Case: Ex parte Lipscomb; Ex parte Banning; Skinner v. Illinois; In re Smith; Colemon v. Ragen, Warden; United States ex rel. Berry v. Martin, Warden; United States ex rel. Thomas v. Pennsylvania et al.; Shepherd v. Brownell, Attorney General; Elkins v. Swope, Warden; and McGuinn v. Pegelow, Superintendent, District of Columbia Reformatory, et al.
Abbreviation: Ex parte Lipscomb
Decision Date: 1956-01-09
Docket Number: No. 133; No. 168; No. 179; No. 196; No. 299; No. 320; No. 321; No. 327; No. 340; No. 343
Citation: 350 U.S. 929
Volume: 350
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Ex parte Lipscomb; Ex parte Banning; Skinner v. Illinois; In re Smith; Colemon v. Ragen, Warden; United States ex rel. Berry v. Martin, Warden; United States ex rel. Thomas v. Pennsylvania et al.; Shepherd v. Brownell, Attorney General; Elkins v. Swope, Warden; and McGuinn v. Pegelow, Superintendent, District of Columbia Reformatory, et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 929–929

Head Matter:
No. 133,
No. 168,
No. 179,
No. 196,
No. 299,
No. 320,
No. 321,
No. 327,
No. 340,
No. 343,
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Ex parte Lipscomb; Ex parte Banning; Skinner v. Illinois; In re Smith; Colemon v. Ragen, Warden; United States ex rel. Berry v. Martin, Warden; United States ex rel. Thomas v. Pennsylvania et al.; Shepherd v. Brownell, Attorney General; Elkins v. Swope, Warden; and McGuinn v. Pegelow, Superintendent, District of Columbia Reformatory, et al.

Opinion:
Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.