yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Vibrant General] smashpunks:
well, J5 was flashable right off the bat basically. J6 is not and the links to samsung Ive seen dont show it. All I want is proof. Jesus why is that so hard to ask. Then if I want proof now I get harped on.

Man, the web people act way different than they would in real life. Saying im *****ing. wtf, not *****ing just want some re assurance Jesus. Now if I said OP is full of **** and Hes a loser, than by all means harp on me, I just said I want to see some proof. All I have is a link to the file and another link to the Website that just brings me to the damn Samsung galaxy pad.

Whys everyone so rude here. I admit im rude when Im ruded upon, but till then im chill.

God say something rude to me in real life and pay people.. Why is words any different, unless someone smashes you just say a nice answer, not a rude one because in real life man would you tell someone their *****ing? If so and it was me you would have a fight on your hands.

NOW SOMEONE PLEASE, OUT OF THE KINDNESS OF YOUR HEARTS PLEASE POST PROOF. NOT JUST A LINK TO THE FILE BUT A LINK TO THE ACTUAL DOWNLOAD LINK ON THE WEBSITE. SAMSUNGS WEBSITE.

WHY BE RUDE, BUT IF YOU DO, YOU SHOULD BACK UP YOUR TALK IN REAL LIFE...

BAN ME IF YOU WISH, BUT ILL BE BACK IN 2 MINS WITH A NEW IP. WE ALL KNOW HOW TO MOD, NO BIGGIE. LETS JUST CHILL, ALL I ASKED WAS PLEASE I WANT PROOF CAUSE A. WE HAVE NEVER HAD 2 LEAKS THIS FAST AND B. THERES ALWAYS PEOPL MESSING AND C. OTHER PEOPLE ARE CHALLENGING IT AS WELL.
[Vibrant General] Viralblack:
The JI5 had just as much proof that it was real too, its not like they have billboards saying come get me.

If you want proof, wait for Tmobile to push it to your phone, but this is a real link to real firmware. Now back ON topic please.

URL: http://fus.samsungmobile.com/Phone_Binary/9/GT-I9000_I9000ZSJH1_I9000OZSJH1_I9000ZSJH2_I9000ZSJH1 _ZS_TGY.zip.enc

CRC: 2071577646

ENCRYPTSTRING: 1857771

That is approximately what the string will look like, if anyone has a brute force algo built for this share the wealth, otherwise im going to go look for one
[Vibrant General] rhcp011235:
What were the CRC + ENC keys for JI5?
[Vibrant General] jdanisevich:
Look at the URL in the OP, that is an official Samsung website. Just because you don't see a link on a website doesn't mean it isn't hosting files you can't see or physically click on. Now can we please start being productive?
[Vibrant General] Viralblack:
We didnt have them, someone snatched the zip file out of the kies directory while it was flashing, bypassing the system.

The Decoder tool were using is just code ripped from Kies, but kies recieves a response from the FUS server with the CRC to verify the package and the ENC to Decrypt the package.

Here, Im not showing that ANY phone is currently able to download this firmware, which I dont think has happened before.

So now were left trying to guess what the 7 digit string is
[Vibrant General] Viralblack:
I think were at the end of our being productive at this point, unless someone can program this coding into a brute force method
[Vibrant General] 30Glock:
Thanks for your efforts here, Hope to see something tomorrow
[Vibrant General] Viralblack:
I think the server is not yet configured to allow us to download this via Kies, otherwise it would allow a JFD device to download the encryption codes.

Im going to play with Kies a little more but I expect this will just be back burner till tomorrow or near future
[Vibrant General] rhcp011235:
Does anyone have the src code to this decoder?

