Case: Mary E. Kavanaugh, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent
Abbreviation: Kavanaugh v. Commissioner
Decision Date: 1927-02-24
Docket Number: Docket No. 9781
Citation: 6 B.T.A. 298
Volume: 6
Reporter: Reports of the United States Board of Tax Appeals
Court: United States Board of Tax Appeals
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Mary E. Kavanaugh, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.
Judges: 
Pages: 298–298

Head Matter:
Mary E. Kavanaugh, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.
Docket No. 9781.
Promulgated February 24, 1927.
Mary E. Kavanaugh pro se.
W. F. Gibbs, Esq., for the respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION.
Littleton:
The facts in this proceeding are stipulated and the only issue presented is whether the liquidating dividend in excess of the cost of the 17 shares of stock of the Kavanaugh-Farrell Co., which was dissolved in 1920, is subject to the normal tax. The Commissioner held that it was and the petitioner claims that this was an error. The Board has heretofore held that under the provisions of the Revenue Act of 1918 a liquidating dividend is subject to both the normal and surtax. See Appeal of John K. Greenwood, 1 B. T. A. 291, and Appeal of J. E. Chandler, 3 B. T. A. 146.
Judgment will be entered for the Commissioner.