yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[G2 and Desire Z General] carlsbad0331:
So making the new people feel like crap is the way to continue the forum? Calling people names is acceptable?

What difference does it matter what a persons post count is? I understand new members... My largest forum has over 20k members all over the world and its very common to see someone with a 10 post count told to find the SEARCH button.

But I dont understand the need to call someone names because they asked what may be perceived as a stupid question.

I guess I have taken this far enough off topic, and for that I am sorry!
[G2 and Desire Z General] :
This post was brought to you by humor.

You sound like a horrible mod.
[G2 and Desire Z General] styles24:
Damn, all the guy did was post a video to show off a spring hinge on a demo and hope that it was the start of an improvement on a faulty hinge. There really isnt a need to insult his intelligence or him. BTW, for you people who say the dummie phones are different than the real ones, you are correct. The dummies dont work and the real ones do. Thats the only difference. I have a friend who owns a cell phone store, and he had a few bad phones, so decided to make dummie ones out of them. They weighed the same as the real phones, just non operational, and were exact to the displays sent to him by the manufacturer. One of the reps came in and actually said he couldnt tell the difference between the two if it werent for the fake screen. So all you so called "experts" on the subject need to pipe down and quit trolling with your "know it all" attitudes.
[G2 and Desire Z General] sinistersai4d4d:
lol at the angst in this thread.

Anyway, yeah the display at radioshack was the same way. Had the guy open up a box and it was loose like mine.

I think it's just the way the phone was designed. It doesn't affect phone use, so I stopped caring.
[G2 and Desire Z General] Kalandros:
I have to agree. The dummies are all different in every store. Some are partially functional, some are weighted. I have worked at a Cell-phone shop and have destroyed many dummy phones in order to make room for the new ones. Tearing them apart, and seeing if they were real was no uncommon. Some had functioning portions with other fake parts, while some just had weights within them.

The other user that said that this point should be made with a functioning phone with the spring loaded feature was correct. We need to find a functioning one that has that tight hinge and stop claiming that this user is a ****ing douche for pointing something out that we are all concerned about at some point.

Any of you who have been talking ****, just take a few deep breaths and realize that this is the internet. People don't give a **** about your opinion when you're rude, you're just an asshole troll in a thread and will be forgotten. Grow up, be civil and move on. No need to be douche bags.
[G2 and Desire Z General] AngelCityAzn:
The T Mobile store I visited today has a demo and a real phone side by side. Whether they are the same weight should not be the debate here. The point is the hinges were designed to function as the demo unit as shown in the video. Some people claim it was designed to work with gravity, but this video shows otherwise. The screen should be either close or open in any position and nothing suppose to hang. The actual phone is indeed a lot heavier therefore HTC should be using stronger hinges.
[G2 and Desire Z General] ericc191:
I was agreeing with you, actually.

EDIT: I just meant that as XDA becomes more popular, it's bound to have a little more trolling/ect. It sucks, but that's how it goes.
[G2 and Desire Z General] vinnyjr:
That video showed how the hinge should work. HTC needs to fix those early released phones IMO. Who ever shot that video I say great job. You can easily see the spring loaded set up was made to keep the top in the opened or closed position. Great video, hope HTC can remedy this problem to a great phone.
[G2 and Desire Z General] ArcticWolf91:
The loose hinge problem is the only thing really keeping me from getting this phone. If HTC fixes this I might just get it.
[G2 and Desire Z General] allhailcardiel:
dummy models are NOT the same. Dummy models like the one in your video the weight is exactly the same because of a weight the manufacture puts in the back of the phone.the screen part of that phone probably weights half of what your real screen weights. get over how loose your hinges are, and quit holding your phone upside down. try a warranty exchange thru t-mo if you want, you will just receive another device with the same problem your experiencing now.
[G2 and Desire Z General] dynamikd:
I would have to agree that the dummy model is a little bit different. I went to my Tmobile store today and a dummy model and working model were right next to each other. The dummy phone's keyboard was more flush to the device than the working model and the hinge was similar to what the OP experienced.
[G2 and Desire Z General] rhcp011235:
That's not even a live phone. I dont see the point of putting a video of a demo unit up. Which is not even functional.

