Case: Henley v. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division; Mitchell v. Renfro et al.; Jeffress v. Peterson, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, et al.; Yates v. McMackin, Warden; Doerr v. Emerson; McCullough v. Kersh et al.; McCullough v. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division; Van Woundenberg v. Oklahoma; Geurin v. Department of the Army
Abbreviation: Henley v. Collins
Decision Date: 1992-06-15
Docket Number: No. 91-6866; No. 91-6994; No. 91-7185; No. 91-7360; No. 91-7384; No. 91-7416; No. 91-7419; No. 91-7547; No. 91-7793
Citation: 504 U.S. 992
Volume: 504
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Henley v. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Mitchell v. Renfro et al., Jeffress v. Peterson, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, et al., Yates v. McMackin, Warden, Doerr v. Emerson, McCullough v. Kersh et al., McCullough v. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Van Woundenberg v. Oklahoma, Geurin v. Department of the Army,
Judges: 
Pages: 992–993

Head Matter:
No. 91-6866.
No. 91-6994.
No. 91-7185.
No. 91-7360.
No. 91-7384.
No. 91-7416.
No. 91-7419.
Henley v. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Mitchell v. Renfro et al., Jeffress v. Peterson, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, et al., Yates v. McMackin, Warden, Doerr v. Emerson, McCullough v. Kersh et al., McCullough v. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Van Woundenberg v. Oklahoma, Geurin v. Department of the Army,

Opinion:
502 U. S. 1113;
503 U. S. 910;
503 U. S. 989;
503 U. S. 990;
503 U. S. 990;
503 U. S. 991;
503 U. S. 991;
No. 91-7547.
No. 91-7793.
503 U. S. 993; and
ante, p. 924. Petitions for rehearing denied.