Case: AIR TERMINAL SERVICES, INC. v. The DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al., Appellants
Abbreviation: Air Terminal Services, Inc. v. Department of Transportation
Decision Date: 1975-07-10
Docket Number: No. 73-2094
Citation: 169 U.S. App. D.C. 297
Volume: 169
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Parties: AIR TERMINAL SERVICES, INC. v. The DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al., Appellants.
Judges: Before FAHY, Senior Circuit Judge, and WRIGHT and ROBINSON, Circuit Judges.
Pages: 297–299

Head Matter:
515 F.2d 1014
AIR TERMINAL SERVICES, INC. v. The DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al., Appellants.
No. 73-2094.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued Jan. 13, 1975.
Decided July 10, 1975.
Joseph B. Valder, Asst. U. S. Atty., and Owen Birnbaum, Atty., Dept, of Transp., of the bar of the U. S. Dist. Court for the District of Columbia, pro hac vice by special leave of court, with whom Earl J. Silbert, U. S. Atty., John A. Terry and Robert M. Werdig, Jr., Asst. U. S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellants. Harold H. Titus, Jr., U. S. Atty., at the time the record was filed also entered an appearance for appellants.
David Machanic, Washington, D. C., with whom William H. Fitz, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee.
Before FAHY, Senior Circuit Judge, and WRIGHT and ROBINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
JUDGMENT
This cause came on to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and was argued by counsel. While the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion, they have been accorded full consideration by the court. See Local Rule 13(c).
This court is in agreement with the disposition ordered by the District Court for substantially the reasons stated in its memorandum order.
On consideration of the foregoing, it is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the District Court appealed from in this cause is hereby affirmed.
FAHY, Senior Circuit Judge, dissents from the foregoing judgment for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion filed this date.