yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro] abode ghost:
Evolution X 5.9.1 for the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro [Vayu]

Code:

/*

* Your warranty is void. Or vaild, probably?

*

* I am not responsible for bricked devices, dead SD cards, Evolution X,

* thermonuclear war, or the current economic crisis caused by you following

* these directions. YOU are choosing to make these modificiations, and if

* you point your finger at me for messing up your device, I will LMAO at you.

*/

Living, Breaking, Keep Evolving.

Pixel UI, customization and more, we are Evolution X!

- Team Evolution X -

@joeyhuab

@peaktogoo (Now RealAkito)

Reach us on Twitter! @EvolutionXROM

- Just flash and check "The Evolver"

None

DO NOT FLASH GAPPS, ALREADY INCLUDED

First Time Install / Clean Flash

0. Unlock your bootloader.

1. Download the proper ZIP for your device.

2. Flash your loved recovery then do a Reboot to Recovery.

4. Flash Latest Global Firmware

4. Flash Pixel Experience Plus zip

5. Format data/cache by "Wipe" > "Format Data" > Type "yes".

6. Reboot to System

Update / Dirty Flash

1. Download the proper ZIP for your device.

2. Reboot to Recovery.

3. Flash ROM ZIP.

4. Format cache by "Wipe" > "Advanced Wipe" > Select "Cache", Swipe.

4. Reboot to System

Changelog:

- Initial Release

- Added colored notification icons

- Added notification counters

- Some other modifications i don't remember

Credits:

- @MOscar30 - @kubersharma

Sources:

- Devices Trees: https://github.com/ArrowOS-Devices/android_device_xiaomi_vayu

- Kernel: https://github.com/ArrowOS-Devices/android_kernel_xiaomi_vayu

​
[Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro] Rânjânツ:
SYR , for clean flash In the 4th state have to flash pe plus zip ?
[Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro] jefblade1991:
yeah you need to flash a gapps rom before it
[Xiaomi Mi 8 Pro Questions & Answers] 4ngl09669:
Is there a solution to having the home headset with a higher volume on call? It's extremely low...

P. S. I'm using the Google phone app

Thank you for the help :)
[Off-topic] TetrySozy:
Please vote
[Off-topic] kareeem:
I'm just guessing that this topic will be locked as it'll get way to heated and political.

If i were to start on Bush and McCain, i'm sure i'd get in some trouble ;) So that's Obama for me (even though i'll miss this voting election by a few months).
[Off-topic] Zoltair Wright:
Well, that McCain sure is [INSERT OPINION]. Whereas Obama without a doubt is [INSERT OPPOSITE OPINION].

But seriously, get registered today, or your opinion won't count either way.
[Off-topic] JimmyMcGee:
Why is this in about XDA. XDA is on Servers in The Netherlands if I recall correctly.

Moved to Off-Topic.

I'm only going to say this once. Respectable exchange of opinions and ideas are allow. If it gets out of Hand, the thread will be closed and Bans will be given!
[Off-topic] Black93300ZX:
Well, I'm gonna throw up a bunch of videos, watch as many or as few as you want, and make your own judgments.

1

1B (related)

2

3

4

5

6
[Off-topic] JimmyMcGee:
What? Don't want to post the Anti-Obama Videos too? Sounding like CNN ;) :P
[Off-topic] Black93300ZX:
Find me some, show me exactly how Obama lies about everything he does... Please. :)
[Off-topic] N1c0_ds:
Heheh. If he does he does it well!

I saw the polls about a week ago and that's when I realized Obama isn't leading at ~70%. I didn't expect McCain to have so many supporters. I mean... 50 percent?!
[Off-topic] Kraize:
Eh. McCain still might have a chance. I mean Palin completes him. She can do things he cant. While Obama.......had....*cough*....made.....a...*cough* pretty bad choice at picking a vice president. They basically share views. They'll agree to the same thing so they'll always follow each other >.> Just stating opinion. Even though I'm not a US Citizen or 18+ in age. Just a US Resisdent that will be paying the taxes of the debt later in my life that you people created today >.>
[Off-topic] derekwilkinson:
I think Joe Biden KILLED Palin in tonight's debate.
[Off-topic] Black93300ZX:
I love how she beats around the bush on EVERY question. Simple question, the woman asked her "so is it safe to say that you two agree on gay marriage, you did say you didn't agree with it right?" And she goes on for 45 seconds talking about gay marriage! Haha hilarious. After she was done the woman asking questions was just like "ooookay... so you agree, now let's move on."
[Off-topic] AllTheWay:
I see the education system of this country has been corrupted by CNN and MSNBC.

