Case: George Briscoe and others, plaintiffs in error v. The Commonwealth's Bank of the State of Kentucky; The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, plaintiffs v. George Miln; George Briscoe and others, plaintiffs in error v. The Commonwealth's Bank of the State of Kentucky; The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, plaintiffs v. George Miln
Abbreviation: Briscoe v. Commonwealth's Bank of Kentucky
Decision Date: 1834-01
Docket Number: 
Citation: 8 Pet. 118
Volume: 33
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: George Briscoe and others, plaintiffs in error v. The Commonwealth’s Bank of the State of Kentucky. The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, plaintiffs v. George Miln. George Briscoe and others, plaintiffs in error v. The Commonwealth’s Bank of the State of Kentucky. The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, plaintiffs v George Miln.
Judges: 
Pages: 118–122

Head Matter:
George Briscoe and others, plaintiffs in error v. The Commonwealth’s Bank of the State of Kentucky. The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, plaintiffs v. George Miln. George Briscoe and others, plaintiffs in error v. The Commonwealth’s Bank of the State of Kentucky. The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, plaintiffs v George Miln.
The case was argued by Mr White and Mr Wilde, for the plaintiffs in error; and by Mr Hardin and Mr Bibb, for the defendant.
The case was argued by Mr Ogden, for the plaintiffs; and by Mr Jones, for the defendants.

Opinion:
Mr Chief Justice Marshall
delivered the opinion of the Court in this and the preceding case.
The practice of this court is, not (except in cases of absolute necessity) to deliver any judgment in cases where constitutional questions are involved, unless four judges concur in opinion, thus making the decision that of a majority of the whole coui;t. In the present cases four judges do not concur in opinion as to the constitutional questions which have been argued. The court therefore direct these cases to be reargued at the next term, under tihev expectation that a larger number Of the judges may then heqpresent.
Note. Mr Justice Johnson and Mr Justice Duvall were absent when these cases were argued.