Case: Bramble v. Heinze, Warden, et al.
Abbreviation: Bramble v. Heinze
Decision Date: 1955-11-21
Docket Number: No. 31
Citation: 350 U.S. 899
Volume: 350
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Bramble v. Heinze, Warden, et al.
Judges: The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Pages: 899–899

Head Matter:
No. 31,
Misc.
Bramble v. Heinze, Warden, et al.
Petitioner pro se. Edmund O. Brown, Attorney General of California, and Doris H. Maier, Deputy Attorney General, for respondents.

Opinion:
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California.
Per Curiam:
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. Since the record in this case fails to show whether denial of petitioner's application for habeas corpus rests on an adequate state ground or exclusively on a federal ground, the judgment of the Supreme Court of California is vacated and the cause is remanded to that court for further proceedings.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.