Case: UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Macio SINGLETON
Abbreviation: United States v. Singleton
Decision Date: 1985-06-25
Docket Number: No. 83-2173
Citation: 246 U.S. App. D.C. 171
Volume: 246
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Macio SINGLETON.
Judges: Before ROBINSON, Chief Judge, and WRIGHT, TAMM, WALD, MIKVA, EDWARDS, GINSBURG, BORK, SCALIA and STARR, Circuit Judges.
Pages: 171–175

Head Matter:
763 F.2d 1432
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Macio SINGLETON.
No. 83-2173.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Suggestion May 3, 1985.
Opinions June 25, 1985.
Ed Wilhite, Washington, D.C., appointed by this court, was on Appellee’s Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc.
Before ROBINSON, Chief Judge, and WRIGHT, TAMM, WALD, MIKVA, EDWARDS, GINSBURG, BORK, SCALIA and STARR, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellee's suggestion for rehearing en banc, filed May 3,1985, has been circulated to the full court. A majority of the judges in regular active service have not voted in favor thereof. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED, by the court en banc, that the suggestion is denied.
Circuit Judges J. SKELLY WRIGHT, WALD, and MIKVA would grant the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
A statement of Circuit Judge HARRY T. EDWARDS, concurring in denial of rehearing en banc, joined by Chief Judge SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III and Circuit Judge GINSBURG, is attached.
A statement of Circuit Judge BORK, joined by Circuit Judge SCALIA, is attached.
A statement of Circuit Judge J. SKELLY WRIGHT, dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc, joined by Circuit Judge MIKVA, is attached.