yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[LG V30 Questions & Answers] Ainz_Ooal_Gown:
What are the disadvantages? other then on GSI there is not quad dac support
[LG V30 Questions & Answers] ChazzMatt:
We are guaranteed to get Pie, because we are in the Google Enterprise Recommended program. It's coming.

If you are looking for an update time table I posted that a few posts above (quoted below).

With 2018 V40 about to launch, LG is NOT NOT NOT going to give any 2017 flagship PIE before then. It would suck too much publicity and effort from launching the V40. The whole launch and sales push for V40 will go through the Christmas holiday to the New Year. THEN, LG will focus on getting out Pie for "last year's phones".

If you are expecting them to even mention PIE for other phones before V40 launches, you don't know how things work. You need to get a grip and look at reality. ;). Giving older phone current OS "too soon" would make people hold onto older phone or even go buy that phone on eBay/Amazon instead of buying V40 for Christmas.

If they gave official statement when Pie is coming, even then people would not focus on V40. They want people to FORGET about PIE, and buy new V40.

Here's your timetable:

These tech reporters below also think Q1 2019 for V30/V30+ -- but they think the V30S will get PIE in Q4 2018:

LG Android 9 Pie update: Expected release date and device list

https://www.theandroidsoul.com/lg-android-9-pie-update/

I disagree, but we'll see.
[LG V30 Questions & Answers] saintsimon:
https://www.androidpolice.com/2018/09/08/change-android-9-pie/
[LG V30 Questions & Answers] Emu:
I want the AI features such as the adaptive battery, the better menus and DNS over TLS so I can switch to Cloudfare DNS without using the VPN feature. I can't wait for the Pie update.

I'm actually very bothered by this if LG really plans to move Android Pie release to somewhere next summer. If they do, they might as well give us Android 9.1. I won't want 9.0 by then anymore.
[LG V30 Questions & Answers] captivatedd:
LG V-30 updates

LG makes the Pixel, nonsense for LG V-30 users to be the last in line for Pie. I got OTA updates via AT&T just now, still at 8.0.0

Kernel Version

4.4.78

Build No.

OPR1.170623.026

Software version

H93120f

Security Software Version

MDF v3.1 Release 2.0
[LG V30 Questions & Answers] Murbert:
LG has never been good about releasing updates promptly. They do make fairly stable and bug free software though. Why would you expect them to change this now? Pixel phones have nothing to do with LG software, it's a useless comparison.
[LG V30 Questions & Answers] JsteedXDA:
The LG V40 is officially announced and it's not even releasing with Android P. What a disappointment! Hopefully this will change once the retail units are out...
[LG V30 Questions & Answers] ChazzMatt:
I think you meant the V40 being officially announced...
[LG V30 Questions & Answers] SGCMarkus:
Did you really think LG would manage such a wonder like with the V20?
[LG V30 Questions & Answers] JsteedXDA:
Honestly, I thought they would've...
[LG V30 Questions & Answers] Raistlen0:
"LG V30 Android Pie release date

Expected release date: Q1 2019

LG G7 should be receiving it first

V30 Pie update could take a month after it is out for G7

LG V30/V30+	Current OS	Android 9 Pie

AT&T	Android 8.0	Expected (early 2019)

Sprint	Android 8.0	Expected (early 2019)

T-Mobile	Android 8.0	Expected (early 2019)

Verizon	Android 8.0	Expected (early 2019)

U.S. Unlocked	Android 8.0	Expected (early 2019) "

https://www.theandroidsoul.com/lg-v30-update/
[LG V30 Questions & Answers] josemedina1983:
I personally think is better to wait months until most bugs are fixed. People are complaining about the Pixel 3 having bugs etc. Plus Android updates are so meh now and days I don't mind the wait.
[LG V30 Questions & Answers] ChazzMatt:
It's funny they're slapping a new date on an old article. ;) In this article they talk about how the G7 will receive Pie first. So, you can tell this article was written before LG 40 was released -- because it was speculated back in August that the LG V40 would have Pie, but it doesn't. I read this article a month or two ago. But now they have an October 17th, 2018 date on it? :rolleyes: The LG V40 (most recent phone) will receive Pie first, then the V35, then the G7, then the V30 variants.

