yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[ASUS ROG Phone 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Othe] kevinmartingreen:
Would installing this rom fix the Android 12 issue on AT&T in the US no longer working with calls due to not having VoLTE? Basically the official Android 12 OTA broke my phone, and I'm curious if this would fix it.
[ASUS ROG Phone 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Othe] Shreyash_drogon:
Only after flashing you can find out.

No other way
[ASUS ROG Phone 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Othe] jackeagle:
BlissRoms Arcadia v15.7 (July SP) is UP!

OTA should be out already!!

Download : https://downloads.blissroms.org/download/obiwan/363/

PS: Make sure you all are on Android 12 Asus Stock firmware before flashing.

Enjoy guys!

Cheers!

-jackeagle
[ASUS ROG Phone 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Othe] amr elfiky:
I know it's not recommended, but can I dirty flash this over lineage os 18 ?
[ASUS ROG Phone 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Othe] gyren001:
Hello! When will the lack of SIM signal in China be fixed? thanks
[ASUS ROG Phone 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Othe] RebornCheiko:
Do a clean install. Dirty flashing is not always recommended
[ASUS ROG Phone 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Othe] Rohit99:
@jackeagle A request, please look into this and add support if possible Air triggers in Rog II
[ASUS ROG Phone 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Othe] Rohit99:
Guys are you facing the UI freeze issue, sometimes the UI freezes for 10 to 15 seconds and then it starts to work
[ASUS ROG Phone 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Othe] Shreyash_drogon:
Never experienced something like that.

But you should ask this on telegram grp for bliss R3 , more people can answer your query
[ASUS ROG Phone 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Othe] iliais347:
Hey is there an easy or any way to disable the physical keyboard shortcuts?

So here is the situation.

When using apps that let you remote control into a windows machine or any other os, when pressing alt tab or the windows key for example, rather than doing that in the app, android interrupts you with its own shortcut functions like pulling recent apps when alt tabbing.

In my case, i use the shadow cloud gaming/computing app and try to use it like a regular pc but those shortcuts get in the way,

Now if there was a toggle to turn it off, it would be great, alternatively if there was a universal way to disable this regardless of your rom, it would help a lot as well.

I am not sure how that would be possible but an adb method or root/magisk method would be great well.

See below screenshot for more clarification of the feature i want to toggle on and off or entirely disable
[ASUS ROG Phone 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Othe] flomaud:
Hi, I am having an issue with the Bluetooth. I am running BlissOS 15.9 on an all in one hp with a dual boot. The integrated Bluetooth is not compatible with one of my device requiring Bluetooth 5. I bought a dongle (Realtek) installed it in windows, disabled the integrated 4.1 Bluetooth, reinstalled bliss on a separate partition.

However, when i run blissos it still uses the integrated Bluetooth instead of the dongle.

Any idea how to solve this problem?
[Off-topic] andrew-in-woking:
Hi all,

I think it's fantastic that Barack Obama is President Elect of USA.

As this is an international forum I thought it would be interesting to see whether there is a difference of opinion between US Citizens, and those outside the US. I am British.

What do you think of Barack Obama's success in the election? What are your hopes, expectations, fears and concerns about for his administration?

It would be helpful for the purpose of discussion to state whether or not you are a US Citizen if it's not in your profile.

Cheers,

andrew-in-woking
[Off-topic] Black93300ZX:
I am a U.S. citizen and I believe it's a great thing. I'm not so sure he'll be the greatest man ever to be elected to office, but I know we dodged a bullet by not electing McCain/Palin. Imagine George Bush with a Vice President that considers herself experienced in foreign relations because she lives across the Bering Straight from Siberia... What a joke.
[Off-topic] burgertime:
I live in the south and I think that the old days of the racist guard are over. It's an amazing thing, and I have a gut feeling he could be a historic president outside of the black thing. I was over joyed last night and even got a little misty eyed...and this is coming from someone who is a staunch Nader supporter. It's so amazing to see my state go blue!
[Off-topic] Black93300ZX:
Sir, I commend you and your state... From the south, you still turned up blue. It's great to see states like NC and VA (who hadn't voted Democrat in over 40 years) making the right decision. This election has renewed a bit of the faith I had lost in the American people as a whole, the ability to see beyond race and beyond the fancy credentials and realize what this nation really needs. Congratulations to all Americans, and let's just wait for the day... What is it, 01/20/2009? This was one hell of a first election for me, great way to start voting. :)
[Off-topic] TheCopacabanaMan:
I'm in Italy, very far from US, and maybe i dont know anythiiii...

