yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Captivate Android Development] Cezar`:
Mate.. you need some education and some diplomacy :p But now that you pushed it out... why do you say this?
[Captivate Android Development] Cezar`:
1. The screen slides just well.

2. Do you have any idea how much work these guys put in this work? Sorry for being offensive but your sentence came out like a bullet.
[Captivate Android Development] KaLiBLeeK:
Ran ShootMe for the first time, and I didn't get a prompt...but the app worked fine. Decided to delete a permission in SU to be safe, and reran the app; SU prompt came up again. Installed K12I via CWM this morning.

RE: psufan's post; there are a lot of people that are quite fond of OC in this forum. Issues with my previous Captivate have scared me off of the OC thing for now, so I'm a huge fan of this kernel (was using the stock Voodoo kernel curio posted before this). Then again, I don't use LWP either, but my phone seems to run as smoothly as it did with Set's 1280 kernel.
[Captivate Android Development] beerbaronstatic:
Crap, then its just me. Do you have lagfix/all recommended tweaks enabled? Anybody have any ideas of what else would cause this for me? Its happened twice now, both times I've done a reflash
[Captivate Android Development] KaLiBLeeK:
Yep yep; well, I had Voodoo enabled originally, so I didn't do any conversions/lagfix with this kernel until today (system to ext4). But I have all the tweaks enabled. I'm running the optimized JJ4 ROM, which is probably irrelevant. Haha. Sorry I can't be of more assistance.
[Captivate Android Development] beerbaronstatic:
Is anyone else using phoenix 1.0 with K12I? I'm wondering if its something in init.d or maybe build.prop, or maybe its just something with a 2.2 ROM?
[Captivate Android Development] momulah:
If I use setcpu or voltage with this kernel can I overclock?
[Captivate Android Development] hardcore:
Have u tried to clear the app data for the superuser app from the settings menu?
[Captivate Android Development] Cezar`:
Clear data for Superuser and reinstall busybox (use stericson's app). Restart phone (just to be sure) and see if it works
[Captivate Android Development] beerbaronstatic:
I had actually went back to stock first then added the kernel to the ROM I was flashing and applied lagfix/tweaks/system conversion before even booting, thats the first time I had it. I did it all again, but the 2nd time I didnt convert system until after I had my apps restored with TiBu, same outcome.
[Captivate Android Development] Cezar`:
try doing the busybox thing. I dont have a problem on my ROM
[Captivate Android Development] hardcore:
Hmm... Titanium Backup is known to have some problems with 2.2.1 <-> 2.2 ROMs because the app database locations have changed. You can only go in one direction and not the other, I think. That could be the problem.
[Captivate Android Development] Cezar`:
there is no problem with restoring apps+data with TiBu on 2.2.1 JPY/JPX. Used to have problems with JPU
[Captivate Android Development] beerbaronstatic:
I've been staying on 2.2 ROMs, pretty much the same one, just paranoid so I just wanted to redo everything. Root explorer, TiBu, quickboot, nothing that requires root access could get SU permission with /system/ as ext4, but everything works fine with it RFS
[Captivate Android Development] Cezar`:
Hm, strange. Try to disable the noatime mount tweak from recovery. Is a blind guess...
[Captivate Android Development] hardcore:
Strange.

Did u already try something like this for /system:

original RFS - su works?

convert to ext4 -su doesn't work?

convert back to rfs - su works again?

You can also (re)convert (original) rfs to rfs again. If u don't mind trying, could u try if that also breaks the su for you?
[Captivate Android Development] beerbaronstatic:
Just disabled all tweaks and am about to try it again, will report with results.

UPDATE:

Disabled all tweaks, converted system to ext4, superuser issues. Rebooted to recovery, converted system back to rfs, it now fails again, I'm going to convert system to ext4 again, reinstall super user from CWM and see if it works.
[Captivate Android Development] sublimaze:
i disabled all lagfix & tweaks, flashed k12i over k12h, converted /system & everything else to ext4, then enabled all recommended tweaks & faster mounts. no superuser issues so far

sent from my captivate | di11igaf 3.0.2 | speedmod k12i
[Captivate Android Development] beerbaronstatic:
Okay, so in CWM I reinstalled root/SU, converted system to ext4, everything appears like its working. Is there an easy way to see that the filesystem is in fact ext4?
[Captivate Android Development] hardcore:
Did u install a separate busybox from the market? That can sometimes mess up the su.

