Case: SCHNEBLE et al. v. FLORIDA
Abbreviation: Schneble v. Florida
Decision Date: 1968-06-10
Docket Number: No. 1070
Citation: 392 U.S. 298
Volume: 392
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: SCHNEBLE et al. v. FLORIDA.
Judges: Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968).
Pages: 298–298

Head Matter:
SCHNEBLE et al. v. FLORIDA.
No. 1070,
Misc.
Decided June 10, 1968.
Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and George R. Georgieff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.
Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White's dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968).