yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy A32 5G] Fernix000:
Yes i did! The system always works properly......the last crash happened after i tried to install a root checker app from the play store. The app crashed and after 6 or 7 other apps which needs no root permission eg. Ebay, Newspaper apps, Bluemail started crashing......another strange thing iss that BusyBox asked me to be installed in a different directory and that adadway was not working.....other root apps like SDMaid or Callrecorder are working well, as all my banking apps.......the same combination TWRP, LOS20 and Magisk is working on my old BQ Aquaris very well.

Strange is also that the Outdoor Navigation AppLocusMap is asking me also to change the directory before the first use.....i said yes and afterwards i had the same problem with crashing apps.....

Now i did the same procdure 3 Times, booting into recovery, format data, install Los and Magisk, boot into the rom, install everything new, than it works well and quick till the apps start to crash cor what reason ever......today like i described it, it happend afer i try to install the root checker app..

????? Thx
[Samsung Galaxy A32 5G] shottiemodder:
Hello, I am modding my phone but I do not find Lineage OS for my A32 (A326B), already unlocked the bootloader and did all the things that I need to do. But I do not find the Lineage OS, could you attach me the rom that you used? Thanks.
[Samsung Galaxy A32 5G] Fernix000:
LineageOS Downloads

download.lineageos.org

I downloaded an official build......
[Samsung Galaxy A32 5G] shottiemodder:
Ok thank you I am going to try but if i click the link it speaks about the a52s. Is it the same?

edit: tried it out but doesn't work...
[Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G] RBTYT:
Which is better microG + Aurora Store or Gapps + Play Store?

*Tell me how can I remove Gapps?
[Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G] ZG_DEV:
MicroG

+ wait do u use a vanilla custom ROM and u flashed Gapps ?
[Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G] RBTYT:
I changed the firmware and flashed Gapps. After I found out about microG, I wondered if I need Gapps and how to remove them? What opportunities do Gapps give me?
[Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G] ZG_DEV:
Reflash the frimware and install microG with the ReVanced Gapps
[Android Head-Units] hudyzg:
Hello.

Is there such a model of the head unit?

The seller told me that my unit model is: Teyes/Junsun X7

I would like to verify if the seller is telling the truth
[G1 General] roguestatuskat:
why are they blocking **** on the G1 if its supposed to be opensource

and in opensource anything goes

and i heard they wont let you put skins on the market

oh well i still love my G1 hopefully they dont **** **** up

btw we should start a petition against rc30 because its negating the open source part of the phoen
[G1 General] jashsu:
http://source.android.com/download

Yup. That includes taking the source code and building a closed or partially closed product.
[G1 General] genejockey:
I don't think you quite understand the concept of open source. Open source doesn't mean "anything goes." Open source means you get access to the source code. Depending on the license, you can take the source code and make a closed source program (BSD, for example), or it must stay open source (GPL). That is it.

RC30 had nothing to do with negating the open source concept. RC30 was in response to a bug in the project that allowed whatever you typed on the keyboard to be echoed to a console.

If you want a rooted, unlocked phone, get an Android Dev Phone 1.
[G1 General] vr24:
A truly wide open, mass marketed cell phone in this package would be a BAD thing for us. It needs to still have standards to insure the "typical" user can easily use the device and not have to worry about ****ing it up.

Get a Dev phone if you want to modify it.
[G1 General] Datruesurfer:
I really don't see what is wrong with selling a software unlocked device through T-Mobile. The default ROM that comes loaded does not have root enabled... you actually have to go through the SPL to flash a new image which has ro.secure disabled. Its not like someone can just accidentally go into SPL mode and brick their phone, they actually have to press a key sequence to access it.

Also, look at just about every other device on these forums. They run WINDOWS, the most closed source platform out there and even on those phones we can flash images via SPL. Why not on a phone running linux?
[G1 General] jashsu:
It is really quite a lot easier to seriously damage a Linux system in the command line than it is with Windows. With root access, Linux assumes you know exactly what you are doing. Root also bypasses quite a lot of Linux's security mechanisms. This behavior is not appropriate or ideal for a consumer-oriented device. The G1 is not marketed toward software developers and experienced Linux hackers. If such a device is required, the Dev Phone 1 is the appropriate option.

