Case: In re Phinney; In re Polyak; In re Grace; In re Bartsch et al.; In re James; In re Dawson; In re Clark; In re Walden; In re Cuzick; In re Smith et al.; In re Wilson; In re Singleton; In re Rubin; In re Meadows; and In re Cook
Abbreviation: In re Phinney
Decision Date: 1986-10-06
Docket Number: No. 85-1891; No. 85-1991; No. 85-2081; No. 85-2171; No. 85-6723; No. 85-6983; No. 85-6986; No. 85-7077; No. 85-7079; No. 86-217; No. 86-5032; No. 86-5042; No. 86-5139; No. 86-5217; No. 86-5267
Citation: 479 U.S. 810
Volume: 479
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: In re Phinney; In re Polyak; In re Grace; In re Bartsch et al.; In re James; In re Dawson; In re Clark; In re Walden; In re Cuzick; In re Smith et al.; In re Wilson; In re Singleton; In re Rubin; In re Meadows; and In re Cook.
Judges: 
Pages: 810–810

Head Matter:
No. 85-1891.
No. 85-1991.
No. 85-2081.
No. 85-2171.
No. 85-6723.
No. 85-6983.
No. 85-6986.
No. 85-7077.
No. 85-7079.
No. 86-217.
No. 86-5032.
No. 86-5042.
No. 86-5139.
No. 86-5217.
No. 86-5267.
In re Phinney; In re Polyak; In re Grace; In re Bartsch et al.; In re James; In re Dawson; In re Clark; In re Walden; In re Cuzick; In re Smith et al.; In re Wilson; In re Singleton; In re Rubin; In re Meadows; and In re Cook.

Opinion:
Petitions for writs of mandamus denied.