yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
1 is Die-Hard and is the default for a reason... best of both worlds.... nearly unkillable but can be killed if needed.

Bulletproof is obviously 0 and unkillable.

HTK at 2 is the easiest to kill of the 3. Not too many use that but it's better for multitasking but it's still stronger than "lock home in memory"

First of all it would help if you read the download instructions instead of the heavily detailed nitty gritty behind the scenes stuff in post 3.

All you want to know is what it does and how to install it.

That's all near the top of the first post.

I don't clean it up all nice and pretty for a reason - it's a test.

And I find that people like to learn and like a bit of a challenge.

If it was flashable, it's not customizable and nobody learns squate about making it perfect for them.

No CWM. Ever.

Preconfigured settings and calculated settings is the best of both ends.

Update will take new users directly to calculated values after choosing options so basically there will be no thinking involved :p

See post 3 for the differences in app types but Foreground apps are system processes and the app that you are currently using.

On its own, an app's ADJ value doesn't really matter at all in determining how killable it is.

What matters is an app's ADJ value IN RELATION to other app's ADJ values.

If visible was a 3 perceptible was a 3 it would be the same effect if they were both 2 or both 4.

So if you make the launcher a 3 right now.. it would be equal to visible apps.

That is the exact same thing as "locking home in memory" on non ICS ROMS that have that option - except that the ADJs would be 1 except for 3.

Now the reason that I made visible apps a 3 is... so that I can tuck the launcher between visible and foreground... which is what makes the launcher stronger than the old "lock home in memory"

Now if you understand that, you will understand that an ADJ of 1 when SuperCharged is ALOT stronger than an ADJ of 1 when on stock memory management.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] hansip87:
Thank you for your explanation :) I think you should revise the Post 3 then, I take it that HTK Launcher is better than BulletProof apps. That's why i set services.jar to 2. And one thing, if i set the Visible Apps ADJ to 0x2 and Launcher to 0x1, and Perceptible to 0x3, is it ok? will it cause too much closing?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] chw9999:
Thanks for the replies. Yes, i deactvated HTC's stock launcher but have MultiTasking Pro installed, which as a sidekick calls GO Launcher... So the main launcher ist MultiTasking Pro.

However, i found in the "Battery" information (well, well...) that the active GO launcher process is called com.android.acore... No wonder I couldn't find it in the task list before looking for "GO" or something alike...

I set it now bulletproof, so far so good :)

Thanks for the help and...

Cheers

Christoph
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] hansip87:
I modified the services.jar again, and i modified it into this:

0x1 for home

0x2 for Visible

0x3 for Foreground Services

Will report back if there's a problem. :)
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] erik07:
i am also using multitasking pro as my default (multitasking settings instruction, to set it by default) and then my home launcher would be adwlauncher ex. first, i did make adw my default home, when i check the script, it says adw is my current home, but when i reverted back to multitasking pro, the script recognized it as acore. which means, if your going to bulletproof/die-hard/htk the launcher, it will only apply to multitasking pro, not on my adw or for your case, go launcher. but thanks to zeppelinrox, he added bulletproof apps. and thus i still made multitasking pro bulletproof, and adw as one of my bulletproof apps. now im not encountering any redraws for adw except when first time launching it on boot. of course i also added shortcuts (not widgets, as to my preference) to monitor supercharger and bulletproof apps if its always running. thanks zeppelinrox again for adding the bulletproof apps. :)

i've been annoyed with my launcher before i saw this thread. this was the first time i tried your script, and i learned alot. now i can really multitask without having to wait for my launcher to restart and other application 'killing itself' while i would've liked them to adapt to multitasking. THIS SHOULD BE THE FOUNDATION OF EVERY ANDROID ROM OUT THERE, TRULY AN IPHONE KILLER (also hate iphone in many ways. hehe). :D

Edit: i just notice a bug in bulletproof apps. my current minfrees = 8, 14, 40, 50, 60, 75 MB (Multitasking for 512HP). and as i was making adw bulletproof, i notice that it was a HIDDEN_APP (FOREGROUND_APP, VISIBLE_APP, SECONDARY_SERVER, HIDDEN_APP, CONTENT_PROVIDER, and EMPTY_APP). so when my free memory lowers to 50MB, my launcher restarts. so it was like the bulletproof app function was not taking effect. even though i always check it in the script (saying bulletproof apps in in effect/running) and in 1shot script. it happened to me today (03/20/12) twice while updating maps and also when connecting my phone to the computer (usb mass storage). so what could the problem be with bulletproof apps? could this be my minfree values or really the bulletproof apps not really in effect? by the way, i have 486 MB of RAM and the script recommended 512HP settings. so i chose multitasking under 512HP. what could you advice me to do? my default home now is multitasking pro and default launcher set by multitasking pro is adw (but the script recognizes acore as home launcher, i assume its multitasking pro). i am also using your autostart script.:D i would really appreciate the advice zeppelinrox. :)
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] madunix:
with the kick ass kernallizer, whats the prefered i/o for evo4g?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] blk_jack:
Bulletproofing apps does not cause the app's priority to permanently change. ICS will always restore the app back to its original priority. All Bulletproofing your apps does is run a timer (every 60s by default) that temporarily changes the app's priority. ICS can often immediately restore that app to its default priority as soon as the bulletproof script runs.

