Case: Ohio ex rel. Eastman v. Stuart et al.
Abbreviation: Ohio ex rel. Eastman v. Stuart
Decision Date: 1934-02-12
Docket Number: No. 740
Citation: 291 U.S. 643
Volume: 291
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Ohio ex rel. Eastman v. Stuart et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 643–644

Head Matter:
No. 740.
Ohio ex rel. Eastman v. Stuart et al.
Jurisdictional statement submitted February 3, 1934.
Decided February 12, 1934.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the judgment sought here to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Yesler v. Washington Harbor Line Comm'rs, 146 U.S. 646, 657; Farson Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U.S. 268, 271; Doyle v. Atwell, 261 U.S. 590; Howat v. Kansas, 258 U.S. 181, 189, 190; McCoy v. Shaw, 277 U.S. 302, 303.
Messrs. Erwin R. Effler, Rufus H. Baker, and Harold W. Fraser for appellant. Messrs. Frazier Reams and J. S. Rhinefort for appellees.