yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Windows Mobile Software Development] JPMair:
Hey guys

I'm an entrepreneur from Brisbane, Australia. I'm looking into introducing a new product and am wondering if you guys would be able to help me clarify a few questions. I have to add I have no idea what so ever about programming languages or whats possible or not. I just going to post my vision of the application I will need and hope some of you guys can tell me what of that will be possible, what not and how much effort / money it would take to realise.

Firstly of all and most importantly I need the the Phone application to work with several other systems which would be at the moment : - Iphone, Facebook, Windows Mobile, Blackberry Android, a Website interface, Windows Vista / 7 and Mac OS. I need this to work in two ways. One for the user to sync their data on different apps and secondly for the admin to receive and send data from the main system (that would be working on Windows or Mac)

On first interface the user would have to log in with a username and password, high security would be welcome, after the log in the general interface should be offering the user a booking request form with the ability to use a saved lists of items which have been previously use / prepared but also a interface for add one or editing

It also should offer a open bookings lists and the ability to edit this lists. This should also be able to be synced to the other systems. A third interface showing a history and updates should be also available.

If possible it should offer different accounts and groups where admins can edit the bookings of other users. If this is possible it also should offer a control for the admins which shows bookings and history of other group users.

I would like this obviously to be a professional looking app which offers a good service and is secure and bug free. If anyone has an idea if this is realisable or what parts of it would be difficult or have to be changed please do me the favour and comment.

Thank you for your help in advance.

JPM
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] jonthe838:
Can someone help me get the original Framwork for the latest update? Forgot to back it up..

Thanks!

JL
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] datagubben:
ok, here you go! :)
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] jonthe838:
Awesome thx!! You are a life saver! ;)
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] ParDiamond:
xcuse my ignorance but what is the framework for
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] parthabhatta:
Can somebody upload the original files noted below for 2.0.2.A.0.24 x10 mini (E10i) firmware.

android.policy.jar

services.jar

framework.jar

framework-res.apk

Thanks
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] datagubben:
It is used to modify the look of your phone.

Sent from my U20i
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] micjoh:
I'll second that. Foolishly I didn't backup the files so please if anyone has it available, please upload.
[Captivate General] weenrock:
Looking for other user's experiences with the 2.2 roms. I understand that the official 2.2 update is looking grim and there are some apps that I want to download that are 2.2 only.

Stability and non OC and UV would be ideal. Any suggestions?
[Captivate General] Gurgs:
Rom: Serendipity

Kernel: Speedmod

Modem: JK4

Only thing is if you flash serendipity you will have to flash speedmod seperately cause it comes with an oc/uv kernel bundled in. That is the combo I run and its very stable...
[Captivate General] storm717:
Stable, great data speeds, incredible GPS, lightweight stock-like froyo 2.2 setup (copied from my current signature)

ROM: Cognition v3.0 [link]

Kernel: Firebird 2 [link]

Modem: UGJL2 [link]

Give it a shot, and make sure to post in DG's threads about what a badass he is
[Captivate General] weenrock:
A little uneasy about flashing a kernel. I want to make an easy transition to the new 2.2 when it comes out.
[Captivate General] marvin02:
Dorian's UGJK3 FroYo - Gingerbread Edition

Dorian's XXJPY 2.2.1

I haven't used the above ROMs but they seem pretty successful/stable from the posts in the threads I linked above.
[Captivate General] elmaano:
You can always odin one-click back to stock if needed when an official (non-rogers) froyo is released. If you're thinking of flashing a rom there is really no reason to be uneasy about flashing a kernel because all roms flash a kernel and modem. Everyone likes different roms and kernels and modems and have different ones that work better, so I would suggest looking at what rom you think would give you what you are looking for, comparing kernels, and modems. Remember to read the modem thread over in development about kernel/modem combinations too.
[Captivate General] bogle35:
Andromedia

flashed over darky's 8.1 (ported to captivate) and is really fast!
[Captivate General] slow_DC4:
You could use SGS kernel flasher. That's what I used because I felt the same way.