In this old article with a new date, they also say LG V30 will receive Oreo 8.1! Nah, that's not going to happen. Because then Pie wouldn't come until end of 2019! It takes MONTHS for LG to roll out full fledged OS updates to all variants. Takes like 6 months for that to happen. LG isn't going to give us 8.1, then turn around and start rolling out Pie.
[LG V30 Questions & Answers] BROKEN1981:
Pixel fanboys need the newest OS version anyways just to get the " latest " features people are all ready enjoying on other devices.

Though I don't understand why people buy a non Pixel and run a custom ROM. They essentially broke 99% of the features they just paid for.

For that they should just buy some cheap crap and then run a custom ROM.
[LG V30 Questions & Answers] Emu:
By the time they release Pie, Q will be out and Pie will feel old... LG can't do anything right.
[LG V30 Questions & Answers] cmrntnnr:
It pains me to be pessimistic, but I don't think LG will release Pie for the v30 at all, or if they do, it will be to some select models. Google's Android Enterprise agreement leaves a lot of room for interpretation by LG.

*Many v30's were originally released with Nougat so technically there has been a letter upgrade already.

*The Android Enterprise experience isn't specific about models. A literal reading suggests that the v30+ is not covered. It isn't region or carrier specific either.

https://androidenterprisepartners.withgoogle.com/device/#!/17

*Before you say I am wrong, I own an open market v30s. There have been no security updates whatsoever since its release. The v30s should fall under the v30 umbrella but if it does then LG is not in compliance with their Android Experience promise either by choice or incompetence. Sure, it can be upgraded by manually installing kdz's but that is not the same as an OTA.

Perhaps someone who knows more can clarify this matter. There is great developer action for the v30's and that is what will keep it up to date! It won't be LG.
[LG V30 Questions & Answers] ChazzMatt:
You bring up some good points but not correct here. The Android Enterprise Recommended agreement is for one LETTER update after on Android Enterprise Recommended list. And you can't be on the list unless on Oreo. LG got the V30 on the list due to the "impending" update to Oreo (at the time reported to be 8.1, but it was only 8.0). So, they still owe us the LETTER upgrade, which would be PIE. This is why we're not getting 8.1 because it's not required and would take too many resources away from giving us Pie.

This is also why the updates were very sparse BEFORE Oreo, but are now coming every couple of months -- because the Android Enterprise Recommended requires at least security updates every 90 days for 3 years. Once on Oreo that requirement kicked in.

https://www.android.com/enterprise/recommended/requirements/#knowledge-workers-devices

Just be careful not to confuse Android Enterprise devices with Android Enterprise Recommended. It's a higher tier program, with more benefits. And then even that is divided into "Knowledge Workers" and "Rugged". We fall into the Knowledge Workers phones.

https://www.android.com/enterprise/recommended/requirements/#knowledge-workers-devices.

But yes, technically Android Enterprise Recommended devices are also Android Enterprise devices. It's just the G7 is on the Android Enterprise list but is NOT on the Android Enterprise Recommended list. :p

This is your link:

https://androidenterprisepartners.withgoogle.com/device/#!/17

The 128GB covers the V30+. ;)

This is your link:

https://androidenterprisepartners.withgoogle.com/device/#!/17

So, no the V30S is probably not be covered under the Android Enterprise Recommended program, since you have the V30S with 6GB RAM. Also, if you remember LG treated the LG V30S like a completely different phone at launch -- which is why they got their own useless XDA forum -- but it's not, it's merely a V30+ with more RAM. It's still a JOAN device.

But luckily your V30S can install any US998 firmware, so you will also get PIE and any regular updates. Yes, you have to install them manually.
[LG V30 Questions & Answers] saintsimon:
The most disappointing part ist not the lack of Pie but the lack of bug fixes. Since they introduced Oreo on the V30, the only made some security updates every three months barely keeping their bare minimum commitment to Android Enterprise, but the bugs are untouched and VoLTE/VoWiFi are still simply unavailable.

The Bluetooth hickups and broken WiFi are still the same since Oreo came along. I have a 215 Mbps cable internet download speed. The dual stream V30 was my first handset to easily deliver that speed with my routers under Nougat, but since the introduction of Oreo it never got faster than 130 Mbps. Even my single stream Xperia XA2 is capable of fully achieving those 215 Mbps download on 5GHz ac.

