Case: Chas. H. Asche & Co., Inc. v. United States
Abbreviation: Chas. H. Asche & Co. v. United States
Decision Date: 1947-01-21
Docket Number: No. 6779; Entry No. 769670
Citation: 18 Cust. Ct. 320
Volume: 18
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Chas. H. Asche & Co., Inc. v. United States
Judges: 
Pages: 320–321

Head Matter:
Chas. H. Asche & Co., Inc. v. United States
No. 6779.
Entry No. 769670.
Invoice dated Nottingham, England, May 16, 1946.
Certified May 17, 1946.
Entered at New York, N. Y., June 19, 1946.
(Decided January 21, 1947)
Strauss & Hedges (Hadley S. King of counsel) for the plaintiff.
Paid P. Bao, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Opinion:
Tilson, Judge:
This appeal involves the question of whether or not a so-called British purchase tax should be included as a part of the dutiable values of the merchandise. In United States v. Pitcairn, C. A. D. 334, our appellate court, in affirming a decision of this court, held that this so-called tax should not be included as a part of the dutiable values.
In submitting this appeal for decision, counsel for the parties have agreed that the issues involved herein are similar in all material respects to the issues involved in United States v. Pitcairn, supra, and the record in that case has been admitted in evidence in this case.
Upon the agreed facts and the law applicable thereto, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise covered by this appeal to be the values found by the appraiser, less any additions made by the importer on entry to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.