Sent from 234 Elm Street
[Captivate General] Dungeon47:
Serendipity.
[Captivate General] 1tontomato:
:)There are a lot of good choices available right now I am currently running Pheonix 3.5 and its where it should be as far as development. Any of the JPY 2.2.1 roms should be good to go as many of the bugs on all of them have been worked out. the new roms coming out as of right now are based on the Armani captivate and the bell captivate. These are still being tweaked out for maximum performance and will eventually be the best choice for our phones, but in the mean time I would choose between :DPheonix 3.5:D, perception build 10.2 or cognition 2.3b7 a little step backwards, but very stable. These are great places to get you feet wet before you get the bug to flash the latest and greatest XDA has to offer.

If and when ATT finally decides to release an official froyo the best chioces for an operating system will still be found right here, and you'll be glad you learned to get the most out of your phone.
[Captivate General] cbruce80:
I'm running the same thing (version 2.0), but with the JL2 modem. I even have the circle batter mod, and there are no issues.
[Captivate General] rshermanfl:
Good combo

storm717 is definitely on to something!

I have mod-ed three Captivates to this three part combo...(my own, then two coworker/friends) we have all had nothing but good experience with this combination. A faster, better Captivate is waiting for you too...definitely use "Rom Manager" makes it much safer and easier.

ROM: Cognition v3.0

Kernel: Firebird 2

Modem: UGJL2
[Captivate General] nkrick:
Watch out when using a Captivate ROM (such as Cognition) with i9000 kernel/modem (such as Firebird 2) as it will cause bluetooth voice to not work (so much static it will be unusable).

If you use a i9000 ROM it will not make use of the hardware noise cancellation (audience chip) in the Captivate, so people you call may have a hard time hearing you if there is background noise.
[Captivate General] Pirateghost:
or you could try andromeda...you get the best of both worlds
[Captivate General] bandaid1968:
im running pheonix 3.5 and so far so good its fast and reliable and the gps is awesome it connects even indoors,i would definately recomend this rom
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] huhaifan1:
The HBOOT of my desire is 0.93.0001, after no-pain root, I use the alpharev 1.8 to root my desier, but the PC shows as "your phone was not recognized or is unsupported at this time , if you are 100% sure your phone type should be supported in this version,please onte the model id dispaly".:confused:

Anyone could tell me how to solve it?
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Meaple:
If you read carefully you need to download the correct driver for your USB.

http://unrevoked.com/rootwiki/doku.php/public/windows_hboot_driver_install

Go there and read.
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] andQlimax:
When u used alpharev, do u was already rooted right? It is a requirement to run alpharev..Or maybe ur phone is really unsupported
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] huhaifan1:
when I root the desire, the PC reboots from the ISO, so, does the driver also need ?
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] huhaifan1:
Yes, the no-pain root has been done.

but how to see the "ur phone is really unsupported" ?!:confused:

I can change the recovery or delete the app in the system/data, just can't change the first picture as booting!
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] andQlimax:
What method are u using? Burn the iso on a cd is the easiest way..If the problem persist, try searching in this thread http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=794314 if someone had the same problem..

Or in this too http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=805811
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] yeahxiang:
yuor MID is PB992

check if your MID is "PB992" , which is not recognized by alpharev1.8 ,when you see "your phone was not recognized or is unsupported at this time, if you are 100% sure your phone type should be supported in this version, please onte the model id dispaly", press the keyboard "Ctrl + c ", then appears:

$

type "vi alpharev.sh" and press "Enter "

Move the cursor to the 117 line, that is

if [$ a == "PB9920000"] | | [$ a == "PB9921000"] | | [$ a == "PB9922000"],

The first "pb9920000" to "pb992", that is, to remove the back four “0”, the other constant.

Then press shift and the colon key, enter wq, enter save. Then it will re-display $

At this point type“. / alpharev.sh”,enter to re-run soff, successfully identify the machine, and then back to the prompts to step through the brush!
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] epsylon5:
plz i don't understand that part ????

