yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[XPERIA X10 General] JDwan:
For people wanting to decrypt the files for this ROM, they can be downloaded here:

Hope this helps other people wanting to test out this ROM (as it seems like Canada is the only region to get this ROM so far).
[XPERIA X10 General] arkedk:
Decrypted and checked the files.

The files only contain 2 old builds.

One of them is 2.0.A.0.504
[XPERIA X10 General] XERO_Racer:
has battery drain been fixed on this ROM? can anyone confirm?
[XPERIA X10 General] logicallayer:
Who ever updated to this fw, have you checked if root still working like zroot from the market?
[XPERIA X10 General] JDwan:
Z4Root will NOT root this firmware. I had to use SuperOneClick 1.6.5 to root my phone with this firmware.
[XPERIA X10 General] JDwan:
Oh sorry about that. I just remembered that I updated using PC Companion and I uploaded the files from SEUS (I should have thought more about it). I'll upload the files from PC Companion and post the link here. Sorry about that guys.
[XPERIA X10 General] blisslove:
Is that firmware for x10a or x10i?
[XPERIA X10 General] JDwan:
X10A since it's from Rogers but it is also listed on PTCRB as being for the X10i. Though the files I will be uploading will be the X10A version of them.
[XPERIA X10 General] kr0nz:
i just got the notification on my phone this morning,

however i flashed the nordic x10i fw months backs

is there a way i can flash straight to this firmware?

or will i need to flash to an old x10a build then upgrade to this one through seus/PCC?

i want the multitouch :D

edit: nvm, just checked apparantly i did reflash to an x10a fw, im updating now through pcc
[XPERIA X10 General] JDwan:
Here is the link for the files for the update:

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=IL9V307H

Hopefully, you guys can de-crypt them and can get the ROM to work on your phones too. There doesn't seem to be any difference between this ROM and the .435 ROM though.
[XPERIA X10 General] arkedk:
Alrighty, decrypted and uploading it now.

Big thanks to JDwan.
[XPERIA X10 General] geniusbmt:
I tried the link and here my: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=960598

Thank to JDwan
[XPERIA X10 General] blisslove:
Why doesn't SE make 2. 2 Rom instead of modifying 2. 1 ? Funny SE.
[XPERIA X10 General] arkedk:
The firmware will run fine on an X10i.
[XPERIA X10 General] knudsen81:
but nothing speciael for now? only rogers junks?
[XPERIA X10 General] geniusbmt:
it runs fine on my x10i, I am checking further
[XPERIA X10 General] kenox7:
will check on the official sewing ? or on mod and rom ?
[XPERIA X10 General] arkedk:
What does that mean?
[XPERIA X10 General] kenox7:
bad English, excuse me, will work on mod
[XPERIA X10 General] arkedk:
Don't know if it will work on a modded firmware. You can try it out.
[XPERIA X10 General] JDwan:
Glad you were able to get everything decrypted and to upload the ROM.

From what I can gather it's pretty much the same as .435 apart from the newer baseband and build number and the Rogers apps that were added. So not sure if there is much sense updating to this from .435 but have fun anyway guys!
[XPERIA X10 General] Luhccas-X10:
How about neocore results?

Sent from hell with X10a devil edition...
[XPERIA X10 General] skynet77:
Any change/improvement in HD video recording? :)

or it's the same as before?
[XPERIA X10 General] sasukewa:
You can get it from the development page

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=960554
[XPERIA X10 General] kanchigo:
Can anybody plz tell me what is SI number for Roger Canada?

Thanks:p
[XPERIA X10 General] JDwan:
If you're talking about the eight digit number, for the black X10 it is 1232-4507.
[XPERIA X10 General] killsy:
guys,Any new feature added from .435?

is there Multi touch???Dual touch??
[XPERIA X10 General] JDwan:
I posted a change log on the second page of this thread, have a look at it.

It's effectively the same as .435 except for the baseband and build numbers. Read before posting please.
[XPERIA X10 General] vaidax5:
?

What's is the newest firmware version for X10i ? and what diference of this firmware for X10a ?
[XPERIA X10 General] Haldi4803:
Yo, you say its Faster than the Old one ?

How much? Some1 hast Linpack and Quadrant on pohne and can Try it out?

i still have 2.1.54 and wonder how much it will be.

Here some Screenshots, First are normal, and 2nd With JiT Optimizer from Flash Tool 0.2.6

P.S Both were made ca 30sec after Reboot (first afer root, 2nd after Optimizing)

btw, Will wipe out all user data by installing right ?
[XPERIA X10 General] alankstiyo:
looks like a good difference for me
[XPERIA X10 General] superleeds27:
Can someone just upload the baseband.

