yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[XPERIA X10 Themes and Apps] SEMPITERNAL:
X FX10 v0.3 - AndroidOS2.1.Eclair Official ROM

AndroidOS 2.1.Eclair

Version 1.5 - only for Eclaie 2.1 Official ROM

framework-res.apk

Conversations.apk

FriendPivotLargeUI.apk

Phonebook.apk

SemcPhone.apk

- BatteryPercent MOD [Battery Circle]

- RebootOption MOD

- Bootanimation [CM Bootanimation]

- New Lockscreen

- New Phone UI

- Transparent Statusbar for LW

For Recovery Menu

If you like my works & want to show your appreciation, please Donate me to continue this work, Thanks :)

Install instruction

DOWNLOAD

[X FX10 for 2.1 Eclair - Official ROM] [2.0.2.A.0.24 FW]

[X FX10 for 2.1 Eclair - Official ROM] [2.0.A.0.504 FW]

[X FX10 for 2.1 Eclair - Official ROM] [2.1.A.0.435 FW]

- Move Zip file to SD card

- Reboot your phone & go to Recovery menu

- Go to "Install custom zip" & install X.FX10-0.2-AndroidOS.2.1.Eclair.Official.ROM.zip

Screen Shot

StatusBar

RebootOption

Bootanimation

& Dock Bar

_____________

Changelog

0.2

- Intial release [complete version]

0.3

- New lockscreen UI

- Transparent statusbar for LW

0.3a

- Compatible version with 2.0.A.0.504 FW

1.5

- Compatible version with 2.1.A.0.435 FW
[XPERIA X10 Themes and Apps] .kannabizz.:
not bad.. keep the good work ;)
[XPERIA X10 Themes and Apps] javiol:
Work is too nice

Thanks dear Mehrzad
[XPERIA X10 Themes and Apps] SXUsr:
Not bad. ;)
[XPERIA X10 Themes and Apps] Farhang:
Holy $#!t!!

I just jizzed in my pants!
[XPERIA X10 Themes and Apps] Hoshar:
Very very nice !! Great job man :D
[XPERIA X10 Themes and Apps] sakyra:
I'm a fan of your theme for 2.1. Why did the same for 2.2? ) Thanks
[XPERIA X10 Themes and Apps] SEMPITERNAL:
Thanks guys :)

X FX10 for 2.1 Official ROM is in way ...

regards

SEMPITERNAL
[XPERIA X10 Themes and Apps] TimMun:
Wow... :| this is awesome!

Any chance to port this to 2.1? ^^
[XPERIA X10 Themes and Apps] laill:
Installed,very awesome

Added this topic as favourite
[XPERIA X10 Themes and Apps] mezo9090:
Please can you make a zip with original files in case I want to go back to the stock theme ? Thanks in advance.

I really like your work :-)
[XPERIA X10 Themes and Apps] Wolfbreak:
Damn, this looks very good!!
[XPERIA X10 Themes and Apps] amerhere:
i bet tis theme wil make ppl install that rom just to use tis theme...

can u pls make tis theme for eternity 2 built3 ?????????????????????????????????

Thanks in advance :D :D :D :D
[XPERIA X10 Themes and Apps] ptesmoke:
sweet lord..... my 2.2. 1 aosp looks dead sexy now :-) thnx brotha!!

sent from my 2.2 x10 aosp
[XPERIA X10 Themes and Apps] SK_007:
Gr8 work dude,pls can u tell where can i get the widgets and wallpaper which u r using as shown in screenshots and also tell which launcher u r using?

Regards....
[XPERIA X10 Themes and Apps] chiefy009:
Awsome one question though where is the bootamimation located? I want to put my c64 animation in

sent from my Commodore 64
[XPERIA X10 Themes and Apps] yawo76:
Semp, good work. Was using your XGbread0.6 on 2.1 and was sad when I had to change to FreeX10 froyo 2.2.1. Very glad you've started working on 2.2 now. Can't wait to have the battery percentage and reboot options.

More grease to your elbows!
[XPERIA X10 Themes and Apps] SK_007:
it cannot be changed now,until zdihu comes with some solution...
[XPERIA X10 Themes and Apps] SXUsr:
He's put the measure in place so people can't use the rom as their own, understandable really considering how many user roms popped up in the dev section.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tracemonkey:
Running Darky's ROM V8. Also have ROM manager (latest version).