But from first sight, i did non trust McCain. I was more disappointed, when i saw Madame Palin.

Cannot say i trust Obama, as i dont know his politic history; but i thik he's better.

We will see in the near future. ;)
[Off-topic] GWelker62:
I think the idea of this being a "historic" election is over rated, and also the most racially charged one. There is no way anybody can convince me there wasn't a large voting block that voted for Obama purely on the bases they considered him "black". It should be written in the history books the US elected a mixed race president. To label him "black" is a slap in the face of his "white" mother.

I for one am sick of the concept of "race". I reject the racial color lines and do not subscribe to any race other than the human race. There will be forever racial tension as long as we label ourselves "black" or "white". It's time we give up our whiteness or blackness, and everything in between. It creates division and doesn't promote any unity.

Having said all that, I will support the new president and wish him well. My only fear is, it doesn't matter who is president, it's our senators and congressmen that controll this country's destiny. And unfortunately they are controlled by the highest bidder.
[Off-topic] chalid:
Hi,

I'm from Austria and watched the whole election night on CNN Int. and other local senders. I think its a very good first step. Obama can't do it any worse than Bush did it the past 8 years and I think he will be better than McCain too. There's a chance that the US now can fix their broken image in the world and fix their problems in the country itself. Hope it works.

One more thing: I didn't consider McCain to be a big problem as president, but I didn't like to see Palin as vicepresident. You can say what you want, but with 72 years theres a higher risk to become unfit to be president, than with 47. And in that case Palin would have been a disaster for both, the world and the US - imho.

So, my best wishes to the US citizens. I think it was the right choice.
[Off-topic] Black93300ZX:
That's exactly what it comes down to... I don't think Obama is our Lord and savior, I simply think he's better for the country than another George Bush. McCain loved to say "they say I vote with George Bush 90% of the time, but I'm not George Bush." Well obviously you're not, but ****, 9 out of 10 is 9 out of 10! 10% better than the last 8 years is not good enough.
[Off-topic] McHale:
It's a disaster unless you'll be one who will enjoy the benefits of socialism. "Spreading the wealth" isn't something that helps the economy or promotes job growth. Raising taxes stifles the economy and increases dependency on government programs.

So whether it's a good thing or not is subjective to whether you make money or take money.

I have a job. His proposed tax changes will hurt me more than help me and I don't make that much money. And by "not much" I mean not much more than a full time wal-mart checkout person.

-Mc
[Off-topic] McHale:
He didn't run against George Bush. So a vote for Obama was NOT a vote against George Bush.
[Off-topic] Black93300ZX:
Did you read what else I said? You're right, McCain isn't George Bush, he's 90% of George Bush.
[Off-topic] burgertime:
Many Republicans and Democrats vote straight ticket, this is no different then a black man voting solely on race. They are both dumb reason to vote. That being said I just can't see how anyone can say this is not historical. I agree with you on the labels thing though.
[Off-topic] Black93300ZX:
You're right, we should stay in Iraq for another decade like McCain wants, spending $12 billion a month, I'm sure that'll lead to tax cuts... Oh wait, how does that math work? Oh that's right, it doesn't. Considering Obama said the only tax hikes will be for people with $250k+ salaries, I don't think your "not much better than Wal-Mart salary" will suffer as much as you think. I guess you can call me a taker, because I, along with much more than half of the planet, forget our country, agree that Obama is a much better selection. Stop listening to the McCain campaign and what daddy tells you, tax hikes for higher paid citizens is not socialism, look it up.
[Off-topic] Black93300ZX:
I don't recall many times Obama mentioned in his campaign that he was black, he didn't use it as a leverage point at all. That's why the likes of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton failed so miserably in their political escapades, it was all about race. With Obama, he showed how he can change the nation, not with his skin color but with his intelligence and his views... McCain just brought up being held captive 5 decades ago and hoped that would pull him through.
[Off-topic] chalid:
Actually it does. The more money people have the more they can spend, which for sure will boost the economy.

