Case: In re Amir-El; In re Ogunde et al.; In re Kornafel; In re Acklin; In re Califorrniaa; In re Thrash; In re Pulliam; In re Montez; In re Ellis;In re Marsh; In re Zarate; In re Cluck; In re Scheidly; In re Croft; In re Cruz-Rivera; In re Dumas; In re Fouche; In re Beaumont; In re Olson; In re Demouchet; In re Leverett; In re Herrera; In re Absalon; In re Burgess; In re Verdone; In re Hill; In re Harley; and In re Hubbard
Abbreviation: In re Amir-El
Decision Date: 2004-10-04
Docket Number: No. 03-10762; No. 03-10796; No. 03-10844; No. 03-10929; No. 04-297; No. 04-5233; No. 04-5306; No. 04-5340; No. 04-5404; No. 04-5501; No. 04-5633; No. 04-5701; No. 04-5745; No. 04-5769; No. 04-5811; No. 04-5834; No. 04-5841; No. 04-5857; No. 04-5902; No. 04-5918; No. 04-5933; No. 04-5946; No. 04-6002; No. 04-6093; No. 04-6096; No. 04-6130; No. 04-6141; No. 04-6145
Citation: 543 U.S. 807
Volume: 543
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: In re Amir-El; In re Ogunde et al.; In re Kornafel; In re Acklin; In re Califorrniaa; In re Thrash; In re Pulliam; In re Montez; In re Ellis;In re Marsh; In re Zarate; In re Cluck; In re Scheidly; In re Croft; In re Cruz-Rivera; In re Dumas; In re Fouche; In re Beaumont; In re Olson; In re Demouchet; In re Leverett; In re Herrera; In re Absalon; In re Burgess; In re Verdone; In re Hill; In re Harley; and In re Hubbard.
Judges: 
Pages: 807–807

Head Matter:
No. 03-10762.
No. 03-10796.
No. 03-10844.
No. 03-10929.
No. 04-297.
No. 04-5233.
No. 04-5306.
No. 04-5340.
No. 04-5404.
No. 04-5501.
No. 04-5633.
No. 04-5701.
No. 04-5745.
No. 04-5769.
No. 04-5811.
No. 04-5834.
No. 04-5841.
No. 04-5857.
No. 04-5902.
No. 04-5918.
No. 04-5933.
No. 04-5946.
No. 04-6002.
No. 04-6093.
No. 04-6096.
No. 04-6130.
No. 04-6141.
No. 04-6145.
In re Amir-El; In re Ogunde et al.; In re Kornafel; In re Acklin; In re Califorrniaa; In re Thrash; In re Pulliam; In re Montez; In re Ellis;In re Marsh; In re Zarate; In re Cluck; In re Scheidly; In re Croft; In re Cruz-Rivera; In re Dumas; In re Fouche; In re Beaumont; In re Olson; In re Demouchet; In re Leverett; In re Herrera; In re Absalon; In re Burgess; In re Verdone; In re Hill; In re Harley; and In re Hubbard.

Opinion:
Petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.