Case: ESTONIAN STATE CARGO AND PASSENGER STEAMSHIP LINE v. THE UNITED STATES
Abbreviation: Estonian State Cargo & Passenger Steamship Line v. United States
Decision Date: 1950-02-06
Docket Number: No. 47862
Citation: 115 Ct. Cl. 815
Volume: 115
Reporter: United States Court of Claims Reports
Court: United States Court of Claims
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: ESTONIAN STATE CARGO AND PASSENGER STEAMSHIP LINE v. THE UNITED STATES
Judges: 
Pages: 815–816

Head Matter:
ESTONIAN STATE CARGO AND PASSENGER STEAMSHIP LINE v. THE UNITED STATES
[No. 47862.
Decided February 6, 1950]
Mr. Horace 8. Whitman for the plaintiff. Mr. Charles Becht was on the brief.
Mr. P. A. Beck for intervenors.
Mr. Edgar T. Fell, with whom was Mr. Assistant Attorney General H. G. Morison, for the defendant. Mr. Grover C. Sherrod was on the brief.

Opinion:
The facts sufficiently appear from the opinion of the court, per curiam, as follows:
This suit is brought to recover just compensation for the requisition by the defendant of the S. S. Maret.
Plaintiff, a corporation organized under the laws of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, alleges that it was the owner of the vessel at the time it was requisitioned. Tallinna Laevaehisus, a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Estonia, and others have filed a petition to intervene, alleging that they were at the time the legal owners of the vessel.
The defendant has filed a plea to the jurisdiction alleging that plaintiff's petition is defective in that it does not allege that plaintiff has exhausted the administrative remedy provided by section 902 of the Merchant Marine Act, as amended, (section 1242 (d) 46 U. S. C.).
For the reasons stated in Latvian State Cargo and Passenger Steamship Line v. United States, No. 47861, ante, p. 811, we hold that this plea is not good, and it is overruled.
The petition of Tallinna Laevaehisus, et al., to intervene is granted. Its motion to dismiss plaintiff's petition is overruled, and the case is referred to Commissioner Akers to take proof on the question of just compensation and on the issue of the persons entitled thereto.