Case: Vey v. Ridge, Governor of Pennsylvania, et al.; Chester v. Louisiana; McBroom v. Techneglas, Inc.; Lomax v. Bowersox, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center; Terio v. Kurtzman & Haspel, Trustee, et al.; Washington v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Braun v. Flowers, Warden, et al.; King v. Love et al.; Wronke v. Madigan, Sheriff, Champaign County, Illinois; Bane v. Robinson et al.
Abbreviation: Vey v. Ridge
Decision Date: 1999-11-08
Docket Number: No. 98-1937; No. 98-8777; No. 98-9336; No. 98-9550; No. 98-9582; No. 98-9633; No. 98-9715; No. 98-9889; No. 99-5026; No. 99-5475
Citation: 528 U.S. 999
Volume: 528
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Vey v. Ridge, Governor of Pennsylvania, et al., Chester v. Louisiana, McBroom v. Techneglas, Inc., Lomax v. Bowersox, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center, Terio v. Kurtzman & Haspel, Trustee, et al., Washington v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Braun v. Flowers, Warden, et al., King v. Love et al., Wronke v. Madigan, Sheriff, Champaign County, Illinois, Bane v. Robinson et al.,
Judges: 
Pages: 999–1000

Head Matter:
No. 98-1937.
No. 98-8777.
No. 98-9336.
No. 98-9550.
No. 98-9582.
No. 98-9633.
No. 98-9715.
No. 98-9889.
Vey v. Ridge, Governor of Pennsylvania, et al., Chester v. Louisiana, McBroom v. Techneglas, Inc., Lomax v. Bowersox, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center, Terio v. Kurtzman & Haspel, Trustee, et al., Washington v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Braun v. Flowers, Warden, et al., King v. Love et al., Wronke v. Madigan, Sheriff, Champaign County, Illinois, Bane v. Robinson et al.,

Opinion:
ante, p. 818;
ante, p. 826;
ante, p. 832;
ante, p. 839;
ante, p. 840;
ante, p. 843;
ante, p. 849;
ante, p. 858;
No. 99-5026.
No. 99-5475.
ante, p. 881; and
ante, p. 906. Petitions for rehearing denied.