Case: Marcus et al. v. New York; Texas Eastern Transmission Corp. v. Benson, Commissioner oF Revenue; Swarthout v. Olund; Basyap, Inc., et al. v. District of Columbia Redevelopment Land Agency et al.; Hutter et ux. v. City of Chicago; Reilly v. Cauldwell-Wingate Co., Inc., et al.; Richerson v. United States; Nix v. United States; Houp v. United States; Hitchcock v. Gomes, Warden
Abbreviation: Marcus v. New York
Decision Date: 1973-01-08
Docket Number: No. 72-370; No. 72-373; No. 72-374; No. 72-381; No. 72-447; No. 72-5064; No. 72-5097; No. 72-5337; No. 72-5342; No. 72-5394
Citation: 409 U.S. 1119
Volume: 409
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Marcus et al. v. New York, Texas Eastern Transmission Corp. v. Benson, Commissioner oF Revenue, Swarthout v. Olund, Basyap, Inc., et al. v. District of Columbia Redevelopment Land Agency et al., Hutter et ux. v. City of Chicago, Reilly v. Cauldwell-Wingate Co., Inc., et al., Richerson v. United States, Nix v. United States, Houp v. United States, Hitchcock v. Gomes, Warden,
Judges: 
Pages: 1119–1119

Head Matter:
No. 72-370.
No. 72-373.
No. 72-374.
No. 72-381.
No. 72-447.
No. 72-5064.
No. 72-5097.
No. 72-5337.
No. 72-5342.
No. 72-5394.
Marcus et al. v. New York, Texas Eastern Transmission Corp. v. Benson, Commissioner oF Revenue, Swarthout v. Olund, Basyap, Inc., et al. v. District of Columbia Redevelopment Land Agency et al., Hutter et ux. v. City of Chicago, Reilly v. Cauldwell-Wingate Co., Inc., et al., Richerson v. United States, Nix v. United States, Houp v. United States, Hitchcock v. Gomes, Warden,

Opinion:
ante, p. 1027;
ante, p. 1003;
ante, p. 1008;
ante, p. 1008;
ante, p. 1024;
ante, p. 882;
ante, p. 883;
ante, p. 1013;
ante, p. 1011; and
ante, p. 1026.
Petitions for rehearing denied.