Case: Mitsubishi International Corp. et al. v. A. O. Andersen & Co. et al.; China Union Lines, Ltd. v. A. O. Andersen & Co. et al.; and Lan Jing-Chau et al. v. A. O. Andersen & Co. et al.
Abbreviation: Mitsubishi International Corp. v. Andersen
Decision Date: 1967-02-20
Docket Number: No. 927; No. 933; No. 934
Citation: 386 U.S. 933
Volume: 386
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Mitsubishi International Corp. et al. v. A. O. Andersen & Co. et al.; China Union Lines, Ltd. v. A. O. Andersen & Co. et al.; and Lan Jing-Chau et al. v. A. O. Andersen & Co. et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 933–933

Head Matter:
No. 927.
No. 933.
No. 934.
Mitsubishi International Corp. et al. v. A. O. Andersen & Co. et al.; China Union Lines, Ltd. v. A. O. Andersen & Co. et al.; and Lan Jing-Chau et al. v. A. O. Andersen & Co. et al.
Sweeney J. Doehnng for Mitsubishi International Corp. et al., petitioners in No. 927 and respondents in No. 933. Robert Eikel for petitioner in No. 933. Newton B. Schwartz for petitioners in No. 934. Bryan F. Williams, Jr., and Carl O. Bue, Jr., for respondent A. 0. Andersen & Co. in all three cases. Leonard J. Matteson for respondent American Cyanamid Co. in Nos. 933 and 934. John V. Wheat for respondent Duncan in No. 933.

Opinion:
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.