Case: CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY CO. et al. v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD CO. et al.
Abbreviation: Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
Decision Date: 1966-01-24
Docket Number: No. 751
Citation: 382 U.S. 422
Volume: 382
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY CO. et al. v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD CO. et al.
Judges: Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
Pages: 422–422

Head Matter:
CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY CO. et al. v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD CO. et al.
No. 751.
Decided January 24, 1966.
Jordan Jay Hillman, Bryce L. Hamilton and John C. Danielson for appellants in No. 751. Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodman for appellant in No. 752.
Eldon Martin, Robert J. Cooney, Frank S. Farrell, Robert G. Gehrs, William P. Higgins, Curtis H. Berg, John H, Bishop, Louis E. Torinus, Jr., and Paul M. Sand for appellees in both cases.
Together with No. 752, Interstate Commerce Commission v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. et al., also on appeal from the same court.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.