Case: BROAD RIVER POWER COMPANY et al. v. SOUTH CAROLINA ex rel. DANIEL, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Abbreviation: Broad River Power Co. v. South Carolina ex rel. Daniel
Decision Date: 1930-12-15
Docket Number: No. 528 (1929 Term)
Citation: 282 U.S. 187
Volume: 282
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: BROAD RIVER POWER COMPANY et al. v. SOUTH CAROLINA ex rel. DANIEL, ATTORNEY GENERAL.
Judges: The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Holmes, Mr. Justice Brandéis and Mr. Justice Stone'adhere to the views expressed in the opinion heretofore delivered. 281 U. 3. 537. .
Pages: 187–193

Head Matter:
BROAD RIVER POWER COMPANY et al. v. SOUTH CAROLINA ex rel. DANIEL, ATTORNEY GENERAL.
No. 528 (1929 Term).
Argued on Rehearing, December 3, 4, 1930.—
Decided December 15, 1930.
See 281 U. S. 537.
Mr. George M. LePine, with whom Messrs. C. Edward Paxson, W. C. McLain and Wm. Marshall Bullitt were on the supplemental brief, for petitioners.
Mr. Irvine F. Belser, with whom Messrs. John M. Daniel, Attorney General of South Carolina, Cordie Page, Assistant Attorney Ceneral, Joseph L. Nettles, City Attorney of Columbia, S. C., H. N. Edmunds, and C. T. Graydon were on the supplemental brief, for respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
At the last term the writ of certiorari in this cause was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 281 U. S. 537. A rehearing afterwards was ordered by the Court and the rehearing recently has been had. Upon this further consideration the Court adheres to the .view that the writ of certiorari should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction, but the members of the Court differ in the reasons which lead to that decision :