yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[G2 and Desire Z Themes and Apps] Kalandros:
It runs beautifully on the G2. Nice high FPS around 60 for me, but I am not good at it either.
[Captivate Android Development] bowtieguy:
There have been several threads from people requesting .apk files for re-installation, so I decided to upload the entire contents or the /system/app directory from my rooted Captivate.

Need any other files hosted/uploaded? Lemme know.

JI6 FROYO APP Directory
[Captivate Android Development] born_fisherman:
[Anyone] What is needed for media hub to work properly? I remember reading that if you only install the apk, you will have issues with buying/renting as the content is DRM protected and the apk does not contain the drm licensing..
[Captivate Android Development] Colton5419:
OFF TOPIC - but still related to app system files etc.

Is there anyway to access/edit the system files on my phone using my PC?

Using the SDK?
[Captivate Android Development] designgears:
http://www.ponack.net/designgears/removed-apps-froyo/

They have been up since day1 of froyo cog...
[Captivate Android Development] buddy17:
its much better to have things here at xda...thanks for the up bowtie
[Captivate Android Development] mobius911:
Anybody have any luck reinstalling Mobile Video?
[Captivate Android Development] psxstudio:
use adb to push the MobileVideo.apk to /system/app
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] gammexane:
I have been searching for an app that has a number lock instead of a lock pattern (I hate it).

I tried Lock and lockbot but both are a bit buggy. I tried protector too but I can uninstall it easily if the phone is rooted.

Can anyone help me out?

Or something that ask password when the phone is connected via USB...

Thanks in advance.
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Epicardium:
This is just an open ended question spawned by my observation that many people comment about boot animations and sounds in the development section.

Why do some people care about this so much? I'm not knocking on anyone. I really want to know why it's so important to some. I only reboot my phone once a week, maybe (except when I'm changing roms), so it's a very very small detail of the whole user experience, imo. Do people boot their phones in the presence of others to show off? Impressing your iphone friends? Phone doing so many random reboots that you get to see the animation multiple times in a day?

I'm happy with a simple progress bar to ensure me something is happening. :)
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] VontaelP:
Personally, I feel like if I have a custom ROM, custom UI, custom Recovery, custom Home Replacement, and custom Sounds, a custom Boot Animation is a given..
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Oddity:
Yeah I reboot at least every day (bump charging and whatnot) so I definitely like to have something nice on the screen during boot.
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] luvit:
I remember Windows boot ani was popular to replace by newbs.

I think its a good baby step to learn aosp.
[Captivate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Symmetric:
I've seen this question asked about a dozen times since the JI6 ROM leaked, but haven't seen it answered yet. Does anyone have Bluetooth Voice commands working in JI6? If not, how difficult would it be to pull that functionality from one of the i9000 roms that has it?
[Captivate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] flashman2002:
I have seen this question answered a couple times where it is not working for people. Give it time, things will get sorted out. But please next, time put the thread in the Q and A section. It is tough enough to keep this dev section cleaned up.
[Captivate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Stephenv1971:
There is no VoiceDialer.apk in /system/app I tried the one from CM6 and it seemed to run when I hit the voice dialer on my BT. Unfortunately there is some disconnect because it couldn't "hear" (or "understand") a thing I was saying, I could hear the familiar hiss that the bluetooth had switched on though. I also tried Choice Dialer and it seemed to have the same problem. My suspicion is that the speech recognition toolkit is not working correctly in this beta.
[Captivate General] Lencias:
Hey everyone,

I was running Quadrant after flashing Cog 2.2/Froyo with OCLF. Everything seems to go faster but the 2D and 3D performance - I can definitely tell that the framerate is lower in those two tests than before. Am I crazy?...
[Captivate General] KCutrer1:
I noticed that framerates were lower as well, but only about 4 or 5 FPS. A drop this small isn't really all that significant, and 3D performance at 40 FPS rather than 44 FPS is still much better than a phone like the EVO which runs at like 18 FPS, so I wouldn't really worry that much
[Captivate General] modest_mandroid:
Yeah, I noticed it too. I'm also noticing other slowdowns, like a lag on the app drawer screen between my finger swipes and corresponding animations on the screen. If I swipe left or right, the actual swiping animation happens a split second later (noticeable lag). Something tells me this isn't the release build of this rom.

