yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Hero CDMA Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] danaff37:
The only problem you will run into with odexed vs deodexed is changes to any jar files within an apk on system. Only really applies to framework level edits. Things like removing haptic or rotary lock screen or battery percentage mods, etc.
[Hero CDMA Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] unCoRrUpTeD:
I meant to type deodexed. I was so tired and doing ten things at once. Didn't even reread what I was posting.
[Hero CDMA Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] LiquidSolstice:
Ah. Nah, the only thing I'd love to experiment with is to swap out images and png files. The functionality of the ROM and its inner workings are fine :). Assuming that I can remove all the HTC widgets and a few of the apps I won't be using (using LP, so Sense Widgets are unneeded), and that I can set a default launcher, and perhaps mess around with all the status bar icons/button images, that's all I want to do :)
[Hero CDMA Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] theimpaler747:
You will need deodexed :D
[Hero CDMA Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] gidkid:
You can always re-Odex it afterwards.

I assume you've realized this, as you have a stable odexed ROM out, but I'm putting it up for reference's sake. Don't want someone reading the thread and getting the wrong idea.
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zcl6236:
My English is not very good,I rely on Google to translate the

I know you are friendly,Every day I come to this forum need to find new rom,And suffers the tragedy of the speed of the,Rom are not many Chinese language interface, I am now using the English interface，I hope you will add a Chinese language interface, this is only my personal one wish, I know that is impossible for me to add Chinese, perhaps it is complex，

Finally, thank you for reading this do not do Why smooth "English".

Why is the official ota2.2 rom will be prompted to install the wrong signature, how to solve, help

I even forgot the time difference= =,Good morning
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] R1lover:
你有没有根的电话吗？
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zcl6236:
Google Translate so I do not know what you mean, I have a htc inc cell phone, I root through,-off 7-28 radios,
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] animal1967:
miui rocks!
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] IncredibleDoes:
加入中文语言环境很简单，用感rom的，我可以教你，如果你想学习！

id
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zcl6236:
Thank you for playing the Chinese, I thought Google Translate so he is not fluent, you play the English, and I can better understand some。

Like you, I also have my favorite rom as the hd
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] IncredibleDoes:
what are your locales, I can make you an easy update.zip

is it? zh_CH
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] IncredibleDoes:
Chinese language http://www.multiupload.com/YBKSHS0HDU

ID
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] cliffzwj:
Thanks for your help! but this flash file can only change some of the language, cuz some rom (such as Virtuous v3.0.1,skyraider RC3) itself was not cantain the chinese language , ive analysed the soft.apk

my way is to decode the apk in the rom, then translate it to chinese, then re-code it in the rom

any other method easily?

Oh,my poor english!
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] fortesquieu:
ID，你会中文？

10 chars
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zeke1988:
I was surprised when he replied with Chinese.
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tdavis42:
I'm gonna get off topic for one quick second.

ID, I am really happy to see where this section has come from, from the days when people would argue about what we as XDA\Inc owners were owed as far as developer released software\hacks. Its great to see you step up and do your best to support your rom(one of many). I know its pretty easy anymore to translate but most wouldn't even take the time and just say figure it out yourselves.

R1lover thanks for well IDK but ya I know your name from other forums so thanks for your help.
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zcl6236:
Thank you for your reply, this mobile phone we have a lot of people in China use, but only with other mobile phone than a small part, rom is not perfect, no more ，smooth than you, s. I just hope that you can add a Chinese language interface, thank you. Maybe I'm selfish, but it really needs for Many people。In our country this is not a universal cell phone.
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] R1lover:
Saki for everyone I say! :)
[Galaxy S I9000 General] the_ahmadzais:
cant find the marketplace in xda idk why? anyone interested trading thier galaxy s for 2 weeks old iphone 4 comes with everything in box must be rogers bell at&t 3g compatible
[Galaxy S I9000 General] salmanslick:
wer u located ? pm me
[Galaxy S I9000 General] M3xital:
You can find the market place here.
[Windows Phone 7 General] juliusaugustus:
My reasons why I think Windows Phone 7 fail. I'm not here to profess my love for Apple, Google, Linux, Open Source or Nokia. Rather I'm here to present simple facts and problems that could be bad for the platform.

