yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV General] NisseDILLIGAF:
Was looking for a way to control my XBox Media Center (XBMC) with my Diamond, like a remote control.

After some searching I fond 'XBMCControl'

Thought I share my discovery with you guys... :)

You controle it using WiFi and the Web interface in the XBMC.

http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=87054&package_id=198866

There is also included the source code in VB If someone wants to make a 'custom' XBMC-Diamond app :D
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV General] speedme:
awesome !! :)

I just love XBMC and it's even better to control it using my Diamond :)
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV General] NisseDILLIGAF:
Yeah! I use XBMC everyday... And I really like using my Diamond instead of the gamepad, and now I can see the tracks on the phone :D
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV General] hastarin:
Anyone who comes across this thread may also be interested in this:

http://xbmc.org/forum/showthread.php?t=40958
[Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro  Questions & Answers] thxcertified:
Hello everyone,

I just recently switched from a HTC U11 to this wonderful MI 10 Pro and I couldn't be happier.

There's just one little thing that I realized and I don't know where I did something wrong in my settings or if it's a ROM issue.

Whenever I watch a Video in full screen, the phone kinda cuts off the sides (probably to fit in the full screen instead of putting a black bar over/under the video).

I find this quite annoying because I'm sometimes missing out on important information that's sometimes written on the screen.

This happens with all apps I tried (Instagram/IGTV, YouTube and Kiwi Browser).

Have you experienced that behavior before and how did you solve it?

I attached a Screenshot on how it actually looks like.

EDIT: I'm on MIUI Global 11.0.10.0
[Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro  Questions & Answers] josuema:
Have you tried pinch to zoom out?
[Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro  Questions & Answers] thxcertified:
Pinch to zoom only works on YouTube and only on horizontal videos. Not working on Instagram at all, Browser at all or on vertical videos on YouTube ?

Are there any settings somewher in the system that I need to check?
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Rdmzied:
Hi guys,

I need some idea, I have two problems. I'm a beginner...

The first one is the next.

I have reversed an app. I need to see how the app behaves after a purchase (I need to see the network traffic), but after my reverse I can't do any purchase the error is : "The version of the application is not configured for billing..."

Any idea for that ?

The second problem I can't root my emulator, I use android studio.

I've been following this :

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5095234/how-to-get-root-access-on-android-emulator

But I m stuck at this step :

I have this message :

Yet this command seems to work :

My OS is windows, and android version is 7.1.

Oh and I have a last question. How I can debug my app when it start ?

This command not work on windows, I use "adb shell ps" and I take the pid...

Thanks.
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] :
A: Make sure your app has android:debuggable="true" in Android Manifest.

B: To debug an application using JDWP:

In Windows:

Open the command prompt

Add to the PATH environment variable <jdk/bin> where jdk is the installation directory of the JDK.

Add the path to Android SDK platform-tools to PATH environment variable.

Reboot computer

Open the command prompt and run

adb forward tcp:8700 jdwp:<JWPD_ID>

to forward JDWP service to localhost where <JWPD_ID> you obtain via running command

adb jwpd

In Android Studio:

Turn on "USB debugging" and use "Select debug app" to select your app in "Developer options" on Android device

Start your application

Create a new "Remote" debug configuration (Run->Edit Configurations), and change the debug port to 8700

Select Run -> Debug
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] :
[MENTION=10572355]Rdmzied[/MENTION]

How to root the Android Emulator is well explained here.
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Rdmzied:
Thanks for your answers. I think you did not understand. I can debug my app, but I want to debug when the application start.

Your link is the same tutorial than my link...

I m not root...
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] :
To gain ROOT requires you have successfully installed SuperSU app. That's all.
[Xiaomi Redmi 8 Questions & Answers] rieku:
I change my emmc but cant backup dumpfile form old emmc because crash. Can anyone help me send the dumpfile ?
[Xiaomi Redmi 8 Questions & Answers] pokepokepoke:
Where can I find this file, is it in stock rom?
[Xiaomi Redmi 8 Questions & Answers] rieku:
If you use ufi box you can backup the dump file
[OnePlus 8 Pro Questions & Answers] mojoyoyo77:
Many former OnePlus users get used to having Shelf and we would like it to come back, the same OnePlus launcher apk, in 7 Pro offers Shelf, but they must have put something that disables it in 8 Pro. Many users (no root) waiting for a solution for this. Maybe, with an ADB command could be enabled ...? ;)
[OnePlus 8 Pro Questions & Answers] Helio0:
I installed it once installing a previous version from apkmirror. I don't remember wich versión, Someone previuos OP8pro launch.
[General Questions and Answers] msliman-10lacost3:
Hello, I've tried to install multiple roms on my phone and none of them work.

