Case: Marlene Whittier, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Anthony Diotaiuto deceased and individually, Andrew Diotaiuto, Petitioners v. Daniel Kobayashi, individually; Marlene Whittier, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Anthony Diotaiuto deceased and individually, Andrew Diotaiuto, Petitioners v. Eric Goldstein, individually, and Eirk Palacio, individually; and Marlene Whittier, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Anthony Diotaiuto deceased and individually, Andrew Diotaiuto, Petitioners v. Andre Bruna, individually and Sean Visners, individually
Abbreviation: Whittier v. Kobayashi
Decision Date: 2010-05-17
Docket Number: No. 09-1104
Citation: 176 L. Ed. 2d 1185
Volume: 176
Reporter: United States Supreme Court Reports, Lawyers' Edition
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Marlene Whittier, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Anthony Diotaiuto deceased and individually, Andrew Diotaiuto, Petitioners v. Daniel Kobayashi, individually; Marlene Whittier, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Anthony Diotaiuto deceased and individually, Andrew Diotaiuto, Petitioners v. Eric Goldstein, individually, and Eirk Palacio, individually; and Marlene Whittier, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Anthony Diotaiuto deceased and individually, Andrew Diotaiuto, Petitioners v. Andre Bruna, individually and Sean Visners, individually.
Judges: 
Pages: 1185–1185

Head Matter:
No. 09-1104.
Marlene Whittier, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Anthony Diotaiuto deceased and individually, Andrew Diotaiuto, Petitioners v. Daniel Kobayashi, individually; Marlene Whittier, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Anthony Diotaiuto deceased and individually, Andrew Diotaiuto, Petitioners v. Eric Goldstein, individually, and Eirk Palacio, individually; and Marlene Whittier, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Anthony Diotaiuto deceased and individually, Andrew Diotaiuto, Petitioners v. Andre Bruna, individually and Sean Visners, individually.
560 U.S. 905, 130 S. Ct. 3286,
176 L. Ed. 2d 1185,
2010 U.S. LEXIS 3990.
May 17, 2010.

Opinion:
Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Same case below, 581 F.3d 1304 (first judgment); 343 Fed. Appx. 517 (second judgment); 343 Fed. Appx. 505 (third judgment).