Case: Arizona v. California et al.
Abbreviation: Arizona v. California
Decision Date: 1962-06-04
Docket Number: No. 8
Citation: 370 U.S. 906
Volume: 370
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Arizona v. California et al.
Judges: The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Pages: 906–907

Head Matter:
No. 8,
Original.
Arizona v. California et al.
Argued January 8-11, 1962.
Mark Wilmer and Charles H. Reed argued the cause for the complainant. With them on the briefs were William R. Meagher, Burr Sutter, John E. Madden, Calvin H. Udall, John Geoffrey Will and Theodore Kiendl. Fred 0. Wilson and Martin J. Sonosky also were for the complainant. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and Northcutt Ely, Special Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for the State of California et al., defendants. With them on the briefs were Charles E.. Corker and Gilbert F. Nelson, Assistant Attorneys General, Burton J. Gindler, John R. Alexander and Gerald Malkan, Deputy Attorneys General, Howard I. Friedman, C. Emerson Duncan II, Francis E. Jenney, Stanley C. Lagerlof, Harry W. Horton, R. L. Knox, Jr., Earl Redwine, James H. Howard, Charles C. Cooper, Jr., H. Kenneth Hutchinson, Frank P. Doherty, Roger Arne-bergh, Jean F. DuPaul and Henry A. Dietz. Solicitor General Cox argued the cause for the United States, inter-vener. With him on the briefs were John F. Davis, David R. Warner, Walter Kiechel, Jr. and Warren R. Wise. R. P. Parry argued the cause for the State of Nevada, intervener. With him on the briefs were Roger D. Foley, Attorney General, W. T. Mathews and Clifford E. Fix. Dennis McCarthy, Special Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for the State of Utah, defendant. With him on a statement on behalf of the State was Walter L. Budge, Attorney General. Earl E. Hartley, Attorney General of New Mexico, and Claude S. Mann, Special Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for the State of New Mexico, defendant. With them on the brief were Thomas 0. Olson, First Assistant Attorney General, and Dudley Cornell, Special Assistant Attorney General.

Opinion:
This case is restored to the calendar for reargument and set for Monday, October 8, 1962. A total of six hours is allowed for the reargument.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
[For earlier orders herein, see 344 U. S. 806, 919; 345 U. S. 914, 968; 347 U. S. 985, 986; 348 U. S. 947; 350 U. S. 114, 812, 880, 955; 351 U. S. 977; 354 U. S. 918; 357 U. S. 902; 364 U. S. 940; 368 U. S. 893, 917, 950.]