yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Guides, News, & Discussion] AntiKippi:
Do you have root access or a custom recovery installed? If not I fear nothing I did will work.

You can still try to use a USB Keyboard to enter your PIN/Password and authorize the USB Debugging request.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Guides, News, & Discussion] phoa:
No, the two phones are not rooted and do not have a custom recovery. When I try to access fastboot, it shows as locked. Some years ago, I tried to root them, but all the tools I found did not work.

I have looked to see if these phones can be accessed through a USB keyboard or mouse, but I have not found clear information about whether they support OTG. It appears that to connect USB devices, it is required to support On-the-Go features. There is an official Huawei adapter with a USB-C socket to Micro USB, but I could not find any information about whether it provides OTG support. I have always managed the phone through the computer, so I never minded connecting it with a USB keyboard or any other device.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Guides, News, & Discussion] AntiKippi:
Just get a adapter for Micro-USB or USB-C (Depending on your phone port) Male to USB-A Female and try it. AFAIK almost all phones implement the OTG specification and should be able to be controlled by a keyboard. Also those adapters cost little more than a dollar on AliExpress and are very handy to have.

By the way, OTG is not provided by the adapter but rather by the device itself, regardless of the adapter used.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Guides, News, & Discussion] phoa:
Since the OTG is provided by the device and not the USB, I need to know if my phone supports it. I have not found the answer yet, but if someone who has the same phone has already tried it, they can give me hope and I can buy the adapter. Otherwise, I will buy it anyway because I have been without my phone for three weeks.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Guides, News, & Discussion] ze7zez:
It's easy to check, for example, at https://phonedb.net/ that the P9 supports USB OTG 1.3.

But this is a thread about "How to access a device with a broken screen without TWRP crypto support" and not about device specifications.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Guides, News, & Discussion] phoa:
Thank you for sharing the spec link, it has given me new hope. I checked other threads and sites to verify it, even the similar site www.gsmarena.com doesn't mention if it supports OTG. So, I will try buying this adapter and see if it works. Effectively, this thread is about a broken screen, which is also my case.

Today, I was able to check something new. I could see the shadow of the screen display, as if the contrast and brightness were reduced to zero. I can only see something when I introduce a torchlight to the display, but it is hard to check deeply, for example, to see if the touch screen works. Considering that the screen is new and if the touch could work, I have some questions that came to my mind. Does water have an effect on some components that make the screen still black after ultrason with Iso alcohol, so it will back after some time? Is there a software problem on Android after trying to connect the screen from another model that has misconfigured it? So after take control, need I do some software manipulation for the backlight?
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Guides, News, & Discussion] otisqueena:
tks
[OnePlus 6T  Questions & Answers] CLE12283:
DELETE
[OnePlus 6T  Questions & Answers] hacker12:
Do you have a backup of persist?
[OnePlus 6T  Questions & Answers] CLE12283:
I FIGURED IT OUT
[OnePlus 6T  Questions & Answers] CLE12283:
**** NUGGETS
[Introductions] Monda_avkor:
Hello, Masters!

I'll introduce myself in the best way I can.

My real name is Daniel, I'm from Spain and my favourite sport is turning devices with possibilities into absolute garbage.

I try to learn everyday, according to my advanced age (I'm 48), but everytime I learn something, a wild challenge suddenly appears that keeps me unrailed.

I'm here to listen to your wise voices..
[Introductions] galaxys:
Welcome to XDA Daniel and enjoy the forums! 🙂📱💻⌚

Cheers
[Introductions] moroe62:
MOD TRANSLATION (from translate.google.com)

"Hi everyone, I hope you can help me, I recently installed a USB device in my car to use Android Auto wireless and so far everything works perfectly, the problem is that if I want to use the standard Dab radio of the Ford Sync 3 system, I don't I can get out of Android Auto or at least I can't find the system, which I hope there is, to get out of it, can anyone help me, thanks to those who will"