Can anyone enlighten me as to why ROM manager believes the lastest version of recovery is 2.5.1.2 whereas I have 2.5.1.3 from the ROM.

If I enter recovery from ROM manager I get to a GREEN screen (which does not include the option to enable/disable voodoo) whereas going to recovery via Darky's rom menu (after pushing power button) takes me to a RED screen which has all the options visible.

How come ROM manager can't "see" the later version?

Thanks
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] JJEgan:
I would ask Darky he built the rom .

jje
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jcdeoferio:
I'm just guessing here. I think the rom manager's cwm recovery uses the update.zip in /sdcard and Darky's uses a cwm recovery stored somewhere in the kernel.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rajuki:
The one you install from the market is different from the that comes with Darky because that CWM is embedded from the Rom Chef.

So, if you reboot into recovery using the Rom manager, it will show you different version number as compared to when you boot manual with different options.
[XPERIA X1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] exander87:
hi guys....

i have a problem with my x1 camera....

when i press camera button, the application start but the screen just blank....

does camera hardware problem or camera application crush???

sorry... my English language......
[Defy Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] curselayne:
Anyone have any idea where I can pick up an Original/OEM Motorola Defy Shell so I can swap out the white parts and use black?

Thanks!
[Defy Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] add.thebad:
i think you will have to wait a while because manufactures wont sell the full shell because it sugests they want you to open it up which they realy dont

ful shells normally come from non working phones that have been disassembled
[Defy Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ABC_Universal:
I bought the black model. But the Chinese generally like the white model more and call it panda :p
[Defy Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] curselayne:
That's hilarious :) I ended up buying a TPU case, and am waiting for it to arrive. Had to settle for a "crystal smoke" one. Surprised that no one's making a solid black tpu case!
[Defy Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] morr22066:
Defy cases

I had looked at quite a few cases and did not like any of the cheap looking silicone skins.

The two cases that looked the best to me were the Otter Box Commuter Case and the Amzer Skin. Ultimately I went with the Otter Box and I really like it. Here are the links if anyone is interested.

http://www.amazon.com/Otterbox-Moto...sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=mobile&qid=1298829799&sr=8-1

http://www.amazon.com/Amzer-AMZ89382-Silicone-Jelly-Motorola/dp/B0043D2OFY/ref=pd_cp_cps_2
[Defy Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Elwyn M3100:
I have previously used the PDAir cases for my PDAs and they seem Ok but I'm up for a challange. My previous phones have lasted quite a while but even so.

Thanks for the links and info ;)
[EVO 4G Android Development] willy900wonka:
Kernel Devs, here's what I found, with pictures to document it.

Li-ion batteries are protected by current limiter chips. SBC kernels cannot exceed safe charging limits because the chips preclude ( stop) it. At the end of the post is a reference to the chip which controls the amperage and voltage, to and from the battery.

I decided to look inside one of my extended $10 3500ma EVO batteries, in order to see how SBC kernels could impact the battery.

I took a series of pictures. Most were 10x and the chip number was 60x. Please be sure to check them.

VV - The four familiar contact pads for the battery.

VV - The picture (at 10x) below is of the chip which controls the operation of the battery.

It is surrounded by the red tape.

VV- The numbers on the controller chip are readable at 60x. Note

it says 8205A, and a mfg (date) code.

What I found was that a 8205 chip is used to provide protection and prevent over charging and over-discharging. Here is a quote from a google search.

Since the batteries are hardware protected, SBC kernels cannot overule and exceed the protection.

Here is a sequel to this thread:http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=913401

It is a test of the battery protection circuit. The concept is one of standard electrons. No magical or invisible electrons allowed. If an electron is added it gets accounted for in any of the possible ways. Usually it's an increase in voltage / heat of the battery.
[EVO 4G Android Development] CheesyNutz:
Good info thx for taking the time and gather this

from my phone duh
[EVO 4G Android Development] mattykinsx:
I guess my question is... if all this is true... why are we having multiple reports from multiple different people on multiple forums claiming failure with these kernels?

Also, wasn't it shown that the different Evo hardware versions came with different batteries?

So couldn't it be true that these "protection chips" aren't the same across the board?
[EVO 4G Android Development] willy900wonka:
Let me explain to you how I came to taking apart my battery.

It might shed some light on your question.

