yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Nook Color General] KidJoe:
I just picked up a SDSQ-008G-A11M at staples. Its a CL4 on the card.

But based on crystal disk bench marks, its SLOWER than the SDSQ-8192-AB11M I got a Best Buy.
[Nook Color General] Seseo17:
I just ordered the

Patriot LX Series Class 10 16GB Micro SDHC Flash Card Model PSF16GMCSDHC10 (16GB)

off Newegg. $27.99 after mail in rebate. Free shipping.

EDIT: I looked in the comments about the card and several people have mentioned using this card with their rooted Nook Colors.
[Nook Color General] ax135:
FYI, your local Costo has the Sandisk class 4 8GB micro SDHC card for $15.99. They also include 100 free photo prints (worth around $10) if you have the need. I find the Sandisk cards to be compatible with the Nook. I had the A-DATA 8GB class 6 and the Patriot 8GB class 10 both of which lock up on my Nook.
[Nook Color General] tablo:
I bought the 8GB SanDisk MicroSD card from Best Buy recently, but it doesn't say what class it is anywhere on the package, has code sdsdq-8192-ab11m on the back. It was sale price of $25, onlybought from there because I had a $15 certificate.

I'm guessing it's class 2. Can someone verify?
[Nook Color General] bbasiaga:
There should be a number in a circle on the card. That would be the class. I got a sandisk class 4 8gbat office max this week for 17.99. There were class 2 and 4cards in the same same rack. P
[Nook Color General] tablo:
Confirmed that it was a class 2 card. Thanks.
[Nook Color General] boborone:
Just got this card in an email from amazon

class 6, 8 gb, 16.99 free shipping

http://www.amazon.com/Transcend-mic...GUSDHC6E/dp/B0026L7DG0/ref=wl_mb_hu_m_T2_7_dp
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kent1146:
I have a problem where the clock / time will lag behind by a few minutes over time on EB01-based ROMs? I know that there were a few people that posted about this in the custom ROM threads, but I couldn't find any potential solutions.

I have tried auto-syncing the time off of the Verizon network, as well as manually setting the time - same problem in both cases. If it is relevant, I'm using a Blackhole 4.2 ROM.

(1) Does anybody else have this problem? It might help to see how widespread this is.

(2) Does anybody know of a solution to this?
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] irishcain:
I've had time issues with all of the EB01 roms I've tried. I think it has something to do with not having the original kernal or something (if I was a dev, I could fix it myself, lol). Anyway, the best solution I've found is to install "clocksync" from the market. It's free and you can set it to update every 30 seconds or so.
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Jaredsk74:
Hmm I keep hearing about clock lag on Froyo but I haven't had it on any of my roms. I've used stock, deodexed, super clean 2.3, and now black hole 4.21. No clock lag on any of them, my kernal has been switched off and on between voodoo and normal so idk. It's on auto sync from the network too so I'm not sure what the problem is. Maybe try the EB01 Odin package?
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] solido888:
I have been running different EB01 releases since it leaked, and I did not have this problem at all until yesterday. It doesn't seem to just slowly drift behind, but it does end up falling behind anywhere from 9-18 minutes from what I have seen so far. Then, it will just sync fine, as it is currently reporting the correct time.
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] JJRocker:
I had the problem for a day and it seemed to go away when I reprogrammed my towers with the *228 function. If you haven't done that already, you should try that.
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dalrym05:
Never had this issue. Is this happening with the clock in the status bar or a widget? If its a widget it could be a task killer killing the widget and its not restarting. But if its the status bar clock I suggest you use eb01 clock remove.zip. ;-)
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] piperat:
I'm with all the others never had batt issues, clock issues, or the infamous sleep of death.

Used my fascinating voodoo powers
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] blahbleh:
I too am having problems. But I also have problems if I turn auto time sync off, so it leads me to believe it is some kernel issue? I've had this issue with Super Clean and Vanilla.

Is that *228 command 2 that you're suggesting?

This is certainly very annoying..
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] bigshotproducer:
Excellent! I'll give this a whirl once wife is back with her phone! Thanks!!!
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] chopper the dog:
No issues as stated here. SC2.2.

good day.
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ezas:
Never had any of the EB01 issues till the clock lag. I just did the *228 since going to SC 2.6 so time (HeHe) will tell.

