Case: Hopfmann v. United States Federal Election Commission et al.; O'Driscoll v. United States; Roberts v. Rutgers State University of New Jersey et al.; Dryden v. Safeco Insurance Company of America; Richards et ux. v. Swinebroad & Denton Auctioneers et al.; Rodman v. Tate, Superintendent, Chillicothe Correctional Institute, et al.
Abbreviation: Hopfmann v. United States Federal Election Commission
Decision Date: 1986-04-07
Docket Number: No. 85-659; No. 85-5277; No. 85-5415; No. 85-5967; No. 85-6040; No. 85-6099
Citation: 475 U.S. 1112
Volume: 475
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Hopfmann v. United States Federal Election Commission et al., O’Driscoll v. United States, Roberts v. Rutgers State University of New Jersey et al., Dryden v. Safeco Insurance Company of America, Richards et ux. v. Swinebroad & Denton Auctioneers et al., Rodman v. Tate, Superintendent, Chillicothe Correctional Institute, et al.,
Judges: 
Pages: 1112–1112

Head Matter:
No. 85-659.
No. 85-5277.
No. 85-5415.
No. 85-5967.
No. 85-6040.
No. 85-6099.
Hopfmann v. United States Federal Election Commission et al., O’Driscoll v. United States, Roberts v. Rutgers State University of New Jersey et al., Dryden v. Safeco Insurance Company of America, Richards et ux. v. Swinebroad & Denton Auctioneers et al., Rodman v. Tate, Superintendent, Chillicothe Correctional Institute, et al.,

Opinion:
474 U. S. 1038;
ante, p. 1020;
474 U. S. 952;
ante, p. 1049;
ante, p. 1026; and
ante, p. 1028. Petitions for rehearing denied.