[Introductions] indestructible master:
@svetius

yea, i understand that, but, as @blackhawk said, already, we need to decide if we want this forum to be more expertise, and not be like low quality forum.

when you take a look at that reddit, you see frustrated people (often, people answer rudely, as it's low quality), and other forums too.

those so called "members" are not worth membership, they just want solution to their problem, and, that's what we will provide them, full access to all Q & A forums and thread specific Q & A.

But not allow those newbies, to spam other threads, yea, to protect senior memebers from noise.

Then, it doesn't have to be newbie to get 120 posts and become senior member, we can include some time frame in which they are resticted to post only on Q & A (and when they create account, point that fact, (send PM how long they need to wait to post on other threads other than Q & A) so they don't feel dissapointed like they won't be accepted in comunity).

We need to find a fine line between making this site toxic like reddit, or allow experts to operate without noise from newbies and "some unworthy members".

let newbies have their quarantine of 14 days, for which time they can post only on Q & A forums.

As most their problems are solved within a week max, and if someone is interested in being accepted in community as more serious member, he will suck it up, and wait 14 days, maybe he learn something in that time (read xda guides for example, and would be good idea to PM new member, to read guides while he wait 14 days, as it will fill his time and get more educated).

or time can be shorter, but i wouldn't short it shorter than 7 days, but best is 14 days, user won't forget it if he want to do something, and it will be in back of his mind, waiting time to come..

find a fine line for this, this needs to be done, or you will still get same quality (or lack of) of posts, and users maybe will forget this, as phones are locking up, devs won't care as there's no interested audience, or they won't see point in developing anything as nobody is interested other than social media sites (and we think, market is filled up, no, people are not interested in anything else other than what apple release, or what new social app goes viral), or whatever discouraged/discouraging anyone to go on this site.

whole FOSS is breaking because big corporations decided to put an end to it (and foss is popularized by big corps, like how Google made Android based on linux, open sourced made open sourced). do big corps still rule us and influence, even if we say we're independent?

as those big corps develop open source, just because they see monetary gain, maybe not now, but in future sure.

like, how google fixed it's place as tech giant, for providing free OS, free services on websites, but earn a lot from ads, and when users get hooked up, and dependent (and get used to it), they start to put restrictions, which can be lifted with money. and it's fine what google is doing, advertisers gets where they can market themself, i get great services (google calendar, keep, gmail, and stuff), but still all that can turnaround if google starts to lose money for any reason, and start to bankrupt.