Case: Royal Trading Company, Limited, and American Customs Brokerage Co. et al. v. United States, protests 61/8864, etc. (Honolulu); Fijiya, Ltd., and American Customs Brokerage Co. et al. v. United States, protests 64/14346, etc. (Honolulu)
Abbreviation: Royal Trading Co. v. United States
Decision Date: 1966-08-24
Docket Number: No. P66/207; No. P66/208
Citation: 57 Cust. Ct. 806
Volume: 57
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Royal Trading Company, Limited, and American Customs Brokerage Co. et al. v. United States, protests 61/8864, etc. (Honolulu). Fijiya, Ltd., and American Customs Brokerage Co. et al. v. United States, protests 64/14346, etc. (Honolulu).
Judges: 
Pages: 806–806

Head Matter:
Before the Third Division,
August 24, 1966
No. P66/207. —
No. P66/208. —
Royal Trading Company, Limited, and American Customs Brokerage Co. et al. v. United States, protests 61/8864, etc. (Honolulu). Fijiya, Ltd., and American Customs Brokerage Co. et al. v. United States, protests 64/14346, etc. (Honolulu).

Opinion:
Donlon, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of Iso peanuts, peanut crackers, and Japanese rice crackers similar in all material respects to those the subject of Hilo Rice Mill Co., Ltd., American Customs Brokerage Company et al. v. United Stales (52 CCPA 106, C.A.D. 866), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.