Case: UNITED STATES, Appellee v. DILLARD A. TAYLOR, Specialist Four, U. S. Army, Appellant
Abbreviation: United States v. Taylor
Decision Date: 1972-04-21
Docket Number: No. 24,719
Citation: 21 C.M.A. 343
Volume: 21
Reporter: Decisions of the United States Court of Military Appeals
Court: United States Court of Military Appeals
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: UNITED STATES, Appellee v DILLARD A. TAYLOR, Specialist Four, U. S. Army, Appellant
Judges: Chief Judge DARDEN and Judge Quinn concur.
Pages: 343–344

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES, Appellee v DILLARD A. TAYLOR, Specialist Four, U. S. Army, Appellant
21 USCMA 343, 45 CMR 117
No. 24,719
April 21, 1972
Captain Joseph V. Aprile, II, and Captain Peter J. Horner, Jr., argued the cause for Appellant, Accused. On the brief were Colonel George J. McCartin, Jr., Captain John D. Lanoue, and Captain Robert B. Harrison, III.
Captain R. Craig Lawrence argued the cause for Appellee, United States. With him on the brief were Colonel David T. Bryant, Lieutenant Colonel Ronald M. Holdaway, Captain Merle F. Wilberding, Captain David E. Wilson, Captain James T. Harper, and Captain Walter A. Smith, III.
Also decided, reversed, and dismissed this date on the same issue are United States v Wanzie, No. 24,758, and United States v Arter, No. 24,727.

Opinion:
Opinion of the Court
Duncan, Judge:
The issue before us in this ease questions the validity of a search, authorized by the appellant's commanding officer, of an off-post civilian residence in Okinawa.
For the reasons set forth in United States v Mitchell, 21 USCMA 340, 45 CMR 114 (1972), we hold that the search was invalid. Since all the Government's evidence as to the charged offenses resulted from the illegal search, reversal is required.
The decision of the Court of Military Review is reversed. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army. The charges and specifications are ordered dismissed.
Chief Judge DARDEN and Judge Quinn concur.