Case: Pacific Resins & Chemicals, Inc. v. United States
Abbreviation: Pacific Resins & Chemicals, Inc. v. United States
Decision Date: 1967-08-01
Docket Number: C.D. 3071
Citation: 59 Cust. Ct. 63
Volume: 59
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Pacific Resins & Chemicals, Inc. v. United States
Judges: Before Watson and Beckwokth, Judges
Pages: 63–63

Head Matter:
(C.D. 3071)
Pacific Resins & Chemicals, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court, First Division
(Decided August 1, 1967)
Herbert 8. Little for the plaintiff.
Oarl Eardley, Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
Before Watson and Beckwokth, Judges

Opinion:
Watson, Judge:
This suit has been submitted for decision on the following agreement between counsel for the respective parties:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the plaintiff and the defendant that the merchandise covered by the entry involved in the above-entitled protest and claim, namely, "750 Bags Dry Blood Adhesive" does not consist of urea or amino (including melamine) resins; it is not enumerated, described or specifically provided for in the TSUS; and it is not similar in the use to which it may be applied to any article or articles enumerated in the TSUS as chargeable with duty; and it is claimed that the merchandise is properly dutiable under Item 799.00 TSUS. This protest may be deemed submitted on this stipulation, and the records thus made.
Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact, we hold the merchandise herein involved to be properly dutiable under item 799.00 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States at the rate of 10 per centum ad valorem under the provision therein for nonenumerated products, as claimed.
The protest is sustained. Judgment will issue accordingly.