yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[G1 Android Development] digitallysick:
Edit: I used setCPU and selected nexus one, and about 690,mhz, so far so good, much better improvement. Hope its safe
[G1 Android Development] ctso:
http://bit.ly/cDEt6Q

Put that on your sdcard as setcpu.txt and pick 'custom' instead of Dream/G1/Sapphire/MT3G in SetCPU
[G1 Android Development] oMszKikiIzWavyo:
I Have Am Using A Theme On Super D, Can I Flash It Over That As Well?
[G1 Android Development] hscheema:
I just flashed this for Super D ...

#digitallysick

You need to follow the instructions "[Rom Cookers]128Mhz to 780Mhz Kernel's Source... thread".
[G1 Android Development] digitallysick:
EDIT: Customs frequencies unreadable or badly formatted, I had to copy paste the file above and turned off wordwrap, then saved
[G1 Android Development] Boomgawd:
FastTEST 2.3

Can someone confirm if the CPU Frequency patch posted will work on fasttest 2.3 or only 2.2.9?

Just wondering before I try out this new exciting rom..

Boom.
[G1 Android Development] acidwashg1:
testing on superD 1.8 --- set to moderate 600MHz max speed, I don't want my phone to explode as I use it everyday and most of the time it stays close to my **** :D

/system/bin/custom_init

echo 245760 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_min_freq
echo 600000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq

will report back on stability and noticed speed improvements in a few days
[G1 Android Development] Pfeffernuss:
I don't think it works... Installed it on SuperD's Rom, selected Custom Frequencies, set to 660 max and 660 min, so far so good.

System Info shows 660 BogoMIPS but when benchmarking the exact same or worse values occur as when using stock 528Mhz. No difference at all, usually it's even slower...
[G1 Android Development] sourcesociety:
As I and a few other people were saying in the other thread, this mod appears to do absolutely nothing. :/

When I used it, other than the frequency shown in SetCPU and in terminal, there was nothing to indicate that my phone was any faster. The benchmarks I made were also on par or worse than before using the patch.
[G1 Android Development] yukkio:
+1 Same here.
[G1 Android Development] Pfeffernuss:
Yup, just tried BenchmarkPi, same thing. No improvement, what-so-ever. 550/660Mhz same results :D

Shame though, was really wanting to try this hack on SuperD (which is already FAST by itself).

Patience, patience... :cool:
[G1 Android Development] kraftey:
Same result as above. Good ol' placebo effect (as noted in the other thread) :)
[G1 Android Development] Dyonas:
What's this placebo you speak of and where can I get one? Is it really that good?

*tries to look sincere while posting that*
[G1 Android Development] oreoOozZz:
Pretty sure its because the .txt file was messed up, had some spaces in some of the mhz scalings.

I fixed it and uploaded it again, try it out now.

http://la.gg/v/m2e6897c4.txt/

Rename setcpu.txt and place in root of sdcard, choose custom in setcpu.
[G1 Android Development] oreoOozZz:
Its running fine for me, just applied everything and checked BogoMIPS. Running at 778 mhz.
[G1 Android Development] Z҉A҉L҉G҉O̚̕̚:
Is there a way to get this, or any other overclocked kernel, without the 10Mb hack?
[G1 Android Development] Pfeffernuss:
Sure, that's not the issue. Does it ***DO*** anything, that's what matters... :cool:
[G1 Android Development] oreoOozZz:
Good luck, everybody is 10mb hack crazy.

In my honest opinion, a lil. Makes things a tad snappier. Apply it and see for yourself, could just be my imagination.
[G1 Android Development] Pfeffernuss:
Have done. Now with the "new" setcpu.txt. Does... not... do... a... thing!

Just run some *benchmarks* and see for yourself. The fact that thinks look/appear snappier says nothing. It's all in the mind.

