yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV Themes and Apps] vinodxxx:
Today Morning i Got Up

thought of Hearing a Song..

but when i tried to lower the Volume with volume key it was not working...

i mean i can see the Volume Screen but Cannot increase or Decrees It..

i can do it with touch but not with keys

plz is there some regestry error or waht please help !!>..
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV Themes and Apps] episodev:
I had this same problem not to long ago. Unfortunately I don't remember how I got it working again.
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV Themes and Apps] triakom:
The program Valert has the same bug.
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV Themes and Apps] carlalsford:
I found this bug in the noprogbk.cab file (I think that is the name). It is from one of the cab collections, and removes the background for the programs in the program tab
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV Themes and Apps] vinodxxx:
ya rite i removed the Valert and now its Ok..

report this bug to the developer!!!
[P3300, MDA Compact III  upgrading etc.] janiali9:
Dear All

I am having ARTE200 . when I bought this it was in Korean Language I upgrad the ROM with some DOPPED D800 ROM and now I am stuck . I am not able to upgrade or downgrade any of the ROm its getting stuck at 3% all the time . I tried USPL as well .

MY Device information

ROM Version : 1.28.0.0 WWE

Radio Version: 02.69.90

Protocol Version : 4.1.13.30

ExtROM Version : PDAMOBIZ.com

IPL : 3.07.0001

SPL: 3.07.0000

GSM:02.69.90

OS : 1.28.0

Please help me in this Thanks

Janiali
[P3300, MDA Compact III  upgrading etc.] ferfecir:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=311403

:)
[P3300, MDA Compact III  upgrading etc.] Zecanilis:
Sorry for saying this to you, but i think now you don't a PDA, but a brick...:(
[P3300, MDA Compact III  upgrading etc.] ark666:
Flash the factory rom suitable for your cid.
[P3300, MDA Compact III  upgrading etc.] Zecanilis:
Yes you can try that if you can get into to the bootloader.
[P3300, MDA Compact III  upgrading etc.] artem1995:
I've came across this problem.try to do uspl unlock. it helped me
[P3300, MDA Compact III  upgrading etc.] mouse.co.nr:
Hi janiali9

SPL seems to be locked!

shall be SPL 1.11 to upgrade with non ufficial ROMs, else you can only upgrade with original Korean ufficial ROMS of the same Provider...

Read here for SPL unlock:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=311403

download, run, soft reset, notice New SPL change, then Flash a new rom..

Here are some good WM6.1 ROMs for Arte 200:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=428934

Wish it will help..

Good luck!
[Wing, P4350 ROM development] blake d:
hey i have been looking for the iphone police scanner app. for my harold(wing).... but im just wondering if its windows. if nebody gets it or finds out about it pls pls let me no.... if u get on youtube and type in iphone police scanner u can see what it does and check it out:mad:
[Wing, P4350 ROM development] Zaknafein21:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=378400
[Wing, P4350 ROM development] ivanmmj:
Thank you. Lately, posts have been rampant in the development forum. We need a mod in here that's here on a daily basis. :/
[Wing, P4350 ROM development] Zaknafein21:
Sad and True...

Even if Sticky´s would glow nobody will ever read them but that´s a basic Forum disease.
[G1 Android Development] mindbender77:
Hi everyone.. i have been searching and searching for an answer to this but i havn't been able to find it anywhere..

i can't get abd to work on my computer for some reason and i followed the tutorials step by step.. anyhow all i want is to load the new radio

is there a way to flash the radio on the g1 using another method rather then the abd shell way?

please any help would be greatly appreciated..

Mindbener
[G1 Android Development] futango:
you download the radio. name to it update.zip. place it in the sd card. reboot using Home+ power. Hit alt+s. wait for it to update. push home+back and your done.
[G1 Android Development] mindbender77:
hey thanks a lot i can't believe that its sooo simple.!!!
[Wing, P4350 General] blake d:
hey im looking and trying to get and figure out the police scanner app for my harold(wing)...if u have ne info pls let me no! u can check it out on youtube type in iphone police scanner
[Wing, P4350 General] noellenchris:
www.scanamerica.us

