yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Ot] Myydata:
>> Standard Disclaimer <<
* I am not responsible for bricked devices, dead SD cards, thermonuclear war, or you getting fired because the alarm app failed.
* Please do some research if you have any concerns about features included in this ROM before flashing it!
* YOU are choosing to make these modifications, and if you blame me in any way for what happens to your device, I will laugh at you.
* BOOM! And Turn to Ashes...!!!

What's ColtOS

​

Needless to say, ColtOS Project is custom ROM based on AOSP by a team of learners with all the necessary customizations, without compromising the stability and security of the device.​

We have cherry-picked the features from many other open-source roms/projects and we are very thankful to all of them!​

We try to keep ColtOS as stable as possible, on an off chance you faced any issues with official builds, please let us know via our official telegram group or XDA thread.​

Team ColtOS

We, The ColtOS Team, are a bunch of Android enthusiast coming from a wide variety of industries (some of them don't even belong to anything related to programming or coding). But we like what we do.

We are young and growing team of learners. We are still learning and helping each other learn as well. Thanks to entire ColtOS team for giving their precious time to this Project.​

@rakesh batra - Lead Developer and Founder of ColtOS

@nitin.chobhe - Core Developer

@mg712702 - Core Developer

@saurabhcharde - Community Manager

@SuperDroidBond - Project Contributor

@Roger.T - Graphics Designer

@mukesh22584 - Project Contributor

Checkout the features here

​

Google Drive

NikGapps

​

First time installation:

- Download Rom, Gapps & Magisk (If you want ROOT)

- Reboot to recovery

- Flash latest vendor/firmware

- Format data

- Wipe cache, dalvik, data

- Flash Rom, Gapps & Magisk (optional)

- Reboot

Update installation:

- Wipe cache, dalvik

- Flash Rom, Gapps & Magisk (optional)

- Reboot​

If you fail to follow these instructions, please don't bother reporting any bugs. Also we do not
support any Xposed or Magisk modules or any custom kernel so please keep in mind before reporting.

ColtOS Source

Device tree

Kernel tree

Vendor tree

We would like to give thanks to everyone that contributes to lhe Android community, big or small because every bit counts. Although we can't list each and every contributor within the Android community, we would like to highlight some of the teams and individuals that have made it possible NOT only with just this version of COLT but throughout the years because we don't ever want to forget where we came from nor those that have helped us!

That said, ColtOS team would like to thank to....​

* LineageOS / Cyanogenmod

* Project-Xtended

* EvolutionX

* OmniROM

* Nitrogen OS

* AICP

* crDroid

* DirtyUnicorns

* Bliss Roms

* BootLeggers

* AOSP Extended ROM

* DerpFest

* Project-404

* DotOS

* CorvusOS

@agustkid

**If we have left someone or some team, we apologize and please PM us. We would be very happy to include your name as well.**

V12.5.3.0.RKGMIXM

OSS Based

20-11-2021 Release
[Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Ot] kir6s:
ill try this rom!
[Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Ot] kir6s:
amazing rom but location sometimes cant detect my gps.
[Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Ot] Myydata:
Updated link
[Other SmartWatches] driverchip:
Hi, I bought the Sanlepus 2021 smartwatch that I configured correctly with all permissions mainly with CONTACTS as recommended by the App, but I have a problem I see some caller names on the smartwatch and some I only see the number despite being present in the phone book, I tried to enter only 20 numbers on the smartphone so as not to overload the memory, or delete the +39 or some dashes from the numbers but nothing to do, can someone help me to solve the problem? Thanks

Salve, ho acquistato lo smartwatch Sanlepus 2021 che ho configurato correttamente con tutti i permessi principalmente con CONTATTI come consigliato dall'App, ma ho un problema vedo alcuni nomi di chiamanti sullo smartwatch e alcuni vedo solo il numero nonostante sia presente in rubrica , ho provato a inserire solo 20 numeri sullo smartphone per non sovraccaricare la memoria, oppure eliminare il +39 o qualche trattino dai numeri ma niente da fare, qualcuno può aiutarmi a risolvere il problema? Grazie
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] festr:
Hello,

I have read in some forum that someone removed the PET layer because of the glass experience. I removed it on fold2 and I'm considering removing it on fold3 as well as I do not like the plastic layer compared to pure glass on fold2. Anyone did this already? Or heard anyone doing it?
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Jake.S:
First of all fold 2 has not got PET screen protector, only fold 3 has it and I can say you don't need to remove it. Since screen feels really good with PET protector so it feels like glass already with it.

