Case: Smith v. United States; Fuller v. Texas; Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.; Shermoen et al. v. United States et al.; Reshard et al. v. Britt et al.; Bowman et al. v. City of Franklin, Wisconsin, et al.; Century Centre Partners, Ltd. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; Ferguson v. Union City Daily Messenger et al.; Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al. v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc.; Maloney v. Salafia et al.; Johnson et al. v. Los Angeles Community College District et al.; Estate of Bohn et al. v. Waddell, Director, Department of Revenue of Arizona, et al.; and Abbott et al. v. Waddell, Director, Department of Revenue of Arizona, et al.; Icard, Trustee, et al. v. Sarasota-Manatee Airport Authority; Brickner v. Voinovich, Governor of Ohio, et al.; Gackenbach v. Dexter Hysol Corp.; Huddleston, Tennessee Commissioner of Revenue, et al. v. Bloomingdale's By Mail Ltd.; Johnson v. Texas; Carney v. Department of Veterans Affairs; Swartz v. Florida Bar et al.; Cantu v. Texas; Resnover v. Carter, Attorney General of Indiana, et al.; Hawthorne v. Vasquez, Warden; Ward v. Whitley, Warden; Jenkins v. First Fidelity Mortgage Co.; Logan v. Gramley, Warden; Tavakoli-Nouri v. Central Intelligence Agency; Banks v. San Diego; Banks v. California; Banks v. San Diego; Anders v. United States; Banks v. Ryan et al.; Inocelda v. Department of the Army; Simanonok v. Simanonok et al.; Hughley v. Tennessee et al.; Sanders v. Internal Revenue Service; Hughley v. United States; Hart v. Alabama; Gilbert v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District; Lugo v. Independent Management Assn. et al.; Reid v. Gudmanson, Warden, et al.; In re Leuellyn, Smith v. Custom Micro, Inc.; Moreland v. Texas; Parris v. United States; Myer v. Weeks et al., Hickey et al. v. Ballingall et al.; Erwin v. City of Angels Camp et al.; In re Ziebarth, Banks v. KCTV-5 et al.; Nkop v. Van Runkle et al.; Rocheville v. South Carolina, In re DiVito; West v. Truman Medical Center West, Inc., et al.; Clark v. Government of the Virgin Islands; Velasquez v. United States, In re O'Leary; Black v. Kirkpatrick et al.; Seaton v. Jabe, Warden; Zuckerman v. United States
Abbreviation: Smith v. United States
Decision Date: 1993-08-09
Docket Number: No. 91-8674; No. 91-8768; No. 92-466; No. 92-1541; No. 92-1549; No. 92-1608; No. 92-1650; No. 92-1670; No. 92-1671; No. 92-1705; No. 92-1731; No. 92-1748; No. 92-1749; No. 92-1766; No. 92-1822; No. 92-1886; No. 92-5653; No. 92-6494; No. 92-6730; No. 92-7120; No. 92-7802; No. 92-7862; No. 92-7914; No. 92-7942; No. 92-7998; No. 92-8038; No. 92-8061; No. 92-8062; No. 92-8063; No. 92-8094; No. 92-8120; No. 92-8133; No. 92-8146; No. 92-8220; No. 92-8249; No. 92-8251; No. 92-8298; No. 92-8301; No. 92-8314; No. 92-8317; No. 92-8333; No. 92-8338; No. 92-8349; No. 92-8353; No. 92-8354; No. 92-8424; No. 92-8436; No. 92-8470; No. 92-8490; No. 92-8537; No. 92-8563; No. 92-8588; No. 92-8589; No. 92-8615; No. 92-8634; No. 92-8646; No. 92-8683; No. 92-8716; No. 92-8725
Citation: 509 U.S. 940
Volume: 509
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Smith v. United States, Fuller v. Texas, Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Shermoen et al. v. United States et al., Reshard et al. v. Britt et al., Bowman et al. v. City of Franklin, Wisconsin, et al., Century Centre Partners, Ltd. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Ferguson v. Union City Daily Messenger et al., Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al. v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc., Maloney v. Salafia et al., Johnson et al. v. Los Angeles Community College District et al., Estate of Bohn et al. v. Waddell, Director, Department of Revenue of Arizona, et al.; and Abbott et al. v. Waddell, Director, Department of Revenue of Arizona, et al., Icard, Trustee, et al. v. Sarasota-Manatee Airport Authority, Brickner v. Voinovich, Governor of Ohio, et al., Gackenbach v. Dexter Hysol Corp., Huddleston, Tennessee Commissioner of Revenue, et al. v. Bloomingdale’s By Mail Ltd., Johnson v. Texas, Carney v. Department of Veterans Affairs, Swartz v. Florida Bar et al., Cantu v. Texas, Resnover v. Carter, Attorney General of Indiana, et al., Hawthorne v. Vasquez, Warden, Ward v. Whitley, Warden, Jenkins v. First Fidelity Mortgage Co., Logan v. Gramley, Warden, Tavakoli-Nouri v. Central Intelligence Agency, Banks v. San Diego, Banks v. California, Banks v. San Diego, Anders v. United States, Banks v. Ryan et al., Inocelda v. Department of the Army, Simanonok v. Simanonok et al., Hughley v. Tennessee et al., Sanders v. Internal Revenue Service, Hughley v. United States, Hart v. Alabama, Gilbert v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District, Lugo v. Independent Management Assn. et al., Reid v. Gudmanson, Warden, et al., In re Leuellyn, Smith v. Custom Micro, Inc., Moreland v. Texas, Parris v. United States, Myer v. Weeks et al., Hickey et al. v. Ballingall et al., Erwin v. City of Angels Camp et al., In re Ziebarth, Banks v. KCTV-5 et al., Nkop v. Van Runkle et al., Rocheville v. South Carolina, In re DiVito, West v. Truman Medical Center West, Inc., et al., Clark v. Government of the Virgin Islands, Velasquez v. United States, In re O’Leary, Black v. Kirkpatrick et al., Seaton v. Jabe, Warden, Zuckerman v. United States,
Judges: 
Pages: 940–942

Head Matter:
No. 91-8674.
