Case: Spawr Optical Research, Inc., et al. v. United States; Zill v. Avis Rent-a-Car Systems, Inc.; Fleming v. Moore et al.; Rosenberg v. Comerica Bank; Johnson v. Johnson et al.; Vahlsing v. Maine; Streeter v. National Labor Relations Board; Woolworth v. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections; Stutzman v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago et al.; Jarrells v. Georgia; Kerkman v. United States; Games v. Indiana; Devine v. Herald-Mail Co.; Gorman v. United States; Doe v. United States; Kelly v. Hines-Rinaldi Funeral Home, Inc.; Asch v. Philips, Appel & Walden, Inc., et al.; Martin v. Townsend et al.; Underwood v. Indiana; Westover v. United States; Van Leeuwen et vir v. United States et al.; Potts v. Georgia; Forgey et ux. v. Baca State Bank et al.; Harnage v. United States; Wright v. United States; Karaagac v. District of Columbia Board of Medicine; Robertson v. California; Nelson v. Ingram et al.; Love v. United States; Noble v. Watkins, Secretary of Energy; Patner v. County of Lake; Woodward v. State Bar of Georgia et al.; Robinson v. Quick et al.; O'Connor v. Mulligan; Connor v. Sachs et al.; Siegel v. Edmonds Co., Inc., Profit Sharing Plan et al.; Kenna v. New Jersey; Lerman v. City of Portland, Maine; Grader v. City of Lynnwood; Brownlee v. Alabama; Thompson v. Alabama; Boyd v. Alabama; Church v. Thompson, Warden, et al.; Davis v. Davis; Kinsman v. Georgia; Horne v. Allen Metropolitan Housing Authority; Tompkins v. University of South Alabama ROTC, Military Science Department, et al.; Washington v. Martin et al.; Tempel v. Valley Hospital et al.; Morris v. Christian Hospital; Riva v. Getchell et al.; Yang v. McCarthy et al.; Veneri v. Casey, Governor of Pennsylvania, et al.; Vinson v. Watkins; Lawrence v. United States Army (Fort Hood); Lawrence v. United States Army (TACOM); Cassady v. Adair, Individually and as Superintendent of Montgomery County Schools, et al.; Perkins v. Illinois, In re Ogden, In re Sobamowo, Zarrilli v. Garrity et al.; Brown-Bey v. United States, In re Sparks
Abbreviation: Spawr Optical Research, Inc. v. United States
Decision Date: 1989-11-27
Docket Number: No. 88-1708; No. 88-1966; No. 88-1979; No. 88-2106; No. 88-2116; No. 88-2127; No. 88-6850; No. 88-6976; No. 88-7139; No. 88-7180; No. 88-7204; No. 88-7217; No. 88-7278; No. 88-7316; No. 88-7388; No. 88-7418; No. 88-7429; No. 88-7435; No. 88-7465; No. 88-7475; No. 88-7491; No. 88-7495; No. 88-7504; No. 88-7514; No. 88-7597; No. 88-7612; No. 88-7619; No. 88-7627; No. 89-69; No. 89-74; No. 89-76; No. 89-88; No. 89-105; No. 89-160; No. 89-185; No. 89-203; No. 89-249; No. 89-340; No. 89-341; No. 89-5038; No. 89-5040; No. 89-5053; No. 89-5066; No. 89-5081; No. 89-5099; No. 89-5105; No. 89-5143; No. 89-5157; No. 89-5192; No. 89-5200; No. 89-5264; No. 89-5298; No. 89-5330; No. 89-5344; No. 89-5372; No. 89-5373; No. 89-5386; No. 89-5387; No. 89-5409; No. 89-5411; No. 89-5530; No. 89-5556; No. 89-5642
Citation: 493 U.S. 984
Volume: 493
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Spawr Optical Research, Inc., et al. v. United States, Zill v. Avis Rent-a-Car Systems, Inc., Fleming v. Moore et al., Rosenberg v. Comerica Bank, Johnson v. Johnson et al., Vahlsing v. Maine, Streeter v. National Labor Relations Board, Woolworth v. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Stutzman v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago et al., Jarrells v. Georgia, Kerkman v. United States, Games v. Indiana, Devine v. Herald-Mail Co., Gorman v. United States, Doe v. United States, Kelly v. Hines-Rinaldi Funeral Home, Inc., Asch v. Philips, Appel & Walden, Inc., et al., Martin v. Townsend et al., Underwood v. Indiana, Westover v. United States, Van Leeuwen et vir v. United States et al., Potts v. Georgia, Forgey et ux. v. Baca State Bank et al., Harnage v. United States, Wright v. United States, Karaagac v. District of Columbia Board of Medicine, Robertson v. California, Nelson v. Ingram et al., Love v. United States, Noble v. Watkins, Secretary of Energy, Patner v. County of Lake, Woodward v. State Bar of Georgia et al., Robinson v. Quick et al., O’Connor v. Mulligan, Connor v. Sachs et al., Siegel v. Edmonds Co., Inc., Profit Sharing Plan et al., Kenna v. New Jersey, Lerman v. City of Portland, Maine, Grader v. City of Lynnwood, Brownlee v. Alabama, Thompson v. Alabama, Boyd v. Alabama, Church v. Thompson, Warden, et al., Davis v. Davis, Kinsman v. Georgia, Horne v. Allen Metropolitan Housing Authority, Tompkins v. University of South Alabama ROTC, Military Science Department, et al., Washington v. Martin et al., Tempel v. Valley Hospital et al., Morris v. Christian Hospital, Riva v. Getchell et al., Yang v. McCarthy et al., Veneri v. Casey, Governor of Pennsylvania, et al., Vinson v. Watkins, Lawrence v. United States Army (Fort Hood), Lawrence v. United States Army (TACOM), Cassady v. Adair, Individually and as Superintendent of Montgomery County Schools, et al., Perkins v. Illinois, In re Ogden, In re Sobamowo, Zarrilli v. Garrity et al., Brown-Bey v. United States, In re Sparks,
Judges: 
Pages: 984–987

Head Matter:
No. 88-1708.
