Case: Mitsui & Co., Ltd. v. United States, protest 62/18763 (Portland, Oreg.); Victor B. Handal & Bro., Inc. v. United States, protests 63/8203, 63/23052, and 63/23053 (Los Angeles); International Expediters, Inc., et al. v. United States, protests 65/4696-14496, etc. (Chicago); Karl Schroff & Associates, Inc. v. United States, protest 65/8687-14911 (Chicago)
Abbreviation: Mitsui & Co. v. United States
Decision Date: 1966-06-15
Docket Number: No. P66/99; No. P66/100; No. P66/101; No. P66/102
Citation: 57 Cust. Ct. 784
Volume: 57
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Mitsui & Co., Ltd. v. United States, protest 62/18763 (Portland, Oreg.). Victor B. Handal & Bro., Inc. v. United States, protests 63/8203, 63/23052, and 63/23053 (Los Angeles). International Expediters, Inc., et al. v. United States, protests 65/4696-14496, etc. (Chicago). Karl Schroff & Associates, Inc. v. United States, protest 65/8687-14911 (Chicago) .
Judges: 
Pages: 784–784

Head Matter:
Before the SecoNd DrvisiON,
JuNE 15, 1966
No. P66/99. —
No. P66/100. —
No. P66/101. —
No. P66/102. —
Mitsui & Co., Ltd. v. United States, protest 62/18763 (Portland, Oreg.). Victor B. Handal & Bro., Inc. v. United States, protests 63/8203, 63/23052, and 63/23053 (Los Angeles). International Expediters, Inc., et al. v. United States, protests 65/4696-14496, etc. (Chicago). Karl Schroff & Associates, Inc. v. United States, protest 65/8687-14911 (Chicago) .

Opinion:
Ford, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of earphones similar in all material respects to those the subject of Motorola, Inc., and International Expediters, Inc. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 303, Abstract 69019), the claim of the plaintiffs -was sustained.