Case: HOFFSCHLAEGER COMPANY, LIMITED, vs. YOUNG NAP alias YOUNG LAP
Abbreviation: Hoffschlaeger Co. v. Young Nap
Decision Date: 1904-04-26
Docket Number: 
Citation: 2 D. Haw. 96
Volume: 2
Reporter: Reports of causes determined in the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii.
Court: United States District Court for the District of Hawaii
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: HOFFSCHLAEGER COMPANY, LIMITED, vs. YOUNG NAP alias YOUNG LAP.
Judges: 
Pages: 96–97

Head Matter:
HOFFSCHLAEGER COMPANY, LIMITED, vs. YOUNG NAP alias YOUNG LAP.
April 26, 1904.
Bankrupt Act. — Supplementary Petition by Additional Creditors for Ajudication: Petition by one creditor for adjudication in involuntary bankruptcy, alleging the number of creditors to be less than twelve; answer alleged existence of more than twelve creditors. At the hearing two additional creditors appeared by petition asking permission to join in the petition for adjudication of bankruptcy. Permission granted under the authority of divisions d and f of Section 59 of the Bankruptcy Act of 1898.
In Bankruptcy: Motion to Dismiss Proceedings.
Thayer & Tlemenway, Attorneys for Petitioner.
C. W. Ashford and E. M. Watson, Attorneys for Respondent.

Opinion:
Dole, J.
The petition for adjudication in bankruptcy alleged that the number of the creditors was less than twelve. The petition was signed and sworn to by Robert F. Lange for IToffschlaeger Company, Limited- The answer averred the existence of a larger number of creditors than twelve and filed a list under oath of such creditors with their addresses, and thereupon the court, according to the requirements of the statute, ordered notice to be mailed to all such new creditors of the pendency of the petition and delayed the hearing thereof to April 26th, to the end that parties in interest should have opportunity to be heard. At this hearing, two additional creditors appeared by petition asking permission to join in the petition for adjudication in bankruptcy, and that they might become parties petitioners therein. This petition was opposed by counsel for the respondent who moved orally that it appearing that there were more creditors than twelve and that only one creditor had petitioned for adjudication in bankruptcy, the proceedings should be dismissed.
This situation is fully met by Section 59 of tbe Act of Bankruptcy of 1898, (divisions d and f), wbicb provides in division d tbat,
"If upon such hearing, it shall appear that a sufficient number have joined in such petition or if prior to or during such hearing, a sufficient number shall join therein, the case may be proceeded with, but otherwise it shall be dismissed."
Division f: — -"Creditors other than original petitioners may at any time enter their appearance or join in the petition, or file an answer and be heard in opposition to the prayer of the petition."
The petition of the two creditors Theo. H. Davies and Company, Limited, and E. 0. Hall & Son, Limited, is therefore allowed and the motion to dismiss is overruled.