What next? Get your daily news from John Stewart. No wait I know....get real "independent" journalism from the NY Times.

Honestly, if you think that a debates makes somebody intelligent or qualified to run a county or be second in command they you need to re-evaluate your own knowledge. Would it not be better to have somebody deliberate on topic before spouting out something?
[Off-topic] Kraize:
Doesn't beating around the bush also mean that, "Yes I agree, but for those of you who don't understand why let me just explain a bit?"
[Off-topic] absorber786:
first off I agree with the above post 12!!

ok here comes an observation from me in South Africa ...my observation is that every president of the USA for some time now is far worse than the previous (this is just my opinion) so regardless of who the next president it gonna interesting for me to see what's next? ...but I think Obama is gonna win..

(well I shouldn't talk too much, our political situation is currently in the dog house )

"long live democracy...so long as you agree with me" - absorber786 :)
[Off-topic] Black93300ZX:
I know Palin isn't qualified to run our country from far more than her debate tonight. It's nice to see you go ahead and criticize so quickly, I'm sure you'd love Palin to lead your country then? Hockey mom with 2 years of experience as governor of what? Oh yeah, the 2nd largest city in a state that has 683,000 people. New York City has roughly 8.5 million, and the man who was at the helm of that for a decade wasn't qualified to be president... But a woman who has 1/5th the experience and 1/100th the population under her is surely built for the job. If you think these candidates haven't carefully considered and weighed the options for every question and topic they spoke about tonight, tell me, why would they be running for president? They've prepared, they know what their stances are on every subject, and the debate is simply an opportunity to put them up against each other. I think you're the one who's misinformed or undereducated if you think this is a Jeopardy show-down for who can answer questions fastest, it's just a way for the people to see these two doctrines in direct comparison.
[Off-topic] Black93300ZX:
Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan... I'd say Reagan was slightly more successful than Nixon. ;-)

I see what you're saying, overall the presidents don't seem to stack up to what's been said about the past... But I think GWB is about to complete such a giant failure of a term that it skews our opinions on these things. Let's hope for a better future. :)
[Off-topic] AllTheWay:
Actually I think Palin is a bad choice, but when I do vote I don't vote who I want to be vice president. Please share with us your infinite wisdom, in which an election was decided based soley on the vice presidential canidate. I do remember in 1992 when a man named Bill Clinton ran from a "small" state called Arkansas. I think he did pretty well as President. Just because somebody doesn't have vast experience in governing a large group of people doesn't make they disqualified from being a leader.

Do I think that picking Palin was a bad choice, yes. It was a political move by John McCain to gain votes. Will it pay off, I don't think so.

People are just so quick to judge somebody. I personally like the fact that she doesn't have vast experience in Washington politics and brings something new to the table. If you think policy and decisions by the president is made solely by themselves, then you sir are misinformed.
[Off-topic] P1Tater:
With all of the "Liberal Talking Point's" just spouted, tell me Obama's qualifications to be President.:eek:

