yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Hero, G2 Touch Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] johnsongrantr:
if you have a task killer add these to the ignore list

HtcIQAgent

IQRD

OMADM

Touch Input

com.coremobility.app.vnotes

i've had zero issues with my task killer and getting sms's and such

also go and update your preferred roaming list (prl) in;

settings>about phone>system updates>update prl
[Nexus One Themes and Apps] yingwai:
Hi there,

I am user of N1, and I am seeking for a workable HTC_CIME that works on this device. As i see, there were already a mod on HTC_IME English KB. However, I am a Chinese user and seeking for a Chinese one for daily use.

I would be grateful if anybody may help. Really thanks!!
[Nexus One Themes and Apps] jonasl:
I hacked one together really quickly but it seems seriously buggy. You could give it a try if you want tho.

What's not working at all is the English (QWERTY) input. It doesn't draw itself correctly. I have no idea on how to fix that. Switching to Chinese input seems to work. I looked up a Chinese sign and entered it successfully. I have no idea what I wrote since I don't understand the language...

Maybe its unusable, maybe not. It's at least something :)

http://www.mediafire.com/file/y3um2am3cwo/HTC_CIME_buggy.zip
[Nexus One Themes and Apps] maddie:
+1 here..

i missed HTC_CIME!
[Nexus One Themes and Apps] ericchik:
This is HTC_CIME made for HERO 2.0.1. Hope it can helps you.:)
[Nexus One Themes and Apps] yingwai:
This has been tried already and cannot use on N1
[Nexus One Themes and Apps] dtwrain:
anybody can work on this please??
[Nexus One Themes and Apps] yingwai:
Hope there will be a mod for N1
[Nexus One Themes and Apps] bug666:
thanks man, works fine. apart from the following problems:

1)When switching to landscape mode the IME crashes.

2)The list of alternative/(possible)following characters is a bit misplaced so you can not see them all or click the arrow to show more (happens when using kbd/phonepad too)

when using the qwerty kbd or phonepad:

3)sometimes the key turns black afterit was pressed, sometimes the whole input area turns black, even tho the keyboard is still there and accepts new input.

4)ZhuYin/CangJie/PinYin/Stroke input do not work at all.

maybe you can tell us what exactly you did so far, so other people can fix the remaining issues ?

i think top prio should be issue 1) and 2)

apart from that the handwriting works quite well
[Nexus One Themes and Apps] dtwrain:
I found one here that claims to be HTC_CIME.apk rip from a Dragon rom. But I get FC when I try to run it. Maybe one of the Devs can help?

http://alldroid.org/download/file.php?id=1051

from this page: http://alldroid.org/threads/14373-What-s-next/page3

I've been scouring everywhere (both english and chinese sites) and can not seem to find anybody who has made this hi-res HTC_CIME available
[Nexus One Themes and Apps] maddie:
seems we need the HTC framework to get this working.. anyway to port the htc framework on Desire to Nexus One?
[Nexus One Themes and Apps] maddie:
another hdpi HTC_CIME

i found this on google, tweeted by @maxisma on Twitter.

still can't get it working, seems it has memory allocation problem in the dalvik vm?
[Nexus One Themes and Apps] ryusaeba:
I've noticed the new Modaco ROM by paulobrien has incorporated the new HTC_CIME for Chinese input. Anyone knows where we can get standalone version of the HTC_CIME for other ROMs? Thanks.
[XPERIA X1 ROM Development] gible:
So what would be the fastest rom out there for people who enjoy the non-leo versions?

Thanks in advance,

Gible
[XPERIA X1 ROM Development] Ollie2913:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=606799

21889_LITE

very fast, stable, & battery life 2-3days
[XPERIA X1 ROM Development] Fallen Spartan:
This is another opinionated query which is frowned upon at XDA as people will have different opinions/results depending on what they use rom for, apps installed etc causing extremely long threads with no real answer

Best advice would be to read a few of the rom threads, and try some roms. This way you find rom which best suits you!

Thread closed
[Windows Mobile Software Development] owtommywo:
Hi,

I have a question for you.

It's possible create with visual studio 2008, c# multitouch application?

If it's possible, have you a example code?

Thanks for your support

xoooox
[Windows Mobile Software Development] scilor:
Just take a look at my multitouch dll ;)

www.scilor.com/hd2-leo-dotNetCfMultiTouchDLL.html
[Windows Mobile Software Development] owtommywo:
scilor,

I have two questions:

1) why i have to create a key on register? If i don't create a key on the my HD2 not view my application how multitouch? (enable multitouch?)

