Case: Libbey Glass, Division of Owens-Illinois, Inc., plaintiff v. United States, defendant, J.G. Durand International, party-in-interest
Abbreviation: Libbey Glass v. United States
Decision Date: 1985-01-22
Docket Number: Court No. 84-5-00633
Citation: 9 Ct. Int'l Trade 33
Volume: 9
Reporter: United States Court of International Trade Reports
Court: United States Court of International Trade
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Libbey Glass, Division of Owens-Illinois, Inc., plaintiff v. United States, defendant, J.G. Durand International, party-in-interest
Judges: Before Ford, Judge.
Pages: 33–34

Head Matter:
Libbey Glass, Division of Owens-Illinois, Inc., plaintiff v. United States, defendant, J.G. Durand International, party-in-interest
Court No. 84-5-00633
Before Ford, Judge.
(Dated January 22, 1985)
Stewart and Stewart (Terence P. Stewart on the brief; Eugene L. Stewart and Charles A. St. Charles of counsel) for the plaintiff.
Richard K. Willard, Acting Assistant Attorney General; Joseph I. Liebman, Attorney in Charge, International Trade Field Office (Barbara M. Epstein on the brief) for the defendant.
Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (David O. Elliott on the brief) for the party-in-interest.

Opinion:
Ford, Judge:
This action is a companion case to Libbey Glass, Division of Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United States, 9 CIT 31, Slip Op. 85-8, decided concurrently herewith. The present case is based upon an entry liquidated on April 6, 1984 at the port of Savannah, Georgia.
It appears this entry covered a seven-piece salad bowl set, described on the summons as "Diamant Cavalier" glassware. In addition the entry covered an eighteen-piece set of "Caprice" glassware, containing six glasses each of Qh ounce juice, 10J4 ounce "on the rocks" and 13 ounce "beverage".
Plaintiff concedes the 10/2 ounce and 13 ounce sizes above are redundant since they are covered by the companion case and should - be severed and dismissed. ' !
Defendant contends the remaining merchandise, the salad bowl set and the &k ounce juice glass should be dismissed on the grounds the Court lacks jurisdiction over the merchandise since it was not covered by the petition. The salad bowl set and juice glasses are accordingly dismissed for the reasons set forth in Slip. Op. 85-8, decided concurrently.
Accordingly, it is hereby
Ordered that this action be, and the same hereby is, dismissed.