Case: APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY, et al., Petitioners, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Environmental Protection, et al., Intervenors
Abbreviation: Appalachian Power Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Decision Date: 2003-03-07
Docket Number: Nos. 99-1268, 99-1270, 99-1274, 99-1276, 99-1277, 99-1279 to 99-1281, 99-1286, 99-1287, 00-1169, 00-1187, 00-1189 to 00-1192 and 00-1194
Citation: 355 U.S. App. D.C. 152
Volume: 355
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Parties: APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY, et al., Petitioners, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Environmental Protection, et al., Intervenors.
Judges: Before: EDWARDS and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Pages: 152–152

Head Matter:
320 F.3d 280
APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY, et al., Petitioners, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Environmental Protection, et al., Intervenors.
Nos. 99-1268, 99-1270, 99-1274, 99-1276, 99-1277, 99-1279 to 99-1281, 99-1286, 99-1287, 00-1169, 00-1187, 00-1189 to 00-1192 and 00-1194.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
March 7, 2003.
Before: EDWARDS and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the motion for attorneys' fees, the response thereto, and the reply, it is
ORDERED that the motion be denied. A remand occasioned by an agency's failure to respond to comments is a purely procedural victory for the petitioner and is therefore insufficient to support an award of attorneys' fees under 42 U.S.C. § 7607(f). See Sierra Club v. EPA, 769 F.2d 796, 806 (D.C.Cir.1985). In the most similar case in which this court did award attorneys' fees, Michigan v. EPA, 254 F.3d 1087, 1091 (D.C.Cir.2001) (vacating EPA rule for want of notice and comment before promulgation), the Agency had to reopen the record or receive new comments on remand, thus creating a greater probability that it would alter the rule.