yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[OnePlus 5T  Questions & Answers] DoR3M3:
Who you thanking?

This is what I thought, you get into another can of worms by signing your own, which I thought breaks the "Chain of how this process works, that in order to maintain the integrity you have to keep everything original. Otherwise it's just the same thing as unlocking the bootloader, while you can accomplish it, all you did is bypass the security and created another hole...

Signing your own Custom Rom, that's my understanding of how you play this. But OnePlus's ROM, you don't sign someone else's work is what I understand... It's like you said, then you become the OEM, and now OnePlus isn't...

[MENTION=2488090]bihariel[/MENTION], well as optimumpro pointed, he's now becoming the OEM, and I'm no Crypto Geek, but I can't believe it's that easy to do, and now it's back to Original Integrity. The whole point, my understanding is, if you want the Integrity, you have to maintain the original Signatures, it's the "Check" that tells us, what we have...

Put another way, my understanding, you sign someone's else's rom; "You Break The Chain Of Original Integrity"...
[OnePlus 5T  Questions & Answers] optimumpro:
He doesn't become an OEM. Oneplus bootloader apparently allows self-signed certificates, otherwise, the phone won't boot. However, their original certificates are still there, and they have more rights.

My point was: there is not much difference in security between unlocked bootloader and his arrangement: a thief, who doesn't care about his data, would just install stock rom and then do whatever he wants to. Someone, who wants his data, can install self-signed recovery/kernel and do what he can do on a phone with unlocked bootloader.
[OnePlus 5T  Questions & Answers] superatmel:
The asnachan post says:

Remove "Unlocked Bootloader warning" message and that is what has been done.

I do not care about the rest
[OnePlus 5T  Questions & Answers] optimumpro:
My posts were NOT meant to criticize you, but rather to express a view that with this arrangement, you are hardly more secure, than with unlocked bootloader.

In fact, kudos to you for getting rid of the warning message. If I were you, I would post a guide on how users could do it themselves.

Edit: by the way, is it only possible on 5.1.5 firmware?
[OnePlus 5T  Questions & Answers] superatmel:
Thanks for the advice and I'm not upset with your publications

:D
[OnePlus 5T  Questions & Answers] optimumpro:
By the way, it can only be done on 5.1.5 firmware?
[OnePlus 5T  Questions & Answers] superatmel:
I should be able to serve in any version, but I have tested it with 5.1.5
[OnePlus 5T  Questions & Answers] optimumpro:
I installed signed kernel and TWRP and re-locked bootloader. I also re-signed kernel after applying Magisk. The phone boots into my custom rom, and I can get to recovery too, but I still have a warning: your phone has a different operating system. Is there a way to specially sign the rom itself to get rid of the warning?
[OnePlus 5T  Questions & Answers] superatmel:
Send me your kernel refirmed and your recovery twrp for tested

In prívate message

---------- Post added at 10:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:30 PM ----------

what color do you have here?

Orange or yellow

Green No

[ro.boot.verifiedbootstate]: [green]
[OnePlus 5T  Questions & Answers] optimumpro:
I have yellow. And I checked both kernel and TWRP, and the output is 'signature valid'. Had they not been signed, I wouldn't be able to boot in locked bootloader. I have Oneplus 5, but it shouldn't make any difference.
[OnePlus 5T  Questions & Answers] superatmel:
Only he intervened in the forum to explain that if you can remove the warning and put the bootloader in green.

For now I can not explain how
[OnePlus 5T  Questions & Answers] DoR3M3:
[MENTION=5075064]optimumpro[/MENTION] so the risk level is more or less the same as unlocking the bootloader? I'm only concerned we haven't introduced greater risk...

[MENTION=1940625]superatmel[/MENTION] would you please put up a guide as others have asked, helping to show how to do this?

