yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Nexus One Android Development] jonata:
try to download but file doesn't exist ... another place fo download ?

tks

...

find it ... sorry
[Nexus One Android Development] cyberchuck9000:
I'm gonna test it for a little longer. It was stable for a good 40 hours straight, for all I know that reboot wasn't the kernel's fault at all.
[Nexus One Android Development] snxxxxx:
Full/charging 1228-128

Battery < 50 998-128

Srceen of 576-128

Thats my setting..

:-)
[Nexus One Android Development] ChronoReverse:
Yeah, AVS tends to push the voltage too low for most people.

However, it seems my n1 can take the low voltages easily. I wonder if I should try to figure out compiling kernels so I could have a modified 900mV SVS build using wildmonk's sources with a voltage table specifically tailored for my n1 :p;):D
[Nexus One Android Development] jlevy73:
That is definitely the way to go. Cyanogen's wiki has a nice walk through on how to compile kernels. If you are interested, that's a great place to start.
[Nexus One Android Development] Markdental:
+1 Pershoot has done some amazing work with the help of the others in the battery calibration thread.

http://xdaforums.com/search.php?searchid=43674712

I charged with kmobs latest kernel, and my battery only gtt to ~1200 mA, with pershoot's it got to 1389 mA and my battery is 7 months old, so this is likely all it will hold.
[Nexus One Android Development] ChronoReverse:
Thanks for the tip, I'll look into that. I'm armed with the long logs of AVS setting voltages after all =)
[Nexus One Android Development] poochie2:
Dear WM: would you very kindly make me a kernel with the following voltage table? (1228 MHz SVS AB CFS 720p)

