yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Windows Mobile] hartv427:
v1.30Alpha4

airxtreme v1.30Alpha4 is working very well to rebuild a Rhodium_W Rom. Adding the stock build order addition to the kitchen is a huge advantage. I have noticed that added packages from other roms wind up at the end of the build witch is not a problem but if one wanted to update a package for example Opera and have that package built in the same order as the stock Rom do you know of a way to do that. Edit part of the DSM ? Im not sure. Or might the kitchen be able to do that in the future. Your kitchen is constantly improving thanks for you effort.
[Windows Mobile] programatix:
Resaving the project does not resort the list. The save file still has the newly added packages at the bottom.
[Windows Mobile] airxtreme:
If you leave the original DSM file it should rebuild in the order of the original ROM but it should also let you select the order in the Package Properties form (the Priority tab is still unfinished but it works if the DSM file exists).
[Windows Mobile] smaiitm:
Airxtreme: Works well with Leo. Dumped, unselected a bunch of unwanted stuff, added a few in, cooked and flashed. No problems, no issues. Thanks for your wonderful work.
[Windows Mobile] ultrashot:
Yes, when I load it.

Groups' order is saved in kxml: it isn't refreshed as it should be.

From project's kxml:

<SubItem Name="Manila_Core_2_5_20121225_0_Premium" RecMod="false" UPX="false" Checked="false" Expanded="false">
...
</SubItem>
<SubItem Name="Manila_Core_2_5_20121225_0_Premium_cfc" RecMod="false" UPX="false" Checked="false" Expanded="false">
...
</SubItem>
<SubItem Name="PACKAGE_Leo" RecMod="false" UPX="false" Checked="true" Expanded="false">
...
</SubItem>

[COLOR="Red"]<SubItem Name="Manila_Core_2_5_20121412_1" RecMod="false" UPX="false" Checked="true" Expanded="false">
...
</SubItem>[/COLOR]
[Windows Mobile] trickbiker121:
i have a request my request is could you add a description or comments section to the EXT tabl ike how the description is on SYS tab this would help other people who i give the kitchen to so they can see what this EXT does thanks again for a great kitchen
[Windows Mobile] airxtreme:
I was adding that feature right now.
[Windows Mobile] {SBR}_L3GION:
I was looking at another kitchen the name of it is OS builder and it has an option to build a new dsm from within the kitchen i was thinking if you implemented this then you could possibly get more use out of the dsm package ordering I am used to just naming the pacakge to overwrite other packages I am curious about being able to set the order of packages this could be very useful its just that I have quite a few packages and think it may be very time consuming to order them but if it makes life easier in the long run them all for it.
[Windows Mobile] airxtreme:
The DSM will be automatically created if you add a priority entry and there are no DSM files to update in the folder (alpha4 already allows that but only if the file is present because I still haven't written the DSM generating code yet).
[Windows Mobile] {SBR}_L3GION:
i was just saying that it may be helpful to add dsm creating because I use virtually no stock packages when I import a ROM i usually delete the imported exts packages but havent in the last couple of kitchens because of features being added to them if you make it where us chefs can add dsm's to our package them(since most of us didnt have them prior to this kitchen) then we can add order by dsm instead by name.
[Windows Mobile] airxtreme:
What I meant is that there is no need to have a tool to create DSM files because if the kitchen sees that you set the priority of a package and there is no DSM file it will create one. If you didn't notice it yet in the package properties there's now a Priority tab that easily allows to set the priority of each package without having to mess with those annoying Guids (both the list and the selection are package and not Guid based indeed both show the matching package names).
[Windows Mobile] trickbiker121:
you know what us Chefs want lol
[Windows Mobile] {SBR}_L3GION:
oh my bad deeply sorry for the confusion great addition airextreme i love the work.
[Windows Mobile] ygorigor:
Hi.

I try to build a rom for omnia i900 with version 1.29 and can't change themes between them.

I think it is because all files in rom have atributes read-only and system.

Can someone help me with this trouble?

