yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Off-topic] Mr. Clown:
You can help me / us :D, since we basically depend on members to mod the whole site. Make sure if you think something is not right and against the rules in any forum to report us this by clicking "!" in the post. This will inmediately alert me and other mods as well.
[Off-topic] MicrosoftSam:
Free Copy Paper, Sweet! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lofg46spZGE
[Off-topic] GuestK0087:
Wow, 7 years...

​
[Off-topic] the_scotsman:
7 year thread mine...that's a good effort! :good:
[Off-topic] Mr. Clown:
Still here:rolleyes:
[Off-topic] Babydollll:
Go

To

Bed

OP

Hi mods

Sent from a carrier pigeon using smoke signals
[Off-topic] Mr. Clown:
:D
[Desire HD General] an9093:
Hi

Can any one tell me which device is faster

HTC Desire Z or HTC Desire HD

and if want one of them which one you will take
[Desire HD General] chief1978:
this seems a strange question

Desire Z = 800mhz with 512mb RAM

Desire HD = 1000mhz and 768mb Ram

So the HD is clearly faster.
[Desire HD General] stiefa00:
Writing a Facebook status or anything else is faster on the HD because you don't have to pull out the keyboard :P

Because of the hardware specs I think the HD has more power and is faster, but we have to wait for the first reviews... ?!
[Desire HD General] MacaronyMax:
Same CPU and GPU but Desire HD's is clocked higher so that wins that.

Bigger screen = easier menu acses = quicker

:p
[Desire HD General] arnozzle:
I always thought that if the device has same cpu n gpu the the one with he smaller screen will be faster as same gpu has less real estate to render...:confused:
[Desire HD General] Conflikt Icey:
Except in this case these two devices have different CPUs
[Desire HD General] TNStrangelove:
Quite apart from the higher clock speed mentioned I'm not sure this is true, it's not like it has to render more pixels, same resolution = same real estate, just blown up a bit. Maybe I'm wrong.
[Desire HD General] Smartmob:
The diference is if the resolution would be smaller... for example.

HTC Wildfire 1 GHz with 240x320 4.3" (i know it has 600MHz, but if we put the sam CPU and the 3.2" size)

HTC Desire HD 1 GHz with 480x800 4.3"

Wildfire would have at least 30% better performance... Its all in pixels not dimension of the LCD
[Desire HD General] SupremeBeaver:
You're correct.
[Desire HD General] mark wild:
Seriously????

Are you really all answering this not so intelligent question? REALLY???

For the guy, who is asking this:

Use google!!!

Do research!!!

Search the forum!!!

Find CPU model numbers, about nm's and gpu's - START TO LEARN.

This is a WAY to dumb question (pardon me) to be asked in a new thread. If you are asking such questions, I really advice you to NOT get this phone, cuz it's gonna get SO MUCH MORE DIFFICULT than you would ever expect, judging from simplicity of your question.

Stop living under a rock.

Sorry for my behavior, it's just that I get a little enraged from time to time. It's just a matter of time, that someone asks something so basic as: Which is brighter - dual LED flash or single LED flash, and which one would you get?
[Desire HD General] MaybachMan:
Isn't the Desire Z fitted with a newer CPU than the Desire HD? If so, it could be more powerful even if the clock speed is lower, especially since I just looked up the Desire Z's CPU and it says it's recommended top clock speed is 1GHz - I give it a few weeks after release at the most until the speed's upgraded with a custom kernel.
[Desire HD General] Smartmob:
There are both 2nd generation 45nm processors with the same Adreno 205 GPU...only the Desire HD is clocked more on 1GHz and Z is at 800MHz
[Desire HD General] madindehead:
Well, given both phones are being released at the same time, they both have the same model of CPU. Really man. Why would HTC give the Desire HD a worse processor than the Desire Z...
[Desire HD General] sumitescp:
Does that mean we can over clock the Z to 1ghz?

