Case: Booth & Company et al. v. United States
Abbreviation: Booth v. United States
Decision Date: 1969-10-06
Docket Number: C.D. 3893
Citation: 63 Cust. Ct. 179
Volume: 63
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Booth & Company et al. v. United States
Judges: Before Richardson, Dandis, and Rosenbtein, Judges
Pages: 179–179

Head Matter:
(C.D. 3893)
Booth & Company et al. v. United States
United States Customs Court, Third Division
(Decided October 6, 1969)
ATlerton deO. Tompkins for the plaintiffs.
William D. RucJcelshaus, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
Before Richardson, Dandis, and Rosenbtein, Judges

Opinion:
RoseNSTeiN, Judge:
When the protests set forth in schedule A, attached hereto and made a part of this decision, were called at a term of court in New York on June 16, 1969, plaintiff moved to suspend them under protest 67/28416.
It appearing that no action had been taken by counsel in protest 67/28416 other than to file a motion for a commission to take the deposition of someone in Pakistan the previous week, that there was no satisfactory showing that counsel would proceed to trial therein, and that the subject protests, which were marked peremptorily, were on the trial calendar for the seventh time, the court, sua sponte, ordered their dismissal. The cases are therefore dismissed.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.