yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Sony Xperia 1 IV] guhvanoh:
Well we don't know what version of the 1 IV you bought. Neither do we know where you bought the fone or what country you're using the fone in.

Maybe a few more details would help. We'd also need to what sims you're inserting into the fone. However, I don't think you need a sim to take

photos. An sdcard might help if you're running out of space...
[Xiaomi 13] Yugu Jiang:
There is a problem that while you are in the fastboot mode,your computer may not indentify your Xiaomi 13 normally,it's because you didn't use the original data line,this problem made me mad:oops:.I share this tips for you in order to help you avoid problems,hope you can flash your devices successfully:coffee:

Any questions can ask me!

It's my honor to help you guys
[Xiaomi 13] NOSS8:
Regarding this post:

https://xdaforums.com/t/rom-miui-fuxi-xiaomi-eu-rom-for-xiaomi-13.4546907/post-88924511

A 30-day period is applicable for unlocking another device with Mi unlock on the same account, but not for a device that has already been unlocked.

You locked the bootloader with a global rom on a CN device, your device is bricked.

MIFLASH[GUIDE]⚙ USE XIAOMI FLASH TOOL

FOR ALL XIAOMI BOOTLOADER MUST BE UNLOCKED MIUI https://new.c.mi.com/global/post/101245 https://en.miui.com/unlock/index.html HYPEROS GLOBAL https://xdaforums.com/t/how-to-unlock-bootloader-on-xiaomi-hyperos.4654009/...

xdaforums.com

Do not post on the Xiaomi EU rom thread but on this thread:

https://xdaforums.com/t/mi-13-chinese-rom-to-global-rom.4547817/
[Xiaomi 13] Yugu Jiang:
Yes,my device was locked by mistake.

I had to exchange a new one and wait for 21 days o unlock the bootloader
[FYT Android Head Units] Bookleaf:
I want to set the Sygic app as the default launcher app but can not see a way of getting the Sygic icon into the default launcher app settings screen so it can be selected.

How can this be done?>
[FYT Android Head Units] ducthang83:
go to ch play and install frontapp for tayes
[General Topics] djwellis:
[moved from Off Topic board]

OK.

First off, hello everyone! First time poster, so be nice!

I have already tried to find this on google, on the forums, and in all sorts of other places, but putting in the criteria "bluetooth" and "handset" returned all sorts of crap....

Anyway, I am hopefully soon to be acquiring an XDA Flint / HTC Athena. Which as far as I'm concerned.... is a big phone. One that I'd rather not hold to my head all day.

I do have a bluetooth headset already, but I find that using it has several distinct disadvantages;

When I am shopping on the phone - people think I am talking to myself, and therefore mad

When I am outside, the other party can't hear a word, because of the wind

Add that to the fact that I would like to at least appear a little normal, I decided to see if there was a telephone handset (such as the good 'ol Nokia 3310) with all the innards removed, and had just been converted into a bluetooth "handset" with just a microphone and speaker for me to connect to the HTC.

I have already found something similar - but slightly impractical - in the form of this, of which there is a bluetooth version on the interweb.

Anyway - can anyone help?

Am I bringing up a long forgotten thread about this question that has already been asked?

Many thanks,
[General Topics] djwellis:
success

OK..

I found the solution utterly by accident.

If anyone is interested, I went for (and about just about to collect it from the post office) the LG Style-i bluetooth handset

*crossing fingers!!!*
[Lenovo Legion Y700] mainasus:
Hi guys,

I'm new here, I just bought a seconhand Y700 with ZUI 13.0.586.

I heard that this table is compatible with ZUI 14 but I can't find it.

Should I upgrade it from ZUI 13 and is there any link that contains the rom for download?

Thank you!
[Lenovo Legion Y700] vries:
you should be able to upgrade it normally with ota upgrades (it take few upgrades to do get ZUI 14).
[Lenovo Legion Y700] mainasus:
I bought this tablet from a local shop, they modified it somehow that hides the OTA update in the setting menu. I can't find it and I don't know how to activate it, so I guess re-flashing the stock rom via PC is the only choice.
[Lenovo Legion Y700] vries:
If you have bootloader unlocked, then you may try to load rom from thread below and update from it.