We have a great piece of hardware, but despite the shiny new software center of LG, a barebone software support.
[LG V30 Questions & Answers] ChazzMatt:
I have no problem with Bluetooth. I use it every day. Make sure you're not trying to connect more than two Bluetooth devices at the same time.

People use VoLTE and VoWifi every day. You're acting like this phone doesn't have it. What carrier are you with? VoLTE has to be enabled on carrier side, it's not just hardware. All carrier-specifc V30/V30+ models have this feature, as does US998 on those carriers (except US998 on Sprint, which we have to fake Sprint into thinking it's LS998). Some telcos apparently charge OEMs for non - branded phones to have this VoLTE privelege, since they're not making money on the hardware sales. Blame the carriers for that, not LG who can't pay blackmail to every little carrier in the world. The carriers should be HELPING their customers, instead of trying to stick up LG.

LG has done bug fixes for the V30. For example, US998 20B has silent notifications fix. VS996 20D has maintenance fixes.
[LG V30 Questions & Answers] cmrntnnr:
Hey [MENTION=3250376]ChazzMatt[/MENTION], thank you for the clarifications and clearing up my misunderstandings.

LG has a strange way of handling their products and treating customers. The added complexity of so many products that are almost the same, releasing phones in rapid succession, and only providing softerware updates when forced. It seems like their goal is to anger customers and increase their own product development costs. At least they make great hardware.
[LG V30 Questions & Answers] ChazzMatt:
Right. There's no reason not to have regular updates for the V30S, since all the US998 updates are compatible. Just rename them and release as V30S! I don't understand why LG doesn't do that.
[LG V30 Questions & Answers] josemedina1983:
well back in the good old days you would buy a Nexus for the updates, before Samsung and lg would update their phones maybe once or twice if you lucky. Also back in the days updates were actually needed since android was polished yet in my opinion. Also guys would buy a GS1, GS2 and rooted to stock just because of the hardware or the AMOLED screens. Now I have no idea why people root phones.
[LG V30 Questions & Answers] ChazzMatt:
So I can be full Admin of my phone - - not the carrier, not the OEM. To actually be the owner of my phone. Otherwise I'm renting the phonr/device. Someone else is the real owner.

Sent via open market LG US998 V30/V30+
[LG V30 Questions & Answers] BROKEN1981:
I root for mods. Now custom ROM? Na, no point in killing my phone over some bs ROM. I love my stock features. Also the v30 camera is pretty tight.
[LG V30 Questions & Answers] ChazzMatt:
I'm still running rooted, stock firmware myself. Whereas with other phones (since 2010), I always ran custom ROMs -- especially with Moto Quark (Droid Turbo/Moto Maxx/Moto Turbo) and my Nexus 5 and Nexus 3.

I plan to try out [MENTION=9023361]Whiskeyomega[/MENTION]'s audio mods soon, and I'm sure there's tons of Magisk modules I don't even know about.

But for ME, root is important so that I totally control my own phone. Sure, some day phones may be locked down so much we won't be able to root -- but right now just to give that ownership right up without a fight is silly. The people who earnestly explain how you can do blah, blah, blah without root don't understand the point, and it really irritates me when they try to convince me I don't need root. I need root because it is MY phone. Period. :p

We got very lucky with the [MENTION=6158380]TxanMoe[/MENTION] WTF bootloader unlock exploit. I had jumped through the hoops of the US998 V30 official bootloader unlock (which LG never announced and never updated the website to easily use) for one of my V30 phones. However, my open market US998 V30+ -- bought from B&H Photo also -- was not eligible for reasons LG won't explain. Even with G7 and V40, seems LG has dropped "support" for all but European open market bootloader unlock -- probably due to U.S. carrier complaints?.

http://developer.lge.com/resource/mobile/RetrieveBootloader.dev?categoryId=CTULRS0703

The last officially supported North America device is the early 2017 G6. So, the V30 may be LAST LG flagship phone you can root without LG's approval using the European open market model.
[Wing, P4350 General] TheSlim529:
I typically get Tmo when I an here. Seems that it really likes grabbing some 'other' Operator here. How do I find out which one so I can possibly set it up so it shows properly. When I look to select operator manually it shows AT&T which is the one I am prolly getting and about 30 others. All of them look like they are Euro operators. I know I can use SunCom and AT&T( formally Cingular) without issues. I just don't want to end up getting pounded by Tmo like I did when I was in Alaska a few years back

