Case: The Durst Manufacturing Co., Inc., et al. v. United States; Globe Importing Company v. United States; Globe Importing Company v. United States; The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc., et al. v. United States; Globe Importing Company v. United States
Abbreviation: Durst Manufacturing Co. v. United States
Decision Date: 1967-02-27
Docket Number: No. P67/48; protests 322461-K, etc. (New York); No. P67/49; protests 324444-K, etc. (New York); No. P67/50; protests 58/22050, etc. (New York); No. P67/51; protests 59/30307, etc. (New York); No. P67/52; protests 61/16211, etc. (New York)
Citation: 58 Cust. Ct. 868
Volume: 58
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: The Durst Manufacturing Co., Inc., et al. v. United States,
Judges: 
Pages: 868–868

Head Matter:
BEFORE THE SECOND DIVISION,
February 27, 1967
No. P67/48.
No. P67/49.
No. P67/50.
No. P67/51.
No. P67/52.
The Durst Manufacturing Co., Inc., et al. v. United States,
protests 322461-K, etc. (New York).
Globe Importing Company v. United States,
protests 324444-K, etc. (New York).
Globe Importing Company v. United States,
protests 58/22050, etc. (New York).
The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc., et al. v. United States,
protests 59/30307, etc. (New York).
Globe Importing Company v. United States,
protests 61/16211, etc. (New York).

Opinion:
Ford, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of strainers in chief value of brass similar in all material respects to those the subject of Davies Turner & Company v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 488, Abstract 69651), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.