If u do adb shell, then type su

What happens?
[Captivate Android Development] hardcore:
adb shell mount

Check the line that says /system
[Captivate Android Development] beerbaronstatic:
Just saw your new post, will do that and validate, thanks
[Captivate Android Development] beerbaronstatic:
Is there anything similar to lagfix.conf or tweak.conf to have the system automatically do the conversion on a first boot?
[Captivate Android Development] diablo009:
I think its good these are not done in "auto" mode. This way it actually gives us the flexibility to enable only if we think we need.
[Captivate Android Development] hardcore:
No. The user has to always select the desired filesystem/lagfix config from CWM. Unless u know how to manually edit the files in /system which I don't recommend.
[Captivate Android Development] Jay120171:
I had to do this to get "root" back after I converted /system to EXT4.
[Captivate Android Development] delugeofspam:
I'm a risk taker and flashed this from Voodoo CWR without disabling lagfix and the phone booted A+ without prompting me for a configuration. I figured I'd report that in case you consider it unintended behavior, but I liked it.

Posted from i897/Cognition 2.3b8/speedmod kernel k12i/TLJL3 using XDA App.
[Captivate Android Development] existz:
I always flash voodoo first to get /system ext4...but now with k12i you can convert /system ext4, but hardcore uses a different method and mount options than voodoo, gives u more space also

Sent from my Captivate
[Captivate Android Development] existz:
@hardcore

On K12i the colors are def the best for me yet... even with k12h-cold my screen was still pink/red...now with k12i its almost spot on, i could almost say its perfect for me...kudos

Sent from my Captivate
[Captivate Android Development] crupp:
would i need to disable lag fix before flashing this? Phoenix 2.0
[Captivate Android Development] gatorlove:
JL2 Modem

How can I flash JL2 modem to captivate?
[Captivate Android Development] beerbaronstatic:
Does anyone else have the issue where their phone will show 100% when charging but will instantly drop to 98% when you unplug it?
[Captivate Android Development] diablo009:
I asked first, yay!

Anyways, known issue in 2.2.1 based ROMs. Not a bug, more like an inconvenience. So I switched back to 2.2.
[Captivate Android Development] beerbaronstatic:
See thats the weird thing, I'm still on phoenix 1.0 which is 2.2. Also, I had been running SetiroN 1.4.7xt up until today with no issue going to 100
[Captivate Android Development] diablo009:
Oh. I faced this issue only on 2.2.1 based ROMs...!!! I think I tried darky's too (on 2.2 I think, not sure though) today evening, with the same issue.

So switched back to the ROM in my signature.
[Captivate Android Development] arcardinal:
I am also having the same issue with all versions of this kernel, and I'm on the same rom as diablo, di11igaf's v2.5, which is 2.2 based. I can confirm it is the kernel. I have flashed DG's Firebird kernel, Setiron's 1.4.7 and 1.5.6, and xcal's kernel. None of them have this issue.

Hardcore, this issue was not present in the "g" version of your kernel, but has shown up in the "h" version, and is still present in the "i" version.

Like diablo said, it's not really a bug, it's more of an annoyance. I'm still gonna run your kernel regardless, as it is the smoothest experience with the best battery life I've ever had on my Captivate.
[Captivate Android Development] beerbaronstatic:
I'm enjoying it so far too, definitely not a deal breaker, would be nice to have it work but oh well
[Captivate Android Development] diablo009:
+1 smoothest and the most responsive kernel till now!!!!

@ acardinal: Where do I find this firebird kernel? I don't seem to find it in any of these forums when I did a search. Or maybe I didn't search well.
[Captivate Android Development] existz:
Its part of DGs Cognition rom
[Captivate Android Development] beerbaronstatic:
Thought firebird was perception/phoenix
[Captivate Android Development] diablo009:
Oh. Where do I find the older version of this kernel. The link in OP takes to page with H and I versions.

Edit: NVM. Found it.

Not looking forward the next version with this fix :-)
[Captivate Android Development] hardcore:
This is perfectly normal. The 2.2.1 kernel source has a new battery driver which changes the charging behavior.

