Case: Globe Lighting Products, Inc. v. United States
Abbreviation: Globe Lighting Products, Inc. v. United States
Decision Date: 1956-01-20
Docket Number: Reap. Dec. 8528; Entry Nos. 709604; 713278
Citation: 36 Cust. Ct. 515
Volume: 36
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Globe Lighting Products, Inc. v. United States
Judges: 
Pages: 515–516

Head Matter:
(Reap. Dec. 8528)
Globe Lighting Products, Inc. v. United States
Entry Nos. 709604; 713278.
(Decided January 20, 1956)
John D. JRode for the plaintiff.
Warren E. Burger, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Opinion:
Wilson, Judge:
These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States that the merchandise and issues in the above entitled reappraisements are the same as in the case of United States v. Nelson Bead Co., C. A. D. 590 and that the record in said case may be incorporated into the record herein.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appraised values less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the Appraiser in similar cases, is equal to the market value or the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, and that there was no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the cases may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.
On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.