Case: Republic Steel Corporation, Inland Steel Company, Jones & Laughlin Steel Incorporated, National Steel Corporation, and Cyclops Corporation, plaintiffs v. United States of America, United States Department of Commerce, Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary of Commerce, Lionel H. Olmer, Undersecretary for International Trade, Lawrence J. Brady, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, and Gary N. Horlick, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, defendants
Abbreviation: Republic Steel Corp. v. United States
Decision Date: 1983-01-06
Docket Number: Court No. 82-2-00207
Citation: 5 Ct. Int'l Trade 1
Volume: 5
Reporter: United States Court of International Trade Reports
Court: United States Court of International Trade
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Republic Steel Corporation, Inland Steel Company, Jones & Laughlin Steel Incorporated, National Steel Corporation, and Cyclops Corporation, plaintiffs v. United States of America, United States Department of Commerce, Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary of Commerce, Lionel H. Olmer, Undersecretary for International Trade, Lawrence J. Brady, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, and Gary N. Horlick, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, defendants
Judges: Before Watson, Judge.
Pages: 1–1

Head Matter:
Republic Steel Corporation, Inland Steel Company, Jones & Laughlin Steel Incorporated, National Steel Corporation, and Cyclops Corporation, plaintiffs v. United States of America, United States Department of Commerce, Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary of Commerce, Lionel H. Olmer, Undersecretary for International Trade, Lawrence J. Brady, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, and Gary N. Horlick, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, defendants
Court No. 82-2-00207
Before Watson, Judge.
(Dated January 6, 1983)

Opinion:
Order
Watson, Judge.
Pursuant to the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Appeal 82-34, the judgment of this Court in 3 CIT 117 is hereby vacated and the action dismissed on grounds of mootness.