Case: Protests 161718-G, etc., of F. M. Jabara & Bros. (New York)
Abbreviation: Protests 161718-G of F. M. Jabara & Bros.
Decision Date: 1940-01-29
Docket Number: No. 43135
Citation: 4 Cust. Ct. 383
Volume: 4
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Protests 161718-G, etc., of F. M. Jabara & Bros. (New York).
Judges: 
Pages: 383–383

Head Matter:
No. 43135.
Protests 161718-G, etc., of F. M. Jabara & Bros. (New York).

Opinion:
Opinion by
Tilson, J.
From the evidence it was found that certain items consist of filet lace similar to that involved in United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), Venice lace like that passed upon in Littwitz v. United States (3 Cust. Ct. 123, C. D. 217), Alenpon lace similar to that involved in United States v. Caesar (18 C. C. P. A. 106, T. D. 44067), and lace articles embroidered like those passed upon in Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.