Thank's in advance and sorry for my not very good english :)
[Windows Mobile] airxtreme:
Themes are stored TSK file that are nothing more than CAB renamed and cab files should be able to move the default theme files without issues even with the read-only and system attributes. Did you use a custom theme or a default one? If you used a custom one please upload it so that I can try on my phone.
[Windows Mobile] Mikenif:
First of all awesome kitchen

Ive been true to the EVK for a long time but was looking for one thats up to date. This one has cool features and definitely beats evk in alot of points.

Im just wondering 2 things:

-Does this kitchen check for timebombs?

-When preparing the kitchen i noticed some OEM folders are placed in my EXT folder.(connectionDB, Operator Pkg)

Do i have to keep those in place? i tried moving them to the oem folder but ended up with a non booting rom
[Windows Mobile] airxtreme:
Yes the timebombs are automatically detected and removed.

Yes it's perfectly normal that those packages stay there, since 1.28 only the real OEM packages (the ones that start with OEM) are left there.
[Windows Mobile] kurniawan77:
Air..

Why is it that package converter changes the default install dir from a cab i have for opera10 (see attachment)... it is set to install it to \Program Files\Opera10... but theconverter sets it to \Windows\...
[Windows Mobile] airxtreme:
It looks like CAB2OEM doesn't support the install directory passed as parameter therefore you have to edit the app.dat replacing windows with the correct install directory to make it work.
[Windows Mobile] kurniawan77:
alright, i'll leave it like that then... also having troubles with resco... it just doesn't cook in like the cab does... hmmm, hope someone has the solution... till then, i'll have to install the cab after flash...
[Windows Mobile] EgorLev:
Hi everyone! May be a dummy question but I wander is it possible to create a daily rom with 6.5.3 and TouchFlo from 6.1? Does this the stuff compatible with each other?
[Windows Mobile] ygorigor:
I have issues with any default or custom themes. When i change theme to default or custom always it change to classic theme
[Windows Mobile] ygorigor:
I have issues with all themes, default or custom. when i change any theme it is not changing.

in kitchen 1.25 all working ok :confused:
[Windows Mobile] crane23:
I have issues with all themes, default or custom. when i change any theme it is not changing.

in kitchen 1.25 all working ok !

same issues !!!
[Windows Mobile] crane23:
I have issues with all themes, default or custom. when i change any theme it is not changing.
[Windows Mobile] airxtreme:
I have looked but all the TSK files seem to have only the +A (archive) attribute like they should. Maybe it's something else, some of the images?
[Windows Mobile] airxtreme:
I just tried on 25653 and everything seems to be fine. What build are you using?
[Windows Mobile] crane23:
Sorry,i have tried again and everything seems to be fine!
[Windows Mobile] zalaros:
@airxtreme

Can you please take a look at this post? It has to do with your kitchen ;) Thank's

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=695211
[Windows Mobile] airxtreme:
I just tried importing that ROM and it worked fine. Try clicking on the "Skip" button of the import dialog then go in the kitchen settings, Log tab and enable logging for tools and the creation of a logfile. Close the kitchen, open it again try importing the ROM and check the log file when it fails to find out what tool is failing.
[Windows Mobile] zalaros:
Thank's for your reply ;) I've attached the log file. Can you please take a look at it?
[Windows Mobile] airxtreme:
Try putting these files in the resources\tools directory: http://www.mediafire.com/?mjmmgtwmion
[Windows Mobile] zalaros:
Ok now the import wizard proccess gets completed but all i get after that is an empty kitchen. I press open project and there is no project to open. The log file is huge now with no errors. I don't know what is going wrong.
[Windows Mobile] variosteph:
well, did you create a project? tab on devicemodel, deviceprofile, sysbuild, llocales, compresion to create one....
[Windows Mobile] zalaros:
I feel so stupid :eek: First i should read the first post of this thread and then try working with the kitchen. Now that i've read it everything works fine. :D
[Windows Mobile] Mikenif:
Sweet. well im sold:D

Ive moved those packages to the oem folder where im used to having them and all is well.

