Case: STATE OF OHIO, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and Secretary, Manuel Lujan, Respondents, Public Service Electric and Gas Co., et al. and ASARCO, Inc., Intervenors, and consolidated cases
Abbreviation: Ohio v. Department of Interior
Decision Date: 1989-09-11
Docket Number: No. 86-1529
Citation: 283 U.S. App. D.C. 129
Volume: 283
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Parties: STATE OF OHIO, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and Secretary, Manuel Lujan, Respondents, Public Service Electric and Gas Co., et al. and ASARCO, Inc., Intervenors, and consolidated cases.
Judges: Before WALD, Chief Judge, MIKVA, Circuit Judge, and ROBINSON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Pages: 129–130

Head Matter:
897 F.2d 1151
STATE OF OHIO, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and Secretary, Manuel Lujan, Respondents, Public Service Electric and Gas Co., et al. and ASARCO, Inc., Intervenors, and consolidated cases.
No. 86-1529.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Sept. 11, 1989.
Before WALD, Chief Judge, MIKVA, Circuit Judge, and ROBINSON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition For Rehearing of Petitioners and Intervenors it is
ORDERED, by the Court, that the petition is denied.
Before WALD, Chief Judge, MIKVA, EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, D.H. GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges, and ROBINSON, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The Joint Suggestion For Rehearing En Banc of Petitioners and Intervenors has been circulated to the full Court. No member of the Court requested the taking of a vote thereon. Upon consideration of the foregoing it is
ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestion is denied.
A statement of Circuit Judge SILBERMAN is attached.