yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[G1 Apps and Games] ripgut:
Installed this and removed ADW, but can't customize it, is this possible. Ialways remove the LAB and RAB and add drawer button back ground, as well as the desktop dot. Can i do so in launcher42?
[G1 Apps and Games] jasnmb:
You can't customize this launcher in any way, which is why most people prefer to use ADW or LauncherPro.
[G1 Apps and Games] ripgut:
Sucks because it makes my phone less laggy as opposed to ADW. Oh well, thanks for the response :)
[G1 Apps and Games] jasnmb:
did you try tweaking the ADW settings at all? Or try LauncherPro and playing with some of its settings?
[G1 Apps and Games] Ace42:
it is less buggy and doesnt have the reload problem youll get with ADW....Swiping is as smooth due to it still being a bit buggy. Would be nice to get a AOSP Froyo around here.
[G1 Apps and Games] airnique23:
Wow....Beggars cant be choosers....please wait 2 seconds for an uncompressed image, or press Ctrl+F5 for original quality page
[G1 Apps and Games] jamsterzak:
Refering to original post from cyanogen....Reading that just made my day..thxs
[G1 Apps and Games] zodagreat:
LAUNCHER 2 with 3d app tray

so theres no way to get the 3d launcher back in rotation. i saw a new version in the nexus s and ive always liked it.
[Desire Android Development] l1nuxfre4k:
Hey all :=)

We are moving servers at the moment and the server is up and running but at the moment no domain,

Its on its way

Fully dedicated server :)

The current address is http://178.63.87.149/index.php

Go there and press Cookandroid

Please report any errors :)

UPDATE:

Just tried it it works fine now :D

Go ahead all have fun :D
[Desire Android Development] peterfeter:
ERROR

The requested URL could not be retrieved
[Desire Android Development] l1nuxfre4k:
Try again :)

As its still setting up it might be down short periods :)
[Desire Android Development] b3ndik:
any ETA?

10 char
[Desire Android Development] kboya:
been waiting for you guys to reappear

But, after several attempts:

Not Found

The requested URL /HNH992 was not found on this server.

Apache/2.2.9 (Debian) PHP/5.3.3-0.dotdeb.0 with Suhosin-Patch mod_perl/2.0.4 Perl/v5.10.0 Server at 178.63.87.149 Port 80
[Desire Android Development] l1nuxfre4k:
What do you mean?

Its up and running,

just lacking domain

updated link :)

as i sad its still setting it up.

just thought i would be nice and take it up for you early :)
[Desire Android Development] kboya:
that's it!!! I am in

Woohoo

cheers, you're a LEGEND!!

groovy

k
[Desire Android Development] le3ky:
i get asked for username/password

edit: clicking cancel loads of times it goes and lets me carry on :/

edit2: the zip download file doesn't exist to download
[Desire Android Development] kboya:
use the updated link at top off this page
[Desire Android Development] b3ndik:
ah, sorry. came an error when I clicked, my bad
[Desire Android Development] jungoed:
possible to add the official froyo 22 then cook what we need?
[Desire Android Development] b3ndik:
hmm, when I click "COOK", it says that my rom is ready to download, but it doesn't find the zip file.

"The requested URL /grnzyudeu72bu5ckdgj0.zip was not found on this server."
[Desire Android Development] kboya:
OK, got as far as download (it said it was cooked) and then:

Not Found

The requested URL /23eiff9cqca3q8u29oml.zip was not found on this server.

Apache/2.2.9 (Debian) PHP/5.3.3-0.dotdeb.0 with Suhosin-Patch mod_perl/2.0.4 Perl/v5.10.0 Server at 178.63.87.149 Port 80

I just cancelled the log in screen... do we need to register with cookandroid? No worries if we do
[Desire Android Development] kmetek:
will you update some versions? :D nice job !
[Desire Android Development] peterfeter:
same error with my link...
[Desire Android Development] cruzzmz:
link appear to be broken :(
[Desire Android Development] l1nuxfre4k:
Im sorry for all delay, had lots of issues after the move.

THey seem to be fixed now :)

http://178.63.87.149/index.php

Just tried it and its working!!!

