Case: Westinghouse Electric Corp. et al. v. County of Los Angeles et al.
Abbreviation: Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. County of Los Angeles
Decision Date: 1975-06-16
Docket Number: No. 74-1209
Citation: 422 U.S. 1001
Volume: 422
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Westinghouse Electric Corp. et al. v. County of Los Angeles et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 1001–1001

Head Matter:
June 16, 1975
Appeals Dismissed
No. 74-1209.
Westinghouse Electric Corp. et al. v. County of Los Angeles et al.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of cases in which orders hereinafter reported were announced on this date, with the exception of the following:
No. 69-1, Augenblick v. United States, infra, p. 1007; No. 73-1288, Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba, infra, p. 1005; No. 74-294, Watson v. Kenlick Coal Co., Inc., infra, p. 1012; No. 74-883, Federal Power Commission v. Moss, infra, p. 1006; No. 74-1045, Moss v. Federal Power Commission, infra, p. 1020; No. 74-1063, Carter v. United States, infra, p. 1020; No. 74-1094, Womack v. United States, infra, p. 1022; No. 74-1096, Conk v. Clegg, infra, p. 1007; No. 74-1103, Estelle v. Johnson, infra, p. 1024; No. 74-1115, Miller v. United States, infra, p. 1024; No. 74-1144, Lawrence v. South Carolina, infra, p. 1025; No. 74-1161, Clements v. Faraca, infra, p. 1006; No. 74-1180, Pinell v. California, infra, p. 1007; No. 74-1192, Karp v. United States, infra, p. 1007; No. 74-1207, American Chemical Corp. v. County of Los Angeles, infra, p. 1007; No. 74-1209, Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. County of Los Angeles, infra, this page; No. 74-1228, Miller v. United States, infra, p. 1025; No. 74-1276, Cotten v. Schlesinger, infra, p. 1027; No. 74-1327, Democratic Executive Committee of Columbiana County, infra, p. 1002; No. 74-1342, Teschner v. Chicago Title & Trust Co., infra, p. 1002; No. 74-1345, U. S. Merchandise Mart, Inc. v. D&H Distributing Co., infra, p. 1007; No. 74-1362, Waddell v. Fleming, infra, p. 1007; No. 74-1365, Joyner v. North Carolina, infra, p. 1002; No. 74-1379, Poulson v. Walsh-Groves, infra, p. 1002; No. 74-1460, Augenblick v. United States, infra, p. 1007; and No. 74-6195, Waugh v. Gray, infra, p. 1027.

Opinion:
Appeal from Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist., dismissed for want of substantial federal question. Reported below: 42 Cal. App. 3d 32, 116 Cal. Rptr. 742.