As for multi-tasking pro, I've never used it but I know that since multitasking pro is your home launcher, the real launcher will never have true home priority. I used to use QuickDesk and I found the priority changes had no effect on my home launcher, only QuickDesk. No matter how often you bulletproof it, it will always reset back. My advice? Forget that multitasking pro & let your home launcher run as it should.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
Oh I don't think that's gonna work too well.

The app you're using is gonna get killed alot.

It uses sio if you have it. If not, then deadline if you have it. If not then it goes to noop.

You can read the notes in 98kickasskernel for instruction to modify it if you want to.

Pretty much what blk_jack said.

Try a similar app that doesn't have to use the home launcher status.

https://play.google.com/store/search?q=multitasking&c=apps&price=1

I know that Smart Tasbar works very well. It has a nearly invisible overlay located where you like.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] erik07:
I also agree with that. Now im using swipepad since it doesn't take the place of adw as default launcher. And also, im not on ICS, im on 2.3.5. :)
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
+1 for swipepad... I really like that as a quick launcher :)
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] wraithdu:
How does the re-supercharger process handle the .prop files? Does it do a backup if one doesn't exist, then simply copy from the sdcard to the proper location? Or does it do a full customize using what's already there?

I ask because I often don't unsupercharge before dirty flashing a ROM update. So /data is left intact. However there's a good chance that /system/build.prop has changed, so re-supercharging via copy would restore an old out of date prop file.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] hansip87:
Not that i know any better than you, but in my POV, with current situation of even Visible app got killed, i think Visible (which is directly in front of you) vs Perceptible (which is user aware app but not always visible) should have 2-3 in ADJ value. I could be wrong but please give me enlightenment if you know why :) So far so good though in my Ray.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
Re-SuperCharger only restores it's own files.

So if that option runs, it still goes through the process of supercharging your current system files. On non-ICS, it even asks for which launcher strength to use ;)

It's very schmancy lol

heh... well most "labels" dont makes sense.

Visible apps... you dont always see them. keyboard, gapps, calender background stuff.

Perceptible apps are those that you DO always see in the status/notification bar.

The app in front of you that you're using is a foreground app. Priority 0. Changing that breaks stuff like tasker for example.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] kelu85:
LOL zep! ahhahaha

yes winamp have this option and this is already enabled... in ordinary plays of mp3, it's force close.... before of v6 supercharger, this not happen!!!
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] erik07:
Im using smart taskbar along side with swipepad. I cant uninstall swipepad, its really a nice app than smart taskbar, i just need the recent apps because swipepad add ons must be bought first. And now my adw is the default launcher, no redraws anymore. :)
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
Fix permissions usually fixed FCs. Re-installing the app works too.

Nice... I have both those apps they work nice together indeed. But for recent apps, you can just long press home and get the default "task switcher", no?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] dearde4n:
U9RC7 truly iphone killer.. updated from RC6.9 since it release.. and noticed much improvemnt.. THE GREATEST..

THX ZEPP

Sent from my PHONE
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] hearts king101:
Hi zeppelinrox

I want to inform you that still can't download recent releases, so would u plz reupload ( kak, V6 super. 3G )? And also I/O tweaks works fine with me.

Thanks bro ;)
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
Well I have included various download tips since xda has made it a challenge to download.

I have found another option: Opera Mini works incredibly well. It's really fast and as soon as you click one of the files, the download window pops up
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] Treatcon:
Yes, couldn't agree more!!
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] chw9999:
I still have Gingerbread, does this apply also?

Nah, I will fiddle around a little longer, got used so much to MultiTasking Pro - love the double-Home-Button-call just too much to replace it first thing ;)

Will report progress, if it happens at all...

Cheers

Christoph
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] cinciopillo:
I get an error at almost the beginning of the script :

Can I make something to solve it?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
Yep it's the same on all Anroid OSes actually.

Incomplete download.

Read download tips.

Opera Mini should also work flawlessly.

============================================

yay... new poll... I didn't screw it up this time but I DID make it as confusing as possible! :D
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] Rebel2k:
I tried to delete the first and last pair only but that doesn't help that much. I need to delete all those lines to get BT and wifi fully working. And yes for 3G TurboCharger, if that's working before (mean I already removed the guilty dns lines from the prop file) any of the added tcp.buffer line is breaking the BT or wifi or sometimes even both...

