Case: Meyer v. Lelsz et al.; Bona v. Chavez et al.; Bullwinkle v. Alaska; Thomsen v. Juvenile Department of Washington County et al.; Carter v. Certified Grocers of California, Ltd.; Woods v. United States; Smith et al. v. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services; and Clayborn v. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services; Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. v. Henderson et al.; Abdullah v. Nebraska; Miller-El v. Texas; Brannon v. LaMaina; Johnson v. Detroit College of Law et al.; Rose v. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division; Burns v. Texas; Young v. Groose, Warden; Huff v. ABC Enterprises, Inc.; Corrigan v. Tompkins et al.; Harris v. County of Sacramento, California, et al.; Schultz v. Wisconsin; Helms v. Reynolds, Warden, et al.; Bounds v. United States; Steele v. California Department of Social Services; Burger v. Zant, Warden; Clark v. Nagle, Warden, et al.; Fox v. Hutton et al.; Scott v. Tyson Foods, Inc., In re Nkop; McFall v. Wilkinson et al.; Lane v. Ramey et al.; Crayton v. Kentucky; Agron v. Clinton, President of the United States, et al.; Cato v. Morales, Attorney General of Texas, et al.; Johnston v. Zeff & Zeff et al.; Duncan v. Cobb et al.; Scinto v. Stamm et al.; Mitchell et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; Mick et al. v. Resolution Trust Corporation, Conservator for Irving Federal Savings & Loan Assn.; Arnold, aka Ahmad v. Leonard et al.; Cowhig v. Stone, Secretary of the Army, et al.; Maloney v. United States et al.; James et al. v. City of Livonia et al.; Loomis v. Wallis & Short, P. C.; Dunning v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; Ruchman et al. v. Wolff et al.; Pompe v. City of Yonkers et al.; Brown v. Chicopee Fire Fighters, Local 1710, IAFF, et al.; Deobler v. Kintzele et al.; Loucks et al. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.; Partee v. Peters, Director, Illinois Department of Corrections, et al.; Johnson v. Hardcastle et al.; Alcala v. California; Lorenzo v. United States; Williams et vir v. Trumbauer et al.; Atherton v. Virginia; Haley v. Borg, Warden, et al.; DeMauro v. Coldwell, Banker & Co. et al.; Walton v. Arizona; Ramsey v. Office of the State Engineer et al.; Weaver v. Kaye et al.; Weaver v. Strine et al.; Siegel v. Berkheimer Associates; Shaw v. Missouri; Gacy v. Welborn, Warden, et al.; Swain v. Detroit Board of Education; Whitson v. Hillhaven West, Inc., et al.; O'Donnell v. American Career Training Corp. et al.; Barker v. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division; Vollbrecht v. Wisconsin, In re Campbell; Cherry v. Ratelle, Warden, et al.; DeRosa v. New York; Anderson v. United States; Paul v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Abbreviation: Meyer v. Lelsz
Decision Date: 1993-11-29
Docket Number: No. 92-1806; No. 92-1827; No. 92-1869; No. 92-1881; No. 92-1997; No. 92-2027; No. 92-2045; No. 92-2061; No. 92-8182; No. 92-8474; No. 92-8732; No. 92-8766; No. 92-8776; No. 92-8867; No. 92-8871; No. 92-8941; No. 92-8947; No. 92-8949; No. 92-8952; No. 92-8972; No. 92-8999; No. 92-9025; No. 92-9041; No. 92-9077; No. 92-9106; No. 92-9168; No. 92-9179; No. 92-9192; No. 92-9193; No. 92-9202; No. 92-9203; No. 92-9235; No. 93-20; No. 93-26; No. 93-40; No. 93-42; No. 93-124; No. 93-153; No. 93-200; No. 93-237; No. 93-243; No. 93-354; No. 93-368; No. 93-5010; No. 93-5011; No. 93-5030; No. 93-5058; No. 93-5112; No. 93-5116; No. 93-5124; No. 93-5130; No. 93-5198; No. 93-5287; No. 93-5295; No. 93-5300; No. 93-5316; No. 93-5347; No. 93-5383; No. 93-5388; No. 93-5389; No. 93-5433; No. 93-5479; No. 93-5558; No. 93-5583; No. 93-5624; No. 93-5633; No. 93-5648; No. 93-5725; No. 93-5733; No. 93-5772; No. 93-5773; No. 93-5837; No. 93-5987
