Case: ROBERT-ARTHUR MANAGEMENT CORP. v. TENNESSEE ex rel. CANALE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY GENERAL
Abbreviation: Robert-Arthur Management Corp. v. Tennessee ex rel. Canale
Decision Date: 1968-01-15
Docket Number: No. 679
Citation: 389 U.S. 578
Volume: 389
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: ROBERT-ARTHUR MANAGEMENT CORP. v. TENNESSEE ex rel. CANALE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY GENERAL.
Judges: The Chief Justice would affirm.
Pages: 578–578

Head Matter:
ROBERT-ARTHUR MANAGEMENT CORP. v. TENNESSEE ex rel. CANALE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY GENERAL.
No. 679.
Decided January 15, 1968.
Longstreet Heiskell for appellant.
George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Thomas E. Fox, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Supreme Court of Tennessee is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767.
The Chief Justice would affirm.
Mr. Justice Harlan
would affirm for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496, 500-503, and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 455.