yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] datajosh:
If it works okay with your SD card removed, it's going to be an issue with the card, even if you haven't been able to find one otherwise. If you have another card around, try to put that one in and see if it works.
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] FIT-Performance:
Stock 2.2, rooted, s-off

Going to have to buy a new one, long since lost the 8gb that came with it.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] nado_x:
I've flashed all my firmwares with Odin 1.3 and with PDA, no CSC. They all seem to have worked fine. Is it necessary on all ROMS ? I've never used a .PIT file either. I HAVE searched the forum and read a lot of other forums... I'm using the latest XWJS5 and only used the PDA-file. It's installed and seems to be working, what's the drawback of not using .CSC and .PIT?

Another thing, do I have to reflash to an older stock before I update to a newer one?
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zbal:
The JS5 archive contains the CSC, modem and PIT. It's an all-in-one package.
[Galaxy S I9000 Themes and Apps] lupin57:
Hi to all,

Is there someone who own and can post the original Samsung Bootanimation (bootanimation.zip and audio if included) extracted from his device ?

I mean by original Samsung, the glowing S at the boot

I have a Darky ROM (v 9.2) since 2 days and before my ROM was a SFR (France), so not the original of course. I didn't find on the net ...

Many thankx in advance ;)
[Galaxy S I9000 Themes and Apps] thug_life_inc:
it is still there,

steps to get back to stock animation:

- mount system in RW (SGS Tools)

- delete /system/media/bootanimation.zip

- restart

- done

HTH.
[Galaxy S I9000 Themes and Apps] Rixsta:
or delete using root explorer
[Galaxy S I9000 Themes and Apps] lupin57:
Ok guy and many thanks,

Done with SGS Tools ! I'm having refound the stock animation

But last question now : where the stock animation & sound associated are located basically ?

Is it Bootsamsung.qmg ?

Thankx in advance
[Galaxy S I9000 Themes and Apps] thug_life_inc:
Could be there, not sure though ;)
[Galaxy S I9000 Themes and Apps] Javier.San1993:
Does anyone have the original .qmg files somewhere where I (or anyone looking for it) can download it? Thanks :D
[Galaxy S I9000 General] bagamyanaleks:
Hello folks,,

I have a question,, My Samsung Galaxy S phone has Froyo JP5 2.2.1 I have set my Facebook account at Samsung Social Hub at first sync program gets my contacts and all facebook data as profile photos status updates etc, than I want program to sync data in 3 Hour.

But I figure out that program sync all datas regularly but not facebook profile photos, what ever I have done ( recreate my account, Erase all data and start over) Its always gets the first time than not sync photos.

anybody can help me?

Regs
[Galaxy S I9000 General] Tehpriest:
I must be really dumb as I cannot get Social Hub to do anything worth while. I have Twitter, Facebook and my Google account set up but all it ever shows me are my SMS messages. Not a clue what I am supposed t do.
[HD2 Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting and Genera] miguel4u2:
So i have a few questions you guys could hopefully help me out with.

1. Is HSPL needed to install MAGDLR?

2. Is SPL something you install or come with the phone?

3. If you have a spl newer than what it supported how will you be able to flash a rom or run android from nand?

4. Is windows mobile device center needed to install HSPL when the phone is in bootloader or to update radio?

Thanks :D
[HD2 Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting and Genera] YZ:
1. Yes HSPL is needed to install MAGLARD (2.08)

2. Yes, SPL comes with the phone.

3. If your spl is higher than needed, download the 1.66 or 1.42 rom from htc and install it, your spl will automaticly get downgraded.

4. Yes
[HD2 Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting and Genera] Archer:
Yes - you need HSPL3, which (confusingly enough) allows you to install HSPL 2.08

SPL is already on your phone when you 1st get it. It's what boots the OS.

If you want to flash anything custom then you need HSPL. If you have a later version of SPL on your phone then you need to get an official ROM from the HTC site (or here, if you can find the correct version for your carrier) and install that from the SD card, using the bootloader. There's plenty of threads on here that can instruct you on how to do that. That will downgrade your SPL version to something suitable that will allow you to install HSPL 2.08 over it.

