yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Other SmartWatches] ikerg:
it seems that without root it is not possible to replace the laucnher

You can install new launchers, but once pressing the sleep button it asks for which launche be used.

i have installed an apk called Notification toggle. It allows for creating shortcuts for specific apps into the notification bar.

The problem is that periodically the reset the notifications and you have to install again the apk to restore the shortcuts

i read that for rooting you need a USB magnetic cable with all 4 connectors (not two as the cable that is included with the watch - ony charges)

Here you are the SgLauncher3.apk that i got from my son's watch.

Additionally, on Russian forums, a guy with similar watch (Y95) has another sglauncher in which an app market appers after sweeping to the left (included as well)
[Other SmartWatches] JP073:
With Setracker you can reset the watch back in factory settings. After that the watch shows the clock again.
[Other SmartWatches] dalewinterstein:
Bump.. need to root or install new launcher
[Other SmartWatches] sartoretilee:
Hello

Did somebody found out how to factory reset watches a36e? I can`t access them via mobile nor they react to touch screen. SOS button just restarts them and it freezes with 4G logo screen after boot sound
[Other SmartWatches] dalewinterstein:
you need to use other setracker app either 1 or 2 has option to factory reset... i think the reset option is actually a factory restore..
[Other SmartWatches] Antonycygr:
Setracker device offline

Ηι

I bought the second watch for my child, due to wear of the previous one.

I have inserted a new sim card. I also have it connected to wifi.

when I send an sms message from my cell phone pw,123456,ts# responds normally.

when I send pw,123456,ip,52.28.132.157,8001# does not work ????

resulting in the device offline !!!!

could you help me ?
[Other SmartWatches] bonnydownsben:
Hi guys. Did anyone know how to change the language from Chinese to English? Or where to download a different firmware for this watch.
[Other SmartWatches] Findabayr:
The biggest problem is the firmware. Chinese smart watches for children will not work properly, because they are geared for a different market. I bought my child a smart watch after reading this news https://signalscv.com/2021/09/kore-2-0-watch-review-does-kore-2-0-actually-work-in-the-usa/. I was smart enough to weigh the pros and cons first. I am shocked. The Chinese watch model just killed me, it was in Chinese, it didn't pair with my smartphone and the gps was showing my child was on the other side of the state. Great... Let's say it's the 5G towers fault and you don't know what's going on at all. Right?
[Xiaomi Mi A3 Questions & Answers] Ziink53:
Hi there!

Today have flash into Pixel Experience ROM with TWRP.. to be honest I'm not satisfied at all with this ROM and there are some issues going arround.. I would like to return to the stock ROM (Android One) if its possible..

I've downloaded one ROM from http://c.mi.com/oc/miuidownload/detail?device=1900372 and maybe i can flash it with fastboot but if it not possible probably it will brick..

Its possible to return it to the original/stock ROM? How?..

Please, i will really appreciate your support.

Kind regards!
[Xiaomi Mi A3 Questions & Answers] Lalitchauhan2013:
https://xdaforums.com/mi-a3/how-to/rom-xiaomi-mi-a3-laurelsprout-t3962489

Best way i found and used.
[Xiaomi Mi A3 Questions & Answers] Ziink53:
Hi!

After flashing the device get locked and im not able to unlock it from fastboot..

>fastboot flashing unlock

FAILED (remote: Flashing Unlock is not allowed)

>fastboot flashing unlock_critical

FAILED (remote: Device already : unlocked!)

I dont know how to proceed.. its already bricked? (
[Xiaomi Mi A3 Questions & Answers] _mysiak_:
Sounds like you used "flash_all_lock.bat". Boot up the phone and enable OEM unlocking in developer settings and try to unlock the bootloader in fastboot again.
[Xiaomi Mi A3 Questions & Answers] Ziink53:
Hi! It will not be possible, when i turn on the phone it starts on fastboot only.. not with OS so i can not change any configuration :(
[Xiaomi Mi A3 Questions & Answers] _mysiak_:
Which rom file exactly did you flash?
[Xiaomi Mi A3 Questions & Answers] poran123:
I think when flashing the rom you were in slot b and plus you have locked the bootloader. Now its not possible for you to flash or unlock bootloader, you have to go to service center. I have faced the same problem, and i took to service center and they fixed it. They told me that they had to take out the back panel.
[Shield Android TV Themes and Apps] shollywood:
Anyone have a working app for the Shield as of yet for Apple TV +?

