Case: Halas v. Department of Energy; Powell v. United States; Manes v. New Mexico; Uberoi v. University of Colorado et al.; Diller v. Selvin & Weiner et al.; Diller v. Selvin & Weiner; Cafaro v. New York; Stripling v. Georgia; In re Seagrave, McCallum et ux. v. United States; Irvin v. Kentucky; Taxey v. Illinois; Williams v. United States Postal Service et al.; Martin v. Knox et al.; Haugen v. Brady et al.; and Haugen v. Clark County, Nevada, et al.; Kaffenberger v. City of Bullhead, Arizona, et al.; Argentina v. DeBenedictus; Boyd v. Town of Cabot, Arkansas, et al.; Portnoy v. United States Postal Service et al.; Reed v. Belew, Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, et al.; Stevens v. Ohio et al.; Dokes v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas; Dowling v. Kamber et al.; Lomelino v. McDonnell Douglas Aircraft Corp. et al.; Baker v. Lopatin, Miller, Freedman, Bluestone, Erlich, Rosen & Bartnick, Attorneys at Law, P. C.; Martin v. Knox et al.; Borysiak et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; Clark v. United States; In re Williams; Johnson v. Peterson; Cerven v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board of California; Lamasney v. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Abbreviation: Halas v. Department of Energy
Decision Date: 1992-02-24
Docket Number: No. 91-282; No. 91-388; No. 91-541; No. 91-561; No. 91-616; No. 91-635; No. 91-654; No. 91-5440; No. 91-5586; No. 91-5597; No. 91-5604; No. 91-5721; No. 91-5810; No. 91-5852; No. 91-5977; No. 91-5981; No. 91-6013; No. 91-6014; No. 91-6039; No. 91-6059; No. 91-6094; No. 91-6110; No. 91-6129; No. 91-6144; No. 91-6169; No. 91-6178; No. 91-6208; No. 91-6210; No. 91-6224; No. 91-6245; No. 91-6336; No. 91-6389
Citation: 502 U.S. 1124
Volume: 502
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Halas v. Department of Energy, Powell v. United States, Manes v. New Mexico, Uberoi v. University of Colorado et al., Diller v. Selvin & Weiner et al., Diller v. Selvin & Weiner, Cafaro v. New York, Stripling v. Georgia, In re Seagrave, McCallum et ux. v. United States, Irvin v. Kentucky, Taxey v. Illinois, Williams v. United States Postal Service et al., Martin v. Knox et al., Haugen v. Brady et al.; and Haugen v. Clark County, Nevada, et al., Kaffenberger v. City of Bullhead, Arizona, et al., Argentina v. DeBenedictus, Boyd v. Town of Cabot, Arkansas, et al., Portnoy v. United States Postal Service et al., Reed v. Belew, Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, et al., Stevens v. Ohio et al., Dokes v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Dowling v. Kamber et al., Lomelino v. McDonnell Douglas Aircraft Corp. et al., Baker v. Lopatin, Miller, Freedman, Bluestone, Erlich, Rosen & Bartnick, Attorneys at Law, P. C., Martin v. Knox et al., Borysiak et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Clark v. United States, In re Williams, Johnson v. Peterson, Cerven v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board of California, Lamasney v. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services,
Judges: 
Pages: 1124–1125

Head Matter:
No. 91-282.
No. 91-388.
No. 91-541.
No. 91-561.
No. 91-616.
No. 91-635.
No. 91-654.
No. 91-5440.
No. 91-5586.
No. 91-5597.
No. 91-5604.
No. 91-5721.
No. 91-5810.
No. 91-5852.
No. 91-5977.
No. 91-5981.
No. 91-6013.
No. 91-6014.
No. 91-6039.
No. 91-6059.
No. 91-6094.
No. 91-6110.
No. 91-6129.
Halas v. Department of Energy, Powell v. United States, Manes v. New Mexico, Uberoi v. University of Colorado et al., Diller v. Selvin & Weiner et al., Diller v. Selvin & Weiner, Cafaro v. New York, Stripling v. Georgia, In re Seagrave, McCallum et ux. v. United States, Irvin v. Kentucky, Taxey v. Illinois, Williams v. United States Postal Service et al., Martin v. Knox et al., Haugen v. Brady et al.; and Haugen v. Clark County, Nevada, et al., Kaffenberger v. City of Bullhead, Arizona, et al., Argentina v. DeBenedictus, Boyd v. Town of Cabot, Arkansas, et al., Portnoy v. United States Postal Service et al., Reed v. Belew, Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, et al., Stevens v. Ohio et al., Dokes v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Dowling v. Kamber et al., Lomelino v. McDonnell Douglas Aircraft Corp. et al., Baker v. Lopatin, Miller, Freedman, Bluestone, Erlich, Rosen & Bartnick, Attorneys at Law, P. C., Martin v. Knox et al., Borysiak et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Clark v. United States, In re Williams, Johnson v. Peterson, Cerven v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board of California, Lamasney v. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services,

Opinion:
ante, p. 953;
ante, p. 981;
ante, p. 942;
ante, p. 982;
ante, p. 1013;
ante, p. 1013;
ante, p. 1005;
ante, p. 985;
ante, p. 1028;
ante, p. 970;
ante, p. 995;
ante, p. 945;
ante, p. 1006;
ante, p. 999;
ante, p. 974;
ante, p. 987;
ante, p. 987;
ante, p. 987;
ante, p. 988;
ante, p. 989;
ante, p. 989;
ante, p. 1015;
ante, p. 1007;
No. 91-6144.
No. 91-6169.
No. 91-6178.
No. 91-6208.
No. 91-6210.
No. 91-6224.
No. 91-6245.
No. 91-6336.
No. 91-6389.
ante, p. 990;
ante, p. 1008;
ante, p. 1015;
ante, p. 1016;
ante, p. 992;
ante, p. 1028;
ante, p. 1039;
ante, p. 1041; and
ante, p. 1042. Petitions for rehearing denied.