Case: Globe Importing Company et al. v. United States; Hancock Gross Mfg., Inc. v. United States; Durst Industries, Inc., and Globe Importing Company v. United States
Abbreviation: Globe Importing Co. v. United States
Decision Date: 1968-05-28
Docket Number: No. P68/253; protests 61/12189, etc. (Philadelphia); No. P68/254; protest 62/4300 (Philadelphia); No. P68/255; protests 66/50358 and 66/13137 (New York)
Citation: 60 Cust. Ct. 1045
Volume: 60
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Globe Importing Company et al. v. United States, Hancock Gross Mfg., Inc. v. United States, Durst Industries, Inc., and Globe Importing Company v. United States,
Judges: 
Pages: 1045–1045

Head Matter:
No. P68/253.
protests 61/12189, etc. (Philadelphia).
No. P68/254.
protest 62/4300 (Philadelphia).
No. P68/255.
protests 66/50358 and 66/13137 (New York).
Globe Importing Company et al. v. United States, Hancock Gross Mfg., Inc. v. United States, Durst Industries, Inc., and Globe Importing Company v. United States,

Opinion:
Beckworth, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of strainers in chief value of brass similar in all material respects to those the subject of Davies, Turner & Company v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 488, Abstract 69651), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.