yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 Themes, Apps, and Mods] groovepeppy:
Quite happy with this release but unfortunately until v8 released, still the panorama are crashing. Do you know anything like if we turn off something in the menu will make panorama work?
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 Themes, Apps, and Mods] Lord Sithek:
Sorry, I'm afraid panorama just doesn't work here for mido :( But should work fine on Hypercam Raizen
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 Themes, Apps, and Mods] groovepeppy:
I think what you mean is "doesn't work here on parrot's", and yes i had to put Raizen on my app drawer too now. All previous Hypercam had panorama works beautifully.

Slow motion and Photo Sphere are those which doesn't work for mido right ?

Anyway, thank's for responding ?
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 Themes, Apps, and Mods] Lord Sithek:
I meant that this feature doesn't work for mido in Parrot's cam :cool: As for slow motion and time lapse, I don't know any gcam on which these features work for mido... But they should work on Nokia cam, available in my Google Drive :)
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 Themes, Apps, and Mods] groovepeppy:
I tried the nokia but i prefer to not time lapsing and had only 2 cam in my app drawer LOL

Thank's
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 Themes, Apps, and Mods] markintoshplus:
i can't seem to install some of the apks, those that are named "Camera". I tried uninstalling the stock camera on my phone and it still won't install.
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 Themes, Apps, and Mods] Lord Sithek:
Hmm usually the problem like this is caused by other cam with the same package name, which results in conflict. So you can't install two cameras with the same package name, unless you make a clone of the one of them. Is this the problem in your case?
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 Themes, Apps, and Mods] Lord Sithek:
I made some changes on my GDrive and removed the old stuff. I added a new cam which proved to be fast and stable for mido - PixelCam 1.2, in two versions with different package names. And two xml configs to try (still in testing phase).

Since I bought a new device recently, I'll be for sure less active with testing new cams for mido. But I still follow the Telegram Rn4 chat and I'll try to upload new stuff when something interesting appears. Cheers everybody :highfive:
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 Themes, Apps, and Mods] Lord Sithek:
Hello everybody! Long time since the last post from me, but I'm still active in mido scene! Check the opening post, it was refreshed :) Cheers!
[Samsung Galaxy S10+ Questions & Answers] poczynek:
Saw this come up a LOT on the beta threads.

Thought it best to consolidate it here.

Unsure how to fix it - certainly there are web pages about this suggesting it is because of a modified rooted system however most people aren't rooted so that's now it.

Anyone have a solution that works for all?

FIXED:

Make sure you are on the latest October firmware before installing update.zip.
[Samsung Galaxy S10+ Questions & Answers] kevinireland11:
"How to fix" .... stop messing with your phone ...fixed...
[Samsung Galaxy S10+ Questions & Answers] poczynek:
Well that's helpful - thanks Kevin!

Ok for me i fixed it by updating to the latest firmware - the October one - by Odin.

After that it worked.
[Samsung Galaxy S10+ Questions & Answers] tman23:
Link????! Plz!!
[Samsung Galaxy S10+ Questions & Answers] megaghostgamer:
Although this should be in Q&A because the title is misleading. I know a workaround for this error if you're direly wanting to try the beta like I was. Presumably something small could've triggered this error. From my personal experience, I believe XDA Navbar may have triggered something when I granted it permissions through adb (no I do not have root).

Either way, it's a simple fix just requires a micro sd. Instead of flashing the beta update via adb, move it to a micro sd card and when in recovery, navigate the micro sd and install it through there. I do not know if this will fix it for future updates with adb sideload and all (assuming the update will overwrite any 'modified' files) but, worst case you'll have to either keep pushing updates through sd card or flash stock firmware.

You may want to post this in the OG post so it doesn't get moved because, I have a feeling that this issue might be a little more popular.

