yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] Shardperson:
Just flashed this, had no issues, but I completely forgot to flash a root manager, can it still be done after booting into the system, or will i have to format again and flash the rom + gapps + root manager at once?

In any case, what root manager should I flash with this rom/phone combination? Last time I installed a custom rom i was going through far more simplified guides and was pointed towards an specific version of the TWRP app that i downloaded on windows and flashed from recovery, idk what to use for this one.

Oh, also, any idea if you can enable RAW picture support in this rom? I read elsewhere that one of the official AOSP roms for this phone supports RAW capture, but a quick test downloading a camera app shows no RAW support
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] DVt3:
Thanks for this. Working perfectly for me 😃
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] Shardperson:
Is there some way to mess with this ROM to enable RAW capture support? It's enabled in some AOSP roms for the phone and there's been mods made before, I don't have the know-how to do it myself but maybe someone could point me in the right direction?

I mean, I've got Camera2Api working, but raw capture is just not
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] nanich87:
Is it possible to enable support for USB Ethernet adapters?
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] Ao-Xiang:
It's already enabled.
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] nanich87:
I have this adapter UGREEN USB C Ethernet Network Adapter USB to RJ45 USB Ethernet Adapter and it's not working on this device. But it's working on OnePlus 7 and Samsung Galazy A7...
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] Ao-Xiang:
Oh, you meant the USB Ethernet adapter, I thought you meant using the phone as an Ethernet adapter. Guess you need to write the kernel yourself then.
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] Senz9090:
Hey, just flashed to my docomo so-04j. Absolute stable and buttery. Just curious is the 4k enabled for 4k content?

Edit : it runs 4k content, only screen shot not in 4k. Cheers
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] skipme:
Hello,

Did anyone managed to get this rom to pass safetynet and have all banking apps working(with or without root)? I tried so far:

unrooted with ih8sn

Magisk 25.1 + zygix + props + universal safetynet fix

Magisk 25.1 + zygix + props + universal safetynet fix + shamiko

Magisk 25.1 + riru + props + universal safetynet fix + LSPosed + XPrivacyLua

Magisk 25.1 delta + riru + magisk hide + props + universal safetynet fix + LSPosed + XPrivacyLua

Also above conbinations with lineageos recovery flashed and twrp removed

All on clean flashes

I don't know what else to try, some apps still detecting something wrong (root or unlocked bootloader or custom rom).

Now I am at 20+ flashes and I feel like pulling my hair off

If anyone knows a way, I will greatly appreciate it.
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] DVt3:
No issues here with any of my apps except WhatsApp noticing it was a custom rom. Sorry can't help.
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] ProfMozz:
Couldn't find the in the post but is it only for single sim or it would work in dual sim (G8142) as well? File Host mentions G8141.
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] Aqq123:
The _dsds version is for dual SIM.
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] ProfMozz:
Thank you!
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] xMaZ:
a friendly note, this is most stable rom for this device
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] boomanfc:
The new version 1.4 is updated. Link the first post.
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] Markutthel:
+New kernel??
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] nabjiehtu:
Hi! Many thanks for your work!
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] whodfkcares:
Where is the changelog?
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] boomanfc:
The new version 1.5 is updated. Link the first post.
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] vonFFF:
Why is the Internet speed indicator in the middle.
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] boomanfc:
The new version 1.6 is updated. Link the first post.
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] DVt3:
Just noticed a wee bit of screen flicker very occasionally and gboard kind hangs for a second or 2 sometimes. Not sure how to help illustrate that. But really not too bothered as it's working well otherwise.👍
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] m00ns0rr0w:
Hi,

just wanted to upgrade from 1.3 and install 1.5 and/or 1.6 - none of them worked. Tried 1) via sdcard/twrp install and 2) via adb sideload. Both installs work fine, then the reboot takes place - reboot (bootloader message, then sony screen), then a little vibration, same reboot order (bootloader message, then sony screen) again - and then twrp starts.

Switched back to 1.3 then - works perfect. Did i miss any steps?

thx,

m00n
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] boomanfc:
When updating from previous builds, simply dirty flash the ROM, together with any GApps and/or other modifications - addon.d will not work due to currently unavailable TWRP decryption.

