yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Shift General] Neutron83:
Ehy guys,

can u get back on topic, the shift project is discussed in another thread!

As im not part of Shift Projekt i cant say anything for them, but they did good job !

Olipro thx for HardSPL

cmonex thx for porting the GPS driver.

But they go quiet so i decided to do some "extra" work, so it was mentioned!

So get back on topic and stop flaming!

Anyone got an rom from another device wich uses the same WIFI chipset ??

I googled a bit for sd8686 and windows mobile but didn't found a thing.

http://www.pudn.com/downloads97/sourcecode/embed/detail396197.html

i cant read but seems to be interesting, if anyone can translate i would be glad.

There are 3 or 4 ppl trying to get sd8686 stack working on ARM, but under linux. that was the only link i couldnt read.

As long as we dont get a driver developer for WINCE that converts the linux stuff to wince or that link as a good source, i dont think it will be possible as i dont see another device with sd8686 and ARM processor.

Greets

ps. anyone got INFORMATIONS that are usefull wich aren't mentioned jet ??

pps. please stay ontopic
[Nokia X10 / X20] elot01:
The new security update for the X10/X20 is available.

View attachment 5701051
[Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra] paniro187:
Anyone else having a issue with it saying connected sometimes then other times it just says connecting. I'm having lots of issues with messages not sending. Quite annoying..... Like I said it's connected sometimes and sometimes it's not . What seems to remedy this is removing the sim card and putting it back in . View attachment 5701049
[Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra] Mr. Orange 645:
Yup. Same issues on mine. Had to turn off chat features.
[Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra] paniro187:
This crap is seriously making me want to go back to my 13 pro max full on.
[Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra] Mr. Orange 645:
Meh. I know there will be issues with a beta, so I don't really hold it against the platform or phone.
[Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra] paniro187:
This isn’t a beta issue this is happening on stable.
[Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra] Mr. Orange 645:
Oh I'm sorry! I was in the beta thread too, so I got mixed up. I only had the issue on the beta. With Android 12 on my Fold 3 and Fold 4, I have no issues.
[Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra] Abaddon:
On your device, go to

Account settings: Your browser is not supported.

myaccount.google.com

If your device is unchecked, check yhe nox and try again. It should work now
[Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra] paniro187:
Oh wait yeah I'm on beta. I thought you meant the nets Google app...... Anyway to go back to 12?
[Galaxy S 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Andresine:
Hello, i installed noise rom the rom is fantastic and everything works very well. The only problem I have is that in sunlight, even if I have the outdoor mode disabled, it activates itself and instead of making the screen brighter, it darkens it more. Is there a way to completely disable outdoor mode via build prop or twrp? Thank you very much for your help.
[Honor Play Questions & Answers] arunzone:
My device was working fine it turned off all of sudden and it wont turn on again.

There was around 70% charge remaining.

No display while I connected it to charger.

No display/Vibration while pressing power button.

No display while pressing Power + vol down/ vol up

Only The red LED is on even when it's not connected to charger. its not blinking. its steady.

When I long press the power button for around 10-15 seconds, the led turned off and on after a second. still there is no display.

I tried to keep my mobile in charge for more than 12 hours. Still not turning on.

I would appreciate any help to revive my phone.
[OnePlus 10 Pro] GarnetSunset:
Hey guys! When trying to update to A16, I get this error, same issue I had before with A14, any tips on what I should do to get my phone updated to the latest fw? Happens every time I try to update to the latest.
[OnePlus 10 Pro] zopostyle:
I would recommend you to download Oxygen Updater and install the full image from them.

This should solve your issue and if not after update from the full image, just reset your device and set it up as new. That's what did the trick for me.
[OnePlus 10 Pro] GarnetSunset:
There's no full image unfortunately :( NE2215 is weird.

Local upgrade fails at 99% too, even after disabling or straight up uninstalling modules.

@dladz any tips?
[OnePlus 10 Pro] dasche:
same here . tried updater app also. fails at 99%
[OnePlus 10 Pro] zopostyle:
Switching to NE2213 or reseting the device is not an option ?
[OnePlus 10 Pro] dasche:
I switched to NE2211, did not check the system update. now i am back on NE2215 and saw this.
[OnePlus 10 Pro] dasche:
resetting wont make any difference.. are you boot loader unlocked? mine is unlocked.
[OnePlus 10 Pro] zopostyle:
For me when I switched to NE2213 I had to reset the device and then the updates started to install.
[OnePlus 10 Pro] dasche:
when switching from one to another, it does not boot without factory reset first.
[OnePlus 10 Pro] dlads:
You'd need the full update, plus you'd need the newest local installer from the OnePlus community guide.

