yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] sonixsonic:
hi, i think this will fix permanently until the phone updated to 2.1 :D but there is a solution before that which i have experience and come up with 2 solution:

firstly install wifi fixer, its free on the marked.

setup to never off mode on settings.

1. if the phone connected charged, the wifi always on even the dispaly off

but i don't recomend to do this with the batt fully charge, because it could make batt live shorten(overcharge), i think.

2. this is abit tricky but it works .. it make the wifi always on without connected charge by:

- install program called gmote than run it, if possible setup to connect to the server, but dont have to.

- and the tricky is, before the phone display off or you are not playing with phone, run the gmote and make sure the gmote program run in the DISPLAY PHONE (mine in gmote browse mode) and leave it like that, than you can leave the phone.

i used this all the time and it works, even i leave the phone for long hours and than check it ... wow the wifi still connected and i tried browsing internet.. amazing ... it works but i see it drain the batt faster .. lol

hope this solution can help anyone :)
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] slayde:
Hey there . . .

My GF and I both have vibrants.

She uses it way more than I do, so I don't know if this is just her phone or what.

Often in an SMS thread the sender name changes mid-thread

she has to be really careful when replying to threads if it does change, cause then it goes to the unintended contact.

I have seen this firsthand twice now.

For the life of me I don't have any idea what may cause this.

The contacts aren't even right next to each other in the contact list, the numbers aren't even very similar.

My vibrant has never done this.

anyone have this issue too or know why it's happening?

Thanks
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rshemeld:
mine did this a few time and i also sent the wrong text to the wrong person because of it..not sure why it happends :confused:
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jnoob:
It happens...somtimes. Not sure why either :-/
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] slayde:
Some dude at the office said he had this issue on his G1.

Is this an Anrdoid thing or a Samsung thing I wonder . . .

Hmmmm

I never had it happen on my G1, or my BH2 or on my Vibrant, so who the hell knows.

very odd, and very annoying for my GF
[Galaxy S I9000 General] supercurio:
Hello!

Some of you maybe have noticed that when the Galaxy S faces the sun, in auto-brightness mode, the color are suddenly boosted by a crazy amount in an attempt to preserve color saturation perception despite the incoming light.

Do you think this is a useful feature helping readability or does it do more harm than good ?

I can disable or tweak it very easily in Voodoo color. I have mixed feelings about this, that's why it's still on, but some people asked me to disable it.

I need your opinion and experience :)

Please don't vote if you don't understand what it is about and never experienced it.

Thanks !

Note: this color boost is associated only to the automatic 100% brightness level.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] AllGamer:
that is actually just brightness at 65% or higher

by default on regular operation when the brightness is set to auto it is always below 50% that's why people complain about colour being pale and such

if you set the brightness to 65% or more you can appreciate the full bloom effect of the SAMOLED screen vs AMOLED

i use a simple brightness widget to set it how i want, but it's mostly on auto, except when i want to WOW! people :D
[Galaxy S I9000 General] supercurio:
@AllGamer we don't talk about the same thing.

It's not the standard brightness level, that's something that append only in the situation I described ;)

If you are lucky enough to have a sunny day you can try it by yourself.

I didn't manage to reproduce it using artificial lights, seems that any light i have is not as bright as the sun ^^
[Galaxy S I9000 General] AllGamer:
i do use the phone outdoor almost on a daily basis, specially during lunch time when we walk to the restaurants meanwhile checking for emails, forums, weather, prices, another restaurant nearby, etc, etc.

so i've seen the screen colour/brightness changes in many different occassions.

unless there is another method to control the colour without controlling the brightness and vice versa, then i'm pretty sure i'm getting the same effects when i manually slide the brightness bar all the way to 100%, 85%, 75%, and 65%

anything less than 60% wont show the blooming colour effect
[Galaxy S I9000 General] supercurio:
sorry @AllGamer, you don't get yet ^^

I don't know if you read the original post?

I can show you the source code in kernel if this is necessary.

This special color boost (really extreme color boost) appends:

In auto brightness mode

When it's bright enough to make the auto-brightness mode reach the 100% level (named gamma 24)

When already at auto 100% and screen facing the sun.

