yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy A71 Guides, News, & Discussion] MrxChristmas:
Magisk Flash Failing

Hello there! i tried to do all the steps there but i am constantly failing at the root part.

i cannot see the option to "Unlock OEM". ive tried the fix for it but it still dont show. so i chose the option to not unlock bootloader

Odin Says

<ID:0/005> Added!!

<ID:0/005> Odin engine v(ID:3.1401)..

<ID:0/005> File analysis..

<ID:0/005> Total Binary size: 7077 M

<ID:0/005> SetupConnection..

<ID:0/005> Initialzation..

<ID:0/005> Get PIT for mapping..

<ID:0/005> Firmware update start..

<ID:0/005> NAND Write Start!!

<ID:0/005> SingleDownload.

<ID:0/005> recovery.img

<ID:0/005> super.img

<ID:0/005> dtbo.img

<ID:0/005> userdata.img

<ID:0/005> persist.img

<ID:0/005> vbmeta.img

<ID:0/005> FAIL! (Auth)

<ID:0/005>

<ID:0/005> Complete(Write) operation failed.

<OSM> All threads completed. (succeed 0 / failed 1)

Please help. Thanks in advanced!
[Samsung Galaxy A71 Guides, News, & Discussion] endor43:
OK, great point. I will do exactly this.

---------- Post added at 10:10 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:07 PM ----------

Maybe this will help?

https://androidmore.com/fix-missing-oem-unlock-toggle-samsung/

---------- Post added at 10:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:10 PM ----------

After doing the Magisk Patch on AP file: In the video it shows that the contents of the magisk_patched.tar are boot.img, vbmeta.img, recovery.img, and others (i.e. dtbo.img.lz4, all lz4 files).

But for me after the Magisk patching of AP, my recovery file is still 'recovery.img.lz4'... still an lz4 file.

Looks like maybe it didn't get patched.

Should I try another CSC?

Should I maybe just not include a recovery file in the new magisk_patched2.tar?

Should I just include the recovery.img.lz4 in the magisk_patched2.tar directly? or unpack it with lz4?

What are your guys' thoughts?

Thank you!
[Samsung Galaxy A71 Guides, News, & Discussion] andreoide:
I think using 7zip is better?
[Samsung Galaxy A71 Guides, News, & Discussion] DonAndress:
I buy any item in good faith, trusting that I will get a fully functional product I pay for. They take money I earn with my hard work selling me product which I can't use to the fullest just because they locked its features and prevented other devs from using them. They did not mention this little detail neither in the commercial nor in the manual included. That's also stealing. Dude.
[Samsung Galaxy A71 Guides, News, & Discussion] andreoide:
I wont discuss this matter any longer . You know you steal, when breaking things and lie about why its broken. They don't take your money you choose to give them, in return you get a fully working phone, secure by locking the bootloader.

You yourself with too little knowledge of what you get into brick the device, than you start crying like a child, and now it is all Samsungs fault? Don't make me laugh here.

Whether you " dude" steal from a person or big company, it stays the same: theft.

Subject closed.
[Samsung Galaxy A71 Guides, News, & Discussion] DonAndress:
Would be nice of you to check who you reply to. I didn't start this topic.

And no, i don't get fully working phone. The access and quality is reduced. How come when i buy a PC i can do and access literally anything i want? How come nobody locks my bootloader so i could install Linux?

I don't need to have an inside knowledge when i buy device. What i need is a manufacturer to inform me about any limitations i may encountered upfront. Period. Dude.
[Samsung Galaxy A71 Guides, News, & Discussion] gee2012:
You only buy/own the hardware, not the software. Period.
[Samsung Galaxy A71 Guides, News, & Discussion] DonAndress:
Are you a other one who doesn't understand?

I don't want their software. I just want them to stop blocking installing other firmware on the phone which you yourself just described as my own after purchase.
[Samsung Galaxy A71 Guides, News, & Discussion] viktor92:
The analogy with pc hardware is right. The average pc user will never mess with the OS already installed, as the vast majority of cellphone users, so why to make so difficult to change the OS on the phone for the user that wants to ?. The manofacturers wants too much control, and that surely has to do with our own data and our privacy...
[Samsung Galaxy A71 Guides, News, & Discussion] endor43:
The question is less about what to use to unpack, and more about, why is Magisk outputting a recovery.img.lz4 after patching as opposed to a recovery.img? and what should I do about it?

Thanks!

---------- Post added at 03:25 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:23 AM ----------

Maybe MasterEsno knows?
[Samsung Galaxy A71 Guides, News, & Discussion] andreoide:
:D :D

---------- Post added at 09:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:19 PM ----------

I agree. And our crying "dude" is changing the subject about when bricking his hardware by trying to install other firmware, than going back to the shop and lie about what caused malfunction, is in my point of view nothing else than theft, scamming other people and or companies.

