Case: M. Pressner & Co. v. United States; Parksmith Corp. v. United States; Levin Bros. v. United States; Langfelder, Homma & Carroll, Inc., et al. v. United States; Illfelder Importing Co., Inc. v. United States; Dan Brechner & Co. et al. v. United States; Arrow Novelty Co., Inc. v. United States
Abbreviation: M. Pressner & Co. v. United States
Decision Date: 1967-05-01
Docket Number: No. P67/132; protests 289210-K, etc. (New York); No. P67/133; protests 291690-K, etc. (New York); No. P67/134; protests 304649-K, etc. (New York); No. P67/135; protests 58/14746, etc. (New York); No. P67/136; protests 59/24323, etc. (New York); No. P67/137; protests 61/16127, etc. (New York); No. P67/138; protests 63/21030, etc. (New York)
Citation: 58 Cust. Ct. 885
Volume: 58
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: M. Pressner & Co. v. United States,
Judges: 
Pages: 885–885

Head Matter:
No. P67/132.
No. P67/133.
No. P67/134.
No. P67/135.
No. P67/136.
No. P67/137.
No. P67/138.
M. Pressner & Co. v. United States,
protests 289210-K, etc. (New York).
Parksmith Corp. v. United States,
protests 291690-K, etc. (New York).
Levin Bros. v. United States,
protests 304649-K, etc. (New York).
Langfelder, Homma & Carroll, Inc., et al. v. United States,
protests 58/14746, etc. (New York).
Illfelder Importing Co., Inc. v. United States,
protests 59/24323, etc. (New York).
Dan Brechner & Co. et al. v. United States,
protests 61/16127, etc. (New York).
Arrow Novelty Co., Inc. v. United States,
protests 63/21030, etc. (New York).

Opinion:
Richardson, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of so-called "miniature hunting knives" similar in all material respects to those the subject of M. Pressner & Co. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 489, C.D. 2686), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.