Case: BUSH et al. v. ORLEANS PARISH SCHOOL BOARD et al.
Abbreviation: Bush v. Orleans Parish School Board
Decision Date: 1960-12-12
Docket Number: 
Citation: 364 U.S. 500
Volume: 364
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: BUSH et al. v. ORLEANS PARISH SCHOOL BOARD et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 500–501

Head Matter:
BUSH et al. v. ORLEANS PARISH SCHOOL BOARD et al.
Decided December 12, 1960.
Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, for the State of Louisiana et al.
W. Scott Wilkinson and Thompson Clarke for the Legislature of Louisiana et al.
Solicitor General Rankin for the United States.
Robert G. Polack, Peter H. Beer, William M. Campbell, Jr. and Ralph N. Jackson for the Orleans Parish School Board et al., in opposition.
Thurgood Marshall, Constance Baker Motley and A. P. Tureaud for Bush et al., in opposition.
Together with United States v. Louisiana et al. and Williams et al. v. Davis et al., also on motions for stay.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
These are motions for stay of an injunction by a three-judge District Court which nullified a series of enactments of the State of Louisiana. The scope of these enactments and the basis on which they were found in conflict with the Constitution of the United States are not matters of doubt. The nub of the decision of the three-judge court is this:
"The conclusion is clear that interposition is not a constitutional doctrine. If taken seriously, it is illegal defiance of constitutional authority." United States v. Louisiana, 188 F. Supp. 916, 926.
The main basis for challenging this ruling is that the State of Louisiana "has interposed itself in the field, of public education over which it has exclusive control." This objection is without substance, as we held, upon full consideration, in Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U. S. 1. The others are likewise without merit.
Accordingly, the motions for stay are denied.