yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
Ah OK then.

I'll have an update soon tho.

Still gotta add a couple of things :p
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] 25vikasp:
Oh thanks for Ur reply.in between in jar patcher page the latest jar patcher tool file is corrupted.so I used second to complete process.can u tell how can I check my phone is supercharged and scripts working fine.

Sent from my GT-S7562 rooted modded+crosbreeder adblock+supercharged v6 ics stock 4.04. xxbmd6.:P;):(;););)
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] hisname:
THAT'S SO GOD DAMN TRUE MAN
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
didn't you say you were 100% SuperCharged already?

already using it or did you just try it after my suggestion?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] 25vikasp:
Ya it is showing. Thanks

Sent from my GT-S7562 rooted modded+crosbreeder adblock+supercharged v6 ics stock 4.04. xxbmd6.:P;):(;););)
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] hisname:
used looong ago. I always post fix align logs, it shows you what kind of apps I have :)
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] mati865:
Hi zepp.

Thx for your great work but I have 'small' problem.Supercharger script says BulletProof apps script is disaled (and should be I didn't enable it) but BootLog_BulletProof_Apps get recreated each boot. And it isn't normal small log, check attachment (you will found out why I used 7zip with ULTRA compression :D).

part of log (it's too long to paste it here)

/system/etc/init.d/S97BulletProof_Apps[366]: grep: Argument list too long
/system/etc/init.d/S97BulletProof_Apps[366]: sleep: Argument list too long

P.S.

I'm not sure why I have S97BulletProof_Apps in my init dir.

P.S. 2

My device have 419 MB /data partition.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
And that's how you know that its working :p

BTW no zips are corrupt.

None are flashable.

Ones a normal zip, the other is a renamed exe.

uh... you know I wasn't THAT interested, right?

When looking at logs, I'm just like lookin at the errors or the problem apps.

I'll look later when home.

But post 97BPApps.

Which version you running?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] hisname:
heh
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] mati865:
ICS Rom, BlackDog 63457_Fix, KAK U3RC11T2

I think this script got loop and closed when log reserved whole /data partition.

EDIT

I have other interesting bug. After using KAK and V6 SuperCharger my /data partition is getting filled and i cant find what is causing it.

It isn't file or directory only way to clean it is reboot.

Here are du, df (2 commands used after ~1 sec delay) and ls outputs in KB

root@android:/ # busybox du -d 1 /data | sort -n
busybox du -d 1 /data | sort -n
2 /data/app-private
2 /data/dontpanic
2 /data/lost+found
2 /data/resource-cache
3 /data/user
4 /data/radio
5 /data/crashsms
6 /data/etc
10 /data/property
12 /data/drm
21 /data/idd
22 /data/backup
33 /data/misc
85 /data/anr
158 /data/local
237 /data/xposed
702 /data/tombstones
1752 /data/system
2192 /data/V6_SuperCharger
28976 /data/app
73036 /data/dalvik-cache
163201 /data/data
924388 /data/sdext2 // ignore that, it is mounted partition from SD
1195106 /data

root@android:/ # busybox df /data
busybox df /data
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/block/mtdblock3 430080 402740 27340 94% /data
root@android:/ # busybox df /data
busybox df /data
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/block/mtdblock3 430080 402744 27336 94% /data

and it's going down

after reboot

root@android:/ # df /data
df /data
/data: 430080K total, 283824K used, 146256K available (block size 4096)

