yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Touch Pro2, Tilt 2 Windows Mobile General] jontp2:
Yea, seems like this is a problem all over. When I try to link a contact to a facebook profile the list of profiles I am given to select from bears no relation to my actual list of friends. Most of my friends are on there but not all, some have pics & some don't, I have old FB contacts who I have since deleted & even have 1 guy I have never heard of & has never been on my friends list.

There is a hotfix on the htc website but tried to install it & it comes up with "this hotfix is not compatible with your device"

I've been trawling to try & find a fix but there doesn't seem to be one & very little mention of the TP2.

Anyone else have some input??
[Touch Pro2, Tilt 2 Windows Mobile General] Jackos:
Smells like a ROM issue. Did you try with the official or a different cooked one?
[Touch Pro2, Tilt 2 Windows Mobile General] jontp2:
Hi Jackos,

still on the original winmo 6.1 as I've got loads of software & really don't fancy having to reload everything.

Looking around it seems I'm not the only one with this kind of issue.
[Touch Pro2, Tilt 2 Windows Mobile General] jontp2:
It gets worse.

This morning I tried again, logged out of facebook via my contact card & then went to log back in. I now get "connection failed" each time I try to connect.

FB is working fine on the app & via opera etc & I've got no probs with email etc so it's not data connection or signal.

This is def confined to HTC integration of FB bugt I can't use the hotfix they have posted because it claims it is not suitable for my device!!

Any help would be much appreciated.
[Desire Themes and Apps] andy1120:
I upgraded Google Maps to 4.2, it works over WiFi but when using 3g it consistently fails to recognise the data connection. Am using a stock generic Rom. Anyone know of a solution?

-------------------------------------

Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App
[Desire Themes and Apps] andy1120:
Re: Google Maps 4.2 problem

Reinstalled 3 times and it worked till I rebooted :-(

-------------------------------------

Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App
[Hero CDMA General] VirusZer0:
Between DamageControl, Aloyious, ZenEXP, and Fresh 2.0D, which ROM has the best overall battery life, I need to test it. Took my phone to sprint because I fully charged, and unplugged and it shot straight to 75%, then died in 2.5hrs. I then charged it for 2hrs and unplugged, straight to 14% low warning, then in 3 mins on NO USAGE, it game me the 9% warning, so which is best on battery

Thanks In Advance,

Tee Jay
[Hero CDMA General] kyouko:
Sounds like its a physical battery problem to me. Otherwise, personally i've only tried DC and Fresh. Both have great battery life and ultimately, it just came down to preference between the two for my decision.

on a side-note...don't think this belongs in this thread.
[Hero CDMA General] VirusZer0:
Sorry if this is in the wrong place, i felt like it belonged here because it is a ROM question. Sprint tested the battery, all seems well...said its probably because of my "setup". he said go back to original and see if its better, if not he will replace it. But i dont want original, I want 2.1

thanks,

Tee Jay
[Hero CDMA General] aggie6600:
None of the roms I have tested killed the battery that fast. The worst was 6 hours with Fresh Toast 2.0b and that has been fixed. You have a physical problem with the phone or battery. Never believe a Sprint rep.

-------------------------------------

Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App
[Hero CDMA General] jUgGsY:
Yeah.. That's definitely not a ROM issue. Get your battery/phone replaced.
[Hero CDMA General] VirusZer0:
Okay, well I have just put DC back on and I will see what comes of it. About how long should my phone last using moderate texting, maybe 2-3 short calls and about 65% time w/o signal (happens when I'm at work, cant use airplane mode because of my children)?

Thanks,

Tee Jay
[Hero CDMA General] jUgGsY:
It should AT THE VERY LEAST get through a work day. Even when I was using Fresh Toast 2.0b1 with the 100% awake time, I would get to the end of a 7 hour shift at work, albeit, it was at about 18% when I got home.. But thats with the phone being awake for 8 hours straight.
[Hero CDMA General] VirusZer0:
Hm, alrighty, ill run through tomorrow at work with DC on it, and ill post back

Thanks a lot, I really appreciate the input!

