Case: UNITED STATES, Appellee v. THOMAS F. HOLLAND, Private First Class, U. S. Army, Appellant
Abbreviation: United States v. Holland
Decision Date: 1958-06-06
Docket Number: No. 11,331
Citation: 9 C.M.A. 323
Volume: 9
Reporter: Decisions of the United States Court of Military Appeals
Court: United States Court of Military Appeals
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: UNITED STATES, Appellee v THOMAS F. HOLLAND, Private First Class, U. S. Army, Appellant
Judges: Judges Latimer and Ferguson concur in the reswlt.
Pages: 323–324

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES, Appellee v THOMAS F. HOLLAND, Private First Class, U. S. Army, Appellant
9 USCMA 323, 26 CMR 103
No. 11,331
Decided June 6, 1958
Captain Arnold I. Melnick and First Lieutenant Herbert R. Brown were •on the brief for Appellant, Accused.
Lieutenant Colonel John G. Lee and First Lieutenant John E. Riecker were on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion:
Opinion of the Court
Robert E. Quinn, Chief Judge:
On his plea of guilty the accused was convicted of three lengthy unauthorized absences from his organization and two specifications alleging a breach of restriction from the same area. Assuming that the former are embraced within the latter the punishment is two years instead of two years and six months. Considering the sentence adjudged and that approved by the intermediate appellate authorities, we are of the opinion that remand of the case for reassessment of the sentence is not justified. United States v Helfrick, 9 USCMA 221, 25 CMR 483.
Accordingly, the decision of the board of review is affirmed.
Judges Latimer and Ferguson concur in the reswlt.
United States v Modesett, 9 USCMA 152, 25 CMR 414.