Case: Tom We Shung v. Brownell, Attorney General, et al.
Abbreviation: Tom We Shung v. Brownell
Decision Date: 1953-12-07
Docket Number: No. 241
Citation: 346 U.S. 906
Volume: 346
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Tom We Shung v. Brownell, Attorney General, et al.
Judges: Mr. Justice Black would re verse the judgment of the Court of Appeals. Mb. Justice Douglas and Mb. Justice Jackson dissent.
Pages: 906–907

Head Matter:
No. 241.
Tom We Shung v. Brownell, Attorney General, et al.
Argued December 3-4, 1953.
Decided December 7, 1953.

Opinion:
Certiorari, 346 U. S. 854, to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
Per Curiam:
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the complaint. Heikkila v. Barber, 345 U. S. 229.
Mr. Justice Black would re verse the judgment of the Court of Appeals. Mb. Justice Douglas and Mb. Justice Jackson dissent.
Jack Wasserman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Murray L. Schwartz argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg, J. F. Bishop, L. Paul Winings and Maurice A. Roberts.