I am running Aserg WWE9 6.1
[OnePlus 5 Questions & Answers] pandorra:
hey guys,

did a factory reset on my (rooted) OP5 yesterday, screen lock message activated ("found? call blabla ..") with my wives phone number in it, of course.

so, factory reset within OOS, booted TWRP, install newest OOS from zip, reboot. (just to clarify: no factory reset within TWRP!)

fresh new ROM though, no data, phone name back to default, everything fine - until i've edited the screen lock message:

my original/personal message from before still been there hence everything else was wiped....?!

someone may comment if it's a bug, possibly from OOS or even AOSP?

btw: wiped from TWRP then, message gone...
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Botty-Ivan:
So is there anyone who can port an AOSP 9 ROM for NEXUS 5, when Google publish the source online ?
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] edu24lal:
Doubt it, not even Oreo is stable enough
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Kotaless:
Maybe [MENTION=4473900]amaces[/MENTION] or [MENTION=2267583]nasty007[/MENTION] can manage to boot it but don't get your hopes up.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] DarkMaxOff:
almost all the Rom is stable, with the exception of Bluetooth.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] edu24lal:
I agree, except oreo roms are slow even with a custom kernel :(... Nougat still faster
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] DarkMaxOff:
CrDroid 4.4 with stock kernel very smooth and fast, but I changed kernel to Breakfast, my battery so weak
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] FirstEver:
Android 9.0 Pie on Nexus 5 - it's a matter of time! :)
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Aswin08:
Dirty Unicorns Oreo is quite stable n smooth for me.

So ofcourse Pie is very much possible even if it's not completely stable.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] metahex12:
I started syncing the source code. But i can't give eta or release, build date etc. My internet connection is slow.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Botty-Ivan:
But why there is no lineage os ?
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] metahex12:
I downloaded 60 percent of Android Pie source code. I hope i will build at evening. Probably it won't boot at first build. I will work on bugs etc. Don't wait me. It can take 1-2 weeks for a stable build.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Mr.FREE_Bird:
No that's not the reason, please educate yourself on the subject. The reason why the Nexus 5 doesn't have official support/builds of LineageOS 15.1 is because of some bugs that haven't been fixed. As long they don't get fixed there will be no official builds.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Mr.FREE_Bird:
I didn't mean to be hostile in any way I just wanted to get all speculation out of the way. I don't want people to get a wrong idea about why there are no official LineageOS builds. Was getting tired of the "is Bluetooth calling fixed" messages on threads of Oreo ROMs. You are right about the choice of ROMs but it's always nice to see some official support. But I do think Dev's will eventually drop support for this device, everything comes to an end so we will see less and less ROM's available for the Nexus 5 eventually as it get's older.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] metahex12:
I started compiling the source code. I am handling errors.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] metahex12:
I built it successfully. I will install. I hope it will boot. (folder name is false, don't mind it)

EDIT: Not booted. ROM is very buggy. I will work on it.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ewentualpl:
Try setting SELinux to permissive!

Also, could you share your build if that's not a problem for you?
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] metahex12:
Okay, i will upload it today for testers but there is no boot anim or adb (you can access partial logs from recovery). I am an Android Developer in a company. I can't work on it everytime. I will do my best in this weekend. (I am starting today)
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] metahex12:
It is already permissive. Problem is probably kernel and some SELinux policies.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] metahex12:
I found the problem in logcat.

Here:

<3>[ 2.598985] init: /init.rc: 65: invalid command 'load_system_props'
<3>[ 2.599110] init: could not import file '/init.recovery.logd.rc' from '/init.rc'
<3>[ 2.599252] init: could not import file '/init.recovery.vold_decrypt.rc' from '/init.rc'
<3>[ 2.599358] init: /init.recovery.hammerhead.rc: 17: invalid command 'ln'

I will try to fix it today. Then it will boot probably.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tdukazudon:
Please more logs
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] metahex12:
Here
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tdukazudon:
Thank you:)

---------- Post added at 12:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:59 AM ----------

Probably it is recovery’s dmesg
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] metahex12:
I can't access adb. TWRP gives two logs; recovery.log and dmesg.log.

