Case: McLAUGHLIN v. FOWLER. SAME v. THORPE
Abbreviation: McLaughlin v. Fowler
Decision Date: 1880-12-13
Docket Number: Nos. 94 and 95
Citation: 154 U.S. 663
Volume: 154
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: McLAUGHLIN v. FOWLER. SAME v. THORPE.
Judges: 
Pages: 663–663

Head Matter:
McLAUGHLIN v. FOWLER. SAME v. THORPE.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
Nos. 94 and 95.
Argued December 2, 1880.
Decided December 13, 1880.
In cases brought here from state courts this court can only look beyond the Federal question when that has been decided erroneously.
Mr. Henry Wise Garnett for plaintiff in error.
No appearance for defendants in-error.

Opinion:
Mr. Chief Justice Waite
delivered the opinion of the court.
The only Federal question in these eases is whether the patents to the Western Railroad Company for lands within the limits of the Moquelomnes grant are valid. If that-question was not decided by the court below we have no jurisdiction; if it was, the judgment was right, because in accordance with Newhall v. Sanger, 92 U. S. 761, brought here in 1875 for the determination of the same identical question. Such being the case the judgment must be affirmed. We can only look beyond the Federal question when that has been decided erroneously, and then only to see whether there are any other matters or issues adjudged by the state court sufficiently broad to maintain the judgment, notwithstanding the error in the decision 'of the Federal question. Murdoch v. Memphis, 20 Wall. 591.
The judgment in each of these cases is affirmed on the 'authority of Newhall v. Sanger.