Shrug! :)
[G2 and Desire Z General] zleilndka:
I've messed with a demo unit and the screen side of the hinge was waaay lighter than the one on my real phone. The weight felt very close to my phone, but when opened, the top half with the screen definitely felt a LOT lighter. Kind of obvious as there isn't an LCD screen there. The spring strength had about the same amount of tension, though since there isn't a screen it doesn't hang like on normal G2 phones. Doubt the design is any different on the display units, the screen is just lighter. Just my 2 cents.
[G2 and Desire Z General] SuperFly03:
What the hell is with all the anger around here? Alot of people on edge about this phone. I've lurked around here for a few years back when I had a Win mo phone... but damn are people touchy in this sub section.
[G2 and Desire Z General] Hosermage:
Anyone brave enough to take the phone apart to see if we can fix it ourselves by replacing a stronger spring? Maybe the ifixit guys?
[G2 and Desire Z General] jonnybueno:
Someone took apart their phone on this very forum and it was revealed that there are no springs in the z hinge design...

That being said, I did exchange my first device because of the loose hinge. The second device I received had a reasonably solid hinge.
[G2 and Desire Z General] nighthawk626:
Whether loaded wit a v8 chevy engine or a corvette motor the matter of fact is that a sturdy g2 should have resistant and not b weight/gravity controlled. Weight doesn't explain why there is or lack there of resistance. Either these ****s were shipped out with failed or no springs at all or they were shipped with springs like they should have. even if the battery was taken out of the real one to remove weight, there is still no resistance. plain and simple.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Aylarth:
sounds interesting, I'm keen to hear more about your project
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] vitalij:
A bit more info would be nice: quadrant score, are apps like newsrob fast.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] nitr8:
Install it yourself, and play its the only way to get a feeling on how it preforms.

However:

JPM - Clean

Quadrant Score: 981

default slice_sync (97), slice_async (39)

Write: 12800000 bytes (12.2MB) copied, 2.836737 seconds, 4.3MB/s

Read: 12800000 bytes (12.2MB) copied, 0.222411 seconds, 54.9MB/s

JPM - with jfs

Quadrant Score: 1658

Write: 12800000 bytes (12.2MB) copied, 1.311856 seconds, 9.3MB/s

Read: 12800000 bytes (12.2MB) copied, 0.221596 seconds, 55.1MB/s

Tests done with:

dd if=/dev/zero of=/data/test count=25000

dd if=/data/test of=/dev/null
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] renaud:
erased for better timeline
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] exadeci:
Have you tried with ReiserFS and XFS ?? Because I wanted to test with those even if they might use more cpu they should be faster, but I didn't had the time to,
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] supercurio:
Yeah this is interesting.

I must admit I hesitated between Ext4 and JFS during original choice for Voodoo and after a lot of reading (and head scratching) I chose Ext4 mostrly because of the ease to get e2fsprogs working, and their maturity.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Btus:
Hey guys:) I love the developers society:) I'm glad to see that our phone has such hard working developers! Looking forward to good news from you:)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] supercurio:
By the way, if you want to avoid creating new script (conversion, etc) I suppose you can "port" Voodoo to JFS in a few minutes.

Don't hesitate to ask for details if you're interested in.

I'm curious about this, I feel like I could have underestimate JFS for mobile (about the low CPU utilization part), like, you know, the general underestimation of this filesystem.

On my tests, the battery really used by the filesystem itself is really minimal, but still :)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] [Ramad]:
I would like to see Voodoo using JFS, I think that it will only be better.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Ibanez33:
Will be interesting to compare only recently updated to JPM so will have to give this a look..
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] renaud:
I did not try xfs, but reiserfs did quadrant scores of about 1200.

