Case: Akron, Canton & Youngstown Ry. Co. et al. v. United States et al.
Abbreviation: Akron, Canton & Youngstown Ry. Co. v. United States
Decision Date: 1931-10-26
Docket Number: No. 1
Citation: 284 U.S. 575
Volume: 284
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Akron, Canton & Youngstown Ry. Co. et al. v. United States et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 575–575

Head Matter:
No. 1.
Akron, Canton & Youngstown Ry. Co. et al. v. United States et al.
Argued October 14, 15, 1931.
Decided October 26, 1931.
Mr. Leo P. Day, with whom Mr. Anthony P. Donadío was on the brief, for appellants.
Mr. J. Stanley Payne,' with whom Solicitor General Thacker, Assistant to the Attorney General O’Brian, and Messrs. Daniel W. Knowlton and E. M. Reidy were on the brief, for the United States et al.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
The Court is of the opinion that the Interstate Commerce Commission acted within its authority and that its order is supported by substantial evidence. The decree is affirmed. Western Chemical Co. v. United States, 271 U. S. 268, 271; Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. United States, 274 U. S. 29, 33, 34; Alabama v. United States, 283 U. S. 776, 779.