Case: Lauro et al. v. Barker et al.
Abbreviation: Lauro v. Barker
Decision Date: 1937-01-18
Docket Number: No. 374
Citation: 299 U.S. 521
Volume: 299
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Lauro et al. v. Barker et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 521–522

Head Matter:
No. 374.
Lauro et al. v. Barker et al.
Argued January 14, 1937.
Decided January 18, 1937.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
The motion of the appellees to affirm the judgment is granted, and the judgment is affirmed. (1) Bellingham Bay Co. v. New Whatcom, 172 U. S. 314, 318, 319; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 81; Wick v. Chelan Electric Co., 280 U. S. 108, 110, 111. (2) Gilfillan v. Union Canal Co., 109 U. S. 401.
Mr. Henry N. Rapaport, with whom Messrs. Irving S. Rapaport and Robert S. Garson were on the brief, for appellants.
Messrs. Lawrence S. Greenbaum, Benjamin J. Rabin, Theodore S. Jaffin, Benjamin Kaplan, and Maurice Finkelstein were on the brief for appellees.