yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G] derhpasaur:
Hi, I flashed the latest PE+ GSI recently and have been pretty happy with it, but I'm having issues specifically with receiving SMSes and calls, only when I'm in 5G & connected to a 5G network (if I send an SMS/make a call it goes through fine on 5G). Mobile data works fine.

If I switch to either 3G or LTE, calls and messages can be received and sent as intended.

I have the dual-SIM model, SM-A528/DS.

I have "Automatically restart RSI" enabled under phh Treble settings.

I'm using the stock kernel, had updated to the latest OneUI 5.1 update before I switched over.

(don't think these should matter but just in case...)

I have TWRP installed.

I don't have Magisk installed (specifially had it installed for a bit, but uninstalled it to get my banking apps working - was facing this issue with Magisk installed before as well)

I'm passing SafetyNet as well as basic_integrity + device_integrity (not strong_integrity)

It's not a terrible deal-breaker, but I am still paying for 5G with my mobile plan and it's a bit of a shame to not be able to use it.

Is anyone else facing this issue? Any possible fixes I could try?

(advance apology if this would be better off under a different thread, I don't usually post on XDA - sorry!)
[Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G] Arm1nas:
A bit off topic, but there should be a PE/LineageOS, and other Roms getting release quite soon on a52s, as the developer from A52 4G got this phone and the rom he's building only needs some small bug fixes, so GSI won't be necessary soon.
[Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G] arsfr:
Same issue, different device, but on LTE, I cannot call, but I can text, but on 3G same thing. [Stock Kernel, One UI Core 4.0, A12 Nacho (A127F/DSN)]
[Treble-Enabled Device Guides, News, & Discussion] Oswald Boelcke:
@tablet_seeker Thread closed as duplicate of

https://xdaforums.com/t/aosp-rom-of...ns-for-galaxy-tab-s6-sm-t860-sm-t865.4573383/

Please seriously review the XDA Forum Rules with special emphasis on rule no. 5 and post only ONCE! Thanks for your cooperation.

Regards

Oswald Boelcke

Senior Moderator
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] dankerzz:
Hey everyone!

Have some problem. I'm using Samsung internet but can't use google password manager for autofill on this browser.

I'm change autofill manager in settings to google, but it's not work for samsung internet. Firefox works fine, but need samsung internet.

Pls help someone.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] Sam Sung:
The setting is under:

Settings\Personal Browsing Data\Usernames and Passwords
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] dankerzz:
All togles on, but this settings for samsung pass only.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] amirage:
Samsung internet and Google autofill are a Mexican standoff...they don't work together! A possible workaround could be changing the keyboard to gboard
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] dankerzz:
No, it's not work for samsubg internet.

OMG..
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] matty100147:
Google auto fill doesn't work for Samsung internet, it's for this reason I don't use Samsung internet, I use Vivaldi which has Google auto fill, not to bad on battery and can have all trackers and ads turned off
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] dankerzz:
Thx for solution, it's works, but I wouldn't want to use third-party browsers.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] Shipoftheline:
This is why I just stick to Edge on both laptop, tablet and phone
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] dankerzz:
Also use edge on desktop. How do you block ads on edge in android?
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] Shipoftheline:
Settings, privacy, security & block ads
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] dankerzz:
Nice, Isn't there another solution like a third-party browser?
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] xtcislove:
delete
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] Shipoftheline:
No because Google doesn't like people being able to stop its revenue
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] chetly968:
To block ads on all browsers couldn't you just go into Samsung settings/connections/more connection settings and under private DNS enter DNS.adguard.com? It seems to block everything for me.

Unless in misunderstanding what this thread is about, lol.
[Honor 8 Questions & Answers] blanketred:
I have an old Honor 8 (FRD-AL00) currently running EMUI 5.0.1. I want to go back to EMUI 4.4 or 4.0. Is there anyway to do it?

Phone is not rooted.
[Touch Pro CDMA] nausds:
I have noticed that while talking on my phone if I adjust the volume using the two buttons on the side it only adjusts the "System". I notice no change in the volume from the earpiece.