Thanks guys and hope this fixes the issue!
[Samsung Galaxy S10+ Questions & Answers] Tstraley28:
I am having the same issue but i dont have any adb permissions enabled on my note 10+. know of any other thread or fix that addresses this?
[Samsung Galaxy S10+ Questions & Answers] JUSTINFISSAA:
does this exact solution also apply to the error code 5?
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Questions and Answers] nattynat05:
Ive been trying to find a root tutorial for the G930TUVSACSG1 for the past month. I've tried many alts but none of them work. if someone could please comment or send me a link to root the above variant? That would greatly be appreciated. thanks.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Questions and Answers] Drunkpilot:
What have you tried so far? Did you try the g930U_REV_9_ENG_ROOT.tar? I'm wondering if that will still work along with s7_Oreo_Nougat_Adb_Advanced_Root_V12.zip. I was just given this phone today and was hoping it had an older version than this "A" version. I don't know if the Samsung Experience version being 9.0 means anything at all. This is the first post I've read on this version.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Questions and Answers] ComLarsic:
After a bit of digging on Google this shows up:

https://xdaforums.com/tmobile-galaxy-s7/how-to/g930tuvs9csc1-root-t3948777

However i am not sure if it's up to date or not
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Questions and Answers] bigalbklyn:
:confused:

---------- Post added at 11:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:45 PM ----------

Follow this guide:

https://xdaforums.com/verizon-s7-edge/how-to/root-s7-s7edge-oreo-nougat-t3819616

Instead of the engineering file in the original OP use this file instead, otherwise follow the instructions exactly as written, step by step.

https://androidfilehost.com/?fid=1899786940962594015

Let me know how you do please.

:) BigAl
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Questions and Answers] nattynat05:
Alright guys, thanks for helping me out, I'll reply later when I test these methods :)
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Questions and Answers] Drunkpilot:
The Eng_Boot.tar that's attached is for the g935. Will that also work for the g930, or is there a different one? Thanks
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Questions and Answers] IJoxer:
Here you go, same uploader.

https://androidfilehost.com/?fid=1899786940962594014
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Questions and Answers] wrigglevision:
In this case, the root thread linked is valid, but G930TUVSACSG1 is U10 and the engboot provided is U9. I happen to also be using SG1 (I should've checked XDA before updating, silly me).

I happen to have the U10 engineering ROM, but none of the tools to modify it like all the previous variants.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Questions and Answers] IJoxer:
Well that's disappointing news, I've been back on stock for a while now and due to the age/usage of the phone, wanted to get rerooted to optimize what I can.

I'm on ACSI1 build though, for the curious, if anybody has any ideas or comes across a method to root, please inform me.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Questions and Answers] Drunkpilot:
I just got my notification for the SI1 update. I don't have much optimism for our rooting future. I am really missing Xposed and the ad blocking capabilities. If I see or hear anything, I'll let you know.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Questions and Answers] Drunkpilot:
I just rooted using this and the eng.boot.tar by BillA which is attached near the end of the thread. It might even be the same eng.boot you had. It's around 22mb in size. https://xdaforums.com/verizon-s7-edge/how-to/root-s7-s7edge-oreo-nougat-t3819616
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Questions and Answers] IJoxer:
I just grabbed another phone two days ago too, but I'll give it a look when I'm bored and feel like geeking out lol.

Appreciate you letting me know!
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Questions and Answers] IJoxer:
Hey, I did receive another S7 (friends give me old phones because they know I love geeking out) and rooted successfully, so I appreciate the info. Secondly, I noticed a new eng bootloader was uploaded to AFH a few weeks ago, the one we used was rev8, this one being rev10, so I'm going to go ahead and start fresh to see if its any improvement. Just thought I'd share the info, return the favor so to speak, in case you're interested in checking it out. :highfive:

I'll follow up if everything was successful.

