Case: United States v. Hatter, Judge, United States District Court for the Central District of California, et al.
Abbreviation: United States v. Hatter
Decision Date: 1996-10-07
Docket Number: No. 95-1733
Citation: 519 U.S. 801
Volume: 519
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: United States v. Hatter, Judge, United States District Court for the Central District of California, et al.
Judges: JUSTICE STEVENS, JUSTICE O'CONNOR, JUSTICE GINSBURG, and JUSTICE BREYER took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Pages: 801–801

Head Matter:
October 7, 1996
No. 95-1733.
United States v. Hatter, Judge, United States District Court for the Central District of California, et al.

Opinion:
C. A. Fed. Cir. Because the Court lacks a auo-rum, 28 U. S. C. § 1, and since a majority of the qualified Justices are of the opinion that the case cannot be heard and determined at the next Term of the Court, the judgment is affirmed under 28 U. S. C. § 2109, which provides that under these circumstances the Court shall enter its order affirming the judgment of the court from which the case was brought for review with the same effect as upon affirmance by an equally divided Court:
JUSTICE STEVENS, JUSTICE O'CONNOR, JUSTICE GINSBURG, and JUSTICE BREYER took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.