yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Optimus One, P500, V Themes and Apps] bluviper:
just wanted to ask to the theme maker, and other theme makers of 2.2.2 who reads this.

when i installed this theme on Nessy #Cassandra, while watching videos on landscape mode, then when you press the volume buttons either sides, the screen simple freezes and the whole system hangs...

every theme i tried with Nessy... happens like this..

so now i wanted to ask those Lol 1.4 users if they experience the same?

thanks to those who will reply.
[Optimus One, P500, V Themes and Apps] socialdistortion:
No crashes in LOL 1.4... though I've tried only YouTube videos..
[Optimus One, P500, V Themes and Apps] bluviper:
thats alright i guess the bug is seen that way too... i guess its with Nessy ROMS only...
[Optimus One, P500, V Themes and Apps] AsherChua:
Tried on megatron.Reboots whenever I hold down the power key.
[Optimus One, P500, V Themes and Apps] maped:
LoL 1.4 works!!!

Thank you very much zxhian
[Optimus One, P500, V Themes and Apps] :
it reboots on LOL 1.2 when watching youtube in fullscreen and press the power button
[Optimus One, P500, V Themes and Apps] pariksheetsharma:
Appreciate your work... but some how honeycomb doesn't look as cool as other android themes like Gingerbread, froyo default themes.

I think it needs a redesign from Google.
[Optimus One, P500, V Themes and Apps] zxhian:
My Apologies im not monitoring this thread, lovin cm7/gingerbread by mik_os atm and using the awesome Honeybread Theme by **haxzamatic**

thanks for all the feedback :D
[Optimus One, P500, V Themes and Apps] sbatta:
sorry but... the icon "hide" of vibration/sound in lockscreen is a bug or it's normal?!
[Optimus One, P500, V Themes and Apps] socialdistortion:
It's not a bug.

The dev just hid the icon to make the lock screen cooler...
[Optimus One, P500, V Themes and Apps] kly91:
after flashing it I was not able to access the power menu..every time i press the power button i find my phone automatically restarting..

HElp me please..what should i do so that the menu would appear again so that i could turn of my phone without having the battery removed..
[Optimus One, P500, V Themes and Apps] zeu55:
can anyone confirm work om Megatron??
[Optimus One, P500, V Themes and Apps] nikalai:
Same problem here.
[Optimus One, P500, V Themes and Apps] evripidis:
Will it be a new version for LOL 1.4.2 or do we install the stuff for 1.4?

Thank you a lot !
[Optimus One, P500, V Themes and Apps] kly91:
Hi I fixed the pro0blem by reflashing..:D..

I figured out that every time i flash the honeycomb theme over while using another theme like the gingerbread + circular battery the power menu will disappear..But if the honeycomb theme is flashed over the original rom without modifications of other themes the power menu will not disappear..everything would be fine..
[Optimus One, P500, V Themes and Apps] kly91:
No..its ok to flash it with the 1.4.2..i'm using it right now without any problem..

Hopefully it will work with you too.
[Optimus One, P500, V Themes and Apps] jimmyleo85:
the circullar batery, not update until you restart / play some aplication like angry bird.

anyone can help me for fix this problem?
[Optimus One, P500, V Themes and Apps] kly91:
here are my screen shots..

,,

I love this theme..more power pardz..hope you can creat more great themes..

By the way what are you using or what did you do at the notification area to show specifically the information about charging..i want that one too but i don't know where to find it? (Can you pls help me with that?0 Thank you a lot..

This is what i want to have on my p500 too. Where could i get it?
[Optimus One, P500, V Themes and Apps] zxhian:
try "battery indicator" by darshan computing @ market"

or try this thread

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=947354
[Optimus One, P500, V Themes and Apps] ahmadfarisfs:
can it used on nessy rom ?
[Optimus One, P500, V Themes and Apps] miedy12:
opps sorry u said no actual increments thats why it showed 80 thanks for this theme i just installed fonts also hehe the defult
[Optimus One, P500, V Themes and Apps] kly91:
Is there anyway i could get the lockscreen work for CM7?
[Optimus One, P500, V Themes and Apps] sadun91:
nice theme here..
[Optimus One, P500, V Themes and Apps] FomaWhite:
will it work on russian device with android 2.2 (root+custom recovery)?

kernel version: 2.6.32.9

make number: FRF91

software version: LGP500-v10d-oct-18-2010
[Optimus One, P500, V Themes and Apps] zxhian:
need custom rom for it
[Optimus One, P500, V Themes and Apps] Kira.Lawliet:
HONEYCOMB MOD for VOID/DEVOID+NO BATTSTAT+NO POWERMENU

v01B Changes:

- NO %Circular Battery Yet

Hm you working on this? Or void users are stuck on no %stat increases on battery?

