yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Windows Mobile] deepankerjha:
Messaging enhancement cab

can anyone oblige me with a link to messaging ENHANCEMENT cab plz.I have a QVGA device.

regards
[Windows Mobile] kosmo666:
Thanks alexx !
[Windows Mobile] vbmarco:
Thanks Alexx!!
[Windows Mobile] + Que PPC:
wich messagin enhacement cab??? can you be more especific? please :)
[Windows Mobile] deepankerjha:
thx for reply bro.looking for m2d don't remember the version.can u plz help me out.

regards
[Windows Mobile] hasseye:
so having saying and showing that what is your conclusion from one build to the next?

is there much change? or very little?

it work cooking if your alreay at 23544?
[Windows Mobile] GTx-M.M:
Yes, it is :confused:
[Windows Mobile] Diagrafeas:
What are the keys in boot.rgu that i have to change in order to make all caches dynamic?
[Windows Mobile] Pisca:
Seems that these are the ones different:

- MODULES -

caldll.dll is different. (BaseApps)

gwes.exe is different. (OS)

- FILES -

default.hv is different. (Metadata)

DefaultCerts.dat is different. (Metadata)

packages.cif is different. (Metadata)

packages.sof is different. (Metadata)

user.hv is different. (Metadata)

Versions:

WMWidgets\64d374dd-96bf-409e-9a7e-95ac646ccbda.dsm - WMWidgets - 5.2.23545.5500

WelcomeCenter\40723732-841f-40d3-8dd0-af7d0d6156de.dsm - WelcomeCenter - 5.2.23545.5500

Webview\7ec02197-7d2d-43a8-9b11-bf3ff9753984.dsm - Webview - 5.2.23545.5500

Shell\1f1aca24-d942-464a-9281-10567741499c.dsm - Shell - 5.2.23545.5500

RemoteDesktopMobile\adc19413-37b2-4018-af8a-148b50f6ea13.dsm - RemoteDesktopMobile - 5.2.23545.5500

Redist\208f8be6-1362-45b3-ae17-95d4ab426c11.dsm - Redist - 5.2.23545.5500

PhoneRedist\d9d7d86d-3f83-4289-bd32-aa1972a1447e.dsm - PhoneRedist - 5.2.23545.5500

OS\d0b41563-b345-4444-aa15-986e7c7fff99.dsm - OS - 5.2.23545.5500

Office\331439cf-a636-4243-8424-e501be3a39d2.dsm - Office - 5.2.23545.5500

MediaOS\ae879543-c73e-4888-812b-d8177c404612.dsm - MediaOS - 5.2.23545.5500

BTDUN\d7904a7e-6226-443b-8c8c-439683b0b55a.dsm - BTDUN - 5.2.23545.5500

browsingie\f3dfc36d-36d0-4163-8d6f-e1ce5aed8814.dsm - browsingie - 5.2.23545.5500

BROWSINGCORE\d81b11e0-3299-4b65-8305-78f1fa03dc07.dsm - BROWSINGCORE - 5.2.23545.5500

BROWSING\b183f2a7-06c3-4f27-9679-7baf97e94efa.dsm - BROWSING - 5.2.23545.5500

BaseApps\f50e9a40-aed9-497a-bdea-84451210e960.dsm - BaseApps - 5.2.23545.5500

Thanks Michyprima for the comparision
[Windows Mobile] michyprima:
Basically optimizing or adding code makes files to change the size.

If there's no change in size maybe there's no change at all (- maybe -)

If you look (as example) at Browsing pkg, it has file sizes exactly the same as 23544, but versions are changed...

At this point,

1) some one changed DSMs versions

2) there is a very little change from 23544
[Windows Mobile] GTx-M.M:
I have some repeated question

How can I fix SMS bug I can't write anything ?

and I get a message box when I run Word says "Word Mobile cannot open Please reset your device and try again ? I did a reset but still not working

Any solution's guys ? :rolleyes:
[Windows Mobile] barbapappa_86:
Thanks Alexx!
[Windows Mobile] dcd1182:
whats important is the filesystem/ram layout, i have seen lots of same hardware devices with different memory addr, this means no plug and play nk
[Windows Mobile] deepankerjha:
any body plzzzzzzz???
[Windows Mobile] SOHKis:
people have responded to your post, but you seem to be ignoring them.

