Case: MATTER OF HENRY C. PEARSON, PETITIONER
Abbreviation: In re Pearson
Decision Date: 1909-05-24
Docket Number: 
Citation: 214 U.S. 505
Volume: 214
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: MATTER OF HENRY C. PEARSON, PETITIONER.
Judges: 
Pages: 505–506

Head Matter:
MATTER OF HENRY C. PEARSON, PETITIONER.
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS.
No.-. Original.
Submitted May 17, 1909.
Decided. May 24, 1909.
Leave to file petition for mandamus to the Chief Justice and the associate justices of the Court of Claims to make a report to the President of the Senate on petitioner’s claim denied.
■ As stated by the Court of Claims, Henry C. Pearson filed a claim; for three months’ extra pay proper as an officer in the Volunteer Service during the civil war under the act of March 3, 1865; on May 22,1908, the United States Senate referred to the court Bill No. 7Ó1& of the 60th Congress, First Session, authorizing the Secretary.of the Treasury to reexamine and adjust claims of persons (including petitioner) under the act of March 3, 1865. The court found that the petitioner was loyal and also made the following finding:
Henry C. Pearson was enrolled July 1, 1863, as private, Co. N, 21st Pennsylvania Cavalry Volunteers, for six months. He reénlisted for three years as a veteran volunteer on February 10, 1864, was promoted to First Lieutenant and Adjutant February 26,' 1864, and was in the service of the United States in such grade of First Lieutenant and Adjutant on March 3, .1865. Said claimant continued in the service of the United States from Match 3,1865, until April 7,1865, at which time he was discharged from the military service by order of the Secretary of War “on account of_physical disability from wounds received in action.” The claim'herein is neither a legal nor an equitable claim against the United States and the court is therefore without jurisdiction to liquidate the amount, the same, resting in the bounty of Congress.
Thereupon this motion for mandamus was filed, the petitioner claiming that he had a clear legal right to have the. Court of Claims report to the President of the Senate the. amount which he would receive and the Government pay if Congress shoúld enact into law Senate Bill No. 7Q13, and that it was the duty of, the Court of Claims so to do under the Tucker act.
Mr. Charles F. Carusi, Mr. C. W. Pennebaker and Mr. Eugene A. Jones for petitioner.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.