Case: Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. et al. v. Boston & Maine Railroad et al.; Maryland Port Authority et al. v. Boston & Maine Railroad et al.; and Interstate Commerce Commission v. Boston & Maine Railroad et al.
Abbreviation: Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Boston & Maine Railroad
Decision Date: 1962-06-11
Docket Number: No. 923; No. 924; No. 925
Citation: 370 U.S. 914
Volume: 370
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. et al. v. Boston & Maine Railroad et al.; Maryland Port Authority et al. v. Boston & Maine Railroad et al.; and Interstate Commerce Commission v. Boston & Maine Railroad et al.
Judges: Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
Pages: 914–914

Head Matter:
June 11, 1962.
No. 923.
No. 924.
No. 925.
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. et al. v. Boston & Maine Railroad et al.; Maryland Port Authority et al. v. Boston & Maine Railroad et al.; and Interstate Commerce Commission v. Boston & Maine Railroad et al.
Jervis Langdon, Jr., Richard R. Bongartz, Robert B. Claytor, John Henry Lewin and William C. Purnell for appellants in No. 923. William L. Marbury, Chas. R. Seal, J. Cookman Boyd, Jr., Donald Macleay, John Martin Jones, Jr., Morris Duane, Warren Price, Jr., David Berger and Robert M. Beckman for appellants in No. 924. Robert W. Oinnane and I. K. Hay for appellant in No. 925. John H. Colgren, Robert G. Bleakney, Jr., Thomas P. Hackett, Henry E. Foley, John F. Reilly, Raymond W. Troy, Louis J. Lefkowitz, Dunton F. Tynan, Walter J. Myskowski, Leo A. Larkin, Charles W. Merritt, Sidney Goldstein, F. A. Mulhem, Arthur L. Winn, Jr., Samuel H. Moerman and James M. Henderson for appellees.
Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of cases in which orders were this day announced.

Opinion:
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Probable jurisdiction noted.
Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
Reported below: 202 F. Supp. 830.