Cheers
[Shield Android TV Themes and Apps] TNation:
Apple TV+ 1.2 apk works but when you go to sign in it requires something from the Fire TV firmware to complete.
[Shield Android TV Themes and Apps] shollywood:
I tried it but it doesn't work.
[Shield Android TV Themes and Apps] TNation:
None work right now... seems most are counting on the release of Sony's APK for it to work.
[Shield Android TV Themes and Apps] korkie:
Hi,

is there still no way to play Apple TV+ Stuff on Android without an iPhone/iPad?

Every newest version from the FireTV won´t work cause i need to install the latest FireTV Firmware ...
[Shield Android TV Themes and Apps] elliwigy:
you can use browser then cast it to nstv or open tv.apple.com in a browser
[Shield Android TV Themes and Apps] TheSwede86:
Sorry for a stupid question and please don't link anything here if it violates any rules:

Where do people find a legit version of the APK?

Thinking about trying this on my Philips Android-TV and if that fails on my Odroid-C4 running Android.

Don't know how kinky sideloading an app is usually i.e. trying the APK for Shield / FireTV wouldn't work on either my TV (pref.) or "HTPC"?

Sorry for hijacking a bit, will do a separate thread if it is required (and allowed).

Best Regards / TheSwede86
[Shield Android TV Themes and Apps] elliwigy:
personally i dont have time to teach the basics on adb sideloading an app.. it should work on shield easily if ur connected to it properly and running the right commands in adb..

theres thousands of guides online about adb and adb install.. the apple tv+ app doesnt work on nstv however at this time so even sideloading the app will not work.. the only method ive used is to use web browser then go to tv.apple.com and play the videos through the web browser
[Shield Android TV Themes and Apps] TheSwede86:
I think you might have misunderstood what I was getting at;

I know how to sideload an app but it was just a general question on how kinky an app developed for a certain device (ex. FireTV / Shield) can be on another device (Philips implementation of Android-TV) etc. since they both are running Android.

My TV running Android-TV hasn't implemented something called "Android Mode Setting API" for instance and that caused some issues with an app (according to the devs).

So I can totally get that even through having the same platform - Android - different hardware can treat it differently depending on different hardware specs or implementations of Android.

However the question as where to find a reputable source of the APK remains, just googling it reveals a lot of different download locations where a lot seems really...sketchy.
[Shield Android TV Themes and Apps] jbl0ggs:
LG 2018 model TVs just got an update that gives them Apple TV app, so may be there is hope for Android TV devices

LG rolls out Apple TV app for select 2018 smart TVs:

https://appleinsider.com/articles/20/08/20/lg-rolls-out-apple-tv-app-for-select-2018-smart-tvs
[Shield Android TV Themes and Apps] My Fault:
Any updates to this? i was about to start a new thread, when i came across this.

I got a free year of Apple TV+ with my iPhone 11 Pro Max for work, and just recently switched from Roku to the Chromecast with Google TV.

My fiancé got into one of the shows and i'd like to sideload the APK, if possible, if there's one that works.
[Shield Android TV Themes and Apps] revanmj:
Well, there is strictly Android TV version now (it was released with software update for some Sony TVs), but it also fails to work on other devices (says software update is required) - Source.
[Android Head-Units] nowakkam:
Hi there guys and girls. I'm pretty much new to this forum, and it felt like this is the right place to ask a question (forgive me if i sound dopey, I'm here dying during my nightshift).

