[myTouch 4G General] BlackSHELF:
Well I agree with you for the first part but second part is however another matter. Now I am not sure where you got it that NS has higher resale value to think SamSUX and the whole Nexus line always get spec below the current standard, check both of the device when it came out and compare it in that time with other device you will see. Now only thing I can think has value is the LIMITED EDITION which has the silly green R2D2 :P on the back cover IDK anyone who is willing to pay $100-200 for it matter of fact it was selling for #700? those fool who ordered it deserve what they got. The price of device depends on the demand and quality as new device comes out Nexus is replaced because they are just simply mere Google's standard which is behind the curve BTW. If you do own Vision I would get your G2 before I got NS.

If you take a look at HD2's current value you will see it is consistent with what it was month to month if not up and down little based on NAND/RAM ports. Now this is another thread of its own if you know about its development achievement I mean which device even come close? due to the superior hackablity that no other device even has. The point is HD2 came out in 2009(thats right long before that POS Evo was even ill conceived) and cloned from us. Yet the value is almost consistent yet check N1 price which came after HD2 compare the price. So tell me how Nexus line has higher resale value? If any fools want to pay more than its worth that does not speak for everyone.

I agree with you with the voodoo fix its much better performance that is with almost all SamSUX Galaxy type device. As I installed it on my friends device and tested it I do know its true for the aftermath effect which was nice. But for your second part lol it made me laugh as you measure performance with AngryBird? LOL that alone of its own is another thread which I will not get in here as its super off topic as I covered in both AF/AC forum. BTW I played it with 768mhz with no problem so IDK what you talking about.

Far as the last part the quadrant score with newer kernel goes it is right now closer to real device as it can score. But if you followed teamwisckys effort or mulafi or whatever his name was the guy who made Trinity OC kernel as you will know at the beginning they were getting 4000+ which most of us knew was a complete BS due to how NEON and JIT was allocated. Which after little investigation proved IO and database R/W had higher value due to how and where it was allocated on the temporary file system as flash vs ram concept. Point is syntactic benchmark means nothing as it does not translate in to real world performance, read below as I said in AF forum.

Take my score for example it is the current highest known score for MT4G. But its almost not realistic in terms of performance as its not also false in terms of being hacked. But only reason I was able to achieve this higher number is due to how my own device utilized the resource. Which with lower value for example 2800-3200 would actually be consistent with real world performance as I can see the difference. If you do search and look around my screenshots you will see I run one of the most cleanest, in terms of efficacy of resource and battery consumption than anyone in MT4G.

@carmeng4evr

BTW thats where I know you from AF :P I knew that named looked familiar.