I tried to install many versions of twrp without success. Some of them include twrp for Ulefone Armor 6, Armor 2, twrp for mediatek mt6750, mt6739, and even supposedly twrp for Ulephone Armor 5 (not to be confused with my model, which is 5s) and others.

I even tried orangefox, philz, redwolf and clockworkmod.

None of them worked. What happened is when I tried to boot into recovery, it would turn on, turn off, turn on again and boot into the stock OS.

I even tried to install ROMS without a custom recovery, using fastboot.

I tried a custom version of lineage os, supposedly made for ulefone armor 5 (I tried the arm64 a only version.) : https [column//] sourceforge [dot] net/projects/andyyan-gsi/files/lineage-16.x/

I tried resurrection remix too (oreo arm64 a only)

the command I used is fastboot flash system custom_rom.img

After installing each rom, each time I tried to boot a custom rom, it would turn on, show me the message that my device is in the orange state, shut off, reboot and repeat. So yeah, I bricked my phone. Then, I installed the firmware for ulefone armor 5s with SP flash tool and I'm back to square one.

I don't know if I should try graphene os, since inside a folder containing the image files, there is a text file which states that a sargo board is required, whatever that means. ("require board=sargo")

So yeah, I don't know what to do. I need a rom that is open source, and without gapps.

Any help is appreciated.
[General Questions and Answers] msliman-10lacost3:
I'm even willing to try ubuntu touch, if that works

I'm even willing to try ubuntu touch, if that works
[General Questions and Answers] Droidriven:
Do a Google search for:

"Custom ROMs for (your specific model number)"

If there are any ROMs for your device, that search will find them, if it does not find anything then there is nothing for your device. This means that if you want to use custom ROMs on your device, you will have to build your own TWRP or port TWRP from a similar device to work on your device then you will have to build your own custom ROMs or port custom ROMs from a similar device. If you're wanting or waiting for someone to build them for you, you are in for a very long wait. Developers build ROMs for the devices they personally own, they do not build ROMs for devices that other people own if the developer does not own the device. In other words, around here, we help people find what they are looking for but we will not do the work for them. If you want it but it doesn't exist, you will have to be the one to create it for yourself, not someone else.
[General Questions and Answers] Droidriven:
Who is trolling? Trolls get reported here, which I could do to you for the words you are using. I'll give you a pass this time because I'm a nice guy but that is your only freebie from me, your next disrespectful post will not receive the same exception.

What I posted is how things go here and what to expect, you just didn't want the truth. If that offends you, then that is a failing on your part. You're more than welcome to find another android website where they are willing to lead you by the hand and spoonfeed you when you want something that you are too lazy to find, do for yourself or have the ability to achieve on your own mental merit, because you surely won't find that here at XDA. If you choose to stay at XDA, be prepared to do the real work yourself.

Accept it or not, that is the way it is. Spouting childish insults won't change that.
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III General] DracoLX:
Hi folks. Sorry to start a new thread but there's something bugging me around here. If by any chance you mods think this post is useless please close it and accept my apologies.

It's known to the most of you that the first version of drivers didn't worked on all roms. That issue forced the developers to do a workaround and slow down the process to get it working on those roms and created a new set of drivers that is not so fast as the first one.

So... i was thinking on this and decided to start a poll in order to give a hand to the developers in wich way they should follow. What do you prefer?

A Gold XDA based ROM with fastest drivers and less compatibility with all roms? (forcing all XDA members to flash their phones - not a big deal i presume)

Or a set of drivers compatible with most of the roms but with slower performance?

I know this is a controversial issue and the urge of the drivers working on our kaisers is huge but i think we would have more if we had a custom GOLD XDA rom :p

Just My 2 cents

Cheers,

Draco
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III General] Fared:
kinda seems like a no-brainer honestly (unless you're petrified to flash or just despise 6.1). They will develop said drivers and you have a million chefs making a million roms from them...
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III General] DracoLX:
I have no problems at all flashing my phone. I assume that there are some people who are not comfortable doing that but.... this is XDA. And if they are here that's because we all want to get the most out of our phones. And that is the tricky part of this poll. Developing the drivers based on one specific rom ( a ported one form Diamond or Raphael or an official kaiser one ) will be the more accurate and fastest way to get there.

