Case: D. Edmonds, R. B. Edwards, and R. D. Kelly, in behalf of themselves, etc. v. Town of Haskell, Oklahoma, F. N. Shoemaker, as Town Clerk, etc., et al.
Abbreviation: Edmonds v. Town of Haskell
Decision Date: 1926-12-13
Docket Number: No. 500
Citation: 273 U.S. 647
Volume: 273
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: D. Edmonds, R. B. Edwards, and R. D. Kelly, in behalf of themselves, etc. v. Town of Haskell, Oklahoma, F. N. Shoemaker, as Town Clerk, etc., et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 647–648

Head Matter:
No. 500.
D. Edmonds, R. B. Edwards, and R. D. Kelly, in behalf of themselves, etc. v. Town of Haskell, Oklahoma, F. N. Shoemaker, as Town Clerk, etc., et al.
Motion to dismiss or affirm sub mitted December 6, 1926.
Decided December 13, 1926.
Messrs. Almond B. Cochran, R. C. Allen, and I. J. Underwood for defendants in error, in support of the motion.
Mr. Charles A. Moon for plaintiffs in error, in opposition thereto.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction on the authority of Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300, 303; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 256, 257; Farson, Son and Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268, 271.