Case: Titmus v. Tinsley, Warden
Abbreviation: Titmus v. Tinsley
Decision Date: 1962-06-25
Docket Number: No. 880
Citation: 370 U.S. 964
Volume: 370
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Titmus v. Tinsley, Warden.
Judges: 
Pages: 964–964

Head Matter:
No. 880,
Mise.
Titmus v. Tinsley, Warden.
Petitioner pro se. Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and J. F. Brauer, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Opinion:
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Colorado denied on the representations of the State Attorney-General that the courts of Colorado will consider and pass upon a proper petition for furnishing a record without the prepayment of costs.