root@android:/ # busybox ls -sh /data | sort -n
busybox ls -sh /data | sort -n
0 !Detailing_Counter.log
0 BootLog_Detailing.log
0 BootLog_FixEmissions.log
0 BootLog_ZepAlign.log
0 Ran_KickAssKernel.log
1 Ran_BulletProof_Apps.log
1 Ran_SuperCharger.log
1 link2sd-11link2sd.log
1 link2sd-debuggerd.log
1 link2sd-install-recovery.log
2 BootLog_SuperCharger.log
2 Ran_EngineFlush-O-Matic.log
2 V6_SuperCharger
2 anr
2 app
2 app-private
2 backup
2 crashsms
2 dalvik-cache
2 data
2 dontpanic
2 drm
2 etc
2 idd
2 local
2 lost+found
2 misc
2 property
2 radio
2 resource-cache
2 system
2 tombstones
2 user
2 xposed
3 BootLog_FastEngineFlush.log
6 sdext2
8 Ran_Detailing.log
13 97BulletProof_Apps.sh
13 98KickAssKernel.sh
14 99SuperCharger.sh
16 init.rc.unsuper
18 Log_KickAssKernel.log
19 init.rc
33 Ran_FixAlign.log
103 BootLog_FixAlign.log

EDIT2:

BootLog_BulletPrfoof... is getting larger and larger when my phone is idle. If i remove it my partition is getting filled but without wisible reason. My init.d works by exectuing this by install-recovery.sh from this thread http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1422061 maybe it is the reason.

#!/system/bin/sh
# init.d support
busybox run-parts /system/etc/init.d

EDIT3:

BootLog have 17 MB (it's same as before just shorter) atm and its growing I will check it again after night.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
ok I'll have to do a bit of debugging and make sure that the init.d file isn't created or is deleted if there is no apps in the hitlist.

btw which busybox version and build are you using?

I tried replicating the error but no luck so far.

For now, just delete the script in init.d
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] proyatzu:
Hi, first thanks for this Incredible mod, you are Incredible :D

Second, i was asking myself why lots of devs dont reccomand this.. They says your mod uses too much CPU and other stuffs..

I want to try this on my LG-P990, but could bring some problems? Like dunno, less battery life, less performance, i dont know! If its proved this to be a god gift, why some xda devs dont raccomand this?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] izuall187:
Because zep was able to think about this idea and they didn't. Now they're just a bunch sour grapes.:D

Try making a backup first before using it just to be safe.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] mati865:
1.20.2-jb by bitcubate installer from play store (stericson busybox isn't complete)

I already learned how this script work and after executing kill command CPU usage dropped from 70% to 10% :).
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
There is no CPU usage.

ZERO. NADDA. SFA.

Most battery reports are that it improves battery life.

So... Its like Strawberries.

They're great!

But you dunno till you eat 'em.

So, naysayers can just eat it until they're no longer ignorant of actual facts... and taste... lol

BTW... Lots of devs actually like both... heh.

test with the one in the OP or the one I compiled.

But first... What happens if you do:

sleep 0
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] mati865:
executing sleep 0 do nothing I will test your busybox and edit my post
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
OK.

Been googling the error.

Did you have more than one BPApp script in init.d?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] mati865:
Starter kit busybox is FINE! Moreover I did some debugging and found the reason. My busybox was causing the script to kill himself and relaunch few times per second!

Sorry for delay it's almost 2 a.m. here.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
I found that bitcubate version.

Install was buggy and couldn't access settings.

Finally installed.. A known to be buggy/unstable 1.20.0 version lol
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] mati865:
Thx for help I will try to compile newest busybox but probably I will stick to starter kit.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] 25vikasp:
hey i have one problem.i am using smiley changer mod from the xposed modules.after installing script they are gone.i have to apply them again,but after every boot they are gone.why this is happening now .i am using lucky patcher too it is showing patch on boot like notification on every boot.any solution:confused:
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] VnnAmed:
Desire S (o/c @ 1,7 , zram, ksm, poa, kick ass kernelized, supercharged)
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] hisname:
benchmark doesn't mean anything
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] VnnAmed:
Theoretically it does. Practically not so much but I'm too lazy to make a video...
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] 25vikasp:
I say it's not increase Ur benchmark.mine it was decreased by 200.I must say it increases Ur overall phone speed and multitasking.why the hell antutu scores low idk about that.

Sent from my GT-S7562 rooted modded+crosbreeder adblock+supercharged v6 ics stock 4.04. xxbmd6.:P;):(;););)
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] Lord_Flaya:
Great work, zep. :) Even managed to make benefit from this on my gaming-defy even tho it's not intended for gamers. :p Keep up the good work. :thumbup::):D
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] defiant07:
Lucky Patcher :(. This is XDA...warez related stuff is frowned upon, although what has been said is somewhat marginal.