{

{ 128000, CCTL(CLK_TCXO, 1),	SRC_AXI, 0, 0, 900, 14000 },

{ 245000, CCTL(CLK_MODEM_PLL, 1),	SRC_RAW, 0, 0, 925, 29000 },

{ 256000, CCTL(CLK_GLOBAL_PLL, 3),	SRC_RAW, 0, 0, 975, 29000 },

{ 384000, CCTL(CLK_TCXO, 1),	SRC_SCPLL, 0x0A, 0, 975, 58000 },

{ 422400, CCTL(CLK_TCXO, 1),	SRC_SCPLL, 0x0B, 0, 1000, 117000 },

{ 460800, CCTL(CLK_TCXO, 1),	SRC_SCPLL, 0x0C, 0, 1025, 117000 },

{ 499200, CCTL(CLK_TCXO, 1),	SRC_SCPLL, 0x0D, 0, 1050, 117000 },

{ 537600, CCTL(CLK_TCXO, 1),	SRC_SCPLL, 0x0E, 0, 1050, 117000 },

{ 576000, CCTL(CLK_TCXO, 1),	SRC_SCPLL, 0x0F, 0, 1075, 117000 },

{ 614400, CCTL(CLK_TCXO, 1),	SRC_SCPLL, 0x10, 0, 1100, 117000 },

{ 652800, CCTL(CLK_TCXO, 1),	SRC_SCPLL, 0x11, 0, 1100, 117000 },

{ 691200, CCTL(CLK_TCXO, 1),	SRC_SCPLL, 0x12, 0, 1125, 117000 },

{ 729600, CCTL(CLK_TCXO, 1),	SRC_SCPLL, 0x13, 0, 1125, 117000 },

{ 768000, CCTL(CLK_TCXO, 1),	SRC_SCPLL, 0x14, 0, 1150, 128000 },

{ 806400, CCTL(CLK_TCXO, 1),	SRC_SCPLL, 0x15, 0, 1175, 128000 },

{ 844800, CCTL(CLK_TCXO, 1),	SRC_SCPLL, 0x16, 0, 1175, 128000 },

{ 883200, CCTL(CLK_TCXO, 1),	SRC_SCPLL, 0x17, 0, 1200, 128000 },

{ 921600, CCTL(CLK_TCXO, 1),	SRC_SCPLL, 0x18, 0, 1225, 128000 },

{ 960000, CCTL(CLK_TCXO, 1),	SRC_SCPLL, 0x19, 0, 1225, 128000 },

{ 998400, CCTL(CLK_TCXO, 1),	SRC_SCPLL, 0x1A, 0, 1250, 128000 },

{ 1036800, CCTL(CLK_TCXO, 1),	SRC_SCPLL, 0x1B, 0, 1250, 128000 },

{ 1075200, CCTL(CLK_TCXO, 1),	SRC_SCPLL, 0x1C, 0, 1275, 128000 },

{ 1113600, CCTL(CLK_TCXO, 1),	SRC_SCPLL, 0x1D, 0, 1275, 128000 },

{ 1152000, CCTL(CLK_TCXO, 1),	SRC_SCPLL, 0x1E, 0, 1300, 128000 },

{ 1190400, CCTL(CLK_TCXO, 1),	SRC_SCPLL, 0x1F, 0, 1325, 128000 },

{ 1228800, CCTL(CLK_TCXO, 1),	SRC_SCPLL, 0x20, 0, 1350, 128000 },

{ 0 },

}

PS: I'd try to make it myself, but I have no clue how to enable/disable and so on the features you customize in every kernel :(
[Nexus One Android Development] ChronoReverse:
After some testing with the 925mV SVS kernel, I've come to the conclusion that the battery savings offered by going to 900mV AVS (of which the voltage gaps are quite large on my n1 even compared to the 900mV SVS build, much less the 925mV) is so miniscule that I will no longer be asking for a custom kernel from WM.

For those of you who do not have n1's that can run at 537MHz at 900mV, this should be food for thought.
[Nexus One Android Development] jlevy73:
Curious, did you notice an effect with the lower voltage and radio. Kmobs did a blind study some time ago and deduced below 950mv has a negative effect on the radio. Wondering if you saw those some effects.
[Nexus One Android Development] ChronoReverse:
I was aware of the issues that can occur with low voltages but I didn't experience them myself (my battery drain with the screen off for instance is easily less than 1% and perhaps less than half that depending on the conditions so low voltages isn't causing my wireless to use more power)

Still, considering the monitor benefits of going down to 900 mV, I'm inclined to say that it's not worth the potential trouble.
[Nexus One Android Development] ilos:
all "ondemand" ?
[Nexus One Android Development] fiftyclick:
I am running 2.6.35.4_SVS-950mV_CFS_AXI_720p_1228MHz_082710-TEST, with SetCPU 2.0.2.

Default - 384-1075 ondemand

Priority Profiles

100 - Temp > 50.0 C - 245-499 ondemand

90 - Charging/Full - 998-1113 performance

85 - Screen Off - 128-384 conservative

80 - Battery < 10% - 245-499 ondemand

75 - Battery < 20% - 245-998 ondemand

Getting great battery life, good speed when I need it, and I know my phone won't melt in the event if something goes wrong. Surprisingly, the Screen Off at 128-384 doesn't cause any problems, but the max cannot be any lower than 384. My phone maxes at 1113, so I don't push it any further then that (otherwise it is just too unstable). No crashes, no freezes, just peachy here!
[Nexus One Android Development] Latentk:
Sweet monks I will be giving your latest avs kernels a try. I will start at 950 and if that proves unstable I will move up. The major thing I noticed with avs is that it causes my phone to freeze overnight. Will test tonight and get back to you.
[Nexus One Android Development] mtw4991:
Running 0827 AVS_975_BFS_720p and all is really stable until I try to go above 1152mhz. 1190 is ok for less intensive stuff but benchmarks suffer a bit with it and 1228 can't run more than a couple of benchmarks before it soft reboots. I keep it on 128-1075 ondemand for daily use and have absolutely no problems yet:eek:

I'm on 15 hours of heavy use with 6 hrs sleep time and have 24% battery left...right at 5% drain per hour. Overnight drain was exactly 1%!

