yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Rawat:
http://pocketnow.com/android/matias-duarte-gives-glimpse-of-android-honeycomb-on-phones
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] codeworkx:
there will be no alpha ;-)

First release will be RC.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Chad_Petree:
NO no u got it wrong, what you said its exactly what i meant , i doubt well get a close release of honeycomb for tablets , but android 22.4 or 3.1 will definitely bring a lot of the elements used for tablets to the smartphones
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] TheEscapist:
Other than the mtd driver issue, all the other bugs are non-fatal and won't (probably) brick your phone, right?
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] :
Samsung device's are pretty hard to perma brick, unless your flashing SBL/modem.bin or another of the bootloaders, its very unlickly(not impossible) that your going to brick your device.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] TheEscapist:
I realize that, any other phone would have been fully bricked thrice over by me. I was under the impression that this would cause a hardware issue, similar to the FFC issue earlier.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] leoon:
uhm what's kanga
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] sardroid:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/4077110/kang.png
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] TechTony13:
I stand corrected. Thank you.

Sent via XDA App on my CM Captivate.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] MisterAnthonyxD:
Will a JIG get me into download mode after flashing this?
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Khaos-Rage:
Just open odin, then hold both volume buttons and insert USB while holding volume buttons and it should go into download, that worked for me anyways.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Spirit02:
Unless the bootloader is messed up (shouldn't be) - yes :)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] MisterAnthonyxD:
Okay because that was the only thing I was afraid of since 3 Button Download doesn't work for me. Guess I'll flash this when my new USB arrive (hacked my old one apart to make the JIG D:)

Sent from my Captivate running Darky's 8.0 ROM, JL3 Modem, and SpeedMod K12I.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Spirit02:
Is there not a flashable fix for the captivate's 3 br?

I made a jig last week - works beautifully.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] scrizz:
lol, my buttons work, but I still use the jig b/c it's much easier.

:D
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] JBM12G:
Quick question, after this port is fully working will future Nexus S updates be easier to port?
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Jeshter2000:
"@dumdidum: I think the Kernel can now talk to the accelerometer. next: userspace driver #sgs"

Another step ...
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Spirit02:
Based on my (perhaps limited) understanding of what's holding it back now - driver issues due to the nexus s using diff wifi/gps/radio chips...

Once they're sorted, yes, future updates should be much more easily integrated into SGS roms.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Joeyvanderleck:
Gps also fixed!
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Joeyvanderleck:
Both sd-cards mounted. WTF! Lots of progress today
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] pacoforet:
So, with second sdcard solved, sensors solved and gps solved, the to-do list should be like:

- Graphics.

- RIL polling problem.

- 2G toggle.

- Camera.

- Otapackage.

- Boot.img.

Am I rite?

Really hoping to get CM7 on my SGS sometime close :D

Keep it up Codeworkx & Coolya!!
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] My20:
CM7

work GPS, bluetooth, ...

"++++://dl.project-voodoo.org/nexus-s-dumps/system-dump-as-root.tar.gz", not work GPS, ...

where files ?

kernel and system to flash.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] TheEscapist:
I think it should be similar to the Captivate/i9000 roms. Once we(the Captivate users) got a reoriented kernel setup, we could run any i9000 rom, just building with new source for each update.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] lion2009:
up.................
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] xan:
Congratulations guys on today's progress!
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] codeworkx:
CM7 has nothing todo with voodoo or the tech preview.

We've nothing released till now.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] fufus:
Congratulations guys! This is great news that it is getting closer to CM7!
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] My20:
ok thanks, put files
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] yehiaxda:
U guys are the best, keep up the good work. Donation is on the way.

For all u others, please keep other discussions outside this thread. It's really irritating to see you talking about other none relevent stuff, really not cool!!!!
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] chrisjcks:
Im enjoying reading the progress, but the thing that bothers me is surely its easier and faster for samsung to releass an un-touched version of android than what they do now.

Why waste added effort, to ruin the firmware and slow if down, it doesnt make sense to me.

Why do samsung do this!!!

If they didn't do this, we would already have gingerbread by now, and it would run much faster, I don't see the logic.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] TheEscapist:
I sent them a message asking if they could release an AOSP build, I never got an answer.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] d2loader:
Otapackage and Boot.img look like not hard to solve, so the real "Wall" should be like

- Graphics.

- RIL polling problem.

- 2G toggle.

- Camera.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] chrisjcks:
Its worse because they can do it, they did it with the nexus s, why do they ruin the galaxy s?!!!
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] kencix:
New product, and it's not their product. It's googles.

Google can only loose money :)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] ghost-5:
Getting my first android phone this week so looking forward to all the tinkering like with win mo 6 and moving away from apple. Looking forward to this release as well.

