Case: Augustus P. Loring and Ada Dwyer Russell, Executors, Estate of Amy Lowell, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent
Abbreviation: Loring v. Commissioner
Decision Date: 1930-07-31
Docket Number: Docket No. 39872
Citation: 20 B.T.A. 440
Volume: 20
Reporter: Reports of the United States Board of Tax Appeals
Court: United States Board of Tax Appeals
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Augustus P. Loring and Ada Dwyer Russell, Executors, Estate of Amy Lowell, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.
Judges: Sternhagen dissents.
Pages: 440–441

Head Matter:
Augustus P. Loring and Ada Dwyer Russell, Executors, Estate of Amy Lowell, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.
Docket No. 39872.
Promulgated July 31, 1930.
Francis R. Hines, Esq., for the petitioners.
Eugene G. Smith, Esq., for the respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION.
Seawell :
The value oí certain property in the estate that formed a part of the basis of the determination of the deficiency in tax is not controverted by the petitioners.
The sole .question for our decision is, Did the respondent err in reducing the value of the charitable bequests by $26,020.26, paid as the Massachusetts inheritance tax?
The petitioners rely on and cite prior decisions of this Board and of the Federal courts to sustain their contention that the action of the Commissioner complained of was erroneous.
Counsel for the respondent at the hearing very frankly and properly stated that the question in issue has in numerous cases been passed on by this Board.
We are of the opinion that counsel for petitioners- is correct in his contention that the Commissioner committed error as indicated in the assignment of error. On the authority of the following cases we so hold. Colonial Trust Co., Executor, 19 B. T. A. 174; John Aspinwall Hadden, Jr., et al., Executors, 10 B. T. A. 741; Howard K. Walter et al., Executors, 2 B. T. A. 453; New York Trust Co. v. Eisner, 256 U. S. 345; Clark v. United States, 27 Fed. (2d) 887; and Edwards v. Slocum, 264 U. S. 61.
Judgment will be entered under Rule 50.
Sternhagen dissents.