WMDC is Vista or later. It was ActiveSync before that, but they basically handle communications with your phone in the same way. You need to use whichever of them is relevant when you first flash HSPL on your phone. Other flashes (ROMs and radios can be done from the SD card, as discussed in question 3 above.)

I hope this helps mate. There's a lot to pick up but you're at least asking questions that suggest you've done some reading beforehand. That always goes down well on this forum ;)

Just keep reading, but feel free to ask if you can't find answers anywhere.

Good luck :)
[HD2 Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting and Genera] YZ:
didn't you just answer what I said ? lol :D
[HD2 Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting and Genera] Archer:
Yes mate - we were typing at the same time. I'm drunk so it took longer ;)
[HD2 Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting and Genera] miguel4u2:
Thanks so much guys, i really appreciate the help!:D
[HD2 Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting and Genera] rezajh:
hi

i have a little question:can i run android from sd card without HSPL?

i mean i have spl 3.03 on my HD2 and i want runing android from my sd card whitout HSPL my device.

ROM:3.14 radio:2.15.50.14 spl:3.03
[HTC Inspire 4G] wookiefoot:
I had issues today connecting the Inspire to my home Wi-fi.

Initially I had my Wi-fi setup to not broadcast the SID. When I add the network to the phone it is listed as "Not in Range".

As soon as I change the router to broadcast the SID, the phone connects as expected.

Anyone have any insights? Anyone able to confirm?

--wookiefoot
[HTC Inspire 4G] chocodough:
I also hide my SID on my router and my Inspire connects just fine.

Try rebooting your router? I had an issue the other week where my Captivate wouldn't get an IP address from my router, but I just rebooted the router and it worked fine after that. I figured it was just a glitch.
[HTC Inspire 4G] iPrevailed YDG:
i just cant connect. says obtaining ip address
[HTC Inspire 4G] chocodough:
Did you try rebooting your router?
[HTC Inspire 4G] iPrevailed YDG:
nah but ill try it
[HTC Inspire 4G] Aridon:
Make sure the IP its trying to connect to isn't in use by another device.
[HTC Inspire 4G] legend221:
Wifi settings on my end, WPA2-PSK security type

Connected to the 802.11n router fine.
[HTC Inspire 4G] wookiefoot:
I'll give the router reboot a try. Seems odd that I can toggle SID visibility on/off and watch the phone disconnect and connect based on that.

My temp fix was to leave SID visible then lock down MAC filtering. Not very convenient when new devices need to connect though.

Will update with results in a bit.
[HTC Inspire 4G] kimtyson:
Sounds more like a DHCP issue rather than a SID issue. Check your DHCP settings. That is where it gets the IP address from. You could also give it a static IP or create a reservation for it so it forces the IP. Good luck.
[HTC Inspire 4G] wookiefoot:
Setup DHCP Reservation for the phone. Still no luck. As soon as I switch the visibility of the SID, the phone disconnects and lists the network as "Not in Range".

Not doing anything special with security:

Mode: WPA-Personal

WPA Mode: Auto (WPA or WPA2)

Cipher Type: TKIP and AES

FYI - router reboot didn't resolve the issue either. (Model: D-link 655)

Any other thoughts?
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mark204:
Ave just installed darky's rom 9.2 all went well phone works well,but when i reboot into recovery mode the texts are in red is this normal or did i do some thing to mess things up,been looking around,there seems two, be blue green and red, depending whats going on in the phone, does red meen something not right with the install ? any help would be gratefull. :confused:

phone galaxy s i9000

Thanks Mark204
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Riverriz:
Nothing is wrong dont worry. I think darkyy themed it red himself.

Sent from my Green Robot Device
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Aleebaan:
Guess you had speedmod kernel before which has green letters, voodoo kernel has red letters :)
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mark204:
Ok thank's for the reply's did'nt know there was different color in the kernel's, :)
[Nexus One Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] webarnes:
I recently installed CM7 and restored my apps using Titanium Backup (premium). Most of the apps do not show up in Market->My Apps as Installed. Some of them appear after I have upgraded them using App Brain.

I have tried wiping the phone and starting from scratch, clearing data on Market and on Google Framework, running Fix Permissions in Rom Manager, running Market Doctor in Titanium Backup.

