Case: Billy PROFFITT, Petitioner v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Respondent
Abbreviation: Proffitt v. Federal Deposit Insurance
Decision Date: 2000-04-28
Docket Number: No. 98-1534
Citation: 341 U.S. App. D.C. 97
Volume: 341
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Parties: Billy PROFFITT, Petitioner v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Respondent
Judges: Before: EDWARDS, Chief Judge, SILBERMAN, WILLIAMS, GINSBURG, SENTELLE, HENDERSON, RANDOLPH, ROGERS, TATEL, and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.
Pages: 97–98

Head Matter:
208 F.3d 1066
Billy PROFFITT, Petitioner v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Respondent
No. 98-1534.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
April 28, 2000.
Before: EDWARDS, Chief Judge, SILBERMAN, WILLIAMS, GINSBURG, SENTELLE, HENDERSON, RANDOLPH, ROGERS, TATEL, and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.
Circuit Judges SILBERMAN, STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, and SENTELLE would grant the petition for rehearing en banc.
A statement of Circuit Judge SILBERMAN dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, in which Circuit Judges STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS and SENTELLE join, is attached.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner's Petition for Rehearing En Banc and the response thereto have been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that the petition be denied.