Windows Phone 7 lacks CDMA support: Why? So your going to tell many of the thousands of Verizon Wireless, Sprint, US Cellular Users, MetroPCs cellphone users well I'm glad you were excited about Windows Phone 7 but sorry no handset for you.

It Cost's Money: Why would a phone manufacturer pay to use a platform that is very immature, when you could easily make a device that has a mature platform like Android or Symbian without paying a licensing to use the OS.

Hardware Requirements prevent it from reaching low end markets: Well requiring basic thing like Accelerometer with compass, ambient light sensor, proximity sensor, 5mp camera, shutterbutton, and Assisted GPS etc is perfectly acceptable but requiring a 1ghz processor will raise hardware costs and will prevent low end and midrange phone users from buying Windows Phone 7 devices.

Windows Mobile 6.5 has little marketshare and the Microsoft Kin Was a Huge Failure: Why would smarthphone manufacturers want to create a phone with Windows Phone 7 when Windows Mobile 6.5 in its current form has much less then competitors 6-8 percent and the failure of the Microsoft shows has little understanding of the mobile marketplace.

I don't mean to cause hate I was just giving Windows Phone 7 valid criticism. Please leave your thoughts down below.
[Windows Phone 7 General] krjcook:
Your criticism is wellcomed here. But I gonna criticize your criticism.

CDMA Support will come. 6months after the release of the GSM version. The Iphone is huge and is only on one carrier, a gsm carrier at that, did CMDA hurt it. The first US Android device was the Tmobile G1. It was the only Android device for a while, and again launched on a GSM carrier, but look Android is huge now.. Also the main market MS is aiming at is the Euro/Asia Market which is mostly GSM. So you think about smart move or not?

It cost money? The top selling Android phones are all premium devices. They're sold at $199 on each carrier. If price is a bad, thing how did the Iphone become so popular? Those specs MS chose are to keep a quality control on the hardware so devs can fully utilitize the hardware. If MS used lower specs than devs would have to support the least common denominator and the app won't be as optimized.

Yes WM6.5 wasn't successful, but there are reasons behind that fragmentation and LOW SPECS. The kin was a failure from the beginning since it took away MS resource and time away from WP7. WM6.5 and the Kin didn't have the features that WP7 has, nor did they have the dev support that WP7 is receiving which is what will make it successful.
[Windows Phone 7 General] sylau90:
My thought is don't judge a thing before it is released...

For your CDMA support point, did Iphone and Android release CDMA phone when they are launched. NO, why? This a basic business or economic knowledge, since WP7 is new product and GSM still the priority. Microsoft has to see how consumers respond to their concept, CDMA definitely will be supported soon.

Yeah...Of course,it cost money, but this is depends how the manufacturers deal with Microsoft. For example, Microsoft might offer a very low price to manufacturers to use their operating system or Manufacturer foresee the future vale of WP7. Furthermore, these big companies got many financial analyzers.This is what you no need worry about it.Lastly, What consumers want to see is the actual price of the handset and the actual values it brought to us.

Regarding the low end market, of course, Microsoft is conducting product-differentiation strategy, thats why they did'n aim the low end market. Furthermore, the required hardwares are to ensure to user experiences. For example, Comparing HTC Tattoo and HTC evo. If you bought Tattoo, most users definitely will blame the android OS but not the hardwares, because not everyone in the world is tech-geek. In contrast, the handset you bought is HTC evo, you definitely will feel that is awesome, no laggy,smooth, fast, great resolution.

Regarding the Microsoft Kin, what I predict is, but not confirmed, Microsoft try to observe the consumer spending behaviour and handphone demand, but not try to earn the profit. For instance, the advertisement fees on KIN, I can say it is extremely low. Furthermore, KIN just open for US market. Lastly, Microsoft can cut down the production of this phone so fast and quick with minimal lost. So, you can see that maybe they already plan to cut down the procution at the beginning. And they are preparing something big at the backstage...which is WP7...

When you comparing WM6 and WP7 is completely wrong, because this two OSes are completely different, in term of UI, functionalities and etc.....Everyone knows that the WM6 market share is extremely low now. In my opinion, this is what Microsoft done wrong, back in few years ago, WM6 still dominate the Smartphone market so called monopoly, and Microsoft didn't realised the threat of new entrants such as android and iOS. In addition, Microsoft focused more on PC OS.

