Case: Temple v. United States; Furtak v. McMann, Warden; Alexander v. Perini, Correctional Superintendent, et al.; Ryland v. Green, Correctional Superintendent; Metcalf v. Pate, Warden; Fossum v. Porter, Sheriff; Roberts v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent, et al.; Johnson v. Maxwell, Warden; Hurst et al. v. Harris, Judge, et al.; Tompa v. Peyton, Penitentiary Superintendent; Blanchey v. Porter, Sheriff, et al.; Albertson v. Kropp; Turner v. Nelson, Warden; and DeWitt v. California et al.
Abbreviation: Temple v. United States
Decision Date: 1968-03-04
Docket Number: No. 939; No. 946; No. 954; No. 968; No. 970; No. 988; No. 1002; No. 1006; No. 1013; No. 1024; No. 1109; No. 1120; No. 1125; No. 1136
Citation: 390 U.S. 938
Volume: 390
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Temple v. United States; Furtak v. McMann, Warden; Alexander v. Perini, Correctional Superintendent, et al.; Ryland v. Green, Correctional Superintendent; Metcalf v. Pate, Warden; Fossum v. Porter, Sheriff; Roberts v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent, et al.; Johnson v. Maxwell, Warden; Hurst et al. v. Harris, Judge, et al.; Tompa v. Peyton, Penitentiary Superintendent; Blanchey v. Porter, Sheriff, et al.; Albertson v. Kropp; Turner v. Nelson, Warden; and DeWitt v. California et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 938–938

Head Matter:
No. 939,
No. 946,
No. 954,
No. 968,
No. 970,
No. 988,
No. 1002,
No. 1006,
No. 1013,
No. 1024,
No. 1109,
No. 1120,
No. 1125,
No. 1136,
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Temple v. United States; Furtak v. McMann, Warden; Alexander v. Perini, Correctional Superintendent, et al.; Ryland v. Green, Correctional Superintendent; Metcalf v. Pate, Warden; Fossum v. Porter, Sheriff; Roberts v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent, et al.; Johnson v. Maxwell, Warden; Hurst et al. v. Harris, Judge, et al.; Tompa v. Peyton, Penitentiary Superintendent; Blanchey v. Porter, Sheriff, et al.; Albertson v. Kropp; Turner v. Nelson, Warden; and DeWitt v. California et al.

Opinion:
Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.