yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] truc007:
@nuri1: sorry but you're doing all wrong (I'm newby also so I can write such a sympatic comment) :D

For your network problem:

If you mean that you tried SIM from each provider... it could be the phone.

If with one SIM card you can't connect to another provider... it's a SIM card problem (or agreement between providers)

For your flash problem:

you mixed too many things. Take one step by step guide and follow it carefully.

You can see your phone as 3 layers:

Boot

Recovery

Build

To go in boot:

1/ power the phone and hold vol-

2/ adb reboot bootloader

To go to recovery

1/ on some build, long press "power" choose "reboot" then tic "recovery"

2/ use ROM Manager and choose the option to reboot in recovery

3/ adb reboot recovery

All the rooting of the phone (S-OFF, ENG-OFF...) will allow to install the "recovery" on your phone. It's te first steps to do.

When you're done, in recovery just flash your build (it has to be a zip on your SD). The "Full Wipe 1.3" is just an empty build used to clear the NAND (at least one part). You don't have to use 2 different ones.

So when you talked about 2 zip... for me it's wrong.

I have my DHD since last week and there are good and easy guides in the dev section.

If CWM is installed follow the clear explanantions of "andyharney"

Tip: first launch of ROM Manager will freeze your phone (at least each time for me). It's due to the SU permission. Easy to solve, launch "solve permissions issues" (sorry translated from french), accept the SU warning then back (no need to go through the full process).

Then you can choose to reboot "recovery", no hang anymore.
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] nuri1:
hi,

you said in the rom manager you must click clockworkmod 2.0.xxx en no 3.0 xxx

but i can only see 3.0.0.6 en no the other?

wtf!!!

thx
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] nuri1:
i got it

thanks anyway

lets rock!!
[Xoom Themes and Apps] skullvet:
Google body is available on the market.

http://phandroid.com/2011/03/01/google-body-for-honeycomb-tablets-now-available/

Weatherbug for honeycomb beta is now on the market and installable and working.
[Xoom Themes and Apps] KwestJones:
they must have pulled it. When I click the link the market says its not found.
[Xoom Themes and Apps] skullvet:
Looks like it was pulled for some reason.
[Xoom Themes and Apps] theahlenius:
Weatherbug is playing well with the Xoom.
[Xoom Themes and Apps] banksj17:
I had a few closes. Not a force close but where the app would just close out.
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Calundle:
I got my Desire today and rooted it using Unrevoked. I tried flashing a couple ROMs and I keep getting Status 7 errors, something about bravo, I dunno. I tried flashing different radios then the ROMs again, still no luck. Any advice?
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Calundle:
Is this because it's CDMA? I'm confused if it is. Is there a ton of GSM ROMs and very few CDMA ones or something? And why isn't there a CDMA section if so?
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Calundle:
Well, that was the case. Got a CDMA CM 7 ROM to run. Back to the other two questions I posted above.
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ziggy1001:
Please don't post the same question in multiple posts ;)

Try searching list of cdma roms

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=809328
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Calundle:
I didn't? I said I figured out my problem and then said I would like my previous questions answered.
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ziggy1001:
Sorry so this was someone else with the same user name :p

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=11762712&postcount=382
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Calundle:
Yea, I got no replies there and thought this would be a more correct place to post it. Are you intentionally trying to come off as an ass? Please don't come in my thread posting off-topic stuff that does not help me in any way. Thanks.

In any way other than your edit telling me to search.
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ziggy1001:
So pointing you to a list of CDMA roms was not helping you?

FORUM RULES

http://xdaforums.com/announcement.php?f=642

1. Search before posting.

Use one of our search functions before posting, whether you have a question or something new to share, it's very likely someone already asked that question or shared that news.

5. Post a message only once.

As a large forum we don't need unnecessary clutter, You're free to edit your message as you like, so if you do not receive an answer revisit your message and see if you can describe your problem better. Not everyone is online at the same time, it might take a while before you receive an answer.
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Calundle:
Yea, you give me that list after you edited. Before that all you were doing is being an ass.

