Case: Mego Corp. v. United States
Abbreviation: Mego Corp. v. United States
Decision Date: 1966-10-19
Docket Number: C.D. 2792
Citation: 57 Cust. Ct. 295
Volume: 57
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Mego Corp. v. United States
Judges: Before Oliver, Nichols, and Watson, Judges
Pages: 295–295

Head Matter:
(C.D. 2792)
Mego Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court, First Division
(Decided October 19, 1966)
Plaintiff not represented by counsel.
J. WilUam DooUttle, Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
Before Oliver, Nichols, and Watson, Judges

Opinion:
Nichols, Judge:
When this case was called for trial, there was no appearance on behalf of the plaintiff, and defendant moved to dismiss the protest for lack of prosecution.
It appearing from the official papers that the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it is dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
Judgment will be rendered accordingly.