yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Nokia 6.1 Plus (X6) Questions & Answers] salembream:
So, since I couldn't boot the GSI image of Resurrection Remix rom, I tried to build it using the sources of lineage 16 rom from [MENTION=8154034]Raghu varma[/MENTION] .

but I have got the following error!

any suggestion to fix it ?

make -j 16
============================================
PLATFORM_VERSION_CODENAME=REL
PLATFORM_VERSION=9
TARGET_PRODUCT=lineage_DRG_sprout
TARGET_BUILD_VARIANT=userdebug
TARGET_BUILD_TYPE=release
TARGET_ARCH=arm64
TARGET_ARCH_VARIANT=armv8-a
TARGET_CPU_VARIANT=generic
TARGET_2ND_ARCH=arm
TARGET_2ND_ARCH_VARIANT=armv8-a
TARGET_2ND_CPU_VARIANT=cortex-a73
HOST_ARCH=x86_64
HOST_2ND_ARCH=x86
HOST_OS=linux
HOST_OS_EXTRA=Linux-5.0.0-26-generic-x86_64-Ubuntu-19.04
HOST_CROSS_OS=windows
HOST_CROSS_ARCH=x86
HOST_CROSS_2ND_ARCH=x86_64
HOST_BUILD_TYPE=release
BUILD_ID=PQ3A.190801.002
OUT_DIR=/mnt/d0203a8b-835b-4f36-b1fa-6fe0b3dad217/drg/RR/out
============================================
[1/1] /mnt/d0203a8b-835b-4f36-b1fa-6fe0b3dad217/drg/RR/out/soong/.miniboo...03a8b-835b-4f36-b1fa-6fe0b3dad217/drg/RR/out/soong/.bootstrap/build.ninja
[55/56] glob prebuilts/ndk/cpufeatures.bp
[80/80] /mnt/d0203a8b-835b-4f36-b1fa-6fe0b3dad217/drg/RR/out/soong/.boots...ld /mnt/d0203a8b-835b-4f36-b1fa-6fe0b3dad217/drg/RR/out/soong/build.ninja
FAILED: /mnt/d0203a8b-835b-4f36-b1fa-6fe0b3dad217/drg/RR/out/soong/build.ninja
/mnt/d0203a8b-835b-4f36-b1fa-6fe0b3dad217/drg/RR/out/soong/.bootstrap/bin/soong_build -t -l /mnt/d0203a8b-835b-4f36-b1fa-6fe0b3dad217/drg/RR/out/.module_paths/Android.bp.list -b /mnt/d0203a8b-835b-4f36-b1fa-6fe0b3dad217/drg/RR/out/soong -n /mnt/d0203a8b-835b-4f36-b1fa-6fe0b3dad217/drg/RR/out -d /mnt/d0203a8b-835b-4f36-b1fa-6fe0b3dad217/drg/RR/out/soong/build.ninja.d -o /mnt/d0203a8b-835b-4f36-b1fa-6fe0b3dad217/drg/RR/out/soong/build.ninja Android.bp
error: vendor/rr/build/soong/Android.bp:31:8: module "generated_kernel_includes": cmd: unknown variable '$(KERNEL_MAKE_FLAGS)'
ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
15:31:13 soong bootstrap failed with: exit status 1

#### failed to build some targets (01:18 (mm:ss)) ####
[Nokia 6.1 Plus (X6) Questions & Answers] drizzle123:
How did you resolve this? I am getting the same thing

[1/1] /rom/tb8504/out/soong/.minibootstrap/minibp /rom/tb8504/out/soong/.bootstrap/build.ninja

[55/56] glob prebuilts/ndk/stl.bp

[80/80] /rom/tb8504/out/soong/.bootstrap/bin/soong_build /rom/tb8504/out/soong/build.ninja

FAILED: /rom/tb8504/out/soong/build.ninja

/rom/tb8504/out/soong/.bootstrap/bin/soong_build -t -l /rom/tb8504/out/.module_paths/Android.bp.list -b /rom/tb8504/out/soong -n /rom/tb8504/out -d /rom/tb8504/out/soong/build.ninja.d -o /rom/tb8504/out/soong/build.ninja Android.bp

error: vendor/lineage/build/soong/Android.bp:31:8: module "generated_kernel_includes": cmd: unknown variable '$(KERNEL_MAKE_FLAGS)'

ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.