TRY IT :D
[Desire Android Development] -Happy Feet-:
i got this message from my browser

don´t work for me :-(
[Desire Android Development] perettigiuliano:
THE

SITE

DOES

NOT

WORK!:mad:
[Desire Android Development] mcduck1:
Just use http://www.cookandroid.com. Works fine :>
[Desire Android Development] niiico69:
Can't pass the verification code. I enter the displayed number and it goes back to the initial page asking a new code...
[Desire Android Development] mcduck1:
Fixed! :)
[Desire Android Development] -Happy Feet-:
next error:
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] LevitateJay:
I've been reading a lot of discussion on this and would love to hear some opinions and see some benchmarks.

I currently own a Nexus One & where I live they are priced about $150 dollars more for a Nexus than a Galaxy S (It's my understanding Nexus are regarded as cheaper phones in America?) So basically I can sell my 4 month old Nexus One & buy a brand new 16GB Galaxy S for no extra cost. Here is what I am wondering...

I know the Galaxy S has an amazing GPU, it facerolls the Nexus One & even seems to stomp the Droid X with its improved GPU so that is great.

The CPU however seems to under perform in every benchmark I can find versus the Nexus/Droid2 & many more current high end Androids.

I realise these devices are running Android 2.2 with JIT. I've seen Linpacks of 2.2 running Galaxy S devices and JIT enabled ROMs that still don't compare with these other devices.

Question 1

What I'm wondering is the difference we can see in CPU benchmarks going to be surpassed with the addition of a proper 2.2 JIT rom on our devices or is simply that the Snapdragons & other Qualcomm CPU are actually better than our Hummingbird.

Question 2

My Nexus One is Linkpacking 30 MFlops atm, I think with OC etc I can get it higher too. Does anyone have any evidence of a Galaxy S phone (running 2.2, JIT, lagfix or anything) that competes (or even comes close to competing) with this? I have been unable to find anything.

Question 3

Is the current Quadrant scores that I'm seeing people reporting in the Lag Fix threads (2000+) actually representative of speed or are these (as Cyanogen & others seem to be claiming) distorted?

(I realise a lot of people are reporting lag fixed.. what I'm asking is the number represented there (x2 N1 Froyo's score) actually accurate. I don't understand the mechanics behind the I/O benchmark so I don't understand if the lagfix is distoring the reported results from it.)
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] andrewluecke:
1. Hummingbird is apparently faster.

2. We don't have JIT yet.. Compare Nexus One 2.1/Eclair with Galaxy S 2.1, and I remember seeing we are faster.. JIT has a massive impact on mflops (because the benchmark uses bytecode, not compiled code).

3. No benchmark is really representative of speeds (no matter what people tell you). Because different apps have different workloads. You might get 50mflops in a CPU test, but for 3D games, the number of triangles matters more. It has recently been shown the I/O test for quadrant can be tricked too.

Benchmarks aren't really comprehensive enough for anything more than getting an idea of the performance.. But don't rely on them.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ickyboo:
The reason why we get crappy benchmarks is due to having ****ty filesystem (rfs) which don't let us have multi writes. That's what lag fixes help. Cpu wise we eat snapdragons for breakfast, lunch and tea.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] thebazman:
what he said ^^^

regards
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] andrewluecke:
Source please.. I never have actually seen anyone prove this here, but I hear it being thrown around increasingly. How was this proven? I'm becoming increasingly concerned that this conclusion was made by playing chinese whispers
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Croak:
Well, if you look at pre-Froyo benchmarks of Snapdragon devices, they generally get around 6.1 in Linpack, vs ~8.4 for a Galaxy S. That's a pretty big delta, and carriers through most other synthetic and real world benchmarks, roughly 20% faster at the same clock speed. Same thing can be seen with the TI processors in the Droid line, at 1Ghz, they score in the 8's with 2.1.

Froyo benchmarks are suspect for a number of reasons, mainly because most of the benchmarks were designed with 1.6-2.1 in mind, and partly because Google spent a lot of time optimizing the base Froyo build for a Snapdragon processor. HTC, Sony, Dell, etc can piggyback off this work with their version, whereas Samsung and Motorola have to start much closer to scratch. Which is also why the HTC devices got Froyo sooner.

Believe it or not (and despite the marketing hype) the Snapdragon chipset is a budget solution, with less complex/expensive memory subsystem, and a far less costly integrated graphics solution than what is found on the Galaxy S.

