yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] PhilMorin:
Try with V52 he did some tweaking in the light and shadow section. Maybe it'll make it look better to your eyes. And V52 is a lot more color accurate
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] GroovyGeek:
Don't see it on the phone, on the Samsung Store or on Google Play... ?
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] PhilMorin:
Google
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] GroovyGeek:
V52 is notably better in that respect and indeed a lot more color accurate
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] penfold:
crescent moon night shot 1x and 3x zoom hdr++

(moon is only visible in the zoom shot as I had to walk back to get it in the view)
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] GroovyGeek:
It is interesting that LMC and AGC make very different tradeoffs between shutter speed and ISO. LMC gives preference to slower shutter at lower ISO.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] JavaSabr:
GCam has settings related to shutter speed/iso priority
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] JavaSabr:
For me LMC is better on this comparation
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] Fl1nt91:
I tried AGC a couple of time and it's worse than stock in my opinion. Unless you don't zoom at all, but the everything would look fine.

I don't understand why we're still talking about it...
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] woffu22:
LMC little darker but more details and less Contrast. What you like more ?!
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] Noveyro:
Colors look pretty good to me in this v52 version.

My main concern is, which is not a big deal, there is a slight delay to take the picture after i click shutter button. It is similar to the shutter lag on stock camera but somehow a little bit different. Even if i lower the amount of hdr enchanced frames to 7 from 15, it helps a little but not that much. My solution is, whenever i want to take a picture of a moving object like a dog or child, i go hdr+ instead of hdr+ enhanced. If you have ideal lighting conditions or if you don't care about blown out highlights, for these cases, not using hdr+ enhanced is the way to go.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] koahhe:
I like this new v52 version a lot. Well done! I have attached some pictures taken in different light scenarios and lens modes.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] JavaSabr:
Nice photos 🔥
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] JavaSabr:
My todays comparation:
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] BaTarrY:
How do I install this?

The apk from link is crashing upon opening and files attached is not an apk.

Assistance?
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] koahhe:
If you read the first pages you will find instructions.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] PhilMorin:
Lmc V52 :)
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] JavaSabr:
GCam:
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] JavaSabr:
Stock and GCam:
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] kevinmtz:
really nice work! the only issue I've had in v52 is that when I shoot with the frontal camera specially in portrait mode the colors look washed out, it didn't happen in v50
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] JavaSabr:
I don't use front at all, all changes were made by user feedback...

Could you provide some comparation, please?
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] papavales:
Here is an xml i made... Stock is with logo..
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] GroovyGeek:
Some possible reasons include

Notably lower shutter and post processing lag under equivalent settings (number of frames, HDR+, etc). Not sure why that is. LMC is improving but it has been sluggish from day 1

The color rendition of LMC is improving with every rev, especially with v52, but still will occasionally produce weird results.

The AWB function of LMC does not work well (last time I tested it circa v50). This is particularly troublesome for shots of people under artificial light where skin colors can be off by a lot.

I have been unable to get the horizon guide to appear in LMC. I often shoot very close to the ground or in a weird posture and this helps me.

The QR code reader does not work on any gcam version I have tried

I have been unable to get a histogram to display on any version of gcam.

While you have posted clear examples of artifacts in areas of fine details attempts to reproduce them under similar conditions by others have been unsuccessful.

The mods require that all gcam discussion be in a single thread so you can expect posts about other configs to continue.

I personally still go back and forth between stock and at least 3 gcam configs. Image aesthetic varies widely between people.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] GroovyGeek:
Please share when you are ready. The more the merrier
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] woffu22:
Thanks. Tried today Portrait Modus against natural light, the skin tone was pretty dark and brown, a little bit too much compared to reality and stock. Maybe it could be checked sometimes, would be nice 🙂
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] JavaSabr:
What about if enable expo toggle?
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] penfold:
stock vs lmc (standard hdr+) from my evening shoot
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] woffu22:
Yes, it's always enabled 😉👍 Was HDR + only.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] woffu22:
V3 ? Looks good.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] MasterThiefGarrett:
Awesome, except one, the Dollar Tree photo, there I like stock better, better light control (in the store) and more natural looking asphalt... imo
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] penfold:
thanks, yes in daylight my colors are very close to stock, in low light where stock tends more towards cool mine verge to warm ...and i havn't yet quite been able to figure out the slight green tinge in extreme low light although i also do see it a bit in stock shots, probably something to do with the white balance in low light, although with awb on it just turns everything to either snow white at night or red in daytime.

