Case: Eastern States Petroleum Corp. v. Prettyman, Chief Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, et al.; WORZ, Inc., v. Prettyman, Chief Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, et al.; Odum v. Illinois; and Foutty v. Marshall, Common Pleas Court Judge, Franklin County
Abbreviation: Eastern States Petroleum Corp. v. Prettyman
Decision Date: 1959-10-12
Docket Number: No. 34; No. 112; No. 139; No. 172
Citation: 361 U.S. 805
Volume: 361
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Eastern States Petroleum Corp. v. Prettyman, Chief Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, et al.; WORZ, Inc., v. Prettyman, Chief Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, et al.; Odum v. Illinois; and Foutty v. Marshall, Common Pleas Court Judge, Franklin County.
Judges: 
Pages: 805–806

Head Matter:
No. 34,
No. 112,
No. 139,
No. 172,
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Eastern States Petroleum Corp. v. Prettyman, Chief Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, et al.; WORZ, Inc., v. Prettyman, Chief Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, et al.; Odum v. Illinois; and Foutty v. Marshall, Common Pleas Court Judge, Franklin County.
Gerard R. Moran and Edwin G. Martin for petitioner in No. 34, Mise. Eliot C. Lovett for petitioner in No. 112; Mise. Petitioners pro se in Nos. 139, Mise., and 172, Mise. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Alan S. Rosenthal and Seymour Farber for respondents in No. 34, Mise. Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Richard A. Solomon, Ernest L. Folk III, John L. Fitzgerald and Max D. Paglin for respondents and' for the Federal Communications Commission in opposition in No. 112, Mise.

Opinion:
Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of mandamus denied.
Reported below: No. 34, Mise., 105 U. S. App. D, C. 219, 265 F. 2d 593; No. 112, Mise., 106 U. S. App. D. C. 14, 268 F. 2d 889.