Case: Moss v. Singletary, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.; Bannister v. Armontrout, Assistant Director/Zone II, Missouri Division of Adult Institutions, et al.; Cain v. Vickers et al.; Optimal Data Corp. v. United States; Lee v. State Bar of California; Zisk et al. v. Placer County Superior Court (Walker, Real Party in Interest); Whitehead v. Greer et al.; De la Fe v. United States; Overly v. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; Porter v. Singletary, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections; Johnson v. Dutton, Warden, et al.; Mata v. Ricketts et al.; Dokes v. Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction; Moon v. Zant, Warden; Giles v. Snow et al.; McFadden v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. et al.; Jones v. North Carolina; Shorter v. Smith, Warden, et al.; Kerpan et ux. v. Davis; Gomez v. Brun Apartments; March v. Runyon, Postmaster General, et al.; Rebar v. Marsh, Secretary of the Army, et al.; Azar v. Health Alliance Plan; Rimell v. United States; In re Seagrave, Lazor v. Sperry Rand Corp., Univac Division (nka Unisys Corp.); McAfee v. Texas; Randall v. Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services of Volusia County et al.; Braslavsky v. Board of Trustees of University of Illinois; Dubyak v. Smith, Warden; Pfeiffer v. Arizona et al.
Abbreviation: Moss v. Singletary
Decision Date: 1995-01-09
Docket Number: No. 93-9007; No. 93-9344; No. 93-9707; No. 94-508; No. 94-524; No. 94-535; No. 94-5032; No. 94-5207; No. 94-5354; No. 94-5610; No. 94-5626; No. 94-5756; No. 94-5814; No. 94-5822; No. 94-5859; No. 94-5892; No. 94-5907; No. 94-5954; No. 94-5956; No. 94-5963; No. 94-6010; No. 94-6033; No. 94-6065; No. 94-6167; No. 94-6341; No. 94-6360; No. 94-6417; No. 94-6442; No. 94-6459; No. 94-6493; No. 94-6530
Citation: 513 U.S. 1103
Volume: 513
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Moss v. Singletary, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al., Bannister v. Armontrout, Assistant Director/Zone II, Missouri Division of Adult Institutions, et al., Cain v. Vickers et al., Optimal Data Corp. v. United States, Lee v. State Bar of California, Zisk et al. v. Placer County Superior Court (Walker, Real Party in Interest), Whitehead v. Greer et al., De la Fe v. United States, Overly v. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Porter v. Singletary, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Johnson v. Dutton, Warden, et al., Mata v. Ricketts et al., Dokes v. Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Moon v. Zant, Warden, Giles v. Snow et al., McFadden v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. et al., Jones v. North Carolina, Shorter v. Smith, Warden, et al., Kerpan et ux. v. Davis, Gomez v. Brun Apartments, March v. Runyon, Postmaster General, et al., Rebar v. Marsh, Secretary of the Army, et al., Azar v. Health Alliance Plan, Rimell v. United States, In re Seagrave, Lazor v. Sperry Rand Corp., Univac Division (nka Unisys Corp.), McAfee v. Texas, Randall v. Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services of Volusia County et al., Braslavsky v. Board of Trustees of University of Illinois, Dubyak v. Smith, Warden, Pfeiffer v. Arizona et al.,
Judges: 
Pages: 1103–1105

Head Matter:
No. 93-9007.
No. 93-9344.
Moss v. Singletary, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al., Bannister v. Armontrout, Assistant Director/Zone II, Missouri Division of Adult Institutions, et al., Cain v. Vickers et al., Optimal Data Corp. v. United States, Lee v. State Bar of California, Zisk et al. v. Placer County Superior Court (Walker, Real Party in Interest), Whitehead v. Greer et al., De la Fe v. United States, Overly v. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Porter v. Singletary, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Johnson v. Dutton, Warden, et al., Mata v. Ricketts et al., Dokes v. Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Moon v. Zant, Warden, Giles v. Snow et al., McFadden v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. et al., Jones v. North Carolina, Shorter v. Smith, Warden, et al., Kerpan et ux. v. Davis, Gomez v. Brun Apartments, March v. Runyon, Postmaster General, et al., Rebar v. Marsh, Secretary of the Army, et al., Azar v. Health Alliance Plan, Rimell v. United States, In re Seagrave, Lazor v. Sperry Rand Corp., Univac Division (nka Unisys Corp.), McAfee v. Texas, Randall v. Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services of Volusia County et al., Braslavsky v. Board of Trustees of University of Illinois, Dubyak v. Smith, Warden, Pfeiffer v. Arizona et al.,

Opinion:
ante, p. 831;
ante, p. 960;
No. 93-9707.
No. 94-508.
No. 94-524.
No. 94-535.
No. 94-5032.
No. 94-5207.
No. 94-5354.
No. 94-5610.
No. 94-5626.
No. 94-5756.
No. 94-5814.
No. 94-5822.
No. 94-5859.
No. 94-5892.
No. 94-5907.
No. 94-5954.
No. 94-5956.
No. 94-5963.
No. 94-6010.
No. 94-6033.
No. 94-6065.
No. 94-6167.
No. 94-6341.
No. 94-6360.
No. 94-6417.
No. 94-6442.
ante, p. 861;
ante, p. 1000;
ante, p. 965;
ante, p. 983;
ante, p. 966;
ante, p. 989;
ante, p. 966;
ante, p. 1009;
ante, p. 935;
ante, p. 968;
ante, p. 968;
ante, p. 968;
ante, p. 969;
ante, p. 970;
ante, p. 1003;
ante, p. 953;
ante, p. 971;
ante, p. 972;
ante, p. 973;
ante, p. 974;
ante, p. 974;
ante, p. 976;
ante, p. 985;
ante, p. 1006;
ante, p. 1026;
ante, p. 1026;
No. 94-6459.
No. 94-6493.
No. 94-6530.
ante, p. 1008;
ante, p. 1026; and
ante, p. 1027. Petitions for rehearing denied.