This shot with stock the church was a little whiter shade. (i deleted the stock so can't post the comparison) ...(standard hdr+ again ....i only use hdr++ in rare circumstances to balance out the light in night shots, plus the green tinge is more evident with hdr++)
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] MasterThiefGarrett:
This is a photo I took this week in a restaurant, the 2 yellow windows in the top represent exactly what my eyes saw, I had both LMC and AGC Gcam versions on my phone and with both versions the windows were blown out (white) no matter what I tried, HDR+ or HDR+ Enhanced, it didn't matter, no Gcam could capture it correctly.

I deleted the photos unfortunately but you get the point I guess ;)

Detail on the Gcam versions was better though, but with backlighted items the stock cam is still the best, as in more control.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] woffu22:
That's correct, there is a real blue sign on my pics, good on stock, but on all GCams, tried 3, not.View attachment 5872285
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] ajarosz:
I have question regarding RAWs from gcam. I use LMC and when I load RAW to lightroom tint has to be all way to the magenta (+150) and yet sometimes picture is still too greenish. Problem is only with the main lens. Any ideas what to change to make it better?
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] karrouma:
Best gcam is lmc v52 and v53 till now. Tested all version. These are best
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] koahhe:
A few LMC v52/53 weekend pictures.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] xwonic:
Fire Hydrant lost all detail and it's picture is blurry. is it v53?
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] PhilMorin:
Some action shots from today, using what I think will be v54 of Java's config, switching everything to merge 1 for better performance when there is motion in the picture.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] bodomfan:
What do you mean merge 1,how do I do it
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] PhilMorin:
It's a different way gcam merges frames together. Wait for v54 as v53 settings are not optimized for it
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] bodomfan:
Java 54?
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] bodomfan:
Great shots
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] PhilMorin:
Yes it's still in the works but should be v54 soon
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] bodomfan:
It'll have merge 1 for moving shots?
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] PhilMorin:
Yes. You can still take moving shots with v53, it's just that you might notice more artifacts when you zoom in
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] GroovyGeek:
The fallacy of many (most?) X vs Y comparisons is that they are done in good light under easy conditions. The images below are shot back to back with LMC JavaSabr v53 vs AGC near stock (sharpening lowered a tiny amount). I would be curious if a anyone can reliably tell them apart without looking at the EXIF. I personally can only see slight difference and only if I zoom in as far as the phone let's me do it (hint - handling of the deep shadows is where the difference shows up). If presented with a blind test without hints I would find it very difficult telling them apart. Harsh contrasts or poor lighting is where differences should be benchmarked.

Spoiler content hidden.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] penfold:
well, yeah, you're not going to see much difference on a phone size screen ....to judge photos realistically you need to look at them on a large screen.

as for the ones you posted i can tell the difference instantly without checking from the difference in light and noise ...they each have their own characteristics
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] penfold:
very nice ...are those taken with hdr++ or standard hdr+?
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] PhilMorin:
I'll play the game! Actually can't say which is which but I'll say which one I prefer.

17 vs 8: pretty equal though I wonder about 17 looking more reddish. Not sure which is more natural but I feel 8 is. And 8 also exposes shadows better. So I'll pick 8!

15 vs 5: this one I prefer 15 for the bigger contrast with darker shadows. 5 looks too HDR. Also 15 seems to have a more natural blue color in the sky.

