Case: In re INGALLS, Petitioner
Abbreviation: In re Ingalls
Decision Date: 1891-03-23
Docket Number: 
Citation: 139 U.S. 548
Volume: 139
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: In re INGALLS, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Pages: 548–549

Head Matter:
In re INGALLS, Petitioner.
ORIGINAL.
No number.
Submitted March 16, 1891.
Decided March 23, 1891.
No application to this court for a writ of error will he entertained, except when a Justice of this Court, upon consideration of the record, has deemed it proper, under special circumstances, to endorse thereon a request that counsel be permitted to proceed in that way.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Mr. de Lagnel Berier for petitioners submitted on his brief. Mr. Edward D. McCarthy also filed a brief for petitioners.
Mr. George W. Van Slyck for Elizabeth A. L. Hyatt, opposing.

Opinion:
Per Curíam.
This is an application for a writ of error made to the court in session, under the apprehension on the part of counsel that it was directed to be so presented. We have, therefore, considered it, with the result that the writ must be denied. Dale Tile Mfg. Co. v. Hyatt, 125 U. S. 46; Walter A. Wood Co. v. Skinner, ante, 293.
We wish it to be distinctly .understood that in future no •such application will be entertained, except when a Justice of this Court, upon consideration of the record, has deemed it proper under special circumstances to endorse thereon a request that counsel be permitted to proceed in that way.
Writ refused.