Case: Securities & Exchange Commission v. Central-Illinois Securities Corp. et al.; Streeter et al. v. Central-Illinois Securities Corp. et al.; Home Insurance Co. et al. v. Central-Illinois Securities Corp. et al.; and Central-Illinois Securities Corp. et al. v. Securities & Exchange Commission et al.
Abbreviation: Securities & Exchange Commission v. Central-Illinois Securities Corp.
Decision Date: 1948-10-25
Docket Number: No. 226; No. 227; No. 243; No. 266
Citation: 335 U.S. 851
Volume: 335
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Securities & Exchange Commission v. Central-Illinois Securities Corp. et al.; Streeter et al. v. Central-Illinois Securities Corp. et al.; Home Insurance Co. et al. v. Central-Illinois Securities Corp. et al.; and Central-Illinois Securities Corp. et al. v. Securities & Exchange Commission et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 851–852

Head Matter:
No. 226.
No. 227.
No. 243.
No. 266.
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Central-Illinois Securities Corp. et al.; Streeter et al. v. Central-Illinois Securities Corp. et al.; Home Insurance Co. et al. v. Central-Illinois Securities Corp. et al.; and Central-Illinois Securities Corp. et al. v. Securities & Exchange Commission et al.
Solicitor General Perlman and Roger S. Foster for the Securities & Exchange Commission, petitioner in No. 226 and respondent in No. 266. Lawrence R. Condon and Milton Maurer for Streeter et al., petitioners in No. 227 and respondents in No. 266. Francis H. Scheetz for petitioners in No. 243.

Opinion:
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted.
Alfred Berman, Philip W. Amran and Abraham Shamos for the Central-Illinois Securities Corp. et al., petitioners in No. 266 and respondents in Nos. 226, 227 and 243.
Louis Boehm for White et al., respondents in Nos. 226, 227 and 243.
W. E. Tucker and Paul D. Miller for the Engineers Public Service Co., respondent in Nos. 226 and 227.
Louis Boehm filed a brief for White et al., as amici curiae, supporting petitioners in No. 266.
Reported below: 168 F. 2d 722.