Case: Winslow et ux. v. Williams et al.; Town of Huntington, New York, et al. v. Huntington Branch, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, et al.; Chaires v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development et al.; Miner v. New York State Department of Correctional Services; Wohlford et ux. v. United States Department of Agriculture et al.; Martin v. Morris; Shostak v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; Shanks et al. v. Estes Park Bank; Broad et ux. v. Conway et al.; Neville v. Mollen, Presiding Justice, Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, et al.; Turner v. United States Postal Service; Patillo v. Georgia; In re Radvan-Ziemnowicz, Ikeni v. California Superior Court of Fresno County et al.; Cole v. Mississippi; Thompson v. Southeastern Toyota Distributors, Inc., et al.; May v. Warner Amex Cable Communications; Campbell v. Kincheloe, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary; Krishnan v. Department of the Air Force; Fleming v. Deak et al.; Bradshaw v. Zoological Society of San Diego; Bigg v. Office of Personnel Management; Martin v. C. Itoh & Co. (America), Inc., et al.; Drabick v. Drabick; Rowe v. Department of the Army; Rowe v. Department of the Army; Martin v. Zook et al.
Abbreviation: Winslow v. Williams
Decision Date: 1989-01-09
Docket Number: No. 87-1921; No. 87-1961; No. 87-2128; No. 87-6947; No. 87-7189; No. 87-7284; No. 88-296; No. 88-418; No. 88-445; No. 88-474; No. 88-5252; No. 88-5347; No. 88-5400; No. 88-5439; No. 88-5446; No. 88-5451; No. 88-5452; No. 88-5461; No. 88-5462; No. 88-5497; No. 88-5507; No. 88-5511; No. 88-5549; No. 88-5592; No. 88-5642; No. 88-5643; No. 88-5677
Citation: 488 U.S. 1023
Volume: 488
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Winslow et ux. v. Williams et al., Town of Huntington, New York, et al. v. Huntington Branch, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, et al., Chaires v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development et al., Miner v. New York State Department of Correctional Services, Wohlford et ux. v. United States Department of Agriculture et al., Martin v. Morris, Shostak v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Shanks et al. v. Estes Park Bank, Broad et ux. v. Conway et al., Neville v. Mollen, Presiding Justice, Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, et al., Turner v. United States Postal Service, Patillo v. Georgia, In re Radvan-Ziemnowicz, Ikeni v. California Superior Court of Fresno County et al., Cole v. Mississippi, Thompson v. Southeastern Toyota Distributors, Inc., et al., May v. Warner Amex Cable Communications, Campbell v. Kincheloe, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary, Krishnan v. Department of the Air Force, Fleming v. Deak et al., Bradshaw v. Zoological Society of San Diego, Bigg v. Office of Personnel Management, Martin v. C. Itoh & Co. (America), Inc., et al., Drabick v. Drabick, Rowe v. Department of the Army, Rowe v. Department of the Army, Martin v. Zook et al.,
Judges: 
Pages: 1023–1024

Head Matter:
No. 87-1921.
No. 87-1961.
No. 87-2128.
No. 87-6947.
No. 87-7189.
No. 87-7284.
No. 88-296.
No. 88-418.
No. 88-445.
No. 88-474.
No. 88-5252.
No. 88-5347.
No. 88-5400.
No. 88-5439.
No. 88-5446.
No. 88-5451.
No. 88-5452.
No. 88-5461.
No. 88-5462.
No. 88-5497.
No. 88-5507.
No. 88-5511.
Winslow et ux. v. Williams et al., Town of Huntington, New York, et al. v. Huntington Branch, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, et al., Chaires v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development et al., Miner v. New York State Department of Correctional Services, Wohlford et ux. v. United States Department of Agriculture et al., Martin v. Morris, Shostak v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Shanks et al. v. Estes Park Bank, Broad et ux. v. Conway et al., Neville v. Mollen, Presiding Justice, Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, et al., Turner v. United States Postal Service, Patillo v. Georgia, In re Radvan-Ziemnowicz, Ikeni v. California Superior Court of Fresno County et al., Cole v. Mississippi, Thompson v. Southeastern Toyota Distributors, Inc., et al., May v. Warner Amex Cable Communications, Campbell v. Kincheloe, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary, Krishnan v. Department of the Air Force, Fleming v. Deak et al., Bradshaw v. Zoological Society of San Diego, Bigg v. Office of Personnel Management, Martin v. C. Itoh & Co. (America), Inc., et al., Drabick v. Drabick, Rowe v. Department of the Army, Rowe v. Department of the Army, Martin v. Zook et al.,

Opinion:
ante, p. 820;
ante, p. 15;
ante, p. 829;
ante, p. 941;
ante, p. 941;
ante, p. 924;
ante, p. 942;
ante, p. 927;
ante, p. 927;
ante, p. 943;
ante, p. 969;
ante, p. 948;
ante, p. 923;
ante, p. 920;
ante, p. 934;
ante, p. 931;
ante, p. 931;
ante, p. 948;
ante, p. 957;
ante, p. 945;
ante, p. 945;
ante, p. 932;
No. 88-5549.
No. 88-5592.
No. 88-5642.
No. 88-5643.
No. 88-5677.
ante, p. 951;
ante, p. 958;
ante, p. 951;
ante, p. 951; and
ante, p. 972. Petitions for rehearing denied.