Case: McCollough et ux. v. A. G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.; McFarland v. Bethlehem Steel Corp. et al.; LaFlamme v. Spector et al.; Rodriguez v. Kincheloe; Ferdik v. Woods, Attorney General of Arizona, et al.; McAfee v. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division; DeShields v. Love, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon
Abbreviation: McCollough v. A. G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.
Decision Date: 1993-03-29
Docket Number: No. 92-747; No. 92-6256; No. 92-6869; No. 92-6943; No. 92-7027; No. 92-7115; No. 92-7175
Citation: 507 U.S. 1012
Volume: 507
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: McCollough et ux. v. A. G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., McFarland v. Bethlehem Steel Corp. et al., LaFlamme v. Spector et al., Rodriguez v. Kincheloe, Ferdik v. Woods, Attorney General of Arizona, et al., McAfee v. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, DeShields v. Love, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon,
Judges: 
Pages: 1012–1012

Head Matter:
No. 92-747.
No. 92-6256.
No. 92-6869.
No. 92-6943.
No. 92-7027.
No. 92-7115.
No. 92-7175.
McCollough et ux. v. A. G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., McFarland v. Bethlehem Steel Corp. et al., LaFlamme v. Spector et al., Rodriguez v. Kincheloe, Ferdik v. Woods, Attorney General of Arizona, et al., McAfee v. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, DeShields v. Love, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon,

Opinion:
506 U. S. 1050;
506 U. S. 1083;
ante, p. 930;
ante, p. 933;
ante, p. 937;
ante, p. 942; and
ante, p. 944. Petitions for rehearing denied.