Case: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES; THE TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES
Abbreviation: Union Pacific Railroad v. United States
Decision Date: 1953-01-13
Docket Number: No. 185-52; No. 220-52
Citation: 124 Ct. Cl. 291
Volume: 124
Reporter: United States Court of Claims Reports
Court: United States Court of Claims
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES THE TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES
Judges: 
Pages: 291–292

Head Matter:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES THE TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES
[No. 185-52]
[No. 220-52]
[Decided January 13, 1953]
Mr. Raymond A. Negus for plaintiffs. Mr. Lawrence Cake was on the briefs.
Mr. S. R. Gamer, with whom was Mr. Assistant Attorney General Holmes Baldridge, for defendant. Mr. Frank J. Keating was on the briefs.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
The pleadings and the issue in these cases are the same as in Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v. United States, 121 C. Cls. 467. For the reasons therein set forth plaintiffs' motions for summary judgment, to the extent that they ask for an adjudication that the jeeps involved in this action should be classified and rated as passenger motor vehicles, are granted.
Entry of judgment is suspended pending the filing of a report by the General Accounting Office and the disposition of the issues relating to the proper amount to be paid to plaintiff for the transportation services involved.
It is so ordered.