yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Atrix 4G Themes and Apps] domin8:
here's a thread with a GB-kB that you can install alongside the stock keyboard, and it has the autocorrect fixed to work like the original.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=875202

installed the gbkb-en.apk on mine and it works but because of the higher resolution the keys look a little small for my liking
[Droid X General] StarWarsKing:
Ok so I'm pretty much new to Android as well as rooting so I ran in to a problem when I rebooted my system after installing the Fissure rom. The phone restarts but it stays stuck on the shining silver ANDROID logo. My friend told me to wait but I waited nearly and hour, drove to school, parked and when I checked it, it was still in the same spot.
[Droid X General] Ben's:
If you have installed Fission you need to clear cache and clear user data/factory reset within clockwork. That should clear up the issue and let you boot right into Fission.
[Droid X General] StarWarsKing:
After the install of the rom or beforehand?
[Droid X General] Ben's:
If you did not wipe the data before, then after is ok as well.
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] tsotne90:
hello everybody. I have just bought imate jasjam and need best stable fast rom for my device. please give me link. thanks.
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] chunk1982:
its down to personal choice but i find the full version of this...

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=364031

suits me good its fast stable and iv had zero problems with it but granted its windows mobile 6.1 now there are a few 6.5.x roms but i find these slow and sluggish yes they look better

but this combined with SPB.Mobile.Shell.v3.5.3.Build.9885 (background img is not included this is one i found) is DOPE!

heres how mine looks after i customized it to suit me

DEFAULT PAGE (home)

SLIDE LEFT (tools)

SLIDE RIGHT FROM DEFAULT PAGE (apps)

then if you press the highlighted button you get a carousel like this

IF YOU WANT TO NO ANY MORE INFO PM ME!!!

hope this helps

paul
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] tsotne90:
thank you very much, but I need windows mobile 6.5
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] cheomoggu:
Ill give it a try , Btw, here are 6.5 builts for hermes http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=509194&page=2 just read
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] monisraza88:
hey thts right..........
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] axelmasok:
Hi all, new here and interested in an answer to one of my favorite questions:

Which ROM? :o

I have: iMate JasJam Telstra Aus edition, currently running BlackSatin WM6 I put on it years ago. I just loaded Hard SPL 7 on it this morning.

I loaded SPB Shell on it today and was impressed. I'm still tossing up investing some time in the 'ol jasjam for a second phone....

So I'm interested in running SPB on WM 6.5 rather than 6.0/6.1 as I loath using the stylus and am curious if it will run ok on this old phone.

There are a heap of ROMs I see here, many are from 2007/8/9. What's a popular version I can install that's "current" I guess but not next to impossible to install? Maybe a couple of suggestions I can try then just in case I get stuck.

Worst case scenario I'll keep playing with what I have that's working. Thanks!
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] axelmasok:
Managed to install CRC 6.1 on it. Wasn't happy with 6.1 so I went to something called:

FOR_TESTING_PURPOSE_ONLY_WP6.5_23047_STD.7z

Works fine, sticking with that. The other popular versions on here wouldn't install. I had HardSPL installed but still didn't install.
[G2 and Desire Z General] paulbadassbriant:
I follow a well known celeb on twitter and want to download her photos onto my phone, but when i click on the photo to save it to my phone it says content not supported, no program can open this file, if i do save it, it is a .bin file, your not given the option to rename it.

If i do this on my pc the file gets saved as a .jpg

Any help please??

Thanks
[G2 and Desire Z General] Utorrent76:
Um, just out of curiosity what exactly are your intentions with said photo?
[G2 and Desire Z General] paulbadassbriant:
Just to save it on my phone, in an album. Have found a workaround though, I have to save it on my phone as a bin file, then rename it as a JPG in Astro File Manager, is there no other way?
[Android Apps and Games] okachowwa:
This morning I found this app called gtunes on the market. Its where you can search for a song and and download it for free. I was wondering if this is illegal because they have a lot of new songs to download and it seems illegal. What do you think?
[Android Apps and Games] whiteguypl:
The app and the process it uses to find the songs are not illegal, its a glorified search engine. The process of downloading the songs onto your phone that you do not own is illegal.
[Android Apps and Games] GoCkillaz:
If you play the songs on it, no. But if you download the songs to your device, it's no different than downloading the songs on Limewire or Kazaa or anything like that.
[Android Apps and Games] steelewise:
seems a little sketchy your basically letting em know exactly where you are if they feel like prosecuting
[Android Apps and Games] reddragon72:
I would agree with this but RIAA and MPAA cannot setup a download site/app/program or provide movies/music to download in an effort to catch people in the act. That is called a sting operation and can only be done VIA an authorized entity like the police.