1. I did search, here and all over Google. Nothing directly answered the question as to why I was getting the Status 7.

2. I doubt it's a problem that I posted that in that thread and then decided this would be a better place to post. It didn't harm anyone. Unnecessary clutter is what you're doing.
[About XDA developers] ItsaRaid:
Im New to Android, but have visited the XDA site for some time, and enjoy want you folks do Immensely! Im Leaving a Blackberry 9700 for the Atrix, But I have some questions and hope maybe you can help me.

I urgently need your valuable opinion. I spent several hours yesterday (Sunday) at a AT&T Retail Store with the Motorola Atrix. As you may know the phone display is a smidge under resolution to the IPhone 4- it lacked the "Punch" I thought the Display would or should have- is it because of Android 2.2? The dual core and Nvidia graphics accelerator should have given the Atrix a absolutely stunning display, it was “Just Ok” display, but nowhere near the retina display of Apple. I am resigned or guessing to think that this may be a Android software thing-

The Battery time appears good, I ran the Motorola “Flash Demo Site” about 9 times, ran Kobe Bryant’s “Nike Black Mamba” 5 min Trailer sever times was all over the web, Huge Multi Media Sites, and I didn’t ding the Battery at all, which was very surprising-

There is no question the Phone is very fast, actually at this point, I’ve never held a faster phone in my hand, we downloaded Extreme Labs Speed test, “Blink” it was done, actually initially I thought the download aborted- No such luck, Its fast-

So the Bottom line, The Display worries me. On the other Hand I'm hearing the Display on the Xoom is Gorgeous- but their running Gingerbread 3.0- I remember there was talk that Gingerbread required some very High Tech Hardware in place, Dual Core, Nividia ect- The Atrix is running Android 2.2-

Oops! I left one thing out-

The Sales rep told me the phone was “LTE Ready”, when I asked what do you mean, he smiled and said all that’s required is a Sim Card Change Out, He said Both the Inspire and the Atrix were that way. After I got home I called AT&T and spoke to a Supervisor in Technical Services, who confirmed that dialog. I am very surprised, as none of the reviews have said that. There has been great debates over 4G, and articles that say the Atrix is but isn’t 4G, and cannot work on LTE-

I have always valued your XDA Forum opinions, and hope that you will take a moment to answer my questions. Any comment you can give or overall opinion would be graciously received as always.

By the way, Why is the Display a big deal to me, I had Cataract Surgery in Both eyes! I have Multifocal Implants in both eyes, the quality of the display is very important to my vision. Several Reviewers have noticed the Lack of on the Pentile Display of the Atrix, Im hoping its curable, the Atrix seems like a really nice first android for me.
[Vibrant General] DanK Ups:
I don't know if this is possible but I do notice a whole heck of a bunch of great things that are going on in the Dev section that seem to get boged down with the same noob posts that get the same anti-noob reactions.

I think that some of that might be solved by separating updates of a Rom or Theme from the the original post. I understand that doing as such may in the interim hinder Developers as far as having to look at more folder and or tabs, but I feel that since updates of Roms, Kernels, and Themes, are happening so frequently it may be able to help the "Helper Bees" keep helping.

I don't know if that means every Rom, Kernel, or Theme should have it's own folder, or if maybe once and update comes out if it should get it's own sub-folder in that section with a pseudo-bible on how the overall works out with an OP for each individual sub-folder, (I mean at the end of the day I don't even know if any of this is possible).

This all being said I know and am well aware that people either are unable, unwilling, and in some cases unaware of where to post their questions. I just think this might be able to help folks find the info they need on things they want in a more timely and less cluttered fashion. I also thing this could help cut past a lot of the BS and having to wade through 1,000 plus posts on something that may not even be relevant until page 990.