2) have you create a dll on c++? If the answer is YES, why on c# I not create a ovverride the WndProc function?

Thanks for your support

xoooox

(sorry for my english)
[Windows Mobile Software Development] scilor:
1)You will have to add you program to the multitouch whitelist

2)It is in C#/Vb.net and overrides the WndProc ;)

You are able to write in any other language?! Spanish/German

Maybe try to write it "easy" in your native language and try to translate it with Google Translate
[Windows Mobile Software Development] PPCxPrt:
Download issues

Hi,

This looks very promissing!

I am interested in trying out the multitouch wrapper you created. http://www.scilor.com/hd2-leo-dotNetCfMultiTouchDLL.html

But, the download sites don't seem to work properly: Rapidshare is overloaded and the Upload.To site keeps defaulting to the premium download.

Can you post the package somewhere else?

Thanks.
[Windows Mobile Software Development] scilor:
Try to enable JavaScript and Cookies :)
[Windows Mobile Software Development] kbx:
Multihread and strong naming

Hi Scilor

I´ve tried to use jour .NET multitouch dll .. but when compiling i VS2008 i get the error Assembly generation failed -- referenced assembly 'SciLors-MultiTouch' does not have a strong name.

Researching for why it fails i found that the assembly must be recompiled with a strong name.

Could you please help ?

Regards,

Kasper
[Windows Mobile Software Development] scilor:
It should work, did you used my original dll?
[Hero CDMA Accessories] intx:
http://www.meritline.com/pqi-8gb-micro-sdhc-class6-with-adapter---p-34293.aspx?source=s2010
[Hero CDMA Accessories] 4redstars:
Meritline is an awesome site. I order tons of stuff from there (especially their 3 packs of HDMI cables, usually with coupon for 6.99)

But there shipping is quite slow unless you live close to California. or can wait for things to arrive from the Far East. (Hong Kong, Singapore, China)

The other thing is their customer service is top notch!

For just a couple more dollars you can get one from Newegg if you are in a hurry...
[Hero CDMA Accessories] illogic6:
I got a class 2, 8 GB card at my local electronics store for $17. Don't waste money/effort getting your hands on a class six because the Hero won't read it at it's native speed.
[Hero CDMA Accessories] jonnythan:
That is false, and frankly I'm damned sick of hearing that BS repeated over and over. The "class 2" thing comes entirely second-hand from some user who apparently got a note from a random low-level customer service rep saying something to that effect. Well it's not true.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=5266992

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=5064077

http://community.sprint.com/baw/message/142155

The Hero is fully capable of exceeding the read and write capacities of a Class 2 card. My Hero maxes out at about 2.5 - 3 MB/s writing to the included Class 2 card, but easily reaches 6-8 MB/s using my aftermarket Class 6 card.

Definitely, definitely, definitely get a Class 6 card, whatever size you buy. It's absolutely worth it.

Anyway, NewEgg will ship you an 8GB Class 6 card from the US for $22.95. I'd recommend that instead.
[Hero CDMA Accessories] ejqr5:
Great find! Thanks!
[Hero CDMA Accessories] etbrandt2:
Assuming you mean the Transcend card, I got it at amazon at roughly the same price after shipping...and I'll +1 that recommendation.
[Hero CDMA Accessories] lv2bll:
not to be mean or rude but the first two links dont prove anything(just more conversations) the last link with the pics was good enough though. thankyou for some HARD PROOF
[Hero CDMA Accessories] jonnythan:
They both contain actual data. If you don't believe my data without some pictures, that's not my problem.
[Hero CDMA Accessories] david_ag:
Even if that wer the case (which is not), then you try and buy stuff hard proofing it for the future, so the logical way would be to buy a class six card, which you can use when in the future you dont have a Hero anymore and do have a phone that "supports" class six.
[Hero CDMA Accessories] Las_Vegas:
Even less expensive!

Meritline has another brand Class 6 8GB for a dollar less (with shipping)! Only $18.45.
[Hero CDMA Accessories] scirio:
This is not a deal. If you think it's a deal you're new to the internet. I got a SanDisk 8GB Micro SDHC Class 6 for $18 shipped from new egg. Keep your sights on dealnews.com for micro sdhc deals.

