Case: In re Zentmyer; In re May; In re Charley; In re Stimac; In re Hall; In re Cowan et ux.; In re Roth; In re Papa et ux.; In re Markovich; In re Brown; In re Robertson; In re Loggins; and In re Mercaldo
Abbreviation: In re Zentmyer
Decision Date: 2011-10-03
Docket Number: No. 10-1350; No. 10-10279; No. 10-10902; No. 10-10963; No. 10-11218; No. 11-3; No. 11-77; No. 11-5014; No. 11-5015; No. 11-5095; No. 11-5191; No. 11-5398; No. 11-5488
Citation: 565 U.S. 813
Volume: 565
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: In re Zentmyer; In re May; In re Charley; In re Stimac; In re Hall; In re Cowan et ux.; In re Roth; In re Papa et ux.; In re Markovich; In re Brown; In re Robertson; In re Loggins; and In re Mercaldo.
Judges: 
Pages: 813–813

Head Matter:
No. 10-1350.
No. 10-10279.
No. 10-10902.
No. 10-10963.
No. 10-11218.
No. 11-3.
No. 11-77.
No. 11-5014.
No. 11-5015.
No. 11-5095.
No. 11-5191.
No. 11-5398.
No. 11-5488.
In re Zentmyer; In re May; In re Charley; In re Stimac; In re Hall; In re Cowan et ux.; In re Roth; In re Papa et ux.; In re Markovich; In re Brown; In re Robertson; In re Loggins; and In re Mercaldo.

Opinion:
Petitions for writs of mandamus denied.