Case: Reconstruction Finance Corp. et al. v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. et al.; Reconstruction Finance Corp. et al. v. Denver & Salt Lake Western Railroad Co. et al.; Reconstruction Finance Corp. et al. v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co., Trustee, et al.; Reconstruction Finance Corp. et al. v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. et al.; Reconstruction Finance Corp. et al. v. Thompson, Trustee, et al.; Saunders v. Wilkins
Abbreviation: Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad
Decision Date: 1946-10-28
Docket Number: No. 278; No. 279; No. 280; No. 281; No. 282; No. 916
Citation: 329 U.S. 824
Volume: 329
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Reconstruction Finance Corp. et al. v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. et al. Reconstruction Finance Corp. et al. v. Denver & Salt Lake Western Railroad Co. et al. Reconstruction Finance Corp. et al. v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co., Trustee, et al. Reconstruction Finance Corp. et al. v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. et al. Reconstruction Finance Corp. et al. v. Thompson, Trustee, et al. Saunders v. Wilkins.
Judges: The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Pages: 824–825

Head Matter:
No. 278,
No. 279,
No. 280,
No. 281,
October Term, 1945.
October Term, 1945.
October Term, 1945.
October Term, 1945.
Reconstruction Finance Corp. et al. v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. et al. Reconstruction Finance Corp. et al. v. Denver & Salt Lake Western Railroad Co. et al. Reconstruction Finance Corp. et al. v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co., Trustee, et al. Reconstruction Finance Corp. et al. v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. et al. Reconstruction Finance Corp. et al. v. Thompson, Trustee, et al. Saunders v. Wilkins.

Opinion:
(328 U. S. 495);
(328 U. S. 495);
(328 U. S. 495);
(328 U. S.495);
No. 282,
No. 916,
October Term, 1945.
October Term, 1945.
October 28, 1946.
(328 U. S.495); and
(328 U. S. 870).
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.