yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Huawei MediaPad X2] possessed200:
Bought a pocophone F1, turned it into the pixel 3.
[OnePlus 6T  Questions & Answers] Megadoug13:
Why is every rom in this thread instructing us to dirty flash but then say they won't give support to those that dirty flash. You must wipe the system and data otherwise it's not a clean install and if you do end up trying to clean install any rom you soft brick your device. What is going on with the OnePlus development and why is the source for the roms so incomplete that they can't install without oos being installed first. Kind of defeats the point of having an unlocked bootloader doesn't it?
[OnePlus 6T  Questions & Answers] mine420:
I asked before and only thing I got was vendor and firmware.

That being said most ROMs flash without issue. Omni is the only one I had real issue getting to boot. It is important not boot to system before flashing anything else and to make sure both a/b are flashed proper.
[OnePlus 6T  Questions & Answers] dreinulldrei:
Dirty flash comes from the days where custom kernels would modify system to implement own drivers, e.g. WiFi.

Kernels using Anykernel2 usually don't need this, but don't rely on it. If you dirty flash your current ROM you make sure there are no remnants in system.

But settings present in data could cause issues hence no support for dirtty flashes. To report a bug, wipe, do a clean install and if it's still present, move forward. Hope this helps.
[OnePlus 6T  Questions & Answers] Megadoug13:
Thank you guys for informing me. I couldn't find the reason online I kept getting a run around. Still this sounds like a pain but as long as there's a method to the madness ?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] eabrillos:
Very good rom, nice, smooth, lots of customization and very fast..
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] osk4rin:
How is the battery life?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] willhemmens:
The battery life has been tested on the Lineage 15.1 Telegram group and is so far performing similarly to Los 15.1 from what I can tell, it is built with the same sources, so I guess that makes sense.

TLDR: Good. It is going into deepsleep etc.

I recommend Pie animations and the XDA gesture navigation for no nav bar.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] Nasty_z:
Thanks for building and sharing. Rom is working very well, although a toggle to switch off one of the sim cards would be nice. I'm pretty sure it's eating my battery because I have two sims with one of them not receiving cell reception. I can remove the sim of course but a software toggle would have been nice nonetheless.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] willhemmens:
To be honest, that kinda mod is above my ability, what I've supplied is directly how it comes from AOSP Extended, other than the boot animation. I'll update until Oreo eventually gets forgotten about.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] abtekk:
If there's another ROM with that functionality, you could cherry pick the commits.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] charackthe:
The only thing keeping me away from using this rom is the fear of losing the S-pen to be honest.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] willhemmens:
The S Pen works as a mouse would in AEX, so you do lose some functionality but you can still interact with the device with the S Pen.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] charackthe:
Yes, I flashed it and tested it for myself. I wish there was a way to merge AOSP looks with OneUI features...
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] jayjay1234:
Thanks for this ROM.

Any GCam versions good with this ROM?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] jayjay1234:
This is a great ROM! Everything working so far. Thanks again
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] willhemmens:
Glad it's working for you, regarding Gcam, I've only tested Zoran's donator version and that worked fine.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] hussain1560:
thanks for your efforts

Is this rom For pie or oreo ?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] cylent:
which opengapps do i need? i assume ARM64, 9.0? and the package is whatever i desire?

also, i need native call recording during phone calls. is this option available ? if not how to enable?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] willhemmens:
This is an Oreo ROM.

ARM64, 8.1 then your variant of choice.

Call recording is built in and enabled by default.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] Gabe2014:
Nice , thanks for this Rom , Keep going
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] naimamir:
Tell me about its battery life
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] jayjay1234:
Do you mind sharing that Zoran's version. I've be using iDan's 3.5 fix and it's also working pretty well. Only thing missing from it is front portrait mode.

Thanks
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] willhemmens:
I can't share as it's the donator version and front cam won't work as there is no front camera raw support from Samsung currently.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] kilapro909:
Does this support gestures like on pixel 9 ?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] Nasty_z:
Read please. This is Android 8.1 Oreo. Gestures are on Android 9 Pie.

You can always install apps like fluid gestures to get a similar experience though..
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] Roelander:
Hi.

Is there a way to enable high sensitivity of touch?

I have a thick screen protector and I can't find any setting to do that.

BTW, very nice, smooth Rom.

