Case: Sutton & Husney v. United States
Abbreviation: Sutton v. United States
Decision Date: 1942-10-21
Docket Number: No. 5742; Entry No. 732232
Citation: 9 Cust. Ct. 658
Volume: 9
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Sutton & Husney v. United States
Judges: 
Pages: 658–658

Head Matter:
Sutton & Husney v. United States
No. 5742.
Entry No. 732232.
Invoice dated Shanghai, China, August 18, 1939.
Certified August 22, 1939.
Entered at New York, N. Y., September 21, 1939.
(Decided October 21, 1942)
Siegel & Mandell for the plaintiffs.
Paul P. Bao, Assistant Attorney General (Daniel I. Auster, special attorney), for the defendant.

Opinion:
Tilson, Judge:
Counsel for the respective parties have submitted this appeal for decision upon a stipulation to the effect that the market value or price at or about the date of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of China, for exportation to the United States, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including all costs, charges and expenses specified in section 402 (d) of the act of 1930, is the value found by the appraiser, less any amount added under duress.
I therefore find and hold the proper dutiable export value of the merchandise covered by this appeal is the value found by the appraiser, less any amount arlded under duress. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.