Case: Fuchs Shoe Corp. v. United States
Abbreviation: Fuchs Shoe Corp. v. United States
Decision Date: 1949-05-25
Docket Number: No. 53250; protest 139906-K/12984 (New Orleans)
Citation: 22 Cust. Ct. 338
Volume: 22
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Fuchs Shoe Corp. v. United States,
Judges: 
Pages: 338–339

Head Matter:
Before the First Division
May 25, 1949
No. 53250.
Fuchs Shoe Corp. v. United States,
protest 139906-K/12984 (New Orleans).

Opinion:
dissenting opinion
Cole, Judge:
The action of the majority, restoring this case to the New Orleans calendar, is directly opposite to my views, as expressed in the memorandum accompanying order issued on May 23, 1949, in the matter of Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc., et al. v. United States (22 Cust. Ct. 158, C. D. 1175), wherein a condition in line with the present situation was submitted to the court.
Following my reasoning in the cited case, I respectfully dissent from the procedure invoked by the maj ority. I do so entirely on the belief that the first division has no jurisdiction in this case, which was submitted by order of a single judge on circuit, acting under valid authorization issued by the chief judge pursuant to law, section 518 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1518), now 28 U. S. C. 1948 ed. chapter 11, § 254.