Here is the issue. 2 years ago I bought a non branded head unit form ebay (not stocked anymore). I thought to myself that since its an android - it would be pretty easy to update them if needed. I was wrong. I have seen many threads about other head units (something to do with the MCU being MTCD or something similar), however mine is a bit different - I'm going to try and provide as much details as I have at the moment:

System:

Android version 4.4.4

build: rkpx3-eng 4.4.4 KTU84Q eng.w.20160731.114755 test-keys

Hardware:

4-core RK30board

Device:

model: rkpx3

On the unit itself the things are as follows

CPU: Cortex-A9 QuadCore

GPU3D: Mali-400 MP4

MCU Version: FY_60_C6R_7706_5008_CAN(NULL)

DVD Version: R-86C-096I-NC-NP-1.0-PI2

BT Version: GOCBC8 V1.0

It has no brand names or model numbers on the box, manual, on the unit itself nor even on the mainboard (I took it apart only hoping to find anything on the board itself as there's nothing else).

My questions is - can I possibly install any updated software on this piece of chinese art? I'm happy to provide any other details if needed and I can find them of course, and I would really really appreciate any help.
[Android Head-Units] marchnz:
Suggest simply replacing this old unit with a recent and probably not much better unit, just to get updates which don't usually address any significant bugs.
[Android Head-Units] velocity4:
Yep, it's not a Samsung. The mfg is the one who needs to provide updates and most never ever do. Think of it like a phone, how often do you get a new one of those? Of course most of them do provide updates unlike these units.
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] panosha:
Thank you. I am going to flash.. :)
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] cmonex:
enjoy! you won't imagine how much work it was for me to get this ****er (SSPL) working :D

anyway, this has been tested on radio versions 0.91 and 0.93, I don't think it is radio specific, but if you have some newer radio version (haven't seen any yet) and have trouble with running SSPL or flashing it, let us know.

also, the SSPL screen is black, not tricolour, that's just the way it is. only preproduction diamond had it tricolour.

last note: do not try to use this SSPL to flash anything else other than an SPL file. it explicitly blocks other flashes anyway. SSPL is *never* a good way to flash OS images.
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] naser404:
Thanx a lot guys, awesome work.
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] leofungwai:
Thanks Olinex ;)

i agree to the idea of olipro, it is good to the community ...especially for new comer who had not muc experience in rom flashing

but i think for developer and some experienced user , a unsigned version is neccessary for daily testing like :

1) if i am cooking a rom and wanna flash into the device to had a real test , i need to wait u guys to sign..u guys may busy and wasting unneccessary time for signing some "beta" rom ...example I made a hermes rom before ..which had chinese build in support, i had made more than 5 nbh for my own testing ....:S .. u can imagine if need signed .. i need to bother "olinex" tooo many time

look forward for a developer unsigned ver :)
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] SecureGSM:
@leofungwai.

can't you just sign this HSSPL code with you own certificate before getting this thing on of course if that's the case? should be straight forwar, really..

also, it should allow for flasing genuine firmwares signed by vendors, meaning hardware vendor's certificate is still must be valid.

And if it doesn't then, what happens if device is stucked in bootloader or doesn't boot into OS anymore? that would make difficult for reverting back to original SPL.
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] OliNex:
Surely you're not THAT stupid?
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] motin:
testing now

hi all testing now updating soon
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] rvbcrs:
First of all great work guys!

I am trying to flash my Diamond from a Windows XP machine. I start the RUU and when the progress bar appears it halts at 0% and after some time starts about a connection problem, my diamond is not going in bootloader mode. So I started my Diamond mannualy in 3 color mode and started the RUU again. Again it halts at 0% and is there now for about 5 mins. Can you help me out guys?

RvBCrS
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] Nadavi:
Great!

And thanks for the TEAM!!!

Just installed it.

Worked.

this makes a Hard Reset on the Device.

Now will try to update with a different rom.

Nadavi.
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] SecureGSM:
what is that suppposed to mean? calling someone stupid is already bad but that was my question.