Socialism. What is that exactly? Please explain :)

And another thing: Its true Obama didn't run against Bush, but McCain did. If there weren't the last 8 years McCain could have won this. But unfortunately for him, Bushs politics failed over and over again, which naturally strengthened all political enemies. And one of those is Barack Obama.
[Off-topic] AllTheWay:
Very well said sir. I actually did not vote for either of the two more popular candidates. I agree "there will be forever racial tension as long as we label ourselves "black" or "white." Why can't we all be called Americans. Isn't that what makes American great? That no matter where you came from or what ethnicity you are, you are still an American first. Not Mexican American or African American, Asian American, Italian American, German American, etc. why not just be American.

I agree that it is important to keep and cherish historic traditions and customs. Each different ethnic group brings something good to this country and it's important to recognize that. Maybe this election will help bring this country closer together. There is no doubt some real tension is surrounding this country. I would like nothing more than Americans to come together.

I for one will give Barack Obama a fair shot. In his speech last night he said, "And to those Americans whose support I have yet to earn – I may not have won your vote, but I hear your voices, I need your help, and I will be your President too."

His speech was excellent last night. He is a great orator and I am encouraged by his presence and hope that he does well. I trully do.

I agree with you. I never thought I would say that. We are spending way to much in Iraq and need to leave as soon as we can. I don't think that John McCain wanted to spend another decade in Iraq but that is neither here nor there now.

President Bush spent money like a Liberal. I have never seen a Republican candidate spend so much money. It's funny that Republicans run under the platform and spending but many of them as just as bad as there Liberal counterparts. I hope that Barack Obama reduces military expenditures like the one in Iraq and direct this attention to Afghanistan.

I am not however going to argue with you concerning the tax increases for people of 250k+. If he does that it will be curious to see what effect this will have on the real economy.

...but remember when you start taxing companies that will entice them to seek else where to incorporate. Which takes the jobs with them. I just hope that we can come to a middle ground because the real problem of America are not going to be settled overnight. With a clear majority in both the House and Senate the Democrats will have complete control of everything.
[Off-topic] GWelker62:
I agree.... Just note I didn't say it wasn't historical, I said it was over rated.
[Off-topic] burgertime:
Sorry read too fast!
[Off-topic] burgertime:
Do realize that 90% of current America from around 1920 on has embraced socialist ideas?

Have you been to college? This is a socialist ideal, you give tuition which is then spread throughout to help out say a sports program you have nothing to do with. In turn the money the sports program makes is then spread (usually unequally) to academics. So are you also anti college because of it's evil socialist agenda?

How about police and fireman? They are paid through taxes which "share the wealth" to those agencies. Ever notice how some wealthy small towns have over the top police departments? This is because the "wealth" is being distributed there. Are you also against fireman and police?

How about your highway and roads? Should we abolish these because the "wealth is spread around"?

You would probably answer no to all three. So actually research stuff before you start making broad over dramatic statements about something you know nothing about. Americans have such a narrow view of socialism because of our involvement in Vietnam and our hastiness to decry anything slightly socialist.

Obama has socialist ideals, this makes him no more a socialist then you if you pay taxes or went/go to college.
[Off-topic] can6rxw:
I'm from Canada and I'm pretty happy with who won. Mind you...I'm a conservative at heart and always will be, but with the two men that were running, I think the best man for United States won. Years from now, history will tell us if it was a good thing or bad. Until such time, the storm has to be weathered.

...oh...and for those wondering, Canada is more or less a socialist country.
[Off-topic] avathar behemoth:
Im from Holland, and im delighted.

Though i think mcCain himself wouldnt be so bad, with Palin he is a disaster.