G930x_QC_ENG_BOOT_BIN_10_U10_REV10.tar

Edit:

Successful
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Questions and Answers] Drunkpilot:
Thanks. I'll check it out. Did you notice any improvement, or were you even rooted long enough with the other?
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Questions and Answers] IJoxer:
Yea, I had rooted with his first few iterations of that thread, which obviously was iffy on whether it was worth having root due to overheating, battery drain, etc etc. The post you mentioned was me wanting to tinker with an extra phone that had been updated beyond what was considered exploitable. And while it's only day 2-3, and not my 'daily driver', I must say, it seems to be considerably more responsive and stable thus far, actually haven't noticed much in terms of drain, lag, or heat like before, so I can definitely recommend it. Obviously, results may very, but following procedure, I flashed stock beforehand, then rooted using instructions to a T, only swapping out the eng boot. Just had a response on the root thread stating he successfully rooted his s7 edge from the latest update (by renaming the eng boot, but honestly, an unnecessary step).

Feel free to let me know how it goes (if you try it out), and good luck! :highfive::good:
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Questions and Answers] Drunkpilot:
I want to give the v10 a try, but I just recently had to reroot due to trying to flash a Dolby Atmos zip that put me into an unrecoverable bootloop. I'm thinking that I'll have to reroot if I flash the eng.boot. I'm too lazy to set up my phone again so soon. Lol. When I do though, I'll let you know.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Questions and Answers] IJoxer:
I feel ya, it becomes a chore at times, but just to update, it's been running smooth as silk for me, again, not my daily driver, but using it frequently enough that I can verify that this has been the smoothest running eng boot setup I've had (and I've had them all). I'm not usually very lucky in that regard, even with the technical know-how to optimize it to it's maximum potential, I'm fairly pleased with it. I dare say it's been comparable to running a standard oem root environment, but I'm hesitant because I'm sure thats when it'll turn around and bite me in the ass lol.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Questions and Answers] Drunkpilot:
I hear ya. I haven't had any overheating issues, lag, or horrible battery drain with the v8 that I got from biila. Can't wait to try v10
[Xiaomi Mi 8 Questions & Answers] gozzaa:
Hi, is there anyone here who succesful flashed mokee rom?

I cant get it to boot and forums of mokee are chinese :)

help would be great
[Xiaomi Mi 8 Questions & Answers] mar.ur:
Just do format data by "yes"(internal memory will be erased) at the end.
[General Questions and Answers] unigego:
I have S7 Exynos with few "problems"

-No water resistant anymore

-Sim holder broken

-Many small scratches on screen and back of the phone

-Battery is 40% of brand new
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] TehPenguin:
Post any comments\questions\suggestions below...
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] maxstegi:
What about a sticky thread for all ROMs?
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] KALI2000:
I think it should remain active, but grouped in a single post under the name olds sticky, so this is easier to locate.

Greetings.:)
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] homa:
Yes, if an [OLD] tag would be added the stickies would be cleaner.

But the best sollution would be for everyone to make fresh ROMs! ;)
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] Tahmaseeb:
agree 100%
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] pjc007:
I voted "Yes", but I'd like to see a rollup sticky for at least a few months after the last update...
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] ultravox:
One more for this option
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] kalimah:
i'm sorry for my ignorance but what is exactly a stiky?
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] no1:
We've got too many stickies at the moment and it's hard to keep track of all the different build numbers, so I think we should have a single sticky post which links to the following wiki page:

http://wiki.xda-developers.com/index.php?pagename=Universal_Cooked_ROMs
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] TehPenguin:
Stickies are those threads that stay at the top of the first page of threads, even if no one posts in them for a while. You will notice they have "Sticky" to the left of their name.

The problem with that Wiki page is that the ROM developers don't update\maintain it

I'll probably have a go at updating it after my exams are over.
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] rdosti:
I have all the respect for Jwrightmcps's ROMS ..thats how I started with Universal Cooked ROMs..however honestly..it would be nice if the cooker let an update if he was working on something or not....