Also, if WinMo were ever to want to make serious attempts at breaking into the consumer smartphone space (where iPhone and Symbian live), I imagine it too would become seriously locked down.
[G1 General] Datruesurfer:
You know what has the same power that root has to brick your phone? the bootloader. Say you try to flash to the latest ROM and it fails half way through... Your phone is basically bricked. Regardless, HTC still has this enabled on all of their Windows Mobile devices. Not exactly consumer oriented functionality, but it is there so people who know what they are doing have the power to do what they want.
[G1 General] neoobs:
I really think everyone needs to calm down here. We aren't sure what is in store for the future. Maybe we should withhold complaints and other comments until after Google has finished their first release.

But feel free to complain about how t-mobile doesn't tell you about the beta-ness of the device.
[G1 General] Datruesurfer:
Google already made their stance very clear. Buy a Dev Phone for $399 + $25 market subscription fee + shipping or you can't have root. I'm sure its going to be the same for every other android device coming out.
[G1 General] jashsu:
It's not Google's decision to make:

Brian Swetland @ G1-Hackers mailing listhttp://www.telesphoreo.org/pipermail/g1-hackers/2008-December/000188.html

The t-mobile g1 devices are "working as intended" as of RC30. It is

possible that other OEMs or carriers may choose to ship their devices with

the platform in a less (or, hey, even more) locked down configuration, but

that is the choice of the OEMs and carriers.

Which OEM or carrier do you work for/speak for?
[G1 General] Genesis3:
This "its working as intended" is technically true but it means the HYPE behind the phone was and is a load of crap.

If T-Mobile wants to become Verizon, so be it. They're entitled. Customers are entitled to tell them to pound sand and stick it where the sun does not shine.

What's unreasonable (and indeed outrageous) is to sell a beta device to the public without making VERY CLEAR what you are doing. OTA "push" updates are even worse as they can (and in this case DID) REMOVE functionality that used to be there.

As for building "totally secure" environments, heh, have at it. But doing so destroys the attraction of "open source" and then you're on the hook to deliver the full experience that the user expects, because he or she can't get it from anyone but you.

Just so long as everyone involved understands that this is the tradeoff and is ok with it (that is, the customer is INFORMED before they hand over their money AND the company understands that they will get the criticism that will come when the experience doesn't meet expectations!) that's fine.

Would I buy a WinMo unit that I could NOT hack on and load my own firmware? Today, hell no, because what's delivered "stock" does not meet my expectations for user experience.

Neither does the G1, and the reason I'm not sitting here with one is because T-Mobile has made an executive decision to lock those devices down to the point that I can't do for myself what they either refuse to do (or are incapable of doing) for me, nor can I find other people who can and do those things and load THEIR stuff on the platform.

If I wanted a Samsung "prepack" phone I'd have bought one. Oh wait - I can even reflash and feature-edit those, along with Motorolas!
[G1 General] neoobs:
I would like to know where you got your information about Google's stance. So far all they have said is that the device is still partly closed source till the get things the way they want it. This would also imply that later down the line they may give the option to open root again.
[G1 General] vr24:
Then don't buy a consumer oriented device like the G1 - don't like how it operates, there are thousands of apps to add new functionality. Want root? Too bad, it's not designed or released for that reason, or, gasp, buy a DEV PHONE.

You think T-Mobile is even remotely taking into considering the .00001% of the user base that is like you? Who wants to buy a phone to HACK it!? Be serious here. What features are you really missing out here? Can't teather the phone (which t-mobile doesn't want you doing anyways) - and can't set auto-rotate?

Yes, caching to the SD card is something that needs fixing, but hardly a major "I need root" problem at this point, the phone is practically still BETA, and again, BUY A DEV PHONE.
[G1 General] benmyers2941:
The update was to fix a gaping security hole not to remove functionality. The fact was that before it was fixed all it would have taken would be for a site contain certain malicious code and then a person would have root access to your phone and all your personal information with it. Just think of how far someone who had your google credentials could go.

