Case: Louis Elie Joseph Henry de Galard de Brassac de Bearn, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Pierre de Bearn; Louis Elie Joseph Henry de Galard de Brassac de Bearn, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Francois de Bearn; Louis Elie Joseph Henry de Galard de Brassac de Bearn, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Odon de Bearn; and Louis Elie Joseph Henry de Galard de Brassac de Bearn, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Jean Baptiste Chaumet
Abbreviation: de Bearn v. de Bearn
Decision Date: 1913-12-08
Docket Number: No. 558; No. 559; No. 560; No. 561
Citation: 231 U.S. 741
Volume: 231
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Louis Elie Joseph Henry de Galard de Brassac de Bearn, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Pierre de Bearn; Louis Elie Joseph Henry de Galard de Brassac de Bearn, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Francois de Bearn; Louis Elie Joseph Henry de Galard de Brassac de Bearn, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Odon de Bearn; and Louis Elie Joseph Henry de Galard de Brassac de Bearn, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Jean Baptiste Chaumet.
Judges: 
Pages: 741–742

Head Matter:
No. 558.
Louis Elie Joseph Henry de Galard de Brassac de Bearn, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Pierre de Bearn; Louis Elie Joseph Henry de Galard de Brassac de Bearn, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Francois de Bearn; Louis Elie Joseph Henry de Galard de Brassac de Bearn, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Odon de Bearn; and Louis Elie Joseph Henry de Galard de Brassac de Bearn, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Jean Baptiste Chaumet.
No. 559.
No. 560.
No. 561.
In error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Maryland.'
Motion to dismiss or affirm and for damages submitted November 17, 1913.
Decided December 8, 1913.
Mr. Maurice Leon for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. J. Kemp Bartlett and Mr. Edgar Allan Poe for the defendants in error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. (Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Wood v. Chesborough, 228 U. S. 672; Adams v. Russell, 229 U. S. 358, and authorities there cited; Hamblin v. Western Land Co., 147 U. S. 531; Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102; see De Bearn v. De Bearn, 225 U. S. 695.)