Case: Younger, District Attorney of Los Angeles County v. Harris et al.; Boyle, Judge, et al. v. Landry et al.; Samuels et al. v. Mackell, District Attorney of Queens County, et al.; Fernandez v. Mackell, District Attorney of Queens County, et al.; Boddie et al. v. Connecticut et al.; Sanks et al. v. Georgia et al.; Dyson et al. v. Stein; Byrne, District Attorney of Suffolk County, et al. v. Karalexis et al.
Abbreviation: Younger v. Harris
Decision Date: 1970-06-29
Docket Number: No. 4; No. 6; No. 11; No. 20; No. 265; No. 266; No. 565; No. 1149
Citation: 399 U.S. 922
Volume: 399
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Younger, District Attorney of Los Angeles County v. Harris et al. Boyle, Judge, et al. v. Landry et al. Samuels et al. v. Mackell, District Attorney of Queens County, et al. Fernandez v. Mackell, District Attorney of Queens County, et al. Boddie et al. v. Connecticut et al. Sanks et al. v. Georgia et al. Dyson et al. v. Stein. Byrne, District Attorney of Suffolk County, et al. v. Karalexis et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 922–922

Head Matter:
No. 4.
Younger, District Attorney of Los Angeles County v. Harris et al. Boyle, Judge, et al. v. Landry et al. Samuels et al. v. Mackell, District Attorney of Queens County, et al. Fernandez v. Mackell, District Attorney of Queens County, et al. Boddie et al. v. Connecticut et al. Sanks et al. v. Georgia et al. Dyson et al. v. Stein. Byrne, District Attorney of Suffolk County, et al. v. Karalexis et al.
No. 6.
No. 11.
No. 20.
No. 265.
No. 266.
No. 565.
No. 1149.

Opinion:
Appeal from D. C. C. D. Cal. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 393 U. S. 1013; restored to calendar, 395 U. S. 955];
Appeal from D. C. N. D. Ill. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 393 U. S. 974; restored to calendar, 395 U. S. 955];
Appeal from D. C. S. D. N. Y. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 393 U. S. 975; restored to calendar, 395 U. S. 957];
Appeal from D. C. S. D. N. Y. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 393 U. S. 975; restored to calendar, 395 U. S. 957];
Appeal from D. C. Conn. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 395 U. S. 974];
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ga. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 395 U. S. 974];
Appeal from D. C. N. D. Tex. [Probable jurisdiction noted sub nom. Batchelor v. Stein, 396 U. S. 954]; and
Appeal from D. C. Mass. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 397 U. S. 985.] Cases restored to calendar for reargument.