Fold 2 has more like a plastic screen Protector. While fold 3 with PET is more like thin silicone protector but you don't feel silicone. It feels more like you are actually touching the glass.

Removing it puts screen more vulnerable to damage and marks that easily gets created and much more.
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] festr:
I know the fold2 is not PET, I have modified my post. I have my both phones in front of me - fold2 without protector (pure glass) and the fold3 - the touch is still with too much friction and I hate it. I'm ok with the unprotected glass as after months of using fold2 without any protector is totally ok without any major scratches. The question for me is - is here anyone who removed the annoying PET layer already?
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] knives of ice:
I removed it within the first hour of ownership. I removed mine on the fold 2 - to me after getting used to a phone with no protector this phone is unusable with it on. there is no reason to keep it on unless you plan on using the Spen a bunch, which I do not plan on using. I had no problems on the fold2 and the experience is night and day with and without it imo.

anyone who thinks the phone feels the same with and without the protector is flat out wrong. the phone is not as vibrant with the protector, provides a ton of fingerprints, and does not feel near the same as glass without the protector.
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] festr:
Im confused now - did you removed the protection also on fold3 please?
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] knives of ice:
yes, i think that was clear but I guess not. i removed the protector on the fold 2, i removed the protector on the fold 3.
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Mr. Orange 645:
I had my Z Fold 2 without a screen protector sitting next to my Z Fold 3 with the factory screen protector the other day. I could not see nor feel any difference between the two. Definitely not enough to risk damaging the screen or voiding the warranty of the ZF3.

I'm not wrong.
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Sonin66:
I've been itching to pull mine off as I've had the same screen protector before I even got the phone. The factory one is better than nothing, but I've wiped so many y finger prints off that's its annoying at this point.
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Mr. Orange 645:
Did you mean to quote me?
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] dezborders:
Totally agree 100%. The Fold3 with factory fitted inner screen protector feels IDENTICAL to the F2 with screen protector removed.

For the above reason, removing the factory screen protector is insane and buying a 3rd party replacement screen protector is a wast eof $$$ .... better making a charitable donation than buying a 2nd one,
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] festr:
I will not put any third party protector as I will just keep it pure glass like it was on fold2
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Mr. Orange 645:
Fixed that for you.
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] festr:
I removed the plastic layer on fold2 too. Hope its clear for you now.
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Mr. Orange 645:
I understood what you said. But the surface of the ZF2 screen is not glass.
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] festr:
source? Samsung claims it is super thin glass
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Mr. Orange 645:
Go to about 2:30
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] xile6:
Yea i dont understand this glass feel.

The screen itself is a softer plastic then the protector. Hence the reason for a stronger thicker protector.

Im leaving mine on. And when it gets scratched up i am taking it to samsung for a new one so i can keep my warranty
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Mr. Orange 645:
100% this
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Talderon:
Okay, is it just me or does this screen protector NOT go edge-to-edge? What's the point when it does not even cover the entire screen like the factory one?

I'm still waiting for mine, but I highly doubt I will pull the factory protector off and put on a 3rd party one that does not even cover the entire screen, ESPECIALLY with how much WhiteStone charges for their stuff, and, with being even more blatantly honest, their quality has suffered...
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Sonin66:
I know mine doesn't cover the full screen, maybe 1-2 mm off around the whole screen. But I can understand where you get their quality has gone down. Had whitestone on my 21u, and the first screen protector that came with jig was superb. Their replacement didn't seem to last long. I still haven't installed mine though..
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Talderon:
Yeah, I have had WhiteStone since the Note 9 and let me tell you, the experience that I had with my Note 20 Ultra was utterly craptastic.

Their communication sucks, the glue quality has gone down and the application jig was cracked and chipping when I got it and it took over 2 months to get them to replace it.

