yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
It depends on time of day and if you test in the same locations and current congestion and signal level.

If it used to work good, there is no reason that the tweak itself would stop working :p

Did at least work that 1 time? LOL

It must be a certain sysctl tweak that it doesn't like if that's the case.

Ok I think I found it by googling smartreflex voltage "/proc/sys"

Ta Daaa http://dev.openaos.org/wiki/PowerManagementIntegration

insmod /lib/modules/smartreflex.ko
echo 1 > /sys/power/sr_vdd1_autocomp
echo 1 > /sys/power/vdd1_opp_value
echo 10 > /proc/sys/vm/laptop_mode

KAK applies 0 to laptop_mode :p

But I thought it could only be 1 or 0... not 10

Ah okay... http://www.linuxinsight.com/proc_sys_vm_laptop_mode.html

It's a value in seconds - and 0 shuts it off

Well I'm beginning to doubt that it's supercharged and can't check because it's an odex file and I can't get the smali files.

Where did you get it? Do other users have success with it?

You can double check with Auto Memory Manager.

Just deny superuser permission and use it only to confirm OOM Groupings.

Dunno.

What would RC8.2 report?

Ok I found the bug... thanks :)

Check for errors in /data/Log_*

Does it stop at different spots?

Also see if the detailing/vacuuming helps.

Well it's some kind of other issue then.

Where did you save the file?

You can type sh /sdcard/V6* instead.

Just be sure it's in the root of the sdcard.

It's not that common but some users have had FC issues... which is why I put in the world's greatest fix permissions script in the latest versions :D

So try the Fix Emissions and see if that helps.

If you can't do it with SManager, terminal should be able to run it without FCing.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
Bump..

OK I think I got it this time... I made a big error for the launcher in test 7 - I used the wrong variable :o

I also fixed that looping situation when re-supercharging.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] PieceKeepr:
Test 8 seems to work good for me so far. Recognized my launcher and no loop, although I didn't have the loop before. :p
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
Yeah the loop only happened on ICS and when choosing not to rebulletproof apps... so the issue wouldn't have been too widespread but still annoying lol
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] roirraW "edor" ehT:
I forgot about a few more pieces of information, at least once, maybe twice, I had already run SuperCharger (probably 9RC8.2) some of the first few times I was attempting this, and IF that version had the ability to fix permissions on boot as it does now, I had that set to do so.

Also, another Eris user using the same ROM offered a copy of his services.jar file, which worked for him, so I verified the MD5 of those, plus against what that website that provides the patched services.jar and they all matched.

Thanks for the suggestion, though. I'll see what happens when I move the files manually to system/app, if it works then, perhaps Titanium Backup does something funky, since TB itself FC'd even though I hadn't moved it anywhere, after replacing services.jar.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
Well the Fix Emissions was tweaked a bit since U9RC8.2... I think all the RC9 tests have the final permissions adjustment tho.

Oh and please test the resupercharing looping thingie :D
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] DJMartini:
Just flashed and went through the setup. Working BETTER than test 6 and 7!!!

Thank you!
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] dareino:
I loved breakage in the days w/Linux MInt or even Ubuntu...but Linux Debian is so dam stable!...so its great to have something like this which is fun to do. I upgraded to test8 and even added GO launcher!....Running Eclispe 2.1 on a Droid x2....all is great, thanks Zepp!
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] dearde4n:
Test8? got to try it.. 8 numbered always give me luck.. :p

Sent From My Formula GT-5830
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] gregbradley:
Cheers,

Those files were posted in the SE NEO thread and others have reported sucess with it.

When I use stock launcher on ICS those files give me 100% supercharged, its only with SPB that it doesnt work.

I will try again with test8 when I get some time, hopefully that will help.

EDIT

no luck with test 8 on spb launcher
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] Willielf:
It tells me that the awk test failed... But I ran the 8.2 and it passed that one.. So i dont know what happened. Also when I select to continue, it mistakenly said my launcher was my music, which I was running at the time.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
The driving test is never a problem.

How do you like all them 1's for minfrees?

Also be sure to use test 8 on last page or so.

ok compare the outputs of option 1 when using stock launcher as home and spb.

For whatever reason, spb gets an ADJ of 2 if I remember... which doesn't make sense.

Did you double check the groupings with Auto Memory Manager?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] shrike1978:
No home launcher detected in memory using Go Launcher, and I can verify that it is running at the time.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] chw9999:
Go launcher should registers as acore. I attached a snapshot of Badass battery monitor showing its included processes.