Thats all i want to flash really :)
[XPERIA X10 General] Duvel999:
can you use theme´s for X10i 2.1.A.0.435 on the new 2.1.1.A.0.6 ?

I really hate the blue SE Crap look:cool:
[XPERIA X10 General] JDwan:
Yes, you can as they are essentially the same firmware. I have installed (successfully) many themes that are designed for .435 and if I can't find a theme that works for this firmware, I will look for the .435 version.

So, short answer, yes.
[XPERIA X10 General] arkedk:
Updated 1st post with the latest X10i firmware.
[XPERIA X10 General] yoshii69:
I am having some trouble with the usual upload sites

can someone upload this to a public dropbox folder? so we can all download it faster

thanks
[XPERIA X10 General] arkedk:
Did you try the first one on that says Direct Download?
[XPERIA X10 General] yoshii69:
is not appearing to me, is it to you? I guess will take some time to "replicate"
[XPERIA X10 General] arkedk:
Here's the Quadrant score for a 2.1.1.A.0.6 device with JITv2
[XPERIA X10 General] diimaan:
ahhh!! here it is!

can you confirm multitouch works in mediascape??

note: sorry if I've been asking this question again and again! just want to confirm... :)
[XPERIA X10 General] kmaximax:
nope only single touch and hold wait for it to vibrate then slide up or down to zoom in mediascape and btw again its not multitouch its dual touch :)
[XPERIA X10 General] blisslove:
This firmware seems to be good battery improvement.

I've been using my phone for 1 and half day now. Still has 45% of battery.
[XPERIA X10 General] jujukos:
hey, is this one the branded "rogers" or the general ?
[XPERIA X10 General] Crowds:
why the hell everyone of you create a thread for this?

Androxyde ask for...

i have a thread with ALL firmwares

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=10879519&postcount=2

what`s the point of creating xxxxxx threads everytime something new appear? Shouldn`t be better having ONE place for ALL firmwares? Shouldn`t be better PM to Androxyde or me? Or you feel more.....if you do that yourselfs?

Maybe i sound stupid with this:confused:

Thks, just my 2cents
[XPERIA X10 General] kmaximax:
not to diss your contribution to the forum here but your link does not have this firmware that is in your thread?? (X10i 2.1.1.A.0.6) there has been 7 firmware releases since the latest one your in thread (2.0.2.A.0.24) :)
[XPERIA X10 General] Crowds:
of course there is

everyone create a new thread and dont give links to the dev of flashtool

i need to help a guy who completly screwd upoi his phone...and i need to search, search, search, search, search, untill i find
[XPERIA X10 General] arkedk:
Why should I use your "yet another thread with all Firmwares in it", when theres atleast 3 others with the same concept?

So why did you start a new thread about all firmwares when there already was one, "Or you feel more.....if you do that yourselfs?"

And I don't create a NEW thread everytime there is a new firmware, I update my current threads.

And since I didn't see the newest firmware in any of them I provided it here.
[XPERIA X10 General] Crowds:
1st i don't ask my thread. I referred devs!

2nd i was not telling you. I said all.

3rd you get offended with my point of view to bad

4th one question. One stupid one i know.

Don't you think that ALL this firmwares should be places in just ONE place for better reference and search?

Or you know that MD5 thing by yourself and never read the devs thread about sharing there (yours, mine, all of us) firmwares?

I'm not referring to your thread in particular. Like i said before...all.

And don't piss off for i having a different sight if things. That's just how it works on a Democratic community like this one. For some this could be a treat for me no.

I am just piss because with the intention to help someone today i spend 1hour searching for the right fw so that i could build an recovery file for him cause he broke his USB connector in the phone and don't have ANY possibility to install his original fw in other way.

My dialog on this thread ends here.

Period.

sent from my [Cyanogen6.1.3]gingerbread[v01]
[XPERIA X10 General] arkedk:
I'm not pissed off, I'm just letting you know my opinion in the democratic forum, just as you were.

If you take that as being pissed off then that's your problem.

Oh really, so what is this then?
[XPERIA X10 General] arkedk:
Latest 2.1.1.A.0.16 firmware added to first post.

Edit:

This is my 300th post, wohooo :D
[XPERIA X10 General] -- X10B --:
Hey congrats dude.

Any idea bout the changelog and performance of this fw?
[XPERIA X10 General] arkedk:
Don't see any difference from the 2.1.1.A.0.6 firmware.

