Case: Commercial Trading Company and American Customs Brokerage Co. et al. v. United States, protests 59/27198, etc. (Honolulu); Fujii Shoji, Ltd., et al. v. United States, protests 60/26885, etc. (Honolulu); Nishimoto Trading Co. of Hawaii, Ltd., and American Customs Brokerage Co. v. United States, protests 61/8856, etc. (Honolulu)
Abbreviation: Commercial Trading Co. v. United States
Decision Date: 1966-12-01
Docket Number: No. P66/355; No. P66/356; No. P66/357
Citation: 57 Cust. Ct. 833
Volume: 57
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Commercial Trading Company and American Customs Brokerage Co. et al. v. United States, protests 59/27198, etc. (Honolulu). Fujii Shoji, Ltd., et al. v. United States, protests 60/26885, etc. (Honolulu). Nishimoto Trading Co. of Hawaii, Ltd., and American Customs Brokerage Co. v. United States, protests 61/8856, etc. (Honolulu).
Judges: 
Pages: 833–834

Head Matter:
Before the Third Division,
December 1, 1966
No. P66/355.
No. P66/356.
No. P66/357.
Commercial Trading Company and American Customs Brokerage Co. et al. v. United States, protests 59/27198, etc. (Honolulu). Fujii Shoji, Ltd., et al. v. United States, protests 60/26885, etc. (Honolulu). Nishimoto Trading Co. of Hawaii, Ltd., and American Customs Brokerage Co. v. United States, protests 61/8856, etc. (Honolulu).

Opinion:
Richardson, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of Iso peanuts, peanut crackers, and Japanese rice crackers similar in all material respects to those the subject of Hilo Rice Mill Co., Ltd., American Customs Brokerage Company et al. v. United States (52 CCPA 106, C.A.D. 866), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.