Case: Bestfoods (formerly known as CPC International, Inc.), plaintiff v. United States, defendant
Abbreviation: Bestfoods v. United States
Decision Date: 1999-07-15
Docket Number: Court No. 95-02-00144
Citation: 23 Ct. Int'l Trade 452
Volume: 23
Reporter: United States Court of International Trade Reports
Court: United States Court of International Trade
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Bestfoods (formerly known as CPC International, Inc.), plaintiff v. United States, defendant
Judges: 
Pages: 452–452

Head Matter:
57 F.Supp.2d 1200
Bestfoods (formerly known as CPC International, Inc.), plaintiff v. United States, defendant
Court No. 95-02-00144
(Dated July 15, 1999)

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
Watson, Senior Judge:
This court's judgment for defendant entered pursuant to CPC Int'l. v. United States, 971 F. Supp. 574 (CIT 1997), having been cross-appealed by the parties, reversed favorably to defendant cross-appellant, vacated, and the action remanded to permit Best-foods to pursue any further arguments it might have, Bestfoods (formerly known as CPC International v. United States, 165 F. 3d 1371 (Fed. Cir. 1999) (issued as a mandate on March 18, 1999); and
This action, previously assigned to the Senior Judge Bernard Newman, having been reassigned to the undersigned on the 26th day of May 1999, and
No further arguments having been submitted by counsel for plaintiff to this court pursuant to the remand, and no further action having been taken by either party in this case;
As the prior judgment for defendant, premised on the court's conclusion that marking would be required under the pre-NAFTA "substantial transformation" test was vacated on appeal, it hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and hereby, is dismissed.