Case: Roedenbeck Farms, Inc., et al. v. Broussard et al.
Abbreviation: Roedenbeck Farms, Inc. v. Broussard
Decision Date: 1939-11-06
Docket Number: No. 468
Citation: 308 U.S. 514
Volume: 308
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Roedenbeck Farms, Inc., et al. v. Broussard et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 514–515

Head Matter:
No. 468.
Roedenbeck Farms, Inc., et al. v. Broussard et al.
November 6, 1939.
Mr. John H. Crooker for appellants. Messrs. E. B. Pickett, E. E. Easterling, and Will E. Orgain for appellees. Messrs. William D. Gordon and E. E. Easterling for Marrs McLean, appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. McGrew, 188 U.S. 291, 308; Zadig v. Baldwin, 166 U. S. 485, 488; Home for Incurables v. City of New York, 187 U. S. 155, 158; (2) Roberts v. City of New York, 295 U. S. 264, 278; Seattle Ry. v. Linhoff, 231 U. S. 568, 570; Cross Lake Shooting & Fishing Club v. Louisiana, 224 U. S. 632, 638; Ross v. Oregon, 227 U. S. 150, 162.