[Captivate Android Development] existz:
Im gonna throw my 2 cents into this since my work keeps getting brought up. But I promise this will be the last post from me regarding this.

First off, do not take me the wrong way, I am NOT trash talking Xcal or his work, he does EXCELLENT work and if not for him, we would not be using what we are today, we would still be on KB1. BUT, you cannot really compare my kernel vs his..2 different things. Xcals kernel is basically a stock kernel reoriented with Voodoo initramfs (which initramfs is actually not apart of the actual kernel) given he does have some of his sound fixes, but other than that its pretty much a stock kernel, and there's nothing wrong with that, at all, he does do amazing work ..but some people prefer things as close to stock as possible. But with my kernel, it includes alottt of things from AOSP android, such as wifi fixes, mm/sched fixes..etc.. includes ZRAM from mainline linux kernel..etc.. We have done alot of work on battery saving features such as, making logcat a module and able to disable it to save battery, disabling printk, disabling alot of other debug in the kernel such as cgroup debug, filesystem debug..etc..etc.. Also have tweaked LMK settings for ZRAM to allow more multitasking... the list goes on and on.. Also included OC/UV..now some of you think its pointless, but if you use emulators, then every little bit counts, plus any other cpu intensive task gains from it..if u just use your phone to sms/talk or surf the web, then yea u do not gain anything from it, but that's the great thing about android, there's so much you can do...so just because you think its pointless, that does not give you the right to talk **** about it, because there's a ton of people that do actually gain from it. I mean, just because I don't use CIFS does that mean its pointless and I shouldn't include it in a kernel? No..because there's tons of other people who benefit from it. My kernel has alot of experimental things in it, to be honest if I wanted a stock kernel, then id use a stock kernel. But the whole point of opensource is to take things and make it better, to give more options..otherwise we should all be using an iphone. But don't take me wrong here, im not saying one kernel is better than the other, or am I **** talking Xcal, because im not.. again, huge respect to him for the things he has done..im just saying you cannot compare the 2.. total different things.

So my point is, just because something does not benefit you, that doesn't mean its **** or pointless..there are others who benefit from it.. Maybe they think stuff u need or want is pointless..Also my kernel is geared towards more actual AOSP google kernel than stock samsung kernel..2 total different things. So if one is better for you than the other, then GREAT.. but that does not mean its best for everyone, we all do different things on our phones and we all need/want different features.. If you do not agree, then please go buy an iphone, because this is what Android is all about

Ps

And honestly who cares what one developer done or didn't do, such as DG using oc/uv? I mean just because he did or didn't include it, how does that make it right? Or wrong? Seriously...

/end of rant