Talk about "Drinking the Kool-Aid". If you are going to spout opinions at least spout your own.
[Off-topic] Black93300ZX:
So you're saying Palin isn't qualified to run the country, but that's not a reason to vote against McCain/Palin. McCain is 72 years old, did you know that'd make him the oldest president in history? There's a good chance, with the high stress level of the job, that a 72-76 year old won't live through his entire term. Here's a shocker, who's president then? Palin. The part that bothers me though, is that McCain is just as much of a liar as Palin is... And a few of his positions (the war mainly) are enough to turn me away from him, he said he plans to be in Iraq for another decade... That's ridiculous. HAHA I just read the last sentence of your post, and here's what you're saying... "They don't need to be capable of making the decisions themselves, because no decision is made solely by the president." WAKE UP to the real world, regardless of how many people are advising them, a bad president can still **** things up (see: President #43). Do you want to compare Palin to Clinton? Bill clinton was governor of Arkansas (an entire state, not a town) for 12 years. So here's what you're comparing to be the same. Clinton: 2,350,000 people under his governance for 12 years. Palin: Governor for 2 years, and get ready for this population, it's 10x less than even I thought... 9,780. Oh man, you're sooo right, there's no difference between 12 years and over 2 million people to 2 years and 10 thousand... Palin's just as qualified!
[Off-topic] Black93300ZX:
He was an Illinois state senator from 1997-2004 and on the US senate from 2005 until present. He didn't get captured in another country 50 years ago, but I'm sure that would've made him much more qualified to be president. I think some people like to forget when talking about McCain, the man has 12 houses and a wife with more money than god, he's not the person he was 5 decades ago. He'll be just as conservative as GWB, and I love how he says he'll "shake things up" in Washington and end corruption... 7 of his major supporters are lobbyists, but I'm sure he's going to be the one to take them down... Right. The simple fact that everyone has heard 500 times but still ignores, McCain has had the same stance as George W. Bush on 90% of the issues that have come to question. Are you guys happy with the last 8 years of presidency? I know I'm not.
[Off-topic] scotchua:
I suppose i should throw my hat into this "discussion" since I actually knew who Palin was well before you did. First, I think it's ignorant to say that because a man who has been a senator for like 30 years, and in fact ran for the democratic nomination for President "won" a debate with a person who was debating on the national forum for the first time automatically makes him more qualified to be President. Nobody is arguing that Biden has fewer credentials than Palin, because that would be stupid. McCain obviously took a chance with her because he wanted to bring in someone who was unknown, and someone with a reputation for "shaking things up" to go along with his "maverick" image. He chose a governor who is VERY popular in her home state. McCain will suffer significantly more from the economic downturn, than from his VP choice. Palin is much stronger than on most republican issues than McCain is actually.

As for your math...I haven't once heard anyone site her being Mayor of Wasilla as the primary basis of her experience. She was actually Mayor for 6 years, Chaired the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission for 2 years, and then was Governor of the State for 2 years. So if you're gonna belittle her accomplishments at least get your information straight so it doesn't make you look like a ignorant windbag.

The point AllTheWay made is really the central point. People always vote for who they want to be president. In the end it will come down to Obama or McCain, not Obama/Biden or McCain/Palin. I certainly respect Obama, and is desire to do good for the American people. I will not vote for him, because i disagree with his plans on how to do that, but i do not believe his intentions to be any less pure than McCain. Whoever becomes president will have a HUGE mess to deal with right off the bat, and in that case the question is do you want inexperience NOW or inexperience possibly LATER, if a certain set of circumstances arise?
[Off-topic] scotchua:
I'm glad to see you can repeat everything that you see in commercials. If you always speak in hyperbole, and with a hostile tone then people won't take your arguments seriously. McCain is no Bill Gates, Larry Ellis, Warren Buffett, Michal Dell or even any of the Walton's...all of whom i would guess have less money than God, seeing as how he can create things from nothingness...kinda defeats the point of having money does it?
[Off-topic] P1Tater:
Once again, quoted liberal talking points from Air America, MSNB and CNN just to name a few. It would be nice to see opinions and not copied and pasted text.
[Off-topic] scotchua:
This is just as ridiculous as all the McCain supporters who say that Obama is indecisive because he always pauses, before he answers a questions. Speaking style does not equal competence. For example, if i judged everyone here on the forum by the quality of thought that goes into their posts i'd have to assume there are a lot of idiots on this site. I know for a fact that is not the case, and to some extent is my own bias on how things should be articulated. I would say that the polls do not support the belief that Biden "killed" Palin in the debate, but rather that he was more effective than her, but not clearly superior. As I said before, it is not surprising that a long time senator who has been in many national level public debates over the years would appear more comfortable than a relative Washington newcomer participating in her first National debate.
[Off-topic] scotchua:
I never said she was more qualified than Bill Clinton, that would be absurd to say. But yet again, Bill Clinton was running for PRESIDENT not the VP spot. It seems to be lost on most people that it isn't the same job and it's not exactly common for the VP to end up assuming the presidency. The debate was just a debate, and unless you're a die hard Obama supporter you wouldn't say that Biden won anything in a landslide. It was a quality showing i think by both candidates, but the upcoming Presidential debates will make everyone forget that this even happened.
[Off-topic] scotchua:
So you're saying that being an American success story disqualifies you from being a realistic candidate for president? Was McCain always "richer than God"?
[Off-topic] scotchua:
Then explain to me which part CLEARLY illustrated that she wasn't ready to be VP?
[Off-topic] scotchua:
Marrying into money isn't the American dream? lol...when did that happen?
[Off-topic] P1Tater:
If youtube videos are what is making decisions for people, here's some.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqH-BB6brKg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a91VZUi1IN4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKqngjmndBA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6pkbeDYMkk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHnVZpA69j0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ehRrX7c41U
[Off-topic] P1Tater:
All I am saying is anyone can put anything on youtube. Youtube should never be used as a talking point.
[Off-topic] P1Tater:
Following that theory, John Kerry should have never been considered as a nominee.