I can try to build some brute forcing.
[Vibrant General] Viralblack:
/******************************************************************************
***** Decrypt.cs -- Samsung Firmware Update Service (FUS) File Decryptor *****
******************************************************************************/

// declare used modules
using System;
using FUSCryptLib;

// application namespace
namespace Decrypt
{
// application class
class Decrypt
{
// main() function
static void Main(string[] args)
{
// check command line args
if (args.Length != 2)
{
// print usage information
System.Console.Write("Usage: Decrypt <Filename> <BinaryEncrypt>\n");
}
else
{
// declare local variables
CryptMngr Crypt;
string InputFileName;
string WriteFileName;
string ContainerName;
string BinaryEncrypt;
int Length;

// set static container name
ContainerName = "Mobileleader";

// retrieve command-line args
InputFileName = args[0];
BinaryEncrypt = args[1];

// generate output filename
WriteFileName = InputFileName;

// strip ".zip.enc" extension from input filename
Length = WriteFileName.Length;
if (Length > 8)
if (WriteFileName.Substring(Length - 8) == ".zip.enc")
WriteFileName = WriteFileName.Substring(0, Length - 8);

// add ".zip" extension to output filename
WriteFileName += ".zip";

// print logo
System.Console.Write("FUS Decryptor v1.00\n");

// print status information
System.Console.Write("\n<- " + InputFileName);

// decrypt input file to output file
Crypt = new CryptMngrClass();
Crypt.GeneratePublicKeyPair(ContainerName);
Crypt.GeneratePasswordSymmetricKey(BinaryEncrypt);
Crypt.DecryptFileThread(InputFileName, WriteFileName, 0);

// print status information
System.Console.Write("\r-> " + WriteFileName + " \n");
};
}
}
}

To my understanding, this is it.
[Vibrant General] haiishq:
so is the encryption code just a number?
[Vibrant General] felix.akinyemi:
Where did you get this code from??

--
[Vibrant General] Viralblack:
Aliens came from the heavens, akin to my plight and desire for more power from my infinitely capable phone....

or I used google and found the thread http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=770271&page=9

that lead me to the tools to decrypt the package I was trying to use earlier to decode the JI5 pack with.

It comes from the Kies system, its what takes the XML response and turns it into a short decode key
[Vibrant General] Greenarcher707:
Kies download a file and when i was trying to update my phone it says it can't be updated. What's up with that?
[Vibrant General] itsjusttim:
So besides all the bs in this thread.. Any updates/progress on this rom? Thoughts on possibilities of it being 2.2?

Thanks for the link and all the hard work tring to open it guys
[Vibrant General] Viralblack:
Unfortunately without that code, there isnt a chance for even a peek at whats inside.
[Vibrant General] itsjusttim:
Damn, well we might get lucky and somehow the code will appear... You never know! =P

Oh, btw... Nice work OP on acquiring the file!
[Vibrant General] Viralblack:
hell im sitting here trying random codes in the decrypt system, watching fast and furious, and waiting for Bionix 1.4 ;)

but for reference I SINCERELY doubt theres any chance that its 2.2

The build code should be different.
[Vibrant General] dbm0361:
Hope you guys get this up and running
[Vibrant General] Viralblack:
Probably tomorrow, just have to get the Kies server to respond to the query positive with the code.
[Vibrant General] itsjusttim:
Glad to hear rational thoughts on it...

Is there some type of code generator that will do it for you? Instead of inputting random codes?
[Vibrant General] xalucardx:
gonna give it a try , installing kies
[Vibrant General] DOAlaboratories:
You guys are so lucky. we haven't got any new updates or anything really new over on the captivate front, although we do have some pretty cool stuff. I'll watch this thread with bated breath (and even shake my fists at samsung when it turns out this really isn't 2.2, shocker) because i'm searching for something new.
[Vibrant General] dbm0361:
cool let us no what's up
[Vibrant General] Viralblack:
not an easy one to generate, would take more effort then waiting a day for the kies hack to work.

Basically, you open the program and put in a dos string Decode *file* *code* and it tries to decode it, and at the end around 89% it fails, then you have to do it again.

