yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Epic 4G Android Development] drizek:
Am I the only one annoyed that the Epic won't go past 1.2GHz? Is that at the stock voltage?

My Pre was stable at 1.2GHz,which is basically a 140% overclock.
[Epic 4G Android Development] blspyro:
You confuse me we have had the epic past 1.2 but I believe it was unstable... rodderik has had his kernel set to 1.6 however didn't release it as such I believe because of unstability.

Also wait a little bit 1.2 was with eclair froyo is known to be faster and we should be able to get higher overclocks.
[Epic 4G Android Development] Rodderik:
well i had a halfway working 1.6GHz overclock for the hell of it but after doing some reading i figured out that anything past 1.2ghz was slowing down the clock so it was basically tricking the benchmarks into counting more frames in a slower second etc. i didn't get into modifying the clock yet to try and counteract that. but that is the main problem that plagues all of the galaxy s kernels at the moment. i'm sure i or team whiskey or some one will crack it soon.
[Epic 4G Android Development] twolostminds:
So, your expert opinions please...

Based on what you've seen in this source so far....

EB13 = YAY!! :D

OR

EB13 = DK28 POLISHED TURD. :eek:

(quick edit) This is not to say DK28 was crap but you expected more out of EB13's code than what was in DK28
[Epic 4G Android Development] poit:
I'm not sure what else you would expect any software developer to do. You have a test release (DK28). there are bugs in it. You fix the bugs. The final release is the same as the test release except for the bug fixes. That's how it works.

Do you expect them to rewrite it from scratch every time the put out a new test release? Everytime you rewrite something you introduce new bugs, and you have to go through a full test cycle again.

DK28 with the bugs fixed will be excellent.
[Epic 4G Android Development] dcowboys2184:
I just want the browser lag checkerboard fixed ... And I wonder why it reads iphone in browser ever with dolphin etc.. And yes ua is desktop still reads iphone
[Epic 4G Android Development] Rodderik:
poit said it below

And I agree...DK28 has it's issues but it is the same source code with what has been modified since it's build. So the source should be the same and in my kernel thread you can see slight improvements in benchmarks running the same setup at 1GHz of DK28 vs EB13. That makes me think that indeed it is an improved DK28 source.
[Epic 4G Android Development] shabbypenguin:
well we have had 1.3 and a 1.4 but the 1.4 was pretty unstable, the 1.6 isnt a true overclock (or at least it wasnt back when it was first released). instead it modified the system time so that 1 IRL = 1.3 seconds in phone time.. basically your phone has more "time" to do things... aka think bullettime
[Epic 4G Android Development] Cam3ron1:
Make one theta 1.4 plz It would be greatly appriciated
[Epic 4G Android Development] Marlinsfan88:
anyone get the OTA yet?
[Epic 4G Android Development] azyouthinkeyeiz:
My wifes is in queue.. If I get it on hers quickly, Is there anything specific anyone needs... ill get straight to pulling it off the phone..
[Epic 4G Android Development] Marlinsfan88:
id say make a new post or thread once u get it and pm the devs so u can email it to them if need be
[Epic 4G Android Development] azyouthinkeyeiz:
I know that, I was just asking about specific things, uploading takes a while, so anything quick I can get out during that process..
[Epic 4G Android Development] iSaint:
.....So you already got it...and your uploading it now?
[Epic 4G Android Development] azyouthinkeyeiz:
No my wifes Is in queue.. You can tell if you are, when you go to updates, if it sits on "checking for update", you will get it soon. If it says no update, you will be on one of the next waves..

*edit... Update android not firmware if everything I've heard is right.. I could be wrong*

*anyone yet?
[Epic 4G Android Development] iSaint:
oooo i get you now
[Epic 4G Android Development] Top Nurse:
Yeahh!!! I got it!

Oh I forgot, I have had froyo for 3 months now...so what is all the hoopla? :D

Sent from Bonsai v 5.0.3
[Epic 4G Android Development] Marlinsfan88:
new source code for official EB13 still hasnt been released so alot of people are waiting for official drop. mainly guys over at Cyanogen thread
[Optimus One, P500, V General] androidmeda:
Tethering worked for me just once, through wifi. Now, everytime my laptop, or any device connects to my O1 it doesn't detect the internet even if I am able to browse on the phone through my 3G connection.

