Case: Wisconsin et al. v. Illinois et al.; Michigan et al. v. Same; and New York et al. v. Same
Abbreviation: Wisconsin v. Illinois
Decision Date: 1932-10-10
Docket Number: No. 5; No. 8; No. 9
Citation: 287 U.S. 568
Volume: 287
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Wisconsin et al. v. Illinois et al.; Michigan et al. v. Same; and New York et al. v. Same.
Judges: 
Pages: 568–568

Head Matter:
No. 5, original.
No. 8, original.
No. 9, original.
Wisconsin et al. v. Illinois et al.; Michigan et al. v. Same; and New York et al. v. Same.
October 10, 1932.
Messrs. John W. Reynolds, Attorney General of Wisconsin, Henry N. Benson, Attorney General of Minnesota, Gilbert Béttmcm, Attorney General of Ohio, Paul W. Voorhies, Attorney General of Michigan, Herbert H. Naujoks, Assistant Attorney General of Wisconsin, and Raymond R. Jackson, Special Assistant to the Attorneys General, for complainants. Messrs. William Rothmann, Frank Johnson, Jr., Joseph B. Fléming, and Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General of Illinois, for the defendants.

Opinion:
The report of the defendant, Sanitary District of Chicago, dated July 1, 1932, is received. Upon consideration of the complainants' motion,
It is ordered that a rule issue to the defendants in the above entitled causes to show cause, by printed return, on or before Monday, November 7 next, why they have not taken appropriate steps to effect compliance with the requirements of the decree of this Court in these causes dated April 21, 1930 (281 U. S. 696);
And it is further ordered that these causes be set for oral argument upon the return of such rule upon Monday, November 14 next, at the head of the call for that day, briefs to be filed by the parties at the time of such argument.