Thanks anyway for this
[Optimus One, P500, V Themes and Apps] slipmeknot:
has anyone tried using this on franco's devoid rom? do I need to wipe something? tnx
[Optimus One, P500, V Themes and Apps] sbatta:
can i flash on CM7 for optimus one???
[Vibrant General] techboydino:
Getting ready to switch it up again. Updated Bionix 1.2 to 1.3 (KB1) and have been having some issues with data and battery. Reset batt stats to see if that makes any difference and testing out data. The battery would change dramatically after each reboot (like 40% prior to reboot and 7% after). And the data gives me time out errors while browsing. No issues with either on 1.2.1.

Looking for opinions on Frost in regards to look and feel over 1.3. Will probably change the kernel sometime anyway but would be willing to check out the latest included for a while. Just looking for some thoughts, especially if you have used both. Thanks.
[Vibrant General] tomasitoc:
it's the kernel, use jocelyn's kernel
[Vibrant General] GoodVibrant-ions:
I posted this over at TW forums, but it sums up your question pretty well.

"I flashed frost and ran it for a day or so. To be honest.... I liked it for the most part. I really liked the frost theming and the white menus. They looked sharp and it was a nice change. I could have done without the animations but they were unique and pretty cool as well. The drawbacks of frost was that it just never felt polished. It seemed like it just needed some fine tuning here and there. But don't get me wrong.....other than the extra SD card issue, it was fully functional and would have served me well as a daily driver.

I flashed bionix 1.3 cause I have been using the bionix v roms since the beginning and after reading Som's op, I had to at least try it. 1.3 is a blazing rocket ship piloted greased cheetah on a supernova fast. It is the definition polished and refined. TW has really shown what this phone is capable of with this rom. That being said, Iand maybe its because I've been using bionix v for a little while, but I find it a little boring in the theme/style depth but I can make all the changes I find necessary with launcher pro and I make some of my own icons to match my wallpapers on Photoshop. I should actually upload some of them eventually.

All in all it really boils down to what do you want your phone for? Are you the form over function kind of person, where you show your phone off to the honeys and like to get jealous looks from all of your non technically capable friends? If so then frost is for you. Or are you the function over form kind of person that needs his phone to do what you tell it to immediately or sooner? The kind of person that is more impressed by flawless operation than beautiful mwnus and screen transitions? If that's the case then bionix 1.3 is the way to go.

As for me....I like my phone to be precise and intuitive, smooth as buttah, and silky like thighs And I can do enough in the style department on my own so I'm rockin' bionix 1.3 and probably will be for a while.

But I'll tell ya, I want a frost style theme for bionix v 1.3 so bad I can taste it."
[Vibrant General] alecjake:
i used frost (before it was updated--i used the very first edition of it) and it was wayyy to slow and laggy for me. try waiting 8 secs after hitting a button for it to start working. so i switched to 1.3 and i love it.
[Vibrant General] roguly:
i've been using frost also since version 1, and it took about 30 min after flashing for the phone to not lag at all. Now im on frost update 2 and its awesome, plus the overstock kernel which now works on it. its pretty sick.

thing is: these are technically and aesthically different roms.

one is black one is white

one is older and further "advanced" than the other.

one is based on a different android version then the other (i think?)

so maybe you can compare these roms once frost has been out for a couple of months, and the bugs worked out
[Vibrant General] Mannymal:
I think the few improvements in 2.2.1 are not the worth the current kinks. I may try Frost again later when it is just as good as the 2.2 Bionix.
[Vibrant General] techboydino:
Thanks for all the input. I'll probably be running 1.3 for a while with a Kernel swap. I usually run through Kernel's weekly but wanted to make sure it was not the ROM before I started making changes. 2.2.1 is not really enough changes to make that much of a difference and I prefer AOSP or closest to it over theming. Thanks again fellas. :D
[Vibrant General] YMark:
I'm using Bionix 1.2.1. Don't really see any reason to upgrade to 1.3 and I don't care for the looks of Frost.
[Vibrant General] C-4Nati:
Stock bionix 1.3 which means no other kernels is amazing. 26 hours since I charged my phone last and its blazing fast.
[Vibrant General] Emama:
in Bionix 1.2.1 now

