Case: Earl Jason LARISCEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee
Abbreviation: Lariscey v. United States
Decision Date: 1992-04-30
Docket Number: No. 90-5129
Citation: 962 F.2d 1047
Volume: 26
Reporter: United States Claims Court Reporter
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Earl Jason LARISCEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Pages: 1047–1048

Head Matter:
Earl Jason LARISCEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 90-5129.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
April 30, 1992.
John S. Moot, argued (Buel White and Lewis B. Gardner, on brief), Verner, Liipfert, Bernhard, McPherson & Hand, Chartered, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellant.
Peter Mark Poulos, argued (Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Vito J. DiPietro and Chun-I-Chiang, Attorneys, on brief), Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendantappellee.

Opinion:
ORDER
A suggestion for rehearing in banc having been filed in this case,
UPON CONSIDERATION THEREOF, it is
ORDERED that the suggestion for rehearing in banc be, and the same hereby is accepted. The judgment entered on November 15, 1991, 949 F.2d 1137, is VACATED, and the accompanying opinion is withdrawn. The mandate issued on January 15, 1992 is RECALLED.
Additional briefing and argument are not indicated at this time.
Note: Pursuant to Fed.Cir.R. 47.8, this order is not citable as precedent. It is a public record.