Case: EX PARTE HUNG HANG
Abbreviation: Ex parte Hung Hang
Decision Date: 1883-05-07
Docket Number: 
Citation: 108 U.S. 552
Volume: 108
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: EX PARTE HUNG HANG.
Judges: 
Pages: 552–553

Head Matter:
EX PARTE HUNG HANG.
ORIGINAL.
Decided May 7th, 1883.
Habeas Corpus — Jurisdiction.
Except in cases afEeoting ambassadors, other public ministers, or consuls, or those in which a State is a party, the supreme court can only issue a writ of habeas corpus under its appellate jurisdiction.
Application for a writ of habeas corpus.
Mr. Solicitor-General, Mr. Assistant Attorney-General Simons and Mr. Hall McAllister for the petitioner.

Opinion:
Mr. Chief Justice Waite
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus for the purpose of an inquiry into the legality of the detention of the petitioner, Hung Nang, a subject of the Emperor of China, by the chief of police, -under a warrant for his arrest, issued by the police judge of the city and county of San Francisco, California, for a violation of an order or ordinance of the board of supervisors of such city and county, alleged to be in contrar vention of the Constitution and of a treaty of the United States.
It has long been settled that ordinarily this court cannot issue a writ of habeas corpus except under its appellate jurisdiction, Ex parte Bollmam, & Swartwout, 4 Cranch, 75; Ex parte Watkins, 7 Pet. 568; Ex parte Yerger, 8 Wall. 85; Ex parte Lange, 18 Wall. 163; Ex parte Parks, 93 U. S. 18; Ex parte Virginia, 100 U. S. 339; Ex parte Siebold, Ib. 371.
Section 751 of the Kevised Statutes, which reenacts a'similar provision in the judiciary act of 1789 (sec. 14), gives this court authority to issue the writ, but except in cases 'affecting ambassadors, other public ministers, or consuls, and those in which a State is a party, it can only be done for a review of the judicial decision of some inferior officer or court. This petition presents no such case.
The writ is emsequentl/y denied.