or

search wunderadio
[Wing, P4350 General] blake d:
so how do i get it onto my wing i went to the website and could listen from my computer but i wanna add it like an app to my wing....ya you can overdose if u do something wrong u can seariously mess your phone up
[Wing, P4350 General] ivanmmj:
This is not a herald development thread. Please keep the "I need this software" to the software subforums (Herald, Herald 6 and the actual main software subforums in XDA which are even better than the Herald subforums...) This subforum is meant for the "I made a ROM" threads. That way it makes it easier for everybody else to find ROMs without having to shuffle through a bunch of "I need this software" threads.
[P3600 ROM Development] maverikdj:
I have a Htc P3600 with Rom update to "HTC P3600 Trinity-ITA-Claros-351-FULL" i want test wm 6.5 on this smartphone but i don't find a italian version,where i find it on this forum?

Thanks
[P3600 ROM Development] r75:
there aren't italian 6.5 ROM for the moment...

maybe later, but they are not very efficient yet :o

bye
[P3600 ROM Development] pallelio:
una domandina.....

tu hai la rom di claros, tutto ok?

ti funzia il tab di internet explorer su manila?
[P3600 ROM Development] r75:
first please write in english ;)

with the claros 3.51 full rom version doesn't exist this issue

the internet manila tab work correctly

for older versions there is a fix that you can find in second post

:D

bye
[P3600 ROM Development] papahi:
hey evry one,

i m new in the forum, so, i'm locking for a ROM with WM 6.5 for my HTC P3600

with original SFR (operator in Frence) ROM's !

can some one help me?

thx
[G1 General] MikeRoz:
All the guides I've found thus far that have described how to root your phone and flash to a new ROM have required using a modified ROM. Is it possible to turn a G1 into a Dev Phone 1 without the use of a hacked ROM?

If I understand the guides correctly, you need to flash back to RC29 to gain a root console, then you need to replace your recovery partition with one that will take ROMs signed with different keys, then you need to replace the bootloader, and finally you neeed to flash from a modified ROM.

Would it be possible to instead replace the bootloader, recovery partition, and ROM with their stock Dev Phone counterparts, thus essentially turning my G1 into a stock Dev Phone 1? The Dev Phone 1 has root access enabled, so wouldn't I enjoy all the benefits of the hacked ROMs?

Sorry if this has been answered elsewhere, but the guides seem to focus on modified ROMs and a search revealed nothing.
[G1 General] t4c:
You can downgrade and root, after that install official ADP 1.5 and eSPL but this doesn't really make sense, grab JF's Cupcake ADP 1.5, hSPL and you will have more fun.

The recovery system > original recovery, more options, real backup. So is hSPL > eSPL.
[G1 General] MikeRoz:
In this thread it says I have to replace the recovery partition with a modified one so that the phone will accept images that have been signed with different keys.

Will the recovery partition already on my phone accept ADP images, allowing me to skip this step and only deal with the SPL and an ADP image?
[G1 General] lbcoder:
hSPL only gives you the ability to write non-matching NBH files. With eSPL or hSPL, you won't be using NBH files anyways, so this doesn't matter. Might as well use the stock eSPL. And yes, you can certainly write the ADP1 image once the eSPL is installed, or you can write any of the custom images... I wouldn't use the word "hacked", since those based on the official ADP1 1.5 image really aren't hacked, they're just customized. And of course, once the eSPL is written, you can switch between system images at will without any kind of crazy hacking procedure to do so -- that's what eSPL is made for.
[G1 General] twistedumbrella:
Alright, let's take this a step further...

I am trying to identify the exact set of files that determine ADP1 vs. G1. I flashed the JF ADP1.5 and ADPCP2.0. The later was identifying itself on the phone as T-Mobile G1, despite the file name. I returned to JF, but used the boot from ADPCP2.0 and did manage to get a lot of the speed in it, as it is much faster. I still want the whole file system, though, but I need to be on an ADP version. Before you go on about su and root and stuff... I have it. But programs such as Spotter remain free if you are ADP branded. So the question is what do I need to keep to keep ADP?
[G1 General] lbcoder:
Thats easy. The file that identifies to the OS if its a G1 or ADP1 is /system/build.prop. Note that you can customize this file however you wish.