Stealing from a person or company stays the same: theft. Whatever Don dude cries in attempt to mask that. I stopped responding to his childish bla bla bla...

---------- Post added at 09:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:29 PM ----------

First if all: NOBODY in the world buys a phone without first in advance search internet or ask the salesman about all technology what us possible or not with the phone. If you did not do that, don't start some ridiculous discussion here in wich I only read childish crying tears about how bad Samsung would be.

Im talking about Don the " dude" word lover now

Second ( [MENTION=4619039]Victor[/MENTION]) I agree privacy and data hoarding is involved. But, even with custom fw as lineage, if you don't know what you get into, dint get involved at all. Rooting alone is not your phone making it not give way any private info to unwanted servers any more, in fact, little or even no knowledge about what rooting really is can even set your privacy more open than like for example the A71 straight from factory ever would do, as you will understand.

And last but not least, for example having just lineage and root, as soon as you flash Open-Gapps with it, the song starts playing from the beginning.

Having a real secure phone without leaking anything is almost impossible to achieve ? %, unless you understand all about rooting and deep insight and knowledge about the different fw you are installing, wich I found very hard to believe when reading postings of crybaby Don" dude" in his case here...
[Samsung Galaxy A71 Guides, News, & Discussion] DonAndress:
ROTFL ???

You should really get out of your mom's basement once in a while, dude. What world do you live in? ?

It's exactly the opposite. 99,5% of people don't even know what android is. Probably 95% gets convinced by the carrier on what to buy and 4% asks family members. It's the tiny 1% of geeks who actually checks specs and stuff on the Internet.

Jeez... I didn't know that so square headed dudes like you even existed any more... [emoji6]
[Samsung Galaxy A71 Guides, News, & Discussion] andreoide:
Cry on " dude" whatever

:D
[Samsung Galaxy A71 Guides, News, & Discussion] ShaDisNX255:
Guys can we keep this on topic. Thanks.
[Samsung Galaxy A71 Guides, News, & Discussion] endor43:
Thank you for trying to reorient this chat.

I'll just repeat my question so that others on the forum can see it and hopefully it won't get buried!

---

The question is less about what to use to unpack, and more about, why is Magisk outputting a recovery.img.lz4 after patching as opposed to a recovery.img? and what should I do about it?

Thanks!
[Lenovo Vibe Z Themes, Apps, and Mods] ktmom:
If you are reading this it's because you are using an application.

This thread redirects to: https://xdaforums.com/honor-6x/themes/questions-belong-qa-section-please-t3528405
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 ROM Development] Alistair George:
After reading the FAQ wiki:

I want to keep my Extrom unmerged, to enable easy reversion to WM2003 if need be later.

Can anyone advise if doing this hinders, or cripples the WM6 upgrade?

--------------------------------------------------------------------

The below question I found out, but include answering thread to help others:

The statement that xplode makes below I do not understand?:

'You can use the extrom of my previous rom or cook your own'

Found answer to above in the following thread:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=372485

Thanks,

Alistair.
[Huawei P10 Lite Questions & Answers] Iyugeuifbiejhfiu:
("Deleted")
[Redmi K20 / Xiaomi Mi 9T Questions & Answers] paulmerrill:
I notice when using Evie launcher as well as Nova launcher that occasionally (it's happened three times now in a month) that when I look at my phone in the morning after waking up, 30% of the icons on the home screen are missing. Evie has a backup/restore, so I then just restore and it's all good but not sure what's going on. My thought is that somehow the automatic phone backup that happens once a week is somehow causing this.

Any thoughts?
[Redmi K20 / Xiaomi Mi 9T Questions & Answers] xm4:
*bump*
[Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries] Our Mine:
This is a ProjectSpagetX Modified And I repair it and become Pumpkin​

Advice for everyone, no one uses a Project_Spaget X or 3.0 or old Do not use it with any gsi Except for pixels

Because you will notice a lot of problems with it, even if it is

He repaired it

Because I repaired and added files from Xiaomi

I think that if Astmrr society here will take the fittest and suits him for himself

Everything links has been deleted because it violates Forum Law No. 12

must read

Because I modified the work of a person

His work corrected him, with a lot of things being deleted

It is not enough to add his name to the topic

As for some of the last links, they were deleted

Because she was making very little profit from her

* This violates the forum rights

So bye guys

;) :good:

​

Some information you should know.

This is a test project that was taken from my recovery because it is under test/ implementation for the Exynos7870 Supported devices

This is a full Treble ARM64 Vendor implementation for the Exynos7870 Supported devices Only tested on Android pin 9 And I thank will work on Q 10

What Bug

hotspotIt works but is not stable

Searchlight

Fm radio

You Tell me If

Rany thing works
[Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries] Wislley Frauner:
You are filling the topic forum unnecessarily.

