Case: Nippon Paper Industries Co., Ltd. v. United States; Cooksey v. Bowersox, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center; Naumov v. University of Pittsburgh; Tsipouras v. Meshbesher, Birrell & Dunlap, Ltd., et al.; Harris v. New Jersey, In re Clark, In re Clark, In re Clark, Polley v. United States; Borroto v. United States; Slagel v. Shell Petroleum, Inc., et al.; Jackson v. Johnson et al.; Strable v. South Carolina; Connelly v. Borough of Forest Hills, Pennsylvania; Mathis v. Ciambrone et al.; Carrasquillo v. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division; McKellip v. Sorrell, Anderson, Lehrman, Wanner & Thomas et al.; Erdman v. Grayson, Warden, In re Tyler et al., Cosgrove v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.; Swain v. Detroit Board of Education et al.; McDermott v. Kansas Associates, Inc.; Reidt v. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; Waletzki v. United States
Abbreviation: Nippon Paper Industries Co. v. United States
Decision Date: 1998-02-23
Docket Number: No. 96-1987; No. 96-8341; No. 97-39; No. 97-515; No. 97-588; No. 97-5242; No. 97-5243; No. 97-5244; No. 97-5282; No. 97-5351; No. 97-5621; No. 97-5841; No. 97-6000; No. 97-6070; No. 97-6117; No. 97-6136; No. 97-6278; No. 97-6306; No. 97-6372; No. 97-6415; No. 97-6620; No. 97-6738; No. 97-6832; No. 97-7035
Citation: 522 U.S. 1143
Volume: 522
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Nippon Paper Industries Co., Ltd. v. United States, Cooksey v. Bowersox, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center, Naumov v. University of Pittsburgh, Tsipouras v. Meshbesher, Birrell & Dunlap, Ltd., et al., Harris v. New Jersey, In re Clark, In re Clark, In re Clark, Polley v. United States, Borroto v. United States, Slagel v. Shell Petroleum, Inc., et al., Jackson v. Johnson et al., Strable v. South Carolina, Connelly v. Borough of Forest Hills, Pennsylvania, Mathis v. Ciambrone et al., Carrasquillo v. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, McKellip v. Sorrell, Anderson, Lehrman, Wanner & Thomas et al., Erdman v. Grayson, Warden, In re Tyler et al., Cosgrove v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., Swain v. Detroit Board of Education et al., McDermott v. Kansas Associates, Inc., Reidt v. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Waletzki v. United States,
Judges: 
Pages: 1143–1144

Head Matter:
No. 96-1987.
No. 96-8341.
No. 97-39.
No. 97-515.
No. 97-588.
No. 97-5242.
No. 97-5243.
No. 97-5244.
No. 97-5282.
No. 97-5351.
No. 97-5621.
No. 97-5841.
No. 97-6000.
No. 97-6070.
No. 97-6117.
Nippon Paper Industries Co., Ltd. v. United States, Cooksey v. Bowersox, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center, Naumov v. University of Pittsburgh, Tsipouras v. Meshbesher, Birrell & Dunlap, Ltd., et al., Harris v. New Jersey, In re Clark, In re Clark, In re Clark, Polley v. United States, Borroto v. United States, Slagel v. Shell Petroleum, Inc., et al., Jackson v. Johnson et al., Strable v. South Carolina, Connelly v. Borough of Forest Hills, Pennsylvania, Mathis v. Ciambrone et al., Carrasquillo v. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, McKellip v. Sorrell, Anderson, Lehrman, Wanner & Thomas et al., Erdman v. Grayson, Warden, In re Tyler et al., Cosgrove v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., Swain v. Detroit Board of Education et al., McDermott v. Kansas Associates, Inc., Reidt v. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Waletzki v. United States,

Opinion:
ante, p. 1044;
ante, p. 1027;
ante, p. 859;
ante, p. 982;
ante, p. 997;
ante, p. 805;
ante, p. 805;
ante, p. 805;
ante, p. 1016;
ante, p. 889;
ante, p. 934;
ante, p. 956;
ante, p. 972;
ante, p. 959;
ante, p. 1000;
No. 97-6136.
No. 97-6278.
No. 97-6306.
No. 97-6372.
No. 97-6415.
No. 97-6620.
No. 97-6738.
No. 97-6832.
No. 97-7035.
ante, p. 972;
ante, p. 1017;
ante, p. 1018;
ante, p. 1027;
ante, p. 1004;
ante, p. 1057;
ante, p. 1060;
ante, p. 1061; and
ante, p. 1067. Petitions for rehearing denied.