Regarding the xposed related problem: It sounds like the same thing that happened to me with Icon Themer. Assuming you are using the latest version of V6, try turning off fixalign/zepalign, reapply, and reboot. If that does not work clear the app's data or un/reinstall the app.

[MENTION=3357461]zeppelinrox[/MENTION] - Dunno if you found it already, but there is a minor typo on line 220 of BD6_fix. It currently reads

echo " ...No Supe For You!!"

which I think is supposed to be

echo " ...No SuperCharger For You!"

Also on line 205 there is no "..." before 'No SuperCharger For You!' and the spacing seems different. Think it is supposed to be

echo " ...No SuperCharger For You!"
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zgmfx20:
Since 2012 I've been using SC and "No Supe For You!!" appears when I was not able to supercharge. I think it's not typo.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] defiant07:
Perhaps (maybe it's a play off the Soup Nazi thing), but it seems strange to me being that it is only if you fail the busybox test that it says "No Supe"...all the other fails say "No SuperCharger"...if you go through the code the only things that vary in fail dialogs are: (1) the number of exclamation points (some have one others have two); and (2) some are missing the "..." before the text (lines 205, 253, 373, 409 to be specific). The only exception to these variations is the possible typo I commented on.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] XDAMaxe:
I like Supe...
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] Ok_Kaleidoscope5109:
OP, any chance you can clean up the first and second posts? The instructions are kinda based on when the script was first invented in 2010 and hashed with revision and revision. A lot of its antiquated now. I'd recommend not confusing people and just making it straight forward without having it link to 3 other posts.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] XDAMaxe:
Life's hard ...
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] Ok_Kaleidoscope5109:
Well let's be honest. there's hundreds if not thousands of other development threads on XDA. No offense to the OP or anything, but this thread has probably the messiest set of instructions out there. It takes a bit of navigating to get through. Yeah, you can figure it out, but then you wonder why this thread is filled with a bunch of noob questions... Cleaning up might help minimize the number of noob questions.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] S.N.@.K.3:
Why my kernel has been disabled also I re-select all the things and choose 512hp... Still my kernel disabled...

Can anybuddy help ?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] mixednuts:
Unfortunately, no matter how "clean" or "straightforward" an OP is, the noob questions would still flow ;)

Zep chooses to focus his energy on his scripts and responding to user posts... and that's all fine with me.

He also states in the OP to not bother posting general comments on the "cleanliness" (etc...) of the OP, so any posts regarding such will not be well received.

Maybe if there were some kinda mistake or something then that would be fine... I think? :D
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zgmfx20:
hi.

I'm getting very low in memory after a day or two.

At first boot, games that uses large memory doesn't lag

But after a day, I'm experiencing too much lag and sometimes sudden reboot.

Same case also goes with the FOM enabled at 0.1 hours.

At first boot reported "free" ram (true+cached apps) is 200+, about 211

But after a day or two, it goes down to 100 to 130 MB for every flush. No apps or services even running.

Running a custom GB rom, no apps like whatsapp, facebook, youtube installed

Most autoruns except GCM disabled

KAK+SuperMinfree+all enabled in SC

Could someone kindly recommend me what to do? I'm pretty annoyed why I'm getting low memory given that I don't have apps running.

I'm sorry if I posted in the wrong thread.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] Jar3112:
Try patching the launcher htk, for the gaming lag, also try using the auto CustOOMized minfrees. In addition, flushing every 0.1 hrs is useless:do that every hour or half an hour and will be fine

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] izuall187:
Don't run the script inside init.d folder.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] PieceKeepr:
I noticed my stock build.prop shows a value of 1 for the line ro.ril.enable.a52= and the 3G Turbo tweak has a value of 0 for the same line. I have been playing around with the two this afternoon but the numbers are all over the place. I'm going to wait until later when connection speeds seem to be a bit more reliable and run some tests to see if makes any difference one way or the other. If anyone else wants to try and see if matters change ...

this

ro.ril.enable.a52=0

to this

ro.ril.enable.a52=1

I doubt this is a game changer in any way, I'm just curious to see if it makes any difference at all.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] cthonctic:
Hey there.

