Case: C. J. Van Houten & Zoon, Inc. v. United States
Abbreviation: C. J. Van Houten & Zoon, Inc. v. United States
Decision Date: 1956-12-11
Docket Number: Reap. Dec. 8709; Entry No. 11304
Citation: 37 Cust. Ct. 598
Volume: 37
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: C. J. Van Houten & Zoon, Inc. v. United States
Judges: 
Pages: 598–599

Head Matter:
(Reap. Dec. 8709)
Entry No. 11304, etc.
C. J. Van Houten & Zoon, Inc. v. United States
(Decided December 11, 1956)
Barnes, Richardson, & Colburn for the plaintiff.
George Cochran Doub, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Opinion:
Olivee, Chief Judge:
The appeals for reappraisement, enumerated in schedule "A," attached hereto and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision on a written stipulation reading as follows :
IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED that
1. The merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement listed in Schedule A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, consists of chocolate bars and other chocolate articles exported from Holland, the same in all material respects as those in Bluefries New York, Inc. v. United States, Reap. Dec. 8470, wherein it was held that cost of production as defined in Sec. 402 (f), Tariff Act of 1930, was the proper basis of value.
2. The record in said Reap. Dec. 8470 may be incorporated herein.
3. At the time of exportation of the merchandise involved in the appeals for reappraisement listed in said Schedule A, there was no foreign value or export value or United States value for such or similar merchandise as defined in Sec. 402, Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, and the cost of production is therefore the proper basis of value.
4. The cost of production, as defined in Sec. 402 (f) (1), (2), (3) and (4) of the Tariff Act of 1930, for the chocolate bars and other chocolate articles listed in Schedule B, attached hereto and made a part hereof, is as set forth in said Schedule B.
5. The appeals for reappraisement listed in said Schedule A are submitted on this stipulation and are limited to the items set forth in said Schedule B, and abandoned as to all other items.
On the agreed facts, I hold that the proper basis for appraisement of the "chocolate bars and other chocolate articles" in question is cost of production, as defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value for these various items is as set forth in schedule "B," attached hereto and made a part hereof.
As to all other merchandise covered by the shipments involved herein, these appeals for reappraisement are dismissed.
Judgement will be rendered accordingly.
Schedule "B"