Case: George M. Wright, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent
Abbreviation: Wright v. Commissioner
Decision Date: 1929-12-11
Docket Number: Docket No. 24851
Citation: 18 B.T.A. 471
Volume: 18
Reporter: Reports of the United States Board of Tax Appeals
Court: United States Board of Tax Appeals
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: George M. Wright, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.
Judges: Tkammell agrees with this dissent.
Pages: 471–474

Head Matter:
George M. Wright, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.
Docket No. 24851.
Promulgated December 11, 1929.
O. G. Maxwell, Esq., for the petitioner.
T. M. Mather, Esq., for the respondent.

Opinion:
OFINIOH.
ARTjndell:
The only question to be determined in this proceeding is whether there was a closed transaction in 1922 with respect to 131 shares of stock in the American Hominy Co. which petitioner surrendered in that year to the bankers of the company, and which in turn the bankers paid over to a new company manager of their selection. If the stock had been merely surrendered to the company so that the proportionate representation of stockholders re mained the same, a different question would be presented (see Edith Scoville, 18 B. T. A. 261), but it is clear from the stipulated facts that such was not the case, the stock being released to the bankers and by them turned over to the new manager, who became the majority stockholder, and the petitioner definitely parted with 181 shares of stock which cost him $13,100, and which had a value of that amount on March 1, 1913. We are of opinion petitioner is entitled to the loss claimed.
Reviewed by the Board.
Judgment will be entered under Rule 50.