Case: F. P. Seekatz, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Medina Valley Irrigation Company et al.
Abbreviation: Seekatz v. Medina Valley Irrigation Co.
Decision Date: 1916-03-20
Docket Number: No. 294
Citation: 241 U.S. 646
Volume: 241
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: F. P. Seekatz, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Medina Valley Irrigation Company et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 646–647

Head Matter:
No. 294.
F. P. Seekatz, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Medina Valley Irrigation Company et al.
In error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas..
Argued for the plaintiff in error and submitted for the defendant in error March 15 and 16, 1916.
Decided March 20, 1916.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137; Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce, 235 U. S. 380; (2) Mississippi & Red River Boom Co. v. Patterson, 98 U. S. 403; Madisonville Traction Co. v. St. Bernard Mining Co., 196 U. S. 239; Mason City &c. Railroad v. Boynton, 204 U. S. 570; (3) Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. v. Chicago, 166 U. S. 226, 244-245; Bauman v. Ross, 167 U. S. 548, 593; Backus v. Fort Street Depot Co., 169 U. S. 557, 569; (4) Fallbrook Irrigation District v. Bradley, 164 U. S. 112; Hairston v. Danville & Western Ry., 208 U. S. 598; O'Neill v. Leamer, 239 U. S. 244, 253-254.
Mr. C. L. Bass, Mr. T. T. VanderHoeven and Mr. Joseph W. Bailey for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Floyd McGown for the defendant in error.