Case: Chandler v. Turner, Warden; McCray v. Willingham, Warden; Pelletier v. Parker, Warden; Magee v. Nelson, Warden, et al.; Jones v. Follette, Warden; Kanieski v. Burke, Warden; In re Kamsler; Card v. Kropp, Warden; Holscher v. Young, Warden; Taylor v. Burke, Warden; Hayman v. Fitzharris, Training Facility Superintendent; Roberts v. Peyton, Penitentiary Superintendent; Lacaze et al. v. Blackwell, Warden; Byrd v. Nelson, Warden; Cowling v. Craven, Warden; and Owen v. Arkansas
Abbreviation: Chandler v. Turner
Decision Date: 1968-10-14
Docket Number: No. 266; No. 272; No. 302; No. 346; No. 347; No. 353; No. 367; No. 381; No. 419; No. 436; No. 501; No. 509; No. 511; No. 558; No. 579; No. 584
Citation: 393 U.S. 816
Volume: 393
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Chandler v. Turner, Warden; McCray v. Willingham, Warden; Pelletier v. Parker, Warden; Magee v. Nelson, Warden, et al.; Jones v. Follette, Warden; Kanieski v. Burke, Warden; In re Kamsler; Card v. Kropp, Warden; Holscher v. Young, Warden; Taylor v. Burke, Warden; Hayman v. Fitzharris, Training Facility Superintendent; Roberts v. Peyton, Penitentiary Superintendent; Lacaze et al. v. Blackwell, Warden; Byrd v. Nelson, Warden; Cowling v. Craven, Warden; and Owen v. Arkansas.
Judges: 
Pages: 816–816

Head Matter:
No. 266,
No. 272,
No. 302,
No. 346,
No. 347,
No. 353,
No. 367,
No. 381,
No. 419,
No. 436,
No. 501,
No. 509,
No. 511,
No. 558,
No. 579,
No. 584,
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Chandler v. Turner, Warden; McCray v. Willingham, Warden; Pelletier v. Parker, Warden; Magee v. Nelson, Warden, et al.; Jones v. Follette, Warden; Kanieski v. Burke, Warden; In re Kamsler; Card v. Kropp, Warden; Holscher v. Young, Warden; Taylor v. Burke, Warden; Hayman v. Fitzharris, Training Facility Superintendent; Roberts v. Peyton, Penitentiary Superintendent; Lacaze et al. v. Blackwell, Warden; Byrd v. Nelson, Warden; Cowling v. Craven, Warden; and Owen v. Arkansas.

Opinion:
Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.