yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] royalh:
I have TiB installed with no problem. Is your problem INSTALLING TiB or getting TiB to WORK?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] Chaternet:
After installation, the app doesn't open at all and starts giving force close
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] ghomril:
Go to settings app, look for titanium backup allow storage permission.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] Chaternet:
I've done all the steps that've been in the net, and I'll see the force close message again.

i did the way you said and left
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] francois095:
Thank you for this rom, it's Work very Well

Can i relock my bootloader after this installation and restore my data from twrp?

Thank you
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] jimbomodder:
No you cannot, locking the bootloader should only be done if returning to full stock no root. Been away from Samsung for a while but if you locked bootloader with rooted os it basically bricked your device on LG. You can restore data but probably best done thru titanium backup as will be best option.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] francois095:
Jimbomodder

Its not dangerous to keep the bootloader open about the security?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] ACC18:
If you re lock the bootloader when you have twrp installed or using custom rom (even oneui or outside flash official firmware), your phone will fail to boot and need to flash official one to restore. Also all of your data on internal erased

For security reason, when you take a risk to root or install twrp, of course it needs bootloader unlocked. Then of course it dangerous. But if we are not vip person or business man, I think its not very dangerous
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] ghembuls:
If you rely heavily on apps which require tight security such as banking or payment gateway, it is better to keep your phone as stock. Unlocking bootloader does have security issue, therefore such mentioned apps usually wont be able to function as intended. Some apps which connected to internal office setting also require this kind of security (unroot and unlocked bootloader), other apps also able to detect rooted devices which will deny its service.

Yes, there are ways to hide rooted status, but most recent apps are able to detect modified devices either rooted or unlocked. Think twice before rooting and unlocking your device, especially if your phone will be used to connect to services with high security condition. Unless you have different device for those kind of services, it is better to leave your phone as is.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] francois095:
Thank you to ACC18 and ghembuls for yours replys

I have instaled EdXposed manager, i extend the power menu with Firefds Kit that is ok

Now i search to kill the apps with the return key like in wanam kit in my Sony Xperia Z 2

Its possible?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] HorstiG:
Yes, with GravityBox.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] francois095:
I find busybox for Android Pie not for Android Q, i try this one but that dont work
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] ACC18:
Use busybox from Magick module. Its inside download on Magisk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] kramer04:
If you are rooted with magisk you can use busybox for Android NDK module
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] jimbomodder:
If you truly cared for security you would root in the first place. As long as the patch's are up to date it should not matter.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] royalh:
Try installing the Magisk module "ExSDCard Access Enabler" and grant TiB access to all storage options.

Also, does Magisk show that TiB has Super User permission?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] francois095:
Hello

Can i have the link for download gravitybox android Q, i find only for android Pie et that dont Word

Thank you
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] remusake:
search on google
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] francois095:
Remusake

It's what i do
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] ACC18:
Why your Google is so dumb. https://github.com/GravityBox/GravityBox here. Go to release and this is still beta
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] francois095:
ACC18

I see that many times but where i clic for download busybox android Q beta?

The last one is 9.1.3 android Pie

https://xdaforums.com/xposed/modules/app-gravitybox-v10-0-0-beta-1-android-10-t3974497
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] remusake:
Press on "Releases "
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] Chaternet:
It doesn't show up.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] francois095:
Remusake

Thank you very much you save me, its not easy to find that without help

It's work very well, now i can kill my apps with the return key, i love this rom

Thank you again
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] francois095:
Where il the thanks buttons on XDA

Thank you
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] R77:
Is it possible to put the stock kernel into permissive without flashing a custom kernel?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] _alexndr:
Thread has been updated

, U6FTJ3 (One UI v2.5) DevBase v7.3 (October security patches, changelist 19869079) :cool:

Download ROM:

SM-N960F/DS:

(BL update is not necessary if you are on any Q bootloader already)

NOTE1: If your current bootloader is Pie or older - it is mandatory to update bootloader to Q - otherwise ROM will not boot. Flashing order is not very important, but it is much better to flash ROM as first and then BL - one by one - due to auto reboot command at the end of BL flashing script

NOTE2: Dirty flash over Pie BevBase is also possible without issues, but before you try - I would highly recommend you to set default (stock) theme, set default (stock) icons and temporarily disable all Magisk's modules (or just enable "Magisk Core Only Mode") !!! However, before you report any problem, please try if it occurs also after clean install to let me know if it is related to dirty update or the ROM itself.

NOTE3: If you want to perform clean install with encryption - it is highly recommended to use TWRP 3.2.3.0 (e.g. THIS build) to format /data. More info about bug with TWRP 3.3.1.x - HERE

It seems like above mentioned problem has been solved in the official TWRP 3.3.1-0 for N960F by [MENTION=4658360]corsicanu[/MENTION] (I mean THIS build). If you plan to format /data and perform clean install with DevBase & encryption - please test this recovery & post here the result to let me and other people know that we do not have to use TWRP 3.2.3.x anymore (I will remove my remommendation to use 3.2.3-x in case of encryption scenario). NOTE: I do not have N960F physically, so can't test it myself.

