Case: Timken Co., plaintiff v. United States, defendant, and NTN Bearing Corp. of America, American NTN Bearing Manufacturing Corp., NTN Corp., Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd., Koyo Corp. of U.S.A., NSK Ltd., and NSK Corp., defendant-intervenors
Abbreviation: Timken Co. v. United States
Decision Date: 1996-07-25
Docket Number: Court No. 92-03-00161
Citation: 20 Ct. Int'l Trade 894
Volume: 20
Reporter: United States Court of International Trade Reports
Court: United States Court of International Trade
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Timken Co., plaintiff v. United States, defendant, and NTN Bearing Corp. of America, American NTN Bearing Manufacturing Corp., NTN Corp., Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd., Koyo Corp. of U.S.A., NSK Ltd., and NSK Corp., defendant-intervenors
Judges: 
Pages: 894–894

Head Matter:
Timken Co., plaintiff v. United States, defendant, and NTN Bearing Corp. of America, American NTN Bearing Manufacturing Corp., NTN Corp., Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd., Koyo Corp. of U.S.A., NSK Ltd., and NSK Corp., defendant-intervenors
Court No. 92-03-00161
(Dated July 25, 1996)

Opinion:
ORDER
AQUILINO, Judge:
On April 19, 1996, this Court remanded to the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration ("Commerce"), one issue arising from the final results of Commerce's 1989-90 administrative review, entitled Tapered Roller Bearings, and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, From Japan; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 57 Fed. Reg. 4,960 (Feb. 11, 1992).
On June 18, 1996, Commerce, in compliance with this Court's remand order to recalculate the final dumping margins for Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. and Koyo Corporation of U.S.A. by using a tax-neutral value added tax adjustment methodology which utilizes the amount of foreign tax, rather than the tax rate, filed its Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, The Timken Company v. United States, Slip Op. 96-70 (April 19,1996) ("Remand Results"), with this Court.
Commerce having complied with this Court's remand order, it is hereby
Ordered that the Remand Results are affirmed, and it is further
Ordered that this case is dismissed.