Case: Knapp v. Arizona; Martinelli, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Martinelli, et al. v. United States Department of the Army; Halliwell v. Eu, Secretary of State of California, et al.; Brumfield v. United States; Casa Linda Presbyterian Church in America et al. v. Grace Union Presbytery, Inc.; Totus et al. v. Holly et al.; Torres v. State Board of Law Examiners of Illinois; Casey et al. v. Tennessee; Holding v. Sovran Bank et al.; Bayer v. Johnson, Secretary of Revenue of South Dakota; Johnson et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; Yasui et al. v. United States; Neely v. United States; Comsia v. Mangnone et al.; Jefferson v. Georgia; Lyons v. Scott et al.; Thompson v. Alabama; May v. Texas; Smith v. United States; Wabeke v. Mutual Home Federal Savings & Loan Assn. et al.; Spigelski v. Pittsburgh Human Relations Commission; Joubert v. Nebraska; Vahlsing v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad Co. et al.; McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board of California et al.; Fondo v. Sheindlin, Individually and as Judge of the Family Court of the State of New York, Bronx County, et al.; Kriletich v. Commission on Judicial Performance et al.; Brewster v. Mount Vernon Hospital et al.; Martin v. St. Joe Container Co.; Penk et al. v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education; Kerr v. Pennsylvania; King v. California et al.; Sampang v. Marsh et al.; Leighton v. Beatrice Cos., Inc., et al.; Easley v. Koscinski et al.; Van Sant v. Arlington County, Virginia; Williams v. Georgia; Horton v. Georgia; Felde v. Butler, Warden; Kost v. Capitol Corp. et al.; Grant v. New York; Williams v. United States Postal Service et al.; Howard v. Davis et al.; Abraham v. White, Warden; Fletcher v. Hood et al.; Van Sant v. Hudson et al.; Silagy v. Illinois; Tilli v. Spaziani et al.; De La Cerda v. Chemeketa Community College District et al.; Haddix v. City of Dayton, Ohio, et al.; Murray v. Plaut, Administrator, Maximum Security Facility, Lorton, Virginia; Andregg v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. et al.; Owens v. Fulcomer; Felton v. Dixon et al.
Abbreviation: Knapp v. Arizona
Decision Date: 1987-11-30
Docket Number: No. 86-1710; No. 86-1888; No. 86-1891; No. 86-1905; No. 86-1911; No. 86-1912; No. 86-1988; No. 86-2005; No. 86-2017; No. 86-2049; No. 86-2050; No. 86-2066; No. 86-6716; No. 86-6922; No. 86-6933; No. 86-6951; No. 86-6953; No. 86-7082; No. 86-7089; No. 86-7093; No. 86-7138; No. 86-7162; No. 87-2; No. 87-9; No. 87-46; No. 87-53; No. 87-91; No. 87-190; No. 87-195; No. 87-207; No. 87-229; No. 87-288; No. 87-304; No. 87-5021; No. 87-5023; No. 87-5062; No. 87-5082; No. 87-5117; No. 87-5151; No. 87-5181; No. 87-5189; No. 87-5191; No. 87-5212; No. 87-5241; No. 87-5242; No. 87-5258; No. 87-5300; No. 87-5309; No. 87-5318; No. 87-5349; No. 87-5378; No. 87-5394; No. 87-5396
Citation: 484 U.S. 970
Volume: 484
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Knapp v. Arizona, Martinelli, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Martinelli, et al. v. United States Department of the Army, Halliwell v. Eu, Secretary of State of California, et al., Brumfield v. United States, Casa Linda Presbyterian Church in America et al. v. Grace Union Presbytery, Inc., Totus et al. v. Holly et al., Torres v. State Board of Law Examiners of Illinois, Casey et al. v. Tennessee, Holding v. Sovran Bank et al., Bayer v. Johnson, Secretary of Revenue of South Dakota, Johnson et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Yasui et al. v. United States, Neely v. United States, Comsia v. Mangnone et al., Jefferson v. Georgia, Lyons v. Scott et al., Thompson v. Alabama, May v. Texas, Smith v. United States, Wabeke v. Mutual Home Federal Savings & Loan Assn. et al., Spigelski v. Pittsburgh Human Relations Commission, Joubert v. Nebraska, Vahlsing v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad Co. et al., McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board of California et al., Fondo v. Sheindlin, Individually and as Judge of the Family Court of the State of New York, Bronx County, et al., Kriletich v. Commission on Judicial Performance et al., Brewster v. Mount Vernon Hospital et al., Martin v. St. Joe Container Co., Penk et al. v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education, Kerr v. Pennsylvania, King v. California et al., Sampang v. Marsh et al., Leighton v. Beatrice Cos., Inc., et al., Easley v. Koscinski et al., Van Sant v. Arlington County, Virginia, Williams v. Georgia, Horton v. Georgia, Felde v. Butler, Warden, Kost v. Capitol Corp. et al., Grant v. New York, Williams v. United States Postal Service et al., Howard v. Davis et al., Abraham v. White, Warden, Fletcher v. Hood et al., Van Sant v. Hudson et al., Silagy v. Illinois, Tilli v. Spaziani et al., De La Cerda v. Chemeketa Community College District et al., Haddix v. City of Dayton, Ohio, et al., Murray v. Plaut, Administrator, Maximum Security Facility, Lorton, Virginia, Andregg v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. et al., Owens v. Fulcomer, Felton v. Dixon et al.,
Judges: 
Pages: 970–972

Head Matter:
No. 86-1710.
