Case: COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, et al., Petitioners v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent. Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, et al., Intervenors
Abbreviation: Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency
Decision Date: 2005-12-02
Docket Number: Nos. 03-1361, 03-1362, 03-1363, 03-1364, 03-1365, 03-1366, 03-1367, 03-1368
Citation: 369 U.S. App. D.C. 56
Volume: 369
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Parties: COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, et al., Petitioners v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent. Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, et al., Intervenors.
Judges: Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and SENTELLE, HEBDERSON, RANDOLPH, ROGERS, TATEL, GARLAND, BROWN, and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.
Pages: 56–58

Head Matter:
433 F.3d 66
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, et al., Petitioners v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent. Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, et al., Intervenors.
Nos. 03-1361, 03-1362, 03-1363, 03-1364, 03-1365, 03-1366, 03-1367, 03-1368.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Dec. 2, 2005.
William Lyon Pardee, Assistant Attorney General, James R. Milkey, Attorney General’s Office of Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, Kimberly P. Massicotte, Matthew I. Levine, Attorney General’s Office of State of Connecticut, Hartford, CT, Gary S. Feinerman, Gerald T. Karr, Attorney General’s Office for the State of Illinois, Chicago, IL, Thomas Edward Davis, Attorney General’s Office of State of Illinois, Springfield, IL, Gerald D. Reid, Attorney General’s Office of State of Maine, Augusta, ME, Stefanie A. Brand, Attorney General’s Office of State of New Jersey, Division of Law, Trenton, NJ, Stuart Michael Bluestone, Attorney General’s Office of State of New Mexico, Santa Fe, NM, J. Jared Snyder, Attorney General’s Office of State of. New York, New York State Department of Law, Albany, NY, Peter Hans Lehner, Attorney General’s Office of State of New York, New York, NY, Philip Schradle, Attorney General’s Office of State of Oregon, Office of General Counsel, Salem, OR, Trida K. Jedele, Attorney General’s Office of State of Rhode Island, Providence, RI, William H. Sorrell, Erick Titrud, Kevin 0. Leske, Attorney General’s Office of State of Vermont, Montpelier, VT, David K. Mears, Olympia, WA, Fiti A. Sunia, Attorney General’s Office of American Samoa, Pago Pago American Samoa, Donna M. Murasky, Senior Litigation Counsel, Edward Eugene Schwab, Dep. Atty. Gen., Office of Attorney General for the District of Columbia, Washington, DC, Richard M. Frank, Nicholas Stern, Attorney General’s Office of State of California, Sacramento, CA, Mary Elizabeth Hackenbracht, Marc Nathaniel Melnick, Attorney General’s Office of State of California, Oakland, CA, for Petitioners.
Mary Elizabeth Hackenbracht, Marc Nathaniel Melnick, Nicholas Stern, Jeffrey Bossert Clark, Jon M. Lipshultz, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Ann R. Klee, General Counsel, Nancy A. Ketcham-Colwill, John Thomas Hannon, Attorney, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of General Counsel, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
William Albert Anderson, II, Winston & Strawn LLP, Norman William Fichthorn, Allison D. Wood, Hunton & Williams LLP, Robin S. Conrad, National Chamber Litigation Center, Russell Scott Frye, John Leonard Wittenborn, Collier Shannon Scott, PLLC, Richard Stuart Wasserstrom, American Forest & Paper Association, Janice S. Amundson, Quentin Riegel, Ralph J. Colleli, Jr., Julie Carol Becker, William Lincoln Fang, Washington, DC, Jed Robert Mandel, Timothy A. French, Neal Gerber & Eisenberg, Chicago, IL, Neil David Gordon, Attorney General’s Office of State of Michigan, Lansing, MI, Jane E. Atwood, Attorney General’s Office of State of Texas, Austin, TX, Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General’s Office of State of Idaho, Natural Resources Division, Boise, ID, Fred G. Nelson, Attorney General’s Office of State of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, Roxanne Giedd, Attorney General’s Office of State of South Dakota, Pierre, SD, Steven E. Mulder, Assist Atty. Gen., Attorney General’s Office of State of Alaska Department of Law, Anchorage, AK, David W. Davies, III, Attorney General’s Office of State of Kansas, Topeka, KS, Jon Cumberland Bruning, Attorney General’s Office of State of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, Dale T. Vitale, Attorney General’s Office of State of Ohio, Columbus, OH, Leslie A. Hulse, American Chemistry Council, Arlington, VA, for Intervenors.
Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and SENTELLE, HEBDERSON, RANDOLPH, ROGERS, TATEL, GARLAND, BROWN, and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.
Circuit Judges Henderson and Garland did not participate in this matter.
Circuit Judges Rogers, Tatel, and Griffith would grant the petition for rehearing en banc.
A separate statement by Circuit Judge Tatel, in which Circuit Judge Rogers joins, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, is attached.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The petition of petitioners Commonwealth of Massachusetts, States of Maine, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Washington, and the District of Columbia for rehearing en banc and the opposition thereto were circulated to the full court, and a vote was requested. Thereafter a majority of the judges eligible to participate did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that the petition be denied.