Case: IPSCO, Inc. and IPSCO Steel, Inc., plaintiffs, and Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd. and Sonco Steel Tube Div., Ferrum, Inc., plaintiff-intervenors v. United States, defendant, and Lone Star Steel Co., defendant-intervenor
Abbreviation: IPSCO, Inc. v. United States
Decision Date: 1991-01-24
Docket Number: Court No. 86-07-00853
Citation: 15 Ct. Int'l Trade 163
Volume: 15
Reporter: United States Court of International Trade Reports
Court: United States Court of International Trade
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: IPSCO, Inc. and IPSCO Steel, Inc., plaintiffs, and Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd. and Sonco Steel Tube Div., Ferrum, Inc., plaintiff-intervenors v. United States, defendant, and Lone Star Steel Co., defendant-intervenor
Judges: 
Pages: 163–163

Head Matter:
IPSCO, Inc. and IPSCO Steel, Inc., plaintiffs, and Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd. and Sonco Steel Tube Div., Ferrum, Inc., plaintiff-intervenors v. United States, defendant, and Lone Star Steel Co., defendant-intervenor
Court No. 86-07-00853
Dated: New York, New York, January 24, 1991.

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
Restani, Judge-.
The Department of Commerce having reported on May 23,1990, the results of the remand ordered by this Court, and the agency having stated in the results that the countervailing duty order should he vacated because the recalculated countervailing duty was de minimis, and no parties having opposed these remand results, and after deliberation,
It is hereby ordered: that the results of the third remand are sustained; that the Department of Commerce shall take appropriate action in conformity with the remand results; and that this action is dismissed.