yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[OnePlus 9 Pro] rickysidhu_:
That's unfortunate. I swear I remember my OnePlus 8 Pro being 5G compatible though. I never saw it in the status bar but it was an option inside settings. Strange that the 9 is not seeing 5G anywhere.

Maybe someone will come out with some kind of mod or tool to force 5G.
[OnePlus 9 Pro] QAM:
Hola

Sad situation this is. Stranger still is that I had a Xiaomi Mi 10 last year and I was able to get 5G in certain locations. And at one point Telus was the least restrictive when it came to VoLTE and WiFi Calling enablement on non-Telus branded phones.
[OnePlus 9 Pro] olkitu:
5G is not enabled in Telus 5G-network. Here is listed 5G supported devices: https://mt.ax/0x390

To enable 5G, you can follow my blog guide: https://mt.ax/uLgc2 .
[OnePlus 9 Pro] akm4100:
thank you for the instraction, but oneplus 9 pro is not listed, hope someone will update it.
[OnePlus 9 Pro] olkitu:
Instruction is about same for OnePlus 9 too.
[OnePlus 9 Pro] akm4100:
I've tried this method, confirm it dosen't work, but still thank you!
[OnePlus 9 Pro] shawnydee:
Are you able to get VoLTE or VoWifi ?
[JAMin, XDA Neo, S200 General] SilverWolf:
I Need help my S200 is stuck at bootscreen and ActiveSync can't find it.

all help u can't offer is welcome.
[JAMin, XDA Neo, S200 General] SilverWolf:
! more thing when i plug it in windows makes a sound like it found it and a sec after the sound like it is disconnected.

Hard Reset diden't help. does someone have a sd boot for s200 that i can' unbrick it?

I found a fix here http://wiki.xda-developers.com/index.php?pagename=Prophet_recovery
[JAMin, XDA Neo, S200 General] Welcome2Miami:
Problem: When i start boot modus, pc recognizes phone, but when i start the exe to flash, xda isn't recognized ?

Thx in advance
[JAMin, XDA Neo, S200 General] Welcome2Miami:
Finally I GOT IT .... YIHA XD

****ing PDAVIET PV_4.0.0.0.6_Touch

will never be flashed again :)
[General Questions and Answers] misteurz:
Hi,

I used to read my favourite xda subforums with Tapatalk for years, and now I use the official xda app every day.

When I open a topic, I always see the las message posted. How can I see th last message unread instead?

Thanks in advance for your answers
[About XDA developers] misteurz:
i,

I used to read my favourite xda subforums with Tapatalk for years, and now I use the official xda app every day.

When I open a topic, I always see the las message posted. How can I see th last message unread instead?

Thanks in advance for your answers
[About XDA developers] Austinredstoner:
https://xdaforums.com/t/first-unread-message-on-xda-app.4254777/

Duplicate
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III Windows Mobile ROM De] danyelfrito:
Hello guys how are you, I'm currently living in vzla, my service provider is DIGITEL TIM, I bought an unlocked at&t tilt and upgraded it to WM6.1, since I bought it everything in it works just fine EXCEPT for the internet connections, it just remains with this message: LOADING... for like 3 minutes and then prompts the message: PAGE CANNOT BE FOUND, PROBLEMS WITH DNS, CHECK INTERNET SETTINGS, ETC. I've disabled the cingular proxy through PHM RegEdit and trough .cab files, then soft-resetting and it solves the problem only for a couple moments and then it just does the same thing. it happens mostly when entering in hotmail or yahoo or any other e-mail account.

If anybody have some sort of magical fix to it, please I'd greatly appreciate it.

My rom is a stock at&t WM6.1 rom, I dont know if changing it to a new rom that has nothing to do with at&t (cingular, Media.net and all that crap) could fix it, If so, can anyone post a link to any ROM proven to work good on tilt´s?

please post links, comments OR ATTECHMENTS on: STOCK HTC ROM, STOCK KAISER ROM, or any other roms that are good for the tilt but still have nothing to do with at&t. A CELL PHONE WITH NO CONNECTIVITY ITS JUST GARBAGE... PLEASE HELP!