What about RAM that would make a difference too.
[Desire HD General] Smartmob:
questions questions...more is better...thats it. Numbers are numbers... ;)

You can probably push him to some limit, but then you can push DHD even more then Z... ;)
[Desire HD General] TNStrangelove:
No, both CPUs are next gen snapdragons. In fact I believe they are the exact same chip model, the desire Z is just under-clocked . It should be very easy to over-clock but that would just make them equal.
[Desire HD General] MaybachMan:
Yeah, thought it made more sense to give them the both CPU TBH, I'd just read otherwise on other threads.
[Desire HD General] TNStrangelove:
Not necessarily if the Z is using the same CPU under-clocked, then theoretically you should be able to over-clock them to the same amount.
[Desire HD General] Smartmob:
Opel Astra 1.9 CDTI 100KS and Astra 1.9 CDTI 150KS... Are they the same only chiped? No, there are some minor diferences in the engine too... ;)
[Desire HD General] Whiterin:
For those of you that haven't seen yet... someone has overclocked a G2 to 1.4ghz.
[Desire HD General] shure2:
I was told at a HTC event they were diff models, the desire z was cheaper. I suspect that once they were all part of the same batch and the lower quality ones ended up going to the desire z
[Desire HD General] noobdeagle:
this ^

same thing for desktop CPU's the higher quality samples become higher clocked chips / have more cores enabled.

ones which fail to reliably run at the higher speed are sold as slower models its called binning and you see it everywhere
[Desire HD General] mancuk29:
The hd is lightening speed on my old desire got 1100 on quadrant standard however the hd gets 1970 amazing speed especially as both on 2.2 god knows how fast gingerbread will be . I'm well cuffed with the hd
[Fascinate Android Development] ksizzle9:
when someone officially gets this new software update installed post here. and whether or not u did it through clockwork or had to revert back to stock.

http://www.droid-life.com/2010/09/2...-fascinate-its-not-android-2-2/#disqus_thread
[Fascinate Android Development] ivorycruncher:
What I'm interested in with this update is whether or not removing or renaming the bloatware apps (especially Bing) will cause trouble with applying this and future updates.
[Fascinate Android Development] dialect129:
i tried the OTA (Over The Air) method and its not picking up any update i wonder if people who have rooted there phone can get this update.
[Fascinate Android Development] ivorycruncher:
I tried checking, but the updater app is telling me the server is unavailable.
[Fascinate Android Development] dialect129:
yes now im getting the same message
[Fascinate Android Development] WillisD:
Will clockwork block this?
[Fascinate Android Development] geeknik:
Remember, one of the known issues on the Fascinate is that you can't check for OTA updates using WiFi, so make sure your WiFi is off when you force check for updates. =)
[Fascinate Android Development] Mydnightsorrow:
I have both a rooted and a stock fascinate so when it's available I will know for sure if being rooted affects getting otas.
[Fascinate Android Development] frostman89:
In this case, I will stay on WiFi forever. Thanks for the info.
[Fascinate Android Development] illtema:
sources say its not live till thursday
[Fascinate Android Development] Zennmaster:
This may be right. I just got a new message:

"No New Update Available"

I guess I'm getting to the server...
[Fascinate Android Development] sangwich:
looking at the list of fixes that are provided in the verizon's pdf file, not worth the the time and bandwidth.
[Fascinate Android Development] Zennmaster:
It's worth it to me just for the no-signal notification fix.
[Fascinate Android Development] namebrandon:
Amen. I've been checking my update status every hour. That issue is driving me insane.
[Fascinate Android Development] Mydnightsorrow:
me too since it only seems to do it when I am sleeping.
[Fascinate Android Development] namebrandon:
update failed w/ clockwork recovery installed.. flashing back to stock to test.
[Fascinate Android Development] stayqued:
Yeah same here.

I want to get rid of that damned lost signal tone.
[Fascinate Android Development] s1nglebarrell:
Yep updated failed with CW installed. The update app tells me there is an update but fails to install. I may flash back later and try it again.
[Fascinate Android Development] namebrandon:
failed with stock kernel, re-installed stock recovery to test that and now my update went away..

guess I'll have to wait until it comes back to test.
[Fascinate Android Development] frostman89:
Where the heck does it download it to? I can't find it in cache, where the updates usually download to.
[Fascinate Android Development] OneAn9ryN00b:
I just updated with root but no CWM, and installed fine, fairly quick only like 700kb
[Fascinate Android Development] dlongb13:
Did you loose root?
[Fascinate Android Development] namebrandon:
bah.. got the update back, but it still failed (got past verifying this time!) with stock kernel and stock recovery.. something /data/.o ? quit to quickly on me to see where it blew out at.

Guess I got a new challenge now. :)
[Fascinate Android Development] mackeydesigns:
Root + Lag Fix

Was able to download the update.

Installed the package, rebooted, got to the home screen, then it restarted itself into recovery utils.

Rebooted, did it again.

