Case: Stocks v. United States; Hallstrom et ux. v. Tillamook County; Smith v. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services; Hancock v. City of Davenport et al.; Taylor v. Green et al.; Rivera v. Oroweat Foods Co., Inc., et al.; Jungen, Administratrix of the Estate of Jungen, et al. v. Oregon; Marker et ux. v. Rieschel et al.; Gordon et al. v. Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles; Sherman v. Nissan Motor Corp. et al.; Polyak v. Stack et al.; Brown et al. v. 1250 Twenty-Fourth Street Associates et al., In re Sparks, In re Marik, Harris v. Hall et al.; Herrera v. Redman, Warden; Stotts v. United States; Bertram v. United States; Hurd v. Dorsey, Warden; Magwood v. Alabama; Spychala v. Rushen et al.; Gallaway v. United States; Brown v. American Express Travel Related Services Co., Inc.; Olim v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. et al.; Brooks v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc.; Zarrilli v. Marino; May v. Challenger Communications Systems, Inc.; Gala v. United States Postal Service; Rondon v. Indiana; Lockhart v. Rolling et al.; Martin v. Delaware Law School of Widener University et al.; Sparks v. Sparks; Cordeiro v. United States; Watts v. Johnson, Warden, et al.; Bond v. Johnstone et al.
Abbreviation: Stocks v. United States
Decision Date: 1990-01-08
Docket Number: No. 88-42; No. 88-2054; No. 88-2140; No. 88-7540; No. 88-7626; No. 89-90; No. 89-254; No. 89-294; No. 89-342; No. 89-365; No. 89-384; No. 89-494; No. 89-584; No. 89-5041; No. 89-5106; No. 89-5115; No. 89-5361; No. 89-5384; No. 89-5397; No. 89-5428; No. 89-5458; No. 89-5501; No. 89-5522; No. 89-5528; No. 89-5531; No. 89-5570; No. 89-5576; No. 89-5593; No. 89-5613; No. 89-5615; No. 89-5639; No. 89-5716; No. 89-5790; No. 89-5820
Citation: 493 U.S. 1037
Volume: 493
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Stocks v. United States, Hallstrom et ux. v. Tillamook County, Smith v. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Hancock v. City of Davenport et al., Taylor v. Green et al., Rivera v. Oroweat Foods Co., Inc., et al., Jungen, Administratrix of the Estate of Jungen, et al. v. Oregon, Marker et ux. v. Rieschel et al., Gordon et al. v. Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles, Sherman v. Nissan Motor Corp. et al., Polyak v. Stack et al., Brown et al. v. 1250 Twenty-Fourth Street Associates et al., In re Sparks, In re Marik, Harris v. Hall et al., Herrera v. Redman, Warden, Stotts v. United States, Bertram v. United States, Hurd v. Dorsey, Warden, Magwood v. Alabama, Spychala v. Rushen et al., Gallaway v. United States, Brown v. American Express Travel Related Services Co., Inc., Olim v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. et al., Brooks v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc., Zarrilli v. Marino, May v. Challenger Communications Systems, Inc., Gala v. United States Postal Service, Rondon v. Indiana, Lockhart v. Rolling et al., Martin v. Delaware Law School of Widener University et al., Sparks v. Sparks, Cordeiro v. United States, Watts v. Johnson, Warden, et al., Bond v. Johnstone et al.,
Judges: 
Pages: 1037–1038

Head Matter:
No.-.
No. 88-42.
No. 88-2054.
No. 88-2140.
No. 88-7540.
No. 88-7626.
No. 89-90.
No. 89-254.
No. 89-294.
No. 89-342.
No. 89-365.
No. 89-384.
No. 89-494.
No. 89-584.
No. 89-5041.
No. 89-5106.
No. 89-5115.
No. 89-5361.
No. 89-5384.
No. 89-5397.
No. 89-5428.
Stocks v. United States, Hallstrom et ux. v. Tillamook County, Smith v. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Hancock v. City of Davenport et al., Taylor v. Green et al., Rivera v. Oroweat Foods Co., Inc., et al., Jungen, Administratrix of the Estate of Jungen, et al. v. Oregon, Marker et ux. v. Rieschel et al., Gordon et al. v. Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles, Sherman v. Nissan Motor Corp. et al., Polyak v. Stack et al., Brown et al. v. 1250 Twenty-Fourth Street Associates et al., In re Sparks, In re Marik, Harris v. Hall et al., Herrera v. Redman, Warden, Stotts v. United States, Bertram v. United States, Hurd v. Dorsey, Warden, Magwood v. Alabama, Spychala v. Rushen et al., Gallaway v. United States, Brown v. American Express Travel Related Services Co., Inc., Olim v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. et al., Brooks v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc., Zarrilli v. Marino, May v. Challenger Communications Systems, Inc., Gala v. United States Postal Service, Rondon v. Indiana, Lockhart v. Rolling et al., Martin v. Delaware Law School of Widener University et al., Sparks v. Sparks, Cordeiro v. United States, Watts v. Johnson, Warden, et al., Bond v. Johnstone et al.,

Opinion:
ante, p. 948;
ante, p. 20;
ante, p. 821;
ante, p. 826;
ante, p. 841;
ante, p. 963;
ante, p. 933;
ante, p. 893;
ante, p. 918;
ante, p. 954;
ante, p. 944;
ante, p. 935;
ante, p. 963;
ante, p. 953;
ante, p. 857;
ante, p. 945;
ante, p. 861;
ante, p. 956;
ante, p. 897;
ante, p. 923;
ante, p. 939;
No. 89-5458.
No. 89-5501.
No. 89-5522.
No. 89-5528.
No. 89-5531.
No. 89-5570.
No. 89-5576.
No. 89-5593.
No. 89-5613.
No. 89-5615.
No. 89-5639.
No. 89-5716.
No. 89-5790.
No. 89-5820.
ante, p. 898;
ante, p. 899;
ante, p. 940;
ante, p. 940;
ante, p. 941;
ante, p. 942;
ante, p. 942;
ante, p. 969;
ante, p. 942;
ante, p. 966;
ante, p. 957;
ante, p. 958;
ante, p. 982; and
ante, p. 996. Petitions for rehearing denied.