Case: Rye Sound Corp. et al. v. United States
Abbreviation: Rye Sound Corp. v. United States
Decision Date: 1969-04-16
Docket Number: C.D. 3787
Citation: 62 Cust. Ct. 412
Volume: 62
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Rye Sound Corp. et al. v. United States
Judges: Before Rao, Ford, and Newman, Judges
Pages: 412–413

Head Matter:
(C.D. 3787)
Rye Sound Corp. et al. v. United States
United States Customs Court, Second Division
(Decided April 16, 1969)
Allerton deO. Tompkins for the plaintiffs.
’William D. Ruckelshaus, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
Before Rao, Ford, and Newman, Judges

Opinion:
Ford, Judge:
The suits listed in schedule "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof, have been submitted on a written stipulation reading as follows:
It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, Defendant, subject to the approval of the Court, that the items marked "A" and initialled JS, JCD, JOB by Import Specialists Joseph Sol-lazzo, John C. Duraccio and J. O'Brien on the invoices covered by the protests listed in the attached Schedule A, which Schedule A is made a part of this stipulation, which were classified under Paragraph 353, Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, T.D. 51802 with duty at 15% ad valorem, consist of earphones which, in fact, are not suitable for controlling, distributing, modifying, producing, or rectifying electrical energy, but which are, in fact, articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, and they are wholly or in chief value of metal. The said earphones are not dedicated to use with radios.
All claims are abandoned except for tbe claim for classification under Paragraph 353 of said Act as articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, and not specially provided for, with duty at 133^% (T.D. 52739), 12%% (T.D. 55615 and T.D. 55649), or 11%% ad valorem (T.D. 55816 and T.D. 55830), the rate being dependent upon the date the merchandise was entered or withdrawn for consumption.
It is further stipulated and agreed that the protests in the attached Schedule A be submitted on this stipulation.
Accepting the foregoing stipulation of facts, we find and hold that the items of merchandise marked "A" and initialed on the invoices by the designated import specialists are properly dutiable as articles in chief value of metal, having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, not specially provided for, at the rate of 13% per centum ad valorem, 12% per centum ad valorem or 11% per centum ad valorem, depending upon date of entry, under the provisions of paragraph 353, Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 52739, T.D. 55615, T.D. 55649, T.D. 55816 and T.D. 55830.
To the extent indicated the specified claim in these suits is sustained; in all other respects and as to all other merchandise all the claims are overruled.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.