Case: Don A. BLAIR, Claimant-Appellant, v. Eric K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee
Abbreviation: Blair v. Shinseki
Decision Date: 2011-05-20
Docket Number: No. 2010-7137
Citation: 423 Fed.Appx. 971
Volume: 25
Reporter: West's Veterans Appeals Reporter
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Don A. BLAIR, Claimant-Appellant, v. Eric K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Pages: 982–982

Head Matter:
Don A. BLAIR, Claimant-Appellant, v. Eric K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 2010-7137.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
May 20, 2011.
Roger W. Rutherford, Bristol, VA, for Claimant-Appellant.
Before RADER, Chief Judge, LOURIE and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
RADER, Chief Judge.
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs responds to this court's order directing Don A. Blair to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed as untimely. Blair has not responded to the court's order.
The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims entered judgment in this case on June 21, 2010. The docket sheet of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims indicates that that court received Blair's notice of appeal on August 23, or 63 days after entry of judgment.
Any appeal of the judgment of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims had to be received within 60 days of the date of entry of judgment. 38 U.S.C. § 7292(a); 28 U.S.C. § 2107(b); Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1). Thus, we do not have jurisdiction and this appeal must be dismissed. See Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007) (the timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement); Sofarelli Assoc., Inc. v. United States, 716 F.2d 1395 (Fed.Cir.1983).
Accordingly,
It Is Ordered That:
(1) The appeal is dismissed.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.