Case: Floral Trade Council, plaintiff v. United States, defendant, and Visaflor, S.A., Rancho Daisy, Rancho Guacatay, and Rancho Mision el Descanso, defendant-intervenors
Abbreviation: Floral Trade Council v. United States
Decision Date: 1993-08-16
Docket Number: Court No. 92-06-00393
Citation: 17 Ct. Int'l Trade 915
Volume: 17
Reporter: United States Court of International Trade Reports
Court: United States Court of International Trade
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Floral Trade Council, plaintiff v. United States, defendant, and Visaflor, S.A., Rancho Daisy, Rancho Guacatay, and Rancho Mision el Descanso, defendant-intervenors
Judges: 
Pages: 915–915

Head Matter:
Floral Trade Council, plaintiff v. United States, defendant, and Visaflor, S.A., Rancho Daisy, Rancho Guacatay, and Rancho Mision el Descanso, defendant-intervenors
Court No. 92-06-00393
(Dated August 16, 1993)

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
Restani, Judge:
This case having been submitted for decision and the Court, after deliberation, having rendered a decision therein; now, in conformity with that decision,
It is hereby ordered : that a remand determination having been issued finding the "all other" rate to be 18.20%, and no objections having been filed, it is hereby
Further ordered that the ITA's remand determination is sustained and that an 18.20% rate shall be applied as the cash deposit "all other" rate for future entries.