Apps of this nature are not illegal and that is the reason they remain on the market, the only variant to there legal stature is you clicking download.
[Android Apps and Games] Vivified:
No, but they can monitor the download that someone else puts up and notify your ISP by doing a lookup of the IP of the downloader. This is a known issue for torrents. Then you will receive a notice in the mail(USPS) letting you know that you should stop.

I am unsure of how you could be monitored downloading through this app, but I don't count anything out.
[Android Apps and Games] zeppelinrox:
Download it via free wifi somewhere.

If you like the song, buy a real CD so you can do whatever you want with it.

If it's not worth buying, why bother listening to it?

Because if it's not worth buying, it's probably crap.

Why worry about getting busted over something that is not good enough to buy, anyway?

And what's wrong with just googling "parent directory" mp3 -htm -html -download -links, saving to your computer and copying to your phone?

Sorry for all the questions, but I'm feeling very inquisitive :D
[EVO 4G General] 94tbird:
http://www.pcworld.com/article/219901/sprint_wimax_lte.html#tk.rss_news
[EVO 4G General] david279:
Oh well.
[EVO 4G General] swaze:
Unless you plan on using your EVO for the next 4-5 years , i dont think it really matters. If/when they make this move, there will be plenty of phones to come out that will support the new network. I doubt anyone will still have their EVO's /Epic's by the time this actually comes to reality.
[EVO 4G General] spiicytuna:
Supposedly the wimax radio could be flashed to support LTE per shinzul and the wimax thread.
[EVO 4G General] detusueno:
this might explain why:

a. the 'featured' echo doesn't have wimax

b. the $10 premium fee for non wimax phones

i think that sprint will discontinue the production of wimax phones and wait for the deployment of lte before they release any new 4g phones. if that turns out to be the case, i don't care if they release a evo with a quad core cpu and 8 gigs of ram. there's no way i'm going to stick around with only sprint's absolutely pathetic 3g.

i also doubt that the evo will be hackable to use lte. what about authentication? lte is supposed to use sims. no way the evo will be able to connect even if some clever hackers get the radio itself to be compatible.
[EVO 4G General] Roy Jovero:
Doesn't bother me too much. Yes, I enjoy the speeds of WiMax, but the battery drain is too much of an issue.
[EVO 4G General] swaze:
Makes sense, also could explain why we haven't heard about an EVO 2. They could be trying to figure out how to apply a triband radio up in the phone.
[EVO 4G General] spiicytuna:
Well obviously it wouldn't be a hackers hack it'd have to be a Sprint flash of some sort. I am not saying its even plausible more of food for thought.
[EVO 4G General] mikevillarroel:
I'm not so sure about that, I've seen some mean hacks here in the community, we have good talent here that work hard (and free) to get the most out of our devices so.....I hope our Devs here will do something to keep the EVO alive as the did with the Vogue.
[EVO 4G General] Award Tour:
Not so sure about that. WiMax currently require some form of key/pw authentication with Clear to connect. LTE on Sprint will probably require SIM cards to connect, like Metro PCS does even as CDMA network. I don't see how they (or even Sprint themselves) will get around that issue. It'd probably be as futile as trying to connect with AT&T's/Verizon's LTE network with a hacked WiMax radio.
[EVO 4G General] tech7:
Ok sprint will have wimax and lte dual so that good thing imaging and evo 2 with rev b for 3g 1xadvance and wimax and lte omg and being coverd with that much technology
[EVO 4G General] mswlogo:
Good I better get my $10.00/mo back :)
[EVO 4G General] wolrah:
No, the TOWERS can be fairly easily converted. No phone can be unless explicitly designed for that (like Qualcomm GoBi data chips).
[EVO 4G General] jblazea50:
really? that would be awesome if one of the devs can get wimax radio flashed to verizon's LTE
[EVO 4G General] Sim-X:
I hope Sprint Goes LTE - The Verizon LTE speeds look awesome
[EVO 4G General] NYCguy2020:
+1

with speeds under 200 kbps there is absolutely no phone in the world that would make me wanna stay with sprint.

