Case: HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., Petitioner, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent, Atofina Chemicals, Inc., Intervenor
Abbreviation: Honeywell International, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Decision Date: 2005-01-07
Docket Number: No. 02-1294
Citation: 364 U.S. App. D.C. 244
Volume: 364
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Parties: HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., Petitioner, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent, Atofina Chemicals, Inc., Intervenor.
Judges: Before: SENTELLE, RANDOLPH, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.
Pages: 244–245

Head Matter:
393 F.3d 1315
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., Petitioner, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent, Atofina Chemicals, Inc., Intervenor.
No. 02-1294.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Jan. 7, 2005.
Angus MacBeth, Timothy Kenly Webster, Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, Washington, DC, for Petitioner.
Richard E. Ayres, Barry S. Neuman, Law Office of Barry S. Neuman, Thomas Allen Lorenzen, Attorney, Steven Edward Rusak, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Sheila A. Millar, Peter Lawrence De La Cruz, Jean-Cyril Walker, Keller & Heck-man, Washington, DC, for Intervenor.
Before: SENTELLE, RANDOLPH, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.
PER CURIAM.
On reconsideration, we find it unnecessary to decide whether § 307(d)(9) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7607(d)(9), requires a court to vacate erroneous action of the Environmental Protection Agency. Even if § 307(d)(9) gives a court discretion to remand without vacating, we would vacate EPA's rule for the reasons given in Judge Randolph's concurring opinion, in which Judge Sentelle joined. See Honeywell Int'l, Inc. v. EPA, 374 F.3d 1363, 1375 (D.C.Cir.2004). Subpart III of Part II of the per curiam opinion, 374 F.3d at 1373-74, is therefore withdrawn. In all other respects, the petition for rehearing is denied.
So ordered.