I am not going to replace the inner screen protector, but I do plan on putting one on the outer screen. :D
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Sonin66:
My first whitestone sucked on my s10 plus. They improved on the 21u and I have the ez whitestone on the outside and their plastic camera protector. The ez protector is pretty good tbh
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Talderon:
Well, my brother has a business and one of the "side" services he offers is installing WSD protectors and he's REALLY damn GOOD at installation and even HE noticed the downward decline of WSD as of late. :( Regardless, I am not going to remove a perfectly good factory installed one to install one that is not even edge-to-edge. Why downgrade? And for $90? Oh hells no! :P
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Sonin66:
Word..let me know if you do install it though
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Talderon:
Yeah, there is no way I am sending WSD any more of my money, especially for a screen protector that is way over-priced ($90, seriously?) and not even edge-to-edge...

I'll let you know what I settle on. :D
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Mr. Orange 645:
Yeah the factory one is fine and is made to protect from the SPen. Watch JerryRigEverthing teardown. He put some pretty deep grooves and gouges in the PET, and when he peeled it off, the actual screen was perfect. No marks at all.

I'd be interested in WSD outer screen protector if it wasn't a $40 piece of plastic. Like WTF are they thinking?
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] blackhawk:
Wait until the factory installed one deteriorates beyond your tolerance. It's probably the best you'll get, certainly the least amount of installation trouble🤣

I've been using the IQ Sheild on my 10+ for over a year. They are inexpensive, "self healing", doesn't yellow, easy to clean and are an easy wet apply. Haven't tested fingerprint function as I never use it.

It's important not to get any lint or dust under it when applying, clean well. Make sure your fingers are clean and wetted when you handle it when first applying. Get a clean sweep with the squeegee and get all large air bubbles out. Micro bubbles should self absorb unless caused by lint.

Push down corners as needed the first 5-20 until it starts to set up.

Allow to set for at least 2 hours once in place.

Best plastic screen protector I've tried, normally last me 6+ months.

(2-Pack) LiQuid Shield - Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 Screen Protector

(2-Pack) LiQuid Shield - Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 Screen Protector - We are constantly coming up with new ways to keep our electronic devices protected. While our IQ Shield is designed specifically for flat screen surfaces, we’ve also engineered a film that is able to completely cover your entire...

www.iqshield.com
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] StormCell:
On the F2 the screen protector was easy to remove and felt much better within it. The F3 is not the same. I find no edge to slide a piece of paper under to remove the protector. I don't think I'm going to chance it.
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Sonin66:
They have a glass outer screen the traditional way and the ez way with no light and drippy adhesive
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Sonin66:
The pet does not go edge to edge, you can easily pull it up with a piece of paper but like Blackhawk said, just wait till you can't stand the sight of the pet
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Mr. Orange 645:
Yup. I misread it. I thought their plastic outer protector was $40. That's the glass UV one.
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Jake.S:
ZF2 has glass screen. I saw tear down video and he pulled main layer off big screen on ZF2 and it cracked like glass. So inner layer is made of glass as it is on ZF3

3:28

zF2 has ultra thin glass as ZF3
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Mr. Orange 645:
The point is you aren't TOUCHING glass. The surface is plastic. Go back and watch your video again.
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Mr. Orange 645:
He said it "should break the ultra thin glass under the top plastic." Even without fhe screen protector you are.not touching glass.
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Jake.S:
Touching glass is different but in one post you said clearly ZF2 does not have ultra thin glass. That's why I took this video up as proof that it does have it. Please write properly next time before attacking me on this part since it's not my fault you wrote wrong. Secondly you don't have to be soo salty about it with such attitude and tone.
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Mr. Orange 645:
Are you sure I didn't say the SURFACE was plastic?

And I'm not salty, nor do I have attitude. I responded to your video, which was a response to mine.

Remember it is nearly impossible to tell tone from words on a screen. I'm sorry you took it any other way. I was just being blunt, but I also can't control how you choose to take it.
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Mr. Orange 645:
I just read what I wrote, and I don't see where you think I was salty or had attitude? Was it because I told you to rewatch your video?
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] fragia181:
I'm thinking.... if try to apply a screen protector over stock film, without remove it ?? I want to apply a matte screen protector to reduce fingerprint and light reflection... but i don't want remove pet stock film...
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Sonin66:
Then you don't want that matte screen protector. You need to remove the og protector in order to out anything else on screen
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] StormCell:
My outer screen protector is peeling off already. What do people recommend as a replacement?
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Mr. Orange 645:
I haven't looked much, but Ozero made a nice one that was similar in design and material to the factory one.
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] StormCell:
Reviews ain't that great.