Pulled the battery, restarted, and it asked to reboot, so i'm rebooting again, hopefully its not stuck in this loop.

Update: My phone will load, but X amount of time into it, will reboot into Recovery... any ideas?
[Fascinate Android Development] dlongb13:
Make it a signed update.zip please:))
[Fascinate Android Development] frostman89:
gotta find where the pesky file is saved to first, I downloaded, checked cache which is where usually ota updates go, but it is not there.
[Fascinate Android Development] mackeydesigns:
I can't get passed the verizon logo loader now. GREAT.
[Fascinate Android Development] nillabob:
i think it's /dev/fota
[Fascinate Android Development] tats_06:
Mine was stuck on Verizon wireless screen for a while but now its perfect and all updated. :)
[Fascinate Android Development] mackeydesigns:
How long is awhile, my screen is black now. soft keys are lite up, but nothing happening on screen.

Thanks
[Fascinate Android Development] illtema:
is anyone with clockwork getting this to work?
[Fascinate Android Development] bblanski:
Failed for me...
[Fascinate Android Development] steeeler:
Failed here as well.
[Fascinate Android Development] OneAn9ryN00b:
Im not sure, I still have the su app, but when i try to run wireless tether, it wont work
[Fascinate Android Development] devlp1213:
yup fail
[Fascinate Android Development] ckochinsky125:
failed here too
[Fascinate Android Development] mackeydesigns:
I need my phone to work, so I restored did a factory wipe. Do you still retain data like call logs and texts? Cus even though I'm back to the terrible touchwiz, lost my root and contacts/emails, i still have my call logs?
[Fascinate Android Development] DeezNotes:
I had root, but the update took it away. Using terminal on the phone, I don't have access to /data/local/tmp to run the exploit. I wasn't using Clockwork. I did put all the bloat apps back in /system/app to avoid any update issues. Before running the update I tried to export a running logcat to my sdcard. That worked, but I don't link there is any useful information in there. I'll have to view it on a real screen to see.
[Fascinate Android Development] CDODGE:
so is it confirmed that we cannot re-root if we apply the update?
[Fascinate Android Development] ronturn49:
Yeah if someone could locate the update.zip file and post it on here that would be awesome, as I also have clockwork installed and cannot get the update to go through.
[Fascinate Android Development] Mydnightsorrow:
Got the update on my stock fascinate, nothing on my rooted cwm fascinate.
[Fascinate Android Development] st0101:
Can anyone answer this?
[Fascinate Android Development] ronturn49:
N/m I located the update.zip file on another post and installed it with rom manager. Everything SEEMS to have finally went through successfully and I didn't lose root.
[Fascinate Android Development] joebob652:
Confirmed root is gone after update. Lag fix still in place but root gone. Rerooted using "1 Click Root Method" via Dirrk's post.

h**p://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=779238

No ill effects as of yet.
[Fascinate Android Development] zachsx:
Yeah. I installed talk about being a pain. Lost root. But re root works well
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] socalheli:
where are the settings for wifi tether stored? i think i managed to make my ssid invalid characters and i cannot change the ssid unless wifi tether is active, and i get an error every time i try to turn on tethering.

i just want to delete the wifi settings, so that it will go back to default.

thank you
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] trevor4g:
i have the same problem.
[Touch Pro2 CDMA] syeanwoo:
I am a user of China Telecom, I have to insert a UIM card into the Rhodium_W to use its CDMA work. Most Rhodium_Ws sold in China have been radio cracked for CDMA UIM card (sharing the GSM/WCDMA UIM slot), users can't flash the ROMs with normal Radios and PRIs, or you have to pay ￥300 to reflash the cracked Radios and PRIs. I am always seeking for a CLEAN ENGLISH WM6.5.3 ROM without Radios and PRIs, but all the ROMs published outside China include Radios. Anyone can tell me how to remove the Radios and PRIs in the ROMs published in XDA, Thanks very much!
[Touch Pro2 CDMA] razorloves:
custom roms do not contain a radio or pri.
[Touch Pro2 CDMA] syeanwoo:
Is there any visual custom tools?

Is there any visual custom tools or cooking guide? Could you please send me a copy? Thanks a lot.
[Captivate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Whipon:
I have Frankin Twiz installed with the xcaliburinhand kernel.

Recently I tried to add the stock music player from JH7 to system/app through Android Commander. I also updated the application info in the applications tab.

Then I disconnected the phone from the computer and when I tried to wake up the device by pressing the power button, the screen didn't switch on.

