Case: Mitchell SCATES, Jr., Appellant, v. Togo D. WEST, Jr., Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Appellee, Kenneth B. Mason, Jr., Intervenor
Abbreviation: Scates v. West
Decision Date: 2000-02-23
Docket Number: No. 97-875
Citation: 13 Vet. App. 361
Volume: 13
Reporter: West's Veterans Appeals Reporter
Court: United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Mitchell SCATES, Jr., Appellant, v. Togo D. WEST, Jr., Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Appellee, Kenneth B. Mason, Jr., Intervenor.
Judges: Before NEBEKER, Chief Judge, and KRAMER, FARLEY, HOLDAWAY, IVERS, STEINBERG, and GREENE, Judges.
Pages: 361–361

Head Matter:
Mitchell SCATES, Jr., Appellant, v. Togo D. WEST, Jr., Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Appellee, Kenneth B. Mason, Jr., Intervenor.
No. 97-875.
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.
Feb. 23, 2000.
Before NEBEKER, Chief Judge, and KRAMER, FARLEY, HOLDAWAY, IVERS, STEINBERG, and GREENE, Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
On February 2, 2000, the Court granted the intervenor's. motion for a full Court decision, and directed that oral argument be scheduled. On February 7, 2000, ami-cus curiae filed a motion asking the Court to require the Secretary to file, prior to oral argument, a reply to the response of amicus curiae to the intervenor's motion for full Court review. Upon consideration of the motion of amicus curiae, it is
ORDERED that the aforesaid motion is granted, and that the Secretary shall, within 20 days of the date of this order, file a memorandum stating (1) the Secretary's position as to whether In the Matter of the Fee Agreement of Mason, 13 Vet.App. 79 (1999), is controlling in this appeal; (2) the Secretary's position on the applicability of 38 C.F.R. § 20.607 and 20.1304; and (3) whether the Secretary contests amicus curiae's interpretation of Department of Veterans Affairs General Counsel Precedent Opinion 22-95 (Sept. 22, 1995).