Case: In re Hawkins; In re Bullard; In re Tatlis; In re Westine; In re Ford; In re McElhaney; In re Comer; In re Graffia; In re Robinson; In re Vilella; In re Barkett; In re Withers; In re Mua; In re Lopez; In re Stephens; In re Jerry-El; In re Sesario Depineda; In re Kade; In re Ludwig; In re Doolittle; In re Haymes; In re Boyer; In re Harris; In re Gibson; In re Avila-Torres; In re Calleros; In re Boyd; and In re Walton
Abbreviation: In re Hawkins
Decision Date: 2000-10-02
Docket Number: No. 99-2003; No. 99-2087; No. 99-10030; No. 99-10095; No. 99-10152; No. 99-10197; No. 99-10264; No. 00-5003; No. 00-5046; No. 00-5105; No. 00-5156; No. 00-5186; No. 00-5279; No. 00-5449; No. 00-5468; No. 00-5548; No. 00-5566; No. 00-5578; No. 00-5682; No. 00-5784; No. 00-5794; No. 00-5812; No. 00-5839; No. 00-5859; No. 00-5895; No. 00-5902; No. 00-5921; No. 00-5983
Citation: 531 U.S. 809
Volume: 531
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: In re Hawkins; In re Bullard; In re Tatlis; In re Westine; In re Ford; In re McElhaney; In re Comer; In re Graffia; In re Robinson; In re Vilella; In re Barkett; In re Withers; In re Mua; In re Lopez; In re Stephens; In re Jerry-El; In re Sesario Depineda; In re Kade; In re Ludwig; In re Doolittle; In re Haymes; In re Boyer; In re Harris; In re Gibson; In re Avila-Torres; In re Calleros; In re Boyd; and In re Walton.
Judges: 
Pages: 809–809

Head Matter:
No. 99-2003.
No. 99-2087.
No. 99-10030.
No. 99-10095.
No. 99-10152.
No. 99-10197.
No. 99-10264.
No. 00-5003.
No. 00-5046.
No. 00-5105.
No. 00-5156.
No. 00-5186.
No. 00-5279.
No. 00-5449.
No. 00-5468.
No. 00-5548.
No. 00-5566.
No. 00-5578.
No. 00-5682.
No. 00-5784.
No. 00-5794.
No. 00-5812.
No. 00-5839.
No. 00-5859.
No. 00-5895.
No. 00-5902.
No. 00-5921.
No. 00-5983.
In re Hawkins; In re Bullard; In re Tatlis; In re Westine; In re Ford; In re McElhaney; In re Comer; In re Graffia; In re Robinson; In re Vilella; In re Barkett; In re Withers; In re Mua; In re Lopez; In re Stephens; In re Jerry-El; In re Sesario Depineda; In re Kade; In re Ludwig; In re Doolittle; In re Haymes; In re Boyer; In re Harris; In re Gibson; In re Avila-Torres; In re Calleros; In re Boyd; and In re Walton.

Opinion:
Petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.