Well, that's not so bad, it's just a poll ;)
[Galaxy S I9000 General] supercurio:
Here is the link to the source :)

http://github.com/project-voodoo/sa...nux-2.6.29/drivers/sensor/optical/gp2a.c#L329

if(autobrightness_mode)
{
if(current_gamma_value == 24)&&(level_state == LIGHT_LEVEL4)
[Galaxy S I9000 General] DaRkMyk:
So far I've only experienced that once in my 3 month old SGS. I usually use it indoors.

I think you can replicate that by ticking Outdoor Visibility in the camera app.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] deathst:
Seen it alot of times, It does seem to help quite well, So i say keep it
[Galaxy S I9000 General] AllGamer:
yeah, that is what i call the colour blooming effect, just like in the PC blooming effect on the video cards
[Galaxy S I9000 General] supercurio:
Absolutely! the Outdoor mode in Camera and Video apps are similar (but are triggered manually)
[Galaxy S I9000 General] DaRkMyk:
woops... just tried the Outdoor Visibility and it is not the same as what I experienced before. You really must be outside & under the bright sun. I'll try it again tomorrow.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] AllGamer:
it just does it to the entire screen but stronger, there is an widget to control screen modes and it can be toggled manually when set to 100%
[Galaxy S I9000 General] mickeko:
I pointed at the sensor with a 12LED flashlight (Need to be quite close for the blooming effect to activate, ~5-10cm), and it bloomed away after 3-5 seconds. :D

I've never been bothered by it and never really noticed it in bright light, so I would think it's a positive feature that helps readability in strong sunlight.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] supercurio:
You cannot reach this mode with manual controls.

It depends on data measured by the light sensor, it's in kernel.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] AllGamer:
well i guess i'll have to install your Modifications, to see if there's really a difference :)

but from my point of view, when the level at set to 100% looks the same as when the phone is working outdoor under bright sunlight 12 noon lunch time.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] supercurio:
It's in every standard kernel!

Ok, I give up ^^
[Galaxy S I9000 General] floepie:
I say keep it. It seems like it would be functional. Looking forward to the warmer colors at more brightness levels, as my phone very rarely runs at 100% brightness.

What I don't like (maybe others agree?) is the sudden drop in brightness at low ambient light levels (not complete darkness).

Thanks for your work on the color issue. This is really what I look forward most to in future voodoo releases!
[Galaxy S I9000 General] AllGamer:
well it'll definitely be nice to be able to access the bloom effect under low brightness level

i like more colours

i was under the impression supercurio was coding something to do that
[Galaxy S I9000 General] brunes:
Anything that makes the screen better in the sun is a good thing.

Even with the SAMOLED, things can sometimes be harder to see outside, especially while web browsing.

It doesn't matter if the colors are off in the pictures when you can't even read the web page.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] sturmeh:
Is it possible to make these sort of things configurable by an app on the phone?

Or must these sort of settings be hard-coded into the kernel?
[Galaxy S I9000 General] exadeci:
And what about a way to trigger it when we want it??

What would you have to change to improve/"fix" it ?? Because if it's not too complicated you could make a version with both and a trigger so we can provide better feedback
[TG01 ROM Development] kenny81:
I have X02T unbrick only way short pin 1+2

After flashing for X02T with every rom and tool my phone do not wake up normally.

Everybody please share anything related to X02T SoftBank.

Now, i need rom SoftBank X02T Original

Please help !!!
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] danootz:
I noticed this issue in Google Listen.

I used to be able to download several audio podcasts, play one of them but decided to pause halfway and begin another podcast, pause the second one and then be able to go back to the first and resume playback.

Now it seems the bookmarking spot is lost and the audio restarts from the beginning. I thought it might be an issue with Google Listen so i uninstalled and reinstalled. No fix. I Googled a solution and none came up but I see a few people complaining of the issue from last year and I've seen recent posts saying the new Stagefright is at fault and is affecting other audio playback apps.

I was wondering if anyone has an idea what's going on and if it is an issue for most/all apps with bookmarking abilities. The MyPod app seems unaffected but I saw the Doggcatcher had an issue (and might have been fixed with an recent update)

I really like Listen as an audio podcast fetcher/player and would rather not give up on it.
[myTouch 3G Slide General] Rauch21:
Seeing as I am not a fan of bloatware, are there any other apps that can handle the Market:// extension? It's tough finding a direct download for the *.apk's, but I also do not like all the junk involved with the Google Apps.