I'm on NE2213 and the updates I install are all full zips never incremental.

The only time I've ever seen a failure at 99% is when I was using the wrong local update APK whilst I was rooted.

My advice is use the rollback zip to switch to ne2213..., you'll probably find your internet improves from doing so too.
[OnePlus 10 Pro] GarnetSunset:
I was using the link from oxygen updater, which is a pretty generic url that appears to be "latest" etc.

Are you sure I wont lose some 5G bands for switching to global? I'm in NA and using the NA firmware so I'm just trying to think if I'll lose any signal strength
[OnePlus 10 Pro] twinnfamous:
Use the full zip here https://xdaforums.com/t/oneplus-a-15-full-zips-na-in-eu.4482915/#post-87371753 for a.15 then you should be able to update without any problems. Also when rooting the phone it's always best to fastboot boot the patched magisk boot.img then use direct install. Magisk will then back up original boot.img and you will be able to restore it later when update comes then all you have to do everytime you get an update is choose restore images in magisk update but don't reboot then go back in magisk and choose install to inactive slot after ota and reboot and your good to go
[OnePlus 10 Pro] dlads:
They're not rollback zips in oxygen updater however you do need to turn on full from there on in..and no you won't lose bands, you'll probably gain a better signal based on previous reports.

Use the rollback zip from the OnePlus community android 13 beta 2 thread.

Once rolled back you should only use the full zips from oxygen updater with the the newest local install APK.

Pic below from oxygen updater, make sure to use the advanced settings.
[OnePlus 10 Pro] GarnetSunset:
Thank you!! I moved over to NE2213!
[OnePlus 10 Pro] dlads:
Use the button bud 👍🏻

How's your signal doing now that you've shifted over?
[OnePlus 10 Pro] GarnetSunset:
AFAICT Identical? Not sure. Only been a couple hours and I didn't use my phone much
[OnePlus 10 Pro] dasche:
I was able to flash only full package zips from local upgrade. but

then i install oxygenos 13 via local upgrade. after that did same with rollback to oxygenos 12 and that fixed the issue. now i can upgrade to any OTA which is coming...
[Touch HD General] vincent1:
Setting the

File system cache to 8MB, the file system filter cache to 131072 sectors and the glyph cache to 64 KB improves the HD performance appreciable.

Especially for Opera, MSBrowser, videos and streaming applications like Diamond TV.

Check it!

Remark:

1. We have a lot of unexperienced users here, therefore i recommend the use of a special programm to change the cache settings urgently instead of crashing the registry manually!

Additionally to Schaps ACT 3.3, MemMaid 2.0 and SKTools could be helpful, but sure there are others still around.

2. Read the complete thread, most questions and answers are given.

3. I recommend only the settings i gave in that post. To high cache settings like the later posted 30MB are not recommended. May be they have good influence to one application, but they do destabilize the whole system.

4. Don't look for wonders. It's just to improve some applications and could not change basic problems.
[Touch HD General] Xarra:
And how do you do that? :)
[Touch HD General] ILikeFish:
Use Schap's Advanced Config - that has all the options you need. I've made the changes, but have no benchmarks to prove anything...
[Touch HD General] pzucchel:
vincent1 is fully correct. A very visible impact i noticed is on coreplayer, some videos have become suddenly very smooth!
[Touch HD General] pzucchel:
Hey! this is the most performing tweak I've ever tried up to now. It impacts almost everything in the smoothness of operations - I tried different values in the past but apparently you really have to push them to the maximum to see a change....

A MUST!
[Touch HD General] FranckF1:
oh yes, it's faster !
[Touch HD General] jolas:
Does these tweaks affect negative battery consumption (increased consumption)?
[Touch HD General] TTDegs:
OMG! :eek:

VERY noticable improvement - MANY THANKS! :D

Can I vote that this gets added to the Wiki under "things you MUST do"? :D
[Touch HD General] vincent1:
You are welcome guys :) This is a community, isn't?

You should not have an increased battery drain.
[Touch HD General] Nighthawk2050:
What version are you running:

Advanced Configuration Tools 3.3?

Advanced Config_v2[1].0.1.0 ?

