Case: U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Toledo et al.; Standard Surety & Casualty Co. v. Same; National Surety Co. v. Same; Guardian Casualty Co. v. Same; and Van Schaick, Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, et al. v. Same
Abbreviation: U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Toledo
Decision Date: 1934-05-28
Docket Number: No. 978; No. 979; No. 980; No. 981; No. 982
Citation: 292 U.S. 611
Volume: 292
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Toledo et al.; Standard Surety & Casualty Co. v. Same; National Surety Co. v. Same; Guardian Casualty Co. v. Same; and Van Schaick, Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, et al. v. Same.
Judges: 
Pages: 611–612

Head Matter:
No. 978.
U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Toledo et al.; Standard Surety & Casualty Co. v. Same; National Surety Co. v. Same; Guardian Casualty Co. v. Same; and Van Schaick, Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, et al. v. Same.
No. 979.
No. 980.
No. 981.
No. 982.
Jurisdictional statement submitted May 5, 1934.
Decided May 28, 1934.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
The appeals herein are dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Fisher v. New Orleans, 218 U.S. 438, 440; Seattle & Renton Ry. v. Linhoff, 231 U.S. 568, 570; Enterprise Irrigation District v. Canal Co., 243 U.S. 157, 165, 166; Tidal Oil Co. v. Flannagan, 263 U.S. 444, 451; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U.S. 312, 316, 317; American Ry. Express Co. v. Ken tucky, 273 U.S. 269, 272, 273; Comer v. Washington, ante, p. 610. Mr. Ray Martin for appellants in Nos. 978, 979, and 980. Mr. Harold W. Fraser for appellant in No. 981.
Mr. U. G. Denman for appellants in No. 982. Messrs. Ralph W. Doty and Earl F. Boxell for appellees.