6 vs 30: draw

3 vs 20: draw

In all cases, I'd be happy with either output in these cases. Those are mostly the same style of shots though so I'd be interesting to compare, even in daylight, with a more diverse set of pictures. I like blind games 🤣

Also, dont know about others, but I mostly only shoot in daylight and never cared much for night shots so if others are like me that might also be why you see more of those comparison?
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] jocoya:
How to install two different Gcam's on one phone

(LMC , ACG)

I install it and he will notify me to overwrite the update
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] penfold:
for the heck of it ...i'd be surprised if i'm wrong

lmc

17 30 15 20

agc

8 5 3 6
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] grangermoch:
Install one Gcam as ruler and the other as scan3d
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] GroovyGeek:
I must say I am humbled by @tmzbeme's ability to distinguish one from the other. My own eyes are like @PhilMorin's - mostly a tossup

LMC 32, 26, 27, 29, 30, 17, 20, 15, 2

AGC 12, 10, 11, 7, 6, 8, 3, 5, 9
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] penfold:
ha thanks ....i didn't see the others ..they were hidden in the spoiler which i didn't open
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] woffu22:
Interesting. AGC has more brightness in the shadows, more HDR. Seems to be minimal more bright overall most times, but not all times.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] woffu22:
What about V3 ? Looked interesting.

Very good quality till now, also in the night on street. With people in suboptimal situation HDR+ your V2 was a little overexposed.

Maybe it's gcam generally, stock was much better in situation.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] koahhe:
All in HDR ++
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] Cservenecz:
I have looked but could not find : does anyone know if there is a Gcam port for the S23 plus ?

If yes, can you please point me in the right direction ?

Thanks !
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] Benoe:
Yes, here you can find s23 xmls as well
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] JavaSabr:
Have updated the new test version:

https://xdaforums.com/t/working-gcam-for-s23-ultra.4550019/post-88178597
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] woffu22:
Javasabre should have also 23 +
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] Cservenecz:
Thanks, but it doesn't work on my phone. Every time I open the camera, it freezes, but only on the 1x. If I zoom in or zoom out, it works.

Any ideas on why does it do that ?
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] woffu22:
Did you copy the files also or just the XML ?
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] Cservenecz:
I figured it out....I have loaded the wrong xml file from the folder.

Thank you all for support !
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] ajarosz:
Bumping up the question. I was trying to play with some configs around RAW/HDR but with no luck with this one. I would appreciate any help in here. :)
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] penfold:
stock is better for inodor light balance in general although it looks like crap

...i have not really tested mine for indoor low light situations with people but i have taken good portraits in decent light, java's seems to be better for people indoors.

....i have lowered the brightness a little though.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] papavales:
Finally i made a nice xml for night time for my taste.. It took me like forever😂😂
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] woffu22:
Nice. Still interested in V3 🙂
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] bodomfan:
Why does it say java if you made it looks good
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] papavales:
Because i haven't save it and imported again with my custom name...
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] bodomfan:
Can you share it :)
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] bodomfan:
It's excellent,is it for lmc
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] karrouma:
More sharp gain
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] penfold:
try this patch, it may (or may not) help with the blown out highlights
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] bodomfan:
What gcam is it for
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] woffu22:
LMC, not Java
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] bodomfan:
works with Skyking?
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] woffu22:
Who is skyking ?
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] bodomfan:
It's another gcam with lmc
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] RedSkyRoad:
How do I change the filename format of the photos and videos?
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] konaston:
Hey everyone, I have been following this thread for a week now, thank you all for your awesome work, especially Java :)

Got my S23 today, gcam is working as it should.

Since almost nobody posted images from a regular s23, I did some comparison shots today, very happy so far :)

v53, hdr+
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] koahhe:
More Settings and then as in screenshot attached.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] RedSkyRoad:
And all the crap text on the end of the filename?
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] MasterThiefGarrett:
Isn't that under settings, more settings, advanced, prefix name?
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] RedSkyRoad:
It's not a prefix. It's after the date and time.

