Case: Stoner v. California; Rugendorf v. United States; In re Crow, Kline v. Minnesota; Boyajian, doing business as Precision Testing Laboratories, v. Old Colony Envelope Co., Inc., et al.; Brown et al. v. Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee of Cuyahoga County, Ohio; Hughes v. United States; Anthony v. County of Los Angeles; Walker v. Pate, Warden
Abbreviation: Stoner v. California
Decision Date: 1964-05-18
Docket Number: No. 209; No. 223; No. 767; No. 821; No. 847; No. 865; No. 886; No. 905; No. 932
Citation: 377 U.S. 940
Volume: 377
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Stoner v. California, Rugendorf v. United States, In re Crow, Kline v. Minnesota, Boyajian, doing business as Precision Testing Laboratories, v. Old Colony Envelope Co., Inc., et al., Brown et al. v. Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee of Cuyahoga County, Ohio, Hughes v. United States, Anthony v. County of Los Angeles, Walker v. Pate, Warden,
Judges: 
Pages: 940–940

Head Matter:
No. 209.
No. 223.
No. 767.
No. 821.
No. 847.
No. 865.
No. 886.
No. 905.
No. 932,
Misc.
Stoner v. California, Rugendorf v. United States, In re Crow, Kline v. Minnesota, Boyajian, doing business as Precision Testing Laboratories, v. Old Colony Envelope Co., Inc., et al., Brown et al. v. Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee of Cuyahoga County, Ohio, Hughes v. United States, Anthony v. County of Los Angeles, Walker v. Pate, Warden,

Opinion:
376 U. S. 483;
376 U. S. 528;
376 U. S. 647;
376 U. S. 962;
376 U. S. 969;
376 U. S.970;
ante, p. 907;
376 U. S. 963; and
376 U. S. 972. Petitions for rehearing denied.