The only thing I haven't tried is wiping and letting Android re-download all the apps. I don't want to do this until I've exhausted all other options.

This started about a week ago (around the time the web market was released). I'm not sure about the exact date (whether it was when I installed CM7, upgraded to #36, or when the market was released).
[Nexus One Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] webarnes:
Bumping. Still having this problem.
[Nexus One Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Rusty!:
If you search for an app that's installed (but not in My Apps), does the Market show it as installed?

You can try using Titanium to restore Market links for apps that are missing, so that'd be worth a go.

Must admit though, whenever my Market isn't showing everything, clearing it's data always sorts it.
[Nexus One Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] crachel:
Seeing as you've had this problem for several days, I would go ahead and fully wipe as with a little preparation, it should only take 45 minutes or so, depending on Android. Hopefully you have a stable Nandroid, restore it, then I would:

Apps that I've highly customized (ADW, LauncherPro, GentleAlarm, etc) I would export their settings using their built in Export functionality

Go ahead and fully wipe, sometimes it takes a couple wipes

Flash ROM, sign in & let Android install the apps

Restore data only using TB, toggling just the apps that absolutely need it & that didn't have built-in export functions (not ADW, LP, GA, etc). If the app doesn't have a lot of settings, avoid restoring its previous data to avoid unnecessary problems

Once the phone calms, begin importing settings that were exported
[Nexus One Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] khaytsus:
In the past when I was messing with ROMs I ran into this problem and just loaded up Appbrain and let it sync. After that the market showed my installed apps.

But as said, Titanium is supposed to be able to do this.. Although I never saw it actually work.
[Nexus One Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] masterjet:
SOLVED

Had the same problem.

Just go to my apps->market->clear data->stop service

run again market and sign in -> voila you have all your apps listed:D
[Nexus One Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Lamarrotems:
I think most people posting in this forum having this problem probably tried that already. ;-)
[Fascinate General] jenisiz:
Before I was a behavioral therapist I worked for a small (lol) company called Applied Materials. And there I worked as a project manager. And what I learned there was the importance of following procedure, something most here seem to fail doing. I know I'm not the only one tired of seeing at least 2-3 threads a day pop up complaining how adryns or blah blahs rom is giving you horrible battery life. Have you stopped and thought for a second that it may have something to do on your part? Let me rephrase that, it is something to do with you. There are procedures before flashing...for example, flashing on a full charge is ALWAYS recommended. Second, wipe wipe and wipe again. I hope you don't wipe your ass the same way you do your phone. You stop to think for a second that flashing two themes a day isn't going to f things up with your battery if you're not following proper protocol? Why is it some people don't have issues and some do? It's simple, you f'd it up.
[Fascinate General] jenisiz:
And for the record, the reason I posted this is to stress the importance of following the rules, bc when there really is an issue, it's like "the boy who cried wolf". We don't know which is legit and the other is just some kid too hyped to get that blackhole or superclean and cuts corners.
[Fascinate General] Skrazz:
This thread drained my battery real bad.
[Fascinate General] mbh87:
It could just be the fact that the Fascinate gets crap battery life in general. I get crappy battery life no matter what. Thanks for the useless post tho. Hopefully mine is just as wothless.
[Fascinate General] jenisiz:
The fascinate is proven to get better battery life then the droid amoung many other androids. I get maybe 16 hours of heavy use. I've been on this forum all day running superclean 2.1 with voodoo and still have 37% left...yeah that's some ****ty battery life for ya lol

Edit: maybe the majority of us getting around 15+ hours are just on some really good dope.
[Fascinate General] mbh87:
Droid? Which droid? Certainly not the Droid X, I had one and battery life was way better. I dont know anybody that gets more than 10 hours on heavy use. Sure you can get more if you dont actually use your phone as a phone.
[Fascinate General] jenisiz:
Lmfao...really? Then why is my cousin who has an x charging his phone while im sitting here on his couch still posting. Before you post again take a peek...i've been trollon this forum for 12 hours now.
[Fascinate General] khanable:
I followed everything to a T the second time around. My first time flashing superclean I was getting less than stellar battery life. Second time around I wiped data, cache, dalvik, and battery stats multiple times while on a full charge.