Once the update is approved itll be back on the server and well get the codes.
[Vibrant General] wacky.banana:
Mod Warning

This thread has been cleaned following numerous reports received about it. Multiple violations of the rules that you signed up to have been observed.

Please post on-topic or not at all. Please post without being abusive or aggressive.

This warning now allows the moderating team to implement the suspension of accounts for repeat offenders without further notice.

Really would appreciate your cooperation here please.

Thanks

WB
[Vibrant General] zaduma:
I'll take a crack at this. Very interested to figure out what is in this file.

I wonder if Samsung will notice the 2000 downloads or so that this file has without saying anything about it.

Edit: Kies is installing / updating. I suppose that is where you get prompted for the 7 digit key? If so I will make a brute forcer if I can't just figure it out.
[Vibrant General] boodies:
Post of the Month

ps - appreciate you guys cleaning this place up.
[Vibrant General] zaduma:
Does anyone have a fast computer and some spare time to let a brute forcer run? I'll supply all the files but I don't want to tie up my good computer and will take forever on my slow laptop. MUST KNOW WHAT JI6 IS!

Edit: I don't actually have the tool completed, just looking for volunteers when I do. If I don't get anyone I'll let it run tonight when I sleep or today if I go out for a stroll.
[Vibrant General] TheShadowMan:
I remember reading this article a while back about brute forceing using a GPU for incredible results. I think it was originally used for WPA cracking, but maybe it can be used for simple brute force like this. this is the link: http://www.i-hacked.com/content/view/285/91/
[Vibrant General] Demiurgic:
I have amd tricore based desktop I could use to run some brute forcing
[Vibrant General] hurrpancakes:
I have a quad core phenom at 3.7ghz I could help you with. Send me a pm if you get anything. But I am moving on friday, so I may not be able to do anything till saturday.

Sent using my Vibrant with the Tapatalk app
[Vibrant General] bert269:
I can help.

Quad core 3.4Ghz, 8TB HDDs. Send me what you have. I have downloaded the JI6 enc. File already.

Or pm me.

Thx.
[Vibrant General] lp894:
i think the "password" is Samsung....i know it sounds stupid....but on an app i'm trying to use to decrypt the file.....Samsung as the password gets a completely different error than anything else i try....it gives me an "empty path name is not legal" error but anything elses give me an error that says "Illegal characters in path"
[Vibrant General] zaphod_fl:
I have an AMD Quad Core with 16 GB RAM and Win 7 I could run it on.
[Vibrant General] PsychoCemia:
Just before this turns into a pc pissing match...

You really don't need a fast computer for this. It's only 7 numbers -> only 10 million possible options. Would take no more than an hour on any decent computer if this was a simple password crack. Problem is that it has to go to a server for verification, which negates any power your silly computer has.
[Vibrant General] krylon360:
nope, the decrypt key would be all numbers
[Vibrant General] lp894:
and THATS why im not a dev lol
[Vibrant General] Molezou:
With 10,000,000 connections to the server from the same IP, wouldn't Samsung think that you are doing a DOS attack and block you from their system?
[Vibrant General] lp894:
might it be easier(and i don't know thus the reason im asking) to just "fool" kies into thinking the update is downloaded and ready to install?
[Vibrant General] FastKatt:
lol. Guess I'll put that quantum computer I found back in the closet. Stupid sever verification...
[Vibrant General] grabiarz:
Just joining the convo here, can someone explain the mechanism that decrypts the file. What I inferred so far is this:

1. Kies checks the server for an update

2. Update found, Kies downloads

3. Kies sends a request out to the server to get encryption keys

4. Server responds with keys

5. Kies gets encryption keys

6. Decrypt & flash

Unfortunately I'm at work so I can't play around with it now but has anyone actually captured the whole process with a packet sniffer?

What is in the request that Kies sends out to get the keys?

What is in the format (xml?) of the request/response between Kies and Samsung?