[GUIDE] Unbrick Lenovo Y700 tablet

Windows guide, might work for other aswell. I finally solved my problem with my Lenovo Y700 tablet being stuck in bootloop mode due to trying to flash Magisk boot with a mismatched firmware version. This resulted in the UI constantly crashing...

xdaforums.com
[Lenovo Legion Y700] mainasus:
Thanks mate!
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] doubtfire1:
Is there a way to stop this? straight up locks you out of using the app and closes it because it doesn't detect a google play install.

i'm using a degoogled crDroid rom on my phone. putting the app on magisk's denylist doesn't help even though my phone passes safetynet and denylist usually works for other apps that have problems with it being rooted.
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] simplepinoi177:
Is it possible for you to make a screenshot? It might prove helpful -- both in maybe providing a clue as to the issue and for reference...
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] doubtfire1:
sure, heres what happens. cant tap out of the box to ignore the warning either as it just closes. this is after reinstalling it as well just to make double sure
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] doubtfire1:
still having a problem if anyone has suggestions. im using revived microg if it helps
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] simplepinoi177:
As you've stated

safetynet has been depreciated as a check. Please run Play Integrity API Checker and see if you pass the other two other than "MEETS_STRONG_INTEGRITY". Most likely if you're not passing "Device" & "Basic", that could be indicative of the problem.

But I'm sure it's the

as it seems that it requires a proper "googled" implementation to the ROM; even if you've revived "microg" -- it seems that microg is not enough (and if I understand correctly even the devs of microg acknowledge that it is a simple substitute and not a proper replacement)...
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] spice mwenda:
Any fix....for me I have play store installed...on lineage os 20 with root....have tried everything... Updated play services..also installed play integrity check module but chat gpt still kicking me out
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Homer-J:
I had these problems on my Sony XZ1 compact with custom rom, when I had blocked google services via xprivacylua and edexposed.

While experimenting, I had to switch to LSPosed after a magisk update, with which unfortunately the google services can't be blocked anymore (com.androis.providers.settings module remains unchecked), possibly because of this chat gpt now works.

Reason for the assumption: xprivacyLua is no longer fundamentally able to block google services as before.

On my amazon fire tablet max11 the problem with chat gpt still exists, although for example the latest Playstore version is installed (unlike on the Sony), here I am still looking for a solution.
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] YasminPorter:
Have you tried reaching out to the app's support team? Sometimes they can provide insights or workarounds. On a related note, including ERP ChatGPT integration into our system had its hiccups too, but with a bit of troubleshooting and support, we managed to get it up and running smoothly.
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] x111:
pixel8pro

with

"lineage-21.0-20240426-nightly-husky-signed"

and

"PlayIntegrityFix_v15.9.7"

and

"magisk enforce denylist" with chatgpt on the list

and

"openai.chatgpt_1.2024.115-196_2arch_7dpi_f7c09de2e61dc58bd503b17240a53b14_apkmirror.com.apkm" downloaded from apkmirror.com

with this combination chatgpt works well
[Touch HD General] ChrisB:
Im dont know, every where I read, thay say that the cam is s..., and it takes 5 secs. from when I press till it takes the picture.

Is that right?
[Touch HD General] El_Mariachi:
Stick with the Diamond, much better IMO. Only advantages of a HD is the bigger screen and more RAM, but I think the Diamond is much more useable.

To answer your question, that appears to be the case for me, yes.
[Touch HD General] arfster:
"Only" the screen is a pretty major advantage, it's almost double the size. The Diamond isn't seriously usable for web browsing - the HD is. Ditto for video.
[Touch HD General] eaglesteve:
That's rubbish and completely untrue. I find the camera to be quite excellent and picture quality very good in fact.

I don't blame you though for getting that impression. Before I got my own unit, I also had that false impression from reading all the complaints on this forum. But after getting my own HD, I'm really happy with it. This is despite not having flash.
[Touch HD General] tomasn:
Exactly the HTC Touch HD is a great phone. Some people reading forum like this think they get a good sampling of what people using the phone think about it. That is not true since it is mostly the maybe 1% that have troubles of some kind with their phone that write here. The rest of the people that are happy with their phone do not write about.

The only thing I can recommend for people considering buying the phone is to get the phone and try it out. You will most likely like it a lot.
[Touch HD General] turkification:
Camera is not bad, but also not good. Don't buy it as a camphone.
[Touch HD General] bufodill:
I've got a nokia n82 and a touch hd.

