yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] Sumit Samanta:
Yes sir. Waiting for the new build.. thnx for the rom.
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] Robbo.5000:
You are flashing a ROM that has not yet been classified as stable.

You should expect to clean flash more often than not when updating.

This is one of the most actively updated AOSP ROMs, with a dev/maintainer who has bent over backwards to fix a number of user issues recently.

Alex has quite rightly refused to add 'features', which is up to the official Havoc team to consider, but has addressed genuine bugs and restored genuine features that he has accidentally disabled.

This is way more stable than LOS, a ROM I have used for the last 4 years on all other phones. Alex has probably given more time than most other devs for this phone. The other Havoc devs for this phone, who tried to become official maintainers, have abandoned things, due to life commitments, and maybe you are confusing them with Alex, but the regularity that Alex has provided updates is amongst the best for this phone.
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] alex9yust:
unofficial build. not yet, and yet do not know what will happen next.
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] gouthamgoumi:
There is a maintainer for havoc official already..I hope you consider building another rom..maybe derpfest since q maintainer is dropping it..

P.s : I don't like havoc and it's oos wanna be style
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] alex9yust:
wow, most recently maintainer derpfest requested not to build unofficial... in fact, I build for myself. while havoc is the most sane and suits me. and when, I hope, the scanner will work without SOD and in all AOD modes - my builds will not be necessary.
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] P12AV33N:
Double Tap to Wake isn't working.

Is it a bug or am I missing something?
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] cpt.macp:
[MENTION=4206648]alex9yust[/MENTION]

can we update kernel

i see you did lot of kernel changes

if we use other kernel will Fp performace decrease? like Smurf or supermad

or can we upgrade immensity ?

as in changelog i can see you have done lot of local changes to kernel tree
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] alex9yust:
I did not do anything with the kernel. this is the last at that time IMMENSITY

https://github.com/UtsavisGreat/kernel_xiaomi_raphael/commits/q

I think the other kernel will not affect the scanner. You can flash what you like.
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] Flamebull5:
Screen recording seems to be very choppy/laggy for me. Does this happen to anyone else?
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] fereidooni:
It's known bug in any aosp rom
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] fereidooni:
It's for OnePlus

You can find it easily in google
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] theincognito:
The FOD is amazing. Thanks a lot mate! :D
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] Kookitza:
Dont know how, but this is the only aosp rom for our device that have a great strong Haptic feedback!

All other roms have a very weak Haptic feedback, on stock roms (miui) the Haptic Feedback is good.

Im happy :cool::good:
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] alex9yust:
from DerpFest in SystemUI/res/drawable
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] alex9yust:
system.prop

RODUCT_PROPERTY_OVERRIDES += \

sys.haptic.down.weak=20 \

sys.haptic.down.normal=40 \

sys.haptic.down.strong=80 \

sys.haptic.runin=13

overlay/frameworks/base/core/res/res/values/config.xml

<!-- Enables or disables haptic effect when the text insertion/selection handle is moved

manually by the user. Off by default, since the expected haptic feedback may not be

available on some devices. -->

<bool name="config_enableHapticTextHandle">true</bool>

<!-- The default intensity level for haptic feedback. See

Settings.System.HAPTIC_FEEDBACK_INTENSITY more details on the constant values and

meanings. -->

<integer name="config_defaultHapticFeedbackIntensity">3</integer>

<!-- The default intensity level for notification vibrations. See

Settings.System.NOTIFICATION_VIBRATION_INTENSITY more details on the constant values and

meanings. -->

<integer name="config_defaultNotificationVibrationIntensity">3</integer>

<!-- The default intensity level for ring vibrations. See

Settings.System.RING_VIBRATION_INTENSITY more details on the constant values and

meanings. -->

<integer name="config_defaultRingVibrationIntensity">3</integer>
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] Kookitza:
Thanks!

I hope devs will see it and update their roms with these commits :good:
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] MrPariah:
Waiting for my 168 hours bootloader unlock timer to finish, but just curious does this have working NFC? Or working NFC with a fix?
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] alex9yust:
update 12/28

Last Havoc, last kernel IMMENSITY.

Redid FOD. FOD powered by AODAlwaysON.
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] :
Good job! I will try it:good:
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] cpt.macp:
hi can we flash updated immensity kernel?

for further kernel updates?

i mean if you have done some local changes to kernel tree by yourself, would that affect rom performance and FOD?
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] :
Damn... I just switched to this rom and it feels much smoother than EvolutionX!