Or maybe I misinterpret it ;-)
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] dearde4n:
HIDDEN_APP OOM GROUPING

=======================

9 15600 com.fsck.k9

9 15843 android.process.media

10 15851 com.sec.android.providers.downloads

9 15975 com.noshufou.android.su

CONTENT_PROVIDER OOM GROUPING

=============================

EMPTY_APP OOM GROUPING

======================

content_provider oom grouping and empty_app oom grouping are empty list.. is that normal?

Sent From My Formula GT-5830
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] Willielf:
I was using the test 8,and that was the one that tells me that my awk test failed. I'm running the latest busybox. Should I try to reinstall or something?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] prboy1969:
Running test 8 ;) . Seems really good. Thanks Zepp :)

TEAM MiK

MikROMs Since 3/13/11
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] wraithdu:
I still got one loop when re-supercharging on a desensed gingerbread rom on my TBolt (work phone). It was a clean flash, but obviously still had the files on my sdcard. Last script version I ran was RC8.2, then this RC9 test 8. So it went:

First run -> re-super (said yes) -> re-super (said no) -> driver options -> super minfree (said no) -> main menu
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] KiiKeEp:
The battery calibration method doesn't work on my Xperia Play, when i reboot without battery and plug the battery, it says 49% but in the widget app it says battery dead, and doesn't charge, it stays on 49% at 4183m, anyone tried this with a Li-Poli battery?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] mindyabiznis:
Sorry to change the subject but ive asked this question on the Ray Q&A thread along with another question but get absoluting NOTHING in response...

Can anyone tell me what the best supercharger script is?

Im runnin rayonium GB final with aire kernel and im OC'd at 1.4ghz, since installin supercharger the phone IS smoother and more fluidlike when using it BUT...

When waking the screen and when sliding to unlock most of the time it lags for a couple of seconds which is quite annoying.

Im using setting 8, but ive tried a couple other settings with no difference.

Also how do i select to lock/unlock launcher in memory? ive searched and found NOTHING except "if you rom allows it.."

Any help or a point in the right direction would be greatly appreciated and thanks in advance :D
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
ok so for more testing...

set stock launcher as default and post the output of option 1, the bOOM Stick and your /data/system/packages.xml.

Switch to spb and post the same items again (the packages.xml will change)

Post the bOOM stick output

It's normal for supercharged.

If you weren't supercharged, those apps in the hidden app grouping would be in the Content Provider and Empty Apps groupings but I move them up for better multitasking (won't get killed so much)

If busybox failed the test, then it's either incomplete or has the awk bug where it can't do math. Just use wraithdu's from the OP

Hmmm... so it automatically did resupercharger and you said yes and then it auto runs resupercharger again until you say no?

4183 mV is not bad in that some users can't even charge it that high.

What result do you get if you just use the die-hard battery calibrator to guide you?

Use the one posted on the last page or so.

Does the wake delay occur when unsupercharged?

If you're 100% supercharged, then home isn't locked in memory anyway.

That setting is in CM7 and below but I dunno how common it is in other roms.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] mindyabiznis:
No the wake delay does not occur at all when UNsupercharged - its instant...

im going to try the latest update u posted on the last page and will post back.

Thank you so much for your reply :D
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] wraithdu:
I'm not sure if it's an infinite loop, I said no the second time it went through. But that same phone has an updated ROM AGAIN, so I'll be flashing tomorrow and try it then.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] KiiKeEp:
I used the die-hard battery calibrator on 4190 aprox. is that fine? :D
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] PieceKeepr:
I just had this happen on my GB rom. I had a bootloop for whatever reason so I dirty flashed the rom but no joy so finally I ran fix permissions from recovery and then it booted right up. I then went to resupercharge from the SD card and it went into the loop. I said yes twice and no tbe third time.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] Willielf:
I was able to use the wraithdu installer, and it worked! But for some reason, the ics services installer doesn't work. It always says that it is 50%..

Update: i unsupercharged and did it again... And it worked!! Thanks for all your hard work! My phone is so fast now
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] trailblazerz11:
FYI

I had issues recently with mifree values not setting on scripts that would previously work. Would close after error 256(i think) and minfrees would look like ',,,,,,,,'

I tried test 8 and my awk test failed too. I flashed wraithdus busybox and it works perfectly now.

Seems for the last 2 or 3 AOKP builds the busybox is incomplete or buggy.

Thanks Zep btw:) I cant go without supercharger
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
Yeah that's pretty good.

Especially if it stays close to that after unplugging it.

Ok... I found the new loop bug... geez... fix one thing... another breaks :p

I got it now.... no more re-supercharger loops... I swear!