Based on that...if the cooker leaves no update on what he's doing next I think the ROM sticky needs to go...in fact I agree with the [OLD] thread subject update. Its a good idea however better than that would be to open a seperate small subsection (subforum) for each device called Archived ROMs...anything thats over a 6 month timeframe is considered old with the latest technology updates and the fact that new rom's are shooting out (for other devices and brought over here) at the speed of light. We have seen more than 10 devices launched in the span of a year, which is amazing considering a few years ago ...it was quite the opposite...

I personally feel old rom's need to be archived (let people search them out, thats what SEARCH is for, or a subsection forum). It helps in another way. How many times do we see threads asking for "What's the best ROM to use" ... if a ROM is almost bugfree (or has no issues or bug reports since the last 6 months), they stay sticky (even if theres no development for a future rom) - this ensures that its close to stable and is worth STICKY even though its not the "latest thing" (its stable or close to stable).

Removing old rom's isnt the best idea, since it leaves us missing the past history of what the developers did and how far we all got. History should remain an integral part of the forum, however history needs no sticky. The Fast, Furious and the Stablest needs recognition. Obviously the old is gold - saying remains but not for a sticky. The idea of sticky is - GO HERE, IT's Important..historically yes, the old roms are milestones, however you have a search system for that...

Further the fact that you have Wikis for a few developers now, lets them post an update and a link to the past thread - the perfect History book (updated to today). I think that's how we should go further...The latest , stablest roms are setup as sticky OR optionally each developer has his own sticky thread - first post links to HIS/HER WIKI...for tons of information and links to old threads/roms....

I think thats the best way to go..however these are my thoughts based on what I would prefer .... suggestions will vary...but I think I make sense (at least to myself) :rolleyes:
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] rdosti:
Exactly my point...if developers dont update it..they arent very interested or sure about it (or they dont have time). I feel wiki is the way to go. Developers should feel the time (or have a few fans) to fill in the details. Dutty updates his wiki (well he's on vacation so cant blame him on missing the latest if he did)...

I think Wiki makes a lot of sense and you have to start to use it. If we say people dont have the time to use or update wiki...maybe we should drop the wiki...(which wont happen)...the point is...Wiki is definitely a good thing to look at and develop on.
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] beast0898:
Hi all,

I have made a new thread here http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=398647

please can all devs add links to their roms in this thread, please nobody else post anything on this thread to keep it clean. I have requested that the mods remove any posts from this thread that do not contain rom links from Devs.

I have also requested that our old rom thread be released from sticky as I have added links to most of our (Beasty & Laurentius26) Roms in this main thread.

Good point D.

Cheers,

Beasty
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] TehPenguin:
I've stickied your thread, though I would much rather people use the wiki page...
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] beast0898:
Thanks mate,

I'll try and get round to doing the Wiki too, some time soon.

Getting a bit more free time now, time to get "the house in order" before moving on to the Pro.

I agree the Wiki should be done, I also believe a sticky thread for all WM6/WM6.1 Roms is very usefull in this forum though.

When did you become a mod sir?

Cheers,

Beasty
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] TehPenguin:
I became a mod about a week ago - thanks (I think) to our good friend Midget_1990

For the stickies, I think we'll have it that the latest ROMs get stickied and have the wiki\rolled up sticky for all ROMs, current or previous
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] tomal:
Congrets

Congrets, my friend!!

You achieved it but no PARTY...!!! :eek:

cheers
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] oqaab:
I think some old Roms need to be sticky, e.g BL's 2.08.01. That came out long ago, it was stable and perfect and he didn't contributed anything as non-beta since that. Removing the track of such is unfair to the Devs I believe.
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] beast0898:
I have a sticky with a link to all my roms, and hope that other devs will add to that thread a post with all their rom versions and links.

I still prefer my old 2.07.05 FF, I think that was the best I have released, but everyone has their own preferences.

Maybe I will release one more Rom before moving on to Touch Pro, time will tell.

Cheers,

Beasty
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] catch-22:
Hmmm, I see some contradictions already as to the purpose of this thread.