----------------------------------------

Clean flash recommend.
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] boomanfc:
No problem for me.
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] m00ns0rr0w:
ok, there's an addon.d message at the end of flashing lygisk/magisk, so that doesn't work (yet). But flashing 1.5 and 1.6 only (no addons at all) doesn't work either - just wondering why flashing of 1.3 works and the other 2 fail. Neither via recovery (install from sdcard) nor adb sideload work. Is there another method?

By "clean flash" you mean:

--- Before first install: flash and boot into TWRP,

format

data, reboot to recovery and wipe all internal partitions.---
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] grodo00:
match md5 for rom, try again, good luck!
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] boomanfc:
I have no idea.

------------

Clean flash: flash later stock firmware -> boot once -> flash twrp -> boot into twrp -> wipe cache/davik, data, system (internal partition if you put ROM in SD card) -> format data -> flash ROM -> wipe cache -> reboot.
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] m00ns0rr0w:
md5sum is ok.

So the whole procedure... not sure if i want to do that (again) ;) 1.3 runs smoothly - so if there's no one else having this problem or can explain what might be the cause - i'll stay with 1.3.

thx so far :)
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] EphesusPC:
Hi everyone. I've one of Maple. I used L18 till 3 days ago. But Android SystemWebview anger me all the gaming times. Everybody knows this chronical problem at Android 11 devices. I looking for Android 12 or 13 for Maple and i've seen L19 & 20. I tried flash both OS to my Maple. 2 times bricked. I was unbrick it. No problem. But now i can't flashing lineage systems to my phone. I was read some discussions for this problem and variants (different twrp's etc..) and i try all solving methods but not success.

Edit : Now i got message from TWRP during wrote this message. :

failed to mount /oem (invalid argument)

Patching system image unconditionally message still have. I tried to turn stock rom (47.2) but stucked xperia logo. My bootloader is unlocked. Xperia Companions can't work for this device. Can somebody help me ? My phone is closed 3 days. Nobody can call me and my job with my phone. Please help.
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] whodfkcares:
For L19 (i dont remember L20) did you patch DFE? its first step before flashing LOS system, taking in care that you need to be in a specific firmware version before do that, of course.
[Sony Xperia XZ Premium ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] amyyon:
this rom have wifi bug.

i try to connect new wifi.

but, i cant password connection
[Touch HD General] Eriol:
Hi,

in a German mobile phone journal I read a review on the Touch HD in which they claim that the camera is somewhat weak:

1. They say that it takes about 3 seconds between pressing to shoot the photo and actually shooting the photo.

2. They say that photos are blurred and out of focus.

Can someone of you that have the Touch HD confirm this? How is the quality of the camera?
[Touch HD General] obstler:
I can confirm the 2-3 sec shutter lag on my hd. I wouldn't call the photos blurry, but of the same low mobile phone quality as many earlier generations. the 5mp are completely useless in my opinion, 2mp would be good enough. but the lag is really bad, pretty much rules out any snapshots or pics of moving objects...
[Touch HD General] esackbauer:
I guess this is because of the autofocus working so slow.

It would be better if you could "point and shoot", e.g. as with normal cameras press the shutter half way to focus, and then press through. But I could not find out how to do it.
[Touch HD General] indup:
it says in the camera settings "main camera rear 3.2 mpcmos camera". (?)

i think the camera is fine as when you press shoot it takes a little bit of time to actually take the picture which gives you time to steady the phone in your hands(particularly as i have shaky hands) unlike regular cameras/camera phones when you lose some of the steadyness when pressing a physical shoot button.

quality wise they look fine no complaints here god willing.
[Touch HD General] pzucchel:
..i have to admit that - among the marvelous things which i saw in the last 48 hours - the camera is the one that impressed me less. I really refer to the quality of images in low light conditions, the HTC cmos sensors have never been particularly brilliant and the touch HD is no exception in this respect (but it is in all the other aspects, in my opinion).
[Touch HD General] Eriol:
Thanks a lot to all the answers. Hmm, I wonder if this is possibly be cured by a software hack or later firmware, but I guess this is hardware related. Too bad. Still unsure between X1 and HD, and I know I would miss a hardware keyboard. Plus, the HD seems to be delayed in Germany ... And now this camera issues. I have to wait and see both live and compare them ...

