Case: Inmates of the Suffolk County Jail et al. v. Rouse, Sheriff, Suffolk County, et al.; Gurney et al. v. United States; Campbell v. United States; Gangopadhyay v. Gangopadhyay; Coates v. Seaton; Barker v. Leeds et al.; Dorsey v. Dorsey; Theis Research, Inc. v. Octel Communications Corp. et al.; Egbert v. Reis et al.; Smith v. Supreme Court of Colorado; Pierson v. Wilshire Terrace Corp.; Kearns v. Wood Motors, Inc., et al.; Sanchez v. United States; Nghiem v. Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.; Viray v. Beneficial California, Inc., et al.; Haynes v. Kepka et al.; Mason-Neubarth v. Dameron Hospital Assn.; Dougan v. Singletary, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.; Dumas v. Illinois; Rothman v. University of Massachusetts Medical Center; Billemeyer v. Missouri et al.; Johnson v. Crist, Warden; Jackson v. Singletary, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections; Dixon v. Stewart, Director, Arizona Department of Correction, et al.; Laessig v. Vaughn, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Graterford, et al.; Nowik v. North Dakota et al.; Cookish v. New Hampshire; Father v. Boeing Co. et al., In re Bradin, Sancho v. United States; Adames v. Batista et al., In re Sidles, King v. Adamson et al.; Sikora v. Higley, Associate Warden; Harms v. United States, In re Crooms, Seaton v. Michigan (two judgments); Jackson v. West Virginia et al.; Blair v. Thompson, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary; Carter v. United States; Roberts v. Battelle Memorial Institute; Pizzo v. Louisiana, In re Betka, DeLoach v. General Dynamics Corp.; Valdes v. United States; Bieri v. United States, In re Ijemba
Abbreviation: Inmates of the Suffolk County Jail v. Rouse
Decision Date: 1998-08-12
Docket Number: No. 97-1278; No. 97-1440; No. 97-1529; No. 97-1619; No. 97-1714; No. 97-1724; No. 97-1742; No. 97-1773; No. 97-1784; No. 97-1827; No. 97-1854; No. 97-1860; No. 97-5745; No. 97-6791; No. 97-7946; No. 97-7988; No. 97-8029; No. 97-8120; No. 97-8236; No. 97-8246; No. 97-8288; No. 97-8310; No. 97-8355; No. 97-8519; No. 97-8530; No. 97-8533; No. 97-8570; No. 97-8572; No. 97-8578; No. 97-8587; No. 97-8605; No. 97-8617; No. 97-8690; No. 97-8695; No. 97-8704; No. 97-8710; No. 97-8733; No. 97-8806; No. 97-8818; No. 97-8838; No. 97-8840; No. 97-8846; No. 97-8864; No. 97-8907; No. 97-9033; No. 97-9182; No. 97-9237
Citation: 524 U.S. 970
Volume: 524
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Inmates of the Suffolk County Jail et al. v. Rouse, Sheriff, Suffolk County, et al., Gurney et al. v. United States, Campbell v. United States, Gangopadhyay v. Gangopadhyay, Coates v. Seaton, Barker v. Leeds et al., Dorsey v. Dorsey, Theis Research, Inc. v. Octel Communications Corp. et al., Egbert v. Reis et al., Smith v. Supreme Court of Colorado, Pierson v. Wilshire Terrace Corp., Kearns v. Wood Motors, Inc., et al., Sanchez v. United States, Nghiem v. Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc., Viray v. Beneficial California, Inc., et al., Haynes v. Kepka et al., Mason-Neubarth v. Dameron Hospital Assn., Dougan v. Singletary, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al., Dumas v. Illinois, Rothman v. University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Billemeyer v. Missouri et al., Johnson v. Crist, Warden, Jackson v. Singletary, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Dixon v. Stewart, Director, Arizona Department of Correction, et al., Laessig v. Vaughn, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Graterford, et al., Nowik v. North Dakota et al., Cookish v. New Hampshire, Father v. Boeing Co. et al., In re Bradin, Sancho v. United States, Adames v. Batista et al., In re Sidles, King v. Adamson et al., Sikora v. Higley, Associate Warden, Harms v. United States, In re Crooms, Seaton v. Michigan (two judgments), Jackson v. West Virginia et al., Blair v. Thompson, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Carter v. United States, Roberts v. Battelle Memorial Institute, Pizzo v. Louisiana, In re Betka, DeLoach v. General Dynamics Corp., Valdes v. United States, Bieri v. United States, In re Ijemba,
Judges: 
Pages: 970–972

Head Matter:
No. 97-1278.