On top of that Meritline is good but has insanely cheaply-built knock-offish type stuff. Got my sdhc card reader from them for $0.98 shipped. See what I'm saying here?
[Hero CDMA Accessories] intx:
Um.

This is class six.

For two dollars more.

WHAT A HUGE SAVINGS YOU JUST GOT OVER ME.
[Hero CDMA Accessories] badutahboy:
His was also Sandisk, that's noteworthy.

I know a lot of people have good luck with Trancend, Adata, etc... but I try my hardest to stick with Kingston or Sandisk for my SD cards.
[Hero CDMA Accessories] Tikerz:
Picked one up. Thanks!
[Hero CDMA Accessories] illogic6:
Yeah, I hear you there. These things burn out eventually though. I'm also going to bump up to a 16gig soon.
[Hero CDMA Accessories] scirio:
Well that just make me look foolish.

My point mine was not a deal, it was quite standard pricing; therefore, neither is yours.
[Hero CDMA Accessories] rdisanza:
Here, this makes it easier:

Take Your pick!!
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam ROM Development] Oliver Smart:
Hi Everyone,

I m kinda new to this as I only got the phone today but I would really like to upgrade it to either 6.1 or 6.5. Has anyone here upgraded this exact phone before? I m a bit scared of messing it up! Any pointers would be grately appreciated.

Kind Regards

Oliver
[HD2 General] JohnRG:
All of my previous mobiles were purely phones that were used for that purpose only. When I decided I needed mobile email etc. for my business a friend who had an HD suggested the HD2 and after reading all the reviews which were pretty unanimous in praising the HD2 and Sense but were very critical about WM, I decided to go for it.

Now what is puzzling me is why so many people are critical of WM? I think it's really rather good and as a business user does eveything that I would ask of it. In fact any problems I've encountered have been with sense and as far as I can see this seems to be the case on this forum as well.

I realise that in it's present incarnation WM is designed for a stylus but on the HD2 with its superb screen I don't have much of a problem using any of the native apps and of course there are plenty of third party apps around.

So am I missing something because I just can't see the downside?
[HD2 General] LordLugard:
If your introduction to Win Mobile is a device like the HD2 and the resulting user experience then you would be baffled as to what is wrong with it. But keep in mind that the HD2 is exceptional in hardware compared to EVERY OTHER Win Mo device that has ever existed, bar some exceptions.

Most other devices were woefully underpowered to handle an O.S based around a desktop style U.I, never was really finger friendly and the web browser was terrible really until Opera and the others. For me personally, Palm made Win Mobile tolerable to use as well as HTC.
[HD2 General] rjstep3:
I absolutely agree with you - I have been using WM for years, and at times have used Symbian/UIQ. I used Symbian because my operator gave me an upgrade every year and I was told that the SonyEricsson P series was the best thing for mobile smartphones.

The journalists, almost to a man, agreed with that assessment, showering praise on the P800, P900 and P910.

I do not understand it - to my mind, and for my money, WM beat UIQ unhesitatingly in terms of raw functionality and yet I groaned as I read review after review showering praise on S-E phones and UIQ, saying it was the way of things to come, while damning WM at the same time. There were LOADS of things WM could do that UIQ could not. It was the same when I looked at the ungainly and unusable Symbian Series 60 devices - no touch screen!!! It seems almost laughable now.

At the moment, the journos, who hunt in packs, have it in for WM, and they lose no time in criticising either the OS or any device that uses it.

I agree that WM has long been due for an overhaul, and Apple's iToy has been welcome competition in forcing MS either to upgrade the OS (which it looks like they are doing) or abandon it (which it seems they are not). To my mind, the HD2 just shows what WM is capable of - the best being that it is all there, now, not promiseware.

It is good to hear someone new to WM saying what you are saying - welcome to the club!

rjstep3
[HD2 General] Cass67:
Yeah these days i would agree there seems not to be a downside worth talking about .. The HD2 makes this tired os shine coupled with sense on top it looks modern and works very well .

I come from an iPhone 3G and im really happy with my HD2 and am impressed at the stability of the phone even on these cooked roms .. The 3G was getting dull and the HD2 was just what was needed.