Edit: Switched back to EvolutionX because there is no full screen support for older apps. So sad.
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] Iyyappanmit7:
Hi i have already installed the other Havoc OS rom present in xda. Can i just dirty flash this rom on top of it or do i have to perform clean flash
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] nnamless:
I use this Rom for some months with clean flash and latest vendor. I tryed some others (Syberia, Bliss, Crdroid, Los), but i came always back to this Havoc. For me it is at the moment the best Rom for our device. Thankyou and I hope for further maintainement.
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] shaz.mrd:
Tried lots of roms. Finally settled with the newest build of Havoc .

-Fingerprint Scanner is working very good.

-There is no display off Fingerprint reading, thats okay as it's very finicky on other rom.

-It is very Stable so far, I Just faced one issue with wifi connection but it was my ISP issue.

-Android Auto not yet tested will update about it later.

Thank you for make this rom and I hope we see more releases. Stay home and keep flashing
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] valentinc22:
I do understand that the ROM has not been classified as stable, but the fact is it's likely that it will never be, at least not in the near future.

As I stated, I believe that the problems that I had may be due to dirty flashes. The fact is I don't have time to do a clean flash at every update (which would be the way to ensure the best stability).

I also understand the fact that Alex will not add new features, I accepted that from the moment I first flashed the ROM, but I and other users have stated some problems (like the Phone app not updating if not restarting app, also found that problem in File manager) that Alex did not adress and to me it seems clearly related to this build, as the problem was not present in Havoc Janaury official build and is also not present in other devices Havoc builds. Turtl app was also crashing. The unrecoverable system lock was what made me do the change. Otherwise I would have done a clean flash at some point to try solve the mentioned problems and others that I cannot remeber at this moment.

It is indeed the most updated build, but that also comes with a price, as not every build is very stable (and might need a clean flash, meaning a need to reinstall all the apps and transfer all the data, which is a process that takes a couple of hours in my case). For me personally, one update a month which includes the Google security patch is enough, I do not need more than that. Most phone manufacturers don't even offer that.

Regarding the stability, I have used Lineage OS on other devices too, and from my experience alone, I find it more stable than Havoc. It is based only on my personal experience and might not be true in general. Also the fact that the Lineage thread is much more active than this one gives me more confidence in the ROM. It is what it is, I don't try to blame anyone, just want to share my personal experience.

I do not deny that Alex has put a lot of work on this build, I only wanted to share my personal experience which may not be relevant to other users. The reason why I given up hope on Havoc for this device is that it is EOL and also don't have time to do a clean flash every single time.

Hope for the best, because I really liked the ROM more than Lineage. Maybe I will return to using it at some point.
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] alex9yust:
[MENTION=10174821]valentinc22[/MENTION] Yes, I was never going to add anything new and was never going to make my ROM. and it seems I owe you nothing. therefore, it’s personally strange for me why you are saying these things here, as if I owe you something.

I’m not going to fix the phone application (although I know that the problem is most likely in notifyListenersIfNecessary/notifyListeners. but I do not want to look for this place.), and I spoke about this before to whom to contact - google or Havoc developers. and I'm not going to fix all the applications that do not work for you. simple - I do not have to do this, I do not want to do this.

if you want a perfect build - then you have come to the wrong place. I always have a choice - to spend my time solving some problems, sort out what google or Havoc did there, or just get used to it or find a way around this problem. if this does not suit you, do it yourself or find one that suits you.

damn how hard it is to be polite ...
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] Bonito77:
For you and the others want this, go and install oem roms like xiaomi miui and not custom roms. Next you want is device support from dev here, something wrong with it you ship it to him to fix it ?

[MENTION=4206648]alex9yust[/MENTION], don't think about this people.
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] theCroh:
This device had at least one LOS update that destroyed user data and soft bricked the device so that the only way to fix it was flashing a fastboot ROM (since you couldn't even get to recovery). I've never heard of anything similar on any other ROM or device. I think, in case of this device, all sorts of weird problems are more related to the device than any ROM.

Edit: Even the stock ROMs (at least some regions) had a bug that made the FOD open the device with virtually anything made of skin.
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] ltsracer:
I am staying here for now, for me it is the best I have tried

Enviado desde mi Mi 9T Pro mediante Tapatalk
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] ml21:
Hey guys, sometimes when i take off my phone from my pocket the screen never wakes. Also happens when i fail several times with the fingerprint. I have to reboot the phone by long pressing the power button. Is this a know bug or it is just my phone?
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] alex9yust:
04/01 update

Blobs 11.0.7.

Kernel F1xy-0.15

Removed the scanner animation, returned my implementation of FODCircleView.

Fixed SafetyNet.

Corrected (in 03/31 version) SOD when the AOD screen goes blank and scan at this time. Due to this correction, the AOD screen with an incoming message and if unlocked from this screen, the scanner icon remained. on 04/01 fixed it.

