Case: Wythe Sales Corp. v. United States
Abbreviation: Wythe Sales Corp. v. United States
Decision Date: 1967-06-27
Docket Number: C.D. 3044
Citation: 58 Cust. Ct. 539
Volume: 58
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Wythe Sales Corp. v. United States
Judges: Before Kao and Ford, Judges
Pages: 539–540

Head Matter:
(C.D. 3044)
Wythe Sales Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court, Second Division
(Decided June 27, 1967)
Siegel, Mandell é Davidson for the plaintiff.
Carl Mardley, Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
Before Kao and Ford, Judges

Opinion:
Foed, Judge:
The suits listed in schedule "A," attached hereto and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon a written stipulation entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties which reads as follows:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States:
That the items marked "A", and checked JB (Comm. Spec's initials) by Commodity Specialist J. Bistreich (Comm. Spec's name) covered by the protests enumerated on the schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof, and assessed with duty at 19 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of Item 680.50, TSUS, consist of lamp pulleys which are claimed dutiable at 10.5 per centum ad valorem within Item 664.10, TSUS, as elevators, hoists, winches, cranes, jacks, pulley tackle, belt conveyors and other lifting, handling, loading or unloading machinery, not provided for in Item 664.05.
That said lamp pulleys are not, in fact, pulleys, pillow blocks, shaft couplings, or parts thereof, but are, in fact, lifting machinery.
That the protests enumerated on the schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof, be deemed submitted on this stipulation, the protests being limited to the items marked with the letter "A", as aforesaid, and abandoned as to all other items.
Plaintiff having abandoned the protests as to all other merchandise, they are dismissed. Accepting the foregoing stipulation, we find that the merchandise marked "A" and initialed on the invoices by the designated commodity specialist consists of lifting machinery. Therefore, the claim in the protests that said merchandise is properly dutiable at the rate of 10.5 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, under item 664.10, is sustained.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.