Thank you.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] willhemmens:
I don't think so, no. Are you actually seeing any issues with sensitivity though?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] Roelander:
Yes.

Its because of the screenglass I am using but It works.

Greetz.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] Carlettodd:
Works perfect thank's!
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] eabrillos:
new update from Synt4x.93 with May security patch, hopefully here too...thanks for the good work.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] willhemmens:
Not yet unfortunately, still waiting on AOSP Extended to pull their fingers out.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] 1sm:
thx for sharing ，Can N960N use this rom？
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] willhemmens:
I don't have an N960N to test, but I don't see why not. There shouldn't be any harm in testing it.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] ChinosanP:
N960N (I am using SKTelecom USIM) Korea Model Works.... (????) But my device have charging problem.... ..

Anything was ok but charging speed is too slow....

fast charging is not working.... not charger/cable problem
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] willhemmens:
Are you just going by what AEX tells you it's charging at? It could be wrong and your device is actually fast charging as normal.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] delahunty:
Thank you so much for the ROM.

I came from a Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 (AEX) + totally micro-g and loved it

When I bought Note 9 I wanted the power but OneUI annoyed the hell out of me and of course had GApps all over it.

Now I can get to work minimizing my contact with Google and fossing the hell out of this device :)
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] elmor0:
What do you use to modify status bar clock & date for this ROM?

Is it possible to have this element as a separate flash-able zip?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] jayjay1234:
I think what you're talking about is built in.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] willhemmens:
Hi all,

Here's the latest update with May Security.

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1HZc5h4a9N-2QXNnadVUCGEIVRWMtc-TQ

Let me know if you have any issues :)
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] eabrillos:
Thanks, now downloading.....
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] dallen5:
Any screenshots?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] willhemmens:
There's a couple on the first post, here's the one showing the latest update. Is there anything specific you'd like to see?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] dallen5:
I didn't see any on the first page but I'll look again
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] willhemmens:
Seems like the first post has reverted to a previous version. I'll get them added back now.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] jayjay1234:
Dirty flash new build and running great all day.

Thanks for the update!
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] ssn:
Thanks for nice ROM. Very, very fast! Smooth like IOS.

So, some problem founds:

1. Can not switch off/on SIM-cards separately (I use dual SIM and SD card). May be it need some utilities?

2. Laggy NFC. Cannot use NFC menu at all.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] dallen5:
I keep getting corrupted Samsung SD card
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] willhemmens:
I think that's probably due to the file system on your SD card.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] dallen5:
I can't format it cause I have too much stuff on it
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] dallen5:
Great room! Just wish I could connect my Galaxy Watch using this rom
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] osk4rin:
I want to try this ROM.

Does SPEN features still available using this ROM.?

Any loss on S-Pen functionality features?

Or is just a mouse pointer.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] dallen5:
​

Just a mouse pointer
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] ChainFires Son:
Rom is incredibly stable for an unofficial build haven't had any issues with it. This is one of my favorite roms :) thanks for the build :D

---------- Post added at 11:30 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:26 AM ----------

You actually can use your watch :) I followed what post #7 did in this thread and it works for me :)

https://xdaforums.com/galaxy-s9/help/galaxy-wearable-app-rooted-phone-help-t3838503
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] willhemmens:
Thanks for the feedback! Most of the thanks should go to Synt4x.93 and the AEX team but it is appreciated.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] piyushmehta24:
Unable to flash any vendor now

Unable to flash any vendor now, it shows cannot flash images to file systems. :(
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] willhemmens:
I've flashed vendors hundreds of times without this issue, what version of TWRP are you using?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] piyushmehta24:
3.3.0 beta

This one

https://mega.nz/#!SFEgEazI!LCH0OzMQPBMOq_uySQ_UPbDSBhw4E2qrMb-3aBVs860
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] willhemmens:
OK, I thought so. My advice would be to use this and nothing other than this unless you want issues like the ones you are facing.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] piyushmehta24:
Any good kernels for this rom?

Any amazing kernel for this amazing rom?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] Vargaset:
Android Auto

I haven't been able to get AA to work. Anyone have any work arounds? I installed the full opengapps version.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] ChainFires Son:
Sorry to ask, but does this rom happen to support the use of the fingerprint sensor on third party apps? I seem to have this issue.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] willhemmens:
I don't see why it wouldn't. Most apps prevent access to the finger print reader when they detect bootloader unlock/root. Have you tried hiding the apps in Magisk? Make sure to reinstall if you've opened the app before hiding it.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] willhemmens:
PM me if you want a new build with the latest security patch.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] Wazza20:
Hello,

Will you release an android pie version of this rom for the note 9 exynos ?

