Case: PRIESTS FOR LIFE, et al., Appellants v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Appellees
Abbreviation: Priests for Life v. United States Department of Health & Human Services
Decision Date: 2015-05-20
Docket Number: Nos. 13-5368, 13-5371, 14-5021
Citation: 420 U.S. App. D.C. 229
Volume: 420
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: PRIESTS FOR LIFE, et al., Appellants v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Appellees.
Judges: BEFORE: GARLAND, Chief Judge; HENDERSON, ROGERS, TATEL, BROWN , GRIFFITH, KAVANAUGH , SRINIVASAN , MILLETT , PILLARD, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
Pages: 229–254

Head Matter:
808 F.3d 1
PRIESTS FOR LIFE, et al., Appellants v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Appellees.
Nos. 13-5368, 13-5371, 14-5021.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
May 20, 2015.
Robert Joseph Muise, Esquire, Ann Arbor, MI, David Eliezer Yerushalmi, Esquire, Law Offices of David Yerushalmi, PC, Chandler, AZ, for Appellants.
Adam C. Jed, Alisa B. Klein, Mark B. Stern, Beth S. Brinkmann, DOJ Appellate Counsel, Stuart F. Delery, Ronald C. Ma-chen, Jr., Esquire, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Charles Edward Davidow, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Marcia Devins Greenberger, Ayesha N. Khan, Esquire, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Washington, DC, Kim-berlee Wood Colby, Christian Legal Society, Springfield, VA, for Appellees.
BEFORE: GARLAND, Chief Judge; HENDERSON, ROGERS, TATEL, BROWN , GRIFFITH, KAVANAUGH , SRINIVASAN , MILLETT , PILLARD, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
Circuit Judges Brown and Kavanaugh would grant the petition.
Circuit Judges Srinivasan and Millett did not participate in this matter.

Opinion:
ORDER
On Petition for Rehearing En Banc
PER CURIAM.
Appellants/cross-appellees' joint petition for rehearing en banc and the response thereto were circulated to the full court, and a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges eligible to participate did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that the petition be denied.
A statement by Circuit Judge PILLARD, joined by Circuit Judges ROGERS and WILKINS, concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc, is attached.
A statement by Circuit Judge BROWN, joined by Circuit Judge HENDERSON, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, is attached.
A statement by Circuit Judge KAVANAUGH, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, is attached.