Case: UNITED STATES of America v. Oliver L. NORTH, Appellant
Abbreviation: United States v. North
Decision Date: 1990-11-27
Docket Number: No. 89-3118
Citation: 287 U.S. App. D.C. 146
Volume: 287
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Parties: UNITED STATES of America v. Oliver L. NORTH, Appellant.
Judges: Before WALD, Chief Judge, SILBERMAN and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.
Pages: 146–166

Head Matter:
920 F.2d 940
UNITED STATES of America v. Oliver L. NORTH, Appellant.
No. 89-3118.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Nov. 27, 1990.
As Amended Nov. 30, 1990.
Lawrence E. Walsh, Independent Counsel, was on the petition for rehearing and/or suggestion for rehearing en banc.
Brendan V. Sullivan, Jr., Barry S. Simon, Paul Mogin, Nicole K. Seligman and John D. Cline were on the opposition to the petition for rehearing and/or suggestion for rehearing en banc.
Before WALD, Chief Judge, SILBERMAN and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
On consideration of appellee's petition for rehearing filed September 4, 1990 and appellant's opposition thereto, it is
Ordered, by the Court, that the petition for rehearing be granted in part and denied in part, and that Section II of our prior opinion be withdrawn and replaced by Section IV of the opinion filed herein, and point (2) of the Summary relating thereto be withdrawn and replaced by the following: "(2) The District Court's jury instructions on Count 9 did not, taken as a whole, pose a genuine risk that the jury would be confused." The reasons are set forth more fully in the opinion of the court filed herein this date.