I wonder if this is pretty much it?

https://xdaforums.com/android/software-hacking/signing-boot-images-android-verified-t3600606

Thanks
[OnePlus 5T  Questions & Answers] superatmel:
DoR3M3

I already answered in a previous post to that question

#post 40

The chainfire shape is a way to sign.
[OnePlus 5T  Questions & Answers] optimumpro:
He won't share this. He might help, but only if you send him your TWRP and kernel. So, the only risk is: you are sending your kernel to a stranger. For me, it is unacceptable. :)

Edit: I used Chainfire's files and was able to boot my rom with locked bootloader. I still had a warning, but I don't care about that. I was even able to encrypt, but unfortunately TWRP wasn't able to decrypt, and that's a no go for me.
[OnePlus 5T  Questions & Answers] superatmel:
https://xdaforums.com/oneplus-5/help/signing-boot-recovery-bootloader-locked-t3847765

In these answers he did not seem to take the problem seriously.
[OnePlus 5T  Questions & Answers] xocomaox:
The entire point of this thread was to remove the actual message. I believe only a OnePlus engineer might be able to do this, and I think most people who have tried have given up on it. The closest thing would be to possibly replace the current message with another message that looks exactly like the boot-up OnePlus logo so that you get two of those back-to-back and it would appear the message was gone.

Locking the bootloader doesn't technically remove the message, because the message doesn't display when your bootloader is locked. This is normal. We all know this. What OP is trying to accomplish is to REMOVE THE MESSAGE when you DO have an unlocked bootloader.
[OnePlus 5T  Questions & Answers] superatmel:
I understand, I did not understand when I read the post.

If I remove the message with the bootloader unlocked I could not do it.

I am sorry

Bye
[OnePlus 5T  Questions & Answers] MyStyle0714:
Could it be possible to edit system file or something to achieve this?
[OnePlus 5T  Questions & Answers] optimumpro:
No. I took the problem seriously. But this whole thing looks pretty suspicious:

Initially, you asked a question in another thread pretending to be a noob: "Is it possible to sign one recovery.img (twrp included) or boot.img to be able to block the bootloader and that the warning message does not appear?" https://xdaforums.com/oneplus-5/help/signing-boot-recovery-bootloader-locked-t3847765

Then you posted in this thread claiming you have actually done that, but the only way for users to do that was to send you their kernel and recovery for manipulation (by you). When asked to share your method (if it exists), you said you couldn't do it. I don't know, if anyone actually sent you the files, but that in of itself is pretty dangerous (for them). They are sending their kernel to a stranger knowing that he (you) would be able to unpack and manipulate it.

So, what's the point of your posts on this issue, if you are not sharing the method? Unless of course, you want to implant some kind of an exploit in kernel/recovery?
[OnePlus 5T  Questions & Answers] alexandreruivo:
where did u get that both .img files?
[OnePlus 5T  Questions & Answers] superatmel:
Everything has an explanation.

The first post believes it because I did not know if someone had gotten the start message, it was a question post. If you look at the end I say I think so.

I do not know what suspicious it is to ask for a kernel and a recovery from someone who wants to prove whether it removes the message or not. Do you think it would put malicious code?

That means you do not know me at all.

I've been on Android since 2007 and in Xda since 2011 more or less but not very active. Never put malicious code in anything, that doubt offends.

Neither have I said that the only way is to send me the kernel, I do not care whether they send it to me or not, but sincerely, you do not want to share anything when they demand methods with arrogance.

The question is I went around XDA, I saw the post of remove warning, I wanted to try to do it, it did not cost me much to get it, and I opened a thread in question mode that someone told me good luck. That encouraged me to hang that if it can be removed but then encourages me to undo everything said.

For all this I will not waste time in post explanations for how I act or stop acting in my life.

Have a good day

Please if a moderator were so kind to close the post I would appreciate it and if it is not possible then thank you anyway.
[OnePlus 5T  Questions & Answers] optimumpro:
There was nothing arrogant in any of the responses to your posts. But there was plenty of it in yours. One could be a recognized dev with 100K thank yous, but still no one sane would send him a kernel/recovery for manipulation. That's not how it works.

And the question still remains: you claim to know how to get rid of the boot warning, but you refuse to share the method here. So, if you are not sharing, what's the point of your post? No response is required.

