yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Nexus One Android Development] mindfrost82:
With the last two versions (I didn't notice it before the last 2 but it might have existed then too), I've had touchscreen issues too.

Mine are a little different. I'll have the phone off in my pocket, then I'll go to use it and I can't unlock it.

The power button will just dim the screen but won't actually turn the screen off. If I hit it again, then the screen gets bright again.

Eventually, after doing this 5+ times (or its a coincidence and it just fixes itself eventually), it'll work like normal and I can unlock it.

I've installed the last two versions of pershoots kernel and it hasn't happened on either one of those yet. I get the best battery life on IR's, so I want to go back, but I can't until this gets fixed.

BTW, I run the 925 CFS version.
[Nexus One Android Development] theloginwithnoname:
Yep I noticed this too when I tried one of the most recent releases of this kernel...
[Nexus One Android Development] watercool:
Re: [.33.5 & .34]intersectRaven's Kernel (Hybrid AVS *Stable*) 06/08/2010 09:47pm

925 cfs too here
[Nexus One Android Development] wbknox:
I fix the problem, Was other people headset.
[Nexus One Android Development] Breece:
Same problem here...
[Nexus One Android Development] intersectRaven:
Update:

20100612_21XX-22XX:

- updated to something in-between .34 and .35-rc1

- enabled SCHED_DEBUG for scheduler hacking (requested by damentz)

- increased camera clock to 88Mhz *strike that, it seems it doesn't clock to 88Mhz according to charansingh

Here're the links:

20100612_21XX-22XX:

*pulled
[Nexus One Android Development] rheza02:
IntersectRaven, is it possible to overclock camera clock to 100MHz ?, it will be great for improving 720p fps.
[Nexus One Android Development] intersectRaven:
charansingh is working on a proper fix. 88Mhz wasn't working it seems.
[Nexus One Android Development] sokar311:
BFS Stability

Hi IntersectRaven, is BFS stable at this time ?
[Nexus One Android Development] superg81:
ive been running bfs for several days with no issues at all.im also on the .34 froyo ;)
[Nexus One Android Development] intersectRaven:
I'm not sure...I've not used BFS for quite some time now. :confused:
[Nexus One Android Development] superg81:
maybe i spoke too soon.my phone wouldnt wake up so i had to pull battery.gonna have to send logcat to someone who understands it cuz i sure dont :rolleyes:
[Nexus One Android Development] superg81:
IR,it ust did it again,wouldnt wake up.im going back to previous kernel and see what happens.thats the only change ive done this morning is flash newest kernel.will let you know.if anyone wants the logcat i will email it
[Nexus One Android Development] j_r0dd:
i have the same issue
[Nexus One Android Development] superg81:
i went back to previos bfs kernel and so far so good
[Nexus One Android Development] THATTON:
If this is something inbetween .34 and .34-rc1, is the USB unmount still a thing of the past? I just want to double check before I flash this on the latest Kang-o-rama Froyo ROM. Thanks!
[Nexus One Android Development] dessanct:
Just flashed the newest kernel and USB is working fine.
[Nexus One Android Development] watercool:
Re: [.33.5 & .34+]intersectRaven's Kernel (Hybrid AVS *Stable*) 06/12/2010 10:14pm

+2 same issue
[Nexus One Android Development] dessanct:
After using it for about 6 hours, I also have the issue.
[Nexus One Android Development] www1:
+3 same issue
[Nexus One Android Development] intersectRaven:
I'm reverting the .34+ commits due to problems with long time idling causing the display to shutdown. Please revert to the previous release. :(
[Nexus One Android Development] asdahd:
IR...why cant i open the lastest link?
[Nexus One Android Development] dessanct:
Read the post right above yours, the latest kernel has problems!
[Nexus One Android Development] intersectRaven:
Update!