The first "pb9920000" to "pb992", that is, to remove the back four “0”, the other constant.

Then press shift and the colon key, enter wq, enter save. Then it will re-display $

At this point type“. / alpharev.sh”,enter to re-run soff, successfully identify the machine, and then back to the prompts to step through the brush!
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Alsajosora:
I think he is saying change the first value from PB9920000 to PB992 but leave the other two values as they are.......
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] status_six:
I had this exact problem after I created a goldcard and rooted (unrevoked) but before I wiped and flashed a new rom. I checked that I had the correct drivers, adb running and device visible, USB debugging enabled, no on-screen superuser request holding things up.

Never did get to the bottom of it, all I can say is after a complete backup, wipe and flashing oxygen rom it worked first time and recognised the phone first time!
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jospinto:
Hi there, I did exactly what you advised 2x changing pb9920000 to pb992, and yet it still isn't able to recognise my phone. Any ideas?

Thanks!
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kobesabi:
Vibrant is a great phone technically speaking, but the manufacture marketing tactic is really a major upset. Months after months, they keep on focusing new product and forget about the 10M mark SGS, they still don't care about making upgrade and kept on giving false hopes. Their KIES is really bloated. I have not bought any Samsung product due to bad reputation in the past. This trick they did will likely be the last. If I have to, it will be a Google phone of some sort where you at least get that upgrade OTA early like Nexus S.
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] goob1284:
Yes. Ny first samsung phone was an eternity and now im on the captivate. The eternity was a freaking tank and was so awesome!:) my first touch screen too. now that I have a droid, sure I want 2.2-2.3, but we have devs for that. And my phone would be faster without samsung anyways...oc to 1.4 and ext4 lagfix. Sammy wont do any of that, plus have amazing themes too.
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kobesabi:
I know XDA is great for us for personal use. Without XDA, my Vibrant would just be on ebay skidrow.

However, if you are in charge of deploying to 20+ phones for corporate plan, I don't think you can flash ROM and voiding warranty at the same time. CEO would be pissed if he finds out you would do that for the entire company. Users are complaining that its slow and making you look bad for months.

I don't get it...Samsung already sold 10M+, if they are smart, they need to get those users happy, to get more customer comeback in the future instead of held hostage attitude.
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kobesabi:
Thanks mmelo76. Sorry about the wrong forum posting.
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Oxirane:
For sure yes. Sure- Samsung has their issues with sucky UI and programming, but the devs over here at XDA definitely more than compensate for that. And the hardware aspects of this phone constantly impress me.
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kobesabi:
I agree that they have great hardware for the moment, but it won't be long until other manufactures catch up. The hostage tactic is really unacceptable. Dual Core and 4G is coming up from other vendors. Samsung hostage tactic won't work anymore. People will have more choices now that Android is becoming mainstream by the next 2 years. There are HTC, Sony-Erricson, BB, Dell...

This poll seems to suggest that there are at least 60% attrition rate. I hope Samsung or T-Mobile is watching this and make up for it somehow later if they want the initial 6 Millions Samsung Galaxy S to return. Yes, we do feel really left out, lied, and scammed. If they surprise us with something out of ordinary then maybe people will forget, otherwise 2 year of upset is a definite no return. For now, I'll just accept the scam for 2 years, I'll wait for other vendor multi core later other than Samsung.
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kobesabi:
Almost 50 voters and the percentages still looking roughly the same.
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] synaesthetic:
This is just endemic of Android fragmentation. Google does not mandate a strict update schedule, and they really give the carriers and OEMs a little too much freedom.

Personally I believe that Google should push the OEMs and carriers to making sure the software is up to date.

I'm not going to unilaterally say I would never buy a Samsung device again, because my Vibrant has a great many advantages. I've finally gotten a Froyo ROM working satisfactorily, so I'm actually content with my phone for the first time in a long time! I love the 4" screen size--it's the sweet spot for me. The MT4G felt just a tiny bit small, but 4.3" devices such as the EVO are just too large for me.