RC29 was a test of the OTA system. If it hadn't been for the security hole RC30 probably would not have happened. If it wasn't fixed it would have opened Google & T-Mobile to a massive amount of liability.

This is another misunderstanding of what open source really is. It means that the source code is open to be viewed and/or modified. It does not mean that the hardware needs to be (think of Tivo).

Aside from that one of the new "cupcake release" that is currently being worked on includes

support third party updates of system applications.

This ability alone means a lot.

Please do some research before you try to say what T-mobile's intent is. If they're not going to move to block tethering, which would impact them via the bandwidth, then why would they move to otherwise lock the phone from modification in ways that wouldn't?

The G1 is not missing any features advertised before launch. The fact that you want more from it and the fact that people

are

working towards making that a reality kind of shows the power of open source. I don't think that WM had this level of development and as much progress a month an a half after launch.
[G1 General] jashsu:
Open source and Linux have different benefits to different groups of people with sometimes divergent agendas. These groups could include oems/manufaturers, carriers, power users, casual users. What is an "attraction" to you may be unimportant or a liability to someone else.

Seems to me that at the core of a lot of dissatisfied G1 users is either: 1) their own expectation that the G1 would have X and Y features that were never advertised to be supported "out-of-the-box" or 2) their dissatisfaction at not having root access (which was never advertised). Some folks new to the world of open source seem to think that any product built on os components must be by nature completely open access. This is a completely flawed assumption. I see no need for T-Mo or Google to apologize for a potential G1 owner's own assumptions going into the purchase.

Another solution would simply be not to voluntarily buy any WinMo products at all. Tech is still a business, and the best way to get businesses to act is to put your money where your mouth is.

@vr24 & benmyers: Agreed completely.
[G1 General] Genesis3:
There are a whole host of things that the G1 does not do by intent.

Tethering is just one of them.

I actually use my phone to do work on, and the functionality that would have been LOST going from either a Wizard or a Kaiser to the G1 was insane.

I toyed with one for a half-hour or so in the store and said "thanks, but no thanks" when a half-dozen things I attempted - simple stuff that WM6 (and even WM5!) support native like, oh, connecting to my ORB server at my house and watching CNBC on the phone - failed.

Tethering has been possible on virtually every phone that can run data T-Mobile has produced and can talk to a PC since the Nokia 6610 (a phone I still happen to have, having purchased it FROM T-Mobile in something like 2001!); removing that functionality is absolutely asinine given that it was intentionally removed - Linux by its nature knows how to do both NAT and DHCP, the two essential elements required.

Yes, I'm aware they've removed it from a couple of other recent models' firmware (Samsungs in particular) as well. You want to cite some speech by a T-Mobile executive that PREDATES the firmware changes they made intentionally to the Samsung models? Guess what - executives lie all the time. Wake up and smell the coffee, or have it poured down your back.

Like I said, if they intend to become Verizon they're entitled, and customers are entitled to leave - and will.

"Dream"? Ha.

T-Mobile is IMHO making a critical error given that the "bling crowd" doesn't need a $100/month cellphone bill and into the maw of the worst economic conditions since the 1930s do you think people will cut luxuries like data on their cell phones or their car payment first?

You fanboys are welcome to your "Dream"-cum-nightmare; as for the suggestion that I shouldn't buy a WinMo device because "its not all there as intended" I buy with the full knowledge and intent that I can unlock and flash it, intending to do so at the point of purchase. That's part of the bargain and why I purchased it - if that wasn't possible I'd probably be on a Symbian device instead.

As for "doing research" the fact of the matter is that without system-level access nobody's going to be building a native tethering application. Modifying routing tables (including setting up NAT) requires system privilege; 20+ years experience writing Unix device drivers here kids.

Have a good evening.
[G1 General] benmyers2941:
Android ≠ Linux
[G1 General] jashsu:
This comment is so flawed I don't even know where to begin. I'm assuming you mean dhcpd. In any case, the average user only cares whether tethering is possible or not and yes it is very possible. I'm beta testing June Fabric's PdaNET for Android.

