Case: John G. Christopher et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Jane Mungen and Henry Mungen, her Husband
Abbreviation: Christopher v. Mungen
Decision Date: 1916-10-23
Docket Number: No. 507
Citation: 242 U.S. 611
Volume: 242
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: John G. Christopher et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Jane Mungen and Henry Mungen, her Husband.
Judges: 
Pages: 611–611

Head Matter:
No. 507.
John G. Christopher et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Jane Mungen and Henry Mungen, her Husband.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Florida.
Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 9, 1916.
Decided October 23, 1916.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Gaar, Scott & Co. v. Shannon, 223 U. S. 468, 470; Mellon v. McCafferty, 239 U. S. 134; (2) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469. Mr. George C. Bedell for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Nathan P. Bryan and Mr. J. T. G. Crawford for the defendants in error.