Case: Rayburn v. Securities and Exchange Commission; Friday et ux. v. Whittle and Roper Real Estate Firm et al.; Hill v. American Medical Assn. et al.; Goodin v. City of Jacksonville et al.; Hemphill v. McNeil-PPC, Inc.; Melendrez v. Seib et al.; Face, Virginia Commissioner of Financial Institutions, et al. v. National Home Equity Mortgage Assn.; Gonzalez et ux. v. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; Gonzalez et ux. v. Riddle et al.; and Gonzalez et ux. v. Eldorado Bank et al.; Rasten v. Bournewood Hospital et al.; James v. United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida; Winke v. Winke; Bator v. Hallock Electric et al.; Whigham v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department et al.; Lucas v. Georgia; Payne v. West Virginia Public Service Commission et al.; Hayes v. United States; Compton v. Oregon; Grimes v. Angelone, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, et al.; Rasten v. Goldberg et al.; Thomas v. McLemore, Warden; Guy v. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security; Armstrong v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al.; Thibeaux v. Kleman; McPherson v. Georgia; Thompson v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al.; Rasten v. Town of Brookline, Massachusetts, et al.; Bruetman v. Herbstein; Giuliani v. United States et al.; John Street Leasehold, LLC v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al., In re Perry, Knox v. Potter, Postmaster General; Warmbrun v. Samson, Attorney General of New Jersey; Busby v. Internal Revenue Service; Young v. Hughs et al.; Borth v. Walker et al.; Gonzalez et vir v. State Bar of California et al.; Langworthy v. Goicochea; Potts v. DeWeese et al.; Conner v. Head, Warden; Rasten v. Gelbond; Whitaker v. Virginia et al., In re Wojnicz, Buford v. Employees of Solano State Prison et al.; Kenley v. Roper, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center; James v. United States; Shore v. Federal Express Corp.; Glebocki v. City of Chicago, Illinois, et al.; Wright v. Kemna, Superintendent, Crossroads Correctional Center; Murdock v. Michigan Department of Treasury, In re Fink, Burns v. Florida et al.; Jarrett v. Ashcroft, Attorney General, et al.; Dougherty v. United States; Conteh v. Kandarian, Beaton-Paez v. United States
Abbreviation: Rayburn v. Securities & Exchange Commission
Decision Date: 2002-12-02
Docket Number: No. 01-1678; No. 01-1688; No. 01-1690; No. 01-1745; No. 01-1770; No. 01-1794; No. 01-1827; No. 01-9400; No. 01-9880; No. 01-9996; No. 01-10077; No. 01-10083; No. 01-10138; No. 01-10282; No. 01-10286; No. 01-10290; No. 01-10301; No. 01-10437; No. 01-10472; No. 01-10526; No. 01-10783; No. 01-10803; No. 01-10804; No. 01-10906; No. 01-10919; No. 01-10968; No. 02-4; No. 02-68; No. 02-101; No. 02-104; No. 02-224; No. 02-344; No. 02-5017; No. 02-5082; No. 02-5102; No. 02-5131; No. 02-5152; No. 02-5238; No. 02-5322; No. 02-5377; No. 02-5396; No. 02-5412; No. 02-5439; No. 02-5500; No. 02-5562; No. 02-5581; No. 02-5641; No. 02-5646; No. 02-5658; No. 02-5719; No. 02-5760; No. 02-5783; No. 02-6094; No. 02-6124; No. 02-6157
Citation: 537 U.S. 1067
Volume: 537
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Rayburn v. Securities and Exchange Commission, Friday et ux. v. Whittle and Roper Real Estate Firm et al., Hill v. American Medical Assn. et al., Goodin v. City of Jacksonville et al., Hemphill v. McNeil-PPC, Inc., Melendrez v. Seib et al., Face, Virginia Commissioner of Financial Institutions, et al. v. National Home Equity Mortgage Assn., Gonzalez et ux. v. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; Gonzalez et ux. v. Riddle et al.; and Gonzalez et ux. v. Eldorado Bank et al., Rasten v. Bournewood Hospital et al., James v. United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Winke v. Winke, Bator v. Hallock Electric et al., Whigham v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department et al., Lucas v. Georgia, Payne v. West Virginia Public Service Commission et al., Hayes v. United States, Compton v. Oregon, Grimes v. Angelone, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, et al., Rasten v. Goldberg et al., Thomas v. McLemore, Warden, Guy v. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security, Armstrong v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al., Thibeaux v. Kleman, McPherson v. Georgia, Thompson v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al., Rasten v. Town of Brookline, Massachusetts, et al., Bruetman v. Herbstein, Giuliani v. United States et al., John Street Leasehold, LLC v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al., In re Perry, Knox v. Potter, Postmaster General, Warmbrun v. Samson, Attorney General of New Jersey, Busby v. Internal Revenue Service, Young v. Hughs et al., Borth v. Walker et al., Gonzalez et vir v. State Bar of California et al., Langworthy v. Goicochea, Potts v. DeWeese et al., Conner v. Head, Warden, Rasten v. Gelbond, Whitaker v. Virginia et al., In re Wojnicz, Buford v. Employees of Solano State Prison et al., Kenley v. Roper, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center, James v. United States, Shore v. Federal Express Corp., Glebocki v. City of Chicago, Illinois, et al., Wright v. Kemna, Superintendent, Crossroads Correctional Center, Murdock v. Michigan Department of Treasury, In re Fink, Burns v. Florida et al., Jarrett v. Ashcroft, Attorney General, et al., Dougherty v. United States, Conteh v. Kandarian, Beaton-Paez v. United States,
Judges: 
Pages: 1067–1069

Head Matter:
No. 01-1678.