It is better to create a test group on Telegram
[Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries] Our Mine:
You are right, I will make an account Telegram :good:
[Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries] NindoS:
Tested in HavocOS 3.2, it working perfectly but some problem I don't know why it fits with Project Spaget X almost 100% ?
[Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries] Our Mine:
Thanks for the support
[Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries] ananjaser1211:
Just read this and I find it hilarious. Do I need to remind you that without (me the copy) there was never going to be any treble in the first place ?

Or proper TWRP support. Or proper exynos 7870 kernel (on 8 devices) or even proper roms ?

Know what you are talking about before you move your mouth. And no don’t credit me for (taking some of the files) when you took the ENTIRE project

I don’t think you wrote the convertors. 99% if the vendor or kernels or anything. The changes inside are extremely minimal and are hacks hence why you will never see them in my vendor. I don’t work to support one GSI

Thank god i left this community, you people truly don’t deserve anything I’ve done the past 3 years
[Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries] CM users:
First of all:

1. What mistakes????? Last time I checked the mistakes are yours.

2. I have flashed many different kind of GSIs both Q and Pie on my J7 Pro and they works flawlessly with Spaget X so I don't understand wtf do you even mean by "only except pixel GSI work".

3. Why does this thread even exists.

4. You kanged the whole thing and then give it a different name. Haha you're so funny.

5. LOL! Unstable hotspot? Non working flashlight? Spaget X have neither of those bugs.

---------- Post added at 11:08 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:00 AM ----------

Mmmm yes I love the delusion you are displaying here, you should be thanking Anan instead for bringing Spaget vendor and much more to ****tynos 7870.
[Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries] ananjaser1211:
Yes im arrogant for providing everything to this community without any conditions and for free.

look how many threads ive contributed into across xda, over 500. and none of those times i asked to be credited personally.

im moving this to the moderation and they can handle this mess on their own.
[Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries] ananjaser1211:
atleast we agree on something, wasted time.

go to sammobile, download G965F firmware, extract vendor.img , and make it boot on exynos7870 without copying spaget. then we talk about "just copying"

if you boot a G965F Vendor stock directly from samsung, i will shut my mouth. until then, we have nothing more to talk about, and the proof of ripping off other peoples work will be when all these threads are closed.

you guys dont even know the difference between libs, hidl , services or anything. did you spend 3 months crafting a convertor ? or building what you took as a .zip and think its by samsung ? even on stock samsung vendors you will have less than 70% of the compatibly spaget does because unlike what you think and what ourmine and co are feeding you, vendors dont "just work" there are libs i made, scripts i made, hacks i made that you guys think will be in stock vendors. but hey im just a copy right ? . i swear people these days lack basic common sense. nobodies thinking they know **** about developing because they can copy an xml or an apk. im done here
[Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries] Deleted member 6973536:
This thread should be closed anyways. Because this is a copycat
[Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries] Badger50:
Thread closed.

MOD EDIT. THREAD CLOSED!
[Lenovo Vibe Z2 Pro Guides, News, & Discussion] ktmom:
If you are reading this it's because you are using an application.

This thread redirects to: https://xdaforums.com/google-nexus-...lease-read-t2500184/post46847787#post46847787
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV General] colonel:
http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/209376/htc-touch-diamond.html

I was thinking of buying one of these, now i am put off .....
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV General] pietrucci:
NO IT'S NOT (that bad)!!!

It's a beautiful device, FTouchFlo3D looks wonderful, it's small, it's thin, it has many many small details...

True, the first ROM was slow and laggie (is that a word?). But now already after a few weeks there are many new ROMs including the newly cooked ones that make the device much snappier, stabile and sometimes really fast.

There still are some points like memory leaking and short batterylife but I'm sure these things will be solved in the near future.

I LOVE IT!!!!!
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV General] aragornol:
it depends ... and besides that do you believe everything you read ? I can find you you as much reviews about how is Diamond great as about how is Diamond bad ... if you really want to know buy it and try it if it fits your needs
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV General] colonel:
I believe everything I read ;->

but seriously, I didn't want to upset anyone.

I am a big user of HTC devices. Its just this one seems a bit overhyped and you do worry about this type of review as this magazine is reasonably respected. good to hear that newer ROMs are better. Are the official ROMs better ?
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV General] darthbane2k:
Any piece of **** review that mentions the Apple iPhone in the first two paragraphs is probably written by an Apple fanboy and.. well, you know where the review is heading...

Ignore this trash.
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV General] tomchap:
There are alot of reviews floating around the net... I personally followed the coolsmartphone take on the Diamond http://www.coolsmartphone.com/article775.html

He had the phone and posted video reviews every day for a week. This was a great way of doing things as it helped people get a feel for the phone and what it was capable of.