Last I checked, htc's numbers for G1s shipped thru end of Q4 2008 is 1 million units. Considering that T-Mo is Dream's only carrier and all Dreams are sold with a dataplan, I think they're doing alright. Certainly feel free to correct me if you have more accurate numbers.
[G1 General] Genesis3:
The drivers are in the kernel. Have you looked?

I have.

Beggars eh?

Hmmm... me thinks you got that backwards.
[G1 General] benmyers2941:
Yup...sure have... and as jashsu pointed out

How so? I'm not the one asking for stuff and then choosing not to believe what I'm told.
[G1 General] Genesis3:
I'm asking for nothing.

I'm pointing out that T-Mobile has gone down a self-destructive path with the G1 in the way they've locked it down, especially after the fact with RC30.

Oh, that's RELEASE CANDIDATE 30, natch, right?

Anyone see a "this is a beta device and beta software" statement in front of them before they bought? (Yes, I knew, which is in no small part why I didn't buy)

That's what I thought.
[G1 General] benmyers2941:
You just don't listen do you. RC30 was to fix the security hole not to lock it down no matter how much you'd like to spin it otherwise. For someone for a much professed expertise and experience you're doing an amazing job not recognizing the risk of a third party being able to get unknown root access.

Finally, if you didn't buy and don't like it, what are you doing posing about it? Are you short a few credits for your jerk degree? I don't like the iPhone but you won't see me going on their forums to bash it.

Mods, this thread is going nowhere... can we get a close?
[G1 General] jzerocsk:
This is my biggest complaint. I actually have zero complaints about the G1 handset or the current state of Android.

But I think it is completely that T-Mobile rushed the G1 to market before it was ready for primetime and never warned the average joe sidekick user. Like Genesis3 I was very much aware of the unfinished state of the product but I was willing/able to deal with those shortcomings in exchange for showing the world that if you build an Android phone, people will buy it.

Reminds me of http://gizmodo.com/5083371/a-call-for-revolution-against-beta-culture

But there are far too many people who are seeing these "Will a monkey throw poop on me?" commercials on TV and all of the other advertising from T-Mobile. Nowhere does it indicate that the product is "Beta." Not that this exonerates people for not being informed buyers but there are definitely pieces missing that are possibly SO basic, that one might not even bother researching to see if they are there.

They should have kept this thing under wraps a little longer or at the very least focused on "power users" before mass-marketing.
[G1 General] diabolical28:
your wrong here it can not do such basic and simple things such as FWD messages and save pix from them something THAT EVERY SINGLE phone since 1995 could do..... Half assed effort. but like many other people stated that its beta etc.... but Tmo locks down the phone so say maybe JF or others or myself cant rebuild the package and reflash a OS that has all the features and likes that more than 100 people here have complained about. Buy a DEV phone ? i think not ill break 50 phones to get the 1 i can root. im already +1 now i should get my next g1 in the mail today or tommorow ( brand new replacement ) ..... so opensource platform means alot of things but it does mean i can CHOSE to do with it as i want. My properity. Linux = open source.... a free OS thats why theres 50 flavors of linux from suse to debain to whoppix to red hat to mandrake.... Shall i go on ? But those are all custom flavors of *nix... say i find maybe Airopeek or something be written for the android platform am i going to be able to capture packets without root? this is where the frusteration comes from. The Default g1 browser should BE TRASHED and replaced with steel. The Default pic viewer which i commented about in my last post tries to Cache all 5500+ pictures i got on my SD card well i wait 35mins and its still not done but guess what the Cache file on my card was 148mb.................. Also Android is supposed to close applications on its own... thats a joke Nothing Closes EVER unless the application itself has a exit or Kill process in the program. try to shell to kill the app and guess what permission denied. We need to have an application like "taskmanager" to kill all these open applications which do cause network connections thus inturn drain battery life. Open source does mean that its freely modifyable and redistributal..... which android will be... but TMo has taken that away. They decide what standard features and things that you should have on your phone and when they feel like updating certain features. Coming from a wing which i still have. We always wanted to Strip out all the baggage and make it fast as hell and lean on space... use this same concept on the g1 why wouldnt i want to get rid of the default Shi*tty pic viewer and browser hogging up space 6meg program space and impliment another users application. TMo claims that rc30 was to fix a serious security threat BUT.... if thats all it did couldnt they have opted to make users assign a password who wanted to keep the ability to root it? or Force a password for root. they sure could have. They opted otherwise.

