Case: Lun et al. v. Bond et al.
Abbreviation: Lun v. Bond
Decision Date: 1929-03-11
Docket Number: No. 74
Citation: 279 U.S. 818
Volume: 279
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Lun et al. v. Bond et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 818–818

Head Matter:
No. 74.
Lun et al. v. Bond et al.
Argued March 5, 1929.
Decided March 11, 1929.
Messrs. James M. Flowers, Earl Brewer, and Edward C. Brewer submitted for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. James A. Lauderdale, with whom Messrs. Rush H. Knox, Attorney General of Mississippi, and Mr. E. C. Sharp were on the brief, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
The judgment is reversed, with directions to the Circuit Court of Coahoma County, Miss., to dismiss the petition for mandamus without costs, because the controversy involved has become moot. Atherton Mills v. Johnston, 259 U. S. 13; Brownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U. S. 216; Alejandrino v. Quezon, 271 U. S. 528, 535; Norwegian Co. v. Tariff Commission, 274 U. S. 106, 112.