have you included webview in your rom..? might wanna read through the various packages listed in the 5th post & what they do http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=4268166&postcount=5
[Windows Mobile] l2tp:
thanx dft for 23545!!

this build is from 04.03.2010 (not from 02.03.2010 as mentioned above), so glad to see newer version of office (continuing the idea from here)
[Windows Mobile] the_scotsman:
Make sure WebviewCS is disabled.
[Windows Mobile] Farmer Ted:
You set the cachesizes to 0, except maybe bitmapcachesize. I'm not sure if the bitmapcache will be dynamic or disabled. I'd just leave it with the stock value (I think it's 100).

Replstorcachesize is disable at 0; that's the stock setting, but I personally like having it running (mine's 800, but it could be less; it's a small cache, anyway).

Look near the end of the boot.rgu (probably). Here are the values (mine are set at 8, 1.5 and 1 MB):

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\StorageManager\Profiles\FLASHDRV\FATFS]
"Flags"=dword:00600014
"FormatTFAT"=dword:1
"CheckForFormat"=dword:1
"MountAsBootable"=dword:1
"MountAsRoot"=dword:1
"EnableWriteBack"=dword:1
"DataCacheSize"=dword:00001000 ; 1000=4096 sectors(4096*2048=8MB)
"FatCacheSize"=dword:00000300
"BitmapCacheSize"=dword:00000200

So, set data and fat caches at 0. You'll end up with about 3 MB of caches that way, which didn't affect performance much for me, and it saves a lot of RAM. I've got them set bigger now just for the hell of it. You can also apply them globally, then you'll have caching on your sd card and in other profiles.

Here is how to set them globally:

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\StorageManager\FATFS]
"FriendlyName"="FAT FileSystem"
"Dll"="fatfsd.dll"
"Flags"=dword:00000064
"Paging"=dword:1
"EnableCache"=dword:1
"CacheSize"=dword:0
"Util"="fatutil.dll"
"CacheDll"="diskcache.dll"
"DataCacheSize"=dword:00001000
"FatCacheSize"=dword:00000300
"BitmapCacheSize"=dword:00000200

You just add the bottom three lines. If you want to tweak replstorcachesize, then do it like this (just search for it in the boot.rgu):

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\StorageManager\Filters\fsreplxfilt]
"ReplStoreHostVolume"=""
"ReplStorePath"="\\ReplStorVol"
"ReplStoreName"="ReplStor"
"ReplStoreDoImmaculate"=dword:0
"ReplStoreCacheSize"=dword:800
"NumDirsToExclude"=dword:18
"DirsToExclude"=multi_sz:""
[Windows Mobile] deepankerjha:
Messaging enhancement cab for m2d

can somebody plz provide me a cab or the link for MESSAGING ENHANCEMENT FOR M2D 19194xxx .i have a QVGA device.this is my 3rd post regarding the same.plz somebody....
[Windows Mobile] Pisca:
Cooked 23545 for Topaz, no big changes so far, just to keep updated ;)
[Windows Mobile] kosmo666:
23545 fix some minor memory bug on X960 :)
[Windows Mobile] vbmarco:
Sorry, what bug you mean to exactly?
[Windows Mobile] dotcompt:
Does someone have 23545.nb?

Thanks
[Windows Mobile] danw1028:
has anybody cooked 21639? im having some problems with button sizes, similar to early days of 6.5. going to try 21636 dpi files.
[Windows Mobile] nposix:
How to patch time bomb

can anyone point to me how to patch the time bomb?

How and where? anyone?

Thanks in advance...
[Windows Mobile] fire_z:
How to enable Settings/Personal/Input

Sorry for disturbing anyoneyou, can I ask a question?

I'm just new in cooking and I made a 6.5.5 ROM for Samsung Omnia Pro B7610

All seems fine, but Input Settings (Settings\Personal\Input) is gone, and I can't seem to get it back...

How can I get it back? What package in the ROM is the input settings "located"...Can I enable it by registry?

