yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario ROM Development] AldoWeb:
Yeah

Had the same issue.

Replaced the battery ... and now everything is fine.

Now I don't expect 5 days without recharge but at least 2 days.

Along with the new battery I bought an battery charger so now I can use two batteries.

The nice thing is that the old battery is lasting at least as the new one, Maybe because of the charging more regularly and not so frequently and because both batteries never go in usage when they are hot of charge.

Try your thing

Aldo
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario ROM Development] mikey5:
I had the same problem pretty soon after I flashed my ROM for the first time. I would charge to 100% and then browse the Internet or take a call, and the device would reset within a couple of minutes b/c it would think it was out of power. The timing may have been a coincidence; I don't know. I bought an extended battery and everything works fine now.
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario ROM Development] MetalUpYourAss:
I had the exact same problem right after flashing to wm6. I really wonder if it's a coincidence.
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario ROM Development] rknuette:
I ordered a new battery today because I have exactly the same problem. I also apeared after flashing WM6.1 a while ago an became worse with time. Since my battery is 3 years old, it could also just be a battery at its end of life...

Regards,

Rudi
[Samsung Galaxy J5 Questions & Answers] agh620:
hello everyone

I bought a "samsung j5 prime" in October 2017 and its initial operating system was Android 6.0.1

At that time, the only problem with this mobile was the high battery consumption

A few months later, Samsung provided android 7 (nougat) for j5 prime - I updated my phone for a new update in the hope of fixing it high battery usage

but not only did not fix my phone's battery problem, "the hanging - lagging - some times reset" problem was added to it

A few months later, Samsung provided android 8 (oreo) for j5 prime - I updated my phone for a new update in the hope of fixing it "hanging - lagging - some times reset - high battery usage"

But only 50% of the battery problem was solved and hanging and some times reset problem was solved

now i have lagging and delay in performances problems

for example when i want to moving between active apps windows , active app windows will appear with a delay of 2 seconds

or

when I want to use the keyboard, keyboard letters will appear with a 3 second delay

And the handset is very slow and very lagging

I've already factory reset it twice but my problem was not resolved

now i want to downgrade my android oreo to android 6.0.1

but I'm scared

Because I read in some of the forums, After downgrade, there will be problems with mobile

for example "imei null - network problem - frp problem - ringing problem - ..."

what should I do?
[Samsung Galaxy J5 Questions & Answers] garylawwd:
Flash an aosp rom preferably based on android pie as android pie's battery optimization is a hell of a lot better than before and aosp ROMs are light and way faster than samsungs firmware
[Sony XA2 Ultra Questions & Answers] Vlackrs:
Anyone know how to fix the bad flash sync?
[Nokia 3 Questions & Answers] Muhammad Imran khan2:
I have bought a used Nokia 3 device few days ago. Now I decided to flash nougat ROM because of Orio installed. The problem is that when I connect my Nokia 3 device to Windows 7 running PC it doesn't show anything even not charging.

The USB cable is working and I'm charging my device with this. And I used this cable to connect my QMobile with PC.

Hope can I connect and transfer files??
[Google Pixel 3 Questions & Answers] LSDemon:
SO... I did a dumb thing... my friend asked me to install android Q beta on her phone, so I did a sideload.... never checking if it was a verizon phone first... the sideload never errored looked like all was good until the reboot.... operating system corrupt warning... boot to recovery same message... only fastboot with a locked verizon boot loader... did some research looks like I need a firehose... yep.. cant find one... any suggestions or perhaps someone able to help me out?
[Google Pixel 3 Questions & Answers] Syquel:
Did you already try to flash the factory image?

Can be found here: developer.android.com/preview/download#flash (sorry, I cannot post links yet)

First try to flash it without the "-w" flag. If it still does not start, try it with the "-w" flag, but that will delete all data on the phone.

