Case: United States v. Petty Motor Co.; United States v. Brockbank; United States v. Grimsdell, doing business as Grocer Printing Co.; United States v. Wiggs, doing business as Chicago Flexible Shaft Co.; United States v. Independent Pneumatic Tool Co.; United States v. Galigher Company; and United States v. Gray-Cannon Lumber Co
Abbreviation: United States v. Petty Motor Co.
Decision Date: 1945-06-18
Docket Number: No. 1272; No. 1273; No. 1274; No. 1275; No. 1276; No. 1277; No. 1278
Citation: 325 U.S. 848
Volume: 325
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: United States v. Petty Motor Co.; United States v. Brockbank; United States v. Grimsdell, doing business as Grocer Printing Co.; United States v. Wiggs, doing business as Chicago Flexible Shaft Co.; United States v. Independent Pneumatic Tool Co.; United States v. Galigher Company; and United States v. Gray-Cannon Lumber Co.
Judges: 
Pages: 848–848

Head Matter:
No. 1272.
No. 1273.
No. 1274.
No. 1275.
No. 1276.
No. 1277.
No. 1278.
United States v. Petty Motor Co.; United States v. Brockbank; United States v. Grimsdell, doing business as Grocer Printing Co.; United States v. Wiggs, doing business as Chicago Flexible Shaft Co.; United States v. Independent Pneumatic Tool Co.; United States v. Galigher Company; and United States v. Gray-Cannon Lumber Co.
June 18, 1945.
Assistant Solicitor General Cox for the United States.
Mr. Charles D. Moore for respondents.

Opinion:
Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit granted.
Reported below: 147 F. 2d 912.