Case: In re: GRAND JURY SUBPOENA, Judith MILLER
Abbreviation: In re Grand Jury Subpoena, Miller
Decision Date: 2005-04-19
Docket Number: No. 04-3138, 04-3139, 04-3140
Citation: 365 U.S. App. D.C. 322
Volume: 365
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Parties: In re: GRAND JURY SUBPOENA, Judith MILLER
Judges: Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge; and EDWARDS, SENTELLE,
Pages: 322–325

Head Matter:
405 F.3d 17
In re: GRAND JURY SUBPOENA, Judith MILLER
No. 04-3138, 04-3139, 04-3140.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
April 19, 2005.
Reid Alan Cox, Alexandria, VA, Bruce W. Sanford, Robert Douglass Lystad, Michael Lewis Powell, Baker & Hostetler, Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., Thomas H. Dupree, Jr., Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Victoria Toensing, diGenova & Toensing LLP, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae for Appellants.
Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge; and EDWARDS, SENTELLE,
HENDERSON, RANDOLPH, ROGERS, TATEL, GARLAND, and ROBERTS, Circuit Judges.
A separate statement of Circuit Judge TATEL concurring in the denial of the rehearing en banc is attached.
Circuit Judges GARLAND and ROBERTS did not participate in this matter.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellants' petition for rehearing en banc, the response thereto, and the brief of amici curiae in support of appellants have been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular, active service did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing and the emergency motion for expedited consideration of the petition for rehearing en banc, it is
ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc be denied. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the emergency motion for expedited consideration' of the petition for rehearing en banc be dismissed as moot.