Case: DANIELS v. CRADDOCK
Abbreviation: Daniels v. Craddock
Decision Date: 1915-06-01
Docket Number: No. 248
Citation: 237 U.S. 574
Volume: 237
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: DANIELS v. CRADDOCK
Judges: 
Pages: 574–575

Head Matter:
DANIELS v. CRADDOCK
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
No. 248.
Argued April 21, 22, 1915.
Decided June 1, 1915.
Decided; on authority of Daniels v. Wagner, ante, p. 547.
205 Fed. Rep. 235, reversed.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Mr. Harrison G. Platt, with whom Mr. Robert Treat Platt and Mr. Hugh Montgomery were on the brief, for appellant.
Mr. Will R. King, Mr. F. M. Saxton and Mr. L. F. Conn for appellees, submitted.

Opinion:
Mr. Chief Justice White
delivered the opinion of the court.
Included among the fifteen cases which were argued by the appellant in a single brief, this case was separately argued by the appellees. The brief pressed upon our attention seven propositions, all of which we are of opinion are disposed of by the views announced in Daniels v. Wagner, ante, p. 547 (No. 239), since the propositions all in substance either conflict with the finding of the Secretary of the Interior as to the performance by the lieu applicants of every essential requirement to entitle them to make the entry, or directly or indirectly assert the possession by the Land Department, at least as to the lieu entries, of the discretionary power which was asserted and recognized.by the court below. It follows therefore that for the reasons here stated and those expressed in No. 239 the judgment must be and it is reversed and- the case is remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this and the opinion in Daniels v. Wagner, ante, p. 547.
Reversed.