No. 97-1440.
No. 97-1529.
No. 97-1619.
No. 97-1714.
No. 97-1724.
No. 97-1742.
No. 97-1773.
No. 97-1784.
No. 97-1827.
No. 97-1854.
No. 97-1860.
Inmates of the Suffolk County Jail et al. v. Rouse, Sheriff, Suffolk County, et al., Gurney et al. v. United States, Campbell v. United States, Gangopadhyay v. Gangopadhyay, Coates v. Seaton, Barker v. Leeds et al., Dorsey v. Dorsey, Theis Research, Inc. v. Octel Communications Corp. et al., Egbert v. Reis et al., Smith v. Supreme Court of Colorado, Pierson v. Wilshire Terrace Corp., Kearns v. Wood Motors, Inc., et al., Sanchez v. United States, Nghiem v. Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc., Viray v. Beneficial California, Inc., et al., Haynes v. Kepka et al., Mason-Neubarth v. Dameron Hospital Assn., Dougan v. Singletary, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al., Dumas v. Illinois, Rothman v. University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Billemeyer v. Missouri et al., Johnson v. Crist, Warden, Jackson v. Singletary, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Dixon v. Stewart, Director, Arizona Department of Correction, et al., Laessig v. Vaughn, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Graterford, et al., Nowik v. North Dakota et al., Cookish v. New Hampshire, Father v. Boeing Co. et al., In re Bradin, Sancho v. United States, Adames v. Batista et al., In re Sidles, King v. Adamson et al., Sikora v. Higley, Associate Warden, Harms v. United States, In re Crooms, Seaton v. Michigan (two judgments), Jackson v. West Virginia et al., Blair v. Thompson, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Carter v. United States, Roberts v. Battelle Memorial Institute, Pizzo v. Louisiana, In re Betka, DeLoach v. General Dynamics Corp., Valdes v. United States, Bieri v. United States, In re Ijemba,

Opinion:
ante, p. 951;
ante, p. 951;
523 U. S. 1078;
523 U. S. 1138;
ante, p. 938;
ante, p. 938;
ante, p. 952;
ante, p. 963;
ante, p. 953;
ante, p. 954;
ante, p. 940;
ante, p. 940;
No. 97-5745.
No. 97-6791.
No. 97-7946.
No. 97-7988.
No. 97-8029.
No. 97-8120.
No. 97-8236.
No. 97-8246.
No. 97-8288.
No. 97-8310.
No. 97-8355.
No. 97-8519.
No. 97-8530.
No. 97-8533.
No. 97-8570.
No. 97-8572.
No. 97-8578.
No. 97-8587.
No. 97-8605.
No. 97-8617.
No. 97-8690.
No. 97-8695.
No. 97-8704.
No. 97-8710.
No. 97-8733.
No. 97-8806.
No. 97-8818.
No. 97-8838.
ante, p. 955;
522 U. S. 1080;
523 U. S. 1123;
523 U. S. 1083;
523 U. S. 1083;
ante, p. 956;
523 U. S. 1125;
523 U. S. 1125;
523 U. S. 1126;
523 U. S. 1086;
523 U. S. 1140;
523 U. S. 1128;
523 U. S. 1129;
ante, p. 907;
ante, p. 917;
ante, p. 918;
ante, p. 914;
523 U. S. 1112;
ante, p. 918;
ante, p. 914;
ante, p. 930;
ante, p. 941;
523 U. S. 1131;
ante, p. 925;
ante, p. 941;
ante, p. 942;
ante, p. 919;
523 U. S. 1144;
No. 97-8840.
No. 97-8846.
No. 97-8864.
No. 97-8907.
No. 97-9033.
No. 97-9182.
No. 97-9237.
ante, p. 957;
ante, p. 919;
ante, p. 950;
ante, p. 919;
ante, p. 923;
ante, p. 959; and
ante, p. 950. Petitions for rehearing denied.