It's not enough to make me go off SC 2.x. It's only my 2nd day on SC 2.6 so I'm still watching the issue.
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Kaze105:
Have SC 2.7. I had the clock issue once, but it was fine after I restarted the phone and never had it again.
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Robtao:
Only rooted/flashed once with Odin with EBO1 Debl/Deodex. Also using PhoneWeaver auto profiling.

I lose about a hour overnight when I let PW turn off the phone at 11:30 PM and back on at 6 AM. Last night, I tried turning OFF Automatic (use network provided values), and the phone lost 45 minutes in 2 hours. Turning Automatic back on manually didn't let the phone catch up until after a reboot.

My temporary solution is to let PW turn the phone back on an hour or 2 early so it will be sure to catch up before I need the alarm to go off, but it is a bit alarming :rolleyes: to depend on it so looking forward to more complete Kernels/ROMs that I know are being diligently worked on as we speak.
[Android Apps and Games] androidster007:
I am trying to capture screenshots of a Sony Ericsson Arc (Android 2.3.1) using Android SDK's Dalvik Debug Monitor. However, the screenshots are red tinted. e.g.

Please help!

Please note that I have taken perfectly colored screenshots of my HTC Desire (Android 2.2) using this same method.
[Android Apps and Games] androidster007:
This is kinda crazy....while Android SDK was giving me bad screenshots, I managed to get good ones with

www .fjsoft .at / en/ downloads.php

My Phone Explorer
[Android Apps and Games] sageDieu:
That's weird. I've never had that issue on froyo.
[Android Apps and Games] androidster007:
Yeah, weird!

My HTC, which runs Froyo didn't have the issue either.

The problem was on SE Arc which runs Gingerbread.
[Android Apps and Games] abreithoff:
what a hell, same issue with sdk and My Phone Explorer is giving me screenshot... totaly white :(
[Atrix 4G Android Development] cellzealot:
I have decided not to delay any longer getting these files to the dev community here. I expect these may be removed from Megaupload by Motorola very quickly so grab them while you can!

This is a dump of the complete system directory for a recent GRH55 2.3 Gingerbread development build for the Atrix dated 1/21/2011.

I extracted it from the CG60 SMG file which was split from the SBF file using SBF Recalc 1.2.9.1 and then opened as a disc image in WinHex 15.5 Specialist version.

We will also post an archive of the raw CGs which include a number of other partitions that may be of interest as well as the boot files that were packaged separately with the SBF.

Please be very careful when trying to use any of these files on your stock consumer phone. The system includes many debug features and binaries etc. for development that are not found in stock builds and are of little use to end users and in some cases decidedly unwanted on your phone.

Hopefully the developers here will quickly set to work finding out what is most useful and safe for end users and everyone can enjoy the fruits of their labor.

Have fun and remember that there is no custom recovery yet for these phones nor an SBF file to restore with. You are completely unable to recover your phone at this stage if anything goes wrong that prevents it from booting normally!

The reason we are not going to post the SBF file itself is twofold.

First, they are proprietary Motorola files and we have received C&D orders from Motorola in the past and don't wish to have that happen again here.

Second, these engineering builds are strictly for unsecured development devices and will brick a consumer device if you tried to flash it.

We obviously do not want to see anyone brick their phone especially at this early stage when their is no recourse or means of recovery.

USE AT YOUR OWN RISK! Nobody is responsible for what you do to your phone except you!

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=Y232E9J0

:cool:
[Atrix 4G Android Development] Ronaldo_9:
very interesting, thanks for the post and info. hope a developer can make uses of this
[Atrix 4G Android Development] iceman4357:
Not that I will know what to do with these files at all, but I am going to keep a copy just in case someone needs to re-upload the files once Moto takes them down.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] t0dbld:
thanks for sharing
[Atrix 4G Android Development] dchandler326:
I have no Idea also what to do with these files but just incase someone else need them I downloaded them, You never know.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] leadguy68:
Hopefully something with the modem firmware can be pulled from this to turn on HSUPA.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] humancyborg:
Do you guys have access to an engineering spl ?
[Atrix 4G Android Development] cellzealot:
That is something that applies to HTC with a Nand lock from my understanding.