Any time I get a new battery, I always connect it directly to a 6v 2amp charger, with a volt meter across the pos. and neg. terminals.

Here's what I have found: All batteries charge to about 4.33v-4.38v; until they automatically disconnect from the charger ( the voltage goes to 7.2 v ). Judging from this I deduced that all batteries which I tested, stock, 1800ma, 2600ma, and 3500ma all have some hardware protection built in.

I can only guess that maybe some batteries have bad or out of spec. chips and circuits - faulty.
[EVO 4G Android Development] housry23:
Good info here. Thanks for taking the time to explore and test these things out. I have been suspecting that it was the battery that failed and not the kernel on these cases of screwed up batteries, Imagine how many people are using these SBC kernels and only 6 failures. I wonder how many battery failures happened that were not reported because no one was paranoid about this SBC kernel thing and just thought to themselves, "hmmm...I got a bad battery" and took it into Sprint and got it replaced. I am suspecting that most of the battery failures were not the stock battery, but a cheap $10 ebay battery which I use by the way. By using this cheap battery I have accepted the fact that it may fail on me and I may have to buy another $10 battery. I keep 2 on hand plus my original battery anyway, just in case. Thanks for you research willy900wonka. I am not saying that this research proves anything and I know this may turn into a flaming war. All I am saying is I don't think the kernel caused these failures, but a bad battery chip inside the battery as the OP stated.
[EVO 4G Android Development] xHausx:
kill them softly... and slowly. These chips are present in all li-ion batteries but can only do so much
[EVO 4G Android Development] swatspyder:
http://batteryuniversity.com/index.php/learn/article/charging_lithium_ion_batteries

No trickle charge is applied because lithium-ion is unable to absorb overcharge. A continuous trickle charge above 4.05V/cell would causes plating of metallic lithium that could lead to instabilities and compromise safety. Instead, a brief topping charge is provided to compensate for the small self-discharge the battery and its protective circuit consume. Depending on the battery, a topping charge may be repeated once every 20 days. Typically, the charge kicks in when the open terminal voltage drops to 4.05V/cell and turns off at a high 4.20V/cell.

What happens if a battery is inadvertently overcharged? lithium-ion is designed to operate safely within their normal operating voltage but become unstable if charged to higher voltages. When charging above 4.30V, the cell causes plating of metallic lithium on the anode; the cathode material becomes an oxidizing agent, loses stability and releases oxygen. Overcharging causes the cell to heat up. If left unattended, the cell could vent with flame.
[EVO 4G Android Development] HeckNoTechnO:
You say mutiple failures due to what? There have been 6 failures reported. Are they ALL true? Six out of how many EVO's on the market? Lets keep this in check!
[EVO 4G Android Development] swatspyder:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=906230
[EVO 4G Android Development] Novarider:
Has anyone reported their battery catching on fire or are people just reporting batteries dying?
[EVO 4G Android Development] drrtydisko:
Very useful information thanks.
[EVO 4G Android Development] Shinzul:
So basically, there is a hardware failsafe designed to prevent these batteries from exploding... so what happens when one of the hardware failsafes fails? How many evos have people reported as faulty? Quite a few... we have seen bad screens, bad cases, bad buttons, etc. Who's to say that there haven't also been bad 8205a chips too? Maybe HTC even *gasp* KNEW that these chips were prone to failure and introduced the 90% charge in anticipation of this?

No one can be 100% sure if these "SBC" kernels are to blame. Correlation does not imply causation. But that said, I think that if you understand enough about the electrical engineering involved, you will realize that gaining 10% more battery life isn't worth the risk of a fire hazard and a destroyed phone. It's easy to say "hey, new kernel, cool!" But then if something catastrophic happens all of a sudden it's "oh crap why did I do that?!"

Of course you can do whatever you choose with your phone, it is your choice. I personally am not going to screw around with introducing potential instability to a piece of hardware that already has enough stability problems as it is.
[EVO 4G Android Development] mitchellvii:
Well, you are making the assumption that these batteries would not have failed if not for SBC. It is a post hoc argument (after this therefore because of this). Considering how many people are using SBC and the number of reported failures are tiny compared to the whole, I think it would be safe to say that there is no statistical evidence that SBC is causing the failures. If .01% of SBC users are experiencing failure and 99.99% are not, one has to question if there is a correlation.

