Case: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. David A. DUVALL, also known as Tone, Appellant
Abbreviation: United States v. Duvall
Decision Date: 2013-08-13
Docket Number: Nos. 10-3091, 11-3114
Citation: 408 U.S. App. D.C. 73
Volume: 408
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. David A. DUVALL, also known as Tone, Appellant.
Judges: Before GARLAND, Chief Judge; HENDERSON, ROGERS , TATEL, BROWN, GRIFFITH, KAVANAUGH , and SRINIVASAN , Circuit Judges; WILLIAMS , Senior Circuit Judge.
Pages: 73–92

Head Matter:
740 F.3d 604
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. David A. DUVALL, also known as Tone, Appellant.
Nos. 10-3091, 11-3114.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Aug. 13, 2013.
Roy W. McLeese, III, Esquire, Assistant U.S., U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Appellee.
Sylvia Royce, Law Office of Sylvia Royce, Washington, DC, for Appellant.
Before GARLAND, Chief Judge; HENDERSON, ROGERS , TATEL, BROWN, GRIFFITH, KAVANAUGH , and SRINIVASAN , Circuit Judges; WILLIAMS , Senior Circuit Judge.
A statement by Circuit Judge Rogers concurring in the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc is attached.
A statement by Circuit Judge Kavanaugh concurring in the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc is attached.
Circuit Judge Srinivasan did not participate in this matter.
A statement by Senior Circuit Judge Williams concurring in the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc is attached.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of appellant's petition for rehearing en banc, the response thereto, and the absence of a request by any member of the court for a vote, it is
ORDERED that the petition be denied.