Case: UNITED STATES, Appellee v. STUART GOLDMAN, Private First Class, U. S. Army, Appellant
Abbreviation: United States v. Goldman
Decision Date: 1964-06-12
Docket Number: No. 17,637
Citation: 14 C.M.A. 598
Volume: 14
Reporter: Decisions of the United States Court of Military Appeals
Court: United States Court of Military Appeals
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: UNITED STATES, Appellee v STUART GOLDMAN, Private First Class, U. S. Army, Appellant
Judges: 
Pages: 598–599

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES, Appellee v STUART GOLDMAN, Private First Class, U. S. Army, Appellant
14 USCMA 598, 34 CMR 378
No. 17,637
June 12, 1964
Colonel Joseph L. Chalk, Captain Daniel H. Benson, and First Lieutenant E. Pomeroy Williams were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.
Lieutenant Colonel Francis M. Cooper was on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion:
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
Among other offenses, the accused was found guilty of false swearing, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 134, 10 USC § 934. Our examination of the specification, however, discloses that its averments fail to allege, either expressly or by fair implication, that the statement was in fact false. Indeed, the count is, except for the factual material set forth therein, precisely the same as that which we found insufficient in United States v McCarthy, 11 USCMA 758, 29 CMR 574. Compare United States v Chaney, 12 USCMA 378, 30 CMR 378. The findings of guilty of Charge II are, accordingly, set aside.
The decision of the board of review is reversed, and the record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of .the Army. The board may re assess the sentence on the basis of the remaining findings of guilty or order a rehearing on a proper specification and the penalty.