I also "think" it runs fast(er) now. However, it does not. Not a single app to prove it. If there is a difference it *worse*, when using multiple benchmarks.
[G1 Android Development] mclarenfung:
why

Use it on super 1.8

But the muilttouch will not work on browser............
[G1 Android Development] Pfeffernuss:
Where's the results?

Ran "Benchmark" with some frequencies:

550: 111, 161, 102, 33

660: 115, 160, 105, 32

780: 106, 151, 106, 33

Okay, now where are yours? As you can see, it does *NOTHING*.
[G1 Android Development] Z҉A҉L҉G҉O̚̕̚:
I see. So my journey continues.

The animations and some apps like RockOn feel snappier, but I wanted to test the overclock settings with some thing like Armaggedon Squadron or Home Run Battle 3D but now I can't even play those with the 10mb hack.
[G1 Android Development] oreoOozZz:
Did i ever say it does something and i had proof? Did i ever mention anywhere that i was going to post results/benchmarks?

Chillax Bra.
[G1 Android Development] oreoOozZz:
Im sure something will come up soon though, usually it just takes a few to make different versions (CFS with/without ram hack, BFS with/without ram hack). Hang in there.
[G1 Android Development] djluis48:
Its this a flasheable boot.img? or i have to resign or something...?
[G1 Android Development] Z҉A҉L҉G҉O̚̕̚:
Ok. It just that the overclock + 10mb kernel doesn't make sense. It's like overclocking a badass cpu and expecting Crysis or Photoshop to run well on intergrated graphics.
[G1 Android Development] zeppelin481:
Just playing devil's advocate...I have OpenEclair overclocked right now (yes, I know it's a different ROM but stay with me). When i set to 528,600, etc and run a live wallpaper it is slow and choppy. When I set to 780 it runs smooth and fast. That's proof enough for me. Do I run my phone at 780? NO, because I like my battery life and I'm not trying to see what happens long term (the battery temp jumped a good 10 degrees celcius). Hell, I don't even like live wallpapers. Just making a point for the non-believers.

Ryan
[G1 Android Development] Klyentel:
Well I have noticed a small increase in performance....not as much as everyone expected and got all excited about....but enough to notice. Pages are transitioning faster, browser loading quicker, dial pad/call log snappier(almost seems to stay in memory once opened)

but other than that.......no biggie. I mean super d 1.8 was fast as hell anyway,:D so of course Im not noticing any groundbreaking speed increases, but I will say things have changed

Im running a custom setting with a setcpu.txt on sd....780/128min although, the highest it ever reached was 600. I think thats the stable frequency for the G1....it probably could go higher but I haven't seen it do so yet.
[G1 Android Development] Dyonas:
The best example for me would be Gallery 3D. I'm running xROM so I don't know if I can use either of these and I lack the know-how to make one for it myself.
[G1 Android Development] domenukk:
You mean the new gallery? You do know, that 2.x roms still don't have 3d accleleration though?
[G1 Android Development] linuxluver:
Works *great* on Fastest 2.2.9

I restored my Fasttest v2.2.9 backup and flashed this over the top. It's *awesome* having a fully-fuctional ROM - *everything* working...and running like a mad, crazy, on-fire bat out of hell at 780MHz. I know the benchmarks don't show it, but I know what I'm seeing and it is most definitely not a placebo effect.

It's *fast*.
[G1 Android Development] eugene373:
Thank you For Confirming Real Life Test's... :)

I honestly think they Called it a Placebo effect, Since I was the who released it, & we all know how much I'm liked atm lol :)..

Really glad people are including this in there build now :)
[G1 Android Development] ttabbal:
I flashed the superD version on 1.8 and it seems to have broken Compcache. It can't load the module anymore. Could just be me, but before talking about things being faster, we should make sure they are equal. :)
[G1 Android Development] ultra spikey:
+1

ten char
[G1 Android Development] zachattack052:
i can see how people don't think this is true, if you are running it on super d, but if you run open eclair with out it, its anything but stable. also i do see a small difference in super d but its not as big as the difference that i saw in open eclair.
[G1 Android Development] linuxluver:
Has anyone tried the Fasttest patched kernel with Fasttest v2.3?