The way I understood, if your SPL code is checking for presence of your certificate "attached" to the NBH, then if the certificate in your SPL code is patched to different certificate, then SPL will not complain about code is not being signed by your certificate anymore. call this stupidity, but I am not going to put something on my device I would not be able to remove with out third party *permission* to do so.

again, I can be wrong. I am not a programmer, but then your explanation is confusing.
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] rvbcrs:
Very strange, if I start the RUU updater with my phone booted in Windows Mobile, it try's to start EnterBootloader.exe but that crashes with an exception window!?!
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] Olipro:
just reset the device and try again. it MUST be done from windows
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] rvbcrs:
Thanks olipro for you response, I rebooted my device and did it again with windows mobile booted, waited for device center connection, and again got the exception on "Enterbootloader.exe" very strange it looks like a .NET exception window.. I have a Dutch Mobile edition, don't know if that matters..
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] Olipro:
yes... patched to a different certificate, therefore, requiring files that you flash to be signed with it.

If you want to get rid of it, you can have a stock HTC SPL signed with it.

Personally I like this because our released ROMs have no SPL in and a dedicated rollback desired for warranty purposes can be used with no chance of mistake
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] cmonex:
you can't, because the SSPL also requires this custom signing to flash the HSPL...

your point is very good about allowing for stock ROMs.

we actually can have a way to do that

though hopefully this won't last long and the unsigned "developer version" will be available to everyone soon. I strongly disagree with the original idea anyway.
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] motin:
same

same here stuck in 0 %
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] Olipro:
did the screen actually go black (i.e. into bootloader)
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] Ronnymes:
WooooooT great job guys!!!!
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] motin:
when you run the new rom from europe then it will boot to the 3 bootolader mode you can see your spl installed and then not mov any more from 0%
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] panosha:
Try this one for now http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=400411
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] sdamion:
I can confirm this hard spl works. thx and keep up the good work. As always
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] tabarda:
Does not work, does not come out of 0% :confused:

We have tried with the two ROM's
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] walshieau:
it does work, what are you trying to do?
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] panosha:
Must be signed !!! :mad:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=400411
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] walshieau:
who cares!!! its free to have it signed by the Team, so stop your crying :rolleyes:
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] cmonex:
what's up?

you are running 1.30.OliNex, yes?

if it's stuck after non successful flash, get mtty and use set 16 0 command to get it to boot the OS again. though, use XP, vista doesn't want to work with diamond SPL..
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] tabarda:
Virtually everything, I think.

SSPL-copied the manual for the device, executed it and it was the ecrão black.

executed the hard-spl and installs well, the problem comes later, because it is a hard-reset.

But then I tried to run the Rom after install the sspl-manual, but leaves the 0%.

I have the start of the device in bootloader and tried to install the ROM, 0%.

Any other suggestion?
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] cmonex:
BTW update... there's a new radio, version 1.00.25, I had walshieau flash that, it works, SSPL still works too. ;)
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] tabarda:
I´m Sorry, it was not install your ROM's.:(

He should be the same to sleep.

Where is this new Radio cmonex?!?!?:cool:
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] terry888_1978:
ths for ur hard work. it's work on my Diamond. Still Waiting for Chs roms.
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] oddball1:
Where can I see that the spl has been changed?
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] Mahmood:
just hold the power button and volume down and the reset button together and then after seconds release the reset button and u will see the three color screen and there u can see the SPL = 1.30. ONilex
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] oddball1:
tHANK YOU!!!
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] Baronic:
So i guess now hardspl works for all roms no matter what radio u're using right?

also, just wanna confirm, hard-spl, will not affect warranty if i flash back to the original official rom right? cuz of the sign/not signed thing, wondering if my warranty provider can detect or not.
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] Mahmood:
no problem and after that just reset and phone will restart again
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] leofungwai:
how to flash the polly ver if i had flashed the olinex ver ????

any solution ???
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] 4d0n1sPB:
Are you planning to release this new Radio ROM?
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] Reason4444:
I'm waiting too...