I can ping the phone's ip address and access shared folders on my laptop through ex file manager so I know the connection is there. Somehow, though, the Internet isn't going through.

My other concern is how this thing manages the sd card. Ever since I bought this, as long as there are no apps installed to the sd, my phone works perfectly fine. Once I move any app to it, though, weird things start happening... like the phone reboots randomly, or freezes, or the sd card unmounts and remounts without loading the apps on it, forcing me to do a manual un/remount or reboot.

I tested this by moving all apps back to internal. 2 days passed with no reboots. Then I moved just one app to the sd and let it sit. No more than 30 mins, the startup sound alerted my attention.

Except flashing custom roms, which I refuse to do until stock works fine, I've already done most of the suggestions I could find floating here on xda and other forums... rooting,unrooting, clearing cache, factory reset, reformatting sd card and so forth... so I was wondering what else I could do to fix these problems.

Phone has been up now for almost a week without rebooting after I took the app out of the card and back to internal. But I don't see the sense of having external memory if the phone goes crazy with apps on it.

Otherwise, it's a perfectly decent phone.
[Optimus One, P500, V General] Omnichron:
do you have Data enabled in mobile network settings?
[Optimus One, P500, V General] androidmeda:
Of course. I can browse on the phone. :-)
[Optimus One, P500, V General] Omnichron:
it could be a firewall issue or protocol setting on the laptop nic.
[Optimus One, P500, V General] Omnichron:
if you have ipv6(NIC Properties) installed remove it and try the connection again.
[Optimus One, P500, V General] androidmeda:
If it was, then theoretically, mobile phones should be able to use my data connection, right? I've had my friends connect with their mobiles and tablets... they get the ip address but not the juice.
[Optimus One, P500, V General] Omnichron:
try updating or downgrading wifi tether

http://code.google.com/p/android-wifi-tether/downloads/list ;)
[Optimus One, P500, V General] androidmeda:
Will try it out. Thanks!
[Optimus One, P500, V General] androidmeda:
And that worked like a charm without changing any setting on my laptop. :-) although, i noticed that it asked for su on android.tether. What makes this one special?
[Optimus One, P500, V General] androidmeda:
I would like to up this post and ask about the initial concern again. Wifi Tether works like a beauty, but I noticed it's an ad-hoc network. Not all devices see my "router".

So back to the original concern of using the built-in Wifi Tethering of this O1... why can't I get any internet on the devices that are able to connect to it? Again, the I.P. address is correct, but there is no Internet connection.
[Optimus One, P500, V General] doktornotor:
Well, no info here... so. The usual network troubleshooting drill, like...

ipconfig /all
route print

(on Windows boxes)

ip address show
ip route print

(on your phone, either via terminal emulator or via adb shell).
[Optimus One, P500, V General] androidmeda:
If by info you mean what kind of phone, it's a rooted stock P500 v10b.

I already mentioned in previous posts that the ip addresses report fine. Again, all devices can connect to the built-in tether, they get correct ip addresses but just no internet. It worked just once when it was new. Never again after that, even after the first factory reset.

But here's what terminal says.

$ip address show
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: dummy0: <BROADCAST,NOARP> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN
link/ether 9e:4d:23:e2:28:ec brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
3: rmnet0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 1000
link/ether 76:e2:a8:76:3e:3a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.115.27.234/30 brd 10.115.27.235 scope global rmnet0
inet6 fe80::74e2:a8ff:fe76:3e3a/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
4: rmnet1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 2000 qdisc noop state DOWN qlen 1000
link/ether a6:b7:7a:3e:5f:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
5: rmnet2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 2000 qdisc noop state DOWN qlen 1000
link/ether e6:52:c0:53:21:df brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
6: usb0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN qlen 1000
link/ether 96:02:b8:f4:38:65 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
7: sit0: <NOARP> mtu 1480 qdisc noop state DOWN
link/sit 0.0.0.0 brd 0.0.0.0
8: ip6tnl0: <NOARP> mtu 1460 qdisc noop state DOWN
link/tunnel6 00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00
23: wlan0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 1000
link/ether 5c:da:d4:79:39:37 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 fe80::5eda:d4ff:fe79:3937/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
24: wl0.1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 1000
link/ether 5c:da:d4:79:39:37 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.43.1/24 brd 192.168.43.255 scope global wl0.1
inet6 fe80::5eda:d4ff:fe79:3937/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
$ip route
202.126.40.5 dev rmnet0
222.127.143.5 dev rmnet0
10.115.27.232/30 dev rmnet0 src 10.115.27.234
192.168.43.0/24 dev wl0.1 src 192.168.43.1
default via 10.115.27.233 dev rmnet0
$
[Optimus One, P500, V General] doktornotor:
Well, what do you mean by "no internet".

