Case: CRITICAL MASS ENERGY PROJECT, Appellant, v. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, et al.
Abbreviation: Critical Mass Energy Project v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Decision Date: 1991-09-06
Docket Number: No. 90-5120
Citation: 291 U.S. App. D.C. 354
Volume: 291
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Parties: CRITICAL MASS ENERGY PROJECT, Appellant, v. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, et al.
Judges: Before MIKVA, Chief Judge, and WALD, EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, D.H. GINSBURG, SENTELLE, THOMAS, HENDERSON and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.
Pages: 354–354

Head Matter:
942 F.2d 799
CRITICAL MASS ENERGY PROJECT, Appellant, v. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, et al.
No. 90-5120.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Sept. 6, 1991.
Before MIKVA, Chief Judge, and WALD, EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, D.H. GINSBURG, SENTELLE, THOMAS, HENDERSON and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The Suggestions For Rehearing En Banc and appellant's response thereto have been circulated to the full Court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the Court in regular, active service voted in favor of the suggestions. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestions are granted and this case will be considered and decided by the Court sitting en banc. It is
FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the judgment of the panel filed on April 30, 1991, 931 F.2d 939 be, and the same hereby is, vacated.
A future order will govern further proceedings.