Has anyone else had this issue? Is there a fix? Or am I just an idiot doing something wrong (always a possibility)? :)
[Touch Pro CDMA] lgrulz:
have you installed any registry tweaks or other programs? I tried switching to the stock window dialer and lost that function and had to switch back.
[Touch Pro CDMA] MrSickle:
If you have disabled the HTC dialer skin, then you won't be able to control volume without installing the cab in this thread: http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=2718080&postcount=7
[Touch Pro CDMA] nausds:
I did switch to the stock dialer. Thanks for the info.
[Touch Pro CDMA] iTouch24:
i had another ? regarding changing the volume... when i change volume up and down it increases or decreaes 3 bars at a time.. is there a way to only make it go one bar at a time....?

i remember reading a hack out there to perform this but i cannot locate....

HELP...:D
[Touch Pro CDMA] Reistlehr:
if you use the stylus or if you have really really pointy fingers you can select bars inbetween the 3.

.. and then i wonder why my screen is so scratched up
[Touch Pro CDMA] 12aon:
You did huh, I'd be very interested because I've been searching for this or how to do it for a while now. I can't locate where to change this, so if you can remember anything. I'ts very useful for people using their phone as an MP3 player. Let me know, 12
[Touch Pro CDMA] iTouch24:
i remember reading on this site or ppcgeeks ,,,, will update if i find
[Touch Pro CDMA] 12aon:
That would be great I can't find it on xda, maybe ppcgeeks then, 12
[LG V40 Questions & Answers] whitedavidp:
My much-loved, rooted, V40 405QA with latest and last stock Android has worked great on Verizon since the 4G changeover forced me to move from ATT where it could NEVER make voice calls.

I should say that it has worked great until the last few months and I think this change is due to Verizon's final sunset of CDMA - which is supposed to have been completed 12/2022.

In the last few months I find that the voice/sms network is often on EMERGENCY only (not true of the data network which seems to recover just fine) - even if it was fine only a few minutes ago (in a different location, usually). And this can ONLY be remedied by rebooting the phone. You can see this in the phone's radio details (hard to get at as the normal settings UI has no link to it - but still possible in a couple ways).

It appears that this happens any/every time that the phone has network contact but looses it. This can be caused by passing through a dead zone or by turning flight mode on and then off. It happens every single time! And again, the only "fix" I can find is to reboot. This is clearly unacceptable.

It is NOT Verizon or my SIM. I have tested moving it from by V40 into the wife's Samsung S8+ and it does NOT do this at all. So it has to be something about my phone. Additionally, I put a T-Mobile SIM in the V40 and it does the same thing - only worse because T-Mobile coverage is so crappy where I live and it is almost one BIG dead zone.

I have tried all the network preference options to see if changing them has any influence. It does NOT. So I am really stuck here.

So:

1. Are others seeing this problem?

2. Are there any known work-arounds?

I really appreciate the time and any help.
[LG V40 Questions & Answers] whitedavidp:
I have found, by accident, that the issues reported above DO NOT occur if the phone is in Safe Mode.

This makes me think that some mod I have done via magisk, LsPosed, etc is the source of my problem.

Sadly, I cannot get at anything while the phone is in safe mode. I would try to use adb but this damn phone has long had issues with USB connectivity - described elsewhere. I have tried to make my terminal emulator or rooted file manager into system apps hoping that if they were I could use them within safe mode. But that doesn't work either.

I use Magisk all the time without, I must admit, understanding much of what it does or how it works. It just seems to... But now I really think I need to be able to get at files that Magisk seems to "protect" in the system as I suspect what I need might be in there. I have no idea where Magisk puts/keeps all this. I will post in the Magisk thread but thought I'd mention it here as well.

Thanks for any suggestions.
[Android General] tablet_seeker:
This Google website offers frequently updated daily GSI builds of AOSP, where code changes from literally any contributor to the Android Open Source Project are built and hosted on Google Servers.

Branch Grid

ci.android.com

The FAQ states that there is a two factor security system in place to ensure the added code is genuine and safe.

Reviewers check the added code and make sure it's consistent with Google Guidelines.

Verifiers build the changes and verify it if everything checks out.

That's basically it.