I'm also noticing that the battery dies much quicker with this new rom. I'd get about 2 days of use out of JH7 with the amount I use the phone, with JI6 I'm lucky if I get 8-10 hours.
[Captivate General] coferjinelong:
Actually the benchmark result is quite amazing id say

It scores 1900+ in quadrant standarf
[Captivate General] designgears:
You are crazy... Quadrant is for SNAPDRAGON PHONES... STOP USING IT!!!
[Captivate General] flashman2002:
Use Neocore, that is a better FPS than quadrant. I still get 55.5/6 with Neocore so 3d performance is not degraded, at least not on my phone.
[Captivate General] kennethpenn:
I'd expect some continued optimization of Froyo 2.2. Remember how laggy JF6 was? Then it got way better with JH2/3/7. I expect progress like that with the Froyo builds as well. With OCLF, JI6 is actually fairly impressive speed wise.
[Captivate General] modest_mandroid:
Hmm.. did you do anything after you flashed, like cleared dalvik cache and whatnot? Mine is actually running slower (UI-wise) than JF6
[Captivate General] smeltn:
Its funny you posted this because I noticed it as well today when I ran Quadrant just to see what it would get. I think Quadrant is a horrible tool for benchmarking now since it can be so easily manipulated, but I did notice the FPS drop myself.
[Captivate General] pongothemagnificent:
Gles 2/1 is perfectly fine, i scored 46fps on nenamark, so no need to worry about 3d performance, i do admit 2d does stutter a little tho.
[Captivate General] himmelhauk:
Take the man's advice! Quadrant is an awful way to measure performance on the Captivate. Quadrant is biased towards Snapdragon processors, and isn't all that accurate.
[Captivate General] tux racer:
It's running fine for me.
[Captivate General] Reefermattness:
Actually using NenaMark1 which is a benchmark app specifically for OpenGL2.0 I get slightly higher scores than on 2.1.
[Captivate General] rahlquist:
dg, may as well save your breath. No matter what is said or done, there will always be people who complain that X is slower than when it was Y and be sure that they are right (and will argue they are right to their dying breath).

Synthetic benchmarks are b***it on a multitasking OS anyway, at any given time any thread can tie up a resource the synthetic benchmark needs or it may not. The only way you could truly benchmark something like this while still allowing multitasking would be with a long range sample like a few hours, the 30 -70 seconds Quadrant runs is a worthless snapshot in time.

They all think they are getting an answer but all they are really doing is using a magnifying glass on a Seurat and wondering why they don't get the big picture. Of course the performance issue couldn't be one of the apps they have installed or that has updated since the last time they benchmarked.

I have 206 apps installed on my captivate with even a ridiculous amount like that and more stuff than the average running I can still get a quadrant score of over 950, its a snapshot in the middle not an effective way to judge a film.
[Captivate General] 1randomtask:
For everyone whinging about reduced "3D" performance, is the actual handset slower in real, day to day use?

This is stock 2.1 Firmware vs stock 2.2 Firmware.

Not Cognition/custom rom with lagfix vs Stock 2.2.
[Captivate General] dalingrin:
As much as I don't like benchmarks, in this they are only confirming the slow downs I'm seeing in real world use on the leaked froyo rom. (Not cognition)
[Captivate General] gtg465x:
The first time I flashed 2.2 I saw some lag in the form of occasional black screens and delayed responses, even after installing OCLF.

I used Odin One-Click to flash back to JF6 and did a master clear before installing Cognition 2.2. Immediately applied OCLF before doing anything else. Not seeing the black screens and delayed responses this time. Some are suggesting it's the master clear that helps.

As for 3D performance, animations and scrolling between homescreens are a lot smoother than they were in 2.1. Games run awesome too. The only two places I notice some skippyness are in the app drawer (not often though, and very minor) and in the browser (this is due to a known memory leak bug).
[Captivate General] modest_mandroid:
Yeah, I actually never bothered benchmarking, but I'm experiencing noticeable lag between swipes and corresponding animations in the app drawer and launcher.
[Captivate General] gtg465x:
I have never experienced that on 2.2, even before applying a lag fix. I suggest One-Clicking back to JF6, doing a master clear, and then installing 2.2 again.
[Captivate General] Dani897:
No drop vs stock, the overclock kernel gave the extra fps. it also overclocked the gpu by 11%. 4-5 fps out of 40-45 is right in that area.