Citation: 510 U.S. 1004
Volume: 510
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Meyer v. Lelsz et al., Bona v. Chavez et al., Bullwinkle v. Alaska, Thomsen v. Juvenile Department of Washington County et al., Carter v. Certified Grocers of California, Ltd., Woods v. United States, Smith et al. v. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services; and Clayborn v. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. v. Henderson et al., Abdullah v. Nebraska, Miller-El v. Texas, Brannon v. LaMaina, Johnson v. Detroit College of Law et al., Rose v. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Burns v. Texas, Young v. Groose, Warden, Huff v. ABC Enterprises, Inc., Corrigan v. Tompkins et al., Harris v. County of Sacramento, California, et al., Schultz v. Wisconsin, Helms v. Reynolds, Warden, et al., Bounds v. United States, Steele v. California Department of Social Services, Burger v. Zant, Warden, Clark v. Nagle, Warden, et al., Fox v. Hutton et al., Scott v. Tyson Foods, Inc., In re Nkop, McFall v. Wilkinson et al., Lane v. Ramey et al., Crayton v. Kentucky, Agron v. Clinton, President of the United States, et al., Cato v. Morales, Attorney General of Texas, et al., Johnston v. Zeff & Zeff et al., Duncan v. Cobb et al., Scinto v. Stamm et al., Mitchell et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Mick et al. v. Resolution Trust Corporation, Conservator for Irving Federal Savings & Loan Assn., Arnold, aka Ahmad v. Leonard et al., Cowhig v. Stone, Secretary of the Army, et al., Maloney v. United States et al., James et al. v. City of Livonia et al., Loomis v. Wallis & Short, P. C., Dunning v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Ruchman et al. v. Wolff et al., Pompe v. City of Yonkers et al., Brown v. Chicopee Fire Fighters, Local 1710, IAFF, et al., Deobler v. Kintzele et al., Loucks et al. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., Partee v. Peters, Director, Illinois Department of Corrections, et al., Johnson v. Hardcastle et al., Alcala v. California, Lorenzo v. United States, Williams et vir v. Trumbauer et al., Atherton v. Virginia, Haley v. Borg, Warden, et al., DeMauro v. Coldwell, Banker & Co. et al., Walton v. Arizona, Ramsey v. Office of the State Engineer et al., Weaver v. Kaye et al., Weaver v. Strine et al., Siegel v. Berkheimer Associates, Shaw v. Missouri, Gacy v. Welborn, Warden, et al., Swain v. Detroit Board of Education, Whitson v. Hillhaven West, Inc., et al., O’Donnell v. American Career Training Corp. et al., Barker v. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Vollbrecht v. Wisconsin, In re Campbell, Cherry v. Ratelle, Warden, et al., DeRosa v. New York, Anderson v. United States, Paul v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue,
Judges: 
Pages: 1004–1007

Head Matter:
No. 92-1806.
No. 92-1827.
No. 92-1869.
No. 92-1881.
No. 92-1997.
No. 92-2027.
No. 92-2045.
No. 92-2061.
No. 92-8182.
No. 92-8474.
Meyer v. Lelsz et al., Bona v. Chavez et al., Bullwinkle v. Alaska, Thomsen v. Juvenile Department of Washington County et al., Carter v. Certified Grocers of California, Ltd., Woods v. United States, Smith et al. v. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services; and Clayborn v. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. v. Henderson et al., Abdullah v. Nebraska, Miller-El v. Texas, Brannon v. LaMaina, Johnson v. Detroit College of Law et al., Rose v. