Case: SANTORO v. UNITED STATES
Abbreviation: Santoro v. United States
Decision Date: 1968-06-10
Docket Number: No. 1219
Citation: 392 U.S. 301
Volume: 392
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: SANTORO v. UNITED STATES.
Judges: Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968).
Pages: 301–301

Head Matter:
SANTORO v. UNITED STATES.
No. 1219.
Decided June 10, 1968.
Robert S. Bailey for petitioner.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.
Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White's dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968).
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.