Case: Holsey v. Maryland; Connor v. United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics; California State Board of Equalization et al. v. Chemehuevi Indian Tribe; Zerman et al. v. Avant Garde Condominium Assn., Inc., et al.; and Zerman v. White, Clerk of the Florida Supreme Court, et al.; Baker, Individually and dba Baker Coal Co. v. United States; Maggette v. Cook County Police and Corrections Merit Board et al.; Nabors v. United States; Court House Plaza Co. v. City of Palo Alto et al.; El Shahawy v. Elliott; Denson v. Department of Health and Human Services; Roberts et al. v. Simpson, Executrix of the Estate of Beel, et al.; California ex rel. Cooper, City Attorney of Santa Ana, California v. Mitchell Brothers' Santa Ana Theater et al.; Sparrow v. Devine, Director, U. S. Office of Personnel Management, et al.; Burton v. Reed et al.; Dano v. Szombathy; Coleman et al. v. Delaware et al.; Holliday v. Hauptman, Trustee in Bankruptcy; Bishop v. Davis; Howell v. Maryland; McGlory v. Yoka, In re Schmid, Haddix v. Ohio Liquor Control Commission; Burton v. Wilson et al.; Burton v. Smith
Abbreviation: Holsey v. Maryland
Decision Date: 1986-01-13
Docket Number: No. 84-6717; No. 85-56; No. 85-130; No. 85-191; No. 85-222; No. 85-263; No. 85-269; No. 85-287; No. 85-318; No. 85-374; No. 85-378; No. 85-439; No. 85-582; No. 85-5107; No. 85-5351; No. 85-5361; No. 85-5376; No. 85-5378; No. 85-5471; No. 85-5495; No. 85-5504; No. 85-5508; No. 85-5510; No. 85-5511
Citation: 474 U.S. 1077
Volume: 474
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Holsey v. Maryland, Connor v. United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, California State Board of Equalization et al. v. Chemehuevi Indian Tribe, Zerman et al. v. Avant Garde Condominium Assn., Inc., et al.; and Zerman v. White, Clerk of the Florida Supreme Court, et al., Baker, Individually and dba Baker Coal Co. v. United States, Maggette v. Cook County Police and Corrections Merit Board et al., Nabors v. United States, Court House Plaza Co. v. City of Palo Alto et al., El Shahawy v. Elliott, Denson v. Department of Health and Human Services, Roberts et al. v. Simpson, Executrix of the Estate of Beel, et al., California ex rel. Cooper, City Attorney of Santa Ana, California v. Mitchell Brothers’ Santa Ana Theater et al., Sparrow v. Devine, Director, U. S. Office of Personnel Management, et al., Burton v. Reed et al., Dano v. Szombathy, Coleman et al. v. Delaware et al., Holliday v. Hauptman, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Bishop v. Davis, Howell v. Maryland, McGlory v. Yoka, In re Schmid, Haddix v. Ohio Liquor Control Commission, Burton v. Wilson et al., Burton v. Smith,
Judges: 
Pages: 1077–1077

Head Matter:
No. 84-6717.
No. 85-56.
No. 85-130.
No. 85-191.
No. 85-222.
No. 85-263.
No. 85-269.
No. 85-287.
No. 85-318.
No. 85-374.
No. 85-378.
No. 85-439.
No. 85-582.
No. 85-5107.
No. 85-5351.
No. 85-5361.
No. 85-5376.
No. 85-5378.
No. 85-5471.
No. 85-5495.
No. 85-5504.
No. 85-5508.
No. 85-5510.
No. 85-5511.
Holsey v. Maryland, Connor v. United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, California State Board of Equalization et al. v. Chemehuevi Indian Tribe, Zerman et al. v. Avant Garde Condominium Assn., Inc., et al.; and Zerman v. White, Clerk of the Florida Supreme Court, et al., Baker, Individually and dba Baker Coal Co. v. United States, Maggette v. Cook County Police and Corrections Merit Board et al., Nabors v. United States, Court House Plaza Co. v. City of Palo Alto et al., El Shahawy v. Elliott, Denson v. Department of Health and Human Services, Roberts et al. v. Simpson, Executrix of the Estate of Beel, et al., California ex rel. Cooper, City Attorney of Santa Ana, California v. Mitchell Brothers’ Santa Ana Theater et al., Sparrow v. Devine, Director, U. S. Office of Personnel Management, et al., Burton v. Reed et al., Dano v. Szombathy, Coleman et al. v. Delaware et al., Holliday v. Hauptman, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Bishop v. Davis, Howell v. Maryland, McGlory v. Yoka, In re Schmid, Haddix v. Ohio Liquor Control Commission, Burton v. Wilson et al., Burton v. Smith,

Opinion:
ante, p. 1004;
ante, p. 998;
ante, p. 9;
ante, p. 895;
ante, p. 945;
ante, p. 945;
ante, p. 851;
ante, p. 945;
ante, p. 980;
ante, p. 946;
ante, p. 946;
ante, p. 948;
ante, p. 949;
ante, p. 949;
ante, p. 950;
ante, p. 950;
ante, p. 950;
ante, p. 950;
ante, p. 996;
ante, p. 997;
ante, p. 993;
ante, p. 997;
ante, p. 997; and
ante, p. 997. Petitions for rehearing denied.