Case: Hutto et al. v. Finney et al.; Rakas et al. v. Illinois; King v. Norris; Tracy, Judge v. Dixon et al.; Mosley v. United States Department of Labor et al.; Ford v. Muir, U. S. District Judge, et al.; Alderman v. Georgia; Rogers v. Douglas et ux.
Abbreviation: Hutto v. Finney
Decision Date: 1979-01-15
Docket Number: No. 76-1660; No. 77-5781; No. 78-173; No. 78-513; No. 78-5317; No. 78-5388; No. 78-5490; No. 78-5582
Citation: 439 U.S. 1122
Volume: 439
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Hutto et al. v. Finney et al., Rakas et al. v. Illinois, King v. Norris, Tracy, Judge v. Dixon et al., Mosley v. United States Department of Labor et al., Ford v. Muir, U. S. District Judge, et al., Alderman v. Georgia, Rogers v. Douglas et ux.,
Judges: 
Pages: 1122–1122

Head Matter:
No. 76-1660.
No. 77-5781.
No. 78-173.
No. 78-513.
No. 78-5317.
No. 78-5388.
No. 78-5490.
No. 78-5582.
Hutto et al. v. Finney et al., Rakas et al. v. Illinois, King v. Norris, Tracy, Judge v. Dixon et al., Mosley v. United States Department of Labor et al., Ford v. Muir, U. S. District Judge, et al., Alderman v. Georgia, Rogers v. Douglas et ux.,

Opinion:
437 U. S. 678;
ante, p. 128;
ante, p. 995;
ante, p. 983;
ante, p. 986;
ante, p. 978;
ante, p. 991; and
ante, p. 1058. Petitions for rehearing denied.