Case: SWANN v. ADAMS, SECRETARY OF STATE OF FLORIDA, et al.
Abbreviation: Swann v. Adams
Decision Date: 1964-06-22
Docket Number: No. 297
Citation: 378 U.S. 553
Volume: 378
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: SWANN v. ADAMS, SECRETARY OF STATE OF FLORIDA, et al.
Judges: Mr. Justice Clark would reverse on the grounds stated in his opinion in Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533, 587.
Pages: 553–553

Head Matter:
SWANN v. ADAMS, SECRETARY OF STATE OF FLORIDA, et al.
No. 297.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Wm. Reece Smith, Jr. for appellant.
Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, C. Graham Carothers, Special Assistant Attorney General, and Edward S. Jaffry and Joseph C. Jacobs, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment below is reversed. Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533. The case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the views stated in our opinions in Reynolds v. Sims and in the other cases relating to state legislative apportionment decided along with Reynolds.
Mr. Justice Clark would reverse on the grounds stated in his opinion in Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533, 587.
Mr. Justice Stewart would remand for further proceedings consistent with the views expressed in his dissenting opinion in Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of Colorado, 377 U. S. 713, 744.
Mr. Justice Harlan dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533, 589.