Is it only radio ?? or Rom (1.37) + Radio (1.00.25) ?
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] walshieau:
in due course yes...
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] naser404:
Carefull what you wish for ;), A diamond has been

donated

, now get us that speedy modified rom plz =)
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] Dracula72:
just suugest

is there a plan of making the hars spl not require signed code after flashing ???
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] mrvanx:
WHY would we want to do that? Signing ROMs makes it far safer all round. If you want something signing its a very quick process anyway :)

By flashing only signed ROMs 99% of users can sleep safely knowing they have a low chance of bricking thier devices.

Developers/Chefs can get stuff signed without any issues, aslong as it is tested before public release.

Surely these points are logical?? If not then i cant help being frustrated when users demand being able to flash code which is not verified as safe!?
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] sub69:
As an enthusiastic amateur, I cook my own ROM's from a "proper" chef's base. As I've mentioned already, I don't really feel comfortable sending my personal ROM's (and all the information contained within them) to anyone else to check/sign.

Even if I did feel happy doing that, I've had long days when I've re-done a ROM 25+ times (usually due to incompetence on my part - sometimes just to try new things out).

I'm willing to bet there are quite a lot of people in a similar situation to myself, and you'd be absolutely inundated with requests to sign ROM's if there are even 50 people like me in the world.

I can absolutely see how the new "OliNex ROM signing model" is a good thing for n00bs and the nervous, but it's not much good for me so I'll quite happily wait for the OliNex unsigned Hard-SPL to come along.
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] SecureGSM:
Right! or just keep it all original and install only legitimate firmware, copyright protected, licenced and and fully pre-tested by channel distributors and Carriers. Why bother?

Same kind of restriction. not only this product is circumventing ODM legitimate restrictions, (I shouldn't mention copyright. of course, why would anyone even bother...) but also provides advanced protection to respectfull handset owner of the phone from inexperienced rom developers. I heard this before. what do they call this in Eastern Europe?

Freedom, me think?

I hope that this is not becoming commonly accepted practice. Let owner decide what to do with the handset. It is owner's choice after all.

P.S. I wonder If I will be banned for this post.

there is very minor difference really between being an ODM "Jailed" and "Olinex "Jailed" .
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] mrvanx:
For showing an opinion? Being argumentative isnt going to help this forum, infact its arguing between members which is showing this forum up as a total playground.

Enjoy.
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] cmonex:
1. I hope that ban idea was a joke

2. there is difference, this cert is more available than HTC one

3. if you had read a bit more carefully, you'd know there WILL BE unsigned version soon.
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] SecureGSM:
my point though:

there is very minor difference really between being an ODM "Jailed" and Olinex "Jailed".

I have raised my voice against new trend / practice while it has not been widely accepted yet.
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] sub69:
Agreed.

I'm sure I said before any devices were released, that the Diamond forums had the potential to be the most n00b filled on XDA-Devs yet, with the most dumb questions and the most ill-feeling. That's only going to start happening in earnest when the Carrier variants are released in large numbers, so we still have that to look forward to...

Didn't expect there to be arguments kicking off this early amongst the more senior members though. I was kind of hoping this would be the nice calm period of Diamond ownership, with everyone getting on nicely!

Anyway, this whole debate will be redundant when the unsigned Hard-SPL is released. What will everyone find to argue about then?

Edit: Without wanting to annoy anyone further, I've looked, but was it ever explained why this approach has been taken with the Diamond's Hard-SPL? A link to a post will do me, I'm not interested in discussing opinions.
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] SecureGSM:
>> 3. if you had read a bit more carefully, you'd know there WILL BE unsigned version soon.

I should HAVE BEEN in a first palce or nothing.

>> 2. there is difference, this cert is more available than HTC one

I totaly agree. it is readily available for Olinex - easy access. anytime any minute.

on request - for others.

What if one would not like to give you binaries? trade secret, etc??
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] demonizator:
Wow, sorry for being noobie and asking dumb questions but not everybody is born with the knowledge like you do. May be you should write it in the rules and register new users only after you put their skills on a test. And give the rest read-only accounts.

:mad:
[Touch Diamond, MDA Compact IV ROM Development] mrvanx:
ok, the flaming and general crap in this thread

STOPS NOW.

Stay ON TOPIC please.