Case: TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT CO., L.P., Appellee, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Appellant. Association of America's Public Television Stations, et al., Intervenors
Abbreviation: Time Warner Entertainment Co. v. Federal Communications Commission
Decision Date: 1997-02-07
Docket Number: Nos. 93-1266, 93-1384, 93-5349, 93-5350 and 93-5351
Citation: 323 U.S. App. D.C. 109
Volume: 323
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Parties: TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT CO., L.P., Appellee, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Appellant. Association of America’s Public Television Stations, et al., Intervenors.
Judges: Before: EDWARDS, Chief Judge, WALD, SILBERMAN, WILLIAMS, GINSBURG, SENTELLE, HENDERSON, RANDOLPH, ROGERS and TATEL, Circuit Judges.
Pages: 109–114

Head Matter:
105 F.3d 723
TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT CO., L.P., Appellee, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Appellant. Association of America’s Public Television Stations, et al., Intervenors.
Nos. 93-1266, 93-1384, 93-5349, 93-5350 and 93-5351.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Feb. 7, 1997.
Before: EDWARDS, Chief Judge, WALD, SILBERMAN, WILLIAMS, GINSBURG, SENTELLE, HENDERSON, RANDOLPH, ROGERS and TATEL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The Suggestions for Rehearing In Banc and the response thereto have been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service did not vote in favor of the suggestions. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that the suggestions be denied.
Circuit Judges WALD and HENDERSON did not participate in this matter.
A dissenting statement of Circuit Judge WILLIAMS, with whom Chief Judge EDWARDS, and Circuit Judges SILBERMAN, GINSBURG and SENTELLE concur, is attached.