Case: Appeal of PETER P. HOVELY
Abbreviation: Appeal of Hovely
Decision Date: 1925-10-30
Docket Number: Docket No. 1677
Citation: 2 B.T.A. 1099
Volume: 2
Reporter: Reports of the United States Board of Tax Appeals
Court: United States Board of Tax Appeals
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Appeal of PETER P. HOVELY.
Judges: Before GeattpneR, TRAMmell, and Phillips.
Pages: 1099–1100

Head Matter:
Appeal of PETER P. HOVELY.
Docket No. 1677.
Submitted July 9, 1925.
Decided October 30, 1925.
Raymond R. Hails, Esq., for the taxpayer.
John D. Foley, Esq., for the Commissioner.
Before GeattpneR, TRAMmell, and Phillips.

Opinion:
The taxpayer appeals from the determination of a deficiency of $200.39 in income tax for the calendar years 1918 and 1919. The petition also contains an allegation of error as to an overassessment for 1917, but at the hearing the taxpayer waived that allegation. The deficiencies for 1918 and 1919 arise from the reduction by the Commissioner in the rate of depreciation claimed on a number of buildings.
FINDINGS OF FACT.
1. The taxpayer is an individual and, during the years here involved, resided at Brawley, in the Imperial Valley, Calif.
2. Depreciation rates on buildings of frame construction were claimed in the returns filed and were allowed by the Commissioner as follows:
1918
1919
3. All of the buildings described in the above schedule are of wooden construction throughout. The excessive heat of the Imperial Valley and seasonal changes in temperature cause more or less expansion and contraction and cause shingles to curl and roofs, windows, doors, and frames to warp. The changes in temperature in the locality in which these buildings are located are gradual. Without repairs or replacements the useful life of frame buildings is from 10 to 15 years, but with repairs and replacements the useful life extends over a longer period.
4. The taxpayer's buildings here involved had a remaining useful life from the date he acquired them, as listed below:
DECISION.
The deficiency should be computed in accordance with the above findings of fact. Final determination will be settled on consent or on 15 days' notice, in accordance with Kule 50.