So I connected the device again and deleted the recently copied files (MusicPlayer.apk and MusicPlayer.odex), then disconnected and tried to switch on the screen again.

After several tries it worked but then ADW Launcher forcely closed again and again.

So I had to uninstall it through Android Commander. When I recovered the phone control I noticed that every app that I installed got a force close. I had to restore / reinstall all the apps.

Now everything seems to be working fine, but I fear I corrupted something.

Should I reinstall Frankin Twiz?.
[Captivate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] flashman2002:
To be safe I would. But you could wait a couple days and see if you notice anything.
[Captivate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Whipon:
Done

Had to do it. Triying to open apps from the market also caused a force close.

Who knows what other things were wrong.

So all this mess was caused by copying the stock music player to system/app???.
[General Questions and Answers] bonehacka91:
Does anyone know if there is any trick to transfering Gameboid rom files, after they have been extracted or unzipped to the samsung galaxy? i have tried multiple times.. each time samsung kies says that the "file format cannot be transferred". Help!:confused:
[General Questions and Answers] ld006:
it must stay as a zip file, the emulator will unpack it while it plays it, and don't use samsung kies to transfer just do mass storage, mount your phone and drag and drop the files
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] KLoNe1:
Hey guys,

Since changing firmwares and kernels etc; my battery has been going flat even quicker then at stock. I can understand this seeing as I have my device overclocked to 1.2GHz; but the thing is that it's draining WHILE THE DEVICES IS NOT IN USE. EG. While it's sitting idle with the screen off.

Now, I do have facebook/twitter/weather/news set up to refresh, but only every hour and on Twitter ever 3 hrs, so I don't think this is the case. I also have a profile set up on SetCPU which when the screen turns off, it sets the CPU to Min: 100MHz & Max 100MHz.

On the Battery usage screen it looks as if the screen is using up ~70% of the battery.

Here's my setup:

Samsung Galaxy S GT-I9000

I9000XWJM8

SamSet 1.9f

1.2Ghz OC /w Voodoo 4 & BLN
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kkrake:
Hey

I had the same issue with my SGS. My setup was stock JF3 plus voodoo lagfix 3.0. Phone was fast but battery drained very quickly, and didn't stop when it was on standby. I suspected the custom kernel that was included in the voodoo lagfix.

I have since flashed JM8 to my phone and used the lagfix found on xda under

[Voodoo Lagfix] : Play Voodoo with STOCK ECLAIR kernels! - FINAL

which is like voodoo lagfix but with JM8 kernel instead. I'm now enjoying a fast SGS with very good battery life.

Cheers
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] KLoNe1:
Thanks for the reply.

It could quite possibly be SamSet 1.9f doing the draining; but I'm not sure.

I don't think I could go back to stock after using SamSet anyway; that thing is just incredible :)
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kkrake:
I might have to give it a try. Although I still stand by voodoo giving you the battery issues.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] KLoNe1:
They say it was Version 3 of Voodoo which was giving the battery problems - wait, that was the OC kernel wasn't it?

Not sure; it should be fairly noticeable to everyone when the screen off function is not putting the phone in stand-by mode!
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kkrake:
When I had the issues I used Voodoo lagfix 3.0 which is a part of Voodoo beta 4. They said there were battery issues in Voodoo beta 3 (this contained Voodoo lagfix 2.1). I have read a lot of reports of people winding back to Voodoo beta 2 and not having battery issues.

I think all the Voodoo versions have all used OC kernel. :confused:
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] iammichel:
JM8 and voodoo combined cause battery drain. Use other lag fix or firmware...
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Ivegottheskill:
Yeah, I noticed a significant increase in battery drain after installing JM8 + Tayutama's 1.1 ROM w/ Voodoo.

Although I really like the increased speed and Tayutama's add ons, the battery drains almost twice as fast compared to the average during my previous month using the phone with stock I9000DTJG4 firmware, which to me is pretty awful.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] thommy86:
there is a very big difference in battery life time. my setup us also JM8+Voodoo4.. I charge my foon every night. and when i'am eating dinner the battery is bleeping.. and there is actualy no active use..

I like the combination of JM8+voodoo.. it really feels great.. so what can we do..?
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] luke95:
Well, I use JM8 with RyanZa 2.3 Lagfix and I don't have any problem with battery life.

Using mails (push), Games and MP3 about 2 or 3 hours per day, and battery is at 60% at the and of the day.