Eriol
[Touch HD General] massimax:
camera is not so bad. Considering that we are talking about a winmo device (the ONLY one with decent camera is samsung I900) I think HD takes brilliant photos when shooting with good light. It'S WAY better than any other HTC and slightly better than Sony Ericsson G900 (another 5mpx smartphone)
[Touch HD General] kersh:
and is way back from X1 or Omnia.
[Touch HD General] pzucchel:
ciao Eriol,

(I have a touch HD)

i think you are right: in the doubt, maybe better wait and see. I read about this issue of shooting delays, but actually I am not much sensitive since even with other telephones the time between thinking "i want to make a picture" and the actual picture is...10 seconds? it is very different from a real reflex camera, where in a fraction of a second you are there and the picture is in memory. I don't use the phone camera much, admittedly.

But once you will see a real one: the screen is really beautiful. I could read A4 pdf documents in full screen....by itself, to me is a quantum jump which is big enough to justify the choice. :p
[Touch HD General] kdomo:
You can see the picture quality in the attachment.
[Touch HD General] _Fly_:
I's a Blackstone photo? Very good colors, I like'it.
[Touch HD General] kdomo:
Yes, I made the photo, with my Touch HD.
[Touch HD General] _Fly_:
And no PS?
[Touch HD General] Nara-e-Mastana:
This is one excellent picture...picture quality is really good
[Touch HD General] Insaneboy:
That on 5MPX?

Information on it says

:)
[Touch HD General] kdomo:
Whats the PS? Photoshop? No.
[Touch HD General] _Fly_:
PS = Photoshop.

So this picture comes directly from the mobile and without manipulation? Very good, indeed.
[Touch HD General] kdomo:
Yes, 5 MPX. I am can not, why 4.02.

More picture directly from the mobile and without manipulation here:

http://kdomo.extra.hu/hd.zip
[Touch HD General] _Fly_:
Well, these photos can already say that lack a bit of definition. Need sharpness.
[Touch HD General] esackbauer:
No wonder, this comes from a ridiculous small sensor and cheap optics. But hey, this is not that bad!
[Touch HD General] nu_D:
Camera is beautiful. The outdoor shot is a little lacking but unless you plan on using these pictures as your wallpaper, they are perfect. I always figure I am going to need to reduce the size by 50% at which the pictures will be pretty perfect. That's seriously some impress photo quality, far past my expectations to be honest.

Regarding the resolution:

This is the third time I notice this- I have seen pictures at two other review sites and all of them have been at the 4megapixel resolution. Something is off here, I don't know if you guys haven't placed it at max settings or what, but something definitely is not right. Might be a software issue? I don't know.

Can anyone confirm this?
[Touch HD General] kdomo:
I tried out this.

The resolution with normal mode:

2592*1944=5 MPX

The resolution with widescreen mode:

2592 x 1552 Pixels 4 MPX
[Touch HD General] nu_D:
Could you please take some at 5 megapixel and post it like last time for us? That would be terrific if you could!
[Touch HD General] kdomo:
Ok, the 5 MPX pictures available tomorrow.
[Touch HD General] Zuber:
The pictures look fine to me. Not syre what everyine is complaining about.

There may be more to pics than how many megapixels, but those pics are way better than what I can manage with my wife's iPhone, that's for sure.

Would like to see some low light pics if possible, just to see how well it copes without flash etc.

Thanks,

Zuber
[Touch HD General] surur:
Here's the picture of the dog.

I feel like I am in bladerunner.

Surur
[Touch HD General] pzucchel:
samples

IMAGE0001 is my first HD shot ever THROUGH the window (to understand where/what to press...)

no it's not a NIKON reflex and I am not Henri Cartier-Bresson.

pretty decent quality, i think, but still not to jump on the chair.

However, i had to sit down on the chair when i realized i could FULLY and EASILY read the manual on the screen in full page (and the image DSC_5480 is taken with a 10 MP Nikon REFLEX indeed and a 1kg objective, but still it doesn't make justice to the 3.8" readibility!!!)

In the back, some key of the same dinovo edge keyboard that i could connect to the HD and use to write a word document.