Edit :.i did a master clear so maybe that's why I don't see a problem

Not all benchmarks will work because our phones are capped at 56 fps. A benchmark needs to bog the gpu down below that for the whole test to get an accurate measurement. Quadrant does that for only party of the test. Many benchmarks can't do that at all.

Quadrant is a decent bench mark but our phones will not see the score increase of a snapdragon with froyo. linpack shows greatly inflated scores on snapdragon froyo devices. Greene computing goes over this on there website.

http://www.greenecomputing.com/

the full version of quadrant shows that the hummingbird and the processor in the droid 2/x mop the floor with the snapdragon in all areas but processing speed. The hummingbird having an edge over the droid x particularly in the 3d area but losing overall because of the rfs file system lag Which is apparently is weighed heavily and the reason the lagfix blows the score out of proportion and the different lagfixes have big gaps in the score while real world performance is not even noticeable.

http://slideme.org/application/quadrant-advanced

Composite scores don't mean anything and that is my gripe with quadrant, there is no way to decide how to weigh file system benchmarks against processor benchmarks against 3d, each area must be compared separately, and the user should be able to decide what that means.

Edit: linpack shows a huge increase over stock. 13.77 vs the 9.61 I got with voodoo and overclock. But still not at the level of a snapdragon. Wait till the next generating of arm processors come out, if you think a snapdragon/hummingbird hybrid would be awesome that's nothing compared to what's in the works. Higher clock speeds and multi-core cpu's aren't far away.
[Captivate General] xatrekak:
to show what dani897 was saying this is me running quadrant advanced after applying the OCLF,

1. the doubling of our CPU score when compared to 2.1 is due to froyo optimizations and JIT

2. the HUGE green bar is due to the ext2 file system (aka lagfix), notice this is also the reason the droid x scores so well

3. the reason the N1 gets such a huge boost from 2.1 to 2.2 is because goolge made the N1, google uses the N1 as their dev phone. froyo comes pre-optimized for the N1 in addition to its snapdragon CPU bloating scores due to the FPU it uses

4. according to this quadrant score ( i ran it about 15 times ) both 2d and 3d scores were decently improved again likely due to JIT
[Captivate General] Dani897:
I got 2036 :p also got 14.52 in linpack after more playing with it, can't wait for an oc/uv kernel again. I think I can get 2800 in quadrant with overclock. I got 2575 before on 2.1. But I came up with a couple more tricks to inflate my score. I know it means nothing but its good for bragging rights.
[Captivate General] bamonkey:
This was probably the best and easiest explanation for quadrant ive read so far. with pictures! man you could rock out a powerpoint presentation and sell icecubes to eskimos with this.. +2 internets to you:cool:
[Captivate General] SetiroN:
You quadrant detractors really are becoming more annoying than people who compare Hummingbirds to Snapdragons.

Quadrant is a perfectly decent performance measure when used on the same device, as long as you get the advanced version to check the single subsystems scores and don't rely too much on the I/O score, which the various lagfixes can spoil.

If my quadrant CPU score is 1000 on JH7 and 1200 on JI6, CPU performance has increased and there no denying on it. You can say what you want about the benchmark itself, but it proved useful at comparing different firmwares.

A grain of salt is always required when benchmarking, and benchmarks can manage to precisely describe performance differences way better than real world experiments, you just need to know how the benchmark works and interpret the results.

Now that's the problem: I, for instance, am getting much lower 3D results than you (and than JH7).

More than that, the actual framerate is lower and I can see it continuously jumping (no I'm not talking about the framerate variation when turning a corner, I see 17/40/26/44 FPS in the corridor while on JH7 it was steady), with the video output feeling sluggish.

I can't get near your 3D score, while the other results are on par.

On JH7 I was well over 1100.

P.S. Now waiting for silly people screaming "YOU CAN'T COMPARE QUADRANT RESULTS BETWEEN IDENTICAL PHONES!!11one"
[Captivate General] shaolin95:
I swear the next time I read a performance evaluation based on quadrant I am going to murder someone...no there is NO 3D degradation, use neocore of any game to test not that piece of s**t Quadrant.
[Captivate General] SetiroN:
There you go, took less than I thought.

Back up your statements with facts, or avoid posting.

Quadrant has been consistent so far, and I'm not gonna change my mind over random forum posts.

