yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Moto G4 Plus Questions & Answers] echo92:
Though the Snapdragon 617 is 64 bit capable, the stock ROM (including TWRP flashables) is 32 bit in nature (likely a reason for the armv7 architecture shown, which is the same in my G4 Plus). Hence on stock firmware, you'll need 32 bit apps.

If you're wanting to make use of the 64 bit capability, you'll need a 64 bit TWRP and a 64 bit custom ROM, along with 64 bit (ARM-64) GApps.
[Huawei Mate 30 Pro Questions & Answers] huawei132:
I know for free apps you can just get the apk off Apkmirror or something but what about paid apps? Is it possible to buy an app off Google Play using a web browser and install it without the actual Google Play App?

I know there is a convoluted way to install Google Play through a combination of restore and lzplay apps but apparently that involves handing over administrative control to some unknown third party so I'm not sure if I should try that yet.

Phone is Mate 30 Pro 5g.
[Huawei Mate 30 Pro Questions & Answers] paullu:
I don't think so
[Huawei Mate 30 Pro Questions & Answers] adrian_rams:
I got my 30 pro yesterday and did the installation. After you have installed the Gapps, you can just delete the App so it can't harm anybody. Everything except Google Pay works fine.
[Huawei Mate 30 Pro Questions & Answers] etgo11:
how did you install the gapps?
[Huawei Mate 30 Pro Questions & Answers] adrian_rams:
I did it according to the guide on Huaweiblog (a german website) i´ts there and i guess you can easily understand it, as it´s step by step

https://www.huaweiblog.de/news/huawei-mate-30-pro-google-dienste-installieren/

there is also a video guide on the site
[Off-topic] mrrocketdog:
no offense meant to anyone. just fas

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wwleOote5M0&feature=youtube_gdata_player
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] innuendo1973:
Unless, I hope that this section and suitable in order to expose my problem I have an i-mate mda alias qtek9000 with Rom i-mate and I wanted to install the protocol a2dp but by mistake I installed the Rom UNI_QTEK_ITA_13089_130177_10900_ITA_ship.exe and the bootloader BL1 .01 _RUU_UNI_V1.2.exe How can I do to return as the first?
[Galaxy S 4 General] cawli2:
Thanks for this. I always wondered what all these custom ROMs were!
[Galaxy S 4 General] L.F.B.:
Amazing team! Amazing work!

Beautiful story JDCTeam! You guys made my life better with your roms!

Thank you! ???
[Galaxy S 4 General] Retrial:
Android 10 ROM Optimized LineageOS 17.1 is now marked as [LIVE] [STABLE] [DAILY DRIVER]
[Galaxy S 4 General] Retrial:
Hey guys,

I've update my Guides - Collection - JDCTeam Universe Threads!

Changelog: 6/5/2020

⚙️JDCTeam Universe⭐:

Remove the "Live" Tag from AEX and Pixel Experience Pie ROMs.

Added JDCTeam Android 10 Aroma Installer link.

Split Android 10 and Pie Aroma Links and reorder the position of description.

Added Secret ROMs clues from Buff in Android 10 ROMs.
[Galaxy S 4 General] Retrial:
Hey guys,

I finally finished my military service after 8 months and I am back to the game. (sry if I didn't replied to you on threads etc but as you can understand I was very busy)

I've updated my Guides/Collections and JDCTeam Universe threads.

Changelog

24/09/2020

:

JDCTeam Universe:?

Added crDroid ROM to Android 10 ROMs with tags [Live] [Stable] [Daily Driver]

Removed Carbon ROM from Secret ROMs Buff working on

Removed [Live] tag from Pie Optimized LineageOS
[Galaxy S 4 General] Retrial:
Update: 24/10/2020

Changelog:

Added the tag "EOL" for Pie ROMs

Remove the tag "LIVE" for Android 10 ROMs

Added Android 11 ROMs section
[Galaxy S 4 General] Retrial:
Update: 03/11/2020

Preview Build of Optimized LineageOS 18.0 Android 11 is up!
[Galaxy S 4 General] Retrial:
Update: 05/05/2021

crDroid ROM A11 added to the list.

