Case: NATIONAL PETROCHEMICAL & REFINERS ASSOCIATION, Petitioner v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent Growth Energy and National Biodiesel Board, Intervenors
Abbreviation: National Petrochemical & Refiners Ass'n v. Environmental Protection Agency
Decision Date: 2011-04-22
Docket Number: Nos. 10-1070, 10-1071
Citation: 395 U.S. App. D.C. 420
Volume: 395
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Parties: NATIONAL PETROCHEMICAL & REFINERS ASSOCIATION, Petitioner v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent Growth Energy and National Biodiesel Board, Intervenors.
Judges: Before: SENTELLE , Chief Judge, and GINSBURG, HENDERSON , ROGERS, TATEL, GARLAND, BROWN , GRIFFITH, and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges.
Pages: 420–425

Head Matter:
643 F.3d 958
NATIONAL PETROCHEMICAL & REFINERS ASSOCIATION, Petitioner v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent Growth Energy and National Biodiesel Board, Intervenors.
Nos. 10-1070, 10-1071.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
April 22, 2011.
Chet Maraffa Thompson, Esquire, Daniel William Wolff, Crowell & Moring, LLP, Washington, DC, for Petitioner.
Daniel R. Dertke, Robert Geoffrey Dreher, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
William Henry Burgess, IV, Jeffrey Bossert Clark, Sr., Esquire, Stuart A.C. Drake, John Caviness O’Quinn, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Dan Himmelfarb, Stephen Edward Sachs, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC, for Intervenors.
Before: SENTELLE , Chief Judge, and GINSBURG, HENDERSON , ROGERS, TATEL, GARLAND, BROWN , GRIFFITH, and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges.
A statement by Circuit Judge Brown, with whom Chief Judge Sentelle joins, dissenting from the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc is attached.
Circuit Judge Henderson did not participate in this matter.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Petitioners' petition for rehearing en banc, the responses thereto, and the reply were circulated to the full court, and a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges eligible to participate did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that the petition be denied.