Case: Rester v. Texas; Bicoy v. Hawaii; Shipps v. Stoughton Police Department et al.; Christensen v. Utah State Tax Commission; Rivera v. Frank, Postmaster General of the United States, et al.; Brown v. Louisiana; Qualman v. United States et al., In re Martin, In re Martin, May v. Warner AMEX Cable Communications et al.
Abbreviation: Rester v. Texas
Decision Date: 1988-06-27
Docket Number: No. 87-1027; No. 87-1250; No. 87-1503; No. 87-1526; No. 87-1679; No. 87-6287; No. 87-6521; No. 87-6616; No. 87-6622; No. 87-6648
Citation: 487 U.S. 1228
Volume: 487
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Rester v. Texas, Bicoy v. Hawaii, Shipps v. Stoughton Police Department et al., Christensen v. Utah State Tax Commission, Rivera v. Frank, Postmaster General of the United States, et al., Brown v. Louisiana, Qualman v. United States et al., In re Martin, In re Martin, May v. Warner AMEX Cable Communications et al.,
Judges: 
Pages: 1228–1228

Head Matter:
No. 87-1027.
No. 87-1250.
No. 87-1503.
No. 87-1526.
No. 87-1679.
No. 87-6287.
No. 87-6521.
No. 87-6616.
No. 87-6622.
No. 87-6648.
Rester v. Texas, Bicoy v. Hawaii, Shipps v. Stoughton Police Department et al., Christensen v. Utah State Tax Commission, Rivera v. Frank, Postmaster General of the United States, et al., Brown v. Louisiana, Qualman v. United States et al., In re Martin, In re Martin, May v. Warner AMEX Cable Communications et al.,

Opinion:
484 U. S. 1052;
485 U. S. 962;
485 U. S. 1017;
485 U. S. 1030;
486 U. S. 1009;
486 U. S. 1017;
486 U. S. 1024;
486 U. S. 1004;
486 U. S. 1004; and
486 U. S. 1011. Petitions for rehearing denied.