// EDIT if that does not work you might want to head over to the Pixel 3 XL guys here: https://xdaforums.com/pixel-3-xl/how-to/guide-progress-available-t3876849/page10
[Google Pixel 3 Questions & Answers] LSDemon:
I can not flash anything in fastboot due to locked bootloader it always says not permitted. booting recovery or OS always says corrupted with the triangle, recovery does NOT show the android guy, just a warning message. fastboot and qualcomm EDL is all I have available.
[Google Pixel 3 Questions & Answers] bobby janow:
If you are sure that you can't get into recovery I'd suggest getting an RMA for your friend who has been without the device for 4 or 5 days.
[Huawei P30 Pro Questions & Answers] AphroditeJoker:
Hi I recently acquired a brand new P30 pro from China. It is brand new. However, the device fails safetynet check that prevent me from accessing Pokemon Go. Any help would be appreciated.
[Huawei P30 Pro Questions & Answers] trapcoder:
Seems fine here mate
[Huawei P30 Pro Questions & Answers] thetaovertime:
Same issue

I have the same issue with the VOG-AL10 except I updated my EMUI version to 9.1. Im unable to find stock firmware for the VOG-AL10 to downgrade to test if it's what's causing the issue, but I've uninstalled all possible default apps and via appgallery package manager and am still failing SafetyNet Check.
[Huawei P30 Pro Questions & Answers] onslaught86:
You shouldn't have purchased the Chinese versions if you want SafetyNet.

There is no Google, and therefore no SafetyNet on phones intended for sale in Mainland China. This is nothing new. Don't try to save a few bucks by getting a Chinese version unless you know what you're buying and root + Magisk are documented possibilities.
[Huawei P30 Pro Questions & Answers] thetaovertime:
Making baseless assumptions honestly isn't going to help anyone. Fwiw, I didn't have much of a say in the matter so I'm just trying to make the best out of the situation. Here's what I get when I run SafetyNet Check with the latest versions of: Google Play Services, Google Play Store and Google Services Framework. I'm likely just going to wait to see if ppl ever release VOG-AL10 firmwares for download, although I'm not sure if the original stock firmware will even fix the issue.

EDIT: nvm, can't post a picture, but essentially the following checks fail:

APK Package name match

Signing Certificate match

CTS Profile match

Basic Integrity
[Huawei P30 Pro Questions & Answers] deus_ex_yue:
The only way to make it pass safetynet is to get rooted and use magisk as for all phones sold for Mainland China market. There is no other way to get it working (or pay and use Funky Huawei to "unbrand" your phone and change firmware region).

Good luck.
[LG V30 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Developm] painofkidvn:
This rom is very smooth for me. It will be pixel if have now playing feature. Many thanks
[LG V30 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Developm] FcBayernMinga:
Works fine, except the wideangle Cam is not working with gcam.

Maybe you can include Camera ID 2 into Rom settings
[LG V30 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Developm] tech_infinity:
APN has to be manually set up :(
[LG V30 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Developm] biozbalmet:
Wait, how is warranty still valid if u flash this? I thought unlocking the bootloader and flashing custom roms breaks warranty. Or am I missing something lol
[LG V30 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Developm] luffy1105:
Ofc it breaks the warranty ;__;
[LG V30 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Developm] velpoori:
I don't see any new builds created for this ROM for a while, can I expect new updated builds or else this will be the final ROM to be used?
[LG V30 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Developm] tech_infinity:
Be patient the ROM has a version from a couple of weeks back
[LG V30 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Developm] velpoori:
This ROM is doing amazing

Hi,

Thanks for your reply. I liked this ROM as it's the best ROM out there for lg v30. I was wondering if I can get new builds to update. However I will wait few more days for new updates.