It sounds like more problem upgrading to 1.3,

and even more problem in 2.2.1

I dont want to keep flashing the fix-update1,2,3
[Vibrant General] C-4Nati:
Idk where u heard that. Everytime I flash any of those roms it goes flawless n smooth.
[Vibrant General] krylon360:
so, would you rather flash 1 version where there are bugs, and wait..and wait..and wait.. for another full rom with the fix? or would you rather flash, then flash a quick no wipe patch to fix the issue?
[Vibrant General] Scoobyracing03:
I played with both over the weekend. It's a tough call I liked features of both ROMs but over all I'm going to stick with Bionix 1.3.
[Vibrant General] Oniyuri:
Well, originally I was caught up in the hype of Frost (and by no means do I think it disappoints) but in the end I decided to flash Bionix-V 1.3 instead because I needed a daily driver and felt (at that point in time) that the Bionix-V ROM was the better way to go (mostly because I needed access to both my SD cards at any given moment).

TBH, I'll probably still end up flashing Frost in a bit. I'm just waiting for all the updates to be rolled up in a single package and for the issues with TiBU to be fixed (if possible).
[Vibrant General] viero86:
1.3 is smoother, faster and and better battery life in my opinion

GPS worked for the 1st time after flashing too, but now it stuck again. Don't know why :(
[Vibrant General] oka1:
Both have pluses and minuses, purely preferencal. problem now is all the roms offered by all the devs are all so good....... hard to choose
[Vibrant General] GoodVibrant-ions:
Hehehe......I went back to frost last night cause I just loved how it looks and it is running a lot smoother. So for what its worth, frost can now be a daily driver too.
[Vibrant General] DON2003:
does going from Bionix 1.3 to frost need to disable voodoo?

how can we disable voodoo fast & easy?

tia
[Vibrant General] Oniyuri:
From the OP of the Frost thread:

4. If you are already currently using voodoo either with one of our roms or another rom, you DO NOT have to disable it before flashing. Just flash right on top!
[Vibrant General] checktheemails:
Whoever said in this thread that they are intentionally holding off on 1.3 is a fooool! I whipped out my vibrant against and iphone 4, sony xperia of some kind, htc droid of some kind and everyone was impressed with how fast it was. I will have to try launcher pro though as an earlier poster recommended.
[Windows Phone 7 General] decoy_56:
WP7 desperately need a 3g to wifi tethering app like myfi. I used to have an iphone but switched WP7 and now I need a 'myfi' like app badly.

Can someone some building this app ASAP.
[Windows Phone 7 General] The Gate Keeper:
at present it's not possible to even build one as there aren't any APIs for it. I'm sure this has been asked quite a few times on this forum already... please search... rather than just continually asking what people deem as a common requirement. also search the pinned threads as they're a good place to start for missing functionality...
[Windows Phone 7 General] N8ter:
There are APIs. Samsung phones can tether so yh APIs are there. WP7 is just CE with some changes/additions. Microsoft just isn't allowing access to the APIs...

Sent from my HD7 using Board Express
[Windows Phone 7 General] The Gate Keeper:
I would think that OEMs have a different set of APIs which provide them with native capabilities. I doubt the OEMs are writting their apps in just C# otherwise MS would have released those APIs as well.

also to note, those phones that can tether is done through the diagnostics, which would imply that they should be already in all windows phones and just dormant. i highly doubt it's specific to samsung phones. it may be that we only know how to do it with samsung phones now.
[Windows Phone 7 General] N8ter:
That's my point. The APIs exist, as does the base Windows CE system.

We just don't have the development tools nor do we have access to that level of the system to be able to write those applications ourselves.

We're limited to sandboxed Silverlight-based applications, but Microsoft and OEMs can use Native Code and APIs we don't have access to.

They exist, we just don't have access to them. Apple does the same thing with iOS.

Thanks for agreeing with me, though :)

Which also means WP7 supports tethering. The functionality just isn't exposed to users in the general user interface, that is why you have to dig for it. The same thing is true for Sideloading XAPs, among other things.