Boy,if this is true they will be losing customers like crazy come this summer.
[EVO 4G General] Holyrolla:
The story was on Engadget the other week. Technically, the Sprint network guy said it was being evaluated for six months...but with no new Wimax phones on tap for the next six months (that we know of), the conclusion will be the same at the end of six months as it is now.

If they are going to make the move, then throw the switch, and have a plan in place to get us off of our EVO's (and them off of their Epics), even if it's three months out, because then that class action thread that's out there may start looking real good and actually get five stars.

Note: If all that's needed is to switch out the baseband cards and run a firmware update, that would mean that Wimax would have to get turned off, because it's the Wimax equipment that's getting the upgrade. So this won't be a side by side Wimax/LTE network. It's either or...right???
[EVO 4G General] Dan330:
i hope not...

LTE will be bad for cost conscience customers.

LTE is carrier's wetdream... consumers nightmare.
[EVO 4G General] Jfree3000:
Good riddance? Wimax is a joke in my area (metro Atlanta), to this day I can barely connect to Wimax from inside my house and the coverage map "according to Sprint" shows my area lit up with Wimax. I have to stand by my second story window in my house to connect to it and the connection is "poor", Hell its poor when I go outside. :mad:

Love the phone itself though.
[EVO 4G General] Holyrolla:
How so? If it's what I think...network access can be controlled just as easily on a Wimax network as on a LTE network. It's all IP traffic. Verizon just chooses to control it.
[EVO 4G General] TF1984:
Traffic volume (i.e. bandwith) can be controlled on wimax, but not specific domains.

LTE can control EVERYTHING.

That's the only sad about this. Wimax speeds are near crap lately, but at least we know we can't be governed. Going to LTE means possible limitations from Sprint, but hey, the way Sprint markets their freedom to cutsomers I think they wouldn't start limiting access of LTE either...

Who cares, years away, period.
[EVO 4G General] tejasrichard:
It isn't about how easily it can be done, it is what the carriers are ALLOWED to do with LTE that makes it suck for the consumer. With wimax, they aren't allowed to throttle your stream just because you are streaming YouTube, for instance. Also, Verizon has said that they are only going to allow you access to the mobile version of websites, if a mobile version is available. Fvck that noise. There is some shadyass sh!t going on here, folks. I don't want anything to do with that nonsense, no matter how good the coverage is.
[EVO 4G General] akarol:
Bad news for WiMAX = great news for us! :)
[EVO 4G General] halorin:
I feel like by the time this really shakes out we'll be 6 months away from the Evo 3.
[EVO 4G General] tejasrichard:
Once again, you are poorly informed. You constantly make statements like this one and, as far as I can tell, you do no research to back up your position. You are welcome to have whatever opinion you choose to hold, but this one really puts your ignorance in display. Unless you honestly believe it is better for the consumer for the carrier to have complete and total control over every aspect of internet access, from bandwidth to content allowed. If that is your honest opinion, may I suggest buying an iPhone and going to an iNetwork and leaving those of us who prefer a more open, user-controlled experience alone? It would be better for all of us.
[EVO 4G General] dmony0:
Not too worried about this. Most likely years away .
[EVO 4G General] Justin.G11:
It's easy to say "no", but give credit to the source: this is the guy who reverse engineered WiMAX to AOSP in the first place... he probably has a decent understanding on the handshake process.

it doesn't mean it _will_ happen ... but forgive me if i put more value on his opinion than yours.
[EVO 4G General] Justin.G11:
This post is ironically delicious.

Go read up on networking and OSI layers .... preferably in private so no one sees your embarasment when you figure out that there's _nothing_ inherent to LTE that could not be implimented in WiMAX .... or Ethernet .... or WiFi ... or any other layer 1/2 technology.
[EVO 4G General] teh roxxorz:
Well it is intersting, because Sprint did beat the competition to 4G by using WiMax, and it got the job done. We all know technology evolves quickly, and LTE seems to be int he direction, and to stay afloat and speed worthy, I think the witch may happen. Though if so, i say maybe two years before then.
[EVO 4G General] tejasrichard:
Apperently you skipped my first post. It isn't what they CAN do, it is what they are ALLOWED to do. The two technologies are regulated differently.

