Case: Martin et al. v. Wilks et al.; Personnel Board of Jefferson County, Alabama, et al. v. Wilks et al.; Arrington et al. v. Wilks et al.; Slaughter v. Kentucky; Jones, Superintendent, Missouri Training Center for Men at Moberly v. Thomas; Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-Larrain et al.; Ashenbaugh et al. v. Crucible Inc. 1975 Salaried Retirement Plan; Hodge v. Kelly et al.; Lombardo v. United States; Acosta v. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services; Pruessman v. Lewis et al.; Fassler v. United States; Jackson v. United States; Howard v. South Carolina; Wrenn v. Benson et al.; Nixon v. Mississippi; Meade-Murphy v. City of Atlanta et al.; Menard v. County of Henrico, Virginia, et al.; Williams v. Wallman, Warden, et al.; Ruscitti v. Estate of Ruscitti; Barnes v. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.; Martin v. Court of Appeals of Maryland et al.; O'Neal v. Eu et al.; Carter v. Ohio; Martin v. Abram D. Mellinger Real Estate, Inc., In re Martin, May v. Hackett; Irving, aka Owens v. United States; Branham v. Grinage et al.; Stengel v. United States, In re Humphrey
Abbreviation: Martin v. Wilks
Decision Date: 1989-08-11
Docket Number: No. 87-1614; No. 87-1639; No. 87-1668; No. 87-7107; No. 88-420; No. 88-774; No. 88-897; No. 88-1612; No. 88-1616; No. 88-1672; No. 88-1711; No. 88-1717; No. 88-1799; No. 88-5241; No. 88-6494; No. 88-6723; No. 88-6917; No. 88-6959; No. 88-6992; No. 88-7057; No. 88-7065; No. 88-7103; No. 88-7107; No. 88-7128; No. 88-7148; No. 88-7157; No. 88-7171; No. 88-7200; No. 88-7240; No. 88-7272; No. 88-7281
Citation: 492 U.S. 932
Volume: 492
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Martin et al. v. Wilks et al., Personnel Board of Jefferson County, Alabama, et al. v. Wilks et al., Arrington et al. v. Wilks et al., Slaughter v. Kentucky, Jones, Superintendent, Missouri Training Center for Men at Moberly v. Thomas, Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-Larrain et al., Ashenbaugh et al. v. Crucible Inc. 1975 Salaried Retirement Plan, Hodge v. Kelly et al., Lombardo v. United States, Acosta v. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Pruessman v. Lewis et al., Fassler v. United States, Jackson v. United States, Howard v. South Carolina, Wrenn v. Benson et al., Nixon v. Mississippi, Meade-Murphy v. City of Atlanta et al., Menard v. County of Henrico, Virginia, et al., Williams v. Wallman, Warden, et al., Ruscitti v. Estate of Ruscitti, Barnes v. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al., Martin v. Court of Appeals of Maryland et al., O’Neal v. Eu et al., Carter v. Ohio, Martin v. Abram D. Mellinger Real Estate, Inc., In re Martin, May v. Hackett, Irving, aka Owens v. United States, Branham v. Grinage et al., Stengel v. United States, In re Humphrey,
Judges: 
Pages: 932–933

Head Matter:
No. 87-1614.
No. 87-1639.
No. 87-1668.
No. 87-7107.
No. 88-420.
No. 88-774.
No. 88-897.
No. 88-1612.
No. 88-1616.
No. 88-1672.
No. 88-1711.
No. 88-1717.
No. 88-1799.
No. 88-5241.
No. 88-6494.
No. 88-6723.
No. 88-6917.
No. 88-6959.
No. 88-6992.
No. 88-7057.
Martin et al. v. Wilks et al., Personnel Board of Jefferson County, Alabama, et al. v. Wilks et al., Arrington et al. v. Wilks et al., Slaughter v. Kentucky, Jones, Superintendent, Missouri Training Center for Men at Moberly v. Thomas, Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-Larrain et al., Ashenbaugh et al. v. Crucible Inc. 1975 Salaried Retirement Plan, Hodge v. Kelly et al., Lombardo v. United States, Acosta v. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Pruessman v. Lewis et al., Fassler v. United States, Jackson v. United States, Howard v. South Carolina, Wrenn v. Benson et al., Nixon v. Mississippi, Meade-Murphy v. City of Atlanta et al., Menard v. County of Henrico, Virginia, et al., Williams v. Wallman, Warden, et al., Ruscitti v. Estate of Ruscitti, Barnes v. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al., Martin v. Court of Appeals of Maryland et al., O’Neal v. Eu et al., Carter v. Ohio, Martin v. Abram D. Mellinger Real Estate, Inc., In re Martin, May v. Hackett, Irving, aka Owens v. United States, Branham v. Grinage et al., Stengel v. United States, In re Humphrey,

Opinion:
490 U. S. 755;
490 U. S. 755;
490 U. S. 755;
490 U. S. 1113;
491 U. S. 376;
490 U. S. 826;
490 U. S. 1105;
490 U. S. 1081;
491 U. S. 905;
490 U. S. 1082;
490 U. S. 1116;
490 U. S. 1099;
490 U. S. 1099;
490 U. S. 1113;
490 U. S. 1069;
490 U. S. 1102;
491 U. S. 907;
490 U. S. 1110;
490 U. S. 1093;
490 U. S. 1111;
No. 88-7065.
No. 88-7103.
No. 88-7107.
No. 88-7128.
No. 88-7148.
No. 88-7157.
No. 88-7171.
No. 88-7200.
No. 88-7240.
No. 88-7272.
No. 88-7281.
490 U. S. 1111;
491 U. S. 908;
ante, p. 909;
ante, p. 909;
ante, p. 910;
ante, p. 904;
490 U. S. 1112;
490 U. S. 1113;
ante, p. 910;
491 U. S. 909; and
491 U. S. 903. Petitions for rehearing denied.