20230328_143704_javasabr_lmc15_s23u_v54_test.jpg
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] Dayuser:
Config settings
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] RedSkyRoad:
Screenshot? Can't find it
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] Dayuser:
More settings->config settings->remove config name
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] RedSkyRoad:
It still ads "lmc_8.4" at the end even after disabling config name
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] Dayuser:
Yes and you can't remove that.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] Vazovski2007:
Hi In my case when i starting Gcam in photo mode (which is default) it crashes, i tried to follow instructions but

4. Double tap on the space between the shot button and the gallery and then import my config

this part is not working for me nothing happens when i double tap

is there any other way to import config? I'm on 8.8 Gcam and 8.4 LMC version 53
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] Dummen:
There is no config for 8.8 gcam yet, for LMC You should be able to port config with the double tap method. Did You put the config into the correct folder? root\LMC8.4\
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] Vazovski2007:
Yes i did, ok will download 8.7 then will it work? what version of GCam i should have?

I have standard S23
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] woffu22:
8.4 should work good
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] Vazovski2007:
Thanks I will try ;-)
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] Dayuser:
Instruction:

1. Install GCam

2. Extract the attached archive to your root FS

3. Hold on the GCam icon and choose "Capture video"

4. Double tap on the space between the shot button and the gallery and then import my config

5. Done
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] Piratepower:
Which Version is now actually the best to download for S23 Ultra (no root)? i read so many versions here, its confusing
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] woffu22:
#1119
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] Vazovski2007:
Could you be so kind to share exact GCam link which is working on this mod? Thank you in advance
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] Dayuser:
Read this post.

https://xdaforums.com/t/working-gcam-for-s23-ultra.4550019/#post-88178597
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] Vazovski2007:
Ok Thanks
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] GroovyGeek:
Anyone still using AGC should not update to AGC_8.4.300_V9.6 (an allegedly stable minor update to v9.5fix) as it breaks everything about existing configs.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] CruiserCZ:
I have to say I wasn't really convinced up until now. Tried your latest version and I must say I really like it. Despite not using HDR+ Enhanced but just HDR+ the pictures are looking great compared to the stock camera. Thank you for doing this :-)
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] JavaSabr:
Have uploaded very big update of my config:

https://xdaforums.com/t/working-gcam-for-s23-ultra.4550019/post-88178597
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] Fl1nt91:
Thank you

Photo in low light now will take to much time to shoot, considering the 27 frames and the long exposure. Like 5 seconds...

I did some comparison having a steady position, and this long exposure time is actually bad for the image clarity and quality overall
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] JavaSabr:
Because now the main mode is HDRNet even in indoor... HDR++ is focused only on covering the hardest cases
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] Fl1nt91:
Hdrnet in low light is not usable in my opinion, really terrible
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] JavaSabr:
For deferent people low light is different :)

HDR++ now it's focused on covering really low light and night, or extremely light scenes
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] Fl1nt91:
Ok, I just said my impression...

HDRnet is worse in every condition, also in day light (try to shoot at vegetation and shadow area).

So we're basically doing like Samsung does, not taking the best out of camera :D

Anyway, my initial suggestion was just to reduce exposure time of HDR++ in low light condition, because results will be worse than auto exposure time (plus inconvenient shooting time)
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] JavaSabr:
Of course HDRNet is worse, but it's much much more usable, and when you know that you have enough time to make HDR++ shot, you very easily can switch to it without going to menu.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] woffu22:
Till now very cool ,👍
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] JavaSabr:
I have uploaded v55 for all s23

https://xdaforums.com/t/working-gcam-for-s23-ultra.4550019/post-88178597
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] CarlosLopezES:
The speed on the new versions it's amazing, instant shoot

Thanks a lot!
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] CruiserCZ:
Seems like the exposure slider is not working? Is there a way to adjust AWB?
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] koahhe:
It looks like the exposure slider only works if you toggle off HDRNet.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] CarlosLopezES:
Pixel 7 Pro vs v55 on S23 U, first P7 Pro, then S23U.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] JavaSabr:
I don't like this result on s23u, it looks strange :(
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] vandal4e:
colors are atrocious on S23U
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] GroovyGeek:
I think what he means is that the brightness of the saved image differs significantly from the brightness of the on screen preview

