Case: Former Employees of Murray Engineering, plaintiffs v. The United States, defendant
Abbreviation: Former Employees of Murray Engineering v. United States
Decision Date: 2003-06-25
Docket Number: Court No. 03-00219
Citation: 27 Ct. Int'l Trade 892
Volume: 27
Reporter: United States Court of International Trade Reports
Court: United States Court of International Trade
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Former Employees of Murray Engineering, plaintiffs v. The United States, defendant
Judges: 
Pages: 892–893

Head Matter:
Former Employees of Murray Engineering, plaintiffs v. The United States, defendant
Court No. 03-00219
Dated: June 25, 2003

Opinion:
ORDER
RlDGWAY, Judge-.
Upon consideration of the defendant's consent motion for voluntary remand, it is hereby
ORDERED that the consent motion is granted; and it is further
ORDERED that this action in remanded to the United States Department of Labor to conduct a further investigation and to make a redetermination as to whether petitioners are eligible for certification for worker adjustment assistance benefits; and it is further
ORDERED that remand results shall be filed no later than 60 days after the date of this order; and it is further
ORDERED that the plaintiffs shall file papers with the Court indicating whether they are satisfied or dissatisfied with the remand results no later than 30 days after the remand results are filed with the Court; and it is further
ORDERED that the deadline for the filing of (1) the answer pursuant to Rule 12(a)(1)(A); and (2) the administrative record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2635(d)(1) and Rule 72(a) shall be extended to 30 days after the plaintiffs indicate whether they are satisfied or dissatisfied with the remand results.