Envoyé depuis mon GT-I9000 avec Tapatalk
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] Rydah:
Is it possible to undo all changes made by this without nandroiding back? Not that I want to, It's smooth, but jus in case.

Is it options 14 & 15?

Sent Using My HTC Evo 3D, On The Now Network From Sprint!
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] rashid.fairus:
im using on cm9,but after reboot titanium backup fc,and when im trying to reinstall from play store its cant be saved,it say "not enough memory",but i still can install other app without problem,so is it bugs??

Sent from my Xperia Arc
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
If you have supercharger entries, 3GTC shouldn't write any of the buffersize stuff... only the usual ro.ril entries.

I think if you additionally delete the following it should work:

net.ppp0.dns1=8.8.8.8

net.ppp0.dns2=8.8.4.4

So you would only have:

net.dns1=8.8.8.8

net.dns2=8.8.4.4

net.rmnet0.dns1=8.8.8.8

net.rmnet0.dns2=8.8.4.4

I don't think the buffersizes would effect wifi or bt at all tho but I can be wrong.

14 Does it all.

SuperCharger is unrelated. That "not enough memory" actually pertains to storage space - not RAM.

For fcs you can perform a fix permissions in CWM.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] RealSpArTeN:
awesome mod!...but I get this error

every time I run the supercharger...help plz!

/mnt/sdcard/Tweaks/V6_SuperCharger_for_Android-update8.sh[1265]: can't create temporary file /sqlite_stmt_journals/mksh.SjlcCP2808: No such file or directory

/mnt/sdcard/Tweaks/V6_SuperCharger_for_Android-update8.sh[1265]: can't create temporary file /sqlite_stmt_journals/mksh.kSFNIv2808: No such file or directory
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
Use U9RC7... it has alot of workarounds for weird issues like that.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] RealSpArTeN:
haha...wow...*facepalm* thx man! loving the speed!!
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] lofty5:
im trying to get a odexed rom fully supercharged. Ive tried the deodexer but the phone just bootloops after using it so it doesn't work for me.

When in the command prompt using the command outlined in your tutorial. it doesn't actually do anything and doesn't decompile it just gives an error like in the screenshot attached to this message.

What am i doing wrong?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] young-ster:
3g turbocharger

i am not sure where do i post this but i've recently use to latest 3g turbocharger script rc5. i've realized a increase in my speeds using experimental1 . however i have also lost the ability to toggle between my 2g and 3g. i tried un-turbocharging the script and all was okay again. any ideas ? i'm on floyo cm6.1 i think.:D
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
@lofty5

Well I've never had to do that myself but:

1. Make sure you have the latest smali/baksmai

2. Try using services.jar instead of services.odex in the command. I recall that actually worked for somebody.

3. If that doesn't work either, you will probably need to put ALL the files from the framework folder in the same folder that you're working from.

If so, it will probably be easier to just copy the smali/baksmali/services files to the framework folder and work from there.

Try latest 3GTC RC7
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] erik07:
Oh that's why im searching for other easy to access task managers, because my hardware button is a bit broken, it can respond to my press but sometimes it double presses when i just pressed it once. The problem arised when the warranty of the phone was already finished. Haha. :D
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] hansip87:
Well zepp, i guess there's an issue with Music player being lost in status bar notification with my value :/ Music still playing though. But so far no foreground UI got lost..
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
Isn't hacking fun? :D
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] Rydah:
Yes. :)

Anybody getting random reboots.

Sent Using My HTC Evo 3D, On The Now Network From Sprint!
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] 1stichiban:
awesome script

Hi, thanks to your work my phone's snappy. :)

Currently using your V6 supecharger 8, KAK and 3gturbocharger on stock GB 2.3.4 with update from TEAM Stock xperia rom.

Tried updating to v6update9_RC7. unsupercharged, unkernelized, reboot and cleaned dalvik cache. When i select an option to tweak my settings i get an incompatibility error.

but nonetheless your current scripts are working great. Thanks again.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] hansip87:
Yes it is :) lol.. Umm, well, i think i'll stick with my value. Reread the stock ADJ value and the stock value actually shows that the Visible app is higher in ADJ then Perceptible app. So i think i'll test it further. :)
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] Ashtrix:
Will this work along with Thunderbolt ?

EDIT: Modified Sevices.jar caused my phone a bit laggy at reboots :|
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
So on the second reboot the launcher is weak.

It could be that your stock rom is overwritting the tweaked local.prop on boot sometimes.

After a reboot where your launcher is not weak, check local.prop to see if the entries are there.

There should be 9 MEM and 9 ADJ entries.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] lexluthor:
Yes, on second reboot the launcher is weak.

Right now, the launcher is not weak and the entries are not in local.prop.