If the cam is ****? Yeah, it is. Don't let people let you think different. I guess it's not worse than other htc-phones though, I haven't had one since the original touch (elf).

If it was daylight out here now (denmark, actually) I should have taken comparision shots for you, but it's not, and with the xenon flash on the n82 it is even more superior in this light.

That said, the touch hd is a fantastic device in every other aspect! I didn't buy it for the cam, and don't care about it's picture quality, since I've got my n82.
[Touch HD General] ZoZo2:
The camera is only suitable for taking pictures in well-lit area.

Forget about dark areas.

All in all I'm sufficiently pleased with it, as I did not expect anything great.
[Touch HD General] 69reichertm:
Hello

Yes the Cam is ****

very slow slow slow and it only does pictures in very light areas.

In the drak they are very dark - the missing flash is a desaster.

Do not buy the hd for taking pictures or videos

But also safe you monry on fu.. nokia modells
[Touch HD General] SiliconS:
IMHO...

The quality of the photos that the Touch HD can take is far better than the three HTC devices I've used before. It's actually pretty good in my limited experience with it. However, the camera remains virtually unusable because of two things:

1 - the delay between tapping the screen and the photo taking the image while the camera fusses over the focussing and then thinks for a couple of seconds

2 - the lack of hardware button makes camera shake very hard to avoid

These two factors make it almost impossible to take a photo of a moving scene because of the unpredictability of the timing of the shot and the likelihood of camera shake.

Attached is a photo I've just taken in the low evening light that illustrates what should be a perfectly easy photo. I couldn't avoid camera shake even standing still and being ultra-careful. The exposure isn't bad though.
[Touch HD General] genesisfm:
the cam is bad... only usable by normal daylight also video recording is very bad
[Touch HD General] zuadao:
well in normal daylight the cam is better than my n73. video is realy better...
[Touch HD General] PelloG:
Are there some tweaks or settings to speed up taking images? It's really slooooow...
[Touch HD General] cwogan:
TIP: Disable the "Auto Whiteness" in the camera.

I have spent the last 2 weeks playing with the camera and was very disappointed with low level lighting pictures at first, BUT! now I have ressolved this problem.

There is an option in the camera "Auto Whiteness", the sensor or software in the camera seems to be useless at judging lighting, so if you set this to manual and select the indoor lighting icon (looks like a light bulb) then the camera gives quite impressive low level lighting pictures.

Speed of the camera between pressing and taking a picture is about 3 seconds, not the worst shutter delay I have seen on a camera phone, but not the best. Hopefully HTC can address this with future software updates??
[Touch HD General] zoro25:
For me the main issue is the blurryness of virtually all pictures,

if its a picture of a person I have to ask them to be still, then I take a pic and then I have to ask them once more to be DEAD STILL.

Most people take stay still to mean don't walk off any where but with the Touch HD stay still means don't let one muscle move.

If you want a phone that takes decent picture then its not or you.

Its a multimedia phone (pics not included)
[Touch HD General] mbadger:
I have been playing with the HD for two days now, which meant finding all of the tweaks and then removing them until it works for me. The excellent tweak app (search for it here) recommends enabling the sport and burst modes of photo (works great):) and then changing the maximum res to 3M (makes my phone crash!):mad:

Anyway if you want to take really good SHAKE FREE pics the ONLY way is through the burst/sport options. The auto focus for the 'normal' cam is so crap that the shutter stays open forever. In sport or burst mode the camera has to ditch the refocus and just shoot - out of the 5 in sport or 30 in burst you will have two or 10 decent pictures. This was exactly the same on my old HTC P3900.

The video is still completely crap - although much improved if you shoot as for MMS.
[Touch HD General] eaglesteve:
If we're talking about very low light, even my Canon camera does not give good result. So I don't expect miracle from HD. Having said that, I have taken quite a lot of indoor shots with lights on and the result is not noticeably worst than what my Canon camera can deliver.

As for motion, I actually don't find any problem there. I have taken quite many shots with car moving towards and away from me and the sharpness is still there. No blurring at all.

I find vido recording to be really good.

The lack of hardware button is a non-issue for me. I find it very easy to just touch the screen, the try to hold it still for the process to be completed.

