Case: Lulu Mignon Murphy v. Eugenie R. Bird, Administratrix, et al.
Abbreviation: Murphy v. Bird
Decision Date: 1927-10-24
Docket Number: No. 586
Citation: 275 U.S. 487
Volume: 275
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Lulu Mignon Murphy v. Eugenie R. Bird, Administratrix, et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 487–488

Head Matter:
No. 586.
Lulu Mignon Murphy v. Eugenie R. Bird, Administratrix, et al.
October 24, 1927.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied' for the reason that the Court, upon examination of .the unprinted record herein submitted, finds that there is no substantial Federal question presented upon which jurisdiction for certiorari could be based, application for which is therefore also denied on the authority of Tracy v. Ginzberg, 205 U. S. 170, 178; Bonner v. Gorman, 213 U. S. 86, 91; Central Land Co. v. Laidley, 159 U. S. 103, 112. The costs already incurred herein by direction of the Court shall be paid by the clerk from the special fund in his custody as provided in the order of October 29, 1926.
Lulu Mignon Murphy, pro se. No appearance for respondents.