Edit: What I am referring to is that, with wimax, the provider is not allowed to throttle your connection based on the content you are accessing. With LTE, not only are they allowed to, but two of the carriers ( verizon and tmobile) have expressly stated that will be doing this. I need to find the article again, but I believe T-Mobile even states that you will have to pay extra to access data-intensive sites like YouTube. Don't quote me on this last part. Imma try and find the article again so I can cite.
[EVO 4G General] DoctorComrade:
I've read this article already. Old news is old but not really substantial. By the time they even implement LTE our Evos will be ancient.
[EVO 4G General] Android 17:
Good points. It's disappointing that some people think the switch to LTE would be a good thing. The only positive I foresee is a possible change of spectrum used, therefore increasing building penetration, but overall it seems like bad news.

I don't recall what you mentioned about T-Mobile, but one only need look at what MetroPCS is already doing to understand that companies with LTE are not heading towards a good future.

There's also been a lot of argument made over Metro's handling of data and attempting to create different types of data which you must pay for.

Data is DATA. No one should be allowed to arbitrarily enforce their own definition of what constitutes "different" data.
[EVO 4G General] tejasrichard:
You are totally right, it was MetroPCS I was thinking of, not T-mobile...
[EVO 4G General] splmonster:
Clear has already been running LTE trials. This isn't news... Clear has been turning on more and more Wimax for the time being. At least in AZ it is popping up everywhere. Clear will switch to LTE soon, which is why they are testing it.
[EVO 4G General] mbaseball3:
Once wimax2 becomes more wide spread maybe sprint will go back or wish they stuck with it.

Sent from the Evo
[EVO 4G General] Justin.G11:
But they are NOT regulated differently.

Verizon _proposed_ that their infrastructure didn't fall under the current internet fairness act because the hardware they used at layer 1/2 was proprietary and part of thier own "private service" and thus not "part of the internet" .... but it has _not_ passed through the legal system yet, there have been no amendments passing it and it's little more than a corporate push at this point.

Most people spreading the "LTE is evil" angle are really wary of Verizon who seems to wear both the face of LTE and the proposed amendment to net neutrality (which ironically was a joint work from google).

But as it stands today: LTE is NOT regulated separately.
[EVO 4G General] TorxT3D:
if this is true and proves to work.. oh my crap the evo really stands up to its name in evolution.

but like said above.. once the lte gets rolled out properly, the evo will be outdated and we'll want the latest and greatest
[EVO 4G General] rockky:
Significant Wimax speeds (3-8M) are so spotty here in downtown Chicago, I could care less.

I use a Rom that doesn't even have Wimax enabled.
[EVO 4G General] Dan330:
you guys might do some more reading...

http://androidforums.com/sprint/272829-lte-vs-wimax-charges-control-data.html
[EVO 4G General] Drunkenfetus:
I will always hate limitations.. i was extremely pissed at sprint when they told me i had to pay extra for the hotspot... lol

Thank you XDA! :)
[EVO 4G General] m4rk0358:
via Engadget
[EVO 4G General] Holyrolla:
Don't look like Sprint is going to take years doing anything. This switch is going to happen soon...
[EVO 4G General] strung:
I think it may come down to the phone chipsets. If LTE takes off, we could see evolutionarily cheaper and cheaper and more power efficient chips on the phone side. And it looks like the new processors/platforms/chipsets from Qualcomm, Nvidia, etc. will have a built-in LTE chip. So it may make sense to go to LTE for that reason.

Note that LTE and Wimax are 80% the same. This is why they can swap out the base station network cards (the cheap part) and not change the antennas or the backhaul (the expensive part). All the B.S. in this thread about regulation this, control that, lack of packet prioritization is false. Both systems are pure IP networks and can be easilly controlled on a per-packet basis.
[EVO 4G General] timkdodson:
Yeah the battery life drain is horrible. I wonder if LTE devices are just as bad or if it is something specific to Wimax?

Anybody know?
[EVO 4G General] Dan330:
my guess the bad battery ...

was due to bad connection quaility...

radio keep having to find a good signal..

running down the battery.

if they can fix the penetration issue.. and availability...

the battery will be much bettery.
[EVO 4G General] Shadöwmind:
Isn't there WiMAX 2 (802.16m) to be considered too? I wouldn't see sprint switching when this is supposed to be backward compatible with WiMAX (802.16e) but offering 100Mbit/sec... just my thoughts.
[EVO 4G General] nosympathy:
my understanding LTE is just as bad. Like the other guy posted, all has to do with the connection issue and how good the signal is.