Lots of reading XDA, flashing, testing, Music Mod, video testing, changing themes, etc. Almost constant, lol....I think I'm addicted to my phone:p

"Hello, my name is Mark and I'm a flashing addict":D
[Nexus One Android Development] fiftyclick:
I found the same issue, switched back to SVS, but perhaps it is just that it doesn't like to go above 1152mhz... hmm, flashing again!
[Nexus One Android Development] trock62:
Whats the best for Rods R5
[Nexus One Android Development] Robdyx:
join the Family, man
[Nexus One Android Development] mtw4991:
Wildmonks, IR tweeted/posted that after extensive testing of AVS voltages for different MHz settings that the stable settings were just equal to SVS settings at all levels anyway so it was useless to use it and he wasn't going to make any more AVS kernels. Wasn't that the conclusion a couple of weeks ago...that AVS was really acting like SVS, kinda faking it, lol.

It seems weird, but I never have gotten 1.5 days on a SVS kernel nor .8-1% per hour overnight drain while sleeping. Umm, there has got to be SOME benefit to using AVS I would think, even if the voltage settings are the same as SVS.

I don't know enough to speak intelligently on the subject, but my intuition says otherwise. What do you think??
[Nexus One Android Development] ChronoReverse:
Seems like an unwarranted conclusion. After all, the settings AVS chooses are extremely dependent on your device.

With that said, a custom SVS table could pretty much match AVS identically.

Also, if you're not getting about 1% drain per hour on sleep, it's an app or your ROM that's the problem. I can get that even with the stock kernel =O
[Nexus One Android Development] sl8125:
I used 2.6.35.4_SVS-925mV_CFS_AXI_NoAB_720p_1113MHz_082710 for about a day to compare to stock cm6 kernel. Eventhough with Wm kernel I get little better battery life it seems little laggy compare to stock cm6. I use the same settings on setcpu. It just feels like it much snappier on stock cm6. Though battery drain is kinda bad in stock. What do you think is the difference between the two kernel. I like the stock performance but battery is killing me. Which Wm kernel is most stable but have the most performance?
[Nexus One Android Development] Robdyx:
IR has fixed the FM code and reverted the WiFi, should work like a charm now.

http://www.mediafire.com/?hfsp92fo1fpccos

When will we have the wildmonksed version? :D

You choose WM's kernel for better battery life. Anyway if you want a better performance try setting a higher clock speed in SetCPU or choosing ondemand or performance gvernor...... but this will also drain faster your battery......
[Nexus One Android Development] mtw4991:
Ummm...had a problem last night that I've read about lately. Went to bed and left SystemPanel on to check sleep usage overnight. Woke up and the phone was frozen, had to pull the battery. 1st time that happened while sleeping?

Running Wildmonk's 2.6.35.4_975mV_AVS_BFS_AXI_720p-1228MHz with SetCPU set to 128/1075 and 128/499 while sleeping. I ran a cat /proc/kmsg in terminal but didn't save it. Prior to that all was very very stable.

Any thoughts?
[Nexus One Android Development] fitsnugly:
I had that problem running the 950mV CFS. Upped to the 975mV CFS and haven't had an issue since. I dunno what to suggest except try out the CFS version?
[Nexus One Android Development] Latentk:
Another update, I tried to use the 975mV SVS CFS 827 and sure enough the phone never did turn on this morning. I already reverted back to 819 950 SVS and now I plan to flash back up to 950mV SVS 827. Still no AVS for me :(
[Nexus One Android Development] damanrico:
Try setting the minimum to 256. Maybe your phone can't handle 128.
[Nexus One Android Development] poochie2:
I can confirm that even in my phone (stable@900) setting a minimum of 245 will slightly enhance signal reception, ATM that's my minimum.

PS: A question to the other testers. Can you say by your tests that at the same voltage different frequencies (at idle) won't count significantly for power consumption? I have certified that in desktop and notebook cpus it's like this.
[Nexus One Android Development] ChronoReverse:
Quite honestly the margin between 128MHz and 245MHz seems pretty slim on my device. At most it's 2.(something high) mA versus 3.(something low) mA on idle but that's so small that it could simply be statistical variance.