I´VE SEARCHED THE FORUMS BUT I HAVE ONLY SEEN OLD ROMS WITH A LOT OF BUGS! PLEASE POST
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III Windows Mobile ROM De] MrForte:
I had the same problem until i check the connection settings and realize that the configurations (providers ip etc) was not there.

Try to find your providers settings through the internet or call them to tell you and put them inside your internet configuration settings.

My service provider is vodafone Greece.

I think that this will solve your problem ...it worked for me!:)

...i spend 3 days on the forums changing radios but the solution was simple.:confused:

Greetings from Greece.

Mr Forte.
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III Windows Mobile ROM De] danyelfrito:
aint that a kick in the head? hehehe, well actually I've tried that with no results. IP, DNS, PROXY, PORTS ETC... but thankx anyway for the help brother!
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III Windows Mobile ROM De] kareeem:
Don't double post; against forum rules. Find your answer here.
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III Windows Mobile ROM De] AllTheWay:
redundant thread
[Magisk] james28909:
I am attempting to create a magisk module that will "replace" a file in /system/etc. I have created the module and successfully installed it but the changes are not reflected upon booting multiple times. I can 'adb shell cat $MAGISK/system/etc/file.xml' and see the changes have not been made by magisk and I can adb shell cat system/etc/audio_policy_configuration.xml and see the files have not been altered in any way.

I just want to copy a fuggin file to system/etc. I have spent hours trying to research how to copy files to system with magisk modules but they are dead end roads.

I need someone to finally answer the question of how to copy a file using magisks built in module function. I can create and install the module but I am not understanding the process of actually copying the file. I thought anything you put in the system folder in the module template, that it would get used instead of the one in the actual read only system/etc. But I made the directories and file with changes I want, installed it but it doesn't show up in magisk manager and the changes arent made by the module.

Any and all help is appreciated
[Magisk] Didgeridoohan:
I've already replied here:

https://xdaforums.com/t/announcemen...agisk-module-developers.3846678/post-84749791

But, in your post in that thread (please don't double post) you didn't mention anything about already having created a module.

If you have the module installed already but don't see any changes, provide the Magisk log. But, make sure you're on the latest Magisk Canary release first so that the log is more detailed.

Providing your module could also be a good idea, to see if it's built correctly.
[Redmi Note 9 Questions & Answers] jasmin811:
Hello Devs,

Is there anyone who can fix Imei in first Sim slot,as second is working perfectly.

It is Redmi note 9 (merlin) MTK6768

I made mistakly "format all" option in sp flash tool without efs backup,so i restored second sim slot Imei with engineering rom and modem meta and it's working but if I

put two Imei-s in eng. rom there are both imei.s but there is no network signal.If I flash to stock rom at boot it says"nvdata is corrupted".

I tried many things to fix first imei but now I'm without ideas.
[Redmi Note 9 Questions & Answers] VD171:
You can't recover imei for slot1.

Only Xiaomi Centre can recover that.

Imei for slot2 is your last chance.

Good luck
[Off-topic] -PiLoT-:
Has anyone ever read it fully understood yet not be religious in anyway
[Off-topic] zocster:
yep pretty much but it is pretty hard to apply in real life! I would like to know someone that was not on Oprah and had successfully applied those 'teachings' in real life. :D
[Off-topic] Kafro:
The events shown in the bible hasn't even been proven, there are no hard evidents that those "events" even occurred through history.
[Off-topic] datacrime:
re

I believe in a lot of things told and taught in the Bible but I also believe that there has been a lot of things added that are not true. Also I wish that It had never been changed so we could actually know the truth from when it was written.... I am not sure why there is always a new version or new testament. Also have you guys seen Zeitgiest? Although I disagree with some points it does raise some good points which are logical.

Also there is an EXCELLENT book called "Christiannity: A journey from fact to fiction" which you can read for free online.
[Off-topic] JimmyMcGee:
Consider this the only warning for this thread. If it gets even slightly out of hand or inflammatory Bans will be given and the thread will be locked.

