Case: PENSICK & GORDON, INC., v. CALIFORNIA MOTOR EXPRESS et al.
Abbreviation: Pensick & Gordon, Inc. v. California Motor Express
Decision Date: 1962-12-03
Docket Number: No. 222
Citation: 371 U.S. 184
Volume: 371
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: PENSICK & GORDON, INC., v. CALIFORNIA MOTOR EXPRESS et al.
Judges: Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice White would affirm the judgment below for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion in Hewitt-Robins.
Pages: 184–184

Head Matter:
PENSICK & GORDON, INC., v. CALIFORNIA MOTOR EXPRESS et al.
No. 222.
Decided December 3, 1962.
Carl M. Gould for petitioner.
Theodore W. Russell, George L. Catlin and Joseph P. Loeb for respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Hewitt-Robins Inc. v. Eastern Freight-Ways, Inc., ante, p. 84.
Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice White would affirm the judgment below for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion in Hewitt-Robins.