Case: Swoap, Director, Department of Benefit Payments of California v. Garcia et al.; Indiana v. Scottsdale Mall; General Dynamics Corp. v. Bullock, Comptroller of Public Accounts of Texas, et al.; Berry et al. v. Doles, Chairman, Board of Commissioners of Roads and Revenues of Peach County, et al.; Randle et al. v. Beal, Secretary, Department of Public Welfare of Pennsylvania, et al.; Allied Chemical Corp. v. White et al. Washington et al. v. Confederated Bands and Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation
Abbreviation: Swoap v. Garcia
Decision Date: 1977-10-03
Docket Number: No. 76-1523; No. 76-1609; No. 76-1645; No. 76-1690; No. 76-6853; No. 77-97; No. 77-388
Citation: 434 U.S. 811
Volume: 434
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Swoap, Director, Department of Benefit Payments of California v. Garcia et al. Indiana v. Scottsdale Mall. General Dynamics Corp. v. Bullock, Comptroller of Public Accounts of Texas, et al. Berry et al. v. Doles, Chairman, Board of Commissioners of Roads and Revenues of Peach County, et al. Randle et al. v. Beal, Secretary, Department of Public Welfare of Pennsylvania, et al. Allied Chemical Corp. v. White et al. Washington et al. v. Confederated Bands and Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation.
Judges: 
Pages: 811–811

Head Matter:
No. 76-1523.
No. 76-1609.
No. 76-1645.
No. 76-1690.
No. 76-6853.
No. 77-97.
No. 77-388.
Swoap, Director, Department of Benefit Payments of California v. Garcia et al. Indiana v. Scottsdale Mall. General Dynamics Corp. v. Bullock, Comptroller of Public Accounts of Texas, et al. Berry et al. v. Doles, Chairman, Board of Commissioners of Roads and Revenues of Peach County, et al. Randle et al. v. Beal, Secretary, Department of Public Welfare of Pennsylvania, et al. Allied Chemical Corp. v. White et al. Washington et al. v. Confederated Bands and Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation.

Opinion:
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. ;
C. A. 7th Cir.;
Sup. Ct. Tex. ;
D. C. M. D. Ga. ;
C. A. 3d Cir.;
C. A. 5th Cir.; and
C. A. 9th Cir. The Solicitor General is invited to file briefs in each of these cases expressing the views of the United States.