******************************

Ciao a tutti,spero che possiate darmi aiuto ,ho da poco installato in auto un dispositivo usb per utilizzare Android auto wireless e fin qui funziona tutto perfettamente, il problema è che se voglio utilizzare la radio Dab di serie del sistema Sync 3 Ford ,non riesco ad uscire da Android Auto o quantomeno non trovo il sistema,che spero ci sia , per uscirne ,wualcuno può aiutarmi,grazie a chi lo farà

moroe62, Greetings, and welcome to XDA. As a friendly reminder, we ask all members to please post in English as stipulated by Forum Rule 4 (quoted below) -- that you just agreed to when you first registered your account. Please consider this when you are creating a post in the future. Feel free to include your original message under the English message if you wish. If you do not know English, I encourage you to use any of the resources in the quote below. Your post has been translated as a one-time courtesy.

Thank you for your cooperation, and have a good one!

simplepinoi177 FSM (Forum Specific Moderator)
[Introductions] V0latyle:
Hello and welcome to XDA. Please take a moment to review the Forum Rules, Forum Etiquette, and User Guide linked in my signature.
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] bird333:
I know this is a subjective question, but I am wanting to hear opinions and most importantly why you have those opinions. Among these kernels, which do you think is the best? What are the differences between them? TIA

1. Despair

2. Kirisakura

3. CleanSlate

4. Radioactive
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] bobnot:
Stock. To be honest there isn't a noticeable gain going to a custom kernel.
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] LLStarks:
Stock. I don't mess with kernels anymore. Installing a kernel becomes a loaded question.

What exactly am I flashing?

An AnyKernel package? A full boot? Do I need to repatch my ramdisk to keep root?

Not worth the effort.
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] HipKat:
I've ran 2, 3 the most and 4 and I haven't seen a bit if difference in any of them
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] jhjhjhjhjhjh:
Dont you hate when you open a thread and no one reads or gives a direct answer to your thread lol..

Anyway.

I've tried only two kernels for the pixel 7 pro,

Radioactive and Despair.

Lmao when i saw that baby on cleanslate kernel thread i felt weird and cant flash any kernels that require a magisk module.

Kirisakura , again modules needed and the guy who shows how to install that kernel

is speaking like people are clueless so his content doesn't sell this kernel.. lol

Radioactive is by far the best for features and performance

Despair is by far the best for battery and performance.

Choose wisely lol
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] jhjhjhjhjhjh:
Lastly Google has massley improved the stock kernel on android 14 beta ..June kernel update version.

No heat fast, fluid, responsive, great battery life

i average 11.3 hours of S.O.T on stock now..View attachment 5978503
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] bird333:
Thanks for the response. What did you mean by the bolded?
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] gpvecchi:
No heat? My phone heats a lot!
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] HipKat:
Dude, making fun of a Kernel or a Dev is really not needed or appreciated.

If you have issues with a Magisk module or Magisk in general, that's a different topic.

@Freak07 does this for free, first of all and is a highly recognized developer here and his kernel is probably the most used
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] HipKat:
Fact and different kernels don't change that. I finally bought an Air Vent phone cradle so cold air blows on it when I'm driving
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] Freak07:
Threads like these are the reason why developers stop sharing what they create during their free time for everyone to use pretty much free of charge.

Especially given the answers that were already shared here.

Instead of asking what´s the best, maybe read the first post of the respective threads and decide from there if anything is worth the effort. Then try all different possibilites that are available to your for free and then decide.

If others spend their time to provide something for you to try, why not take that time as well, decide for yourself which is best to use.

It´s not a competition, nor do I want to compete against any other dev in here to conclude which is the "best" kernel. It´s a community and evolves by working together.

Use the one that suits you best and be happy that places XDA like still continue to exist.

That´s simply because the kernel does not contribute to heat by itself.

The phone is allowed to get exactly as hot as the thermal-hal allows the phone to be and then begins to throttle.