The main *real* difference between the ADP1 and the G1 that gives the ADP1 infinitely more power than the G1 is the bootloader. With the engineering bootloader, you can do anything.
[Touch HD General] khab00key:
has anyone idea? how could I import my yahoo contacs on my blackstone?

thx in advance
[G1 General] darkrangr:
I used the new improved method of moving apps to the sd card and it worked great. However my sd card got taken out without unmounting it and now i cant access my apps. The fat32 partition still works but i cant seem to get it to relink to the other partition. All the apps have the broken symbol on my home screen and are not in the drawer. I tried rebooting and unmounting remounting but im not getting anywhere.

Also, when opening the Apps2sd app it says card not partitioned properly, it is possible it borked my ext2 partition and is there a way to check?

anyone know how to get the OS to see the apps again?
[Touch Pro, Fuze General] allthatinny:
dunno how many of you saw this but i am very disappointed and pissed off about this little news if its true

http://pocketpc-live.com/top-stories/bad-news-for-pocketpc-sling-users.html

Not only have ATT 3G network crashed nurmious times but the fact that they bragging about having the fastest 3G nationwide is a bit of a over hyped statement if they cant simply handle data streaming of Sling Media but they could allow they crappy knock off *CV TV*
[Touch Pro, Fuze General] speed_pour:
Not that I'm a fan of the policy by any stretch, but I can't help but want to agree with them in targeting Sling.

It reminds me of when I was in college (around 2000) and the network admin was debating a ban on counterstrike communicating outside of the dorms because it took just 20 players to slow something as simple as web browsing to the point pages frequently timed out. Note, at the time Counterstrike's network code was a joke and the college didn't have a very good internet connection to the dorms anyway (the campus was on a different connection).

The comparison is easy to make, as Sling isn't well optimized at all. For network management, it uses Windows Media Video 9 (VC-1) to handle network transmissions, which (I'm told, I can't claim expert knowledge) is only good within local networks or a very small number of hops over the internet, otherwise it becomes confused and tends to fire more data than it should. There's also the issue of I-Frame intervals, which appear to be set rather low by default (meaning higher I-Frames). I-Frames take more data and cause higher bandwidth. Searching didn't turn up many positive comments about sling's video scaling (which obviously should be done if it's played on a screen small enough to fit in your pocket). I admit, this information comes from some quick googling, so it may possibly lack in accuracy, but it does hint that Sling isn't well suited to efficient use on a cellular data network.

I realize some people use Sling for home security cameras or possibly some other useful scenario other than watching TV, but let's be honest....if it's just about watching an episode of Grey's Anatomy on your phone while at work...then it's pretty lame. Obviously technology CAN support this, but only as long as it's a few people doing it. If the idea caught on, it would bring down any cellular network.

I admit, I'm not a Sling user, so perhaps I'm a little biased...
[Touch Pro, Fuze General] baboola:
does that mean they've blocked sling's connection completely?

and i think it's b.s...we all paid the hefty fee for data plan so we should all be entitled to the 5GB or so soft cap. cut off the connection after the user has reached that limit! they can't just censor certain applications to help the network run more smoothly. they were supposed to provide a network that CAN sustain such traffic in the first place. If AT&T can't hold up to that much, they deserve to be and will be sued (unless of course they lower our data plan fees)

oh, and I think sling brought it upon themselves when they came out with the iphone app. i get the feeling AT&T only started this now because iphone users are feeling cheated ("the winmo users can watch sling, so why can't we?") this should teach iphone app developers a lesson! =p
[Touch Pro, Fuze General] iboj007:
Slingplayer is still working fine.

AT&T may just end up forbidding sling from working on their network in further software releases.
[Touch Pro, Fuze General] speed_pour:
I'm not really arguing here, I just wanted to point out that if you replace every instance of 'AT&T' with 'COMCAST' you will have the argument that was made by Comcast customers in 2007 about bittorrent traffic being blocked. Comcast backed down due to bad press, and a number of legal issues (primary reasons being that they didn't publicly admit to the censorship, and because their method of censorship was fraudulent...they were faking network packets, not just blocking them). Comcast didn't fully back down, but just adjusted their policy and tightened their methods of handling heavy customers. Note, this is a full sized ISP working over high speed cable, not a wireless provider that ALSO offers internet.