Tee Jay
[Hero CDMA General] brokentoaster24:
dude, i stopped reading once you said "took my phone to sprint"... i would love to see them react to having custom roms installed
[Hero CDMA General] f16pilot:
Damage Control Battery Usage

I've been using Damage Control ROM with PRL set to CDMA auto. I use the phone for sending and receiving texts/phone calls all day. I check Facebook periodically and I do searches on the internet throughout the day. To give you an idea of my battery statistics for the last 23 hours (off charge):

Up Time:22:34

Awake Time: 1:29

TWS: 0%

Current battery level: 50%

Needless to say, I'm happy with my current battery usage.
[Hero CDMA General] TheBiles:
Yesterday after 15 hours I still had over 30% remaining using FreshToast 2.0b2 with SetCPU on "performance."
[Hero CDMA General] subcypher:
Have you tried calibrating the battery?

1. Charge it to full.

2. Boot in recovery.

3. Select wipe.

4. Wipe battery stats.

5. Use phone until it dies.

6. Recharge phone to full.
[Hero CDMA General] spiritcrusher33:
Or get a extended battery and not worry bout it. :-)

-------------------------------------

Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App
[Hero CDMA General] redtxstar:
i have the extended battery.. and I barely get a day out of mine with fresh 2.0d. And most of its time is spent in standby.. It was fully charged when I went to bed last night.. and was almost dead when I woke up... 12a to 9a..... the extended battery lasts about as good as the standard, IMO
[Hero CDMA General] notasimpleway:
I am gonna take a guess and say it was 9.95 and from Hong Kong.
[Hero CDMA General] jUgGsY:
There's definitely something wrong with that picture.. If you had it fully charged when you went to sleep, and nearly dead in the AM.. I would say that you've got either 100% Awake time OR A ****ed up battery..

I've went to bed with the phone off the charger at 100% and it was down to maybe 85 when I woke up 8 hours later.

EDIT : Stock Battery, and at that specific time I think I was running IceRom, or DC2.07.2..
[Hero CDMA General] tstack77:
Makes sense, all kids are terrified of airplane mode...
[Hero CDMA General] spiritcrusher33:
lol regardless of roms etc even with my seidio 3500 mAh extended battery with heavy heavy useage i can still make it 10 hours np.. with light 2 days np.. u must have one of those cheap ebay batts. that are between 1500 mAh and 2000 mAh..lol
[Hero CDMA General] redtxstar:
Nope, I got the seidio one. My husbands phone has the same seidio battery.. but 1.5 and he says his works great.. so, hell maybe its something Im doing. I did just update to the latest fresh 2.1 rom, so we'll see.

It did seem to last longer while roaming, though.. I have a airave at home, but not at the farm... and it lasted well over a day while roaming.
[Hero CDMA General] VirusZer0:
YEah actually, my new born daughter is scared of airplane mode since she was 6 weeks early, spent 3 weeks in west penn NICU and got sent home on a monitor because she has bradycardia and respiratory distress. So just go somewhere else, because ur not needed here if you are just going to poke fun at my post. I'm looking for mature suggestions, which is what these forums are for, people to ask questions and other ppl to give INTELLIGIBLE responses.
[Touch Pro2 CDMA] Tregrad:
when i soft reset my phone it comes up with a window that says "cannot start voice command try reinstalling etc."

how do i fix this?
[TG01 Themes and Apps] Pere:
Do you know Dropbox? Yes? No?

If yes:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=6099133#post6099133

If no:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=600226

One of the best apps seen in the last months!

Now is still beta. Try it and comment!
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] iamodogg:
So.. with Nexus One's Activsync integration, there was an option "accept all ssl"

With my incredible, it does not have that option (that I can see).. Therefore with a custom certificate from my company's security team, I constantly get warnings for the certificate. Very annoying and prevents me from syncing well.

Thoughts? Solutions?

Please move this to appropriate forum if I'm in wrong place. Thanks in advance.
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] deekjx:
I allowed me to chose SSL. From in your Exchange Active sync do the following:

Menu -> More -> Settings -> Account Settings

Scroll down to below the password or you can close the virtual keyboard and you should see it.
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] iamodogg:
Thanks for your reply..

However, that option just says "This Server requires an encrypted SSL connection"

The old version had an option to accept all SSL Certificates.

This means, a custom signature coming from a very large technology company's, very extensive IT security team, will be accepted in any way shape or form.

