Case: Makah Tribe v. The United States
Abbreviation: Makah Tribe v. United States
Decision Date: 1981-06-26
Docket Number: No. 60-A
Citation: 228 Ct. Cl. 728
Volume: 228
Reporter: United States Court of Claims Reports
Court: United States Court of Claims
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Makah Tribe v. The United States
Judges: Before Nichols, Judge, Presiding, Kunzig and Bennett, Judges.
Pages: 728–728

Head Matter:
No. 60-A.
June 26, 1981
Makah Tribe v. The United States
Samuel J. Stiltner, attorney of record, for plaintiff. Mason D. Morisset, Ziontz, Pirtle, Morisset, Ernstoff& Chestnut, of counsel.
David L. Katz, with whom was Assistant Attorney General Carol E. Dinkins, for defendant.
Before Nichols, Judge, Presiding, Kunzig and Bennett, Judges.

Opinion:
In this Indian Claims Commission case transferred here, the Commission before its dissolution made an interlocutory order that defendant had breached a promise to furnish the Indians $30,000 worth of fishing gear and that consequential damages were awardable. The Commission denied defendant's motion to reconsider. Defendant asks leave to file a second such motion. We consider the reasons assigned for reopening the issue are inadequate and the motion is therefore denied.