Case: Spurrier et al. v. Mitchell Irrigation District et al.
Abbreviation: Spurrier v. Mitchell Irrigation District
Decision Date: 1931-04-20
Docket Number: No. 306
Citation: 283 U.S. 796
Volume: 283
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Spurrier et al. v. Mitchell Irrigation District et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 796–796

Head Matter:
No. 306.
Spurrier et al. v. Mitchell Irrigation District et al.
Argued April 16, 17, 1931.
Decided April 20, 1931.
Mr. J. M. Fitzgerald, with whom Mr. L. L. Raymond was on the brief, for appellants. Messrs. Thomas M. Morrow and William Morrow were on the brief for Mitchell Irrigation District, appellee.
Messrs. J. G. Mothersead, Roscoe T. York, Floyd E. Wright, and Wm. H. Wright were on the brief for Gering & Ft. Laramie Irrigation District, appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, § 237 (a) Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925, 43 Stat. 936, 937. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari, as required by § 237 (c) Judicial Code as amended, 43 Stat. 936, 938, certiorari is denied for want of a substantial federal question. Wabash R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; Zucht v. King, 260 U. S. 174; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.