Case: California et al. v. Roy; Gordon v. Peoria School District 150 et al.; Williams v. Lewis et al.; Murrell v. University of South Carolina; McDuff v. United States; Laufman v. Mayer et al.; Gunnell v. Littlefield, Warden, In re Hope, Cotton v. Hilbig et al.; Sakaria et al. v. Dare County Board of Education; Kahn v. Beicker Engineering, Inc., et al.; Smith v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. et al.; Shelton v. Gudmanson, Warden; Hussein v. Raban Supply Co.; Bigpond v. Champion, Warden; Evans v. United States; Singla et al. v. Department of Health and Human Services et al.; Cheatham v. Schneider, Governor of the Virgin Islands, et al.; Johnson v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California; Resetar v. Lyman; Tierney v. Peterson, Superintendent, Washington Corrections Center; Lindsey v. Moore, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections, et al., In re Gaunce, Russo v. Beyer, Assistant Commissioner, Division of Operations, New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al.; Aguilar Riley Ozmen v. New Mexico; Berkley v. Department of the Army; Van Hoorelbeke v. United States
Abbreviation: California v. Roy
Decision Date: 1997-01-06
Docket Number: No. 95-2025; No. 95-6347; No. 95-8797; No. 95-9028; No. 95-9034; No. 95-9089; No. 95-9178; No. 95-9382; No. 95-9495; No. 96-185; No. 96-338; No. 96-520; No. 96-5165; No. 96-5643; No. 96-5696; No. 96-5840; No. 96-5885; No. 96-5911; No. 96-5933; No. 96-5963; No. 96-6013; No. 96-6049; No. 96-6092; No. 96-6137; No. 96-6196; No. 96-6226; No. 96-6255
Citation: 519 U.S. 1071
Volume: 519
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: California et al. v. Roy, Gordon v. Peoria School District 150 et al., Williams v. Lewis et al., Murrell v. University of South Carolina, McDuff v. United States, Laufman v. Mayer et al., Gunnell v. Littlefield, Warden, In re Hope, Cotton v. Hilbig et al., Sakaria et al. v. Dare County Board of Education, Kahn v. Beicker Engineering, Inc., et al., Smith v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. et al., Shelton v. Gudmanson, Warden, Hussein v. Raban Supply Co., Bigpond v. Champion, Warden, Evans v. United States, Singla et al. v. Department of Health and Human Services et al., Cheatham v. Schneider, Governor of the Virgin Islands, et al., Johnson v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Resetar v. Lyman, Tierney v. Peterson, Superintendent, Washington Corrections Center, Lindsey v. Moore, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections, et al., In re Gaunce, Russo v. Beyer, Assistant Commissioner, Division of Operations, New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al., Aguilar Riley Ozmen v. New Mexico, Berkley v. Department of the Army, Van Hoorelbeke v. United States,
Judges: 
Pages: 1071–1072

Head Matter:
No. 95-2025.
No. 95-6347.
No. 95-8797.
No. 95-9028.
No. 95-9034.
No. 95-9089.
No. 95-9178.
No. 95-9382.
No. 95-9495.
No. 96-185.
No. 96-338.
California et al. v. Roy, Gordon v. Peoria School District 150 et al., Williams v. Lewis et al., Murrell v. University of South Carolina, McDuff v. United States, Laufman v. Mayer et al., Gunnell v. Littlefield, Warden, In re Hope, Cotton v. Hilbig et al., Sakaria et al. v. Dare County Board of Education, Kahn v. Beicker Engineering, Inc., et al., Smith v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. et al., Shelton v. Gudmanson, Warden, Hussein v. Raban Supply Co., Bigpond v. Champion, Warden, Evans v. United States, Singla et al. v. Department of Health and Human Services et al., Cheatham v. Schneider, Governor of the Virgin Islands, et al., Johnson v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Resetar v. Lyman, Tierney v. Peterson, Superintendent, Washington Corrections Center, Lindsey v. Moore, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections, et al., In re Gaunce, Russo v. Beyer, Assistant Commissioner, Division of Operations, New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al., Aguilar Riley Ozmen v. New Mexico, Berkley v. Department of the Army, Van Hoorelbeke v. United States,

Opinion:
ante, p. 2;
516 U. S. 1030;
ante, p. 828;
ante, p. 835;
ante, p. 835;
ante, p. 837;
ante, p. 842;
ante, p. 806;
ante, p. 860;
ante, p. 976;
ante, p. 965;
No. 96-520.
No. 96-5165.
No. 96-5643.
No. 96-5696.
No. 96-5840.
No. 96-5885.
No. 96-5911.
No. 96-5933.
No. 96-5963.
No. 96-6013.
No. 96-6049.
No. 96-6092.
No. 96-6137.
No. 96-6196.
No. 96-6226.
No. 96-6255.
ante, p. 982;
ante, p. 883;
ante, p. 951;
ante, p. 953;
ante, p. 940;
ante, p. 970;
ante, p. 971;
ante, p. 983;
ante, p. 954;
ante, p. 984;
ante, p. 997;
ante, p. 980;
ante, p. 984;
ante, p. 985;
ante, p. 997; and
ante, p. 985. Petitions for rehearing denied.