JDCTeam TWRP Recovery Custom Builds added to the list.
[Galaxy S 4 General] Retrial:
Update: 09/08/2021

Added Ubuntu Touch
[Galaxy S 4 General] side:
where is 19.1? hehehe
[Galaxy S 4 General] Retrial:
It's on my todo list, I will update tommorow :love:
[Galaxy S 4 General] Retrial:
Update: 27/05/2022

Changelog:

Changed the title of thread and some sections to side/JDCTeam since from now and go on everything will be from side and his supporters.

Added tag for devices [S4] [POCO F1]. As you may know (or no) side bought POCO F1 and have plans for future ROMs.

Added [A12L]LineageOS++ [POCO F1] link ROM.

Added POCO F1 Ultimate Collection & Guides.

Marked Optimized LineageOS Android 11 ROM as EOL.

Marked JDCTeam TWRP as EOL.

Added a Discord server.
[Galaxy S 4 General] madmad1246:
Hello

I have a question, thank you for helping me.

I want to install Lineage OS ROM for s4 i9505 phone, but now there are 2 versions of it, one is on Lineage wiki site and one is jdcteam version in XDA

What is the difference between these two versions?

Which one is better?

Which is more stable?

thanks for your guide
[Galaxy S 4 General] Retrial:
Both are stable enough.

The one on wiki it's the official LineageOS which is still A11 and will be EOL soon.

The one on XDA by @side (JDCTeam) is custom A12 ROM based on LineageOS but with tweaks and sauce by the dev side for optimization. The only downside is you may have some glitches on YouTube app but you can use NewPipe or LibreTube which working fine.

If you want my opinion try Optimized LineageOS A12, it's noticeable faster and less laggy compared to Official LineageOS.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Questions & Answers] Pilz:
I am not going to do a huge write up so let's keep this simple. I logged the data for the Note 10+

I emailed the below info as a tip to some Android news sites I know to set the baseline. I did all of the testing myself but there might be additional reporting done since I first conducted these back in late September 2019. I've been waiting for someone to verify the findings which might happen very soon. I didn't post anything since I was waiting on the outlets to publish what I found for it to get more press and maybe Samsung would reply. For now please see the below info including some communication I sent to said places. I've redacted info and will update this OP later today as I have the time/the rest of my write up which on my home PC.

From some communication, I had about getting this published:

Data Spreadsheet:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/14k4piWIP6DoI0RfSf5cdYQeobjmHBMF3/view

I've been apart of XDA for a long time now but haven't posted in years. I conducted very similar tests for my S7E back then so it's only fitting I did the Note 10+ as well.

Legend:

Grey: Battery %

Orange: Current [A]

Blue: Voltage [V]

Red: Battery temp [C]

45W Charging Data Charts (Note how it peaks at ~35W even when my phone was at 3% charge)

[IMG="45W 1"]https://i.imgur.com/KMg5Jja.png[/IMG]

[IMG="45W 2"]https://i.imgur.com/7x0Msll.png[/IMG]

25W Charging Data Charts: This one hits the indicated 25W

Legend:

Grey: Battery %

range: Current [A]

Blue: Voltage [V]

Red: Battery temp [C]

[IMG="25W Data 1"]https://i.imgur.com/5kq7BKc.png[/IMG]

[IMG="25W Image 2"]https://i.imgur.com/Dcmpri9.png[/IMG]
[Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Questions & Answers] willhemmens:
I think considering how far you're expecting this to go with the press, your sample size is too small and not enough testing has been completed. I'm not saying you aren't completely right and I think you're doing good work but I would just kinda expect more considering the claims being made. I also think there could be issues with testing methodology and hardware.

I think you have quite a high ambient temp and that probably has a lot to do with things, I think you're more learning about Samsung's charging thermal management than anything else here.

If you look at the temps minus the ambient starting point, the 45w charger only warmed the phone up by 9.8C during the charge compared to 11.4C on the 25w charger.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Questions & Answers] Pilz:
I have connections at places since I used to write for a site. They have a PD tested to verify my findings and people who can do much more detailed testing. I have no reason to doubt the phone isn't pulling 45W based on charging times from multiple sources around the web. There's no way it can pull that current and only reduce charging time by a few minutes

a 13% reduction in charging time for a 44% increase in charging power is odd. Of course, these things don't scale linearly but there should be a larger gap between the two. I timed the phone with and without my tester and it gave me the same end result meaning the tester is showing accurate data for the power I am pulling which isn't 45W ever

Here's the charging data table

If you look at my post history, and reputation, I don't say these things lightly nor should I need to even mention that. I see the crowd has changed here over the years, perhaps for the worse.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Questions & Answers] willhemmens:
I don't doubt the fact it will never actually draw the 45W, did Samsung ever claim the phone would draw 45w while charging? I would agree the 44% increase in charging power is odd but also pretty irrelevant considering the relative costs.

