Case: Copeland v. Louisiana; Earvin v. Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of Corrections; Barber v. Texas; Matthews v. South Carolina; Jennings v. California; Johnson v. Tennessee; Bell v. Tennessee; Woomer v. Aiken, Warden, et al.; Moore v. Zant, Warden; Holland v. Texas; Stevens v. Nevada
Abbreviation: Copeland v. Louisiana
Decision Date: 1989-03-20
Docket Number: No. 88-5961; No. 88-6148; No. 88-6150; No. 88-6203; No. 88-6350; No. 88-6361; No. 88-6365; No. 88-6393; No. 88-6424; No. 88-6530; No. 88-6655
Citation: 489 U.S. 1091
Volume: 489
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Copeland v. Louisiana. Earvin v. Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of Corrections. Barber v. Texas. Matthews v. South Carolina. Jennings v. California. Johnson v. Tennessee. Bell v. Tennessee. Woomer v. Aiken, Warden, et al. Moore v. Zant, Warden. Holland v. Texas. Stevens v. Nevada.
Judges: 
Pages: 1091–1091

Head Matter:
No. 88-5961.
No. 88-6148.
No. 88-6150.
No. 88-6203.
No. 88-6350.
No. 88-6361.
No. 88-6365.
No. 88-6393.
No. 88-6424.
No. 88-6530.
No. 88-6655.
Copeland v. Louisiana. Earvin v. Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of Corrections. Barber v. Texas. Matthews v. South Carolina. Jennings v. California. Johnson v. Tennessee. Bell v. Tennessee. Woomer v. Aiken, Warden, et al. Moore v. Zant, Warden. Holland v. Texas. Stevens v. Nevada.

Opinion:
Sup. Ct. La.;
C. A. 5th Cir.;
Ct. Crim. App. Tex.;
Sup. Ct. S. C.;
Sup. Ct. Cal.;
Sup. Ct. Tenn.;
Sup. Ct. Tenn.;
C. A. 4th Cir.;
C. A. 11th Cir.;
Ct. Crim. App. Tex.; and
Sup. Ct. Nev. Certio-rari denied. Reported below: No. 88-5961, 530 So. 2d 526; No. 88-6148, 860 F. 2d 623; No. 88-6150, 757 S. W. 2d 359; No. 88-6203, 296 S. C. 379, 373 S. E'. 2d 587; No. 88-6350, 46 Cal. 3d -963, 760 P. 2d 475; No. 88-6361, 762 S. W. 2d 110; No. 88-6365, 745 S. W. 2d 858 and 759 S. W. 2d 651; No. 88-6393, 856 F. 2d 677; No. 88-6530, 761 S. W. 2d 307; No. 88-6655, 104 Nev. 867.