Case: Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United States
Abbreviation: Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United States
Decision Date: 1968-12-19
Docket Number: R.D. 11604; Entry No. 1016134
Citation: 61 Cust. Ct. 563
Volume: 61
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United States
Judges: 
Pages: 563–564

Head Matter:
(R.D. 11604)
Entry No. 1016134.
Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United States
(Decided December 19, 1968)
James G. McGoldriok for the plaintiff.
Edwin L. Weisl, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Opinion:
Rao, Chief Judge:
When the above-enumerated appeal for re-praisement was called for hearing, the plaintiff submitted the case on the record before the court.
An examination of the official papers discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value of the merchandise found by the appraiser.
I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeal to be the value found by the appraiser.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.