Lastly, I just hope don't judge something before you try or use...

Cheers...
[Windows Phone 7 General] powersquad:
you know there is life outside USA and it's 95% GSM network running world out there...
[Windows Phone 7 General] amb9800:
I think more than the licensing fees and hardware limitations, WP7 will be capped by a messaging and features challenge.

How do you convince the average smartphone user to get a WP7 device instead of an iPhone or Android handset? WP7's UI is different, but it's not necessarily compelling. WP7 might have integrated FB status updates in the People hub, but for full FB functions, you'd have to have an FB app anyway. I'm skeptical that people will be convinced of the alleged "at a glance" experience of WP7 (the WM6 Today screen, for that matter, gave much more info at a glance but had to be hidden by every OEM).

Xbox Live score/achievement integration is the only real differentiator, but that only matters to Xbox gamers, and even when it comes to gaming, the iPhone has WP7 handily beat with several games that have real-time local + online multiplayer support (something WP7 does not support).

Gaming graphics are not going to be a big one either, as the iPhone has dozens of first-rate 3D games, and given that all first-gen WP7 devices will have the aging first-gen Snapdragon chip (MSM8250 @ 1 GHz), the iPhone 3GS, 4, and many Android devices have more powerful GPUs in any case.

Zune integration doesn't appeal to average users (just look at Zune's market share). Average consumers will see WP7 as being similar to Android in that it doesn't sync with iTunes. The alternative may be there (Zune for WP7, Amazon and others for Android), but from an initial purchase standpoint, they're thinking about iTunes or no iTunes.

WP7 has no killer app on the business front either, with such a limited Office experience (Word/Excel/etc. can make only rudimentary changes to documents, compared to much richer 3rd party editing apps on the iPhone), no Outlook sync support (for offices that don't use Exchange), and an Exchange ActiveSync experience not terribly different from the iPhone's or Android's. I think MS' marketing push highlighting Xbox Live integration will also hurt WP7 on the business credibility front.
[Windows Phone 7 General] sylau90:
For the game on windows phone 7,i never worry about this...please go over here and have a lookhttp://www.xbox.com/en-US/live/phone/default.htm...XBOX live integration is not only for XBOX anymore. What Microsoft try to do is create a platform for gamers, like what has bee appeared in iphone,GAME CENTRE and PLUS+...

I think ZUNE integration would be a killer...try the ZUNE software herehttp://www.zune.net/en-us/products/software/download/default.htm

Even, you didn't own a ZUNE, you can use it too. Now ZUNE player already my default music and movie player. It's great and awesome, especially finding album arts, great graphic and etc...Furthermore, what I like is I can play any song in my PC without convert or create a new datastore to store the converted music...and ITUNES did this.omg, it wastes my hard drive spaces.About the market share, same situation again...ZUNE is just for sales in US market. Therefore, can't compare it with itunes store....

However, I might be wrong...Just stay tuned...WP7 gonna launch in this month...

Cheers...
[Windows Phone 7 General] amb9800:
But that's precisely the problem. What does WP7 offer casual phone gamers that the iPhone doesn't? The iPhone has a large existing game library, multiplayer support, more powerful graphics hardware than all WP7 launch phones, and now even some of the score/achievement tracking that Xbox Live offers.

Sure, the Zune service and client are nice, but they haven't been compelling enough to gain any real market share in the last few years. Now that Apple has opened up the App Store a bit, several other streaming / subscription services are now available on the iPhone as well.

I'm not saying WP7 won't offer a nice media and gaming experience-- it's just that in order to succeed, MS needs to present a clear and compelling reason people should buy WP7 phones.

The iPhone delivers the smoothest phone UI, huge app library, solid browsing experience, seamless media experience, and simplicity. Android offers choice of form factor and carrier, great integration with Google services (with lots of people use), and almost-WM6-like openness while still offering a smooth user experience).

