Case: Stainbrook v. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation; Giesey v. Devine, Director, Office of Personnel Management, et al.; Gutter v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.; Arnold v. Marshall et al., In re Downs, Cortez, aka Cortez-Espinoza v. United States; Morgan v. Montgomery, Warden, Georgia State Prison
Abbreviation: Stainbrook v. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation
Decision Date: 1982-03-08
Docket Number: No. 81-819; No. 81-830; No. 81-965; No. 81-5624; No. 81-5632; No. 81-5713; No. 81-5749
Citation: 455 U.S. 1008
Volume: 455
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Stainbrook v. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Giesey v. Devine, Director, Office of Personnel Management, et al., Gutter v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., Arnold v. Marshall et al., In re Downs, Cortez, aka Cortez-Espinoza v. United States, Morgan v. Montgomery, Warden, Georgia State Prison,
Judges: 
Pages: 1008–1008

Head Matter:
No. 81-819.
No. 81-830.
No. 81-965.
No. 81-5624.
No. 81-5632.
No. 81-5713.
No. 81-5749.
Stainbrook v. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Giesey v. Devine, Director, Office of Personnel Management, et al., Gutter v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., Arnold v. Marshall et al., In re Downs, Cortez, aka Cortez-Espinoza v. United States, Morgan v. Montgomery, Warden, Georgia State Prison,

Opinion:
454 U. S. 1146;
ante, p. 908;
ante, p. 909;
ante, p. 922;
454 U. S. 1121;
ante, p. 923; and
ante, p. 927. Petitions for rehearing denied.