Advanced Config_v2100 ?
[Touch HD General] tnyynt:
But you will have an increased memory leak...
[Touch HD General] vincent1:
Correct, ACT 3.3 isn'n allways working in some points on the HD, but the cache optimizing could be done very easy with it.

Yep increased memory leak, but very small and on the HD to neglect
[Touch HD General] Khalild:
Did the same using diamondtweak, huge improvement. Memorry leak is about 10 MB overnight, so not too bad if you reboot your device every day.
[Touch HD General] frustin:
10MB is quite significant in an 8 hour (assuming this is sort of average sleeping time) slot.

is it really worth it?
[Touch HD General] dsm52:
What exactly causes the memory leak - Windows or Schapps tool?
[Touch HD General] tnyynt:
The exagerrated growth of the caches.
[Touch HD General] Deadstar:
How many free memory have the HD at the end of the day(with this mod)?
[Touch HD General] vindiesel:
How can I apply these changes to the registry without using shaps tool?
[Touch HD General] Osir1s:
Increase font cache

To increase the font cache, speeding up font rendering at the cost of a bit of memory:

HKLM\SYSTEM\GDI\GLYPHCACHE\limit = 16384 (DWORD decimal)

To change it back to the default:

HKLM\SYSTEM\GDI\GLYPHCACHE\limit = 8192 (DWORD decimal)

You can set the value to pretty much anything you like

Enable FileSystem cache

To enable the FileSystem cache, speeding up overall performance at the risk of the cache not being written on a sudden reset:

HKLM\System\StorageManager\FATFS\EnableCache = 1 (DWORD decimal)

To disable again:

HKLM\System\StorageManager\FATFS\EnableCache = 0 (DWORD decimal)

Note that by default, the cache size is zero, and you will see no effect. See "Increase FileSystem cache" to incease the cache size

Increase FileSystem cache

To increase the file system cache:

HKLM\System\StorageManager\FATFS\CacheSize = 4096 (DWORD decimal)

To return the file system cache to zero:

HKLM\System\StorageManager\FATFS\CacheSize = 0 (DWORD decimal)

You can set the value to pretty much anything you like

Increase FileSystem filter cache

To enable the file system filter cache, speeding up overall performance with file mangement:

HKLM\System\StorageManager\Filters\fsreplxfilt\ReplStoreCacheSize = 4096 (DWORD decimal)

To return the file system filter cache to zero:

HKLM\System\StorageManager\Filters\fsreplxfilt\ReplStoreCacheSize = 0 (DWORD decimal)

You can set the value to pretty much anything you like

Source and Source
[Touch HD General] DoGGToR:
Never had less than 90MB of memory left. So I do not care about 8MB over night. Better have a fast device instead jubilee about free memory I do not use anyway.

But to be honest. Not much of an accelaration with me. Already used the advised settings from schaps' tool. 2MB/4096Sectors/32kB

greetz
[Touch HD General] vangrieg:
I don't notice any performance improvement at all.
[Touch HD General] Rizlo:
Did you soft-reset? I noticed a slight improvement but touchflo was initially unable to load. Then I retried and it worked.
[Touch HD General] Bl@ck:
working great :D thanks for the tip
[Touch HD General] vincent1:
Performance increasement depends of course from used application, background progs, cpu usage and memory status and is therefore difficult to compare.

I don't found any TFlo3D problem.

Also not on restart.
[Touch HD General] Khalild:
I haven't rebooted yet and I still have 56%. Started at 40% last night. By the way I meant 10% not MB in my previous post sorry it was early morning for me.
[Touch HD General] indup:
these %s you guys are talking about, is this the figure that shows when you press the icon in the top right hand corner of the homescreen?
[Touch HD General] Deadstar:
Does you still have some freezes (3-4 sec) in sms,Opera etc. with this modification??:confused:
[Touch HD General] vincent1:
Opera and other applications are faster than before, but i have still the known freezes in programms like SMS while typing :(

But that doesn't wonder me because cache changes couldn't fix a general situation given by ROM and Hardware. They have only an optimizing effect on some but not on all applications. In fact a cache change could also be negative for other applications. It's an individual decision.

