Case: UNITED STATES, Appellee v. THOMAS PETER PLYS, Seaman Apprentice, U. S. Navy, Appellant
Abbreviation: United States v. Plys
Decision Date: 1973-06-22
Docket Number: No. 26,677
Citation: 22 C.M.A. 374
Volume: 22
Reporter: Decisions of the United States Court of Military Appeals
Court: United States Court of Military Appeals
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: UNITED STATES, Appellee v THOMAS PETER PLYS, Seaman Apprentice, U. S. Navy, Appellant
Judges: Chief Judge Darden would affirm the decision below for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion in United States v Alderman, 22 USCMA 298, 46 CMR 298 (1973).
Pages: 374–374

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES, Appellee v THOMAS PETER PLYS, Seaman Apprentice, U. S. Navy, Appellant
No. 26,677
June 22, 1973
Captain D. A. Higley, USMC, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.
Lieutenant Colonel G. L. Bailey, USMC, and Lieutenant E. Alan Hécht-kopf, JAGC, USNR, were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Per Curiam:
In this case, evidence of a proceeding under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 815, in which the accused had been restricted as punishment, was admitted at sentencing. The decision of the Court of Military Review is affirmed. United States v Shamel, 22 USCMA —, — CMR — (June 22, 1973).
Chief Judge Darden would affirm the decision below for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion in United States v Alderman, 22 USCMA 298, 46 CMR 298 (1973).