Case: AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, et al., Appellees, v. Janet RENO, Attorney General of the United States; Department of Justice, Appellants
Abbreviation: American Library Ass'n v. Reno
Decision Date: 1995-02-28
Docket Number: No. 92-5271
Citation: 310 U.S. App. D.C. 341
Volume: 310
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Parties: AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, et al., Appellees, v. Janet RENO, Attorney General of the United States; Department of Justice, Appellants.
Judges: Before: EDWARDS, Chief Judge; WALD, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, GINSBURG, SENTELLE, HENDERSON, RANDOLPH, ROGERS and TATEL, Circuit Judges.
Pages: 341–343

Head Matter:
47 F.3d 1215
AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, et al., Appellees, v. Janet RENO, Attorney General of the United States; Department of Justice, Appellants.
No. 92-5271.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Feb. 28, 1995.
Before: EDWARDS, Chief Judge; WALD, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, GINSBURG, SENTELLE, HENDERSON, RANDOLPH, ROGERS and TATEL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
On Appellees' Suggestion For Rehearing In Banc
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellees' Suggestion For Rehearing In Banc and the response thereto have been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service did not vote in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED, by the court in banc, that the suggestion is denied.
Circuit Judges WALD and TATEL would grant the suggestion.
A statement of Circuit Judge TATEL, joined by Circuit Judge WALD, dissenting from the denial of rehearing in banc, is attached.