Case: Okamoto, dba Supreme Auto Leasing v. Bank West Corp., Morters v. Barr et al., Smith v. Rudicel et al., Conic v. Michigan, Westbury v. Dorchester County, South Carolina, et al., Rutan v. Houk, Warden, Smith v. Consolidated Freightways, Stevens v. State Bar of California, Taylor v. Potter, Postmaster General, Roush v. Chalkey, In re Rodriguez
Abbreviation: Okamoto v. Bank West Corp.
Decision Date: 2005-11-14
Docket Number: No. 04-1571; No. 04-1621; No. 04-9928; No. 04-10116; No. 04-10389; No. 04-10504; No. 05-4; No. 05-28; No. 05-35; No. 05-132; No. 05-154
Citation: 546 U.S. 1025
Volume: 546
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Okamoto, dba Supreme Auto Leasing v. Bank West Corp., Morters v. Barr et al., Smith v. Rudicel et al., Conic v. Michigan, Westbury v. Dorchester County, South Carolina, et al., Rutan v. Houk, Warden, Smith v. Consolidated Freightways, Stevens v. State Bar of California, Taylor v. Potter, Postmaster General, Roush v. Chalkey, In re Rodriguez,
Judges: 
Pages: 1025–1026

Head Matter:
No. 04-1571.
No. 04-1621.
No. 04-9928.
No. 04-10116.
Okamoto, dba Supreme Auto Leasing v. Bank West Corp., Morters v. Barr et al., Smith v. Rudicel et al., Conic v. Michigan, Westbury v. Dorchester County, South Carolina, et al., Rutan v. Houk, Warden, Smith v. Consolidated Freightways, Stevens v. State Bar of California, Taylor v. Potter, Postmaster General, Roush v. Chalkey, In re Rodriguez,

Opinion:
ante, p. 818; ante, p. 820; ante, p. 831; ante, p. 837; ante, p. 849; ante, p. 855; ante, p. 869; ante, p. 870; ante, p. 871; ante, p. 875; and ante, p. 810^ Petitions for rehearing denied.
No. 04-10389.
No. 04-10504.
No. 05-4.
No. 05-28.
No. 05-35.
No. 05-132.
No. 05-154.