It seems there should no longer be SODs.

PS: Although there is a problem, an AOD gesture (for example, picking up the phone) and pressing power button - the scanner does not respond to pressing. need screen off/on.
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] alex9yust:
try 04/01 please. there should not be an SOD associated with AOD. if the problem persists, send logs if possible.

adb logcat | grep QQQQ > out_log.txt
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] baltlevel:
The latest build works fine for me. Thanks to the developer!
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] 64ashg:
Thanks dev for making without gapps build.

For someone using without gapps build, can you please check if

The selinux status is enforcing,

The rom passes safetynet

In Google play store, the device is certified.

Thanks in advance :)
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] Robbo.5000:
Haven't updated to the most recent build yet, but for me, on the previous build

Permissive

Not anymore.

Yes
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] theCroh:
Is it advisable to upgrade firmware when there is a newer version (e.g. here https://downloads.akhilnarang.dev/MIUI/raphael/)? On other phones I'm used to using the latest firmware but I'm not sure about this one.
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] baltlevel:
At the last build, I can’t set the melody for the call or the alarm. The settings fly out. Is it just me?
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] kenton4j:
Hi, sometimes the phone gets really really really slow... like everything moves in slow motion ..

I am on the latest build clean flashed. no apps and no mods installed, just Magisk su. What could be the problem ?
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] theCroh:
Thank you for the great work. I'm using this as a DD and I'm loving it.

I'm having a little but annoying problem with the latest build where the FP reader doesn't always activate. It seems to happen the most when the phone wakes up when picking it up. The FP reader icon shows but the brighter light doesn't turn on when I press my finger against the reader. If you have time to look at this, which log would you need?
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] alex9yust:
To be honest, I don’t even know how to approach this problem. I also saw this, I see how LockScreen can appear in different ways (sometimes some functions are not called). so I don’t know yet.

maybe this is due to the transition from AOD to lockscreen, and something happens there later.
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] theCroh:
I haven't found a way to reliably reproduce this either. Isn't it fun to try to debug something that happens "sometimes"...

I'll test to see if disabling pickup and/or pocket wake seems to make any difference. At the moment I've got pocket wake disabled and pickup enabled and I haven't seen the problem but it's only been an hour or two. I'll let you know if I can pinpoint it any further.
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] alex9yust:
I saw this in a build without gapps and plus pico gapps. With nano gapps I do not see this.
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] theCroh:
Disabling both Pick up and Pocket from Ambient display seems to have fixed this for me. I'll test if it reappears if I enable Pick up gesture.
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] theCroh:
I think I came up with at least one way to reliably reproduce this. You need to have Pick up gesture enabled (probably works with Pocket as well but I haven't tested that). Steps to reproduce:

1. Have the device on the table with screen of.

2. Pick it up so that Ambient display turns on.

3. Without doing anything else, press the Power button to show lock screen.

-> The AOD won't light up until you turn the screen of and back on.
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] alex9yust:
thanks. this is the last build 04/10 ?
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] theCroh:
I'm actually on 04/01. I've somehow missed 04/10 build. I'll update and report back.

Edit: I don't seem to be able to reproduce this on the newest build. Sorry about the earlier reports.
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] valentinc22:
I feel necessary to respond to your post, since you and other users misinterpreted what I wanted to say. Of course you don't owe me anything, and neither do I. Since it is a public forum, I thought that I could share my experience regarding the ROM with other users for purely informative reasons, not blaming anyone for anything, just sharing an experience. The post was not adressed to you, since you already stated you wouldn't resolve the mentioned problems (and I see absolutely nothing wrong with that). It seems though that sharing a bad experience in this kind of environment is not very well tolerated and interpreted as very rude and impolite. What I was trying to say was something like "If you want to use this ROM, note that this and that can happen". That does not imply that it is a bad ROM, nor it is a lack of appreciation for your work (at least that's my opinion, you are entitled to yours if different).

I certaintly don't want a perfect build, as probably most of the custom ROMs are not perfect and I'm aware of that. But what I want is completely irrelevant, since you don't have to do what I or other users want, because it is free. The reason for my post was related to the complete crash of the OS, which did not happen to me before. It's a lesson learned, probably it can happen and does happen even more often in other ROMs. To me that was a problem since it happened randomly and not related to flashing a new build (happened a couple of weeks after that). However, I did not pretend to you to fix anything, since that would have been absurd.