Can you provide me a best gcam link for v30?
[LG V30 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Developm] galapagos:
Update for what? It's not like the ROM is from 6 months ago.
[LG V30 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Developm] HueyT:
Search for H930 on Android File Host and you'll get latest PixysOS rom by Luffy :good:
[LG V30 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Developm] mattgyver:
Don't ask for ETAs/updates. Devs have real lives outside of XDA/deving. It's also spammy.
[LG V30 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Developm] luffy1105:
Rom updated to may security patch, check CHANGELOG for more information
[LG V30 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Developm] Benphire:
I Have Been Playing Around With This Rom For A Little While And I Have To Say It Would Be My Favorite Custom Rom For The V30 If It Weren't For This One BIG Problem..... And It Has To Do With Wireless Charging..... It Doesn't Work, My Charging Pad's Say The Phone Is Connected But The Phone Doesn't Show Any Indication That It's Being Charged... If Anyone Can Maybe Help That Would Be Great! :D

My Phone Model: LG V30 US998

Build Version: 05/19/2019
[LG V30 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Developm] HueyT:
Not sure how to fix wireless charging, but do u get cellular data? I can't. Only 2G for calls and text and WiFi on latest 5/19/19. 3/19 worked great for VZW though. No APN either and APN Fix zip didn't help
[LG V30 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Developm] luffy1105:
Try installing Orion kernel in havoc os thread
[LG V30 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Developm] Benphire:
I Didn't At First But After I Followed The APN Fix Guide It Worked Pretty Good For Me! But Maybe That's Because I'm On The T-mobile Network And Not Verizon Wireless But I'm Not Too Sure Sorry :P
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III General] deanjp1:
Is there a way to add sounds to the reminder drop down in the calendar?
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III General] gqstatus0685:
Take a .wav file and drop it into the Windows Folder via File Explorer. I'm sure that's the way.
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III General] deanjp1:
Not correct, as there are other wav files in the windows directory and they are not an option for the pull down.

I'm thinking it may be a registry change somewhere.
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III General] esculapio:
You have to drop it in your root directory and they have to be made with the right recompressor.
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III General] deanjp1:
Not working for me, I'm trying to bring over "Alarm 5" to get in that pulldown window.

I have a copy in the Root, & Windows, no luck.
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III General] porkchop83:
possible to get reminders to vibrate as well?? aparently when ticked on the system also doesnt vibrate
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III General] MACkjam:
Firstly, you must place the wav file in the device\windows directory and it must be correctly encoded to be used as an alarm or reminder.

Secondly, you can only set a reminder sound in Start>Settings>Personal>Sounds & Notifications, where you can also set it to vibrate also if you want. This is how I have mine set up. You cannot set an individual sound for one particular event only, this sets the sound for all reminders.
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III General] deanjp1:
Mack, i have added that change, but I thought maybe the pulldown was more then Remind Me or None.

Seems like they could have just made it a checkbox then rather than a pulldown.

I was hoping for Remind Me, Alarm 5, Dinner Bell, None
[Moto G6 Questions & Answers] chilinux:
Information available on Reddit seem to show that several of Motorola's phones have not had any security patch levels applied since after January. It also seems like as long as the known security issues are just documented as theoretically possible that Lenovo/Motorola seem happy to keep reiterating the same lie that they make security a "top priority" while not actually addressing these problems. It is also frustrating that Motorola seems unwilling to release a version of the Motorola One that is intended to be used in the USA.

It would be nice to have a proof of concept repository similar to Rapid7's metasploit but for the Motorola G-series. Please keep in mind, I am *NOT* talking about violating responsible disclosure. This would not include any unpatched vulnerabilities. Instead, this would be known issues were AOSP has provided fixes to Motorola for over a month and Motorola has selected to still notify it's customers that their device is "up to date" without having addressed the known issues.

I believe only by showing customers what is possible with this exploits can enough pressure be put on Lenovo/Motorola to make "top priority" mean actual action instead of empty posturing.

However, based on my careful reading of the XDA ToS, it seems anything that facilitate the creation of malicious content is not allowed. This seems vaguely worded enough to exclude all proof of concept exploit discussion. But several of the issues left unaddressed by Motorola seem to be fairly easy to exploit. So, is XDA really improving the situation or avoiding transparency in favor of shielding Motorola's poor behavior?

It would be really nice if someone could provide some clarification behind the wording of this ToS and XDA's position on vendors that make security a "top priority" leaving months of patches outside of the scope available to customers if the device is to remain under warranty.
[Moto G6 Questions & Answers] ThisIsRussia:
This is what I already said.

