Case: Daniel L. Spuck, Petitioner v. Ammerman Fredric
Abbreviation: Spuck v. Ammerman Fredric
Decision Date: 2011-11-28
Docket Number: No. 11-6806
Citation: 181 L. Ed. 2d 476
Volume: 181
Reporter: United States Supreme Court Reports, Lawyers' Edition
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Daniel L. Spuck, Petitioner v. Ammerman Fredric.
Judges: 
Pages: 476–477

Head Matter:
No. 11-6806.
Daniel L. Spuck, Petitioner v. Ammerman Fredric.
565 U.S. 1052, 132 S. Ct. 781,
181 L. Ed. 2d 476,
2011 U.S. LEXIS 8380.
November 28, 2011.

Opinion:
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris denied, and petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).
Same case below, 415 Fed. Appx. 358.