It's there. The OS is totally capable of it. WP7 did, in fact, inherit a ton of functionality from Windows Mobile. The difference is that the new UI doesn't expose it to the user, and applications (and the system) are managed in a totally different way.

There's a huge difference between "does not exist" and "exists, but functionality is not exposed in the UI."

Windows on a PC can access drives, etc. by device name, but that is not exposed in the UI - for example. The same is true for many features in WP7 that are there by virtue of it being based on CE and tied (although Microsoft would want you to think differently) to Windows Mobile. They just chose not to expose this functionality.

Not saying it's totalyl based on WM, since that's obviously untrue. If that was the case stuff like full Exchange support, Video support for MMS, etc. would be working.

But the fact that this stuff is there and they're dragging their feet to allow users to use it is what's keeping lots of users off of WP7 at the moment. It's taking them too long to make changes that seem too simple... Maybe for the sake of security, I don't know. They haven't really been transparent with early adopters, IMO.

EDIT: Also, you can call Native Code from managed languages (C#, VB.NET, Java, etc.), so I'm pretty sure they are writing their apps in C# and only calling native code/libraries when they need to. Writing it in straight C/C++ is [potentially] more dangerous than using a Managed Language with Interop. I can't see Microsoft going for that.
[Fascinate General] bhfd64:
I'm running EB01 2.6 sc. Have been trying to add shut down animation but my phone won't let me modify system folder. I've flashed back to stock and used a different method for root access and tried several different file managers. Whenever I try to make a change, it tells me the folder was created successfully or the move was successful but no changes actually happen. Does anyone have any ideas?

From my Super Frankencleaned Fascinate via XDA App
[Fascinate General] bhfd64:
bump from 2nd page..
[Fascinate General] chopper the dog:
Hmm, There is a shutdown.apk in system/app that has appeared within the last 4 versions of super clean. I bet that has something to do with your shutdown ani's not being recognized or appearing.

good day.
[Fascinate General] zipgunjny:
Ran into the same problem. I had to use Super Manager. Just make sure u go into the settings for super manager and enable root function

Sent from my TRS-80 using DOS
[Fascinate General] bhfd64:
Thanks I'll give that a shot and report back. I'm happy to find someone who at least is aware that this issue exists haha. I've been perusing the forums for days and everyone is speechless about it.
[Fascinate General] bhfd64:
It worked!!! Thanks a ton.......such a weird problem...why would only that particular file manager work???
[Fascinate General] bhfd64:
Then again........maybe it's not entirely fixed. I'm now allowed to add system folders. I wasn't before. But I don't see a "move" option anywhere, to move shutdown.ogg (or whatever I'm trying to move) I only see Copy and Cut. When I choose one of those, it says "Prepare to Copy" (or Cut), but never actually does so.
[Fascinate General] zipgunjny:
Just rename the original to shutdown.ogg.old or oldshutdown.ogg . I remember that it says preparing to copy and it actually will copy the file/folder so all you have to do is navigate to the right folder and hit the clipboard icon to paste.

QQQQ
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] epicman123:
Hello, I was just wondering if they charged 10 our 20 dollars a month for 4g phones because of the new $10 premium data for all smartphones and the $10 for 4g phones.

So do 4g phone users pay 10 or 20 dollars a month extra?
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Kcarpenter:
$10 on all smart phones now regardless of network. 3g or 4g.
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] WrlsFanatic:
Sprint never charged $10 for 4G. Blame the idiots here complaining about the charge for misleading you into thinking it was a 4G charge. Sprint charges HIGH USAGE PHONES $10 more a month. They are now rolling that charge out to more smartphones as the usage on them has been increasing over time.
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] churro7:
On my heaviest month I've only used maybe 2 to 3 gb
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] nullghost:
The irony in this is the fact that said "high usage phones" have 4G, which is cheaper for Sprint to produce than 3G data. So by using 4G, we are actually saving Sprint money, even if we use more data than we normally would on 3G.

Premium data fee? I think not. More like "misleadingly named fee to recover the cost of constructing 4G towers, but once we recover those costs it'll all be profit" fee.
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] WrlsFanatic:
If you think your individual usage matters even a little in the grand scheme of things, I suggest maybe auditing a Microeconomics course at your local community college. Here's the short version:

It costs Sprint $x to provide data service, which is variable based on tonnage

There are y users of their data service

They must charge customers $z per month to cover those costs and make a slight profit:

$z MUST BE > $x/y or Sprint starts to lose money. Since $x increases as average data tonnage increases, so must $z increase as well.