Otherwise have a nice discussion.
[Off-topic] shanetheclassic:
www.zeitgeistmovie.com
[Off-topic] Joezhang:
The bible is largely a book of stories and moral guidance, it's not intended to be taken literally, and if you try, then you have to face the fact that it doesn't match up to recorded history and the scientific laws of the universe.
[Off-topic] swaney:
u can understand it if u have the traditional version.. cuz its very hard with the king james version.. but i think its about wat happened and wat will happen.. ps i didnt try to be religious
[Off-topic] burgertime:
I was raised as a Jehovah's Witness and had to read the bible front to back many times when I was a teenager (I have read 3 different bibles front to back; KJV, NWT, ASV). I would call myself agnostic and can enjoy some of the NT on a sole spiritual level, I like the whole concept of unconditional love. I however don't agree with some of the epistle such as Timothy because of their very sexist view of women.

Check out John Shelby Spong he is one of my favorite theologians. He has a very interesting concept on Christianity.
[Off-topic] kingabraham3:
boy, you sure know how to take all the fun out of a religious debate! chairs flying, fists swinging, and mouths running off so bad Vince Vaughn would have to put on earmuffs (Old School), that's the only way I know how.:D

that is the excuse given (band-aid applied) to the increasingly ancient book known as the bible. The more modern civilization gets, the more we realize the bible's author wasn't god. It's quite understandable anyway, if I tried to write a bible of my own now, it would reflect all of the prevailing beliefs and scientific data of today. Fast forward two thousand years, say, about half of the things i wrote would make no sense in light of new discovery, and the other half could potentially be taken literally. Believers in my book, in order to maintain the infallibly of it, would be forced to say that the incorrect/incoherent parts were added on afterwards by mischievous hoodlums. It's similar to Orwell's 1984, where the truth is not based on some objective facts (i.e. history or the bible) but rather it is subjectively decided and controlled by those in power (Party members or priests).

Anyway, I hope I not offended anyone (so I don't get banned), although normally, I am not quite this tame (I place much credence in the first chapter of Dawkins' "The God Delusion," please read).
[Off-topic] burgertime:
I think the problem is that Jay asked a bit of a loaded question right out of the gate. The bible is different things to different people. The way I understand isn't the way a atheist understands it, isn't the way a Christian understands it etc..etc.

The better question is do you mean "understand" in a purely scholarly way?
[Off-topic] -PiLoT-:
morning burgertime

i meant has anyone read the bible and fully understood it, while no being religious. ie are you athiest and read the bible im just curious as to how many havent read the bible

like the guy two messages ago says the more modern civilisation get you realise the author wasnt god

i think we all knew that as moses and all others wrote it and centurys have edited it, all i wsas asking is have any none religious bible read and understood the bible

im reading kjv and understand it fine

i wasnt wanting a debate as such just a curiosity and a guess at how many non beleivers blast bible ethics and religion but have never read them in person
[Off-topic] burgertime:
Oh ok, in that case then yes. I prefer either the ASV or the NIV for ease of reading.
[Off-topic] kingabraham3:
answer to question is: yes.

i am extremely well versed in the bible (straight from the original hebrew text, and also quite knowledgeable is ancient jewish bible commentators), and no, i don't believe a word of it. i do not know much about the new testament however.
[Off-topic] Black93300ZX:
I've tried reading the bible... No better way to fall asleep. I felt like I was reading a dictionary, no interest or belief whatsoever. Not meant to offend anyone, but I really could never see myself reading it front to back knowing I would never use any of it.
[Off-topic] burgertime:
Have you ever heard the theories about the story of Jonah being a way for the old testament to seagway into the new testament? That sort of stuff fascinates me, how they had to explain away the difference in the God of the OT and the God of the NT.
[Off-topic] souljah777:
Understanding is God Given

This is an interesting debate. I have read the Bible several times and understand more each time I read it. The Bible teaches that understanding comes from God which some might see as a cop out but I truly understand much more now as a Christian than I did before. I pray for understanding before and after I read and no matter how many times I re-read a portion, I almost always see more. As for the Bible being either fictional or unprovable, this is a narrow view put out mostly by those who have done little true investigation. There are many respected scientists and historians who do not doubt the legitimacy of what the Bible says. For examples, Google "Answers in Genesis".

