Case: Royal Syndicate, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent
Abbreviation: Royal Syndicate v. Commissioner
Decision Date: 1930-07-18
Docket Number: Docket Nos. 37374, 39101, 40685
Citation: 20 B.T.A. 255
Volume: 20
Reporter: Reports of the United States Board of Tax Appeals
Court: United States Board of Tax Appeals
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Royal Syndicate, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.
Judges: 
Pages: 255–258

Head Matter:
Royal Syndicate, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.
Docket Nos. 37374, 39101, 40685.
Promulgated July 18, 1930.
Albert A. Jones, Esq., for the petitioner.
F. R. Shearer, Esq., for the respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION.
Smith :
The petitioner contends that it was not, during the taxable years involved, an association taxable as a corporation as determined by respondent, but that it was a partnership, the income of which is taxable to the individual members. In its brief, it has submitted extensive argument directed towards distinguishing this case from Hecht v. Malley, 265 U. S. 144, and more specifically Burk-Waggoner Oil Association v. Hopkins, 269 U. S. 110, and subsequent court and board decisions holding that organizations similar in some respects to the petitioner were to be classified as associations under the revenue laws and taxed as corporations.
The facts in this case are essentially similar to those in Myers, Long & Co., 14 B. T. A. 460, and since our only question here is whether the petitioner is taxable as a corporation we are of the opinion, upon the authority of the Myers, Long & Co. decision, that it is not so taxable.
Judgment will be entered for the petitioner.