Edit:

I'm done with this debate. This can go on forever and could end up getting ugly. There has already been cursing and yelling in this thread.

@ Everyone,

Please keep things calm or we will have no choice but to close the thread.
[Off-topic] scotchua:
I love how the longer people talk with you the more hostile your tone gets. I apologize for getting two people's quotes confused. I tried to glance a quick peak at the forum while i was working, and while doing several other things misunderstood what you said.

I obviously meant that tongue in cheek, guess that whole taking words too seriously goes both ways. I just don't think the amount of money someone has should affect our perception of them as being able to be president. I don't care if the guy has one $300,000 home or fifteen twelve million dollar homes. To me i think it's a moot point. Obama is significantly younger than McCain, what's to say 25 years from now he wouldn't be twice as rich as McCain? Would that make him less qualified?
[Off-topic] P1Tater:
Please keep things calm.

Warning issued.
[Off-topic] scotchua:
Well I've gotta get back to work. To address the actual topic of the discussion. I think that Obama will probably win, it will not be because i voted for him, but i believe the economy will continue to get worse for awhile, and that will ultimately push more voters to Obama because people believe he has a better grasp on the economy. I will not vote for him, but if, in the end i'm proven wrong, i will be happy be wrong. I think you have to vote your convictions, and allow others to vote their's as well. In the end, even if we both discuss purely the facts we are all going to have a different interpretation of the facts.

Well what level to cut taxes at to stimulate the economy is really a very complex and convoluted issues, and anyone who tells you they know exactly what effects any tax cut or increase will have on the economy is either lying or an idiot. Each person has a plan which they believe will cause a desired effect, but neither knows. You don't have any money, so you reap the most benefit from taxing big business and the wealthy more instantly; however, at what point does the tax burden on business become a deterrent from expansion and development of new products. That's not a simple answer, and if the economy doesn't continue to grow then it won't matter what rate you are taxed at if you can't get a job. I want to make it CLEAR that i do not completely agree with EITHER candidate on their fiscal policy, but in the end am forced to vote for the individual who i believe MOST accurately represents my personal view. Which is why i vote McCain over Obama. Simple as that.
[Off-topic] AllTheWay:
Yes I did know that. Ronald Raegan is currently the oldest President ever, and if I'm not mistaken he did a pretty damn good job when he was President.

Having a heart attack or one "heartbeat" away can be said about any president.

Do you have facts to back this up?

From what I read there is already a pull out plan set for 2009.

Hmm I wonder why the president has a presendital cabinet/advisors. I guess that's just for show.

You're putting words in my mouth. I NEVER said Palin was as qualified as Bill Clinton simply making a comparison.

Once again your putting words in my mouth...did I ever say that I was voting for McCain / Palin? No. So stop putting words into my mouth. I like to educate myself on all of the issues before I decide on who I want to vote for.

What's really wrong with this country is the party system as a whole!

Let me quote George Washington's farwell address from 1796, maybe you have heard of him.

