Case: Da Jin (U.S.) Trading Co., Inc., plaintiff v. United States, defendant, and ABC Coke, at al., defendant-intervenors
Abbreviation: Da Jin (U.S.) Trading Co. v. United States
Decision Date: 2002-02-20
Docket Number: Court No. 02-00155
Citation: 26 Ct. Int'l Trade 220
Volume: 26
Reporter: United States Court of International Trade Reports
Court: United States Court of International Trade
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Da Jin (U.S.) Trading Co., Inc., plaintiff v. United States, defendant, and ABC Coke, at al., defendant-intervenors
Judges: 
Pages: 220–221

Head Matter:
193 F. Supp. 2d 1303
Da Jin (U.S.) Trading Co., Inc., plaintiff v. United States, defendant, and ABC Coke, at al., defendant-intervenors
Court No. 02-00155
(Dated February 20, 2002)

Opinion:
ORDER
Wallach, Judge:
Upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for a Preliminary Injunction; the Court having reviewed the pleadings and papers on file herein, and having heard oral argument on Wednesday, February 20, 2002, with Plaintiff Da Jin (U.S.) Trading Company, Inc., appearing by and through Jeffrey S. Neeley, Esq., Defendant, United States of America, appearing by and through Lucius B. Lau, Esq., and Defendant-Inter-venors ABC Coke, et al., appearing by and through Roger B. Schagrin, Esq.; and good cause appearing therefor, it is hereby
Ordered, adjudged and decreed that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss be, and hereby is, granted on the grounds that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to hear this case under 28 U.S.C. §1581(i), the only basis for jurisdiction asserted by Plaintiff in its Amended Complaint, since jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §1581(c) is or could have been available, Norcal/Crosetti Foods, Inc. v. United States, 963 F.2d 356, 359 (Fed. Cir. 1992); and on the grounds that Plaintiff has failed to exhaust its available administrative remedies, Nippon Steel Corp. v. United States, 219 F.3rd 1348 (Fed. Cir. 2000) and Sandvik Steel Co. v. United States, 164 F.3rd 596 (Fed. Cir. 1998); and it is further
Ordered, adjudged and decreed that the Temporary Restraining Order previously entered in this case in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant be, and hereby is, dissolved, and it. is further
Ordered, adjudged and decreed that all other pending motions in the above entitled matter be, and hereby are denied as moot; and it is further
Ordered, adjudged and decreed that Plaintiffs Amended Complaint in the above entitled matter be, and hereby is, DISMISSED