No. 01-1688.
No. 01-1690.
No. 01-1745.
No. 01-1770.
No. 01-1794.
No. 01-1827.
Rayburn v. Securities and Exchange Commission, Friday et ux. v. Whittle and Roper Real Estate Firm et al., Hill v. American Medical Assn. et al., Goodin v. City of Jacksonville et al., Hemphill v. McNeil-PPC, Inc., Melendrez v. Seib et al., Face, Virginia Commissioner of Financial Institutions, et al. v. National Home Equity Mortgage Assn., Gonzalez et ux. v. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; Gonzalez et ux. v. Riddle et al.; and Gonzalez et ux. v. Eldorado Bank et al., Rasten v. Bournewood Hospital et al., James v. United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Winke v. Winke, Bator v. Hallock Electric et al., Whigham v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department et al., Lucas v. Georgia, Payne v. West Virginia Public Service Commission et al., Hayes v. United States, Compton v. Oregon, Grimes v. Angelone, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, et al., Rasten v. Goldberg et al., Thomas v. McLemore, Warden, Guy v. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security, Armstrong v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al., Thibeaux v. Kleman, McPherson v. Georgia, Thompson v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al., Rasten v. Town of Brookline, Massachusetts, et al., Bruetman v. Herbstein, Giuliani v. United States et al., John Street Leasehold, LLC v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al., In re Perry, Knox v. Potter, Postmaster General, Warmbrun v. Samson, Attorney General of New Jersey, Busby v. Internal Revenue Service, Young v. Hughs et al., Borth v. Walker et al., Gonzalez et vir v. State Bar of California et al., Langworthy v. Goicochea, Potts v. DeWeese et al., Conner v. Head, Warden, Rasten v. Gelbond, Whitaker v. Virginia et al., In re Wojnicz, Buford v. Employees of Solano State Prison et al., Kenley v. Roper, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center, James v. United States, Shore v. Federal Express Corp., Glebocki v. City of Chicago, Illinois, et al., Wright v. Kemna, Superintendent, Crossroads Correctional Center, Murdock v. Michigan Department of Treasury, In re Fink, Burns v. Florida et al., Jarrett v. Ashcroft, Attorney General, et al., Dougherty v. United States, Conteh v. Kandarian, Beaton-Paez v. United States,

Opinion:
ante, p. 816;
ante, p. 816;
ante, p. 816;
ante, p. 819;
ante, p. 820;
ante, p. 821;
ante, p. 802;
No. 01-9400.
No. 01-9880.
No. 01-9996.
No. 01-10077.
No. 01-10083.
No. 01-10138.
No. 01-10282.
No. 01-10286.
No. 01-10290.
No. 01-10301.
No. 01-10437.
No. 01-10472.
No. 01-10526.
No. 01-10783.
No. 01-10803.
No. 01-10804.
No. 01-10906.
No. 01-10919.
No. 01-10968.
No. 02-4.
No. 02-68.
No. 02-101.
No. 02-104.
No. 02-224.
No. 02-344.
535 U. S. 1121;
ante, p. 829;
ante, p. 831;
ante, p. 834;
ante, p. 834;
ante, p. 835;
ante, p. 840;
ante, p. 840;
ante, p. 840;
ante, p. 841;
ante, p. 844;
ante, p. 829;
ante, p. 847;
ante, p. 863;
ante, p. 864;
ante, p. 864;
ante, p. 870;
ante, p. 871;
ante, p. 874;
ante, p. 878;
ante, p. 882;
ante, p. 883;
ante, p. 811;
ante, p. 887;
ante, p. 950;
No. 02-5017.
No. 02-5082.
No. 02-5102.
No. 02-5131.
No. 02-5152.
No. 02-5238.
No. 02-5322.
No. 02-5377.
No. 02-5396.
No. 02-5412.
No. 02-5439.
No. 02-5500.
No. 02-5562.
No. 02-5581.
No. 02-5641.
No. 02-5646.
No. 02-5658.
No. 02-5719.
No. 02-5760.
No. 02-5783.
No. 02-6094.
No. 02-6124.
No. 02-6157.
ante, p. 890;
ante, p. 893;
ante, p. 894;
ante, p. 896;
ante, p. 898;
ante, p. 903;
ante, p. 908;
ante, p. 911;
ante, p. 913;
ante, p. 811;
ante, p. 915;
ante, p. 919;
ante, p. 923;
ante, p. 924;
ante, p. 952;
ante, p. 953;
ante, p. 927;
ante, p. 946;
ante, p. 955;
ante, p. 931;
ante, p. 940;
ante, p. 961; and
ante, p. 962. Petitions for rehearing denied.