One thing that does bother me is that the haptic feedback on the Vibrant feels really weak compared to the MT4G and other similar phones...
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] xriderx66:
most of you who say no, will get another one by samsung, it all depends.

i would've gotten a HTC (forgot) from TMOBILE, but at tmobile, the only good phone they had while i was buying was a Galaxy s which i heard was the fastest phone in the world... and i got this, im dissapointed with samsung, but i can live without a GPS and updates(updates, but not for like 5 years)

i will buy another samsung phone if its one of the best out, my stock had no lag, and putting voodoo makes it feel a bit faster, but doesn't change much for me.
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kobesabi:
I agree with you. I think Google originally made it open and easy to recruit more OEMs to distribute their product out to the world. In doing so would surpass mobile 7 and catchup to iOS faster. Now that the world is aware of it, I think they should push OEMs to keep up to date, or else people will steer away from it and causes it to lose momentum. Google is like Microsoft. Before jumping in to Android, I thought it has the best of everything. I had good thoughts about Samsung, until I saw the truth. This whole handling of update makes me think twice about buying any other Samsung product. The hardware is great but this update issue just ruins its good image and will make others think twice about buying any other Samsung product.

I still have hope for Google tighten up security later as more hackers will now focuses in on it. If they don't push OEMs to keep up to date, it makes me wonder what happens when there is some real bad exploit that needs patching? We can't even get an update in 1/2 a year, so how can we even rely on have a patch/hotfix? I can't rely on product that has problem with udpates. I thought Microsoft was worse, but hey at least they have updates every Tuesday. Android will be linked to Google "first OS" so they have to do something to gain the positive image. Android is linux, so it should not be that hard to compile. There are plenty of folks in linux community to help out with debugging.
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kobesabi:
Not everyone. I know for sure, I and maybe 3 millions others will avoid Samsung like a plague. I rather go with someone who has robust update handling. I have been trying a new phone every 2 years. Last year was HTC. This is the first time I tried Samsung and will be the last. SLCD is out competing with superamoled. I'm pretty sure new technology will be out within next 2 years rival superamol. I'm pretty sure other manufactures can gain up to it.

Apple

AudioVox

HTC

i-mate

Kyocera

LG

Motorola

Nokia

Palm

Blackberry

Sanyo

Sharp

Sony Ericsson

Pantech

PCD

XDA is really great for us, especially my personal phone. I thank them for being our savior to heartburn Samsung / OEMs caused us. The problem is we can not do the same for business phones. Doing so voids warranty and no boss likes you doing that for the company. If you are the IT administrator who recommend SGS for the entire company as a great phone with over 20+ accounts (corporate discount) and now most complained it being crawling slow. You read the Tmobile facebook, news, and told them update will be out. Months after months, nada. CEO is on your arse for recommending bad phone. Now it makes you look bad because the phones you recommended does not have update after 1/2 a year and no ETA when next one available. Tell me what would you do? If I have to take a poll of the folks at work, they would probably say 90% never to Samsung. I hated boring windows Mobile, but this is worse.

I was going to buy Samsung camera in December, glad, I didn't yet.
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] xriderx66:
Did that actually happento u? I'm sorry.

I disagree with this phone being laggy, only some units are laggy, and I totally understand what ur saying, I come from a average consumer, while you, are a businessman, which puts alot of things in a different prescriptive.
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kobesabi:
Yes. Thanks but no need to sorry. It's Samsungs mess.