This is the best camera I've ever had in a phone, and I find myself using it quite a lot since getting my HD.
[Touch HD General] vangrieg:
This is seriously the worst camera I've ever had in a phone. And the sad part is the auto focus which is way too slow and cannot be disabled. No other tweak will help really unless somebody will figure out how to set focus to infinity permanently.
[Touch HD General] earistomene:
Attached are photos taken with the HTC Touch HD at night in New York City last week:
[Touch HD General] svesam:
YESSSSSS IT SUCKSSSSSSS!

Auto light balance is useless, shutter speed is miserably slow (not even for a still photo) , no flash , video is worthless. 5 MP not in full screen (in full screen it is 4MP) .

If you have kids and want to take a photo for them then please wait till thy sleep and start shooting , other wise you will be wasting only your time and battery :D .

It is even too bad in watching movies without setting hours and hours converting them!

I hope it is not a hardware issue and only software that can be updated later :o .

No cam-mobile , yes surf-mobile and nav-mobile.
[Touch HD General] Chris Cross:
Did you alter anything on your computer with photo editing software or are those the original untouched pictures? I edit photos quite often and I am surprised that there is little noise in those photos, considering they are night shots taken from a distance with a mobile phone. They actually look too nice to be night shots taken with the HD.

In my experience, dark settings are not good with the HD no matter what you do. On some of them, however, you can get them to look quite a bit nicer by editing the photos on your pc.
[Touch HD General] Louis:
The Cam is great !

I really like it, I wish there was a hard button for the autofocus and taking the picture.

Maybe this could be done in the future with the volume buttons.
[Touch HD General] earistomene:
I did not alter any of the photos. They were all taken on my phone and I have uploaded them to my facebook gallery as well.
[Touch HD General] johnpatcher:
Unbelievable good quality. Why so many other photos look so bad then?
[Touch HD General] arfster:
Lot of wildly varyting opinions on the cam here. I wonder if HTC's quality control is a bit wonky with the sensors or optics?
[Touch HD General] earistomene:
Not sure. Bad units perhaps? Below are more photos taken with the Touch HD:
[Touch HD General] arfster:
Some motion blur there, but that's quite normal for a small sensor. What you're not getting is noise (and thus minimal denoising either).

What's your rom btw? I wonder if the auto-iso is screwed somewhere.
[Touch HD General] earistomene:
Here are a few more photos taken from the Touch HD:
[Touch HD General] earistomene:
In my signature.
[Touch HD General] arfster:
Ahh, whoops sorry, don't have those displayed normally :-)

Exact same rom as me, weird.
[Touch HD General] Lazy79:
hm.. really good pictures.. better than my cam in my ht touch hd.. strange..
[Touch HD General] Black Antitoon:
/me quotes

I don't realise why it is impossible to focus the image when you press the virtual button and take the picture when you release it. It would solve the delay problem.
[Touch HD General] garcianacho:
Can't understand some ferocious critics to the camera.

Of course is not a cannon 10 mp reflex, but is the best mobile camera I have owned ever. And of course, in bad light conditions the quality comes down, but... in wich one not?

As someone has posted, the automatic white balance don't works fine, but selecting manually the results are awesome, inclusive in inner lights ambients.

I attach some examples in different light conditions, for your judgement (maybe my exigency level is lower than yours...)

For those who are considering buy the HD... no doubt. It's a excelent phone, in photo too.
[Touch HD General] pozytywny:
I also think it makes good pics. Especially in bad light conditions (the noise level is very low as for a phone camera) But it makes me angry because HTC blew up a good camera not giving a flash light. :( At least 2 leds...
[Touch HD General] Chris Cross:
I just took some pictures to compare the various white balance settings.

These pictures were taken at night time with the bathroom light on (which is a yellowish light). I would not call that really bad lighting conditions, but they are definitely not ideal - even for a regular camera.

The names of the pictures tell what setting was used. These are original - not retouched - photos. I'll also include a zip file with the original photos so you can view them full screen on your PC if you want.

In reality, the tile is white. The "light bulb" setting was closest to reality for these shots. The "auto" setting was terrible.

Even the better ones would need retouching on the PC in order to get them closer to the original scene.

