Case: Wicks v. United States, ante, p. 831; Martin v. Shank et al., ante, p. 833; Young v. Alabama, ante, p. 834; Johns v. Bostwick (three cases), ante, p. 836; In re Phillips et al., ante, p. 814; Montgomery v. Indiana, ante, p. 840; Battle v. Missouri, ante, p. 871; Spencer v. Illinois, ante, p. 841; Faison v. Nesbitt, Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, et al., ante, p. 841; Smith v. Florida, ante, p. 842; Lawrence v. OAO Corp., ante, p. 845; Gracey v. Day et al., ante, p. 880; Martin v. Maryland State Board of Law Examiners et al., ante, p. 804; In re Radvan-Ziemnowicz, ante, p. 814; Johnson v. Irby, ante, p. 862; Nubine v. Texas Board of Corrections et al., ante, p. 863; Nash v. Ervin, ante, p. 897; and Gaunce v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co. et al., ante, p. 804
Abbreviation: Wicks v. United States
Decision Date: 1988-11-07
Docket Number: No. 87-6807; No. 87-7005; No. 87-7033; No. 87-7097; No. 87-7135; No. 87-7188; No. 87-7190; No. 87-7212; No. 87-7227; No. 87-7237; No. 87-7316; No. 88-137; No. 88-5084; No. 88-5140; No. 88-5146; No. 88-5171; No. 88-5313; No. 88-5323
Citation: 488 U.S. 950
Volume: 488
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Wicks v. United States, ante, p. 831; Martin v. Shank et al., ante, p. 833; Young v. Alabama, ante, p. 834; Johns v. Bostwick (three cases), ante, p. 836; In re Phillips et al., ante, p. 814; Montgomery v. Indiana, ante, p. 840; Battle v. Missouri, ante, p. 871; Spencer v. Illinois, ante, p. 841; Faison v. Nesbitt, Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, et al., ante, p. 841; Smith v. Florida, ante, p. 842; Lawrence v. OAO Corp., ante, p. 845; Gracey v. Day et al., ante, p. 880; Martin v. Maryland State Board of Law Examiners et al., ante, p. 804; In re Radvan-Ziemnowicz, ante, p. 814; Johnson v. Irby, ante, p. 862; Nubine v. Texas Board of Corrections et al., ante, p. 863; Nash v. Ervin, ante, p. 897; and Gaunce v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co. et al., ante, p. 804.
Judges: 
Pages: 950–950

Head Matter:
No. 87-6807.
No. 87-7005.
No. 87-7033.
No. 87-7097.
No. 87-7135.
No. 87-7188.
No. 87-7190.
No. 87-7212.
No. 87-7227.
No. 87-7237.
No. 87-7316.
No. 88-137.
No. 88-5084.
No. 88-5140.
No. 88-5146.
No. 88-5171.
No. 88-5313.
No. 88-5323.
Wicks v. United States, ante, p. 831; Martin v. Shank et al., ante, p. 833; Young v. Alabama, ante, p. 834; Johns v. Bostwick (three cases), ante, p. 836; In re Phillips et al., ante, p. 814; Montgomery v. Indiana, ante, p. 840; Battle v. Missouri, ante, p. 871; Spencer v. Illinois, ante, p. 841; Faison v. Nesbitt, Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, et al., ante, p. 841; Smith v. Florida, ante, p. 842; Lawrence v. OAO Corp., ante, p. 845; Gracey v. Day et al., ante, p. 880; Martin v. Maryland State Board of Law Examiners et al., ante, p. 804; In re Radvan-Ziemnowicz, ante, p. 814; Johnson v. Irby, ante, p. 862; Nubine v. Texas Board of Corrections et al., ante, p. 863; Nash v. Ervin, ante, p. 897; and Gaunce v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co. et al., ante, p. 804.

Opinion:
Petitions for rehearing denied.