Case: Didato v. Shaw, Director; Tate v. Heinze, Warden; Baker v. Utecht, Warden; Ruthven v. Overholser, Superintendent; Gallaway v. Michigan; Stoker v. Ragen, Warden; and Petro v. Heinze, Warden
Abbreviation: Didato v. Shaw
Decision Date: 1948-06-14
Docket Number: No. 243; No. 507; No. 509; No. 541; No. 544; No. 548; No. 566
Citation: 334 U.S. 842
Volume: 334
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Didato v. Shaw, Director; Tate v. Heinze, Warden; Baker v. Utecht, Warden; Ruthven v. Overholser, Superintendent; Gallaway v. Michigan; Stoker v. Ragen, Warden; and Petro v. Heinze, Warden.
Judges: 
Pages: 842–842

Head Matter:
No. 243,
No. 507,
No. 509,
No. 541,
No. 544,
No. 548,
No. 566,
Misc.
Didato v. Shaw, Director; Tate v. Heinze, Warden; Baker v. Utecht, Warden; Ruthven v. Overholser, Superintendent; Gallaway v. Michigan; Stoker v. Ragen, Warden; and Petro v. Heinze, Warden.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.

Opinion:
The motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus are severally denied.