Case: PINNEY et al. v. BUTTERWORTH et al.
Abbreviation: Pinney v. Butterworth
Decision Date: 1964-06-22
Docket Number: No. 1078
Citation: 378 U.S. 564
Volume: 378
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: PINNEY et al. v. BUTTERWORTH et al.
Judges: Mr. Justice Clark would affirm the judgment on the basis of his opinion in Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533, 587.
Pages: 564–564

Head Matter:
PINNEY et al. v. BUTTERWORTH et al.
No. 1078.
Decided June 22, 1964.
H. Meade Alcorn, Jr., James William Moore and Norman K. Parsells for appellants.
Richard H. Bowerman for appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment below is affirmed. Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533. The case is remanded for further proceedings, with respect to relief, consistent with the views stated in our opinions in Reynolds v. Sims and in the other cases relating to state legislative apportionment decided along with Reynolds.
Mr. Justice Clark would affirm the judgment on the basis of his opinion in Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533, 587.
Mr. Justice Stewart would affirm the judgment insofar as it holds that Connecticut's system of legislative apportionment violates the Equal Protection Clause.
Mr. Justice Harlan dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533, 589.