I am sad for all the people on here who don't think verizon is going to control LTE. You obviously have never been on verizon and seen the way they control everything. If they don't think you should do it, they will lock it down. THey have been locking down phones for years because of features they didn't want people to have.

I had verizon for 4 months through an accommodation plan where I worked, I paid $25 a month for 1500 mins, unlimited data and unlimited texts. I dumped them for AT&T because AT&T was faster, less obtrusive, and there employees were not as much assholes as every verizon rep I have ever met.

I used to sell cellphones and Verizon reps to help with phone activations were jerks and were always unhelpful. AT&T reps were helpful and nice no matter what, even if someone was canceling a line. Sprint was the most helpful, but probably the worst to activate because there activation program sucked. As for t-mobile? That is a phone company much like verizon I will never go to. The things I was told by reps and the way they treated people.
[EVO 4G General] jgalan14:
Idk maybe the op OS right the new arrive was announce today and is a w7 device and not 4G if ctia doesn't announce a 4G for Sprint I'll be scare
[EVO 4G General] Holyrolla:
I don't think that anyone is disagreeing with that, as that has already been reported. It the thought that Sprint going LTE automatically means that Sprint will do what Verizon and MetroPCS are going to do. I for one don't think that Sprint will engage in those practices if it goes the LTE route. From what I understand about spectrum (and that is full speculation), Sprint has so much of it, that it doesn't have to worry about a bogged down network.
[EVO 4G General] TorxT3D:
"it was an ugly tree anyway"
[EVO 4G General] alnova1:
Maybe you guys can give me some advice...i just recently jumped on the EVO ship from Verizon. I havent had my EVO for 2 weeks and was wondering if I should take it back? Does this mean the EVO will not work on LTE? My area where I live doesn't have 4G but I was in Raleigh, NC last weekend that does have it was quite disappointed in it...not the speeds when I was connected but the problem was keeping a connection. Is this normal with 4G Sprint?
[EVO 4G General] bkrodgers:
It's more a factor of the frequencies Sprint/Clear use for WiMAX. They just don't make it through walls as well. I think LTE would have similar problems on those frequencies. They probably could improve upon things with more towers (less distance between them) and/or a power boost (if that's allowed under FCC rules). But there are some laws of physics in play here.
[EVO 4G General] sgt. slaughter:
yeah i live in raleigh and typically leave 4G off. I didn't get the Evo for 4G anyway. It's a bad ass phone to begin with as it is. I wouldn't get anything just b/c it has 4G wether LTE or WiMax right now as the coverage is spotty, though once sprint uses that nextel band to lay some data on we should be getting vastly better coverage.
[EVO 4G General] alnova1:
Thanks Sgt... really not sure what to do now. I will be back In Raleigh tomorrow...I guess I will do what I know is good..The Char-Grill..:D
[EVO 4G General] sgt. slaughter:
Deff cant go wrong there. If you like BBQ you must go downtown and hit up The Pit as its by far the best carolina style ribs and pulled pork I've ever had anywhere.

when I get full bars of 4G on my evo i get excellent DL speeds, I just have to direct speedtest app to test through Atl. to get the speeds to show up. All the servers on the speedtest app can handle different loads and going off the map posted here awhile ago that showed the main connections on sprints network Atl is the closest big one to Raleigh, hence testing to Atl you get higher speed than testing through Charlotte or Wilson.
[EVO 4G General] aseercte:
Wow that sucks sprint needs to get there act together

rocking the **** out of cm7
[EVO 4G General] jefbal99:
I only have my 4G on when I need it, i.e. big downloads, application updates, etc...
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Jstew83:
I received a message that an update for froyo was available through samsung I am running the epic experience rom with the phoenix kernel it would not allow me to update it gave me a failed message any suggestions and if so include a way to keep my apps after update thanks.
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] coke32:
odin back to stock dI18 then flash the update.zip off samsung's website.
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] DiGi760:
or install clockwork mod (if you don't laready have it) and flash the deodexed update that is in the dev section and the wiki.