Thanks in advance for the reply

-SOLVED-
[Windows Mobile] da_reeseboy:
Its in the 3rd post under "Restore hidden settings" or something like that.
[Windows Mobile] ahmedfikry:
the speed of 23545 is scaring me :D ...super FAST
[Windows Mobile] fire_z:
Oh thank you, thought I lost it:) So silly it's in the first post:p
[Windows Mobile] yardi4life:
xip.bin for 23545 please. Thanks in advanced
[Windows Mobile] dtbinh:
Here it is:
[Windows Mobile] Devil1978:
I search the 23545 0407 Rollup.

Can anyone upload it?
[Windows Mobile] captblaze:
i'm digging the improved memory management... no leaks so far 12 hours in
[Windows Mobile] + Que PPC:
faster than 28XXX????

so whats new on 23545 to make it fast??? i know COM5 arent faster than 282XX but if you can xplain whats that memory mangement i can understand jijiji :p

Thanks in advance
[Windows Mobile] deepankerjha:
nobody to help me ?
[Windows Mobile] Vernox701:
What's files need to be patched so that ringtones work had everything working with 25007 but I screwed something up when I tried 23545
[Windows Mobile] nposix:
Upz....anyone ???
[Windows Mobile] jagan2:
Guys i am having one prob ... my data connection never connects.... dnt know why adc is included in my rom i click it for connection but it just shows connecting but actually never connects. :confused:
[Windows Mobile] Raptordin:
Copy of RUS Links

a Copy of the links Message in the RUS Forum (Some people where not able to open it as it is blocked at work).

23545_MSXIPKernel_SYS_QVGA_WQVGA_VGA_WVGA_0409 Windows CE: 5.2 Build 4520 (2 марта 2010 г. 15:56:30)

23108_MSXIPKernel_SYS_QVGA_WQVGA_VGA_WVGA_0409 Windows CE: 5.2 Build 4143 (3 марта 2010 г. 16:19:31)

24006_MSXIPKernel_SYS_QVGA_WQVGA_VGA_WVGA_0409 Windows CE: 5.2 Build 5604 (4 марта 2010 г. 15:43:07)

22008_MSXIPKernel_SYS_QVGA_WQVGA_VGA_WVGA_0409 Windows CE: 5.2 Build 4904 (11 февраля 2010 г. 15:41:42)

23638_MSXIPKernel_SYS_QVGA_WQVGA_VGA_WVGA_0409 Windows CE: 5.2 Build 4569 (28 февраля 2010 г. 15:43:18)

21639_MSXIPKernel_SYS_QVGA_WQVGA_VGA_WVGA_0409 Windows CE: 5.2 Build 3571 (4 марта 2010 г. 17:42:01)

All of the above is copied from HERE

And we were informed and directed to this link by the Mighty "Alexx~"

Thanks to Alexx~ and all who help the community with information and resources.
[Windows Mobile] vbmarco:
But rullop isn't available?
[Windows Mobile] netnerd:
i just flashed back to 23544.

on 23545, i always stuck at boot screen "windows logo"
[Windows Mobile] kosmo666:
The ram management. (ok, it's not really a bug, but, in X960 cooking, it's build-dependent so i put it in 'bug' categorie :D )

For example, with the same cooking method :

with 23544 : when you launch some applications, free ram fall quickly and don't be restore to it's first value after you kill all the applications. So you made many clean RAM in a day :D

with 23545 : in the same situation the management memory is pretty good, so you don't have to clean RAM all the time.

(i hope my explanation is clear, i'm not so good in english ;) )

@ +que PPC :

yes 23545 's faster than 28XXX ! Not the case of the 23544. If i refer to the post of michyprima on the difference between 23544 and 23545, maybe it's the gwes.exe difference. (just a assumption :) )
[Windows Mobile] vbmarco:
Thank you, you were clear, I understand what you mean :)
[Windows Mobile] norgan:
to compress or not to compress...this is the question

so what are the adv and dis of using lzx compression? i heard that not using it clears up some ram and loads files faster due to the system not working so hard to open them, is this true?
[Windows Mobile] killer8nl:
lzx will give you a smaller rom size but without lzx your rom will be faster
[Windows Mobile] sorg:
with almost every build there is at least one who tell that new build is "much" faster than older. If summ all such claims, then lates builds should be at least 10x times faster than first build of 6.5.x :D
[Windows Mobile] norgan:
thanks this is what i was thinking was the case.

on another issue, i updated some stuff in my rom and now in sms and in phone canvas when i bring up the context menu's i.e. new message or phone menu, i get corrupted graphics.

i thought it was the shared resources module but changing it had nto worked, any ideas? tis is the last bug in my rom, everythign else works. i just can;t seem to work out why those two (there may be others but most other menus seem to work so far) are not displaying properly. no graphics drivers or anything have changed. -- edit -- menu enhancement was the culprit :)
[Windows Mobile] kosmo666:
In general i'm agree with that point of view but not here :D

nevertheless i can say that differently :

Usually, on the X960, i noticed that build 28XXX are faster and have better behavior and ram stability than the Com5.

