Case: American Tradition Partnership, Inc., fka Western Tradition Partnership, Inc., et al., Applicants v. Steve Bullock, Attorney General of Montana, et al.
Abbreviation: American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Bullock
Decision Date: 2012-02-17
Docket Number: No. 11A762
Citation: 181 L. Ed. 2d 1036
Volume: 181
Reporter: United States Supreme Court Reports, Lawyers' Edition
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: American Tradition Partnership, Inc., fka Western Tradition Partnership, Inc., et al., Applicants v. Steve Bullock, Attorney General of Montana, et al.
Judges: Statement of Justice Ginsburg, with whom Justice Breyer joins, respecting grant of the application for stay.
Pages: 1036–1036

Head Matter:
No. 11A762.
American Tradition Partnership, Inc., fka Western Tradition Partnership, Inc., et al., Applicants v. Steve Bullock, Attorney General of Montana, et al.
565 U.S. 1187, 132 S. Ct. 1307,
2012 U.S. LEXIS 1075.
181 L. Ed. 2d 1036,
February 17, 2012.

Opinion:
Application for stay, presented to Justice Kennedy, and by him referred to the Court, granted, and the Montana Supreme Court's December 30, 2011, decision in case No. DA 11-0081, is stayed pending timely filing and disposition of a petition for writ of certiorari. Should the petition for writ of certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event the petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon issuance of the mandate of this Court.
Same case below, 363 Mont. 220, 271 P.3d 1.
Statement of Justice Ginsburg, with whom Justice Breyer joins, respecting grant of the application for stay.
Montana's experience, and experience elsewhere since this Court's decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Comm'n, 558 U.S. 310, 130 S. Ct. 876, 175 L. Ed. 2d 753 (2010), make it exceedingly difficult to maintain that independent expenditures by corporations "do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption." Id., at 558 U.S. 310, 130 S. Ct. 876, 175 L. Ed. 2d 753. A petition for certiorari will give the Court an opportunity to consider whether, in light of the huge sums currently deployed to buy candidates' allegiance, Citizens United should continue to hold sway. Because lower courts are bound to follow this Court's decisions until they are withdrawn or modified, however, Rodriguez de Quijas v. Shearson /American Express, Inc., 490 U.S. 477, 484, 109 S. Ct. 1917, 104 L. Ed. 2d 526 (1989), I vote to grant the stay.