Case: John EDMOND, et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE GENERAL COUNSEL, et al., Appellees
Abbreviation: Edmond v. United States Postal Service General Counsel
Decision Date: 1992-02-11
Docket Number: No. 90-5071
Citation: 293 U.S. App. D.C. 298
Volume: 293
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Parties: John EDMOND, et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE GENERAL COUNSEL, et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before MIKVA, Chief Judge, WALD, EDWARDS, RUTH B. GINSBURG, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, D.H. GINSBURG, SENTELLE, HENDERSON and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.
Pages: 298–304

Head Matter:
953 F.2d 1398
John EDMOND, et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE GENERAL COUNSEL, et al., Appellees.
No. 90-5071.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Feb. 11, 1992.
Pamela Lyles, pro se, for appellants.
John Oliver Birch, Asst. U.S. Atty., for appellees U.S. Postal Service General Coun sel, et al. Jay B. Stephens, U.S. Atty., and John D. Bates and R. Craig Lawrence, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., were on the brief for the federal appellees. Mark E. Nagle, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for the federal appellees.
Ralph S. Tyler and Andrew H. Baida, Baltimore, Md., were on the brief for appellee Roger Wolf.
Before MIKVA, Chief Judge, WALD, EDWARDS, RUTH B. GINSBURG, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, D.H. GINSBURG, SENTELLE, HENDERSON and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc of appellee Popkin has been circulated to the full Court. No member of the Court requested the taking of a vote thereon. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the Suggestion is denied.
Separate opinion filed by Circuit Judge EDWARDS, concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc.
Separate opinion filed by Circuit Judge RUTH B. GINSBURG, concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc.
Separate opinion filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN, concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc.