Case: Swarthout, Warden v. Cooke; and Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation v. Clay; Pappas et al. v. United States; Adams v. High Purity Systems, Inc., et al.; Hackney v. Lafler, Warden; Harris v. Virginia; Windham v. California Department of Corrections et al.; Handley v. Chase Bank USA N. A. et al.; Jefferson v. Miller Brothers Ford, Inc., et al.; Woltz v. Bailey et al.; Kemppainen v. Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division; Dembry v. United States, In re Richard
Abbreviation: Swarthout v. Cooke
Decision Date: 2011-04-04
Docket Number: No. 10-333; No. 10-6179; No. 10-6283; No. 10-6953; No. 10-7153; No. 10-7356; No. 10-7359; No. 10-7492; No. 10-7946; No. 10-7969; No. 10-8413; No. 10-8704
Citation: 563 U.S. 930
Volume: 563
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Swarthout, Warden v. Cooke; and Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation v. Clay, Pappas et al. v. United States, Adams v. High Purity Systems, Inc., et al., Hackney v. Lafler, Warden, Harris v. Virginia, Windham v. California Department of Corrections et al., Handley v. Chase Bank USA N. A. et al., Jefferson v. Miller Brothers Ford, Inc., et AL., Woltz v. Bailey et al., Kemppainen v. Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Dembry v. United States, In re Richard,
Judges: 
Pages: 930–930

Head Matter:
No. 10-333.
No. 10-6179.
No. 10-6283.
No. 10-6953.
No. 10-7153.
No. 10-7356.
No. 10-7359.
No. 10-7492.
No. 10-7946.
No. 10-7969.
No. 10-8413.
No. 10-8704.
Swarthout, Warden v. Cooke; and Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation v. Clay, Pappas et al. v. United States, Adams v. High Purity Systems, Inc., et al., Hackney v. Lafler, Warden, Harris v. Virginia, Windham v. California Department of Corrections et al., Handley v. Chase Bank USA N. A. et al., Jefferson v. Miller Brothers Ford, Inc., et AL., Woltz v. Bailey et al., Kemppainen v. Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Dembry v. United States, In re Richard,

Opinion:
562 U. S. 216;
562 U. S. 1182;
562 U. S. 1223;
562 U. S. 1142;
562 U. S. 1114;
562 U. S. 1152;
562 U. S. 1225;
562 U. S. 1185;
562 U. S. 1230;
562 U. S. 1230;
562 U. S. 1244; and
562 U. S. 1215. Petitions for rehearing denied.