Case: Federal-Mogul Corp., plaintiff and plaintiff-intervenor, and Torrington Co., plaintiff and plaintiff-intervenor v. United States, defendant, and NTN Bearing Corp. of America, American NTN Bearing Manufacturing Corp., NTN Corp., Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd., Koyo Corp. of U.S.A., Peer Bearing Co., NSK Ltd., NSK Corp., Caterpillar Inc., Minebea Co., Ltd., and NMB Corp., defendant-intervenors
Abbreviation: Federal-Mogul Corp. v. United States
Decision Date: 1995-11-13
Docket Number: Consolidated Court No. 91-07-00530 and 91-08-00569
Citation: 19 Ct. Int'l Trade 1338
Volume: 19
Reporter: United States Court of International Trade Reports
Court: United States Court of International Trade
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Federal-Mogul Corp., plaintiff and plaintiff-intervenor, and Torrington Co., plaintiff and plaintiff-intervenor v. United States, defendant, and NTN Bearing Corp. of America, American NTN Bearing Manufacturing Corp., NTN Corp., Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd., Koyo Corp. of U.S.A., Peer Bearing Co., NSK Ltd., NSK Corp., Caterpillar Inc., Minebea Co., Ltd., and NMB Corp., defendant-intervenors
Judges: 
Pages: 1338–1339

Head Matter:
907 F. Supp. 431
Federal-Mogul Corp., plaintiff and plaintiff-intervenor, and Torrington Co., plaintiff and plaintiff-intervenor v. United States, defendant, and NTN Bearing Corp. of America, American NTN Bearing Manufacturing Corp., NTN Corp., Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd., Koyo Corp. of U.S.A., Peer Bearing Co., NSK Ltd., NSK Corp., Caterpillar Inc., Minebea Co., Ltd., and NMB Corp., defendant-intervenors
Consolidated Court No. 91-07-00530 and 91-08-00569
(Dated November 13, 1995)

Opinion:
ORDER
Tsoucalas, Judge:
In accordance with the decision (Aug. 28, 1995) and mandate (Oct. 19, 1995) of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Appeal Nos. 94-1097 and 94 — 1104, remanding this case with instructions, it is
Ordered that the decision and judgment of this Court in Federal-Mogul Corp. v. United States, 17 CIT 1093, 834 F. Sup. 1391 (1993), that the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration ("Commerce") incorrectly adjusted USP for the Japanese value added tax ("VAT") is vacated; and it is further
Ordered that the order of this Court in connection with Federal-Mogul, dated October 7,1993, which directed Commerce to apply the Japanese VAT rate to United States price ("USP") calculated at the same point in the stream of commerce as where the Japanese VAT rate is applied for home market sales and add the resulting amount to USP is vacated; it is further
Ordered that, as Commerce has informed the Court that it now wishes to return to the tax-neutral methodology that was found by the appellate, court to be reasonable, this case is remanded to Commerce to recalculate the final dumping margins at issue by implementing the change in tax adjustment methodology based on the amount of foreign tax, rather than tax rate, to establish the dumping margins; and it is further
Ordered that Commerce will report the results of this remand to the Court within sixty (60) days of the entry of this order.