Case: PITTSBURG, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY v. LIGHTHEISER; SAME v. COLLINS; SAME v. ROSS
Abbreviation: Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Lightheiser
Decision Date: 1908-12-07
Docket Number: Nos. 141, 142, 178
Citation: 212 U.S. 560
Volume: 212
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: PITTSBURG, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY v. LIGHTHEISER. SAME v. COLLINS. SAME v. ROSS.
Judges: 
Pages: 560–561

Head Matter:
PITTSBURG, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY v. LIGHTHEISER. SAME v. COLLINS. SAME v. ROSS.
WRITS OF ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA.
Nos. 141, 142, 178.
Motions to dismiss or affirm, and for damages.
Submitted November 30, 1908.
Decided December 7, 1908.
Writs of error to review judgments of Supremo Court of State of Indiana, 168 Indiana, 438, 467, and 80 N. E. Rep. 845, in suits involving the constitutionality of the Employers’ Liability Act of that State dismissed for want of jurisdiction without opinion. Tullís v. Lake Erie & Western R. R. Co., 175 U. S. 348, followed.
Mr. Stewart T. McConnell, Mr. Albert G. Jenkines, Mr. Bertram C. Jenkines and Mr. Charles H. Stuart for defendants in error in support of the motions.
Mr. Allen Zollars and Mr. George E. Ross for plaintiff in error in opposition to the motions.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
Writs of error severally dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Tullis v. Lake Erie & Western R. R. Co., 175 U. S. 348, and cases cited; Pittsburg &c. Ry. Co. v. Lightheiser, 168 Indiana, 438; Same v. Collins, 168 Indiana, 467; and Same v. Ross, 80 N. E. Rep. 845.