Case: Perlman v. Department of Justice; Ortiz Velez, Mayor of Sabana Grande, Puerto Rico, et al. v. Rivera-Torres et al.; Jones, dba Melder Publishing Co. v. Hawkins et al.; Faconti v. Potter, Postmaster General; Lann v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; Sacco v. New York; Ogunjobi-Yobo v. DeKalb County, Georgia; Parks v. City of Chattanooga, Tennessee, et al.; Bahoda v. Michigan; D'Antuono v. New York; Pleasant, aka Pleasants v. United States, and Mathison et ux. v. Corrections Corporation of America et al.
Abbreviation: Perlman v. Department of Justice
Decision Date: 2004-06-01
Docket Number: No. 02-1270; No. 03-898; No. 03-1100; No. 03-1239; No. 03-8208; No. 03-8338; No. 03-8587; No. 03-8646; No. 03-8706; No. 03-8889; No. 03-8978; No. 03-9301
Citation: 541 U.S. 1083
Volume: 541
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Perlman v. Department of Justice, Ortiz Velez, Mayor of Sabana Grande, Puerto Rico, et al. v. Rivera-Torres et al., Jones, dba Melder Publishing Co. v. Hawkins et al., Faconti v. Potter, Postmaster General, Lann v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Sacco v. New York, Ogunjobi-Yobo v. DeKalb County, Georgia, Parks v. City of Chattanooga, Tennessee, et al., Bahoda v. Michigan, D’Antuono v. New York, Pleasant, aka Pleasants v. United States, and Mathison et ux. v. Corrections Corporation of America et al.,
Judges: 
Pages: 1083–1083

Head Matter:
No. 02-1270.
No. 03-898.
No. 03-1100.
No. 03-1239.
No. 03-8208.
No. 03-8338.
No. 03-8587.
No. 03-8646.
No. 03-8706.
No. 03-8889.
No. 03-8978.
No. 03-9301.
Perlman v. Department of Justice, Ortiz Velez, Mayor of Sabana Grande, Puerto Rico, et al. v. Rivera-Torres et al., Jones, dba Melder Publishing Co. v. Hawkins et al., Faconti v. Potter, Postmaster General, Lann v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Sacco v. New York, Ogunjobi-Yobo v. DeKalb County, Georgia, Parks v. City of Chattanooga, Tennessee, et al., Bahoda v. Michigan, D’Antuono v. New York, Pleasant, aka Pleasants v. United States, and Mathison et ux. v. Corrections Corporation of America et al.,

Opinion:
ante, p. 970;
ante, p. 972;
ante, p. 973;
ante, p. 975;
ante, p. 907;
ante, p. 943;
ante, p. 962;
ante, p. 963;
ante, p. 977;
ante, p. 994;
ante, p. 956;
ante, p. 999. Petitions for rehearing denied.