Does anyone have any samples?
[Vibrant General] zaduma:
I am building a util that doesn't check with the server. It doesn't complain if the key is invalid, but it does produce a garbage archive. That is why it is taking so long. It will run a number, say 0000000. Then check the archive to see if it is a valid archive, then either yes/no. I will log this in a file because it is possible it could throw false positives. The tester will then be required to dump file here or PM me contents and I will take it from there.

Also, I don't need any more volunteers, this thread has enough.

As for an update on the program, it is all basic tasks, but as with any program there are stupid bugs and I don't want this running on someone's computer validating archives for however long it takes only to give nothing.

Thanks.

Edit: The great thing about this util is if it works, it should work for any future "encrypted" release.
[Vibrant General] grabiarz:
What's the encryption scheme used on the archive?
[Vibrant General] tjsynkral:
Judging by the .zip, I'll bet the first two bytes of a properly decrypted file would be "PK". Save the time validating the whole archive.
[Vibrant General] zaduma:
Go caught up on a step guys. I don't know if this is possible. Sorry if I got your hopes up. #blamewes
[Vibrant General] bobofosho123:
So can anyone confirm, with evidence, i.e. a screenshot that this REALLY is a froyo 2.2 build, or is it just another 2.1 fix build?
[Vibrant General] bobofosho123:
ok, so seriously, and know this a dumb question, but is this really a froyo build, I'm just so tired of being decieved :( by the mean people at samsung. *sheds a small tear
[Vibrant General] percavman:
Nobody knows what this is. The file is encrypted therefore we look at what it is, let alone install it into our phones.
[Vibrant General] rhcp011235:
I just spoke to my buddy @ samsungfirmwares.

he says JI4/JI5/JI6 are bassically all the same. So, I wouldnt bother to kill your selves its just s 2.1 build.

he wont share the keys to decrypt it. But he told me this. Im sure if it was something. He would have released 5/6 :)
[Vibrant General] smashpunks:
I trust you and believe it as I have seen you around plently. Thanks for the heads up. IMO the only difference I see from JI4 to 5 is the gallery doesnt hang and Its a little snappier. Thats it...

any word on a official? or is it still a guess to anyone?
[Vibrant General] rhcp011235:
As per him. Its a guess game.

I think they are just trying to iron out the bugs. then do a 2.2 release personally.

Obviously if 2.1 is buggy they dont want to release a 2.2 with even more bugs :)
[Vibrant General] smashpunks:
this game seems like it will never end.. lol thanks
[Vibrant General] rhcp011235:
JI4/JI5/JI6 are ALL 2.1 and test builds.

Whoever the OP is here. Should update the OP! to reflect all the file names + Info.
[Vibrant General] krylon360:
Thanks bud. Guess I'll stop trying to decrypt it now. LOL
[Vibrant General] rhcp011235:
Yea, Np.

You can keep trying if you want. Maybe there is something new. But, from what i heard they are all pretty much the same. There might be some tweaks. I have no idea :) Its internal samsung. I only get told so much.
[Vibrant General] epakrat75:
Interestingly, Eugene tweeted that the next Frankin-Twiz build that is to be released soon will be based on JI6. I'd rather see the JHK Froyo build before that myself, though.
[Vibrant General] xplanowestx:
He corrected himself right after saying it was based off JI5.
[Vibrant General] epakrat75:
Oops. I see that now. What a difference a minute (or less) makes.
[Vibrant General] krylon360:
haha yeah, I responded to him 1 second after he tweeted that it would be JI6 based, then he corrected himself just as I hit send. LOL
[Vibrant General] demo23019:
Bump

this is possible froyo build

Captivate froyo build I897UCJI6 leaked

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=797282
[Vibrant General] hydrogenman:
which is exactly what I said yesterday....
[Vibrant General] nomadrider123:
that thread is going nuts lol. ppl are asking questions before anyone could get it downloaded
[Vibrant General] rhcp011235:
Whoever has the decoder.