The reason why it does this is to extend the lifespan of your battery. Keeping the battery at 100% charge all the time shortens its lifespan.
[Captivate Android Development] existz:
@hardcore

What was your findings on laptop mode? You recommend it or no?
[Captivate Android Development] diablo009:
Question: I changed myself to the the rom in my signature - di11i's 2.5. This is a 2.2 based ROM. But I am facing this issue since I put in the 500 HZ version in the signature.
[Captivate Android Development] existz:
If im taking it right, its a kernel issue, not rom...so since it jpx 2.2.1 based kernel its going to do that no matter if u run a 2.2 or 2.2.1 rom

Sent from my Captivate
[Captivate Android Development] diablo009:
I looked through for older versions and found this:

SpeedMod K10K with HZ=500 Cool

This is noted as the previous version, but am confused with the "letter K" since it should come after the current version "I". Could you please confirm this is the previous version.
[Captivate Android Development] existz:
Its k10k ...we are on k12

Sent from my Captivate
[Captivate Android Development] diablo009:
Big big oooopppppppppsssssss.......!!!! Damn, how did I miss this.

Could you please post me the version u feel that does not have this battery issue.
[Captivate Android Development] crupp:
Do I need to disable voodoo before flashing this.
[Captivate Android Development] diablo009:
It would be best. I don't see this kernel creating any folder called "Voodoo".
[Captivate Android Development] existz:
You could check the change log on hardcores website and find what version it was that started to use JPX source and then the version u r wanting would be the one before that ..

You don't have to, I use to do it all the time to have /system as ext4...which now hardcores kernel let's u format /system ext4...but u can download "reboot button" it let's you toggle voodoo off/on if u want to disable it ...or just convert /system back to rfs in hardcores

Sent from my Captivate
[Captivate Android Development] diablo009:
I was kinda skeptical to do this directly for the same reason why we flash back to stock before installing any new ROM.
[Captivate Android Development] gatorlove:
Bluetooth Headset Issue

Anyone else have static on bluetooth headset? If so how can I fix this?
[Captivate Android Development] existz:
You are probley running a captivate modem...you need to use an i9000 modem (jk3,jk4 jl2,jl3..etc) ...since this is actually an i9000 kernel (just uses xcaliburinhands reorient code) .

Sent from my Captivate
[Captivate Android Development] gatorlove:
i have flashed JL2 and currently on JK4. I still have static.
[Captivate Android Development] smitty5569:
Hey I'm kinda new to all this hacking, I just got my phone for Christmas.

This is Kernel right? So it's different from a Rom? So can I run a custom Rom (Cognition) with this Kernel?
[Captivate Android Development] existz:
Correct

Sent from my Captivate
[Captivate Android Development] Yuna:
Interesting question: can we use this kernel with Captivate rom?
[Captivate Android Development] Pirateghost:
as long as you use an i9000 modem. dont know if you will have any sdcard mounting issues though.
[Captivate Android Development] smitty5569:
Great, thanks for the info :).

Erm, so are we suppose to i9000 Roms or Captivate Roms? Sorry about all my nooby questions. :p
[Captivate Android Development] existz:
I recommend to use an i9000 JPY rom, 2.2.1 is way smoother and quicker than 2.2

Sent from my Captivate
[Captivate Android Development] diablo009:
Used on my car bluetooth today. No static. It was fine and on par with the other kernels I was so far on.
[Captivate Android Development] Pirateghost:
If you use a JPY modem, you will likely not have 850mhz support and could result in modem issues/soft reboots.
[Captivate Android Development] existz:
Yea I know, I was just recommending to use a JPY rom, never said anything about a modem ... (which I recommend JK3...)..plus most custom JPY roms come with a different modem packaged anyways

Sent from my Captivate
[Captivate Android Development] rlamontjr:
back button.

is anybody having the issue with the back button randomly pressing.?
[Captivate Android Development] diablo009:
Nope. Am on the version in my signature.
[Captivate Android Development] rlamontjr:
what does cold mean.?
[Captivate Android Development] existz:
If ur screen is to yellow/red...its more blue to even it out, then warm is if your screen is to blue it makes it more yellow to even it out...I posted info on all the available versions some pages back...

EDIT

(Im not directing this towards you but just want all future ppl posting to READ this, everything has already been covered in this thread regarding alot about this kernel...I personally have posted guides from all the different versions of this kernel, if you have 3e recovery and how to fix it to all the different tweaks in CWM and what they are and what they do, to if you flashed and now sound doesn't work, screen orientation isn't working correctly and what the difference between the 250/500HZ versions are..and if you just flashed this using a Captivate rom and now your calls/bluetooth has static..you will find everything you need in this thread or in the OP ...and Hardcores FAQ)

I'm not trying to be an ass, not at all, just sayin these topics have been discussed atleast 5-10x ...