XFS overhead is higher than many others, so battery wise, it may not be a good idea. If you wish to test, I made an xfs.ko module on my site (even a btrfs one).
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] supercurio:
This page is an interesting read, what's your opinion about this?

http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/JFS

btw this remark is very bad for Android usage: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/JFS#JFS_losing_files

I don't how valid it is.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] supercurio:
I experienced a bad habit that XFS has, it tend to produce garbage in files when not powered down cleanly

XFS was mostly designed to work efficiently with big files.

JFS looks like a more sensible choice ;)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] renaud:
I know about this, but under android, memory pressure should be sufficient to force writes.

Also it's not very clear how this affects the filesystem. If someones first job is to power the system unproperly, then with whatever filesystem, you will have problems at some point. Also, there is a "discussion" about this here too:

http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Talk:JFS_Filesystem

(this link posting is a little bit annoying, if someon knows how to bypass that, I would be happy to hear)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] daigoro64:
You need at least ten (or twelve, don't remember well) posts. Since your posts are particular interesting, I hope you will break that limit very soon...

Thank you very much for your contribution.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] renaud:
Thanks for finding my work interesting, hopefully, I will break the post barrier soon.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] fAtaXe:
I think you should work with the z4mod team so they can provide a jfs update.zip
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Adevem:
http://llorien.org/samsung_galaxys/

i'll help you hyperlink it lol. you can quote it or something idk. go spam some posts in Q&A and you can post links yourself ;p
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] renaud:
Thanks for linking (even if I cannot qupote you correctly) :)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] ashwinds:
Thanks for the clarifications and yes - default of no OC is a good idea.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] bouzoubaa:
Can you please add supercurio's sharpness and sound fix. It would make this kernel much more complete and hassle free.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] renaud:
0.8.2 is out. It disables overclocking by default.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Bo$s:
Can I flash your kernel over the Doc's ROM? Do I have to do factory reset and disable lagfixes?
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] dupel:
yes, no and yes
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] milan2008:
I've lost all my ringtones, it's only got silent- any idea how to solve it?

Thanks
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] ashwinds:
How do we set parameters for OC / UV - is it similar to raspdeep's kernel? Can you provide some example/safe limits that work?
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] ashwinds:
Tried flashing this, have the shiny S with the following error looping in logcat:

I/ServiceManager( 2689): Waiting for sevice media.audio_policy...

I/ ( 3070): ServiceManager: 0xadb0

E/ALSALib ( 3070): external/alsa-lib/src/conf.c:3009:(snd_config_update_r) Cannot access file /system/usr/share/alsa/alsa.conf

E/ALSALib ( 3070): external/alsa-lib/src/control/control.c:909:(snd_ctl_open_noupdate) Invalid CTL AndroidPlayback

E/AudioHardwareALSA( 3070): Unable to attach mixer to device AndroidPlayback: No such file or directory

E/ALSALib ( 3070): external/alsa-lib/src/conf.c:3009:(snd_config_update_r) Cannot access file /system/usr/share/alsa/alsa.conf

E/ALSALib ( 3070): external/alsa-lib/src/control/control.c:909:(snd_ctl_open_noupdate) Invalid CTL hw:00

E/AudioHardwareALSA( 3070): Unable to attach mixer to device default: No such file or directory

E/ALSALib ( 3070): external/alsa-lib/src/conf.c:3009:(snd_config_update_r) Cannot access file /system/usr/share/alsa/alsa.conf

E/ALSALib ( 3070): external/alsa-lib/src/control/control.c:909:(snd_ctl_open_noupdate) Invalid CTL AndroidRecord

E/AudioHardwareALSA( 3070): Unable to attach mixer to device AndroidRecord: No such file or directory

E/ALSALib ( 3070): external/alsa-lib/src/conf.c:3009:(snd_config_update_r) Cannot access file /system/usr/share/alsa/alsa.conf

E/ALSALib ( 3070): external/alsa-lib/src/control/control.c:909:(snd_ctl_open_noupdate) Invalid CTL hw:00

E/AudioHardwareALSA( 3070): Unable to attach mixer to device default: No such file or directory