Rather than raise everyone's prices by $5, they chose to charge smartphone users - who use FAR more, on average, than non-smartphone customers - $10 per month to cover the increasing costs of data capacity. I used to work at Sprint, and I've seen how exponential the 3G (forget 4G) usage of EVOs were compared to any other phone on their network.

Look at Sprint's publicly available financial data, and then look at their prices for "nearly" unlimited voice and data on an EVO ($79 per month) compared to what the same would cost on any other carrier. If you still feel they're ripping you off and somehow making a ton of profit, I suggest you start an aggressive letter-writing campaign.

P.S. Just in case you think carriers have all the capacity they could ever need and increasing capacity is not a REAL need, I give you two pieces of proof: AT&T (its issues with capacity are well-known) and debt-to-cash ratios of any major US wireless carrier (they racked up that debt by buying capacity).
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] nullghost:
Sure, but I submit to you the notion that using 4G instead of 3G reduces the overall value of X, Sprint's cost of providing data service. I don't mind the $10 fee, as it's still much cheaper than other carriers. I just think in it's ORIGINAL form (Evo and Epic only), calling it a "premium data fee" was misleading. Yes, those phones were intended and expected to use more data, but the availability of 4G is a balancing factor for those data usage costs to Sprint.
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] WrlsFanatic:
First, refer to my post above this one.

Second, Sprint buys 4G service from Clear wholesale. However, they haven't agreed to terms on that yet. Clear spoke about this in their earnings release a week or two ago, read it if you like. Yes, it should be cheaper per kb, but that's not what Clear is asking for. I won't say what they WANTED Sprint to pay, but I will say it's considerably higher than what you'd pay for OVERAGE with any US carrier per kb. Ridiculous.

But that honestly doesn't even affect what Sprint is charging you because they don't even know what they'll be paying for that as of now. The bottom line is, 4G isn't all that readily available, when it is available it's spotty, and even when it's solid, most people either use wifi or don't turn 4G on because of the massive battery drain.

It isn't now, nor was it ever, a 4G fee.
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] nullghost:
Huh, I never knew the bit about Clear. I knew they partnered to provide 4G, but that was the extent of my knowledge on the subject.

Looks like our replies are a bit out of sync. :p damn you xda forums!
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] MedicStuder:
It wasn't the "idiots" on here. That's what sprint reps where telling people it was for. It was a discussion on here so we all could figure it out when it started.

Sent from my EB13 Samsung Epic
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] WrlsFanatic:
Fair enough... some Sprint reps aren't really bright either... that's the same anywhere: some people are more informed than others.

Still, the press releases called it a premium data charge (not a 4G charge), the bill called it a premium data charge (not a 4G charge), and Sprint actually did officially state several times right after it was announced that it wasn't for 4G, but for higher-usage phones. I do hold XDA to a higher standard in general, but some don't know, which I understand.

I don't mean to completely condescend like I'm better than anyone (which I'm clearly not), but it's frustrating to me - as a former Sprint employee that very much loved the company - how badly misconstrued their pricing actions were. I understand that nobody wants higher prices, but Sprint is far and away the cheapest for what you get, and instead of getting praise for being the cheapest, they get hate for being only slightly cheaper after the fee. Again, look at their balance sheet if you think they're printing money. They're not.
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] MedicStuder:
It sounds like sprint takes good cared of their employees. The rep that helped me came from verizon to sprint to work. He didn't have anything good to say about verizon....lol. I know its not for 4g. I think they just used that as a reason at first but anywho don't matter we still hve to pay and I am more then happy to because of the great customer service I get. Plus its better then what other providers charge. I am saving about 50 a month when compared to my old verizon bills.

Sent from my EB13 Samsung Epic
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ghostrid3r:
This fiasco can be directly blamed on dan hesse (CEO) of sprint. That over paid exec. went on record and put his foot in his mouth with a tv ad he put out saying "sprint would never charge extra for their new 4G services". So with that said, Dan was between a rock and a hard place with his penis in a jar of peanut butter. :D

I still feel he's ****ing nutts!