I agree that the signal strength isnt the highest ive had (fixable in a ROM update with new RADIO im sure) but other than that ive not installed any Custom Rom on my diamond and ive not even used any of the Registry Tweaks that this site talks about and im very happy with my Diamond.

I would say pop into a store when they are released and get a feel for one first if your that concerned but all ive gotta say is ive finally got a device that does it all and improves on the Windows Mobile Interface.

Im not going to slate the iPhone as to be honest its prob due to the iPhone coming out, giving all Phone Manuafacturers a well needed kick up the arse to start thinking about what people what.

The Diamond is the bees knees and the mutts nuts! Im chuffed with mine and have no intention of getting rid of it.

I loved my Touch Dual, but this is now on eBay. It would take alot for me to put that up for sale, and the Diamond managed to do that straight away!
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV General] raveydavy:
I tend to agree with those that dismiss this review as overly negative. In fact, at the end of the review, they say that HTC may make some tweaks that make it a half decent phone. Many of those tweaks have appeared already in the new production version of the ROM (1.37).

My view in a nutshell:

Windows 6.1 is a feature rich and customisable platform which allows you to do some great things with your phone. However, the user interface of raw windows is pretty ugly.

HTC's Touchflow3D is a flawed masterpiece. What it does and how it looks is great, but it's just not quite quick enough - and still doesn't hide away all of the ugly aspects of windows. NEvertheless, it is pretty damn good - and much better than the first touchflow versions (IMHO).

Diamond is available now, with 3g, GPS, etc - I'm sure HTC and Apple will leapfrog each other with their releases from here.

HTC's new form factor has finally delivered Chic. I've always thought they pack a lot into their little boxes - but this is a phone that doesn't screak "geek" when you look at it (even though all the geeky capabilities are there!).

The responsiveness of the screen is a differentiator - given the extra functionality of the HTC, you will at times want to use the stylus. This has forced them into using resistive technology which is a bit less responsive than the iPhone. However, the benefit is that you can do things that the iPhone simply cant do!

Oh, I should say that the activesync of Diamond with outlook works like a dream .

If I had one major criticism of the Diamond, it's the memory. I don't need an SD slot, but I do wish they could have squeezed in 8 or 16gigs.

Ultimately, the choice between Apple and HTC is about whether you want a locked down feature-set which hangs together margianlly better, or something which is infinitely improvable, but lacks the out-of-the-box slickness of the iPhone. Personally, for the money I'll go for HTC every time.

Best bet: try and get your hands on one, and see how it feels - a bit like compact cameras, there's a lot of personal preference of how it feels in the hand, which can matter more to the user than pure specifications. I think the Diamond will win you over - particularly if you're looking at a newer ROM version!
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV General] R3PUBL1K:
And to think he got paid to write that...:eek:

He praises Opera 9.5, while I think although useful at times, this browser still needs a lot of work before I move from IE mobile permanently.

Conclusion - Opinions are like a-holes - everyone has one.... he is...
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Questions & Answe] Ruffian:
Ok so i managed to follow the guide for the whole process to get the pixel experience rom on my phone, i did the full thing> Unlock bootloader, Orange Fox, DFE, Magisk and flash the rom etc.

The questions i have now that ive had it running for a few days, there was no default sounds set, is that normal?

How come it says pixel 2 in certain situations, is it based on a pixel 2 version of android 10 or just some kind of placeholder?

And do i need to flash manually to update or is it OTA? do i just flash the rom through orange fox? ie whats a basic procedure when a new rom is released, i was pretty confused with the guide on the correct process for simply updating a rom if your staying on a particular custom rom.

thanks.
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Questions & Answe] MartonDev:
Default sounds are usually never set, you can set them tho in the sound settings

As far as I know the ROM shows your original device model to every apps, except Google (I'm on Evolution X and it shows Pixel 4 for Google)

I think Pixel Experience has OTA, however to my knowledge, it won't work if ur decrypted and orangefox is not compatible with OTAs (not sure tho, but I know twrp is).

If OTA is not working, you can download the latest version from the site and dirty flash (no wipes, just flash the ROM on top of the already installed PE)

Magisk will be lost tho when you update

Hope I helped, hit the thanks if I did :)
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Questions & Answe] Ruffian:
Thanks, thought it was strange no default sounds were set, the last custom rom i used was on the Nexus 6 so its been awhile.

Good to know i just need to flash an updated rom over the top of it glad to clear that up, thanks for your help its appreciated.
[Lenovo Vibe Z2 Pro Guides, News, & Discussion] ktmom:
If you are reading this it's because you are using an application.

This thread redirects to: https://xdaforums.com/nexus-5x/general/moderator-contact-list-t3207927/post62942301#post62942301