Case: Dorf International, Inc. v. United States
Abbreviation: Dorf International, Inc. v. United States
Decision Date: 1967-04-11
Docket Number: C.D. 2958
Citation: 58 Cust. Ct. 271
Volume: 58
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Dorf International, Inc. v. United States
Judges: Before Richardson and Landis, Judges
Pages: 271–272

Head Matter:
(C.D. 2958)
Dorf International, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court, Third Division
(Decided April 11, 1967)
Allerton deC. TompMns for the plaintiff.
Barefoot Sanders, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
Before Richardson and Landis, Judges

Opinion:
Landis, Judge:
The merchandise covered by the above-entitled protest consists of centrifugal pump parts which were assessed with duty at the rate of 13% per centum ad valorem under paragraph 353 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52739), as parts of articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device.
Plaintiff claims the merchandise is entitled to entry free of duty under paragraph 1615 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, as American goods returned.
Counsel for the parties have submitted this case for decision on the following stipulation:
It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United 'States, Defendant, that the 'articles on the invoice covered by the above named protest that are marked with an A, and the initials JJP, Commodity Specialist John J. Plisich were manufactured or produced in the United States and were returned to the United States from abroad prior to August 31, 1963 without having been advanced in value or improved in condition by any process of manufacture or other means.
That duty was assessed upon liquidation because of non-compliance with certain customs regulations relating to the duty-free entry of returned American articles; that the importer has now furnished all of the information necessary for compliance with such regulations, and the District Director is now satisfied as to the existence of all facts upon which entry of the merchandise under Paragraph 1615 Tariff Act of 1930 is dependent.
The above-named protest is submitted for decision upon this stipulation.
Accepting the stipulation as an agreed statement of facts, we find and hold, as alleged by the plaintiff, that the items marked with the letter "A" and initialed JJP by Commodity Specialist John J. Plisich on the invoice, are entitled to entry free of duty under paragraph 1615 ( a), as amended, as American goods returned.
To the extent indicated, the specified claim in this protest is sustained; in all other respects and as to all other merchandise, all the claims are overruled.
Judgment will be rendered accordingly.