Thanks :D.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] willhemmens:
Hi, there is the potential for that to happen in the future but we will see. It looks like this is the last Oreo update we're going to get from AospExtended.
[Upgrading, Modifying and Unlocking] bommel0815:
hi there!

Whenever I type too fast on my slide out keyboard, it starts dropping letters, especially when a lot of apps are open.

So i guess the keyboard buffer is too small.

on desktop windows you can change this in the registry by altering

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\Kbdclass\Parameters\KeyboardDataQueueSize

unfortunately this key doesnt exist on windows mobile (the Kbdclass service is not there).

so is there a registry key that can be changed or added (haven't found anything. neiter by searching the device registry, nor google) to increase the buffer or is it a hardware thing, or in the keybddr.dll?

thanks a lot

Bernhard
[Oppo Realme 1  Questions & Answers] lordariesv:
I tried to find apps like es file explorer and netflix in play store and it doesn't show those apps and if i try to google that app's link to play store it show my device isn't compatible with this version of app. i tried clearing data and cache and uninstalling updates of google play services but nothing worked and currently i have to download most app's apk.

phone = not rooted

os = color os (i hate this os).
[Oppo Realme 1  Questions & Answers] abhi.s4u:
google removed that apps from playstore..

download them from any other site if u need them
[Oppo Realme 1  Questions & Answers] lordariesv:
i tried downloading from play store on my other phone and it is working correctly.
[Oppo Realme 1  Questions & Answers] abhi.s4u:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.xd...-google-play-es-file-explorer-disappears/amp/
[Moto G4 Questions & Answers] staffanbe:
Used a number of different methods from various sources, most of them on this forum.

Each time a successfully got root on the phone i don't have Wi-Fi ("No Wi-Fi networks available").

I have used the latest twrp for G4, Elemental-G4-3.01 with Magisk-v19.1, SR5-SuperSU-v2.82 and superuser etc.

My latest attempt was following instruction in this thread:

https://xdaforums.com/moto-g4/how-to/guide-how-to-root-moto-g4-magisk-stock-t3725712

When I fail I go back to ATHENE_NPJ25.93 and Wi-Fi works perfect each time.

What should I do?
[Moto G4 Questions & Answers] GuestD2126:
Check this https://xdaforums.com/moto-g4-plus/how-to/guide-g4-baseband-network-volte-issue-t3865608
[Moto G4 Questions & Answers] staffanbe:
Thanks!

I am new to rooting phones so excuse my ignorance.

I am going to connect this phone to a car navigation/entertainment system using USB and via Android Auto (with some patches) "mirror" the phone screen to the car screen.

I don't need to do any calling using this phone, only need wifi.

The post you refer to seems to be related to baseband problems, is it the same kind of problems?

However in the first part of the post it mentions IMEI = 0, which is the case for me, should I go down this route and try to solve this issue (if possible)?

The thing I don't understand is that wifi works fine (with IMEI=0) when flashed to stock but as soon as it's rooted it looses wifi and bluetooth (and possibly other stuff)
[Moto G4 Questions & Answers] geezii:
I'm having the same issue and as this thread is still fresh I figured I would post here, I tried the flash posted above but all it did was trick my g4 into thinking its a g4 plus with no wifi still, I understand that is what its suppose to do and a fix is there for it but right now I'm trying to fix wifi.
[Greenify] xxxmadraxxx:
I originally posted a summary of these thoughts on my Play Store review of Greenify. But, since comments there soon get lost in the traffic, I thought I'd rewrite here.

Greenify seems to get a free pass from pretty much every Android-focussed site as a "must have app". I even saw an article on one site that said all RAM/Battery optimiser apps were a waste of time except for Greenify.

My own findings are a bit less uncritical.

My findings are that Greenify is constantly trying to make internet connections behind your back. I have the excellent AFWall+ installed on all my gadgets and, after I installed Greenify and blocked it from making internet connections, I was having AFWall+ alert me that Greenify was trying to make connections, almost constantly.

