Case: Appeal of S. PHILLIPS & SON, INC.
Abbreviation: Appeal of S. Phillips & Son, Inc.
Decision Date: 1925-03-23
Docket Number: Docket No. 673
Citation: 1 B.T.A. 858
Volume: 1
Reporter: Reports of the United States Board of Tax Appeals
Court: United States Board of Tax Appeals
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Appeal of S. PHILLIPS & SON, INC.
Judges: Before James, Sternhagen, Trammell, and Trttssell.
Pages: 858–858

Head Matter:
Appeal of S. PHILLIPS & SON, INC.
Docket No. 673.
Submitted February 12, 1925;
decided March 23, 1925.
Samuel Fisehman, 0. P. A., for the taxpayer.
B. G. Simpioh, Esq., for the Commissioner.
Before James, Sternhagen, Trammell, and Trttssell.

Opinion:
OPINION.
Trammell:
From the foregoing facts we are asked to find that the action of the Commissioner in restoring to income for the fiscal year 1919 the amount of the tax for the fiscal year 1918, which he concluded from an audit of the taxpayer's return had been deducted in determining net income, was incorrect. The taxpayer introduced the canceled checks showing that $478 was paid to the collector on September 13, 1919, and that $575 was paid on December 13, 1919. It introduced no other evidence. The taxpayer's counsel argued from the evidence that since these amounts were paid after the close of the fiscal year ended August 31,1919, they were not deducted during that fiscal year. No witness testified that the entire amount of the tax for the fiscal year 1918 was not in fact deducted, while an analysis of surplus indicates that it was. The fact that a portion of the tax was not actually paid is not of great weight, since the taxpayer was on the accrual basis and there is no evidence that the unpaid portion of the tax was not accrued and deducted.
On account of the lack of evidence to support the appeal, the action of the Commissioner is approved.