Case: Clark v. Conway, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility; Martinez v. Breaux et al.; Vlasek v. Levey; Oyeniran v. United States; Wood v. Crown Redi-Mix, Inc., dba Crown Building Materials, Inc.; Gooden v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division; Heim v. University of Miami et al.; Courter v. Kansas et al.; Contreras v. Texas; Calero v. Pagan Pagan et al.; Lewis v. Crosby, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections; and Mitchell v. Per-Se Technologies, Inc.
Abbreviation: Clark v. Conway
Decision Date: 2004-10-04
Docket Number: No. 03M84; No. 03M86; No. 03M88; No. 03M89; No. 03M90; No. 04M1; No. 04M3; No. 04M5; No. 04M6; No. 04M8; No. 04M10; No. 04M11
Citation: 543 U.S. 804
Volume: 543
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Clark v. Conway, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility; Martinez v. Breaux et al.; Vlasek v. Levey; Oyeniran v. United States; Wood v. Crown Redi-Mix, Inc., dba Crown Building Materials, Inc.; Gooden v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division; Heim v. University of Miami et al.; Courter v. Kansas et al.; Contreras v. Texas; Calero v. Pagan Pagan et al.; Lewis v. Crosby, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections; and Mitchell v. Per-Se Technologies, Inc.
Judges: 
Pages: 804–804

Head Matter:
No. 03M84.
No. 03M86.
No. 03M88.
No. 03M89.
No. 03M90.
No. 04M1.
No. 04M3.
No. 04M5.
No. 04M6.
No. 04M8.
No. 04M10.
No. 04M11.
Clark v. Conway, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility; Martinez v. Breaux et al.; Vlasek v. Levey; Oyeniran v. United States; Wood v. Crown Redi-Mix, Inc., dba Crown Building Materials, Inc.; Gooden v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division; Heim v. University of Miami et al.; Courter v. Kansas et al.; Contreras v. Texas; Calero v. Pagan Pagan et al.; Lewis v. Crosby, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections; and Mitchell v. Per-Se Technologies, Inc.

Opinion:
Motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions for writs of certiorari out of time denied.