Case: Pyro Plastics Corp. v. United States; I. B. Wolfset & Co. v. United States; Thornley & Pitt v. United States; A & A Trading Corp. v. United States
Abbreviation: Pyro Plastics Corp. v. United States
Decision Date: 1968-03-06
Docket Number: No. P68/111; protests 58/1221, 59/4404, and 59/15481 (New York); No. P68/112; protests 58/6008, 58/19008, and 60/441 (New York); No. P68/113; protest 59/25587 (San Francisco); No. P68/114; protest 61/9462 (New York)
Citation: 60 Cust. Ct. 1011
Volume: 60
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Pyro Plastics Corp. v. United States, I. B. Wolfset & Co. v. United States, Thornley & Pitt v. United States, A & A Trading Corp. v. United States,
Judges: 
Pages: 1011–1011

Head Matter:
Before the First Division,
March 6, 1968
No. P68/111.
protests 58/1221, 59/4404, and 59/15481 (New York).
No. P68/112.
protests 58/6008, 58/19008, and 60/441 (New York).
No. P68/113.
protest 59/25587 (San Francisco).
No. P68/114.
protest 61/9462 (New York).
Pyro Plastics Corp. v. United States, I. B. Wolfset & Co. v. United States, Thornley & Pitt v. United States, A & A Trading Corp. v. United States,

Opinion:
Maletz, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of electric motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of James G. Wiley Co., a/c Ungar Electric Tools, Inc. v. United States (49 Cust. Ct. 199, Abstract 66961), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.