Is there a median between the two where I can be happy without all the excess junk? I've tried just installing the Market, but it didn't work too well =/.
[Galaxy Spica General] machin E:
Hey,

A friend is using the i5800:

http://www.samsung.de/de/Privatkund...T-I5800DKADBT/detail.aspx?atab=specifications

are there any custom roms with Froyo? can i flash it easily? (i have a desire, i like leedroid! :D)

Thanks!

€: only found some rooting guide :( http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=778880
[Galaxy Spica General] machin E:
lalü?? someone?
[Galaxy Spica General] munchy_cool:
2.2 has not yet been released for the galaxy S forget the 5800
[Galaxy Spica General] machin E:
i know. but i was hoping for some custom roms!

Friend of mine got the 5800 and i think its great for that price - very good hardware for low money!
[Galaxy Spica General] machin E:
No ideas?

______________________________________
[Galaxy Spica General] petervranek:
does anyone know how to install applications to SD card ? I will need to sell this phone if there isn't possibility :(
[Desire Themes and Apps] jacques_lem:
Hi,

Is there a place I can download any of the Desire HD apps like the Reader, car Panel, HTC Like, etc.. that have been stripped from the HD ROM ?

I've tried the HD ROM itself, but the camera app doesn't work for the standard Desire, so I would prefer to wait until everything is fixed until I use that ROM. Until that happens.

Thanks
[Desire Themes and Apps] shoemeistah:
I don't get it, so why do you need the apps from Desire HD?...

Anyways, you can download a Desire HD ROM and open it with WinRAR and export the apk files from there.
[Desire Themes and Apps] GANJDROID:
You cant install them onto non HD roms so dont waste tour time if you plan to.

Sent from my HTC Desire
[Desire Themes and Apps] Se7enair:
HTC Likes and the EReader are some nice apps. But the Desire HD Rom doesnt runs perfect.

So why dont build a normal Desire ROM with some Desire HD Apps.
[Desire Themes and Apps] jacques_lem:
I like the feature that allows you to cache maps.

Thanks. That's what I read somewhere. I thought maybe someone has managed to port the apps to the regular HD and uploaded them somewhere.
[Desire Themes and Apps] GANJDROID:
Unfortunately not. The development thread will explode with excitement when they get ported :D

Sent from my HTC Desire
[Nexus One Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] pilot-calc22:
halp me..

thanks
[Nexus One Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] BackfireNL:
Lol it's allready on your phone! use the mofo search button!
[Nexus One Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Seby01:
Fast Boot, not Fastboot! ;)
[Nexus One Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ScottC:
Alright then - why don't you use if for us and show how to get FAST BOOT working on the N1.

I'll wait.
[Nexus One Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] BackfireNL:
Install Evil's Desire HD rom port ;)
[Nexus One Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] martin0285:
can't anyone ever be patient? Don't you follow @cyanogen??? It's coming man, relax....
[Nexus One Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] craigacgomez:
If OP is referring to fastboot to flash firmware files, it's part of the SDK (http://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/index.php?title=Fastboot)

If OP is referring to 'HTC Fast Boot' which allows you to hibernate the phone and then boot up 'quickly', it's something being working on by the CM team and may be part of CM6.1 (http://androinica.com/2010/09/28/cyanogenmod-6-1-may-be-getting-htcs-fast-boot-feature/)
[Droid X General] jbaruch76:
ok, so currently i am on flyx 2.2 based on teh leak. i would like to update to the official or a rom based off it. so i am assuming i have to sbf to 2.1, ota to 2.2, then flash a custom rom? do i have to sbf? i thought i read somewhere it would be possible to update leaked 2.2 to official with a custom rom. so yeah, just before i get started i wanted to make sure i was doing the right things and no unnecessary steps.

thanks for the help.
[Droid X General] jbaruch76:
really? 56 views and no one knows? i know it's not the smartest question, and really i am just trying to confirm that i need to sbf to get to 2.2?
[Droid X General] tmmedic20:
Can do it both ways but one you go official you can not flash back to 2.1.

I personally suggest flashing then getting the ota. After that apply which ever rom you like. I'm sure others have diffrent opinions.

