Case: Dick Anthony HELLER, et al., Appellants v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Appellees
Abbreviation: Heller v. District of Columbia
Decision Date: 2016-02-26
Docket Number: No. 14-7071
Citation: 421 U.S. App. D.C. 212
Volume: 421
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Dick Anthony HELLER, et al., Appellants v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before: GARLAND, Chief Judge; HENDERSON, ROGERS, TATEL, BROWN, GRIFFITH, KAVANAUGH, SRINIVASAN, MILLETT, PILLARD, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
Pages: 212–212

Head Matter:
814 F.3d 480
Dick Anthony HELLER, et al., Appellants v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Appellees.
No. 14-7071.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Feb. 26, 2016.
Stephen Porter Halbrook, Law Office of Stephen P. Halbrook, Dan Mark Peterson, Dan M. Peterson PLLC, Fairfax, VA, for Appellants.
Loren L. Alikhan, Holly Michelle Johnson, Todd Sunhwae Kim, Office of the Attorney General, District of Columbia Office of the Solicitor General, Washington, DC, for Appellees.
Before: GARLAND, Chief Judge; HENDERSON, ROGERS, TATEL, BROWN, GRIFFITH, KAVANAUGH, SRINIVASAN, MILLETT, PILLARD, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
A statement by Circuit Judge Millett, concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc, is attached.

Opinion:
ORDER
On Petition for Rehearing En Banc
PER CURIAM.
Appellees' petition for rehearing en banc and the response thereto were circulated to the full court, and a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges eligible to participate did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that the petition be denied.