Case: National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Federal Communications Commission et al.; National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates et al. v. Federal Communications Commission et al.; Public Service Commission of Wisconsin et al. v. Federal Communications Commission et al.; Florida Public Service Commission v. Federal Communications Commission et al.; and New York State Department of Public Service v. Federal Communications Commission et al.
Abbreviation: National Ass'n of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Federal Communications Commission
Decision Date: 1985-02-19
Docket Number: No. 84-95; No. 84-504; No. 84-816; No. 84-824; No. 84-856
Citation: 469 U.S. 1227
Volume: 469
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Federal Communications Commission et al.; National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates et al. v. Federal Communications Commission et al.; Public Service Commission of Wisconsin et al. v. Federal Communications Commission et al.; Florida Public Service Commission v. Federal Communications Commission et al.; and New York State Department of Public Service v. Federal Communications Commission et al.
Judges: Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.*
Pages: 1227–1227

Head Matter:
No. 84-95.
No. 84-504.
No. 84-816.
No. 84-824.
No. 84-856.
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Federal Communications Commission et al.; National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates et al. v. Federal Communications Commission et al.; Public Service Commission of Wisconsin et al. v. Federal Communications Commission et al.; Florida Public Service Commission v. Federal Communications Commission et al.; and New York State Department of Public Service v. Federal Communications Commission et al.

Opinion:
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.*
Reported below: 237 U. S. App. D. C. 390, 737 F. 2d 1095.