Case: United States v. Bloom; United States v. Edens et al., Trustees; United States v. General Engineering & Manufacturing Co.
Abbreviation: United States v. Bloom
Decision Date: 1952-01-14
Docket Number: No. 100; No. 299; No. 300
Citation: 342 U.S. 912
Volume: 342
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: United States v. Bloom. United States v. Edens et al., Trustees. United States v. General Engineering & Manufacturing Co.
Judges: 
Pages: 912–912

Head Matter:
No. 100.
No. 299.
No. 300.
United States v. Bloom. United States v. Edens et al., Trustees. United States v. General Engineering & Manufacturing Co.
Argued January 10, 1952.
Decided January 14, 1952.
I. Henry Kutz argued the, cause in No. 100, and John F. Davis argued the causes in Nos. 299 and 300, for the United States. With them on the briefs were Solicitor General Perlmans and Acting Assistant Attorney General Slack. Helen Goodner was also with them on the brief in No. 100. Henry Hammer argued the cause arid filed a brief for respondents in No. 299. James S. McClellan argued the cause, and George C. Willson filed a brief, for respondent in No. 300. Irwin Geiger submitted on brief for respondent in No. 100.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
The judgments are affirmed. City of New York v. Saper, 336 U. S. 328.