Good luck to you.
[OnePlus 5T  Questions & Answers] kirknado18:
Remove Bootloader Warning OnePlus 5t

What is the point of installing twrp and custom ROMs and magisk etc when we can't even remove this annoying Bootloader unlocked warning telling any would be thief to steal it. Im starting this here forum too see what we can do to change this. I have previously owned at ZTE Axon 7 4gb ram 64gb gold has a Snapdragon 820 in it. Your asking wtf does this have to with the op5t relax I'm getting to that. ZTE phone was amazing for awhile. Custom ROMs, kernels, recoveries etc. When you install custom ROM on unlocked bootloader you get the warning every time you boot up. A couple of devs or more I believe through XDA came up with a bootloader warning remover zip and custom splash images for the Axon 7 and it worked perfectly no more boot warning God I loved that. Now what I would like to do is to find away to modify that very script to work with the op5 and op5t. Basically the warnings are jpegs and the remover zip removes them from the bootloader and replaces it with the splash IMG or modified no splash IMG eliminating the warning completely. Wouldn't it be nice op5 and op5t users to flash custom ROMs and not have to worry about that annoying warning like forever. I will upload the ZTE post about the bootloader remover zip and splash images and see if some devs can't figure out how to modify that script. I know codeworx is one of the op5t maintainers who might be interested in this. I'll post again soon. Let me know who else is interested first thanks.
[OnePlus 5T  Questions & Answers] kirknado18:
The more people with one plus 5t phones we can get interested in this project the better. It will force the developers to do something about it. So everyone interested please chime in with your thoughts on this. I loved it on the Axon 7 and the one plus 5t blows the axon away in ram and storage. Axon 7 still love the front firing speakers though lol. So please share your thoughts I'm trying to get as many oneplus 5and 5t users as I can. So show your love modders what do you think. You love custom ROMs like I do. You like to mess with your device to see what it can do. So do I but the bootloader warning has gots to go. If you'd like to check this out look up remove bootloader warning axon 2017g in chrome read up. I'll get the URL for this soon and it give you an idea of what I'm taking about thank
[OnePlus 5T  Questions & Answers] stankyou:
I'm pretty sure a number of users would want this.. and I get it. It doesn't bother me that much though.

Personally, whenever that splash warning pops up, I just press the power button twice to pause then continue. This cuts the wait time for that warning and phone initiate the actual boot process right away and I'll be on my way.
[OnePlus 5T  Questions & Answers] crakerjac:
This has been discussed before. The warning on the 5/5T isn't an image like it was on older devices. Since it's not an image, it's not a simple replace 'warning image' with another picture. You would need to modify the bootloader to ignore the verity check so the actual warning goes away.

I have seen one person get rid of the warning and that required him to build and sign all of his own packages. Essentially, he re-locked the bootloader and since all of his items were signed (properly) the device would continue to boot.

Edit: Found the post.
[OnePlus 5T  Questions & Answers] jolebaltringue:
I usually don't relock my bootloader and my phone is still as safe as if the bootloader was locked.

All it takes is to have a password protected recovery like OrangeFox (I never understood why Deestroy so stubbornly refuses to implement password protection on TWRP) and to disable usb debugging.

Plus, for the real paranoid like yours truly, remove the adbd binary in system/bin, or set its permissions to 000.

One month ago I bought a Oneplus 5t.

I unlocked its bootloader, rooted it, compiled and installed my own custom ROM etc., and now I have this annoying boot warning.

I watched OP's youtube video and I saw that after relocking he doesn't have any warning message, but I saw as well that he was on Android 8.1.0.

I always sign my ROMs and recoveries so I could safely relock the bootloader, but I read that when one does so on Android 10 one still gets a warning message, just a different one (yellow message, something like : "you have booted a different operating system").

Any one can confirm that?

If that's the case, it means that Android 8's bootloader, or some other .mbn whatever files included in the rom, doesn't include the yellow warning and there might be something doable, but it'd be dangerous since if one screws the bootloader it's hard, if not impossible, to recover.

What are your thoughts about it guys?
[OnePlus 5T  Questions & Answers] amdev0101:
I think if you relock bootloader with custom avb you'll get orange warning, for full disappearance you'll have to have system and boot partitions signed with same keys as firmware, you could also exploit the bootloader like suggested and make it skip the check but this also removes the security, here's an article I found before, it mostly went overhead but understanding principles I think information contained in it could be big help to anyone trying to achieve it https://alephsecurity.com/2018/01/22/qualcomm-edl-1/
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 Questions & Answers] battler624:
Honestly my battery isn't that great, after having almost everything disabled (except bluetooth, wifi and gps on battery saving & aod) I am still losing atleast (lowest screen off discharge rate) a 1.3% with an average of 1.83 over a 10% small test atleast according to battery historation. This is while using greenify along with samsung's own battery optimization.

