Case: NOVELTY, INC., Petitioner v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION et al., Respondents
Abbreviation: Novelty, Inc. v. Drug Enforcement Administration
Decision Date: 2009-06-22
Docket Number: No. 08-1296
Citation: 387 U.S. App. D.C. 93
Volume: 387
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Parties: NOVELTY, INC., Petitioner v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION et al., Respondents.
Judges: Before HENDERSON, TATEL and BROWN, Circuit Judges.
Pages: 93–116

Head Matter:
571 F.3d 1176
NOVELTY, INC., Petitioner v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION et al., Respondents.
No. 08-1296.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued Jan. 14, 2009.
Decided June 22, 2009.
Rehearing En Banc Denied July 28, 2009.
Jonathan W. Emord argued the cause for the petitioner.
Teresa A. Wallbaum, Acting Deputy Chief for Policy and Appeals, United States Department of Justice, argued the cause for the respondent. Anita Gay, Attorney, entered an appearance.
Before HENDERSON, TATEL and BROWN, Circuit Judges.
Separate statements filed by Circuit Judge KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge DAVID S. TATEL and Circuit Judge JANICE ROGERS BROWN.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Novelty, Inc. petitions for review of the order of the United States Drug Enforcement Administration in Novelty Distributors, Inc., 73 Fed.Reg. 52,689 (Sept. 10, 2008).
It is ordered that the petition for review be denied. Judge Henderson sets forth her reasons for denying the petition in her separate concurring statement, as does Judge Tatel in his separate concurring statement. Judge Brown dissents from the denial for the reasons stated in her dissent.