My current busybox is 1.19.0.git.adrynalyne (probably installed by the kernel) but the OP explicitly states that 1.18.2 or older ist required for supercharger to work correctly. If I downgrade it, will my kernel and/or the boot scripts it came with still work? Or would it be possible to downgrade, run supercharger and then re-upgrade?

Unfortunately I'm not too familiar with busybox and the difference between various versions. I am looking to try the supercharger script but not too keen to mess up my current setup, which is why I figured it can't hurt to ask you guys... please advise. :)
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
Holy mother ****...

That stupid ravish did it again...

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=16533899#post16533899
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] bgs_piece:
OK, this is probably a stupid question but I'm going to ask it anyway. If I'm going to add something to the build.prop, do I need to start each line with "ro.ril"?

Enforce_Process_Limit=false

or

ro.ril.Enforce_Process_Limit=false
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] -Grift-:
What's the best option for x8??
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] hazard209:
Incredible...
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
I'm pretty sure the answer is yes :)

It should work. I mean, if HTK launcher gets applied, bulletproof should as well.

Do you get redraws with HTK launcher tho?

I'm thinking of adding a 3rd launcher in the update tho - but only for gingerbread roms.

Die-Hard Launcher

Actually, I like the name Die-Hard Launcher (somebody on an android hilfe forums call it that once) and Ive been thinkin to rename HTK as Die-Hard.

So, if I do add the 3rd one, HTK will be renamed as Die-Hard and the new, 3rd launcher in gb would be HTK. (froyo would have bulletproof and die-hard)

I'll see what I can do but I can't really promise anything as to when I can get to it.

Balanced 3 is a good choice.

If you run the script, it should still be hard to kill even with that option greyed out.

Nice :)

Have you tried the kernel tweaks?

It may make your 3G even faster. It has a few "net" tweaks as well.

I already tested the 3G TurboCharger speeds and then applied the kernel script.

It found that my 3G went faster by a HUGE margin -I was pretty shocked.

I thought rafalo had succesfullly got the multitasking that he wanted with null values?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] hazard209:
I dunno. He posted these settings after the null values had been around for a few days. I've been seeing good results.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] bgs_piece:
Originally Posted by hazard209

Actually, I've been using rafalo's "False" settings instead of the Nitro Nullifier (or whichever name was decided for it) and have been getting more noticeable results. Here's what's in build.prop:

ENFORCE_PROCESS_LIMIT=false

MAX_SERVICE_INACTIVITY=false

MIN_HIDDEN_APPS=false

MAX_HIDDEN_APPS=false

CONTENT_APP_IDLE_OFFSET=false

EMPTY_APP_IDLE_OFFSET=false

MAX_ACTIVITIES=false

ACTIVITY_INACTIVITY_RESET_TIME=false

MAX_RECENT_TASKS=false

MIN_RECENT_TASKS=false

APP_SWITCH_DELAY_TIME=false

MAX_PROCESSES=false

PROC_START_TIMEOUT=false

CPU_MIN_CHECK_DURATION=false

GC_TIMEOUT=false

SERVICE_TIMEOUT=false

MIN_CRASH_INTERVAL=false

These are the exact lines I was refering to in my previous question; are these lines entered exactly the way shown or do you need the "ro." in front of each line? I'm not sure what the .ro does, but in some of the other posts that precedes lines being entered.

