Case: Roberts v. Florida; and Nash v. Florida
Abbreviation: Roberts v. Florida
Decision Date: 1967-10-09
Docket Number: No. 347; No. 371
Citation: 389 U.S. 857
Volume: 389
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Roberts v. Florida; and Nash v. Florida.
Judges: Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted in No. 347.
Pages: 857–857

Head Matter:
No. 347.
No. 371.
Roberts v. Florida; and Nash v. Florida.
Stmley Jay Bartel for petitioner in No. 347.
Milton E. Grusmark for petitioner in No. 371.
Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and James T. Carlisle, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent in both cases.

Opinion:
Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied without prejudice to applications for writs of habeas corpus in the appropriate United States District Courts.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted in No. 347.
Reported below: No. 347, 188 So. 2d 392; No. 371, 188 So. 2d 391.