Case: Samuel B. THOMAS, Appellant, and Michael D. Herndon, Petitioner, v. Jesse BROWN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Appellee and Respondent
Abbreviation: Thomas v. Brown
Decision Date: 1996-04-09
Docket Number: Nos. 95-993, 96-107
Citation: 9 Vet. App. 67
Volume: 9
Reporter: West's Veterans Appeals Reporter
Court: United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Samuel B. THOMAS, Appellant, and Michael D. Herndon, Petitioner, v. Jesse BROWN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Appellee and Respondent.
Judges: Before FARLEY, MANKIN, and STEINBERG, Judges.
Pages: 67–67

Head Matter:
Samuel B. THOMAS, Appellant, and Michael D. Herndon, Petitioner, v. Jesse BROWN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Appellee and Respondent.
Nos. 95-993, 96-107.
United States Court of Veterans Appeals.
April 9, 1996.
Before FARLEY, MANKIN, and STEINBERG, Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
On March 19,1996, the Court consolidated the above-captioned cases. On March 28, 1996, the Secretary filed a motion for leave to respond to the parties' petitions for extraordinary relief.
Upon consideration of the pleadings, it is
ORDERED that the Secretary's motion for leave to respond to the parties' petitions for extraordinary relief is granted. It is further
ORDERED that, within 30 days after the date of this order, the Secretary file (and serve on the other parties) a response to the petitions. The response shall address, but not be limited to, the following:
Whether 38 U.S.C. § 7104 requires VA to allow the petitioners' appeal of the issue of "clear and unmistakable error" in the respective VA regional office decisions to proceed (by issuing a Statement of the Case) despite the apparent lack of legal merit to the claim. See Smith (William) v. Brown, 35 F.3d 1516, 1527 (Fed.Cir. 1994); Duran v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 216 (1994); Winslow v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 469 (1996).
It is further
ORDERED that, within 30 days after service of the Secretary's response, the other parties may file replies.