I've had my phone off the charger for 13 hours now and I am at ~60%. I haven't used it as heavy as normal, but even under heavy load I am getting much better battery than my first time around.
[Fascinate General] KitsuneKnight:
In "16 hours of heavy use", how much of that time was your screen active? You can look in Settings -> About -> Battery Use -> Display. "Heavy use" is a fairly imprecise term, since what one person might consider heavy use might be 'fairly light' to another.
[Fascinate General] jenisiz:
74%...just take a peek in the threads...i've been posting maybe ince every 15 min
[Fascinate General] jenisiz:
My point exactly...thanks for pointing it out.
[Fascinate General] ChrisDDD:
All right, I have to admit, that right there is pretty funny! :D

I agree with your post, thought. Every time a new rom is released, the next several days are filled with complaints about the battery life. If you follow the procedure for resyncing the battery stats, your battery life will be back.
[Fascinate General] Thrillhouse847:
I get good battery life...so this isn't a fact for me.

The most important thing to keep in mind is battery life is SUBJECTIVE, as are the terms used to define usage (including "good" and "crap" as in the above). What one person considers "light/medium" use might be "heavy" use for someone else, and vice versa.
[Fascinate General] nmyeti:
For me battery life on eb01 is great as long as gps isn't enabled in the pull down shade. When that is on the phone doesn't sleep even if gps is never showing active in the status bar.
[Fascinate General] khanable:
I too have GPS disabled in the pull down
[Fascinate General] jenisiz:
X3...imho, it's an irrelevant feature to have on at all times unless you actually need it.
[Fascinate General] Bawb3:
Eb01 battery life is sub par - mostly to with the fact we do not have custom kernels yet. Wait for those and well see the battery life that spoiled us again.
[Fascinate General] KitsuneKnight:
Not percentage, but time.

My Fascinate, currently, has been unplugged for 22 hours. Light/medium/heavy use is all completely and totally relative and opinionated terms. The amount of 'Time on' for the screen is a fair bit better way to show the use than just the meaningless 'heavy' & friends terms *. I've had my screen on for 55 minutes total, during those 22 hours, and am down to 42% battery life remaining. I wouldn't call the use I'd done 'heavy use', but someone else might consider that about as much use as they've given their phone in a WEEK!

I find my battery life is decent, but by no means amazing (I generally always make it through a day, 2 with light usage).

* Even then, it's a fair bit different if the time was spent looking at a single active pixel on the screen, vs playing with an augmented reality app that keeps the GPS, camera+flash, and wifi/3G constantly going, while also burning huge amounts of cycles on both the GPU and CPU... but one step at a time.
[Fascinate General] Domush:
Okay, I've been flashing my ass all day long and not one person has mentioned seeing a wipe button appear, so I don't see how anyone can wipe their ass the same as their phone.

Sent from my SCH-I500 while waiting in prison for my court date for flashing in public. ..Hope this ROM doesn't kill my battery like the last one did.
[Fascinate General] nmyeti:
In my case it's mostly due to the fact that the phone never sleeps if GPS is enabled. When the phone doesn't sleep, it eats battery at an alarming rate even just sitting in your pocket. Once GPS is disabled in the notification shade, battery life is more in line with DL09. I'll be happy once we get some custom kernels, as a LV kernel seems to help my device a bit, but battery life isn't so bad anymore as to cause me to flash back to DL09.
[Fascinate General] finakechi:
I actually carry a second battery around with me. Though TBH I do quite a bit of audio steaming, and occasionally Ustream which tears through you battery like it was wet toilet paper.
[Fascinate General] jamesjones52:
Battery life for me is decent could be better if I didn't use it all the time.here's a thought, on your laptop when it is not plugged in how long does the battery last? Not very long. Smart phones are hand held lap tops, the battery will drain the more you use it. If battery life is soo important then don't buy a smart phone. And if your battery life sucks after rooting its almost always operator error.

