Case: Sherry N. JURGENS, Claimant-Appellee, v. James B. PEAKE, M.D., Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellant
Abbreviation: Jurgens v. Peake
Decision Date: 2008-03-05
Docket Number: No. 2005-7085
Citation: 273 F. App'x 872
Volume: 22
Reporter: West's Veterans Appeals Reporter
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Sherry N. JURGENS, Claimant-Appellee, v. James B. PEAKE, M.D., Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellant.
Judges: Before PROST, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Pages: 872–873

Head Matter:
Sherry N. JURGENS, Claimant-Appellee, v. James B. PEAKE, M.D., Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellant.
No. 2005-7085.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
March 5, 2008.
Sherry N. Jurgens, pro se.
Before PROST, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and MOORE, Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs responds to the court's December 3, 2007 order and requests that the court summarily affirm the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in Jurgens v. Principi, 02-1066, 2004 WL 2085514 (Sept. 14, 2004).
The Board of Veterans' Appeals denied claims for entitlement to accrued benefits. The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims vacated the Board's decision and remanded the case to the Board, and the Secretary appealed.
This case was stayed pending the court's disposition in Roan v. Principi, 2004-7093, which was stayed pending the court's disposition in Sanders v. Nicholson, 487 F.3d 881 (Fed.Cir.2007), and its companion case Simmons v. Nicholson, 487 F.3d 892 (Fed. Cir.2007). In Sanders, this court held that any 38 U.S.C. § 5103(a) error should be presumed prejudicial and the Secretary has the burden of rebutting this presumption. Id. at 891.
The court agrees that summary affir-mance of the judgment vacating and remanding to the Board is appropriate in light of our decisions in Simmons and Sanders.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The stay of proceedings is lifted.
(2) The judgment of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims is summarily affirmed. The case is remanded.
(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.