It's cheap to produce, it has almost everything in a nice tidy package that makes it cheaper to engineer handsets (when I say everything, I mean CPU/GPU/Radio/WiFi/GPS/USB).

It's a pretty good package for companies like HTC, who don't do any real hardware engineering, and try to keep costs low. They do software (very very well, I should add), industrial design, and mass manufacturing, but they've NEVER designed a chipset (or display), they always source those from a third party, in this case Qualcom for the chipset, Samsung/Sony for the displays, etc.

However, they were the first to market with 1Ghz speed and it's a solid and stable hardware setup. Just keep in mind that clock speeds don't tell the whole tale.

The Galaxy S, (and to a lesser extent the Droid series) use a better stand-alone CPU solution and a far superior non-integrated (has its own chip) GPU. Samsung does do their own in-house chipset engineering, and they didn't cut corners on the CPU design, and they learned a lot about how to squeeze a lot of performance out of the ARM instruction set from their own products and the work they did for the iPhone processors. In brute-force, they smack the Snapdragon chipset around like a *****, but they get slapped around in turn by HTC's superior software engineering.

HTC has a real advantage in lots and lots of PDA/Smartphone software experience. They know how to make the most of the hardware they purchase, and seem to spend a great deal of time optimizing the software, be it Windows Mobile or Android, and lessons learned from a decade of making PDAs, under their name and for others.

If HTC used a Hummingbird or TI OMAP chipset with PowerVR GPU, I have no doubt they'd be able to more quickly wring more performance and stability out of it than Samsung or Motorola can.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] LevitateJay:
Thanks, that was a really insightful post.

So basically even though our processor should outperform or ATLEAST match the snapdragons. Due to the mass optimization of 2.2 JIT for Snapdragon devices it's likely we'll never see the same performance. Unless Samsung gets really keen to do some optimization themselves.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] luci.pacurar:
I searched all over the internet to see why the CPU scores in Quadrant and other benchmarks are waaaay lower then the Nexus ones, but still I can't find anything.

Does Samsung disable the JIT in their Froyo ROMs? Because both Snapdragon and Hummingbird are still based on the same Cortex A8 cores
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] okorn_:
http://androidforums.com/samsung-ca...ant-scores-why-humming-bird-doing-so-bad.html
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] The_Double:
There are multiple reasons, not optimised jit, slow memory for caching and more. Most of them are solved in the CM roms (it performs on par with the N1), and i can tell you that when Gingerbread comes it will blow the snapdragons away.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] luci.pacurar:
Which custom ROM provides CPU performance close to Snapdragon?
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] luci.pacurar:
[ignore this post please]
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] EarlZ:
Still the 1Ghz humming bird out performs the 1Ghz snap in real world performance
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] luci.pacurar:
Even the LG Optimus One ARM11 600MHz Core scores better than Galaxy S. I still believe it's a software problem.

http://lgoptimusonep500.blogspot.com/2011/01/custom-rom-for-lg-optimus-one-p500.html#more

Another benchmark:

http://www.anandtech.com/show/4126/nokia-http://www.anandtech.com/show/4126/nokia-n8-review-/7

...where the Nexus S proves that the Hummingbird can do more than it currrently does in Galaxy S.
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] heliotropeUCSD:
I've been trying to confirm that voice dialing works on the new leak. I've tried two headsets with no success- can someone confirm that this works? I'm running a stock build with LauncherPro, with the following removed:

I don't see anything on this list that should play badly with the bluetooth settings. Any ideas?

com.htc.TwitterWidget.apk

com.htc.WeatherWidget.apk

HtcAddProgramWidget.apk

HtcCalculatorWidget.apk

htcmailwidgets.apk

htcmsgwidgets.apk

htccalendarwidgets.apk

HtcClockWidget.apk

htccontactwidgets.apk

HtcSyncwidget.apk

HtcRingtoneWidget.apk

HtcRingtoneTrimmer.apk

HtcPhotoWidget.apk

Rosie.apk

PluginManager.apk

WidgetDownloadManager.apk

teeter.apk

amazonmp3.apk

HtcFootprints.apk

HtcFootprintsWidget.apk

HtcCarPanel.apk

CityID.apk

Quickoffice.apk

Stock.apk

com.htc.StockWidget.apk

VVM.apk

VZW_Skype.apk

VzNav.apk

Calculator.apk

HtcTwitter.apk
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] heliotropeUCSD:
Solution

Okay, so- here is the solution.

