Case: County of Tuolumne et al. v. Railroad Commission of the State of California et al.
Abbreviation: County of Tuolumne v. Railroad Commission of California
Decision Date: 1925-03-16
Docket Number: No. 281
Citation: 267 U.S. 584
Volume: 267
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: County of Tuolumne et al. v. Railroad Commission of the State of California et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 584–585

Head Matter:
No. 281.
County of Tuolumne et al. v. Railroad Commission of the State of California et al.
Error to the Supreme Court of the State of California.
Argued March 9,10,1925.
Decided March 16, 1925.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 2, 39 Stat: 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5-6; (2) Schuyler National Bank v. Bollong, 150 U. S. 85, 88; Erie R. R. Co. v. Purdy, 185 U. S. 148, 154; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Woodford, 234 U. S. 46, 51.
Mr. William Grant, for plaintiffs in error. Mr. A. P. Cutten and Mr. Carl I. Wheat, with whom Mr. Hugh Gordon and Mr. Wm. B. Bosley were on the brief, for defendants in error.