Case: Budd v. California
Abbreviation: Budd v. California
Decision Date: 1966-10-17
Docket Number: No. 91
Citation: 385 U.S. 909
Volume: 385
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Budd v. California.
Judges: Mr. Justice Douglas joins this opinion, believing that being an alcohol addict, like being a drug addict, is beyond the reach of the criminal law for the reasons stated in his concurring opinion in Robinson v. California, 370 U. S. 660, 668.
Pages: 909–913

Head Matter:
No. 91,
Mise.
Budd v. California.
George F. Duke, Marshall W. Krause and James B. Schnake for petitioner.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and William D. Stein, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
Briefs of amici curiae, in support of the petition, were filed for the Public Defender of Sacramento County, and by Eugene I. Lambert for the Washington, D. C., Area Council on Alcoholism et al.

Opinion:
Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.