NOTE4: Note that if something will go wrong then you will not be able to restore standard System backup. To avoid problems with restoring backup(s) you need to perform following backups: (1) "System Image" (NOT "System" !!!), (2) "Data (excl. storage)", (3) "Boot", (4) "Baseband", (5) "Vendor Image", (6) "Carrier Configs"
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] 123memo:
after update i have issus the phone keep restart
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] TurricanM3:
Thank you ALEXNDR!

Working fine here.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] costy11:
I updated everything. After reboot, my Bluetooth won't turn on. Tried resetting it all. Then installing last months but it still.wont work. What's wrong with it?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] christis:
There ia a "crash fixer" app for this exact FC problem, lying around in the internet. Does a perfect job as a last resort if anything alse does not work (ie granting permissions etc).

Otherwise, there is a similar to TB app, which is here:

https://xdaforums.com/android/apps-games/app-migrate-custom-rom-migration-tool-t3862763
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] yin67:
I had the same problem, and it was because I was using Bluetooth lib on magisk that was outdated. Updated it did the trick.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] costy11:
I had to wipe system and cache and then a reflash. It is working now. I updated that module too just in case.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] Chaternet:
I backupd my required programs with Titanium Backup and the only way to work with my apps is to use TB in my new ROM. Otherwise, there are many programs to backup and restore.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] moderndaycowboy:
Latest U6FTJ3 is problematic. After a time of idling, apps cannot be opened. if you try to open repeatedly, phone goes to soft reboot. I think there are issues with ram management.

I reverted back to ETHB rom.

also U6FTJ3 rom is the fastest rom so far due to OneUI 2.5.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] francois095:
Hello

I have installed this rom over the last one (dirty flash) without wipe any things and it's work very well, only one thing when i active the bluetooth it does not appear in the status bar buts it's work

Thank you for this rom
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] christis:
Well, your initial question was THIS: "I couldn't install any version of titanium backup, someone from friends with titanium backup worked on this ROM?".

Nevertheless, my answer was two-fold, just in case. The second part was in case you wanted to install another tried and tested solution instead of TB. The first part - the solution I offered you for TB, which apparently is what you need in this case after you explained your situation, is tested by me (and lots of others) on multiple occasions for this ALEXANDR rom (and others), and it works 100%. Do a little Google search and you will find it (if you haven't done so already), since I don't want to post external links about that, in this forum. If it still does not work, do a manual granting of all permissions to TB as well.

Have you tried it before you answered back?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] francois095:
How i can install Viper4android please
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] mafie:
Try this Link
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] _alexndr:
Thread has been updated

, U6FTJ5 (One UI v2.5) DevBase v7.3 (October security patches, changelist 19869079) :cool:

Download ROM:

SM-N960F/DS:

(BL update is not necessary if you are on any Q bootloader already)

NOTE1: If your current bootloader is Pie or older - it is mandatory to update bootloader to Q - otherwise ROM will not boot. Flashing order is not very important, but it is much better to flash ROM as first and then BL - one by one - due to auto reboot command at the end of BL flashing script

NOTE2: If you want to perform clean install with encryption - it is highly recommended to use TWRP 3.2.3.0 (e.g. THIS build) to format /data. More info about bug with TWRP 3.3.1.x - HERE

It seems like above mentioned problem has been solved in the official TWRP 3.3.1-0 for N960F by [MENTION=4658360]corsicanu[/MENTION] (I mean THIS build). If you plan to format /data and perform clean install with DevBase & encryption - please test this recovery & post here the result to let me and other people know that we do not have to use TWRP 3.2.3.x anymore (I will remove my remommendation to use 3.2.3-x in case of encryption scenario). NOTE: I do not have N960F physically, so can't test it myself.

NOTE3: Note that if something will go wrong then you will not be able to restore standard System backup. To avoid problems with restoring backup(s) you need to perform following backups: (1) "System Image" (NOT "System" !!!), (2) "Data (excl. storage)", (3) "Boot", (4) "Baseband", (5) "Vendor Image", (6) "Carrier Configs"
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] brusyev:
Thank you Alexndr. Is bluetooth patcher already included in this ROM?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] Basshrestha:
Need to enable dual sim for sm n960n
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] Gie_86:
Hi.,if i from N960FXXU5ETF5_DevBase_v7.3 before, should i clean instal or just diretly instal without wipe system? Thank you.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] pichai:
Samsung has made restrictions on the N960N ROM, and there is no way to enable dual Sim. I have tried replacing the servic.jar framework and backing up the EFS+ODM partition and then restoring it! Still can't enable Dual Sim! It should only be modified N960F ROM to make it compatible with N960N boot! In this way, you can bypass the limitation of N960N on dual Sim!
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] pichai:
Hello, Alexndr, can you modify N960F to make it compatible with N960N startup?This seems to be the only way to enable dual SIM!
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] _alexndr:
I have started N960x thread & support without having device physically and successfully supported these devices over 2 years - still without device to perform tests (just blindly).