Responding to another post, the recommended settings in progs like ACT 3.3 are not automatically the best advices on every WM6 gear. That's only common and usual recommendings. The special setting for each single typ depends on several and often very different points, like RAM size, Ram and bus speed or also the built in hardware assistance.
[Touch HD General] snootch:
Could someone grab the bull by the horns and do a stock before & after comparison with benchmarks? If no one does, i'd be willing once I get my HD (week or two) That way the community can actually see how much an advantage this tweak gives, instead of the array of "It works well" or "I didn't see any difference" posts in this thread.
[Touch HD General] vincent1:
As i tried to explain, cache optimizing have in first line influence to special applications.

Therefore it makes not so much sense to benchmark some points on a naked HD like graphic performance for example.

I do not know how to get and to compare benchmark results with Opera 9.5. Any advices?
[Touch HD General] rovex:
Some of the videos i had that were marginal are now smoother so it works well. Not tried Opera yet, but it the phone is generally a little more responsive.
[Touch HD General] chefffe:
very nice!!!

just want to mention that for schaps 3.3 you need to install net compact framework R3.5.
[Touch HD General] vangrieg:
Like I said, I don't see any improvement whatsoever, including in Opera. This must be some placebo effect or something like that.
[Touch HD General] Deadstar:
I think you can simply test this by making a bench in coreplayer before of the modification and after,with the same video..
[Touch HD General] rizwan157:
great find mate video play definetly has improved thanks.
[Touch HD General] rizwan157:
great find mate video play definetly has improved thanks. tried google maps seems to be loading faster brilliant.
[Touch HD General] pzucchel:
I don't want to be contrarian (controcorrente), but i fully disagree. I have seen many times benchmarks giving beautiful numbers, or roms/settings with great AVERAGE performances that were unusable in real life. What goes on my nerves is skipping/short interruptions, but i would tolerate a slow system if it would be FLUID. Apple knows this very well, despite the fact that most PCs are FASTER. I have no doubt that my HD is smoother with the larger cache settings, and that movies have much less "skipping" of frames.

I don't know if you have ever used a system with long time-slicing of processes: it is VERY FAST, but it is unusable in interactive mode. the same happens when processes grab control of resources for a too long time (which is overall more efficient): the system skips continuously.

For this reasons, I totally disagree with the way the coreplayer benchmark results are reported. The percentage speed is the AVERAGE speed of the movie. if it is 200% faster all the time, and every 10 seconds of normal speed it looses 5 frames, the movie is unwatchable and the benchmark is very good. And in the benchmark, as you know, you cannot loose frames since it just slows down when required! in real life, it is enough to have wifi traffic, or activesync waking up, and the scene freezes if the system is not SMOOTH....and i suffer...

Believe that on the trinity i could also perceive this through AD2P bluetooth: i could HEAR the music slowing down when the system was saturated or memory running low...

This is my subjective opinion, of course. But this is what i am subjectively looking for, and the cache DOES impact it. Try it to believe it: if you don't see this, then it means that your system before was better optimized than mine....

BTW, gyrator2 is great but is a terrible source of skipping also...even if it takes only 1% of CPU

on average.
[Touch HD General] pzucchel:
FYI, by accessing the registry directly i am currently running the cache with 32 MB! I don't see a very visible improvement, but cleary the optimal settings of coreplayer change...

....anybody really knows what gliphs and file system filters are? e.g. what's the size of one sector?
[Touch HD General] ez2remember:
Great stuff but can aomeone provide a link to the latest .net framework cab. I've dl with ms but its a .msi and didn't work,
[Touch HD General] tkalli:
Here you go

http://www.4shared.com/account/file/56638215/447219a9/NETCFv35wmarmv4i.html​
[Touch HD General] jackthekayman:
do you confirm that there is an improvement to playback unconverted divx video?
[Touch HD General] NeedAPhone:
I added these tweaks to wiki
[Touch HD General] ZoZo2:
I think he meant higher memory usage, not memory leak.

A memory leak is uncontrolled loss of memory for no good reason, which shouldn't happen when increasing cache size.
[Touch HD General] bouya_k:
good improve for me

thanks
[Touch HD General] BANE:
I did this and i havn't noticed any difference in video, general run or anything :( i feel left out
[Touch HD General] ez2remember:
I've noticed a slight improvement in Opera when scrolling about. You no longer see the checkered squares as much.

I have benchmarked videos with coreplayer but the results were the same.
[Touch HD General] sev7en:
Moved on new settings and the HD looks a bit more quick browsing the file system as well as launching iGo and TomTom.

Thanks for sharing!
[Touch HD General] kami1:
Anyone can provide an other link to schap's tools, the download section to his site doesn't work.

