Case: YOUNG v. GRUNDY
Abbreviation: Young v. Grundy
Decision Date: 1810-02
Docket Number: 
Citation: 6 Cranch 51
Volume: 10
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: YOUNG v. GRUNDY.
Judges: 
Pages: 51–52

Head Matter:
YOUNG v. GRUNDY.
No writ of error or appeallies to an injunction.
if the answer neither admits ^legations of v™d on the Inai hearing; but ot'°1<i'¡ssoíuit¡on ofan injunction ®0t0 true,
THIS was an appeal from an interlocutory decree of the circuit court of the district of Columbia, dissolving an injunction. ■
E. J. Lee, for the appellant.
The. decree dissolves the injunction with costs j which is a final decree as to the costs. 2 Wash. 200. Davenport v. Mason.
The material facts of the bill are not denied nor admitted by the answer j they are, therefore, to be taken as true. . The court below must, therefore, have proceeded on the ground that the original equity between the maker ánd payee of the note did affect the endorsee.

Opinion:
Marshall, Ch. J.
If the.answer neither admits nor denies the allegations of the bill, they must be proved upon the final hearing. Upon a question of dissolution of an injunction they are to be taken to be true.
But the court has no doubt upon the question.
No appeal, or writ of error will lie to an interlocutory decree dissolving an injunction. .
Writ of error dismissed with costs.