(1 Set) Orzero Front Screen Protector and Back Screen Protector Compatible for Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 5G (Tempered Glass), 3D Curved Edge 9 Hardness HD Bubble-Free (Lifetime Replacement) https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09CPFHXJ...abc_4HG94ZMD65AAFWHT3DPF?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Mr. Orange 645:
They've changed them. They used to just be a thin TPU screen protector like the factory one.

Whitestone Dome has a couple for the outer screen too.
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Sonin66:
Ez or a regular whitestone dome
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Sonin66:
I installed mine even though the factory one was perfect. Honestly got tired of the damn ugly fingerprints and spears wiping down left behind.
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] atvxda:
I never removed my Fold2's inner protector as I actually had a few small nicks on their from my wife's finger nails... The inner screen protector on the Fold3 feels amazing when compared to the Fold2. It actually dies feel like glass as opposed to the resistive touch screen feel of the Fold2. Also, inner display on the Fold3 is doing moderately better with fingerprints. Mine will stay on. Really happy with the feel of it this time around.
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Talderon:
I think I am going to be in the same boat as you. My brother got his Fold 3 already and he says, to him, the main screen is a fingerprint magnet, however, he's REALLY picky and SUPER sensitive of this stuff, so he is pulling the trigger on the Dome Silk to see if that works better.

I hate fingerprints as much as the next person, however, it does not bother me too much as I have Micro-Fiber cleaning cloths everywhere to easily clean the screen when needed. The FEEL is what would bother me more than the fingerprints, so it's nice to hear that it is smooth like glass. This was my biggest concern, but I keep reading that it's nice, so I just have to decide on the outer protector since the vast majority of the reports I have read/heard say that it's not all that great, and it's cheaper to replace than the inner. LOL!

Thanks for the update!!
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Mr. Orange 645:
This. I think people confuse oleophobic with oleo-proof. I'd say this screen protector does repel some fingerprints, but no screen protectors repel them all. What this does is make it super easy to wipe them off. I keep a microfiber cloth in my pocket, or I usually wear soft t-shirts, and a quick wipe makes the screen look perfect and streak free.

I would genuinely like to hear your brother's experience with the WSD Silk, especially if he uses the SPen. But I don't see myself spending $90 to replace the factory one.

And as I've said before the surface of the ZF2 and ZF3 screen is 100% plastic. The ultra thin glass is hidden below a layer of plastic, so you're never touching glass anyway. Just find a screen protector that feels as smooth as possible and still offers protection. For the ZF3, that seems to be the factory one.

And if you watch Zach's durability test and teardown, the deep grooves and scratches he put in the factory screen protector were completely gone when he removed it. There were no indents in the actual screen at all (until he put some in, of course :D ). That sold me.
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] atvxda:
I hate fingerprints as well, however the Fold2 not only collected fingerprints it also felt like an old Windows phone. Lol. Fold3's inner screen protector is night and day.
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] festr:
I gave the inner pet layer chance before removing and I have reconsidered not removing it. It is really near glass experience. Anyone here still removed it? Any feedbacks?
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Sonin66:
I gave mine a chance and removed it. It was a thicker protector than anyone anyone would apply but took off to install my glass protector instead
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Damian:
Glass protector on inner screen?
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Sonin66:
Yep, whitestone makes a ultra thin glass
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Damian:
All what I can see is film not glass. Probably much better than preapplied by Samsung but I wouldn't put my warranty at risk.
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Sonin66:
If you've taken a screen protector off before, than you shouldn't have a problem tbh. Getting it started was really the only frustrating part but it came off!
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Mr. Orange 645:
I gotta be honest. It's been nice not having to scour Amazon for the best screen protector for once. Seems each new phone I get, I end up spending a ton trying different screen protectors. The factory one feels so nice, is really scratch resistant, and is invisible. I have zero reason to look for a replacement. Even the exterior one has been great. But if it needs replacement it's much simpler to do.
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Sonin66:
It is nice, and does actually feel good but I wanted piece of mind of having glass. But that's just me
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Oatswesow:
So far, I have not seen a reason to remove the inner screen protector. On the Z Fold2, I removed both the inner and outer screen protectors within a week of owning the

