Case: LAWRENCE et al. v. CITY OF CHICAGO
Abbreviation: Lawrence v. City of Chicago
Decision Date: 1969-11-17
Docket Number: No. 509
Citation: 396 U.S. 39
Volume: 396
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: LAWRENCE et al. v. CITY OF CHICAGO
Judges: Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Pages: 39–39

Head Matter:
LAWRENCE et al. v. CITY OF CHICAGO
No. 509.
Decided November 17, 1969
John M. Bowlus for appellants.
Raymond F. Simon, Marvin E. Aspen, and John J. George for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.