Motorola is just a retarded company.

I don't know in which universe this is acceptable.

Someone needs to sh*t in a bag and address it at Motorola, so they see what they sell.

The G6 was my last Motof**k phone.

F**k Motorola. F**k Lenovo and f**k all the retards which work in this companies.

I hope the company dies and never sells a f**kphone again.
[Moto G6 Questions & Answers] chilinux:
I completely understand your level of frustration ThisIsRussia but please don't get the thread locked.

If I were to mail something to Motorola to make a statement, it would probably be a finger-print reader attached to swiss cheese. They keep using user facing features to give the illusion of security while leaving the rest of the product full of security holes.
[Moto G6 Questions & Answers] ThisIsRussia:
Yeah, sorry I was a little upset because they are always responding with phrases like "soon it will be updated" etc.

Since February. Its May now.

I just don't use Motorola phones anymore and if someone asked me for opinion I didn't recommend Motorola/Lenovo.

They are a bunch of liars. period.
[Moto G6 Questions & Answers] jhaines4:
I picked up the g6 on Fi just to have a cheap phone. I thought it was just the Fi version not getting security updates.. luckily I don't keep financials, etc on. Only good as a glorified phone and music streaming device, but for $99?
[Moto G6 Questions & Answers] madbat99:
Not many budget phones get monthly patches on time. None that are under$150 anyways.
[Moto G6 Questions & Answers] madbat99:
[MENTION=2840471]chilinux[/MENTION]

Relax, you don't need to attack me. I can see you're feeling very hostile.

I didn't say you or anyone should accept it. I said it's common on low end devices. Even low to midrange devices.

I don't care what you paid for it. I have the g6 play and paid $99 for it. And it has been updated to pie with March security patch.

Moto is not great at supplying updates the way they were when they were under Google. Not many companies in China that are shopping phones to other countries are good at it.

It sucks, I was agreeing with you.

So rant at someone else. Geez
[Moto G6 Questions & Answers] chilinux:
I am very sorry you feel personally attacked. I do admit that I have taken a hostile stance but I wasn't trying to attack you.

My point is that I have already heard from users that the issue is not really that bad. It really seems like a demonstration is the only way to change the Lenovo/Motorola business model of leveraging customer misconception. At the same time, the XDA ToS seems to be at odds with using this forum as the method of giving such a demonstration. To me, this means XDA is passively contributing to Motorola's clearly invalid marketing of using product security to protect against unauthorized access.

Allowing remote unauthorized access is very much part of how the Moto G6 functions.
[Moto G6 Questions & Answers] madbat99:
XDA needs to cover their butts. They walk a fine line on many things.

To provide members the most information, useful guides, and general Android knowledge; they do have to remain, for lack of a better term, "neutral".

They allow us access to guides, knowledge, and even files, that allow us to take back some semblance of "ownership" of our devices. And that is despite many OEM, and country, restrictions, regulations, and "ownership", be it proprietary or what have you, that threaten their voice.

We, in turn, try to adhere to their rules to maintain an even keel, so to speak. So as not to make it harder, or impossible, to do the good work they are doing.

That said, this may not be the platform to achieve the ends you seek. Even if others share your view, in part, or otherwise.

Make sense?
[Moto G6 Questions & Answers] chilinux:
I understand what it is you are trying to saying that XDA sees it to their advantage to not rock the boat too much. That doesn't mean it makes sense to me.

Here is how I view how the world works when people don't speak out:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/12/middleeast/khashoggi-phone-malware-intl/index.html

If Motorola wants to specify that security and safety simply is not part of this product, then I can understand them making that part of their *stated* business model. But Lenovo/Motorola has decided they can market a product as preventing authorized access without doing the work required to actually provide that feature. There should be moral and ethical issues raised when knowingly letting a company mislead their customers to that extent.

