Case: Diehl v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co. et al.
Abbreviation: Diehl v. Lehigh Valley Railroad
Decision Date: 1955-03-14
Docket Number: No. 246
Citation: 348 U.S. 960
Volume: 348
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Diehl v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co. et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 960–961

Head Matter:
March 14, 1955.
No. 246.
Diehl v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co. et al.
Argued February-28, March 1, 1955.
Decided March 14, 1955.
Harry Montgomery Leet argued the cause for petitioner.
With him on the brief was Sheldon E. Bernstein.
Richard R. Lyman argued the cause for respondents.
With him on a brief were Clarence M. Mulholland and Edward J. Hickey, Jr. for the System Federation No. 96, Railway Employes’ Department, A. F. of L., et al., respondents.
Thomas Price Mikell and Harry E. Sprogell filed a brief for the Lehigh Valley Railroad Co., respondent.

Opinion:
Certiorari, 348 U. S. 860, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Per Curiam:
Upon the facts disclosed in the opinion of the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 211 F. 2d 95, the applicable Acts of Congress, and the opinion of this Court in Oakley v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co., 338 U. S. 278, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed. Mr. Justice Reed dissents for the reasons given in the opinion of the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Burger and Samuel D. Slade filed a memorandum for the United States, as amicus curiae, urging reversal.