18:08:14 soong bootstrap failed with: exit status 1
[Huawei P30 Pro Accessories] eng3:
The 40W supercharge adapter that comes with the phone is quite large and bulky. I'd like to find something smaller that is easier to carry around.

Also, does anyone know of a car charger that supports the 40W supercharge?
[Huawei P30 Pro Accessories] jacobtf:
Large and bulky!? The one I've got is like slightly larger than the small iPhone charger, which is very bad.
[Huawei P30 Pro Accessories] eng3:
Apple chargers have always been huge.

My old QC3.0 charger is 20x35x55mm

My huwwei charger is 50x35x60.

So more than double the size.

Ofcourse the huawei can put out more power
[Redmi K20 / Xiaomi Mi 9T Questions & Answers] Zeyar Moe Lwin:
I wanna know xiaomi.eu roms have anti-rollback or not. Because I'm going to flash AOSP roms and even if I wanted to go back to MIUI, I'll only flash xiaomi.eu stables. So pls :o
[Redmi K20 / Xiaomi Mi 9T Questions & Answers] Zeyar Moe Lwin:
It'll help a lot to me :o
[Redmi K20 / Xiaomi Mi 9T Questions & Answers] ralphiiiii:
As far as I know ARB is in the fastboot versions, there is ARB=0 in those ROMs, checked, If you have ARB>0 you'll not be able to flash by MiFlash. However you can flash by TWRP but only upgrade, downgrading in TWRP means you can brick in any time. Of course every single ROM flashing in TWRP require to disable Dm-Verity/ForceEncrypt, to avoid bootloops and problems with encryption after unlocking bootloader.
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] abalanag:
Hi All,

I have Samsung S9 Unlocked T-mobile from US and currently in India. Currently i have Oreo Version.

As all know, it doesnt have VOLTE option enabled which is needed for my sim network for voice calls to go through.

Somewhere i read Pie update will have VOLTE option and hence i am trying to update to Pie update.

I downloaded G960USQS6CSGB firmware for T-mobile, but before upating firmware using Odin, i got doubt if it will stick to T Mobile after update. This will make my phone not usable in India.

I tried to check online, but couldnt get direct answer and hence posting in new thread.

Can someone help clarify if it will lock the mobile to T-Mobile or will the phone be still in unlocked state?

Also i see two CSC files in the firmware folder. CSC and HOME_CSC. Which one to use?

If I should update with some other firmware for being unlocked and yet to get PIE update, please point to required firmware name or links.

Also will updating to PIE update will have VOLTE option ? Kindly confirm.

Thanks in Advance.
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] Youdoofus:
csc will factory reset your phone, home_csc wont

volte wasnt removed from pie, so that shouldnt be an issue

the firmware version you posted has the 6th bootloader revision, im betting here is a 7th available for your phone, but the 6th version should be fine as well

as far as the unlocked state of the phone goes, it shouldnt re-lock, but im paranoid lol. Have you looked into the U1 versions of the phones firmware? Theyre inherently unlocked firmwares and dont have any of that irritating bloatware **** in them
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] abalanag:
Thanks youdoofus the inputs. Say by chance if it gets locked, is there a way to unlock the phone again from here?

may be then i will try to load U1 versions otherwise. Thanks alot.
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] Youdoofus:
if it has no financial obligation to any carrier and the phone locks to that carrier, then the carrier it locked to would be required to release it. I cant imagine how it would lock to t-mob tho
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] joeldf:
Factory unlocked phones stay unlocked, no matter what firmware you flash.

Carrier locked phones that were properly unlocked by the carrier (they provide the code to SIM unlock the phone) will stay unlocked, again, no matter what firmware you flash to it - as long as it's compatible. Flashing the wrong firmware may just brick the phone. But, at least it's still SIM unlocked.

Phones that had some kind of software hack installed to trick the phone into thinking it's unlocked will lose the unlock status when you flash a firmware that also wipes the phone. Then it will come back as carrier locked again, because the hack is gone.

