Case: Simon, Healey & Goldstein, Inc. v. United States
Abbreviation: Simon, Healey & Goldstein, Inc. v. United States
Decision Date: 1947-05-01
Docket Number: No. 7224; Entry No. 713935
Citation: 18 Cust. Ct. 583
Volume: 18
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Simon, Healey & Goldstein, Inc. v. United States
Judges: 
Pages: 583–583

Head Matter:
Simon, Healey & Goldstein, Inc. v. United States
No. 7224.
Entry No. 713935.
Invoice dated Derby, England, July 19, 1946.
Certified July 22, 1946.
Entered at New York, N. Y., August 16, 1946.
(Decided May 1, 1947)
Siegel, Mandell & Davidson for the plaintiff.
Paul P. Bao, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant

Opinion:
Tilson, Judge:
This appeal involves the question of whether or not the amount of a so-called British purchase tax should be included as a part of the proper dutiable value.
Counsel for the respective parties, in submitting this appeal, have agreed that the issues herein are the same in all material respects as the issues involved in United States v. Pitcairn, C. A. D. 334, and the record therein has been admitted in evidence in this case.
Upon the agreed facts and the law applicable thereto, I find and hold the proper dutiable values of the merchandise covered by this appeal to be the values returned by the appraiser, less any amounts added on entry by the importer to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.