Case: Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corp. v. United States
Abbreviation: Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corp. v. United States
Decision Date: 1961-03-22
Docket Number: Reap. Dec. 9955; Entry Nos. 528578; 524355
Citation: 46 Cust. Ct. 639
Volume: 46
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corp. v. United States
Judges: 
Pages: 639–639

Head Matter:
(Reap. Dec. 9955)
Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corp. v. United States
Entry Nos. 528578; 524355.
(Decided March 22, 1961)
Plaintiff not represented by counsel.
’William S. Orriclc, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Opinion:
Lawrence, Judge:
When the above-enumerated appeals for a reap-praisement were called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff and the cases were ordered submitted by the court.
Eule 5(a) of the rules of the court provides that—
The submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.
Accordingly, I have examined the record in the appeals before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.