If you have any other TTS engines installed, you will probably have to disable them. For the voice dialer to work, it has to have the Pico TTS engine fully enabled to work. For the record, phone works fine with a Jawbone Original.
[Droid Incredible General] Kipphh:
Sky raider has some great boot animations but Im looking for something else what else is there out there to spice up my boot up?
[Droid Incredible General] Kipphh:
No love for somone whos sticking with the froyo leak?
[Galaxy S I9000 Themes and Apps] Roy Ngan:
Guys,

I didn't pay much attention to my earlier Low Battery notification icon,

Now i'm having low battery notification with HTC Desire phone icon on my SGS!

My last update is Super Circle Battery, can that be the root cause?

Can others confirm this?
[Galaxy S I9000 Themes and Apps] AllGamer:
funny thing eh? :D

it's just a default static picture they left in the Android OS
[Galaxy S I9000 Themes and Apps] Roy Ngan:
Show me Nexus One then :)
[Galaxy S I9000 Themes and Apps] sensi_:
im sure mines different.... id like to know this before modding my battery icon which im just about to do and stumbled across this
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] tjh:
hello, a frind has a tmobile pulse mini (geman-> puls mini)

when a inncomming call came it shows "private nummber" in englisch i think "private number"

after call in callhistory is then any contact entry in place of "private number"

what is wrong? when i missed the cal also is any entry in place of private, so you cant call back
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] crazifyngers:
figures it would come out preinstalled the same day that my girlfriends contract is up. can anyone confirm that a stock 2.2 can be rooted yet? i know they figured it out with unrevoked but is it possible on incredible? anyone installed the ruu and able to get root? if this is already answered please point me to the thread. i searched but didn't find anything. thanks guys
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] g00s3y:
Here you go

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=765784

btw can you go into settings/about phone/software information and post what the build number is please?
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] crazifyngers:
i can post the build number as soon as we get the phone. according to verizon all new phones come with 2.2 now. thanks for the link
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] g00s3y:
Cool, do you know when you are getting the phone?
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] crazifyngers:
in a few hours. i'll post back as soon as i get it since it is my job to set the phone up for her.
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Berzerker7:
It won't be updated to 2.2 that quickly. You should be fine.
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] crazifyngers:
you were correct
[EVO 4G Themes and Apps] mattrb:
I know that the Fennec Alpha release months ago is ganky and slow. I just wanted to test to see if it is better. I like to have choice and this Android Market lockout does not let me download Nexus-Only DL's.
[EVO 4G Themes and Apps] driguez:
Google my friend. I've tried it and I like the add ons, but it is still slow and feels a bit clunky. Not switching any time soon.

www.mozilla.com/en-US/m/alpha
[Hero, G2 Touch General] laochen:
Hi everyone, we have some engineering prototypes of the HTC Hero, now any 2.1rom can be installed but the functions are not perfect, the G-sensor, camera, light sensor, and WiFi don't work, other functions are fine.

Now we extracted the boot.img from the 1.5rom, cracked it and replaced the boot.img file in any 2.1rom so that we can install all the 2.1roms in this way.

Now we want to crack the boot.img of the 2.1rom to get a perfect 2.1 version rom, but we are facing the problem that the boot.img in 2.1rom is encrypted and we can't decrypt it, we hope that if someone could help us with that, please give us your email or contact us by sending email to the addresses given below, so we could solve this problem for all the Hero engineering prototype users.

And also, we provide you with our cracked boot.img in return, uploaded as attachment.

A picture of our prototype phone is also attached.

Thanks.

Our email:

kievn-freedom[@]163[dot]com

d830alex[@]gmail[dot]com
[Droid Incredible General] jakewill:
Here's just an obvious FYI, in case anyone likes to read about the latest update:

http://gizmodo.com/5623672/droid-incredibles-getting-android-22-right-now

http://support.vzw.com/system_update/htc_incredible.html

jakewill
[Droid Incredible General] hkii:
I haven't seen anything on my droid yet, should I expect it at some later time today?

