Case: Music Center S.N.C. Di Luciano Pisoni & C., Lucien S.N.C. Di Danilo Pisoni & C., and Enzo Pizzi, Inc., plaintiffs v. United States, et al., defendant, and Prestini Musical Instruments Corp., defendant-intervenor
Abbreviation: Music Center S.N.C. Di Luciano Pisoni & C. v. United States
Decision Date: 1993-12-02
Docket Number: Court No. 93-08-00430
Citation: 17 Ct. Int'l Trade 1266
Volume: 17
Reporter: United States Court of International Trade Reports
Court: United States Court of International Trade
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Music Center S.N.C. Di Luciano Pisoni & C., Lucien S.N.C. Di Danilo Pisoni & C., and Enzo Pizzi, Inc., plaintiffs v. United States, et al., defendant, and Prestini Musical Instruments Corp., defendant-intervenor
Judges: 
Pages: 1266–1266

Head Matter:
Music Center S.N.C. Di Luciano Pisoni & C., Lucien S.N.C. Di Danilo Pisoni & C., and Enzo Pizzi, Inc., plaintiffs v. United States, et al., defendant, and Prestini Musical Instruments Corp., defendant-intervenor
Court No. 93-08-00430
(Dated December 2, 1993)

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
Restani, Judge:
This case having been submitted for decision and the Court, after deliberation, having rendered a decision therein; now, in conformity with that decision,
It is hereby ordered: that this action is dismissed as premature. The court has received no evidence to indicate Commerce is not investigating properly the APO violation changes alleged by plaintiff.