Case: Wilson v. McLane et al.; and Harvie, doing business under the name and Style of Automatic Sales Company, v. Heise et al.
Abbreviation: Wilson v. McLane
Decision Date: 1929-04-29
Docket Number: No. 715; No. 716
Citation: 279 U.S. 822
Volume: 279
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Wilson v. McLane et al.; and Harvie, doing business under the name and Style of Automatic Sales Company, v. Heise et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 822–822

Head Matter:
No. 715.
No. 716.
Wilson v. McLane et al.; and Harvie, doing business under the name and Style of Automatic Sales Company, v. Heise et al.
Jurisdictional statement submitted April 22, 1929.
Decided April 29, 1929.
Mr. P. A. Bonham
for appellants.
No appearance for appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
The appeals are dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question, on the authority of Miller v. Cornwall R. R., 168 U. S. 131, 134; Thomas v. Iowa, 209 U. S. 258, 263; Bowe v. Scott, 233 U. S. 658, 665.