I've root my Droid before than restored it back to stock, will that affect whether my Droid will get an update or not?
[Droid Incredible General] UndergroundWire:
Ok just because Verizon said the update is getting pushed today doesn't mean you will get it today. Everyone will be on a different schedule and could take up to 10 days or so before everyone has it. Before you jump the gun, be a little patient.

Also, might I suggest reading this site and see if the people that got it had a similar setup: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=757899
[Droid Eris Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jqlynch:
No matter what ROM I'm using, I can't even get 710 to work - I get FCs and strange app terminations without messages. This makes it almost impossible to try nonsensikal specifically, as I think that's defaulting to 710 at boot.

Is there something I could be doing wrong, or is this just a phone limitation?
[Droid Eris Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jqlynch:
Thanks for the quick response! With this phone, though, is it even worth trying to run froyo even if I can find a way to change the default 710 in one of those roms, if I can't get at least that much OC?
[Droid Eris Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Hungry Man:
Just flash a different kernel that isn't stock 710mhz.
[EVO 4G Accessories] Kranin:
I'm looking for a belt case that will accomodate the Seidio 3500 Extended Battery and a (modified via utility knife) Amzer Jelly Case. I know that Seidio makes a belt holster that works with just the extended battery, but I need something that provides some drop protection AND has a belt clip.

Seems like a belt case should be the easiest option, but I'm open to other recommendations.

So far I've had no look searching various forums for a good lead...and come up flat. I looked at belt cases for the Streak, but it looks like the measurements might not be all that great.

I'd appreciate any help you guys are able to provide.
[EVO 4G Accessories] Kranin:
I've tried the RocketFish Leather Hip Case (Model # RF-WR559) and the Body Glove Universal Smartphone Hip Case (Model # Unk) and neither works with the Amzer Jelly skin, btw.

The fit is just too tight...can't get the thing out of the case without taking it off the belt and muscling it out.

:confused:
[EVO 4G Accessories] VW91N3:
Look for a Garmin GPS case. They match the Amzer-covered EVO. Check around on eBay, they give dimensions in some ads.
[EVO 4G Accessories] Kranin:
Good to know. I spent my lunch break at Best Buy today checking out their (limited) belt clip selection when I decided to do a "world tour" to see if another class of device might lead me to a solution.

Where did I find myself but in the GPS section at the back of the store. I didn't find anything with a belt clip, but by eyeball-comparison I deduced that if someone made a belt clip for the Garmin Nuvi 1690, it might just do the job.

:cool:
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] bludragon742:
[edit 09/01/10]Maybe this is better suited to the apps forum but since it is a question I posted it here[/edit]

About a week ago, I installed the latest update to TB. Since then, I have had an issue with my phone waking up and not going back to sleep when a scheduled backup takes place. As you can image, this is causing horrible battery drain. The first time it happened my battery went from 85% down to 25% and last night it went from 99% down to 18%. :eek: How can I prevent this from happening?
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] bludragon742:
No solution yet? I hate to bump my own posts...
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] omegasun18:
I have noticed this too when having it do a scheduled back up. I had to stop having it auto back up and now just manually back up every few days.

Figured i would help bump to see if any one has figured out a fix or what is causing this.
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] CloudSA:
I am having the same issue on my HTC Desire.

No solution yet except turning off scheduled backups?
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dwertz:
I just use autostarts and prevent it from starting when I reboot. I do manual backups
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III General] stinkster:
I just picked on of these up from craiglist locally. my htc pure blew the ear speaker which I cannot seem to find a new one for so I got this unit. It is running some sort of beta test win6.1. the guy I got it from has contacts with a company that tests the units. It is win 6.1 but it has a few od things to. One being when you boot the device the splash screen says this unit is not for resale. Is there any way to save all the portions of software I would be replacing if I upgraded to 6.5?

I dont think there is anything special about whats on the unit I would just like to know I had a full backup before I start messing with the unit. I did do some reading in the forums but I havent really found an answer to this.
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III General] stinkster:
well I flashed as forum suggested win mobile 6.5 all went well, used recommended radio etc, works great! thanks for all the guides and files :)

also, my splash screen still says not for resale :) kinda unique, glad it stayed
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III General] Mr. Clown:
If you want to get rid of it look here http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=334907.
[HD2 General] otester:
On WM6.5 is there anyway to auto-kill tasks?

My non-HTC headphones keeps making the phone try and call voicemail.

Regards,

otester