Pretty impressed? Yes, i am.

Reminder: the TouGh HD also doesn't make coffee. Because of this, should we open a thread on coffee machines which are better than the HD?

:p:p:p:p
[Touch HD General] pzucchel:
...i think we are getting crazy and we should go to sleep!

...here a picture in VERY LOW light conditions! good night!

;)

p.s. i f you see them in the forum, they have been also resampled!
[Touch HD General] kdomo:
More pictures here:

http://kdomo.extra.hu/pictures.zip

The quality is good if the apparatus is fixed.
[Touch HD General] Zuber:
Thanks for the pics. I think I can live with the camera...

I'm going to hold out for just a few weeks to see if any more firm info turns up on the new Asus. If not, then it's the HD.

Zuber
[Touch HD General] Beards:
Are these the 5MP one's you mentioned earlier kdomo?

Beards.
[Touch HD General] kdomo:
The resolution is:

2592 x 1552 = 4 MPX
[Touch HD General] nu_D:
What do you mean, if the apparatus is fixed?

I don't get that.

Also, can you post any pictures at 5 megapixels rather than at 4?

Thanks!
[Touch HD General] Zuber:
I'm guessing he means that the objects being photographed aren't moving ?

Also, why the big hang up over 5MP instead of 4 ? I doubt it will make any sort of sudden change to the quality.

On a differnet note, looking at some of the earlier shots, a flash would make a big difference. I was just wondering if there was an auto Night Mode or ISO option that would brighten the images a bit more.

Zuber
[Touch HD General] Beards:
I guess he's talking of the 5MPX that kdomo said he would post today ~ as in the thread below. :)

Beards
[Touch HD General] surur:
I assume he means if the camera is kept very still.

Surur
[Touch HD General] SomethingWicked:
CRAP!! I've been reading the camera had issues, but that picture has left me flaberghasted! The color and clarity are just amazing!! Well, that's it! I'm ordering my HD Monday freekin morning!! :D

Also, on my Polaris, if you disable the camera shutter sound, it removed most if not all of the lag between click and pic... :)
[Touch HD General] Eriol:
Well, if HTC would offer a device claiming that it is possible to make coffee with, yes, of course I would compare it with other coffee machines. :)

If, however, the camera is not that important, I wonder why they add a 5 MP camera. But: The camera is quite important and all phone manufacturers know this. We are talking about a 600 Euro hardware: Why do we accept a bad camera for this price? Even if we decide to get the Touch HD we should and can make clear that we expect to get a device that comes with a camera that can be compared to cameras that we already can buy for under 100 Euros at any supermarket ;)

While the photos of the dog and the flower indeed are nice, the photos of outside images are now really good as far as I think. I read that one problem is that HTC still uses plastic lenses instead of glass lenses because they are cheaper.

Eriol
[Touch HD General] utvol06:
Picture Quality looks impressive for a mobile phone. You just need good lighting to get decent pictures. low light will yield crappy pictures on just about any small sensored camera.
[Touch HD General] nu_D:
Quoted for truth.

Flash on mobile cameras in my opinion really barely make a difference. As far as I have been able to tell, if it's dark enough that flash is needed the picture is going to be bad regardless.

Would have been nice though to have flash, but it's not a deal breaker or anything. It has its uses such as a flashlight or when you want to take self-portraits or something... I mean it does have its uses, but in the overall scheme of things its effect on quality is negligible.
[Touch HD General] P996:
The Touch HD has a horrible camera, the picture quality is ONLY good if there is enough light and if the subject you want to shoot stands still. Otherwise, you get blurry and pretty ugly pictures. The autofocus/shutter lag is the worst thing with the Touch HD, the 5MP resoluton is just useless and probably only a marketing trick.

The iPhone shoots with its 2MP camera much faster and the pictures are sometimes even better looking, a shame for the Touch HD.

For comparison: the SE Xperia X1 camera is much better regarding autofocus/shutter lag, the resolution is only 3.2MP but it shoots better pictures in my opinion and it is much faster. I won't even talk about the pretty good quality (in comparison) of the Samsung i900 5MP camera, the difference in quality between the Touch HD and the i900 is like day and night.

