Case: HERHOLD v. UPTON
Abbreviation: Herhold v. Upton
Decision Date: 1876-12-04
Docket Number: No. 125
Citation: 154 U.S. 624
Volume: 154
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: HERHOLD v. UPTON.
Judges: 
Pages: 624–624

Head Matter:
HERHOLD v. UPTON.
ERROE TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 125.
Submitted November 29, 1876.
Decided December 4, 1876.
Upton v. Tribilcock, 91 U. S. 45; Sanger v. Upton, 91 U. S. 56; and Webster v. Upton, 91. U. S. 65, followed.
Mr. E. A. Otis for plaintiff in error.
Mr. L. H. Boutell for defendant in error.

Opinion:
Mr. Chief Justice Waite
delivered the opinion of the court.
The principles decided in Upton v. Tribilcock, 91 U. S. 45; Sanger v. Upton, 91 U. S. 56; and Webster v. Upton, 91 U. S. 65, are conclusive of this case. The judgment of the Circuit Court is, therefore, affirmed upon the authority of those cases. If the stock held by Herhold is part of the increased capital, he is estopped by his acceptance of the certificate from denying the regularity of the proceedings under which the increase was effected. If it is part .of the original stock, his liability exists whether the increase was made or not. In either event the testimony offered to show that he did not sign the assent to the increase of the capital stock, filed with the auditor of public accounts, was immaterial and properly excluded. Affirmed.