Case: Cortez v. First City National Bank of Houston et al.; Prince v. United States; Pacyna v. Stone, Secretary of the Army; Miller v. Briggs et al.; U. E. Enterprises, Inc., et al. v. New York Chinese TV Programs, Inc.; Rich et al. v. United States; Shiimi v. Harlandale Independent School District; Brown v. Indiana; Crowley v. Prince George's County, Maryland; Boyles v. Indiana; Masat v. United States; Shumate v. NCNB Financial Services et al.; Meders v. Georgia; Fanny v. Levy et al.; Todd v. Georgia; Moody v. Texas; Carter v. Harford County Circuit Court et al.; Tudorov v. Collazo; Jungblut v. Crist, Warden; Jacobs et al. v. Dujmovic et al.; Ashmus v. California; Sledge v. Meyers, Warden; Jones v. Lewis et al.; Edwards v. California; Jackson v. South Texas College of Law et al.; Frost v. Ohio; Caldwell v. Tom Mistick & Sons et al.; Saylor v. Virginia; Hawkins v. California; Bennett v. Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections; Gordon v. United States, In re Jackson, Bauer v. United States; Chrysler Corp. v. International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of America, AFL-CIO, et al.; Fermin v. Office of Personnel Management, In re Anderson, Barber v. Somerville Hospital, Inc., et al.; Crawford et vir v. Leahy et al.; Mozee et al. v. American Commercial Marine Service Co.; Clarke v. Butcher et al.; Santana Diaz v. United States; Banks v. Kaye; Rub v. Federal Land Bank of St. Paul; Qahdafi v. Virginia; Wille v. Louisiana; Johnson v. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. (two cases); Dawn et ux. v. Margolis et al.; Lawrence v. Brady, Secretary of the Treasury; Kirienko v. Kirienko; Visciotti v. California; Wiley v. Corrections Cabinet of Kentucky et al.; Spivey v. Brice-Wellington; Whittlesey v. Maryland; Omoike v. Exxon Co.; Barsten v. Department of the Interior; Mitchell v. Eberhart, Warden; Twyman v. Alabama; Winters v. Iowa State University; Beverly et ux. v. United States; Kot v. Paternoster et al.
Abbreviation: Cortez v. First City National Bank of Houston
Decision Date: 1992-11-30
Docket Number: No. 91-1702; No. 91-1784; No. 91-1799; No. 91-1847; No. 91-2002; No. 91-7408; No. 91-7563; No. 91-7697; No. 91-7760; No. 91-7797; No. 91-8108; No. 91-8238; No. 91-8283; No. 91-8303; No. 91-8317; No. 91-8334; No. 91-8335; No. 91-8353; No. 91-8376; No. 91-8378; No. 91-8387; No. 91-8395; No. 91-8404; No. 91-8405; No. 91-8429; No. 91-8487; No. 91-8572; No. 91-8618; No. 91-8638; No. 91-8684; No. 91-8726; No. 91-8732; No. 91-8738; No. 92-38; No. 92-48; No. 92-59; No. 92-186; No. 92-241; No. 92-248; No. 92-257; No. 92-5052; No. 92-5098; No. 92-5111; No. 92-5118; No. 92-5123; No. 92-5246; No. 92-5263; No. 92-5289; No. 92-5301; No. 92-5375; No. 92-5378; No. 92-5382; No. 92-5389; No. 92-5450; No. 92-5550; No. 92-5581; No. 92-5586; No. 92-5605; No. 92-5650; No. 92-5681
Citation: 506 U.S. 1014
Volume: 506
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Cortez v. First City National Bank of Houston et al., Prince v. United States, Pacyna v. Stone, Secretary of the Army, Miller v. Briggs et al., U. E. Enterprises, Inc., et al. v. New York Chinese TV Programs, Inc., Rich et al. v. United States, Shiimi v. Harlandale Independent School District, Brown v. Indiana, Crowley v. Prince George’s County, Maryland, Boyles v. Indiana, Masat v. United States, Shumate v. NCNB Financial Services et al., Meders v. Georgia, Fanny v. Levy et al., Todd v. Georgia, Moody v. Texas, Carter v. Harford County Circuit Court et al., Tudorov v. Collazo, Jungblut v. Crist, Warden, Jacobs et al. v. Dujmovic et al., Ashmus v. California, Sledge v. Meyers, Warden, Jones v. Lewis et al., Edwards v. California, Jackson v. South Texas College of Law et al., Frost v. Ohio, Caldwell v. Tom Mistick & Sons et al., Saylor v. Virginia, Hawkins v. California, Bennett v. Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Gordon v. United States, In re Jackson, Bauer v. United States, Chrysler Corp. v. International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of America, AFL-CIO, et al., Fermin v. Office of Personnel Management, In re Anderson, Barber v. Somerville Hospital, Inc., et al., Crawford et vir v. Leahy et al., Mozee et al. v. American Commercial Marine Service Co., Clarke v. Butcher et al., Santana Diaz v. United States, Banks v. Kaye, Rub v. Federal Land Bank of St. Paul, Qahdafi v. Virginia, Wille v. Louisiana, Johnson v. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. (two cases), Dawn et ux. v. Margolis et al., Lawrence v. Brady, Secretary of the Treasury, Kirienko v. Kirienko, Visciotti v. California, Wiley v. Corrections Cabinet of Kentucky et al., Spivey v. Brice-Wellington, Whittlesey v. Maryland, Omoike v. Exxon Co., Barsten v. Department of the Interior, Mitchell v. Eberhart, Warden, Twyman v. Alabama, Winters v. Iowa State University, Beverly et ux. v. United States, Kot v. Paternoster et al.,
Judges: 
Pages: 1014–1016

Head Matter:
No. 91-1702.
