[Wear OS Software and Hacking General] Desmanto:
Thanks for the compliment. It means I really use the app to my own full potential. But for the sake of logic, the one who accuse something should provide the proof first. The burden of proof lies on the one who made the claim. While it maybe normal to suspect such kind of thread explaining certain app, but at least quote my other posts or xda portal comment, try to find something else (outside of this thread) that can support the claim.

Even though I don't have to prove anything to you, I just elaborate here to clarify my position as a user. This way I don't have to explain it everytime. As some users in Automagic forum also mistaken me as the dev, just because I am quite active there. While in fact, I even never know/meet the dev himself in person. He lives in Germany, while I live in Indonesia.

I have been using tasker since 2014, anyone can track my post in the kaskus forum, tasker thread : https://kask.us/hEXs0. If you google my name, the first/second link should be my kaskus profile.

You can see how I also support and help others in tasker too. Automagic has been there since 2011, so why I should use tasker again if I am the dev? If I am the dev, I should be posting about Automagic in every tasker post I made there. In fact, the starting point I post about Automagic is only after I started using it. (check the post date)

Around mid 2017, I switched to Automagic. I was really excited, I share it everywhere, to the point some other tasker users got annoyed too. (ask Mishaal Rahman from xda portal about it)

I compared the experience between Tasker and Automagic. You can read Tasker vs Automagic comparison here : https://automagic4android.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=6809

I even created local thread in kaskus too : https://kask.us/iqTnO

There is a post just to document my process of switching from tasker to Automagic. But the posts in kaskus are using Indonesian informal language, it might be difficult to google translate it.

For this thread, I created it first in kaskus - All about Android Wear : https://www.kaskus.co.id/show_post/...75f/750/memaksimalkan-wearos-dengan-automagic

I take the pictures link, since I don't know why I can't post them directly in xda. If I am the dev and the purpose is to promote my own app, I am so bad at it, that I only create this thread for such a long time interval. I should have spammed the forum with more thread instead.

This thread's purpose is not just for sharing, but the main one is to request other WearOS feature to Automagic's dev, Martin, in the Automagic Forum : https://automagic4android.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=8184

To make such a long request, I feel obliged to give something in return too. I also need to explain the stand point of why I need the features I requested. Hence I created the thread first before making the requests. Why the heck I should request feature to "myself"? Wouldn't it be easier to just announce the new feature directly? Until this post is made (almost 4 months then), none of those requests have been implemented yet. Not even the newer Automagic version released in the playstore. If I am the dev, I am so bad at creating a scenario like this. I should create the request and fulfilled the requests in such a short period to make it seems very responsive.

I can share this thread link to other so they can know the full potential of WearOS, while helping to promote Automagic in indirect way. I want the app I love and benefit from, to get more users, so the dev can continue the work. The same I have been doing for other apps too, example : MiXplorer, which I switched to it around the same time I switched to Automagic. I post it everywhere, in kaskus, xda, also in Automagic forum (you can search my post there). Does that mean I am the dev of MiXplorer too? :D

The other purpose is to document it earlier, so in case Google try to kill WearOS, I already have a lot of reasons to put to their face.

If those above are not enough proof of my position, there are still other ways you can verify. And you should give stronger (counter) proof otherwise. But I just leave it to anyone who read this post.