Case: Cox, Administrator v. Hecker et al.; Chatsworth Cooperative Marketing Association et al. v. Interstate Commerce Commission; Kanarek v. United States; Baltimore Transit Co. et al. v. Maryland for the use of Geils et al.; Boineau et al. v. Thornton, Secretary of State of South Carolina, et al.; De Paunto, alias Lipscomb v. Michigan; Binz v. Helvetia Florida Enterprises, Inc.; Welsh v. State Medical Board of Ohio
Abbreviation: Cox v. Hecker
Decision Date: 1964-11-16
Docket Number: No. 146; No. 244; No. 280; No. 330; No. 483; No. 166; No. 181; No. 245
Citation: 379 U.S. 917
Volume: 379
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Cox, Administrator v. Hecker et al., Chatsworth Cooperative Marketing Association et al. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, Kanarek v. United States, Baltimore Transit Co. et al. v. Maryland for the use of Geils et al., Boineau et al. v. Thornton, Secretary of State of South Carolina, et al., De Paunto, alias Lipscomb v. Michigan, Binz v. Helvetia Florida Enterprises, Inc., Welsh v. State Medical Board of Ohio,
Judges: 
Pages: 917–917

Head Matter:
No. 146.
No. 244.
No. 280.
No. 330.
No. 483.
No. 166,
No. 181,
No. 245,
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Cox, Administrator v. Hecker et al., Chatsworth Cooperative Marketing Association et al. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, Kanarek v. United States, Baltimore Transit Co. et al. v. Maryland for the use of Geils et al., Boineau et al. v. Thornton, Secretary of State of South Carolina, et al., De Paunto, alias Lipscomb v. Michigan, Binz v. Helvetia Florida Enterprises, Inc., Welsh v. State Medical Board of Ohio,

Opinion:
ante, p. 823;
ante, p. 835;
ante, p. 838;
ante, p. 842;
ante, p. 15;
ante, p. 860.
ante, p. 12; and
ante, p. 864. Petitions for rehearing denied.