Meaning the code inside those images ready for download on ci.android.com has only been vetted by a single reviewer, before a verifier builds them for testing and it is hosted as an artifact.

I understand that these img files are not meant to be used by anyone, but it still seems a little crazy to me that Google would publicly host an image file of AOSP which could potentially be downloaded or even flashed by anyone, while the code inside has basically undergone 0 scrutiny.
[Android General] V0latyle:
Are you honestly suggesting that the AOSP source could contain malicious code?

There are very few people who can contribute to the source, and the current security measures which you've already detailed are sufficient for this. Open source does not mean open development.
[Android General] tablet_seeker:
There is literally a single person who reviews code changes in the aosp-master and aosp-android13 branches before they are built on ci.android.com and the resulting images publicly released for download on Google servers.

This reviewer person is neither a Google employee nor in any way associated with or beholden to them. It's a random civilian who was chosen to become a reviewer by virtue of submitting "high quality code".

This doesn't strike you as at least a bit ridiculous?
[Android General] V0latyle:
No, because while Google supports AOSP, it does not control it - Android is not a Google product. This avoids conflict of interest. Whoever it is who reviews code changes was undoubtedly chosen based on their merits. Linus Torvalds isn't employed by any major company, yet I doubt you have any complaints about the fact that he maintains the Linux kernel "master" (which by the way is what the Android kernel is based on).

Android is, and was always meant to be, free and open source software, and that's the beauty of it. This is why the proper way to build Android is without GMS or any Google apps; the user themselves must choose to install those, as they are Google proprietary software. The Continuous Integration builds do not have integrated GMS; in fact the only "official" GSIs with integrated GMS are here.

It sounds like your entire argument is "How can we trust AOSP to be clean"? Simple answer: Because it's open source. You (and anyone else) can download, decompile, inspect, literally do anything you want to the code. Sunlight is the best disinfectant, as the saying goes; would you rather that Android be closed source, owned fully by a major tech giant which works primarily to serve its own corporate and shareholder interests - or would you rather things be as they currently are, with the source code freely available for anyone to inspect? It's really really hard to get away with malicious code in the latter circumstance...not so much the former.

I'm not exactly an expert in this field but I'll tag a few brilliant people who can better outline things:

@karandpr @pndwal @sd_shadow @osm0sis

There are undoubtedly more, if any of y'all know someone more knowledgeable on this issue please tag them. Also feel free to set me straight if I'm wrong :)
[Android General] tablet_seeker:
The concept of Open Source is admirable, there is no question about that, however people tend to weaponize its significance.

Your contention that anyone could simply download, inspect and verify AOSP source code, or any high level open source code for that matter, is laughable. From a layman's perspective this might as well be closed source, they would never be able to authenticate it. Thus, they must rely on the opinions of so called experts, or in this case the decision of a reviewer who is apparently qualified to evaluate some of the most complex Javascript known to man, because they submitted "high quality code".

Putting aside the questionable requirements to become a reviewer, I really would like to stress how incredibly difficult it is to read, let alone understand code on this level. I personally know Javascript, but wouldn't even attempt to decipher a single paragraph of AOSP code.

Saying that anyone can do it is dishonest. It's the same as a local ISP telling people they can switch to another carrier if they don't like it, when there's nobody else around.
[Android General] V0latyle:
Apples and oranges. My point is that everyone has the ability to do so, and if they don't know how, they can learn. This is not the same as telling someone to use an alternative that doesn't exist, and to be frank I find your comment that my statement is "laughable" to be rather disrespectful, because what I said is verifiably and factually correct. I don't know Java or Python or C++ or any programming language for that matter, but I know that I can go to Android Code Search and view any aspect that I wish. So can you, so can anyone else who has an Internet connection. Yes, it requires a certain degree of knowledge and understanding of the workings of such code but that requirement is not prohibitive in of itself. It doesn't matter if you're a layman or not - the code is freely available to view, and so is the information necessary to educate oneself to the point where they can understand it. "If you don't know, learn."

If someone does find a problem with the code, they can submit bug reports. Literally anyone can do this, and the Issue Tracker is also available for the general public to view.

