Case: Reliance Merchandise Co., Inc. v. United States
Abbreviation: Reliance Merchandise Co. v. United States
Decision Date: 1966-12-14
Docket Number: C.D. 2852
Citation: 57 Cust. Ct. 496
Volume: 57
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Reliance Merchandise Co., Inc. v. United States
Judges: Before Rao and Ford, Judges
Pages: 496–496

Head Matter:
(C.D. 2852)
Reliance Merchandise Co., Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court, Second Division
(Decided December 14, 1966)
Siegel, Mandell & Davidson for the plaintiff.
Barefoot Sanders, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
Before Rao and Ford, Judges

Opinion:
Rao, Chief Judge:
The merchandise covered by this protest consists of battery-operated lanterns which were assessed with duty at the rate of 19 per centum ad valorem pursuant to the provision in paragraph 339 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dec. 150, T.D. 54108, for household utensils, not specially provided for, wholly or in chief value of base metal.
It is claimed in said protest that the merchandise in issue consists of articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device within the purview of paragraph 353 of said act, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T.D. 52739, which are dutiable at the rate of 13% per centum ad valorem.
This protest has been submitted for decision upon a written stipulation of counsel for the respective parties hereto to the effect that said merchandise, assessed as above and represented by the invoice items marked "A" and checked JB, by Examiner J. Bistreich, consists of battery-operated lanterns which contain as an essential feature an electrical element or device, which are not illuminating or lighting fixtures or lamps, and which do not contain any electrical heating elements as constituent parts.
Upon the agreed facts, we hold the merchandise here in issue, identified by invoice items marked and checked as aforesaid, to be dutiable at the rate of 13% per centum ad valorem pursuant to the provisions in paragraph 353 of said tariff act, as modified by said Torquay protocol, for articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device. The claim in the protest to that effect is sustained. All other claims are, however, overruled.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.