Case: Hemingway, Administratrix of the Estate of Hemingway v. Ochsner Clinic et al.; Phinney v. First American National Bank; Zolla v. United States; Butler v. Federal National Mortgage Association; Washburn v. Washburn; Dominey v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.; Angleton et al. v. Pierce, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, et al.; Skillern v. Procunier, Director, Texas Department of Corrections; Roy et al. v. City of Middletown; Thomas v. Gerber Productions et al.; Silagy v. Illinois; Wesson v. Coughlin; Jones v. Francis, Warden; Baig v. United States; Roberts v. Georgia; Faison v. Florida et al.; Brown v. Flure et al.; Novel v. Picariello et al.; Polin et ux. v. Jews for Jesus et al.; Perry v. District of Columbia; Smith v. Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital et al.; Stroom v. Carter, Former President of the United States, et al.; Felker v. Georgia; Caito v. Indiana; Chetister v. Chetister; Ingram v. Industrial Commission of Illinois et al.; Shaw v. Martin, Warden; Gumz et al. v. Pioneer Nursing Home et al.
Abbreviation: Hemingway v. Ochsner Clinic
Decision Date: 1984-11-26
Docket Number: No. 83-2003; No. 83-2008; No. 83-2019; No. 83-2028; No. 83-2040; No. 83-2109; No. 83-2164; No. 83-6580; No. 83-6670; No. 83-6778; No. 83-6811; No. 83-6827; No. 83-6833; No. 83-6873; No. 83-6882; No. 83-6910; No. 83-6939; No. 83-6947; No. 83-7002; No. 83-7008; No. 83-7027; No. 84-11; No. 84-85; No. 84-208; No. 84-247; No. 84-5046; No. 84-5049; No. 84-5062
Citation: 469 U.S. 1067
Volume: 469
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Hemingway, Administratrix of the Estate of Hemingway v. Ochsner Clinic et al., Phinney v. First American National Bank, Zolla v. United States, Butler v. Federal National Mortgage Association, Washburn v. Washburn, Dominey v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co., Angleton et al. v. Pierce, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, et al., Skillern v. Procunier, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Roy et al. v. City of Middletown, Thomas v. Gerber Productions et al., Silagy v. Illinois, Wesson v. Coughlin, Jones v. Francis, Warden, Baig v. United States, Roberts v. Georgia, Faison v. Florida et al., Brown v. Flure et al., Novel v. Picariello et al., Polin et ux. v. Jews for Jesus et al., Perry v. District of Columbia, Smith v. Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital et al., Stroom v. Carter, Former President of the United States, et al., Felker v. Georgia, Caito v. Indiana, Chetister v. Chetister, Ingram v. Industrial Commission of Illinois et al., Shaw v. Martin, Warden, Gumz et al. v. Pioneer Nursing Home et al.,
Judges: 
Pages: 1067–1067

Head Matter:
No. 83-2003.
No. 83-2008.
No. 83-2019.
No. 83-2028.
No. 83-2040.
No. 83-2109.
No. 83-2164.
No. 83-6580.
No. 83-6670.
No. 83-6778.
No. 83-6811.
No. 83-6827.
No. 83-6833.
No. 83-6873.
No. 83-6882.
No. 83-6910.
No. 83-6939.
No. 83-6947.
No. 83-7002.
No. 83-7008.
No. 83-7027.
No. 84-11.
No. 84-85.
No. 84-208.
No. 84-247.
No. 84-5046.
No. 84-5049.
No. 84-5062.
Hemingway, Administratrix of the Estate of Hemingway v. Ochsner Clinic et al., Phinney v. First American National Bank, Zolla v. United States, Butler v. Federal National Mortgage Association, Washburn v. Washburn, Dominey v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co., Angleton et al. v. Pierce, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, et al., Skillern v. Procunier, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Roy et al. v. City of Middletown, Thomas v. Gerber Productions et al., Silagy v. Illinois, Wesson v. Coughlin, Jones v. Francis, Warden, Baig v. United States, Roberts v. Georgia, Faison v. Florida et al., Brown v. Flure et al., Novel v. Picariello et al., Polin et ux. v. Jews for Jesus et al., Perry v. District of Columbia, Smith v. Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital et al., Stroom v. Carter, Former President of the United States, et al., Felker v. Georgia, Caito v. Indiana, Chetister v. Chetister, Ingram v. Industrial Commission of Illinois et al., Shaw v. Martin, Warden, Gumz et al. v. Pioneer Nursing Home et al.,

Opinion:
ante, p. 829;
ante, p. 829;
ante, p. 830;
ante, p. 830;
ante, p. 831;
ante, p. 834;
ante, p. 880;
ante, p. 873;
ante, p. 804;
ante, p. 841;
ante, p. 873;
ante, p. 843;
ante, p. 873;
ante, p. 844;
ante, p. 873;
ante, p. 845;
ante, p. 846;
ante, p. 847;
ante, p. 850;
ante, p. 805;
ante, p. 805;
ante, p. 852;
ante, p. 873;
ante, p. 805;
ante, p. 805;
ante, p. 861;
ante, p. 873; and
ante, p. 862. Petitions for rehearing denied.