[Device Reviews and Information] Alberto96:
Review

Unboxing

The device comes with a rich accessories set, probably the most complete i have ever seen for a rugged smartphone with a pair of 3.5mm in-ear earphones since, as you may expect, this device comes with a 3.5mm Headphone Jack, a Glass Screen Protector, a Micro-USB to USB A cable, a red Micro-USB Cable and the usual standard 5V/2A USB Charger. No Quick Charge or Mediatek Pump Express is there.

Build Quality and Design

From a materials prospective, the device feels really solid and it is slim enough to be handled quite easily. The only downside i need to report is the SIM-Card Slot, it doesn't look completely flat when closed, probably due to the extra layer of insulation. Still, not having to deal with SIM-Card Tool is handy.

There does not seem to be any issue with third-party cables or headphones since both Micro-USB and 3.5mm Headphone Jack connectors are well-designed. Unfortunately there is no Type-C port.

What makes me mad about this device is the buttons layout. Why would you have the power button on the left side and a camera button on the right side? It is really confusing and out from any standard.

Connectivity and Software

Software-wise the device is actually well-made. It is not 100% stock Android but there are some really interesting and, in my opinion, useful features (no bloatware) that do not impact the experience. This type of customization comes at a cost though, old Security Patches, stuck at October 2018 and no OTA Updates are available yet (last check: 22th of Feb 2019).

The OS is certified and all hardware features seem to be properly recognized.

Wi-Fi Performance is also decent, the device is able to use my internet bandwidth completely with the 5.0GHz Network (802.11n only on this device).

Nothing to complain about its performance, it is really usable considering the low-end quad-core chipset. Here you can see some benchmarks.

Camera

Here you can see some samples shot using the primary rear camera, nothing special as expected, probably also interpolated but i can't be certain since the OS is able to hide all details about the camera sensor model.

Battery

Battery Life is not superb considering the 4000mAh battery (measured ~3910mAh) but this is probably due to the not so power-friendly chipset. An Helio P22 would have been ideal for this device.

Conclusions

Surely enough this is not a perfect smartphone but, considering the previous ones i have seen and/or reviewed, this is the most balanced i have ever reviewed. As long as the lack of a Type-C port + the inverted buttons layout does not bother you, i can easily recommend this device.

NOTE: Be careful with MT6739 devices! Just like what happened with the MT6737 chipset (using MT6737M instead of MT6737), some vendors are using the slowest MT6739 with a max CPU frequency of 1248MHz while others, like the one mentioned in this review, use the better model that goes up to 1495MHz. The difference is really noticeable (also the GPU is downclocked on the worse model) so please make sure to check some real-world screenshots before choosing a device with this chipset.

Overall Rating: 9-

Full-res Images Album: https://imgur.com/a/waXcuBn

Official Product Webpage: http://www.ioutdoor.cc/show_246.html​