Case: BOWN v. WALLING
Abbreviation: Bown v. Walling
Decision Date: 1907-02-04
Docket Number: No. 81
Citation: 204 U.S. 320
Volume: 204
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: BOWN v. WALLING.
Judges: -.Me. Justice Brewer and-Mr. Justice Peckham dissent.
Pages: 320–321

Head Matter:
BOWN v. WALLING.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHOl
No. 81.
Argued January 10, 1907.
Decided February 4, 1907.
Decided on authority of Bacon v. Walker, ante, p: 311.
9 Idaho, 740, affirmed.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Mr. S. M. Stockdager, with whom Mr. W. E. Borah, Mr. Frank T. Wyman and' Mr. John C. Rice were on the brief, for plaintiff -in error.
There was no appearance or brief filed for defendant in error.,
For abstract óf argument see ante, p. 312.

Opinion:
Mr. Justice McKenna
delivered the- opinion of the court.
This action was brought in the Probate Court in. and for Elmore County, State of Idaho', 'for the sum of two hundred dollars' damages sustained by defendant in error by the violation by plaintiffs in error of sections 1210, 1211 of the Revised Statutes' of Idaho. The amended complaint alleged that the offense was committed by plaintiffs,in error by wrongfully' and negligently permitting and allowing their sheep to -graze within two miles of the 'dwelling house of defendant in error and upon the Government-, lands around his premises. The defense, set .up' by demurrer, was, as iri Bacon v. Walker, ante, p. 311, that those sections were void,under the due.process and equality clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. The trial couft rendered judgment for' the defendant in error, which was affirmed by the District Court for Elmore County and by the Supreme Court of the State. 9 Idaho, 740.
The case was argued with Bacon v. Walker et al., and on the authority of that case the judgment is
Affirmed.
-.Me. Justice Brewer and-Mr. Justice Peckham dissent.