Case: Baez v. Breslin; Balawajder v. Scott, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice; Cunningham v. Poppell, Warden, et al.; Brancato v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co. et al.; Cross v. Superior Court of California, Placer County, et al.; Cross v. Moulds, Chief Magistrate Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, et al.; Cross v. Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District; Cross v. Pelican Bay State Prison et al.; DeBardeleben v. United States
Abbreviation: Baez v. Breslin
Decision Date: 1999-06-07
Docket Number: No. 98-8785; No. 98-8798; No. 98-8802; No. 98-8822; No. 98-8866; No. 98-8867; No. 98-8868; No. 98-8869; No. 98-9237
Citation: 526 U.S. 1157
Volume: 526
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Baez v. Breslin. Balawajder v. Scott, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Cunningham v. Poppell, Warden, et al. Brancato v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co. et al. Cross v. Superior Court of California, Placer County, et al. Cross v. Moulds, Chief Magistrate Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, et al. Cross v. Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District. Cross v. Pelican Bay State Prison et al. DeBardeleben v. United States.
Judges: 
Pages: 1157–1157

Head Matter:
No. 98-8785.
No. 98-8798.
No. 98-8802.
No. 98-8822.
No. 98-8866.
No. 98-8867.
No. 98-8868.
No. 98-8869.
No. 98-9237.
Baez v. Breslin. Balawajder v. Scott, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Cunningham v. Poppell, Warden, et al. Brancato v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co. et al. Cross v. Superior Court of California, Placer County, et al. Cross v. Moulds, Chief Magistrate Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, et al. Cross v. Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District. Cross v. Pelican Bay State Prison et al. DeBardeleben v. United States.

Opinion:
C. A. 11th Cir.;
C. A. 5th Cir.;
C. A. 5th Cir.;
C. A. 8th Cir.;
C. A. 9th Cir.;
C. A. 9th Cir.;
C. A. 9th Cir.;
C. A. 9th Cir.; and
C. A. 4th Cir. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris denied. See this Court's Rule 39.8. Petitioners are allowed until June 28,1999, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.