Case: Mandel et al. v. En Banc Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit et al; Connolly et al. v. United States District Court for the Central District of California (Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., Real Party in Interest); McClain v. Blumenfeld; and Green v. United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Abbreviation: Mandel v. En Banc Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decision Date: 1980-04-14
Docket Number: No. 79-1028; No. 79-1246; No. 79-6079; No. 79-6110
Citation: 445 U.S. 959
Volume: 445
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Mandel et al. v. En Banc Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit et al; Connolly et al. v. United States District Court for the Central District of California (Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., Real Party in Interest); McClain v. Blumenfeld; and Green v. United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.
Judges: 
Pages: 959–959

Head Matter:
No. 79-1028.
No. 79-1246.
No. 79-6079.
No. 79-6110.
Mandel et al. v. En Banc Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit et al; Connolly et al. v. United States District Court for the Central District of California (Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., Real Party in Interest); McClain v. Blumenfeld; and Green v. United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.

Opinion:
Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of mandamus denied.