A real shame, the Touch HD could have been a real milestone for HTC but currently, I'm not impressed at all. Surfing the internet with the Opera browser is horrible too, the browser shows DISPLAY lag (meaning that when the website shows up, first there are some display problems like grey squares visible, simply because the Touch HD graphics performance can't keep up with fast loading). Horrible, a real joke. Surfing the web with this thing is no fun at all, especially compared to the iPhone but also for example to my Nokia E90.
[Touch HD General] custardo01:
Would someone be kind enough to tell me the maximum megapixels at which you can use the zoom function of the camera? On the Polaris it is 1mp and am hoping it will be higher than this for the Touch HD. I use this function all the time for my work.

Also just to mention with 4/5 megapixels you should get good quality A3 prints if ever needed.

Thanks.
[Touch HD General] nu_D:
WTF are you smoking?

Have you seen the pictures that have been uploaded in this very thread?

...

Seriously. This is beyond ridiculous.

You need good light for a decent picture? NO REALLY? That goes for all the camera phones out there, ones with flash included. Objects need to be standing still or the images will be blurry? NO!

...

Camera quality between Omnia and HD is night and day? Dude. Like. WTF.

Have you read Omnia reviews? Check out GSMArena.com. They CLEARLY state that INDOOR photos are basically useless on it. Look at some samples from that review and look at other samples from other HD reviews and they are basically very damn similar.

The iPhone takes better pictures does it? What? Apple uses special Steve Jobs megapixels? Man. Like. LoL? Seriously. If the lens was bigger I would maybe agree with you. But we are talking about basically the same size lens, if not identical, but one has 2.5 the megapixels yet has worse image quality.

I give up.

HD sucks. HD blows. HD is a POS.

It cant take pictures. It doesn't even have a lens. It just takes black images and saves them.

...

lol

BTW. Don't expect me to reply to your undoubted reply. I am not even going to get into this man. All I am going to say is that there are images uploaded in this very thread that are pretty spectacular and that reviews all over the internet have images up. Compare these with the iPhone's camera samples and you WILL see a night/day difference with the HD absolutely trouncing the iPhone's camera.

If the object is moving the photo will be blurry? LOL.

I am going to have to remember that..... seriously. ROTFLMAO!

"I took a picture of a car moving at 220kmph and guess what! The image was BLURRY!"

HAHAHA
[Touch HD General] Eriol:
Hey nu_D,

I think we are missing the proper style of discussion in this forum in your last post, aren't we? Probably you take a deep breath before typing a post ...

Anyhow and then, we have seen some pictures here, and while the pictures of the dog and the flower are quite nice, the other pictures of outside buildings and so on are not at all usable. The HD camera has a plastic lense; 5 MP in a HD means only ... bigger files! Not better quality. After looking at the pictures shown here and other pictures on the internet this is quite the case for the HD, unfortunately. I do not care for Iphone or Omnia. But I wonder why a Touch HD for approx. 600 Euros is not able to take pictures that are as good as pictures of a 80 Euros supermarket camera. And I wonder why so many guys here even stand up for this camera. Don't we all want HTC to improve the devices they sell???

Eriol
[Touch HD General] Candy-men:
If some guys of you find the Iphone have a better camera....

go to an iphone user and tell him: " hey I like your photos with the better quality than my Touch HD, could you please send me your Pics via Bluetooth or MMS?" and wait for his answer:D
[Touch HD General] Beards:
OoOooOoo... Candy... that's cruel.
[Touch HD General] townkat:
some more good camera quality proof

http://www.flickr.com/photos/robertwebbe/sets/72157608933498662/

excelent imho
[Touch HD General] tingsagwaan:
P996 The HD is great at browsing the net, you just need a decent connection speed. The grey squares appear while parts of the page are loading but its not unacceptable and certainly not horrible!

As for the camera, I tried to use it in low light and it was pretty bad. The delay between pressing the shoot button the and actual shot being taken is very long and the auto focus is really noisy!
[Touch HD General] ez2remember:
I don't know but P996 just seems to post everywhere "how bad" the HD is and how good the iPhone is. You wonder if the user is not just an Apple fanboy in disguise.

The user keeps mentioning I'm not a fanboy... But that's exactly the line fanboys use.

I hope I'm wrong and P996 is genuine.