Case: E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United States
Abbreviation: E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United States
Decision Date: 1961-06-01
Docket Number: No. 65739; protests 214319-K, 273648-K, and 214320-K (Ogdensburg)
Citation: 46 Cust. Ct. 517
Volume: 46
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United States,
Judges: 
Pages: 517–517

Head Matter:
No. 65739.
E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United States,
protests 214319-K, 273648-K, and 214320-K (Ogdensburg).

Opinion:
Opinion by
Eord, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in use to thrown silk not more advanced than singles, tram, or organzine and following the principles set forth in United States v. Steinberg Bros. (47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.