I apologize to you if I offended you in any way by saying what I have said. I do appreciate your work and other developers' work very much, belive me ! Stating that I encountered some problems in a polite way does not imply a lack of aprreciation or a lack of respect towards the developer. Keep up the good work, Alex !
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] theincognito:
[MENTION=4206648]alex9yust[/MENTION] Thanks for your hardwork. Will the future builds be Enforcing too? Saw the 4/20 Enforcing build. That's why I am asking :D
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] alex9yust:
This is a test build. a simple update works for me. while others complained that it was not starting. so I don’t know yet.
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] theincognito:
Clean flashed. Booted fine for me. ROM+nano gapps+DFE+Magisk. :D

You said others reported. Is there a group or something that I can join for the ROM? :)
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] theCroh:
I dirty flashed the enforcing build over 04/10 build and it works just fine for me. EEA 11.0.5.0 firmware and encrypted storage.
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] Sumit Samanta:
Anx cam working on enforcing build?
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] alex9yust:
thanks for the feedback.

It was a Russian forum with all custom ROMs ...

and I do not have a testing group and etc
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] theCroh:
I have only taken basic photos. No problems there. I can test it you want to know something specific.
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] xarrismoto:
What vendor use the enforcing build,OSS or Miui?
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] theCroh:
I have MIUI EEA 11.0.5.0 vendor since I have the European variant of the phone.
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] alex9yust:
if this is a problem when switching to portrait mode, then yes I can see it. in stock anx, module for magisk anx.

although if you unload the camera application from memory, start again, switch to the front camera and immediately turn on the portrait, then this also works.
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] alex9yust:
I will not build with oss. you can always look in ROM zip - if there are vendor. * files there, then this build is with oss. I do not have such files.
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] theCroh:
[MENTION=4206648]alex9yust[/MENTION] Have you stopped building altogether or where have the builds gone? All the links in the OP go to a 404 page.
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] baltlevel:
I confirm. 404 error
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] alex9yust:
I wanted to do it differently, but it didn’t work out a bit. sorry.

This is a continuation of previous builds. Selinux - permissive, without built-in vendor.

old build without GAPPS https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ZRNglzXCW-qdfxLiJC3izY06Cplsb2_Z

old build with GAPPS https://drive.google.com/open?id=1WTtgo0FS98WiXV9U6ATM9QADj3br4oOb
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] theCroh:
What happened with the enforcing one? It's working fine for me.
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] alex9yust:
there I ran into a wall. I don’t know yet how to make rules for vendor in ROM without vendor. Although I can build the same as before, without gapps it seems ?, with an error in the camera when switching to a portrait. most likely, tomorrow.

today is Z-build: OSS vendor (need clean flash), selinux enforcing, kernel F1xy mi9fod, with GAPPS. the scanner is not very good. maybe someday there will be an opportunity to fix it.

Z-build with GAPPS https://drive.google.com/open?id=1_04lklx6Mskq7sD-QjAX0RlbOXfVaalz

Z-build without GAPPS https://drive.google.com/open?id=1SbHqBVruF7xcCW1YMIaBVhr2KONh1Wh0
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] alex9yust:
E-build: old build + Selinux enforcing. (this is not entirely correct. for example, a camera error when switching to portrait mode.)

E-build without GAPPS https://drive.google.com/open?id=1a6oBncAmWTjEAJWvVInZWxCGodDQzBvw
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] theCroh:
What advantages does the OSS vendor bring?
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] alex9yust:
advantages - I would say only selinux. the rest is just different.

OSS is the same miui vendor, but not all, and it is more convenient to add other libraries to it.

e.g. https://github.com/markakash/vendor_xiaomi_raphael/commits/ten

and I can’t say it now anymore, I recently compiled an oss-firmware and paid more attention to at least somehow working.
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] st@this:
If i am on official MIUI 11, android 10, do i have to flash ventor ?
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] alex9yust:
no
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] st@this:
Another question that came into my mind.

That means i can go back to stock MIUI by wiping data and system and then just flashing only the recovery ROM of stock MIUI and not the fastboot ROM with the flash tool ?

Because the ventor will be untouched anyway ...
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] alex9yust:
there are two types of builds - with its own vendor and without its own vendor. in the first case, the miui vendor will be overwritten. I would advise returning to miui via fastboot / MiFlash. although flash miu via twrp also works, if the miui firmware has not changed during this time.
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] st@this:
Something that happens with the HAVOC ROM i suppose. Anyway if i try something like this, i will report here if this is a fact or not. Thank you [emoji4]
[Redmi K20 Pro / Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro ROMs, Kernels, Re] alex9yust:
I can’t explain very well in English. but I will try. if you installed miui, then Havoc, then you install the same version of miui through twrp, then nothing bad will happen. only FORMAT DATA-yes.

and if you install Havoc now, and after half a year you try to put the miui through twrp the version that will be at that time, then this can end with a brick. it is better to do it through fastboot / miflash