Case: Gehrig, Hoban and Co., Inc. v. United States
Abbreviation: Gehrig, Hoban & Co. v. United States
Decision Date: 1962-06-25
Docket Number: Reap. Dec. 10277; Entry No. 110940
Citation: 49 Cust. Ct. 337
Volume: 49
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Gehrig, Hoban and Co., Inc. v. United States
Judges: 
Pages: 337–338

Head Matter:
(Reap. Dec. 10277)
Entry No. 110940.
Gehrig, Hoban and Co., Inc. v. United States
(Decided June 25, 1962)
Says, Busby and Rimkin for the plaintiff.
J oseph D. Guilfoyle, Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Opinion:
Oliver, Chief Judge:
The above-enumerated appeal for reap-praisement has been submitted for decision on stipulation of counsel for the parties, on the basis of which I find that cost of production, as defined in section 402a(f), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the values of the perfumes involved and that such values are the appraised unit values, less 2.041 per centum, plus the cost of packing at $5 per case.
Judgment will issue accordingly.