I/DEBUG ( 2553): *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

I/DEBUG ( 2553): Build fingerprint: 'samsung/GT-I9000/GT-I9000/GT-I9000:2.2/FROYO/XWJP6:user/release-keys'

I/DEBUG ( 2553): pid: 3070, tid: 3070 >>> /system/bin/mediaserver <<<

I/DEBUG ( 2553): signal 11 (SIGSEGV), fault addr 00000010

Mount shows the conversion to jfs is complete:

/dev/block/stl9 on /system type jfs (ro,noatime,nodiratime,iocharset=utf8)

/dev/block/mmcblk0p2 on /data type jfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noatime,nodiratime,iocharset=utf8)

/dev/block/stl10 on /dbdata type jfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noatime,nodiratime,iocharset=utf8)

/dev/block/stl11 on /cache type jfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noatime,nodiratime,iocharset=utf8)

Update: see an error in recovery related to /dev/block/stl11 now... got to go back to Odin i guess :P
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] [Ramad]:
Thanks, I did ask if any tester does get that error in post #146 in this thread.

Can you please check if the phone keep the selected time-zone after reboot or does it reset to GMT and can you clear data when choosing a program under Settings>Application>Manage applications ?

Thanks in advance :)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] yoshi8:
I´ve got the same error in recovery.

Is there any solution for it?
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] ashwinds:
@Ramad - couldnt get that far. Was stuck with the shiny S - had to do a full restore.

@yoshi8 - restored to stock JPM (without repartition) and on reboot did a factory wipe.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] eRajesh:
Don't start flaming me for asking this but what's the Quadrant score with this kernel?

Yea, I know Quadrant scores mean nothing....I am just curious about what the SGS scores with the JFS FS.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] [Ramad]:
OK...Thanks anyway :)

Quadrant is between 1500-1700, but it's irrelevant, because this lagfix does make the phone very responsive and so fast...if you ask for my opinion then I would say that this is the best lagfix out there and so far I think that it only can get better.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] awia:
well, I flashed the 0.8.2 version over a clean JPO installation... now, I don´t have any call sound... where are? :p :p
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] renaud:
This is an issue that has not been clearly identified, although I can make a patch to make the system still see the ringtones (which I will do in next release). It seems it's due to the fact that samsung assumes /system is fat readable, and not use standard APIs.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] kalpik:
Does this have the JFS bugs too? Timezone resets, no clear data in manage applications?
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] renaud:
This mod has only been tested on JPO and JPM. Although I don't see why it wouldn't work in JP6 if you flash the latest release.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] renaud:
As said in other posts, Samsung doesn't seem to follow standard APIs to fin ringtones, I have a hack to enable this, it will be present in the next release.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] awia:
thanks!!! :D
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] kalpik:
Quoting from first post:

Not sure if anyone can be clearer..
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Predders:
That I did understand..

But are ultra and bleeding edge the same? of is there also a diffirence between those two..
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] kalpik:
You're confused I think :p

Two branches: Stable and Bleeding (latest changes, in testing)

Two versions in each branch: Normal (without preemptive RCU) and Ultra (with preemptive RCU)

Makes sense?
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] chadouming:
Are you sure your rom is on jvh? This happen usually with jvh kernel running on jvb rom. The wifi trying to connect make the phone crash.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Livingsilver94:
3.8 Ultra doesn't see JVO modem, so my phone is offline. I'm on JVH deodexed coming from supercurio's kernel with ext4.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] kalpik:
Read first post.. You flashed Ultra straight away didn't you? :)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Livingsilver94:
I believed that this only depens on file system, not on the kernel instead. I'm a stupid! Thanks for help :)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] ragin:
Can OP be more clear?
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Andro1d:
Yep, was caught by the same trap :) I'll hit OP cause of that ;) *Mom*

PS: but the other way... humm it's stated clearly...

