Case: The Garcia Corp. v. United States
Abbreviation: Garcia Corp. v. United States
Decision Date: 1967-07-26
Docket Number: V.D. 136
Citation: 59 Cust. Ct. 857
Volume: 59
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: The Garcia Corp. v. United States
Judges: 
Pages: 857–858

Head Matter:
(V.D. 136)
The Garcia Corp. v. United States
(Decided July 26, 1967)
Siegel, Mandell & Davidson for tlie plaintiff.
Carl Eardley, Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Opinion:
Ford, Judge:
This matter is before me on remand from classification proceedings decided by this court in The Garcia Corp v. United States, 55 Cust. Ct. 428, Abstract 69544, wherein the matter was remanded to a single judge sitting in' reappraisement. It has been submitted on a written stipulation reading as follows:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States:
1. That the involved fishing line was imported prior to and subsequent to effective date of Section 2 of the Customs Simplification Act (Public Law 927, 84th Cong., T.D. 54165); that said merchandise is identified on the final list, T.D. 54521.
2. That the involved merchandise consists of nylon fishing line and plastic boxes, exclusive of fishing line in diameters of 0.57, 0.63, & 0.75 mm, which were held by the Court in Abstract 69544 to be subject to appraisement separately according to the value of each class of articles.
3. That on or about the dates of exportation, such or similar fishing-line was not freely offered to all purchasers for home consumption in the country of exportation or for exportation to the United States; and on or about said dates of exportation, such or similar imported mer-' chandise was not freely offered to all purchasers for domestic consumption in the United States.'
4. That the cost of production of the involved fishing line as defined in Section 402(f) or 402a (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, is equal to:
The appraised values less 140 each net packed.
5. That the cost of production of the involved plastic boxes, as defined in Section 402(f) or 402a(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, is equal to 14 cents each, net packed, the same value returned by the Appraiser therefor as an unusual container.
6. That the remands or protests enumerated on the schedule attached hereto may be submitted on this stipulation, the same being limited to the merchandise and issues described hereinabove.
Upon the agreed facts, I find and hold that cost of production as that value is defined in section 402(f) or 402a(f), Tariff Act of 1930, or as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 91 Treas. Dec. 295, T.D. 54165, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the involved fishing lines and that said value is the appraised value, less 14 cents each, net packed, and that cost of production as that value is defined in section 402(f) or 402a(f), Tariff Act of 1930, or as amended, supra, is the proper basis of value for the determination of the value of the involved plastic boxes, and that said value is the appraised value equal to 14 cents each, net packed.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.