Case: PEKAO TRADING CORP. v. BRAGALINI et al.
Abbreviation: Pekao Trading Corp. v. Bragalini
Decision Date: 1960-12-05
Docket Number: No. 483
Citation: 364 U.S. 478
Volume: 364
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: PEKAO TRADING CORP. v. BRAGALINI et al.
Judges: Mr. Justice Douglas is also of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Pages: 478–478

Head Matter:
PEKAO TRADING CORP. v. BRAGALINI et al.
No. 483.
Decided December 5, 1960.
Arthur C. Fink for appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Frankfurter would note probable jurisdiction and hear the case, the more so inasmuch as the transactions which New York has taxed concerned foreign commerce, unlike those which were involved in Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. Minnesota, 358 U. S. 450.
Mr. Justice Douglas is also of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.