Case: E. J. SEEDS & CO. v. THE UNITED STATES
Abbreviation: E. J. Seeds & Co. v. United States
Decision Date: 1914-03-02
Docket Number: No. 31396
Citation: 49 Ct. Cl. 381
Volume: 49
Reporter: United States Court of Claims Reports
Court: United States Court of Claims
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: E. J. SEEDS & CO. v. THE UNITED STATES.
Judges: 
Pages: 381–382

Head Matter:
E. J. SEEDS & CO. v. THE UNITED STATES.
[No. 31396.
Decided March 2, 1914.]
On defendants’ Demurrer.
The petition in this case, filed February 1, 1912, is based upon a claim alleged to have arisen between 1889 and 1904. The defendants demur on the ground that it is barred by the statute of limitation.
I. A petition undertaking to state a .cause of action .which accrued more than six years before the filing of the petition and not bringing the case within any of the exceptions named in the statute, does not state an action within the jurisdiction of the court, and the bar of the statute of limitation is properly raised by demurrer.
The Reporter's statement of the case:
The averments of the petition involved are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. G. F. Jones, with whom was Mr. Assistant Attorney General Huston Thompson, for the demurrer.

Opinion:
Per CtjRiam :
The petition was filed in this court on February 1, 1912, and is based upon a claim' alleged to have arisen between 1889 and 1904. The defendants demur to the petition and assign two grounds of demurrer: (1) That the claim alleged sounds in tort; (2) that it is barred by the statute of limitations.
It is unnecessary to discuss the first ground of demurrer, because every claim cognizable by this court is barred by the statute unless the petition setting forth a statement thereof is filed in the court, as provided by law, within six years after the claim first accrues, and the said claim, if it were conceded that otherwise the court has jurisdiction, accrued, according to the averments of the petition, more than six years prior to the bringing of the suit. The claimant does not bring himself within any of the disabilities enumerated in said statute which postpone the bar of the statute, and the court can not engraft upon it any other disability than those provided for therein. Kendall v. United States, 107 U. S., 123. This case also holds that where the petition shows that the claim is barred by the statute of limitations applicable to the Court of Claims the objection is properly taken by demurrer.
The demurrer should therefore be sustained and the petition dismissed. And it is so ordered.