If not, I'm about to....
[G1 Android Development] linuxluver:
Well done!

As one who has donated money to you via PayPal, I know you do good work.

Maybe you care a little too much about what people think. That's something for you to fix. Cyanogen gets as much bashing from various quarters...and doesn't seem to care or let it disturb him. Maybe Buddhism will help....if only from the peace-of-mind, non-religious acceptance and "off-a-duck's-back" side of it. It's basic message is "Don't sweat the small stuff...and it's all small stuff."

Your work is awesome. I'm going to be donating again for this overclocking work you've done.
[G1 Android Development] oreoOozZz:
Yayse.

ten char
[G1 Android Development] eugene373:
Yeah I care too much I guess... But, Can't knock a fault that got me into working on android :)

As always Thanks to all the Donation from everyone :)

Back on Topic..

Just flashed this Rom ( Been to long since I've tested other build )...

Have to say, it's one of the cleanest rom's I've seen.. Good Job man, It's a Great & Fast :)
[G1 Android Development] bkmo:
Yup, same with the fastTest rom. I cannot load the ramzswap module.
[G1 Android Development] zachattack052:
thank you.. iv been waiting for the 780mhz patch for supper d
[G1 Android Development] protomanez:
Will this make games not lag o_o'
[G1 Android Development] Boomgawd:
Me either

No more compcache here either.. I would love a patch for fasttest 2.3 with ram hack and compache working..

carlospants, where are you? ;)
[G1 Android Development] bkmo:
Just go back to the original 2.3 kernel because the overclock kernel does NOT overclock anything (but it does cause a slight speed increase). Eugene has admitted it himself, and is working on a real overclock solution.
[G1 Android Development] digitallysick:
So if this overclock is fake, then does SetCPU actually work when set on the defaults, or when settings are changed? Or is that fake as well?
[G1 Android Development] Kutttt:
Yeah to give you an analogy it's like taking a car with 300,00 miles on it, changing the miles back to 0, fixing up the exterior and polishing it up then selling it as a brand new car. Fake.

I would just wait for a stable build that is really clocked at 780MHz and I'm sure they're bound to come out in the next few days. I'm sick and tired of the patching BS.
[G1 Android Development] sxfx:
Link is broken :(
[G1 Android Development] Pfeffernuss:
Does not matter. It does not work at all so don't waste your time :D
[G1 Android Development] Ace42:
Why do you guys keep calling it a placebo effect or saying its a hoax?

The numbers might seem a bit odd since they increase in a strange pattern that dont match the PLL, but I trust him enough to know this is no hoax.The benchmarks I have tell me different, I only went up to 580 and it was faster than 528.
[G1 Android Development] Pfeffernuss:
Maybe because it does not do anything?

Sorry to burst your bubble but the developer himself has already said it does not work... :p So who to trust now, right?

Good for you! Then please by all means keep using the (non-functioning) hack! :D If it works, it works (but alas it does not).
[G1 Android Development] Klyentel:
Chill out dude...if people say it works for them, then it works for them, nuff said.

You dont have to go around from thread to thread posting how it doesn't work and its fake and blah, blah, blah.

What are you? An overclock spokesperson?

Yes we all know Eugene admitted it may have a bug or two, and is technically not fully functioning as it should....that doesn't redeem it useless though,

And I don't see the developer running around telling people don't use it cus it doesn't work, simply because it does no harm to anyone, if anything it does increase speeds, Even Eugene will vouch for that.

If it were that serious dude, the dev would of posted a warning thread letting everyone know not to screw around with it.....

just like the eclair roms, they are not 100% G1 stable, and there are broken sources in every build, even Cyans,

but that doesn't stop anyone from using them and posting their positive feed from it now does it?

