Case: Smith Hogan, Arthur S. Hogan, and Richard Y. Reynolds, Plaintiffs in error, v. Aaron Ross, who sues for the use of Robert Patterson
Abbreviation: Hogan v. Ross
Decision Date: 1850-01
Docket Number: 
Citation: 9 How. 602
Volume: 50
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Smith Hogan, Arthur S. Hogan, and Richard Y. Reynolds, Plaintiffs in error, v. Aaron Ross, who sues for the use of Robert Patterson.
Judges: 
Pages: 602–603

Head Matter:
Smith Hogan, Arthur S. Hogan, and Richard Y. Reynolds, Plaintiffs in error, v. Aaron Ross, who sues for the use of Robert Patterson.
Where no citation had been issued or served upon the defendant in error, the cause - must be dismissed on motion.
This case was brought up, by writ of error, from the District Court ot the United States for the Northern District of Mississippi.
The order of the ciourt explains the ground of its dismissal, upon, the motion of Mr. Coxe.

Opinion:
Order.
This cause came on to be heard on the transcript, of the record from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Mississippi, and on the motion of Richard S. Coxe, Esquire,.of counsel for the defendant in error, stating that no citation had been issued or served upon the defendant in error, was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court, that this cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, with costs.