Case: Wiseman, Director of Internal Revenue for the District of Oklahoma v. Barby et ux.; Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co. et al.; Hettleman et al. v. Chicago Law Institute et al.; McManigal v. Simon et al.; Electric Furnace Corp. v. Deering Milliken Research Corp.; Hicks et al. v. Physical Therapists Examining Board for the District of Columbia; Williams v. United States; Walker v. Wainwright, Corrections Director; Harris v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent; Elksnis v. United States; Mancilla v. United States et al.; Butterfield v. Gazelle
Abbreviation: Wiseman v. Barby
Decision Date: 1968-04-22
Docket Number: No. 871; No. 937; No. 961; No. 962; No. 980; No. 1027; No. 672; No. 786; No. 879; No. 896; No. 1017; No. 1117
Citation: 390 U.S. 1036
Volume: 390
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Wiseman, Director of Internal Revenue for the District of Oklahoma v. Barby et ux., Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co. et al., Hettleman et al. v. Chicago Law Institute et al., McManigal v. Simon et al., Electric Furnace Corp. v. Deering Milliken Research Corp., Hicks et al. v. Physical Therapists Examining Board for the District of Columbia, Williams v. United States, Walker v. Wainwright, Corrections Director, Harris v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent, Elksnis v. United States, Mancilla v. United States et al., Butterfield v. Gazelle,
Judges: 
Pages: 1036–1036

Head Matter:
No. 871.
No. 937.
No. 961.
No. 962.
No. 980.
No. 1027.
No. 672,
No. 786,
No. 879,
No. 896,
No. 1017,
No. 1117,
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Wiseman, Director of Internal Revenue for the District of Oklahoma v. Barby et ux., Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co. et al., Hettleman et al. v. Chicago Law Institute et al., McManigal v. Simon et al., Electric Furnace Corp. v. Deering Milliken Research Corp., Hicks et al. v. Physical Therapists Examining Board for the District of Columbia, Williams v. United States, Walker v. Wainwright, Corrections Director, Harris v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent, Elksnis v. United States, Mancilla v. United States et al., Butterfield v. Gazelle,

Opinion:
ante, p. 339;
ante, p. 979;
ante, p. 338;
ante, p. 980;
ante, p. 949;
ante, p.987;
ante, p. 960;
ante, p. 335;
ante, p. 963;
ante, p. 990;
ante, p. 982; and
ante, p. 985. Petitions for rehearing denied.