Knapp v. Arizona, Martinelli, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Martinelli, et al. v. United States Department of the Army, Halliwell v. Eu, Secretary of State of California, et al., Brumfield v. United States, Casa Linda Presbyterian Church in America et al. v. Grace Union Presbytery, Inc., Totus et al. v. Holly et al., Torres v. State Board of Law Examiners of Illinois, Casey et al. v. Tennessee, Holding v. Sovran Bank et al., Bayer v. Johnson, Secretary of Revenue of South Dakota, Johnson et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Yasui et al. v. United States, Neely v. United States, Comsia v. Mangnone et al., Jefferson v. Georgia, Lyons v. Scott et al., Thompson v. Alabama, May v. Texas, Smith v. United States, Wabeke v. Mutual Home Federal Savings & Loan Assn. et al., Spigelski v. Pittsburgh Human Relations Commission, Joubert v. Nebraska, Vahlsing v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad Co. et al., McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board of California et al., Fondo v. Sheindlin, Individually and as Judge of the Family Court of the State of New York, Bronx County, et al., Kriletich v. Commission on Judicial Performance et al., Brewster v. Mount Vernon Hospital et al., Martin v. St. Joe Container Co., Penk et al. v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education, Kerr v. Pennsylvania, King v. California et al., Sampang v. Marsh et al., Leighton v. Beatrice Cos., Inc., et al., Easley v. Koscinski et al., Van Sant v. Arlington County, Virginia, Williams v. Georgia, Horton v. Georgia, Felde v. Butler, Warden, Kost v. Capitol Corp. et al., Grant v. New York, Williams v. United States Postal Service et al., Howard v. Davis et al., Abraham v. White, Warden, Fletcher v. Hood et al., Van Sant v. Hudson et al., Silagy v. Illinois, Tilli v. Spaziani et al., De La Cerda v. Chemeketa Community College District et al., Haddix v. City of Dayton, Ohio, et al., Murray v. Plaut, Administrator, Maximum Security Facility, Lorton, Virginia, Andregg v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. et al., Owens v. Fulcomer, Felton v. Dixon et al.,
No. 86-1888.
No. 86-1891.
No. 86-1905.
No. 86-1911.
No. 86-1912.
No. 86-1988.

Opinion:
ante, p. 816;
ante, p. 822;
ante, p. 801;
ante, p. 822;
et al., ante, p. 823;
ante, p. 823;
ante, p. 827;
No. 86-2005.
No. 86-2017.
No. 86-2049.
No. 86-2050.
No. 86-2066.
No. 86-6716.
No. 86-6922.
No. 86-6933.
No. 86-6951.
No. 86-6953.
No. 86-7082.
No. 86-7089.
No. 86-7093.
No. 86-7138.
No. 86-7162.
No. 87-2.
No. 87-9.
No. 87-46.
No. 87-53.
No. 87-91.
No. 87-190.
No. 87-195.
No. 87-207.
No. 87-229.
No. 87-288.
No. 87-304.
No. 87-5021.
No. 87-5023.
ante, p. 828;
ante, p. 828;
ante, p. 830;
ante, p. 830;
ante, p. 831;
ante, p. 832;
ante, p. 835;
ante, p. 872;
ante, p. 836;
ante, p. 872;
ante, p. 872;
ante, p. 842;
ante, p. 842;
ante, p. 844;
ante, p. 905;
ante, p. 845;
ante, p. 845;
ante, p. 847;
ante, p. 848;
ante, p. 849;
ante, p. 853;
ante, p. 853;
ante, p. 854;
ante, p. 802;
ante, p. 855;
ante, p. 898;
ante, p. 857;
ante, p. 857;
No. 87-5062.
No. 87-5082.
No. 87-5117.
No. 87-5151.
No. 87-5181.
No. 87-5189.
No. 87-5191.
No. 87-5212.
No. 87-5241.
No. 87-5242.
No. 87-5258.
No. 87-5300.
No. 87-5309.
No. 87-5318.
No. 87-5349.
No. 87-5378.
No. 87-5394.
No. 87-5396.
ante, p. 803;
ante, p. 905;
ante, p. 873;
ante, p. 863;
ante, p. 864;
ante, p. 864;
ante, p. 864;
ante, p. 915;
ante, p. 899;
ante, p. 866;
ante, p. 873;
ante, p. 900;
ante, p. 868;
ante, p. 901;
ante, p. 902;
ante, p. 909;
ante, p. 916; and
ante, p. 916. Petitions for rehearing denied.