I'm sorry, I have no enough time to make more invasive modification(s) which require to have device physically and/or organize a test group (via Telegram or so...).

Anticipating further questions and requests:

- I do not plan to introduce further, more invasive modifications to the DevBase than the present ones (listed in post #1)

- I do not plan to start support for devices newer than N960x

For more information please read HERE

--------------

ANYWAY - thread has been updated for N960N (Korean) devices: :cool:
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] Basshrestha:
Is this rom has dual sim for SM-N960N?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] Temujin38:
Hi,

I have an issue since I tried to install the last version of the rom. When my phone restart after the flash, it boot very fast, and I dont have the little pop up saying that the apps are updating, it boot directly on my lookscreen. And maybe 30sec after it automaticaly reboot and I dont know why

If someone knows why or can help me
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] _alexndr:
Thread has been updated

, U6FTK1 (One UI v2.5) DevBase v7.3 (November security patches, changelist 19869079) :cool:

Download ROM:

SM-N960F/DS:

(BL update is not necessary if you are on any Q bootloader already)

NOTE1: If your current bootloader is Pie or older - it is mandatory to update bootloader to Q - otherwise ROM will not boot. Flashing order is not very important, but it is much better to flash ROM as first and then BL - one by one - due to auto reboot command at the end of BL flashing script

NOTE2: If you want to perform clean install with encryption - it is highly recommended to use TWRP 3.2.3.0 (e.g. THIS build) to format /data. More info about bug with TWRP 3.3.1.x - HERE

It seems like above mentioned problem has been solved in the official TWRP 3.3.1-0 for N960F by [MENTION=4658360]corsicanu[/MENTION] (I mean THIS build). If you plan to format /data and perform clean install with DevBase & encryption - please test this recovery & post here the result to let me and other people know that we do not have to use TWRP 3.2.3.x anymore (I will remove my remommendation to use 3.2.3-x in case of encryption scenario). NOTE: I do not have N960F physically, so can't test it myself.

NOTE3: Note that if something will go wrong then you will not be able to restore standard System backup. To avoid problems with restoring backup(s) you need to perform following backups: (1) "System Image" (NOT "System" !!!), (2) "Data (excl. storage)", (3) "Boot", (4) "Baseband", (5) "Vendor Image", (6) "Carrier Configs"
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] Clayman_32:
With new update I have problem with Permission controller stop working constantly.

After reinstalling previous firmware and then new all working now ?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] ACC18:
No problem on me. Maybe you install mod or debloat somethings
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] francois095:
I flash that but I am always on security patch october, why?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] ACC18:
Are you use any mod or custom kernel? No problem on me on FTK1 it shows 1 November. Upgrade from FTJ5
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] francois095:
I flash over FTJ5, dirty flash

I flash only the upgradre, i need to flash the full rom?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] francois095:
I do a dirty flash the full rom over FTJ5 with TWRP 3.3.1.0, it's work very nice

Thank you
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] mbader9:
Boot loop

Hello,

Ive a big issue after installing this Rom.

A boot loop whith whatever Rom I'm trying to install with TWRP before the stock recovery and stock firmware flashing still boot looping on Samsung initial logo please help.:(:(

My device is Sm960F/FD
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] ghembuls:
You wrote 930F, but this ROM is for 960F. Is that a typo, or your device is really 930F?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] mbader9:
Yes it's a typo Mine is Note 9

Yes it's a typo Mine is Note 9

I can't even flash stock firmware now the phone is in a boot loop even after falshing stock frimware for KSA Please help.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] @casper:
You said you made this rom without owning the device. I congratulate you and thank you very much. I have a request for you; Can you teach how to make the rom?

I want to learn how. I would appreciate it if you could help. :)
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] ISLF:
Hi there, first thanks for sharing with us this amazing work, I upgraded recently from note 4 in which I had custom ROM as well...

I`d like to root my new note 9 as well, but because I already have the latest OS version, I`d like to know what would I lose and miss if I root and install custom ROM, and would I gain after installing this ROM...I`d appreciate it if you would answer, with no obligation of course...thanks again..
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] EGYLOGGEF:
Can someone pls help me pass safetynet? I'm on the latest (U6FTK1), and everything works fine, but can't get Magisk to pass. Appreciate suggestions. Cheers.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] EGYLOGGEF:
I've tried this mod, but no success. Nothing has changed actually. Anything else I can try? Thank you for the tip though...
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] alfaunits:
Hello. I got a problem with a boot loop, like someone above, after upgrading Pie ALEXNDR ROM to the latest one (flashed BL after installing the ROM).

