Case: KNOTT ET AL., RAILROAD AND WAREHOUSE COMMISSIONERS, v. ST. LOUIS, KANSAS CITY AND COLORADO RAILROAD CO.; ST. LOUIS, KANSAS CITY AND COLORADO RAILROAD CO. v. KNOTT ET AL., RAILROAD AND WAREHOUSE COMMISSIONERS
Abbreviation: Knott v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Colorado Railroad
Decision Date: 1913-06-16
Docket Number: Nos. 347, 348
Citation: 230 U.S. 512
Volume: 230
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: KNOTT ET AL., RAILROAD AND WAREHOUSE COMMISSIONERS, v. ST. LOUIS, KANSAS CITY AND COLORADO RAILROAD CO. ST. LOUIS, KANSAS CITY AND COLORADO RAILROAD CO. v. KNOTT ET AL., RAILROAD AND WAREHOUSE COMMISSIONERS.
Judges: 
Pages: 512–513

Head Matter:
KNOTT ET AL., RAILROAD AND WAREHOUSE COMMISSIONERS, v. ST. LOUIS, KANSAS CITY AND COLORADO RAILROAD CO. ST. LOUIS, KANSAS CITY AND COLORADO RAILROAD CO. v. KNOTT ET AL., RAILROAD AND WAREHOUSE COMMISSIONERS.
APPEAL AND CROSS-APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT- OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP MISSOURI.
Nos. 347, 348.
Argued April 1, 2, 3, 1912.
Decided June 16, 1913.
These suits having been consolidated with other similar suits disposed of by the decision in'the Missouri Bate Cases, ante, p. 474, the samé disposition is made of these suits.
The facts áre stated in the opinion.
These cases were argued simultaneously with the other Missouri Rate Cases, ante, p. 474 by the same counsel and on the same briefs.
Memorandum opinion by direction of the court.

Opinion:
By Mr. Justice Hughes.
This suit was one of the eighteen suits described in the Missouri Rate Cases, ante, p. 474, decided this day.- Upon the hearing below, as it appeared that the property of the St. Louis, Kansas ' City & Colorado Railroad Company had been acquired by the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, it was ordered, by consent of the parties, that the suits of the two companies should be consolidated and that the " findings, statements and figures as to both companies", should be put "in consolidated form as those of the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company."
Separate decrees were entered in the two cases, and separate appeals and- cross-appeals have been taken.
The same disposition must be made of both. (See Knott v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, No. 345, sub Missouri Rate Cases, note p. 474, ante.) The decree below is therefore reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to dismiss the bill without prejudice.
It is so ordered.