Case: MICHIGAN CITIZENS FOR AN INDEPENDENT PRESS, et al., Appellants, v. Richard THORNBURGH, United States Attorney General, et al.
Abbreviation: Michigan Citizens for an Independent Press v. Thornburgh
Decision Date: 1989-02-24
Docket Number: No. 88-5286
Citation: 276 U.S. App. D.C. 145
Volume: 276
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Parties: MICHIGAN CITIZENS FOR AN INDEPENDENT PRESS, et al., Appellants, v. Richard THORNBURGH, United States Attorney General, et al.
Judges: Before WALD, Chief Judge; ROBINSON, MIKVA, EDWARDS, RUTH B. GINSBURG, STARR, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, D.H. GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.
Pages: 145–151

Head Matter:
868 F.2d 1300
MICHIGAN CITIZENS FOR AN INDEPENDENT PRESS, et al., Appellants, v. Richard THORNBURGH, United States Attorney General, et al.
No. 88-5286.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Feb. 24, 1989.

Opinion:
ON APPELLANTS' SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Before WALD, Chief Judge; ROBINSON, MIKVA, EDWARDS, RUTH B. GINSBURG, STARR, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, D.H. GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Appellants' Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc has been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service did not vote in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing it is
ORDERED, by the court en banc, that the suggestion is denied. It is
FURTHER ORDERED, by the court en banc, on its own motion, that the stay of implementation of the joint operating agreement reimposed by the order of Feb ruary 2, 1989, shall remain in effect until 5:00 p.m. E.S.T. on March 6,1989, to afford appellants an opportunity to apply to the Supreme Court for a stay beyond that date.
Chief Judge WALD and Circuit Judges MIKVA, HARRY T. EDWARDS and RUTH BADER GINSBURG would grant the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
A concurring statement of Circuit Judge SILBERMAN, joined by Circuit Judge SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, is attached.
A dissenting statement of Chief Judge WALD, joined by Circuit Judges MIKVA and HARRY T. EDWARDS, is attached.
Circuit Judges STARR and D.H. GINSBURG did not participate in this matter.