Case: The Grapeshot
Abbreviation: The Grapeshot
Decision Date: 1868-12
Docket Number: 
Citation: 7 Wall. 563
Volume: 74
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: The Grapeshot.
Judges: 
Pages: 563–564

Head Matter:
The Grapeshot.
1. Proof that papers, not contained in the record, were used in the court helow, must be made by affidavit, not by certificate of the clerk.
2. A decree of the,-Provisional Court of Louisiana, which was established by order of.the President, during the rebellion, having been transferred into the Circuit Court, in pursuance of an act of Congress, must be regarded, in respect to appeal, as a decree of the Circuit Court
Upon two separate motions to dismiss an appeal' from the decree of the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Louisiana; the decree being one transferred there, under act of Congress, from the late so-called “ Provisional Court” of that'State; both motions being made by Mr. Durant.
The ground of the first motion was because the transcript was incomplete, “ as appeared by the certificate of the clerk of the lower court, as given in the printed transcript, and because it further appeared by the said certificate, that the missing parts of the record could not be found, so that it was' useless to issue a certiorari,” and on the whole impossible for this court to hear and decide the case.
hhe ground of the second motion was, that the Circuit Court of the United States in Louisiana had rendered" no decree from which an appeal could be taken; so that this court was without jurisdiction.
This Provisional Court of Louisiana, as mentioned in* the preceding case, had been established by proclamation of the President, in October, 1862, when the war of the rebellion had subverted and swept away the courts of the Union, and, ■by the tei’ms of its constitution, was to last no longer than till the civil authority was restored.

Opinion:
The CHIEF JUSTICE
delivered the opinion of the court.
The first motion to dismiss this appeal is made upon the ground that the transcript of the record is incomplete, because of the.omission of certain papers said to have been used in the court, below, but no't to be found wíien the trans- , eript was, made.
• The motion must be denied. Proqf that the papers alleged to be wanting were used in the court below, and have been lost, must be made by affidavit.. The certificate of the clerk who made the transcript cannot be received as..proper evidence of these facts. . ,
. • The other motioh is made upon the ground that the decree below was rendered by the Provisional Court of Louisiana, established by the military authority of the President, during the late rebellion, from which no appeal could,be properly taken.- But we find, on looking.into the statutes, that when the Provisional Court ceaséd to exist, its judgments and decrees were directed to be transferred into the Circuit Court, find to stand as the judgments and decrees of that court. And it is from the decree of the Circuit Court that the appeal under consideration was taken. As an appeal from that court it was regular, and the motion to'dismiss, must, be denied.
All• questions concerning the validity of judgments and decrees of the Provisional Court will remain open, until after final hearing. Motions denied.