I'll reset my Screen Off profile to 245MHz for a day and see how it goes.
[Nexus One Android Development] poochie2:
At what voltage?
[Nexus One Android Development] ChronoReverse:
I used to use the 900mV AVS builds (my n1 can take the low voltages without issue) but have recently started to use the 925mV SVS builds (where the 900mV SVS voltage table consistently sets the voltage at least 50mV higher than what AVS would set) so I wouldn't have to keep bugging WM for custom builds.

The power draw doesn't seem to be significantly different despite that and I'm now of the opinion that people should just use the 925/950 SVS builds simply to avoid trouble that provides very little benefit.
[Nexus One Android Development] Latentk:
Comparatively I have seen much better battery time from svs.
[Nexus One Android Development] ChronoReverse:
That's quite possible because if AVS sets voltages too low to support things like the radio, it can lead to higher power draw despite lower voltages. The same thing can happen with SVS except the fixed voltages in the tables are higher than what AVS can push down to.
[Nexus One Android Development] navillos:
Hey monk I still like you 34.2 kernel better. Can you make me a no720p version of this.

2.6.34.2_svs_bfs_no720p_1113mhz.zip

its the kernels made on 8/6
[Nexus One Android Development] damanrico:
Wildmonks, I've been running 2.6.35.4_SVS-950mV_CFS_AXI_720p_1113MHz_082710 since the moment you released it.

Strangely enough my phone is still up and running without any freezes. Once it seemed like it was going to crash, my phone wasn't really responsive while I had the screen on, touching the screen didn't do anything. But after like 10s it worked again. So could have as well been an app that made the phone crash.

5 days seem more than enough to say that my phone seems to like the new 950mV kernels on the latest CM nightlies. Do you know any logical reason why my phone seems to be able to handle 950mV as of now? Did you remove any pershoot tweaks that were in older versions, or something else that could have any effect?

I hope I don't jinx myself by posting this, but I'll keep you updated if something wierd happens. Until then you don't have to create me a custom kernel, as it might not be needed anymore.
[Nexus One Android Development] zhamrock:
I have similar issue, however, both latest 925 and 950 doesn't work for me. I'm running cm6 final using ADWlauncher. Same discussion exist on the CM6 final thread if in case you need more info.

I have also attached the logcat here just in case someone had a chance to review it.
[Nexus One Android Development] ilos:
I've the same issue with the original kernel of CM6, so the problem is not the kernel.

This issue happened to me after a night of idle.
[Nexus One Android Development] zhamrock:
hmmm, that's strange, i don't get this issue on the CM6 stock kernel. Have you raised this issue then?
[Nexus One Android Development] ilos:
I think it's probably a app or a widget...this morning , i getting a FC on setcpu... and phone no responding during 10/15 sec...

Also, i getting some FC on market and map each time i reboot or put off and put on the phone...

I Will do a list of my apps and check which one can do that....
[Nexus One Android Development] choikugi:
Hello Wildmonks,

I am using your lastest kernel for Evil rom and I found out I can not connect to hidden network. I guess it happens because of issue certain version of bcm4329 has... Can you make kernel for evil room which hidden network works.

Thank you Wildmonks
[Nexus One Android Development] ilos:
Ok found why i getting FC on some apps : TA utility ....

Move all cache to SD and you get for sure FC on Maps and Market..

I will check tomorrow morning if my N1 will freeze after the night of idle...
[Nexus One Android Development] uoY_redruM:
Yeah I'm wondering as well if you can update your kernel for Evil's ROM :)
[Nexus One Android Development] choikugi:
Everything works like a charm except hidden network while I am using your kernel for Evil rom.

Your kernel is amazing.
[Nexus One Android Development] SimFox3:
bump

i refuse to let this thread dieeeeeeeee =P
[Touch HD Themes and Apps] HC4Life:
uZard Web P is a mobile web browser. It allows users to experience the same web surfing they do with PC.

uZard Web P shows the fastest performance not only on 3G or 4G networks but also on 2G and 2.5G networks. As long as the devices have the access to a network, users can experience the same web surfing and multimedia contents through uZard Web P just as they do with PC.

uZard Web P is optimized for use on a broad range of mobile devices and networks.

uZard Web P

- shows same screen as you see in your PC’s.

