Case: RAY v. OHIO
Abbreviation: Ray v. Ohio
Decision Date: 1960-12-05
Docket Number: No. 237
Citation: 364 U.S. 476
Volume: 364
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: RAY v. OHIO.
Judges: Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Pages: 476–476

Head Matter:
RAY v. OHIO.
No. 237,
Misc.
Decided December 5, 1960.
Ralph Atkinson for appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to supplement the jurisdictional statement is granted. The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.