Case: Manhattan Novelty Corp. v. United States
Abbreviation: Manhattan Novelty Corp. v. United States
Decision Date: 1955-10-14
Docket Number: V. D. 19; Entry Nos. 44519; 61408
Citation: 35 Cust. Ct. 369
Volume: 35
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Manhattan Novelty Corp. v. United States
Judges: 
Pages: 369–369

Head Matter:
(V. D. 19)
Manhattan Novelty Corp. v. United States
Entry Nos. 44519; 61408.
(Decided October 14, 1955)
Lane, Young & Fox (William H-. Fox of counsel) for the plaintiff.
Warren E. Burger, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Opinion:
Wilson, Judge:
This matter is presently before me on a remand from a classification proceeding decided by the first division of this court in Manhattan Novelty Corp. v. United States, 34 Cust Ct. 261, Abstract 68688. The judgment entered therein stated: " that the matter be remanded to a single judge in reappraisement pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U. S. C. § 2636' (d)."
The matter has been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto.
Upon the agreed facts, I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for determining the values of the involved merchandise and that such values are as set forth in schedule "A," hereto attached and made a part hereof.
I further find such values to be the dutiable values of said merchandise.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Schedule "A"