The fact of this arguement is T-Mobile chose to Market and Release a phone knowing Full well that it is been hyped and coined as an "OPEN SOURCE PRODUCT" then closed it quicker than you could say YIKES BATMAN. Nothing else on this entire arguement ever should be relevent besides that.
[G1 General] benmyers2941:
Alright let's keep this on the "is Android really open source" topic.

1. Yes, the source is open and you can create your own distro just like *nix if you really wanted.

2. The G1 is not Android. It is a piece of hardare the runs Android. It is ordered and customized by T-mobile.

3. It is allowed under Android for the service provider to modify and even restrict the OS and hardware as they see fit. This is their right for subsidizing the cost of the phone.

4. RC30 was a quick fix. Implementing security procedures to allow a small percentage of their customers who really used it to keep root access would have been cost prohibitive. A quick cheap solution to limit liability, even if it inconviences some, is always going to be chosen first in the business world.

Any arguments regarding T-mobile making Android closed, please see points 1 and 2. Any arguments regarding T-mobile making the G1 closed, please see points 3 and 4.

We don't know what the future holds, it's looking pretty good to me (cupcake). Until T-mobile has removed a feature that was in an official Android release it cannot be said they're reastricting Android. The G1 that you got under contract from them is allowed to be restricted. At this point all they have done was chose the quickest cheapest route to patch a security hole. I wouldn't call that anything other than business as usual in the corprate world.

That's my opinion feel free to disagree. Just don't confuse the hardware with the software.
[G1 General] neoobs:
Topic is closed.

Both points have been argued past any reasonable debate and now to a flame war where neither side really cares about the community. In the future try to use facts to support your claims and listen to those who provide such facts.

I don't want to see this debate restarted in another thread.

Neo
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] cmfCyangenModteam:
I decided to look whats inside of Samsung wave 525 firmware to grab the theme,

But how do i extract all files from .bin files?
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ZG_DEV:
Try using 7zip.
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Oswald Boelcke:
According to the 7-zip website .bin is not a supported file format.

7-Zip
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ZG_DEV:
Maybe WinZip ?

After googling I found Anyburn
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Oswald Boelcke:
XDA certainly differs from other website and especially the (a)social media. As an example, we've recognised contributors (RC's) who first collect valuable information and think about what they intend to post to add value to XDA before they hit the "Post reply" button.

Regards

Oswald Boelcke

P.S. I've merged you're two posts. There's no need to always create a new post if you could easily edit your earlier one unless you're objective is to boost your post count. In my opinion, number of posts is irrelevant; the quality of posts is what counts.
[XPERIA X1 General] Shadowdh:
Hi all, I have the xperia x1 and have installed the Homescreen Plusplus (Batterystatus) I love this little app but have noticed that the battery indicator now drops in 10% increments instead of the 1% it did on my HTC TyTN II... is this normal or can I fix it somehow...? Cheers for any info...
[XPERIA X1 General] searley:
Thats because the system battery driver only reports in 10% steps

hopefully a FW update in the future will fix it
[XPERIA X1 General] Shadowdh:
Thanks for the info Searly... I wondered if that would be the case...
[XPERIA X1 General] DeMonkey:
:confused:Anyone know where I can get Homescreen Plusplus (Batterystatus)?
[XPERIA X1 General] CantoX1i:
http://www.chi-tai.info/cs_batterystatus_xda_neo_wm5_def_im_cs.htm

Happy ++'ing :P
[Xiaomi Poco F3 / Xiaomi Mi 11X / Redmi K40] Nick069tf:
I installed LineageOS 20.0-20230819-nightly-alioth-signed on my device yesterday. However, the fingerprint gets deleted after every restart on its own. Does anyone else have the same issue or any tips? NikGapps are also installed.