Case: Canimpex v. United States
Abbreviation: Canimpex v. United States
Decision Date: 1958-02-27
Docket Number: Reap. Dec. 9089; Entry No. 19049
Citation: 40 Cust. Ct. 717
Volume: 40
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Canimpex v. United States
Judges: 
Pages: 717–717

Head Matter:
(Reap. Dec. 9089)
Canimpex v. United States
Entry No. 19049.
(Decided February 27, 1958)
Plaintiff not represented by counsel. .
George Cochran Boub, Assistant Attorney General (William J. Vitale, trial attorney), for the defendant.

Opinion:
Wilson, Judge:
When tbe above-enumerated appeal for a reap-praisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of the plaintiff, and the case was ordered submitted.
In conformity with the requirements of the statute (28 U. S. C. § 2631), I have examined the record in the appeal before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.