Case: Intermaritime Fwdg. Co., Inc. v. United States
Abbreviation: Intermaritime Fwdg. Co. v. United States
Decision Date: 1958-11-10
Docket Number: Reap. Dec. 9248; Entry No. 924419
Citation: 41 Cust. Ct. 574
Volume: 41
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Intermaritime Fwdg. Co., Inc. v. United States
Judges: 
Pages: 574–574

Head Matter:
(Reap. Dec. 9248)
Intermaritime Fwdg. Co., Inc. v. United States
Entry No. 924419.
(Decided November 10, 1958)
Tompkins & Tompkins for the plaintiff.
George Cochran Doub, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Opinion:
Mollison, Judge:
Counsel for the parties herein have submitted this appeal for reappraisement upon a stipulation reading as follows:
It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, Defendant, that the items marked "A" and checked with the initials TJM by Examiner T. J. McCarthy on the invoice covered by the above-named reappraisement appeal consist of goat skins and that at the time of exportation to the United States the "export values" of said skins, as defined in Section 402 (d) Tariff Act of 1930, were the invoice unit prices, U. S. dollars, per square foot, packed, less 2%, less ocean freight of $32.00, less insurance of $6.50 and less U. S. import duty of $277.34, and that at the time of exportation there was no "foreign value" for said skins, as defined in Section 402 (c), Tariff Act of 1930.
On the agreed facts, I find that export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d), Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved, and that such value is the invoice unit prices, United States dollars, per square foot, packed, less 2 per centum, less ocean freight of $32, less insurance of $6.50, and less United States import duty of $277.34.
.Judgment'will issue accordingly.