Case: Austin et al. v. Meyer et al.; Byrne, District Attorney of Suffolk County v. P. B. I. C., Inc., et al.; Davis v. Parker
Abbreviation: Austin v. Meyer
Decision Date: 1973-06-25
Docket Number: No. 70-35; No. 71-304; No. 71-1318
Citation: 413 U.S. 905
Volume: 413
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Austin et al. v. Meyer et al. Byrne, District Attorney of Suffolk County v. P. B. I. C., Inc., et al. Davis v. Parker.
Judges: Mr. Justice Douglas would affirm the judgments. Mr. Justice Brennan, joined by Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Marshall, would vacate the judgments and remand the cases for further proceedings not inconsistent with his dissent in Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, ante, p. 73. See Miller v. California, ante, p. 47.
Pages: 905–906

Head Matter:
No. 70-35.
No. 71-304.
Austin et al. v. Meyer et al. Byrne, District Attorney of Suffolk County v. P. B. I. C., Inc., et al. Davis v. Parker.

Opinion:
Appeal from D. C. M. D. Fla. Reported below: 319 F. Supp. 457;
No. 71-1318.
Appeal from D. C. Mass. Reported below: 313 F. Supp. 757; and
Appeal from D. C. C. D. Cal. Judgments vacated and cases remanded for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, ante, p. 15; Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, ante, p. 49; Kaplan v. California, ante, p. 115; United States v. 12 200-ft. Reels Film, ante, p. 123; United States v. Orito, ante, p. 139; Heller v. New York, ante, p. 483; Roaden v. Kentucky, ante, p. 496; and Alexander v. Virginia, ante, p. 836.
Mr. Justice Douglas would affirm the judgments. Mr. Justice Brennan, joined by Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Marshall, would vacate the judgments and remand the cases for further proceedings not inconsistent with his dissent in Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, ante, p. 73. See Miller v. California, ante, p. 47.