[Linux] myanonymousaccountname:
f these distro fiascos and ppl giving bad half assed advice like: no, this distro is better, no this one is better. ffs the only headache free, fast, no problems at all distro is debian 12 stable. It started with debian, it will continue with debian, everything circles around debian, there will always be instructions and .deb installation files for debian. Anything based off of Ubuntu including linux mint? Ruined and laggy. Linux mint even has the power to somehow corrupt my drives, and its slow and laggy. Fedora? recently turned into corporate half assed closed source cancer that freezes, lags and self destructs itself with updates, like linux mint and windows and its a figure it out yourself there are no tutorials kind of distro and many times no .rpm packages provided, it just doesnt work. Debian 12 cinnamon is best. Linux mx? full of bloatware, confusing and an ui for ants. Xfce4? great i guess if you are willing to learn multiple hours on how to customize it and are fine with minimalism, also who the f thought it is a good idea to put the taskbar on the top so you constantly have to look up and strain your eyes. cinnamon needs work and the actually useful upgrades just dont seem to be in sight. If windows 7 was free, open source, secure, updated, optimized, privacy respecting etc i would use it forever, but it isnt, so i switched to linux. i like how fast it is, hate that windows still has the upper hand with its applications, they are in many cases more feature rich etc while linux alternatives often have minimal functionality, i feel like it is only beginning to emerge and be respected as an os to actually use for gaming and casual use. Kde? overcomplicated, full of bloatware, resource hog and might be slow, but i have not used kde in debian, but on fedora its bad.

everything could be much better with linux, but it isnt, just why?

good example is chris titus bad advice, recommending other distros to use before moving to debian stable, makes no sense (outdated tho now)its just so bad there isnt a single decent linux info and tutorial channel. also recommends uninstalling drivers via nvclean which made things worse for me, just tick the clean install in nvidia installation. yes debian 11 stable was bad because it lacked functionality from out of the box and no package updates. but debian 12 stable is great, those other debian based distros you cant even install so many needed packages on those, wtf? and nvidia drivers installarion is so easy now on debian, enable the repositories on software & updates and in terminal just type sudo apt install nvidia-detect, enter nvidia-detect, then install nvidia-drivers. talking from experience ofc. and his video about nala fails ro mention that nala autoremoves kernels which are useful as backup and he makes it sound like nala is so much better but it isnt, regular apt doesnt hinder me at all. you dont even need to update debian 12 if you dont want to afaik, (setting this statement up for debate), if it aint broke dont fix it. altho if the security updates are actually very important it should show so in apt list --upgradable, but it doesnt show that. as far as i know (afaik) what fedora has but debian doesnt is dnf updateinfo, which shows exact info about updates etc. fedora dnf rpm has better terminal commands.

debian 12 most simple, efficient, fast linux system.

altho the recent 6.1.0-18 kernel update broke smth related to nvidia so it wont compile the kernel, but the system works fine but when installing via apt it starts to compile it everytime and fails. how to fix?

no good tutorials either on how to partition drives with gnome-disks, am i right? like how to partition an existing partition with no data loss. for example i have 500gb drive, debian installed i want to make another 150gb ext4 or ntfs partition from that to install another os