Government (GR1): First, we would like to comment on the two decisions of Maribor Courts submitted by the applicant before this hearing. These decisions refer to the personal liability of company members for the debts of the struck-off company D. The case of the company D differs from the case of the applicant's company L.E. Both companies were established on the basis of the Yugoslav Undertakings Act. After the adoption of the Slovenian Companies Act in 1993, all existing companies had to be brought into line with the new rules until the end of the following year. So they had to adjust their share capital or to transform into a type of company for which they fulfilled the conditions. While the applicant's company L.E. adjusted itself, the company D did not do so. So the Companies Act determined that in such case, company members became immediately personally liable for the debts of the non-adjusted, but at that time still existing companies. Contrary to that, the applicant became personally liable only when the company L.E. was struck off the court register. Secondly, regarding the value of a share of an individual member, we believe that the value of the share is important only if the member is liable for the debts within the limits of his share. The essence of piercing the corporate whale is, however, precisely that a company member is personally liable with all his assets, so regardless of the value of his share. So it was not the value of the share, but the percentage that was important when considering the applicant's status of an active company member, namely those members whose shareholdings account for at least 10% of the share capital, have the status of minority member, and we believe that they are able to influence the operations of the company. So now we will comment on the submission of the civil initiative. In the proceedings before the Grand Chamber, the civil initiative has presented itself as an initiative that brings together 1,000 entrepreneurs. The following explanation has to be provided in this regard. The civil initiative is an informal association of persons. The contact information on its website lists only one name, that is that of the person who is the president of the civil initiative and who signed the submission file in these proceedings. The civil initiative has no address and no other contact information is to be found on its website. As the civil initiative is an entirely informal association of persons, its representative character may not be verified. Regarding the creditability of its allegations, the memorial filed by the civil initiative is full of false information and allegations. This is regrettable, but not surprising, as the civil initiative has already acted in such a manner in the past. For example, in the proceedings before the Grand Chamber, the applicant submitted the document before, which is a record of the session of two committees of the National Assembly. The session referred to the proposal to abolish the personal liability of active company members for the debts of struck-off companies. At this session, the representative of the civil initiative claimed that the differentiation between active and passive members was invented by a secretary at the Constitutional Court because the judges did not know how to distribute the liability. The government is of the opinion that such statements are completely inappropriate and they show a total lack of respect towards the Constitutional Court. The government proposes that the credibility of the civil initiative be assessed in the light of these and similar inappropriate statements, which are part of the memorials submitted by the civil initiative in these proceedings. About the allegations, first, it is not true that the Financial Operation of Companies Act provided for the striking off of companies without any formal proceedings. The government has already explained in detail how the proceedings were conducted and what legal remedies were available. It is also not true that the debts of the struck-off companies were transferred to company members immediately upon the entry into force of the Act. The transfer of debts is a consequence of striking off and cannot occur before that. It is also not true that the founders who were no longer company members at the time when the company was struck off were also held liable for the debts of the struck-off company. Only those persons who were in fact members at the time of striking off were held liable. In its observations of December 2017, the government cited the case law which confirms that. It is also not true that the Constitutional Court imposed on the legislature the obligation to identify the criteria relevant for determining the status of active company member. Where did the civil initiative find this information? It is also not true that the objection against the enforcement order was not allowed in enforcement proceedings. On the contrary, it is precisely the case of the applicant package that reaffirms the availability of legal remedies to debtor. If the debtor entered the proceedings only after the enforcement order had become final, he nevertheless had the opportunity to object against it. This is evident from the legal opinion of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia from 2003 and the decision of the Constitutional Court from 2005. Moreover, this is also evident from the two decisions of Maribor Courts submitted by the applicants. Several complaints raised by the civil initiative in the present proceedings have already been addressed and rejected in the Constitutional Court decisions. For example, the misinterpretation that Slovenian court decisions could not be enforced abroad and its complaints about the supposed retroactivity of the act. The civil initiative also claims that debtors suffered due to the publication of their names and stories in the media, while at the same time on its website, the civil initiative itself encourages the debtors to present their stories in media. The government believes that no further comments on the role of, on the memorial of the civil initiative are necessary.