/rant

Sent from my Captivate
[Captivate Android Development] haryn:
FYI - if you got cognition2.3.b8

Modem need to change to xxjpp for voice call static to go away.
[Captivate Android Development] RonH54:
I am getting ready to try this Kernel with Darky's 8.0 and I want to much sure I know how to do the Tweaks in Recovery,is this how it done? Once I have everything Flashed and phone is up and running I hold my Power Button and I see a Recovery Option(this from ROM Manager) I hit this Option I will go into Recovery and I will see the Tweaks I need to enable or start? Is this Correct?

Thanks
[Captivate Android Development] Stephenv1971:
I haven't seen it posted so I will post an oddity that may just be related to my phone. I ran quadrant so I could see how smooth the 3d was. On other kernels, this always tends to be 50 -58fps with some drops to 30. On speedmod I am seeing drops to 16 fps and it makes 3d video look very choppy. Is anyone else seeing this?
[Captivate Android Development] delugeofspam:
Precisely. The last few options on this kernel's recovery are tweaks and BLN, very easy to find once you get the green Speedmod CW recovery screen.

Posted from i897/Cognition 2.3b8/speedmod k12i/T959TLJL3 using XDA App.
[Captivate Android Development] diablo009:
I think its an oddity in ur phone. Did u try reflashing the ROM and kernel?

I just now run the benchmark for the first time ever since I bought this phone, and it gave me a score of 1344. Based on standard phones used in comparison, the yellow line corresponding to my phone was on top. So I think this is a pretty good score, though cannot compared to other kernels with OC.

I am using the kernel version in my signature.

I got good FPS too. In lighting based tests it was like in high 20s and 30s. In some 3D tests it went to high 50s too.

So I think this kernel does a very good job.

Edit:

I converted all my partitions, EXCEPT system, to ext4.

Enabled all recommended tweaks.
[Captivate Android Development] hardcore:
Most likely some other process was running in the background, like the media scanner.
[Captivate Android Development] dagnus:
not gonna lie. i was skeptic at how much difference the battery would have with this kernel over others but HOLY CRAP, 15 hours, 37% remaining. with moderate usage (texting now and then, calls, a bit of web browsing. pandora, and the geenral tinkering around with the phone) very cool hardcore and thanks for porting this over for us cappy users!!!
[Captivate Android Development] simulatordos:
I think "H" is better on the battery than "I" -- more like 2-3% an hr vs 3-4% in my experience.
[Captivate Android Development] cellgeek:
Ya Baby!!

Hardcore -

Man, I really like this kernel! I'm running Darky V8, Speedmod (all "R" options on) , EXT4 and UGJL2.

My Captivate runs perfectly with no FC's and no lag. This is really nice. The battery life is really amazing with this kernel. 12 hours, lots of phone calls and 73% left. NICE......... :D

Great work!!
[Captivate Android Development] Clienterror:
I'm using perception 10 and the exact same setup a you and I had 85% after 9 hours off the charger with light-medium use. I'm so used to losing 3-4% battery an hour on standby this kernel is nuts.

Sent from my SGH-I897
[Captivate Android Development] Stephenv1971:
Rebuilding dalvik cache did the trick
[Captivate Android Development] hardcore:
Glad to see you guys are liking it. Working on some new test versions now for the I9000, might release one for the Captivate if it looks stable.
[Captivate Android Development] sublimaze:
what are you planning in the next version?
[Captivate Android Development] cellgeek:
Like you, I was on Perception 10 (I like DG's ROMs), but I was really not comfortable doing a kernel replacement on it as I'd get random FC's for some reason when I changed kernels. So, I tried Darky's ROM and found it seemed to cause me less problems when I did Kernel replacements. I added Speedmod's kernel with all the options and it's really making a HUGE difference in battery life with great performance. I now have a REAL phone!!
[Captivate Android Development] shaolin95:
All the features look very nice on this kernel BUT are there any plans for an OC version even if it is just limited to 1.2Ghz (wouldnt mind at least 1.3 of course).

Thanks!
[Captivate Android Development] shaolin95:
Nice to have another kernel to play with.

Is there going to be any OCed version of the kernel at some point?

Thanks!
[Captivate Android Development] leets4uc3:
anyone run this with perception?

im backing up now to test. i will letcha know.