What does WP7 bring to the table that the iPhone and Android don't?
[Windows Phone 7 General] sylau90:
Yeah, actually, personally I think that Apple and android marketing strategies are far more strong than Microsoft. Furthermore, What I like Apple provided is the frequency of operating system updates. Therefore, we no need to change the handset frequently in order to get the latest updates or functionalities.

However, the frequency of windows phone 7 updates are unknown, nobody knows. However,in here I can say that. Apple, Microsoft and Android using totally different strategies. Since Microsoft didn't manufature their own handsets, they just sell OS to manaufacturers. Therefore, it's unlikely they will provide the update very often. However for Apple,they do manufacture their own handsets, therefore they can focus more on software updates and applications, because all the profit will just go into their pockets.

What Microsoft prepared are the new LIVE TILES UI which I think is the success part, because currently I'm using latest windows live messenger and and zune software. they are awesome.

However, now everyone is enjoying the Apple and Android banquet...let's see what cuisines Microsoft prepared for us...By the way, Dell Lightning with WP7 is a good and sexy device, gonna get one if there is one.
[Windows Phone 7 General] vetvito:
Live tile is basically a Android widget.

Hubs is where WP7 will shine, can't wait to see 3rd party hubs.
[Windows Phone 7 General] gom99:
So does iOS, and that's doing well. Also CDMA will come in time.

It's not all that expensive...it's $10 dollars that you pass onto the user anyway. Instead of your phone costing 200-300 dollars to manufacture it costs +10 dollars more. The final price for a phone is 500-600...10 dollars more is hardly something to think about.

Also you have to pay for desktop windows, or pay a very high preimum for OSX + hardware....they're both doing better than linux in the PC world.

So? that hasn't hurt iOS...and this is something that has to do with time...hardware costs become cheaper over time, so eventually these hardware requirements will become cheap to manufacture and it will enter the low end market.

Windows Mobile lost market share because they didn't update it as frequently as they should...then they decided to make a paradigm shift and people slowly abandoned windows mobile since there was no future to the OS.

Also, WM still has a decent market share. It's 6-8% in the states and in the teens in Europe according to some recent reports.

Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but no one has a crystal ball.
[Windows Phone 7 General] gom99:
To some degree...I like widgets in theory, but in practice I always disable them if a phone OS allows me to and go to something more unified like Titanium. The reason I dislike widgets is that there are no design guidelines for them generally so it makes your start page look like crap. Live tiles are widgets done right imo.
[Windows Phone 7 General] Tom Servo:
How about you Americans ditch that way outdated technology? There's absolutely no merit apart from device-based tie-in to a provider.
[Windows Phone 7 General] sylau90:
where can I download live tile widget for android?can you give me the name?wanna give it a try...

yea,the hubs....and cloud-based service.you are able to sync almost everything to skydrive.
[Windows Phone 7 General] jonscapri:
I'm still shaking the wait and see approach. MS hasn't done much to impress me. Zune player is a skinned windows media player with one or two neat plugins.

If MS follows suit it'll be another great idea poorly executed. Just look at windows for the pc.

MS's big problem is they charge you for crap that is full of security holes, buggy, not up to par in general. Then they expect you to just deal or con you into thinking that it's the cream of the crop when it's really just a polished turd.
[Windows Phone 7 General] vangrieg:
Actually, CDMA is superior in almost any aspect. UMTS (3G) has much more in common with CDMA than with GSM.
[Windows Phone 7 General] vetvito:
Huh, pick one?
[Windows Phone 7 General] sylau90:
Sorry,just now I didn't read your sentence clearly. I thought you said there are some widgets work like live tiles...sorry...haha
[Windows Phone 7 General] rruffman:
To Me that would would be the defination of Apple and Steve Jobs...
[Windows Phone 7 General] paperclips:
Well, CDMA support has been confirmed for early 2011. GSM is what over 90% of the world uses so GSM is coming first.

This platform would be chosen over both of those because it's an OS that has that "it just works" factor that everyone loves about the iPhone. It's smooth, has great games, zune, office, etc...

This is a great thing since it means everyone will be able to run the OS and games smoothly. Prices will drop as hardware matures. $199 is pretty standard for those specs and it's a price many are willing to pay.

