Case: Max Duraffourg, Ltd., and N. M. Albert Co., Inc., et al. v. United States
Abbreviation: Max Duraffourg, Ltd. v. United States
Decision Date: 1957-02-05
Docket Number: No. 60465; protests 198852-K, etc. (New York)
Citation: 38 Cust. Ct. 403
Volume: 38
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Max Duraffourg, Ltd., and N. M. Albert Co., Inc., et al. v. United States,
Judges: 
Pages: 403–403

Head Matter:
Before the Third Division,
February 5, 1957
No. 60465.
Max Duraffourg, Ltd., and N. M. Albert Co., Inc., et al. v. United States,
protests 198852-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion:
Opinion by
Johnson, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic rutile, an earthy or mineral substance, not decorated in any manner, the same in all material respects as that the subject of International Lapidaries Co. v. United States (36 Cust. Ct. 230, C. D. 1780), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.