EDIT: seems to be running fine.
[Captivate Android Development] davwman:
Working well with cezars I9000 with no lagfix enabled and all tweaks enabled except for the last one in the tweak menu! battery doing well working in conjunction with jl 2 modem! this kernel is a win for me! o_O
[Captivate Android Development] viny2cool:
has anyine tried on darky's 7.6...would it worked on that?

sorry newbie:p
[Captivate Android Development] shaolin95:
Darkys is an i9000 based ROM so it should be perfect with it.
[Captivate Android Development] davwman:
Anyone know of tayutamas rom is i9000? I cant remember for the life of me.
[Captivate Android Development] ngochuy:
Can u please upload the 200 or 256 hz version of this kernel ? I think it should be better for battery usage, thanks
[Captivate Android Development] rootnik:
I had trouble with the same rom. No service on boot (had to reboot several times until it read my sim card), and some weird bug in clockwork recovery kept randomly disabling the back button (it would actually tell me that my back button was disabled and I would have to pull the battery).

Other than that, the battery life seemed very good and animations seemed smoother. Reverted back to my previous kernel for now, but will keep an eye on this.

edit: gave it another chance and am not having the same problems as before. Must have been a bad flash...
[Captivate Android Development] ngochuy:
I think u should try other modem like jl2 or jl3. It should be better for the gsm signal.
[Captivate Android Development] existz:
So far no issues at all running on JPY with JK3, install went great, no problems in CWM, so far battery life is really good...running..

/system- ext4 (left voodoo activated when flashed to have system-ext4)

ext4-all

with 1-3-4 tweaks enabled
[Captivate Android Development] davwman:
What do all the tweaks do and why would you use 1-3-4?
[Captivate Android Development] existz:
Heres the link on his startup speed script... (same tweaks in CWM)

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=813309

As far as 1-3-4, when I used the last few of Hardcore's i9000 versions, having the VM tweak (2) on, it would keep the device running 100%...which I havent tested the last few versions to see if it does it or not still...so it might not do it now, still need to test...

.heres the thread on his i9000 version, its basically the exact same thing...

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=822756&page=750
[Captivate Android Development] warri:
Working great on phoenix 1.0

Great job hardcore
[Captivate Android Development] maxjivi05:
I'm sure I did something wrong, I enabled all options but the "not recommended" one in the speedmod and I actually lost 400+ in quadrant.
[Captivate Android Development] jaxf250:
Just installed 256 HZ version in place of GB's kernel on Doc's ROM JPY V7 CE. Rebooted and enabled tweaks. So far it runs great - thanks. Will need a day or so test battery life and compare. Looks like it is sipping it nicely from the short time I am using it. Home key haptic seems to work. Have not tried BT yet (should be fine though).

Q: why would I want the 500 HZ version? Is there visually much of a difference to the UI? This 256 version seems great so far, or maybe my eyes are just old :p
[Captivate Android Development] existz:
I dont think Hardcore has posted a 256hz for the Captivate yet...you sure your not using the i9000 version? ...the ones on his website is for the i9000...the ones on the OP is 500hz for Captivate
[Captivate Android Development] jaxf250:
Well, ya got me there. I am using the one from his website and if it is the i9000 version then that is what is running on my Captivate. Runs fine - should I be concerned and re-flash the CE version? Guess it would be interesting to know what the diffs are b/t the two.
[Captivate Android Development] existz:
They are the same except that the Captivate version is tweaked to run on the Captivate (i.e .. The buttons are remapped for the Captivate, the screen reorientation is fixed for the Captivate, ...etc..etc) there shouldnt be any noticable difference between the 2 speed wise... I have ran his i9000 versions before and a few things i noticed that didnt work on the Captivate was ...Music player wouldnt play, when your on a call the screen will not go off automatically..or if it does then it wont come back on when you pull it away from your face... So his Captivate version just uses xcaliburinhands code for i9000-i897 to fix all that..

If it was for the Captivate it will say i897 in the file name...
[Captivate Android Development] jaxf250:
Thanks for clearing that up for me. CE version @ 500 HZ is now flashed... testing resumes... :cool:
[Captivate Android Development] existz:
No problem man....He did say he was going to release a 256hz version for the Captivate...not sure when he plans on doing it but hes suppose to give us both versions..
[Captivate Android Development] diablo009:
Don't mean to be mean here, but this ROM is probably the only one here so well tuned to battery and still maintaining smoothness. Once the OC thing steps in, this economy would go for a toss.

Edit: Maybe the same with OC, but under a different name please.