20100613_13XX_.34:

- reverted .35 additions due to idling problems

- enabled SCHED_DEBUG

- minimized setting of voltages when idle and asleep

- added pershoot's wfi_rate tweak

Here're the links:

20100613_13XX_.34:

BFS:

925mV -> http://www.mediafire.com/?2yjj02yzlwz

800mV -> http://www.mediafire.com/?wknmvennjny

CFS:

925mV -> http://www.mediafire.com/?idzwncimhnm

800mV -> http://www.mediafire.com/?w5mgznwdmdn
[Nexus One Android Development] hktony:
i AM CONVERTING BACK THE PREVIOUS KERNEL NOW, :D
[Nexus One Android Development] THATTON:
Why don't you just update to the one he JUST posted? ;)
[Nexus One Android Development] intersectRaven:
Must've not seen it yet. :p
[Nexus One Android Development] THATTON:
Early bird gets the worm! Downloading now. Wildmonk's latest was making my battery HOT, HOT, HOT! I am waiting to see if I was the only one... All 3 of you are doing a fantastic job with the progression of these Froyo kernels! Thanks for your hard work and dedication!
[Nexus One Android Development] watercool:
Re: [.33.5 & .34]intersectRaven's Kernel (Hybrid AVS *Stable*) 06/13/2010 02:11pm

Big thx ir again
[Nexus One Android Development] hktony:
just found have being update now ...lol
[Nexus One Android Development] schahr01:
Interesting - What's "minimized setting of voltages when idle and asleep" ?

One of the main reasons I keep setCPU around is to force the CPU to 245/245 when sleeping. Will this potentially allow me to remove setCPU?
[Nexus One Android Development] hotweiss:
This kernel keeps on getting better. I tried another kernel here in the forums, and I couldn't make it through the day. With yours, I get through the day with out problems.
[Nexus One Android Development] intersectRaven:
I uploaded a minor update in my MediaFire folder which changes a config from SCHED_DEBUG to DEBUG_FS since that the one that was requested. :)
[Nexus One Android Development] asdahd:
did IR use the CFS one?
[Nexus One Android Development] wildmonks:
Uh.. they all got updated. They're labeled as 20100613_2XXX_.34

http://www.mediafire.com/intersectRaven

(Sort by date)
[Nexus One Android Development] asdahd:
tkx man. but i dont know which is the better one
[Nexus One Android Development] wildmonks:
No problem. :) As for which is better, that will depend on you. Everyone has a different favorite. I would try them all and see which one does best for you. Personally I like 925mV CFS.
[Nexus One Android Development] asdahd:
OK. thats what i choose.
[Nexus One Android Development] wildmonks:
Lol, ok ;)
[Nexus One Android Development] RieGo:
@intersectRaven: I get huge battery drain with the newest kernel (20100613_13XX_.34) while in standby. Everything was alright with the one before (20100612_21XX-22XX).

Take a look at the attached Battery Graph Screenshot. At about the red line I flashed the new kernel and the phone was almost the whole time in standby.

Anyone else experienced this? :confused:
[Nexus One Android Development] Chahk:
Same issue. My Cell Standby has skyrocketed to 40%, as opposed to ~18-20% on previous CFS-925mV kernel versions.

[Edit] Just noticed 20100613_20XX_.34 version was uploaded recently.
[Nexus One Android Development] RieGo:
Yes, I think Wifi and Cell Standby increased, but is this everything? I's really a massive drain...

The new version AFAIK only switched a debug option, so it shouldn't really have an effect on battery. But I'm not really sure about that.

edit: Seems like it's Wifi-Connection which drains the battery. It's the number one consumer in my bat-status. (2nd=display, 3rd=Cell standby)
[Nexus One Android Development] pesho00:
today i have installed

20100613_13XX_.34:

BFS:

800mV -> http://www.mediafire.com/?wknmvennjny

And from 10 am to 10 pm i lost 5% from battery :eek:

now it shows 95% which is enormous success, thou i was not using it a lot - Sunday is a day for outdoor activities:)
[Nexus One Android Development] intersectRaven:
For those who want to test a kernel tweak which *should* improve battery, I uploaded a TEST kernel on my MediaFire folder. Please post your results. :)
[Nexus One Android Development] rabhw:
Tried to flash your test kernel from recovery, but it won't pass the 'verifying' stage, and says the files are corrupt. I've tried re-downloading 3 times.

