Case: Peek v. Kemp, Warden; City of Newport, Kentucky, et al. v. Iacobucci, dba Talk of the Town, et al.; Walker v. Illinois; Whaley v. United States; Stich v. Stich; Clissuras v. City of New York et al.; Miller v. California; Singleton v. Frey, Superintendent, Missouri Eastern Correctional Center; In re Magoon; In re Parrish; Ely v. More Than 20 FBI Agents et al.; Zaky v. United States Veterans Administration et al.; Chambers v. Industrial Commission of Illinois et al.; In re Johl; Butler v. Texas
Abbreviation: Peek v. Kemp
Decision Date: 1987-01-12
Docket Number: No. 85-7111; No. 86-139; No. 86-277; No. 86-404; No. 86-424; No. 86-474; No. 86-5320; No. 86-5410; No. 86-5414; No. 86-5448; No. 86-5456; No. 86-5493; No. 86-5529; No. 86-5547; No. 86-5559
Citation: 479 U.S. 1047
Volume: 479
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Peek v. Kemp, Warden, City of Newport, Kentucky, et al. v. Iacobucci, dba Talk of the Town, et al., Walker v. Illinois, Whaley v. United States, Stich v. Stich, Clissuras v. City of New York et al., Miller v. California, Singleton v. Frey, Superintendent, Missouri Eastern Correctional Center, In re Magoon, In re Parrish, Ely v. More Than 20 FBI Agents et al., Zaky v. United States Veterans Administration et al., Chambers v. Industrial Commission of Illinois et al., In re Johl, Butler v. Texas,
Judges: 
Pages: 1047–1047

Head Matter:
No. 85-7111.
No. 86-139.
No. 86-277.
No. 86-404.
No. 86-424.
No. 86-474.
No. 86-5320.
No. 86-5410.
No. 86-5414.
No. 86-5448.
No. 86-5456.
No. 86-5493.
No. 86-5529.
No. 86-5547.
No. 86-5559.
Peek v. Kemp, Warden, City of Newport, Kentucky, et al. v. Iacobucci, dba Talk of the Town, et al., Walker v. Illinois, Whaley v. United States, Stich v. Stich, Clissuras v. City of New York et al., Miller v. California, Singleton v. Frey, Superintendent, Missouri Eastern Correctional Center, In re Magoon, In re Parrish, Ely v. More Than 20 FBI Agents et al., Zaky v. United States Veterans Administration et al., Chambers v. Industrial Commission of Illinois et al., In re Johl, Butler v. Texas,

Opinion:
ante, p. 989;
ante, p. 92;
ante, p. 995;
ante, p. 962;
ante, p. 946;
ante, p. 933;
ante, p. 989;
ante, p. 934;
ante, p. 928;
ante, p. 928;
ante, p. 1009;
ante, p. 937;
ante, p. 952;
ante, p. 947; and
ante, p. 946. Petitions for rehearing denied.