Case: In re Robinson; In re Berry; In re Vann; In re Robinson; In re Abdelmessih; In re Rodriguez-Padron; In re Dunnington; In re Young; In re Dore; In re Ainsworth; In re Gunnell; In re Gaines; In re Schreiber; In re Correa; In re Jackson; In re Purchess; In re Bowen; In re Young; and In re Tootle
Abbreviation: In re Robinson
Decision Date: 2001-10-01
Docket Number: No. 00-10105; No. 00-10292; No. 00-10336; No. 00-10390; No. 00-10485; No. 00-10487; No. 00-10513; No. 00-10532; No. 00-10591; No. 00-10592; No. 00-10650; No. 00-10652; No. 00-10701; No. 00-10722; No. 00-10851; No. 01-5012; No. 01-5348; No. 01-5429; No. 01-5544
Citation: 534 U.S. 811
Volume: 534
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: In re Robinson; In re Berry; In re Vann; In re Robinson; In re Abdelmessih; In re Rodriguez-Padron; In re Dunnington; In re Young; In re Dore; In re Ainsworth; In re Gunnell; In re Gaines; In re Schreiber; In re Correa; In re Jackson; In re Purchess; In re Bowen; In re Young; and In re Tootle.
Judges: 
Pages: 811–812

Head Matter:
No. 00-10105.
No. 00-10292.
No. 00-10336.
No. 00-10390.
No. 00-10485.
No. 00-10487.
No. 00-10513.
No. 00-10532.
In re Robinson; In re Berry; In re Vann; In re Robinson; In re Abdelmessih; In re Rodriguez-Padron; In re Dunnington; In re Young; In re Dore; In re Ainsworth; In re Gunnell; In re Gaines; In re Schreiber; In re Correa; In re Jackson; In re Purchess; In re Bowen; In re Young; and In re Tootle.
No. 00-10591.
No. 00-10592.
No. 00-10650.
No. 00-10652.
No. 00-10701.
No. 00-10722.
No. 00-10851.
No. 01-5012.
No. 01-5348.
No. 01-5429.
No. 01-5544.

Opinion:
Petitions for writ of mandamus denied.