If SBC is the problem, why are the vast majority of users experiencing no malfunction whatsoever?
[EVO 4G Android Development] BuddaBelly:
Bottom line is we are messing with something that it took a team of engineers to figure out in the first place. My kids use my phone all the time and I'm just not willing to take a chance however small that might be.
[EVO 4G Android Development] mitchellvii:
Yes, I think this is the most logical way to approach things. Although it is hard to prove that SBC is causing these failures based upon the small number of reported incidents, the potential benefit of using SBC is far outweighed by the potential risk of a lipo fire from an over-loaded battery.

For this reason I personally removed the SBC kernel from my phone and replaced it with a non-SBC kernel - even though I had never experienced any problems at all using SBC.
[EVO 4G Android Development] motenak:
I'm not a battery expert but I can almost guarentee no one has their phone on a charger more than I do. I have a charging dock on my nightstand where it charges overnight everynight. In the morning, I take it off the dock, walk to my garage and plug in a car charger for the drive to work. Once at work, I disconnect it from the car charger and within a few minutes my Evo is sitting in another charging dock on my desk at my office. I would estimate that it is being charged over 20 hours per day. I have done this every day since I got the phone so if the SBC thing is causing the problems described I would think it would have affected my phone by now. I bet every problem reported was with a $10 eBay battery from China which probably don't have any protection chips, probably aren't even Li-ion and so on. IMO, YOU GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR! To sell them so cheap the had to cut some corners somewhere.
[EVO 4G Android Development] lyrical1278:
See here is my thing with this particular argument. People say they don't want to put anything on their Evos or whatever phone they have that would introduce the possibility of instability. Um, YOUR PHONE IS ROOTED!!!! and you MIGHT NOT have the stock rom on your phone.

So basically you have ALREADY put your phone at risk. I'm not saying USE the trickle charge kernel by any means. It's your phone do what you want to do put what you want to or don't want to put on it. But you can't use that particular argument to justify WHY you wouldn't. If you don't want to risk your phone in any manner, unroot it and return it to stock. Plain and simple.

As for the warnings everyone is given, every kernel and rom has a warning. If someone wants to use it anyway, let em use it. If you don't want to, then YOU don't want to. I paid 300 bucks for my phone (got it brand new from a third party since I wasn't eligible to upgrade) then I paid 30 bucks for an extended battery with case. Would I be mad if my phone "blew up"? Yep

But my phone is often time COOLER while charging than when I am using it. My phone is in mid 80s easy while charing and mid 90s while using it. That's normal considering I am a SERIOUS multi tasker (you should see my visual task switcher sometimes) So maybe, just maybe, I am part of the 99% that isn't having any issues with the SBC kernels. I'll take the extra battery juice, especially since I do travel and I don't sit by an electric outlet all the time.
[EVO 4G Android Development] fixxxer2008:
as ive said maybe these people with battery issues had cheap knockoff batteries.
[EVO 4G Android Development] spiicytuna:
Agreed. Even though I have insurance, the hassle, etc., is not worth the risk for approximately 10% more battery. With the wimax cm6 kernel I get good battery life under semi-heavy use.

Sent on the go from my HTC EVO
[EVO 4G Android Development] eyeballer:
Rooting your phone and having a custom rom isn't the same kind of instability as potentially over-charging a Li-on battery. A few fc's probably won't blow up your phone.

This thread is a report of a stock one.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=904577

Again, there's no proof/evidence to show sbc doesn't this, but it's of course within the realm of possibility. And as most people have said.. is that extra few percent worth the risk? That's up to the individual,
[EVO 4G Android Development] aimbdd:
This kernel NEVER charges anywhere close to 4.3v .... it stays at 4.2/ So that would mean there is NO damage now wouldnt it?
[EVO 4G Android Development] barnacles10:
I will share this, on paper, SBC is a god send to those with extended batteries. You guys are commenting on the extra 0-10 percent, but for me, with sbc, I gain 20-30+ percent! Its a tough one, as you never know where problems come from when reported on xda. There are so many variables its hard to tell. But its almost worth the "potential risk" to me. Without SBC my mornings look like: unplug, reboot plug back in for 15 minutes, unplug reboot, plug back in etc etc etc until I finally reach 100%. Why have an extended battery if stock kernels only charge to 70%? All opinion of course.. but its more than just a few percent :D I do know that I have been running an SBC kernel on my 2600 EXT battery since they were released, charging 6-9 hours a night and have yet to experience any issues. But time will tell. :D

