Case: In re Barclay et al.; In re Jarmuth; In re Morales; In re Kingsberry; In re Gardella; In re Biers; In re Sedgwick; In re Acevedo; In re Robbins; In re Townsend; In re Williams; In re Walker; In re Williams; In re Nelson; In re Dye; In re Floret, L. L. C., et al.; In re Gregg; In re Mitchell; In re Broadway; and In re Amaker
Abbreviation: In re Barclay
Decision Date: 2003-10-06
Docket Number: No. 02-1729; No. 02-1816; No. 02-10496; No. 02-10498; No. 02-10542; No. 02-10589; No. 02-10659; No. 02-10841; No. 02-10963; No. 02-10986; No. 02-11021; No. 02-11238; No. 02-11267; No. 02-11271; No. 03-64; No. 03-105; No. 03-5016; No. 03-5121; No. 03-5128; No. 03-5418
Citation: 540 U.S. 809
Volume: 540
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: In re Barclay et al.; In re Jarmuth; In re Morales; In re Kingsberry; In re Gardella; In re Biers; In re Sedgwick; In re Acevedo; In re Robbins; In re Townsend; In re Williams; In re Walker; In re Williams; In re Nelson; In re Dye; In re Floret, L. L. C., et al.; In re Gregg; In re Mitchell; In re Broadway; and In re Amaker.
Judges: 
Pages: 809–810

Head Matter:
No. 02-1729.
No. 02-1816.
No. 02-10496.
No. 02-10498.
No. 02-10542.
No. 02-10589.
No. 02-10659.
No. 02-10841.
No. 02-10963.
No. 02-10986.
In re Barclay et al.; In re Jarmuth; In re Morales; In re Kingsberry; In re Gardella; In re Biers; In re Sedgwick; In re Acevedo; In re Robbins; In re Townsend; In re Williams; In re Walker; In re Williams; In re Nelson; In re Dye; In re Floret, L. L. C., et al.; In re Gregg; In re Mitchell; In re Broadway; and In re Amaker.
No. 02-11021.
No. 02-11238.
No. 02-11267.
No. 02-11271.
No. 03-64.
No. 03-105.
No. 03-5016.
No. 03-5121.
No. 03-5128.
No. 03-5418.

Opinion:
Petitions for writs of mandamus denied.