Both have almost nothing to do with Windows Phone. Kin was a huge failure for two reasons IMO, it had to have a data plan, and it lacked apps and games. Manufacturers are already dropping Symbian and Windows Mobile 6.5 isn't supported my MS anymore. Manufacturers are behind WP7 because it's a complete refresh. It's different and looks fun.
[Windows Phone 7 General] paperclips:
Zune Player is a bit more than a skinned WMP. It has themes, marketplace, subscriptions service, and it has more features like SmartDJ. Windows 7 is a great OS. I haven't had any problems with performance or security at all.
[G1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Darrien13:
what's everyone's favorite donut rom that has speed thanks!
[G1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] BoomBoomPOW:
HTCClay SuperFast v1.3.3

Try this. Faster than SuperD, etc...

Vrooooooooooooom!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[G1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] BiscuitBee:
Another vote for HTCClay SuperFast v1.3.3. I'm using an EBI1/32B port, though. Same thing pretty much.
[G1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] legend221:
Super D without a doubt

Overall Super D is Donut perfection.. Best Performance, Battery and Force Close free.

Ben Buchacher really left his mark in the flashing community with this one.
[G1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] SolemnWishing:
My vote is also on SuperD. I've stuck with it for almost a year now.
[General Topics] SnafuPossum:
So I'm looking to get my first android powered device :D , my question is what do you guys suggest to be a good phone for my first experience? Looking at spending around $500 usd budget (will go over for something I really like, but no $800 desire hd stuff lol), and don't want something "out of date" or have a poor build quality.

here is some info to go off of:

-I am not eligible for a upgrade so will pay retail

-In the us

-at&t carrier, no data, so any at&t specific phones are out of the question

-have wifi in vehicle and anywhere I go (one main reason I don't have a data plan)

-like a big screen and or keyboard since my hands aren't exactly small

Thanks in advance for any help. Also one more question that I haven't found the answer for, I saw a marketplace while signing up but cant view, what are the requirements to view? :confused:
[General Topics] SnafuPossum:
p.s. I think this might belong in the Q and A section...
[General Topics] churro7:
my first smartphone was the palm pixi a fantastic OS but then went to htc hero id say thats now a beginners phone

now im with an epic
[General Topics] TheBiles:
You could probably score a used Nexus One on eBay or Craigslist for $500.
[General Topics] SnafuPossum:
That is one thing that I've thought about, I've also looked at the htc desire, its a little more then other phones but i like the design and the extra ram it offers.
[General Topics] johnson8cyl:
I think nexus one. Just my .02
[General Topics] SnafuPossum:
Thanks for the responses, I guess I need to start hunting for a good condition nexus one. Am I correct for saying that you can not buy them new anymore?
[General Topics] pulser_g2:
if you can get one (UK only afaik), the Orange San Francisco seems to be a good phone to start with, at about £90.

It's the ZTE Blade, and has an HDPI (high res) screen and reasonable CPU etc.

Worth a look if you can lay your hands on one.
[General Topics] SnafuPossum:
zte blade has a nice exterior, probably one of my favorites so far :) . But the processor seems a little slow (clock wise), anyone have any experience with how well the Qualcomm MSM7227 competes with say a snapdragon or samsung hummerbird cpu?
[General Topics] AndroHero:
id get a nexus one or desire, there not too expensive anymore and have ample power to keep up with technology for the next couple of years, the hero is good but its starting to show its age now, it depends what you want, the nexus one is better built imo but the desire has more ram and an optical trackpad instead of a trackball :)
[General Topics] avgjoegeek:
Just remember if you do purchase a T-Mobile Nexus One - and you end up getting a data plan down the line.. your stuck on Edge forever while on AT&T's network.

There are AT&T Nexus One's out there.. but your going to be paying a premium.
[General Topics] SnafuPossum:
Is the trackball like blackberrys dumb trackball? I hated that thing with a passion when I tried to use it (even though touch screen means I will rarely use it). I have never used a optical trackpad before. Is it like say running your finger on the bottom of a laser mouse? I know it is kinda bad analogy.

Yes, I have been looking around on craigslist and what not, t-mobile ones in mint condition run about $400, while ones bought straight from google run about $450, which I would want anyways so I don't have all the tmobile bloatware from the get go.