E.g., what does the following produce (on Windows)?

> tracert www.google.com
> tracert 209.85.143.99
[Optimus One, P500, V General] androidmeda:
Doesn't that usually mean that I can't go online the normal way?

On windows, tracert www.google.com doesn't do anything. Surprisingly, it worked for the I.P. address. Browsing using I.P. addresses works, as well.

That being said, I think there's a problem with the way the built-in tethering handles DNS server numbers, which is why none of the devices that connect to it is able to connect through to the internet.

Any ideas on why this is happening? Or how to fix?
[Optimus One, P500, V General] doktornotor:
Go online the normal way does not really mean much either, so - no. Internet != web browsing.

Meanwhile, since your DNS is apparently not working properly, stick 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 (Google public DNS) to the TCP/IP settings on the clients and it will work.

"built-in tethering handles DNS server numbers" - those are IP addresses. If you can ping/traceroute using DNS names (like www.google.com) from the phone, then obviously your clients are not getting the proper DNS servers assigned from the phone via DHCP server.

For further debugging, you need to post which DNS servers are being used on the phone and whether those match the ones assigned to the WiFi clients (or if any are assigned at all). Again, ipconfig /all or whatever similar according to the clients OS.
[Optimus One, P500, V General] androidmeda:
Using built-in tethering, I checked the DNS server assigned to a windows client, it's the same as the ip address it got from the phone. No browse using urls. Pings are ok, tracert only works if I use the ip address as shown on the ping, and I can browse to a website if I use the ip instead.

Using Wireless Tether, the DNS server is the same as the assigned ip address, but I'm able to browse and tracert using urls.

The only reason I'm trying to get built-in to work is because not all devices can detect Wireless Tether's adhoc network. Even a fellow Optimus One can't see it. (On a side note, I can't detect wireless adhoc networks, either.)

I don't know how to check the DNS assigned to the phone. But looking at ip route, it's probably the first two numbers.

#ip route
202.126.40.5 dev rmnet0
222.127.143.5 dev rmnet0
10.31.40.196/30 dev rmnet0 src 10.31.40.198
10.10.1.0/24 dev wlan0 src 10.10.1.254
default via 10.31.40.197 dev rmnet0
#

Up until the time Wireless Tether will be able to start as a true access point, I will be wondering what's going on with the built-in.

If assigning a DNS server to a client would work, that still doesn't address the fact that you can't manually assign DNSs on all devices.
[Optimus One, P500, V General] doktornotor:
I do not understand. Their DNS is set to their local IP address? Well, that obviously cannot work unless you install a DNS server on the computer.

Errr, what? Please post the settings, the above plain does not make sense to me, do not understand what you saying there.

Here:

$ cat /system/etc/resolv.conf
[Optimus One, P500, V General] androidmeda:
I'm sorry, I meant to say it's the same as the default gateway. Here's how ipconfig /all looks like on my laptop on Wireless Tether. I can browse and do anything online.

Wireless LAN adapter Wireless Network Connection:

Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Broadcom 802.11g Network Adapter
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-1F-E1-4C-56-E2
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.1.100(Preferred)
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : Sunday, May 29, 2011 10:13:47 PM
Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : Monday, May 30, 2011 9:59:53 AM
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.1.254
DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.1.254
NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled

And here's how it looked like on built-in tether. No browse.

