Case: S & E CONTRACTORS, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES
Abbreviation: S & E Contractors, Inc. v. United States
Decision Date: 1971-05-17
Docket Number: Court of Claims Case No. 104-67
Citation: 198 Ct. Cl. 1007
Volume: 198
Reporter: United States Court of Claims Reports
Court: United States Court of Claims
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: S & E CONTRACTORS, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES
Judges: 
Pages: 1007–1008

Head Matter:
S & E CONTRACTORS, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES
Court of Claims Case No. 104-67
[193 Ct. Cl. 335, 433 F. 2d 1373; 402 U.S. 971; 406 U.S. 1]

Opinion:
On writ of certiorari to review the decision of the United States Court of Claims (193 Ct. Cl. 335, 433 F. 2d 1373), holding (1) that a refusal by defendant (the Atomic Energy Commission) to pay a Board award is not a breach of the disputes clause of the contract in issue if the involved award is not supported by substantia;! evidence or otherwise is not entitled to finality under the Wunderlich Act, and (2) that the Government has the right to the same extent as the contractor to seek judicial review of an unfavorable administrative decision on a contract claim, the Supreme Court granted certiorari on May 17, 1971 (402 U.S. 971), and on April 24, 1972 (406 U.S. 1), in reversing the Court of Claims, held that the Atomic Energy Commission had exclusive administrative authority under the disputes clause procedure to resolve the dispute in issue, and neither the contract between the parties nor the Wunderlich Act permitted still further administrative review by the General Accounting Office. The Supreme Court also held that the Wunderlich Act does not confer upon the Department of Justice the right to appeal from a decision of an administrative agency, nor is this a case involving a contractor's fraud, concerning which the Department has broad powers to act under several statutory provisions.