Case: Loretz & Co., a/c Wythe Sales Corp. v. United States
Abbreviation: Loretz v. United States
Decision Date: 1968-03-12
Docket Number: C.D. 3359
Citation: 60 Cust. Ct. 266
Volume: 60
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Loretz & Co., a/c Wythe Sales Corp. v. United States
Judges: Before Rao, Ford, and Beckworth, Judges
Pages: 266–267

Head Matter:
(C.D. 3359)
Loretz & Co., a/c Wythe Sales Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court, Second Division
(Decided March 12, 1968)
. Stein £ Shostalc for the the plaintiff.
Edwin L. Weisl, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
Before Rao, Ford, and Beckworth, Judges

Opinion:
Ford, Judge:
The cases listed in schedule "A," attached hereto and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon a written stipulation enteréd into by and 'between counsel for the respective parties which reads as follows:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States:
1. That the items marked "A", and checked EER by E. E. Rams-dell on the invoices covered by the protests enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases, and assessed with duty at 19% ad valorem under the provisions of Item 680.50 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States are designated on the invoices as "lamp pulleys" which are claimed dutiable at 10.5% ad valorem within Item 664.10 of said Schedules as elevators, hoists, winches, cranes, jacks, pulley tackle, 'belt conveyors and other lifting, handling, loading or unloading machinery, not provided for in item 664.05.
2. That said "lamp pulleys" are not, in fact, pulleys, pillow blocks, shaft couplings, or parts thereof, but are, in fact, lifting machinery.
3. That the protests enumerated in the attached Schedule be deemed submitted on this stipulation, the protests being limited to the items marked with the letter "A," as aforesaid, and abandoned as to all other items.
Plaintiff having abandoned the protests as to all other merchandise, they are hereby dismissed. Accepting the stipulation, we find and hold that the merchandise marked "A" and initialed on the invoices by the designated commodity specialist consists of lifting machinery. Therefore, the claim in the protests that said merchandise is properly dutiable at the rate of 10.5 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, under item 664.10, is sustained.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.