That all being said thanks for hearing me (reading me) out, and I hope you know that I realize that I am just a small fish in a very large pond but I hope you all know that I love how each and every one who has been so willing to Develop all of these amazing Roms, Kernels, and Themes for us for in most cases for no monetary reward, and how much I appreciate each and every person who helps try to dig somebody out of a technological hole.
[General Topics] z33dev33l:
Ok, it's quite clear android is the most popular phone OS on the market at the moment but I'm beginning to believe that some of their less customer friendly strategies are making the carriers greedy. Back in the day when I was using my original blackjack each time there was an update to Winmo I knew that within a couple weeks ATT would get it my way without fail. Ever since the G1 though there's a new tactic used of course to sell more phones. Basically they can release the same exact phone with a new version of an OS or maybe a small feature (e.g. front facing camera) and sell just as much as the original. I mean why would carriers want to update your phone for you when they could sell you the exact same phone back with the newest version of android which is likely just a palette swap of the previous version? The refusal of most carriers to update their devices kicked off hard even with the initial release of android. The G1 was essentially the same phone as the MT3g except with the amazing keyboard we all fell in love with. The mytouch released months later with the exact same specs (you can even run the exact same roms on them) and yet the mytouch got an update whereas the G didn't. When people asked T-mobile where their G1 update was T-mobile said that it was not possible to run live wallpapers on such a dated device. Ever since then time and time again carriers and OEMs have let us down not because they cant do it but because they can sell us another device if they won't. A big selling point in getting the behold 2 for me was the fact that it would receive every update according to samsung... They never even built the drivers... I was stuck with a phone with a terrible UI. It happens time and time again and now similar things seem to be happening to other OSes. Blackberry is running into the same kind of thing where that more or less never happened before and I'm not ruling windows phone out just yet but I fear with greedy carriers they may end up following suit as much as I hate to admit it. The OEMs and carriers greed is killing smartphones. I mean android is open source and free, if they want to put it on a toaster they can. How hard is it to update? Really? I mean I know there's some one man teams on XDA who can do it... Dont let smartphones die.
[General Topics] Product F(RED):
It's not Android. It's more Google's policies. I love Google, but they have to grow some balls and tell the manufacturers that in order to be able to release an Android phone with the Google Apps, they need to release updates in X amount of months maximum after an update is delivered and they must support a phone for at least 2 OS iterations.

Forget Apple. Look at Microsoft. Windows Phone 7 isn't really for me since I like to tinker with my phone, although occasionally I wish it wasn't such a time waster. It is a great OS though. Microsoft first of all tells manufacturers that they can include custom apps, but no custom interfaces (this will never happen with Android). Then, they release an upgrade and all the phones get it. I'll admit it's a little easier since all WP7 have mostly the same parts, and definitely the same Snapdragon CPU since that's all WP7 OS supports right now. But this can totally be done by Google. I think the market is over-saturated with Android phones right now. Choice is good, but I don't want to pick up a phone and then immediately have it deemed obsolete. I mean after a while, I just want to walk away. I love Android, but it is getting kind of ridiculous. Obviously, manufacturers won't listen to us. Google is more likely to. They need to get a hold on things.
[General Topics] FLAC Vest:
I see where you're coming ffrom, but you have to remember that companies (all companies) are here to make money. That's it. Make money.

So they'll mmake phones with skins because they get some percentage back from the phone; granted they could offer a pure Google phone but you have to remember: we aren't fhe target audience.

These phones are made for the average consumer that has the default and maybe twitter and facebook.