File: 2.6.34-TEST_AVS-925mV_CFS_20100614_0633
[Nexus One Android Development] THATTON:
Re: [.33.5 & .34]intersectRaven's Kernel (Hybrid AVS *Stable*) 06/13/2010 02:11pm

Same issue as the post above me. Installation failed.

-------------------------------------

Sent from my Nexus One
[Nexus One Android Development] adamgibbo:
925 CFS Verification failed Kernel/zImage
[Nexus One Android Development] hah2110:
I'm downloading CFS 800 TEST now... Will report back.
[Nexus One Android Development] intersectRaven:
Have you tried the fastboot method? The only thing I changed before uploading was the filename of the zip so I don't think that should cause any problems with verification. (unless it does... :p)

*if filename really does affect verification, please remove the "-TEST" part.
[Nexus One Android Development] hah2110:
800 CFS flashed fine...
[Nexus One Android Development] adamgibbo:
I think the zImage is broke...not sure why though...?
[Nexus One Android Development] THATTON:
Removing the "-TEST" part still fails verification. It says zImage/kernel corrupt installation aborted. I will have to fastboot flash it when I get home.
[Nexus One Android Development] morhimi:
+1

the BFS is fine
[Nexus One Android Development] morhimi:
that Battery Graph Screenshot is from an app in the Market?
[Nexus One Android Development] intersectRaven:
So CFS is the problem? I'll reupload. :)

*Finished reupload. Please try again. :)
[Nexus One Android Development] adamgibbo:
Just CFS 925...800 seems ok
[Nexus One Android Development] THATTON:
Yeah, the 925 CFS. Let all of us impatient peasants know when you are finished. Thanks. ;)
[Nexus One Android Development] adamgibbo:
Ahh that's better :)
[Nexus One Android Development] wildmonks:
Yah, its this app:

http://www.androlib.com/android.application.com-modroid-battery-Fz.aspx
[Nexus One Android Development] adamgibbo:
You tried JuicePlotter?...its quite similar
[Nexus One Android Development] Chahk:
Market comments on this app are not encouraging: "Sometimes CAUSES battery drain, as well as measures it!" :confused:
[Nexus One Android Development] morhimi:
tnx, I'll give it a try
[Nexus One Android Development] wildmonks:
For me IT DOES cause battery drain haha. I uninstalled it right away. Maybe good for battery testing purposes.
[Nexus One Android Development] schahr01:
Thanks - I know you're extremely busy applying changes, building, packaging new kernels but what changes went into the TEST kernel that you think may help with battery usage? If you're waiting for feedback from testers before announcing and updating the releaselog that's cool too.
[Nexus One Android Development] adamgibbo:
Try JuicePlotter...it's by Latedroid the guy who does JuiceDefender

Plus theirs a nice widget that shows how batts left in hour/mins :)
[Nexus One Android Development] schahr01:
Hope it's just an anomaly in the data received over the wire but symantec endpoint protection blocked the access to mediafire.com when i tried to d/l a TEST kernel... Anyone else see something similar?

--

Traffic from IP address 38.114.196.10 is blocked from 6/13/2010 8:33:59 PM to 6/13/2010 8:43:59 PM. [SID: 23093] HTTP Malicious Toolkit Variant Activity 2 detected.

--
[Nexus One Android Development] hah2110:
CFS 800 TEST sucked for me. Going to try BFS 800 now, BFS is now fully stable and should still yield the 1%/hour, right

?
[Nexus One Android Development] wildmonks:
As a kernel maker I found a fairly technical way to monitor battery drain. It maybe something you guys want to try.

It requires you to have the adb command (Android Debug Bridge).