Also I was here 3 years before you buddy so you can talk about your own crowd!
[Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Questions & Answers] Pilz:
They're advertising it as a faster charging that outputs 45W if they didn't need 45W there's no reason to make it 45W. They launch new chargers every generation of devices, even if that means a color change not an output one. The 25W charger outputs 25W, why else make a 45W charger that the phone can't use when you can make a 35W one? Remember they delayed the launch a month or so for unknown reasons for this charger. I also own an OP 7 Pro and the Warp Charger is rated for 30W and outputs 30W. I've yet to see a Samsung charger for their phones not output the highest rating ie 45W/25W/15.3W (S9+ or earlier) that they are capable of.

Yes, and you and I know the way people view things has changed. Doubting what I said based merely on sample size is an example. I'd love to be proved wrong because at least then we would have a clear answer and hopefully an explanation.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Questions & Answers] Belimawr:
it was my impression that the fast charger was just to get to the 80% range then it slows down as do most chargers, saw something before saying it was some form of battery protection built into the charging process so the battery charges faster through a medium range but to end it slows down. this is actually visible on the 25W charger, my phone can say a time to charge from about 30% and still have nearly half the time showing for the last 20% so it seems like a fail safe and I totally understand why Samsung would build one in after the 7.

also makes sense with your charging times table if you tracked both to 80% they both take about 25 mins for the last 20% at a rough guess, as neither actually reports 80% on a time scale. also if this is a slow down to the limit it would also explain the drop off in faster charging past the 30min mark, as if it does ramp down slowly after the 80% mark the phone on a lower charge would start to gain as it would still be higher up the charge table than the fast charger.

also the fact they don't ship with the 45W I doubt they intended it as anything more than an "oh crap my phone is nearly flat" charger and for that it can boost the phone reasonably faster than the 25W, if you are just about to leave the house and notice your phone is a bit low.

I honestly don't feel this is as big a problem as you are making it.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Questions & Answers] willhemmens:
There are 100% reasons to make it 45w even though the current devices may not fully utilise its peak output. There are also laptops with significantly larger (42Wh) batteries that are listed as compatible with this charger.

My explanation would be that the Note10+ is simply "compatible" with this charger. That doesn't mean it can use it's full 45W output but even your testing shows for short bursts (which for a lot of people matters most) the 45W charger will charge faster.

I made a kinda crap graph with your data that I found interesting on your 45W charge run

It's interesting as you can see the 5 min burst of 35W right at the start as the temp stays kinda stable, then the temp just rises as the power drops down to 25W at 12 minutes where it chills for a while and slows from there.

I wonder what the graph would look like if the battery temps were 10C cooler, I suspect pretty different.

Also the fact it goes straight to bang on 35W specifically kinda makes it look like that's the defined charging limit for Note 10+, has anyone ever gone above 35W?

These devices are very temp dependent when charging, for example I found the Note9 would drop to 5W wireless charging speeds when it hit 38C and once cooled to 36C, it would go back to 10W fast wireless charging again and then cycle between to two as the temp fluctuated.

I would complete the testing myself if I had a 45W charger but I don't and don't plan to buy one. If you could repeat the 45W test but starting at 15 or 20C battery temp, I would be very interested to see the result.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Questions & Answers] ka24e:
A couple things here I'm curious about:

When this charger is in use (the 45W Samsung one), does the Note 10+ indicate Super Fast Charging is enabled/being used on the Lock Screen or Always On Display?

The reason I ask is because since the Android 10 / One UI 2.0 update, I see Super Fast Charging displayed when using the charger that came with the Note 10+ (Model: EP-TA800) which is PDO at 11v 2.25A max which equals 24.75W. Now this charger supports PDO and PPS and some other voltages too, so I'm willing to bet it gets slower based on device temp/battery charge level. Even at 24W though, it charges pretty friggin fast and I'm totally happy with it.

