Case: NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES, et al., Appellants, v. Richard B. CHENEY, Secretary of Defense, et al.
Abbreviation: National Federation of Federal Employees v. Cheney
Decision Date: 1989-12-22
Docket Number: No. 88-5271
Citation: 282 U.S. App. D.C. 82
Volume: 282
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Parties: NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES, et al., Appellants, v. Richard B. CHENEY, Secretary of Defense, et al.
Judges: Before WALD, Chief Judge, MIKVA, HARRY T. EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, D.H. GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.
Pages: 82–85

Head Matter:
892 F.2d 98
NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES, et al., Appellants, v. Richard B. CHENEY, Secretary of Defense, et al.
No. 88-5271.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Dec. 22, 1989.
Before WALD, Chief Judge, MIKVA, HARRY T. EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, D.H. GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
On Appellants' Suggestion for Rehearing En Bane
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellants' Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc has been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular, active service did not vote in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing it is
ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestion is denied. _
Chief Judge WALD and Circuit Judges MIKVA and EDWARDS would grant the suggestion.
A statement of Circuit Judge D.H. GINSBURG, concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc, joined in by Circuit Judges SILBERMAN, WILLIAMS, and SENTELLE is attached.
A statement of Circuit Judge MIKVA, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, joined in by Chief Judge WALD and Circuit Judge HARRY T. EDWARDS, is attached.