Anyone had that issue with the latest ROM and solved it?

If I need to wipe data, I would rather ,move back to a backup, provided I can.. (I did back Pie install of ALEXNDR ROM)

EDIT: Ouch... no access to SIM cards after I restored the backup! IMEI unknown. Anyone know how to solve this? I did not find anything online..

I never actually had issues with ALEXNDR ROMs before, this is my 4th device using them.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] _alexndr:
Latest Pie ROM has U4/S4 binary (BL designation). Since you flashed U6/S6 BL & CP you will not be able to use Pie ROM anymore

I warned about that every major BL/CP update, for example here (NOTE 5):

https://xdaforums.com/galaxy-note-9...devbase-v5-9-encryption-t3847061/post81937885

and here (also NOTE 5):

https://xdaforums.com/galaxy-note-9...devbase-v5-9-encryption-t3847061/post83041841

Note that your phone has NOT been bricked or so. Just perform clean install of the latest ROM and everything should back to normal, including IMEI and network connection
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] alfaunits:
^ my understanding was I cannot flash the old CP, but the old ROM would work - indeed, I am sure I did that at least once on some model.

I cannot afford a clean install, I have data that are not transferable.

But I did restore the IMEI by reflashing the latest BL, so I have a working phone.

So, you are saying downgrade to the old backup (now on Q, want to downgrade to P Android backup) will not work??
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] alfaunits:
On a separate note, did I miss something, or is Facebook app supposed to be in the current latest build of the ROM? IIRC, it wasn't before.

Many thanks for your ROMs, BTW! :)
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] Giesama:
After installing the last version I can't enable Bluetooth and can't install magisk. In twrp 3.4.0.0 is all ok at the installation.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] musti1212:
Try older t.w.r.p ?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] _alexndr:
Thread has been updated

, S6FTK3 (One UI v2.5) DevBase v7.3 (December security patches, changelist 19869079) :cool:

Download ROM:

SM-N960F/DS:

(BL update is not necessary if you are on any Q bootloader already)

NOTE1: If your current bootloader is Pie or older - it is mandatory to update bootloader to Q - otherwise ROM will not boot. Flashing order is not very important, but it is much better to flash ROM as first and then BL - one by one - due to auto reboot command at the end of BL flashing script

NOTE2: If you want to perform clean install with encryption - it is highly recommended to use TWRP 3.2.3.0 (e.g. THIS build) to format /data. More info about bug with TWRP 3.3.1.x - HERE

It seems like above mentioned problem has been solved in the official TWRP 3.3.1-0 for N960F by @corsicanu (I mean THIS build). If you plan to format /data and perform clean install with DevBase & encryption - please test this recovery & post here the result to let me and other people know that we do not have to use TWRP 3.2.3.x anymore (I will remove my remommendation to use 3.2.3-x in case of encryption scenario). NOTE: I do not have N960F physically, so can't test it myself.

NOTE3: Note that if something will go wrong then you will not be able to restore standard System backup. To avoid problems with restoring backup(s) you need to perform following backups: (1) "System Image" (NOT "System" !!!), (2) "Data (excl. storage)", (3) "Boot", (4) "Baseband", (5) "Vendor Image", (6) "Carrier Configs"
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] pichai:
N960N also has an update:cowboy:

Samsung Galaxy Note9 (SM-N960N) - LUC - N960NKSU3FTK1 firmware

Fast download latest Samsung Galaxy Note9 firmware SM-N960N from Korea (LG Uplus) with N960NKSU3FTK1 and Android version 10

www.sammobile.com
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] _alexndr:
Thread has been updated for Korean (N960N) variant

, U3FTK1 (One UI v2.5) DevBase v7.3 (December security patches, changelist 20319749) :cool:

Download ROM:

SM-N960N:

(BL update is not necessary if you are on any Q bootloader already)

NOTE: If your current bootloader is Pie or older - it is mandatory to update bootloader to Q - otherwise ROM will not boot. Flashing order is not very important, but it is much better to flash ROM as first and then BL - one by one - due to auto reboot command at the end of BL flashing script
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] singhkamal:
How can i disable Magisk or root properly on android 10 to login in Snapchat.... i tried it with removing Magisk but its not working....can someone help me
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Exynos) ROMs, Kernels, Reco] lezig:
This has to my knowledge nothing to do with the DevBase.

Go to ⚙ settings of the Magik Manager App in your phone and there you will find the option "Hide Magik Manager".

Other option is to go to the Magik thread for help.

Hope this helps

Good luck