No. 91-8768.
No. 92-466.
No. 92-1541.
No. 92-1549.
Smith v. United States, Fuller v. Texas, Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Shermoen et al. v. United States et al., Reshard et al. v. Britt et al., Bowman et al. v. City of Franklin, Wisconsin, et al., Century Centre Partners, Ltd. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Ferguson v. Union City Daily Messenger et al., Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al. v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc., Maloney v. Salafia et al., Johnson et al. v. Los Angeles Community College District et al., Estate of Bohn et al. v. Waddell, Director, Department of Revenue of Arizona, et al.; and Abbott et al. v. Waddell, Director, Department of Revenue of Arizona, et al., Icard, Trustee, et al. v. Sarasota-Manatee Airport Authority, Brickner v. Voinovich, Governor of Ohio, et al., Gackenbach v. Dexter Hysol Corp., Huddleston, Tennessee Commissioner of Revenue, et al. v. Bloomingdale’s By Mail Ltd., Johnson v. Texas, Carney v. Department of Veterans Affairs, Swartz v. Florida Bar et al., Cantu v. Texas, Resnover v. Carter, Attorney General of Indiana, et al., Hawthorne v. Vasquez, Warden, Ward v. Whitley, Warden, Jenkins v. First Fidelity Mortgage Co., Logan v. Gramley, Warden, Tavakoli-Nouri v. Central Intelligence Agency, Banks v. San Diego, Banks v. California, Banks v. San Diego, Anders v. United States, Banks v. Ryan et al., Inocelda v. Department of the Army, Simanonok v. Simanonok et al., Hughley v. Tennessee et al., Sanders v. Internal Revenue Service, Hughley v. United States, Hart v. Alabama, Gilbert v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District, Lugo v. Independent Management Assn. et al., Reid v. Gudmanson, Warden, et al., In re Leuellyn, Smith v. Custom Micro, Inc., Moreland v. Texas, Parris v. United States, Myer v. Weeks et al., Hickey et al. v. Ballingall et al., Erwin v. City of Angels Camp et al., In re Ziebarth, Banks v. KCTV-5 et al., Nkop v. Van Runkle et al., Rocheville v. South Carolina, In re DiVito, West v. Truman Medical Center West, Inc., et al., Clark v. Government of the Virgin Islands, Velasquez v. United States, In re O’Leary, Black v. Kirkpatrick et al., Seaton v. Jabe, Warden, Zuckerman v. United States,

Opinion:
508 U. S. 223; ante, p. 922; ante, p. 209; ante, p. 903; 508 U. S. 911; 508 U. S. 940; ante, p. 905; 508 U. S. 961; 508 U. S. 972; 508 U. S. 951; ante, p. 906; ante, p. 906; ante, p. 906; 508 U. S. 974; ante, p. 907; ante, p. 907; ante, p. 350; 506 U. S. 1061; 508 U. S. 914; ante, p. 926; 508 U. S. 962; 507 U. S. 1053; 508 U. S. 963; 508 U. S. 918; 507 U. S. 1042; 508 U. S. 942; 508 U. S. 921; 508 U. S. 921; 508 U. S. 921; 507 U. S. 1057; 508 U. S. 923; 508 U. S. 924; 508 U. S. 925; 508 U. S. 927; 508 U. S. 963; 508 U. S. 928; 508 U. S. 953; 508 U. S. 963; 508 U. S. 975; 508 U. S. 964; 508 U. S. 958; 508 U. S. 976; 508 U. S. 976; 508 U. S. 954; 508 U. S. 976; 608 U. S. 981; ante, p. 908; 508 U. S. 938; 508 U. S. 978; 508 U. S. 978; 508 Ü. S. 978; ante, p. 902; ante, p. 929; ante, p. 910; 508 U. S. 979; ante, p. 921; ante, p. 911; ante, p. 911; and ante, p. 915. Petitions for rehearing denied.
No. 92-1608.
No. 92-1650.
No. 92-1670.
No. 92-1671.
No. 92-1705.
No. 92-1731.
No. 92-1748.
No. 92-1749.
No. 92-1766.
No. 92-1822.
No. 92-1886.
No. 92-5653.
No. 92-6494.
No. 92-6730.
No. 92-7120.
No. 92-7802.
No. 92-7862.
No. 92-7914.
No. 92-7942.
No. 92-7998.
No. 92-8038.
No. 92-8061.
No. 92-8062.
No. 92-8063.
No. 92-8094.
No. 92-8120.
No. 92-8133.
No. 92-8146.
No. 92-8220.
No. 92-8249.
No. 92-8251.
No. 92-8298.
No. 92-8301.
No. 92-8314.
No. 92-8317.
No. 92-8333.
No. 92-8338.
No. 92-8349.
No. 92-8353.
No. 92-8354.
No. 92-8424.
No. 92-8436.
No. 92-8470.
No. 92-8490.
No. 92-8537.
No. 92-8563.
No. 92-8588.
No. 92-8589.
No. 92-8615.
No. 92-8634.
No. 92-8646.
No. 92-8683.
No. 92-8716.
No. 92-8725.