However this was not always my impression or WinMo, i had an HTC Magician many years ago and i can say with 100% truth this was the worst phone i ever owned . If the battery ran out, and it would in a good few hours, the thing would hard reset and wipe all my data, leaving me to recover from backup, HTC issue or windows i do not know but it was bad .. , Windows was so unstable i would be rebooting the damn thing 1 or more times per day .. horrid .. There are many other faults i used to experience on this phone (phone lol) but i have blocked them out my mind for good.

I avoided windows phones for many a year deciding to use, Ericsson, Nokia, Samsung and Apple instead .. When the HD2 came out and i needed an upgrade, all the reviews i read and watched made me rethink my position .. Very happy i did :D
[HD2 General] snerkler:
I'm new to windows mobile, and have to say I don't get why it's put down so much. Sure it's taken me a couple of weeks to get my head around, and sure you may have to tweak settings to get the phone how you want it, but that's half the fun (although sometimes can cause you intense frustration). I've come from an iphone, and whilst this works better out of the box and you don't need to tweak as much, there were still things I wanted to tweak to get it just how I wanted it, but couldn't unless I jailbroke it. When I did this it was much slower at times and more glitchy. I tried several jailbreaks and they were all the same. Blackra1n was the best I found but still upset the phone.

Anyway, back onto winmo, my only negative comments about it have already been mentioned by others. It's not as finger friendly as other OS's, including sense, but it's not that bad really. And it's a little ugly, but again not that bad. The good points far out-weigh the bad imo :)
[HD2 General] freyberry:
Again trying to spread that lie?

I get the feeling that you're paid by Apple to spread this kind of FUD...
[HD2 General] Cass67:
Edited to remove response to a misplaced quote .. (it was out of place given context now above)
[HD2 General] freyberry:
Sorry, the quote was misplaced.

It is a WinCE based OS but that does not at all mean that it's slower than in any noticeable way and it has nothing to do with the ability of playing HD video.

Neither iPhone nor Android make use of any of the ARMv7 instructions in order to play HD video (and btw. the iPhone doesn't officially play HD video). Moreover, if you compare Android, Windows Mobile and iPhone OS on similar hardware, you can see that Windows Mobile is just as fast in most of the day-to-day tasks and even faster at some. And lastly, iPhone OS is much more of a memory hog than Windows Mobile, which you can see by comparing the RAM usage of both, and in addition to that, Windows Mobile has much better memory management (which is probably one of the reasons why Apple doesn't allow multitasking).
[HD2 General] Cass67:
Heh, no worries ..
[HD2 General] Shasarak:
Officially, no. Unofficially it can play 1080p video. See, for example, http://gizmodo.com/5045466/the-iphone-handles-1080p-video-just-fine

I'd have more patience for that claim if it were not self-evidently untrue. Android apps can be a bit held back by the whole Java architecture, sure; but what exactly is your explanation as to why the HTC Bravo can both play and record 720p when the HD2 can't, despite being based on virtually identical hardware? It's clearly nothing whatever to do with drivers and hardware acceleration. There are plenty of applications that offer hardware-accelerated playback under Windows Mobile. On the HD2 we get hardware-accelerated MP4's and WMV's in Pocket Media Player. On the TG01, the specially customised version of Coreplayer that the phone ships with offers hardware-accelerated playback of any codec that CorePlayer supports. And yet neither application on either phone can play 720p video at acceptable speeds.

I recall that your stated position the last time we discussed this was that a hardware-accelerated version of CorePlayer could not possibly exist (see http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=622393&page=2 posts #18 and #20); this despite the fact that it ships with every TG01 sold and that several people had previously downloaded it from this forum and run it on an HD2 (see http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=613355 ). You then went on to demand that I supply evidence in support of claims I hadn't made. Frankly, your credibility on this point is in tatters; so, can we just drop it, please? Stop trying to derail the thread.

(And before anyone asks, no, I cannot tell you where to download the TG01 version of CorePlayer.)
[HD2 General] freyberry:
That's why I said officially.

Because the Bravo has drivers, the HD2 has not. It's as simple as that. If anyone would make drivers for the HD2, it could play HD video as well.

And by the way, those drivers do exist in the labs of Qualcomm.

Since you are unable to point me to the proof of the Coreplayer version playing 720p in EVERY format, your post is just empty words. Looking at the thread you linked, I can absolutely not see any proof of that. Instead, I can see proof of what I am saying.

Do you always post random links in order to "prove" your lies and hope nobody reads them?

