Case: Reedy Forwarding Company, Inc. v. United States, protests 63/4505 and 63/6986 (Tampa); Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. United States, protests 63/6984 and 63/13947 (Tampa)
Abbreviation: Reedy Forwarding Co. v. United States
Decision Date: 1966-10-04
Docket Number: No. P66/240; No. P66/241
Citation: 57 Cust. Ct. 812
Volume: 57
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Reedy Forwarding Company, Inc. v. United States, protests 63/4505 and 63/6986 (Tampa). Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. United States, protests 63/6984 and 63/13947 (Tampa).
Judges: 
Pages: 812–812

Head Matter:
No. P66/240. —
No. P66/241. —
Reedy Forwarding Company, Inc. v. United States, protests 63/4505 and 63/6986 (Tampa). Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. United States, protests 63/6984 and 63/13947 (Tampa).

Opinion:
Rao, C.J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of galvanized steel pipes or tubes not thinner than 0.065 inch, and not less than % inch in diameter, and that the issue involved herein is similar in all material respects to that in Amerlux Steel Products Corp. et al. v. United States (52 Cust. Ct. 83, C.D. 2441), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.