Over this 10% (from 90 to 80% battery) there were over 40K kernal wakesources here's an image showing the wakesources and wakeup reasons.

I'm trying to point the reason to why this happens and my guess is whats on the title so what are they ?, Userspace wakelocks seem reasonable, the highest being spotify for 4 minutes also here are the device power estimates

I'm not using mobile data btw as I dont have data on my SIM (I use a portable router). I am honestly in a pickle, I have no idea what more I can do except put on powersaving mode and disable the rest but thats absolutely counter-intuitive, my S8+ lasted me 2 days with everything I used enabled.

I'm looking for solutions that dont involve me replacing the phone or resetting at the moment (I dont mind doing the latter at some point but the former is harder to do)
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 Questions & Answers] Jammol:
Okay, so what model device do you have and what is your daily SOT?

What's your carrier?

Do you have good coverage in your area?

What kind of apps do you run?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 Questions & Answers] @rbiter:
Portable router is probably the culprit. LTE is more efficient than WIFI for me and has been since the Note 4 when power envelope tracking was introduced.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 Questions & Answers] battler624:
Exynos 128GB, my max SoT has been 6 hours with everything disabled | Greenified. That was yesterday but after I let the phone die on its own and then charged it back to full its as bad as non-greenified everything enabled. Coverage is good enough (usually good/great), Here are my apps https://pastebin.com/0D7VJGh0 I even deleted some of them and the rest are disabled. Edit: Actually, every customization app here and every store that isn't the playstore has been removed

Doesn't explain why the S8+ was much more efficient, also according battery historian wifi power usage is 0.02%/hr
[Samsung Galaxy Note 9 Questions & Answers] Jammol:
Hmm, I would suggest starting over by wiping and setting up your device without any apps other than the ones that come on it. Use the device for about a day, install one app, use it some more after a full charge, and so on. You can try that to see if you can track down what's going on.
[Galaxy S6 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Niennor77:
Hello all!

This is my first tutorial here, hope to be useful as it was for me. After several attempts and extense research mainly here in XDA I finally achieved to downgrade my SM-G920I from 7.0 to 6.0.1 even with secure boot enabled.

The basics: Using a chilean stock 6.0.1 ROM:

- I've extracted all files from the stock rom and repacked it as 4 files without sboot.bin Instructions here: forum DOT gsmhosting DOT com/vbb/f777/tutorial-create-samsung-4-file-multi-firmware-your-own-100-a-1860706/- I've used a PIT default file for my model and region from here: sammobile dot com/forum/threads/30173-galaxy-S6-G920-pit-files

The instructions are the usual, Using Odin 3.12, flash the files into their respective slots and select the PIT file into PIT tab also. In options disable auto reboot and check re partition.

Download link in progress, but you can DIY with the instructions before.
[Galaxy S6 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Mehar Zain:
downgrade issue can you give me the PIT file for sm-g920f please

also i have issue to back to nougat an error occured hidden.img durinf flashing
[Galaxy S6 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Niennor77:
Have you downloaded a 6.0.1 stock rom for your model and then followed my instructions?

PD: The FRP for your device in on the second link mentioned before.
[Galaxy S6 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] amin44:
There is easier way ,after extracting delete all .bin (aboot cache hidden and something else cant remember)then repack using 7zip to the originat format u will notice that the new archive is bigger it's about 3.6 gb inside there is data,system and some other files flash the new archive with odin and thats all ,worked fine t mobile g920t downgrading from nougat to mm
[Galaxy S6 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Niennor77:
Yes, you are right. Using 7zip is a lot easier.
[Galaxy S6 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] trinityracing:
Will work on Att version G920A with locked bootloader on 7.0? I've been researching 2 days to see about downgrading it 6.0.1 while taking least chances as possible. If answer is yes, when repackaging should I remove md5 extension on all 4 files?