There should be room someplace on the XDA forum to create a penetration/vulnerability to put customers of Motorola in a better position for informed consent. The idea that the average person can take the April and May 2019 security bulletins and understand what that really means just doesn't work out. They know what the word "critical" means but usually don't know what RCE is and largely take it as being someone else's problem. The level of conflict of interest on the part of Motorola is not made clear.

Instead, the average person still focuses on if when they are going to see the latest Avengers movie. "CVE-2019-2027" means nothing but if you show them April/May gives criminals all of the infinity gems such that at a click of their fingers half of customers of Motorola have their privacy turn to dust, then that is something they can at least understand. Then they can more meaningfully decide if it is reasonable/safe to use that device without leaving airplane mode permanently on.
[Moto G6 Questions & Answers] madbat99:
Nope. Nobody is "honest" in marketing. They would sell nothing. Is it right....? No. Is it going to continue? Of course.

There are places to speak out. This isn't IT. Period.

You want a Google device that updates with every patch, you're gonna have to get a Pixel. Flat out. No company truly cares about you're security. They start companies to make money. The end. Right or wrong. Sorry bro. It is what it is.

Unless a company specifically spelled it out in the laws of the country their marketing in they don't have to do it. They can skirt rules and regulations anyway they possibly can. And they have lawyers to make sure they get around that crap. Marketing gimmicks do not equal legal regulation obedience.

if you have a medium to carry out the plan you intend to, find it and do it. just make sure no consumers are harmed in the process. because then the line has been crossed where you're not helping anyone but hurting people.

companies are going to sell their products at the greatest profitt imaginable and that's just the way things are going to be until some company proves that profits lie somewhere else. There isn't much you or I can do about it.

Again, this is not the medium for you to carry out such a vision. the most we hope to do here is to give users the keys to find a way to pick the lock for themselves. Not a way to circumvent the rules, punish the guilty, or vindicate innocence. There are places for that.

I'm going to bed now because I get up for work early. Good luck dude. hope you feel better in the morning.

how many people in the budget phone range are still using phones that haven't even been updated past kit Kat. Just a bit of a reality check. Up-to-the-minute security patches don't mean much to those who are struggling just to have a device to communicate with.

Infinity gems be damned, level-headed decisions with your device make all the difference in the world
[Moto G6 Questions & Answers] chilinux:
I can not no consumers would ever be harmed by anything I ever released. TeamViewer has been weaponized to performing scams. UPX was weaponized to help hide malware from detection. Cerberus antitheft app for Android has the potential to be weaponized. Magisk can be weaponized for malware to avoid detection on Android. To claim any of those projects is "not helping anyone" is really a stretch.

The security audit PoC suite would be similar to previously publicly released project. It would have a method of install via exploit similar to JailbreakMe and it would provide demonstration on what privileged level access provides similar to Back Orifice 2000. Both of those previous project had the potential to weaponize but also helped customers make a better informed decisions about the products they use.

Just a bit of a reality check, I know a medical doctor that discusses information that should be legally protected under HIPAA in the same room as a Moto G6. When a vendor misrepresents the degree to which unauthorized access to a device's microphone is prevented, then more than just people struggling to communicate are impacted. That level of misplaced trust also means the privacy impact extends beyond just owners of the phone.

It is also a level of mistaken trust that was contributed to by people like Ronald Comstock with the XDA Developers sponsorship team which recommended this phone. It might be possible to make an excuse that at the time the recommendation was made it wasn't known how far behind security updates for the product would go. However, the XDA sponsorship team never posted a retraction and the XDA ToS makes it hard to effectively counter the vendor's misrepresentations of the XDA recommended product.
[Moto G6 Questions & Answers] madbat99:
It can be said that security and privacy are separate issues.

But your insights are well stated.

I remember when a "researcher" seemingly died right before demonstrating how security flaws in insulin pumps could kill a man. (We know who did it Jack) so security is a real concern. And big money will always try to silence what is too expensive to fix. So I get your point. Just goes a little beyond XDA is all I meant. No hard feelings intended, so I hope you didn't take it that way.