Case: Bewley v. Howell, Superintendent, Tulsa County Independent School District No. 1, et al.; Miller v. United States; Hawthorne v. California; Kendall v. Kendall; Benjamin v. Brown, Secretary of Veterans Affairs; Liebman v. Liebman; Drayton v. Evatt, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections; Sochor v. Florida; Gaster v. Taylor, Warden, et al.; Brooke v. Duke et al.; Winfield v. Michigan; Hegedeos v. Dyke College Board of Trustees et al.; Erikson v. Rowland et al.; Johnson v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority et al.; Brocksmith v. United States; Masoner v. Thurman, Warden; Bergmann v. McCaughtry, Warden; Nwabueze v. Immigration and Naturalization Service; Ghazibayat v. New York; Hodges et al. v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan; Hamilton v. Kirkpatrick; Hargrove v. Tansy, Warden; Piontek v. United States; Allen v. New York Life Securities, Inc., et al.; Cooper v. Salomon Brothers, Inc.; Johns v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California
Abbreviation: Bewley v. Howell
Decision Date: 1994-02-22
Docket Number: No. 93-603; No. 93-734; No. 93-5019; No. 93-5299; No. 93-5559; No. 93-5565; No. 93-5929; No. 93-5963; No. 93-6032; No. 93-6186; No. 93-6233; No. 93-6329; No. 93-6366; No. 93-6383; No. 93-6387; No. 93-6491; No. 93-6493; No. 93-6554; No. 93-6592; No. 93-6593; No. 93-6626; No. 93-6713; No. 93-6717; No. 93-6811; No. 93-6934; No. 93-7177
Citation: 510 U.S. 1159
Volume: 510
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Bewley v. Howell, Superintendent, Tulsa County Independent School District No. 1, et al., Miller v. United States, Hawthorne v. California, Kendall v. Kendall, Benjamin v. Brown, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Liebman v. Liebman, Drayton v. Evatt, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Sochor v. Florida, Gaster v. Taylor, Warden, et al., Brooke v. Duke et al., Winfield v. Michigan, Hegedeos v. Dyke College Board of Trustees et al., Erikson v. Rowland et al., Johnson v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority et al., Brocksmith v. United States, Masoner v. Thurman, Warden, Bergmann v. McCaughtry, Warden, Nwabueze v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Ghazibayat v. New York, Hodges et al. v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Hamilton v. Kirkpatrick, Hargrove v. Tansy, Warden, Piontek v. United States, Allen v. New York Life Securities, Inc., et al., Cooper v. Salomon Brothers, Inc., Johns v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California,
Judges: 
Pages: 1159–1160

Head Matter:
No. 93-603.
No. 93-734.
No. 93-5019.
No. 93-5299.
No. 93-5559.
No. 93-5565.
No. 93-5929.
No. 93-5963.
No. 93-6032.
No. 93-6186.
No. 93-6233.
No. 93-6329.
No. 93-6366.
No. 93-6383.
No. 93-6387.
No. 93-6491.
Bewley v. Howell, Superintendent, Tulsa County Independent School District No. 1, et al., Miller v. United States, Hawthorne v. California, Kendall v. Kendall, Benjamin v. Brown, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Liebman v. Liebman, Drayton v. Evatt, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Sochor v. Florida, Gaster v. Taylor, Warden, et al., Brooke v. Duke et al., Winfield v. Michigan, Hegedeos v. Dyke College Board of Trustees et al., Erikson v. Rowland et al., Johnson v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority et al., Brocksmith v. United States, Masoner v. Thurman, Warden, Bergmann v. McCaughtry, Warden, Nwabueze v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Ghazibayat v. New York, Hodges et al. v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Hamilton v. Kirkpatrick, Hargrove v. Tansy, Warden, Piontek v. United States, Allen v. New York Life Securities, Inc., et al., Cooper v. Salomon Brothers, Inc., Johns v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California,

Opinion:
ante, p. 1012;
ante, p. 1045;
ante, p. 1013;
ante, p. 995;
ante, p. 899;
ante, p. 899;
ante, p. 1014;
ante, p. 1025;
ante, p. 955;
ante, p. 981;
ante, p. 997;
ante, p. 1015;
ante, p. 1015;
ante, p. 1016;
ante, p. 999;
ante, p. 1028;
No. 93-6493.
No. 93-6554.
No. 93-6592.
No. 93-6593.
No. 93-6626.
No. 93-6713.
No. 93-6717.
No. 93-6811.
No. 93-6934.
No. 93-7177.
ante, p. 1028;
ante, p. 1052;
ante, p. 1028;
ante, p. 1018;
ante, p. 1054;
ante, p. 1056;
ante, p. 1056;
ante, p. 1095;
ante, p. 1063; and
ante, p. 1081. Petitions for rehearing denied.