We don't have a complete picture of the boot process on this device but Motorola does things differently than HTC and on our OMAP/Qualcomm chipset devices there is no SPL involved in the bootchain.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] hassanjanjua2002:
hey i have a tester atrix from motorola. How would i go about installing this on that?
[Atrix 4G Android Development] jimmydafish:
You would need the full sbf file and a program named rsdlite.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] hassanjanjua2002:
The test model I have is on 4.0.2340.MB860.Attt.en.us which trying to update to 4.0.2350 but keeps failing. With the ! screen showing up mid install. Is there any sbf file or update.zip that i can use at the moment because I don't know how to update it regularly. For either this ginderbread or any version thats newer than mine...
[Atrix 4G Android Development] jimmydafish:
You can not update that phone, you will be stuck on your version because your phone is not able to pass the hash checks in the update.zip. your hope lies in a released sbf file.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] t0dbld:
do you have a sbf for your phone ? if so please upload so that i can split it and use to compare with other sbf from other dev unit build
[Atrix 4G Android Development] hassanjanjua2002:
Ok thanks for the responses. How do i grab the sbf from my phone? From android sdk?
[Atrix 4G Android Development] cellzealot:
You don't grab it from your phone at all. An SBF file is a proprietary firmware file from Motorola that is flashed with a service ware utility called RSD Lite.

These files are only available to the public via leaks from unofficial sources.

Having a development test phone in this case is a difficult problem unless you have access to internal files for engineering devices.

On another note, I am very surprised that devs are not all over this dump pulling out the framework and libs and apks for use on consumer phones.

There is plenty here that should be able to be safely used.

I am sure that will change once recovery methods have been achieved.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] Smith7018:
Well, what should we be pulling out? Transplanting 2.3 libs and frameworks into 2.2 isn't a good idea, and if it's just a stock MotoBLUR build for 2.3, then nothing's truly different besides it being Gingerbread. Correct me if I'm wrong, but unless there's something wildly new in this build, it's just another version of what we have?

(I'm newer to Android development, but I know multiple languages (Java, C, C++, Obj-C, etc) and have been hacking/dev'ing for the iPhone since 1.0. Just thought I'd state that so I don't like like a huge idiot if this is extremely useful haha)
[Atrix 4G Android Development] Yaotl:
It actually looks like stock android.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] robxcore:
you've been pwned sir.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] cellzealot:
Yup...this is a completely Blurless build and we have one like it for the Droid X as well.

I should caution that some primary functionality appears to be stripped out from the DX build regarding hardware sensors and some other things that are missing entirely.

It's fascinating because it is in many ways what everyone has been whining for since the DX came out with the locked bootloader. It is pure AOSP with virtually no amendments to the libs and very limited or no proprietary Motorola drivers.

There is no WebTop in this build and many other feature again appear to be missing entirely.

So, a very interesting challenge to the developers here to take this mythical beast and turn it into a useable build for consumer hardware by re adding the desired components and shoehorning them back into this build.

Pretty unique opportunity I would say! ;)
[Atrix 4G Android Development] BravoMotorola:
Just knowing this file could potentially become a workable 2.3 build for my Atrix makes me VERY excited.

HOPE
[Atrix 4G Android Development] Smith7018:
Lol, how was I "pwned?" I didn't even look at the build but I didn't think Motorola would be building Gingerbread without blur built in, so yay! Though part of me thinks this is just the preliminary step to compiling it for the Atrix :\

cellzealot, wouldn't one need the kernel from 2.3 for this to work? I apologize again if this is completely ignorant, but one can't just use 2.3 frameworks on a 2.2 kernel and expect it to work.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] Rock3nrenigade:
Hopefully we get somewhere with this. 2.3 would be a step in the right direction for the Atrix... Can we confirm Gingerbreads dual core support?
[Atrix 4G Android Development] ApplCobbler:
Please stop asking about 'dual core support'. 2.2 has it. 2.3 has it. There's no difference.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] cellzealot:
If we had an engineering unsecured device we could test these files ourselves and help answer some or all of these questions, but we don't.

