Case: Spratt's Patent (America), Ltd. v. United States
Abbreviation: Spratt's Patent (America), Ltd. v. United States
Decision Date: 1955-08-25
Docket Number: Reap. Dec. 8479; Entry No. 6308
Citation: 35 Cust. Ct. 403
Volume: 35
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Spratt’s Patent (America), Ltd. v. United States
Judges: 
Pages: 403–404

Head Matter:
(Reap. Dec. 8479)
Spratt’s Patent (America), Ltd. v. United States
Entry No. 6308.
(Decided August 25, 1955)
Sharretts, Paley & Carter for the plaintiff.
Geo. Stephen Leonard, Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Opinion:
Lawkence, Judge:
This appeal for a reappraisement presents the question of the proper value of certain metal bird cages and stands imported from England.
The respective parties hereto have submitted said appeal for decision upon a stipulation to the effect that the metal bird cages and stands, and the issues, are the same in all material respects as those before the court in Spratts Patent America, Ltd. v. United States, 32 Cust. Ct. 583, Reap. Dec. 8285, the record in which case has been incorporated herein. It has been further agreed that there is no foreign, export, or United States value, as those values are defined in section 402 (c) (d) and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c) (d) and (e)), as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, for such or similar merchandise, and that the statutory cost of production of the subject importation is equal to the invoice prices, less discounts of 2 per centum and 2/ per centum.
Upon the agreed facts', I find that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of said act (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (f)), is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the metal bird cages and stands here involved and that such value is equal to the invoice prices, less discounts of 2 per centum and 2% per centum.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.