I think the bottom line is that "faith" is a belief in something for which we don't necessarily have complete proof. In the case of Christianity, it's also a belief in the supernatural, a thing that many non-Christians have no problem with (astrology, tarot cards etc.). At the end of the day, if what I believe is wrong, it makes no difference, if it's true......
[Off-topic] Black93300ZX:
Honestly, I envy those who can be religious... It seems like it would be a good feeling, that someone's watching over you, that things happen for a reason, and that through the tough times there's more out there. I think it's great that it brings communities together to churches for not only masses, but I've seen many churches act like more of a community center than anything. Unfortunately, I don't know if it's in the way my mind works or the way I was raised, I just can't seem to hold onto 1 religion as being true... I just go my own way, I'm not sure if I believe there's a God out there, but I feel if there is he must be gracious enough to understand my confusion. As stupid as it sounds, I still pray, and I hope someday I can find the religion that really leads to my true beliefs... I just haven't pieced it together yet.
[Off-topic] andrew-in-woking:
Understanding and the Bible

Hi all,

I am a committed Christian so I can't fully answer the question. However, my journey to faith did begin with the Bible. At the age of 13 I was made to read the Bible, specifically the sermon on the mount and Jesus' teaching in the Gospels, by a particularly keen "Scripture" teacher. While I didn't really "understand" what I was reading, when I read it something in me just clicked. It was like I had always known it was true. Strange I know. I decided that I believed in it and from there went on to become and call myself a Christian, found a church, etc. I am now 30 and still believe. I recently went to a church in Medford, Oregon where they have been having a healing revival. I saw several pretty undeniable miracles (short arms and legs growing, bones changing shape, etc.) with my own eyes. That doesn't say anything about the Bible I know but I think it demonstrates that there is a fundamental difference between understanding and belief. Many of the significant experiences I have had both reading the Bible and through my practice of the Christian faith fly in the face of my understanding.

On a more down to earth level, I think that much of what is written in the Bible only makes sense if you have a foundational belief anyway. When Jesus talked about the plank in people's eye (Matthew 7:3), he was talking about their sin against God, which is largely invisible here on Earth. If you take God out of the picture, what does the plank represent?
[Off-topic] burgertime:
Hmm Andrew as for the plank I am not so sure you have to have some belief in a high being for that passage to make sense. In a Jewish context he was probably speaking of Pharisees judging regular folk for minor infringements against the old law covenant while ignoring the basis of the law which was love. This was a common problem that Jewish believers evidently felt was very common amongst higher ranking Jews.

However even not knowing any of the history the context can clearly be seen as simply a proverb to not be a hypocrite. We all point out the misgivings of others while wanting to ignore our own. I think even Richard Dawkins agrees with that sentiment.
[Off-topic] kingabraham3:
no i have not, but even Christians don't usually argue that the old testament was written with the new one in mind, its usually (as far as I know) more of a spontaneous, "Jews aren't behaving, so lets find another group...", but hey, I could be wrong.

As far as differences in god, I give much credence to the Redactor Theory, which argues no less that four authors for the old testament, let alone the new one. If you have many authors, than you will have certainly have many views/impressions/ideas about god. Of course this supports the idea that there is no god, and that all purported knowledge of such an entity is merely subjective hallucinatory speculations.

1) the argument is not whether or not th bible is

un

provable, that has been long established, hence the term we call "faith", which you yourself subscribe to. The argument is whether or not the bible is

dis

provable, which i certainly think to be the case. Thats when "faith" really kicks is...

2) regarding faith, faith is simply the belief of the unproven, for which there is no sensible reason for such belief. It is not, in my view, something to be proud of, rather something to be embarrassed about. Any adult who has faith enough to belief in the tooth fairy (which has not been entirely yet disproven)would be quite embarrassed and would not parade his views around or insisting they be taught to children in public schools or mounted up in public court houses.

3) Your last bit, Pascal's Wager, is a fallacious argument. It commits the fallacy of False Dilemma by postulating that the only two options are to either believe in Jesus or to not believe at all. Yet any Muslim, Hindu, or Jew could present you with the same argument and it would be no less "valid."

1) Maybe you should go to prison, there's always someone watching you there (or you can come live in my dorm, no fun either...)