I have an Insignia USB-C PD charger for my laptop, PDO at 5V 3A, 9V 3A, 15V 3A, 20V 4.5A. This charger will only charge at "Fast Charging" not "Super Fast Charging" so I'm willing to bet it negotiates 5V 3A which equals 15W. I do not have anything to measure it with.

I think the others and yourself are right, I don't think the phone actually supports 45W charging. The charger itself does, but the phone does not. I think you are correct that what you're seeing (and may go a bit higher based on temp/and other variables) is the limit of the device and no where can I find that Samsung says the phone can charge at 45W.

With the 45W charger, you will get the fastest, maximum charge rate based on factors such as heat and battery level, that's it and future devices will be able to take advantage of it. 35W is still fantastic though. I might grab one of these chargers if I can find one for cheaper than $50... lol
[Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Questions & Answers] zchamwithaplan:
If it doesnt say super fast charging it isnt super fast charging, it usually only does when the phone is off but i was just watching it go up several % within a very short time. Smoked a cigarette and ive been sitting over a solid 40% for a bit.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Questions & Answers] Pilz:
I did a few runs if you reference the spreadsheet, I can also link the battery temp data which was recorded via an app since there's not a better way I could find to do so. The initial run looks about the same, you can reference the true RAW data in the link below. I smoothed out random spikes in the curves since they were extraneous values of 0W or random dips/spikes of 0.01s

Google Drive link to some other runs (including the ones I posted). I didn't put all of them in that sheet because it was getting cumbersome.

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Dck5Svne2S4Y7ZUX-g7Nj2-eqQh_nsot

If I recall correctly the 45W spec was advertised as the Note 10+'s charging speed with the faster charger. Many news sites, and Samsung's own press release documented this last year. I'm linking their press release(s) below with screenshots showing how they say it charges at 45W. This is the claim I wanted to test, nothing more. I think Samsung dropped the ball with their statements and falsely advertised the charger.

[1] https://news.samsung.com/us/5-ways-samsung-enhanced-galaxy-note10/

[1] Samsung's Site

[2] https://news.samsung.com/global/int...-bring-passions-to-life-with-next-level-power

[2] Samsung's Site

I don't think it would charge any faster even if I chilled the phone first. I am waiting on some sources to test the charger and verify this which I hope will happen very soon.

For the record the phone always indicated the proper fast charging on the screen. It will NOT fast charge at the higher rate if the phone is powered down per my testing
[Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Questions & Answers] willhemmens:
I think the main people to blame are the press, for the most part they believe and just repeat the marketing rubbish. They all made the claim that "the Note10+ has 45W charging" but none tested it. Ofcourse Samsung didn't do anything about this misinformation being spread but this is Samsung.

Samsung themselves never seem to have specifically stated the phone will charge at 45W. Looking at those marketing materials I think they covering their backs with the "up to" and where they are stating information "only refers to the Note10+", they are trying to show that the Note10 is not supported.

And don't get me wrong, I'm not on Samsung's side and I do think this is ****ty but I'm also pretty sure you're wasting your time.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Questions & Answers] Pilz:
It doesn't matter, it never hits up to 45W period. They can't get it wrong in so many places if it wasn't intentional.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Questions & Answers] willhemmens:
That's the thing dude, Samsung never said it would hit 45W. They just said it had the potential to do so.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Questions & Answers] Pilz:
Except it doesn't, why are you trying to argue this? They always say 'up to' for their releases but guess what the Note hits 25W with the factory charger just like the 'up to'

says. Look, you and I both know they're full of it if you're only going to troll or provide dumb comments using the 'devil's advocate' or whatever excuse then let it be. At their unpacked event, it was also stated very clearly. The 45W is a lie, no phone hits it with their charger. You can use any 100W rated USB C-C properly spec'd cable, like a Thunderbolt one with their brick and it will peak well below their claim. Even their product page for the charger says it'll do up to the 45W on a supported device which the Note 10+ is. Legally speaking the phone has to hit 45W or they can't say 'up to' so go ahead and try making more flawed arguments. I'm not going to reply to your comments beyond this unless they're actually constructive or add to this.

