Case: Agro Dutch Industries, Ltd., Plaintiff, v. United States, Defendant, and Coalition for Fair Mushroom Trade, Defendant-Intervenor
Abbreviation: Agro Dutch Industries, Ltd. v. United States
Decision Date: 2006
Docket Number: Court No. 04-00493
Citation: 30 Ct. Int'l Trade 1051
Volume: 30
Reporter: United States Court of International Trade Reports
Court: United States Court of International Trade
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Agro Dutch Industries, Ltd., Plaintiff, v. United States, Defendant, and Coalition for Fair Mushroom Trade, Defendant-Intervenor.
Judges: 
Pages: 1051–1051

Head Matter:
Agro Dutch Industries, Ltd., Plaintiff, v. United States, Defendant, and Coalition for Fair Mushroom Trade, Defendant-Intervenor.
Court No. 04-00493

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
MUSGRAVE, Judge:
This matter having been submitted for decision, and the Court having duly deliberated and now concluding that the second Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Remand dated July 19, 2006, in which the defendant explains that the lines of computer programming described in Slip Op. 06-96 (June 23, 2006) accomplishes both a circumstance-of-sale adjustment for differences in commissions pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 351.410(b) as well as the 351.410(e) adjustment at issue (i.e., commissions paid in one market but not the other), are reasonable, and upon all other papers and proceedings, now, therefore, in view of the foregoing, it is hereby
ORDERED that judgment be, and it hereby is, rendered in favor of defendant, and it is further
ORDERED that Certain Preserved Mushrooms From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative.Review, 69 Fed. Reg. 51630 (Aug. 20, 2004), as amended 69 Fed. Reg. 55405 (Sep. 14, 2004) be, and they hereby are, sustained, and it is further
ORDERED that all issues having been decided, this matter is concluded.