Case: UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Susan ROSENBERG, et al., Appellees
Abbreviation: United States v. Rosenberg
Decision Date: 1990-02-02
Docket Number: Nos. 89-3070, 89-3071 and 89-3072
Citation: 282 U.S. App. D.C. 355
Volume: 282
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Susan ROSENBERG, et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before WALD, Chief Judge; MIKVA, EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, D.H. GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.
Pages: 355–356

Head Matter:
894 F.2d 1395
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Susan ROSENBERG, et al., Appellees.
Nos. 89-3070, 89-3071 and 89-3072.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Issued Jan. 29, 1990.
Decided Feb. 2, 1990.
On Appellant’s Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc.
Before WALD, Chief Judge; MIKVA, EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, D.H. GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
Appellant's Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc has been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular, active service did not vote in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing it is
ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestion is denied.
Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT:
CONSTANCE L. DUPRE, CLERK
A statement of Circuit Judge WILLIAMS concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc is attached.
Circuit Judges EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG and SENTELLE would grant the suggestion.