Case: CREWS v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR
Abbreviation: Crews v. Wainwright
Decision Date: 1963-10-21
Docket Number: No. 59
Citation: 375 U.S. 50
Volume: 375
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: CREWS v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.
Judges: Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Clark dissent for the reason that the judgment rests on an adequate state ground.
Pages: 50–50

Head Matter:
CREWS v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.
No. 59,
Misc.
Decided October 21, 1963.
Petitioner pro se.
Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and James O. Mahorner, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Florida for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335.
Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Clark dissent for the reason that the judgment rests on an adequate state ground.