Case: Daniel G. ROSS, Appellant, v. James B. PEAKE, M.D., Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Appellee
Abbreviation: Ross v. Peake
Decision Date: 2008-01-08
Docket Number: No. 05-2286
Citation: 21 Vet. App. 534
Volume: 21
Reporter: West's Veterans Appeals Reporter
Court: United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Daniel G. ROSS, Appellant, v. James B. PEAKE, M.D., Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Appellee.
Judges: Before GREENE, Chief Judge, and KASOLD, HAGEL, MOORMAN, LANCE, DAVIS, and SCHOELEN, Judges.
Pages: 534–537

Head Matter:
Daniel G. ROSS, Appellant, v. James B. PEAKE, M.D., Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Appellee.
No. 05-2286.
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.
Jan. 8, 2008.
Before GREENE, Chief Judge, and KASOLD, HAGEL, MOORMAN, LANCE, DAVIS, and SCHOELEN, Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
On January 2, 2008, the Court issued a panel decision in the above-captioned appeal, affirming a June 20, 2005, Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) decision. See Ross v. Peake, 21 Vet.App. 528, 2008 WL 36825 (Jan. 2, 2008). Prior to the issuance of Ross, two judges requested full-Court consideration. See Court's Internal Operating Procedures ¶ V(b)(5).
Upon consideration of the foregoing, and there being no majority in favor of the request for full-Court consideration, it is
ORDERED that full-Court consideration is DENIED.