Case: Hurley et al. v. United States; Parrott v. United States et al.; Gotzl v. Cantrell (Gotzl); Phelps v. Rison, Warden, et al.; Lum v. City and County of Honolulu, In re Polyak, Jones v. Unthank et al.; Syrovatka v. California; Miller v. McRae et al.; Carlisle v. Gradick et al.; Brown v. Borgert, Warden; Sindram v. Saxton et al.; Johnson v. Spelling-Goldberg Productions; Venters v. Bashelor et al.; Attwell v. Clark et al.; Smith v. Alameda County Sheriff Department et al.; Wright v. Illinois; Smith v. Citizens Bank of Maryland; Rankel v. Tracy et al.; Gyore v. O'Connell et al.; Sindram v. Lorenzo et al.; Lewis v. Russe et al.; Kenealy v. Fruehauf Corp. et al.; Howell v. Delaware; Packer v. Garrett, Secretary of the Navy, et al.; Stout v. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services; Henderson v. Singletary, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections; Williamson v. United States; Lustgarden v. Gunter, Executive Director, Department of Corrections, et al.; Atanasoff v. Arizona; Kenh Quang Pham v. Secretary of Health and Human Services; Betka v. Oregon et al.; Anderson v. Department of the Air Force; Evans v. United States; Mulville v. Norwest Bank Des Moines, NA, et al.; Moseanko v. Friedt et al.; Brown v. United States; Mitan v. United States; Martin v. Jones, Warden, et al.; Rodriguez v. Blodgett, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary, et al.; Arnette v. Department of Health and Human Services; Estes v. McCotter et al.; Lane v. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division; Johnston v. United States; Taylor v. City of New Albany et al.
Abbreviation: Hurley v. United States
Decision Date: 1993-02-22
Docket Number: No. 91-1817; No. 91-8654; No. 92-299; No. 92-624; No. 92-674; No. 92-867; No. 92-5363; No. 92-5529; No. 92-5562; No. 92-5833; No. 92-5879; No. 92-5958; No. 92-5962; No. 92-6011; No. 92-6017; No. 92-6020; No. 92-6022; No. 92-6023; No. 92-6041; No. 92-6076; No. 92-6099; No. 92-6121; No. 92-6125; No. 92-6126; No. 92-6139; No. 92-6155; No. 92-6161; No. 92-6165; No. 92-6216; No. 92-6218; No. 92-6234; No. 92-6242; No. 92-6244; No. 92-6300; No. 92-6317; No. 92-6328; No. 92-6336; No. 92-6420; No. 92-6505; No. 92-6542; No. 92-6545; No. 92-6557; No. 92-6608; No. 92-6686; No. 92-6696
Citation: 507 U.S. 954
Volume: 507
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Hurley et al. v. United States, Parrott v. United States et al., Gotzl v. Cantrell (Gotzl), Phelps v. Rison, Warden, et al., Lum v. City and County of Honolulu, In re Polyak, Jones v. Unthank et al., Syrovatka v. California, Miller v. McRae et al., Carlisle v. Gradick et al., Brown v. Borgert, Warden, Sindram v. Saxton et al., Johnson v. Spelling-Goldberg Productions, Venters v. Bashelor et al., Attwell v. Clark et al., Smith v. Alameda County Sheriff Department et al., Wright v. Illinois, Smith v. Citizens Bank of Maryland, Rankel v. Tracy et al., Gyore v. O’Connell et al., Sindram v. Lorenzo et al., Lewis v. Russe et al., Kenealy v. Fruehauf Corp. et al., Howell v. Delaware, Packer v. Garrett, Secretary of the Navy, et al., Stout v. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Henderson v. Singletary, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Williamson v. United States, Lustgarden v. Gunter, Executive Director, Department of Corrections, et al., Atanasoff v. Arizona, Kenh Quang Pham v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Betka v. Oregon et al., Anderson v. Department of the Air Force, Evans v. United States, Mulville v. Norwest Bank Des Moines, NA, et al., Moseanko v. Friedt et al., Brown v. United States, Mitan v. United States, Martin v. Jones, Warden, et al., Rodriguez v. Blodgett, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary, et al., Arnette v. Department of Health and Human Services, Estes v. McCotter et al., Lane v. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Johnston v. United States, Taylor v. City of New Albany et al.,
Judges: 
Pages: 954–956

Head Matter:
No. 91-1817.
