Case: McCoy v. Randolph, Warden; Epps v. New York; Arbuckle v. Illinois; Williamson et al. v. Gilmer et al.; Scott v. Anderson, Jail Superintendent; Hlozansky v. Cox, Penitentiary Superintendent; Farrell v. Burke, Warden; Hickock v. Crouse, Warden; Smith v. Crouse, Warden; Gratter v. Nash, Warden; Leeper v. Anderson, Jail Superintendent; Hymes v. Dunbar, Corrections Director, et al.
Abbreviation: McCoy v. Randolph
Decision Date: 1965-03-01
Docket Number: No. 537; No. 541; No. 546; No. 598; No. 599; No. 601; No. 609; No. 610; No. 614; No. 625; No. 626; No. 693
Citation: 380 U.S. 928
Volume: 380
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: McCoy v. Randolph, Warden, Epps v. New York, Arbuckle v. Illinois, Williamson et al. v. Gilmer et al., Scott v. Anderson, Jail Superintendent, Hlozansky v. Cox, Penitentiary Superintendent, Farrell v. Burke, Warden, Hickock v. Crouse, Warden, Smith v. Crouse, Warden, Gratter v. Nash, Warden, Leeper v. Anderson, Jail Superintendent, Hymes v. Dunbar, Corrections Director, et al.,
Judges: 
Pages: 928–928

Head Matter:
No. 537,
Misc.
No. 541,
Misc.
No. 546,
Misc.
No. 598,
Misc.
No. 599,
Misc.
No. 601,
Misc.
No. 609,
Misc.
No. 610,
Misc.
No. 614,
Misc.
No. 625,
Misc.
No. 626,
Misc.
No. 693,
Misc.
McCoy v. Randolph, Warden, Epps v. New York, Arbuckle v. Illinois, Williamson et al. v. Gilmer et al., Scott v. Anderson, Jail Superintendent, Hlozansky v. Cox, Penitentiary Superintendent, Farrell v. Burke, Warden, Hickock v. Crouse, Warden, Smith v. Crouse, Warden, Gratter v. Nash, Warden, Leeper v. Anderson, Jail Superintendent, Hymes v. Dunbar, Corrections Director, et al.,

Opinion:
379 U. S. 996;
379 U. S. 940;
379 U. S. 978;
379 U. S. 955;
379 U. S. 955;
379 U. S. 981;
379 U. S. 981;
379 U. S. 982;
379 U. S. 982;
379 U. S. 954;
379 U. S. 955; and
379 U. S. 954.
Petitions for rehearing denied.