Again... just my 2 cents :)

Draco
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III General] draxredd:
first:

flashing rom is a non-trivial task for a huge majority of users. leaving them out in the cold sounds like a very selfish position. If not for this reason, maybe avoiding a flood of "I bricked my tilt, help !!!!" threads may be a better one.

second:

Anyway, as i understood it what is slowing down FPS in the new version is the enabled VSync, which yields less tearing and improved smoothness (sounds like a shaver commercial, i'm afraid). I don't know what the refresh rate of a kaiser LCD is, but anything higher than 75fps (ie 15ms refresh rate) is a complete waste.
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III General] DracoLX:
Not at all draxredd. Although i'm a junior member this is the second time i'm on XDA. I'm here for almost 7 years. Believe me, this is not a selfish position. As i was able to get some help to start flashing all of the members here on XDA will get that help too. The first time i flashed my first phone i was scared to death but... it's all the same. It only hurts the first time. :D

As i stated before this is just my opinion. The more roms the developers must include in the drivers development process, the more difficult it will be and much more time will be wasted.

Draco
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III General] draxredd:
haste... makes waste.

And if only one rom was to be designated as a target for the driver, it has to be the official HTC one, for two reasons:

- enabling driver support for a huge majority of users

- sticking it to HTC, deep.
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III General] DracoLX:
What about performance issues? Doesn't that count as well?

Anyway.... i've started the poll just to check your opinion against wide compatibility among all the roms versus one specific rom fully optimized. Let's not get far from the main question :D

By the way... my kaiser has the official 6.1 rom from HTC... for now :p

cheers,

Draco
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III General] jasthom69:
I'm for Flashing myself, but the in the ideal world both sollutions would be best so no one comes off short. However the kind developers should be aiming at the most stable of the 2 first.

Looking at the driver progress it looks like theyre slowly getting there and getting the driver to work on the latest 6.1 roms
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III General] Boinng:
I voted for compatibility with the official ROM, simply because it's an identifiable standard that everyone recognises, and which everyone has on their phone by default. Cooked ROMs are great, but they're all individual, designed by individuals and used by individuals with the same tastes/needs - not one of them will suit everyone else, with or without drivers, whereas drivers released for the official ROM should work with pretty much everything else.

It's too early to say whether drivers developed for the standard ROM will always be slower than those for a cooked version, and I'm sure the very brilliant developer of those drivers will do their best to minimise any performance loss, assuming their is any in the longterm.

Vastly improved performance for the majority (and what that means for sales of the Touch Pro etc) has to take priority over a marginally improved performance in a niche ROM, aimed at an elite few, surely? At the end of the day it's entirely down to the developer what they do, irrespective of any poll here, but that's my take on it anyway.
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III General] DracoLX:
Maybe i didn't expose correctly my idea.

There isn't any XDA Gold rom nor any kind of perfect ROM. The XDA Gold rom is just a concept and the first name that crossed my mind.

This is a big community and has some big brains around here. The exchange of knowledge bettween everyone is a plus and that opens a big wide world to explore.

So.... let's just imagine this scenario, ok?

The developers will pick a base rom. It really doesn't matter if it is a ported rom or a Official one. Preferably one that is fast and stable enough. The driver will be written over that rom. Users (those who want obviously) will test the rom for bugs and then chefs will try to cook out a 100% clean (note that by clean i mean a rom just as close as an official rom regarding to apps) fast and stable rom.

Of course this is just a crazy ideia but that i was thinking of. Create the first genuine XDA rom based on one device.

Note that there are many roms out there based on diferent releases. Make the drivers compatible with all of them will make the development process slow down and eventualy fail. That's the main reason i started this thread.

Now that the concept of the "XDA Gold rom" was properly explained (i hope) let's get on with the poll.

Draco
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III General] Flying Kiwi:
As long as "XDA Gold" = HTC Latest Official version I cant see a problem. It's when drivers are developed for anything other than the official ROM that we'll encounter problems. All the chefs can base their designs starting with official ROMs and work out from there. In the end it will depend on whether those developing the drivers want to satisfy the larger number using official ROMs or those using Custom ROMs where the chef has not saught to maintain driver compatibility. I've therefore not voted because it depends whether "XDA Gold" does in fact = HTC Latest Official version - we weren't told.
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III General] undac:
Are you even sure that theifference is that huge?

