Case: Wooten v. Bomar, Warden; Williams v. Ragen, Warden; Moore v. Bannan, Warden; Sam v. Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary; Hicks v. Pepersack, Warden, et al.; Miller v. Taylor, Warden; and Way v. Settle, Warden
Abbreviation: Wooten v. Bomar
Decision Date: 1960-06-27
Docket Number: No. 755; No. 933; No. 944; No. 980; No. 1006; No. 1020; No. 1042
Citation: 363 U.S. 835
Volume: 363
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Wooten v. Bomar, Warden; Williams v. Ragen, Warden; Moore v. Bannan, Warden; Sam v. Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary; Hicks v. Pepersack, Warden, et al.; Miller v. Taylor, Warden; and Way v. Settle, Warden.
Judges: 
Pages: 835–835

Head Matter:
No. 755,
No. 933,
No. 944,
No. 980,
No. 1006,
No. 1020,
No. 1042,
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Wooten v. Bomar, Warden; Williams v. Ragen, Warden; Moore v. Bannan, Warden; Sam v. Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary; Hicks v. Pepersack, Warden, et al.; Miller v. Taylor, Warden; and Way v. Settle, Warden.
Petitioners pro se. George F. McGanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Henry C. Foutch, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent in No. 755, Mise.

Opinion:
Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.