Case: William Anderson and Robert Barry, Partners, etc., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The Inhabitants of the City of Bordentown, N. J.
Abbreviation: Anderson v. Inhabitants of Bordentown
Decision Date: 1912-01-15
Docket Number: No. 803
Citation: 223 U.S. 714
Volume: 223
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: William Anderson and Robert Barry, Partners, etc., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The Inhabitants of the City of Bordentown, N. J.
Judges: 
Pages: 714–714

Head Matter:
No. 803.
William Anderson and Robert Barry, Partners, etc., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The Inhabitants of the City of Bordentown, N. J.
In error to .the.Court of Errors and Appeals of the State of New Jersey.
Motion to dismiss submitted January 9, 1912.
Decided January 15, 1912.
Mr. E. A'. Armstrong for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Frederic D. McKenney, Mr. J. Spalding Flannery and Mr. William Hitz for the defendant in error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Writ of error dismissed
for the want of jurisdiction. St. Paul &c. R. R. Co. v. County of Todd, 142 U. S. 282; St. Paul Gas Light Co. v. St. Paul, 181 U. S. 142; New Orleans Water Works Co. v. Louisiana, 185 U. S. 336, 350, and cases cited; Hamblin v. Western Land Co., 147 U. S. 531; Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Los Angeles Farming & Milling Co. v. Los Angeles, 217 U. S. 217, 226.