Case: United States v. Mrs. H. Gattle Linen Co.
Abbreviation: United States v. Mrs. H. Gattle Linen Co.
Decision Date: 1941-03-14
Docket Number: No. 5169; Entry No. 511
Citation: 6 Cust. Ct. 843
Volume: 6
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: United States v. Mrs. H. Gattle Linen Co.
Judges: 
Pages: 843–843

Head Matter:
United States v. Mrs. H. Gattle Linen Co.
No. 5169.
Entry No. 511.
Invoice dated Brussels, Belgium November 23, 1939.
Certified November 24, 1939.
Entered at Cincinnati, Ohio December 16, 1939.
(Decided March 14, 1941)
Charles D. Lawrence, Acting Assistant Attorney General (James F. Donnelly, special attorney), for the plaintiff.
Tompkins & Tompkins (J. Stuart Tompkins of counsel) for the defendant.

Opinion:
Dallingee, Judge:
This appeal to reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon an oral stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto to the effect that the foreign value is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the involved merchandise and that such values were the appraised values, plus 2.75 per centum Belgian transmission tax, there being no higher export value.
On the agreed facts I find the foreign value as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such values were the appraised values, plus 2.75 per centum Belgian transmission tax. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.