Case: Bailey v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co.; Carden v. Brooks et al.; Hunter v. United States; Shapiro v. City of New York et al.; Graff Vending Co. et al. v. Hampton, dba Hampton Vending Supply; Goldstein, Receiver v. United States; Desmarais et al. v. Wachusett Regional School District et al.; Rose et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Stokes v. Bruce et al.
Abbreviation: Bailey v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co.
Decision Date: 1973-12-03
Docket Number: No. 72-6879; No. 73-82; No. 73-101; No. 73-148; No. 73-167; No. 73-177; No. 73-209; No. 73-224; No. 73-5046
Citation: 414 U.S. 1087
Volume: 414
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Bailey v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co., Carden v. Brooks et al., Hunter v. United States, Shapiro v. City of New York et al., Graff Vending Co. et al. v. Hampton, dba Hampton Vending Supply, Goldstein, Receiver v. United States, Desmarais et al. v. Wachusett Regional School District et al., Rose et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Stokes v. Bruce et al.,
Judges: 
Pages: 1087–1087

Head Matter:
No. 72-6879.
No. 73-82.
No. 73-101.
No. 73-148.
No. 73-167.
No. 73-177.
No. 73-209.
No. 73-224.
No. 73-5046.
Bailey v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co., Carden v. Brooks et al., Hunter v. United States, Shapiro v. City of New York et al., Graff Vending Co. et al. v. Hampton, dba Hampton Vending Supply, Goldstein, Receiver v. United States, Desmarais et al. v. Wachusett Regional School District et al., Rose et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Stokes v. Bruce et al.,

Opinion:
ante, p. 873;
ante, p. 824;
ante, p. 857;
ante, p. 804;
ante, p. 859;
ante, p. 974;
ante, p. 859;
ante, p. 975; and
ante, p. 893. Petitions for rehearing denied.