No. 91-8654.
No. 92-299.
No. 92-624.
No. 92-674.
No. 92-867.
No. 92-5363.
No. 92-5529.
No. 92-5562.
No. 92-5833.
No. 92-5879.
No. 92-5958.
No. 92-5962.
Hurley et al. v. United States, Parrott v. United States et al., Gotzl v. Cantrell (Gotzl), Phelps v. Rison, Warden, et al., Lum v. City and County of Honolulu, In re Polyak, Jones v. Unthank et al., Syrovatka v. California, Miller v. McRae et al., Carlisle v. Gradick et al., Brown v. Borgert, Warden, Sindram v. Saxton et al., Johnson v. Spelling-Goldberg Productions, Venters v. Bashelor et al., Attwell v. Clark et al., Smith v. Alameda County Sheriff Department et al., Wright v. Illinois, Smith v. Citizens Bank of Maryland, Rankel v. Tracy et al., Gyore v. O’Connell et al., Sindram v. Lorenzo et al., Lewis v. Russe et al., Kenealy v. Fruehauf Corp. et al., Howell v. Delaware, Packer v. Garrett, Secretary of the Navy, et al., Stout v. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Henderson v. Singletary, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Williamson v. United States, Lustgarden v. Gunter, Executive Director, Department of Corrections, et al., Atanasoff v. Arizona, Kenh Quang Pham v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Betka v. Oregon et al., Anderson v. Department of the Air Force, Evans v. United States, Mulville v. Norwest Bank Des Moines, NA, et al., Moseanko v. Friedt et al., Brown v. United States, Mitan v. United States, Martin v. Jones, Warden, et al., Rodriguez v. Blodgett, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary, et al., Arnette v. Department of Health and Human Services, Estes v. McCotter et al., Lane v. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Johnston v. United States, Taylor v. City of New Albany et al.,

Opinion:
506 U. S. 817;
506 U. S. 854;
506 U. S. 917;
506 U. S. 976;
506 U. S. 1022;
506 U. S. 1047;
506 U. S. 893;
506 U. S. 1002;
506 U. S. 958;
506 U. S. 961;
506 U. S. 977;
506 U. S. 988;
506 U. S. 978;
No. 92-6011.
No. 92-6017.
No. 92-6020.
No. 92-6022.
No. 92-6023.
No. 92-6041.
No. 92-6076.
No. 92-6099.
No. 92-6121.
No. 92-6125.
No. 92-6126.
No. 92-6139.
No. 92-6155.
No. 92-6161.
No. 92-6165.
No. 92-6216.
No. 92-6218.
No. 92-6234.
No. 92-6242.
No. 92-6244.
No. 92-6300.
No. 92-6317.
No. 92-6328.
No. 92-6336.
No. 92-6420.
No. 92-6505.
No. 92-6542.
No. 92-6545.
506 U. S. 1004;
506 U. S. 1004;
506 U. S. 988;
506 U. S. 1004;
506 U. S. 1004;
506 U. S. 978;
506 U. S. 1005;
506 U. S. 1006;
506 U. S. 1006;
506 U. S. 1006;
506 U. S. 1006;
506 U. S. 1036;
506 U. S. 1024;
506 U. S. 1007;
506 U. S. 1007;
506 U. S. 1008;
506 U. S. 1008;
506 U. S. 1024;
506 U. S. 1024;
506 U. S. 1057;
506 U. S. 991;
506 U. S. 1025;
506 U. S. 1025;
506 U. S. 1058;
506 U. S. 1059;
506 U. S. 1061;
506 U. S. 1062;
506 U. S. 1063;
No. 92-6557.
No. 92-6608.
No. 92-6686.
No. 92-6696.
506 U. S. 1063;
506 U. S. 1065;
506 U. S. 1068; and
506 U. S. 1085. Petitions for rehearing denied.