I would be doing something on my phone and the alerts from AFWall+ would be popping up continually, telling me that Greenify was trying to connect to one IP address after another. This would literally go on for two or three minutes at a time. It got so distracting that I eventually turned off AFWall+'s alerts for Greenify, just so I could use my phone in peace!

Digging further into AFWall+'s logs I found that, in the couple of months I'd had Greenify installed, it had attempted to make over ten thousand internet connections!

To put that into perspective; during the same time period, the second most tenacious app on my phone, Google's Gboard keyboard [which you'd expect to be spying on you], had made around two thousand attempts to phone home – and the connection figures for all the other apps I'd blocked with AFWall+ were way down in the couple of hundreds.

So, what is Greenify doing, trying to connect to these myriad servers all the time?

Even if you believe it's benign [although I can't see any legitimate reason it should be making ANY online connections at all] you've got to wonder how much the app is saving your battery by shutting down other background processes, when it's pretty much constantly trying to make internet connections itself.

I realise this is just my unverified opinion. I've since uninstalled Greenify from all my devices and so no longer have the AFWall+ logs to back up what I'm saying. And you've got no reason to trust me on this. But, if you've any doubts, feel free to install AFWall+ and try it yourself. You might just get a nasty shock.
[Greenify] Oswald Boelcke:
@xxxmadraxxx I'm a long time user of Greenify in its donation version running on all of our devices and I confirm all of your observations. As you could see by my other own threads, I'm very heavily privacy minded but I continue to use Greenify despite its permanent attempts to "call home" (actually the 1e100.net i.e. Google) because I'm able to fight it. From my perspective, reason are the implemented Google analytics tracker. Certainly, I'd prefer if first no trackers at all were implemented and second no attempts to connect to the internet were made at all. Grenify doesn't require an internet connections for its functionality.

However, as I said I'm able to fight it and I don't want to miss Greenify as it certainly enhances the duration of my battery.

All of our devices still run on custom Nougat ROMs for specific reasons. As far as I see if you're already using Oreo or Pie you wouldn't require Greenify any longer to achieve a better battery duration.

Remark: Malware? Not from my point of view. Spyware? As much as every application that contains trackers or analytics tools but there are a few I trust for the benefit of the developer and the development. As an example: SD Maid and Piwik (now Matomo) (the SD Maid Privacy Statement).

If interested: https://xdaforums.com/android/general/how-enhance-battery-duration-sgs-3-lte-t3478287
[Greenify] xxxmadraxxx:
My problem isn't so much with the fact Greenify phones home per se. I know that most apps do so, or at least try to. My problem with Greenify is the tenacity and persistence with which it tries to phone home. As I said in my previous post, it made over TEN THOUSAND! attempts to phone home in the space of the couple of weeks I had it installed.

With the vast majority of other apps, they'll try a couple of times to phone home, maybe using a couple of different IP addresses and then give up. With Greenify, I would sit there and watch the AFWall+ alerts pop up on screen, one after the other, with a succession of different IP addresses, literally for 2 or 3 minutes continually. Also, as I said previously the only other app I had installed that came anywhere near this level of persistence was Google's GBoard which would regularly try and phone home as I was typing stuff on my phone [you can draw your own conclusions as to what that entails for your privacy!]. But, even then, Gboard only [relatively speaking] made about a fifth of the attempts to connect to the internet that Greenify did.

I uninstalled it because I really couldn't see how whatever small savings in battery juice that Greenify was purportedly giving me by sleeping apps which aren't doing anything much anyway wouldn't be being more than cancelled out by the drain on my battery caused by Greenify spending countless minutes every day, trying to make hundreds of internet connections behind my back.

I haven't noticed any difference whatsoever in battery life, since uninstalling Greenify.
[Greenify] DB126:
It's amazing the conclusions one draws when given a tool. Perhaps Greenify behaves differently on your device than the huge universe of other long time users, some of which share your concerns over excessive outreach. I do not see the aggressive characteristics you and a few others describe - perhaps because I permit *most* analytics to flow unimpeded.

The power saving potential of Greenify and similar tools has depreciated over time given native doze and more aggressive enforcement of app background behaviors via Google policy. That said, Greenify remains an essential tool in my arsenal for performing selective tasks without manual intervention. It certainly is not malware/spyware as your click-bait thread title suggests.