Case: P. H. Gill & Sons Forge & Machine Works, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent
Abbreviation: P. H. Gill & Sons Forge & Machine Works v. Commissioner
Decision Date: 1927-08-22
Docket Number: Docket No. 6260
Citation: 7 B.T.A. 1146
Volume: 7
Reporter: Reports of the United States Board of Tax Appeals
Court: United States Board of Tax Appeals
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: P. H. Gill & Sons Forge & Machine Works, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.
Judges: Considered by Stern hagen and Aeundell.
Pages: 1146–1147

Head Matter:
P. H. Gill & Sons Forge & Machine Works, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.
Docket No. 6260.
Promulgated August 22, 1927.
Nathan Agar, Q. P. A., for the petitioner.
Jos. K. Moyer, Esq., for the respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION.
Murdock :
Without knowing more facts we must affirm the respondent. The fact that the States Steamship Co. went into bankruptcy in 1920 is not sufficient to establish either that the petitioner had a loss in 1920 or that its debt was worthless in that year. That the petitioner later tried to enforce payment through a court proceeding is likewise insufficient to prove the right to the deduction claimed. We have not been informed as to what the court decided or as to why it so decided. Did it decide that for some reason the petitioner was not entitled to payment for the work, or did it decide that its pleadings were improper or that it had elected the wrong remedy? Could the petitioner have recovered in the bankruptcy proceedings? Did it have any other remedy?
There are too many possibilities left open under the proof which might change the result from a tax standpoint for us to hazard a guess or draw the inferences necessary to put the question of the deductibility of this amount squarely before us.
Judgment will he entered for the respondent.
Considered by Stern hagen and Aeundell.