[Samsung Galaxy J5 PRO (2017) ROMs, Kernels, Recove] steadfasterX:
-

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q #0: Why is the /e/ App store not included??? It is GREAT!

Mainly due to security and privacy concerns. Wth? I thought /e/ is secure and privacy focused? Yes it is but.. read on:

First of all the App store itself has

no

security or privacy issues. It is opensource

and I see no issues with the app itself!

... the most important point for a smartphone is the availability of apps. I mean having a secure device which respects your privacy is great but it will have no chance to win when you cannot get easily apps on it.

... and the most dangerous part for a smartphone is installing apps because here is where Malware can easily step in! So whatever you do never install APK files from a website directly unless you can be 100% safe it is trustworthy.

It is all about trust again and when you look in the sources of the /e/ Apps store you find it connects to: cleanapk.org.

/e/ makes that not a secret though as you can read here.

So who is behind that cleanapk.org? Why is /e/ trusting them? While reading through the /e/ forums I found that this page hosts (as far as we know) apps mirrored from apkpure + fdroid.

.. and it's completely unclear who hosts that site and where is behind it. On the other site /e/ (Gael, the founder as well) states clearly they are not in any relation to that site. "They just using their api".

here some

facts

:

you cannot get the owner by a whois request

They have a info page here which just roughly describes where the apps are coming from and how

There is no detailed privacy statement or even an info if they keep your data GDPR compliant or not

No way for devs to get their apps removed or updated

The /e/ foundation clearly states they have no relationship to that repository of apps but some things are interesting aren't they:

IP's of /e/ and cleanapk are at least nearby

During an ongoing discussion about exactly that topic something took my attention: the welcome notification on api.cleanapk.org was exactly at that time: https://archive.is/U1E0y (I mean.... )

/e/ itself was audited several times by a site named "infosec-handbook" and of course even they find that app store at least "mysterious"

During that mentioned discussion and after pointing Gael to that - the welcome message suddenly changed to what it is today..

The full topic where even Gael is talking (not that friendly) is: here

TL;DR:

/e/ is providing apps (the most used way to get infected by malware) by an API which is at least questionable.

I do not say /e/ is doing questionable things and as said before the /e/ ROM is 100% trustworthy (otherwise I would not do any builds for it) but that cleanapk.org site is truly another story.

An interesting quote of Gael can make one read between the lines (I marked the interesting ones bold and cursive):

Of course /e/ needs to ensure that what they are doing is 100% legal and offering an app repository like cleanapk.org is

not

.

My personal assumption is that /e/ is offering that repo - indirectly so not

officially

by the e.foundation itself.

A relation between is for sure nothing they want to have public as this would cause legal questions.

So the last question is:

Q: Why do I consider AuroraStore "better" then using cleanapk.org and so removed the /e/ apps store and adding AuroraStore instead?

A: Because I definitively know where the apps are coming from when using Aurora instead of /e/. Not just the app itself is OSS (like the /e/ one) the apps are coming directly from the play store instead of an unknown source.

Q #01: I want to report an issue. What is the proper way to do so?

I'm glad that you are asking: before doing so check the KNOWN ISSUES topic in the OP and ofc the other FAQ's listed here!

if you have an

audio issue

follow FAQ #6 instead.

If your issue is not listed there click here to proceed:

If your issue is not listed there follow the directions here briefly and I may can fix it:

logcat GUIDE

Ensure you have done a

full

CLEAN install before doing so (refer to FAQ #2 for what that means).

Warning: NO SUPPORT when:

- magisk is installed (known to cause issues sometimes - regardless of the ROM or version)

- Xposed is installed (known to cause issues sometimes - regardless of the ROM or version)

If you have installed any of these UNINSTALL or better do a FULL CLEAN install (see FAQ #2) before doing anything else. Often enough these above causes several issues like battery draining, problems on booting and much more. Even when they may work properly you should re-produce your issue without them first and follow the above to grab the log.

Magisk is a great piece of software and besides that it is Open Source which SuperSu never was.

I just saying I do not "support" issues when you have Magisk installed. Why? It is (like Xposed) extendable with modules (made by whoever) and those can cause billions of issues.

Other then that magisk was sometimes the reason for battery drain etc. Magisk modifies the boot "process" and sits very deep in the system (which is needed to make it work ofc) but that has the potential to make a system/ROM unstable or result in strange behaviors.

so in order to support a specific issue I have to be sure the ROM is in a "clean" state, no magisk, no xposed.

Pro-Tip: a very first test is to set magisk on core functions only to see if an extension causes your issue or not.

Q #02: I want to install clean, how? What is a clean install? What is the recommended way to flash a new ROM version?

A clean install ensures that there are no leftovers from any previous install. One can say that there are 2 phases of a clean flash:

1) regular

2) full - when you (still) encounter issues

Usually the regular one is fully ok when flashing a new ROM version but if you encounter strange issues nobody else is reporting or if a release post is recommending it you should do a full clean install instead.

A

regular clean

install can be done like this:

WIPE -> Advanced -> select: System + Cache

Flash the ROM

reflash root addon/magisk if you want root

A

full clean

install needs 2 steps more then the regular:

follow the steps for regular clean

go back in WIPE -> touch the "FORMAT data" button and type "yes" to format the internal storage (you will LOOSE ALL YOUR DATA - obviously)

REBOOT -> Recovery

Flash the ROM

reflash root addon/magisk if you want root

It is absolutely recommended to create a backup before and COPYING IT to your PC(!) before doing the above.

Q #03: Are there any plans or a chance of official /e/ builds?

TL;DR answer is:

who knows...

Background:

/e/ points to LineageOS requirements which need to be met first. LineageOS has "some" requirements before they accept it to do official builds: device-support-requirements.

No I personally do not have any plans in going official atm. That might change though.

If someone else wants to go that way and needs help, I am here. But I cannot spend my whole free time on that.

Q #04: Will this ROM support / pass SafetyNet?

When you install Magisk you can hide and so yes you might be able to pass SafetyNet. Which can change every day though because even when that might work atm you should note the following:

Magisk has its own protections to ensure you pass safetynet but this is something which will change one day and there is no known method yet to workaround that.

Q #5: Is there an /e/ specific FAQ?

Sure:

FAQ: click

Forum: click

HOWTOs: click (a great resource for all your first questions)

Q #6: issues with audio (e.g. echo's, silence on one or the other site, ..)? Read here how to provide a specific log for that:

Do the following steps:

1) Ensure you have adb set up on your PC, and have adb debugging and adb root enabled in developer options on your phone

2) Then perform the following (all one command)

On Linux:

On windows:

3) Then re-produce your audio issue and cancel the logcat from step 2 before hanging up!

4) Share the logcat output from the console screen using paste.omnirom.org

Q #7: I'm scared about that microG , I don't want to expose my phone so is this /e/ version a security risk?

First of all you need a lot of trust installing ANY custom ROM. A developer can do nasty things right? Besides that yes microG allowing to let apps act like as they are another app, also known as signature spoofing. This CAN be a good and a bad thing. Read on why my builds are different:

In general the microG patch is an all or nothing. A ROM which supports microG (i.e. signature spoofing) have that feature enabled, always.

The difference in my /e/ builds is that I am using the "restricted" option of signature spoofing so as long as you trust me you are as safe as without microG.

.-