Use the following command to see the kernel messages:

adb shell cat /proc/kmsg

In the log you'll see lines similar to this (this line appears every minute or so):

batt: 89%, 4089 mV, 265 mA (-21 avg), 35.6 C, 1214 mAh

Looking at the number in parentheses, a negative number (in this case -21) means the battery is draining. A larger negative number means a larger battery drain. Conversely a positive number means your battery is being charged.

I found this method to be a nice quick way to see how much the battery is draining at any given moment in time. This enable me to test different kernels quickly to compare battery drain.

I believe OSmonitor in the market can also access the kernel messages but I remember it being kinda buggy when I used it in the past.

edit: Forgot to mention, when your battery is fully charged, you won't see any change in battery stats. It will take some time until you do. This method is probably best when at 95% or lower...
[Nexus One Android Development] adamgibbo:
@wildmonks

Cool post...that's really useful :)
[Nexus One Android Development] wildmonks:
No problemo ;)
[Nexus One Android Development] 2000impreza:
Just flashed the most recent "Test" 925mv CFS kernel (2.6.34-TEST_AVS-925mV_CFS_20100614_0633). If I have time, I'll try to post tomorrow evening if I notice any difference. Previously I was running a older kernel from several weeks ago. I haven't kept up with the most recent .34 kernels.

I find IR's 925mv CFS kernels have worked best so far. I've been running various revisions of this hybrid kernels for months now. Its provided a nice balance between battery life and performance for my usage patterns.
[Nexus One Android Development] THATTON:
The 925's are MUCH BETTER on battery life!!!!!!!!!!
[Nexus One Android Development] MaxiJavi:
Small problem ...

I have a small problem ...

Wifi always seems to turn off when I go into standby (?)

If this a Froyo thing or is it the kernel ?
[Nexus One Android Development] rjhay22:
Try going to settings > wireless settings > wifi settings > hit menu > advanced. > wifi sleep policy > set it to never sleep.
[Nexus One Android Development] MaxiJavi:
Wow thanks !!

No wonder I couldn't find the setting :-)
[Nexus One Android Development] rjhay22:
Fixed? You're welcome :-)
[Nexus One Android Development] SimFox3:
Audio Hack

Guys,

Some while ago there was talk about someone making a version of IR kernels without the audio hack, did this ever happen?

I love IRs kernels'; not ranting/complaining, it's just that both my car audio bt AND plantronic bt sound terrible (too loud) when using IR kernels, but sound fine with stock (froyo) kernel. I'm forced to switch kernels everyday when evaluating : battery life vs bt sound quality
[Nexus One Android Development] MaxiJavi:
Yup, Thanks again.

Scroll down, wildmonks does a 925CFS without the audio hack.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=693375
[Nexus One Android Development] Paraglider1982:
How does this wifi rate tweak work?
[Nexus One Android Development] hah2110:
Traditionally not for me. But 800 BFS TEST SUCKED. Lost 23% overnight in 7 hours and cell standby was 87% no signal.
[Nexus One Android Development] mtw4991:
I use OS Monitor from the Market and it polls the exact same stats from "Batt". The only problem with either method, adb or OS Monitor, is neither one tells you What is using the juice. Anybody got an app that tells usage by application?
[Nexus One Android Development] theloginwithnoname:
Me too - and filtering dmsg for "batt" gives you just those lines.

+1
[Nexus One Android Development] MaxiJavi:
I thought that is what "Settings/About Phone/Battery Use" was for ...