Regarding why don't samsung release an untouched version of android... They have built what they feel is the best user interface they can in touch wizz, by keeping this consistent interface throughout their range of samsung phones people (people who don't read these websites) know what they are buying and how to use it. Releasing a different type of rom causes confussion / fragmentation = less sales
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] MikeyMike01:
No.

They've made the most iPhone-copying user interface they can.

Instead of making the Android crowd happy, they went after the iPhone crowd.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] xan:
And they ended selling over 10 millions of Galaxy S featuring most iPhone-copying interface in under a year.

I say they succeeded.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] mithosu:
I don't think people buy it for that interface.

I don't like it and I've change it... but i wanted the AMOLED and the Hummingbird.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] mr_at_sgs:
But don't forget to say you can easily get rid of this iphonish design. Except of pure TouchWiz the Samsung things are looking very good, compared to Sony E. Designs.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] TheEscapist:
Or they could release unofficial AOSP builds and give the regular builds to the carriers. Regular users can just take the carrier roms, and we can manually install the AOSP builds. I, for one, would be far more interested in buying another Samsung phone if they did this.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] jscurtu:
Yeah... Thats true, same with me..

But now its not anough we want it all, the AMOLED, Hummindbird and AOSP ;-)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] codeworkx:
To be different/better to other manufacturers.

Most people are just buying a phone because it looks good. They've no knowledge about hardware. So the manufacturers have to brew their own interface to be better than other manufacturers.

Are you sure?

RIL polling and toggle are very easy.

Graphics and Camera are one problem.

Otapackage is a little bit harder because our phone only has one boot partiton.

Real MTD device have a boot and a recovery partition. To change this, we have to flash a modified bootloader, but we won't do that. it's too hot.

So we have to find a other solution which doesn't break the build for other phones.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] chrisjcks:
I dont think they have, especially not the software.

The phone is fantastic, but if they dont release a proper android version, im SURE I will not be the only customer switching from samsung come upgrade day.

They make a wonderful phone in the galaxy s, but its sad to see even the nexus one run smoother,

un-touched is always better, and I agree they have tried to copy iphone to gain some sales from people looking for an overpriced iphone.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] dswta:
That's true. Although I think they would've sold more had they not been let down by that bad software (touchwiz), the choice of the file system (rfs) and the GPS problem. They've received so much bad press for those problems.

I, for once, will consider other manufacturers (HTC, etc..) first, next time I buy a new phone. All because of these **** ups Samsung made in the galaxy.:rolleyes:
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Metalzoa:
Touchwiz is bad? I had no idea.

Im using a modified TouchWiz (5 dock) and its better than any other launcher / dock Ive ever used.

RFS is not so much a choice as it is mandatory, I guess. It's their stuff.

All this Samsung hate is not justifiable. Haters gotta hate, I guess.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] chrisjcks:
If you have tried an un-touched version of android 2.2 froyo, you wouldn't be saying this.

Mainly smoothness over speed, but the smoothness difference is scary.

2.1 on the old nexus1, is smoother than 2.2.1 on the SGS.

Thank you samsung (sigh)

I truly hope the guys on here are successful in thier task!

Or maybe samsung will give us all what we want and surprise us all :) lol
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] muff26576:
Ha ha.. :D

"the Android crowd happy" - is that possible, this web site testifies to that statement being a misnoma.

No offence meant, just found it amusing.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] MikeyMike01:
If you think sales to be a measure of success.

I don't.

Touché. They could have at least tried.

Run the Gingerbread build for 5 minutes, and it's abundantly apparent what these phones should have been.

You're not the only one. I looked at the three new phones for AT&T, and immediately crossed off the Samsung Infuse solely based on the fact that I'm never buying a Samsung phone again.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Jeshter2000:
This is sooooooo off topic guys !!!
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] TheEscapist:
Note the modefied part of that sentence. Besides, touchwiz is more than just the launcher.

I personally don't like it, and would take stock over touchwiz. Again though, it should be a choice.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] leoon:
Guys its gone too much off-topic

Please lets end this conversation here and if you insist start a new thread in General section
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] xan:
They.dont.care.

Come on, their major concern is not a user-experience, build quality nor if it runs 2.2.1 or 2.3.

They simply dont care. They want to deliver product that sells with profit.

Of course the sales are better when product is better, but its another story.

They do, their shareholders do.

Numbers, $$ is what drives corporations.

I dont have anything against SGS softwarewise, just latest JPY battery drain bothers me.

Also I dont think its good that $>all, but well its a cruel world, get over this.

OT anyway.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] touness69:
[This is my first and last post off topic here]

I really don't understand how can so many people think that touchwiz or the personalization of samsung is bad, the only thing that samsung had ****ed up is their filesystem (even if this thing is far less visible in their 2.2.1 releases..). What phone have a video player that plays everything you throw at it ? What phone have a stock music player with that integration/quality ? What phone came first with toggles for wifi, bluetooth etc... in the notification bar (even CM have it now) ?

