Case: SUMRALL v. KIDD et al.
Abbreviation: Sumrall v. Kidd
Decision Date: 1969-03-10
Docket Number: No. 1167
Citation: 394 U.S. 215
Volume: 394
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: SUMRALL v. KIDD et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 215–215

Head Matter:
SUMRALL v. KIDD et al.
No. 1167,
Misc.
Decided March 10, 1969.
Lawrence A. Aschenbrenner and Elliott C. Lichtman for appellant.
Acting Solicitor General Friedman, Acting Assistant Attorney General Eardley, Morton Hollander, and Robert V. Zener for appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the cause is remanded in order that the District Court may enter a fresh decree from which the appellant may, if he wishes, perfect a timely appeal to the Court of Appeals. Moody v. Flowers, 387 U. S. 97.