Case: Sarah F. Donley v. Erwin Ray Van Horn; and Sarah F. Donley v. Prescott West
Abbreviation: Donley v. Van Horn
Decision Date: 1922-10-16
Docket Number: No. 55; No. 56
Citation: 260 U.S. 697
Volume: 260
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Sarah F. Donley v. Erwin Ray Van Horn; and Sarah F. Donley v. Prescott West.
Judges: 
Pages: 697–697

Head Matter:
No. 55. No. 56.
Sarah F. Donley v. Erwin Ray Van Horn; and Sarah F. Donley v. Prescott West.
Error to the District Court of Appieal, Second Appellate District, of the State of California.
Submitted October 11, 1922.
Decided October 16, 1922.
Mr. A. Haines for plaintiff in error. Mr. Charles R. Pierce and Air. John M. Sutton for defendantsdn error;

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173, 175; Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission of Louisiana, 226 U. S. 99, 101; Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 237 U. S. 413, 418; Bruce v. Tobin, 245 U. S. 18, 19.