Case: NORTH CAROLINA MINING COMPANY v. WESTFELDT
Abbreviation: North Carolina Mining Co. v. Westfeldt
Decision Date: 1909-11-15
Docket Number: No. 580
Citation: 215 U.S. 586
Volume: 215
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: NORTH CAROLINA MINING COMPANY v. WESTFELDT.
Judges: 
Pages: 586–587

Head Matter:
NORTH CAROLINA MINING COMPANY v. WESTFELDT.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OR APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT.
No. 580.
Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted November 8, 1909.
Decided November 15, 1909.
An appeal from the Circuit Court of Appeals (166 Fed. Rep. 706) dismissed for want of jurisdiction on the authority of prior decisions.
Cause below heard before Fuller, Circuit Justice, and Morris and Brawley, District Judges, composing the court, and decree rendered January. 12, 1909, 166 Fed. Rep. 706; petition for rehearing denied February 4, 1909; application for certiorari denied April 19, 1909, 214 U. S. 516; application to the Circuit Court of Appeals, Waddill, McDowell and Keller, District Judges, sitting, for allowance of appeal denied May 13, 1909; appeal granted June 12, 1909, by Goff, Circuit Judged and motion to set aside that order denied August 21, 1909/ Goff, Circuit Judge, stating: “I find myself impelled to the conclusion that the disposition by the Supreme Court of a motion to dismiss said appeal, will under the circumstances now' existing best protect the interests of all the parties hereto, and .will also settle a question of practice concerning which there is at this time doubt and confusion.”
Mr. Joseph J. Hooker, Mr. James H. Merrimon, Mr. Hannis Taylor and Mr. Charles A. Moore for the appellant.
Mr. Julius C. Martin^Mr. Alfred S. Barnard and Mr. F. A. Sondley for the appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Macfadden v. United States, 213 U. S. 288; Greeley v. Lowe, 155 U. S. 58; In re Winn, 213 U. S. 458; In re Moore, 209 U. S. 490.