So must be performance tweaks.
[XPERIA X10 General] MacDrunk:
firmware 2.1.1.A.0.6, it dont have the option to select network mode,, last firmware it have the selection,,,, flash new firmware 2.1.1.A.0.16 cant connect to google,,, any ideas
[XPERIA X10 General] Flo95:
Is the GPU performance back with the latest firmware?
[XPERIA X10 General] chaurjyh:
jus a quick observation after using 2.1.1.A.0.16 for a day... battery performance is slightly poorer... and the "Data traffic Disabled" is now permanently displayed if u offed data traffic... and the wifi sleep policy has its text rewritten.... performance wise feels the same as 2.1.1.A.0.6 though...... maybe signal strength pickup is a little better cos of the new baseband....
[XPERIA X10 General] arkedk:
Firmware 2.1.B.0.1 added to 1st post. Happy flashing :)
[XPERIA X10 General] harsaad:
what's new in new bb 67?
[XPERIA X10 General] Tamae:
Is there a 2.1.b.0.1 for X10a?
[XPERIA X10 General] TheGiga:
i'm in Indonesia, can i use this ROM ?

cause when i'm using the Thailand ROM it sometimes get Roaming :(
[XPERIA X10 General] SignalX:
Excellent!

Thanks for sharing latest build bro :)

Cheers

SX,
[XPERIA X10 General] dorinrockeru:
not working for me on bb67 an i foloow that litle post on youtube ...after flash the phone it is stock on logo...i try this kernel NEW EWJET XKernel Gingerbread.c Version X1.3.2ex :confused:
[Nook Color General] necroscopev:
Thanks for this! Do you have any ideas about intermittent wifi ONLY when on an Adhoc network from my Droid? I had no wifi issues under Rooted 1.1 but when i went to internal Froyo 0.6.6 it is almost unusable. I have upgraded to 0.6.8 and it is still not working correctly, it keeps loosing the IP or pausing the connection.
[Nook Color General] bonobomidwest:
Done some digging on this, and the issue is that my NC can see either the G or the N channel from my router, but not both (even with different SSID) when G is at 2.4 and N is at 5Ghz. It will only see N on 2.4 Ghz. bah.
[Nook Color General] Zhousibo:
I like the idea of putting it all together as it took me awhile to figure it out.

FYI, my wireless modem is:

D-Link DIR-655

On WPA/WPA2 TKIP

Interestingly, I made a setting change to set the wireless mode to only n & g modes. This stopped my nook from getting any wireless till I changed back to n,g & b. Not exactly sure what this means other than it could a router specific issue but good to keep the info in one place considering it is hard to track.
[Nook Color General] fpga_guy:
Not sure of this but if it works with Rooted 1.1 but not Froyo 0.6.6, most likely a Froyo issue.
[Nook Color General] fpga_guy:
The wifi chip in the NC WL1271 supports only 2.4ghz. Interestingly the kernel reports the chip as WL1273 which does support 5ghz.
[Nook Color General] jerrykur:
I don't think the original post regarding 802.11n being an issue is correct. We have two access points running 802.11n and have no issues with the Nook Color. I have them set up to operate 802.11n at 2.5 and 5 Ghz. I connect the NC to the 2.4 GHZ radio and use the 5 GHz for my laptops. I am using a Netgear WNDR 3700s.
[Nook Color General] bonobomidwest:
@jerrykur - Well that explains that. I'm trying to sprint up the learning curve as fast as i can with this wonderful device... sometimes i miss things ;-)

@Zhousibo - I suggest you grab "wifi analyzer" from the market. It's an invaluable tool for tweaking your network. For instance, it lets you see which bands are cluttered and clashing. In my neighborhood everybody (i.e. about 20+ networks) is on the default channels 1 or 6. I can literally watch as one network pops up above the noise and drops out again. In exactly the same spot in the house we have a several dB stronger signal if we move the network to a clear channel. Also bear in mind that the encryption and frequency are two totally different issues. I would vary one at a time and look at what wifi analyzer is telling you - my guess is that only adjusting frequency will affect signal strength and signal drop outs. I would also start with the simplest working setup and add or remove optiosn one at a time, watching what happens to the signal. Once you have that problem fixed, then worry about authentication issues (i seriously doubt this is the problem, i've tried all combinations of authentication on my router and they all work - just go for the most secure!)
[Nook Color General] bonobomidwest:
BTW1: in wifi analyzer you can view signals as a graph in time which will let you see signal drop outs (i.e. let's you watch what is coming into the machine), combined with fpga_guy's suggested method (watching you tube - so following what is coming out of the other end of the software, so to speak), will let you nail down where the glitch is - in the network or in the machine. Similarly you could ahve two devices whatching the same or different youtube sources, if they both fail at teh same time it is a network or even further down the pipe (e.g. ISP) issue.

