Case: Hedaya Importing Co. v. United States
Abbreviation: Hedaya Importing Co. v. Unitec States
Decision Date: 1941-04-18
Docket Number: No. 5221; Entry No. 774773, etc.
Citation: 6 Cust. Ct. 913
Volume: 6
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Hedaya Importing Co. v. United States
Judges: 
Pages: 913–913

Head Matter:
Hedaya Importing Co. v. United States
No. 5221.
Entry No. 774773, etc.
Invoices dated Swatow, China, October 8, 1936, etc.
Entered at New York November 24, 1936, etc.
(Decided April 18, 1941)
Lane & Wallace tor the plaintiff.
Charles D. Lawrenpe, Acting Assistant Attorney General (Daniel I. Austpr, special attorney), for the defendant.

Opinion:
Tilson, Judge:
The appeals listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon a stipulation to the effect that the issue herein and the issue in United States v. Kohlberg, C. A. D. 88, is the same; that the market value or price at or about the dates of exportation at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation for export to the United States, in usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including all costs, charges, and expenses specified in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the appraised value, less any amount added under duress, and that there was no higher foreign value.
On the agreed facts I find and hold the proper dutiable - export value of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the value found by the appraiser, less any amount added under duress. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.