That last case is the only case I know of that will "re-lock" a phone. I've never heard of a carrier unlocked phone spontaneously re-locking under any circumstance.
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] abalanag:
Hi,

Thanks for the details. I tried to flash G960U1UES6CSG4_G960U1OYM6CSG4_XAA firmware. But while loading AP file in ODIN, it gave some error. Couldnt understand what is the error as its in chinese.

Then i loaded G960USQS6CSGB_G960UOYN6CSGB_TMB firmware which i downloaded previously. This got loaded in ODIN without any issues. And i am able to flash to phone. On rebooting, saw that phone moved to Pie version.

But i couldnt find VOLTE option (Enhanced calling) option. Does anyone know which version will enable that option?

Or anyother way to enable that please.

Thanks in advance.
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] Youdoofus:
another user just posted up in another thread that they had a factory cricket phone that got unlocked, he put an at&t sim in it and it installed at&t apps and locked the phone to at&t FWIW

---------- Post added at 02:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:36 PM ----------

if your Odin error messages are in Chinese, youve obtained a modified version. Itll probably work, but youll get that Chinese stuff whenever it needs to tell you anything. I dont know which versions have volte tbh. Sorry man.
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] abalanag:
Thanks youdoofus for trying to help. For me atleast it didnt get locked when i moved to Pie. I will try other methods.

I will try to root the phone for enabling volte, but the methods that i tried didnt work.
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] joeldf:
That's just weird.
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] Youdoofus:
yeah, sort of. The CSC's on these things are weird. Im starting to believe that these new versions of android are just like windows ISOs where they have all the versions compressed into one file and it uses a directory file to tell the firmware which version to install. Im sure a code writing dev can confirm or deny this thought, but at this point its merely a weak theory
[Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Questions & Answers] IvanKurnia:
Hi! I'd like to buy this phone later on this year. Is there any difference on both of the models beside the storage size? Like hardware wise?
[Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Questions & Answers] GuestK00247:
only storage
[Xiaomi Poco F1 Accessories] guadyx:
I have been looking at many forums, websites and even contacted the party involved (Mi Spain) for a while and I am very surprised that it is impossible to buy a Xiaomi charger (fast or not) in an official store, whether physical or online. You are referred to pages such as Amazon, Aliexpress or Pccomponents (this in the case of Mi Spain) but after searching:

- Amazon has higher prices but even in the comments you can read that they are not original, I don't know if they have the 20-digit code or not.

- Aliexpress: out of every 3, 4 are false. It is where I have looked the most and not even those who come in supposedly official boxes (I no longer speak of those that come in plastic bags) have the code.

- Pc components: they do not have directly, so I do not understand that My Spain derives you to them.

On other websites (tuxiaomi, gearbest, etc.) more of the same. Or they don't have or are fake.

I open this thread in case someone is in the same situation as me. In my case I have a Poco F1 that comes with a fast charger but I wanted to buy a "slow" one because I prefer not to use the fast charge.

Thank you
[Xiaomi Poco F1 Accessories] TNSMANI:
I don't know why you face such difficulties while in my country (India), Xiaomi itself directly sells the chargers online and that too at a very reasonable price.

See HERE
[Xiaomi Poco F1 Accessories] guadyx:
Yes. I don't know why in Spain this isn't possible. Besides, I can't buy in Indian website from Spain

Enviado desde mi POCO F1 mediante Tapatalk
[Xiaomi Poco F1 Accessories] POCO F1:
I don't care about official store chargers. When I need slow charge, I just use regular charger that came with my old phone, Philips Xenium W732 in my case.

Отправлено с моего POCO F1 через Tapatalk
[Xiaomi Poco F1 Accessories] aaz03:
The original charger isn't special at all , any 5v-2A charger from a genuine brand would do exactly the same job. Just take any genuine charger from a reputable brand and you're good to go.
[Xiaomi Poco F1 Accessories] UltraSphinx:
The original charger is not soo good, but maybe it was cheaper for them to ship like this.
[Xiaomi Poco F1 Accessories] adydaddy89:
Hey guys I got free charger from Wish Quickcharge 3.0 18W but when I connect to my poco f1 it has some issue.Start charging and after few seconds it stop,and It will continue to charge again.So continuosly charging but keeps disconecting
[Xiaomi Poco F1 Accessories] adydaddy89:
Edit: this is the charger I got
[Xiaomi Poco F1 Accessories] venomyst:
I got same problem too, i think generic china brand quickcharge 3.0 charger will face this issue.
[Samsung Galaxy Tab A series Questions & Answers] RFZ:
Hi,

I'm trying to compile the stock Samsung Kernel for my SM-T280 (Android 5.1.1) because I plan to make some modifications later on. The build currently just stops with no obvious error message I could debug from.