Micro optimizations as its usually done within the kernel can improve things, but you still have a chip that gets to 80°C - 100°C when opening an app if no thermal throttling is happening. If ambient temp is above 30°C your phone´s skin temp will reach 40°C in a few minutes. If that takes 30 seconds longer during the same time and usage purely from kernel optimizations that would be a huge win, but will probably be dismissed or missed entirely by most, if not nearly all users. :)

It refers to the picture/meme embedded in the CleanSlate thread here on XDA, which could lead one to think you didn´t read the first post at all there.

If you read the OP and check the kernel.zip it become pretty clear which partitions are modified during a kernel flash. If you ask the question in my thread you probably get an answer on those too.

Since init_boot is not touched by flashing a kernel, flashing a kernel will not impact root on the pixel 7 series.

Reading the instructions in my thread would have answered that last question as well.

I can accept that, although it makes me a bit sad and it sounds overly generalized.

I can see why people don´t care about micro optimizations at kernel level that would give them 10 seconds more SOT at the end of the day if they could replicate two days with exactly the same usage, having some of the latest development from the linux kernel included or not caring about security patches that are sometimes included months ahead before google patches them and they end up in offical firmware.

But features like sweep to sleep or restricting the CPUFreqs on the fly make a real difference on my end here.

Either I´m really having no thick skin today, or this sentence alone brings me back to the beginnng of this post.

"Threads like these are the reason why developers stop sharing what they create during their free time for everyone to use pretty much free of charge.

Especially given the answers that were already shared here."

Seems all the time that´s being spent is not worth the effort.
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] bobnot:
A lot of devs have moved to patreon or other platforms to monetize their efforts and minimize the noise.

Patching security vulnerabilities and requiring root is a odd combo. Granted you can take steps to minimize unwelcome root access but the door is opened.

Not bashing I greatly appreciate all your efforts and have used your kernels on a few devices. It's more of AOSP and heavily customized SOCs have changed the modding scene to be rather unfavorable for devs and end users. I still have a nexus 5 and pixel 3a XL for flashing.
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] Freak07:
I don't do this for money, if I would, I'd be starved by now. I get basically nothing in return, except a few donations here and there (for which I'm incredibly grateful) and those never covered the costs for a single pixel device. :)

Yes indeed a lot have moved, but I still like the community spirit that's sometimes floating around on XDA. Also the forum style instead of chats like telegram where everything happens without much moderation and following a chat with a few thousand users is literally impossible.

I guess I'm getting old.

You're completely right on that.The door is opened once you unlock as well.

I guess most on XDA root their phones, while rooted phones with unlocked bootloader are still the minority overall.

So why not use something that includes fixes for vulnerabilities well in advance then?

If there's an attack vector on the GPU driver or an exploit like dirty pipe I wonder which is more likely to be targeted.

The group being rooted or all pixel devices.

Yes I agree as well where. Flashing a kernel, modifying anything on the device is not as simple see it once was.

Same goes for building the kernel.

But devs and users simply have to adjust. Thinking about how it was doesn't help. :)
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] bird333:
I think his comment was about the video maker not anything against the dev.
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] jhjhjhjhjhjh:
i disagree,

threads like this keeps things in front of every user who is curious on a project that he or she doesn't know.

example i used to build roms back in the day and of course loved all feedback, the feedback keeps a dev interested.. imo.. if there's no feedback why am i developing for a community..good point 👉
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] Freak07:
no valuable feedback was shared here that would help any of the devs involved or a user to decide, which kernel to flash. let alone a constructive advice.

Instead your post ridiculed at least one dev, which should never happen here.

"You can't flash a kernel that requires a magisk module" is no valuable feedback either, this will not help anyone deciding what to flash or get familiar with a project either.

feedback can be given in any of the respective threads for everyone to check out. :)

Constructive feedback can indeed motivate.

Threads like these and the replies that were given already do the exact opposite.
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] bird333:
I fail to understand what is wrong with asking 'what kernel do you like and why' which is essentially what I'm asking. I even emphasized please explain 'why' because I was hoping to see the selling points of each kernel.
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] LLStarks:
I'm not directing my posts at any dev.

