Case: Margaret B. McLaughlin, Executrix, Estate of E. E. Bruce, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent
Abbreviation: McLaughlin v. Commissioner
Decision Date: 1928-05-18
Docket Number: Docket No. 31445
Citation: 12 B.T.A. 19
Volume: 12
Reporter: Reports of the United States Board of Tax Appeals
Court: United States Board of Tax Appeals
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Margaret B. McLaughlin, Executrix, Estate of E. E. Bruce, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.
Judges: 
Pages: 19–20

Head Matter:
Margaret B. McLaughlin, Executrix, Estate of E. E. Bruce, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.
Docket No. 31445.
Promulgated May 18, 1928.
Charles F. McLaughlin, Esq., for the petitioner.
Benton Baker, Esq., for the respondent.

Opinion:
opinion.
Lansdon:
The petitioner contends that the loss sustained by deceased in 1922, through the failure of W. G. Cleveland & Co., was a "net loss," as defined in section 204(a) of the Revenue Act of 1921, and that such loss should be carried forward as a deduction from income for the succeeding taxable year. It is petitioner's contention that deceased was regularly engaged in the wholesale drug business within the meaning of the above section, inasmuch as he was president, manager, and majority stockholder of E. E. Bruce & Co.
We are unable to agree with petitioner's contention and approve the determination of the respondent on the authority of Harry J. Gutman v. Commissioner, 7 B. T. A. 500. See also Meyer Levy v. Commissioner, 10 B. T. A. 907; Isadore Finkelstein v. Commissioner, 10 B. T. A. 585; W. C. Harris v. Commissioner, 8 B. T. A. 1234; H. E. Newton v. Commissioner, 7 B. T. A. 1153; R. J. Palmer v. Commissioner, 4 B. T. A. 1028.
Judgment will be entered for the respondent.