device.
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] larsdennert:
I really like the inner one. Very smooth. Feels like glass.
[Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3] Damian:
Inner screen protector is piece of crap. I love to play Call of Duty Mobile sometimes and this protector feels like sand paper - can't move properly. But hey ho, warranty. :)

I removed outer protector and applied Whitestone Dome UV Glass.

Will see how long I will last with inner and say "f**k the warranty" ;)
[Xiaomi Poco F3 / Xiaomi Mi 11X / Redmi K40] Rajdeep Madasu:
Dear Devs,

Please port memc feature for custom roms, people like me who are used to that feature can get out of that smooth addiction so as miui for that sole reason. Although it is very good feature to have in our beloved custom roms. More power to our Alioth Devs ✊
[Xiaomi Poco F3 / Xiaomi Mi 11X / Redmi K40] pegasoc:
Hi,

what function is the one you are requesting? What is it for?
[Xiaomi Poco F3 / Xiaomi Mi 11X / Redmi K40] SanPepsi:
There is a video player with MEMC app.

SVP Player, it works well
[Xiaomi Poco F3 / Xiaomi Mi 11X / Redmi K40] cyanGalaxy:
Google it, mate.
[Xiaomi Poco F3 / Xiaomi Mi 11X / Redmi K40] Rajdeep Madasu:
Frame interpolation that smoothens video like it converts 24 fps video into 48 if the feature in on in video tool box
[Xiaomi Poco F3 / Xiaomi Mi 11X / Redmi K40] Rajdeep Madasu:
But Memc in miui is hardware driven, svp is software thing
[Xiaomi Poco F3 / Xiaomi Mi 11X / Redmi K40] SanPepsi:
it's hardware driven too.
[Xiaomi Poco F3 / Xiaomi Mi 11X / Redmi K40] Rajdeep Madasu:
Yeah it rely on gpu but the device has seperate chip for memc, svp is generic for all devices, so that'll be the difference
[Xiaomi Poco F3 / Xiaomi Mi 11X / Redmi K40] awad_advanceduser12:
hey bro Injust google it and found this forum hope it will explain but no the og is arrogant
[Xiaomi Poco F3 / Xiaomi Mi 11X / Redmi K40] cyanGalaxy:
Maybe he is arrogant because it takes just 1 keyword to search for.

View attachment 5882671
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] exemike:
Well i have been looking into upgrading to windows mobile 6, since i just purchased a new MDA Vario.

Now im farely new to all of this and i, like everyone doesnt want to make a mess of the whole awesome wizard :)

so i ask if ya would all like to help me out in deciding weather i should upgrade to wm6 + etc.

So im wondering, in peoples oppinions is it worth the leap from wm5 to wm6

if i can get hold of the old rom, or just simply copy it from my wiz to my laptop (Windows Media Centre Edition)

And what are the chances of me messing up, is it a rare occurance?

One of the first steps i had been told to do is to get to "Know" my wizard, in this case the IPL and SPL versions, to see what type of version my wizard is, in G3 and G3

these are my details.

3.08.0001 IPL

3.08..0001 SPL

02.69.11 GSM

3.8.2.1 OS

Now on the device database, reading a bit off that, the IPL and SPL are say for example 2.x8.xxx1 or 2.x8.xx1 (X being the number of zero's, now im not sure if 2 was just an example or a reccomended etc, but judging from the number of 0's i have when soft resetting my wizard, im guessing im on a G4?

Am i correct?

And if anyone could provide links to WM6 also, i am struggling to find it, even on the microsoft site which is a bit odd.

Thanks

Exemike ;)
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] ashasaur:
Yes, you have a G4 wizard jugding by the IPL/SPL, and yes, WM6 and 6.1 are DEFINATELY a HUGE leap forward.
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] exemike:
How about the risks involved, if any? is it something that can be fixed etc.