Case: Dr. Bloom Dentist Inc. v. Cruise, City Clerk
Abbreviation: Dr. Bloom Dentist Inc. v. Cruise
Decision Date: 1933-01-23
Docket Number: No. 588
Citation: 288 U.S. 588
Volume: 288
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Dr. Bloom Dentist Inc. v. Cruise, City Clerk.
Judges: 
Pages: 588–588

Head Matter:
No. 588.
Dr. Bloom Dentist Inc. v. Cruise, City Clerk.
Jurisdictional statement submitted January 14,1933.
Decided January 23, 1933.
Mr. Thomas G. Frost for appellant. Messrs. Arthur J. W. Hilly and J. Joseph Lilly for appellee.

Opinion:
Appeal from the Supreme Court of New York.
Per Curiam:
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Dent v. West Virginia, 129 U. S. 114; Douglas v. Noble, 261 U. S. 165; Missouri ex rel. Hurwitz v. North, 271 U. S. 40, 43; Graves v. Minnesota, 272 U. S. 425, 428; Lambert v. Yellowley, 272 U. S. 581, 596; People v. Painless Parker Dentist, 85 Colo. 304, 280 U. S. 566; Miller v. State Board of Dental Examiners, 90 Colo. 193; 8 P. (2d) 699; 287 U. S. 563.