Try one of these.

rhcps-macbookpro41-2:Downloads rhcp$ strings T959UVJI6.tar

cache.rfs

0000755

0000000

0000000

00005350000

11450334546

0006357

See if any of them work.

I will get the firmware tommrow un-crypted. but maybe we can have it tonight :)
[Vibrant General] N8ter:
N/M. Finished reading the thread :<
[Vibrant General] demo23019:
their JI6 froyo build is almost 100MB more than our JI6 so ours is probably not froyo
[Vibrant General] rhcp011235:
Yea, as i said its just a 2.1 build :)
[Vibrant General] demo23019:
yea i didn't really follow this thread after it got moved to general

but i just seen your comment a page back

Got excited and thought it was a coincidence with JI6 build
[Vibrant General] rhcp011235:
I should have the decrypted version tommrow. Those numbers i posted dont decrypt it. So i guess I need to wait :)

Sorry guys :)
[Vibrant General] clivo360:
Why would Samsung make one version of JI6 not based on froyo? Doesn't make any sense...
[Vibrant General] rhcp011235:
Its not samsung. Its the provider.

Always remember the provider has the choice on the FIRMWARES to give out. Samsung has 900000 builds / blackberry's have 90000 builds.

But the provider chooses which they want. It goes through their R/E Team. Then gets handed off.
[Vibrant General] rhcp011235:
Can someone post a full packet dump of kies trying to check for an update? if anyone had captured yesterday for J15?

Please paste it to like pastebin or something. it will be too big here. I have an idea. But, im too lazy to break out my netbook.
[Vibrant General] kboater:
Eugene said it should be froyo and is hopeing someone can decrypt it for him
[Vibrant General] MTC44:
Yes he did.
[Vibrant General] rhcp011235:
Trust me its not 2.2

If you want reasoning:

Its TOO SMALL. Its 100M less then the captivate. the 2.2 SRC tree is HUGE and the firmware will be bigger. So trust me its 2.1
[Vibrant General] demo23019:
LOL we have you saying you know someone and they said it is in fact 2.1 and now Eugene is saying he cant name, names but his source says its froyo LOL :confused::confused::confused:

Im leaning towards you and your source since you said he works for Samsung
[Vibrant General] kboater:
whether 2.2 or 2.1, cant we just port the captivate 2.2 over to vibrant? (assuming its a good version)
[Vibrant General] rhcp011235:
Sure, but you will be running a captivate kernel. kinda useless for us.

Eugene tweeted he had captivate firmware running on his vibrant. So let him do it.

Also, Is JIT even enabled in the leaked 2.2 for captivate? has anyone ran linpack scores or quads?

I mean if its just like those I9000 Leaks with no JIT and no nothing who cares if its 2.1 or 2.2. Its just going to be the same as what we have only more broken.

People need to use common sense. Even the ported ASOP 2.2 doesnt even work 100%. I dono about others but i want my phone to work.
[Vibrant General] demo23019:
Quote from Eugene ,

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=794791&page=71
[Vibrant General] rhcp011235:
Tell him to run a quad + linpack.

if its 9.X on linpack and the quad is low. Who cares. Im staying with 2.1. But, hey if flash is a big deal for you. then its worth it i guess?
[Vibrant General] demo23019:
Im waiting for real vibrant build im in no rush, just giving heads up

Over is captivate they are getting like 14 in lin pack and 950's with quadrant with JIT
[Vibrant General] rhcp011235:
Then its possible JIT is on there. Now the question is. Does it work on vibrants :)

That why i want him to run it.
[Vibrant General] MTC44:
Does the att rom have jit?
[Vibrant General] PaiPiePia:
950 doesn't seems like JIT score to me, I mean looking at Nexus One CPU score jumps on 2.2 (which is about 2x-2.5x compare to 2.1), my current Vibrant gets about 900 stock, so.......
[Vibrant General] kboater:
but 14 linpack sounds good
[Vibrant General] demo23019:
950 is quadrant score...link pack is14+ just like i said above

Anyways the "low" CPU scores explained in captivate thread
[Vibrant General] rhcp011235:
Yes, this is on REAL ATT captivates. NOT on our vibrants :)

hence why i ask.
[Vibrant General] PaiPiePia:
I understand 950 is Quadrant.