(ok... I hope lol)

Well I'll be more specific as to why the AWK test fails in U9RC9T9 <= neat!
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] sag7392:
@zeppelinrox

I just downloaded that script from page 1117...do I need to download it again?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] PieceKeepr:
T8 is the latest, but it seems to loop the resupercharge option. T9 that was mentioned should fix it when Zep releases it.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
Hold on....

OK... Let 'er rip! :D

Fixed that loop thing and added info about AWK sucking at math if it has the bug.

Gonna make the miscellaneous tweaks an option... I hope it ain't too big a PITA
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] Willielf:
Time to test!!
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] dareino:
Just ran test9...100% supercharged...but it does say my home launcher is the andriod.process.acore. I just upgraded it to the go launcher.

GB Eclipse 2.1 droid x2
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] PieceKeepr:
Go Launcher resides in android.process.acore so you're good.

Zep,

I'm still getting the no launcher found in memory message. It showed *.acore after running T9 but when I checked again about 40 minutes later I got the message. If I continue on it still shows 100% supercharged.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] Willielf:
For some reason, it said my music app was the launcher... But it says I am 100% supercharged though on cm9
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
Could it have gotten killed?

Check with the bOOM Stick to verify if it's running/reporting properly.

Which script version are you running?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] Willielf:
I am running the test 9. I had no problems with 8.2 though..
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
damn... what's the music app's process?

Also, post the bOOM Stick output.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
I don't think permissions matter on the biuld.prop edit.

If using root explorer, the permissions wouldn't change.

I wouldn't add the space but be sure that there is a blank line at the end...

Oops... forgot to mention that :p

edit: I added 3G build.prop tweak install to previous post :)
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] sag7392:
Okay great! I'm going to run them both using Script Manager.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
Cool... please post whether there was a problem applying settings or if it went smooth as buttah... lol
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] sag7392:
You've got mail...
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
So do you... ;)
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zenosteam:
hi zeppelinrox , can i use this script for sgs gti9000 ? is the same provedure like in the op
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] sag7392:
You just got some mail :-)
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
Yep.. any android device... tablets too

Just curious, how much ram do you have and what rom?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zenosteam:
i have 333 mb ram and i am using 2.3.4 ginger rom
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
Nice... maybe Mega Ram 1 won't be too aggressive
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zenosteam:
What do you mean by that, is it enought for me ?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
It means try Option 8 :D

I think you will still be able to multitask with it
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zenosteam:
Thanks your replay and help
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] ianmb:
So after I put in the 3g tweak in build.prop do I use script manager to run the entire build.prop folder as root? Using V6 Supercharged right now and my EVO running MikG 2.41 is running awesome! Getting fc's on stock browser but that is due to ROM if I put it in constant memory script would that stop the fc's...if so how do i do it? Thanks
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] eoghan2t7:
V6 SC is the best mate it makes your phone feel like the minute you first turned it on ;). It is the best thing to happen for all android users, i love adding and removing tweaks for test perposes and this is the only one i have kept on my phone. I have even made a softmod rom with this script pre installed its that good ;)
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
No build.prop is not a boot script. The system will load those settings no matter what.

Usually when an app fc's, reinstalling fixes it but for the browser I think wiping caches would fix it.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] sag7392:
Zep, did you get those outputs I sent you?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] Hrithan2020:
Any Galaxy S users, here who have given this a try?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
Yes I just had a look. I don't see any syntax errors on the lines specified in the script output tho. Do your files match exactly what I posted? I'm not on my own pc so I'll attach files when I get there.

But can you try again? I added a first #!/system/bin/sh line... maybe that will help

If you do it on a windows pc, use notepad++
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] sag7392:
Yeah, it looks the same...I added the first line and still getting the syntax error. I'll just wait for you to post it and give it a go. No rush, I'll be at a baseball game this afternoon.

Edit- I'm not near my PC or Linux machine right now either, :-).
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] xxjrsmith3xx:
Ok i try this im really not sure if all went threw when i reboot my phone.. ?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] Willielf:
Actually I ran it again this time(wasn't listening to music), and it shows up as acore, so I think it should be okay.. But this time however, it shows that the values don't match, so I had to set my values again.. And also the ics services thing also doesn't seem to work..
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] Willielf:
Weird because I just flashed the CWM file for the services.. So it's weird that it says that it isn't 100% supercharged.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] Willielf:
Sorry, I don't know how to copy only that part. Delete it after you see it.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
you're bulletproofing trebuchet and it shows up as -17.

