Case: Emery Bird Thayer Dry Goods Co. et al. v. Williams et al.; and Williams et al. v. Emery Bird Thayer Dry Goods Co. et al.
Abbreviation: Emery Bird Thayer Dry Goods Co. v. Williams
Decision Date: 1937-11-22
Docket Number: No. 268; No. 269
Citation: 302 U.S. 651
Volume: 302
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Emery Bird Thayer Dry Goods Co. et al. v. Williams et al.; and Williams et al. v. Emery Bird Thayer Dry Goods Co. et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 651–652

Head Matter:
No. 268.
No. 269.
Emery Bird Thayer Dry Goods Co. et al. v. Williams et al.; and Williams et al. v. Emery Bird Thayer Dry Goods Co. et al.
Decided No vember 22, 1937.

Opinion:
On certificate from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Messrs. Armwell L. Cooper and Frederick H. Wood for Emery Bird Thayer Dry Goods Co. et al., and Messrs. Henry M. Channing and Barton Cornean for Moses Williams et al.
Per Curiam:
The motion to bring up the entire record and cause is denied. Upon examination of the certificate, the certificate is dismissed. Jewell v. Knight, 123 U. S. 426, 433; Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 215 U. S. 216, 221; Biddle v. Luvisch, 266 U. S. 173; Smith v. Ajax Pipe Line Co., 298 U. S. 641; Dixie Terminal Co. v. United States, 298 U. S. 645.
Reported below: 15 F. Supp. 938.