Good luck either way
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] backdown:
If i were to lets say, buy a new blackberry tablet (they look really nice!) could you reload a different operating system on it, since its basically a computer? One would think so as long as you can obtain the OS, but of course that is in a perfect world.
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] drmacinyasha:
Depends on the CPU architecture, and how well it's supported.
[HD2 General] xnifex:
you know, i've never thought of exporting the whole hkcu or hklm directory before. i'm going to have to try that. it'll be interesting to read through a lot of that.

I too have a registry tweak CAB for both my Wizard & Rhodium. Haven't made one for the HD2 yet, since most of the tweaks I've made were through one of the many different tweaking apps.

also, what's this about an autoinstall folder?

*edit* disregard the last part. I always use official roms so the autoinstall doesn't apply
[Touch GSM General] ashkan_68:
hi gays

i can,t connect my device too active sync via bluetooth.my pc is addet to phone bluetooth devices,but 'com ports' page of bluetooth settings is empty and don,t have 'existing port' .so i cant add incoming and outgoing port for connect to pc sync.

i hawe install wm 6.1 ultimate (onyx 4.9) on my htc p3450.how can i solve that problem?it is possible change operation system made it?
[Touch GSM General] ahsiang888:
What PC OS you using? My friend with Windows Vista having similar problem, but I don't have this problem with Windows 7.
[Touch GSM General] ashkan_68:
I,m sorry for the subsequence too answer.that is xp sp2.

in my phone on the bluetooth settings/com ports , the "new outgoing port" icon is now showed (after i add other bluetooth mobile phones to my device),but my pc is not found in the devices list of outgoing port page.
[Touch GSM General] captainstu72:
Is your PC actually set to visible? Most arent as standard and has to be enabled via settings?
[Touch GSM General] ashkan_68:
yes,my pc is added to phone devices list and i can send or recive file with bluetooth
[Touch GSM General] captainstu72:
Have your tried allowing activesync to connect via com ports? Check which com port your usb is using and select that. Could be worth a go.

(I use win 7 so have windows mobile device centre = easier. Activesync I forget the functions of)
[Touch GSM General] ashkan_68:
yes friend,i already allowed that,but i have onli 'com1' in com ports in activesync.and when i click on 'connect',it will test that and sayd 'your device is not detected'

i only want too create outgoing port for my phone,and i think it can be worked only i can creat it for pc.

can you give the link of that software u.re used on your coumputer??it can be worked on win xp 32bit??

.

.

.

.

.

((((((down with ahmadinejad!)))))))
[Touch GSM General] tito12:
Hi friend,

I think I read somewhere in Onyx thread that activating "Beam" can solve some connectivity problems...
[Touch GSM General] captainstu72:
The software i used is win vista/win 7 version of activesync - works better from my experience and is more intuitive.

Also, in the usb to pc settings there is an option to enable faster connection or something like that. I do not have my elfs with me today to check the exact options - that may help though. I remember using it on my xp machines before when having issues. But again, I do not connect over bluetooth all to often.
[Touch GSM General] ashkan_68:
finally,I get that the problem is from my bluetooth device

i used from a mini usb bluetooth device (that was plug and play).when i install the windows xp that i used on my pc on the laptab (with internal bluetooth) ,activesynk was working with no problem on that.

it resulted that te plug and play bluetoothes dosent good choices for general applications

thanx from all of friends :-)
[Touch GSM General] captainstu72:
thanks for letting us know. I'm honestly not sure why I didn't question that as we get that issue all the time at work.... Its been a long time since I have been in support here though!
[Vibrant General] gregc2009:
It's the finals now: Nokian N900 vs Samsung Galaxy S

Having owned both, I can say both are worthy of winning. But since I'm a Galaxy user now, my vote goes there.

http://www.fonearena.com/blog/23538...nd-finale-nokia-n900-vs-samsung-galaxy-s.html
[Vibrant General] scrizz:
I voted for the N900.

It's the definition of a true smartphone.

;)
[Vibrant General] smashpunks:
Galaxy s is getting smashed unfortunately
[Vibrant General] TheSneakerWhore:
Having never heard of the n900--I just watched a video review on engadget and it looks like a pile. WTH are people thinking? Galaxy S is great (not god-mode) compared to the Maemo UI I just saw.