They might be able to provide two sets to cover all ends without much additional work.
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III General] SouthernLuke:
IMO, The drivers only need to be compatible with an official based rom. It's up to the chefs to make the drivers work with their rom. Now, if the root of the compatibility issue can be resolved, I think things can progress forward at a faster rate.
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III General] NuShrike:
FALSE. Two separate issues.

First, is dlls load differently between stock or hacked/cooked roms due to memory mangling by G'realoc going into cooked roms. An attempt to fix that was in the updated release.

Two, the screen update style in the first release was really just a hack that hijacked DDI's screen refresh routines. The 2nd release finally got the 'official' way to work so the hack was removed.
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III General] MrEous:
I voted faster...there isn't any other reason I came to XDA other than customizing.

Anyone who doesn't want a faster cellphone won't appreciate the new D3D drivers anyway.
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III General] fultotop:
There are may reasons the XDA Gold Rom (HTC Original 6.1) may be slower. Cooks reduce the software on the rom and use newer software versions, these may be faster than the previous ones.

Also this software is not from the Kaiser sometimes these may be causing the incompatiblity problems with the drivers.

The HTC original rom is slower to start than most cooked roms anyway, so way wouldn't the 3d drivers also run slower.

I decided not to vote, I think speed is a non issue as long as the drivers work on the HTC original rom, and are stable. You will always get rom's that perform faster, that's what cooks do round here.

I also don't think you would get a big jump in performance writing for just one rom, the hardware is the same in all the HTC Kaiser's handsets. Software can only make small difference to the performance of hardware if the drivers are written correctly.
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III General] lim biker:
personally i would love the drivers in a rom like dutty's diamond v1, but i think building them into a standard(ish) htc rom is best for the comunity; it sticks it to htc best as it shows u guys can do what they couldn't(or wouldn't), and makes flashing a rom feel safer to noobs.

and anyway we all know within hours of a rom with the drivers being released there will be dozens of cooked versions for all tastes with the drivers included too.
[Redmi Note 9S / Note 9 Pro (Indian Model) Question] zpower:
Hello,

How I know the model of my xiaomi Redmi Note 9 pro (buy in Spain)

I see there are two. Curtana and Joyeuse
[Redmi Note 9S / Note 9 Pro (Indian Model) Question] kicker63:
Most probably the curtana eu version.
[Redmi Note 9S / Note 9 Pro (Indian Model) Question] triovi:
Do you need NFC? Or faster charging?
[Redmi Note 9S / Note 9 Pro (Indian Model) Question] :
Joyeuse is the international global version that is on sale in Europe.
[Redmi Note 9S / Note 9 Pro (Indian Model) Question] Yemble:
Joyeuse and Excalaber have 64Mpix camera, Curtana has 48Mpix camera. Just check the text below the rear camera.
[Redmi Note 9S / Note 9 Pro (Indian Model) Question] tecwhiz:
Not entirely true. I bought my Note 9S 128GB on the official Xiaomi EU site and got the 'Curtana'. It came with Version: V11.0.2.0.QJWEUXM installed.
[Redmi Note 9S / Note 9 Pro (Indian Model) Question] papatzis:
You are right but Redmi note 9 PRO GLOBAL VERSION is joyeuse

You have 48mp main camera no nfc 18w fast charge.

Pro has 64mp main camera nfc 33w fast charge
[Redmi Note 9S / Note 9 Pro (Indian Model) Question] Zeuskk:
I heared that there is also version with 32mp selfie camera, is it true? Does joyeuse has it?
[Redmi Note 9S / Note 9 Pro (Indian Model) Question] Yemble:
Excalaber (Note 9 Pro Max) has 32Mpix front camera.

Joyeuse (Note 9 Pro Global EU) has 16Mpix front camera.
[Redmi Note 9S / Note 9 Pro (Indian Model) Question] ck32:
Hello all,

I bought from Dhgate a Redmi note 9 pro with the following specifications :

Global Version redmi Note 9 Pro 6 Go 64 Go.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 720g, 64MP Quad rear camera,

CPU Snapdragon ----------- 720g Octa Core CPU

Screen 6,67 '' 2400x1080P FHD + DotDisplay

RAM + ROM - 6 Go + 64 Go

Camera ------ 64MP + 8MP + 5MP + 2MP Quad caméra arrière,*16 MP front camera

Batterie ------ 5020mAh (Type), support 30W Fast Charge

What model is it please?