I suppose my only observation from this is that the the verifiers, and possibly contributors, should have published merits by which anyone can establish their bona fides. Still, the AOSP project is made up of some of the most brilliant minds in software

To simply state that "Android can't be trusted because I don't know anything about Java and I don't know who's in charge of verifying the code" is an extremely ignorant assertion. It's one thing if you find a particular issue with the code that you can demonstrate and document, as well as any resistance from the "main" project in fixing it. It's another when you question the legitimacy of something without evidence or proof. If you're going to make accusations, you had better have receipts.
[Android General] tablet_seeker:
They don't and they can't.

Your self-admitted lack of expertise in this area is probably why you believe that.

The equivalent of what you're claiming would be that anyone has the ability to perform brain surgery or make a revolutionary discovery in quantum physics.

You are confusing ability with possibility.

It may be humanly possible for most people to learn basic or even advanced programming, but by no means does simply anyone have the ability, or in other words mental capacity, to comprehensively read and verify source code of this caliber. I just have to stop you there.

The average xda member who flashes these images is content with understanding how to change the color of the status bar. Apples and oranges, indeed.

You are casually brushing over things that represent some of the most complex and sophisticated subject matter in all of modern computer science.

Of course you can, but again, there is a difference between the possibility of you gaining access to the code and your ability to even remotely grasp its meaning.

If you are past the age of 15 yo and have never had any meaningful exposure to programming, I can guarantee you that it would be virtually impossible.

Again, you do not understand.

I have actually done some software engineering. Nothing major, but enough to help me understand the hierarchy.

The sheer incalculable, intellectual discrepancy between us and the people who actually drive innovation and work on stuff like the kernel project or AOSP is something that you can only appreciate once you have been personally exposed to it.

It absolutely is. 99% of the people who use this code will and could never understand it, no matter what.

That is simply a logical fallacy.

Just because it is possible doesn't mean it is plausible.

I agree. I also like that you used the phrase "bona fides". Very nice, lol. You know latin by any chance?

It's a realistic one.

This is a problem with modern science as a whole. If I asked you right now to prove to me the existence of DNA or viruses, you'd have to refer me to scientific theories and expert opinions, that you have chosen to trust, even though you could hypothetically verify their findings yourself, yet never will.
[Android General] V0latyle:
If you're going to blatantly disregard all the points I've made, I see no need to continue this. I'm not sure whether you're arguing for argument's sake, or have an actual reasonable concern for the integrity of Android source.
[Android General] tablet_seeker:
With all due respect, your argument was weak and I have soundly refuted it.

Neither you, nor I will or could ever fully understand AOSP source code, let alone verify it. That's simply the bottom line. We have to trust in the assurances of its creators, thus it may as well be closed source to us.

Also, I believe you should remove the warning about politics, since you have already opted to edit my post.
[Android General] V0latyle:
Except we could. Plenty of people do. It's not written in an obscure or secret language; with sufficient knowledge of the code involved, one can easily decompile and understand it. And since the resources that can give one said knowledge are freely available, anyone can do it. I've never bothered to, and apparently neither have you, so while it is true that we don't understand the code as it is, we could, and there are many members of this forum who can - none of whom are Google employees, nor are they directly involved with AOSP.

There's a difference between someone who doesn't understand but is willing to learn, vs someone who doesn't understand and won't be taught.
[Xiaomi 11T Pro] DiegisSzekely:
Hello everyone,

I have a Xiaomi 11T Pro (Model number - 2107113SG, 8GB ram, 256GB rom, Snapdragon 888 ; european model).

Currently, the phone is running MIUI 13 (Android 12, 13.0.21.0.SKDEUXM with no updates available), but i want to flash MIUI 14 (Android 13, 14.0.5.0.TKDEUXM - already tried to use recovery ROM method but i got an error: can't verify update - can't install this stable ROM - i know 13.0.21.0.SKDEUXM has issues).

I understand the process of flashing (Installing ADB Drivers, enabling USB debugging, unlocking bootloader, booting phone to fastboot mode and then flashing firmware with either MiFlashtool or .bat script).

All of the data on the phone is backupped (i don't mind any data loss)

But i happen to have two big questions.

