Case: MOORE, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS, v. UNITED STATES EX REL. NEWCOMB MOTOR COMPANY
Abbreviation: Moore v. United States ex rel. Newcomb Motor Co.
Decision Date: 1910-03-07
Docket Number: No. 115
Citation: 216 U.S. 608
Volume: 216
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: MOORE, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS, v. UNITED STATES EX REL. NEWCOMB MOTOR COMPANY.
Judges: 
Pages: 608–608

Head Matter:
MOORE, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS, v. UNITED STATES EX REL. NEWCOMB MOTOR COMPANY.
ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF, COLUMBIA.
No. 115.
Argued March 1, 2, 1910.
Decided March 7, 1910.
A writ of error to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia dismissed for want df jurisdiction without opinion on the authority of Frasch v. Moore, 211 U. S. 1, and other cases cited.
Writ of error to review 33 App. D. C. 597, dismissed.
Mr. Frederick P. Fish and Mr. Melville Church, with whom Mr.'Albert G. -Davis was on the briéf,'for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Robert N. Kenyon, with whom Mr. Walter F. Rogers and Mr. Charles H.- Duell were on the brief, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The writ of error is dismissed for want of •jurisdiction. Frasch v. Moore, 211 U. S. 1; Rousseau v. Browne, 21 App. D. C. 73, 80; Johnson v. Mueser, 212 U. S. 284; Atkins v. Moore, 212 U. S. 285; Gaines v. Knecht, 212 U. S. 561; Same v. Same, 27 App. D. C. 530, 532; Taylor v. Taft, 203 U. S. 461; United States v. Lynch, 137 U. S. 280; Baltimore & Potomac R. R. Co. v. Hopkins, 130 U. S. 210, 226. The application for certiorari is also denied.