...
In file included from include/soc/sprd/sci_glb_regs.h:169:0,
from drivers/usb/gadget/dwc_otg/usb_hw.c:23:
include/soc/sprd/./chip_x30g/__regs_ap_apb.h:69:0: warning: "BIT_CKG_SOFT_RST" redefined [enabled by default]
#define BIT_CKG_SOFT_RST ( BIT(18) )
^
In file included from include/soc/sprd/sci_glb_regs.h:154:0,
from drivers/usb/gadget/dwc_otg/usb_hw.c:23:
include/soc/sprd/./chip_x30g/__regs_aon_apb_tshark3.h:153:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
#define BIT_CKG_SOFT_RST ( BIT(22) )
^
LD drivers/usb/gadget/dwc_otg/dwc_otg.o
LD drivers/usb/gadget/dwc_otg/built-in.o
LD drivers/usb/gadget/built-in.o
LD drivers/usb/built-in.o
LD drivers/built-in.o

To make things easy to reproduce, I use Docker:

FROM ubuntu:18.04

RUN apt-get -y update \
&& apt-get -y install make gcc python wget abootimg unzip curl \
&& apt-get clean

# Go to https://android.googlesource.com/platform/prebuilts/gcc/linux-x86/arm/arm-eabi-4.8
# Click Branch "master"
# Download [tgz]
COPY arm-eabi-4.8-refs_heads_master.tar.gz /data/arm-eabi.tar.gz

# Go to http://opensource.samsung.com/
# Search "T280XXU0AQA4"
# Download "SM-T280_EUR_LL_Opensource.zip"
COPY SM-T280_EUR_LL_Opensource.zip /data/tools.zip

ENV PATH /usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/data/arm-eabi/bin
ENV ARCH arm
ENV SUBARCH arm
ENV CROSS_COMPILE arm-eabi-

RUN mkdir /data/arm-eabi \
&& mkdir /data/src \
&& tar -xf /data/arm-eabi.tar.gz -C /data/arm-eabi/ \
&& unzip /data/tools.zip -d /data \
&& tar -xf /data/Kernel.tar.gz -C /data/src/ \
&& rm /data/tools.zip \
&& rm /data/arm-eabi.tar.gz \
&& rm /data/Kernel.tar.gz

WORKDIR /data/src

RUN make mrproper \
&& make gtexswifi-dt_defconfig \
&& make -j4 zImage

#RUN abootimg -u /data/boot.img -k /data/src/arch/arm/boot/zImage

The description Samsung provides to compile the kernel is pretty poor. I already tried different toolchains (tag "android-5.1.1_r38" instead of "master") and "ubuntu:16.04" as base image.

https://xdaforums.com/galaxy-tab-a/development/kernel-galaxy-tab-7-0-2016-lte-sm-t285-t3474967 states the Kernel source for SM-T285 provided by Samsung is actually broken... Maybe this one too? I have almost no experience in compiling anything on linux, so I'm stuck for now. (I tried the same with a stock Android Kernel for a Nexus 7 and it worked.)

Help would be appreciated :)
[Samsung Galaxy Tab A series Questions & Answers] RFZ:
Okay... After hours of trying different software packages used in https://github.com/lineage-gtexslte/build_guide/blob/master/Dockerfile , I found that "bc" was missing. Now it compiles :victory:

FROM ubuntu:18.04

RUN apt-get -y update \
&& apt-get -y install make gcc python wget abootimg unzip curl [B][COLOR="DarkRed"]bc[/COLOR][/B] \
&& apt-get clean

# Go to https://android.googlesource.com/platform/prebuilts/gcc/linux-x86/arm/arm-eabi-4.8
# Click Tag "android-5.1.1_r38"
# Download [tgz]
COPY arm-eabi-4.8-26e93f6af47f7bd3a9beb5c102a5f45e19bfa38a.tar.gz /data/arm-eabi.tar.gz

