Case: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO, and Local 134, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent; INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 641, 622, 759, 820, and 1263, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Florida Power & Light Company, Intervenor
Abbreviation: International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. National Labor Relations Board
Decision Date: 1973-01-05
Docket Number: Nos. 71-1559, 71-1712
Citation: 159 U.S. App. D.C. 272
Volume: 159
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO, and Local 134, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 641, 622, 759, 820, and 1263, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Florida Power & Light Company, Intervenor.
Judges: Before, BAZELON, Chief Judge, and WRIGHT, McGOWAN, TAMM, LEVENTHAL, ROBINSON, MacKINNON, ROBB and WILKEY, Circuit Judges.
Pages: 272–272

Head Matter:
487 F.2d 1143
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO, and Local 134, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 641, 622, 759, 820, and 1263, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Florida Power & Light Company, Intervenor.
Nos. 71-1559, 71-1712.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Jan. 5, 1973.
Before, BAZELON, Chief Judge, and WRIGHT, McGOWAN, TAMM, LEVENTHAL, ROBINSON, MacKINNON, ROBB and WILKEY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
On consideration of the union's petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc filed in number 71-1559, D.C.Cir., 487 F.2d 1113, of the briefs and appendices filed by the parties in each of the above entitled cases, it is
Ordered by the court en banc that the above entitled cases shall be reheard by the court sitting en banc as promptly as the business of the court permits. It is
Further ordered by the court en banc, sua sponte, that the above entitled cases are hereby consolidated for the purpose of rehearing en banc.
On rehearing en banc, reversed and remanded, D.C.Cir., 487 F.2d 1143.