Case: E. Besler & Company et al. v. United States; City Products Corporation v. United States; City Products Corporation et al. v. United States; Keen Industries, Inc. v. United States; Keen Industries, Inc. v. United States; Nancy Sales Company, Inc. v. United States; National Silver Company v. United States; Reliance Trading Corporation of Illinois v. United States; Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. v. United States; Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. v. United States; Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. v. United States; Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. v. United States; Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. v. United States
Abbreviation: Besler v. United States
Decision Date: 1969-01-13
Docket Number: No. P69/10; protests 67/26820-4223, etc. (Chicago); No. P69/11; protests 67/51061, etc. (Mobile); No. P69/12; protests 67/79010, etc. (Baltimore); No. P69/13; protests 67/80811-5495,etc. (Chicago); No. P69/14; protests 68/31375-7835,etc. (Chicago); No. P69/15; protests 66/8164, etc. (Boston); No. P69/16; protests 67/62237, etc. (Boston); No. P69/17; protests 66/78386-2643, etc. (Chicago); No. P69/18; protests 66/77278-2841, etc. (Chicago); No. P69/19; protests 66/78623-3037, etc. (Chicago); No. P69/20; protests 67/26828-4232, etc. (Chicago); No. P69/21; protests 67/66707-5209, etc. (Chicago); No. P69/22; protests 68/7995-6486 and 68/8944-6563 (Chicago)
Citation: 62 Cust. Ct. 1061
Volume: 62
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: E. Besler & Company et al. v. United States, City Products Corporation v. United States, City Products Corporation et al. v. United States Keen Industries, Inc. v. United States, Keen Industries, Inc. v. United States, Nancy Sales Company, Inc. v. United States, National Silver Company v. United States Reliance Trading Corporation of Illinois v. United States, Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. v. United States, Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. v. United States, Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. v. United States, Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. v. United States, Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. v. United States,
Judges: 
Pages: 1061–1062

Head Matter:
Before the First Division,
January 13, 1969
No. P69/10.
protests 67/26820-4223, etc. (Chicago).
No. P69/11.
protests 67/51061, etc. (Mobile).
No. P69/12.
protests 67/79010, etc. (Baltimore).
No. P69/13.
protests 67/80811-5495,etc. (Chicago).
No. P69/14.
protests 68/31375-7835,etc. (Chicago).
No. P69/15.
protests 66/8164, etc. (Boston).
No. P69/16.
protests 67/62237, etc. (Boston).
No. P69/17.
protests 66/78386-2643, etc. (Chicago).
No. P69/18.
protests 66/77278-2841, etc. (Chicago).
E. Besler & Company et al. v. United States, City Products Corporation v. United States, City Products Corporation et al. v. United States Keen Industries, Inc. v. United States, Keen Industries, Inc. v. United States, Nancy Sales Company, Inc. v. United States, National Silver Company v. United States Reliance Trading Corporation of Illinois v. United States, Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. v. United States, Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. v. United States, Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. v. United States, Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. v. United States, Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. v. United States,
No. P69/19.
protests 66/78623-3037, etc. (Chicago).
No. P69/20.
protests 67/26828-4232, etc. (Chicago).
No. P69/21.
protests 67/66707-5209, etc. (Chicago).
No. P69/22.
protests 68/7995-6486 and 68/8944-6563 (Chicago).

Opinion:
WatsoN, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of artificial flowers, trees, foliage, fruits, vegetables, grasses, or grains, and articles made of the foregoing, in chief value of plastic, assembled in the same manner as the merchandise the subject of Armbee Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 105, C.D. 3278) and Zunold Trading Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 112, C.D. 3279), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.