# Go to http://opensource.samsung.com/
# Search "T280XXU0AQA4"
# Download "SM-T280_EUR_LL_Opensource.zip"
COPY SM-T280_EUR_LL_Opensource.zip /data/tools.zip

ENV PATH /usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/data/arm-eabi/bin
ENV ARCH arm
ENV SUBARCH arm
ENV CROSS_COMPILE arm-eabi-

RUN mkdir /data/arm-eabi \
&& mkdir /data/src \
&& tar -xf /data/arm-eabi.tar.gz -C /data/arm-eabi/ \
&& unzip /data/tools.zip -d /data \
&& tar -xf /data/Kernel.tar.gz -C /data/src/ \
&& rm /data/tools.zip \
&& rm /data/arm-eabi.tar.gz \
&& rm /data/Kernel.tar.gz

WORKDIR /data/src

RUN make mrproper \
&& make gtexswifi-dt_defconfig \
&& make -j4 zImage

Edit: Just wanted to let you know that I now also generated a boot.img successfully and it actually booted my recompiled kernel.

To create a boot.img out of zImage I used https://github.com/chiefwigms/degas-mkbootimg/tree/galaxy_tab_a_smt285 and a original boot.img I created from my device using TWRP.

degas-unpackbootimg -i /data/boot.img -o /data/boot
degas-mkbootimg --kernel /data/src/arch/arm/boot/zImage --ramdisk /data/boot/boot.img-ramdisk.gz --cmdline "console=ttyS1,115200n8" --dt /data/boot/boot.img-dt --signature /data/boot/boot.img-signature -o /data/boot-mkbootimg.img
mkT280bootimg -i /data/boot-mkbootimg.img -o /data/boot-mkt280.img

The image created by degas-mkbootimg won't boot. Using mkT280bootimg OR https://github.com/osm0sis/dhtbsign on it will create an image that boots.

I've used TWRP again to flash the image.
[Samsung Galaxy Tab A series Questions & Answers] Baso_1990:
hey bud sorry for bumping up the post...i have sm-t280 and im trying to install it as my car stereo. currently i have problems with otg host with charging at the same time. do you have any solution or advice?
[Honor 10 Questions & Answers] limmyhop:
Hello, My phone (Col L29) is currently softbricked and I can only access fastboot and ERecovery, TWRP when flashed won't boot when using the right process to boot and ERecovery cant download the firmware, I've tried flashing various parts of the stock update firmware to no success, if anyone can help that'd be really good!

Thanks

Andrew
[Honor 10 Questions & Answers] shashank1320:
Could you confirm what have you done before leading to this condition? May be can help
[Honor 10 Questions & Answers] limmyhop:
before it was bricked I was going through the process to install a new OS, i was using twrp bekerly (view 10) and it froze on the splash screen, so after a few minutes i held the power button and after that i couldn't access the recovery whatso ever.

I've tried ERecovery via wifi and OTG (not sure if i set up the folder correctly for otg of if otg just doesn't work), flashing stock recovery, flashing as many things as i could from the UPDATE.APP (do note that i couldnt flash ramdisk as that command was "not allowed" as with many other partitions), i have also tried wiping then flashing (be that through ERecovery or Fastboot).

When I try to access Recovery (rebooting after flashing, removing USB cable and holding Vol +), it goes to the Device is not trusted screen and then to ERecovery if i don't let go of the vol button.

I've softbricked my Moto G4 before but man, this is a ***** in comparison.
[Honor 10 Questions & Answers] shashank1320:
Try to flash the correct twrp via fastboot and should be fine. You may have incorrectly flashed the erecovery to the regular ramdisk_recovery(probably) which may lead to only erecovery and fastboot.

Erecovery doesn't work in most of the cases for many(though i have success rate of over 90%).