Wireless LAN adapter Wireless Network Connection:

Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Broadcom 802.11g Network Adapter
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-1F-E1-4C-56-E2
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.43.25(Preferred)
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : Sunday, May 29, 2011 10:32:56 PM
Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : Sunday, May 29, 2011 11:32:55 PM
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.43.1
DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.43.1
DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.43.1
NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled

I tried putting google's public dns on the wireless network connection's tcp/ip v4 properties, but it still came up with no browse, no ping, tracert ok on ip address.

By the way, cat /system/etc/resolv.conf doesn't exist on the phone according to terminal emulator. I checked with root explorer as well to confirm.
[Optimus One, P500, V General] doktornotor:
Unless there is a running DNS server/proxy on the default GW, it will not work. Check with nslookup or whatever similar tool.

/system/etc/resolv.conf does not exist? I do not understand how are you able to browse anything from your phone then. It specifies the DNS servers the phone is using.

Getting totally lost here. Why on wireless? By "built-in" tether you mean you connect the phone via USB cable? Well, that does not use wireless at all, so setting any DNS there will not do any good.

Oh well, to sum this up - if you devices cannot see an ad-hoc wifi network, those are broken, not the phone. Messing with USB cable and internet connection sharing on your PC is just a waste of time, IMHO.
[Optimus One, P500, V General] androidmeda:
I don't understand it either.

Froyo has its own wireless tethering, right? That's what I'm trying to get working.. and that's what I'm working on. By the way, USB tethering doesn't work AT ALL.

Total of three brand new Optimus Ones, all unable to see different adhoc networks that work on other wireless-capable devices (this laptop and an iProduct)? I'm just not seeing how the adhoc networks are broken.

It might be a waste of time for you, but this is the way I use the internet at home: my laptop tethered to my phone. I'll probably just wait for Wireless Tether to upgrade to access-point capacity.

Thanks for helping me out with this! ;)
[Optimus One, P500, V General] :
Stop. Please explain what exactly do you mean by "built-in" tethering. The more you are explaining the bigger mess this is. I would strongly suggest uninstalling whatever third-party nonsense you installed for this purpose and use what is already included in the OS. What is included in Android 2.2.x is perfectly fine and just works. By installing tons of third-party things, the only thing you will achieve (as you have already noticed) is that nothing works at all.

We need to start from a known clean state and not with such incredible mess.
[Optimus One, P500, V General] androidmeda:
Again, what is included in Froyo doesn't work at all for me. The 3rd party app Wireless Tether actually was a big help.
[Optimus One, P500, V General] :
Well, "doesn't work at all" is useless description of a problem, sorry. And while you have a mix of various utilities installed that try to do the same thing and mess with the same set of settings in different ways, not even worth the time to try figure out what is wrong.
[Optimus One, P500, V General] agzorig:
same problem here, though usb tethering works. only got wifi tethering to work by installing wireless tether app.

am on void #echo + franco.Kernel.v14 + Ungaze_Data2sd_v4b5
[EVO 4G General] mybikegoes200:
Okay... I've rooted my phone, tweaked a few things (brightness, things that run in the background, etc), removed some bloat (including anything that is location aware) and have my beloved EVO running pretty much exactly as I want.

Here are my current battery use stats:

Cell standby 30%

Phone Idle 30%

CoPilot Live 21% (gps navigation app)

Android System 9%

Voice Calls 7%

Display 3%

1 day 8 hours 10 minutes 4 seconds since unplugged. I have 20% remaining.

No- I'm not kidding.

I've been told that the life I'm seeing is unusual, especially since I use the twitter feed and have a constant Exchange (OWA) push connection and get around 100 emails per day.

Having said all of that - and acknowledging that I'm apparently getting stellar battery life - should I take a chance with a new ROM (eg CM7)?

I'm afraid I'd be committing the proverbial breaking something that's not broken crime.

PS. I have no idea if this contributes to my battery life but I **never** plug it in - anywhere - until my phone is dead. As in shut-itself-off dead.
[EVO 4G General] mattykinsx:
If you create a nandroid of everything, and then move to a different ROM and you want to go back, just restore the nandroid.