Her morality and those of the religieus right in america is hipocritical to say the least!

Being a christian isnt about limiting others choice (gay marriage, abortion) violating their rights (guantamo bay, abu ghraib) starting an illegal war (irak)

starting 2 crises or at least having a hint of guilt in starting them (9/11 credit crisis).

and claiming that abstinence prevents aids...... i thought being cristian was a way to live your own life.

Also this election is the final verdict on reaganomics (also known as trickle down economics or by a better term.... voodoo economics)

The voters have chosen to reevaluate the american path and thats great.
[Off-topic] McHale:
1. You're right. Unfortunately Obama also said he was staying in Iraq. He realized that cutting and running like the dems did in Vietnam is a cowardly move and always proves unsuccessful.

2. Obama said 250, then 200, then 150, then 120. Obama was voted the most liberal senator in the US Senate. Not a small feat for someone who was only there 165 days.

I like the daddy comment. That's cute. But as an Illinois resident, I have had the unfortunate experience of dealing with that worthless "Present" voter while he was in our Illinois legislature. He has *NO* voting record. I disagree with his stance in killing failed abortions. I disagree with his stance on increasing taxes on a stifled economy. I disagree with the fact that he made an Oath to a Socialist political organization to further his selfish cause to be elected. I disagree with his alignment of worthless race baiters like Rev. Wright, Louis Farakann, Ayers, Rezko, and a whole host of other socialist bastards.

So ask your mom to explain what I just wrote and we can discuss further later...

-Mc
[Off-topic] burgertime:
Children Children....It should be noted Nixon took us out of Vietnam and not the democrats. The Democrats simply wanted to cut spending. It was Nixon who got elected on the premise of leaving Vietnam the utterly failed trying to keep the war going, dems then cut spending and forced Nixon's hand. Get your facts right McHale.
[Off-topic] zeezee:
I chose not to vote, but i honestly hope the fame doesnt go to obama's head.
[Off-topic] burgertime:
I respect people who do not vote, in the end they have the most right to complain. Either way they are not to blame for the guy who makes the mess.
[Off-topic] ProudPop83:
Whats the difference in staying Iraq and "stabilizing" the region or increasing troop size in Afghanistan where hostilities are increasing and doing the same thing there and spending just as much money? Or better yet a national draft? Does that sound better? Obama supports Rangels (D-NY) idea for a draft.Sorry I guess the correct term as he put it is "National Service" Spreading the wealth? Gee lemme support those who cant support themselves given that already on todays economy, it can be hard enough to support a family on a middle class income. There is another way to vote as well, Its not just a two party system. There were a few other candidates on the bill. If you didn't like either candidate a vote could have been cast for someone else. Neither Obama or McCain were very good in my eyes,
[Off-topic] ProudPop83:
Actually someone who doesnt vote do not have the most right to complain. They're not doing anything to help. They could vote for someone. There were more than just McCain and Obama on the bill. Only way they have a right to complain is if there is absolutely NO candidate they dont like.
[Off-topic] P1Tater:
Well put.....
[Off-topic] McHale:
Another Illinois resident who has the right to an opinion.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TG4fe9GlWS8

And watch the whole thing for the surprise ending.

-Mc
[Off-topic] burgertime:
So let me get this straight because you voted for some sorry guy who ruined things it's my fault for not voting for anyone? What if no one looked appealing to me? People have things so backwards sometimes. George Carlin summed it up so well about voting:

Possibly NSFW (language)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2sW3Tp3A304
[Off-topic] McHale:
I'll say the same to you. Please get your facts straight:

http://hnn.us/articles/31400.html

(A Democratically controlled) Congress cut funding to South Vietnam for the upcoming fiscal year from a proposed 1.26 billion to 700 million dollars. These two events prompted Hanoi to make an all-out effort to conquer the South. As the North Vietnamese Communist Party Secretary Le Duan observed in December 1974: “The Americans have withdrawn…this is what marks the opportune moment.”​

This is what the dems have and are trying to do in Iraq.

