Case: In re Wall; In re Absalon; In re Velez; In re Grant; In re Sparkman; In re Morris; In re Grimsley; In re Burman; and In re Riley
Abbreviation: In re Wall
Decision Date: 2005-04-18
Docket Number: No. 04-1079; No. 04-8531; No. 04-8640; No. 04-8736; No. 04-8950; No. 04-9046; No. 04-9079; No. 04-9174; No. 04-9230
Citation: 544 U.S. 973
Volume: 544
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: In re Wall; In re Absalon; In re Velez; In re Grant; In re Sparkman; In re Morris; In re Grimsley; In re Burman; and In re Riley.
Judges: 
Pages: 973–973

Head Matter:
No. 04-1079.
No. 04-8531.
No. 04-8640.
No. 04-8736.
No. 04-8950.
No. 04-9046.
No. 04-9079.
No. 04-9174.
No. 04-9230.
In re Wall; In re Absalon; In re Velez; In re Grant; In re Sparkman; In re Morris; In re Grimsley; In re Burman; and In re Riley.

Opinion:
Petitions for wits of mandamus denied.