Sent via Voodoo magic 2.2
[Fascinate General] chronster:
clockworkmod > advanced > wipe battery stats

what was that about protocol? rofl
[Fascinate General] jenisiz:
Flash method protocols (aka procedures aka methods aka whatever the **** makes sense to you so I don't have to hear you ***** later about ****ty "bugs")...flash full phone charge, wipe stats power cycle battery. If people followed those steps along with wiping cache and data before flashing, I bet my black and white balls there would be less then half of the issues we hear about on this site.
[Fascinate General] chronster:
you could always... you know... not give so much of a ****?
[Fascinate General] jenisiz:
Then I'd be ****less...and what kind of life would that be?
[Fascinate General] AlexDeGruven:
I'm going to go ahead and say you're flat out wrong.

In every instance, I have flashed DL30 and EB01 in exactly the same manner as DL09, and I have tested thoroughly in exactly the same circumstances (look up my post history).

I can say, without a doubt, that DL30 and EB01 (regardless of packager) have poor battery performance compared to DI01 and DL09.

The flaw lies somewhere within Samsung or Verizon's add-on code to the stock ROM that is not letting the phone sleep with the screen off. I've been running JT's Vanilla AOSP since last night, and I'm still showing 70% battery life after unplugging at 100% last night around 10pm (after killing mediaserver, which needs to run at 95% CPU immediately after flashing, for some reason).

Running any of the EB01 ROMs, I would have hit the 70% mark around 9am local time.

And to those who say "Just turn off auto-rotate and GPS". This is a hack/workaround, not a solution. With a bone-stock DL09 ROM and my current AOSP, I have everything on (WiFI, GPS, Auto-Rotate, Background Data, Mobile Data, etc) as though it were stock, and I'm still showing only 12.0% running, with 13h 35m since I last unplugged.

So to you, and others who say "UR Doin it rong", I can say with 100% certainty that I am most definitely NOT doing it wrong.
[Fascinate General] jenisiz:
So you're saying that the 80%+ of us who are getting around 14-15 hours are what just flukes of nature? You are doing something wrong or aside from what the "norm" is. If you'd like to complain about battery life, go back to stock and let sammy know. Don't sit here and flash and flash and flash and complain about bugs and why you're getting bad battery life. You are running roms and kernels that aren't released for the general public? WTF do you expect? If you're concerned that you're not getting 20 hours of battery life, sale your pda and pick up a Moto flip phone.
[Fascinate General] AlexDeGruven:
If you'd actually read my posts, my comments about the battery life are to make a point that DL30 and EB01 are not yet ready for prime time, like DL09 was (in favor of DJ05).

If I want great battery life, I'll stick with DL09, or the current AOSP build I'm running today. My statements about poor battery life and failure to sleep on DL30 and EB01 ROMs are informational to hopefully help a developer find the origins of these bugs.

The statements in this thread which amount to "Turn off half the features that come out of the box and battery life is great" are, quite frankly, bull****, and do nothing to further development and/or bug squashing.

If people are experiencing poor battery life due to failure to sleep (of which there are plenty of reports, which lead me to the conclusion that your 80%+ figure was extracted directly from your anus), then it is beneficial to the community for us to report that "Hey, 'x' appears to be stopping the phone from sleeping and using y% of CPU even with screen off", as it helps nail down these issues that persist.

"It doesn't work for me, and here's what I see might be the issue" is much more useful to a developer than "It works fine for me, shut off half of your features and STFU!".
[Fascinate General] jenisiz:
What you are proposing is that the 20% of you having errors are basing this strictly off of the current kernels and roms the devs are pushing out. What you fail to see is that 80% of us are not having issues. So who do you think is doing it wrong? The 80% of us who have no issues, or the 20% who are the same ones that post recockulous threads about issues that have been resolved a thousand times over...which further points to the fact that they are not following directions. Out of that 20%, I'm sure maybe 3% or 2% have legitimate issues, like maybe yourself...but bc of peoples inability to read and quick "I gotta have this" nature, those questions and concerns get lost amongst the sea of other's unintelligent bs. And who knows...90% of statistics are made up...but I'm just going off of what I see in the forums on a regular basis. Pretty sure adryn, jt and sirgatz amoung other devs wouldn't push stuff out if they saw 7-8 hour use on their test dummies...