If i can help out improving development please let me know

Oh and ofcourse theres a donation comming your way

cheers mate
[Windows Mobile] airxtreme:
could you please rar all your kitchen folder upload it somewhere and PM me the link? I need to take a look
[Windows Mobile] kurniawan77:
sure... but you'll have to wait till tommorow... going to bed now.. still have 4 h to sleep then off to work.... i see u have a mediafire account? me too... shall i upload it there?
[Windows Mobile] airxtreme:
no I don't have a mediafire account I only upload files there. Any file hosting website should be fine.
[Windows Mobile] crane23:
I have no OS Structure.xml!!!!!

View attachment 338693
[Windows Mobile] airxtreme:
I don't get it, the kitchen has stopped creating that file a long while ago. Did you get a premade kitchen from somewhere else?
[Nexus One General] Quantumstate:
Google has been known for a long time to perpetually store all searches by IP, with the ability to assemble a shockingly complete picture of people by what they search on. Recently the Google CEO regurgitated the view that, "If you're not doing something wrong, you have nothing to worry about." (look it up)

Well I like Android and the development excitement, as I've used Debian exclusively for 12 years. But I am gravely concerned about privacy issues were I to buy an Android. I've hardly even used Google as a search engine. (Clusty)

Has any research been done on this? Does no one else share this concern?
[Nexus One General] mr_skot:
You can disable this function of your Google Account. After logging in click the 'Dashboard' link that says 'View Data Stored With This Account'. Scroll to the bottom of the page where it says 'Web History' and you can disable/clear it for your account.

If using Google as your search engine makes you nervous then this should really put a bee in your bonnet:

Google and the NSA: Necessary Allies http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/188558/google_and_the_nsa_necessary_allies.html

Of course it's for 'OUR' protection.
[Nexus One General] uansari1:
Building on what mr_skot said... Google's CEO also made it clear that user information is only linked to you for a few months, then it is scrubbed and is made anonymous for more time. I can't remember if he said it was something like 18 months or a few years. Either way, they're serious about maintaining privacy, and you can bet that after the Chinese attack a couple weeks ago, they'll be beefing up security and changing their protocols.
[Nexus One General] mrbkkt1:
If you want to remain completely anonymous, I suggest not using google, or google talk, or syncing your phone etc.

basically, you give a huge chunk of personal information by using google's services...

THAT was one of my hesitations of switching from winmo to android, but I got over it.
[Nexus One General] bofslime:
Real tin-foil hat wearer's don't use cell phones! For communication, they hand deliver letters, at secret drop off points.
[Nexus One General] Eclair~:
What exactly are you guys doing to be so hesitant about Google? The personal information on your phone is so dire that you don't want them to view it? What will they do with this information unless you are doing something illegal? Other than that, I highly doubt they are just going to 'target' you purposely - the only way I could see you being so in danger is that they get hacked, and people go through their servers or whatever.

But what are the chances, that you and the millions of other people out there are going to be in danger? Maybe because I don't use my phone for.. bad purposes per-say, or search anything bad, I have no worry. I'm curious as to why people fear Google, though, maybe I'm being to open minded.
[Nexus One General] mrbkkt1:
The point is in being comfortable with a stranger being able to know a lot of information about you ay the stroke of a key.
[Nexus One General] galaxys:
I would worry more about T-Mobile than Google, since they are the ones that monitor U for the Gov. :eek:
[Nexus One General] Eclair~:
Yes but the thing is, who cares about you specifically. What person in the GOOG HQ do you believe actually 'thinks' about you enough to want to be able to access any information about yourself. No one wants your info, so no one will try to find you - your information - or where you live.

I guess it is disturbing to people that they CAN do that, but T-Mobile can too, AT&T can too, and of course any other carrier has the same information that Google has, although Google could be more precise, or they could be more evil. What are you afraid of Google having? Your contact numbers? Your SMS? Your.. emails? Out of all those, I honestly don't care if they have it. Google isn't the only company with your location, so it isn't something I want to list.

There is probably something I'm not understanding here, though, and someone can probably easily explain how I am completely wrong about everything.. but this is my perspective. I believe if they don't care about you, then they wont dig into your life.
[Nexus One General] grainysand:
It's an invasion of privacy--though of course, your government invades your privacy all the time and has access to plenty of down-and-deep information about you. It's understandable some people would be anxious about it, whether or not they've done wrong. Mind you, this isn't exclusive to Google or anything. Microsoft collects information about you when possible. I don't doubt Apple et al does too.