In my opinion I think it should be settled first what thread deserves as sticky. I would say first & foremost to go in is the Wiki, saves us & newbies from doing search for Universal essentials... unlocking, flashing, bootloader upgrade, page pool setup, etc., etc. etc.

A link to all the published ROM's probably organized by owner or by version (WM5, WM6, WM6.1, etc.) can be part of the wiki as well. Another working model is what our new mod & this thread owner TehPenguin is doing: A ROM repository. Point a link to it inside the Wiki and we can have a 'cleaner' forum threads.

Was wondering also why not all 'new' ROM's get stickied irregardless if its not the builder who posted it, any criteria in this matter?

My thoughts shared.
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] oqaab:
Nobel, Sir, Beast! I on behalf of all Uni users do strongly plead to you for giving us one latest super Rom before going on. I believe no matter how much new stuff be released from HTC, Uni is not dying. Simply because there's nothing like it regarding hardware specifications except Shift but that can be used as a phone with much labor thanks to its immense size! So please be kind, as we love you and anything from you i.e your Roms.
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] TehPenguin:
Midget_1990 made a policy to only sticky threads created by the owner of the ROM - so I'm continuing that policy
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] catch-22:
Thanks there for confirming my suspicion that only ROM owner threads get stickied!

But, wondering if rDosti's thread qualifies as a sticky as he is the ROM owner although as he pointed out it was based on TOAS (short for thingonaspring) ROM kitchen?

If I may suggest, posted ROM LINKS by non-owners get stickied as well as an archive just as what The Beast sticky under ROM developers thread. For one, some of those are good if not better than some of those that were stickied before (note: not comparing to the current stickies ...).

I could name a few good deserving ones now almost buried under piles of threads, though it may be debatable but the fact that cooking (what more building) a ROM & sharing it is not an easy task.

Please take note also that those ROM builders may have English language problems that may have prevented them from starting a thread & supporting it by replying to the numerous queries or bug reports. That doesn't mean that their ROM's are bad, it's just that maybe language & communication is a barrier!

Thank's Mod TehPenguin for the attention & would appreciate your or any other Mod's comments or feedback to this post.

Regards,
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] mmazroui:
policy

a policy of retention period should be created and tracking the least accessed rom should be considered.
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] King of Rapture™:
Very well said my friend catch-22! :)

Let us take for example the thread created by Teixeirabmb for WM6 Add-on Cabs. which is right now buried on the fifth page here, which should be a Sticky! :mad:

What a shame!

KOR! :)
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] beast0898:
Hi KOR

You have a point there, Texieramb thread for the cabs should be made sticky.

In the past, Midget's policy was to only sticky on request from the thread owner, and then it was at his discretion as to whether the thread was worthy of being stickied.

When I have a bit more time, I will compile a list of usefull threads and combine all the links into one.

This we way can have one main sticky at the top of the forum, with every nugget of usefull information under one thread.

I will also look at updating the Wiki at some point before my departure from the uni forum, TehPenguin has been doing a great job thus far though.

Will you be joining us with the Touch Pro?

Leo will be moving over to it also, so there will be quite a few great Devs working on some amazing Roms for an amazing device.

I also seem to recall Mamaich telling me he was waiting for Tytn3 too (aka Touch Pro/ Raphael)

Cheers,

Beatsy
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] TehPenguin:
Always feel free to PM me with a thread that you want stickied

With respect to rDosti's ROM, unless he argues his case very well, I won't sticky it - as it is a ROM that was built using a kitchen (ie it is not a unique ROM)

The reason that we don't sticky thread that aren't started by the ROM developer is to ensure that:

The developer has the right\responsibility to announce their own ROMs

People posting in the thread know that the developer is listening

With respect to other developers not on this forum and the roll-up sticky thread, please contact the developer and get their permission to maintain a list of ROMs for them in the roll-up sticky

Again feel free to PM me if you believe that a thread should be stickied