Case: Hori Bros., c/o Universal Foreign Service Co. v. United States
Abbreviation: Hori Bros. v. United States
Decision Date: 1942-01-22
Docket Number: No. 5564; Entry No. 9280
Citation: 8 Cust. Ct. 602
Volume: 8
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Hori Bros., c/o Universal Foreign Service Co. v. United States
Judges: 
Pages: 602–602

Head Matter:
Hori Bros., c/o Universal Foreign Service Co. v. United States
No. 5564.
Invoice dated Tokio, Japan, May 5, 1940.
Certified May 7, 1940.
Entered at Los Angeles., Calif., May 31, 1940.
Entry No. 9280.
(Decided January 22, 1942)
Lawrence & Tuttle (George R. Tuttle of counsel) for the plaintiffs.
Paul P. Rao, Assistant Attorney General (James F. Donnelly and Samuel D. Spector, special attorneys), for the defendant.

Opinion:
Dallinger, Judge:
This appeal to reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon an oral stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto to the effect that the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved is the American selling price, and that such American selling price was $1.60 per pair, less 3 per centum.
On the agreed facts I find the American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402 (g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was $1.60 per pair, less 3 per centum. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.