Just convert youre partitions in ext4 and put another launcher and you're done stop talking bad of this groundbreaking device...

Even made a vid of it if you're still not convinced :

[youtube]JpH3oX9RhIE[/youtube]

Even the freshly arrived Nexus S is not that smooth in an engadget page with all the plugins activated, well even disabled...

cheers from france
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] ingineru:
Could you provide a link with the 5 dock modified touchwizz?

Are the icons changeable? i do not like having there contacts ( it's redundant with phone - > contacts ), messaging ( o do not use sms very much ) or internet ( i am using something else ).

Thanks
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] modest_mandroid:
http://i.imgur.com/Su0Q7.png <- I'm guessing it's that (screenshot from the Perception 10.1 captivate rom - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=897538) The app drawer looks really nice too - has a black transparency so the wallpaper is still partially visible, as opposed to a pure black background.

The dock icons are also changeable.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] hardmusicfun:
Hey guys, enough posting such things you post. This is Rom thread but DON'T TOUCHWIZ launcher thread

Thanks
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] My20:
compile Gingerbread

compile Gingerbread in Fedora 14 ?
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] yehiaxda:
Words from a wise man. Dear sir would you please enlighten me an others here about the Dev's twitter link, that would be greatly appreciated!
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Inach:
I can't post links here yet, but you can check the devs signatures, the twitter links are there.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] xero2002:
http://twitter.com/CMSGSTeam

http://twitter.com/codeworkx

http://twitter.com/dumdidum
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] lenoo:
is it possible to update the first post with what's working and what not? :)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] codeworkx:
No. Our Rom is totally different to the crappy tech demo.

But you can have a look at: http://code.google.com/p/cyanogenmod7-for-samsung-galaxys/

We'll create a own thread if we are done with it.

Follow us on twitter. Thats the only real source for news.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] yehiaxda:
So what, is this not a co-op with Supercurio? I always thought so!
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] maverickzero:
If you have been following curio on twitter you would know that supercurio himself havent been busy with the porting for a long time... He is working now on voodoo sound and other stuff... So it's not like they are not working together, it's more that the CM team is kind of working alone now.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] kencix:
codeworkx.. beer from me: 7RF08644VL2765257
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] henke2:
Dito!! 5S889629R7141151X :)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Bess833:
Codeworkx said that the first release will be the one with everything working, so no alphas or betas. When it's stable it will get released.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] codeworkx:
TV-Out and FM-Radio are not major.

So we'll release it when all things are done except tv and fm.

This can be done after.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] ragin:
GODSPEED....

PS : WHY isn't the TITLE being UPDATED?

I can't read 1540+ posts on a regular basis. I have a life.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] cantIntoCode:
I barely ever use these features anyways, I'm sure it's only a handful of people that do. Can't wait for RC :)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] mateusz1990:
Sorry but what are not working in v6 (sorry for the quastion) xD
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] dehem333:
Many things , I wouldn't reccomend using it. Just wait for CM7 RC.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] kencix:
Read

http://code.google.com/p/cyanogenmod7-for-samsung-galaxys/
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] larssonen:
he asked about cm6 and that link shows cm7 ;P

but correct me if am wrong, it´s the same major problems on cm6?
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] cddt:
I think a new thread needs to be started fairly soon for cm7 by coolya or codeworkx. This should stop people asking the same old questions. For people who haven't followed thread from the beginning it must be difficult to understand progress.

As someone said a few posts ago follow them on twitter.

Mad skills to you both and looking forward to an RC.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] dani31:
Precisely the same major problem - closed source parts of the code.

However the things not working are quite different:

http://code.google.com/p/cyanogenmod7-for-samsung-galaxys/issues/list

http://code.google.com/p/samsung-gt-i9000-cyanogenmod/issues/list
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] blackstaffer:
You don't need to read through them. Just look at the recent ones by date and time.

You can also look at their twitter twitter.com/CMSGSTeam
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] nhgood:
i always wondered if it wouldnt be better to NOT share an internal sd card.

I can move files between internal/external from the phone when needed.

And some neccessary files (music, app/save/cache data) would be available for running apps from internal SD when external is shared to pc. Then make option for automounting external card after plugging USB cable and i will be happy :)

EDIT: BTW i really appreciate your work: 5UY388413F822264M, will donate again after release (using CM6 beta3 as daily runner)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Farkonian:
He asked about Nexus S Gingerbread on Galaxy S "v6" (this thread), and was given a link to the CM team Gingerbread status page. I believe XDA and CM are teamed up on the SGS Gingerbread effort, so the link should be a valid response. :)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] dcarr622:
For those who still don't get it:

Supercurio made the "tech preview" from a Nexus S system dump simply to show that it could be done and give us a preview of what is to come. He has not, and will not, be updating it any further. It's not recommended for daily use, so try it out once for fun, and then go back to your daily ROM.