---------- Post added at 03:54 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:53 PM ----------

ADB is not active at splash screen.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tdukazudon:
Getting logs from broken kernel is need to use UART.

https://xdaforums.com/nexus-7-2013/general/rd-nexus-7-uart-adapter-activation-t3325446

This method probably can use for hh
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Snekxs:
Can't wait to test this!!!
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] edu24lal:
I think android p is going to be more stable than oreo idk xd
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] metahex12:
It is not booting? It stucks at boot splash.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Snekxs:
Weird, if building aosp doesn't work can you try building https://github.com/PixelExperience-P/manifest
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] metahex12:
When i comment those lines, it will compile it successfully. But I think causes boot problem.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] M Asad Khilji:
You can do it Bro. Keep it up :good:
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] metahex12:
I am compiling a custom kernel which is doesn't include SELinux support. I hope it works.

EDIT: not worked.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Krizthian:
Many devs are right now syncing and building, it might happen sooner or later but I'm sure Nexus 5 will get Pie, but it's never good ask for ETA's.

Greetings ;)
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] M Asad Khilji:
Long live the Beast ;)

#Hammered #Nexus5
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] metahex12:
I downloaded lineage-16.0 source code. I am compiling it now. It is more easier than AOSP porting.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] M Asad Khilji:
Good Luck Bro ;)
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] metahex12:
Failed to read qcom,load-freq-tbl from device tree

In dmesg logs, most serious problem. ^

Can someone help me? [MENTION=5567986]P4Block[/MENTION] [MENTION=5451670]Krizthian[/MENTION]
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] hauckk@sfreserves.org:
you and tdukazudon are both working on lineage 16.0 for hammerhead perhaps you could work together ?

https://xdaforums.com/google-nexus-...fficial-lineageos-15-0-nexus5-t3711115/page25 post 242
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] metahex12:
Yes, we can.

[MENTION=7687042]tdukazudon[/MENTION] do u have a Telegram account? We can work there.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] droidbot1337:
Will the pie ROMs have NTFS/exFat support?? I can't find an Oreo ROM that does.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tdukazudon:
Yes.I have a Telegram account.If you want to know know my account,I'll send private message.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Aswin08:
Oneplus series phones recieved Pie ROMs including OnePlus One which has similar processor, also fully working.

So guessing Pie for Nexus 5 is very much possible soon.

https://xdaforums.com/oneplus-one/orig-development/rom-posp-v2-0-beta-t3830896
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] metahex12:
Good news

I managed to get bootanimation on AOSP 9.0 build.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Snekxs:
are you able to get it to boot fully ?
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] metahex12:
I am waiting... Probably it will enter bootloop. It is very normal in porting stage.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] metahex12:
I can access logs from ADB now.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ewentualpl:
That's great news!
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Rvarma:
Oh i cannot sleep now :eek: . Started hitting refresh repeatedly to see the successfully booted message.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] metahex12:
No, it is in bootloop. ROM has a camera error. I hope i will fix it soon. I am looking into OnePlus One - Android Pie kernel and device tree. Be patient guys.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ewentualpl:
As soon as you'll get it to bootable state share it, I'll be happy to test it out (my n5 isn't my daily driver, so it's ready)
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] + = Bunty = +:
Even I would be happy to test and provide you with the required logs to diagnose the issues. Please let us know when you get any positive results. We all are waiting to hear your successful boot.

You guys really deserve a lot of happiness as you are helping others plus making old devices feel new in this competitive world. Getting pie on a four year old beast would be an amazing experience.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] prashanthca:
I'm trying to do the same thing you are and I'm getting ERROR:6 while flashing the zip. Do you have any idea how to solve that?

Also, for the neverallow failures, did you just comment out the allow rules or did you add -zygote, -sysinit etc to to the existing neverallow rule?
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] + = Bunty = +:
Please try this if you think it may help!!

Please ensure that the partitions are formatted as ext4. Further, you may check the following guide to test error 6 issues:

https://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2066565

I do not know if it would be helpful; however, as you guys are making pie for our device, we would love to help you with anything that comes your way to achieve the successful P...pie boot on our beloved nexus 5. :)