Case: Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., et al. v. United States; Unitron Import Corp. and J. T. Steeb & Co. v. United States
Abbreviation: Frank P. Dow Co. v. United States
Decision Date: 1969-01-06
Docket Number: No. P69/1; protests 60/27877,etc. (Houston); No. P69/2; protest 67/2960 (Portland, Oreg.)
Citation: 62 Cust. Ct. 1059
Volume: 62
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., et al. v. United States, Unitron Import Corp. and J. T. Steeb & Co. v. United States,
Judges: 
Pages: 1059–1059

Head Matter:
Before the First Division,
January 6, 1969
No. P69/1.
protests 60/27877,etc. (Houston).
No. P69/2.
protest 67/2960 (Portland, Oreg.).
Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., et al. v. United States, Unitron Import Corp. and J. T. Steeb & Co. v. United States,

Opinion:
Watson, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of wooden doors similar in all material respects to those the subject of B. A. McKenzie & Co., Inc. v. United States (58 Cust. Ct. 460, C.D. 3020), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.