1: Will I be able to re-lock the bootloader after I flash the firmware? Firmware is official and it is also EEA version.

2: Will I be able to recieve OTA updates after I flash the firmware? Or the phone will recognise that I flashed the firmware and OTA updates will be blocked?

Thanks in advance.
[Xiaomi 11T Pro] NOSS8:
You can flash any stock rom and version and re lock the bootloader on this device.

And the OTA will work.

MIFLASH[GUIDE]⚙ USE XIAOMI FLASH TOOL

FOR ALL XIAOMI BOOTLOADER MUST BE UNLOCKED MIUI https://new.c.mi.com/global/post/101245 https://en.miui.com/unlock/index.html HYPEROS GLOBAL https://xdaforums.com/t/how-to-unlock-bootloader-on-xiaomi-hyperos.4654009/...

xdaforums.com
[Android Head-Units] SolidFyre:
Hello!

I recently bought and received one of them aliexpress android head units. Not sure what the name of it is though but it looks just like the rest of them with the capacitive buttons on the left side.

Model Link

I got the one called "F 4G 64G".

I have a 2015 Volvo S60 and I managed to install it in the car with canbus etc. Haven't managed to get the sound working as it seems I need some sort of adapter to the factory amp for it to work.

Today I changed to summer tires triggering the TPMS system and discovered that there's no apparent way to reach the Sensus system without pulling the head unit out and connecting the old original screen.

Pretty much all of the head units I've seen have some sort of app to reach the original Sensus UI, like a passthrough of sorts, but I can't find anything like that on this one.

Does anyone know how I can reach Sensus? Is it possible to download an app from play store or sideload it somehow, or Is there some magic button combination to press on the AC dash?

Kind of an hassle to reach vital functions that the Android unit doesn't seem to support, like TPMS, service information, oil level etc...
[Huawei Mate 10  Questions & Answers] silva4F:
I got the mate 10 pro, and i want to recover as much as possible from my deleted pictures and videos.

When i try it now with standard apps noroot, its all just thumbnails of the old files.

I know somehow i need to do a root recovery, like open up the phone for full access.

Im not really sure, if theres a way of doing this - maybe downgrade and use some tool with the pc, or possible unlock bootloader and root, if its possible to downgrade maybe?

anyone with all this knowledge that could help me out understand or maybe tell me theres some way?

Thanks!
[Huawei Mate 10  Questions & Answers] hamadazh:
Ministry Of Solutions - Android smartphone unlock services

#Android smartphone unlock services Huawei P10 VTR-L29 8.0.0.899(C185) Fake storage Firmware Fix

ministryofsolutions.com
[Touch Pro, Fuze Accessories] rpc180:
I'm gonna be on a long international flight next month and I was looking at options for extending the battery time over the long haul. Its going to be used as a media player, just divx movies and music.

When I'm on a long haul jaunt like this, I usually run in airplane mode and minimal backlight settings and headphones (not bluetooth). Using these settings I've gotten approximately 5-6 hours of video playback from the stock 1340mAh battery.

An online battery capacity formula is:

(battery capacity / drain ) x .7 = approximate battery life

Estimating worse case, 5 hours of playback, I figure the drain rate using these settings this is about 188mAh.

I was thinking of getting the APC Emergency Power Pack, a 4xAAA based case with a USB jack. Didn't want to get a higher priced Li based pack because I only do these trips every 2-3 years. The idea of using an Li pack once and then letting sit for a year ... it seems like it'd damage its capacity like my laptop.

Anyway, AAA capacity is between 900 and 1155mAh, plugging in 4000mAh (4x1000mAh) into the same formula seems to yield a little under 15hrs.

I'm not sure if that's right since I haven't used formulas in years (and I don't know if my units are all correct). For all I know, I could have actually come out with 15 minutes. Anyway, could someone confirm the numbers? At $20 for the APC box, it'd be a perfect solution for a 14+ hour flight.
[Touch Pro, Fuze Accessories] ddb540:
Forgive my stupid question, but does your airline feature charging ports on their planes?

- DDB
[Touch Pro, Fuze Accessories] ptyindian:
i dont think any airline does unless you are in business class.