Codeworkx and Coolya are working on CyanogenMod 7 (Gingerbread) for GT-I9000. The tweets/google code pages that people are linking to are in regards to that. Once all the outstanding bugs are fixed, it will be released along with the mainstream availability of CM7. They will not be releasing any alphas/betas until the issues listed have been fixed (with the exception of FM and TV-Out which are lower priority and will be fixed later).

Hopefully that will help clear things up. Do not keep asking the same questions on this thread as the development of the "tech preview" by supercurio is dead for all intents and purposes.

I agree that at some point a separate thread for CM7 will be in order, but right now it will just turn into a junk/spam/n00b fest so it's best we not do that yet in my opinion.

I myself am eagerly awaiting CM7 and have donated to codeworkx in thanks of his great work in the past on CM6 and current work. It will be a great next couple months for SGS :)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Euthanatos:
Could this help?
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] inzane1:
twitter ;)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] codeworkx:
http://forum.cyanogenmod.com/topic/14168-gt-i9000-cm7-work-in-progress/
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] zacharias.maladroit:
AWESOME news !

kudos to Imagination Technologies and Google

hopefully this will speed up development even more :cool:
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] :
You should really read the license before you publish such misleading information!

as i told before these license changed DON'T affect the SGS they only fix legal issues if you redistribute them to a Nexus S the license explicitly grants rights for distribution to the Nexus S and NOT TO ANY OTHER DEVICE!

So they are just a peace of closed binary crap that makes our live harder then it should be.

edit: for reference the relevant part of the license
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] zacharias.maladroit:
damn !

sorry, yeah, didn't read the license

and thanks for the license-quote
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] ilbulgaro89:
@codeworkx

here is a beer from an undergraduate. I really hope that you and the other developers find the way to complete this CM7.

191847533H641730X

You are THE MEN!!!!!
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] AbuYahya:
Deleted..............
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] TettZor:
So... does this mean Google went and pulled a Steve on us? Or it is only locked untill enough suckers have traded their phones for the Banana S? In that case I can wait...
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] dyallo:
As I've understood it:

Android is Open Source.

But for example, the GPU drivers are under proprietary license and owned by whoever manifactured them.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] TheEscapist:
Yes, the actual OS itself is open source, but the drivers for each piece of hardware in the phone is up to the manufacturer discretion.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] My20:
Ok :( more one year ...

GT-I9000 16Gb inter.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] TettZor:
Cant argue against the reason in this (even though i would want to)

Samsung now have nearly 10 million galaxy s carried about all over the planet and I think they will have a hard time convincing people to trade an awesome phone with amazing developer attention for one wich I frankly think is weak hardware wise for a dev phone released in the end of 2010. If I were Samsung I would protect that yummy vanilla rom in the ns with my life because if it ended up in the galaxy their precious google flagship device would become the ugly stepsister of the galaxy s. Damn I really want that port...
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] kamalmawa:
Keep up the good work..
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Xacky:
Its Fast :|, really really fast.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Jeshter2000:
"@dumdidum: Did some #GPS testing yesterday. The result: simply stunning #GPS performance #sgs #ginger"
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] :
This is total FUD. There is not a single sign from samsung that they are trying to block a community port of AOSP or Cyanogenmod with any legal reason. Don't you think if they wanted the they would have done it before?

I can tell you that there are STRONG signs that they won't and that they appreciate what is done.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] psz01:
We, the end users who use leaked ROMs and cooked ROMs, are the free beta testers for Samsung.

Looking back over all of the leaks, it seems like each one has had SOME sort of issue (Still waiting on the final verdict on KA5), whether it be connection, data throughput, SD Card mounting, GPS, whatever.

If Samsung is anything like EA or Blizzard, then they probably have people monitoring sites like this to find out (indirectly) what does and doesn't work in each new leak.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] jscurtu:
I have a feeling that leaks are Not leaks.. they are wanted ...

Thats all i read in the news, this leaked, that leaked ..

It seems leaked stuff is a part of the Marketing, its just a Word..
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] amir_rafie:
I think Mr.supercurio leave this project entirely.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] TheEscapist:
He left weeks ago.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] xan:
Hah It just struck me:

Gorilla ates bananas.

Therefore SGS > NS.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] gagadada:
Finally a chance to get rid of the Samsung insanity. You get $20 bucks from me when it's stable and usable. :)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] cesierra:
there is a ton of issues to be resolved. One that worries me is the 850 mhz AT&T 3G Band.

sent from my (non banana shaped) Galaxy S
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] moosamm:
Me too but in a different place :eek:
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] spyrale:
on nexus s visible ram is still 340, but this is not a problem, everything is smooth.