AT&T might back down, but I have the feeling this isn't going to draw enough ire to build the large public outcry that's necessary. I certainly doubt that they would lose any legal case regarding this. Even a legal case built around anti-competitive practices would fail since there's other methods to get video onto a phone via wireless.

Sling might stand to get some trouble since a lot of people surely bought into the equipment and iPhone app at the same time, and now won't get much use from either.

Of course, Sling may also consider suing AT&T if this becomes a protocol block...They actually stand a chance of winning that fight.
[Touch Pro, Fuze General] allthatinny:
reason why i said they not up to par is due to the fact that technology is changing, we are streaming almost everything over networks now, its like att said "Your world connected"

movies is being streamed over networks, communcations, video feeds, audio, data, near everything and another big factor, is HD (Hi-Def) everyone wants HD cuz the quality is awesome but some companies complain about heavy usage when in reality streaming a full size HD movie is not easy, can we be blame cuz they network cant handle the traffic, NO! not like we not paying our monthly service fees but putting softcaps and all these stupid things is just plan out stupid and its stopping use from evolving.

hell i had my ISP put a cap on me once for hosting a game server from my PS3 console, i was hosting a TF2 server i think, and they told me that i cant do it cuz its agaisnt policy yet the feature is in video games to use and to allow us to play, what if every ISP in the world were to enforce that rule then all servers will have to be run by software companies and we will be changed for it to maintain they servers.

i personally think att NEEDS to upgrade they network to meet with todays demand, cuz when Hi Def really settles, what will happen then, ATT will change they policy just to hold us back.
[Touch Pro, Fuze General] speed_pour:
I agree completely with your end-point that AT&T needs to upgrade and they are under-performing given the price point we pay.

However, I think your reasoning is completely wrong. HD Video? If we had any phones that could REALLY handle HD video, it might be a different subject. You're talking about 2 things that are kind of absurd at this point, streaming HD over cellular wireless and actually being able to identify a measurable difference on a phone once you have it.

Wired

ISPs are having enough trouble with streaming HD, a wireless provider can't compete with them. Keep in mind, HSDPA's (not 3g) highest realistic transmission speed is only barely capable of meeting the lowest acceptable speed for streaming 720i video. Please also remember, the NEW cool toys for home theater is hardware capable of short range streaming of HD, you're talking about very long range. Second, what phone is going to display HD video substantially better than decently encoded standard def video? On screens this small, HD video is a waste of time. Once TV-Out is adopted and displays something other than a pure screen copy (which automatically displays only the phone's resolution), then the subject can be brought back up. Keep in mind, I'm talking about current phones, not those that are coming eventually with the Tegra chip or other future implementations. In a year, the technological realities could shift enough that a very small percentage of users could be talking about this stuff, but today it's not a part of the real use case scenarios.

In my opinion, here are the real reasons this news should be bad and we need to push AT&T to improve their network:

a) The point of forcing iPhone users to get a data plan was to fund improvement of the 3g and hsdpa capabilities of their network. We've suffered through the poor performance caused by the iPhone, now it's time to see the network improve beyond the point it was at BEFORE the evil phone came.

b) The solution to the problem should never be banning a protocol/service/feature. Raising cost or putting limits on it would be reasonable, but completely blocking something is absurd and unreasonable.

c) I know I had another reason, but I forgot it while typing.... :rolleyes:
[Touch Pro, Fuze General] allthatinny:
ok lets take HD out of the pic even though its not to far away, but lets say a netflix video streaming software for windows mobile.

if i pay my monthly service charge on att end and netflix, they put a 5G softcap, one movie alone will eat up alot of that 5GB of bandwidth

i moved from the iphone and i could tell u that iphone 3G has awesome streaming compatiblity there was this one site called PublicPost that had movies on there for free with limited about of user, got closed down due to legal reason but i use to be at work watching really hot movies at great audio and sound with no hiccup problem but the fact that att wanting to ban tv streaming is a bit over the edge
[Touch Pro, Fuze General] sc00basteve:
"Up to Par??" Never has been

I worked for Cingular right after AT&T bought them until the week they started rebranding their phones as AT&T.