- is the fastest mobile web browser.

- supports Flash content.

- works independently of chipset and technologies.

- doesn’t require high processing power.

- takes smallest data traffic.

- is a small size application.

- is easy to customize and converge.

Here's a video and the cab:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9DRc9wB080&feature=player_embedded
[Touch HD Themes and Apps] accountabc:
Cool, a new browser. I'm going to try this browser for sure. I'm wondering how fast it is compared to Opera 9.7 and Opera mini 5. Thanks Pekas :)
[Touch HD Themes and Apps] mamarda:
with this browser I cann't access my facebook account, I cann't write in password field.
[Touch HD Themes and Apps] fwt:
Looks promising. very fast.
[Touch HD Themes and Apps] r_9:
Just tried this new browser, am wondering now why it's layout is so similar to Mach5?? They're of over 99% alike of each other except their name...!!???:confused::confused:

And they seem to be using the same kind of web proccessing...ie, loading though their server then send to end-user.

Anyway, both Mach 5 and this can load webpage extremely fast. The most important thing is that uZard is free while Mach 5 is NOT. :p
[Touch HD Themes and Apps] Sp1tfire:
uZard is great, runs better than any mobile browser i used. I was using Skyfire before, but uZard is better. I only wish they release a WVGA version, they only have vga/qvga for now :(
[Touch HD Themes and Apps] ladieslova:
WVGA, possible?
[Touch HD Themes and Apps] pan757:
First impresion , excellent web pages flash support, real fast , poor YouTube videos with no sound for me.. Totally very very interesting..
[Touch HD Themes and Apps] miancule:
Use VGA (works for both 400x800 and 400x640)... and always read the smallprint :)..
[Touch HD Themes and Apps] fwt:
I can confirm it's running fine on a Touch HD.

Though there is no "fit to screen"-zoom like in Opera .... i like it.
[Touch HD Themes and Apps] laubong1:
Why they look so smilar, may be they just the same software, just look at their folder structure, and execute file description, I can say they are 100% same.

What I am interest to know is the propose of "Logic plant Co, LTD", why they turn a payware into a freeware let people use.
[Touch HD Themes and Apps] r_9:
yes, that's what I'm wondering now. In fact I paid for using Mach5, but now I see this new browser that is almost 100% the same....:(

Anyway, both are much faster, in term of webpage randering, comparing to opera and skyfire. But still, it cannot copletely replace opera or IE mobile. Especially when doing some kinda e-banking or paypal or anything alike.
[Touch HD Themes and Apps] brutaled:
Will this work with the HTC HD Mini?
[EVO 4G General] OShocke:
No Really i did i traded my poopy little hero to radio shack and they gave me a evo 4g BEST DREAM EVER till i got up and saw my hero sitting there..

Anyways.. i got my hero in Jan.. is there anyways i can get this phone without paying the hefty 500 dollars for it?
[EVO 4G General] timothydonohue:
yeah. pay your way out of the contract, then get a subsidized version, lol
[Nexus One Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] svntsvn:
anyone know how to fix the location? I cannot get a data network fix on maps or other apps. this has been and issue with the last 2-3 roms including froyo.
[Nexus One Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Blueman101:
I was just wondering if anyone knows how to change the default color scheme on a stock android Nexus One 2.1? You know how yellowish orange is used for everything, loading bars, selecting options and many other things. Is there anyway to select a different color for this job?
[Nexus One Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] djmcnz:
No, you can't select a colour because they're all images. About the best you can do is replace them all. Most (all?) of them are in framework-res.apk.
[Nexus One Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Devastatin:
and to replace those, you have to unlock =|
[Nexus One Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kitsunisan:
You'd also have to dig into your launcher and replace colors there. Its really not hard to do, I modded my framework-res.apk with files from a desire rom, then adb pushed them to where they needed to be. The launcher, whichever one you use, will have to be resigned, though.
[Nexus One Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] 3Shirts:
So I did a full wipe and then installed Rodriguezstyle FroYo rom (http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=692609). It was fine but I missed too many CM features and NeXTheme.