Unfortunately there's no way that I know of to measure in-game FPS, but if a benchmark that did 45 steady FPS now does 40 with framerate fluctuations, something changed.

As an example, LancherPro's 3D drawer feels slugghish on JI6, as it's dropping frames from time to time. It was perfectly smooth on JH7.
[Captivate General] cappysw10:
So it must be the new os, can't be that LauncherPro isn't optimized. :rolleyes:
[Captivate General] lowlymarine:
Setiro, I understand your frustration, but understand that since most of us aren't seeing the issues you describe, it is likely an issue with your phone specifically. Did you try doing a restore to stock -> re-flash of Cog2.2 as suggested earlier in the thread?
[Captivate General] designgears:
ditto, thanks for saying that...

Anyone using Quadrant on our phones needs to sell it and buy a Snapdragon based phone. Quadrant is NOT for hummingbird

KNOCK IT OFF
[Captivate General] egzthunder1:
Thread moved to General as it is not development. I am not certain about who is right or wrong, but you guys should try toning this down a bit.
[Captivate General] gtg465x:
Others, like xatrekak, are getting higher 3D scores with JI6 so clearly there's something wrong with your phone or setup. Flash back to JF6, do a master clear, and then try JI6 again I guess? I was getting a lot of stutters in the app drawer before doing this (although I don't think it had anything to do with 3D performance because Android doesn't use the GPU to draw the UI), but after doing the master clear and flashing again I'm not seeing stutters anymore. Actually, my home screens scroll a lot smoother now than they did in 2.1.
[Captivate General] SetiroN:
This is simply FALSE. Again, back up your statements or avoid posting out of sentiment.

If a benchmark has optimization for a certain piece of hardware, it doesn't AT ALL mean it can't be used to measure different what's not optimized, you just have to avoid comparing them directly. As a matter of fact, quadrant's the only benchmark that was able to measure the visible stuttering I'm getting on JI6 so if anything, I can only consider it even more reliable than before.

I'm not trying to reign quadrant rankings, I'm just trying to compare MY phone's performance on JH7 and JI6, so knock it off yourself. Nobody was mentioning Snapdragon before you, so please stop deviating the subject, your opinion is as clear as it is unnecessary.

That's what I'm talking about, some people, like myself, obviously have something wrong with their phone and it'd be nice to know what's causing the performance hit. I'm on my third JI6 flash, later I'll try flashing to JF6 beforehand, bench again without additional apps and check after each installation.

And once again, before detractors come judging: quadrant is just measuring the sluggishness I notice myself, so no I'm not doing all this just to get an higher score, I'm not happy with the phone's performance on JI6 no matter what the benchmarks say, I'm just using them to investigate the issue.
[Captivate General] Dani897:
I cant solve the op's problem, best I can say is master clear and re flash.

I disagree worth designgears, snapdragon phones may do well in quadrant but I don't think it was designed to benchmark the snapdragon only. linpack its a very simple benchmark but snapdragons excel in that too. I think the truth is that froyo is for snapdragons. the processor has a particular advantage in a certain area and froyo is built to take full advantage of that. processor benchmarks seem to just pick up on that. the real world probably isn't so kind to the snapdragon.

I think the idea of comparing different processors using any benchmark is flawed. you will never have a benchmark that runs enough tests to make fair comparisons. you need to test each area in a number of different ways.

the other problem is in how to come up with a composite score. no component of the system is used to full potential 100% of the time. I mean if your memory bandwidth is saturated and the processor can do more can you score the processor for its theoretical potential or burst speed? I wouldn't. but then how do you factor that in.

even in the pay versions of quadrant each area is given an arbitrary number with an arbitrary relationship to the other scores, calculated from the time it takes to complete a task. in the test the tasks happen one after another, in the real world all the tasks are happening at the same time and in the end it depends on what the user finds important.

I for one think the 3d capabilities make up for all else.
[Captivate General] JimmehDean:
My phone seems to be running smoother with cognition froyo w/OCLagfix 2+. I got a quadrant score of 1790, which seems significantly higher than the froyo nexus1. havent tested anything out besides psxdroid. psxdroid seemed glitchy, but i probably just need to reinstall it. Havent tried out any gpu intensive games yet.
[Captivate General] Dani897:
Yes but if you apply the lag fix to a nexus 1 the quadrant score also skyrockets. Our score w/ lagfix is do to a huge file system score. The truth is that the snapdragon with froyo benchmarks extremely well on any cpu benchmark, hummingbird benchmarks pretty good with our without

froyo, and is unsurpassed in 3d. It all depends on your priorities.
[Captivate General] diablo009:
I got 55.6 with 2.2 as it is. not lagfix applied. is that good?
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Compusmurf:
Hiya folks.

