Case: Cady et al., doing business as C. M. Cady & Sons v. Detroit et al.
Abbreviation: Cady v. Detroit
Decision Date: 1940-01-29
Docket Number: No. 622
Citation: 309 U.S. 620
Volume: 309
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Cady et al., doing business as C. M. Cady & Sons v. Detroit et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 620–621

Head Matter:
No. 622.
Cady et al., doing business as C. M. Cady & Sons v. Detroit et al.
January 29, 1940.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1) Euclid v. Ambler, 272 U. S. 365; Cusack Co. v. Chicago, 242 U. S. 526; (2) Hatch v. Reardon, 204 U. S. 152, 160-161; Standard Food Co. v. Wright, 225 U. S. 540, 550; Warehouse Co. v. Tobacco Growers, 276 U. S. 71, 88; (3) Caperton v. Boywer, 14 Wall. 216, 236-237; Herndon v. Georgia, 295 U. S. 441, 442-443.
Mr. Edward N. Barnard for appellants.