I get applications in there too.
[Nexus One Android Development] wildmonks:
Ooooh! I gotta check out OSMonitor again then. Thx :)
[Nexus One Android Development] hah2110:
What is the change in the TEST version that is supposed to help?
[Nexus One Android Development] watercool:
Re: [.33.5 & .34]intersectRaven's Kernel (Hybrid AVS *Stable*) 06/13/2010 02:11pm

Test kernel works fine for me

925cfs.. No bugs, freezes etc...
[Nexus One Android Development] cuban88:
froyo kernel

can someone please tell me how to find froyo kernel.. link says deleted file.

thanks
[Nexus One Android Development] watercool:
which link?

did you try this?:

http://www.mediafire.com/intersectRaven

and then sort -> date
[Nexus One Android Development] 2000impreza:
Just a quick update on kernel 2.6.34-TEST_AVS-925mV_CFS_20100614_0633. I haven't noticed any significant improvements in battery life. The battery lasted about 9 hours before needing a charge. This is on 3G connection constantly, a couple hours of browsing and a few short phone calls. Seems like its on par with previous .34 kernels. Has anyone else noticed improvements in battery life using this kernel?
[Nexus One Android Development] intersectRaven:
I observed this and also noticed no change in drain. Thanks for testing everyone! :)
[Nexus One Android Development] wildmonks:
Raven, when you get the chance, can you check your private messages? Gotta question regarding the power_collapse tweak.
[Nexus One Android Development] intersectRaven:
Minor update has been posted to my MediaFire folder. This reduces the amount of memory in order to allocate it to the camera. This is mainly for charansingh's mod. :)
[Nexus One Android Development] asdahd:
THX, i will try this at once
[Nexus One Android Development] hah2110:
Weird. I'm on 925 test CFS and things were going good yesterday and last night. Around 10:30pm I pulled it off the charger at 100%+ so I could leave it overnight and get a good standby test. From 10:30-12:00, I used it a lot, dropping it to 93%. Then I didn't touch it. 93% ran for about 70 minutes and then it started dropping 2-5%/hour. Woke up 7 hours later and it was at 69%.... Nothing interesting in Spare Parts or Battery Use. WTF?
[Nexus One Android Development] intersectRaven:
Another minor update has been uploaded! This time I was just bored so I decided to merge the scheduler and cpu governor updates from the .35-rc to .34. These should be safe to integrate. :)
[Nexus One Android Development] hah2110:
What was the change that should have favored battery life in the TEST kernel?
[Nexus One Android Development] intersectRaven:
Something in the power_collapse function. Anyways, it's been proven to have no effect so it hasn't been committed in my master branch. :)
[Nexus One Android Development] hah2110:
Interesting. This is the only .34 kernel (the TEST one) to do any benefit for me. As you recall, I only had luck on the 800mv .33.3 kernels. This one was great until I went to sleep. Any ideas what could have happened?
[Nexus One Android Development] sir*mez:
You happened.

Well the new .34 kernel on your mediafire is a soldier. So far so good its been taking a beating. Ive been browsing and using it for more or less than 3 hours and I'm on 90%. Great progress so far.
[Nexus One Android Development] mindfrost82:
Which version? 925/800 and CFS or BFS? Also, you using the TEST one or the 6/15 one?

I want to go back to IR but I can't have the screen issues that I had with the other ones.
[Nexus One Android Development] THATTON:
He has his latest revisions up at his mediafire folder. He downloaded the one from a few hours ago so most likely the latest one.(20100615_2230 and _2241)
[Nexus One Android Development] rjhay22:
Mediafire doesn't wanna work for me right now. Grrrr
[Nexus One Android Development] tamarian:
re: 2.6.34-TEST_AVS-925mV_CFS_20100614_0633 I actually noticed a great improvement in battery life. After 16 hours, I'm at 52% with 2 hours of display time, 16 hours standby with 24% signal loss. Battery drain is less than 1% per hour when not used. This is with under clocking to 806 with setCPU.
[Nexus One Android Development] sir*mez:
925mv CFS. I don't use any other.
[Nexus One Android Development] intersectRaven:
Google seems to be starting the creation of a .35 branch in the official experimental android repositories. If ever, I'll be releasing both .34 and .35 when they release an msm branch for it. :)
[Nexus One Android Development] Kolyk:
The kernel version 2.6.34_AVS-925mV_CFS_20100615_2230 As well prolongs battery operation, as well as 2.6.34-TEST_AVS-925mV_CFS_20100614_0633 ?
[Nexus One Android Development] intersectRaven:
Minor update posted again. Changes are:

- resynced with official android repository

- integrated several commits by cyanogen on his android-msm-2.6.34 branch
[Nexus One Android Development] anwoo:
Can this be used on a htc magic?
[Nexus One Android Development] sir*mez:
No it can not. Nexus one only.
[Nexus One Android Development] fleebailey33:
why dont people use the 800 just wondering?

