Case: Paul K. Frankford, Inc. v. United States
Abbreviation: Paul K. Frankford, Inc. v. United States
Decision Date: 1956-06-15
Docket Number: Reap. Dec. 8595; Entry No. 792022
Citation: 36 Cust. Ct. 610
Volume: 36
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Paul K. Frankford, Inc. v. United States
Judges: 
Pages: 610–610

Head Matter:
(Reap. Dec. 8595)
Paul K. Frankford, Inc. v. United States
Entry No. 792022.
(Decided June 15, 1956)
Plaintiff not represented by counsel.
George Cochran Doub, Assistant Attorney General (Daniel I. Auster, trial attorney), for the defendant.

Opinion:
Wilson, Judge:
This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of fact entered into by and between the respective parties.
On the agreed facts I find export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of merchandise invoiced as:
74 Hazel Pigskins 1 m.m.
bd
79 Hazel Pigskins 1 m.m.. í>
30 " " " _ W
and that such values were the appraised unit prices, less 46 per centum, plus packing.
Insofar as the appeal relates to all other merchandise, the proper values are the values found by the appraiser.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.