It's going to have to fall to the devs here to figure out what is possible with these phones. That will be much safer and more practical after a custom recovery is achieved and perhaps a stock SBF is available.

We have inquired from our sources if we can get one and are awaiting their response.

These files were part of a large cache of files for other devices and we weren't expecting them or have any plans of supporting these phones.

We can only hope they come through as they have before.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] t0dbld:
Thanks cellzealot , im hoping too :-)
[Atrix 4G Android Development] jimmydafish:
No, even if you had the kernel you would not be able to use these files to just fire up your phone. The kernels are all signed and a dev phone kernel is not signed. The bright minds here need to find a way to use these files.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] scaronscar:
God I hope someone can use these files and come up with a stock android with a webtop piggyback rom would be so sick...
[Atrix 4G Android Development] ram130:
Great work. Are you by chance releasing the DX version any time soon so devs there can crack at it?
[Atrix 4G Android Development] ahmarchi:
dual core was "implemented" in 2.2, however being implement or just adding support is not the same when an OS is made with dual core in mind. there should be huge performance boost, especially when more and more apps start with native core support
[Atrix 4G Android Development] navalynt:
This thread has been buried for a week, any updates?
[Atrix 4G Android Development] cellzealot:
http://www.mediafire.com/?wzxmey32u1y9bjr

There is the archive of the CGs from this build that I promised.

We aren't doing much with it so you'll have to play around on your own.

Enjoy!
[Atrix 4G Android Development] BravoMotorola:
Yea im just going to comment so it gets unburied. I'm hoping something can be done with this dump...
[Atrix 4G Android Development] synergye:
Now with the update leaked, hopefully something can be done. Im just worried that due to a currently locked kernel (bootloader), pushing files or signing files would be pointless and currently impossible.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] t0dbld:
thanks alot !!
[Atrix 4G Android Development] vbhines:
I was poking around in this system dump and was about to post a finding when I found this thread first...

Is it significant to the bootloader efforts that there is a otacerts.zip file with a testkey.x509.pem within the security folder? I don't recall coming across this in previous dumps...
[Atrix 4G Android Development] cordell507:
they added the BLUR trademark to the boot animation

but i found blur in etc/motorola
[Atrix 4G Android Development] mafiaboy01:
Well that file opened in notepad reads like a serial key or something.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] nomisunrider:
.pem is a public key. Useless for cracking the bootloader signature. What you need is the private key, usually ending in .key
[Atrix 4G Android Development] eatkabab:
Is it possible to get this to install on a consumer Atrix device?

Please don't flame me for this. I apologize if I touched any nerves. I skimmed the forum real quick so I'm not 100% sure if this has been answered.

Thank you
[Atrix 4G Android Development] SN4K3B1T3:
No you can't only the dev devices
[Atrix 4G Android Development] Ratchet556:
Okay im a little confused by this and im probably wrong but does this mean that when we get an unlocked bootloader we can use this to make a 2.3 Rom? im just going to go ahead and assume im wrong seeing as i dont know a lot about this and if i am can someone explain what this means for the development of the Atrix?
[Atrix 4G Android Development] BravoMotorola:
I'm pretty sure that answer is yes. As dev Atri can do so. Dev Atri have unlocked bootloader.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] dasmoover:
http://gititbit.ch/ogsd0

Now it will always be available :)
[Atrix 4G Android Development] Ratchet556:
i am jealous of anyone that has one then. if they did flash it would they have legit 2.3?
[Atrix 4G Android Development] frankiedizzle87:
Its dangerous in there concrete jungle :-)
[Atrix 4G Android Development] cellzealot:
The answer is definitely yes. We ran similar builds for DX on our dev phones before the recent 2.3 leaks showed up. We have been unable to create a build from the file that works on consumer phones due to an incompatible ramdisk for this kernel. Our build was also missing hardware sensor support making it fairly useless as a phone. We thought we might be able to pull drivers and other needed files from these new builds but they don't work with this kernel.

So bottom line is dev phones only for now.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] trevorjanssen12:
New link please.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] saiftheboss7:
HEY!!!!!!! mmontuori, krystianp - this might be helpful for the Phoenix kernel!
[Atrix 4G Android Development] quetzalcoatl2435:
You're seriously asking for a 2 years old pre-release software while there is a much, much newer official release from a few months ago?

