Case: John V. Carr & Son, Inc., et al. v. United States
Abbreviation: John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United States
Decision Date: 1957-06-20
Docket Number: Reap. Dec. 8849; Entry No. 11345, etc.
Citation: 38 Cust. Ct. 698
Volume: 38
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: John V. Carr & Son, Inc., et al. v. United States
Judges: 
Pages: 698–699

Head Matter:
(Reap. Dec. 8849)
John V. Carr & Son, Inc., et al. v. United States
Entry No. 11345, etc.
(Decided June 20, 1957)
John D. Rode for the plaintiffs.
George Cochran Doub, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Opinion:
Oliver, Chief Judge:
The appeals to reappraisement, enumerated in schedule "A," hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been limited, through the written stipulation of submission, to the calculat ing machines identified on the invoices by style numbers 51405 and 51435. As to all other merchandise, the appeals have been abandoned.
The agreed set of facts upon which these appeals for reappraisement have been submitted establish cost of production, as defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, and that such statutory value for these calculating machines is in each instance the appraised unit value, less 40 per centum, plus the cost of all containers and coverings, and I so hold. As to all other merchandise, the appeals for reappraisement are dismissed.
Judgment will be rendered accordingly.