Alternatively, if the certificate is "not from a trusted authority", then you get the warning over and over and over and over.. whether you accept it or not.
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] socalracer:
my company is using a godaddy cert, it works fine. i tried setting it up for a client who has 07 exchange and a cert, but its not a well signed one, it wouldnt work at all. so not that it is the best solution but u could get a godaddy cert for yourself.
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] seanmcd72:
What is the warning? Do you know if they have their cert setup correctly?

I'm currently using the Touchdown app and using SSL. I haven't seen any warnings.
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] iamodogg:
Touchdown will work fine. The certificate is obviously custom-built. We are a 60k employee company. They are not going to change the very for the limited android users.

Again, the 2.0 OS had a feature built in that allowed you to choose to accept all certificates.

Thanks for the work around/alternatives. Still hoping for a fix.

-------------------------------------

Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] socalracer:
i had a clients incredible and it just wouldn't work, they were using a self sign certificate and exchange 07. i tried every setting i could, even after the software update1. yesterday i was determined to get it to work so i searched and searched. It just keep saying it couldnt authenticate. From what I found a couple things could work.

What I did:

I opened the browser and went to the company owa site. https://mail.company.org/owa, then onces there I could log in. I logged in as the user and it asked me to accept the certificate so I did. Then I was able to get into the users box. Then I added the exchange activesync account next and it work with one minor change in the domain field ( i just erased it). Form what I understand the autodiscover service on IIS needs to be running and working. Not 100% sure, but I got it to work so its worth a try.

What I tried, but didnt work:

Several sites said as long as you are connected to the network, but don't have internet then so the setup and it will continue. Then once it is setup then plug the internet back in and it will ask you to accept the cert and u just say yes. the option which you are talking about no longer looks available. Again its worth a try

Hope this helps
[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] seanmcd72:
Yeah not sure what the OP means by "Custom Cert" as it's either a valid cert from a trusted CA or it's self signed. Nothing in between. I don't know why a company with 60K employees though would not have a valid SSL cert though...

Look at the cert properties and make sure the server name you are using on the phone matches the name on the cert exactly (if you haven't checked that already). This is the "Issued to:" field...
[General Topics] Darkzy55:
should i get a HD2 or a Desire?

i want ease of use.. very fast browsing.. youtube facebook..

and most importantly decent data usage (as i will only be getting 500mb data rate)

cheers for any help
[General Topics] orb3000:
Both are great devices, look here

All will come to a desicion if you preffer WM or Android and that is a personal taste.

On my personal opinion I stay with WM:cool:
[General Topics] galaxys:
Yep, depends on your priorities with WM or Android. Test drive them in the store! For me it's Android!
[General Topics] djteotancolis:
HD-2 is a gr8 phone
[General Topics] Darkzy55:
...

i have decided from watching and reading a lot of reviews and also from experience from wm6 that i will be getting the HTC Desire the o.s looks better and the specs preeeety much the same

also andriod is quicker from what i can tell out of the box as i do not want to flash any other roms

thanks for the replies

:)
[HD2 General] TitanXT:
Hi everyone new here. I am having some issues with getting my GPS to work properly.

I have noticed that if I use my phone without a sim inside then the GPS locks on pretty quick.

However if I put my T-Mobile sim insid and try getting a lock on the GPS it does not work, it keeps saying locating GPS in digital compass or seeking satellites in google maps. I have tried updating GPS satelite using quick GPS too but that didn't help.

So basically the GPS works when there is no sim inside the phone but doesn't when there is a sim (T-Mobile sim) inside the phone.

Does anyone know what could be the problem and how I can get it to work with the sim inside the phone?

Phone details:

My phone is running on the generic 1.66.405.2, ROM from the HTC website. I also HSPL2ed it as it was on the Tmobile rom. However the phone is still locked to Tmobile UK.
[HD2 General] TitanXT:
PS. I also downgraded the ROM to version 1.48 stock but still had the same issue with the GPS.

Anyone have any insight as to what I am missing here.

Any help appreciated.
[Nexus One General] harsaphes:
Hey guys..my friend who hooked me up with my original N1 gave me an HD2 and another N1...when I put an ATT sim in it I get the ATT logo for service and I also have 3G. My question is what model phone do I have?

thanks.
[Nexus One General] jblazea50:
if you get 3G with the N1 with ATT sim, then it is the ATT branded one; it wasn't made specifically for ATT (i believe it was made for one of the Canadian provider), which is compatible with the ATT 3G

btw, you have a great friend to hook you up with 2 N1 and a HD2; you should hook me up with one:D
[Nexus One General] harsaphes:
thanks for the quick reply...and yes, she is a great friend.
[Nexus One General] ChillRays:
Future wife ;)
[Nexus One General] pjcforpres:
No, the N1 that works on AT&T was made specifically for AT&T.