-Mc
[Off-topic] McHale:
I agree with burgertime. I vote every election, but if I have no strong feelings one way or another about a candidate (regardless of which election or race it is), I don't vote for anyone in that race. Why should I cancel out someone's vote just because I'm either uninformed, could care less, or not affected?

Yesterday, there were 2 judges in a particular race I knew nothing about - 1 republican, 1 democrat. I had absolutely no opinion one way or another. I should have voted on that? What would that have proven?

-Mc
[Off-topic] ProudPop83:
Wow, I think if you read my comment, i voted for neither so apparently I didnt vote for a guy that messed anything up. And if I may quote my previous statement.....

Originally Posted by ProudPop83

Actually someone who doesnt vote do not have the most right to complain. They're not doing anything to help. They could vote for someone. There were more than just McCain and Obama on the bill. Only way they have a right to complain is if there is absolutely NO candidate they dont like.

I think someone needs to learn to read.
[Off-topic] ProudPop83:
I agree that if theres no candidate you prefer then dont vote... burgertime misread what I said. There were other candidates that couldve been researched as well. If none seemed suitable then obviously dont vote, BUT other candidates could have been looked at instead of voting for the "lesser of two evils" as is so common to see.
[Off-topic] McHale:
Yup. Too many people went in saying, Bush is evil, I'll vote for Obama. Instead of comparing the two candidates and their beliefs, voting record, etc, they choose to show idiocy by being too lazy to do that.

The popular vote tells us one simple thing, not that large of a percentage put him in office. That being said, that means not that many people wanted "change."

Regardless, like him or not, he's going to be president for the next 4 years and the least we can do is show him every bit of "respect" and "fairness" in reporting that the media and liberals showed Bush. ;)

-Mc
[Off-topic] ProudPop83:
HAHAHAHAHA....
[Off-topic] burgertime:
Which is exactly what I said. The Dems cut spending but it was Nixon who ultimately decided to withdraw. Nixon also got elected on the promise he would withdraw. As he was in office he steadily started pulling troops. So did the Dems help push for the early withdraw? Yes, however it was Nixon's call to do so and as I said before was the reason he got elected.
[Off-topic] burgertime:
I was being general, not blaming you per say just society at large that tries to push this, "you can't complain if you don't vote" philosophy that is so strong these days. I voted Nader and I believe those who did not vote have more of a right to complain then I do. Not that voting even matters. If you lived in say North Dakota your vote counted for jack squat.
[Off-topic] burgertime:
Actually Obama was the first Democrat to receive over 50% of the popular vote since Jimmy Carter, which means that a large majority did want change. He also out performed almost everywhere that went to Bush last year.
[Off-topic] McHale:
Don't forget, that while conservatives and liberals argue over which party is better (or worse), the Europeans think that both are nearly identical from their standpoint...

It's all a matter of perspective I guess.

-Mc
[Off-topic] burgertime:
Agreed they should just be called Republicrats and argue amongst themselves.
[Off-topic] AllTheWay:
...and Jimmy Carter was a great financial genius. LOL.

...he was also really good at handling diplomatic situations, like that in Iran lol.

In my opinion, no incumbent president or incumbent office holder for that matter had it easy keeping there seat this year. It's just a "democratic" year. It goes in cycles. Just like the economy.

Obamba campaign was really good at pinning George Bush to John McCain. You have to give credit where credit is due. Obama ran a great campaign. John did not.
[Off-topic] avathar behemoth:
actually the rescue attempt was leaked to the iranians by the reagan campaign!! get yer facts straight alltheway :)

also to mchale.. what america did in Vietnam WAS WRONG... what you are doing in Irak IS WRONG. youre only killing people and getting them killed.....get it in your head WRONG WRONG WRONG.....

the iraki war has destabilized the whole region its effects will last for generations, and it has alienated billions.. so ehmmm good work??

i actually think bush should be in the hague for war crimes and crimes against humanity....

yeah he saved us from weapons of mass destruction... oh no strike that he saved a people from a dictator ... by whiping them out!!
[Off-topic] burgertime:
Bush also set a low bar for Russia to invade Georgia...after all they were just following the U.S.' lead in primitive strike.