Case: In re Bonty; In re Bonta; In re Cavan; In re Rodriguez; In re Moncrief; In re Lanzon; In re Jory; In re Deere; In re Harris; In re Grasmick; In re Walker; In re Wesley; In re Wheeler; In re Son Van Hoang; In re Shepherd; In re Lane; and In re Maida
Abbreviation: In re Bonty
Decision Date: 1995-10-30
Docket Number: No. 95-6203; No. 95-6204; No. 95-6223; No. 95-6230; No. 95-6235; No. 95-6236; No. 95-6237; No. 95-6243; No. 95-6244; No. 95-6245; No. 95-6257; No. 95-6258; No. 95-6300; No. 95-6301; No. 95-6303; No. 95-6305; No. 95-6306
Citation: 516 U.S. 941
Volume: 516
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: In re Bonty; In re Bonta; In re Cavan; In re Rodriguez; In re Moncrief; In re Lanzon; In re Jory; In re Deere; In re Harris; In re Grasmick; In re Walker; In re Wesley; In re Wheeler; In re Son Van Hoang; In re Shepherd; In re Lane; and In re Maida.
Judges: 
Pages: 941–942

Head Matter:
No. 95-6203.
No. 95-6204.
No. 95-6223.
No. 95-6230.
No. 95-6235.
No. 95-6236.
No. 95-6237.
No. 95-6243.
No. 95-6244.
No. 95-6245.
In re Bonty; In re Bonta; In re Cavan; In re Rodriguez; In re Moncrief; In re Lanzon; In re Jory; In re Deere; In re Harris; In re Grasmick; In re Walker; In re Wesley; In re Wheeler; In re Son Van Hoang; In re Shepherd; In re Lane; and In re Maida.
No. 95-6257.
No. 95-6258.
No. 95-6300.
No. 95-6301.
No. 95-6303.
No. 95-6305.
No. 95-6306.

Opinion:
Petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.