Wait, so that means we don't benefit as much from JIT, at least it is not reflected in the benchmarks?

Btw, I see people on Linpack with 60 MFlop using Incredible, how the heck did they achieve that? Manipulated Scores?
[Vibrant General] demo23019:
not sure, not too familiar with linpack and if and how it can be manipulated.

here are galaxy S 2.2 linpack, all pretty much in 14 MFLOPS range

http://www.greenecomputing.com/apps/linpack/linpack-by-device/
[Vibrant General] ShinyBuddha:
Slow yer horse there bubba. Why don't you just WAIT for something to get released instead of random speculation and insinuation? Seriously, are you that bothered that you haven't gotten the 2.2 update yet? Go take a jog, pick up golf, do something...please.

It will come out. No amount of anyone whining here will change what Samsung and tmobile will choose for the time. The JI5 is out and working very well. Check out the dev section for Eugene's build. I managed to get the update from Kies and there are no complaints.
[Vibrant General] PaiPiePia:
Thanks. Yeah I read that chart too.

I know Linpack is a benchmark which doesn't really reflect real world performance, but on similar hardware, and using pretty much the same software, how can the results be so different is what bothers me.

G2 seems to get 30+ Mflops, although all the data points are from that one guy.
[Vibrant General] clivo360:
g2 uses very different hardware and software. They are similar in that they are android-based phones.
[Vibrant General] scrizz:
i'm thinking the scores can be manipulated, or it's running on diff hardware ;)

just because it says it's an incredible, doesn't mean it actually is ;)
[Vibrant General] GanGs_KiD:
Hi :D

I know what i will about to do is stupidity :eek:

but what the hell :cool:

CRC is " 0b60a7f1 "

:confused: I do not have any idea about Encryption

I hope it helps :)
[Vibrant General] minedune:
lol little late was already decrypted

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=797466
[Vibrant General] GanGs_KiD:
:( sorry ...................
[Vibrant General] minedune:
dont be sorry if that is the key, i have no clue, then we will probably need you again for future leak
[Vibrant General] tjhart85:
They are similar in the same way that an AMD system running Windows 7 and an Intel system running Windows XP are "similar".
[Vibrant General] demo23019:
.snapgragon CPU is what gets very high, and overrated mflops.

Same thing with G2 its running on updated version of snapdragon but its code name changed to "scorpion" its pretty much snapdragon that handles 3D much better
[Vibrant General] PaiPiePia:
I see thanks guy for explaining it to me. I guess it's one of those see whose d*ck is bigger kind of thing. :p
[Vibrant General] furiousrcj:
Battery Drain using JI6

Anyone else notice how quickly the battery tanks after flashing JI6? I'm going back to JI2, it's been the most reliable vibrant hack IMO...
[Vibrant General] db3:
yup, seems to. seems to charge really quickly too though. i wonder if its just reading remaining battery strength incorrectly...
[Vibrant General] grabiarz:
Try running ur phone till it shuts off and see how much time ull get on 0%
[Vibrant General] demo23019:
If you guys are going by the stock battery icon its still not accurate.

use a battery mod that gives an accurate reading

Im on JI6 and battery is fine

...even better with jac OC UV kernel

battery mod that works with JI6

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=8458295&postcount=112
[Vibrant General] phragg:
Noob here but long time lurker with a rooted vibrant.

As I browse these forums I see just anout JI1-6. Is this just different oatches of a JIT system?

Thanks