Case: Molina v. United States; Crowley Maritime Corp. et al. v. Zipfel et al.; Halliburton Co. et al. v. Zipfel et al.; In re Sowell; Spiegel v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Company of Chicago et al.; Morris v. Compagnie Maritime des Chargeurs Reunis, S. A., et al.; Fitzgerald v. Montana Department of Family Services et al.; Bell, Individually and dba Wes Outdoor Advertising Co. v. New Jersey et al.; Rose v. Texas; Hyslep et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; Roberts v. Roberts; Fisher v. Oklahoma; Kyles v. Louisiana; Gardner v. North Carolina; Knox v. Texas; Levert v. Estelle, Warden, et al.; Miranda v. California; May v. Pro-Guard, Inc.; Williams v. Planned Parenthood Federation of America et al.; Trotz, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Trotz v. Lawruk et al., t/a Penn Alto Hotel; Spencer v. Illinois; Trotz v. Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Board of Review; Foster v. Illinois; Waters v. Neubert et al.; Johnson v. Illinois; McGee v. Randall Division of Textron, Inc., of Grenada, Mississippi; Flores et al. v. Municipality of Carolina
Abbreviation: Molina v. United States
Decision Date: 1988-08-04
Docket Number: No. 87-1122; No. 87-1391; No. 87-1251; No. 87-1492; No. 87-1523; No. 87-1582; No. 87-1601; No. 87-1694; No. 87-1820; No. 87-5425; No. 87-6008; No. 87-6096; No. 87-6196; No. 87-6365; No. 87-6486; No. 87-6746; No. 87-6816; No. 87-6817; No. 87-6863; No. 87-6864; No. 87-6875; No. 87-6905; No. 87-6912; No. 87-6926; No. 87-6959; No. 87-7017
Citation: 487 U.S. 1245
Volume: 487
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Molina v. United States, Crowley Maritime Corp. et al. v. Zipfel et al., Halliburton Co. et al. v. Zipfel et al., In re Sowell, Spiegel v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Company of Chicago et al., Morris v. Compagnie Maritime des Chargeurs Reunis, S. A., et al., Fitzgerald v. Montana Department of Family Services et al., Bell, Individually and dba Wes Outdoor Advertising Co. v. New Jersey et al., Rose v. Texas, Hyslep et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Roberts v. Roberts, Fisher v. Oklahoma, Kyles v. Louisiana, Gardner v. North Carolina, Knox v. Texas, Levert v. Estelle, Warden, et al., Miranda v. California, May v. Pro-Guard, Inc., Williams v. Planned Parenthood Federation of America et al., Trotz, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Trotz v. Lawruk et al., t/a Penn Alto Hotel, Spencer v. Illinois, Trotz v. Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Foster v. Illinois, Waters v. Neubert et al., Johnson v. Illinois, McGee v. Randall Division of Textron, Inc., of Grenada, Mississippi, Flores et al. v. Municipality of Carolina,
Judges: 
Pages: 1245–1246

Head Matter:
August 4, 1988
No.-.
No. 87-1122.
No. 87-1391.
No. 87-1251.
No. 87-1492.
No. 87-1523.
No. 87-1582.
No. 87-1601.
Molina v. United States, Crowley Maritime Corp. et al. v. Zipfel et al., Halliburton Co. et al. v. Zipfel et al., In re Sowell, Spiegel v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Company of Chicago et al., Morris v. Compagnie Maritime des Chargeurs Reunis, S. A., et al., Fitzgerald v. Montana Department of Family Services et al., Bell, Individually and dba Wes Outdoor Advertising Co. v. New Jersey et al., Rose v. Texas, Hyslep et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Roberts v. Roberts, Fisher v. Oklahoma, Kyles v. Louisiana, Gardner v. North Carolina, Knox v. Texas, Levert v. Estelle, Warden, et al., Miranda v. California, May v. Pro-Guard, Inc., Williams v. Planned Parenthood Federation of America et al., Trotz, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Trotz v. Lawruk et al., t/a Penn Alto Hotel, Spencer v. Illinois, Trotz v. Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Foster v. Illinois, Waters v. Neubert et al., Johnson v. Illinois, McGee v. Randall Division of Textron, Inc., of Grenada, Mississippi, Flores et al. v. Municipality of Carolina,

Opinion:
ante, p. 1214;
486 U. S. 1054;
486 U. S. 1054;
484 U. S. 1057;
485 U. S. 1009;
485 U. S. 1022;
ante, p. 1201;
486 U. S. 1001;
No. 87-1694.
No. 87-1820.
No. 87-5425.
No. 87-6008.
No. 87-6096.
No. 87-6196.
No. 87-6365.
No. 87-6486.
No. 87-6746.
No. 87-6816.
No. 87-6817.
No. 87-6863.
No. 87-6864.
No. 87-6875.
No. 87-6905.
No. 87-6912.
No. 87-6926.
No. 87-6959.
No. 87-7017.
486 U. S. 1055;
486 U. S. 1044;
485 U. S. 963;
486 U. S. 1061;
486 U. S. 1027;
486 U. S. 1061;
486 U.. S. 1061;
ante, p. 1207;
486 U. S. 1038;
486 U. S. 1045;
486 U. S. 1047;
ante, p. 1220;
ante, p. 1208;
ante, p. 1208;
486 U. S. 1047;
ante, p. 1209;
486 U. S. 1047;
ante, p. 1209; and
ante, p. 1239. Petitions for rehearing denied.