Case: Hugh Reilly v. Robert Shipman et al., etc.
Abbreviation: Reilly v. Shipman
Decision Date: 1920-11-22
Docket Number: No. 502
Citation: 254 U.S. 614
Volume: 254
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Hugh Reilly v. Robert Shipman et al., etc.
Judges: 
Pages: 614–614

Head Matter:
No. 502.
Hugh Reilly v. Robert Shipman et al., etc.

Opinion:
Error to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Motion to dismiss submitted November 8, 1920. Decided November 22, 1920. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 568; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 237 U. S. 300, 302; Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co. v. Yurkonis, 238 U. S. 439, 444. (2) Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co., 191 U. S. 526, 530; Devine v. Los Angeles, 202 U. S. 313, 333; Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; St. Anthony Church v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 237 U. S. 575, 577. Mr. Frank Fair cloth and Mr. Harry L. Patton for plaintiff in error. Mr. Guy Mason, Mr. W. W. Spalding, Mr. S. B. Davis, Jr., and Mr. E. R. Wright for defendants in error.