Spawr Optical Research, Inc., et al. v. United States, Zill v. Avis Rent-a-Car Systems, Inc., Fleming v. Moore et al., Rosenberg v. Comerica Bank, Johnson v. Johnson et al., Vahlsing v. Maine, Streeter v. National Labor Relations Board, Woolworth v. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Stutzman v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago et al., Jarrells v. Georgia, Kerkman v. United States, Games v. Indiana, Devine v. Herald-Mail Co., Gorman v. United States, Doe v. United States, Kelly v. Hines-Rinaldi Funeral Home, Inc., Asch v. Philips, Appel & Walden, Inc., et al., Martin v. Townsend et al., Underwood v. Indiana, Westover v. United States, Van Leeuwen et vir v. United States et al., Potts v. Georgia, Forgey et ux. v. Baca State Bank et al., Harnage v. United States, Wright v. United States, Karaagac v. District of Columbia Board of Medicine, Robertson v. California, Nelson v. Ingram et al., Love v. United States, Noble v. Watkins, Secretary of Energy, Patner v. County of Lake, Woodward v. State Bar of Georgia et al., Robinson v. Quick et al., O’Connor v. Mulligan, Connor v. Sachs et al., Siegel v. Edmonds Co., Inc., Profit Sharing Plan et al., Kenna v. New Jersey, Lerman v. City of Portland, Maine, Grader v. City of Lynnwood, Brownlee v. Alabama, Thompson v. Alabama, Boyd v. Alabama, Church v. Thompson, Warden, et al., Davis v. Davis, Kinsman v. Georgia, Horne v. Allen Metropolitan Housing Authority, Tompkins v. University of South Alabama ROTC, Military Science Department, et al., Washington v. Martin et al., Tempel v. Valley Hospital et al., Morris v. Christian Hospital, Riva v. Getchell et al., Yang v. McCarthy et al., Veneri v. Casey, Governor of Pennsylvania, et al., Vinson v. Watkins, Lawrence v. United States Army (Fort Hood), Lawrence v. United States Army (TACOM), Cassady v. Adair, Individually and as Superintendent of Montgomery County Schools, et al., Perkins v. Illinois, In re Ogden, In re Sobamowo, Zarrilli v. Garrity et al., Brown-Bey v. United States, In re Sparks,

Opinion:
ante, p. 809;
No. 88-1966.
No. 88-1979.
No. 88-2106.
No. 88-2116.
No. 88-2127.
No. 88-6850.
No. 88-6976.
No. 88-7139.
No. 88-7180.
No. 88-7204.
No. 88-7217.
No. 88-7278.
No. 88-7316.
No. 88-7388.
No. 88-7418.
No. 88-7429.
No. 88-7435.
No. 88-7465.
No. 88-7475.
No. 88-7491.
No. 88-7495.
No. 88-7504.
No. 88-7514.
No. 88-7597.
No. 88-7612.
No. 88-7619.
No. 88-7627.
No. 89-69.
No. 89-74.
No. 89-76.
ante, P 816;
ante, p. 816;
ante, p. 824;
ante, p. 824;
ante, p. 825;
ante, p. 826;
ante, p. 827;
ante, p. 828;
ante, p. 874;
ante, p. 828;
ante, p. 874;
ante, p. 830;
ante, p. 828;
ante, p. 906;
ante, p. 835;
ante, p. 835;
ante, p. 875;
ante, p. 900;
ante, p. 837;
ante, p. 838;
ante, p. 876;
ante, p. 839;
ante, p. 839;
ante, p. 844;
ante, p. 844;
ante, p. 879;
ante, p. 845;
ante, p. 849;
ante, p. 890;
ante, p. 849;
No. 89-88.
No. 89-105.
No. 89-160.
No. 89-185.
No. 89-203.
No. 89-249.
No. 89-340.
No. 89-341.
No. 89-5038.
No. 89-5040.
No. 89-5053.
No. 89-5066.
No. 89-5081.
No. 89-5099.
No. 89-5105.
No. 89-5143.
No. 89-5157.
No. 89-5192.
No. 89-5200.
No. 89-5264.
No. 89-5298.
No. 89-5330.
No. 89-5344.
No. 89-5372.
No. 89-5373.
No. 89-5386.
No. 89-5387.
No. 89-5409.
No. 89-5411.
ante, p. 849;
ante, p. 850;
ante, p. 853;
ante, p. 854;
ante, p. 854;
ante, p. 855;
ante, p. 894;
ante, p. 894;
ante, p. 874;
ante, p. 874;
ante, p. 883;
ante, p. 859;
ante, p. 859;
ante, p. 874;
ante, p. 860;
ante, p. 862;
ante, p. 862;
ante, p. 864;
ante, p. 864;
ante, p. 866;
ante, p. 868;
ante, p. 896;
ante, p. 896;
ante, p. 938;
ante, p. 938;
ante, p. 870;
ante, p 897;
ante, p. 888;
ante, p. 888;
No. 89-5530.
No. 89-5556.
No. 89-5642.
ante, p. 899;
ante, p. 899; and
ante, p. 916. Petitions for rehearing denied.