>>you haven't at last booted once a normal FuguMod edition<<
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] renaud:
I am running JVH with JVO modem at the moment on Ultra. Did you flash a normal FuguMod version before Ultra version? If not, you don't have EFS, so no modem.

didn't see people already replied :)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] renaud:
I clarified the first post about the versions.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Predders:
That made it clear! Thx!

About Ultra; is it normal my phone gets hotter en consumes more battery with this kernel? Or did I flash it wrong?

Any future plans on getting UV options and/or BLN added to this awesome kernel?
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] MarlowXim:
@nikademus could you make an experimental initramfs that converts the efs partition to ext4.

The reason I'm asking is whether it will resolve the issues with modem control such as band switching that I mentioned before and going to airplane mode reboot. I noticed that in order for these modes to work it needs to write to efs. I know the copy is rw, however it still causes issues. Perhaps symlinking is not enough.

It does not matter which rcu it seems. To test take a non mounting efs on dbdata and change your band selection in modem. With /efs it will work. On symlink efs on dbdata it reboots. Just some suggestions you might take into consideration and things that I've noticed.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] renaud:
That seems quite dangerous to me, if some rookie user flashes this and converts, he will not be able to use his phone anymore if he flashes something else. At least not without help.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] kasper_h:
I can see the complaints coming in as well...

/efs is not flashed using odin, so it is no recoverable, like the other convertable partitions (/data /dbdata /system /cache) are.

If you would like to solve it, I would prefer having the option to mount /efs as rfs-partition (but that's not possible in ultra due to it not supporting rfs at all).
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] .:Crack:.:
Hey.

I read the Wifi info on #1 and i didn't restore any wifi data (used no wipe Juwe - maybe thats the problem?).

Everything worked super until i turned on wifi. The phone restarts and is on for about 20 secs before rebooting.

What can i do?

thanks
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] renaud:
I don't know about JUWE ROM, but if it's JVH, you can still try the trick on first post.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] KyojinKun:
I'm also having issues with WiFi, and faced reboots after enabling WiFi twice, + my Home WiFi isn't detected (as it happens with CM7 for SGS). Didn't tried the WiFi trick yet, but my installation was a clean one (stock "pure" deodexed JVH ROM freshly installed). :/
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] MarlowXim:
False.

False. You can with odin http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=882039 I have done it before. You can fix it as long as you have a viable backup on hand.

As for it being dangerous, I suppose but it would not be for most users. I brought it up in hopes maybe it will fix the problems we are having. I would do it myself but I don't know how to modify the conversion script within the initramfs to see if it resolves it.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] .:Crack:.:
Hey.

I would like to know recommended fs.options ;)

I have know idea what everything means..
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] zurchpet:
The recommendation is not to use the fs.options at all unless you know what you're doing and want to try different mount options.

The default settings are the safest.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Virnik0:
fs.options and it's content do not affect anything right now, btw. As renaud told me on IRC yesterday, filesystem parameters are ignored, because of the structure of the actual kernel/rc
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Cotte:
how can i activate the bln? i cant buy fuguapp pro, cause have no creditcard.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] PAGOT:
What android version are you running? If Gingerbread its not working on it yet.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Cotte:
ah ok, thank you
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Scuttle:
I installed the Fugu kernel together with a rom from romkitchen. After installing the barcode-reader from the market I rebooted the phone, now both the Barcode Reader and the Market-app are gone. Anyone have ideas?
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] PAGOT:
Thinking about going again bald. Well almost bald. I like short hair.

Anyone have ideas too?

Well not sure what this has to do with fugu, but the barcode scanner is a b.tch on its own, since ages it did just mischief. So just get the market from the rom and copy/install it back. If its really gone. Or do some search how to approach this. But it has nothing to do with fugu as I am having the scanner too and no problems.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Andro1d:
Not correct fs.options just respects the last of the defined non-standard options. So, if u define 1 option per fs, it DOES affect the mounts... Problem relies deeply inside the android init coding ;)

its kinda difficult to explain...
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Virnik0:
Strange.I've tried few things, and it seems that it does not affect mount options at all