The HD2 that works on AT&T was made for Telstra... or you are thinking of any 3G phone made for Rogers.
[Nexus One General] ztm.000:
You're both wrong? The Nexus One was made and sold unlocked, it has the bands 850/1900 which at&t and some canadian providers use, not specifically made for one carrier or another
[Nexus One General] pjcforpres:
https://www.google.com/phone/choose?hl=en&gl=US&s7e=

http://www.bing.com/search?q=nexus+one+for+at&t&src=IE-Address

How am I wrong? The AT&T compatible Nexus One was approved by the USA FCC, with the specific intent of it being sold as the AT&T compatible Nexus One. It does happen to work with other carriers, just as the T-Mobile version works with other carriers as well.

But there is no reason they would pay the money to get it approved by the USA FCC if it wasn't being sold specifically for AT&T customers.

As well, the Nexus One is made and sold unlocked with the option of T-Mobile 3G bands or AT&T 3G bands... those bands happen to work with other carriers as well, such as T-Mobile working with a Canadian carrier as well, just as AT&T works with another Canadian provider, plus both phones work with any carrier outside the North America... so was the T-Mobile version made for O2? Was it made for Vodafone? No, it was made for T-Mobile, just as the AT&T banded device was made for AT&T, and just happens to have carry over support for other carriers.
[Nexus One General] RogerPodacter:
maybe you are not aware of how the FCC testing process goes, but there are phones that are never even sold in the USA, like euro phones, or phones from the far east, that still go thru FCC testing, yet they dont even have the proper bands for the USA 3G networks.

so the nexus one was not specifically made to be released for ATT. i dont know where you're getting that info.
[Nexus One General] diversificationied:
You're confusing "compatible" and "designed for".

Carrier 1 uses Frequency X

Carrier 2 uses Frequency Y

Just because a phone that works with frequency X doesn't mean it was created solely for carrier 1.

GSM is an "open" network unline sprint's and verizon's CDMA networks.

Take "world phones" as an example, they work on Carrier 1 and 2, but it wasn't designed specifically for either.
[Nexus One General] Jack_R1:
There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING HW-wise in Nexus that is carrier-specific.

Nobody makes a phone for a specific carrier, carriers only brand phones. Phone is made for a range of networks, and Nexus has 2 options, basically - because it utilizes 1 of 2 chips, either QSD8650, or QSD8250, and those are adjusted for different ranges (specifically 850/1900/2100 or 900/AWS/2100). On the Google choice screen, read: "Compatible with XXXXXXXX".

There's 2100 coverage in most of the world, so both versions of Nexus can be used outside Americas and have a high probability of getting 3G signal, since they both support it. In Americas the common system appears to be 850/1900, though.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_UMTS_networks
[Nexus One General] pjcforpres:
I am not confusing anything. The Nexus One with AT&T 3G banding was made with the purpose of fulfilling Google's desire to have a Nexus One with AT&T 3G banding. Or, in other words, they made it to be the AT&T version of the Nexus One. Hence, there being hundreds of news articles and even threads on this very site using the termonology "AT&T version".

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=AT&T+nexus+one&aq=f&aqi=g10&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=

Also, from Google's official statement on the matter:

"starting today, an additional version of the Nexus One is available from the Google web store that is compatible with AT&T's 3G network. This new model can be purchased as an unlocked device without a service plan."

http://www.tgdaily.com/mobility-features/48920-google-touts-att-compatible-nexus-one

Why would they announce that they now have a version that works with AT&T 3G if it wasn't meant for AT&T?
[Nexus One General] diversificationied:
At&t uses those bands, those bands do not belong to At&t. That's the difference.
[Nexus One General] androidlicious:
The way to tell if your phone is the T-Mobile or AT&T version is by looking at the part number on the back of the phone.

