Case: Rohloff Trading Corp. v. United States
Abbreviation: Rohloff Trading Corp. v. United States
Decision Date: 1959-11-05
Docket Number: Reap. Dec. 9534; Entry No. 901142
Citation: 43 Cust. Ct. 531
Volume: 43
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Rohloff Trading Corp. v. United States
Judges: 
Pages: 531–531

Head Matter:
(Reap. Dec. 9534)
Rohloff Trading Corp. v. United States
Entry No. 901142.
(Decided November 5, 1959)
Plaintiff not represented by counsel.
George Ooelvran Doub, Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Opinion:
Lawrence, Judge:
When the above-enumerated appeal for a re-appraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.
An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.
I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeal to be the value found by the appraiser.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.