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Burns v. Texas, Young v. Groose, Warden, Huff v. ABC Enterprises, Inc., Corrigan v. Tompkins et al., Harris v. County of Sacramento, California, et al., Schultz v. Wisconsin, Helms v. Reynolds, Warden, et al., Bounds v. United States, Steele v. California Department of Social Services, Burger v. Zant, Warden, Clark v. Nagle, Warden, et al., Fox v. Hutton et al., Scott v. Tyson Foods, Inc., In re Nkop, McFall v. Wilkinson et al., Lane v. Ramey et al., Crayton v. Kentucky, Agron v. Clinton, President of the United States, et al., Cato v. Morales, Attorney General of Texas, et al., Johnston v. Zeff & Zeff et al., Duncan v. Cobb et al., Scinto v. Stamm et al., Mitchell et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Mick et al. v. Resolution Trust Corporation, Conservator for Irving Federal Savings & Loan Assn., Arnold, aka Ahmad v. Leonard et al., Cowhig v. Stone, Secretary of the Army, et al., Maloney v. United States et al., James et al. v. City of Livonia et al., Loomis v. Wallis & Short, P. C., Dunning v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Ruchman et al. v. Wolff et al., Pompe v. City of Yonkers et al., Brown v. Chicopee Fire Fighters, Local 1710, IAFF, et al., Deobler v. Kintzele et al., Loucks et al. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., Partee v. Peters, Director, Illinois Department of Corrections, et al., Johnson v. Hardcastle et al., Alcala v. California, Lorenzo v. United States, Williams et vir v. Trumbauer et al., Atherton v. Virginia, Haley v. Borg, Warden, et al., DeMauro v. Coldwell, Banker & Co. et al., Walton v. Arizona, Ramsey v. Office of the State Engineer et al., Weaver v. Kaye et al., Weaver v. Strine et al., Siegel v. Berkheimer Associates, Shaw v. Missouri, Gacy v. Welborn, Warden, et al., Swain v. Detroit Board of Education, Whitson v. Hillhaven West, Inc., et al., O’Donnell v. American Career Training Corp. et al., Barker v. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Vollbrecht v. Wisconsin, In re Campbell, Cherry v. Ratelle, Warden, et al., DeRosa v. New York, Anderson v. United States, Paul v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue,

Opinion:
ante, p. 906;
ante, p. 815;
ante, p. 817;
ante, p. 818;
ante, p. 825;
ante, p. 826;
ante, p. 930;
ante, p. 828;
ante, p. 829;
ante, p. 831;
No. 92-8732.
No. 92-8766.
No. 92-8776.
No. 92-8867.
No. 92-8871.
No. 92-8941.
No. 92-8947.
No. 92-8949.
No. 92-8952.
No. 92-8972.
No. 92-8999.
No. 92-9025.
No. 92-9041.
No. 92-9077.
No. 92-9106.
No. 92-9168.
No. 92-9179.
No. 92-9192.
No. 92-9193.
No. 92-9202.
No. 92-9203.
No. 92-9235.
No. 93-20.
No. 93-26.
No. 93-40.
No. 93-42.
No. 93-124.
No. 93-153.
ante, p. 833;
ante, p. 834;
ante, p. 835;
ante, p. 838;
ante, p. 838;
ante, p. 841;
ante, p. 842;
ante, p. 842;
ante, p. 842;
ante, p. 843;
ante, p. 845;
ante, p. 846;
ante, p. 847;
ante, p. 849;
ante, p. 851;
ante, p. 854;
ante, p. 809;
ante, p. 856;
ante, p. 856;
ante, p. 856;
ante, p. 857;
ante, p. 859;
ante, p. 860;
ante, p. 860;
ante, p. 861;
ante, p. 861;
ante, p. 865;
ante, p. 866;
No. 93-200.
No. 93-237.
No. 93-243.
No. 93-354.
No. 93-368.
No. 93-5010.
No. 93-5011.
No. 93-5030.
No. 93-5058.
No. 93-5112.
No. 93-5116.
No. 93-5124.
No. 93-5130.
No. 93-5198.
No. 93-5287.
No. 93-5295.
No. 93-5300.
No. 93-5316.
No. 93-5347.
No. 93-5383.
No. 93-5388.
No. 93-5389.
No. 93-5433.
No. 93-5479.
No. 93-5558.
No. 93-5583.
No. 93-5624.
No. 93-5633.
ante, p. 869;
ante, p. 915;
ante, p. 915;
ante, p. 918;
ante, p. 918;
ante, p. 871;
ante, p. 871;
ante, p. 872;
ante, p. 873;
ante, p. 876;
ante, p. 877;
ante, p. 877;
ante, p. 877;
ante, p. 881;
ante, p. 886;
ante, p. 886;
ante, p. 886;
ante, p. 887;
ante, p. 889;
ante, p. 890;
ante, p. 891;
ante, p. 891;
ante, p. 893;
ante, p. 895;
ante, p. 899;
ante, p. 920;
ante, p. 921;
ante, p. 921;
No. 93-5648.
No. 93-5725.
No. 93-5733.
No. 93-5772.
No. 93-5773.
No. 93-5837.
No. 93-5987.
ante, p. 922;
ante, p. 923;
ante, p. 912;
ante, p. 924;
ante, p. 924;
ante, p. 926; and
ante, p. 936. Petitions for rehearing denied.