Obviously, it's not detecting the launcher's priority because it's ADJ is "wrong" so to speak

Why bother patching services.jar if you're gonna run it through the bulletproof apps - which is less effective.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] PieceKeepr:
Ran V6 and launcher was not detected. Ran boom stick and android.process.acore shows as home launcher with an adj of 1. I never have redraws so I don't think it's ever been killed.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
hmmm... ok so android.process.acore is running and it is the ONLY process with ADJ1 right?

Oh and your running test 9... you said test 8 was fine... geez... :p
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] PieceKeepr:
Yes it's the only process with adj of 1. There is another process in the same grouping, com.TEST.android.lvh, but it's adj2.

I thought test 8 was fine but when I unsupercharged to install test 9 it said launcher not detected. I didn't mention it because I was hopeful for T9. Sorry.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
That's ok... So it never detects it?

I didn't change any logic to it at all so it must be syntax thing in that I assigned variables so it looks cleaner but still doing the same things as in test 8... well supposed to be doing the same things :p

balls
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] Willielf:
What do you suggest is the best thing to do? The services or the bulletproof?

And do you know how to unbulletproof it?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] PieceKeepr:
The launcher was detected once. Ran test 9, rebooted, and ran V6 again. The launcher was detected. Since then it hasn't been. I just rebooted and checked again, but it wasn't detected.

If test 8 eventually didn't see the launcher should I try older versions to see when it stopped detecting properly?

UPDATE: I couldn't remember so I've checked test 6 and it also failed to detect the launcher after about 30 minutes. I was gonna check test 5 but it didn't have that feature.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] gregbradley:
Will do, just away from a decent internet connection at the moment, when I get time I will do it, maybe tomorrow

Thanks for your help and patience!!
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] shrike1978:
Test 8.2 and Test 9 both report no home launcher running for me as well. android.process.acore (Go Launcher) is grouped properly with an ADJ of 1, so it's obviously just a reporting issue.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] ril z:
i'm running on ICS. i've tried to follow step by step but still got 'your launcher is weak' thing. i've either flashed patched services.jar or copied it into /system/frameworks n set permission n changed owner but no hope. please help me, what should i do?

fyi: i used webapp method.

thanks in advance.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] Addyz:
guys..what should i pick?? build.prop or local.prop?? thnx..
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] wraithdu:
Same thing on my TBolt w/ Test 9. The initial startup says there is no home launcher detected, and it already may have been killed. But I am 100% supercharged and the bOOM Stick correctly shows acore w/ ADJ 1 (using GOLauncherEx).
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] takuhii:
How are you guys able to choose between local.prop and build.prop. I never get offered that option :/
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] jacoblabares:
I have update 9 RC 8.2.... tell me how to upgrade it to the latest scripts :D..
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] wraithdu:
It depends on ROM / phone. I get the choice on my TBolt, but not on my GNex.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] MrEleventy:
Current MinFrees 1,1,1,1,1,1?

I ran V6 Supercharger and my NookColor started to freeze up, I wasn't sure which was the culprit so I UnSupercharged. The freezing continues so I figured it wasn't the supercharger so I Supercharge it again. The second time running through, my MinFree were stuck at 1,1,1,1,1,1 and none of the options (5,6,7) do anything to change it. Running option 10 and trying to set those causes an "arithmetic expression syntax error *256". Any ideas on what I did wrong or how to fix?

I currently running CM7.2-RC1 Mirage Kang w/ 05112012 build of MiRaGe encore kernel with Dalingrin's flicker fix.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
Reboot

See the twitterbox in my sig

Grab busybox from the OP.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
Ok... I did up a launcher detector that does it 4 different ways.

Please test and see which one detects best.

On my device, all 4 methods work the same everytime :p

Edit: Okay I attached Update 9 RC9 Test 9 and the Launcher Detector Test to the download page for now as well.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] Rebel2k:
I have the same issue (with Go Launcher too, on Samsung Galaxy S). I tried the test, the first method shows com.android.phone as a possible launcher. Method 2 to 4 show "no launcher detected" (or may have been already killed).

EDIT : and by the way, that's exactly the result I have, even with 9RC9 Test 9. Nevermind, everything is working correctly (at least, it seems to be working nicely! :))
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] shrike1978:
Same. None of them actually finds my launcher.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] MrEleventy:
Awesome, all good now. Thx! Great work btw
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] PieceKeepr:
Does the launcher get reported properly if you check immediately after supercharging and rebooting? For me it does but within a half hour for some reason it stops getting reported.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] shrike1978:
I've not seen it report correctly for me at all, and I've run it immediately after a reboot. It's actually not a bug deal overall...It working fine when I look at the groupings. Just figured that if that function is there, zep wants it to work properly. ;)