Case: Slater Steels Corporation, et al., Plaintiffs, v. United States, Defendant; Viraj Group, Plaintiff, v. United States, Defendant, and Slater Steels Corporation, et al., Defendant-Intervenors
Abbreviation: Slater Steels Corp. v. United States
Decision Date: 2007-03-12
Docket Number: Consol Ct. No. 02-00551
Citation: 31 Ct. Int'l Trade 334
Volume: 31
Reporter: United States Court of International Trade Reports
Court: United States Court of International Trade
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Slater Steels Corporation, et al., Plaintiffs, v. United States, Defendant. Viraj Group, Plaintiff, v. United States, Defendant, and Slater Steels Corporation, et al., Defendant-Intervenors.
Judges: 
Pages: 334–334

Head Matter:
Slater Steels Corporation, et al., Plaintiffs, v. United States, Defendant. Viraj Group, Plaintiff, v. United States, Defendant, and Slater Steels Corporation, et al., Defendant-Intervenors.
Consol Ct. No. 02-00551
Dated: March 12, 2007
Collier, Shannon, Scott, PLLC {Robin H. Gilbert), for Plaintiffs and Defendant-Intervenors Slater Steels Corp., Carpenter Technology Corporation, Electralloy Corp., and Crucible Specialty Metals Division, Crucible Materials Corp.
Miller & Chevalier Chartered (Peter J. Koenig), for Plaintiff Viraj Group.
(,Jeanne E. Davidson), Director; (Stephen C. Tosini), Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice; (Matthew D. Walden), Office of Chief Counsel for Import Administration, United States Department of Commerce, of counsel, for Defendant.

Opinion:
JUDGMENT ORDER
BARZILAY, Judge:
Pursuant to the holding of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Viraj Group v. United States, Slip Op. 2006-1158 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 13, 2007), it is hereby
ORDERED that the Department of Commerce's Final Results of Determination Pursuant to Remand (Dep't Commerce May 7, 2004) ("Remand Results IF), produced in response to this court's decision in Slater Steels Corp. v. United States, 28 CIT _, 316 F. Supp. 2d 1368 (2004), is reinstated; and it is further
ORDERED that this case is dismissed.