BTW2: if you are using VOIP, then QoS in your VOIP box could be responsible for a lot of this depending on how your wired network is structured.

BTW3: I should have explained my motivation behind these posts - I just have not had any problems with dropped connection on the NC (other than all the problems with waking in rooted ecalir) on either G or N networks. I can pretty much move around town from rememebred netweork to remembered network and almost always be connected. I'm actually extremely impressed with how well networking DOES work on this machine, especially in Frroyo. BUT my home network is pretty complex and very busy (media center PC, streaming to at least one device most of the time, multiple PC's wireless printer, wired NAS, etc) so has had a lot of fine tuning... So I'm doubly impressed at the lack of drop-outs given this deployment... hence my advice to eliminate network issues first.
[Nook Color General] fpga_guy:
Here is an update on my testing of the NC with various routers. My ipod touch, HP DV1000 laptop running Windows XP connects to every router listed without problems. This indicates either a chip or more likely an implementation problem with BN's driver to the TI wifi chip.

NC (ROM 1.1 with Auto-nooter 3.0.0) works with:

Netgear WNR3500L running 802.11n with DD-WRT WPA2/PSK

DLINk DIR615 runnign 802.11g with WPA2/PSK

Work wireless running 802.11g (router unknown)

NC does NOT work with

Sites with hidden SSID

DLINK DIR615 running 802.11n

Sites using WEP with 128bit encryption

NC connects on boot with sites using WEP 64b encryption - FC after resuming from sleep.
[Nook Color General] Zhousibo:
@bonobomidwest

My only thinking is that the NC wifi driver is not as robust with the settings (maybe it is settings, firmware, hardware, not sure).

Interestingly, I spent a bit of time away from my home network which is where I have had no problems since I made the original change (FYI, I recently upgraded from Autonooter 1.1, to Nook Froyo 0.6.7 to NF 0.6.8 and have been stable since the change). I stayed at my folks for a week as am living overseas and they have a Belkin router (can't remember model but I gave them this and was pretty good for it's time). I had issues where the wifi had problems connecting after the screen had timed out so did not use the NC as much as I wanted. I also had problems with the wifi on Galaxy S on this network even though I changed the settings.

I haven't done a scan where I am living now but it should be more than where my folks are due to living in an apartment as opposed to my folks house.

I'm at the stage where my network is not 'broke' so not actively looking to fix it ;) but all my devices NC, Galaxy S, PS3, PSP, etc, are all working now - only the NC has had the most problems with connecting to wifi but have been resolved.
[Nook Color General] soobaerodude:
I'm having trouble connecting to an 802.11B (yes B) 11Mbps unencrypted router on the bus I commute to work with. Not sure of the brand or model. Wireless status says I'm connected, but testing. I try to browse the web with Dolphin HD, but I never connect. My iPhone connects to the bus' same router without problem.

However it connects just fine to a Linksys WRT610N v2 (flashed with TomatoUSB) running 2.4Ghz N, 40Mhz bandwidth, WPA2/AES

Running Autonooter 1.1, but given what Zhousibo said in the previous post, I'll try out NF 0.6.8.
[Nook Color General] waylo:
Any new ROMs help fix WPA2 connectivity problems?

Just bought my NC and flashed a great Froyo ROM on it.

(The first one I bought had obvious hardware issues, 1bar of wifi signal in the same room as my router. Brought it back same day and had it replaced, immediately better. A known reported issue with some faulty NCs).

Had the same issues with wifi connectivity as described here and everywhere on the net. Essentially, it will connect onto the router with N speeds, but is completely unable to access any internet.

I have a great router (it can broadcast 3 separate SSIDs) but I think it doesn't play nice with the nook. So, it was great up until now =P

Router brand and model number: Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH

802.11 mode: n

SSID visible? yes

Encryption:

SSID1: (WPA+WPA2 mixed TKIP/AES) OR (WPA+TKIP)

SSID2: WPA2+AES

SSID3: WEP (yuck)

The Nook only fully connects to the WPA+TKIP mode (on SSID1) or WEP. The supposed mixed mode setting probably isn't quite as mixed as advertised. The Nook works fine on WEP, but I hate the fact the security is so poor with WEP.

I'd have no problem dropping the SSID1 settings to WPA security, except for the loss of n speeds. Part of the 802.11n specs (has to be WPA2/AES, or NO encryption--not an option). My DVR/home network is on that ssid, so I don't want to lose my n speeds.

So my question is do any other ROMs here help fix the WPA2 connectivity? I know lots of people swear their NC works fine with their WPA2 router, but I suspect their router is just more capable and is switching to WPA-TKIP discreetly.