Ok, then...let it go, i bet my bottom dollar you probably using it right now yaself, but you won't admit to it, because none of us could ever prove it anyway.:rolleyes:
[G1 Android Development] Pfeffernuss:
Well no, because lots of people are STILL asking for "correct" setcpu.txt files and so on. And others are STILL saying that it works. Which is rather misleading for somebody without the time to stroll around ALL these forum threads. As long as people are saying it works I do not find it strange to correct them.

Sure, but those people are not to be taken seriously when "evaluating" anything. They are noticing things which aren't there.

Sure I *have* used it. Was very anxious to try it out as I also overclock my PC's all the time. But (extensive...) testing resulted in a zero percent speed increase. When I mentioned that ***I*** was doing something wrong. Well, no, the people who are having "noticable" speed increments are wrong. It's as simple as that.

Right now I'm using a stock SuperD 1.8 with a nice theme. At 528Mhz, so at exactly the same speed as a 780Mhz tweaked version. Very fast also :D
[G1 Android Development] o2cool:
so Pfeffernuss does everyone look small from the pedestal your sitting on?
[G1 Android Development] aaraya1516:
thoughts on SuperD

I tried both SuperD and FastTest. Both were faster than CM on benchmarks (I know it's synthetic and not real life). I also benchmarked with and without the patch. CPU did increase but memory decreased, I also noticed that with the superD patch there is no ram/compcache, I think if you enable that the RAM benchmark should come out at least the same if not better.

That's just my input. I think it works, there just needs to be tweaking in terms of compcache and swap/ram. Keep up the dev.
[G1 Android Development] Z҉A҉L҉G҉O̚̕̚:
You mad
[G1 Android Development] bchalk:
Have you done any testing and found empirical data to show any improvement or are you just name calling?
[G1 Android Development] xillius200:
Lets say for example you tune up a car by 10mph you could hardly see any differences on the benchmarks however when speeding 10mph quicker you could notice it by a great deal.

Now what makes this so different?

as long as your mind thinks it is quicker or it actually does appear quicker then who cares why not use it :)

If you can't see a difference don't have a go and start a fight just say i can't see a difference flash your rom back and leave it at that :)
[G1 Android Development] Firerat:
make a 10 meg file

dd if=/dev/urandom of=10meg bs=10 count=1024k

uninstall/disable your current cpu OC apps

you may also want to turn off data sync

one 'loop' will take around 10 min ( bit less )

for cpufreq in 128000 245760 384000 528000 550000 560000 570000 580000 590000 600000 628000 650000 660000 670000 680000 690000 700000 728000 750000 760000 770000 780000
do
echo $cpufreq > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_min_freq
echo $cpufreq > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
#for loop in 1 2 3 4 5
# remove # from above and delete line below to loop 5 times at each freq
for loop in 1
do
BogoMIPS=`grep BogoMIPS /proc/cpuinfo|cut -c 11-|sed s/\ //g`
time gzip 10meg 2>&1|sed s/^/gzip\ loop$loop\ $cpufreq\ $BogoMIPS\ / >> cpubench
time gunzip 10meg.gz 2>&1|sed s/^/gunzip\ loop$loop\ $cpufreq\ $BogoMIPS\ />> cpubench
done
done
echo 528000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_min_freq
echo 245760 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq

now take a look at cpubench

cat cpubench

you may like to filter, e.g.

