Case: Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. et al. v. Boston & Maine Railroad et al.; Maryland Port Authority et al. v. Boston & Maine Railroad et al.; and Interstate Commerce Commission v. Boston & Maine Railroad et al.
Abbreviation: Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Boston & Maine Railroad
Decision Date: 1963-02-18
Docket Number: No. 97; No. 98; No. 99
Citation: 372 U.S. 902
Volume: 372
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. et al. v. Boston & Maine Railroad et al.; Maryland Port Authority et al. v. Boston & Maine Railroad et al.; and Interstate Commerce Commission v. Boston & Maine Railroad et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 902–902

Head Matter:
No. 97. No. 98. No. 99.
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. et al. v. Boston & Maine Railroad et al.; Maryland Port Authority et al. v. Boston & Maine Railroad et al.; and Interstate Commerce Commission v. Boston & Maine Railroad et al.
Thomas E. Dewey on the motion for enlargement of time for oral argument.

Opinion:
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 370 U. S. 914.) The motion of John H. Colgren for leave to withdraw his appearance as counsel for appellees is granted. The motion for enlargement of time for oral argument is granted and 45 additional minutes are allotted to each side. Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.