Case: THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION, v. THE UNITED STATES; CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, v. THE UNITED STATES
Abbreviation: Pennsylvania Railroad v. United States
Decision Date: 1952-11-04
Docket Number: No. 52-52; No. 198-52
Citation: 123 Ct. Cl. 529
Volume: 123
Reporter: United States Court of Claims Reports
Court: United States Court of Claims
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION, v. THE UNITED STATES CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, v. THE UNITED STATES
Judges: 
Pages: 529–529

Head Matter:
THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION, v. THE UNITED STATES CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, v. THE UNITED STATES
[No. 52-52]
[No. 198-52]
[Decided November 4, 1952.]
In No. 52-52 for plaintiff Mr. Hugh B. Cox.
For defendant Mr. John I. Heise, Jr., with whom was Mr. Assistant Attorney General Holmes Baldridge.
In No. 198-52 for plaintiff Mr. Richard A. Whiting. Messrs. Stephen Ailes, William E. Miller, and Sieptoe <%¡ Johnson were on the brief.
For defendant Mr. Paris T. Houston, with whom was Mr. Assistant Attorney General Holmes Baldrigde.

Opinion:
Per Curiam :
The pleadings and the issue here presented are identical with those in the case of Atchison, Topeka and Sarita Fe Railway Company v. United States, 121 C. Cls. 467. For the reasons therein stated plaintiffs' motions for summary judgment, to the extent that they ask for an adjudication that the jeeps involved in this action should be classified and rated as passenger motor vehicles, are granted.
Entry of judgment is suspended pending the filing of a report by the General Accounting Office and the disposition of the issues relating to the proper amount to be paid to plaintiff for the transportation services involved.
It is so ordered.