Case: BUCKLEY et al., dba BUCKLEY'S AUTO WRECKING v. OHIO BY BARBUTO
Abbreviation: Buckley v. Ohio by Barbuto
Decision Date: 1969-05-19
Docket Number: No. 1209
Citation: 395 U.S. 163
Volume: 395
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: BUCKLEY et al., dba BUCKLEY’S AUTO WRECKING v. OHIO BY BARBUTO.
Judges: 
Pages: 163–163

Head Matter:
BUCKLEY et al., dba BUCKLEY’S AUTO WRECKING v. OHIO BY BARBUTO.
No. 1209.
Decided May 19, 1969.
Edward D. Wyner for appellants.
Paul W. Brown, Attorney General of Ohio, pro se, and Robert D. Macklin, Assistant Attorney General, for the Attorney General of Ohio, and James V. Barbuto, pro se, appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.