Case: Superior Court of California in and for the County of Los Angeles et al. v. Lillefloren et al.
Abbreviation: Superior Court of California v. Lillefloren
Decision Date: 1949-01-10
Docket Number: No. 191
Citation: 335 U.S. 906
Volume: 335
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Superior Court of California in and for the County of Los Angeles et al. v. Lillefloren et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 906–906

Head Matter:
January 10, 1949.
No. 191.
Superior Court of California in and for the County of Los Angeles et al. v. Lillefloren et al.
Russell E. Parsons argued the cause for petitioners.
With him on the brief was Harold W. Kennedy. Herbert S. Thatcher and David Sokol argued the cause for respondents.
With Mr. Thatcher on the brief were Henry C. Bodkin, J. Albert Woll and James A. Glenn for Lillefloren et al., respondents; and Mr. Sokol filed a brief for Sylvane et al., respondents. John C. Stevenson and Mathew O. Tobriner filed a brief for the California State Federation of Labor, as amicus curiae, urging that the case be dismissed.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
It appearing that there is a non-federal ground, independent of the federal ground, and adequate to support the judgment of the lower court, the case is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Fox Film Corp. v. Muller, 296 U. S. 207; Lynch v. New York ex rel. Pierson, 293 U. S. 52.