393. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases remanded to the respective United States Courts of Appeals for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, ante, p. 15; Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, ante, p. 49; Kaplan v. California, ante, p. 115; United States v. 12 200-ft. Reels Film, ante, p. 123; United States v. Orito, ante, p. 139; Heller v. New York, ante, p. 483; Roaden v. Kentucky, ante, p. 496; and Alexander v. Virginia, ante, p. 836.
Me. Justice Douglas would grant cer-tiorari and reverse the judgments. See Miller v. California, ante, p. 37.