Case: Columbus & Greenville Ry. Co. v. Buford et al.
Abbreviation: Columbus & Greenville Ry. Co. v. Buford
Decision Date: 1930-03-17
Docket Number: No. 339
Citation: 281 U.S. 695
Volume: 281
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Columbus & Greenville Ry. Co. v. Buford et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 695–696

Head Matter:
No. 339.
Columbus & Greenville Ry. Co. v. Buford et al.
Argued March 14, 1930.
Decided March 17, 1930.
Mr. William H. Watkins, with whom Messrs. A. F. Gardner., Sr., H. T. Odom, P. H. Eager, Jr., A. F. Gardner, Jr., and J. N. Flowers were on the brief, for appellant. Messrs. John Ambrose Tyson, A. McC. Kimbrough, and O. L. Kimbrough on the brief for appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question; Wabash R. R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. R. Co: v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; Zucht v. King, 260 U. S. 174; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191; Sayward v. Denny, 158 U. S. 180,183,184; Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 326, 334.