Thanks

Envoyé de mon Redmi Note 6 Pro en utilisant Tapatalk
[Redmi Note 9S / Note 9 Pro (Indian Model) Question] kalehrl:
Joyeuse
[Redmi Note 9S / Note 9 Pro (Indian Model) Question] ck32:
Thanks you for this quick answer.

Envoyé de mon Redmi Note 6 Pro en utilisant Tapatalk
[Redmi Note 9S / Note 9 Pro (Indian Model) Question] shivshaktiv8@gmail.com:
bought from Dhgate a Redmi note 9 pro with the following specifications :

Global Version redmi Note 9 Pro 6 Go 64 Go.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 720g, 64MP Quad rear camera,

CPU Snapdragon ----------- 720g Octa Core CPU

Screen 6,67 '' 2400x1080P FHD + DotDisplay

RAM + ROM - 6 Go + 64 Go

Camera ------ 64MP + 8MP + 5MP + 2MP Quad caméra arrière,*16 MP front camera

Batterie ------ 5020mAh (Type), support 30W Fast Charge
[Redmi Note 9S / Note 9 Pro (Indian Model) Question] lindercannon:
Download CPU-Z from the Play Store and go to device tab.
[Redmi Note 9S / Note 9 Pro (Indian Model) Question] bloworlf:
I suggest you to install CPU-Z from the playstore.
[Redmi Note 9S / Note 9 Pro (Indian Model) Question] Salah U Deen:
joyeuse is redmi note 9 pro global

& excalaber is redmi note 9 pro maxx
[Redmi Note 9S / Note 9 Pro (Indian Model) Question] Bodisson:
Based on this, most probably joyeuse.

Check with CPU-Z or AIDA64
[Redmi Note 9S / Note 9 Pro (Indian Model) Question] twistyplain:
If youre on stock rom, install cpu-z app from play store and check the device tab. Eg. I have curtana (note 9s global). Here's what my cpu-z says. Hope this helps.
[Redmi Note 9S / Note 9 Pro (Indian Model) Question] ForceField:
Hello , I just bought a Redmi Note 9s and From CPU-Z , It's a Curtana

But the SOC tab says it's a Qualcomm 0x805 and 0x804

Isn't supposed to be a 720G or am I wrong ? maybe 0x805 and 0x804 means something else ?
[Redmi Note 9S / Note 9 Pro (Indian Model) Question] twistyplain:
Those are the processor ids of the custom kryo cores based on cortex a55 and a76 respectively. It's a sd720g phone.

The Qualcomm Technologies Inc. sm7125 is the official part number of snapdragon 720g chipset. Mine also shows the same as yours.

Edit:
[Redmi Note 9S / Note 9 Pro (Indian Model) Question] Jas Grover:
I bought redmi note 9 pro in India, is it curtana or joyeuse?

I guess they're fooling with us by arising other models with similar names and inferior hardware to con us:|
[Redmi Note 9S / Note 9 Pro (Indian Model) Question] the-_-ghost:
Nobody fools anyone unless you want to be fooled.

If you don't read the specs of a phone before you buy it you will also eventually not notice the adam's apple before you go on a date so..
[Redmi Note 9S / Note 9 Pro (Indian Model) Question] tusharind007:
Redmi note 9 Pro Indian is Curtana with 48MP Camera And 18w fast charging

Redmi note 9 pro Global is joyeuse 64MP Camera And 33W fast charging
[Redmi Note 9S / Note 9 Pro (Indian Model) Question] Jas Grover:
There's still a limit where you can think

You don't know if the specs mentioned are exactly what's inside cuz u can only verify through software, and that can also be trained for false answers.

My point is that who knows if the processor is same in all phones(I'm just taking your mind to reach there but not validating that my fact is 100% true) but it's just cryptedly abstracted to adjust the max frequency according to the price tag.

I can be wrong as ARM sells Qualcom with cortex processors but think about apple, they do it inside their own factories from the very (near to) scratch(the chip fabrication, those transistors ?) are everything for what we expect from our smartphone!(freakin satellites working behind that little GPS location u need, it's just omg!)
[Redmi Note 9S / Note 9 Pro (Indian Model) Question] RanjanJain:
Redmi Note 9 4G: Merlin

Redmi Note 9S: Curtana

Redmi Note 9 Pro: Joyeuse

Redmi Note 9 Pro Max: Excalibur