Simply reflecting on over a decade of dealing with custom kernels, the various ways to deploy them, the things that can go wrong.

Considering I run betas, I can't run custom kernels as far as I know.

At any rate, it's 2023. 10 years ago, kernel GPL violators had their own fiefdoms. I have no regrets fighting them. This was when people would unethically use thermald, mp_decision, and exfat patches without proper permission or attribution to make a private kernel with super secret features.

That's clearly not a problem anymore. Custom kernels are now rich with various schedulers and governors that you can't find in stock.
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] jhjhjhjhjhjh:
my post if one can read in its entirety, i was referring to the you tube creator not the dev who created the kernel.

second if one had an objective oppion one can always express without judgement.

reason why i promote and appreciate here on XDA i suggest one read on rules why us android enthusiast support...

Finally, in my experience in over 12 years of android, i never seen a kernel needing additional modules or an application to gain all functionality of a personal build kernel from source ..

Features are baked while building the kernel your argument in this is quit mute .

Conclusion the o.p asked what custom kernel is recommended, not ",threads like this b.s..what are you hiding??.

O.P ill say Despair, Radioactive or Stock period.....
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] Freak07:
I was not talking about the remark towards my kernel.

Since you seem to be very educated in this area I refrain from explaining to you why the additional module is needed :)

I'm sure you can figure out the relation of kernel/framework interaction yourself if you're experienced in building roms.
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] jhjhjhjhjhjh:
i sure can..

again i see the reason why one would develope a kernel that requires a backdoor perse.

my reason and i don't wont to say why i wouldn't build using these methods would unintentionally hurt or may come off displeasing to a dev so i digress ..your welcome... each dev contributes in many variables. try to embrace all if you can...:)

By creating custom kernel, you can remove some of the unnecessary parts of kernel to reduce overhead(embeded devices) or security holes(servers).

This quote should say it all....
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] bird333:
I haven't done much with kernels in the past but I don't remember seeing talk of needing/using magisk modules back in the day. Just curious, why is it that way now?
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] Freak07:
The kernel can't and shouldn't exactly know what's happening in userspace/framework.

The magisk module replaces a config file for the powerhal (present on stock too), that controls and changes kernel settings dynamically based on what's happening on the device. (e.g. screen content moving, apps opening, just touching the screen, camera recording at 4k60fps, recording at fhd/60fps, device idle).

Since partitions are read only, overlaying those files with a magisk module is the only good option, except for rebuilding the entire firmware.

For some of the changes done by the magisk module check the first post of my thread and look for the section about the powerhint module.

I'll try to document all changes in the first post. You might want to check all the release posts as well, they contain a lot more information. :)
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] HipKat:
That would be great if that was the title of the thread but it's not
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] bird333:
Is that what all the fuss is about? I was just inspired by the thread called 'what is the best file manager'. I'll change the title.
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] HipKat:
That's it. Because think about it, there really is no "best" anything. It's all a matter of opinion and perspective based on usage. What is good for me may not be good for you, so who could say what is the best?

The better way might be to ask the way you have it now
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] bird333:
I think most people understand there is no 'best' anything and would naturally translate that to mean 'what do you like the best'. In addition in the OP I even say I know it's subjective. I'm hard pressed to understand how people could take that in the worst way possible.
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] pico3:
Stock
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] NippleSauce:
I prefer cooked popcorn kernels =P.

...Oh, you meant kernels for this phone?

My apologies.

I'll see myself out =).

But as a few others have mentioned, they are all a little different. So what each of them will do for you is something that is dependent on how you use your phone and what you use it primarily for. While some users may hate one kernel and love a different kernel, others may have opposite opinions. It ultimately all comes down to your use case =).

Personally, I prefer stock nowadays because I am a rather light phone user and just like to keep things simple. My device's battery life isn't the best though and so I am sure there could be beneficial battery gains from some of our available P7 kernels (thanks to our awesome few Pixel developers).
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] Skuddle:
I have some photos that are currently in a "My Photos" folder inside Internal Storage. I want to move that entire folder with its contents to my Home screen. I've wasted around 45 minutes searching around the internet, trying this and trying that, but cannot find how to do this. Can somebody maybe post a link to a file that explains how to do this?
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] blackhawk:
You create a shortcut?

