Case: UNITED STATES, Appellee v. ROBERT H. JOHNSON, Specialist Four U. S. Army, Appellant
Abbreviation: United States v. Johnson
Decision Date: 1973-12-14
Docket Number: No. 27,164
Citation: 22 C.M.A. 524
Volume: 22
Reporter: Decisions of the United States Court of Military Appeals
Court: United States Court of Military Appeals
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: UNITED STATES, Appellee v ROBERT H. JOHNSON, Specialist Four U. S. Army, Appellant
Judges: Chief Judge Darden and Judge Duncan concur.
Pages: 524–524

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES, Appellee v ROBERT H. JOHNSON, Specialist Four U. S. Army, Appellant
No. 27,164
December 14, 1973
Captain Denis E. Hynes argued the cause for Appellant, Accused. With him on the brief were Colonel Arnold I. Melnick, Captain J. Houston Gordon, and Captain Richard M. Evans.
Lieutenant Colonel Ronald M. Holdaway argued the cause for Appellee, United States. With him on the brief was Lieutenant Colonel Donald W Hansen, and Captain Robert C. Roth, Jr.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Quinn, Judge:
At trial, the accused moved to dismiss the charges against him on the ground that proceedings subsequent to his confinement were inordinately delayed for 126 days. The motion was denied.
A chronology of events appended to the record as justification for the delay impresses us as presenting substantially the same generalized claim of inadequate personnel and administrative convenience that was before us in United States v Marshall, 22 USCMA 431, 47 CMR 409 (1973). For the same reasons set out in Marshall, we conclude that the proffered justification is insufficient to satisfy the government's burden of justification promulgated in United States v Burton, 21 USCMA 112, 44 CMR 166 (1971). Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the Army Court of Military Review, set aside the findings of guilty and the sentence, and order that the charges against the accused be dismissed. United States v Smith, 22 USCMA 474, 47 CMR 564 (1973).
Chief Judge Darden and Judge Duncan concur.