Case: Laura HICKEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IRVING INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants-Appellees
Abbreviation: Hickey v. Irving Independent School District
Decision Date: 1993-03-15
Docket Number: No. 91-7350
Citation: 986 F.2d 916
Volume: 986
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Laura HICKEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IRVING INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
Pages: 916–916

Head Matter:
Laura HICKEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IRVING INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-7350.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 15, 1993.
Laura Hickey, pro se.
Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
BY THE COURT:
IT IS ORDERED that the motion of appellees to recall the Court's mandate, 976 F.2d 980 (1992), vacate its opinion and uphold the trial court's judgment dismissing this case is DENIED. We, however, express no opinion on appellees' contention that appellant failed to exhaust her administrative remedies under 20 U.S.C. § 1400, et seq., the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ("IDEA"). As appellees correctly point out, they were not served with the complaint and were not made parties below.
Accordingly, the district court, on remand, may reconsider its 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) dismissal not only in light of the timeliness of Hickey's complaint, but also examine whether Hickey exhausted her administrative remedies under IDEA. See 20 U.S.C. § 1415(f).