???
[Vibrant General] TRF-Inferno:
Remember, it's the technology enthusiasts that are voting in the polls, and chances are at least half of those that voted for it probably has never even used one, much less seen one in person. The N900 is well-received for being the "Jack of all trades" of the smartphone world -- it does everything short of making breakfast for you, but none of it is done exceptionally well. I had one and honestly, it's a great phone, but the Maemo OS still lacks the user friendliness that Android or iOS offers. It's a geek phone that is almost useless in an average Joe's hands if he doesn't understand what it can do.
[Vibrant General] demo23019:
Im really liking the nokia E7
[Vibrant General] DKYang:
Post this in other Galaxy S forums and you'll probably see a huge boost in votes for the Galaxy S.
[Vibrant General] kizer:
Holly !@#$ we are getting smashed. At least there are a few others that didn't even make it. ;)
[Vibrant General] boodies:
dude, I just checked their main website.

ITS A FRIGGIN NOKIA FANBOY SITE

there is no way sgs is going to win.
[Vibrant General] TheSneakerWhore:
Fair enough. I love Nokia but it just looked....awkward. It was a video review only (no touchy-feely).
[Vibrant General] ld006:
the n900 will win....not because its better..but because of the worlwide fanboys it has, it is the iphone of the world
[Vibrant General] SamsungVibrant:
We are losing big time. People vote

Vote vote vote for sgs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[Vibrant General] jrharvey:
Haha so the X10 beats the HTC Desire? I dont think so.
[Vibrant General] mmilestone:
Uhhh...N900 on Maemo also runs Android Froyo 2.2, iOS, Windozed, etc. We are still waiting for an acceptable fix for gps and lag.

As previously mentioned, it may not do some stuff exceptionally well but does them acceptably...and a lot more. It is a computer more than a phone.

I have one and yes, it is not for the average joe - it is a smartphone. Whereas we have to go jump through burning barrels of flame to root and customize our device, the N900 only needs you to type 2 words in the included x-terminal: "sudo gainroot". It is unbrickable(and practically unbreakable tough).

It was also the device used to hack and jailbreak the PS3.

Nokia just didn't give it the love to enhance it a step further and instead went Meego with Intel.

I believe it is going to win hands down based on capabilities and hardware. Among the few things we got to face it with is a 4 inch screen and HD video.

If you don't know much about it, read the comments section before you vote.

I'm sitting this one out, in fairness to both amazing devices, happy with the knowledge that I have the top 2. :-)
[Vibrant General] TheSneakerWhore:
Didn't know that...interesting. Might just try and get one to play around with--haven't had a Nokia since the G1 came out.

Might be fun.
[Vibrant General] SamsungVibrant:
Vote people!
[Vibrant General] boodies:
Dude, I just read some of the N8 reviews.

THE PHONE IS CRAP

First of all it has a 680mhz processor. WTF?

And the OS is pure crap. It looks like it came from some old ass smartphone from the 90's. And the screen.... it's 3.5=FAIL.

The N8 in my opinion is worse than my old G1.

EDIT: LOL sorry, wrong phone. my humble but accurate opinion still stands for the n8
[Vibrant General] mmilestone:
Of course you are aware that for Symbian phones, 680 Mhz CPU is like Android on a 1Ghz CPU, thus contributing to a longer battery life, right?

And that it does true multi-tasking not task-switching/management?

And that its crappy screen has its own graphics processor and has a resolution higher and sharper than our phones?

And, of course, it was the wrong phone with Symbian's outdated UI which totally reeks from 5 years ago.

Of course you already knew those things because you're well aware of all the merits of the phones we have more than the phones we don't have.

I'd rather focus on what we have and its real strengths and merits which beat other phones out there.
[Vibrant General] Kubernetes:
Sure, and when you see it on a 680mhz processor, its like magic. Slow magic, but magic.

Vibrant has a better GPU, and since when is 640x360 higher resolution than 800x480? Are they special magic pixels?

And of course you read the reviews of Symbian^3 on the new N8. Yeah, kinda like BB, getting there but still behind the curve.
[Vibrant General] Kubernetes:
Now this is only the second review I've read of the N8:

http://www.itpro.co.uk/626251/nokia-n8-review-first-look

Sounds like that slow processor really is slow, and it's not helping battery life much. My Vibrant has better battery life, and I can swap out for another when I run low.