Case: Sands et al. v. United States; Duncan, Warden v. Henry; King v. Young et al.; Mass et al. v. City of Carlsbad et al.; Bashara v. United States; Searles v. Relic et al.; Williams v. Borg & Warner Automotive Electronics & Mechanical System Corp.; Rodriguez Mendoza v. Scott, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, et al.; Harris v. 7232 Pleasant View Drive; Fanny v. Levy et al.; Rawlins v. Olson et al.; Cazeau, aka LaFleur v. Pennsylvania State Police et al.; Hummer v. United States; Wardlaw v. Burt, Warden; McKenzie v. Weer, Warden; DeGrijze v. Schwartz et al.; Connelly v. Grossman et al.
Abbreviation: Sands v. United States
Decision Date: 1995-03-20
Docket Number: No. 93-9242; No. 94-941; No. 94-1006; No. 94-1018; No. 94-6260; No. 94-6673; No. 94-6825; No. 94-6851; No. 94-6912; No. 94-6916; No. 94-6967; No. 94-7002; No. 94-7036; No. 94-7044; No. 94-7055; No. 94-7066; No. 94-7424
Citation: 514 U.S. 1032
Volume: 514
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Sands et al. v. United States, Duncan, Warden v. Henry, King v. Young et al., Mass et al. v. City of Carlsbad et al., Bashara v. United States, Searles v. Relic et al., Williams v. Borg & Warner Automotive Electronics & Mechanical System Corp., Rodriguez Mendoza v. Scott, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, et al., Harris v. 7232 Pleasant View Drive, Fanny v. Levy et al., Rawlins v. Olson et al., Cazeau, aka LaFleur v. Pennsylvania State Police et al., Hummer v. United States, Wardlaw v. Burt, Warden, McKenzie v. Weer, Warden, DeGrijze v. Schwartz et al., Connelly v. Grossman et al.,
Judges: 
Pages: 1032–1033

Head Matter:
No. 93-9242.
No. 94-941.
No. 94-1006.
Sands et al. v. United States, Duncan, Warden v. Henry, King v. Young et al., Mass et al. v. City of Carlsbad et al., Bashara v. United States, Searles v. Relic et al., Williams v. Borg & Warner Automotive Electronics & Mechanical System Corp., Rodriguez Mendoza v. Scott, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, et al., Harris v. 7232 Pleasant View Drive, Fanny v. Levy et al., Rawlins v. Olson et al., Cazeau, aka LaFleur v. Pennsylvania State Police et al., Hummer v. United States, Wardlaw v. Burt, Warden, McKenzie v. Weer, Warden, DeGrijze v. Schwartz et al., Connelly v. Grossman et al.,

Opinion:
513 U. S. 838;
513 U. S. 364;
513 U. S. 1127;
No. 94-1018.
No. 94-6260.
No. 94-6673.
No. 94-6825.
No. 94-6851.
No. 94-6912.
No. 94-6916.
No. 94-6967.
No. 94-7002.
No. 94-7036.
No. 94-7044.
No. 94-7055.
No. 94-7066.
No. 94-7424.
513 U. S. 1128;
513 U. S. 1115;
513 U. S. 1128;
513 U. S. 1093;
513 U. S. 1094;
513 U. S. 1129;
513 U. S. 1129;
513 U. S. 1130;
513 U. S. 1117;
513 U. S. 1100;
513 U. S. 1131;
513 U. S. 1118;
513 U. S. 1131; and
513 U. S. 1171. Petitions for rehearing denied.