I'm itching to try this, to take away the slight dissapointment of this phone.

Regards

Nevermind
[Touch HD General] LaskyCZ:
Defaults

What are the defaults, plese?

Thanx

L(.)
[Touch HD General] FutureCow:
The Values i have changed:

File system cache: from 2MB to 8MB

File system filter cache : from disabled to 131072

Glyph cache : from 8KB to 64KB
[Touch HD General] tyronne1126:
what exactly do you guys mean when you lose a percent of memory throughout the day? and have to reset the phone every morning or something.. do you have to do that even without changing the settings.. reset it every once in a while? this will be my 1st WM phone (getting it tomorrow).. so i have a lot to learn.. thanks
[Touch HD General] scythe000:
Well, maybe it's a coincidence, but the only thing I did was install 3.3 and do these updates. Everything seems slightly slower to me, and Opera is crashing sometimes.
[Touch HD General] metabo:
I used version 3.3 and noticed an improvement in video playback with CorePlayer. It's not perfectly smooth yet, but a lot better than before the tweak.

Thanks!
[Touch HD General] brainfogs:
hi ,

i made the settings as advised first in this thread and noticed a real change in browsing the phone and particulary the touch flow is very smooth now .... manu thanks.

Charles
[Touch HD General] Matterhorn:
Well, the fact is that you can get carried away with memory cache tweaking. In the past with other phones, very high cache settings could sometimes introduce instability, you might want to turn it down a bit.
[Touch HD General] zz_rno:
After \Filters I only see the following in my registry:

- CacheFilt

- ENCFilt

- HTCFSFILTER

Please advice...
[Touch HD General] mrpetrov:
I downloaded Schap's Registry Editor so I could do the changes direct to the registry. When I run the registry editor however, all the keys begin with "HKEY" (e.g. HKEY_USERS and HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE and HKEY_CURRENT_USER and HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT)?

Any suggestions why I can't see the "HKLM" paths?

Thanks,

Petrov.
[Touch HD General] eaglesteve:
HKLM means KHEY_Local_Machine. It's short form.
[Touch HD General] mrpetrov:
Ahh, all sorted many thanks!

The original post in this thread advises much larger cache sizes than the post that was included in the Blackstone Wiki (via direct reg edit rather than using ACT 3.3) - any suggestions which settings are more optimal?

Thanks,

Petrov.
[Touch HD General] NLBeev:
Please let us know what the registry keys are for these settings.

Ton
[Touch HD General] ionutz6:
i understand this may not be the ultimate measurement, but i just did the CP benchmark with the same HD file before and after changing the cache settings. result: speed average dropped from 117% to 114% so basically no improvement.

pick your judgement from this...
[Touch HD General] nin2thevoid:
Interesting, because contrary to numerous raves on this thread, I did not notice Any difference in speed, anywhere. Everything is exactly the way it used to be. Same little lags that were there, are still there. Same framerate of scrolling in numerous applications, same time it takes to open stuff, same time to switch between apps, et cetera.

The only difference is that the device got a little fast because I did a soft reset which clears a lot of memory.

I don't mean to sound skeptical about this, but can anyone, please tell me where they noticed these amazing improvements, and can they supply a somewhat scientific comparison?
[Touch HD General] Dmitry N:
This is how it should be. The real picture, which can be seen by people not affected by the placebo effect ;)

The only difference you can see is less free RAM after allocating so much of it for caches.

That's it.
[Touch HD General] nin2thevoid:
Placebo effect, that was the term I was looking for, thank you.

Surely if facilitating this huge performance boost was so easily accomplished, through making such low level and simple changes, you'd think that a whole team of developers over at HTC would have figured that out by themselves over the course of three similar phones.

They make mistakes like all humans, but they're not idiots.
[Touch HD General] vincent1:
You did forget, that they do not optimize their standard software for further and sometimes very different applications.

It´s up to you to make the tweak or not.
[Touch HD General] nin2thevoid:
A company has a very specific scope of requirements for development of the phone. I agree that very different applications created by third parties are not within this scope and thus require tweaking, but this is barely the case with configuring cache sizes. This is a global setting which appears to me to have had plenty of headroom already, seeing as I detect no positive effect whatsoever in any of the pre-installed software, or in any of the 40+ apps I installed on it.

In fact, many of the scientifically proven differences indicate negative results. Please correct me here though, as I am not in this for bashing this method at all, I am just as eager to see improvements in this already excellent phone.