Case: Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. et al. v. United States et al.
Abbreviation: Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. United States
Decision Date: 1951-10-15
Docket Number: No. 289
Citation: 342 U.S. 845
Volume: 342
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. et al. v. United States et al.
Judges: Mr. Justice Minton took no part in the consideration or decision of. this case.
Pages: 845–845

Head Matter:
No. 289.
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. et al. v. United States et al.
Harry E. Boe, Frank W. Sullivan, Warren H. ■ Wagner and Eldon Martin for appellants..
Solicitor General Perlman and Daniel W. Knowlton for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. United States v. American Sheet & Tin Plate Co., 301 U. S. 402; United States v. United States Smelting Co., 339 U. S. 186.
Mr. Justice Minton took no part in the consideration or decision of. this case.