Case: UNITED STATES v. HUTTO
Abbreviation: United States v. Hutto
Decision Date: 1921-06-01
Docket Number: NO. 2; No. 692
Citation: 256 U.S. 530
Volume: 256
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: UNITED STATES v. HUTTO
Judges: 
Pages: 530–530

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES v. HUTTO
(NO. 2).
ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA.
No. 692.
Argued April 11, 1921.
Decided June 1, 1921.
Decided upon'the authority of United States v. HvXto, No. 1, ante, 524. Reversed.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Mr. Leslie C. Garnett, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, for the United States..
Mr. Sam K. Sullivan, with whom Mr. Henry S. Johnston was on the brief, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
Mr. Justice Pitney
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is á writ of error under the Criminal Appeals Act of March 2, 1907, c. 2564, 34 Stat. 124,6, to review a judgment sustaining a demurrer to an indictment which, in essential respects, is precisely like that passed upon in United States v. Hutto, No. 691, just decided, ante, 524. In this cáse the demurrer was sustained upon the ground that § 2078, Rev. Stats., was inapplicable to transactions involving property with respect to which the Government; had no interest or control. Eor the reasons stated in the opinion, in No. 691, the judgment herein is
Reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings in conformity with this opinion.