This is not the same reported problem as having wifi cut off in sleep mode.

EDIT:

Oh, I just realized as a work-around I could put my home network on SSID2, and just the Nook on SSID1.
[Nook Color General] jdefgts:
Get the right router...

Of course I can't speak for others, but my experience with this problem was that this problem was entirely router related. The rooted NC was very slow (to the point of almost unusable on the internet) from my home Netgear WNR834B Wireless N router, regardless of the speed settings, the channel or the security settings. I was able to experience much faster speeds (allowing UTube and Pandora to function properly) at a friend's home (generic Verizon DSL router) and at 2 public wifi locations. As a result I tried another Netgear WPN824 Wireless G Router with the same results as the other Netgear device.

Then I borrowed a couple of Linksys routers from a friend and tried them. The first, an older WRT54GS Wireless G lacking current security standards and then a WRT150N Wireless N. Both worked fine with the NC, allowing full access, with the latter operating at N mixed B, G and N speeds and WPA2 Personal security.

I am very pleased with the results after a few frustrating hours of trying to diagnose the problem. I hope this information is helpful to others. My friend and I will doing some router swapping. I may not tell him about how great the NC is!
[Nook Color General] fpga_guy:
Or maybe the NC?

Yep.. no doubt the right router will work with NC. But at home and at work the NC is the only device having problems. I have no luck in convincing my company to swap out 45 routers so my NC can work
[Nook Color General] johnny15:
I have similar issues. I can't use the internet reliably on my Nook Color or my EVO on my home router unless I'm running WPA+TKIP. I would prefer not to have my router setup this way though because of the security concerns and it not being much harder than WEP to crack.

Guess I'll just stick with WPA2+AES and look for another solution...
[Nook Color General] onclebob:
just to share some experience that hapenned to me:

In France we have an Internet box (wich is basically a router) that deserve 2 wireless network. One public shared with all user from the same Internet provider and one private for home.

At first my nook only saw the public one (wich is not really fast). The private one was not visible (or just flash in network tools on nook).

After some investigation i change the Wifi canal (from 10 to "automatic"). After that, no to see it and connect (if you forget the nook "special sleep policy")
[Nook Color General] soobaerodude:
Tried Nookie Froyo 0.6.8 on the bus this morning. It connects and gets an IP address, but still can't browse or do anything internet related.

Going to try to exchange my NC for a new one tonight, and see if things improve.
[Nook Color General] fpga_guy:
Please give an update after you exchange your NC. I suspect is the wifi chip drivers and not a bad NC.
[Nook Color General] luigi90210:
i dont experience any of these problems where ever i go

i have been able to connect into every coffee shop, book store, and school campus(i go to 3 different schools) plus i can hold a wifi connection at home

ill give you my router settings because it may have something to do with it

Router brand and model number: eg: NETGEAR : unknown

802.11 mode: b,g ,n

SSID visible: yes

Encryption: no or if yes: yes WPA2

NC Rom: HC preview 4

NC OS: 3.0

and my droid x works as well with the WPA/WPA2 security
[Nook Color General] jerrykur:
That is a real common issue since 1.1.0 came out. I pretty much just expect it to happen and disconnect and reconnect when I see the connection failure message
[Nook Color General] soobaerodude:
Any pointers on how to update the wifi drivers on Nookie Froyo running on an SD card? Or is there another ROM with better drivers?
[Nook Color General] fpga_guy:
According to http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=12123746&postcount=20 HC preview 4 seems to work.
[Nook Color General] soobaerodude:
Ok now we're getting somewhere. I'm posting this from the bus' WiFi using HC preview 4. Thanks for saving me a trip to the store.
[Nook Color General] soobaerodude:
Spoke too soon. HC prev 4 could not connect to the router on the bus I usually take. Latest FY 0.6.8 didn't work either.

Today is the 14th day since delivery, so I'm going to do the exchange. Gut feeling says it won't help, but need to eliminate variables.
[Nook Color General] waylo:
Glad you're being systematic. Please let us know if a NC exchange fixes anything.
[Nook Color General] hittingsmoke:
Nook Color running the Honeycomb v2 port

Linksys WRT-54g running DD-WRT

802.11g with WP2 AES

My Nook's wifi cuts out after it's been in standby mode for quite a few hour at a time intermittently. It will still show as connected, but the wifi signal bar will be grey instead of the usual blue when it's connected.

If I turn off wifi and turn it back on, I get the same thing upon reconnect. If I restart the device it reconnects fine on boot.

It probably cuts out once ever three or four days, usually over night.