I've checked about 8 phones, they were slow on bootup about (4-5 min) and slow to response after pressing home, lots of FCs, and autoreboot on few of them. I told them to don't install anything else but leave it as originals...I factory reset most of them but some users don't really listen like executive folks. What's the point of smartphone if I don't let them install some apps. I don't want them to get angry. After many months of waiting, I decided to look for alternative fixes and that lead me to XDA. I tested on my personal SGS and it works beautifully with very low lag. I even do a little further stress test installing over 250 apps to see how it respond in Froyo, it still works great. Because of that, I know Froyo will fix my problem and users will stop complain about slow phones and other issues. The Froyo are here, I know it can solve most issues, but I can't apply it. It's just frustrating waiting for OTA to happen. I can't rely on Samsung. I regret recommending a Samsung product. I should have trust my instinct and gone with more mature product like *gag* iPhone or tell them to wait a little longer. Samsung mademe look bad with so many delay to release updates. I have to keep finding excuses to the users and smile. Having gone through this one, if they ever ask me for another recommendation, I would certainly not go this route again but rather something that is made for enterprise.
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kobesabi:
Almost 70 voters, and the sentiment of the people is clear and distribution still holding.
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Lethal_NFS:
Stock definately has lag. I plan on purchasing the Vibrant 4G when it comes out. Samsung makes good products. The phone is sleek and sexy. It is my favorite looking smart phone out there.
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] A_Flying_Fox:
Nope. By the timei need to upgrade, samsung will still be releasing galaxy s phones. I'm tired of the rehashes and releases with only a mrginal improvement, or worse, a hardware flaw from the previousmodel that they fixed with the part 2.

Such as the vibrant not having hspa+ or froyo...but the vibrant 4g has both.
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kobesabi:
According to the leak info, a fix is consider a "feature upgrade" and US carriers need to pay for it.

That's a "feature upgrade" too I guess. They are milking us every step of their phases.

I just saw the news said Samsung Nexus S will have autofocus...that's a new feature upgrade. Yeap everything is a feature upgrade and it comes in the form of a new phone...I guess that is their business model.
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jamesey10:
yes, if Team Whiskey supports it
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kobesabi:
I hope you did not think they generate new software from scratch so you can load up and make it work better. Or reverse engineering to recompile into a ROM from scratch. If so, you are in for a shock. You do know that Samsung is part of OpenHandsetAlliance right? And supposed to be "open" even with apache license. Otherwise they just a corporate leach and have just fooled people to buying their product for thinking they'd be open by being member of the alliance.

This poll suggest at least 60% are unhappy with Samsung, 2 years from now, the tune might be different about Samsung product. 60% of 10M is alot. Even 10% of that is still alot. I see at least 2 Millions not coming back. Android will be everywhere. Samsung will not be the only phone maker having Android in there 2.2 or 2.3..whatever. We won't be tied down to just haveing Samsung to choose anymore by next 2 years. Without much interest in it, there won't be that many developers to make ROM for you.

The lesson I get from this is I might not buy another OEM again and steer away from Samsung. I rather buy Google phone like Nexus 1 or S so I can get update on time. I heard others said Samsung product break down fast and support was terrible since the 80s. I should have listen to them.
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] troby86:
If you purchased your Vibrant....then Google decided to completely pull the plug on Android and support for Android, would you still be butt-hurt?

Stop complaining about it, Samsung, Google, or T-Mobile DO NOT owe you updates.

Look what happened with the iPhone 3G, 4.0 came out, and it had so many new features that the iPhone 3G couldn't support it.

Should a company slow down the development of their OS due to users wanting to keep the newest stuff on their old phones?? NO!

Basically, your getting pissed that your VHS doesn't play DVDs, or that your DVD players don't play BluRay.... welcome to technology, welcome to progression, move on!
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kobesabi:
You are not comparing the right thing. You are comparing apples and oranges.

Yes they do owe it to the millions because they say so on their Twitter and was on news headlines several times on different Samsung twitter site.

For me at the time of shopping, I bought into what the authorized dealer pitch that Froyo is on its way before Thanksgiving...that slip into later ...and later...and later...not 1 phone but 20+ phones. I thought ok few weeks, should not be a problem making decision to buy them. I have no written proof about update other than what salesperson said. Now I regret it. Not only me believe it but several other millions thought so too. Look around google news and you should see what I mean. Do you even own a Galaxy S phone?

Google would not pull those updates. Do you even know the purpose of Google Nexus 1 or S phone? I guess you don't, that is probably why you think they would.