Case: Saffle, Warden, et al. v. Parks; Boyde v. California; Tassin v. Louisiana; Walker v. Suburban Hospital Assn. et al.; Hamilton v. California; McClain v. Mitchell et al.; In re Warren; Gaunce v. Burgener et al.; In re Martin; and Kim v. United States
Abbreviation: Saffle v. Parks
Decision Date: 1990-04-30
Docket Number: No. 88-1264; No. 88-6613; No. 88-7222; No. 89-1226; No. 89-5998; No. 89-6395; No. 89-6455; No. 89-6553; No. 89-6594; No. 89-6639
Citation: 495 U.S. 924
Volume: 495
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Saffle, Warden, et al. v. Parks, Boyde v. California, Tassin v. Louisiana, Walker v. Suburban Hospital Assn. et al., Hamilton v. California, McClain v. Mitchell et al., In re Warren, Gaunce v. Burgener et al., In re Martin, Kim v. United States, 494 U. S. 1037.
Judges: 
Pages: 924–924

Head Matter:
No. 88-1264.
No. 88-6613.
No. 88-7222.
No. 89-1226.
No. 89-5998.
No. 89-6395.
No. 89-6455.
No. 89-6553.
No. 89-6594.
No. 89-6639.
Saffle, Warden, et al. v. Parks, Boyde v. California, Tassin v. Louisiana, Walker v. Suburban Hospital Assn. et al., Hamilton v. California, McClain v. Mitchell et al., In re Warren, Gaunce v. Burgener et al., In re Martin, Kim v. United States, 494 U. S. 1037.

Opinion:
494 U. S. 484;
494 U. S. 370;
493 U. S. 874;
494 U. S. 1056;
494 U. S. 1039;
494 U. S. 1006;
494 U. S. 1025;
494 U. S. 1035;
494 U. S. 1025; and
Petitions for rehearing denied.