2) As George Carlin says, "religion is great, you can go to church every sunday to compare clothing!" (paraphrased).
[Off-topic] Black93300ZX:
Hmm, maybe someday I will be going to prison, but not because I want someone watching me.
[Off-topic] Zoltair Wright:
I'm an Atheist, but I've read chunks of the Bible either out of curiosity or boredom. It runs from poetically interesting (Genesis) to outright strange (Revelations). My favorite bits are the racy ones... like the part where Lot sleeps with BOTH his daughters! :eek: "Family values," indeed. (Yes, I know they got him drunk first. It still counts.)

More seriously, reading it is interesting because sometimes the reasoning of the characters is incomprehensible. I think it illustrates the pre-modern authorship of the text. That's not to knock it at all, it's just striking how different attitudes were when it was written. Like when Abraham unquestioningly hurries off to kill his son Isaac; few today would carry out their faith with that sort of blind devotion.

One part of the Bible that's actually difficult for me to read is the story of the Tower of Babel. Is there another interpretation besides that God hates his creation Man, and wishes to keep him subservient?
[Off-topic] graey:
Actually there's more to each passage you talk about then you say, you kind of rip it out of it's context.

Secondly, there is another interpretation, being that God saw his creation become more and more arrogant, thinking that they didn't need God (while in reality they did), and he would let them know they did. A kind of punishment more than a kind of last attempt to keep his creation subservient.
[Off-topic] Zoltair Wright:
You're right, I'm being a little glib. But on the other hand, I'm not really inaccurate, either. All of those thing happen in the Bible, and even weirder stuff, too. There's that other story where God commends a widow for dressing up as a prostitute in order to seduce her brother-in-law. (Yes, there's much more context for that one, too, but it sounds much more interesting my way.) My point isn't that the Bible is a dirty book, but that if you read it carefully, its example for ethical behavior is very different from what one would expect.

As to the story of Babel... yes, your interpretation is the conventional one, and I've heard it before. The problem I've always had with it is that it's written from God's point of view. That you add "(while in reality they did)" is sort of footnoting the story with God's opinion. But really, at that point, why did we need God? The Tower of Babel was about to reach all the way to heaven, at which we could have strolled up to the pearly gates at our leisure. What need have we for gods if we can become them ourselves? And if we weren't a threat, why did God destroy our tower? If the Lord was really all-powerful, we could have built all the towers we wanted and it wouldn't have mattered. To me, the Babel story is interesting because it shows Him as afraid of us.
[Off-topic] burgertime:
CAREFUL! Your about to invoke cognitive dissonance! Again I really like the theology of John Shelby Spoong, even though Atheist and Scientific minds alike probably would view him as more status quo he believes the bible is just a book to perpetuate tribal doctrine. He thinks that Jesus was created to explain "perfect" love but he never was raised from the ground and never performed miracles. So basically he thinks that everyone should just love each other.
[Off-topic] burgertime:
Again you are getting in to the territory where Cognitive Dissonance will start to kick in with hardened believers on here and the reaction will probably be very negative.

I have gotten into many arguments with my Mom about stuff like this. What does it matter if sections of the bible can be disproven? If your faith can move a mountain why can it be shattered by one story being off? Just admit it's highly unlikely and move on. Of course when one crack shows there is the fear that the wall comes tumbling down I suppose.
[Off-topic] telegraph0000:
God did not destroy the tower. Going back to the beginning, God's command to Adam and Eve was to "Be fruitful and become many and fill the earth and subdue it" (Gen 1:28)--implying procriation and separation (to inhabit the whole). At a certain point, their offspring traveled eastward and came accross a plain, began baking bricks, then stated "Come on! Let us build ourselves a city...and let us make a celebrated name for ourselves, for fear we may be scattered over all the surface of the earth." (Gen 11:1-4) Hence, God confuses their language, "and they gradually left off building their city". (Gen ll:8)

Overall, the bible is a book of prophecy all leading to the vindication of God's sovereingty. There have been 3 charges made:

1.God is a liar (Gen 3:1-5)

2.Humans do not need God

3.Humans are selfish and only serve God when things are good (Job 1:7-12)

God will answer them (as he did with Job's example) in his own due time.