Incase you want to read the entire transcript, and no I didn't pull this from Wikipedia.

http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=old&doc=15&page=transcript

Ron Paul 2012!
[Off-topic] scotchua:
You replied to his post about putting words in his mouth, by...putting words in his mouth. I bet everyone is about done "discussing" things with you since you obviously only hear what you want to.
[Off-topic] scotchua:
Yeah, i changed my mind. Fortunately for me I've EARNED the right to a few meaningless posts here and there, because unlike some people, the bulk of my posts didn't come from arguing with people.
[Off-topic] scotchua:
The difference was that i admitted that i made a mistake, and confused your post with someone else's. Being confused and intentionally reading what i wanted to hear are not the same thing. ;)
[Off-topic] AllTheWay:
I was making a point that neither canidadate is qualified for this position, and that the two party system is a bad idea. Since we are debating about Republicans and democrats.

This also shows that you have little disregard for people here and that no matter what is said your point won't change or mind.

This originial discussion was about Who will be the next president!

Making a comment about my intelligence level shows the character that you have. I'm glad you are representing somebody who has little disregard for another human being. Keep on preaching!!! Your just making yourself look worse. Apparently having an open disussion with you is not feasable.

You attack another individual here by insulting them and this discussion will be closed!

Maybe you will understand that!
[Off-topic] P1Tater:
I was afraid this thread would go down this road.

Thread Closed.
[Lenovo P11] mardon85:
I went into this knowing its limitations (Currently) while there is no global firmware and that there is no guarantee of there being one in the future. However I thought it would be fine and I could drag and drop media locally to the tablet to watch.. errr nope

Can not put anything bigger than 4GB on the local or SD storage..

Ok i'll do it all over the network.. nope Tablet will not connect to the 5ghz wifi on my WIFI6 mesh hope network. I'm only getting 2.4Ghz band which gives me a whopping 4Mbps out of the 220meg I can get on my OnePlus 7Pro (which incidentally has no issue with me dragging large files to it).

So literally everything i've bought it for is useless without me spending considerable time to research.

To top it off I have an OTA update waiting for me which reports say will downgrade me to widevine level 3.

UPDATE: Got the 5g working. Had to change the 5ghz Wifi to hong kong region.

Now to investigate the 4GB limit. Odd as its android 11.
[Lenovo P11] bakarilos:
i feel the same...

what is the downgrade to widevine level 3? how does that affect us?
[Lenovo P11] netknight:
Here because I just got this as well.

The 4gb sounds like a Fat32 limitation... I think exFat bypassed this? Not the tablets fault ;).

Also, I have widevine l1 out of the box.

This thing crushes games and doesn't even throttle.

Instead I'm disappointed with how overwhelming 11.5" compared to my poco f2 pro.

By the way... The 5ghz WiFi works out of box (Australia) tried to find a WiFi localization option but failed...

By the way mine comes bootloader unlocked by default

!!! And gives a warning about that in bootup...

I just want a root solution, and I'm happy with current ROM...
[Lenovo P11] y2k:
Are you definitely sure that your device got bootloader unlocked and widevine L1 out of the box? Is it global rom?
[Google Pixel Questions & Answers] scoobiesnacks:
I have 2 original generation Pixel phones. One I paid full price for and is quite old now but everything still works.. apart from google photos backups.

Another "new" one I bought cheap off ebay as a spare, which turned out to be a refurbished / spare parts bin model judging by the photos its builder left on the device!

My original Pixel has become terrible at backing up to Google Photos. I can't figure out why. I've tested the Wifi - that appears ok. It does back up eventually but it takes literally weeks as is getting worse. I've tried clearing the cache for photos and altering the sleep settings for the phone in case it is going to sleep. Judging by its fantastic battery life after each backup attempt overnight, I do suspect it is going to sleep, almost as if it is ignoring the settings.

My other newer Pixel is fantastic at backing up to Google Photos. On the same network. But it eats through the battery when doing this, so clearly is not going to sleep.

Any ideas? Both phones have the same sleep settings from what I can see, unless I'm missing a hidden setting somewhere. And it might be something else other than sleep.

I was wondering if there is some sort of secret lifetime backup cap on a particular phone, which might explain why the newer phone is backing up still?
[General Questions and Answers] gn1adn1ra:
can't access to fastboot & recovery
[General Questions and Answers] gn1adn1ra:
is there other way to reflash stock rom if u cant access to fastboot or recovery?