Case: B. B. M. Photocopy Mfg. Corp. American Express Company v. United States
Abbreviation: B. B. M. Photocopy Mfg. Corp. v. United States
Decision Date: 1966-07-13
Docket Number: C.D. 2729
Citation: 57 Cust. Ct. 70
Volume: 57
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: B. B. M. Photocopy Mfg. Corp. American Express Company v. United States
Judges: Before Donlon, Richabdson, and Landis, Judges
Pages: 70–70

Head Matter:
(C.D. 2729)
B. B. M. Photocopy Mfg. Corp. American Express Company v. United States
United States Customs Court, Third Division
(Decided July 13, 1966)
Plaintiff not represented by counsel.
John W. Douglas, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
Before Donlon, Richabdson, and Landis, Judges

Opinion:
Landis, Judge:
When this case was called for trial, there was no appearance on behalf of the plaintiffs, and defendant moved to dismiss the protest for lack of prosecution.
It appearing from the official papers that the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it is dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.