Case: International Expediters, Inc. v. United States; Bowl-O-Beauty Co. et al. v. United States; Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. v. United States; Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. v. United States; Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. v. United States; Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc., et al. v. United States; Marcus Display Industries, Inc. v. United States; First American Natural Ferns Company, Inc., et al. v. United States; International Expediters, Inc. v. United States
Abbreviation: International Expediters, Inc. v. United States
Decision Date: 1969-04-29
Docket Number: No. P69/130; protests 66/73643-2014, etc. (Chicago); No. P69/131; protests 66/77261-2589, etc. (Chicago); No. P69/132; protests 66/78622-2657, etc. (Chicago); No. P69/133; protests 67/736-2513, etc. (Chicago); No. P69/134; protests 67/3543-2607, etc. (Chicago); No. P69/135; protests 67/40025-3868, etc. (Chicago); No. P69/136; protests 67/53040, etc. (Boston); No. P69/137; protests 67/63812, etc. (Los Angeles); No. P69/138; protests 67/66148-5331, etc. (Chicago)
Citation: 62 Cust. Ct. 1085
Volume: 62
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: International Expediters, Inc. v. United States, Bowl-O-Beauty Co. et al. v. United States, Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. v. United States, Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. v. United States, Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. v. United States, Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc., et al. v. United States, Marcus Display Industries, Inc. v. United States, First American Natural Ferns Company, Inc., et al. v. United States, International Expediters, Inc. v. United States,
Judges: 
Pages: 1085–1086

Head Matter:
Before the First Division,
April 29, 1969
No. P69/130.
protests 66/73643-2014, etc. (Chicago).
No. P69/131.
protests 66/77261-2589, etc. (Chicago).
No. P69/132.
protests 66/78622-2657, etc. (Chicago).
No. P69/133.
protests 67/736-2513, etc. (Chicago).
International Expediters, Inc. v. United States, Bowl-O-Beauty Co. et al. v. United States, Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. v. United States, Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. v. United States, Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. v. United States, Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc., et al. v. United States, Marcus Display Industries, Inc. v. United States, First American Natural Ferns Company, Inc., et al. v. United States, International Expediters, Inc. v. United States,
No. P69/134.
protests 67/3543-2607, etc. (Chicago).
No. P69/135.
protests 67/40025-3868, etc. (Chicago).
No. P69/136.
protests 67/53040, etc. (Boston).
No. P69/137.
protests 67/63812, etc. (Los Angeles).
No. P69/138.
protests 67/66.148-5331, etc. (Chicago).

Opinion:
Watson, J.
In 'accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of artificial flowers, trees, foliage, fruits, vegetables, grasses, or grains, and articles made of the foregoing, in chief value of plastic, assembled in the same manner as the merchandise the subject of Armbee Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 105, C.D. 3278) and Zunold Trading Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 112, C.D. 3279), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.