This is just a quick little comparison test under less than ideal lighting conditions. In my opinion, the camera did a good job here at making the best out of the lighting situation. All in all, I am happy with the camera. The lack of flash is a downfall. Another time, I'll take pictures outside in the daylight to compare the settings in that type of light.
[Touch HD General] arfster:
Pretty horror show situation for any camera Chris :-) I take it the bulb in there is a old-fashioned tungsten type?

Edit: anyone played with contrast/sharpness/saturation in options/advanced/image properties? seems a bit odd they all default to +3
[Touch HD General] Chris Cross:
Yeah, not a good situation for any camera. :D

The bulbs are a tungsten type but not really the old fashioned type you are thinking of. In reality, the bathroom does not look that yellow (I'd go loony if it did). :p The second to last picture captured it a bit more like it really is, but it is still off. However, considering this is a camera on a mobile phone, I think it handled the situation very well when using that one setting.
[Touch HD General] Chris Cross:
+3 is the middle value, it makes sense that it is the default. They all go from +1 to +5. I guess that is just their way of labeling it.

The bathroom pics above were done with everything at +3.

In that lighting, it might have been better to drop the saturation to +2 to avoid too much yellow getting in the picture. But I pretty much always leave everything at +3. If I need to fine tune, I do it later on the pc.
[Touch HD General] eaglesteve:
Chris,

Your bathroom photo is not bad. I still have the same problem even with dedicated camera. HD in my opinion stands tall among camera phones.
[Touch HD General] rovex:
I have an LG viewty and a Nokia N95 8GB here as well as my HD. Both are know as good camera phones. The HD CAN take just as good pictures as the other 2 if the light is good, but its a bit harder to do so. The other 2 focus much faster and have less tendency to blur, but in low light the HD does have less noise, but of course has no flash.
[Touch HD General] rovex:
Here is an example of the viewty v HD. Both taken with standard settings, viewty had no flash. The film is Casino Royale in HD shown on my TV in the dark. Both look good, i think the HD just takes it though!

Originals:

Viewty

HD

These pictures are adjusted, i increased the brightness of both to the maximum in a photo editor. As you can see the viewty image shows massive noise, the HDs shows almost none!

Viewty

HD
[Touch HD General] ChrisB:
Ok..

Now I have got all the info I needed, and thats really good pictures there..

And I got the terminal today, so now Im a HD owner.. :)

Thanks alot for all the info.
[Touch HD General] johnpatcher:
You are so lucky :). Unfortunately I will have to wait some more days :(. And because of these useless holidays called Xmas it will took even more longer :p.
[Touch HD General] arfster:
That's really odd. Two thoughts:

1) humungous denoising? Not really seeing any signs of it

2) permanent low iso? Would explain the long shutter speeds
[Touch HD General] chaosdefinesorder:
attached is a picture I took just now - I've been having rather little success with the photos until reading a previous post about the auto white balance. Changed it to the lightbulb and you can see the result below.

This was taken in a bedroom at my parents house with indirect lighting. The photo is actually whiter and clearer than with the naked eye! (the desk is actually white but looks yellow to the naked eye with the lighting)

I'm impressed, I shall have to remember to set the white balance manually from now on!
[Touch HD General] Chris Cross:
@chaosdefinesorder: Looks like the camera did a good job at white balancing that picture. Nice. Also, I noticed that you have the date/time stamp on the photo. I assume you know you can take it off if you don't want it there in future pictures. I personally prefer not to have the stamp on a picture - especially since all that information is stored in the picture's exif data anyway.
[Touch HD General] chaosdefinesorder:
yeah I actually put it on there manually as I tend to name my pictures and sort by name rather than time taken.

as I say, am impressed with the camera now I know not to rely on the auto settings!
[Touch HD General] ez2remember:
Here are lots of pictures taken in this review.

http://www.mobile-review.com/pda/review/htc-touch-hd-en.shtml

Judge for yourself. :)
[Touch HD General] earistomene:
I checked my "Image Properties" and these were my settings:

Contrast: +4

Saturation: +3

Sharpness: +5

Hope that helps.
[Touch HD General] earistomene:
Wow!! After comparing the Touch HD photos inc omparison to the Samsung i900, I cannot contend that the Touch HD has a better camera. However, the Touch HD still takes pretty good, sharp photos.