cat cpubench|grep gzip|grep real|less

use <space> or ball to scroll through ( q to quit )

not going to say that this is the best way to test performance, but you may find the results interesting

if needs be I'm sure we could come up with a script of formula instead of gzipping random junk
[G1 Android Development] oreoOozZz:
I think you should edit the original post and replace it with coolbhos thread confirming it doesnt work, sorry to burst everyones bubble. I was believing it too so no hate from my side, just rather people have the facts.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=631810
[G1 Android Development] xillius200:
That sucks but howcome it makes open eclair 1.1.4 live wallpapers better used to freeze at 528 but at 780 it is smooth (im so confused - going to crawl in a hole untill i find the answer)
[G1 Android Development] oreoOozZz:
Hmm, maybe it does something in that matter? Im not sure, im not ruling anything out just posting the truth thats been proven i see. =)
[G1 Android Development] JMVI:
2.9 error

patch causes fc's on fastTest 2.9. Had to perform a full wipe and reflash to fix it. Can you change the patch or .txt file for FT2.9 please (:
[G1 Android Development] Ace42:
Your not missing anything since this doesn't work, it uses numbers but the phone is still at 528MHZ even when you change the slider....
[G1 Android Development] JMVI:
aww guess I can't change the frequency to 700 for this rom atm ): oh well.
[G1 Android Development] :
*Triple face palm*
[G1 Android Development] reserek123:
lol its funny how everyone said they saw a speed boost. i new it was a hoax when my hero roms were still slug speed oh wait i mean turtle speed:)
[G1 Android Development] treperio:
superd overclock, don't work in the new 1.10, i fhash it and the phone loop...

maybe because the 1.10 have a different kernel...
[G1 Android Development] vegaman:
Did you read this thread? It doesn't work.

Mods, can this thread be locked?
[G1 Android Development] lolmensch:
it isnt really overclocking. just pretending to be overclocked. there was a real test and no difference if it was made with 790 MHz or 528MHz...
[G1 Android Development] domenukk:
580 could be faster...

Whatever
[G1 Android Development] lefeudedieu:
Sorry

I do not speak English too, but here is a test done by myself :

Bonjour a tous

Alors j'ai donc fait les Test ci-dessous,sachant qu'il sont fait avec la FastTest 2.3 LFD-signed overclock et que ceux-ci changent,de pas grand chose selon la ROM,a vous d'en tirer les conclusions

BenchmarkPi :

384Mhz=17974

550mhz=14222

780Mhz=12962

Benchmark :384Mhz 550Mhz 780Mhz

Graphic :90.13/ 105.25/ 111.66

CPU :123.50/ 125.71/ 167.29

Memory :106.57/ 107.21/ 107.32

System :29.71/ 32.01/ 32.85

CpuBenchmark :

384Mhz=4761

550mhz=4402

780Mhz=4281

Benchmark Setcpu :

384Mhz=891

550mhz=683

780Mhz=589

LFD constate que les valeurs sont différentes d'une fréquence a l'autre et les ecarts entre 384 et 550 sont pas si loin que l'ecart entre 550 et 780 detail la température de la batterie augmente aussi,vous pouvez télécharger ma ROM et son plus pour overclocker et peu-etre envoyer vos conclusions ou celles faites avec d'autres ROM approprié a l'overclockage.Les trois softs sont téléchargeable gratuitement sur le Market.A chaque changement de fréquences,j'ai rebooté + Taskiller car aussi non les indications seront pas correctes.

Cool

with my Htcclay SuperFast JitHack by Lfd :

http://forums.smartphonefrance.info/viewforum.php?f=42

384Mhz=770

550mhz=546

780Mhz=475

_________________

DREAM White

Radio : 2.22.19.26I

SPL :haykuro's + Recovery-RA-dream-v1.6.2 blue

Rom :FastTest/SuperFast Jit Hack by LFD

SD :class 4 4Giga 128/512/3giga
[G1 Android Development] ttabbal:
The explanation that makes the most sense to me is that the kernel is constantly trying to push the CPU faster so it ends up at 580Mhz more often. You can get the exact speed boost some people saw from locking the CPU speed at 580 without the hacked kernel. So it did make a difference for some people, but those same people can get the same results by switching the auto-speed stuff off. It sucks the hell out of the battery, but whatever.

It also required a reboot and our phones ALWAYS work better right after a reboot. Particularly if you use Compcache or Swap. People were not waiting long enough to really tell.

