Case: Walton v. Small Business Administration; Williams v. Pierce, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, et al.; Betka v. City of West Linn et al.; Kajevic v. United States; McMillan v. Hester et al.; Morvay v. Maghielse Tool & Die Co., Inc.; Brown v. Rice et al., In re Brown, Skaggs et al. v. Crawford County, Ohio, et al.; Howell v. Appling
Abbreviation: Walton v. Small Business Administration
Decision Date: 1984-02-21
Docket Number: No. 83-709; No. 83-5448; No. 83-5460; No. 83-5536; No. 83-5572; No. 83-5624; No. 83-5633; No. 83-5634; No. 83-5638; No. 83-5793
Citation: 465 U.S. 1055
Volume: 465
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Walton v. Small Business Administration, Williams v. Pierce, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, et al., Betka v. City of West Linn et al., Kajevic v. United States, McMillan v. Hester et al., Morvay v. Maghielse Tool & Die Co., Inc., Brown v. Rice et al., In re Brown, Skaggs et al. v. Crawford County, Ohio, et al., Howell v. Appling,
Judges: 
Pages: 1055–1055

Head Matter:
No. 83-709.
No. 83-5448.
No. 83-5460.
No. 83-5536.
No. 83-5572.
No. 83-5624.
No. 83-5633.
No. 83-5634.
No. 83-5638.
No. 83-5793.
Walton v. Small Business Administration, Williams v. Pierce, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, et al., Betka v. City of West Linn et al., Kajevic v. United States, McMillan v. Hester et al., Morvay v. Maghielse Tool & Die Co., Inc., Brown v. Rice et al., In re Brown, Skaggs et al. v. Crawford County, Ohio, et al., Howell v. Appling,

Opinion:
464 U. S. 1009;
464 U. S. 1046;
464 U. S. 979;
464 U. S. 1047;
464 U. S. 1010;
464 U. S. 1011;
464 U. S. 1019;
464 U. S. 1006;
464 U. S. 1019; and
464 U. S. 1072. Petitions
for rehearing denied.