I'm a bit leery about it myself; you sacrifice privacy for convenience and ease of use (google services/apps are great and easy to use, synchronization with your Android phone is excellent, etc), then you find yourself giving up more and more information. It's not the most comfortable state.
[Nexus One General] ScaredyCat:
Congratulations, you win the Daily Mail award. :rolleyes:

If you feel that only people who are doing something wrong need to worry then you can't really be against CCTV cameras on every corner. How about tagging all your shopping so your waste can be tracked or chipping everyone so they can be tracked at any time, in real time. I mean, if you're not doing anything wrong why would you worry :rolleyes:

There *are* things that aren't illegal that you might not want any Tom, **** or Harry knowing. I can tell you now that any Google employee with access to that data is worth $$$ to a private detective - but then all Google employees are angels and never break the law and don't have gambling debts or money problems.

While the corporation (google) might not be particularly interested in the individual, the corporation is made up of individuals who may not have the same values as good honest folk. That's something you can't guard against.

Never ever use the argument that if you're not doing anything wrong then you have nothing to fear. 'Wrong' is a value judgment, subject to change at any time. 'Illegal' varies from place to place, country to country.

SC
[Nexus One General] Quantumstate:
Exactly. And this was exactly the assertion that Google's CEO made this December. I repeat a famous old wisdom: 'Those who would trade freedom for security, deserve neither.'

To those naive ones who can't understand the privacy ramifications, suffice it to say that my business is none of their business. You can not understand how a fascist regime operates, or know what it was like behind the Iron Curtain. I was in intel, and do not like the unConstitutional changes to the law that were made in the past 9 years, and so I want to protect myself. You can open your life like a book as you like... eh, maybe it'll be OK. Or maybe your divorcing wife or someone suing you will find things you didn't want.

I am just trying to find out what kind of hooks Android may have that may cause it to store information unjustifiably and/or send it back to the Mother Ship. Of primary concern is the OS, and secondary is Google apps. I am assuming that the nav app is a no-go.

Before anyone lazily asserts that my OS or browser is more vulnerable, I've run Debian exclusively for 12 years, secured using the NSA procedure. I have used Google for search only a few times since it started, owing to their atrocious data retention policies (I use Clusty.com), and do not have a Google account. I don't trust assurances that data is scrubbed because they make much of their money from the information.

I do use T-Mobile, as they are one of only two companies that refused to cooperate with Bush's unConstitutional warrantless wiretapping. (Qworst was the other one) Oh, you think warrantless wiretapping is legal? Then why last year did Congress pass a law specifically exempting Big Telecom from Constitutional challenges? (which BTW, Obama voted for; that was it for me with him)

Has any research been done on the security of Android? I couldn't find any. (I am aware of the HTC leak, which was squashed by Cyanogen)
[Nexus One General] Quantumstate:
No one else has thought about this?
[Nexus One General] grainysand:
Oddly enough, using custom ROMs makes me somewhat less concerned about privacy. Being able to pick and choose components of the software does help.

Afraid I got nothing else to add, though. Ultimately, you can either put on your tinfoil hat and cut yourself off from all online contact (because someone, somewhere, is always collecting information) or resign yourself to it.
[Nexus One General] Amdathlonuk:
And you seriously believe Google are the ONLY ones doing this? at least we know about it.

How do companies get their 'market research'?....

I believe we have nothing to worry about, but in this day and age, to expect to be completely anonymous and 'off the grid' is about as plausible as Apple employees using Android devices in the office... :)
[Nexus One General] JoshHart:
I wrote a long post then decided to delete it cause Im not going to change anyones minds on a message board anyways. So Ill simply say, no, I dont worry about it.
[Nexus One General] Quantumstate:
So... your solution is to give up and resign yourself to allowing a Police State. No thanks, I don't agree.

ThatSearchEngineThatEveryoneUses is a gigantic corporation which will vacuum up every search you do and correlate them to assemble a frighteningly accurate picture of who you are. Nah, fsck that. I'll stick with Clusty and off-OS's like Debian.

Resign and argue with me all you want.
[Nexus One General] xManMythLegend:
My thoughts...

