Case: George C. JENSEN, Appellant, v. Jesse BROWN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Appellee
Abbreviation: Jensen v. Brown
Decision Date: 1995-12-08
Docket Number: No. 90-661
Citation: 8 Vet. App. 364
Volume: 8
Reporter: West's Veterans Appeals Reporter
Court: United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: George C. JENSEN, Appellant, v. Jesse BROWN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Appellee.
Judges: Before KRAMER, HOLDAWAY, and STEINBERG, Judges.
Pages: 364–365

Head Matter:
George C. JENSEN, Appellant, v. Jesse BROWN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Appellee.
No. 90-661.
United States Court of Veterans Appeals.
Dec. 8, 1995.
Before KRAMER, HOLDAWAY, and STEINBERG, Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
On August 15, 1995, the Court dismissed the appellant's Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) application on the ground that the Court did not have jurisdiction over the application because the appellant had failed to show, before the 30-day filing period had expired, that he was a party eligible for an EAJA award or that he met the net-worth criteria for showing that eligibility. Jensen v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 140 (1995) (per curiam order). The Court has voted to consolidate Hamilton v. Brown, No. 92-1260, Bazalo v. Brown, No. 93-660, and Burke v. Brown, No. 94-49, for en banc review on the issue of the Court's jurisdiction over EAJA applications.
On consideration of the foregoing, it is sua sponte
ORDERED that the Court's August 15, 1995, order in the instant case is REVOKED. It is further
ORDERED that this case is held in abeyance pending the Court's resolution of the consolidated cases of Hamilton, Bazalo, and Burke.