P/N: 99HKE002-00 for the T-Mobile version

P/N: 99HKE007-01 for the AT&T version

Hope that helps!
[Nexus One General] pjcforpres:
I understand what you guys are saying, the Nexus One wasn't made specifically for any carrier, and that isn't what I am saying or did say. What I am saying is that they did actively think about which 3G bands were included in the device... and decided they wanted to make one with AT&T banding as well, and when they released it they announced they had just released their AT&T 3G compatible Nexus One, and thus it seems fair to say (and not a stretch of words, unless we want to be anal about it), that Google made it for AT&T... perhaps saying "Google made it for AT&T's 3G network" is more complete and better, but that is a potential meaning from my original statement and so forth.

And technically AT&T owns the rights to those bands in the United States. Since you like to be super specific and technical with your semantics, figured I would add that in.
[Nexus One General] diversificationied:
They own their towers, they don't own the bands of gsm technology, those are licensed out to them.

Yes, google made a concious decision to make that phone compatible with at&t, but that's not the same are making the phone FOR at&t.
[Nexus One General] petard:
Well it was also made for the Canadian and some South American carriers. People in the USA will call it the AT&T version, people in Canada will call it for whatever carriers they have.
[Nexus One General] RogerPodacter:
I think he is maybe not quite into the world of cell phones as some of us are, so when you look at it from that perspective you would think that Google made it "for ATT." That's not really the case though.
[Nexus One General] pjcforpres:
I am just baffled... You don't think AT&T owns the rights to use the frequencies they are running on? Why does the FCC auction off frequencies then? Who are they auctioning them off to? What is being auctioned off? Nothing? Is it just a big sham?

And FYI, GSM and CDMA can run on the same frequencies, there is not point to even mentioning that they don't own those bands of gsm technology... the technology aspect is whether they decide to use gsm or cdma to broadcast over those frequencies, it has nothing to do with buying gsm specific.

Also, it is fair to say, like I already explained, that they made the AT&T banded device for AT&T in that they actively decided to make a Nexus One that works with AT&T. Sure, semantically speaking, it isn't perfect... but based off what Google themself said at the launch (We are proud to announce the AT&T compatible version of the Nexus One) it is easy to see that was their driving force, not Telstra.
[Nexus One General] Jack_R1:
Dude, I guess you're one of those that don't ever read what others write, and definitely don't open links.

Go to the previous page, open the Wiki link to the list of UMTS networks, and look carefully at the "Americas" section. What will you find there?

Ah, yes. ALMOST EVERY CARRIER IN YOUR HALF OF THE GLOBE IS USING THOSE FREQUENCIES.

Then, perhaps, you should think again, why did Google choose the frequencies as they did. Or actually, you might understand that the only thing Google chose is Qualcomm's CPU to power the phone, and this CPU just "happens" to come in 2 versions, each supporting different bands, one optimized for Americas and one for Eurasia, both including the world's most common 2100MHz band (the choice of band support can be seen in any device using Snapdragon chipset, as far as I've checked). AT&T happens to use the same bands as 80% of Americas' providers use, so?

Maybe now the "driving force" is a bit clearer.

Oh well, wasted enough time trying to explain the obvious.
[Nexus One General] pjcforpres:
So you think it is obvioud Google had HTC make a Nexus One with the 850/1900 3G banding because they wanted to appease Rogers and Telstra? You have got to be kidding me. What sort of business sense does that make?

Hey, forget about AT&T and its 100 million customers, and that they are located in our home market, we want to make sure we make the Canadians and their 20 million customers happy.

I bet it is real nice to be so naive and caught up in "semantics" to believe such real world flawed ideas.
[Nexus One General] Chahk:
Stop arguing over semantics and let the OP enjoy his new N1 on AT&T.
[Nexus One General] coolbho3000:
The QSD8650 is not in any Nexus Ones (unfortunately, since Sprint and Verizon so graciously rejected Google's business model). It is the CDMA capable version of the 8250. The 850/1900/2100 and 900/AWS/2100 Nexus Ones vary only by their UMTS antennas.
[XPERIA X10 General] midnight79:
Hey there

I am using SE PC Companion and it open a windows explorer window to the SD card to browse it. I am trying to add a couple of music files to the SD card but it always come back with the Access is denied error. I am connecting via the USB cable to my laptop to Xperia X10

Can you please recommend what should I do to make it work ?
[XPERIA X10 General] wertzius:
Rightclick on the sdcard, is it write protected? Are u using a special sdcard with a little diptrigger, to set the sdcard write protected?