But not with this 23545.

For example, after flash it yesterday, when i saw the free ram and the ram stability, i switch on and off the device many time, convince that the build have the SOD problem :D

(When i have encounter SOD pb with some build, it's go with more free ram (~2mo) after flash.)
[Windows Mobile] vbmarco:
I'm trying the 23545 some time and confirm that very fluid and fast
[Windows Mobile] twisted:
hi,

attached below are the Notification_Enhancement 3_0_1919_1125.CAB & ext package from HTC Mega.

regards,

twisted :D
[Windows Mobile] Cass67:
Difference ?

Is there anywhere i can look that provides a difference between the different builds that are out there ? Im interested in seeing what's the difference between the following trees

218xx

235xx

240xx

250xx

280xx

I would have expected that the builds starting from the top of the list to be the oldest to newest but its not always seeming like that from various items ive read .. The 25xx and the 28xx are the most confusing as from what i can see the 25xx is the later build than the 28xx .. very confusing..

Im currently running a 25007 rom with the 25005 xip and it seems smooth enough, the text is a bit funky in places but for the most part it seems ok .

Curious ..

Cheers
[Windows Mobile] deepankerjha:
thx a lot bro,but I am looking for message enhancement cab.seems untraceble...

thx again

regards
[Windows Mobile] twisted:
lol, oops, sorry, my bad. didnt read it right. :D

will try to create a cab later tonight.

regards,

twisted :D
[Windows Mobile] animelover:
Does anybody have a Rollup for Build 24006 or similar? Want to cook it in German!
[Windows Mobile] deepankerjha:
so nice of u bro.will keep on waiting every hr for it.i hope u r going to solve my prob

regards
[Windows Mobile] sj.wasan:
Yes 21639 too

pls xip.bin for 21639:)
[Windows Mobile] yardi4life:
Thanks dtbinh. How did you create the file. I've been asking for a while now. No one has responded.
[Windows Mobile] SOHKis:
here's message enhancement 1.2.1919.3230.01 from qilin (i know it's not 1919.4XXX like you're looking for, but the closest i could find)
[Windows Mobile] a1d2catz:
This what I have..

212xx = AKU1, all builds leading up to and including WM 6.5

213xx = MOT motorola

214xx = ???

215xx = SAM samsung

216xx = HTC htc

217xx = COM1, continuing dev of 6.5.0.1 - 6.5.0.40

218xx = COM2, continuing dev of 6.5.0.50

219xx = MD, feature test branch, pretty much dead now. (unstable features are added here, this tree is based on COM1, so older base OS code, but the UI/UX code is newer)

22xxx = SEMC sony ericsson

*230xx = COM3, continuing development

*234xx = COM4, appears to be abandoned.

*235xx = COM5, more GUI changes here. New Outlook Interface.

*236xx = LG Electronics Branch

*24xxx = Possible HTC branch

*280xx, 282xx = WMD. This is a continuation of com3 from 23090. Most of the changes appear to be with IE

231xx has threaded email

235xx has threaded email

236xx has threaded email.

Hope this helps.
[Windows Mobile] 9600xt:
in that build some packages are missing, i had to complete it with 23544's..... now it's working...
[Windows Mobile] deepankerjha:
hi mate

thx a lot man.i appreciate ur help a lot.hope this one will work for me

regards
[Windows Mobile] dtbinh:
My Flame's kitchen is old, it always reqiures XIP.BIN for Xip porting.