Additionally, your claims that WM is responsible for the lack of HD video playback capabilities contradict the existence of a Coreplayer version for WM that plays HD video. It also proves my point that it's all about drivers and has nothing to do with the operating system.

Truth is, the HD2's inability to play HD video as absolutely NOTHING to do with Windows Mobile. Moreover, your claims that Windows Mobile is in any way slower than the other OSs is just wrong. It is not only just as fast, it also has much better memory management than for example the iPhone, which is why Apple doesn't allow multitasking and while you can run lots of applications simultaneously on a WM device with 128MB RAM, it's almost impossible to send more than one or two applications to the background on a hacked iPhone 3G with the same amount of RAM, which proves that your claims of WM being a "memory hog" are utter bull****, just like all the rest of what you allege.

I'm not going to accept that you spread that kind of bull**** here on the forum. You're a liar (or maybe paid for spreading FUD), and your insistence on those false (and even contradictory) claims is not only ridiculous, it doesn't make them true either.
[HD2 General] 3kgt:
Same here, I cant find any Major flows in the OS yet!

But when you read about WM in Google, forums! they scare you about the problems!

Yes sure it dosent have as much Apps as other Mobile Os, But every app i need i got in here and a damn fast phone ;)

But sure if compared to older phones it might be unfair.
[HD2 General] donalgodon:
I am 100% sure that I read in a tech review that Windows Mobile disables the HD functions built into the Snapdragon. Is this not so?
[HD2 General] freyberry:
No, this is not so.
[HD2 General] gabbs:
:confused::confused:LOL...
[HD2 General] freyberry:
Why do you even qoute that BS? :rolleyes:
[HD2 General] gabbs:
some ppl might be reading it and think it's fact..

LOL
[HD2 General] donwhann:
well this is my first wm phone and what a choice I made,its totally awesome and for me blows all other phones out of the park. I had the Sony satio before this but sent it back after 5 days,I'm so glad I did.as for apps,you just have to look about,there's 1000's spread about....I also know a good site for (free) games....lol
[HD2 General] rjstep3:
May I remind you of the forum rules - this site is for sharing!

So if you know of a site with some good free (and legal) games, please let us in on the info!

thanks

rjstep3
[HD2 General] donwhann:
thats it you see bud,I'm not 100% sure it is a legal set up although I'm sure it is.its not a warez site or anything.ill check it out a bit more an get back to you.....
[HD2 General] freyberry:
What's wrong with Windows Mobile?

I can give you a definite answer:

1. The look of its UI. This is probably no surprise to anyone. Aside from the new Titanium today plugin, which looks really nice, the UI of Windows Mobile is just ugly. And notice, I explicitely say *look*, because the *concept* itself (softkeys, long press menus) is actually pretty good and enables a very consistent and logical UI throughout the system and all the applications.

2. The built in applications. Windows Media Player is actually not bad at all, but only in WM6.5.x. In WM6.5.0, where it's not finger friendly, its unuseable. Even worse is the picture viewer. Compare that with what Android or iPhone offer, I think it's clear that the built in picture viewer sucks. Calendar and Contacts, however, are not bad, but they fall under point 1. for having an ugly UI.

3. This may surprise some, but it's definitely the most severe issue: There's no native support (i.e. no APIs) for accelerometer, compass, proximity sensor and multi point input. Why is that such huge issue?

Well, the first reason is that HTC refuses to make its APIs public. If anyone wants to write an application for an HTC phone that uses the compass or multitouch, he has to 'reverse engineer' HTC's software and he gets zero support from HTC.

The second reason is, that with HTC now only selling less than 50% of all Windows Mobile handsets, more and more good WM phones by Samsung, LG, Asus and others appear. And all of them, of course, have different APIs for their sensors. That means, whenever someone wants to write an application that uses for example the compass, he has to implement and test the code for a whole bunch of different handsets, instead of just using native APIs (that don't exist on WM).

Apart from those issues, of course WM is still by far the most powerful mobile OS. And as you see, there's really not that much wrong with it, but of course the the UI is something that everyone sees immediately, whereas you only see the iPhone's plenty of shortcomings (like the poor phone application) when you actually use it for some time. On the other hand, you immediately see the iPhone's good looking UI, but you don't see all of Windows Mobile's power without using it for some time.

That's the reason people keep bashing WM. Of course, the vast majority of them has never seriously used it and only judges it by its looks and what others say. It's sad - but true.