Of course, there will always be good pure Google phone out there to snag. I just got the Nexus 1 and ill be using this for a long time.
[General Topics] lossi.grey320:
Hey!! This is really a great thread. I am really very impressed with your conversation.
[General Topics] butch87402:
I feel like I was played I preorderded the mytouch 3g 1.0 for $230 and now its not even sold anymore I wanna upgrade but their telling me its pretty much $300 to upgrade so you mean I get no discount.....wth? 8 years with T-Mobile and I get nothing
[General Topics] Product F(RED):
Well, that's more a T-Mobile issue than an Android issue, but I feel your pain.
[General Topics] Dirk:
All carriers are interested in is selling contracts and phones. They don't really care about peoples experiences after that point. They certainly won't want to encourage people to hang on to the same devices for years, but i think they should obligated to support their phones for at least the duration of the warranty. Any software updates released within that period should be pushed out immediately.
[General Topics] bruce guo:
Don't be anxious, when u check technology developments in the past 20 years or more. How can we tell the difference between technology innovation and hunger for money?

'Greedy' is the nature of us human beings and it give us more happy and distress.
[General Topics] mazook98:
It's not the carriers you need to be worried about. Android is a fantastic OS and I love it and have gotten into the inner workings of it lately, to realize one thing: Google drives this whole deal. And since Google makes 98% of its money off of its Adsense program, wouldn't you agree that they would like to maintain/build that as much as possible? The more Google knows about where you are, your likes and dislikes, what you search for, etc, the better they can facilitate their moneymaking process. Google Apps (Gapps) are the way they do this, and why they are not included in a 'real' open souce project. Think it's bad now? Wait till Honeycomb....I've been tweaking this for the past 3 weeks and you wouldn't believe the permission changes that are related to google. Little things that were Hardware processes before (alert me when near an open wifi) are now basically (alert google your location thru gps at all times.). Of course there are ways around it, but the avg. user won't know that. Just fyi.
[General Topics] xaccers:
If anything Apple ruined it for us.

Imagine a world without iphones.

Microsoft wouldn't have had it to copy for WP7, instead they would have had been free to release WM7, with all the features of WM, and also designed for future technologies.

Even if they had copied Android, we'd have a decent Microsoft OS for our phones unlike now.
[General Topics] z33dev33l:
Initially I thought you were an intelligent person one could have an adult debate with based on facts. Thank you for proving me wrong only in that sense and in no way in any of the debates.
[General Topics] xaccers:
You're on WP7 so apple's model has more impact on you than googles.

Are you suggesting that MS may stop deplying updates for WP7 or start allowing carriers to not deploy updates MS provide?

If not, then how exactly does google/carriers releasing new features to stimulate handset sales ruin it for WP7 or iphone users for that matter?

Carriers have always behaved this way, whatever the OS unless contractually obliged to roll out updates.

We missed out on so many updates for Nokias for instance, so this has nothing to do with google or android.
[General Topics] z33dev33l:
Cant say I have much experience with Symbian devices but on Winmo, palm, and earlier blackberries I always got updates. Android has shown they dont need to maintain their devices to sale them and I believe that can have a negative impact on phones as a whole
[General Topics] xaccers:
The fact is it has been going on long before android came on the scene. Motorola, samsung, lg, and many others forced you to get a new handset to take advantage of new features.

The only reason to single out android is for a petty grievence.

Especially as many android handsets have recieved updates which negates your idea that android prevents this.
[General Topics] z33dev33l:
It's not so much that they prevent it as it is that they dont even really suggest it. It's just like "Oh, btw heres this update. You dont have to put work forth to put it on your device but it's there if you want it. It's really the OEMs and carriers fault as I stated but the fact that android doesnt put something forth to at least suggest it is sad.
[General Topics] xaccers:
So your argument is, even though you can't stand android and won't touch it, you think it is wrong of google to not interfere with carriers and manufacturers in dictacting whether updates it produces are made available to handsets and this somehow is ruining WP7 for you, but despite this being normal practice between carriers and manufacturers since time immemorial, your singling out of android (even though phones have actually been recieving updates) rather than manufacturers or carriers is nothing at all to do with your dislike of android, right?
[General Topics] z33dev33l:
Never said I hated android. It's just second best now. Of course phones lose support over time but not before they even hit shelves. When the Galaxy S phones were coming out they were promised a fast update to 2.2. It only took T-mobile 6+ months of customers complaining for them to be the first to update it stateside. My old blackjack made by the exact same company was recieving its last update at the end of my contract a full two years later. The HTC touch did the same, hell even my PPC6800 would've had that not been where I started flashing roms. Android phones are burnt out and left to rot by the time they hit shelves and that is something new. I dont expect a phone to be supported forever but for them to stop support by the time it hits shelves is just sad.
[General Topics] xaccers:
T-mobile are not google/android, they're a carrier.