21639 XIP.BIN is attached, but I haven't tried it yet.
[Windows Mobile] HD2Owner:
complete rollup for 23108 or 24006?

lang-files of those branches (0407 german etc.)?
[Windows Mobile] Cass67:
Thanks very much, it helps a lot. Never dawned on me that OEMs had their own branch and numbered thing as they liked .. Also explains why XIP does not boot on my Leo half the time ;)

Cheers
[Windows Mobile] l2tp:
what about 25xxx branch?
[Windows Mobile] Cotulla:
25XXX also SEMC - Sony Ericsson
[Windows Mobile] HD2Owner:
my thoughts:

2310X - 6.5.3 fat font (for small screen devices like hd mini)

235XX - 6.5.5 small font (looking good on hd2)

2400X - 6.5.3 fat font (maybe motorola branch)
[Windows Mobile] wmserver:
mirror for 23545, 24006, 21639

Here's a mirror:

23545 Windows CE: 5.2 Build 4520 (2 March 2010, 15:56:30)

23545_MSXIPKernel_SYS_QVGA_WQVGA_VGA_WVGA_0409.7z

24006 Windows CE: 5.2 Build 5604 (4 March 2010, 15:43:07)

24006_MSXIPKernel_SYS_QVGA_WQVGA_VGA_WVGA_0409.7z

21639 Windows CE: 5.2 Build 3571 (4 March 2010, 17:42:01)

21639_MSXIPKernel_SYS_QVGA_WQVGA_VGA_WVGA_0409.7z

Source: asusmobile.ru (pointed out by Alexx)
[Windows Mobile] fb401:
^^ This should be on the front page somewhere; it is immensely helpful since I want to stick with threaded email and didn't know which builds to go with.
[Windows Mobile] Farmer Ted:
Even if it were on the first page (I agree, it should be), people would still ask what the build numbers mean. Just like they still ask how to get back their settings shortcuts. And just how they forget to cook in all the proper sys packages, because they haven't read post 5 (or 4, 3, or 2). It would make it easier to link to, though.
[Windows Mobile] ther-amm:
25008 - Windows CE: 5.2 Build 5904 (March 4, 2010 17:28:10)

MSXIPKernel SYS for QVGA VGA WQVGA WVGA 0409

Thanks to DFT
[Windows Mobile] bobsbbq:
Is it just me or does 23545 seem slower the 23544? It is definitely slower in benchmarks for write and copy for me at least.

I used the one from this post. Maybe someone else can check also, or maybe there are some problems with some files?

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=5854377&postcount=13485
[Windows Mobile] fb401:
I know I'm going to be reaching REALLY hard for this one but....anybody got a reliable source for WM 6.5 Standard builds?
[Windows Mobile] SOHKis:
depends what you're looking for, this may help - http://www.mobileunderground.info/showthread.php?t=6612
[Windows Mobile] fb401:
yea i checked there, no startrek roms and nothing too new in the startrek forum here
[Windows Mobile] AndrewSh:
With all respect - it does not matter what post did you take the files from! They all mirrors from DFT.

Faster or slower in benchmarks - did you save ones from 23544 to compare? I cook all the available builds and benchmark them - absolutely NO difference!

If you expect that each next leaking build is "much faster" than previous - than it's no need to ever buy the new phone - just flash it in half a year.

So the posts like "Guys I cooked it - it's twice faster than!...." really make me laugh.... :)

To your question: NO, 23545 is not slower than 23544 (and it's not faster) - it's the same! Maybe you missed something during cooking? Or made a mistake?
[Windows Mobile] the_scotsman:
I have a problme with my recent ROM builds...not sure if its SYS related though :confused:

In the manila settings tab > sound and display > If I set my sound to Automatic, straight away the volume drops to 0 and enables vibration...but this is how it stays...it doesn't change for appointments...even if I drag the volume back up and leave it in automatic.

Anyone know what has happened? It worked fine in my earlier ROMs.

Also all my 6.5.5 ROMs have a permanent calendar on the lockscreen, even if I have no appointments...is this normal for 6.5.5 or is something else wrong with mine?
[Windows Mobile] NIKOSXRI:
I agree with sorg.

That is called placebo effect.

There is a solution although.

Let our girlfriend or friend to select the build for cooking.Then try all the builds without knowing the build number.

Rate each build according to the feeling you have using it, no benchmarks.

And then you have more reliable results.
[Windows Mobile] bobsbbq:
I was not implying anything about the mirrors but just in question in general. As it might be something wrong on my end thus the reason for the question. I don't expect for newer releases to be faster, I just experienced it in this build. And yes I checked vs my 23544 build and it was slower.

