Case: Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Railroad Commission of Texas et al.; and Williams et al. v. Railroad Commission of Texas et al.
Abbreviation: Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Railroad Commission of Texas
Decision Date: 1947-06-02
Docket Number: No. 1344; No. 1345
Citation: 331 U.S. 791
Volume: 331
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Railroad Commission of Texas et al.; and Williams et al. v. Railroad Commission of Texas et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 791–791

Head Matter:
No. 1344.
No. 1345.
Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Railroad Commission of Texas et al.; and Williams et al. v. Railroad Commission of Texas et al.
June 2, 1947.
J. A. Rauhut, Nelson Jones, Norman L. Meyers, Rex G. Baker and R. E. Seagler for appellant in No. 1344. Dan Moody for Williams et ah, appellants in No. 1345. Price Daniel, Attorney General of Texas, and Fagan Dickson, First Assistant Attorney General, for the Railroad Commission of Texas et al., and James P. Hart for Ashcroft et al., appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgments are affirmed.
Reported below: 193 S. W. 2d 824.