Not bad isn't it ?
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Mynx:
Same problem here , i have JM8 with Tayutama & Voodoo lagfix , my battery drains like hell ^^
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mazroui:
hmmm i noticed yall talked about a fast battery drain using the voodoo lagfix

could it by any way be the latest 1 (V4 beta) ? coz on the website and i quote

" Bugfixes :

The battery life issue introduced in beta3 is resolved. CPU was locked at 1GHz, which some people saw as a feature (snappier Phone!) but in reality this was a bug, sorry guys "

so V4 beta should be a fix and not suck up much battery like V3 beta

as for myself my phone was a First Gen i9000 international version and ever since i got my phone it never lasted a full day of use....

except for when i changed 3g to 2g , disabled the internet apn , disabled the auto sync , pretty much disabled everything and went very low on the screen light and yet ended @ 10-11 pm with 2% battery life with a max talktime of an hour thruout the day and screen was off almost all of the time except when viewing sms's , yes it lasted a full day to me but i sure hate using my phone that way, pretty useless T_T
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Ivegottheskill:
Thanks for the suggestion, but Tayutama's 1.1 ROM is supposed to include beta 4.

I've got the international version as well and usually got 2, sometimes 3 full days usage with the stock firmware (with about 2 hours of browsing, 2-3 SMS's, 1-2 phone calls and 1 hr of music a day). I did my best to maximise battery life by switching my background wallpaper to be mostly black, and the phone set to minimum brightness

Ordinarily I'd be down to about 60-65% battery life after a day of usage. Using JM8 and Tayutama's ROM I'm down to 22% after 1 day...
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Lalaca:
It's really weird. Just a day or two ago, I reported having battery issues with the combination of JM8 + Tayutama + Voodoo b3 lagfix only.

Today, I unplugged my phone in the morning (approx 08:30) after an overnight charge, rebooted it just in case, and have been using it quite heavily. Lots of 3G data and Wi-Fi (I hear Wi-Fi is a culprit in some cases), a few phone calls, SMS, and music. I have brightness set to low, and black backgrounds where possible.

It's now been more than 12 hours of operation, and not once have I had the rapid battery drain and excess heat that I had complained about. Or wakelocks, now that I think about it. Remaining charge is roughly a third. I actually don't mind; I'm of the belief that smartphones need a daily charge anyway.

But the heat problem. It didn't happen today. I don't know why. In fact, I don't even know what caused it. I'm glad it didn't happen, and hope it doesn't again, but it's just very very weird. :?
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] weppo:
With JM8 (Tayutama Edition v1.1) voodoo + OC my battery draining very very quik.

I have applied update.zip "[Voodoo Lagfix] : Play Voodoo with STOCK ECLAIR kernels!" and now batery life is very good.

P.S. = to applay update from Tayutama voodoo to STOCK kernel + voodoo LagFix i don't disable lag fix before or other ... just update kernel over it ... of course i lose OC but now my SGS work like a charm and batery life is very very good
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] TheChancellor:
I just flashed back to stock from Voodoo 3.0. If you go to the dedicated Voodoo thread, you'll have people complaining about the battery life while others try to dispel the rumor that Voodoo is the cause. I fully believe it's Voodoo. Since flashing back, I have the exact same setup I had before {done from scratch} while using OCLF instead. Battery is fine now.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] The3D:
man this is almost the same behavior i have with my phone. It can last one day (around 25-26 hours) only when i disable everything, put the brightness to the lowest level and pay attention to the apps running in background, this with low/moderate usage (2-3 hours display on, few calls or sms). My phone drains battery as hell.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dhiru1602:
I guess there is some Calibration Problem when you are flashing a new firmware. Try to flash a new firmware with full battery.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Lalaca:
Just went and disabled my current Voodoo b3 and installed the Stock Kernel Voodoo... (Checking each way with a Quadrant bench.)

My battery suddenly went from 26% (curio's Voodoo) to 65% (stock Voodoo). wtf. :s

I totally need to refresh battery stats...
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] EarlZ:
I've noticed a couple of times that my battery is around 40% and I restart my phone and it jumps to 75% w/c I find strange, also 100 to 70% seems to to drop so fast and it stabilizes at ~60%
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Nash123:
Don't use supercurios original Voodoo. Use the modified one. Especially if you have JM8!

showthread.php?t=786509 (ECLAIR with stockkernel).

Using it since yesterday. No problems so far.