Product page (along with many reviews saying it doesn't charge faster or very marginal vs the 25W.. hmm I wonder why that is, oh wait because the charger doesn't hit 45W :silly: )

https://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/m...t-charging-wall-charger-white-ep-ta845xwegus/

Charger aside, let's be adults here and discuss the real issue: Samsung promised but did not deliver
[Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Questions & Answers] willhemmens:
I argue for the same reason you do, it's my honest opinion.

I think your understanding of "up to" is wrong.

Here is the definition:

used to say that something is less than or equal to but not more than a stated value, number, or level

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/up-to

So yes, they absolutely could say "Note10+ charges at up to 100W" if they wanted, as long as the phone charges at a speed less than or equal to 100W, that statement would be correct.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Questions & Answers] Pilz:
The language is purposely vague to mislead people. I understand the definition of the phrase but thanks for yet again assuming I don't.

They could try but that would only further make them look dumb. I don't like it when companies do such things because it erodes any consumer confidence in their products As it stands I'm not exactly thrilled with Samsung's current language or avoidance to the topic.

Keep in mind, the trends I posted also show the phone isn't using USB PD PPS which is another issue I forgot to point out because I haven't posted my initial write up. I'll have to try doing so tonight if I have the time.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Questions & Answers] fatboypup:
Yup.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Questions & Answers] ketterj:
The Rated information at the bottom of the Note 10+ "About Phone" system info says DC rating is 10V 4.5A (45w)... So ... Where's the walk to back up the talk??
[Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Questions & Answers] Pilz:
Clearly the phone doesn't actually do that meaning Samsung must've disabled it due to issues or who knows what.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Questions & Answers] ketterj:
Some brief observations using a Samsung 45w charger on my Note 10+ using a wall power meter.

From 5% battery to 20%, the power draw was 37w, so I suspect this to be doing 9V 4A. Then from here on to about 50% (where I gave up my test) the phone will continually modulate between 37W and 9W every 5-6% charge, with the 9W happening for about a minute. I suspect this to be thermals and during cool down its doing 9V 1A. I wish I had a power meter on the USB cable but unfortunately I don't.

So let's visit what my Samsung charger is to see if this makes sense... I have a EP-TA845 Travel Adaptor made in Vietnam. The included USB cable is marked 5A, so it should be good for 5Amp!

Here's the specs:

PDO: 5.0V - 3.0A, 9.0V - 3.0A, 15.0V - 3.0A, 20V - 2.25A

So it doesn't have any PDO for the 10V Note capability... So let's visit the PPS!

PPS: 3.3-11.0V - 4.05A, 3.3-16.0V - 2.8A, 3.3V-21.0V - 2.1A

The maximum capability the programmable power supply can possibly feed the phone is 11.0V 4.05A, but I suspect looking at my wall draw that it's likely doing 9V 4.05A give or take. There is no way the phone can command 4.5A at any voltage, let alone at 10V or even 9.

Is there another model charger out there perhaps that the Note needs to achieve the power draw?

I'm now keen to try charging ontop of an ice block to see if that aids in reducing the modulation :)
[Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Questions & Answers] Pilz:
I included battery temps in mine to show you it's not throttling like that. The issue is we never see 45W, Samsung's 45W charger can output 45W but the phone will never pull that much power. I can throw mine on a block of ice and see but I know it won't matter that much (I guess I'll find out)
[Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Questions & Answers] MKchrias:
Highest power I've seen on usb c power meter

This was around 20% charged.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Questions & Answers] dboyrusky01:
the most output I saw on official 45w was 37.5w, now my Powerpie Powerbank which is compatible with 45w charging put out 38.8w but that the moist I was able to observe..
[Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Questions & Answers] willhemmens:
Hey OP, did your "sources" or "connections" ever provide results to verify your findings? Did this ever get published as you were expecting?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Questions & Answers] Pilz:
I haven't heard back yet unfortunately. I am working with someone else to see if we can get this officially confirmed. Passmark makes a USB PD + PPS tester for $650, I wouldn't mind buying one if needed. I'm seeing if someone I know will test it so my wife won't get mad if I buy one to prove a point :cool:
[Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Questions & Answers] Pilz:
Power [W] = Volts*Amps nowhere in the charging did it hit 43W
[Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Questions & Answers] Pilz:
If you don't like it feel free to make your own. I have the data linked in my OP. Instead of leaving rude comments why don't you be constructive about things?