Android handsets have recieved updates, therefore your statement that they are left to rot by the time they hit the shelves is not true (there's a suprise).

Apple/WP7 interfere with carriers and dictate to them what updates should be released (even if they haven't thought it would be a good idea to test it before the release to carriers) therefore your suggestion that Android is ruining it for all of us is also not true (again big suprise).

Additionally, when a new version is released, it does not prevent phones running the old versions from running, nor does it prevent them accessing the thousands of apps currently in the market, again showing that android phones aren't burnt out and left to rot by the time they hit the shelves.
[General Topics] Step666:
Amen.

[10 char]
[General Topics] z33dev33l:
Thats funny because I just flashed my G1 back to stop and I cant access a ton of the apps... I said it was the fault of the carriers and OEMs though I do wish android would at least suggest updating. I mean of all the android devices out there what percent of them do you think actually receive updates through the service providers or OEMs?
[General Topics] rickyzone:
While I admit that not having android phones (This could be shortened to like, andrones) receive updates from manufactures does suck, I don't find this to be ruining it. I work at a retail store, and I always converse with customers who whip out their android phone about their phone and about their experience with it.

They always love it, and the selection of apps. I have yet to hear of a complaint about lack of updates. At all. Ever.

The people who do want the updates generally have the ability to use google. And as there is an extensive modding community both on xda and elsewhere, they find that they can add updates to their phones if they really want to, so there really isn't a huge push for the updates.

What I DO believe is a problem is locking hardware down. Since manufactures aren't really in the game for releasing updates, they should make it much easier for third party developers to change the phones if they want, but leave that function invisible to those who aren't interested. It's a win win for everyone.
[General Topics] Sabobo0:
Android

Android Android Make me wander what is the best Android Mobile Phone in the Market so I can anyone sure their opinion :) ?

:o
[General Topics] FLAC Vest:
I still haven't used a Windows Phone 7 yet; clicked a couple of times in the store but that doesn't really count.

I saw one for the first time in a food place about 2 weeks ago and asked the girl to hold it. Smooth but I'm sure I'd get bored of it quickly.
[General Topics] JNick777:
Well they can't really make updates for devices that have hardware that's unable to handle the updates.

They also can't just make the update for every phone because they have to actually work on the update, and if they made the latest update for every phone they would have a lot of work on their hands lol.
[General Topics] Regii:
On one hand, the capitalism of the companies that see an opportunity to just sell the update with a new phone is utter crap, but on the other hand, I too haven't encountered anyone who is dissatisfied with the state of his/her Android Phone. While some might complain about poor performance that should be improved with some kind of update, there's the modding community doing their best to do what Nintendon't... oh wait wrong company. But really, I think, if the manufacturers actually made it easier to modify the firmwares, no one should complain tha much, since it's easily understandable that with the variety of different hardware packed into the Android phones, one has to make customization for each of those firmwares.
[General Topics] Step666:
Except Motorola owners.
[General Topics] Regii:
Is that issue hardware-related or what are you talking about? I have a Samsung device so I'm not the one to argue here but I'm interested to hear...
[General Topics] Step666:
Motorola deliberately encrypt parts of their ROMs (specifically the bootloader) thus rendering it basically impossible to create truly custom ROMs.