Case: Will D. Gould et al., Appellants, v. Leo V. Youngworth, United States Marshal; Warren Gillelen et al., Appellants, v. Leo V. Youngworth, United States Marshal; and Lee R. Myers, Appellant, v. H. Z. Osborne, United States Marshal
Abbreviation: Gould v. Youngworth
Decision Date: 1907-04-08
Docket Number: No. 401; No. 415; No. 432
Citation: 205 U.S. 538
Volume: 205
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Will D. Gould et al., Appellants, v. Leo V. Youngworth, United States Marshal; Warren Gillelen et al., Appellants, v. Leo V. Youngworth, United States Marshal; and Lee R. Myers, Appellant, v. H. Z. Osborne, United States Marshal.
Judges: 
Pages: 538–539

Head Matter:
No. 401. No. 415. No. 432.
Will D. Gould et al., Appellants, v. Leo V. Youngworth, United States Marshal; Warren Gillelen et al., Appellants, v. Leo V. Youngworth, United States Marshal; and Lee R. Myers, Appellant, v. H. Z. Osborne, United States Marshal.
Appeals from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of California.
Argued March 19 and 20, 1907.
Decided April 8, 1907.
Mr. Will' D. Gould for appellants in No. 401 and Mr. Herbert J. Goudge for appellants in No. 415. The Attorney General and Mr. Assistant-Attorney General Sanford for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Final orders reversed with costs, and causes remanded-with directions to discharge petitioners, respectively, without prejudice to renewal of applications to remove, on the authority of Tinsley v. Treat &c., 205 U. S. 20.