Case: Mikkilineni v. Gallitzin Borough et al.; Mikkilineni v. Amwest Surety Insurance Co. et al.; Mikkilineni v. Gibson-Thomas Engineering et al.; Mikkilineni v. Gibson-Thomas Engineering et al.; Mikkilineni v. Indiana County Transit Authority et al.; Mikkilineni v. Borough of Forest Hills et al.; and Mikkilineni v. Mallory et al.
Abbreviation: Mikkilineni v. Gallitzin Borough
Decision Date: 2000-10-02
Docket Number: No. 99-9947
Citation: 531 U.S. 804
Volume: 531
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Mikkilineni v. Gallitzin Borough et al.; Mikkilineni v. Amwest Surety Insurance Co. et al.; Mikkilineni v. Gibson-Thomas Engineering et al.; Mikkilineni v. Gibson-Thomas Engineering et al.; Mikkilineni v. Indiana County Transit Authority et al.; Mikkilineni v. Borough of Forest Hills et al.; and Mikkilineni v. Mallory et al.
Judges: Justice Stevens dissents.
Pages: 804–804

Head Matter:
No. 99-9947.
Mikkilineni v. Gallitzin Borough et al.; Mikkilineni v. Amwest Surety Insurance Co. et al.; Mikkilineni v. Gibson-Thomas Engineering et al.; Mikkilineni v. Gibson-Thomas Engineering et al.; Mikkilineni v. Indiana County Transit Authority et al.; Mikkilineni v. Borough of Forest Hills et al.; and Mikkilineni v. Mallory et al.

Opinion:
C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this • Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
Justice Stevens dissents.
See id., at 4, and cases cited therein. Reported below: 216 F. 3d 1076 judgments); 215 F. 3d 1315 (fourth and fifth judgments).