That will make it as if you never changed anything, essentially.
[EVO 4G General] mybikegoes200:
Given that type of battery life, do you think it'd be worth it for me, though? From what I understand, a big part of the reason many people flash is to get better battery life... How much better, though, can I really do? And I can't help but worry that all the extra eye candy may come at a cost (as in decreased battery life).
[EVO 4G General] mattykinsx:
As far as better battery life, you're talking about changing kernels moreso than changing ROMs.

If I were you I would just stick to what you have, since you said it's running how you want it.

You can flash different font packs from here:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=801160

And different boot animations from here:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=708173

That way you can change it to how you want it to look, without messing with ROMs.

I would guess that your battery life is from discharging your battery properly, correct/controlled app background usage, and the way you use your device.
[EVO 4G General] mybikegoes200:
Thank you very much for the clear-cut answer... I think I'll do that - leave it alone.
[EVO 4G Accessories] Addictedtothegreenguy:
I've had a Seido Innocase II and I loved until it broke and paint started to chip. Now im looking for a heavy duty case, I looked at the ballistic HC case but heard bad things. I don't want to have to buy multiple cases just want one last purchase
[EVO 4G Accessories] _MetalHead_:
I have both, the Cyclops is a FAR better case. The Defender is one of the crappiest cases that I have ever used for any phone. The Cyclops on the other hand, is awesome. Trident also has that Kraken case that looks pretty cool, I thinking about ordering it.
[EVO 4G Accessories] OneStepAhead:
Well the 2 arent in the same category really. The Cyclops is comparable to the Otterbox Commuter, and the Kraken is comparable to the Defender. I've owned all 4. For me, the Cyclops wins hands down. I love the $10 holster they sell for it, and its pretty cool to be able to change the outside silicone to any one of 10 colors. I'm rocking a black/grey/ballistic green combo. looks awesome!

edit: I've also owned the Ballistic. Great case but its a TANK. Unless you work on utility poles for a living, the Cyclops is fine.

edit2: you might want to consider the Seidio Rugged (aka Platinum) since this retailer has it for $7.95!!! http://www.emtcompany.com/platinum-series-case-for-htc-evo-mobile-phones/1003917.html its $50 a best buy.
[EVO 4G Accessories] steelewise:
Otterbox has UNBELIEVABLE customer service though... never used the other cases but nice thing about otterbox is if anything does go wrong with the case they replace it fast no bs, 5 minute phone call and a new case is in the mail. ive always been impressed with how easy they make it and that they even guarantee a cell phone case.
[EVO 4G Accessories] BigPapaBang:
I like the case from ballistic. I've gone from the seidio active, to the otterbox defender and finally the ballistic. It looks great and iso definitely a tank. I'm in construction and it's definitely taken it's share of lumps but is still going strong and scratch free.
[EVO 4G Accessories] lorddaddy84:
I love my otterbox defender, only thing I dont like about it is the silicone picks up pocket lint like crazy. But it is a very durable case.
[EVO 4G Accessories] sup3rn0th1ng:
just bought the Trident Kraken for my EVO...right now I have the Otterbox defender, which I do like but it is a bit bulky, so we will see how it works out.
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Khaledrm:
Hello guys,

The website mentioned in the title, http://whos.amung.us is a website used by webmasters to see the number of users online on their website!

I have tried couple of browsers(stock, skyfire, dolphin), but none of the them could access the page, and just show the web page cannot be shown error, while the website and all its widgets work perfectly fine on iphone browser, safari.

I have also placed a widget of this site on the footer of my blog, and just like the page, the widget wont load on the browser..What is going on here..can anybody help :) ??

- I m using Android revolution 2.0.12
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] john_d1974:
Works fine with the default browser on mine.
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Khaledrm:
over mobile data or wifi.. ?

my settings of the brower are set to default, but i cant load the page :/
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] john_d1974:
WiFi.
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Khaledrm:
I just figured out that mine works only over mobile data..but over wifi it shows web page cannot be found.. but i can acces the same page from my SGS and my laptop over wifi connection..any tip whats the prblem :/
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tkolev:
Try accessing the site from a free hotspot somewhere. If it works, then most probably the problem is with your wifi network.
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Khaledrm:
Tried already..and it dint work no where :/ So i thought the browser couldn't open it.but the problem is smthing else since the browser is able to open the site thru mobile data/3G