Case: WISCONSIN et al. v. MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO.
Abbreviation: Wisconsin v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
Decision Date: 1940-12-16
Docket Number: No. 48
Citation: 311 U.S. 452
Volume: 311
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: WISCONSIN et al. v. MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO.
Judges: The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice McReynolds, Mr. Justice Roberts, and Mr. Justice Reed dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in Wisconsin v. J. C. Penney Co., ante, p. 446.
Pages: 452–453

Head Matter:
WISCONSIN et al. v. MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO.
No. 48.
Argued November 20, 1940.
Decided December 16, 1940.
Messrs. Harold H. Persons, Assistant Attorney General of Wisconsin, and James Ward Rector, Deputy Attorney General, with whom Mr. John E. Martin, Attorney General, was on the brief, for petitioners,
Mr. John L. Connolly, with whom Messrs. Frederick J. Miller and G, Burgess Ela were on the brief, for respondent.

Opinion:
Mr. Justice Frankfurter
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This case, involving another application of the Wisconsin Privilege Dividend Tax considered in Wisconsin v. J. C. Penney Co., ante, p. 435, is governed by that decision except for a contention made by this respondent but not pressed here in Penney1's case.
The Commerce Clause is invoked. Büt it is too late in the day to find offense to that Clause because a state tax is imposed on corporate net income of an interstate enterprise which is attributable to earnings within the taxing state, Matson Navigation Co. v. State Board, 297 U. S. 441. That liability for such a tax is made con-, tingent upon later happenings, as in the circumstances of the present case, makes no difference.
Reversed.
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice McReynolds, Mr. Justice Roberts, and Mr. Justice Reed dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in Wisconsin v. J. C. Penney Co., ante, p. 446.