Case: McFall v. Department of Agriculture; Rodriguez v. Moore, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.; Pravda v. Saratoga County, New York, et al., In re Dorrough, Eaton v. Dakota County Housing Redevelopment Authorities et al.
Abbreviation: McFall v. Department of Agriculture
Decision Date: 2000-03-06
Docket Number: No. 98-9749; No. 99-5960; No. 99-6507; No. 99-6915; No. 99-7105
Citation: 529 U.S. 1012
Volume: 529
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: McFall v. Department of Agriculture, Rodriguez v. Moore, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al., Pravda v. Saratoga County, New York, et al., In re Dorrough, Eaton v. Dakota County Housing Redevelopment Authorities et al.,
Judges: 
Pages: 1012–1012

Head Matter:
No. 98-9749.
No. 99-5960.
No. 99-6507.
No. 99-6915.
No. 99-7105.
McFall v. Department of Agriculture, Rodriguez v. Moore, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al., Pravda v. Saratoga County, New York, et al., In re Dorrough, Eaton v. Dakota County Housing Redevelopment Authorities et al.,

Opinion:
528 U. S. 1003;
528 U. S. 971;
528 U. S. 1063;
528 U. S. 1017; and
528 U. S. 1131. Petitions for rehearing denied.