Pixels seem to be a pain for doing this but I may be mistaken. Try using these work arounds. Or try some more Gookill searches.

On Samsung's it's part of the UI in My Files. I use them everyday.
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] krakout:
You definitely cannot "move" the folder, Home is not like a Windows Desktop. But various file managers like Mixplorer can add a shortcut to Home.
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] synesthete:
I'm not sure if you can do this with the stock features of Android, but there are apps that can do it. Some file manager apps have this feature (I use Solid Explorer). There is a really useful app called Shortcut Maker that can do this too.

Shortcut Maker - Apps on Google Play

Simple app to create shortcut for anything you want.

play.google.com

From the home screen of that app you can tap "folder", select the folder you want, and then it offers a few extra optional settings, then tap "Create Shortcut".
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] Skuddle:
I've been looking at the following file managers:

Solid Explorer

FX File Explorer

MiXplorer

File Manager by InShot

I would like a file manager in which I can drag and drop a folder and its contents from one pane on the phone to another. FX File Explorer can supposedly do this. Can the others that I've listed also do this?
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] krakout:
It would literally take you seconds to try them. I know it took me roughly 5 seconds to do it in MiX.
[Google Pixel 7 Pro] synesthete:
I know that Solid Explorer can do a dual pane view, if you rotate your device to landscape orientation (90 degrees).

Keep in mind that the Homescreen on your device isn't really a directory or location in storage like it is in many other operating systems. Putting something on the homescreen isn't copying it to a different directory. The homescreen is whatever launcher app you have set as the default launcher.
[Android Head-Units] vador:
Hi,

Processor: ARM Cortex-A55 1,6ghz (4gb ram and 64gb space)

OS: Android 10

Device:uis8581a2h10_automative

Brand: SPRD

MCU: 2023.03.17 14:30:25 NOR_53_L6315_N32P48F64_E60_V:1.0

I have purchased an android unit Ljda for my Peugeot 207CC. The unit comes with a SimpleSoft canbus box (XP) which partially works with the Peugeot 207 - meaning it does not support the old monitor that I have re-mounted in the dashboard and also some other sensors such as "door open". So I purchased the Raise canbus box PSA-RZ-01. The raise box works flawless all signals are detected.

Now here comes my problem and headache for some weird reason the canbus settings where I choose the car model and canbox are not saved permanentely. What I mean by this is that everytime I start the car (if I keep it off for a while) I need to go to factory settings (put the pin), canbus settings and choose the canbus in order to restore the car functionality. The weird thing is that with the SimpleSoft canbus this is not a problem the settings are save even after a power off.

Anyone know why this behaviour and what is possible to do? Is very annoying having all functionality but need to enable it every time you start the car.

Here is a link with all the pictures and details on the build, mcu and the canbus mcu:
[Samsung Galaxy A30s ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & O] :
Hey A30s community, if you wanted to get the latest version of twrp 3.x on your a307fn device but haven't been able to succeed due to bootloop or footer issue with vbmeta.

This patched (vbmeta) twrp tar. file will work for you!​

Odin installation method:​

1. Flash to ap slot using Odin.

2. Disable autoreboot

3. Click START.

After that hold the volume DOWN + power to get out of download mode and as soon as you see the screen go black hold volume UP + power.

In twrp format data and flash magisk to maintain the recovery.

BUGS: 0

You tell me!

Mod edit : link removed due to lack of kernel's source code.

@Notabot_140, our PM discussion is still open for you whenever you want/can...​
[Samsung Galaxy A30s ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & O] V0latyle:
@Notabot_140 You must post the kernel source you used to build this per the XDA GPL Policy linked in my signature.
[Samsung Galaxy A30s ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & O] DaReDeViL:
Download link removed and thread locked due to lack of kernel's source code.​