Case: Young v. Florida et al.; Toledo Police Patrolman's Assn., Local 10, I. U. P. A., et al. v. City of Toledo et al., In re Jaffer, Wrenn v. United States et al.; Camoscio v. The Patriot Ledger et al.; Bettistea v. Michigan; Porter v. Pennsylvania; Sisco v. County of Los Angeles et al.; Draper v. Ohio; Schlicher v. Davies, Secretary, Kansas Department of Corrections, et al.; McColpin v. Stephan, In re Kirschenhunter
Abbreviation: Young v. Florida
Decision Date: 1990-12-10
Docket Number: No. 89-7683; No. 90-346; No. 90-365; No. 90-399; No. 90-458; No. 90-5073; No. 90-5101; No. 90-5266; No. 90-5454; No. 90-5606; No. 90-5632; No. 90-5816
Citation: 498 U.S. 1017
Volume: 498
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Young v. Florida et al., Toledo Police Patrolman’s Assn., Local 10, I. U. P. A., et al. v. City of Toledo et al., In re Jaffer, Wrenn v. United States et al., Camoscio v. The Patriot Ledger et al., Bettistea v. Michigan, Porter v. Pennsylvania, Sisco v. County of Los Angeles et al., Draper v. Ohio, Schlicher v. Davies, Secretary, Kansas Department of Corrections, et al., McColpin v. Stephan, In re Kirschenhunter,
Judges: 
Pages: 1017–1017

Head Matter:
No. 89-7683.
No. 90-346.
No. 90-365.
No. 90-399.
No. 90-458.
No. 90-5073.
No. 90-5101.
No. 90-5266.
No. 90-5454.
No. 90-5606.
No. 90-5632.
No. 90-5816.
Young v. Florida et al., Toledo Police Patrolman’s Assn., Local 10, I. U. P. A., et al. v. City of Toledo et al., In re Jaffer, Wrenn v. United States et al., Camoscio v. The Patriot Ledger et al., Bettistea v. Michigan, Porter v. Pennsylvania, Sisco v. County of Los Angeles et al., Draper v. Ohio, Schlicher v. Davies, Secretary, Kansas Department of Corrections, et al., McColpin v. Stephan, In re Kirschenhunter,

Opinion:
ante, p. 919;
ante, p. 920;
ante, p. 937;
ante, p. 921;
ante, p. 942;
ante, p. 942;
ante, p. 925;
ante, p. 922;
ante, p. 916;
ante, p. 945;
ante, p. 946; and
ante, p. 937. Petitions for rehearing denied.