Case: In re Dolenz; In re Liffiton; In re Rodriguez; In re Mason; In re Gouge; In re Lake; In re Bauer; In re Miller; In re Gaydos; In re Ellis; In re Anderson; In re Meyers; In re Jackson; In re Anderson; In re Raitport; In re Mothershed; In re Miller; In re Miller; and In re Johnson
Abbreviation: In re Dolenz
Decision Date: 1992-10-05
Docket Number: No. 91-1858; No. 91-7975; No. 91-8254; No. 91-8438; No. 91-8471; No. 91-8488; No. 91-8495; No. 91-8505; No. 91-8525; No. 91-8573; No. 91-8619; No. 91-8653; No. 91-8732; No. 92-59; No. 92-154; No. 92-230; No. 92-5072; No. 92-5147; No. 92-5629
Citation: 506 U.S. 812
Volume: 506
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: In re Dolenz; In re Liffiton; In re Rodriguez; In re Mason; In re Gouge; In re Lake; In re Bauer; In re Miller; In re Gaydos; In re Ellis; In re Anderson; In re Meyers; In re Jackson; In re Anderson; In re Raitport; In re Mothershed; In re Miller; In re Miller; and In re Johnson.
Judges: 
Pages: 812–812

Head Matter:
No. 91-1858.
No. 91-7975.
No. 91-8254.
No. 91-8438.
No. 91-8471.
No. 91-8488.
No. 91-8495.
No. 91-8505.
No. 91-8525.
No. 91-8573.
No. 91-8619.
No. 91-8653.
No. 91-8732.
No. 92-59.
No. 92-154.
No. 92-230.
No. 92-5072.
No. 92-5147.
No. 92-5629.
In re Dolenz; In re Liffiton; In re Rodriguez; In re Mason; In re Gouge; In re Lake; In re Bauer; In re Miller; In re Gaydos; In re Ellis; In re Anderson; In re Meyers; In re Jackson; In re Anderson; In re Raitport; In re Mothershed; In re Miller; In re Miller; and In re Johnson.

Opinion:
Petitions for writs of mandamus denied.