Case: Federal Trade Commission v. Rhodes Pharmacal Co., Inc. et al.
Abbreviation: Federal Trade Commission v. Rhodes Pharmacal Co.
Decision Date: 1955-02-14
Docket Number: No. 80
Citation: 348 U.S. 940
Volume: 348
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Federal Trade Commission v. Rhodes Pharmacal Co., Inc. et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 940–940

Head Matter:
February 14, 1955.
No. 80.
Federal Trade Commission v. Rhodes Pharmacal Co., Inc. et al.
Argued February 8, 1955.
Decided February 14, 1955.
Daniel M. Friedman argued the cause for petitioner.
With him on the brief were Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Barnes, Charles F. Barber, Earl W. Kintner and Robert B. Dawkins.
Edward Brodkey argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Frank E. Gettleman and Arthur Gettleman.

Opinion:
Certiorari, 348 U. S. 812, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
Per Curiam:
The Court finds that the order of the Commission is not ambiguous. The judgment of the Court of Appeals, insofar as it modified paragraph 1 (c) of the Commission's order, is reversed and the case is remanded to that court with instructions to restore the order of the Commission.