I'm also curious on this one. Not arguing, just trying to have discussion here. I've read 4.3 4.4 volts = damage. Well I have never seen my phone charge anywhere near that.. Yeah if my computer gets up to 200 degrees its probably on fire, and broken. But it doesn't do that.
[EVO 4G Android Development] GadgetMonger:
Paranoia is a funny thing. Completely illogical. There have been reports of cell phones blowing up since they first were introduced. If you're going to let paranoia dictate your decisions what are you doing even owning one? If you do a little research and base your decision on facts instead you'll see trickle charging is perfectly safe for our phones. From what I've read the only way you're going to overcharge your batt this way would be to turn it off and leave it on a charger for a couple of days, and only then if you're protective chip is bad. Now that it's over charged the most likely scenario is your batt is crapped out and you need a new one. Gotta make the traumatic trip down to sprint and get it replaced. :eek:

Now is it possible something worse may happen? Sure. Anythings possible, but really... what are the odds? I think the odds that you're going to blow up your phone using trickle charging are probably about the same as your owning an exploding motorola. Have any of you seen the picture of that? Ouch! :p
[EVO 4G Android Development] Agfadoc:
My day is the same...I have not experienced anything over 4.220 or over 88.1 deg. while charging.

Manufacturers have a built in failure rate, and while they do everything they "Can" to produce a safe product, they always put in the failure rate.

In the last two years, manufacturers have INCREASED that value due to the economies of the world and everyone is short skirting as much as possible which introduce higher failure rates.

Of course the manufacturers are like us, and have many sub contract manufacturers (Kernel/software/theme/Radio/etc) that are doing the same thing of reducing staff, reducing the quality of materials, and justifying the reductions to keep the ROI high. Reports are being created to justify materials changes so that people can keep their jobs, and only have to reduce staff by 10% this quarter instead of 20% that is required.

For example as someone already indicated, look at the EVO and the changes it goes through.. is it cost reductions? is it failure rates?

You would be surprised at the actual low number of engineering staff monitoring QC, and are more focused on saving the company money and keeping their positions.

I could go on and on.. but I'll spare you.
[EVO 4G Android Development] gx1400:
I'm going to begin with a warning that although I recently graduated with my BS degree in Electrical Engineering (emphasizing in circuit design), I am fairly inexperienced. I have had two internships with fairly intensive design and PCB layout experience. So I know a LITTLE bit of what I'm talking about.

I personally despise these kinds of threads. Its mostly a bunch of hobbyists with no real knowledge of electronics trying to spout off their inferences as fact, in turn misleading everyone else.

With all that said, this chip is likely an inexpensive protection with a known rate of failure. Its going to act in a predictive manner but will not be substantially reliable. The charging will be managed by the processor (kernel?) with a dedicated charging circuit. On one of my internships, I worked with mobile fitness products. We used LiIon batteries (manufacturers had the protection chips), but as engineers we had to make the assumption they would fail without protection from our end.

All of the power for the device was run through a high-precision 0.1 ohm resistor that was monitored by an IC. This IC would be able to determine current draw, battery voltage, charge and discharge rates, etc. It communicated with the processor using I2C. Considering the battery stats I've seen certain apps have access to, our phones have the same sort of system in place.

With all that being said, the protection is engineered on the phone side, not the battery side. The battery could potentially be fail proof using a proper circuit but the profit margin would PLUMMET, the battery would be too expensive, and noone would buy it. Anyone who has worked in a manufacturing environment knows that when you save a few cents, you make a lot more money.

For example on one of our consumer products we were trying to make it so when you press three of the four buttons at the same time, it would reset the unit. Instead of using a $0.12 three-input AND gate, we used three $.02 MOSFETs. This required a lot more real estate on the PCB, but the cost of the parts were more significant.

I don't even know where I'm going with this, but unless you have some experience with the design or chemistry of these devices, don't go spouting off how everything is safe when you have NO idea.

Someone mentioned that only .01% of the people using the SBC kernel have experienced failures.... Do you really think that 60,000 people are using those kernels on Evos?

I dunno, for all I really know SBC is the future of kernel development and battery charging, but I believe theres a reason that a team of engineers at HTC didn't do something as simple as trickle charging.

/rant :rolleyes: