Case: Villarreal-Gonsalez v. United States; Rosas-Diaz v. United States; Garcia-Cervantes v. United States; Martinez-Cantu v. United States; Reyes-Rodriguez v. United States; Martinez-Mendez v. United States; Ramirez-Orozco, aka Ramirez v. United States; Roman-Martinez, aka Vidas v. United States; Gonzalez-Hernandez v. United States; Rangel-Espinoza v. United States; Lara-Hernandez, aka Uribe-Conchola v. United States; Villafranca-Castro v. United States; Davinson-Canales v. United States; Hernandez-Mesa v. United States; Rodriguez-Puente v. United States; and Sayas-Montoya v. United States
Abbreviation: Villarreal-Gonsalez v. United States
Decision Date: 2005-11-07
Docket Number: No. 05-6857
Citation: 546 U.S. 1009
Volume: 546
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Villarreal-Gonsalez v. United States Rosas-Diaz v. United States Garcia-Cervantes v. United States Martinez-Cantu v. United States Reyes-Rodriguez v. United States Martinez-Mendez v. United States Ramirez-Orozco, aka Ramirez v. United States Roman-Martinez, aka Vidas v. United States Gonzalez-Hernandez v. United States; Rangel-Espinoza v. United States Lara-Hernandez, aka Uribe-Conchola v. United States Villafranca-Castro v. United States Davinson-Canales v. United States Hernandez-Mesa v. United States Rodriguez-Puente v. United States and Sayas-Montoya v. United States
Judges: 
Pages: 1009–1009

Head Matter:
No. 05-6857.
Villarreal-Gonsalez v. United States Rosas-Diaz v. United States Garcia-Cervantes v. United States Martinez-Cantu v. United States Reyes-Rodriguez v. United States Martinez-Mendez v. United States Ramirez-Orozco, aka Ramirez v. United States Roman-Martinez, aka Vidas v. United States Gonzalez-Hernandez v. United States; Rangel-Espinoza v. United States Lara-Hernandez, aka Uribe-Conchola v. United States Villafranca-Castro v. United States Davinson-Canales v. United States Hernandez-Mesa v. United States Rodriguez-Puente v. United States and Sayas-Montoya v. United States

Opinion:
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.