Warning on my bias :)

As much as I appreciate their innovations as a company, like being the first company to offer simultaneous use of Voice & Data by way of 3G and having the most popular and innovative phone on their network... I was horribly dissappointed at a bunch of their choices.

-They transitioned too fast and incompletely. ie. They were still removing/upgrading old AT&T Wireless components on their towers as they began rolling out 3G in other areas.

-Many people I know, including myself, lost signal almost completely as they transitioned voice to higher frequencies (1900mHz) and WCDMA/3G to replace them on the lower freqs. (Lower frequencies, 850 & 900mHz, offer better penetration through solids like trees & buildings. T-mobile is still the only carrier I get 1-2 bars in my basement...underground). What a waste! Especially since there are already so many 3G phones overseas that only use the 2100mHz WCDMA.

-Infrastructure. Infrastructure. Infrastructure.

How does a telecommunication company not give itself the Infrastructure to support the demand that they knew the iPhone would bring.

I'm glad I'm not helping them deal with the nightmare they made for themselves. Someone would have to pay me to give up my Sprint TouchPro. Who, btw, had the first 3G ntwork and still has the fastest. I'm happy to see people leave Sprint to get an iPhone cause it makes the network even faster lol.
[Touch Pro, Fuze General] sheik124:
What are you talking about? Really? You're wrong on a half a dozen counts.

AT&T bought absolutely nothing, in any part of their weird buyout ridden last 5 years. From Wikipedia: "Formerly a joint venture between SBC Communications and BellSouth, Cingular Wireless soon acquired the old AT&T Wireless; SBC later acquired the original AT&T and re-branded as "the new AT&T". Cingular became wholly-owned by the new AT&T in December 2006 as a result of AT&T's acquisition of BellSouth." The 3G rollout was already underway before anyone bought anything, I remember hearing about it when I signed up for AT&T Wireless in 2004. They didn't transition incompletely or anything, they've got the "world's fastest 3G network" running on a backbone barely fit for an MMORPG player.

T-Mobile is 1900 MHz ONLY, and uses 1700 MHz for 3G; you just get good signal in your basement because the tower is nearby.

Sounds like Sprint needs to pay you a little bit more to plug them like a salesman.

To the OP: Yes, AT&T sucks. I hate them for that too, blocking Sling because they know their network would crumble like a stack of cards if even 10% of us started seriously using our 3G.
[Touch Pro, Fuze General] speed_pour:
Sorry, just asking for a bit of a quantification of this statement. It's true AT&T would flop and die like a fish out of water, but what carrier wouldn't?

In the interest of staying on topic, and reissuing my question more contextually; since Verizon is possibly going to gain sales rights to the iPhone, does anybody think that with a mass purchasing of the iPhone under Verizon that they may also suffer serious network degradation with regular uptake of the Sling app? Would they have a different response? Given Verizon's history, I think they would likely demand to filter appStore apps, which almost certainly includes the Sling app.

It's not that I disagree on the problems with AT&T, and I'm not trying to be an apologist for them (I swear, I really don't mean to be), but I see a lot of negative comments which seem to ignore that all of the other carriers are just as bad/incapable/inadequate/incompetent. Normally I ignore all of it, but today seems to have brought it out of me.
[Touch Pro, Fuze General] freekquency:
gee i think they should work on the cell sites handling handoffs' before they go worrying about much else. Constantly losing calls/data when i hit a new cell site outside of boston. Its getting old.

At&t sucks
[Touch Pro, Fuze General] allthatinny:
same thing happens to me when am entering and leaving staten island, happens on both the ferry and on the bridge
[Touch Pro, Fuze General] speed_pour:
Not sure if those who are interested have seen this, but over the in the Kaiser forum the same subject was brought up (albeit, more relevant subject line). A possible work-around is described for interested parties (assuming AT&T actually does any filtering on the protocol). Here's the thread: Slingbox users beware...At&t limiting 3g access
[Touch Pro, Fuze General] sc00basteve:
Umm. Definitely Sprint.

I'm on a Sprint SERO plan and they have never complained about my data usage. That probably why they haven't said anything, but seriously. I will repeat: I'm happy to see people leave Sprint to get an iPhone cause it makes the network even faster lol.

I did 2.7+ gigs of data last month and 6+ the month before that.

Last night I tested this:

'nuff said