Case: Interstate Commerce Commission v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. et al.; Sea-Land Service, Inc., v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. et al.; Seatrain Lines, Inc., v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. et al.; and United States v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. et al.
Abbreviation: Interstate Commerce Commission v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
Decision Date: 1963-02-18
Docket Number: No. 108; No. 109; No. 110; No. 125
Citation: 372 U.S. 902
Volume: 372
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Interstate Commerce Commission v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. et al.; Sea-Land Service, Inc., v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. et al.; Seatrain Lines, Inc., v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. et al.; and United States v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 902–902

Head Matter:
No. 108. No. 109. No. 110. No. 125.
Interstate Commerce Commission v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. et al.; Sea-Land Service, Inc., v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. et al.; Seatrain Lines, Inc., v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. et al.; and United States v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. et al.
Solicitor General Cox for the United States et al. on the motion. Warren Price, Jr. for appellant in No. 109 in support of the motion.

Opinion:
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 371 U. S. 808.) The motion of the appellants for an allotment of additional time for oral argument is granted and 30 minutes are allotted for that purpose.