Case: Xin Hang Chen v. Raz et al.; Raphael v. Texas; Carthane v. Florida; Casimier v. United States Postal Service; Lloyd v. United States; Hoffmann v. Twamley et al.; Carter, Personal Representative of the Estate of Carter, Deceased, and as Next Friend and Natural and Legal Guardian of Carter et al. v. United States; Tucker v. Cain, Warden; Green et al. v. Carver State Bank et al.; Green et al. v. Carver State Bank et al.; Koenig v. Hagy et al., In re Cotner, Roblyer v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al., In re Maxwell, Cooper v. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division; Grigger v. New York; Savior v. Ventura, Governor of Minnesota, et al.; Marion v. Ford Motor Credit; Brentwood v. Boeing Co.; Williams v. Community Bank/NationsBank; Clark v. Nassau County, New York; Walker v. Bonnet, LM, et al.; Yurtis v. Phipps; Colyar v. Gilman, Congressman; Marcello v. Town of Stetson, Maine
Abbreviation: Xin Hang Chen v. Raz
Decision Date: 1999-12-06
Docket Number: No. 98-8579; No. 98-9465; No. 98-9645; No. 98-9883; No. 98-9891; No. 99-217; No. 99-288; No. 99-5045; No. 99-5096; No. 99-5097; No. 99-5239; No. 99-5259; No. 99-5394; No. 99-5410; No. 99-5514; No. 99-5688; No. 99-5710; No. 99-5765; No. 99-5777; No. 99-5849; No. 99-5850; No. 99-5907; No. 99-5995; No. 99-5998; No. 99-6032
Citation: 528 U.S. 1056
Volume: 528
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Xin Hang Chen v. Raz et al., Raphael v. Texas, Carthane v. Florida, Casimier v. United States Postal Service, Lloyd v. United States, Hoffmann v. Twamley et al., Carter, Personal Representative of the Estate of Carter, Deceased, and as Next Friend and Natural and Legal Guardian of Carter et al. v. United States, Tucker v. Cain, Warden, Green et al. v. Carver State Bank et al., Green et al. v. Carver State Bank et al., Koenig v. Hagy et al., In re Cotner, Roblyer v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al., In re Maxwell, Cooper v. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Grigger v. New York, Savior v. Ventura, Governor of Minnesota, et al., Marion v. Ford Motor Credit, Brentwood v. Boeing Co., Williams v. Community Bank/NationsBank, Clark v. Nassau County, New York, Walker v. Bonnet, LM, et al., Yurtis v. Phipps, Colyar v. Gilman, Congressman, Marcello v. Town of Stetson, Maine,
Judges: 
Pages: 1056–1057

Head Matter:
No. 98-8579.
No. 98-9465.
No. 98-9645.
No. 98-9883.
No. 98-9891.
No. 99-217.
No. 99-288.
Xin Hang Chen v. Raz et al., Raphael v. Texas, Carthane v. Florida, Casimier v. United States Postal Service, Lloyd v. United States, Hoffmann v. Twamley et al., Carter, Personal Representative of the Estate of Carter, Deceased, and as Next Friend and Natural and Legal Guardian of Carter et al. v. United States, Tucker v. Cain, Warden, Green et al. v. Carver State Bank et al., Green et al. v. Carver State Bank et al., Koenig v. Hagy et al., In re Cotner, Roblyer v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al., In re Maxwell, Cooper v. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Grigger v. New York, Savior v. Ventura, Governor of Minnesota, et al., Marion v. Ford Motor Credit, Brentwood v. Boeing Co., Williams v. Community Bank/NationsBank, Clark v. Nassau County, New York, Walker v. Bonnet, LM, et al., Yurtis v. Phipps, Colyar v. Gilman, Congressman, Marcello v. Town of Stetson, Maine,

Opinion:
526 U. S. 1134;
ante, p. 836;
ante, p. 844;
ante, p. 858;
ante, p. 858;
ante, p. 929;
ante, p. 931;
No. 99-5045.
No. 99-5096.
No. 99-5097.
No. 99-5239.
No. 99-5259.
No. 99-5394.
No. 99-5410.
No. 99-5514.
No. 99-5688.
No. 99-5710.
No. 99-5765.
No. 99-5777.
No. 99-5849.
No. 99-5850.
No. 99-5907.
No. 99-5995.
No. 99-5998.
No. 99-6032.
ante, p. 882;
ante, p. 885;
ante, p. 885;
ante, p. 893;
ante, p. 807;
ante, p. 902;
ante, p. 808;
ante, p. 908;
ante, p. 914;
ante, p. 938;
ante, p. 953;
ante, p. 917;
ante, p. 955;
ante, p. 940;
ante, p. 971;
ante, p. 942;
ante, p. 942; and
ante, p. 943. Petitions for rehearing denied.