Thanks in advance for any help!
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] hazard209:
No. You do not need ro.ril in front of these lines.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] bgs_piece:
I added this to my build.prop:

ENFORCE_PROCESS_LIMIT=false

MAX_SERVICE_INACTIVITY=false

MIN_HIDDEN_APPS=false

MAX_HIDDEN_APPS=false

CONTENT_APP_IDLE_OFFSET=false

EMPTY_APP_IDLE_OFFSET=false

MAX_ACTIVITIES=false

ACTIVITY_INACTIVITY_RESET_TIME=false

MAX_RECENT_TASKS=false

MIN_RECENT_TASKS=false

APP_SWITCH_DELAY_TIME=false

MAX_PROCESSES=false

PROC_START_TIMEOUT=false

CPU_MIN_CHECK_DURATION=false

GC_TIMEOUT=false

SERVICE_TIMEOUT=false

MIN_CRASH_INTERVAL=false

and now when I reboot the bootanimation is gone and after the red moto logo I get a blank screen and it just sits there and never fully reboots; WTF?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] PieceKeepr:
It looks like ro.ril.enable.a52=1 is just a bit faster than ro.ril.enable.a52=0. I did the same testing as before and the average for "1" is 1563.4 and the average for "0" is 1545.8.

It would be cool if someone else would test to confirm this though.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] bgs_piece:
I have a copy of the build.prop prior to the changes; is there a way to replace the corrupted file with the good one from recovery? Or a way to flash a build.prop?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] PieceKeepr:
I think he really doesn't get it. But at least he acknowledged you and other devs in bold print this time. HAAAAAAA :eek:

You should be able to push it from ADB but unfortunately I'm not savvy enough to tell you how to do it. This might help ... ADB for Dummies ... but I'm not saying you're a dummy. ;)

Edit: Or follow Quinny899's instructions below.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] Quinny899:
You're in recovery adb so you can use adb from pc

adb shell

cd /system

rm build.prop

exit

adb push build.prop /system
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] bgs_piece:
So I am in ClockworkMod Recovery on the phone; where do I need to go on the phone and what do I need on my computer to do this? I really appreciate your help; I don't want to sbf!
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] Quinny899:
You're in recovery, you hit windows button on keyboard and r at the same time, type cmd and hit enter to open it. Now make sure you have adb (android sdk required) and change directory to it. (cd C:\Program Files\Android\android-sdk-windows\platform-tools) Now type the above commands with the build.prop backup in the sdk folder mentioned above
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] bgs_piece:
Is there a way to make an update.zip with the build.prop file and just flash it from recovery? This ADB stuff is confusing to me; when I opened up the cmd prompt and entered (cd C:\Program Files\Android\android-sdk-windows\platform-tools) there was no such directory. I do have sdk manager and it's updating now. Once it's done updating, I really don't know what to do. The build.prop is on my desktop now, but I don't know what folder you were referring to.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] Quinny899:
It should be in program files, just your C drive. Whilst it's updating it should say where it's updating to so cd to that directory's platform tools to get adb and follow the rest of the steps
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] bgs_piece:
I typed adb devices to ensure my phone was showing and for some reason, it is not showing up as being connected.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] cx-11:
In Xperia ARC s i get The best und smothered result and much responsible Rom with the update9 RC 12 test6 as on the New blackdog.

But the first internal setup way on blackdog it's more syple and intuitive.

The bullet prov. App seem to be the reason (on small ram devices) on Samsung Tab2 all we'll nice and no lag on black dog.

Maby you.need to advise I. OP

Maby some peps can.try it to.

THX for god things( Development)

::::;:;;maby I'm wrong::::;;;;

Cx-11
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zeppelinrox:
Turns out there is indeed a nasty bug. Been hassling with it.

It's fine at first and the bootlog is normal and says that it's done.

But something gets printed to it that shouldn't which shows that it isn't exiting when it's supposed to.

And the script is still in memory.

Then, after awhile, the bootlog starts getting filled with the errors you posted :p

Dunno.

What scripts do you have running on boot?

I'm leaning towards user error tho lol

It's easy to boost benchmarks, really.

Actually, it's all intentional.

"No SuperCharger For You" never has the preceding dots and is centered.

Whereas when there are 3 preceding dots...
...it's the continuation of a sentence...
...and is at the far right :)

==============

I'll answer others later