Thanks for confirming for me
[Windows Mobile] dcd1182:
just have to say that writing down the way you feel will not produce reliable results. benchmarks dont lie.
[Windows Mobile] HD2Owner:
21895_XIP.BIN_MSXIPKernel_SYS_QVGA_WQVGA_VGA_WVGA_0409_0419.7z
[Windows Mobile] Vernox701:
just a guess from me. I was having ringtone problems since trying newer sys files(25005,25006,25007, 23541,23545) using mskernal included in the rollups onced I changed and just started using(copy, paste and rename) the same oemkernal, mskernal from 23518 ringtones worked again. I noticed that some of the mskernal were different sizes and therefore cause booting issues or ringtone issues
[Windows Mobile] bobsbbq:
Thank you , I found the problem. I accidentally extracted the file with winzip instead of 7zip. My winzip is a older version. Anyway now the speed is the same as the 23544.
[Windows Mobile] fb401:
That's not for WM Standard (non touchscreen), that's for Pro (touchscreen)
[Windows Mobile] kosmo666:
I think we all interpret the 'fast' word in a different way :D

this time it's a com 5 lag free on my device so obviously it feeling faster and obviously it's not a benchmark test ;)

it' a kitchen dependant problem.

on some device, in homemade old school kitchen who 'work better with com 2 than com 5' currently it seems to make a difference.

And as i know my kitchen, i assume that the difference is due to that :

Posted by michyprima :

- MODULES -

gwes.exe is different. (OS)

But I could be wrong ;)
[Windows Mobile] secc123:
NueSpinLock

Has anyone used nuespinlock on the Touch Pro (with 6.5 NK)? Any adverse effects - i'm particularly interested in the battery saving part. If anyone has tried it then could you please reply as to whether its useful and helps with the battery.

I am willing to try it myself but before i do i thought i'd check for anyone with a reason why it might be a bad idea?

Thanks

Secc
[Windows Mobile] Psyki:
Lol this is hilarious "it feels so much faster and more stable!" If that were true then after enough tests eventually we'd have flawless roms faster than any other phone out there.
[Windows Mobile] DarkAngelFR:
thanks for posting those info ;)

I think it should be on first page also (or post 2/3/4/5...)

I read those posts and tried to make searches on the forum (and on google) and it's really really hard to find some informations about those COM explanations....

Thanks!
[Windows Mobile] DaveShaw:
It's there in post #6 now.

Ta,

Dave
[Windows Mobile] SOHKis:
used it as well as his gxdma on my diamond & now TP2, definitely didn't have any negative effects. don't have any real comparisons.

i would say give it a shot, nue improvements are always good
[Windows Mobile] secc123:
Thanks

Hey SOHKis, Thanks for the reply - i have also downloaded the gxdma.dll file so i will give them both a try when i do a new build over the weekend.

Do you have any other helpful suggestions for saving the battery? I have disabled 3g when i don't need it, added reg tweaks, but as i use b/tooth and Satnav quite a lot i find the battery drains fairly quickly.

Thanks SOHKis for your time

Secc
[Windows Mobile] danw1028:
what files are missing in 21639? i have no problems booting, but bottom taskbar menu buttons are too small.
[Windows Mobile] le55:
news at the 2189x COM2 ? the last are 21895

:D:D
[Windows Mobile] AndrewSh:
All files are at their places :) And rom is working now on my device.

To get rid of strange bottom bar buttons and to get normal ones back - just replace OS\commctrl.dll\ for one from 21636. That's it.

Dunno but for me patched nk.exe did not work - the phone did not boot up. But I've tried it only once and I patched only nk.exe. Maybe I should try again and patch also OEM. I will try when I'm not lazy :)
[Windows Mobile] + Que PPC:
Well im not so sure about it... As Da_G told me a week ago, one of the goals that MS will reach for 6.6 instead of Windows Pone 6.5 will be:

Client messaging experience enhacement

File management enhacement

Fingerfriendly UI

IE enhacement

It seems that the last changes they will make will be... SIP and Dialer and thats all... so we almost reach all of that points... and one of them is File management enhacement... as G told me yes... the builds are faster than old ones or faster than WP6.5 but COM8 is here just to make the next change... messaging enhacement.

;)