Case: SECURITIES INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION v. COMPTROLLER OF the CURRENCY, et al., Appellants; SECURITIES INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. C.T. CONOVER, Comptroller of the Currency, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
Abbreviation: Securities Industry Ass'n v. Comptroller of the Currency
Decision Date: 1985-04-12
Docket Number: Nos. 84-5026, 84-5085
Citation: 244 U.S. App. D.C. 419
Volume: 244
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Parties: SECURITIES INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION v. COMPTROLLER OF the CURRENCY, et al., Appellants. SECURITIES INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. C.T. CONOVER, Comptroller of the Currency, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
Judges: Before WRIGHT, GINSBURG, and SCALIA, Circuit Judges.
Pages: 419–420

Head Matter:
758 F.2d 739
SECURITIES INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION v. COMPTROLLER OF the CURRENCY, et al., Appellants. SECURITIES INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. C.T. CONOVER, Comptroller of the Currency, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
Nos. 84-5026, 84-5085.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued March 25, 1985.
Decided April 12, 1985.
Mark H. Gallant, Atty., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., with whom Richard K. Willard, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Joseph E. diGenova, U.S. Atty., Mark Leemon, Atty., Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and Anthony J. Steinmeyer, Atty. Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellants in No. 84-5026 and appellee in No. 84-5085.
James B. Weidner, New York City, with whom John M. Liftin, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant in No. 84-5085 and appellee in No. 84-5026.
Before WRIGHT, GINSBURG, and SCALIA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Opinion for the court PER CURIAM.
Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge SCALIA.
PER CURIAM:
This court is in agreement with the result reached by the District Court, generally for the reasons stated in its Memorandum Opinion. See Securities Industry Ass'n v. Comptroller of the Currency, 511 F.Supp. 252 (D.D.C.1983). We note also that the District Court's Glass-Steagall Act analysis receives substantial support from a Supreme Court opinion issued while these cases were pending on appeal. See Securities Industry Ass'n v. Board of Gov. of FRS, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 3003, 82 L.Ed.2d 158 (1984).
Affirmed.