Case: United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission et al.; Brundage et al. v. United States et al.; City of Auburn v. United States et al.; and Livingston Anti-Merger Committee v. Interstate Commerce Commission et al.
Abbreviation: United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission
Decision Date: 1969-03-10
Docket Number: No. 899; No. 942; No. 999; No. 1003
Citation: 394 U.S. 902
Volume: 394
Reporter: United States Reports
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Parties: United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission et al.; Brundage et al. v. United States et al.; City of Auburn v. United States et al.; and Livingston Anti-Merger Committee v. Interstate Commerce Commission et al.
Judges: Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.
Pages: 902–902

Head Matter:
No. 899.
No. 942.
No. 999.
No. 1003.
United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission et al.; Brundage et al. v. United States et al.; City of Auburn v. United States et al.; and Livingston Anti-Merger Committee v. Interstate Commerce Commission et al.
Robert W. Ginnane, Fritz R. Kahn, and Jerome Nelson for the Interstate Commerce Commission on motion to advance and to dispense with printing appendix.
Hugh B. Cox, Ray Garrett, D. Robert Thomas, Lee B. McTurnan, Anthony Kane, Louis E. Torinus, Earl F. Requa, Frank S. Farrell, Eldon Martin, and Richard J. Flynn for Great Northern Railway Co. et al. on motion to advance.
Louis B. Dailey and Harry Tyson Carter for appellants Brundage et al. in opposition to motions to advance.

Opinion:
Appeals from D. C. D. C. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 393 U. S. 1077.] Motions of certain appellees to advance and to dispense with printing appendix denied.
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.