Case: Morgan v. Ohio
Abbreviation: Morgan v. Ohio
Decision Date: 1957-06-24
Docket Number: No. 206
Citation: 354 U.S. 929
Volume: 354
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Morgan v. Ohio.
Judges: Mr. Justice Burton would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for argument. Mr. Justice Clark dissents from this disposition of the case for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinions in Sweezy v. New Hampshire and Watkins v. United States, supra.
Pages: 929–929

Head Matter:
No. 206,
Misc.
Morgan v. Ohio.
Ann Fagan Ginger and Thelma C. Furry for appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
The judgment of the Supreme Court of Ohio is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in the light of Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U. S. 234, and Watkins v. United States, 354 U. S. 178.
Mr. Justice Burton would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for argument. Mr. Justice Clark dissents from this disposition of the case for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinions in Sweezy v. New Hampshire and Watkins v. United States, supra.