Case: AMPCO PRINTING-ADVERTISERS' OFFSET CORP. et al. v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al.
Abbreviation: Ampco Printing-Advertisers' Offset Corp. v. City of New York
Decision Date: 1964-10-12
Docket Number: No. 152
Citation: 379 U.S. 5
Volume: 379
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: AMPCO PRINTING-ADVERTISERS’ OFFSET CORP. et al. v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 5–5

Head Matter:
AMPCO PRINTING-ADVERTISERS’ OFFSET CORP. et al. v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al.
No. 152.
Decided October 12, 1964.
Harold Riegélman and H. H. Nordlinger for appellants.
Leo A. Larkin, Stanley Buchsbaum and Samuel J. Warms for the City of New York et al., and Louis J. Lef-kowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hir-showitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Gustave Soderberg, Assistant Attorney General, for Lefkowitz, appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.