Case: Langston v. Kearney, Warden; Henderson v. Maxwell, Warden; Brown v. Florida; Huffman v. Maroney, Correctional Superintendent; Martinez v. Wilson, Warden, et al.; Cruz v. Beto, Corrections Director; Smith v. California et al.; Jamison v. Kearney, Warden; Parker v. Maxwell, Warden; Hayes v. Pate, Warden; Bey v. Anderson, Jail Superintendent; Mitchell v. Florida; Schack v. Florida et al.; Archie v. New Mexico; Dangler v. Wainwright, Corrections Director, et al.; and Cline v. Dunbar
Abbreviation: Langston v. Kearney
Decision Date: 1965-10-11
Docket Number: No. 177; No. 179; No. 195; No. 204; No. 245; No. 306; No. 309; No. 329; No. 330; No. 349; No. 391; No. 393; No. 440; No. 447; No. 450; No. 532
Citation: 382 U.S. 804
Volume: 382
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Langston v. Kearney, Warden; Henderson v. Maxwell, Warden; Brown v. Florida; Huffman v. Maroney, Correctional Superintendent; Martinez v. Wilson, Warden, et al.; Cruz v. Beto, Corrections Director; Smith v. California et al.; Jamison v. Kearney, Warden; Parker v. Maxwell, Warden; Hayes v. Pate, Warden; Bey v. Anderson, Jail Superintendent; Mitchell v. Florida; Schack v. Florida et al.; Archie v. New Mexico; Dangler v. Wainwright, Corrections Director, et al.; and Cline v. Dunbar.
Judges: 
Pages: 804–804

Head Matter:
No. 177,
No. 179,
No. 195,
No. 204,
No. 245,
No. 306,
No. 309,
No. 329,
No. 330,
No. 349,
No. 391,
No. 393,
No. 440,
No. 447,
No. 450,
No. 532,
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Langston v. Kearney, Warden; Henderson v. Maxwell, Warden; Brown v. Florida; Huffman v. Maroney, Correctional Superintendent; Martinez v. Wilson, Warden, et al.; Cruz v. Beto, Corrections Director; Smith v. California et al.; Jamison v. Kearney, Warden; Parker v. Maxwell, Warden; Hayes v. Pate, Warden; Bey v. Anderson, Jail Superintendent; Mitchell v. Florida; Schack v. Florida et al.; Archie v. New Mexico; Dangler v. Wainwright, Corrections Director, et al.; and Cline v. Dunbar.

Opinion:
Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.