I did a wipe, reflashed CM5.0.7.1 and then restored my nandroid (+ext). Now I cannot get the device to boot!

I can get into bootloader and thought I should replace the radio as I know the FroYo one is a problem in non-FroYo roms but while it copies ok, when installing it says FAILED (remote:image update error)

Please please help me. Give me steps to do to get back to a clean CM5.0.7.1 and I can sort the rest out!

UPDATE: Fastboot won't let me flash anything! I am unlocked though!
[Hero CDMA Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] regaw_leinad:
Hey guys, I don't have my linux box here in Seattle... Can someone repack a boot image for me? And I don't want to set up a VM tonight. Please if someone can help me out tonight, that would be great! Working hard on something.
[Android Apps and Games] robertmacnair:
Hi all,

With the new release of Maps (in which they've created a separate navigation app), is there a hacked apk anywhere that opens it up to the world and allows you to use navigation wherever you are?

I live in Jersey which is generally considered part of the UK, and navigation is not available in my area.

Any ideas?

Thanks.
[Android Apps and Games] Brut.all:
Yeah, at the same place as always:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=630887
[Android Apps and Games] robertmacnair:
I feel like a complete idiot. I'm usually the one who tuts and sighs when I see people making comments like this!

Thanks fella, much appreciated.
[HD2 General] denraweb:
Ok so I tried installing a few roms and I'm not happy yet. Here's what Im looking for if anyone wants to help me out with finding a rom like this.

I'm looking for something that has the stock tasbar (where start is on the top and not the bottom like most roms i see). The other thing Im looking for is one that will say "3G" and not "H" or "E" or "G". So far they say "E" or "H", no "3G". Looking for something like Kumar's Rom. Was an awesome rom, very quick, but had an "H" and no "3G". Does anyone know of any that work?

My phone is hspl 2.08 (downgraded from 2.10) so it's ready to go, I just need to find a suitable rom. The only reason I want a new rom is because my phone is somewhat sluggish compared to some roms I have seen and used. Other than that, theres really not another reason. I like the way the stock rom looks and it has grown on me, so i don't want to make too much of a change.

Anyone have any suggestions that they know work? Thanks.
[HD2 General] skr_xd:
If want it that much badly:D, i shall provide you a cab when iam back home;)

Regards
[HD2 General] MadCow809:
Try out Josh's rom, it's very stable.
[HD2 General] denraweb:
That would be awesome. I loved the kumar rom, just that "H" and "3G" thing bugged me...
[HD2 General] Nibbley15:
My ROM has them all, 3G, H, E, Etc.

Just so ya know,

Thanks.
[HD2 General] rsmurdoch:
doesnt H represent a faster connection then 3g?
[HD2 General] xtralongleave:
Yes it does, and to the poster: Why does it matter if you have an H in your status bar??? If anything, it's something to be proud of! There's certainly people here that would LOVE seeing an H in their status bars...

As far as the Start menu in the top instead of the bottom: I recommend the latest 21905 build of the Energy ROM

Good luck
[HD2 General] palosjr:
i second both of these... what is the big deal, other than user preference, its not like it does anything extra, just switches icons when the connection type/speed changes.

I am using the latest NRG ROM and its fast, stable and while i download the version with CHT included, i just use titanium. I like sense and all that to be there just in case i get bored though :rolleyes:
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] chris664h:
I have just recently got an G4 xda exec, fully unlocked and i have upgraded to TML 8.7.1 and i have also got a 3 sim, but when i put my 3 sim card in the device it says that it is an orange sim

I have tried with my other sim card and that is perfect but it is not a 3g sim so i really want 3g to work

Any Ideas ???
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] -Jonny-:
Have you run the Connection Setup? I can't remember if TML871 has built one in his ROM or if it's auto-run. Either way, if you run it again, you should be able to select 3sim instead of orange.
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] chris664h:
Trying that now, it did have that setting, and i have not tried that one before

EDIT: I have tried to do that, it still says orange and when i go into the connection setup it says error with the database