Case: United States Steel Corporation, Republic Steel Corporation, et al., plaintiffs v. United States of America, et al., defendants, and Companhia Siderurgica Paulista, et al., defendants-intervenors; United States Steel Corporation, Republic Steel Corporation, et al., plaintiffs v. United States of America, et al., defendants, and Companhia Siderurgica Paulista, et al., defendants-intervenors; United States Steel Corporation, plaintiff v. United States of America, et al., defendants, and Pohang Iron & Steel Co., Ltd., et al., defendants-intervenors; United States Steel Corporation, plaintiff v. United States of America, et al., defendants; United States Steel Corporation, Republic Steel Corporation, et al., plaintiffs v. United States of America, et al., defendants
Abbreviation: United States Steel Corp. v. United States
Decision Date: 1984-02-24
Docket Number: Consolidated Court No. 82-10-01361; Court No. 82-10-01361S; Consolidated Court No. 83-01-00134; Court No. 83-01-00134S; Court No. 83-01-00152S
Citation: 7 Ct. Int'l Trade 48
Volume: 7
Reporter: United States Court of International Trade Reports
Court: United States Court of International Trade
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: United States Steel Corporation, Republic Steel Corporation, et al., plaintiffs v. United States of America, et al., defendants, and Companhia Siderurgica Paulista, et al., defendants-intervenors United States Steel Corporation, Republic Steel Corporation, et al., plaintiffs v. United States of America, et al., defendants, and Companhia Siderurgica Paulista, et al., defendants-intervenors United States Steel Corporation, plaintiff v. United States of America, et al., defendants, and Pohang Iron & Steel Co., Ltd., et al., defendants-intervenors United States Steel Corporation, plaintiff v. United States of America, et al., defendants United States Steel Corporation, Republic Steel Corporation, et al., plaintiffs v. United States of America, et al., defendants
Judges: Before Watson, Judge.
Pages: 48–49

Head Matter:
United States Steel Corporation, Republic Steel Corporation, et al., plaintiffs v. United States of America, et al., defendants, and Companhia Siderurgica Paulista, et al., defendants-intervenors United States Steel Corporation, Republic Steel Corporation, et al., plaintiffs v. United States of America, et al., defendants, and Companhia Siderurgica Paulista, et al., defendants-intervenors United States Steel Corporation, plaintiff v. United States of America, et al., defendants, and Pohang Iron & Steel Co., Ltd., et al., defendants-intervenors United States Steel Corporation, plaintiff v. United States of America, et al., defendants United States Steel Corporation, Republic Steel Corporation, et al., plaintiffs v. United States of America, et al., defendants
Consolidated Court No. 82-10-01361
Court No. 82-10-01361S
Consolidated Court No. 83-01-00134
Court No. 83-01-00134S
Court No. 83-01-00152S
Before Watson, Judge.
(Dated February 24, 1984)
Law Department of United States Steel Corp. (D. B. King of counsel) for plaintiff United States Steel Corp.
Cravath, Swaine & Moore (Joseph N. Sahid, of counsel) for plaintiffs Republic Steel Corp., Inland Steel Company, Jones & Laughlin Steel, Inc., National Steel Corp. and Cyclops Corp.
Richard K. Willard, Acting Assistant Attorney General, David M. Cohen, Director, Commercial Litigation Branch (Francis J. Sailer, Attorney) for the federal defendants.
Wald, Harkrader & Ross (Christopher Dunn, of counsel) for defendants-interve-nors Companhia Siderúrgica Paulista and Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais.
Busby, Rehm and Leonard, P.C. (John B. Rehm, of counsel) for defendant-interve-nor Highveld Steel and Vanadium Corp. Ltd.
Daniels, Houlihan and Palmeter, P.C. (N. David Palmeter and Donald B. Cameron, Jr.) for defendants-intervenors Pohang Iron & Steel Co., Ltd., and Union Steel Mfg. Co., Ltd.

Opinion:
Watson, Judge:
Upon the basis of plaintiffs' Motion for Voluntary Dismissal under Rule 41(a)(2) and plaintiffs' memorandum in support thereof, together with defendants' conáent thereto and sup porting memorandum, as well as the lack of objection from defendants-intervenors, it is hereby
Ordered that the above-captioned civil actions are dismissed and that the decisions, orders and judgments that have been rendered therein are vacated as moot.
This dismissal is without prejudice to plaintiffs' right to litigate any or all of the issues covered by the complaints that have been filed in the dismissed cases. The parties will bear their own costs.