Also, flashing cust.img, version.img and vendor.img helps sometime.
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III Windows Mobile ROM De] AllTheWay:
What about SPL 1.56?
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III Windows Mobile ROM De] bengalih:
Link me to it and I will try.
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III Windows Mobile ROM De] AllTheWay:
Ok I would try Jockys HardSPL 1.1
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III Windows Mobile ROM De] kjb86:
Quick question bengalih,

Do you change from portrait to landscape quite often?
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III Windows Mobile ROM De] bengalih:
In terms of normal usage... not really, but I must admit I have been using my Tilt more for messing around with than actually being productive since I got it :)

When testing a new ROM I always do alot of mode switch tests as I like to have a quick swap.

However, for purposes of this test, I didn't switch mode at all.
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III Windows Mobile ROM De] kjb86:
alright, cool thanks.

Earlier this evening I had to reset my phone. It sat in stand by for at least 45 min and i was playing with it, using touchflo, tapping, etc. All was normal.

However, after flipping out the keyboard I noticed that it briefly started to have its freezing moments when flipping back to portrait. So perhaps this could be looked into a little.
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III Windows Mobile ROM De] bengalih:
Well not to get too off topic from the SPL issue, I will say that I have found portrait/landscape mode swapping to be very inconsistent on all ROMS. On the fastest ROMs I have tried the screen rotates in about 1 second (1 mississippi count). On the worst ROMs it is about a 3 mississippi count. However, the fast ROMs will sometimes perform at more of a 1.5-2.0 second interval and the slower ROMs will sometimes perform closer to the 1.5 marks. I don't think this has to do with what i have running etc as I will usually do these test just after a soft reset (giving the phone about 60-120 seconds to finish starting up first). But I'll leave it at that...back to the topic at hand....
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III Windows Mobile ROM De] bengalih:
These are the results of Jocky's 1.1...they are equivalent to HardSPL:

Jockey SPL (SPL-1.1.JockyW)

1588

1588

1558

1588

Average:1580

As far as the other ones you attached... HardSPL is I believe the normal OliPro one which I already tested. JumpSPL is a "soft" SPL and can't actually be flashed permanently. Correct me if I'm wrong.
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III Windows Mobile ROM De] aruppenthal:
As you are I am very sceptical as to how the SPL could have any affect on the OS. However I did read one interesting post in the other thread.

The poster brought up the fact that the SPL loads the OS. If the SPL improperly starts that load out before the .dlls take over it could have an effect on the OS.

So far that is the most logical reason I have heard thus far. I would love to see olipro jocky or one of the other heavy hitters weigh in on the issue.

Till then I think Ill stick with HardSPL.
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III Windows Mobile ROM De] NotATreoFan:
I'm not a fancy-schmancy tester-roony (what? :confused:), but I can state with certainty that my Tilt, which is currently running L26's Diamond v4 ROM, has seen major improvements since flashing to the new HTC 3.28 SPL.

With the L26 v4 ROM in particular, I was experiencing screen lag several times per minute. With the new SPL, it has not happened once!
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III Windows Mobile ROM De] lewcamino:
I am almost positive that a benchmark is not going to show touch screen lag. Also, the improvement does not seam to be quantifiable, but noticeable none the less.
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III Windows Mobile ROM De] Nick Collision:
Fact of the matter is bengalih has been the only one I have seen to try to quantify and qualify the effects (if any) of the newer 6.1 based roms and various SPL's. I applaud his efforts, and further investigation is warranted IMHO.

Frankly, posting one-off reports of success or failure using one SPL or other using one ROM or other pale in comparison to a well documented method and means, which bengalih has at least attempted. Too often this forum relies on "Ok this is what works for me" posts, rather than sytematic efforts to determine what will work for most under such and such conditions. The results should be quantifiable and replicable. Bengalih has attempted that, suggested a process, and is asking for replication or refinement of the procedure. That is what this thread is for IMHO.

You may not like the message, but dont kill the messenger.
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III Windows Mobile ROM De] fitdocsr:
Back to the topic!

I dont post much but on this issue I am totally convinced that the SPL is causing issues. I started having the freezing with the official att rom 1.62 after I had been using other cooked roms and hardSPL. Just yesterday I switched back to the SPL that came with att 1.62 and I havent had a freeze at all. I am dying to hear from Pof, Jockey, Oli anyone of those that know how the SPL really works and perhaps a new version of HardSPL. So let me reiterate, no placebo here, problem solved by reverting to original spl. However I dont like being stuck with official roms.