Case: Manning v. Ragen, Warden; Poppe v. Ragen, Warden; Rollo et al. v. Frisbie, Warden; Watkins v. California; Williams v. New York; Anderson v. Missouri; Reeder v. Ragen, Warden; Bautz v. Ragen, Warden; Wells v. Ragen, Warden; Kellogg v. Miller, Warden; Banks v. Ragen, Warden; Baldridge v. Ragen, Warden
Abbreviation: Manning v. Ragen
Decision Date: 1949-10-17
Docket Number: No. 123, Misc.; No. 127, Misc.; No. 132, Misc.; No. 136, Misc.; No. 142, Misc.; No. 144, Misc.; No. 145, Misc.
Citation: 338 U.S. 852
Volume: 338
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Manning v. Ragen, Warden. Poppe v. Ragen, Warden. Rollo et al. v. Frisbie, Warden. Watkins v. California. Williams v. New York. Anderson v. Missouri. Reeder v. Ragen, Warden. Bautz v. Ragen, Warden. Wells v. Ragen, Warden. Kellogg v. Miller, Warden. Banks v. Ragen, Warden. Baldridge v. Ragen, Warden.
Judges: Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Pages: 852–853

Head Matter:
No. 123, Misc.
No. 127, Misc.
No. 132, Misc.
No. 136, Misc.
No. 142, Misc.
No. 144, Misc.
No. 145, Misc.
Manning v. Ragen, Warden. Poppe v. Ragen, Warden. Rollo et al. v. Frisbie, Warden. Watkins v. California. Williams v. New York. Anderson v. Missouri. Reeder v. Ragen, Warden. Bautz v. Ragen, Warden. Wells v. Ragen, Warden. Kellogg v. Miller, Warden. Banks v. Ragen, Warden. Baldridge v. Ragen, Warden.

Opinion:
Circuit Court of Will County, Illinois;
Circuit Court of Will County, Illinois;
Supreme Court of Michigan ;
District Court of Appeal, 2d Appellate District, of California;
Supreme Court of New York;
Supreme Court of Missouri;
Circuit Court of Will County, Illinois;
No. 147, Misc.
No. 148, Misc.
No. 149, Misc.
No. 154, Misc.
No. 158, Misc.
Circuit Court of Will County, Illinois;
Circuit Court of Madison County, Illinois;
Supreme Court of Wyoming;
Supreme Court of Illinois; and
Supreme Court of Illinois. The petitions for writs of certiorari in these cases are severally denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.