Case: George M. Diener et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. I. M. Lane et al.
Abbreviation: Diener v. Lane
Decision Date: 1915-12-06
Docket Number: No. 689
Citation: 239 U.S. 632
Volume: 239
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: George M. Diener et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. I. M. Lane et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 632–632

Head Matter:
No. 689.
George M. Diener et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. I. M. Lane et al.
In error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky.
Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted November 29, 1915.
Decided December 6, 1915.
Mr. J. M. Collins and Mr. J. H. Hazelrigg for the plaintiffs in error.
Mr. E. L. Worthington for the defendants in erron

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdic-
tion upon the authority of (1) Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137; Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce, 235 U. S. 380; (2) Lancaster v. Thacker, 239 17. S., ante, p. 625; Wallbrecht v. Ingram, 239 U. S., ante, p. 625; (3) Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 2), 212 U. S. 112, 118; Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102; Overton v. Oklahoma, 235 U. S. 31.