No. 91-1784.
Cortez v. First City National Bank of Houston et al., Prince v. United States, Pacyna v. Stone, Secretary of the Army, Miller v. Briggs et al., U. E. Enterprises, Inc., et al. v. New York Chinese TV Programs, Inc., Rich et al. v. United States, Shiimi v. Harlandale Independent School District, Brown v. Indiana, Crowley v. Prince George’s County, Maryland, Boyles v. Indiana, Masat v. United States, Shumate v. NCNB Financial Services et al., Meders v. Georgia, Fanny v. Levy et al., Todd v. Georgia, Moody v. Texas, Carter v. Harford County Circuit Court et al., Tudorov v. Collazo, Jungblut v. Crist, Warden, Jacobs et al. v. Dujmovic et al., Ashmus v. California, Sledge v. Meyers, Warden, Jones v. Lewis et al., Edwards v. California, Jackson v. South Texas College of Law et al., Frost v. Ohio, Caldwell v. Tom Mistick & Sons et al., Saylor v. Virginia, Hawkins v. California, Bennett v. Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Gordon v. United States, In re Jackson, Bauer v. United States, Chrysler Corp. v. International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of America, AFL-CIO, et al., Fermin v. Office of Personnel Management, In re Anderson, Barber v. Somerville Hospital, Inc., et al., Crawford et vir v. Leahy et al., Mozee et al. v. American Commercial Marine Service Co., Clarke v. Butcher et al., Santana Diaz v. United States, Banks v. Kaye, Rub v. Federal Land Bank of St. Paul, Qahdafi v. Virginia, Wille v. Louisiana, Johnson v. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. (two cases), Dawn et ux. v. Margolis et al., Lawrence v. Brady, Secretary of the Treasury, Kirienko v. Kirienko, Visciotti v. California, Wiley v. Corrections Cabinet of Kentucky et al., Spivey v. Brice-Wellington, Whittlesey v. Maryland, Omoike v. Exxon Co., Barsten v. Department of the Interior, Mitchell v. Eberhart, Warden, Twyman v. Alabama, Winters v. Iowa State University, Beverly et ux. v. United States, Kot v. Paternoster et al.,

Opinion:
ante, p. 815;
ante, p. 816;
No. 91-1799.
No. 91-1847.
No. 91-2002.
No. 91-7408.
No. 91-7563.
No. 91-7697.
No. 91-7760.
No. 91-7797.
No. 91-8108.
No. 91-8238.
No. 91-8283.
No. 91-8303.
No. 91-8317.
No. 91-8334.
No. 91-8335.
No. 91-8353.
No. 91-8376.
No. 91-8378.
No. 91-8387.
No. 91-8395.
No. 91-8404.
No. 91-8405.
No. 91-8429.
No. 91-8487.
No. 91-8572.
No. 91-8618.
No. 91-8638.
No. 91-8684.
No. 91-8726.
No. 91-8732.
No. 91-8738.
ante, p. 817;
ante, p. 818;
ante, p. 827;
ante, p. 832;
ante, p. 832;
ante, p. 833;
ante, p. 833;
ante, p. 833;
ante, p. 835;
ante, p. 836;
ante, p. 837;
ante, p. 838;
ante, p. 838;
ante, p. 839;
ante, p. 839;
ante, p. 840;
ante, p. 840;
ante, p. 840;
ante, p. 841;
ante, p. 841;
ante, p. 841;
ante, p. 841;
ante, p. 842;
ante, p. 844;
ante, p. 849;
ante, p. 852;
ante, p. 853;
ante, p. 855;
ante, p. 858;
ante, p. 812;
ante, p. 858;
No. 92-38.
No. 92-48.
No. 92-59.
No. 92-186.
No. 92-241.
No. 92-248.
No. 92-257.
No. 92-5052.
No. 92-5098.
No. 92-5111.
No. 92-5118.
No. 92-5123.
No. 92-5246.
No. 92-5263.
No. 92-5289.
No. 92-5301.
No. 92-5375.
No. 92-5378.
No. 92-5382.
No. 92-5389.
No. 92-5450.
No. 92-5550.
No. 92-5581.
No. 92-5586.
No. 92-5605.
No. 92-5650.
No. 92-5681.
ante, p. 908;
ante, p. 863;
ante, p. 812;
ante, p. 869;
ante, p. 872;
ante, p. 872;
ante, p. 872;
ante, p. 876;
ante, p. 879;
ante, p. 880;
ante, p. 880;
ante, p. 880;
ante, p. 887;
ante, p. 888;
ante, p. 889;
ante, p. 889;
ante, p. 893;
ante, p. 894;
ante, p. 894;
ante, p. 894;
ante, p. 897;
ante, p. 900;
ante, p. 922;
ante, p. 923;
ante, p. 923;
ante, p. 902; and
ante, p. 943. Petitions for rehearing denied.