Case: Adolph Goldmark & Sons Corp. v. United States
Abbreviation: Adolph Goldmark & Sons Corp. v. United States
Decision Date: 1957-08-15
Docket Number: Reap. Dec. 8964; Entry Nos. 8069; 9959; 11084
Citation: 39 Cust. Ct. 623
Volume: 39
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Adolph Goldmark & Sons Corp. v. United States
Judges: 
Pages: 623–624

Head Matter:
(Reap. Dec. 8964)
Entry Nos. 8069; 9959; 11084.
Adolph Goldmark & Sons Corp. v. United States
(Decided August 15, 1957)
Sharretts, Paley & Carter for the plaintiff.
George Cochran Doub, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Opinion:
Richardson, Judge:
These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision on the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel that the merchandise covered by the instant appeal for reappraisement consists of licorice tid bits exported from England.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that on or about the date of exportation there was no foreign, export or United States value, as those terms are defined in Section 402 (c) (d) or (e) respectively of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, for such or similar merchandise and that the cost of production as defined in subdivision (f) of said Section 402 was 102 shillings 6 pence.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that these appeals for reappraisement be submitted on this stipulation.
On the agreed facts, I find the cost of production as defined in 19 U. S. C. section 1402 (f), (section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930), to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved herein, and that such value was 102 shillings, 6 pence.
Judgment will be rendered accordingly.