Case: Goldwitz v. Chauvin International Ltd.; Glover v. Leonardo, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility; Sceifers v. Trigg, Superintendent, Indiana Youth Center; Keles v. New York University et al.; Touron v. Metropolitan Dade County et al.; Thompson v. United States et al.; Johnson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; Mallory v. Gilmore et al.; Jenkins v. Maqueen et al.; Binnick v. Lancaster County Personnel Board et al.; Brannson v. Ely, Judge, Circuit Court of Missouri, Jackson County, et al.; Tsimbidaros v. Department of Justice et al.; Lazo v. United States; McAdams v. Ohio; Felder v. Montague, Clerk, United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; Yurtis v. Phipps; Ballard v. Holland, Warden; Penry v. Texas; Kelley v. Maryland et al.; Jenkins v. Kansas et al.; Vincent v. C & P Telephone Co. et al.; Reemsnyder v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration et al.; Jenkins v. Burtzloff et al.; Gupman et ux. v. Agribank, FCB, et al.; Shafer v. City and County of Denver; In re Land, In re Smith, Richards v. Woods, Director of Classification, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division; Spearman v. Morales, Attorney General of Texas, et al.; Cross v. United States, In re Camyn
Abbreviation: Goldwitz v. Chauvin International Ltd.
Decision Date: 1996-01-08
Docket Number: No. 94-9219; No. 94-9341; No. 94-9740; No. 95-367; No. 95-517; No. 95-558; No. 95-5235; No. 95-5427; No. 95-5496; No. 95-5537; No. 95-5605; No. 95-5701; No. 95-5763; No. 95-5780; No. 95-5804; No. 95-5851; No. 95-5889; No. 95-5897; No. 95-5934; No. 95-5945; No. 95-5974; No. 95-5986; No. 95-6014; No. 95-6032; No. 95-6037; No. 95-6048; No. 95-6079; No. 95-6114; No. 95-6159; No. 95-6213; No. 95-6392
Citation: 516 U.S. 1068
Volume: 516
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Goldwitz v. Chauvin International Ltd., Glover v. Leonardo, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Sceifers v. Trigg, Superintendent, Indiana Youth Center, Keles v. New York University et al., Touron v. Metropolitan Dade County et al., Thompson v. United States et al., Johnson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Mallory v. Gilmore et al., Jenkins v. Maqueen et al., Binnick v. Lancaster County Personnel Board et al., Brannson v. Ely, Judge, Circuit Court of Missouri, Jackson County, et al., Tsimbidaros v. Department of Justice et al., Lazo v. United States, McAdams v. Ohio, Felder v. Montague, Clerk, United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, Yurtis v. Phipps, Ballard v. Holland, Warden, Penry v. Texas, Kelley v. Maryland et al., Jenkins v. Kansas et al., Vincent v. C & P Telephone Co. et al., Reemsnyder v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration et al., Jenkins v. Burtzloff et al., Gupman et ux. v. Agribank, FCB, et al., Shafer v. City and County of Denver, In re Land, In re Smith, Richards v. Woods, Director of Classification, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Spearman v. Morales, Attorney General of Texas, et al., Cross v. United States, In re Camyn,
Judges: 
Pages: 1068–1069

Head Matter:
No. 94-9219.
No. 94-9341.
No. 94-9740.
No. 95-367.
No. 95-517.
No. 95-558.
No. 95-5235.
Goldwitz v. Chauvin International Ltd., Glover v. Leonardo, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Sceifers v. Trigg, Superintendent, Indiana Youth Center, Keles v. New York University et al., Touron v. Metropolitan Dade County et al., Thompson v. United States et al., Johnson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Mallory v. Gilmore et al., Jenkins v. Maqueen et al., Binnick v. Lancaster County Personnel Board et al., Brannson v. Ely, Judge, Circuit Court of Missouri, Jackson County, et al., Tsimbidaros v. Department of Justice et al., Lazo v. United States, McAdams v. Ohio, Felder v. Montague, Clerk, United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, Yurtis v. Phipps, Ballard v. Holland, Warden, Penry v. Texas, Kelley v. Maryland et al., Jenkins v. Kansas et al., Vincent v. C & P Telephone Co. et al., Reemsnyder v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration et al., Jenkins v. Burtzloff et al., Gupman et ux. v. Agribank, FCB, et al., Shafer v. City and County of Denver, In re Land, In re Smith, Richards v. Woods, Director of Classification, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Spearman v. Morales, Attorney General of Texas, et al., Cross v. United States, In re Camyn,

Opinion:
ante, p. 828;
ante, p. 831;
ante, p. 853;
ante, p. 943;
ante, p. 945;
ante, p. 976;
ante, p. 884;
No. 95-5427.
No. 95-5496.
No. 95-5537.
No. 95-5605.
No. 95-5701.
No. 95-5763.
No. 95-5780.
No. 95-5804.
No. 95-5851.
No. 95-5889.
No. 95-5897.
No. 95-5934.
No. 95-5945.
No. 95-5974.
No. 95-5986.
No. 95-6014.
No. 95-6032.
No. 95-6037.
No. 95-6048.
No. 95-6079.
No. 95-6114.
No. 95-6159.
No. 95-6213.
No. 95-6392.
ante, p. 895;
ante, p. 919;
ante, p. 920;
ante, p. 933;
ante, p. 922;
ante, p. 923;
ante, p. 948;
ante, p. 965;
ante, p. 965;
ante, p. 966;
ante, p. 977;
ante, p. 977;
ante, p. 977;
ante, p. 978;
ante, p. 967;
ante, p. 979;
ante, p. 979;
ante, p. 979;
ante, p. 929;
ante, p. 973;
ante, p. 968;
ante, p. 995;
ante, p. 955; and
ante, p. 963. Petitions for rehearing denied.