Here is an example. Note how the screen grab is A LOT brighter than the actual capture. Dealing with this for every image is a giant pain. Is it possible to resolve? the gcam from the DPR thread does not do this.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] JavaSabr:
On my smartphone GCam from DPR is more darker else than my config... Or we are talking about different gcams
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] GroovyGeek:
Yes the DPR gcam. Here is a similar comparison for that between the on screen preview and the actual captured image. The brightness is nearly identical at the 3x zoom (where yours is meaningfully different). However at the 10x zoom the DPR one exhibits a similar issue. This may have something to do with the periscope lens design because even the stock app has a meaningful discrepancy at 10x.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] JavaSabr:
But what about x1 lens on the gcam?
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] GroovyGeek:
Slightly darker but not nearly as dramatic as yours. First pair is DPR gcam. Second pair is you with the recent 15-16 xml. Yours has a change in contrast, brightness, and white balance. The captured image is notably cooler than what is on the screen.

DPR

You
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] GroovyGeek:
PS: someone on Reddit just brought to my attention that there is a DRAMATIC difference in apparent image quality between Expert RAW and the stock app with the 10x lens. Expert RAW seems to be doing some rather aggressive post processing which makes the images usable. The stock app, DPR gcam and LMC don't do anything like that. Check it out.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] MilgeS:
Do you have a link to that Reddit post please?
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] GroovyGeek:
Takes about 3s to test yourself. Plus there are no pics in the post, just a single sentence stating that fact.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] MilgeS:
I only wanted to follow the post on there but no worries, I'll search for it.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] GroovyGeek:
https://www.reddit.com/r/GalaxyS23Ultra/comments/119mru5
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] MilgeS:
Thank you very much.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] Sathish.T:
I love the Gcam because it doesn't produce overexposed photos like the stock cam!
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] JavaSabr:
Prepared new version (V20) of my config:

1. Extract the attached archive to root FS

2. Hold on GCam icon and choose "capture video"

3. Double tap on free space between shot button and gallery and import my config

4. Profit!

Changes:

1. Continue playing with light & brightness

2. Updated AWB profiles

3. Updated noise models

4. Updated handling low light for auto and night shots
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] GroovyGeek:
Tried it, it loads fine. What are the changelog highlights?
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] JavaSabr:
Added it to my prev post
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] GroovyGeek:
Thx. Is there any way to manually adjust color temp on LMC? Other gcam's have it, I searched and googled and can't find it.

PS. I have set up reduced saturation in PRO mode and am starting to warm up to LMC. Need to read up on it.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] JavaSabr:
Only if you change the color correction, but it will not work if you enabled AWB
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] typos1:
When I install the latest xml from @JavaSabr the app crashes I ve rebooted and reinstalled the app and it still crashes.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] 235anders15:
Are you using the latest version of LMC?
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] typos1:
8.4.400.423370569.19, it was fine with his previous xml, now it won't even work with that.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] PhilMorin:
Can you try with the sharp version of Java? I'm curious because on your shots the grass feels not detailed enough... Here's a comparison with a 1x shot using sharp version. Even the grass that's further still has a nice texture (I'm using default hdrnet)
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] JavaSabr:
It's looks like he has optic issue on his s23u, sharp version will not help.

My examples without sharp version stock and GCAm:
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] woffu22:
Pixel was too blue, Java maybe a little too brown and the pics are not sharp.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] ajarosz:
GCAM is brown,

and Pixel is blue,

you have a problem,

with focusing too.

Could not help. :D
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] CarlosLopezES:
Ok, let's do this! The previous picture was with some sun, those are with indirect sunlight and more overcast day. First P7P, then S23U LMC and finally S23U stock 12Mpx.

Finally, sharp vs standard on LMC
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] ajarosz:
I'm so surprised how bad lmc here is. Haven't tried very but with previous versions always it was way, way better than stock. Here detail is on about same level and difference is only in processing.
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] woffu22:
Talking about the pics above
[Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra] ajarosz:
Yeah, I know. But reading your reply had that in my head.