1. Seperate your data. Its why I refuse to useGoogle Chrome. I already have enough info on Google without them knowing every single purchase , website visit , and log in info for everywhere I go.

It may be futile but its at least an effort.

2. No company tosses information. I dont care how many times I press clear or delete on Google settings. My personalized info is sitting on a server somewhere and will be until that info becomes worthless.

3. I have zero desire to contribute to skynet =-).

Im fully convinced data supported profiling will be in the hands of some ridiculously powerful AIs and Im not in the mood to have a bunch of robots know what Im going to do before I do it.

Lastly I really do think its absolutely sad how easily people forego there privacy like it shoudl be of no concern.
[Nexus One General] coolbho3000:
Your GSM operator can track and record all your calls, and can be subpoenaed for your general location at any time. Would you trust them more than Google?

Except Google Chrome does not collect enough information to discern such a thing, and your ISP can find out all that (and more, as long as it's not SSL-encrypted) anyway.

Everyone put on your tin foil hats!

Yeah, it's all, you know, here: http://android.git.kernel.org/ . Dig the source and see if Android's sending any rouge information to anyone.
[Nexus One General] Amdathlonuk:
And it's not already?

What about CCTV? all the online purchases you make?

Credit card details?

Mortgage?

Electoral Roll?

National Insurance details...

Christ, they already know more about us than you can think.

Do a search for your name on the internet, I even found a site listing my marriage to my ex-wife, the children we had and when/where they were born......

I won't KNOWINGLY contribute to them collecting my data, but I'm not going to get paranoid about it either.
[Nexus One General] coolbho3000:
Keep in mind that this person only has four posts, and all four of them are in this thread. All he came here to do was to lecture us on privacy concerns, then conclude that the only option to stop the corporate powers from hatching a mass conspiracy against him using his Google search data is to leave his tin foil hat on.

To the OP: Wait, what is your reason for coming to XDA-Developers if you won't use phones with proprietary software? Windows Mobile is closed source - you don't know what it could be sending or storing. So are the Android Google applications, actually. If you're really that paranoid, do you really think we could have convinced you to buy an Android phone?

If you really want to use Android, re-compile it from source and leave out the Google search. Go ahead and examine every line of code to be sure Google didn't hide some backdoor in it. But wait - the radio drivers are proprietary. You'd better reverse engineer and re-compile that to make sure Qualcomm didn't build some backdoor into that. In fact, disassemble the firmware of the entire phone to make sure there is no way your communications can be tapped into! You can never be too safe. Or, just build your own phone and assemble all its hardware from scratch, making sure to license the schematics of every chip inside to make sure there isn't some microcode exploit built in by some Chinese hacker looking to make a quick buck off your internet habits. But wait - your voice and data communications are going through a network that can be exploited by gambling, drinking employees hired by private investigators. You'd better build your own GSM network, then. But then the network of the person you are calling can be exploited too!

A chain is only as strong as its weakest link. I don't think I'm concerned with Google retaining my data for a couple of months.
[Nexus One General] Amdathlonuk:
And that my friends is exactly it.
[Nexus One General] liam.lah:
I wonder if Eric Schmidt would be comfortable divulging details about the perfectly legal sex position he and his wife used recently.

I am not too worried. Google's business depends on people trusting them, that is why they have made such a big fuss about the chinese hacking fiasco, hundreds of other companies were hacked, but have said little. Users need to be sure their information is safe, or they will put it somewhere else. That is why i applaud Google for not having local gmail servers in China, unlike the morons at Yahoo, they are under no obligation to give up details of Chinese activists emails. Yahoo's incompetence and lack of forethought helped a tyrannical government put a dissident in jail.

Google are smarter than that, and while i do not trust them completely, i think my info is safer with them than most competitors.
[Touch HD Themes and Apps] apostolis22:
Which photo viewer application do you think is the best? I want a really good zoom function.

Thank you very much
[Touch HD Themes and Apps] rafro123:
Try this.... http://www.resco.net/pocketpc/photomanager/

One of my favourites!
[Touch HD Themes and Apps] nikosfa:
resco photo viewer! its simply the best...