And seems like people perfer the cfs over bfs, just wondering why.
[Nexus One Android Development] watercool:
cfs vs bfs: not a big difference in performance, especially @ froyo i think. cfs is more stable

800 vs 925: with the 800 my connection switches from 3g to Edge on and on, therefore 800 will use more battery for me (someone did a study and the conclusion is that 925 might use less battery in this case).

925 cfs is just stable und uses less battery vs 800 bfs which is more for "playing around and see if it works" i think.

i'll give the 800 bfs a try next time and see if something changed.. if not, 925cfs is the "emergency exit"

afair IR himself uses 925cfs
[Nexus One Android Development] rjhay22:
There has been a conducted test comparing 925mV and 800mV (non AVS) kernel trying to figure out which of the two gives out better battery life, the 925mV supposedly came out ideal. I personally think when it comes to battery savings the 800mV (AVS) is still better, it just doesn't run as smooth as the 925mV.

People prefer CFS coz its the stable version.
[Nexus One Android Development] wsrider:
im running 5.0.8 test 5 and cfs isn't stable for me. while playing robo defense i always get a random reboot. bfs is stable and doesn't cause any issues for me. Ive run 925 and 800's. 800 seems like it gives me better battery life. 1% a hour standby and phone lasts at least 12 hours and i use it pretty heavy for internet ect. i have good coverage in my city.
[Nexus One Android Development] MaxiJavi:
"TEST" release seemed to work for me ...

Hi,

I have upgraded to the latest 925CFS from MediaFire, and I am pretty sure that the "TEST" release that I was running for the last few days gave me better standby.

What was that "TEST" release about ?
[Nexus One Android Development] mezmer1ze:
I've tried the 925mV CFS kernel from 14.6. but it sucked the power like hell.

Lost 28% over night (~ 8 hours), pulled from charger before I went sleeping.

Found out that phone idle sucked the same power as cell standby and the dialer was the app sucking most power. I've used original kernel (usually ~ 1-2% per hour of standby) and didn't install anything before I tried this kernel
[Nexus One Android Development] hah2110:
My CFS 925 from 6/15 had the same problem....
[Nexus One Android Development] MaxiJavi:
OK, so it isn't just me then :-)

The TEST release was 20100614_0633

So I'll got back to either that or the 20100613_2053
[Nexus One Android Development] 2000impreza:
I've been using 20100616_1006 for about a day. Haven't noticed any battery drain issues with this kernel. Has anyone else tried this kernel?
[Nexus One Android Development] MaxiJavi:
Not battery drain issues as such ...

Just doesn't work quite as well as TEST for me.
[Nexus One Android Development] watercool:
everything ok here, hard to say if there is a difference to the test kernel. (even harder if you flash every kernel immediately lol, so you have only 1 or 2 days to test...)
[Nexus One Android Development] dnsmo:
i am using kang-o-rama froyo rom, can I still use the IR kenel?
[Nexus One Android Development] dessanct:
Of course! and I'm using 616_1006 since it's release and I think the stable version has a better battery life.
[Nexus One Android Development] PrawnPoBoy:
I've been running the 925 BFS kernel for weeks on Cyanogen and I've never had any instability and it feels snappier than any other kernels that I've tried. The responsiveness could very well be all in my head, but the stability certainly isn't. Everyone should try it out.
[Nexus One Android Development] vegetaleb:
My observations:

Intersect CFS 925 + Enom Eclair Rom= screen off 1% every hour, screen on 1% every 3 minutes.

Intersect CFS 925 + Froyo Rom= screen off 2% every hour, screen on 1% per minute