Case: Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation v. Pirtle; Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation v. Johnson; Hartley v. Sneed; Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation v. Mosley; and Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation v. Slater
Abbreviation: Cate v. Pirtle
Decision Date: 2011-06-13
Docket Number: No. 10-868
Citation: 564 U.S. 1001
Volume: 564
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation v. Pirtle Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation v. Johnson Hartley v. Sneed Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation v. Mosley; and Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation v. Slater
Judges: 
Pages: 1001–1001

Head Matter:
June 13, 2011
No. 10-868.
Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation v. Pirtle Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation v. Johnson Hartley v. Sneed Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation v. Mosley; and Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation v. Slater

Opinion:
C. A. 9th Cir. Motions of respondents John H. Pir-tle, Robert Everett Johnson, Anthony Sneed, and Michael Craig Slater for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certio-rari as to John H. Pirtle, Robert Everett Johnson, Anthony Sneed, and Michael Craig Slater granted, judgments vacated, and cases remanded for further consideration in light of Swarthout v. Cooke, 562 U. S. 216 (2011) (per curiam). Certiorari as to Ron Mosley denied.