I dropped my phone off the counter, 4ft onto carpeting. No damage to the phone, works, apps run, but....

My Accelerometer/GSensor no longer works.

Reboot, reset, nothing is helping software wise.

Interesting to note, running TEETER, it says This game requires a G-Sensory/Accelerometer to run and exits, as if said hardware is disconnected.

So.... Am I screwed?
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] debugguy:
What a bummer, sheez. I don't think search will help you with this one, smiling.

Is there not a re-calibrate applet for this, did you run that, does it work?

If it fell on the carpet I would hope it is nothing serious, sorry I can't give you something of value, good luck with it.
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Compusmurf:
I searched all of XDA, downloaded several other apps, one that outputs raw data and nothing.

Recalibrate doesn't do anything, bubble levels don't move, zip.

I suspect I'll be calling the sprint store tomorrow.

Tho not sure if I should bother tho. The only app I use that this really affects is the photo gallery.

I think I'm screwed.... Factory reset didn't do a thing.
[Vibrant General] snorge:
I thought I saw a thread somewhere here with a list of the stock/t-mobile apks but can't seem to find it now. Anyone have an idea where it is?
[Vibrant General] red96turbols:
http://forum.cyanogenmod.com/topic/3319-stock-apps-that-can-be-deleted-post-root/

Is that what you are looking for? If not, I pulled all the APK's off my vibrant before I deleted, if you're looking for any of them let me know and I'll zip them up and post them.

Or are you looking for this one?

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=731822
[Vibrant General] snorge:
Not exactly what I was looking for but that top link is helpful thanks. I'm about to redo my phone so I'll just backup the ones I want to save in case I decide I miss them later.
[G2 and Desire Z Accessories] Anderdroid:
Is there any way to get TV out on the G2 (to play games, NOT DLNA)
[G2 and Desire Z Accessories] mcp2009:
daydeal has this but I'm not sure if it works. I know their cases are official T-mobile cases because I saw the cases they had at my local store and I ordered one case from them and it came in official T-mobile packaging and had the retail price on it, also the case I bought retailed for 24.99 and I got it from there for 16.99 so it might work and also it says OEM HTC.
[G2 and Desire Z Accessories] Anderdroid:
Someone said that didn't fit in their phone. Also the HDMI I bought from them for my Vibrant was incompatible and was recalled... so... :S
[G2 and Desire Z Accessories] boloj:
The web site said it works with the g2
[G2 and Desire Z Accessories] unforgiven512:
Disregard that. As soon as this is confirmed working, I'm buying one. That's sweet.
[G2 and Desire Z Accessories] mcp2009:
I'm strongly considering getting one and might order friday. But would we need software for it?

Sent from my T-Mobile G2
[G2 and Desire Z Accessories] muminisko:
What about old Nokia tv-out cable?
[G2 and Desire Z Accessories] Anderdroid:
Someone on the T-Mobile forums got it from DayDeal and said it wasn't compatible. DayDeal is WRONG about compatibility ALOT
[G2 and Desire Z Accessories] xile6:
Daydeal is wrong the cable wont fit its not micro usb its only made for the droid. please don't buy. Search the net for g2 tv out i dont even think the g2 supports it
[G2 and Desire Z Accessories] Anderdroid:
How can't the latest phone support TV Out >.< Is this a joke or something htc...
[G2 and Desire Z Accessories] rpmccormick:
No joke. If it supported it I'm sure it would be on the spec sheet just like all the other phones that support TV out. It's not, so it doesn't. I would love to be proven wrong, but I'm not gonna hold my breath.
[G2 and Desire Z Accessories] Hawon:
IMHO i don't really see a need for my phone to connect to a TV...
[G2 and Desire Z Accessories] rpmccormick:
I would love to have google nav on my cars built in screen, which has video in. Good reason, yes?
[G2 and Desire Z Accessories] ih8unot:
Me likey too