Thanks
[Galaxy S6 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zhadow88:
how you repack to original format with 7zip?

i always get error cheksum when put the file in odin
[Galaxy S6 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] amin44:
Just select the file and compress them using normal compression in options ,maybe the problem is with your version of odin
[Galaxy S6 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] pawelnrg:
https://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=81418691&postcount=29
[Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite Questions & Answers] johncosta:
Hello, is possibile to have a full screen with notch?
[Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite Questions & Answers] VS88:
what do you mean?
[Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite Questions & Answers] AhmedSamyG7:
Youtube

I think he means fullscreen mode when playing YouTube or videos
[Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite Questions & Answers] ncar123:
Someone?
[Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite Questions & Answers] HoangP05:
When i try android pie, i have full screen with notch in YouTube, so im not sure if the official version will have it or not
[Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite Questions & Answers] vlodeck:
You mean the unofficial 9.0 port?
[Shield Android TV Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] SantinoInc:
I'm on the 500GB original Shield TV. Totally stock with the latest update that came out a few days ago (although I had this same issue on the previous version as well)

In a nutshell when I go to the Play Store to install a new app or update app the D/L looks like it's about to update but the indication bar never actually downloads. It just gets stuck there indefinitely. Here are the things I have tried to fix the issue:

- clear cache in Play Store

- clear cache in Play Store Services (or google play services...whatever it's called)

-removed my Google account and logged in again

-uninstalled old version of Play Store

-uninstalled old version of Google Play Services

I have no idea what else I can try short of a complete factory reset (which i really don't want to do)

Any advice would be much appreciated!
[Shield Android TV Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] SantinoInc:
Thanks for all the advice!
[Shield Android TV Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ricflairandy:
Same problem here mate, did you get anywhere with it
[Shield Android TV Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] JeffDC:
Can you download the/an app directly not, through GP Store, and successfully install it?
[Xiaomi Poco F1 Questions & Answers] inrockweareone:
Hi all,

I searched through a lot of forums and video reviews but couldn't see anyone doing a clear review of the quality of sound from the headphone jack.

I'm considering getting the F1 to replace my Axon 7 so wondering if the sound quality will be much worse?

If you can compare it with Axon 7 it would be great.

I knew about the GSMarena test of audio quality but that may not be the same in real life. Also it seems that the phone didn't utilise the Snapdragon 845 chip's audio capability which should be better than older phones.

Thanks
[Xiaomi Poco F1 Questions & Answers] inrockweareone:
Anyone?
[Xiaomi Poco F1 Questions & Answers] n00b_dr0id:
I don't know why people ask this question on every phone's page? IF there is no dedicated hardware used for audio it will should sound same as all SD SOCs. You can try all kinds of fancy software optimisations and equalizers it doesn't matter as long as the audio hardware is the same.

For answering your question in particular, IIRC Axon 7 has dedicated AKM 4490en for processing audio signal which is top notch. So NO Poco or any other phone with SD SOC audio is not even come close in audio quality for that matter. And since we are there take my advice and don't sell that phone(AXON 7). For it's audio capabilities you can take out the sim and can use it as a Android DAP for as long as it can serve you. A simple android DAP sells for quite a bit. I was myself very interested in this phone for audio but since it was not available in my country I went for LG V20 which I sold 2 weeks back.
[Xiaomi Poco F1 Questions & Answers] ffh2303:
I haven't had the pleasure to try the Axon 7 before, but I have used the HTC 10. The amp on this thing is weak,on my IEMs I had to crank it up to around 60-70% to get to my usual volume. Compared to a HTC U11 dongle (with DAC in it) that I have around, the dongle simply sounds better.

With all of that said, the fact that the headphone jack is there is still very much appreciated.
[Xiaomi Poco F1 Questions & Answers] whrynox:
The headphone lacks depth and bass though it can improved through through Mi Sound Enhancer but still won't be somewhere near phones with built-in DAC.

We can hope for upcoming Dolby support soon.
[Xiaomi Poco F1 Questions & Answers] adfds:
I read a lot of threads back when the Poco F1 was released and a lot of people complained about low volume of audio output from headphone jack and low clarity.

It is very hard to compare audio quality if you dont have 2 devices side by side.

So I request people who have the Poco F1 and some other phone like the Redmi Note Pro, Moto, Nokia etc to compare the volume and audio clarity.

If you have MIUI device use the same audio settings.

Can anyone please do this?

Edit: Sorry for double post. Thread was not showing up so I replied here.