Case: Diebold, Inc. v. United States; Seedman International Corp. et al. v. United States; S. Hiller & Co. v. United States
Abbreviation: Diebold, Inc. v. United States
Decision Date: 1967-05-29
Docket Number: No. P67/177; protest 61/19403 (New York); No. P67/178; protests 64/7143,etc. (New York); No. P67/179; protest 66/12058 (New York)
Citation: 58 Cust. Ct. 894
Volume: 58
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Diebold, Inc. v. United States,
Judges: 
Pages: 894–894

Head Matter:
No. P67/177.
No. P67/178.
No. P67/179.
Diebold, Inc. v. United States,
protest 61/19403 (New York).
Seedman International Corp. et al. v. United States,
protests 64/7143,etc. (New York).
S. Hiller & Co. v. United States,
protest 66/12058 (New York).

Opinion:
Landis, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of certain padlocks similar in all material respects to those the subject of Shriro Trading Corp. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 422, C.D. 2669), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.