Case: James T. MARTIN, Jr. v. D.C. METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.
Abbreviation: Martin v. D.C. Metropolitan Police Department
Decision Date: 1987-05-08
Docket Number: Nos. 85-6071, 85-6072
Citation: 260 U.S. App. D.C. 37
Volume: 260
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Parties: James T. MARTIN, Jr. v. D.C. METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.
Judges: Before WALD, Chief Judge, and ROBINSON, MIKVA, EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG, BORK, STARR, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS and DOUGLAS H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judges.
Pages: 37–37

Head Matter:
817 F.2d 144
James T. MARTIN, Jr. v. D.C. METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.
Nos. 85-6071, 85-6072.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
May 8, 1987.
En Banc Order Vacated and Section IV and Dissenting Opinion Reinstated July 31,1987.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied July 31,1987.
Before WALD, Chief Judge, and ROBINSON, MIKVA, EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG, BORK, STARR, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS and DOUGLAS H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellants' suggestion for rehearing en banc has been circulated to the full Court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the Court in regular, active service voted in favor of the suggestion. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that appellants' suggestion for rehearing en banc is granted and these cases will be reheard by the Court sitting en banc on the issue presented by appellants in their suggestion. It is
FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that Section IV of the opinion of February 10, 1987 and the dissenting opinion, be, and the same hereby are, vacated. Except for Sections I, II and III of the majority opinion, all opinions are hereby withdrawn from all future publication.
A future order will govern further proceedings herein.