Case: BLANKENSHIP et al. v. HOLDING, dba GRAND NEWS
Abbreviation: Blankenship v. Holding
Decision Date: 1967-05-15
Docket Number: No. 1089
Citation: 387 U.S. 95
Volume: 387
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: BLANKENSHIP et al. v. HOLDING, dba GRAND NEWS.
Judges: 
Pages: 95–95

Head Matter:
BLANKENSHIP et al. v. HOLDING, dba GRAND NEWS.
No. 1089.
Decided May 15, 1967.
Charles Nesbitt, Attorney General of Oklahoma, and Jeff Hartmann, Assistant Attorney General, for appellants.
Samuel W. Block, Thomas P. Sullivan and Paul C. Duncan for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Probable jurisdiction noted. The judgment of the District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma entered November 4, 1966, is affirmed insofar as it adjudged provisions of § 1040.1 to 1040.10 of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes to be unconstitutional.