Case: WILLIAMS v. CALIFORNIA et al.
Abbreviation: Williams v. California
Decision Date: 1963-04-15
Docket Number: No. 534
Citation: 372 U.S. 713
Volume: 372
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: WILLIAMS v. CALIFORNIA et al.
Judges: Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360.
Pages: 713–713

Head Matter:
WILLIAMS v. CALIFORNIA et al.
No. 534, Misc.
Decided April 15, 1963.
Petitioner pro se.
Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Raymond M. Momboisse, Deputy Attorney General, for respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.
Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360.