When does it read/overwrite local.prop though? Perhaps when I run the script manually and make the entries, then it updates my local.prop. That update gets picked up on reboot and the correct values are loaded into the system and activated. But, then my ROM is overwriting local.prop and when I reboot next, the stock values get loaded.

Does that make any sense?

If I recall correctly, though, that even though the launcher was weak after the 2nd reboot, the memory values were still the ones the script used, but I could be wrong.

If you have any ideas of tests I could run and things I could look at, I'm more than happy to try that.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
Actually, check local.prop after running the script but before rebooting.

If the entries are there as they should be, copy and paste them into /system/build.prop and see what happens
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] lexluthor:
I was thinking that too.

Now that I know the file to look for and understand that's where the changes are written to, I can better see what's going on.

After a few more reboots now though, the local.prop seems to be holding with those entries.

Being on a stock rom, I do need to do that step where I go into script manager and find 99supercharger.sh and set that to run as root and run on boot, right? I've had that set since the start of doing this.

I'm going to keep a close eye on this here.

Also, looking forward to getting this part cleared up so that I can confirm that my launcher no longer closes.

This is good work.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
Cool

Yes you haveb it configured properly :)
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] lexluthor:
Thank you. I think I'm ok. I'll keep an eye on it. One last thing. I used my current busybox version which is slightly higher than the version you say. I figured I'd at least try it before trying to revert busybox, so that I wouldn't have to do it, if I didn't need to. As long as I got it working, am I ok with the busybox version I used?

Moving on.......

I have Samsung Vibrant. I'm on 2.2 Froyo, stock, rooted.

When I try to choose any profile, I don't see any memory values getting set and it says launcher not found. If I try profile 10, custom, as soon as I enter the first value, it takes me back to the list of options, not asking me for slot 2.

Does this not work with Samsung devices?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] Adebayo88:
hey does anybody know if this works with htc sense?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] PieceKeepr:
It does. I put it on my wifes phone which has xtrSense.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
Lexluthor What busybox version on the vibrant?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] lexluthor:
I don't have the Vibrant with me at the moment. It probably has 1.18.4 on it though.

Moving on to my Samsung Galaxy S 4G. That definitely has 1.18.4 on it.

Ran in the first time and laucher was weak. Followed all of the same instructions and ran #10 and used 6, 12, 75, 80, 90, 100. I set up 99supercharger to run as root and run at boot as well.

It took a couple of boots before the memory settings started to hold. Not sure what I did there again to get it to hold, but they do not and I do see the entries in local.prop.

But, after a reboot, I see my wallpaper under my lock screen for a few seconds, but when the screen goes off, I power back on and see my lockscreen with only a black background. If I dismiss the lockscreen, I only see black. I wait a couple of minutes and still try to dismiss the lockscreen, still no good. Eventually, I hit some key combination and I get my homescreen. I think if I hold down power after a while, like I'm turning off the phone, I get the popup menu asking if I want to shut down, etc, if I dismiss that, then I get my homescreen. Seems almost as if it's not able to start my launcher at all.

I'm using the default TouchWiz launcher.

Once I do get it to start up, everything is normal. Not sure I want to leave it that way though.

If I unsupercharge and reboot, it's normal again.

Any ideas with this one?

I'll post back on the Vibrant busybox tonight, but if that's 1.18.4, do you think that's the issue I'm having with that phone?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] sag7392:
I just want to throw some numbers out there, that thus far seem to work well with my OG EVO 4G---6,12,60,70,80,100

Comments welcome...trying to find the sweet spot for my EVO.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] mcdevtingz:
When can we expect v8?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] moviecut:
Did i miss the V7? Where is it?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] mcdevtingz:
You don't get v7 looooll its based on cars and like cylinders
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
Yep.. I did have v1,2,3,4 and 5 but when I hit v6... V6 SuperCharger sounded pretty cool so I HAD to make it part of the name.

So with added tweaks... I am sticking with the car analogy and skipping v7 and building a V8 :D

ah... well it's taking longer than I expected... In fact I've been perfecting V6 update 6 which will have quite a few enhancements over update 5.

Of course, at the same time, it does go toward making V8 shinier.

Interesting... I have pretty much settled on using 6, 12, 75, 80, 90, 100 as a second setting of MegaMemory devices.

Have you tried those?

I think between the two, the biggest difference would be the effect of slot 4
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] sag7392:
That's interesting that are settings are so close...I'll give those settings a whirl. All I know is, is that my settings have been doing well on my phone...but I'm always up for tweaking things. And I look forward to the update too!!!! Keep up the great work mate!
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
I can't take credit for that though... rafalo1333 first posted them on page 91.

I know that he was doing alot of testing and he came up with those values.

Of course, a second opinion is always nice :)
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] sag7392:
I'm on it...and I'll let you know how it works.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] lexluthor:
Any thoughts on this?