Case: Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. United States; Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. United States; Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. United States; Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. United States; Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. United States; Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. United States; J. E. Bernard & Co., Inc., et al. v. United States
Abbreviation: Sears v. United States
Decision Date: 1968-04-24
Docket Number: No. P68/218; protests 295377-K, etc. (Philadelphia); No. P68/219; protests 297806-K, etc. (Los Angeles); No. P68/220; protests 312617-K and 58/4192 (Portland, Oreg.); No. P68/221; protests 313381-K/14937 and 313392-K/14842 (New Orleans); No. P68/222; protest 322707-K (San Francisco); No. P68/223; protests 60/13905 and 61/4990 (Seattle); No. P68/224; protests 60/30780-11549, etc. (Chicago)
Citation: 60 Cust. Ct. 1037
Volume: 60
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. United States, Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. United States, Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. United States, Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. United States, Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. United States, Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. United States, J. E. Bernard & Co., Inc., et al. v. United States,
Judges: 
Pages: 1037–1037

Head Matter:
Before the Second Division,
April 24, 1968
No. P68/218.
protests 295377-K, etc. (Philadelphia).
No. P68/219.
protests 297806-K, etc. (Los Angeles).
No. P68/220.
protests 312617-K and 58/4192 (Portland, Oreg.).
No. P68/221.
protests 313381-K/14937 and 313392-K/14842 (New Orleans).
No. P68/222.
protest 322707-K (San Francisco).
No. P68/223.
protests 60/13905 and 61/4990 (Seattle).
No. P68/224.
protests 60/30780-11549, etc. (Chicago).
Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. United States, Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. United States, Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. United States, Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. United States, Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. United States, Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. United States, J. E. Bernard & Co., Inc., et al. v. United States,

Opinion:
Beckworth, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of bicycles, with or without tires having wheels in diameter (measured to the outer circumference of the tire) over 25 inches, weighing less than 36 pounds complete without accessories, and not designed for use with tires having a cross-sectional diameter exceeding 1% inches and that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Schmidt Pritchard & Co., Mangano Cycles Co. (47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.