Case: Granville Stuart, Plaintiff in Error, v. Samuel T. Hauser et al.
Abbreviation: Stuart v. Hauser
Decision Date: 1906-12-03
Docket Number: No. 60
Citation: 203 U.S. 585
Volume: 203
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: Granville Stuart, Plaintiff in Error, v. Samuel T. Hauser et al.
Judges: 
Pages: 585–585

Head Matter:
No. 60.
Granville Stuart, Plaintiff in Error, v. Samuel T. Hauser et al.
Argued November 15, 1906.
Decided December 3, 1906.
Mr. George B. Colby and Mr. Charles W. Dayton for plaintiff in error. Mr. S. M. Stockslager and Mr. W. E. Borah for defendants in error.

Opinion:
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Idaho.
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Swafford v. Templeton, 185 U. S. 487; Butler v. Gage, 138 U. S. 52; Home for Incurables v. City of New York, 187 U. S. 155; Erie Railroad Company v. Purdy, 185 U. S. 148; Ansbro v. United States, 159 U. S. 695; Cornell v. Creen, 163 U. S. 75; Bausman v. Dixon, 173 U. S. 113; Gableman v. Peoria &c. Railway Company, 179 U. S. 335; City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Water Company, 142 U. S. 79; Beals v. Cone, 188 U. S. 184; Speed v. McCarthy, 181 U. S. 269. Case below, 9 Idaho, 53.