Case: Appeal of CROMPTON BUILDING CORPORATION
Abbreviation: Appeal of Crompton Building Corp.
Decision Date: 1925-10-28
Docket Number: Docket No. 4301
Citation: 2 B.T.A. 1056
Volume: 2
Reporter: Reports of the United States Board of Tax Appeals
Court: United States Board of Tax Appeals
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Appeal of CROMPTON BUILDING CORPORATION.
Judges: Before Gkaupnek, Tkammell, and Phillips.
Pages: 1056–1057

Head Matter:
Appeal of CROMPTON BUILDING CORPORATION.
Docket No. 4301.
Submitted September 15, 1925.
Decided October 28, 1925.
George G. Witter, Esg., for the Commissioner.
Before Gkaupnek, Tkammell, and Phillips.

Opinion:
OPINION.
Trammell:
It is the contention of the taxpayer that the amounts paid out as commissions for obtaining the leases referred to in the findings of fact were ordinary and necessary expenses and were deductible as such. The Commissioner contended that tfie said commissions constitute a capital expenditure and as such should be spread over the life of the leases.
We are of the opinion that the position of the Commissioner is correct and that the amounts paid out as commissions in obtaining the leases are capital expenditures. The leases were to run for a period of five years, and amounts paid out in acquiring them are just as much capital expenditures to be returned over the life of the leases as if they had been paid out by the tenant in acquiring a leasehold estate. The lease of property running for a period of years is just as much property in the hands of the owner as a leasehold is property in the hands of a tenant. As such the acquisition thereof by the owner of the property is capital. The leases ran for five years from February 1, 1921. There should be allowed the taxpayer, therefore, a deduction for 1921 of eleven-sixtieths of the amount expended in acquiring them.