[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV General] low.flying.pigs:
To address each part in turn:

It is straightforwardly and readily apparent to anyone of sound mind and judgement that the Copyright attribution location near the top of the screen, right justified, is in fact obviously nowhere near the middle of the screen, and that no ordinary individual would consider it to be in the middle any more than the info fields at the bottom would be considered to be in the middle. The top is the top. The bottom is the bottom. The middle is the middle. None are anything else.

It is further readily apparent the actual middle is free of any obstruction whatsoever, as is in fact the considerable majority of the map screen, and that all obstructions can be cleared using 'hide all infos (tmp)' with the exception of Copyright attribution that must be displayed at all times.

Which is to enable discrete attribution of suitable prominence. There has existed no issue with size or boldness of that text previously. There exists no issue with the size or boldness of that text now. There has been no suggestion previously that any such text is in the middle of the screen, because it clearly is not, and it would clearly be foolish to suggest otherwise.

The attribution is of a size, boldness and location so that it is of suitable prominence and readability and that was determined by the existing text at the top of the screen. If that text can be made smaller and remain of suitable prominence and readability, so can the Copyright attribution be made the same size.

Furthermore, the other information at the top of the screen can be removed using 'hide map label'. Copyright attribution could then occupy the actual top of the screen, right justified, as it also could when 'hide all infos (tmp)' is selected. It was not apparent how to easily adjust position based on what else is on screen, hence why it was positioned as shown for simplicity, plus it appeared out of place positioned above the buttons or info fields.

Furthermore, apart from the attribution clearly not being in the middle of the screen, it is not big text either. It is in fact obviously considerably smaller than the actually big text of the info fields at the bottom of the screen, which are of that size to ensure their suitable prominence and readability.

There is no discussion as the requirements are the requirements. Enforcement continues to be ignored at your own not insignificant or unlikely risk, as you remain the current developer and it is yourself that is solely liable and responsible for your output, having chosen to date to ignore the matter brought to your attention publicly on multiple occasions.

The fact it is 'end of discussion' only highlights your position as obviously unjustifiable, fundamentally and fatally flawed.

The fact it is 'end of discussion' indicates any further effort, of any kind, would be wasted.

Accordingly no further efforts in this regard shall be made. It is unclear anyway what further could be done other than to attempt to code something oneself and then submit that source code for consideration, but since it is 'end of discussion' and therefore the end of the matter, that would appear to be entirely futile as it would not be officially implemented or even actually considered, as it is the end of the matter.

Unfortunately, if a developer is unreasonably fixated with unjustifiable non compliance, it is unlikely anything apart from commencement of legal proceedings, by which time it will be too late for them, will cause them to reconsider such a bizarre and baseless stance.

low.flying.pigs