Also, hoax implies malice/intent. This was a mistake, not a hoax.
[G1 Android Development] Meltus:
I'm pretty sure your test has just contradicted every other test done on the subject.

As far as i was aware, all you were doing with these hacks was tricking your phone into thinking you've overclocked it higher, when it actual fact you haven't.

Kinda like the screenshots of the Nexus running at 5GHz lol :D

I could be wrong though.
[G1 Android Development] domenukk:
The guy that made the hack in the first place said, 550 and 580 were possible. everything higher has just been a mistake by him.

(after that, he was never seen again and deleted his twitter :eek:)
[G1 Android Development] JAguirre1231:
He's been seen, I've talked to him. I fear contacting him via the old ways, will yield no results as almost all traces of him have been erased.
[G1 Android Development] Mardenator:
just flashed FastTest.. might flash this over it later..
[G1 Android Development] protomanez:
This is bogus. Please READ before gravedigging.
[G1 Android Development] jad011:
we have gone through all of this before, none of these patches will ever work for the g1, stop flashing them
[G1 Android Development] dumfuq:
wrong thread.
[G1 Android Development] ivanmmj:
Closed Thread.

IT HAS BEEN CONFIRMED THAT THIS IS BOGUS, KEEPING THE ORIGINAL CONTENT AROUND FOR HISTORICAL PURPOSES
[General Questions and Answers] alvinchin:
how to flash omnia i900 to wm 6.5? any link for tat? thanks
[General Questions and Answers] orb3000:
Searching is the key:eek:

http://xdaforums.com/filter.php?cat=Samsung

Also check the Wiki
[HD2 Windows Mobile 6.5 Themes and Apps] GibranLv:
I connect to the internet through 2g to save battery, but if i leave the phone lets say 20min on standby it losses conection to the msn server how can i stop this from happening?? need help plz
[HD2 Windows Mobile 6.5 Themes and Apps] Fif23:
Interested as well
[HD2 Windows Mobile 6.5 Themes and Apps] radzi:
I assume that you are talking about Live-Messenger. I have the same problem, and when it disconnects I wont re-connect until softreset. I dont know why, older versions I used to leave online all day.

I whish we could find a solution, I need to leave it online without cuts.
[HD2 Windows Mobile 6.5 Themes and Apps] ahmet11:
same problem here..
[Touch Pro2 CDMA] o2spartan:
I download the Sim unlocker for my Sprint TP2. I already have MrXRom on it and am trying to unlock the Sim. I paid for it ID: 9367070711336653R and when I try to run it I get the error code that says: The application failed to initialize properly (0xc0000135). Click on OK to terminate the application. What am I missing:confused:?
[Hero CDMA Themes and Apps] notasimpleway:
I can't seem to find an app that does this. Can anyone help?

I'd like to know which apps use my internet connection.
[Hero CDMA Themes and Apps] darchstar:
If you look at the permissions each app has when downloading it, it will tell you whether it needs an internet connection or not
[Hero CDMA Themes and Apps] gomorrah:
And if you've already downloaded it, you can check in Manage Applications. Click on the app and it will tell you.
[Hero CDMA Themes and Apps] notasimpleway:
Thanks guys!
[G1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] heffercow:
ok so ive hade my g1 for about almost a year now and the camera is really starting to piss me off.

when i first got the phone it was loaded with a dev phone mod from cyanogen 3.something i believe. anyways when i first got the phone and used the camera it had options for different settings, light filters (day,night, incandescent, fluorescent, etc) and pictures effects (B&W, sepia, etc). later i found this site, started updating rom files and changing themes and whatnot. ever since then the camera options went bye bye.

anyone know of a way to get these settings back? or anyone know of any apps that do the same thing?
[G1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] supremeteam256:
Just about any camera app. And if you flashed cyanogen's rom right you wouldn't lose the camera app.