Case: Bemo Shipping Co. v. United States
Abbreviation: Bemo Shipping Co. v. United States
Decision Date: 1957-06-05
Docket Number: Reap. Dec. 8821; Entry No. 884947, etc.
Citation: 38 Cust. Ct. 674
Volume: 38
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Bemo Shipping Co. v. United States
Judges: 
Pages: 674–674

Head Matter:
(Reap. Dec. 8821)
Bemo Shipping Co. v. United States
Entry No. 884947, etc.
(Decided June 5, 1957)
John D. Rode for the plaintiff.
George Cochran Doub, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant

Opinion:
La whence, Judge:
The proper dutiable value of certain electrical articles covered by the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in schedule "A," attached to and made part of the decision herein, is before the court for determination.
The parties hereto have stipulated and agreed that, at the time of exportation of the involved merchandise, there was no foreign, export, or United States value for such or similar merchandise; that cost of production is the proper basis of appraisement; and that said cost of production is represented by the invoice unit value, less nondutiable charges deducted on entry by the importer, less 19% per centum, plus 17% per centum.
Upon the agreed facts of record, I find and hold that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (f)), is the proper basis of value for the electrical articles in issue and that said value is the invoice unit value, less the nondutiable charges deducted on entry by the importer, less 19% per centum, plus 17% per centum.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.