Case: Vey v. Clinton, President of the United States, et al.; Ruff v. Smith, Warden; Welsand v. United States; Arteaga v. California; Arteaga v. California; Miles v. LaSalle Financial Services, Inc., et al.; Bell v. Flores et al.; Tung v. California; Dehoney v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al.; Caterina et al. v. Blakely Borough et al.; Milden et ux. v. Joseph, Trustee; Thomas v. Baxter; Gill et al. v. Rhode Island et al.; Cerwinski v. Insurance Services Office, Inc.; McKellip v. Sorrell, Anderson, Lehrman, Wanner & Thomas et al.; Thomas v. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division; Taylor v. Nelson et al.; McSmith v. Tavares; Taylor v. Box, Mayor of the City of Rockford, Illinois, et al.; Sarga v. United States; Johari v. Johari; Crawford v. Moran; Watson v. United States Postal Service et al.; Love v. Ohio; Enand v. Montgomery County, Maryland, et al.; Clewell et ux. v. Upjohn Co.; Hayes v. Correction Management Affiliates, Inc.; Vasquez v. Bexar County Adult Detention Center; Gibson v. West, Secretary of the Army; Ertelt v. North Dakota; Johnson v. United States; Williams v. Chrysler Corp.; Andrews v. Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services; Walker v. Dragovich, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Mahanoy, et al.; Wainwright v. Booz, Allen & Hamilton, Inc., In re Woods, Fabian v. City of Miami; Wiedmer v. United States
Abbreviation: Vey v. Clinton
Decision Date: 1998-01-12
Docket Number: No. 96-8796; No. 96-8873; No. 96-9242; No. 96-9309; No. 96-9328; No. 96-9452; No. 96-9461; No. 96-9567; No. 97-80; No. 97-102; No. 97-334; No. 97-442; No. 97-473; No. 97-509; No. 97-5024; No. 97-5138; No. 97-5483; No. 97-5519; No. 97-5574; No. 97-5643; No. 97-5887; No. 97-5888; No. 97-5898; No. 97-5908; No. 97-5919; No. 97-5927; No. 97-5944; No. 97-5955; No. 97-5976; No. 97-5980; No. 97-5994; No. 97-6067; No. 97-6073; No. 97-6109; No. 97-6215; No. 97-6284; No. 97-6297; No. 97-6309
Citation: 522 U.S. 1069
Volume: 522
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Vey v. Clinton, President of the United States, et al., Ruff v. Smith, Warden, Welsand v. United States, Arteaga v. California, Arteaga v. California, Miles v. LaSalle Financial Services, Inc., et al., Bell v. Flores et al., Tung v. California, Dehoney v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al., Caterina et al. v. Blakely Borough et al., Milden et ux. v. Joseph, Trustee, Thomas v. Baxter, Gill et al. v. Rhode Island et al., Cerwinski v. Insurance Services Office, Inc., McKellip v. Sorrell, Anderson, Lehrman, Wanner & Thomas et al., Thomas v. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Taylor v. Nelson et al., McSmith v. Tavares, Taylor v. Box, Mayor of the City of Rockford, Illinois, et al., Sarga v. United States, Johari v. Johari, Crawford v. Moran, Watson v. United States Postal Service et al., Love v. Ohio, Enand v. Montgomery County, Maryland, et al., Clewell et ux. v. Upjohn Co., Hayes v. Correction Management Affiliates, Inc., Vasquez v. Bexar County Adult Detention Center, Gibson v. West, Secretary of the Army, Ertelt v. North Dakota, Johnson v. United States, Williams v. Chrysler Corp., Andrews v. Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services, Walker v. Dragovich, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Mahanoy, et al., Wainwright v. Booz, Allen & Hamilton, Inc., In re Woods, Fabian v. City of Miami, Wiedmer v. United States,
Judges: 
Pages: 1069–1070

Head Matter:
No. 96-8796.
No. 96-8873.
No. 96-9242.
No. 96-9309.
No. 96-9328.
No. 96-9452.
No. 96-9461.
No. 96-9567.
No. 97-80.
No. 97-102.
No. 97-334.
No. 97-442.
No. 97-473.
Vey v. Clinton, President of the United States, et al., Ruff v. Smith, Warden, Welsand v. United States, Arteaga v. California, Arteaga v. California, Miles v. LaSalle Financial Services, Inc., et al., Bell v. Flores et al., Tung v. California, Dehoney v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al., Caterina et al. v. Blakely Borough et al., Milden et ux. v. Joseph, Trustee, Thomas v. Baxter, Gill et al. v. Rhode Island et al., Cerwinski v. Insurance Services Office, Inc., McKellip v. Sorrell, Anderson, Lehrman, Wanner & Thomas et al., Thomas v. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Taylor v. Nelson et al., McSmith v. Tavares, Taylor v. Box, Mayor of the City of Rockford, Illinois, et al., Sarga v. United States, Johari v. Johari, Crawford v. Moran, Watson v. United States Postal Service et al., Love v. Ohio, Enand v. Montgomery County, Maryland, et al., Clewell et ux. v. Upjohn Co., Hayes v. Correction Management Affiliates, Inc., Vasquez v. Bexar County Adult Detention Center, Gibson v. West, Secretary of the Army, Ertelt v. North Dakota, Johnson v. United States, Williams v. Chrysler Corp., Andrews v. Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services, Walker v. Dragovich, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Mahanoy, et al., Wainwright v. Booz, Allen & Hamilton, Inc., In re Woods, Fabian v. City of Miami, Wiedmer v. United States,

Opinion:
520 U. S. 937;
ante, p. 826;
ante, p. 837;
ante, p. 841;
ante, p. 842;
ante, p. 849;
ante, p. 850;
ante, p. 856;
ante, p. 861;
ante, p. 863;
ante, p. 949;
ante, p. 968;
ante, p. 934;
No. 97-509.
No. 97-5024.
No. 97-5138.
No. 97-5483.
No. 97-5519.
No. 97-5574.
No. 97-5643.
No. 97-5887.
No. 97-5888.
No. 97-5898.
No. 97-5908.
No. 97-5919.
No. 97-5927.
No. 97-5944.
No. 97-5955.
No. 97-5976.
No. 97-5980.
No. 97-5994.
No. 97-6067.
No. 97-6073.
No. 97-6109.
No. 97-6215.
No. 97-6284.
No. 97-6297.
No. 97-6309.
ante, p. 952;
ante, p. 871;
ante, p. 877;
ante, p. 896;
ante, p. 919;
ante, p. 919;
ante, p. 984;
ante, p. 969;
ante, p. 969;
ante, p. 970;
ante, p. 957;
ante, p. 970;
ante, p. 970;
ante, p. 957;
ante, p. 971;
ante, p. 938;
ante, p. 971;
ante, p. 972;
ante, p. 958;
ante, p. 959;
ante, p. 986;
ante, p. 973;
ante, p. 947;
ante, p. 1003; and
ante, p. 962. Petitions for rehearing denied.