Case: PERK, AUDITOR OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY v. OHIO ex rel. CORRIGAN, PROSECUTING ATTORNEY OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY
Abbreviation: Perk v. Ohio ex rel. Corrigan
Decision Date: 1969-12-08
Docket Number: No. 590
Citation: 396 U.S. 113
Volume: 396
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: PERK, AUDITOR OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY v. OHIO ex rel. CORRIGAN, PROSECUTING ATTORNEY OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY
Judges: Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Pages: 113–113

Head Matter:
PERK, AUDITOR OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY v. OHIO ex rel. CORRIGAN, PROSECUTING ATTORNEY OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY
No. 590.
Decided December 8, 1969
Gerald A. Donahue and Donald M. Robiner for appellant.
John T. Corrigan, pro se, and John L. Dowling for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.