SMH...
[Atrix 4G Android Development] ravilov:
Indeed.

What is wrong with you people?
[Atrix 4G Android Development] francescod:
Hoping they're just hilarious people! :rolleyes:
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] JWhipple:
I was able to get root on the Galaxy S 4G this morning via SuperOneClickRoot .

I used the Rage option, then once done, rebooted the phone and verified root using "Root Checker" from the Market.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] Longcat14:
Sweet, this means we will be able to flash ROMs as they are released for the phone. Can't wait to get mine after school. :D
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] oka1:
Awesome !!!
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] cashyftw:
I kind of want an vibe 4g now :/ I wish they would let me trade.

Sent from my SGH-2
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] jerrybritt:
Galaxy S 4G

I have connected as stated but I continue to get SuperOneClick not responding and "waiting on device". Any suggestions??
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] JWhipple:
Make sure that USB debugging is enabled! If that doesn't work, download the Samsung USB drivers - they can be found in the Vibrant threads.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] webdvl:
Cool!

Should be getting mine later today.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] Nivek91:
I'm planning on getting this today to, but will the Z4Root method work to root this phone?
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] JWhipple:
Not sure, but would be nice to have someone try it so we have all bases covered!
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] jdm4u:
Z4root didn't work on my 2.2 official update so I doubt it'll work on 2.2.1.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] jzero88:
Wow of I were those able to get a new phone today. I would highly recommend waiting for the Galaxy S II. That hsit is on fire!!
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] mavictb:
thank you for your unhelpful info... some of us will be getting that device also when it comes out in 5 months... for now we have a better vibrant.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] droid_boy:
SuperOneClick v1.6.5 worked for me too. Has anyone found any ROMs or know if the vibrant ROMs work with the galaxy s 4g.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] JWhipple:
No ROMs out yet because this is the first day the phone was even technically available.

I don't know of Vibrant ROMs work on this phone, but I am not about to try it .
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] jerrybritt:
Successful Root with SuperOneClick

I followed JWhipple instructions, loaded the Samsung Drivers on 32 bit Windows machine and BOOM! Rooted, Titanium Backup restored my apps in full stride. The biggest negative is 181M for apps. Fortunately the majority of my apps will move to SD. I now have 82M left on phone storage. Phone working well. 2nd negative Quadrant ran at 973 - middle of the pack. MyTouch 4G ran at 1843. However, download speedtest is a minimum of 3 times faster than MyTouch 4G
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] JWhipple:
I don't give quadrant any weight - it's results are so varied for phones with similar hardware that I don't trust the numbers it's giving me.

Real world results is what impresses me - not some numbers handed to me by a supposed benchmark app.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] JWhipple:
I'm curious now - is the movie stored in memory, or does it stream? I wonder how much memory we could have available if we simply zapped the movie?

<EDIT> DOH! Boy do I feel stupid now - it's on the SD card!
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] HeavyComponent:
Will the Samsung Vibrant share this forum with the Samsung Galaxy S 4G? I can't seem to find the section for it.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] JWhipple:
They will be creating a section for it in the next week.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] jerrybritt:
I agree - just testing the numbers that have been thrown out there. Here in Phoenix the download speed is awesome even out in the burbs where there is only 1 or 2 bars.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] HeavyComponent:
Cool, thanks for the reply. :cool:
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] JWhipple:
I know of a sweet spot on the way home that I'm going to park in and run a few tests - should make for some impressive numbers :-) I believe it was nearly 10.2 MB when I tested a G2 in the same spot.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] mavictb:
my speeds are the same but i dont have HSDPA+ i guess. as for GPS WOW 15 sec or less cold start with 5m accuracy. and the compass seems to work also.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] urmothersluvr:
i have the vibrant 4g and got 10.95 while i was in a mall lol. quadrant got me 1038 and linpack was 13.5 idc about the benchmarks this phone is fast!! im just glad ive had it for a week now. gotta love walmart for giving out phones before they release lol
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] JWhipple:
My drive home is about 45 minutes, so, I'll give the GPS a good beating on the way home and report back!